Hazardous Materials: Adoption of Certain Special Permits and Competent Authorities Into Regulations, 15033-15046 [2014-05630]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 52 / Tuesday, March 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Measure ID
Achievement
threshold
Description
15033
Benchmark
Outcome Measures
PSI–90 ........
Patient safety for selected indicators (composite) .........................................................................
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.778, Medical Assistance
Program)
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.773, Medicare—Hospital
Insurance; and Program No. 93.774,
Medicare—Supplementary Medical
Insurance Program)
Dated: March 6, 2014.
Jennifer M. Cannistra,
Executive Secretary to the Department,
Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2014–05836 Filed 3–17–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 107, 171, 172, 173, 175
and 178
[Docket No. PHMSA–2011–0158 (HM–233C)]
RIN 2137–AE82
I. Executive Summary
II. Background
III. Overview of Amendments
IV. List of Commenters
V. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
Hazardous Materials: Adoption of
Certain Special Permits and
Competent Authorities Into
Regulations
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration is
amending the Hazardous Materials
Regulations (HMR) to adopt provisions
contained in certain widely used or
longstanding special permits and certain
competent authority approvals
(‘‘approvals’’) that have established
safety records. Special permits allow a
company or individual to package or
ship a hazardous material in a manner
that varies from the regulations
provided an equivalent level of safety is
maintained. An approval is a written
consent (document) required under an
international standard (i.e.,
International Maritime Dangerous
Goods (IMDG) Code, International Civil
Aviation Organization’s Technical
Instructions for the Safe Transport of
Dangerous Goods by Air (ICAO TI)), or
is specifically provided for in the HMR,
and is issued by the Associate
Administrator for Hazardous Materials
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Mar 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
Safety. These revisions are intended to
provide wider access to the regulatory
flexibility offered in special permits and
approvals and eliminate the need for
numerous renewal requests, reducing
paperwork burdens and facilitating
commerce while maintaining an
appropriate level of safety.
DATES: This regulation is effective April
17, 2014. The incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in the rule
is approved by the Director of the
Federal Register as of April 17, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steven Andrews, Office of Hazardous
Materials Safety, Standards and
Rulemaking Division, (202) 366–8553,
or, Diane LaValle, Office of Hazardous
Materials Safety, Approvals and Permits
Division, (202) 366–4535, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (PHMSA), 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary
PHMSA is amending the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR
parts 171–180) to adopt several long
standing special permits and competent
authority approvals into the HMR. The
identified special permits and
competent authority approvals have a
long history of safety. Special permits
allow a company or individual to
package or ship a hazardous material in
a manner that varies from the HMR
provided an equivalent level of safety is
maintained. A competent authority (CA)
approval is a written consent
(document) required under an
international standard (i.e.,
International Maritime Dangerous
Goods (IMDG) Code or International
Civil Aviation Organization’s Technical
Instructions for the Safe Transport of
Dangerous Goods by Air (ICAO TI)) and
is issued by the Associate Administrator
for Hazardous Materials Safety.
In 2009, an audit of the Special
Permits program by the Office of the
Inspector General identified a need for
an ongoing review of all open special
permits with an outlook towards
identifying those that should be made
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
0.616248
0.449988
part of the HMR to reduce the overall
economic burden to both affected
industry and the government. Three
rulemakings, HM–233A; PHMSA–2009–
0289 (75 FR 27205), HM–245; PHMSA–
2010–0017 (76 FR 5483), and HM–216B;
PHMSA–2010–0018 (77 FR 37962) have
successfully codified certain special
permits into the HMR. These revisions
provide wider access to the regulatory
flexibility offered in special permits and
eliminate the need for numerous
renewal requests, thus reducing
paperwork burdens and facilitating
commerce while maintaining an
appropriate level of safety.
This Final Rule, HM–233C, continues
this initiative by adopting several other
long-standing special permits and
competent authority approvals with
proven safety records into the HMR. The
special permits affected by the final rule
represent variances from current
regulations on topics categorized as
follows:
• Limited quantities of liquids and
solids containing ethyl alcohol.
• Transportation of solid coal tar
pitch compounds.
• Transportation of certain ammonia
solutions in UN1H1 and UN6HA1
drums.
• Transportation of spent bleaching
earth.
• Requalification of non-DOT
specification cylinders in life-saving
appliances.
• Use of regulated medical waste
containers displaying alternative
markings.
• Adoption of special permits to
harmonize with FAA Modernization
and Reform Act of 2012.
The economic impact of the final rule
can thus be summarized as follows:
NET COST: $0. Currently, industry
must apply for a special permit in order
to ship materials as described in this
final rule. Adoption of these special
permits into the HMR will reduce the
burden on industry by no longer
requiring industry to apply for a special
permit to ship these materials.
Therefore, this final rule does not
impose any new costs to industry.
NET BENEFITS: $9,900 per year.
(Averaged over 10 years, at a 7% annual
discount rate.)
In addition to general positive
economic impacts noted above, this
final rule will eliminate the need for
E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM
18MRR1
15034
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 52 / Tuesday, March 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
numerous party-to applications and
renewal requests. PHMSA estimates that
the adoption of these special permits
and competent authority approvals will
result in 140 fewer responses per year.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
II. Background
PHMSA is amending the HMR to
adopt certain requirements based on
existing special permits (SPs) issued by
PHMSA under 49 CFR Part 107, Subpart
B (§§ 107.101 to 107.127) and certain
approvals issued under 49 CFR Part 107,
Subpart D (§§ 107.401 to 107.405). A
special permit sets forth alternative
requirements—or a variance—to the
requirements in the HMR in a way that
achieves a safety level at least equal to
the safety level required under the
regulations or that is consistent with the
public interest. See 49 CFR 107.105(d).
Congress expressly authorized DOT to
issue these variances in the Hazardous
Materials Transportation Act (US Code:
49 U.S.C. 5109–5127) as amended. An
approval is a written consent
(document) required under an
international standard (i.e., IMDG Code,
ICAO TI), or is authorized in a specific
section of the HMR and is issued by the
Associate Administrator for Hazardous
Materials Safety.
Special Permits
The HMR generally are performanceoriented regulations, which provide the
regulated community with some
flexibility in meeting safety
requirements. Even so, not every
transportation situation can be
anticipated and built into the
regulations. Innovation is the strength of
our economy and the hazardous
materials community is a leader in
developing new materials and
technologies and innovative ways of
moving materials. Special permits
enable the hazardous materials industry
to quickly, effectively, and safely
integrate new products and technologies
into production and the transportation
stream. Thus, special permits provide a
mechanism for testing new
technologies, promoting increased
transportation efficiency and
productivity, and ensuring global
competitiveness. Hazardous materials
transported under the terms of a special
permit must achieve a level of safety at
least equal to the level of safety
achieved when transported under the
HMR or that is consistent with the
public interest. Implementation of new
technologies and operational techniques
may enhance safety. Special permits
also reduce the volume and complexity
of the HMR by addressing unique or
infrequent transportation situations that
would be difficult to accommodate in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Mar 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
regulations intended for use by a wide
range of shippers and carriers.
PHMSA conducts ongoing reviews of
special permits to identify widely used
and longstanding special permits with
established safety records for conversion
into regulations of broader applicability.
Converting these special permits into
regulations reduces paperwork burdens
and facilitates commerce while
maintaining an acceptable level of
safety. Additionally, adoption of special
permits as rules of general applicability
provides wider access to the benefits
and regulatory flexibility of the
provisions granted in the special
permits. Factors that influence whether
or not a specific special permit is a
candidate for regulatory action include:
the safety record for hazardous materials
transported or operations conducted
under a special permit; potential broad
application of a special permit;
suitability of provisions in the special
permit for adoption into the HMR;
rulemaking activity in related areas; and
agency priorities. During PHMSA’s
analysis of the suitability for adoption of
each special permit, PHMSA performed
a search of incident reports from the
previous 10 years to determine whether
there were any safety issues related to
each special permit.
The special permits addressed in this
final rule have hundreds of party status
holders. Party status is granted to a
person who intends to offer for
transportation or transport a hazardous
material or perform an activity subject
to the HMR in the same manner as the
original applicant.
These amendments to the HMR will
eliminate the need for approximately
464 current holders to reapply for
renewal of 20 special permits. Adoption
of special permits into the HMR
eliminates significant paperwork
burdens. As a condition of a special
permit issued by PHMSA and
depending on the provisions of the
special permit, a copy of each special
permit must be: (1) maintained at each
facility where an operation is conducted
or a packaging is manufactured under a
special permit; (2) maintained at each
facility where a package is offered or reoffered for transportation under a
special permit; and (3) in some cases,
carried aboard each transport vehicle
used to transport a hazardous material
under a special permit.
Competent Authority Approvals
The HMR also allows for PHMSA to
grant approvals to companies or
organizations for the manufacturing of
packages in accordance with the HMR.
PHMSA has identified approvals that
have an established safety record to
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
adopt into the HMR. The approvals
PHMSA identified for conversion into
the HMR have an established safety
record and warrant adoption into
regulations of broader applicability.
Converting these approvals into
regulations reduces paperwork burdens
and facilitates commerce while
maintaining an acceptable level of
safety. A copy of each approval must be
maintained at each facility where a
packaging is manufactured under this
approval. The adoption of component
authority approvals eliminates the
renewal and maintenance requirements
that were previously required.
Additionally, adoption of approvals as
rules of general applicability provides
wider access to the benefits and
regulatory flexibility of the provisions
granted in the approvals. Factors that
influence whether a specific approval is
a candidate for regulatory action
include: the safety record, whether
broadly applicable, related rulemakings,
and agency priorities.
Part 171
Section 171.7
Section 171.7 provides a listing of all
standards incorporated by reference into
the HMR. For this rulemaking, PHMSA
is revising the entry for the Compressed
Gas Association (CGA) Pamphlet C–6,
Standards for Visual Inspection of Steel
Compressed Gas Cylinders, 1993 to add
a reference to § 172.102, (Special
Provisions). This standard has a wellestablished and documented safety
history; its revision will maintain the
high safety standard currently achieved
under the HMR.
III. Overview of Amendments
PHMSA would like to note that SP
13124 was accidently mentioned in this
section in the NPRM. It was not
PHMSA’s intention to mention this
special permit in this rulemaking.
Special permit 13124 is no longer
needed based on a final rule published
in the Federal Register on October 1,
2003 [68 FR 44992] under docket
number RSPA–2002–13658 (HM–215E).
The special permits and competent
authorities mentioned in this
rulemaking are available for viewing on
PHMSA’s Web site at https://
phmsa.dot.gov/hazmat/permitsapprovals. In this Final Rule, PHMSA is
revising the HMR by adopting the
following special permits and
competent authority approvals:
Special Permits
• DOT–SP 9275—Authorization for
the transportation in commerce of
certain limited quantities of liquids and
E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM
18MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 52 / Tuesday, March 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
solids containing ethyl alcohol and
exempt these shipments from the
provisions of the HMR. PHMSA is
modifying this adoption to limit
containers using this exception to 8
fluid ounces and eliminating the need
for marking the words ‘‘contains ethyl
alcohol on the package.’’ Packages
shipping between 8 fluid ounces and 1
gallon under this section are required to
place the words ‘‘contains ethyl
alcohol’’ on the package.
• DOT–SP 11263—Authorization for
the transportation of Class 9 solid coal
pitch compounds in non-specification
open-top or closed-top sift proof metal
cans or fiber drums.
• DOT–SP 11836—Authorization for
the transportation in commerce of
UN1H1 and UN6HA1 drums containing
ammonia solutions that do not meet
certain requirements contained in
§§ 173.24 and 173.24a.
• DOT–SP 12134—Authorization of
exceptions for spent bleaching earth
(Division 4.2 PG III)
• DOT–SP 12825—Authorization to
transport Life-saving appliances, selfinflating, containing non-specification
steel cylinders between a vessel and an
authorized facility for servicing.
• DOT–SP 14479—Authorization for
the use of alternative shipping names
and marking requirements for regulated
medical wastes.
• Special Permits for Harmonization
with the ‘‘FAA Modernization and
Reform Act of 2012’’—PHMSA is adding
an exception to the HMR for Oxygen
cylinders and other Oxidizing cylinders
transported aboard aircraft within the
state of Alaska. This language will make
several existing special permits no
longer necessary.
This includes the following special
permits: 14903, 14908, 15062, 15075,
15076, 15077, 15078, 15079, 15092,
15094, 15095, and 15143.
Approvals
• CA2005120010—Authorization to
manufacture, mark, and sell UN4G
combination packagings with outer
fiberboard boxes and with inner
fiberboard components that have basis
weights that vary by not more than plus
or minus 5% from the measured basis
weight in the initial design qualification
test report.
• CA20060660005—Authorization to
manufacture, mark, and sell UN5M1
and UN5M2 multi-wall paper bags with
individual paper wall basis weights that
vary by plus or minus 5% from the
nominal basis weights reported in the
initial design qualification test report.
• CA2006060006—Authorization to
manufacture, mark, and sell UN4G
combination packagings with outer
fiberboard components that have
individual containerboard basis weights
15035
that vary by plus or minus 5% from the
nominal basis weight reported in the
initial design.
• CA2006010012—Authorization to
manufacture, mark, and sell UN4G
combination packagings with outer
fiberboard boxes and with inner
fiberboard components that have
individual containerboard basis weight
that vary by plus or minus 5% from the
nominal basis weight reported in the
initial design qualification test report.
Revision to Approvals Renewals
• PHMSA is revising this section to
allow for approval holders applying for
a timely renewal to continue using their
approval after the expiration date if they
apply within 60 days of the expiration
dates.
IV. List of Commenters
In response to the NPRM, PHMSA
received 36 comments. A majority of
these commenters were in support of
the Fibre Box Associations comments to
increase the packaging variation of +/¥
5% to +/¥ 10%. Other commenters
mostly supported modifying the
proposed adoption of SP 9275 to not
include the requirement to mark
packages with ‘‘contains ethyl alcohol.’’
The commenters and the docket number
were the comments are located are
listed below:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Commenter
Docket ID No.
American Trucking Association (ATA) ............................................................................................................................
Association of Hazmat Shippers ....................................................................................................................................
Atlas Container ...............................................................................................................................................................
Batavia Container, Inc. ...................................................................................................................................................
Bates Container ..............................................................................................................................................................
Bemis Company .............................................................................................................................................................
California Box .................................................................................................................................................................
Council on Safe Transportation of Hazardous Articles, Inc ...........................................................................................
Dangerous Goods Advisory Council ..............................................................................................................................
Exopack, LLC .................................................................................................................................................................
Fibre Box Association .....................................................................................................................................................
Georgia Pacific ...............................................................................................................................................................
Great Northern Corporation ............................................................................................................................................
Green Bay Packaging .....................................................................................................................................................
Greif, LLC .......................................................................................................................................................................
Healthcare Waste Institute .............................................................................................................................................
Hood Packaging Corporation .........................................................................................................................................
International Paper .........................................................................................................................................................
International Vessel Operators Dangerous Goods Association Inc (IVODGA) .............................................................
Langston Companies, Inc. ..............................................................................................................................................
Lawrence Paper Company .............................................................................................................................................
Lonnie Jaycox .................................................................................................................................................................
Mall City Containers .......................................................................................................................................................
National Association of Chemical Distributors ...............................................................................................................
Niagara Sheets LLC .......................................................................................................................................................
Norampac .......................................................................................................................................................................
Packaging Corporation of America .................................................................................................................................
Packaging Services ........................................................................................................................................................
Paper Shipping Sack Manufacturers’ Association (PSSMA) .........................................................................................
Porto Packaging .............................................................................................................................................................
Pro-Pack Testing ............................................................................................................................................................
SMC Packaging Group ...................................................................................................................................................
Stericycle, Inc. ................................................................................................................................................................
