[EPA-R07-OAR-2013-0817; FRL-9908-02-Region 7] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri, 15017-15019 [2014-05821]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 52 / Tuesday, March 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R07–OAR–2013–0817; FRL– 9908–02–Region 7] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the Missouri State Implementation Plan (SIP) which were submitted to EPA on July 12, 2012. This submission revises two heavy duty diesel vehicle idling rules that are applicable in Kansas City and St. Louis. This revision provides clarity to the rules in the applicability section by listing owners and operators of passenger load/unload locations where commercial, public and institutional heavy-duty vehicles load or unload passengers. The affected parties were unintentionally omitted from the applicability section of the rule even though they are required to comply with the rule in the general provisions section. These revisions do not have an adverse affect on air quality. EPA’s approval of these SIP revisions is being done in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: This direct final rule will be effective May 19, 2014, without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by April 17, 2014. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– OAR–2013–0817, by one of the following methods: 1. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. 2. Email: higbee.paula@epa.gov. 3. Mail or Hand Delivery: Paula Higbee, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219. Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2013– 0817. EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:18 Mar 17, 2014 Jkt 232001 the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through www.regulations.gov or email information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219. The Regional Office’s official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30 excluding Federal holidays. The interested persons wanting to examine these documents should make an appointment with the office at least 24 hours in advance. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula Higbee, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219, or at 913–551– 7028, or by email at higbee.paula@ epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by addressing the following: I. What is being addressed in this document? PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 15017 II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met? III. What action is EPA taking? I. What is being addressed in this document? EPA is taking direct final action to amend Missouri’s SIP by approving the state’s requests to amend 10 CSR 10– 2.385 and 10 CSR 10–5.385, Control of Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicle Idling Emissions. Specifically, Missouri is inserting additional clarifying language to subsection, (1)(C) to both rules, as follows, ‘‘This regulation applies to owners and operators of load/unload locations where commercial, public, and institutional heavy duty diesel vehicles load or unload passengers.’’ The purpose of this revision is to clarify the rule by listing owners and operators of passenger load/unload locations where commercial, public and institutional heavy-duty vehicles load or unload passengers. The affected parties were unintentionally omitted from the applicability section of the rule even though they are required to comply with the rule in the general provisions section. EPA has determined that these changes will not relax the SIP or adversely impact air emissions. II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met? The state submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. In addition, as explained above, the revision meets the substantive SIP requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and implementing regulations. III. What action is EPA taking? We are publishing this rule without a prior proposed rule because we view this as a noncontroversial action and anticipate no adverse comment. However, in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of today’s Federal Register, we are publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposed rule to approve the SIP and operating permits revision if adverse comments are received on this direct final rule. We will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. For further information about commenting on this rule, see the ADDRESSES section of this document. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that this direct final rule will not take effect. We will address all public E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM 18MRR1 15018 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 52 / Tuesday, March 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations comments in any subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–4); • Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 19, 2014. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules section of today’s Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: March 3, 2014. Karl Brooks, Regional Administrator, Region 7. 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: PART 52—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et. seq. Subpart AA—Missouri 2. In § 52.1320 the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising the entries for 10–2.385 and 10–5.385 to read as follows: ■ § 52.1320 Identification of plan. (c) * * * EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS Missouri citation State effective date Title EPA approval date Explanation Missouri Department of Natural Resources sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES * * * * * * Chapter 2 Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Rules Specific to the Kansas City Metropolitan Area * 10–2.385 .......... * VerDate Mar<15>2010 * * Control of Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicle Idling Emissions. * 7/30/2012 * * 3/18/2014 [insert FR page number where the document begins]. * * * * * Chapter 5 Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Rules Specific to the St. Louis Metropolitan Area 17:18 Mar 17, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM 18MRR1 * * * 15019 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 52 / Tuesday, March 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS—Continued