Global Intellectual Property Academy (GIPA) Surveys, 15317-15319 [2014-06002]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 53 / Wednesday, March 19, 2014 / Notices
Scientific and Statistical Committee—8
a.m.
Salmon Advisory Subpanel—8 a.m.
Salmon Technical Team—8 a.m.
Enforcement Consultants—3 p.m.
Chair’s Reception—6 p.m.
Day 4—Sunday, April 6, 2014
California State Delegation—7 a.m.
Oregon State Delegation—7 a.m.
Washington State Delegation—7 a.m.
Groundfish Management Team—8 a.m.
Groundfish Advisory Subpanel—8 a.m.
Salmon Advisory Subpanel—8 a.m.
Salmon Technical Team—8 a.m.
Enforcement Consultants—As Needed
Day 5—Monday, April 7, 2014
California State Delegation—7 a.m.
Oregon State Delegation—7 a.m.
Washington State Delegation—7 a.m.
Coastal Pelagic Species Advisory
Subpanel—8 a.m.
Coastal Pelagic Species Management
Team—8 a.m.
Groundfish Advisory Subpanel—8 a.m.
Groundfish Management Team—8 a.m.
Salmon Advisory Subpanel—8 a.m.
Salmon Technical Team—8 a.m.
Enforcement Consultants—As Needed
Day 6—Tuesday, April 8, 2014
California State Delegation—7 a.m.
Oregon State Delegation—7 a.m.
Washington State Delegation—7 a.m.
Coastal Pelagic Species Advisory
Subpanel—8 a.m.
Coastal Pelagic Species Management
Team—8 a.m.
Groundfish Advisory Subpanel—8 a.m.
Groundfish Management Team—8 a.m.
Salmon Advisory Subpanel—8 a.m.
Salmon Technical Team—8 a.m.
Ecosystem Advisory Subpanel—1 p.m.
Enforcement Consultants—As Needed
Day 7—Wednesday, April 9, 2014
California State Delegation—7 a.m.
Oregon State Delegation—7 a.m.
Washington State Delegation—7 a.m.
Ecosystem Advisory Subpanel—8 a.m.
Groundfish Advisory Subpanel—8 a.m.
Groundfish Management Team—8 a.m.
Salmon Technical Team—8 a.m.
Enforcement Consultants—As Needed
sroberts on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Day 8—Thursday, April 10, 2014
California State Delegation—7 a.m.
Oregon State Delegation—7 a.m.
Washington State Delegation—7 a.m.
Ecosystem Advisory Subpanel—8 a.m.
Additional detail on agenda items,
Council action, and meeting rooms, is
described in Agenda Item A.4, Proposed
Council Meeting Agenda, and will be in
the advance April 2014 briefing
materials and posted on the Council
Web site (www.pcouncil.org).
Although non-emergency issues not
contained in this agenda may come
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:28 Mar 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
before this Council for discussion, those
issues may not be the subject of formal
Council action during these meetings.
Council action will be restricted to those
issues specifically listed in this notice
and any issues arising after publication
of this notice that require emergency
action under Section 305(c) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act,
provided the public has been notified of
the Council’s intent to take final action
to address the emergency.
Special Accommodations
These meetings are physically
accessible to people with disabilities.
Requests for sign language
interpretation or other auxiliary aids
should be directed to Carolyn Porter at
(503) 820–2280 at least 5 days prior to
the meeting date.
Dated: March 14, 2014.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–06039 Filed 3–18–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
Global Intellectual Property Academy
(GIPA) Surveys
ACTION:
Proposed collection; comment
request.
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), as part of its
continuing efforts to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on this extension of a
continuing information collection, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13 (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before May 19, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Email: InformationCollection@
uspto.gov. Include ‘‘0651–0065
comment’’ in the subject line of the
message.
• Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records
Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450,
Alexandria, VA 22313–1450.
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15317
should be directed to the attention of J.
David Binsted, Program Manager, Global
Intellectual Property Academy, United
States Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–
1450; by telephone at 571–272–1500; or
by email at james.binsted@uspto.gov.
Additional information about this
collection is also available at https://
www.reginfo.gov under ‘‘Information
Collection Review.’’