United Parcel Service (UPS) ..........................................................................................................................................
PHMSA–2011–0158–0019
PHMSA–2011–0158–0031
PHMSA–2011–0158–0037
PHMSA–2011–0158–0012
PHMSA–2011–0158–0011
PHMSA–2011–0158–0034
PHMSA–2011–0158–0025
PHMSA–2011–0158–0029
PHMSA–2011–0158–0030
PHMSA–2011–0158–0009
PHMSA–2011–0158–0004
PHMSA–2011–0158–0022
PHMSA–2011–0158–0006
PHMSA–2011–0158–0008
PHMSA–2011–0158–0017
PHMSA–2011–0158–0028
PHMSA–2011–0158–0014
PHMSA–2011–0158–0010
PHMSA–2011–0158–0026
PHMSA–2011–0158–0036
PHMSA–2011–0158–0015
PHMSA–2011–0158–0002
PHMSA–2011–0158–0021
PHMSA–2011–0158–0032
PHMSA–2011–0158–0027
PHMSA–2011–0158–0020
PHMSA–2011–0158–0024
PHMSA–2011–0158–0005
PHMSA–2011–0158–0018
PHMSA–2011–0158–0016
PHMSA–2011–0158–0007
PHMSA–2011–0158–0023
PHMSA–2011–0158–0003
PHMSA–2011–0158–0033
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Mar 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM
18MRR1
15036
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 52 / Tuesday, March 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Commenter
Docket ID No.
Viking Industries, Inc. .....................................................................................................................................................
Werthan Packaging Inc. .................................................................................................................................................
PHMSA–2011–0158–0013
PHMSA–2011–0158–0035
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
V. Summary Review of Amendments
and Response to Comments
A. Consumer Products Containing
Liquids and Solids Containing Ethyl
Alcohol
DOT–SP 9275 authorizes the
transportation in commerce of certain
beverages, foods, cosmetics, medicines,
medical screening solutions and
concentrates containing ethyl alcohol
and exempts these shipments from the
provisions of HMR. This special permit
has been in effect since at least 1985 and
had been utilized by hundreds of
companies. However, on August 18,
2011 PHMSA found that SP 9275 did
not provide a level of safety at least
equivalent to the HMR due to the lack
of hazard communications markings.
This was discovered during PHMSA’s
review of all special permits as required
by the DOT Office of the Inspector
General (OIG) to ensure all special
permits met an equivalent level of
safety. PHMSA issued a revised version
of SP 9275 to address the lack of hazard
communication markings on August 18,
2011.
In response to the NPRM, PHMSA
received several comments on how to
adopt this special permit. Several
commenters opposed the requirement
for the shipments under the proposed
section to require the words ‘‘contains
ethyl alcohol’’ on the outside of the
package. After careful consideration of
these comments, PHMSA is adopting
the special permit without requiring the
words ‘‘contains ethyl alcohol’’ for
shipments of ethyl alcohol in quantities
not exceeding 8 fluid ounces in glass
containers and not exceeding 16 fluid
ounces in non-glass containers. For
shipments of ethyl alcohol (not more
than 70% concentration) in quantities
greater than 8 fluid ounces in glass
containers and greater than 16 ounces in
non-glass containers, the words
‘‘contains ethyl alcohol’’ are required on
the outside of the package. Shipments of
ethyl alcohol in quantities of 8 ounces
or less are not required to be marked
with the words ‘contains ethyl
alcohol’.’’ (This would apply to both
greater than and less than 70%
concentration.)
Therefore, PHMSA is adopting the
terms of SP 9275 as revised on August
18, 2011 with modification. PHMSA is
adopting this special permit to allow
certain limited quantities of ethyl
alcohol to be excepted from the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Mar 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
applicable provisions of the HMR that
require the packages to be marked with
the words ‘‘Contains Ethyl Alcohol.’’
PHMSA is adding § 173.150(g) to allow
for the shipment of limited quantities of
ethyl alcohol of not exceeding 8 fluid
ounces in glass containers and not
exceeding 16 fluid ounces for non-glass
containers without the term ‘‘contains
ethyl alcohol’’ marked on the outside of
the package. Packages containing 8 fluid
ounces to 1 gallon shipped under this
section require the marking ‘‘contains
ethyl alcohol’’ on the outside of the
package.
B. Transportation of Solid Coal Tar
Pitch Compounds.
DOT–SP 11263 authorizes the
transportation of solid coal tar pitch
compounds, Class 9, in open-top and
closed-top sift-proof metal cans or fiber
drums. The special permit has been in
effect since 1994 and has been utilized
by 5 holders with an acceptable safety
performance. In addition, PHMSA has
no reported incidents over the past 10
years involving this special permit. The
American Trucking Association (ATA)
supports adoption of this special permit
in response to the NPRM. PHMSA
received no negative comments
regarding this special permit in the
NPRM.
Therefore, PHMSA is adopting the
terms of DOT–SP 11263 into the HMR
by amending the entry in § 172.101, The
Hazardous Materials Table (HMT), for
Environmentally hazardous substances,
solids, n.o.s., UN 3077, by adding a new
Special Provision N91 in Column 7. In
addition, in § 172.102 new Special
Provision N91 is added in appropriate
sequence specifically authorizing the
use of a non-DOT specification siftproof, non-bulk, metal can with or
without lid, or a non-DOT specification
sift-proof, non-bulk fiber drum, with or
without lid. The fiber drum is required
to be fabricated with a three ply wall,
as a minimum. The coal tar pitch
compound must remain in a solid mass
during transportation.
C. Transportation of Certain Ammonia
Solutions in UN1H1 Drums, UN3H1
Jerricans, and UN6HA1 Composite
Packagings
DOT–SP 11836 authorizes the
transportation of specific ammonia
solutions in specification UN1H1
drums, UN3H1 jerricans, and UN6HA1
composite packagings that do not meet
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the provisions in §§ 173.24(g) and
173.24a(b)(2). Specific operational
controls are required in lieu of
compliance with these two
requirements. This special permit has
been in effect since 1997 and has been
utilized by at least 61 holders with an
acceptable safety performance. In
addition, PHMSA has no reported
incidents over the past 10 years
involving this special permit. American
Trucking Association (ATA) supports
adoption of this special permit in
response to the NPRM. The National
Association of Chemical Distributors
supports adoption of this special permit
into the HMR. PHMSA received no
negative comments regarding this
special permit in the NPRM.
Therefore, PHMSA is adopting the
terms of DOT–SP 11836 into the HMR
by amending the entry in the HMT for
‘‘Ammonia solutions, relative density
between 0.880 and 0.957 at 15 degrees
C in water, with more than 10 percent
but not more than 35 percent ammonia,
UN 2672’’, by adding a new Special
Provision 336 in Column 7. In addition,
in § 172.102 new Special Provision 336
is added in appropriate sequence
specifically authorizing the use of DOT
UN1H1 drums, UN3H1 jerricans, and
UN6HA1 composite packagings which
meet the requirements of Part 178 of the
HMR at the Packing Group I or II
performance level except that the
packagings do not meet the venting
requirements in § 173.24(g) and the
hydrostatic pressure test marking
specified in § 173.24a(b)(4).
Transportation of these packages also
requires the door of each van trailer to
be marked with ‘‘Warning trailer may
contain chemical vapor. Do not enter
until vapors have dissipated.’’ The
driver of the transport vehicle and the
consignee(s) must be trained not to enter
the transport vehicle until the ammonia
vapors have dissipated, and the
emergency response information on the
hazardous materials shipping paper
must indicate that the vehicle may
contain ammonia vapors.
D. Transportation of Spent Bleaching
Earth
DOT–SP 12134 authorizes the
transportation of spent bleaching earth
as a Division 4.2, solid, PG III, exempt
from the provisions of the HMR, except
as specifically required by the special
permit. Packagings authorized under the
E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM
18MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 52 / Tuesday, March 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
special permit are non-specification,
sift-proof dump or hopper type vehicles,
and sift-proof roll-on/roll-off bulk bins.
All authorized packaging must be
covered by a tarpaulin, metal cover, or
equivalent means during transportation.
The special permit also includes
specific operational controls, including:
the temperature of the spent bleaching
earth may not exceed 55 °C at the time
it is offered for transportation and any
time during transportation; drivers must
be specifically trained in handling and
responding to emergency incidents
involving the spent bleaching earth; and
transport vehicles must be marked in
accordance with § 172.302(a). This
special permit has been in effect since
1999 and has been utilized by at least
27 holders with an acceptable safety
performance. In addition, PHMSA has
no reported incidents over the past 10
years involving this special permit.
PHMSA received no comments
regarding this special permit in the
NPRM.
Therefore, PHMSA is adopting the
terms of DOT–SP 12134 into the HMR
by amending the entry in the HMT for
‘‘self-heating solid, organic, n.o.s. (spent
bleaching earth), UN 3088’’, by adding
a new Special Provision, B116 in
Column 7. In addition, in § 172.102 new
Special Provision B116 is added in
appropriate sequence specifically
authorizing the use of non-specification,
sift-proof dump or hopper type motor
vehicles, and sift-proof roll-on/roll-off
bulk bins, which must be covered by a
tarpaulin, metal cover, or equivalent
means. The material also is subject to
operational controls, including not
exceeding a temperature of 55°C (130
°F) during transportation, not exceeding
a transportation time of 24 hours, and
drivers transporting spent bleaching
earth must be trained in the properties
and hazards of the spent bleaching earth
and the actions required to mitigate the
self-heating properties of the material
that may occur during the
transportation.
E. Requalification of non-DOT
Specification Cylinders in Life-Saving
Appliances
DOT–SP 12825 authorizes the
transport between a vessel and a U.S.
Coast Guard approved inflatable life raft
servicing facility of life-saving
appliances, self- inflating, containing
non-DOT specification steel cylinders
for the purpose of the servicing of such
life-saving appliances. Specific
operational controls are specified in the
below listed Special Provision. This
special permit has been in effect since
2001 and has been utilized by at least
54 holders with acceptable safety
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Mar 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
performance. In addition, PHMSA has
no reported incidents since 2001
involving this special permit. PHMSA
received a comment from the
International Vessel Operators
Dangerous Goods Association, Inc.
(IVODGA) supporting adoption of SP
12825 into the HMR. PHMSA did not
receive any negative comments in
response to the NPRM.
Therefore, PHMSA is adopting the
terms of DOT–SP 12825 into the HMR
by revising the entry in the HMT for
Life-saving appliances, self-inflating,
UN 2990, by adding a new Special
Provision 338 in Column 7. In addition,
in § 172.102, new Special Provision 338
is added in appropriate sequence
requiring that Life-saving appliances,
self-inflating, UN 2990 being shipped
between a vessel and a U.S. Coast Guard
approved life raft servicing facility only
be subject to the requirements of this
special provision. A material meeting
the requirements of this special
provision is not otherwise be subject to
the HMR.
F. Use of Regulated Medical Waste
Containers Displaying Alternative
Markings
DOT–SP 14479 authorizes the
continued use of regulated medical
waste containers manufactured before
October 1, 2006 and marked with an
alternative shipping name for UN 3291,
‘‘Regulated medical waste, n.o.s.’’ It also
allows for orientation arrows that
deviate from the prescribed color
specification in the HMR. This special
permit has been in effect since 2007 and
has been utilized by at least 22 holders.
In addition, PHMSA has no reported
incidents since 2007 involving this
special permit. PHMSA received
comments from the Healthcare Waste
Institute and Stericycle Inc. supporting
adoption of this special permit. PHMSA
received no negative comments
regarding adoption of this special
permit.
Therefore, PHMSA is adopting the
terms of DOT–SP 14479 into the HMR
by amending the entry in the HMT for
Regulated Medical Waste, n.o.s., UN
3088, by adding a new Special
Provision, 337 in Column 7. Special
Provision 337 allows for the use of
regulated waste containers marked with
the alternative shipping name of
Regulated medical waste, UN3291 and
black or white orientation arrows that
deviate from the prescribed
specifications in § 172.312(a)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15037
G. Adoption of Oxygen Generator
Special Permits to Harmonize With FAA
Modernization and Reform Act of 2012
Section 824 of the FAA
Modernization and Reform Act of 2012
includes a provision that allows for
exceptions for cylinders of compressed
oxygen or other oxidizing gases
transported in the State of Alaska
aboard aircraft. By adopting this
statutory exception into the HMR, the
following special permits will no longer
be necessary: 14903, 14908, 15062,
15075, 15076, 15077, 15078, 15079,
15092, 15094, 15095, and 15143. These
special permits all provide exceptions
for the transportation of Oxygen and
other Division 2.2 Oxidizing gases for
transportation aboard aircraft in the
State of Alaska. PHMSA received no
comments regarding this special permit
in the NPRM. Therefore, PHSMA is
adopting the terms of these special
permits in § 175.34.
H. Competent Authority CA2005120010
for Approval of Equivalent Packagings
This approval authorizes the
manufacturing, marking, and selling of
UN4G combination packagings with
outer fiberboard boxes and with inner
fiberboard components that have basis
weights that vary by not more than plus
or minus 5% from the measured basis
weight in the initial design qualification
test report. This approval was issued in
2009 and has demonstrated an
acceptable safety performance. PHMSA
has no reported incidents involving this
approval. PHMSA received several
comments in support of comments
made by the Fibre Box Association to
increase the variation from plus or
minus 5% to plus or minus 10%.
However, PHMSA does not have the
historical data to support an increase in
this variation to plus or minus 10%.
Therefore, PHMSA is adopting the terms
of CA2005120010 as proposed into the
HMR in § 178.516(b)(7).
I. Competent Authority CA2006060005
for Approval of Equivalent Packagings
This approval authorizes the
manufacture, mark, and sale of UN5M1
and UN5M2 multi-wall paper bags with
individual paper wall basis weights that
vary by not more than plus or minus 5%
from the nominal basis weights reported
in the initial design qualification test
report. This approval was issued in
2009 and has demonstrated an
acceptable safety performance. PHMSA
has no reported incidents involving this
approval. PHMSA received several
comments in support of comments
made by the Fibre Box Association to
increase the variation from plus or
E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM
18MRR1
15038
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 52 / Tuesday, March 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
minus 5% to plus or minus 10%.
However, PHMSA does not have the
historical data to support an increase in
this variation to plus or minus 10%.
Therefore, PHMSA is adopting the terms
of CA2006060005 in § 178.521(b)(4).
J. Competent Authority CA2006060006
for Approval of Equivalent Packagings
This approval authorizes the
manufacture, mark, and sale of UN4G
combination packagings with outer
fiberboard components that have
individual containerboard basis weights
that vary by not more than plus or
minus 5% from the nominal basis
weight reported in the initial design.
This approval was issued in 2009 and
has demonstrated an acceptable safety
performance. PHMSA received several
comments in support of comments
made by the Fibre Box Association to
increase the variation from plus or
minus 5% to plus or minus 10%.
However, PHMSA does not have the
historical data to support an increase in
this variation to plus or minus 10%.
Therefore, PHMSA is adopting the terms
of CA2006060006 in § 178.516(b)(7).
K. Competent Authority CA2006010012
for Approval of Equivalent Packagings
This competent authority authorizes
the manufacture, mark, and sale of
UN4G combination packagings with
outer fiberboard boxes and with inner
fiberboard components that have
individual containerboard basis weight
that vary by not more than plus or
minus 5% from the nominal basis
weight reported in the initial design
qualification test report. This approval
was issued in 2006 and has
demonstrated an acceptable safety
performance. PHMSA received several
comments in support of comments
made by the Fibre Box Association to
increase the variation from plus or
minus 5% to plus or minus 10%.
However, PHMSA does not have the
historical data to support an increase in
this variation to plus or minus 10%.
Therefore, PHMSA is adopting the terms
of CA2006010012 in § 178.516(b)(7).