State effective date Missouri citation Title * 10–5.385 .......... * * Control of Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicle Idling Emissions. * * * * * * * * [FR Doc. 2014–05821 Filed 3–17–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Parts 52 and 81 [EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0498; FRL–9908–05– Region–3] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; West Virginia; Approval of Redesignation Requests of the West Virginia Portion of the Steubenville-Weirton, OH–WV Nonattainment Area for the 1997 Annual and 2006 24-Hour Fine Particulate Matter Standards Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving the State of West Virginia’s requests to redesignate to attainment the West Virginia portion of the Steubenville-Weirton, OH–WV nonattainment area (hereafter ‘‘the Steubenville-Weirton Area’’ or ‘‘the Area’’) for both the 1997 annual and the 2006 24-hour fine particulate matter (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS or standards). EPA is also approving as a revision to the West Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP), the associated maintenance plans to show maintenance of the 1997 annual and the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS through 2025 for the West Virginia portion of the Area. West Virginia’s maintenance plans include insignificance findings for the mobile source contribution of PM2.5 and nitrogen oxides (NOX) emissions to the West Virginia portion of the Area for both the 1997 annual and 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standards, which EPA agrees with and is approving for transportation conformity purposes. In addition, EPA is approving the 2008 emissions inventory for the West Virginia portion of the Area for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA has taken a separate rulemaking action to approve the redesignation of the Ohio portion of the sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:18 Mar 17, 2014 * 7/30/2012 Jkt 232001 * EPA approval date Explanation * * 3/18/2014 [insert FR page number where the document begins]. * * * * Steubenville-Weirton Area for the 1997 emissions inventory for PM2.5, sulfur annual and 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. dioxide (SO2) and NOX for the 2006 24These actions are being taken under the hour PM2.5 NAAQS, which WVDEP Clean Air Act (CAA). supplemented on June 24, 2013 to include emissions of volatile organic DATES: This final rule is effective on April 17, compounds (VOC) and ammonia. The Steubenville-Weirton Area is comprised 2014. of Brooke County and Hancock County ADDRESSES: EPA has established a in West Virginia (the West Virginia docket for this action under Docket ID Number EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0498. All portion of the Area), and Jefferson County in Ohio. documents in the docket are listed in On December 9, 2013 (78 FR 73769), the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the electronic docket, EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) for the State of West some information is not publicly Virginia. In the NPR, EPA proposed available, i.e., confidential business approval of West Virginia’s information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. redesignation requests for its portion of the Steubenville-Weirton Area for the Certain other material, such as 1997 annual and 2006 24-hour PM2.5 copyrighted material, is not placed on NAAQS. EPA also proposed approval of the Internet and will be publicly the associated maintenance plans as SIP available only in hard copy form. revisions for the 1997 annual and 2006 Publicly available docket materials are 24-hour PM2.5 standards, which available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for included insignificance determinations for PM2.5 and NOx for both standards for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air Protection purposes of transportation conformity. Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Also, EPA proposed approval of the Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 2008 comprehensive emissions Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. inventory for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 Copies of the State submittal are standard to meet the requirement of available at the West Virginia section 172(c)(3) of the CAA. EPA Department of Environmental proposed to find that the Area continues Protection, Division of Air Quality, 601 to attain both standards. 57th Street SE., Charleston, West In the NPR, EPA addressed the effects Virginia 25304. of two decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Columbia (DC Circuit or Court): The ´ Emlyn Velez-Rosa, (215) 814–2038, or Court’s August 21, 2012 decision to by email at velez-rosa.emlyn@epa.gov. vacate and remand to EPA the CrossSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: State Air Pollution Control Rule I. Background (CSAPR); and the Court’s January 4, On April 13, 2012 and June 8, 2012, 2013 decision to remand to EPA two the West Virginia Department of final rules implementing the 1997 Environmental Protection (WVDEP) annual PM2.5 standard. Specific details formally submitted two separate of West Virginia’s submittals and the requests to redesignate the West rationale for EPA’s proposed actions are Virginia portion of the Steubenvilleexplained in the NPR and will not be Weirton Area from nonattainment to restated here. No public comments were attainment for the 1997 annual and the received on the NPR. 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS, II. Final Action respectively. Each submittal included a EPA is taking final actions on the maintenance plan as a SIP revision to redesignations requests and SIP ensure continued attainment of the revisions submitted by the State of West standards throughout the West Virginia Virginia on April 13, 2012 and June 8, portion of the Area over the next 10 2012 for the 1997 annual and 2006 24years. The June 8, 2012 submittal also hour PM2.5 standards. First, EPA is includes a 2008 comprehensive PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM 18MRR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 52 (Tuesday, March 18, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15017-15019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05821]