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) surveys
international and domestic participants
of the USPTO’s Global Intellectual
Property Academy (GIPA) training
programs to obtain feedback from the
participants on the effectiveness of the
various services provided to them in the
training programs. GIPA was established
in 2006 to offer training programs on
enforcement of intellectual property
rights, patents, trademarks, and
copyrights. The training programs
offered by GIPA are designed to meet
the specific needs of foreign government
officials (including judges, prosecutors,
police, customs officials, patent,
trademark, and copyright officials, and
policy makers) concerning various
intellectual property topics, such as
global intellectual property rights
protection and enforcement and
strategies to handle the protection and
enforcement issues in their respective
countries.
This collection contains three
surveys: Pre-program, post-program, and
alumni. The pre-program survey is
designed to obtain the background and
experience of a participant and is
delivered to the participant prior to
their arrival for a GIPA training
program. The post-program survey is
used to analyze the overall effectiveness
of the program and is conducted at the
conclusion of the training program. The
alumni survey is used to determine the
value of the GIPA training program on
the future job performance of the
participant. The data obtained from
these participation satisfaction surveys
will be used to evaluate the percentage
of foreign officials trained by GIPA who
have initiated or implemented a positive
intellectual property change in their
organization; the percentage of foreign
officials trained by GIPA who increased
their expertise in intellectual property;
the satisfaction with the intellectual
property program, and the value of the
experience as it relates to future job
performance. The data received from
these surveys will also be used to help
the USPTO meet organizational
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
15318
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 53 / Wednesday, March 19, 2014 / Notices
performance and accountability goals
through the following legislative
mandates: Government Performance and
Results Act of 1993 (GPRA), the
President’s Management Agenda (PMA),
and the Office of Management and
Budget’s (OMB) Program Assessment
Rating Tool (PART). These surveys also
support various business goals
developed by the USPTO to fulfill
customer service and performance goals,
to assist the USPTO in strategic
planning for future initiatives, to verify
existing service standards, and to
establish new ones.
The GIPA surveys are voluntary
surveys. The USPTO expects to hire a
survey contractor to conduct these
surveys. The surveys will primarily be
conducted electronically, but the
USPTO will also have paper surveys to
mail to those participants who have
poor Internet connectivity or have
access restrictions. In-person surveys
may also be conducted. Survey
participants will be able to access the
online surveys through links provided
to them in email invitations. The links
provided in these emails are
individualized links that are uniquely
tied to the survey participants so
passwords, user ids, or usernames are
not needed to access the surveys.
Information collected from the
surveys will be kept private, to the
extent provided by law. Responses to
the pre-program, post-program, and
alumni surveys can be linked to the
participants and to the demographic
data collected from them during the
various GIPA training programs.
However, the actual data recorded from
the surveys will not be directly linked
to the participants. Any data linking the
individual to their responses will not be
retained after the data has been
aggregated. The USPTO will have
limited access to the data. The only data
that the USPTO can access will be the
aggregated survey data and the
frequency of the responses; the agency
will not be able to view the individual
responses or the data related to the
survey. The survey contractor will have
access to individual survey responses
for analysis purposes only and will only
report the aggregated data and the
frequency of the responses. The USPTO
does not intend to collect any personal
identifying data from the participants
and intends to maintain the contact
information for the participants in a
separate file from the quantitative data.
II. Method of Collection
The surveys will primarily be online
surveys but the USPTO will also have
paper surveys to mail to those
participants who have poor Internet
connectivity or have access restrictions.
The surveys will also be distributed by
email. In-person surveys may also be
conducted.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651–0065.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households and businesses or other for
profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
650 responses per year. The USPTO
estimates that approximately 350 of the
surveys will be filed electronically.
Estimated Time per Response: The
USPTO estimates that it takes the public
approximately 15 minutes (0.25 hours)
to complete the surveys in this
collection. This includes the time to
gather the necessary information,
respond to the survey, and submit it to
the USPTO. The USPTO calculates that,
on balance, it takes the same amount of
time to complete and submit the
surveys, whether the participant
completes the survey in paper or
electronically.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Burden Hours: 163 hours per year.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Cost Burden: $28,688 per year. The
USPTO expects that the audience for the
GIPA training programs will typically
consist of high-ranking government
officials, judges, lawyers, examiners,
and others. The USPTO estimates that
roughly 20% of the attendees fall into
the high-ranking categories, while the
rest make up 80% of the attendees. The
USPTO estimates that the hourly rate for
20% of the attendees would be roughly
equivalent to the professional hourly
rate of $389, while the rest would be
roughly equivalent to the paraprofessional hourly rate of $122. Using
these U.S. hourly rates, the USPTO
estimates a professional hourly rate of
$78 and a paraprofessional hourly rate
of $98, for a total hourly rate of $176.