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
L. Revision of § 107.705(c) for Renewing
Approvals
PHMSA is revising this section to
allow approval holders applying for a
renewal to continue using their
approval after the expiration date if they
apply at least 60 days before the
expiration date. PHMSA did not receive
any comments on this proposal and,
therefore, it will be adopted as proposed
in the NPRM.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Mar 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
V. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
A. Statutory/Legal Authority for This
Rulemaking
This Final Rule is published under
the authority of 49 U.S.C. 5103(b) which
authorizes the Secretary to prescribe
regulations for the safe transportation,
including security, of hazardous
material in intrastate, interstate, and
foreign commerce. 49 U.S.C. 5117(a)
authorizes the Secretary of
Transportation to issue a special permit
from a regulation prescribed in 5103(b),
5104, 5110, or 5112 of the Federal
Hazardous Materials Transportation
Law to a person transporting, or causing
to be transported, hazardous material in
a way that achieves a safety level at least
equal to the safety level required under
the law, or consistent with the public
interest, if a required safety level does
not exist. This final rule amends the
regulations by adopting provisions from
certain widely used and longstanding
special permits that have established a
history of safety and which may,
therefore, be converted into the
regulations for general use.
B. Executive Order 12866, 13563, 13610
and DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures
This final rule is considered a nonsignificant regulatory action under
section 3(f) and was reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). This final rule is considered a
non-significant rule under the
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
order issued by the Department of
Transportation [44 FR 11034]. Executive
Order 13563 is supplemental to and
reaffirms the principles, structures, and
definitions governing regulatory review
that were established in Executive Order
12866 Regulatory Planning and Review
of September 30, 1993. By building off
of each other, these two Executive
Orders 12866 and 13563 require
agencies to regulate in the ‘‘most costeffective manner,’’ to make a ‘‘reasoned
determination that the benefits of the
intended regulation justify its costs,’’
and to develop regulations that ‘‘impose
the least burden on society.’’
Executive Order 13610 (Identifying
and Reducing Regulatory Burdens)
reaffirmed the goals of Executive Order
13563 (Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review) issued January 18,
2011, and Executive Order 12866
(Regulatory Planning and Review)
issued September 30, 1993. Executive
Order 13610 directs agencies to
prioritize ‘‘those initiatives that will
produce significant quantifiable
monetary savings or significant
quantifiable reductions in paperwork
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
burdens while protecting public health,
welfare, safety, and our environment.’’
Executive Order 13610 further instructs
agencies to give consideration to the
cumulative effects of their regulations,
including cumulative burdens, and
prioritize reforms that will significantly
reduce burdens.
In this final rule, PHMSA is amending
the HMR to adopt alternatives this
agency has permitted under widely used
and longstanding special permits and
approvals with established safety
records that we have determined meet
the safety criteria for inclusion in the
HMR. Adoption of these special permits
and approvals into regulations of
general applicability provides shippers
and carriers with additional flexibility
to comply with established safety
requirements, thereby reducing
transportation costs and increasing
productivity. In addition, the final rule
reduces the paperwork burden on
industry and this agency resulting from
putting an end to the need for renewal
applications for special permits. Taken
together, the provisions of this final rule
promotes the continued safe
transportation of hazardous materials
while reducing transportation costs for
the industry and administrative costs for
the agency.
The impact of this final rule is
presumed to be minor as no new costs
are imposed upon any stakeholders and
those that currently hold special permits
and CAs will find some relief from
regulatory review for current practices.
This final rule makes provisions that are
currently approved in certain special
permits available to all businesses
operating in the U.S. without needing to
submit party-to special permit
applications to PHMSA, and current
permit holders will no longer need
renewals. Over the past decade,
approximately 464 companies have
applied for and/or renewed the special
permits included in this final rule.
Many of these special permits have had
positive economic impacts by allowing
companies to be accepted from
requirements in the HMR when
shipping certain quantities/types of
materials or by allowing the use of less
expensive non-specification packages
when certain provisions are met. It is
difficult to quantify the savings these
special permits have allowed, but it
should be noted that these savings are
extended to other firms that would
make use of the provisions once
adopted into regulations. PHMSA
calculates that this rulemaking results in
a paperwork reduction that, on average,
saves each applicant $39.50. PHMSA
estimates that over a 10-year period
there will be an estimated benefit total
E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM
18MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 52 / Tuesday, March 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
totaling $18,328 affecting approximately
140 entities. In accordance with the
Federal hazardous materials law (49
U.S.C. 5101 et seq.), initial issuances of
special permits are for two years and
can be renewed for four years thereafter.
Thus, over 10 years, a special permit
would on average be renewed twice for
a total benefit of between $43,000 and
$47,000. These figures are discounted
annually by 3 and 7 percent to reflect
the time value of money.
This final rule adopts four approvals
into the HMR. This allows
manufacturers of affected hazardous
materials packaging to continue
manufacturing packages without the
need to renew their approvals. Adoption
of the four approvals results in a onetime total economic benefit of $158. The
renewal cycle for approvals can vary
based on the applicant needs and
regulatory authority, but are typically
renewed every five years. At both 3 and
7 percent annual discount, this yields
over $270 in benefits. Total benefits
represent a small but positive sum
(between $46,000 and $52,000) over 10
years affecting approximately 140
entities.
C. Executive Order 13132
This final rule was analyzed in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13132 (‘‘Federalism’’). This final rule
preempts state, local and Indian tribe
requirements but does not create any
regulation that has substantial direct
effects on the states, the relationship
between the national government and
the states, or the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various
levels of governments. Therefore, the
consultation and funding requirements
of Executive Order 13132 do not apply.
Federal hazardous material
transportation law, 49 U.S.C. 5101–
5128, contains an express preemption
provision (49 U.S.C. 5125(b))
preempting state, local and Indian tribe
requirements on certain covered
subjects. Covered subjects are:
(1) The designation, description, and
classification of hazardous materials;
(2) The packing, repacking, handling,
labeling, marking, and placarding of
hazardous materials;
(3) The preparation, execution, and
use of shipping documents related to
hazardous materials and requirements
related to the number, contents, and
placement of those documents;
(4) The written notification,
recording, and reporting of the
unintentional release in transportation
of hazardous materials; or
(5) The designing, manufacturing,
fabricating, inspecting, marking,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Mar 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
maintaining, reconditioning, repairing,
or testing a package, container or
packaging component that is
represented, marked, certified, or sold
as qualified for use in transporting
hazardous material in commerce.
This final rule addresses covered
subject items (2), (3), and (5) and would
preempt any State, local, or Indian tribe
requirements not meeting the
‘‘substantively the same’’ standard.
Federal hazardous materials
transportation law provides at 49 U.S.C.
5125(b)(2) that if PHMSA issues a
regulation concerning any of the
covered subjects, PHMSA must
determine and publish in the Federal
Register the effective date of Federal
preemption. The effective date may not
be earlier than the 90th day following
the date of issuance of the final rule and
not later than two years after the date of
issuance. The effective date of federal
preemption will be 90 days from
publication of this final rule in this
matter in the Federal Register.
D. Executive Order 13175
This final rule was analyzed in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13175 (‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’).
Because this final rule does not have
tribal implications and does not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian tribal governments, the funding
and consultation requirements of
Executive Order 13175 do not apply.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act, Executive
Order 13272, and DOT Procedures and
Policies
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires an agency to
review regulations to assess their impact
on small entities. An agency must
conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis
unless it determines and certifies that a
rule is not expected to have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This final rule adopts into the
HMR certain widely used special
permits. Adoption of these special
permits into regulations of general
applicability provides shippers and
carriers with additional flexibility to
comply with established safety
requirements, thereby reducing
transportation costs and increasing
productivity. Entities affected by the
final rule conceivably include all
persons—shippers, carriers, and
others—who offer and/or transport in
commerce hazardous materials. The
specific focus of the rule is on the
adoption of special permits into the
HMR. In a review of the companies
using the identified special permits,
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15039
PHMSA identified a combination of
small and large businesses that are
affected positively by this rulemaking.
For example, the final rule accepts
certain shipments from the specific
documentation requirements of the
HMR; these exceptions will increase
shipping options and reduce shipment
costs. Overall, this final rule reduces the
compliance burden on the regulated
industries, such as small businesses that
dispose of medical waste, transporters
of consumer products containing ethyl
alcohol, and airlines transporting
oxygen generators, without
compromising transportation safety and
should provide a slight positive
economic benefit (i.e., reduced
compliance burden) for those small
entities. Therefore, we certify that this
final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. For example,
special permit 9275 will no longer
require businesses to apply for a special
permit in order to ship common retail
items such as cosmetics that would
normally be shipped as a class 3
material.
This final rule has been developed in
accordance with Executive Order 13272
(‘‘Proper Consideration of Small Entities
in Agency Rulemaking’’) and DOT’s
procedures and policies to promote
compliance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act to ensure that potential
impacts of draft rules on small entities
are properly considered.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
PHMSA has an approved information
collection under OMB Control Number
2137–0051, ‘‘Rulemaking, Special
Permits, and Preemption
Requirements.’’ This final rule results in
a decrease in the annual burden and
costs under this information collection
due to the changes that adopts
provisions contained in certain widely
used or longstanding special permits
that have an established safety record.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, no person is required to
respond to an information collection
unless it has been approved by OMB
and displays a valid OMB control
number. Section 1320.8(d), title 5, Code
of Federal Regulations requires that
PHMSA provide interested members of
the public and affected agencies an
opportunity to comment on information
and recordkeeping requests.
This final rule identifies a revised
information collection request that
PHMSA will submit to OMB for
approval based on the requirements in
this final rule. PHMSA has developed
burden estimates to reflect changes in
this final rule. PHMSA estimates that
E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM
18MRR1
15040
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 52 / Tuesday, March 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
the information collection and
recordkeeping burden of this final rule
is as follows:
I. Environmental Assessment
The National Environmental Policy
Act, 42 U.S.C. 4321–4375, requires that
federal agencies analyze proposed
OMB CONTROL NO. 2137–0051
actions to determine whether the action
will have a significant impact on the
Net Decrease in Annual Number of
human environment. The Council on
Respondents ...............................
434 Environmental Quality (CEQ)
Net Decrease in Annual Reregulations requires federal agencies to
sponses .......................................
434
conduct an environmental review
Net Decrease in Annual Burden
considering (1) the need for the
Hours ...........................................
434
proposed action (2) alternatives to the
Net Decrease in Annual Burden
Costs ........................................... $17,143 proposed action (3) probable
environmental impacts of the proposed
action and alternatives and (4) the
PHMSA received no comments on the agencies and persons consulted during
information collection and
the consideration process. 40 CFR
recordkeeping burdens associated with
1508.9(b).
developing, implementing, and
The Need for This Action
maintaining these requirements for
approval in the NPRM.
The purpose and need of this
rulemaking is to adopt certain approvals
Requests for a copy of this
related to air transportation in Alaska
information collection should be
and widely used special permits or
directed to Deborah Boothe or T. Glenn
those with an established safety record
Foster, Office of Hazardous Materials
into the HMR for universal use. PHMSA
Standards (PHH–11), Pipeline and
is working to reduce the number of
Hazardous Materials Safety
special permits to reduce administrative
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
burden to both the government and
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590–
private industry while affording the
0001, Telephone (202) 366–8553.
benefits of certain special permits that
Address written comments to the
have been vetted for safety to a wider
Dockets Unit as identified in the
audience.
ADDRESSES section of this rulemaking.
This rule follows an FAA statutory
We must receive comments regarding
provision that requires PHMSA to adopt
information collection burdens prior to
certain special permits into the HMR.
the close of the comment period
Section 824 of the FAA Modernization
identified in the DATES section of this
and Reform Act of 2012 includes a
rulemaking. In addition, you may
submit comments specifically related to provision that allows for exceptions for
the information collection burden to the cylinders of compressed oxygen or other
oxidizing gases transported in the State
PHMSA Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, at fax number of Alaska aboard aircraft. These special
permits all provided exceptions for the
(202) 395–6974.
transportation of Oxygen and other
G. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
Division 2.2 Oxidizing gases for
transportation aboard aircraft in the
A regulation identifier number (RIN)
state of Alaska.
is assigned to each regulatory action
The need for hazardous materials to
listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal
support essential services and industry
Regulations. The Regulatory Information means transportation of highly
Service Center publishes the Unified
hazardous materials is necessary.
Agenda in April and October of each
PHMSA conducted a periodic review of
year. The RIN contained in the heading
Special Permits that have a long history
of this document may be used to crossof safety. After this review PHMSA
reference this action with the Unified
determined that certain special permits
Agenda.
were candidates for adoption into the
HMR.
H. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
Special Permit 9275 authorizes the
1995
transportation in commerce of certain
This final rule does not impose
consumer products of liquids and solids
unfunded mandates under the
containing ethyl alcohol and exempts
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
these shipments from the provisions of
1995. It does not result in costs of
HMR. This Special Permit is used
$141.3 million or more to either state,
frequently by the cosmetics industry to
local or tribal governments, in the
move very small quantities of ethyl
aggregate, or to the private sector, and
alcohol contained in consumer
is the least burdensome alternative that
products. After reviewing the history of
achieves the objective of the rule.
this Special Permit, PHMSA found an
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Mar 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
adequate safety record for adoption into
the HMR.
Special Permit 11263 authorizes the
transportation of solid coal tar pitch
compounds, Class 9, in open-top and
closed-top sift-proof metal cans or fiber
drums. Coal tar pitch is a black or darkbrown amorphous residue produced by
the distillation or heat treatment of coal
tar. It is a solid at room temperature and
exhibits a broad softening range instead
of a defined melting temperature.
Among other uses, coal tar pitch is used
as a base for coatings and paint, in
roofing and paving, and as a binder in
asphalt products. This Special Permit
authorizes the use of a specification
package with a proven safety record in
order to mitigate a potential release of
coal tar pitch compounds. During a
review of long standing Special Permits,
PHMSA found that this Special Permit
had an adequate safety record and
provided an equivalent level of safety to
the HMR.
Special Permit 11836 authorizes the
transportation of specific ammonia
solutions in specification UN1H1
drums, UN3H1 jerricans, and UN6HA1
composite packagings. Ammonia
solutions are a clear colorless liquid
consisting of ammonia dissolved in
water which is corrosive to tissue and
metals. This Special Permit is utilizes
the use of specification packages with a
proven safety record in order to mitigate
a potential release of ammonia
solutions. During a review of long
standing Special Permits, PHMSA found
that this Special Permit had an adequate
safety record and provided an
equivalent level of safety to the HMR.
Special Permit 12134 authorizes the
transportation of spent bleaching earth
as a Division 4.2, solid, PG III, exempt
from the provisions of the HMR. Spent
bleaching earth, is a solid waste from
the edible oil industry can be converted
to a clay-carbon adsorbent for potential
reuse in the adsorptive cleansing of
vegetable oils. This Special Permit
utilizes the use of a specification
package with a proven safety record that
will mitigate a potential release of spent
bleach earth material. During a review
of long standing Special Permits,
PHMSA found that this Special Permit
had an adequate safety record and
provided an equivalent level of safety to
the HMR.
Special Permit 12825 authorizes the
transportation of life-saving appliances,
self-inflating, that contain non-DOT
specification steel cylinders for the
purpose of movement between a vessel
and a U.S. Coast Guard approved
inflatable life raft servicing facility in
conjunction with the servicing of such
life-saving appliances. Adoption of this
E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM
18MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 52 / Tuesday, March 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
15041
Special Permit is needed to ensure that
these life-saving appliances are serviced
without delay. During a review of long
standing Special Permits, PHMSA found
that this Special Permit had an adequate
safety record and provided an
equivalent level of safety to the HMR.