[[Page 15017]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52


[EPA-R07-OAR-2013-0817; FRL-9908-02-Region 7] Approval and 
Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct 
final action to approve revisions to the Missouri State Implementation 
Plan (SIP) which were submitted to EPA on July 12, 2012. This 
submission revises two heavy duty diesel vehicle idling rules that are 
applicable in Kansas City and St. Louis. This revision provides clarity 
to the rules in the applicability section by listing owners and 
operators of passenger load/unload locations where commercial, public 
and institutional heavy-duty vehicles load or unload passengers. The 
affected parties were unintentionally omitted from the applicability 
section of the rule even though they are required to comply with the 
rule in the general provisions section. These revisions do not have an 
adverse affect on air quality. EPA's approval of these SIP revisions is 
being done in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act 
(CAA).

DATES: This direct final rule will be effective May 19, 2014, without 
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by April 17, 2014. 
If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal of 
the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that 
the rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2013-0817, by one of the following methods:
    1. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for 
submitting comments.
    2. Email: higbee.paula@epa.gov.
    3. Mail or Hand Delivery: Paula Higbee, Environmental Protection 
Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, 
Lenexa, Kansas 66219.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-
2013-0817. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included 
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at 
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, 
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential 
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is 
restricted by statute. Do not submit through www.regulations.gov or 
email information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected. 
The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, 
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information 
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email 
comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your 
email address will be automatically captured and included as part of 
the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on 
the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that 
you include your name and other contact information in the body of your 
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your 
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for 
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic 
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of 
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the 
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some 
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information 
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such 
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy 
form. Publicly available docket materials are available either 
electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the 
Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 
11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219. The Regional Office's 
official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30 
excluding Federal holidays. The interested persons wanting to examine 
these documents should make an appointment with the office at least 24 
hours in advance.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula Higbee, Environmental Protection 
Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, 
Lenexa, Kansas 66219, or at 913-551-7028, or by email at 
higbee.paula@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' or 
``our'' refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by 
addressing the following:

I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
III. What action is EPA taking?

I. What is being addressed in this document?

    EPA is taking direct final action to amend Missouri's SIP by 
approving the state's requests to amend 10 CSR 10-2.385 and 10 CSR 10-
5.385, Control of Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicle Idling Emissions. 
Specifically, Missouri is inserting additional clarifying language to 
subsection, (1)(C) to both rules, as follows, ``This regulation applies 
to owners and operators of load/unload locations where commercial, 
public, and institutional heavy duty diesel vehicles load or unload 
passengers.'' The purpose of this revision is to clarify the rule by 
listing owners and operators of passenger load/unload locations where 
commercial, public and institutional heavy-duty vehicles load or unload 
passengers. The affected parties were unintentionally omitted from the 
applicability section of the rule even though they are required to 
comply with the rule in the general provisions section. EPA has 
determined that these changes will not relax the SIP or adversely 
impact air emissions.

II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?

    The state submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP 
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also 
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. In 
addition, as explained above, the revision meets the substantive SIP 
requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and implementing 
regulations.

III. What action is EPA taking?

    We are publishing this rule without a prior proposed rule because 
we view this as a noncontroversial action and anticipate no adverse 
comment. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's Federal 
Register, we are publishing a separate document that will serve as the 
proposed rule to approve the SIP and operating permits revision if 
adverse comments are received on this direct final rule. We will not 
institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties 
interested in commenting must do so at this time. For further 
information about commenting on this rule, see the ADDRESSES section of 
this document. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a 
timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that 
this direct final rule will not take effect. We will address all public

[[Page 15018]]

comments in any subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule.

Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and 
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state 
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as 
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), 
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in 
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct 
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by May 19, 2014. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor 
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may 
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or 
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are 
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of 
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules 
section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate 
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can 
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed 
rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to 
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen 
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: March 3, 2014.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et. seq.

Subpart AA--Missouri

0
2. In Sec.  52.1320 the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising 
the entries for 10-2.385 and 10-5.385 to read as follows:


Sec.  52.1320  Identification of plan.

    (c) * * *

                                        EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      State
    Missouri citation              Title         effective date   EPA approval  date          Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Missouri Department of Natural Resources
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  * * * * * * *
  Chapter 2 Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Rules Specific to the Kansas City Metropolitan Area
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
10-2.385.................  Control of Heavy           7/30/2012  3/18/2014 [insert FR  .........................
                            Duty Diesel Vehicle                   page number where
                            Idling Emissions.                     the document
                                                                  begins].
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 0* * * * * * *
   Chapter 5 Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Rules Specific to the St. Louis Metropolitan Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

[[Page 15019]]

 
                                                  * * * * * * *
10-5.385.................  Control of Heavy           7/30/2012  3/18/2014 [insert FR  .........................
                            Duty Diesel Vehicle                   page number where
                            Idling Emissions.                     the document
                                                                  begins].
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-05821 Filed 3-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P