Please note that since individuals with
varying job titles and pay grades
typically attend the GIPA training
programs, the USPTO is currently
unable to derive a concise international
labor rate for these individuals. Due to
this and the fact that the training is
conducted in the United States, the
USPTO is using the corresponding
United States pay rates to calculate the
hourly labor rates. If the agency can
obtain more concise hourly labor rate
data for these individuals, these rates
will be used to calculate the respondent
burden in the future. The USPTO
estimates that the total respondent cost
burden for this collection is $28,688 per
year.
Estimated time
for response
(minutes)
Item
Estimated annual
responses
Estimated annual
burden hours
15
15
15
15
15
15
100
100
100
100
100
150
25
25
25
25
25
38
Total ..........................................................................................................................
sroberts on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Pre-Program Survey ........................................................................................................
Electronic Pre-Program Survey .......................................................................................
Post-Program Survey ......................................................................................................
Electronic Post-Program Survey .....................................................................................
Alumni Survey ..................................................................................................................
Electronic Alumni Survey .................................................................................................
............................
650
163
Estimated Total Annual Non-hour
Respondent Cost Burden: $0 per year.
There are no maintenance, operation,
capital start-up, or recordkeeping costs
associated with this information
collection. These surveys do not have
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:28 Mar 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
filing or other fees associated with them.
The USPTO expects to conduct these
surveys electronically using a survey
tool and may also conduct in-person
surveys. In either case, there will be no
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
postage costs associated with these
surveys.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 53 / Wednesday, March 19, 2014 / Notices
included in the request for OMB
approval. All comments will become a
matter of public record.
The USPTO is soliciting public
comments to: (a) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) Evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) Minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Dated: March 14, 2014.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–06002 Filed 3–18–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark
Office
[Docket No. PTO–C–2014–0017]
at https://www.uspto.gov/about/nmti/
index.jsp.
The Chief
Financial Officer and Assistant
Secretary of Commerce for
Administration, with the concurrence of
the General Services Administration,
renewed the Charter for the National
Medal of Technology and Innovation
Nomination Evaluation Committee
(NMTI Committee) on February 28,
2014. The NMTI Committee was
established in accordance with the
Federal Advisory Committee Act and
provides advice to the Secretary of
Commerce regarding recommendations
of nominees for the National Medal of
Technology and Innovation (Medal).
The duties of the NMTI Committee are
solely advisory in nature. Nominations
for this Medal are solicited through an
open, competitive, and nationwide call
for nominations, and the NMTI
Committee members are responsible for
reviewing the nominations received.
The NMTI Committee members are
distinguished experts in the private and
public sectors with experience in, or an
understanding of, the promotion of
technology, technological innovation,
and/or the development of technological
manpower. The NMTI Committee
evaluates the nominees and forwards its
recommendations, through the Under
Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property, to the Secretary of Commerce
who, in turn, forwards her
recommendations for the Medal to the
President.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: March 12, 2014.
Michelle K. Lee,
Deputy Undersecretary of Commerce for
Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of
the United States Patent and Trademark
Office.
National Medal of Technology and
Innovation Nomination Evaluation
Committee Charter Renewal
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
[FR Doc. 2014–06015 Filed 3–18–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
The Chief Financial Officer
and Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Administration, with the concurrence of
the General Services Administration,
renewed the Charter for the National
Medal of Technology and Innovation
Nomination Evaluation Committee on
February 28, 2014.
DATES: The Charter for the National
Medal of Technology and Innovation
Nomination Evaluation Committee was
renewed on February 28, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Palafoutas, Program Manager, National
Medal of Technology and Innovation
Program, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, 600 Dulany Street,
Alexandria, VA 22314; telephone (571)
272–9821 or by electronic mail at nmti@
uspto.gov. Information is also available
sroberts on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:28 Mar 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark
Office
[Docket No. PTO–P–2014–0013]
Request for Comments and Notice of
Roundtable Event on the Use of
Crowdsourcing and Third-Party
Preissuance Submissions To Identify
Relevant Prior Art
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting;
request for comments.