Special Permit 14479 authorizes the
continued use of regulated medical
waste containers manufactured before
October 1, 2006 and marked with an
alternative shipping name for UN 3291
and orientation arrows. The packages
are used in the medical waste industry
to ship low hazard medical waste to
disposal facilities. Adoption of this
Special Permit allows the medical waste
industry to continue using packages
authorizes safely transport medical
waste in these pacakging. During a
review of long standing Special Permits,
PHMSA found that this Special Permit
had an adequate safety record and
provided an equivalent level of safety to
the HMR.
any negative effects on safety or the
environment.
(2.) Adoption of a Subset of Special
Permits
Special Permit 12825
PHMSA considered a wide array of
special permits for adoption. It also
considered adopting a smaller subset of
special permits.’’ However, the full
benefits would not be realized as some
permits would not be adopted.
Alternatives to the Proposed Action
Information about benefits of this
final rulemaking action can be found in
the preamble (i.e., ‘‘Overview of
Proposed Amendments) to this
rulemaking. The alternatives considered
in the analysis include (1) the proposed
action, that is, adoption of the proposed
special permits as amendments to the
HMR; (2) adoption of some subset of the
proposed special permits (i.e., only
some of the proposed special permits) as
amendments to the HMR; and (3) the
‘‘no action’’ alternative, meaning that
none of the proposed special permits
would be adopted into the HMR.
The adoption of this Special Permit
allows ‘‘UN3077, coal tar pitch
compounds’’ to be shipped in nonspecification open-top or closed-top sift
proof metal cans or fiber drums. The use
of this alternative package for the
shipment of coal tar pitch compounds is
not expected to have any negative effect
on safety or the environment.
Analysis of the Alternatives
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
(1.) Adopt All Special Permits and
Competent Authority Approvals
The selected alternative amends
certain HMR requirements including
methods for packaging, describing, and
transporting hazardous materials that
are currently permitted under widely
used special permits with established
safety records for inclusion in the HMR.
This final rule allows the transportation
of the following hazardous materials
and packages in accordance with the
following former special permits in
ways that vary from certain other
provisions in the HMR:
Special Permit 14479
The adoption of this Special Permit
will allow for ‘‘UN 3291, Regulated
medical waste, n.o.s.,’’ to be shipped
using alternative shipping names and
marking requirements for regulated
medical wastes. Use of this alternative
shipping name and marking
requirements is not expected to have
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Mar 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
The adoption of this Special Permit
allows for the shipment of nonflammable compressed gases in nonDOT specification steel cylinders for use
in life-saving appliances. Allowing the
uses of non-DOT specification cylinders
in life saving appliances is not expected
to have any effects on safety or the
environment.
Special Permit 9275
The adoption of this Special Permit
allows consumer products of liquids
and solids containing ethyl alcohol to be
exempted from the HMR. These low
hazard, low quantity packages
containing ethyl alcohol are not
expected to have any negative effect on
safety or the environment.
Special Permit 11263
Special Permit 12134
The adoption of this Special Permit
allows ‘‘UN 3088, spent bleaching
earth’’ to be exempt from the
requirements of the HMR when shipped
in non-specification, sift-proof dump or
hopper type vehicles. Exempting these
materials from the HMR when shipped
in these alternative packages is not
expected to have any negative effect on
safety or the environment.
Special Permit 11836
The adoption of this Special Permit
allows ‘‘UN 2672, ammonia solutions’’
to be shipped in UN1HI drums, UN3H1
jerricans, and UN6HA1 composite
packages that do not meet provision in
§§ 173.24 and 173.24a. Allowing
shipments of these materials in these
packages is not expected to have any
negative effects on safety or the
environment.
Summary
These hazardous materials are capable
of affecting human health and the
environment if a release were to occur.
However, adoption of these special
permits maintains an equivalent level of
safety as provided in the special
permits.
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(3.) No Action
If no action is taken then Special
Permits will continue to be issued
resulting in no change to the current
potential affects to the environment.
Probable Environmental Impacts of the
Proposed Action and Alternatives
This final rule allows the
transportation of the following
hazardous materials and packages in
ways that vary from certain other
provisions in the HMR:
• ‘‘UN 3291, Regulated medical
waste, n.o.s.,’’—PHMSA considered
whether alternative markings would be
sufficient in providing adequate
hazardous communication. The package
described in this special permit does not
differ from packages currently allowed
under the HMR with the exception of
the allowed markings and thus will not
impose any addition risk to the
environment. Medical waste
transportation is regulated to avoid risk
of injury, infection, and contamination.
In addition, as described above, PHMSA
has no report of incidents under this
special permit and thus expects there
will be no impact to the environment.
• Non-flammable gasses shipped in
non-DOT specification steel cylinders
for use in life-saving appliances—
PHMSA considered whether the limited
use of non-DOT specification cylinders
between U.S. Coast Guard ships and
servicing facilities would pose a risk to
the environment. The cylinders used in
this special permit contain inert gases
which if released would pose little to no
risk to the environment. The regulation
of compressed gas cylinders requires
testing to ensure integrity and
functionality of the cylinder. Cylinder
rupture or failure can cause serious
injury or death. In addition, as
described above, PHMSA has no reports
of incidents under this special permit
and thus expects there will be no impact
to the environment.
• Beverages, food, cosmetics and
medicines, medical screening solutions,
and concentrates classed as a flammable
liquid or flammable solid containing
ethyl alcohol—PHMSA considered
whether the shipment of these low
hazard consumer products containing
ethyl alcohol would pose a risk to the
environment. These packages contain
E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM
18MRR1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
15042
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 52 / Tuesday, March 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
ethyl alcohol which is a flammable
liquid. A release from one of these
containers would pose little risk to
safety or the environment due to the
very limited quantity in each container.
In addition, as described above, PHMSA
has no reports of incidents under this
special permit and thus expect there
will be no impact to the environment.
• ‘‘UN3077, coal tar pitch
compounds’’—PHMSA considered
whether the shipment of coal tar pitch
compounds in open-top and closed-top
sift-proof metal cans or fiber drums
would pose a risk to the environment.
Coal tar pitch is a black or dark-brown
amorphous residue produced by the
distillation or heat treatment of coal tar.
Coal tar pitch compounds contain
various chemical vapors that become
airborne during the heating of coal tar
pitch. Coal tar pitch is a flammable
liquid and a known carcinogen. An
accidental release of ‘‘coal tar pitch
compounds’’ could result in
contamination of surrounding
environmental medium (air, water, soil).
However, as described above, PHMSA
has no reports of incidents under this
special permit and thus expects there
will be no impact to the environment.
• ‘‘UN 3088, spent bleaching earth’’—
PHMSA considered whether the
shipment of spent bleaching earth in
non-specification, sift-proof dump or
hopper type vehicles would pose a risk
to the environment. These packages
contain ‘‘spent bleaching earth’’ which
is a solid waste from the edible oil
industry. Spent bleaching earth can be
flammable, as it contains oil residue. An
accidental release of ‘‘spent bleaching
earth’’ could result in possible
contamination of surrounding
environmental medium (air, water, soil).
However as described above, PHMSA
has no reports of incidents under this
special permit and thus expects there
will be no impact to the environment.
• ‘‘UN 2672, ammonia solutions’’—
PHMSA considered whether the
shipment of ammonia solutions in
UN1H1 and UN6HA1 drums would
pose a risk to the environment.
Ammonia can cause irritation and
damage to mucous membranes and
lungs, depending on concentration. An
accidental release of Ammonia solutions
could result in possible contamination
of surrounding environmental mediums
(air, water, soil). However, as described
above, PHMSA has no reports of
incidents under this special permit and
thus expects there will be no impact to
the environment.
Hazardous materials shipments
frequently move through densely
populated or environmentally sensitive
areas where the consequences of an
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Mar 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
incident could be loss of life, serious
injury, or significant environmental
damage. Because of the vastness of
transportation networks, nearly any
community or ecosystem could be
affected by a hazardous materials
release during transportation. Therefore,
impacts from a release could affect
include atmospheric, aquatic, terrestrial,
and vegetal resources (for example,
wildlife habitats). The adverse
environmental impacts associated with
releases of most hazardous materials are
short-term impacts that can be greatly
reduced or eliminated through prompt
clean-up of the incident scene.
In all modes of transport, the potential
for environmental damage or
contamination exists when packages of
hazardous materials are involved in
transportation incidents. The process
through which safety permits are issued
requires the applicant to demonstrate
that the alternative transportation
method or packaging proposed provides
an equivalent level of safety as that
provided in the HMR. Implicit in this
process is that the special permit must
provide an equivalent level of
environmental protection as that
provided in the HMR. Thus, adoption of
the special permits as regulations of
general applicability maintain the
existing environmental protections built
into the HMR. The special permits and
approvals adopted into the HMR have
consistently demonstrated a long history
of safe use. In its review of these special
permits and approval, PHMSA did not
identify any incidents that had a
significant effect on the environment.
These special permits have a long
history of transporting the above
mentioned hazardous materials safely
and without any effects on the
environment. Therefore, we find that
adoption of the above described special
permits into the HMR will not have any
significant positive or negative impact
on the environment.
Agencies and Persons Consulted During
the Consideration Process
This final rule would affect some
PHMSA stakeholders, including
hazardous materials shippers and
carriers by air, highway, rail and vessel.
PHMSA sought comment on the
environmental assessment contained in
the October 22, 2012, NPRM published
under Docket PHMSA–2011–0158 [77
FR 64450] (HM–233C) however,
PHMSA did not receive any comments
on the environmental assessment
contained in that rulemaking. In
addition, PHMSA sought comment from
the following modal partners:
• Federal Aviation Administration
• Environmental Protection Agency
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
• Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
• United States Coast Guard
Conclusion
PHMSA is making numerous
amendments to the HMR through the
adoption of special permits and
approvals. The amendments adopted in
this final rule are intended to update,
clarify, or provide relief from certain
existing regulatory requirements to
promote safer transportation practices;
eliminate unnecessary regulatory
requirements; finalize outstanding
petitions for rulemaking; facilitate
international commerce; and, in general,
make the requirements easier to
understand and follow.
Given that this rulemaking amends
the HMR to adopt provisions contained
in certain widely-used or longstanding
special permits that have an established
safety record, these changes in
regulation should in fact increase safety
and environmental protections.
Furthermore, while the net
environmental impact of this rule will
be positive, we believe there will be no
significant environmental impacts
associated with this final rule.
J. Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477), or at www.dot.gov/provacy.
K. Executive Order 13609 and
International Trade Analysis
Under E.O. 13609, agencies must
consider whether the impacts associated
with significant variations between
domestic and international regulatory
approaches are unnecessary or may
impair the ability of American business
to export and compete internationally.
In meeting shared challenges involving
health, safety, labor, security,
environmental, and other issues,
international regulatory cooperation can
identify approaches that are at least as
protective as those that are or would be
adopted in the absence of such
cooperation. International regulatory
cooperation can also reduce, eliminate,
or prevent unnecessary differences in
regulatory requirements.
Similarly, the Trade Agreements Act
of 1979 (Pub. L. 96–39), as amended by
the Uruguay Round Agreements Act
(Pub. L. 103–465), prohibits Federal
E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM
18MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 52 / Tuesday, March 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
agencies from establishing any
standards or engaging in related
activities that create unnecessary
obstacles to the foreign commerce of the
United States. For purposes of these
requirements, Federal agencies may
participate in the establishment of
international standards, so long as the
standards have a legitimate domestic
objective, such as providing for safety,
and do not operate to exclude imports
that meet this objective. The statute also
requires consideration of international
standards and, where appropriate, that
they be the basis for U.S. standards.
PHMSA participates in the
establishment of international standards
in order to protect the safety of the
American public, and we have assessed
the effects of the final rule to ensure that
it does not cause unnecessary obstacles
to foreign trade. Accordingly, this
rulemaking is consistent with E.O.
13609 and PHMSA’s obligations.
List of Subjects
49 CFR Part 107
Administrative practice and
procedure, Hazardous materials
transportation, Penalties, Reporting and
record keeping requirements.
49 CFR Part 173
Hazardous materials transportation,
Packaging and containers, Radioactive
materials, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Uranium.
49 CFR Part 175
Hazardous materials transportation,
Air carriers, Radioactive materials,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
49 CFR Part 178
Hazardous materials transportation,
Motor vehicle safety, Packaging and
containers, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, we
are amending 49 CFR Chapter I as
follows:
PART 107—HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
PROGRAM PROCEDURES
1. The authority citation for part 107
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128, 44701;
Pub. L. 101–410 section 4 (28 U.S.C. 2461
note); Pub. L. 104–121 sections 212–213;
Pub. L. 104–134 section 31001; 49 CFR 1.45,
1.53.
2. In § 107.705, revise paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
■
49 CFR Part 171
Exports, Hazardous materials
transportation, Hazardous waste,
Imports, Incorporation by reference,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
§ 107.705 Registrations, reports, and
applications for approval.
*
49 CFR Part 172
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Education, Hazardous materials
transportation, Hazardous waste,
Incorporation by reference, Labeling,
Markings, Packaging and containers,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Mar 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
*
*
*
*
(c) For an approval with an expiration
date, each application for renewal or
modification must be filed in the same
manner as an original application. If, at
least 60 days before an existing approval
expires the holder files an application
for renewal that is complete and
conforms to the requirements of this
section, the approval will not expire
until final administrative action on the
application for renewal has been taken.
Operation under an expired approval
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15043
not filed within 60 days of the
expiration date is prohibited. This
paragraph does not limit the authority of
the Associate Administrator to modify,
suspend or terminate an approval under
§ 107.713.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 171—GENERAL INFORMATION,
REGULATIONS, AND DEFINITIONS
3. The authority citation for part 171
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128, 44701; 49
CFR 1.45 and 1.53; Pub. L. 101–410 section
4 (28 U.S.C. 2461 note); Pub. L. 104–134
section 31001.
4. In § 171.7, revise paragraph (n)(3) to
read as follows:
■
§ 171.7
Reference material.
*
*
*
*
*
(n) * * *
(3) CGA Pamphlet C–6, Standards for
Visual Inspection of Steel Compressed
Gas Cylinders, 1993, into § 172.102,
§ 173.3, 173.198, 180.205, 180.209,
180.211, 180.411, 180.519.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 172—HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
TABLE, SPECIAL PROVISIONS,
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
COMMUNICATIONS, EMERGENCY
RESPONSE INFORMATION, TRAINING
REQUIREMENTS, AND SECURITY
PLANS
5. The authority citation for part 172
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128; 44701; 49
CFR 1.53.
6. In § 172.101, revise following
entries in the Hazardous Materials Table
to read as follows:
■
§ 172.101 Purpose and use of hazardous
materials table.
E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM
18MRR1
Hazardous materials
descriptions and
proper shipping
names
VerDate Mar<15>2010
(1)
17:18 Mar 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4700
*
Regulated medical
waste, n.o.s. or
Clinical waste, unspecified, n.o.s. or
(BIO) Medical
waste, n.o.s., or
Biomedical waste,
n.o.s. or Medical
waste, n.o.s.
Self-heating solid, organic, n.o.s.
*
Life-saving appliances, self-inflating.
*
Environmentally hazardous substances,
solid, n.o.s.
[Revise]
Ammonia solutions,
relative density between 0.880 and
0.957 at 15 degrees C in water,
with more than 10
percent but not
more than 35 percent ammonia.
(2)
Symbols
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
(3)
Sfmt 4700
4.2
6.2
9
9
8
Hazard
class or division
UN3088 ....
*
UN3291 ....
*
UN2990 ....
*
UN3077 ....
UN2672 ....
(4)
Identification Numbers
4.2 ............................
*
6.2 ............................
*
None .........................
*
9 ...............................
8 ...............................
(6)
Label Codes
4.2 ............................
II ...............
*
II ...............
*
...................
*
III ..............
III ..............
(5)
PG
III ..............
*
*
*
134 ...........
None .........
155 ...........
154 ...........
(8A)
Exceptions
E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM
212 ...........
212 ...........
*
197 ...........
*
219 ...........
*
213 ...........
203 ...........
(8B)
Non-bulk
(8C)
Bulk
241 ...........
241 ...........
197 ...........
None .........
240 ...........
241 ...........
(8)
Packaging (§ 173.***)
IB6, IP2,
None .........
T3, TP33.
IB8, IP3,
None .........
T1,
TP33.
B116.
41, A13,
337.
338 ...........
8,146, 335,
A112,
B54,
B120,
IB8, IP3,
N20,
N91, T1,
TP33.
336, IB3,
IP8, T7,
TP1.
(7)
Special
Provisions
(§ 172.102)
*
*
*
15kg ..........
15kg ..........
No limit .....
No limit .....
No Limit ....
5L .............
(9A)
Passenger
aircraft/rail
50kg ..........
50kg ..........
No limit .....
No limit .....
No Limit ....
60L ...........
(9B)
Cargo aircraft only
(9)
Quantity limitations (see
§§ 173.27 and 175.75)
C.
C.
B ...............
A.
A.
A ...............
(10A)
Location
40
40, 52, 85
(10B)
Other
(10)
Vessel stowage
15044
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 52 / Tuesday, March 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
18MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 52 / Tuesday, March 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
7. Section 172.102 is amended:
a. In paragraph (c)(1), Special
provisions 336, 337, and 338 are added;
■ b. In paragraph (c)(3), Special
provision B116 is added; and
■ c. In paragraph (c)(5), Special
provision N91 is added.
The additions read as follows:
■
■
§ 172.102
*
Special provisions.
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
*
*
Code/Special Provisions
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
336 The use of UN1H1 drums,
UN3H1 jerricans, and UN6HA1
composite packagings which meet the
requirements of Part 178 of the HMR at
the Packing Group I or II performance
level. These packagings are not required
to: (1.) meet the venting requirements in
§ 173.24(g) or (2.) be marked with the
hydrostatic pressure test marking
specified in § 173.24a(b)(4). Shipment of
packages under this special provision
must be made by private or contract
motor carrier. Transportation of these
packages also requires the door of each
van trailer to be marked with ‘‘Warning
trailer may contain chemical vapor. Do
not enter until vapors have dissipated.’’
The driver of the transport vehicle and
the consignee(s) must be trained not to
enter the transport vehicle until the
ammonia vapors have dissipated, and
the emergency response information on
the shipping paper must indicate that
the vehicle contains ammonia vapors.
This training must be documented in
training records required by
§ 172.704(d). Transport vehicles must be
vented to prevent accumulation of
vapors at a poisonous or flammable
concentration.
337 Authorizes the use of regulated
waste containers manufactured prior to
October 1, 2006 to be marked with the
alternative shipping name of Regulated
medical waste, UN3291 and arrows that
deviate as prescribed in § 172.312(a)(2)
in that they may be black or white.
338 Life Saving appliances, selfinflating transported between an U.S.
Coast Guard approved inflatable life raft
servicing facility and a vessel are only
subject to the following requirements:
a. Prior to repacking into the lifesaving appliance, an installed inflation
cylinder must successfully meet and
pass all inspection and test criteria and
standards of the raft manufacturer and
the vessel Flag State requirements for
cylinders installed as part of life-saving
appliances, self-inflating (UN2990) used
on marine vessels. Additionally, each
cylinder must be visually inspected in
accordance with CGA pamphlet, CGA
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Mar 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
C–6 (incorporated by reference, see
§ 171.7). A current copy of CGA
pamphlet, CGA C–6 must be available at
the facility servicing the life-saving
appliance.
b. An installed inflation cylinder that
requires recharging must be filled in
accordance with § 173.301(l).
c. Every installed inflation cylinder,
as associated equipment of the lifesaving appliance, must be packed
within the protective packaging of the
life raft and the life raft itself must
otherwise be in compliance with
§ 173.219.
d. The serial number for each cylinder
must be recorded as part of the lifesaving appliance service record by the
U.S. Coast Guard-approved servicing
facility.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
Code/Special Provisions
*
*
*
*
*
B116 The use of non specification,
sift-proof dump or hopper type vehicles,
and sift-proof roll-on/roll-off bulk bins,
which must be covered by a tarpaulin,
metal cover, or equivalent means is
authorized for the transportation of
spent bleaching earth by motor vehicle.
The material is also be subject to
operational controls which include not
exceeding a temperature of 55C (130F)
at the time it is offered or during
transportation, not exceeding a
transportation time of 24 hours, and
drivers transporting spent bleaching
earth must be trained in the properties
and hazards of the spent bleaching
earth. This training must be
documented in training records required
by § 172.704(d).
*
*
*
*
*
(5) * * *
Code/Special Provisions
*
*
*
*
*
N91 The use of a non specification
sift-proof, non-bulk, metal can with or
without lid, or a non specification siftproof, non-bulk fiber drum, with or
without lid is authorized when
transporting coal tar pitch compounds
by motor vehicle or rail freight. The
fiber drum must to be fabricated with a
three ply wall, as a minimum. The coal
tar pitch compound must be in a solid
mass during transportation.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 173—SHIPPERS—GENERAL
REQUIREMENTS FOR SHIPMENTS
AND PACKAGINGS
8. The authority citation for part 173
continues to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15045
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128, 44701; 49
CFR 1.45, 1.53.
9. In § 173.150, paragraph (g) is added
to read as follows.
■
§ 173.150 Exceptions for Class 3
(flammable and combustible liquids).
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Limited quantities of retail
products containing ethyl alcohol. (1)
Beverages, food, cosmetics and
medicines, medical screening solutions,
and concentrates sold as retail products
containing ethyl alcohol classed as a
flammable liquid or flammable solid
containing not more than 70% ethyl
alcohol by volume for liquids, by weight
for solids are excepted from the HMR
provided that:
(i) For non-glass inner packagings:
(A) The volume does not exceed 16
fluid ounces in capacity for liquids; or
(B) For volumes greater than 16 fluid
ounces but not exceeding 1 gallon the
company name and the words
‘‘Contains Ethyl Alcohol’’ are marked on
the package;
(C) Solids containing ethyl alcohol
may be packaged in non-glass inner
packagings not exceeding 1 pounds
capacity;
(D) For weight greater than one pound
up to 8 pounds the company name and
the words ‘‘Contains Ethyl Alcohol’’ are
marked on the package.
(ii) For glass inner packagings:
(A) The volume does not exceed 8
fluid ounces in capacity; or
(B) For volumes greater than 8 fluid
ounces to 16 fluid ounces the company
name and the words ‘‘Contains Ethyl
Alcohol’’ are marked on the package;
(C) Solids containing ethyl alcohol
may be packaged in glass inner
packagings not exceeding 1⁄2 pound;
(D) For weight greater than 1⁄2 pound
up to 1 pound the company name and
the words ‘‘Contains Ethyl Alcohol’’ are
marked on the package.
(iii) The net liquid contents of all
inner packagings in any single outer
packaging may not exceed 192 fluid
ounces. The net solid contents of all
inner packagings in any single outer
packaging may not exceed 32 pounds.
The gross weight of any single outer
package shipped may not exceed 65
pounds; Inner packagings must secured
and cushioned within the outer package
to prevent breakage, leakage, and
movement.
(2) Beverages, food, cosmetics and
medicines, medical screening solutions,
and concentrates sold as retail products
containing ethyl alcohol classed as a
flammable liquid or flammable solid
containing more than 70% ethyl alcohol
by volume, by weight for solids are
excepted from the HMR provided that:
E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM
18MRR1
15046
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 52 / Tuesday, March 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
(i) For inner packagings containing
liquids the volume does not exceed 8
fluid ounces in capacity;
(ii) Solids containing ethyl alcohol are
not packed in inner packagings
exceeding 1⁄2 pound in weight;
(iii) The net liquid contents of all
inner packagings in any single outer
packaging may not exceed 192 fluid
ounces. The net solid contents of all
inner packagings in any single outer
packaging may not exceed 32 pounds.
The gross weight of any single outer
package shipped may not exceed 65
pounds. Inner packagings must be
secured and cushioned within the outer
package to prevent breakage, leakage,
and movement.
(3) For transportation by passenger or
cargo aircraft, no outer package may be
transported which contains an inner
packaging exceeding:
(i) 16 fluid ounces of flammable
liquid, or
(ii) 1 pound of solids containing
flammable liquid.
PART 175—CARRIAGE BY AIRCRAFT
destination that does not receive cargo
only service once a week.
PART 178—SPECIFICATIONS FOR
PACKAGINGS
12. The authority citation for part 178
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128; 49 CFR
1.53.
13. In 178.516, paragraph (b)(7) is
added to read as follows:
■
§ 178.516
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(7) Authorization to manufacture,
mark, and sell UN4G combination
packagings with outer fiberboard boxes
and with inner fiberboard components
that have individual containerboard or
paper wall basis weights that vary by
not more than plus or minus 5% from
the nominal basis weight reported in the
initial design qualification test report.
■ 14. In 178.521, paragraph (b)(4) is
added to read as follows:
§ 178.521
10. The authority citation for part 175
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128, 44701; 49
CFR 1.45 and 1.53
■
11. Add § 175.34 to read as follows:
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 175.34 Exceptions for Cylinders of
Compressed Oxygen or Other Oxidizing
Gases Transported Within the State of
Alaska.
(a) Exceptions. When transported in
the State of Alaska, cylinders of
compressed oxygen or other oxidizing
gases aboard aircraft are excepted from
all the requirements of §§ 173.302(f)(3)
through (5) and 173.304(f)(3) through (5)
of this subchapter subject to the
following conditions:
(1) Transportation of the cylinders by
a ground-based or water-based mode of
transportation is unavailable and
transportation by aircraft is the only
practical means for transporting the
cylinders to their destination;
(2) Each cylinder is fully covered with
a fire or flame resistant blanket that is
secured in place; and
(3) The operator of the aircraft
complies with the applicable
notification procedures under § 175.33.
(b) Aircraft restrictions. This
exception only applies to the following
types of aircraft:
(1) Cargo-only aircraft transporting the
cylinders to a delivery destination that
receives cargo-only service at least once
a week.
(2) Passenger and cargo-only aircraft
transporting the cylinders to a delivery
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Mar 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
Standards for fiberboard boxes.
*
Standards for paper bags.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) UN5M1 and UN5M2 multi wall
paper bags that have paper wall basis
weights that vary by not more than plus
or minus 5% from the nominal basis
weight reported in the initial design
qualification test report.
Issued in Washington, DC on March 10,
2014 under authority delegated in 49 CFR
1.97.
Cynthia L. Quarterman,
Administrator, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014–05630 Filed 3–17–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 120731291–2522–02]
RIN 0648–XD167
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and
Butterfish Fisheries; Butterfish Trip
Limit Reduction
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; inseason
action.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
NMFS announces that the
butterfish trip limit for longfin squid/
butterfish moratorium permit holders
will be reduced to no more than 5,000
lb (2.27 mt), effective 0001 hours, March
18, 2014. Vessels issued a Federal
longfin squid/butterfish moratorium
permit and using greater than 3-inch
(76-mm) mesh may not fish for, catch,
possess or land more than 5,000 lb (2.27
mt) of butterfish per trip or calendar day
for the remainder of the year (through
December 31, 2014). The possession
limit remains unchanged at 2,500-lb
(1.13 mt) per trip or calendar day for
vessels issued a Federal longfin squid/
butterfish moratorium permit and
fishing with less than 3-inch (76-mm).
The incidental possession limit also
remains unchanged at 600 lb (0.27 mt).
Federally permitted dealers also may
not purchase more than 5,000 lb (2.27
mt) of butterfish from federally
permitted vessels per trip or per day,
through December 31, 2014. This action
is necessary to prevent the fishery from
exceeding the domestic annual harvest
(DAH) of 2,570 mt, and to allow for
effective management of this stock.
DATES: Effective 0001 hours, March 18,
2014, through 2400 hours, December 31,
2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aja
Szumylo, Fishery Policy Analyst, 978–
281–9195, Fax 978–281–9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulations at 50 CFR part 648 govern
the butterfish fishery. The regulations
require specifications for maximum
sustainable yield, initial optimum yield,
allowable biological catch, annual catch
limit (ACL), domestic annual harvest
(DAH), domestic annual processing
(DAP), joint venture processing, and
total allowable levels of foreign fishing
for the species managed under the
Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish
(MSB) Fishery Management Plan (FMP).
The procedures for setting the annual
initial specifications are described in
§ 648.22. The 2013 MSB specifications
set the 2013 butterfish DAH at 2,570 mt
(77 FR 3346, January 16, 2013). The
regulations at § 648.22(d) state that, if
annual specifications for the MSB
fisheries are not published in the
Federal Register prior to the start of the
fishing year (January 1), the previous
year’s annual specifications, will remain
in effect. A proposed rule for 2014 MSB
specifications and management
measures was published on January 10,
2014 (79 FR 1813), and the public
comment period for the proposed rule
ended on February 10, 2014. A final rule
is expected shortly, after which the 2014
specifications will go into effect and
supersede the 2013 specifications.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18MRR1.SGM
18MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 52 (Tuesday, March 18, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15033-15046]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05630]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 107, 171, 172, 173, 175 and 178
[Docket No. PHMSA-2011-0158 (HM-233C)]
RIN 2137-AE82
Hazardous Materials: Adoption of Certain Special Permits and
Competent Authorities Into Regulations
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration is
amending the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) to adopt provisions
contained in certain widely used or longstanding special permits and
certain competent authority approvals (``approvals'') that have
established safety records. Special permits allow a company or
individual to package or ship a hazardous material in a manner that
varies from the regulations provided an equivalent level of safety is
maintained. An approval is a written consent (document) required under
an international standard (i.e., International Maritime Dangerous Goods
(IMDG) Code, International Civil Aviation Organization's Technical
Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air (ICAO
TI)), or is specifically provided for in the HMR, and is issued by the
Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety. These revisions
are intended to provide wider access to the regulatory flexibility
offered in special permits and approvals and eliminate the need for
numerous renewal requests, reducing paperwork burdens and facilitating
commerce while maintaining an appropriate level of safety.
DATES: This regulation is effective April 17, 2014. The incorporation
by reference of certain publications listed in the rule is approved by
the Director of the Federal Register as of April 17, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Andrews, Office of Hazardous
Materials Safety, Standards and Rulemaking Division, (202) 366-8553,
or, Diane LaValle, Office of Hazardous Materials Safety, Approvals and
Permits Division, (202) 366-4535, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration (PHMSA), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary
II. Background
III. Overview of Amendments
IV. List of Commenters
V. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
I. Executive Summary
PHMSA is amending the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR
parts 171-180) to adopt several long standing special permits and
competent authority approvals into the HMR. The identified special
permits and competent authority approvals have a long history of
safety. Special permits allow a company or individual to package or
ship a hazardous material in a manner that varies from the HMR provided
an equivalent level of safety is maintained. A competent authority (CA)
approval is a written consent (document) required under an
international standard (i.e., International Maritime Dangerous Goods
(IMDG) Code or International Civil Aviation Organization's Technical
Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air (ICAO
TI)) and is issued by the Associate Administrator for Hazardous
Materials Safety.
In 2009, an audit of the Special Permits program by the Office of
the Inspector General identified a need for an ongoing review of all
open special permits with an outlook towards identifying those that
should be made part of the HMR to reduce the overall economic burden to
both affected industry and the government. Three rulemakings, HM-233A;
PHMSA-2009-0289 (75 FR 27205), HM-245; PHMSA-2010-0017 (76 FR 5483),
and HM-216B; PHMSA-2010-0018 (77 FR 37962) have successfully codified
certain special permits into the HMR. These revisions provide wider
access to the regulatory flexibility offered in special permits and
eliminate the need for numerous renewal requests, thus reducing
paperwork burdens and facilitating commerce while maintaining an
appropriate level of safety.