AGENCY:
The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (Office) is hosting a
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15319
roundtable event to solicit public
opinions regarding the use of
crowdsourcing and third-party
preissuance submissions to identify
relevant prior art and enhance the
quality of examination as well as the
quality of issued patents. Members of
the public are invited to participate. The
roundtable will provide a forum for an
informal discussion of the topics
identified in this notice. Written
comments in response to these topics
also are requested.
Event: The roundtable event will
be held on April 10, 2014, beginning at
12:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT),
and ending at 5:00 p.m. EDT.
Registration: Registration to attend the
roundtable in person or via webcast is
required by April 4, 2014. Additionally,
members of the public who wish to
participate in the roundtable as a
speaker must do so by request in writing
no later than March 27, 2014. See the
‘‘Event Registration Information’’
section of this notice for additional
details on how to register.
Comments: Any member of the
public, whether attending the
roundtable or not, may submit written
comments on any of the topics
identified in part III of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section,
below, for consideration by the Office.
Written comments must be received on
or before April 25, 2014, to ensure
consideration. Persons submitting
written comments should note that the
Office will not provide a response
because this notice is not a notice of
proposed rulemaking. Written
comments should be sent by electronic
mail addressed to
CrowdsourcingRoundtable2014@
uspto.gov. Comments also may be
submitted by postal mail addressed to:
Mail Stop Comments—Patents,
Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box
1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–1450,
marked to the attention of Nicole Dretar
Haines. Although comments may be
submitted by postal mail, the Office
prefers to receive comments by
electronic mail.
Comments will be available for public
inspection via the Office’s Internet Web
site at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/
init_events/index.jsp, and at the Office
of the Commissioner for Patents, located
in Madison East, Tenth Floor, 600
Dulany Street, Alexandria, VA 22314,
upon request. Because comments will
be available for public inspection,
information that is not desired to be
made public, such as an address or
phone number, should not be included
in the comments.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 53 (Wednesday, March 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15317-15319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06002]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
Global Intellectual Property Academy (GIPA) Surveys
ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as part
of its continuing efforts to reduce paperwork and respondent burden,
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on this extension of a continuing information
collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public
Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before May 19, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Email: InformationCollection@uspto.gov. Include ``0651-
0065 comment'' in the subject line of the message.
Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records Officer, Office of the
Chief Information Officer, United States Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
should be directed to the attention of J. David Binsted, Program
Manager, Global Intellectual Property Academy, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450; by
telephone at 571-272-1500; or by email at james.binsted@uspto.gov.
Additional information about this collection is also available at
https://www.reginfo.gov under ``Information Collection Review.''
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) surveys
international and domestic participants of the USPTO's Global
Intellectual Property Academy (GIPA) training programs to obtain
feedback from the participants on the effectiveness of the various
services provided to them in the training programs. GIPA was
established in 2006 to offer training programs on enforcement of
intellectual property rights, patents, trademarks, and copyrights. The
training programs offered by GIPA are designed to meet the specific
needs of foreign government officials (including judges, prosecutors,
police, customs officials, patent, trademark, and copyright officials,
and policy makers) concerning various intellectual property topics,
such as global intellectual property rights protection and enforcement
and strategies to handle the protection and enforcement issues in their
respective countries.
This collection contains three surveys: Pre-program, post-program,
and alumni. The pre-program survey is designed to obtain the background
and experience of a participant and is delivered to the participant
prior to their arrival for a GIPA training program. The post-program
survey is used to analyze the overall effectiveness of the program and
is conducted at the conclusion of the training program. The alumni
survey is used to determine the value of the GIPA training program on
the future job performance of the participant. The data obtained from
these participation satisfaction surveys will be used to evaluate the
percentage of foreign officials trained by GIPA who have initiated or
implemented a positive intellectual property change in their
organization; the percentage of foreign officials trained by GIPA who
increased their expertise in intellectual property; the satisfaction
with the intellectual property program, and the value of the experience
as it relates to future job performance. The data received from these
surveys will also be used to help the USPTO meet organizational
[[Page 15318]]
performance and accountability goals through the following legislative
mandates: Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA), the
President's Management Agenda (PMA), and the Office of Management and
Budget's (OMB) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART). These surveys
also support various business goals developed by the USPTO to fulfill
customer service and performance goals, to assist the USPTO in
strategic planning for future initiatives, to verify existing service
standards, and to establish new ones.