This Final Rule, HM-233C, continues this initiative by adopting
several other long-standing special permits and competent authority
approvals with proven safety records into the HMR. The special permits
affected by the final rule represent variances from current regulations
on topics categorized as follows:
Limited quantities of liquids and solids containing ethyl
alcohol.
Transportation of solid coal tar pitch compounds.
Transportation of certain ammonia solutions in UN1H1 and
UN6HA1 drums.
Transportation of spent bleaching earth.
Requalification of non-DOT specification cylinders in
life-saving appliances.
Use of regulated medical waste containers displaying
alternative markings.
Adoption of special permits to harmonize with FAA
Modernization and Reform Act of 2012.
The economic impact of the final rule can thus be summarized as
follows:
NET COST: $0. Currently, industry must apply for a special permit
in order to ship materials as described in this final rule. Adoption of
these special permits into the HMR will reduce the burden on industry
by no longer requiring industry to apply for a special permit to ship
these materials. Therefore, this final rule does not impose any new
costs to industry.
NET BENEFITS: $9,900 per year. (Averaged over 10 years, at a 7%
annual
discount rate.)
In addition to general positive economic impacts noted above, this
final rule will eliminate the need for
[[Page 15034]]
numerous party-to applications and renewal requests. PHMSA estimates
that the adoption of these special permits and competent authority
approvals will result in 140 fewer responses per year.
II. Background
PHMSA is amending the HMR to adopt certain requirements based on
existing special permits (SPs) issued by PHMSA under 49 CFR Part 107,
Subpart B (Sec. Sec. 107.101 to 107.127) and certain approvals issued
under 49 CFR Part 107, Subpart D (Sec. Sec. 107.401 to 107.405). A
special permit sets forth alternative requirements--or a variance--to
the requirements in the HMR in a way that achieves a safety level at
least equal to the safety level required under the regulations or that
is consistent with the public interest. See 49 CFR 107.105(d). Congress
expressly authorized DOT to issue these variances in the Hazardous
Materials Transportation Act (US Code: 49 U.S.C. 5109-5127) as amended.
An approval is a written consent (document) required under an
international standard (i.e., IMDG Code, ICAO TI), or is authorized in
a specific section of the HMR and is issued by the Associate
Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety.
Special Permits
The HMR generally are performance-oriented regulations, which
provide the regulated community with some flexibility in meeting safety
requirements. Even so, not every transportation situation can be
anticipated and built into the regulations. Innovation is the strength
of our economy and the hazardous materials community is a leader in
developing new materials and technologies and innovative ways of moving
materials. Special permits enable the hazardous materials industry to
quickly, effectively, and safely integrate new products and
technologies into production and the transportation stream. Thus,
special permits provide a mechanism for testing new technologies,
promoting increased transportation efficiency and productivity, and
ensuring global competitiveness. Hazardous materials transported under
the terms of a special permit must achieve a level of safety at least
equal to the level of safety achieved when transported under the HMR or
that is consistent with the public interest. Implementation of new
technologies and operational techniques may enhance safety. Special
permits also reduce the volume and complexity of the HMR by addressing
unique or infrequent transportation situations that would be difficult
to accommodate in regulations intended for use by a wide range of
shippers and carriers.
PHMSA conducts ongoing reviews of special permits to identify
widely used and longstanding special permits with established safety
records for conversion into regulations of broader applicability.
Converting these special permits into regulations reduces paperwork
burdens and facilitates commerce while maintaining an acceptable level
of safety. Additionally, adoption of special permits as rules of
general applicability provides wider access to the benefits and
regulatory flexibility of the provisions granted in the special
permits. Factors that influence whether or not a specific special
permit is a candidate for regulatory action include: the safety record
for hazardous materials transported or operations conducted under a
special permit; potential broad application of a special permit;
suitability of provisions in the special permit for adoption into the
HMR; rulemaking activity in related areas; and agency priorities.
During PHMSA's analysis of the suitability for adoption of each special
permit, PHMSA performed a search of incident reports from the previous
10 years to determine whether there were any safety issues related to
each special permit.
The special permits addressed in this final rule have hundreds of
party status holders. Party status is granted to a person who intends
to offer for transportation or transport a hazardous material or
perform an activity subject to the HMR in the same manner as the
original applicant.
These amendments to the HMR will eliminate the need for
approximately 464 current holders to reapply for renewal of 20 special
permits. Adoption of special permits into the HMR eliminates
significant paperwork burdens. As a condition of a special permit
issued by PHMSA and depending on the provisions of the special permit,
a copy of each special permit must be: (1) maintained at each facility
where an operation is conducted or a packaging is manufactured under a
special permit; (2) maintained at each facility where a package is
offered or re-offered for transportation under a special permit; and
(3) in some cases, carried aboard each transport vehicle used to
transport a hazardous material under a special permit.
Competent Authority Approvals
The HMR also allows for PHMSA to grant approvals to companies or
organizations for the manufacturing of packages in accordance with the
HMR. PHMSA has identified approvals that have an established safety
record to adopt into the HMR. The approvals PHMSA identified for
conversion into the HMR have an established safety record and warrant
adoption into regulations of broader applicability. Converting these
approvals into regulations reduces paperwork burdens and facilitates
commerce while maintaining an acceptable level of safety. A copy of
each approval must be maintained at each facility where a packaging is
manufactured under this approval. The adoption of component authority
approvals eliminates the renewal and maintenance requirements that were
previously required. Additionally, adoption of approvals as rules of
general applicability provides wider access to the benefits and
regulatory flexibility of the provisions granted in the approvals.
Factors that influence whether a specific approval is a candidate for
regulatory action include: the safety record, whether broadly
applicable, related rulemakings, and agency priorities.
Part 171
Section 171.7
Section 171.7 provides a listing of all standards incorporated by
reference into the HMR. For this rulemaking, PHMSA is revising the
entry for the Compressed Gas Association (CGA) Pamphlet C-6, Standards
for Visual Inspection of Steel Compressed Gas Cylinders, 1993 to add a
reference to Sec. 172.102, (Special Provisions). This standard has a
well-established and documented safety history; its revision will
maintain the high safety standard currently achieved under the HMR.
III. Overview of Amendments
PHMSA would like to note that SP 13124 was accidently mentioned in
this section in the NPRM. It was not PHMSA's intention to mention this
special permit in this rulemaking. Special permit 13124 is no longer
needed based on a final rule published in the Federal Register on
October 1, 2003 [68 FR 44992] under docket number RSPA-2002-13658 (HM-
215E). The special permits and competent authorities mentioned in this
rulemaking are available for viewing on PHMSA's Web site at https://phmsa.dot.gov/hazmat/permits-approvals. In this Final Rule, PHMSA is
revising the HMR by adopting the following special permits and
competent authority approvals:
Special Permits
DOT-SP 9275--Authorization for the transportation in
commerce of certain limited quantities of liquids and
[[Page 15035]]
solids containing ethyl alcohol and exempt these shipments from the
provisions of the HMR. PHMSA is modifying this adoption to limit
containers using this exception to 8 fluid ounces and eliminating the
need for marking the words ``contains ethyl alcohol on the package.''
Packages shipping between 8 fluid ounces and 1 gallon under this
section are required to place the words ``contains ethyl alcohol'' on
the package.
DOT-SP 11263--Authorization for the transportation of
Class 9 solid coal pitch compounds in non-specification open-top or
closed-top sift proof metal cans or fiber drums.
DOT-SP 11836--Authorization for the transportation in
commerce of UN1H1 and UN6HA1 drums containing ammonia solutions that do
not meet certain requirements contained in Sec. Sec. 173.24 and
173.24a.
DOT-SP 12134--Authorization of exceptions for spent
bleaching earth (Division 4.2 PG III)
DOT-SP 12825--Authorization to transport Life-saving
appliances, self-inflating, containing non-specification steel
cylinders between a vessel and an authorized facility for servicing.
DOT-SP 14479--Authorization for the use of alternative
shipping names and marking requirements for regulated medical wastes.
Special Permits for Harmonization with the ``FAA
Modernization and Reform Act of 2012''--PHMSA is adding an exception to
the HMR for Oxygen cylinders and other Oxidizing cylinders transported
aboard aircraft within the state of Alaska. This language will make
several existing special permits no longer necessary.
This includes the following special permits: 14903, 14908, 15062,
15075, 15076, 15077, 15078, 15079, 15092, 15094, 15095, and 15143.
Approvals
CA2005120010--Authorization to manufacture, mark, and sell
UN4G combination packagings with outer fiberboard boxes and with inner
fiberboard components that have basis weights that vary by not more
than plus or minus 5% from the measured basis weight in the initial
design qualification test report.
CA20060660005--Authorization to manufacture, mark, and
sell UN5M1 and UN5M2 multi-wall paper bags with individual paper wall
basis weights that vary by plus or minus 5% from the nominal basis
weights reported in the initial design qualification test report.
CA2006060006--Authorization to manufacture, mark, and sell
UN4G combination packagings with outer fiberboard components that have
individual containerboard basis weights that vary by plus or minus 5%
from the nominal basis weight reported in the initial design.
CA2006010012--Authorization to manufacture, mark, and sell
UN4G combination packagings with outer fiberboard boxes and with inner
fiberboard components that have individual containerboard basis weight
that vary by plus or minus 5% from the nominal basis weight reported in
the initial design qualification test report.
Revision to Approvals Renewals
PHMSA is revising this section to allow for approval
holders applying for a timely renewal to continue using their approval
after the expiration date if they apply within 60 days of the
expiration dates.
IV. List of Commenters
In response to the NPRM, PHMSA received 36 comments. A majority of
these commenters were in support of the Fibre Box Associations comments
to increase the packaging variation of +/- 5% to +/- 10%. Other
commenters mostly supported modifying the proposed adoption of SP 9275
to not include the requirement to mark packages with ``contains ethyl
alcohol.'' The commenters and the docket number were the comments are
located are listed below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commenter Docket ID No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
American Trucking Association PHMSA-2011-0158-0019
(ATA).
Association of Hazmat Shippers... PHMSA-2011-0158-0031
Atlas Container.................. PHMSA-2011-0158-0037
Batavia Container, Inc........... PHMSA-2011-0158-0012
Bates Container.................. PHMSA-2011-0158-0011
Bemis Company.................... PHMSA-2011-0158-0034
California Box................... PHMSA-2011-0158-0025
Council on Safe Transportation of PHMSA-2011-0158-0029
Hazardous Articles, Inc.
Dangerous Goods Advisory Council. PHMSA-2011-0158-0030
Exopack, LLC..................... PHMSA-2011-0158-0009
Fibre Box Association............ PHMSA-2011-0158-0004
Georgia Pacific.................. PHMSA-2011-0158-0022
Great Northern Corporation....... PHMSA-2011-0158-0006
Green Bay Packaging.............. PHMSA-2011-0158-0008
Greif, LLC....................... PHMSA-2011-0158-0017
Healthcare Waste Institute....... PHMSA-2011-0158-0028
Hood Packaging Corporation....... PHMSA-2011-0158-0014
International Paper.............. PHMSA-2011-0158-0010
International Vessel Operators PHMSA-2011-0158-0026
Dangerous Goods Association Inc
(IVODGA).
Langston Companies, Inc.......... PHMSA-2011-0158-0036
Lawrence Paper Company........... PHMSA-2011-0158-0015
Lonnie Jaycox.................... PHMSA-2011-0158-0002
Mall City Containers............. PHMSA-2011-0158-0021
National Association of Chemical PHMSA-2011-0158-0032
Distributors.
Niagara Sheets LLC............... PHMSA-2011-0158-0027
Norampac......................... PHMSA-2011-0158-0020
Packaging Corporation of America. PHMSA-2011-0158-0024
Packaging Services............... PHMSA-2011-0158-0005
Paper Shipping Sack PHMSA-2011-0158-0018
Manufacturers' Association
(PSSMA).
Porto Packaging.................. PHMSA-2011-0158-0016
Pro-Pack Testing................. PHMSA-2011-0158-0007
SMC Packaging Group.............. PHMSA-2011-0158-0023
Stericycle, Inc.................. PHMSA-2011-0158-0003
United Parcel Service (UPS)...... PHMSA-2011-0158-0033
[[Page 15036]]
Viking Industries, Inc........... PHMSA-2011-0158-0013
Werthan Packaging Inc............ PHMSA-2011-0158-0035
------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Summary Review of Amendments and Response to Comments
A. Consumer Products Containing Liquids and Solids Containing Ethyl
Alcohol
DOT-SP 9275 authorizes the transportation in commerce of certain
beverages, foods, cosmetics, medicines, medical screening solutions and
concentrates containing ethyl alcohol and exempts these shipments from
the provisions of HMR. This special permit has been in effect since at
least 1985 and had been utilized by hundreds of companies. However, on
August 18, 2011 PHMSA found that SP 9275 did not provide a level of
safety at least equivalent to the HMR due to the lack of hazard
communications markings. This was discovered during PHMSA's review of
all special permits as required by the DOT Office of the Inspector
General (OIG) to ensure all special permits met an equivalent level of
safety. PHMSA issued a revised version of SP 9275 to address the lack
of hazard communication markings on August 18, 2011.
In response to the NPRM, PHMSA received several comments on how to
adopt this special permit. Several commenters opposed the requirement
for the shipments under the proposed section to require the words
``contains ethyl alcohol'' on the outside of the package. After careful
consideration of these comments, PHMSA is adopting the special permit
without requiring the words ``contains ethyl alcohol'' for shipments of
ethyl alcohol in quantities not exceeding 8 fluid ounces in glass
containers and not exceeding 16 fluid ounces in non-glass containers.
For shipments of ethyl alcohol (not more than 70% concentration) in
quantities greater than 8 fluid ounces in glass containers and greater
than 16 ounces in non-glass containers, the words ``contains ethyl
alcohol'' are required on the outside of the package. Shipments of
ethyl alcohol in quantities of 8 ounces or less are not required to be
marked with the words `contains ethyl alcohol'.'' (This would apply to
both greater than and less than 70% concentration.)
Therefore, PHMSA is adopting the terms of SP 9275 as revised on
August 18, 2011 with modification. PHMSA is adopting this special
permit to allow certain limited quantities of ethyl alcohol to be
excepted from the applicable provisions of the HMR that require the
packages to be marked with the words ``Contains Ethyl Alcohol.'' PHMSA
is adding Sec. 173.150(g) to allow for the shipment of limited
quantities of ethyl alcohol of not exceeding 8 fluid ounces in glass
containers and not exceeding 16 fluid ounces for non-glass containers
without the term ``contains ethyl alcohol'' marked on the outside of
the package. Packages containing 8 fluid ounces to 1 gallon shipped
under this section require the marking ``contains ethyl alcohol'' on
the outside of the package.
B. Transportation of Solid Coal Tar Pitch Compounds.
DOT-SP 11263 authorizes the transportation of solid coal tar pitch
compounds, Class 9, in open-top and closed-top sift-proof metal cans or
fiber drums. The special permit has been in effect since 1994 and has
been utilized by 5 holders with an acceptable safety performance. In
addition, PHMSA has no reported incidents over the past 10 years
involving this special permit. The American Trucking Association (ATA)
supports adoption of this special permit in response to the NPRM. PHMSA
received no negative comments regarding this special permit in the
NPRM.
Therefore, PHMSA is adopting the terms of DOT-SP 11263 into the HMR
by amending the entry in Sec. 172.101, The Hazardous Materials Table
(HMT), for Environmentally hazardous substances, solids, n.o.s., UN
3077, by adding a new Special Provision N91 in Column 7. In addition,
in Sec. 172.102 new Special Provision N91 is added in appropriate
sequence specifically authorizing the use of a non-DOT specification
sift-proof, non-bulk, metal can with or without lid, or a non-DOT
specification sift-proof, non-bulk fiber drum, with or without lid. The
fiber drum is required to be fabricated with a three ply wall, as a
minimum. The coal tar pitch compound must remain in a solid mass during
transportation.
C. Transportation of Certain Ammonia Solutions in UN1H1 Drums, UN3H1
Jerricans, and UN6HA1 Composite Packagings
DOT-SP 11836 authorizes the transportation of specific ammonia
solutions in specification UN1H1 drums, UN3H1 jerricans, and UN6HA1
composite packagings that do not meet the provisions in Sec. Sec.
173.24(g) and 173.24a(b)(2). Specific operational controls are required
in lieu of compliance with these two requirements. This special permit
has been in effect since 1997 and has been utilized by at least 61
holders with an acceptable safety performance. In addition, PHMSA has
no reported incidents over the past 10 years involving this special
permit. American Trucking Association (ATA) supports adoption of this
special permit in response to the NPRM. The National Association of
Chemical Distributors supports adoption of this special permit into the
HMR. PHMSA received no negative comments regarding this special permit
in the NPRM.
Therefore, PHMSA is adopting the terms of DOT-SP 11836 into the HMR
by amending the entry in the HMT for ``Ammonia solutions, relative
density between 0.880 and 0.957 at 15 degrees C in water, with more
than 10 percent but not more than 35 percent ammonia, UN 2672'', by
adding a new Special Provision 336 in Column 7. In addition, in Sec.
172.102 new Special Provision 336 is added in appropriate sequence
specifically authorizing the use of DOT UN1H1 drums, UN3H1 jerricans,
and UN6HA1 composite packagings which meet the requirements of Part 178
of the HMR at the Packing Group I or II performance level except that
the packagings do not meet the venting requirements in Sec. 173.24(g)
and the hydrostatic pressure test marking specified in Sec.
173.24a(b)(4). Transportation of these packages also requires the door
of each van trailer to be marked with ``Warning trailer may contain
chemical vapor. Do not enter until vapors have dissipated.'' The driver
of the transport vehicle and the consignee(s) must be trained not to
enter the transport vehicle until the ammonia vapors have dissipated,
and the emergency response information on the hazardous materials
shipping paper must indicate that the vehicle may contain ammonia
vapors.
D. Transportation of Spent Bleaching Earth
DOT-SP 12134 authorizes the transportation of spent bleaching earth
as a Division 4.2, solid, PG III, exempt from the provisions of the
HMR, except as specifically required by the special permit. Packagings
authorized under the
[[Page 15037]]
special permit are non-specification, sift-proof dump or hopper type
vehicles, and sift-proof roll-on/roll-off bulk bins. All authorized
packaging must be covered by a tarpaulin, metal cover, or equivalent
means during transportation. The special permit also includes specific
operational controls, including: the temperature of the spent bleaching
earth may not exceed 55 [deg]C at the time it is offered for
transportation and any time during transportation; drivers must be
specifically trained in handling and responding to emergency incidents
involving the spent bleaching earth; and transport vehicles must be
marked in accordance with Sec. 172.302(a). This special permit has
been in effect since 1999 and has been utilized by at least 27 holders
with an acceptable safety performance. In addition, PHMSA has no
reported incidents over the past 10 years involving this special
permit. PHMSA received no comments regarding this special permit in the
NPRM.
Therefore, PHMSA is adopting the terms of DOT-SP 12134 into the HMR
by amending the entry in the HMT for ``self-heating solid, organic,
n.o.s. (spent bleaching earth), UN 3088'', by adding a new Special
Provision, B116 in Column 7. In addition, in Sec. 172.102 new Special
Provision B116 is added in appropriate sequence specifically
authorizing the use of non-specification, sift-proof dump or hopper
type motor vehicles, and sift-proof roll-on/roll-off bulk bins, which
must be covered by a tarpaulin, metal cover, or equivalent means. The
material also is subject to operational controls, including not
exceeding a temperature of 55[deg]C (130 [deg]F) during transportation,
not exceeding a transportation time of 24 hours, and drivers
transporting spent bleaching earth must be trained in the properties
and hazards of the spent bleaching earth and the actions required to
mitigate the self-heating properties of the material that may occur
during the transportation.
E. Requalification of non-DOT Specification Cylinders in Life-Saving
Appliances
DOT-SP 12825 authorizes the transport between a vessel and a U.S.
Coast Guard approved inflatable life raft servicing facility of life-
saving appliances, self- inflating, containing non-DOT specification
steel cylinders for the purpose of the servicing of such life-saving
appliances. Specific operational controls are specified in the below
listed Special Provision. This special permit has been in effect since
2001 and has been utilized by at least 54 holders with acceptable
safety performance. In addition, PHMSA has no reported incidents since
2001 involving this special permit. PHMSA received a comment from the
International Vessel Operators Dangerous Goods Association, Inc.
(IVODGA) supporting adoption of SP 12825 into the HMR. PHMSA did not
receive any negative comments in response to the NPRM.
Therefore, PHMSA is adopting the terms of DOT-SP 12825 into the HMR
by revising the entry in the HMT for Life-saving appliances, self-
inflating, UN 2990, by adding a new Special Provision 338 in Column 7.
In addition, in Sec. 172.102, new Special Provision 338 is added in
appropriate sequence requiring that Life-saving appliances, self-
inflating, UN 2990 being shipped between a vessel and a U.S. Coast
Guard approved life raft servicing facility only be subject to the
requirements of this special provision. A material meeting the
requirements of this special provision is not otherwise be subject to
the HMR.
F. Use of Regulated Medical Waste Containers Displaying Alternative
Markings
DOT-SP 14479 authorizes the continued use of regulated medical
waste containers manufactured before October 1, 2006 and marked with an
alternative shipping name for UN 3291, ``Regulated medical waste,
n.o.s.'' It also allows for orientation arrows that deviate from the
prescribed color specification in the HMR. This special permit has been
in effect since 2007 and has been utilized by at least 22 holders. In
addition, PHMSA has no reported incidents since 2007 involving this
special permit. PHMSA received comments from the Healthcare Waste
Institute and Stericycle Inc. supporting adoption of this special
permit. PHMSA received no negative comments regarding adoption of this
special permit.
Therefore, PHMSA is adopting the terms of DOT-SP 14479 into the HMR
by amending the entry in the HMT for Regulated Medical Waste, n.o.s.,
UN 3088, by adding a new Special Provision, 337 in Column 7. Special
Provision 337 allows for the use of regulated waste containers marked
with the alternative shipping name of Regulated medical waste, UN3291
and black or white orientation arrows that deviate from the prescribed
specifications in Sec. 172.312(a)(2).
G. Adoption of Oxygen Generator Special Permits to Harmonize With FAA
Modernization and Reform Act of 2012
Section 824 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012
includes a provision that allows for exceptions for cylinders of
compressed oxygen or other oxidizing gases transported in the State of
Alaska aboard aircraft. By adopting this statutory exception into the
HMR, the following special permits will no longer be necessary: 14903,
14908, 15062, 15075, 15076, 15077, 15078, 15079, 15092, 15094, 15095,
and 15143. These special permits all provide exceptions for the
transportation of Oxygen and other Division 2.2 Oxidizing gases for
transportation aboard aircraft in the State of Alaska. PHMSA received
no comments regarding this special permit in the NPRM. Therefore, PHSMA
is adopting the terms of these special permits in Sec. 175.34.
H. Competent Authority CA2005120010 for Approval of Equivalent
Packagings
This approval authorizes the manufacturing, marking, and selling of
UN4G combination packagings with outer fiberboard boxes and with inner
fiberboard components that have basis weights that vary by not more
than plus or minus 5% from the measured basis weight in the initial
design qualification test report. This approval was issued in 2009 and
has demonstrated an acceptable safety performance. PHMSA has no
reported incidents involving this approval. PHMSA received several
comments in support of comments made by the Fibre Box Association to
increase the variation from plus or minus 5% to plus or minus 10%.
However, PHMSA does not have the historical data to support an increase
in this variation to plus or minus 10%. Therefore, PHMSA is adopting
the terms of CA2005120010 as proposed into the HMR in Sec.
178.516(b)(7).
I. Competent Authority CA2006060005 for Approval of Equivalent
Packagings
This approval authorizes the manufacture, mark, and sale of UN5M1
and UN5M2 multi-wall paper bags with individual paper wall basis
weights that vary by not more than plus or minus 5% from the nominal
basis weights reported in the initial design qualification test report.
This approval was issued in 2009 and has demonstrated an acceptable
safety performance. PHMSA has no reported incidents involving this
approval. PHMSA received several comments in support of comments made
by the Fibre Box Association to increase the variation from plus or
[[Page 15038]]
minus 5% to plus or minus 10%. However, PHMSA does not have the
historical data to support an increase in this variation to plus or
minus 10%. Therefore, PHMSA is adopting the terms of CA2006060005 in
Sec. 178.521(b)(4).
J. Competent Authority CA2006060006 for Approval of Equivalent
Packagings
This approval authorizes the manufacture, mark, and sale of UN4G
combination packagings with outer fiberboard components that have
individual containerboard basis weights that vary by not more than plus
or minus 5% from the nominal basis weight reported in the initial
design. This approval was issued in 2009 and has demonstrated an
acceptable safety performance. PHMSA received several comments in
support of comments made by the Fibre Box Association to increase the
variation from plus or minus 5% to plus or minus 10%. However, PHMSA
does not have the historical data to support an increase in this
variation to plus or minus 10%. Therefore, PHMSA is adopting the terms
of CA2006060006 in Sec. 178.516(b)(7).
K. Competent Authority CA2006010012 for Approval of Equivalent
Packagings
This competent authority authorizes the manufacture, mark, and sale
of UN4G combination packagings with outer fiberboard boxes and with
inner fiberboard components that have individual containerboard basis
weight that vary by not more than plus or minus 5% from the nominal
basis weight reported in the initial design qualification test report.
This approval was issued in 2006 and has demonstrated an acceptable
safety performance. PHMSA received several comments in support of
comments made by the Fibre Box Association to increase the variation
from plus or minus 5% to plus or minus 10%. However, PHMSA does not
have the historical data to support an increase in this variation to
plus or minus 10%. Therefore, PHMSA is adopting the terms of
CA2006010012 in Sec. 178.516(b)(7).
L. Revision of Sec. 107.705(c) for Renewing Approvals
PHMSA is revising this section to allow approval holders applying
for a renewal to continue using their approval after the expiration
date if they apply at least 60 days before the expiration date. PHMSA
did not receive any comments on this proposal and, therefore, it will
be adopted as proposed in the NPRM.
V. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
A. Statutory/Legal Authority for This Rulemaking
This Final Rule is published under the authority of 49 U.S.C.
5103(b) which authorizes the Secretary to prescribe regulations for the
safe transportation, including security, of hazardous material in
intrastate, interstate, and foreign commerce. 49 U.S.C. 5117(a)
authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to issue a special permit
from a regulation prescribed in 5103(b), 5104, 5110, or 5112 of the
Federal Hazardous Materials Transportation Law to a person
transporting, or causing to be transported, hazardous material in a way
that achieves a safety level at least equal to the safety level
required under the law, or consistent with the public interest, if a
required safety level does not exist. This final rule amends the
regulations by adopting provisions from certain widely used and
longstanding special permits that have established a history of safety
and which may, therefore, be converted into the regulations for general
use.
B. Executive Order 12866, 13563, 13610 and DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures
This final rule is considered a non-significant regulatory action
under section 3(f) and was reviewed by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). This final rule is considered a non-significant rule
under the Regulatory Policies and Procedures order issued by the
Department of Transportation [44 FR 11034]. Executive Order 13563 is
supplemental to and reaffirms the principles, structures, and
definitions governing regulatory review that were established in
Executive Order 12866 Regulatory Planning and Review of September 30,
1993. By building off of each other, these two Executive Orders 12866
and 13563 require agencies to regulate in the ``most cost-effective
manner,'' to make a ``reasoned determination that the benefits of the
intended regulation justify its costs,'' and to develop regulations
that ``impose the least burden on society.''
Executive Order 13610 (Identifying and Reducing Regulatory Burdens)
reaffirmed the goals of Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review) issued January 18, 2011, and Executive Order 12866
(Regulatory Planning and Review) issued September 30, 1993. Executive
Order 13610 directs agencies to prioritize ``those initiatives that
will produce significant quantifiable monetary savings or significant
quantifiable reductions in paperwork burdens while protecting public
health, welfare, safety, and our environment.'' Executive Order 13610
further instructs agencies to give consideration to the cumulative
effects of their regulations, including cumulative burdens, and
prioritize reforms that will significantly reduce burdens.
In this final rule, PHMSA is amending the HMR to adopt alternatives
this agency has permitted under widely used and longstanding special
permits and approvals with established safety records that we have
determined meet the safety criteria for inclusion in the HMR. Adoption
of these special permits and approvals into regulations of general
applicability provides shippers and carriers with additional
flexibility to comply with established safety requirements, thereby
reducing transportation costs and increasing productivity. In addition,
the final rule reduces the paperwork burden on industry and this agency
resulting from putting an end to the need for renewal applications for
special permits. Taken together, the provisions of this final rule
promotes the continued safe transportation of hazardous materials while
reducing transportation costs for the industry and administrative costs
for the agency.
The impact of this final rule is presumed to be minor as no new
costs are imposed upon any stakeholders and those that currently hold
special permits and CAs will find some relief from regulatory review
for current practices. This final rule makes provisions that are
currently approved in certain special permits available to all
businesses operating in the U.S. without needing to submit party-to
special permit applications to PHMSA, and current permit holders will
no longer need renewals. Over the past decade, approximately 464
companies have applied for and/or renewed the special permits included
in this final rule. Many of these special permits have had positive
economic impacts by allowing companies to be accepted from requirements
in the HMR when shipping certain quantities/types of materials or by
allowing the use of less expensive non-specification packages when
certain provisions are met. It is difficult to quantify the savings
these special permits have allowed, but it should be noted that these
savings are extended to other firms that would make use of the
provisions once adopted into regulations. PHMSA calculates that this
rulemaking results in a paperwork reduction that, on average, saves
each applicant $39.50. PHMSA estimates that over a 10-year period there
will be an estimated benefit total
[[Page 15039]]
totaling $18,328 affecting approximately 140 entities. In accordance
with the Federal hazardous materials law (49 U.S.C. 5101 et seq.),
initial issuances of special permits are for two years and can be
renewed for four years thereafter. Thus, over 10 years, a special
permit would on average be renewed twice for a total benefit of between
$43,000 and $47,000. These figures are discounted annually by 3 and 7
percent to reflect the time value of money.
This final rule adopts four approvals into the HMR. This allows
manufacturers of affected hazardous materials packaging to continue
manufacturing packages without the need to renew their approvals.
Adoption of the four approvals results in a one-time total economic
benefit of $158. The renewal cycle for approvals can vary based on the
applicant needs and regulatory authority, but are typically renewed
every five years. At both 3 and 7 percent annual discount, this yields
over $270 in benefits. Total benefits represent a small but positive
sum (between $46,000 and $52,000) over 10 years affecting approximately
140 entities.