The GIPA surveys are voluntary surveys. The USPTO expects to hire a
survey contractor to conduct these surveys. The surveys will primarily
be conducted electronically, but the USPTO will also have paper surveys
to mail to those participants who have poor Internet connectivity or
have access restrictions. In-person surveys may also be conducted.
Survey participants will be able to access the online surveys through
links provided to them in email invitations. The links provided in
these emails are individualized links that are uniquely tied to the
survey participants so passwords, user ids, or usernames are not needed
to access the surveys.
Information collected from the surveys will be kept private, to the
extent provided by law. Responses to the pre-program, post-program, and
alumni surveys can be linked to the participants and to the demographic
data collected from them during the various GIPA training programs.
However, the actual data recorded from the surveys will not be directly
linked to the participants. Any data linking the individual to their
responses will not be retained after the data has been aggregated. The
USPTO will have limited access to the data. The only data that the
USPTO can access will be the aggregated survey data and the frequency
of the responses; the agency will not be able to view the individual
responses or the data related to the survey. The survey contractor will
have access to individual survey responses for analysis purposes only
and will only report the aggregated data and the frequency of the
responses. The USPTO does not intend to collect any personal
identifying data from the participants and intends to maintain the
contact information for the participants in a separate file from the
quantitative data.
II. Method of Collection
The surveys will primarily be online surveys but the USPTO will
also have paper surveys to mail to those participants who have poor
Internet connectivity or have access restrictions. The surveys will
also be distributed by email. In-person surveys may also be conducted.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651-0065.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Individuals or households and businesses or other
for profit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 650 responses per year. The USPTO
estimates that approximately 350 of the surveys will be filed
electronically.
Estimated Time per Response: The USPTO estimates that it takes the
public approximately 15 minutes (0.25 hours) to complete the surveys in
this collection. This includes the time to gather the necessary
information, respond to the survey, and submit it to the USPTO. The
USPTO calculates that, on balance, it takes the same amount of time to
complete and submit the surveys, whether the participant completes the
survey in paper or electronically.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Burden Hours: 163 hours per year.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost Burden: $28,688 per year.
The USPTO expects that the audience for the GIPA training programs will
typically consist of high-ranking government officials, judges,
lawyers, examiners, and others. The USPTO estimates that roughly 20% of
the attendees fall into the high-ranking categories, while the rest
make up 80% of the attendees. The USPTO estimates that the hourly rate
for 20% of the attendees would be roughly equivalent to the
professional hourly rate of $389, while the rest would be roughly
equivalent to the para-professional hourly rate of $122. Using these
U.S. hourly rates, the USPTO estimates a professional hourly rate of
$78 and a paraprofessional hourly rate of $98, for a total hourly rate
of $176. Please note that since individuals with varying job titles and
pay grades typically attend the GIPA training programs, the USPTO is
currently unable to derive a concise international labor rate for these
individuals. Due to this and the fact that the training is conducted in
the United States, the USPTO is using the corresponding United States
pay rates to calculate the hourly labor rates. If the agency can obtain
more concise hourly labor rate data for these individuals, these rates
will be used to calculate the respondent burden in the future. The
USPTO estimates that the total respondent cost burden for this
collection is $28,688 per year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated time
Item for response Estimated annual Estimated annual
(minutes) responses burden hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-Program Survey........................................ 15 100 25
Electronic Pre-Program Survey............................. 15 100 25
Post-Program Survey....................................... 15 100 25
Electronic Post-Program Survey............................ 15 100 25
Alumni Survey............................................. 15 100 25
Electronic Alumni Survey.................................. 15 150 38
-----------------------------------------------------
Total................................................. ................ 650 163
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual Non-hour Respondent Cost Burden: $0 per
year. There are no maintenance, operation, capital start-up, or
recordkeeping costs associated with this information collection. These
surveys do not have filing or other fees associated with them. The
USPTO expects to conduct these surveys electronically using a survey
tool and may also conduct in-person surveys. In either case, there will
be no postage costs associated with these surveys.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or
[[Page 15319]]
included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will become a
matter of public record.
The USPTO is soliciting public comments to: (a) Evaluate whether
the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the accuracy of
the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (c) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
to be collected; and (d) Minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of responses.
Dated: March 14, 2014.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-06002 Filed 3-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P