C. Executive Order 13132
This final rule was analyzed in accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order 13132 (``Federalism''). This
final rule preempts state, local and Indian tribe requirements but does
not create any regulation that has substantial direct effects on the
states, the relationship between the national government and the
states, or the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of governments. Therefore, the consultation and funding
requirements of Executive Order 13132 do not apply. Federal hazardous
material transportation law, 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128, contains an express
preemption provision (49 U.S.C. 5125(b)) preempting state, local and
Indian tribe requirements on certain covered subjects. Covered subjects
are:
(1) The designation, description, and classification of hazardous
materials;
(2) The packing, repacking, handling, labeling, marking, and
placarding of hazardous materials;
(3) The preparation, execution, and use of shipping documents
related to hazardous materials and requirements related to the number,
contents, and placement of those documents;
(4) The written notification, recording, and reporting of the
unintentional release in transportation of hazardous materials; or
(5) The designing, manufacturing, fabricating, inspecting, marking,
maintaining, reconditioning, repairing, or testing a package, container
or packaging component that is represented, marked, certified, or sold
as qualified for use in transporting hazardous material in commerce.
This final rule addresses covered subject items (2), (3), and (5)
and would preempt any State, local, or Indian tribe requirements not
meeting the ``substantively the same'' standard. Federal hazardous
materials transportation law provides at 49 U.S.C. 5125(b)(2) that if
PHMSA issues a regulation concerning any of the covered subjects, PHMSA
must determine and publish in the Federal Register the effective date
of Federal preemption. The effective date may not be earlier than the
90th day following the date of issuance of the final rule and not later
than two years after the date of issuance. The effective date of
federal preemption will be 90 days from publication of this final rule
in this matter in the Federal Register.
D. Executive Order 13175
This final rule was analyzed in accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order 13175 (``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments''). Because this final rule
does not have tribal implications and does not impose substantial
direct compliance costs on Indian tribal governments, the funding and
consultation requirements of Executive Order 13175 do not apply.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act, Executive Order 13272, and DOT
Procedures and Policies
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires an
agency to review regulations to assess their impact on small entities.
An agency must conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis unless it
determines and certifies that a rule is not expected to have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. This
final rule adopts into the HMR certain widely used special permits.
Adoption of these special permits into regulations of general
applicability provides shippers and carriers with additional
flexibility to comply with established safety requirements, thereby
reducing transportation costs and increasing productivity. Entities
affected by the final rule conceivably include all persons--shippers,
carriers, and others--who offer and/or transport in commerce hazardous
materials. The specific focus of the rule is on the adoption of special
permits into the HMR. In a review of the companies using the identified
special permits, PHMSA identified a combination of small and large
businesses that are affected positively by this rulemaking. For
example, the final rule accepts certain shipments from the specific
documentation requirements of the HMR; these exceptions will increase
shipping options and reduce shipment costs. Overall, this final rule
reduces the compliance burden on the regulated industries, such as
small businesses that dispose of medical waste, transporters of
consumer products containing ethyl alcohol, and airlines transporting
oxygen generators, without compromising transportation safety and
should provide a slight positive economic benefit (i.e., reduced
compliance burden) for those small entities. Therefore, we certify that
this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. For example, special permit 9275
will no longer require businesses to apply for a special permit in
order to ship common retail items such as cosmetics that would normally
be shipped as a class 3 material.
This final rule has been developed in accordance with Executive
Order 13272 (``Proper Consideration of Small Entities in Agency
Rulemaking'') and DOT's procedures and policies to promote compliance
with the Regulatory Flexibility Act to ensure that potential impacts of
draft rules on small entities are properly considered.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
PHMSA has an approved information collection under OMB Control
Number 2137-0051, ``Rulemaking, Special Permits, and Preemption
Requirements.'' This final rule results in a decrease in the annual
burden and costs under this information collection due to the changes
that adopts provisions contained in certain widely used or longstanding
special permits that have an established safety record.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no person is required to
respond to an information collection unless it has been approved by OMB
and displays a valid OMB control number. Section 1320.8(d), title 5,
Code of Federal Regulations requires that PHMSA provide interested
members of the public and affected agencies an opportunity to comment
on information and recordkeeping requests.
This final rule identifies a revised information collection request
that PHMSA will submit to OMB for approval based on the requirements in
this final rule. PHMSA has developed burden estimates to reflect
changes in this final rule. PHMSA estimates that
[[Page 15040]]
the information collection and recordkeeping burden of this final rule
is as follows:
OMB Control No. 2137-0051
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Decrease in Annual Number of Respondents.................. 434
Net Decrease in Annual Responses.............................. 434
Net Decrease in Annual Burden Hours........................... 434
Net Decrease in Annual Burden Costs........................... $17,143
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHMSA received no comments on the information collection and
recordkeeping burdens associated with developing, implementing, and
maintaining these requirements for approval in the NPRM.
Requests for a copy of this information collection should be
directed to Deborah Boothe or T. Glenn Foster, Office of Hazardous
Materials Standards (PHH-11), Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001,
Telephone (202) 366-8553.
Address written comments to the Dockets Unit as identified in the
ADDRESSES section of this rulemaking. We must receive comments
regarding information collection burdens prior to the close of the
comment period identified in the DATES section of this rulemaking. In
addition, you may submit comments specifically related to the
information collection burden to the PHMSA Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, at fax number (202) 395-6974.
G. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
A regulation identifier number (RIN) is assigned to each regulatory
action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations. The
Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda in
April and October of each year. The RIN contained in the heading of
this document may be used to cross-reference this action with the
Unified Agenda.
H. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This final rule does not impose unfunded mandates under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. It does not result in costs of
$141.3 million or more to either state, local or tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or to the private sector, and is the least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objective of the rule.
I. Environmental Assessment
The National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4375,
requires that federal agencies analyze proposed actions to determine
whether the action will have a significant impact on the human
environment. The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations
requires federal agencies to conduct an environmental review
considering (1) the need for the proposed action (2) alternatives to
the proposed action (3) probable environmental impacts of the proposed
action and alternatives and (4) the agencies and persons consulted
during the consideration process. 40 CFR 1508.9(b).
The Need for This Action
The purpose and need of this rulemaking is to adopt certain
approvals related to air transportation in Alaska and widely used
special permits or those with an established safety record into the HMR
for universal use. PHMSA is working to reduce the number of special
permits to reduce administrative burden to both the government and
private industry while affording the benefits of certain special
permits that have been vetted for safety to a wider audience.
This rule follows an FAA statutory provision that requires PHMSA to
adopt certain special permits into the HMR. Section 824 of the FAA
Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 includes a provision that allows
for exceptions for cylinders of compressed oxygen or other oxidizing
gases transported in the State of Alaska aboard aircraft. These special
permits all provided exceptions for the transportation of Oxygen and
other Division 2.2 Oxidizing gases for transportation aboard aircraft
in the state of Alaska.
The need for hazardous materials to support essential services and
industry means transportation of highly hazardous materials is
necessary. PHMSA conducted a periodic review of Special Permits that
have a long history of safety. After this review PHMSA determined that
certain special permits were candidates for adoption into the HMR.
Special Permit 9275 authorizes the transportation in commerce of
certain consumer products of liquids and solids containing ethyl
alcohol and exempts these shipments from the provisions of HMR. This
Special Permit is used frequently by the cosmetics industry to move
very small quantities of ethyl alcohol contained in consumer products.
After reviewing the history of this Special Permit, PHMSA found an
adequate safety record for adoption into the HMR.
Special Permit 11263 authorizes the transportation of solid coal
tar pitch compounds, Class 9, in open-top and closed-top sift-proof
metal cans or fiber drums. Coal tar pitch is a black or dark-brown
amorphous residue produced by the distillation or heat treatment of
coal tar. It is a solid at room temperature and exhibits a broad
softening range instead of a defined melting temperature. Among other
uses, coal tar pitch is used as a base for coatings and paint, in
roofing and paving, and as a binder in asphalt products. This Special
Permit authorizes the use of a specification package with a proven
safety record in order to mitigate a potential release of coal tar
pitch compounds. During a review of long standing Special Permits,
PHMSA found that this Special Permit had an adequate safety record and
provided an equivalent level of safety to the HMR.
Special Permit 11836 authorizes the transportation of specific
ammonia solutions in specification UN1H1 drums, UN3H1 jerricans, and
UN6HA1 composite packagings. Ammonia solutions are a clear colorless
liquid consisting of ammonia dissolved in water which is corrosive to
tissue and metals. This Special Permit is utilizes the use of
specification packages with a proven safety record in order to mitigate
a potential release of ammonia solutions. During a review of long
standing Special Permits, PHMSA found that this Special Permit had an
adequate safety record and provided an equivalent level of safety to
the HMR.
Special Permit 12134 authorizes the transportation of spent
bleaching earth as a Division 4.2, solid, PG III, exempt from the
provisions of the HMR. Spent bleaching earth, is a solid waste from the
edible oil industry can be converted to a clay-carbon adsorbent for
potential reuse in the adsorptive cleansing of vegetable oils. This
Special Permit utilizes the use of a specification package with a
proven safety record that will mitigate a potential release of spent
bleach earth material. During a review of long standing Special
Permits, PHMSA found that this Special Permit had an adequate safety
record and provided an equivalent level of safety to the HMR.
Special Permit 12825 authorizes the transportation of life-saving
appliances, self-inflating, that contain non-DOT specification steel
cylinders for the purpose of movement between a vessel and a U.S. Coast
Guard approved inflatable life raft servicing facility in conjunction
with the servicing of such life-saving appliances. Adoption of this
[[Page 15041]]
Special Permit is needed to ensure that these life-saving appliances
are serviced without delay. During a review of long standing Special
Permits, PHMSA found that this Special Permit had an adequate safety
record and provided an equivalent level of safety to the HMR.
Special Permit 14479 authorizes the continued use of regulated
medical waste containers manufactured before October 1, 2006 and marked
with an alternative shipping name for UN 3291 and orientation arrows.
The packages are used in the medical waste industry to ship low hazard
medical waste to disposal facilities. Adoption of this Special Permit
allows the medical waste industry to continue using packages authorizes
safely transport medical waste in these pacakging. During a review of
long standing Special Permits, PHMSA found that this Special Permit had
an adequate safety record and provided an equivalent level of safety to
the HMR.
Alternatives to the Proposed Action
Information about benefits of this final rulemaking action can be
found in the preamble (i.e., ``Overview of Proposed Amendments) to this
rulemaking. The alternatives considered in the analysis include (1) the
proposed action, that is, adoption of the proposed special permits as
amendments to the HMR; (2) adoption of some subset of the proposed
special permits (i.e., only some of the proposed special permits) as
amendments to the HMR; and (3) the ``no action'' alternative, meaning
that none of the proposed special permits would be adopted into the
HMR.
Analysis of the Alternatives
(1.) Adopt All Special Permits and Competent Authority Approvals
The selected alternative amends certain HMR requirements including
methods for packaging, describing, and transporting hazardous materials
that are currently permitted under widely used special permits with
established safety records for inclusion in the HMR. This final rule
allows the transportation of the following hazardous materials and
packages in accordance with the following former special permits in
ways that vary from certain other provisions in the HMR:
Special Permit 14479
The adoption of this Special Permit will allow for ``UN 3291,
Regulated medical waste, n.o.s.,'' to be shipped using alternative
shipping names and marking requirements for regulated medical wastes.
Use of this alternative shipping name and marking requirements is not
expected to have any negative effects on safety or the environment.
Special Permit 12825
The adoption of this Special Permit allows for the shipment of non-
flammable compressed gases in non-DOT specification steel cylinders for
use in life-saving appliances. Allowing the uses of non-DOT
specification cylinders in life saving appliances is not expected to
have any effects on safety or the environment.
Special Permit 9275
The adoption of this Special Permit allows consumer products of
liquids and solids containing ethyl alcohol to be exempted from the
HMR. These low hazard, low quantity packages containing ethyl alcohol
are not expected to have any negative effect on safety or the
environment.
Special Permit 11263
The adoption of this Special Permit allows ``UN3077, coal tar pitch
compounds'' to be shipped in non-specification open-top or closed-top
sift proof metal cans or fiber drums. The use of this alternative
package for the shipment of coal tar pitch compounds is not expected to
have any negative effect on safety or the environment.
Special Permit 12134
The adoption of this Special Permit allows ``UN 3088, spent
bleaching earth'' to be exempt from the requirements of the HMR when
shipped in non-specification, sift-proof dump or hopper type vehicles.
Exempting these materials from the HMR when shipped in these
alternative packages is not expected to have any negative effect on
safety or the environment.
Special Permit 11836
The adoption of this Special Permit allows ``UN 2672, ammonia
solutions'' to be shipped in UN1HI drums, UN3H1 jerricans, and UN6HA1
composite packages that do not meet provision in Sec. Sec. 173.24 and
173.24a. Allowing shipments of these materials in these packages is not
expected to have any negative effects on safety or the environment.
Summary
These hazardous materials are capable of affecting human health and
the environment if a release were to occur. However, adoption of these
special permits maintains an equivalent level of safety as provided in
the special permits.
(2.) Adoption of a Subset of Special Permits
PHMSA considered a wide array of special permits for adoption. It
also considered adopting a smaller subset of special permits.''
However, the full benefits would not be realized as some permits would
not be adopted.
(3.) No Action
If no action is taken then Special Permits will continue to be
issued resulting in no change to the current potential affects to the
environment.
Probable Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action and Alternatives
This final rule allows the transportation of the following
hazardous materials and packages in ways that vary from certain other
provisions in the HMR:
``UN 3291, Regulated medical waste, n.o.s.,''--PHMSA
considered whether alternative markings would be sufficient in
providing adequate hazardous communication. The package described in
this special permit does not differ from packages currently allowed
under the HMR with the exception of the allowed markings and thus will
not impose any addition risk to the environment. Medical waste
transportation is regulated to avoid risk of injury, infection, and
contamination. In addition, as described above, PHMSA has no report of
incidents under this special permit and thus expects there will be no
impact to the environment.
Non-flammable gasses shipped in non-DOT specification
steel cylinders for use in life-saving appliances--PHMSA considered
whether the limited use of non-DOT specification cylinders between U.S.
Coast Guard ships and servicing facilities would pose a risk to the
environment. The cylinders used in this special permit contain inert
gases which if released would pose little to no risk to the
environment. The regulation of compressed gas cylinders requires
testing to ensure integrity and functionality of the cylinder. Cylinder
rupture or failure can cause serious injury or death. In addition, as
described above, PHMSA has no reports of incidents under this special
permit and thus expects there will be no impact to the environment.
Beverages, food, cosmetics and medicines, medical
screening solutions, and concentrates classed as a flammable liquid or
flammable solid containing ethyl alcohol--PHMSA considered whether the
shipment of these low hazard consumer products containing ethyl alcohol
would pose a risk to the environment. These packages contain
[[Page 15042]]
ethyl alcohol which is a flammable liquid. A release from one of these
containers would pose little risk to safety or the environment due to
the very limited quantity in each container. In addition, as described
above, PHMSA has no reports of incidents under this special permit and
thus expect there will be no impact to the environment.
``UN3077, coal tar pitch compounds''--PHMSA considered
whether the shipment of coal tar pitch compounds in open-top and
closed-top sift-proof metal cans or fiber drums would pose a risk to
the environment. Coal tar pitch is a black or dark-brown amorphous
residue produced by the distillation or heat treatment of coal tar.
Coal tar pitch compounds contain various chemical vapors that become
airborne during the heating of coal tar pitch. Coal tar pitch is a
flammable liquid and a known carcinogen. An accidental release of
``coal tar pitch compounds'' could result in contamination of
surrounding environmental medium (air, water, soil). However, as
described above, PHMSA has no reports of incidents under this special
permit and thus expects there will be no impact to the environment.
``UN 3088, spent bleaching earth''--PHMSA considered
whether the shipment of spent bleaching earth in non-specification,
sift-proof dump or hopper type vehicles would pose a risk to the
environment. These packages contain ``spent bleaching earth'' which is
a solid waste from the edible oil industry. Spent bleaching earth can
be flammable, as it contains oil residue. An accidental release of
``spent bleaching earth'' could result in possible contamination of
surrounding environmental medium (air, water, soil). However as
described above, PHMSA has no reports of incidents under this special
permit and thus expects there will be no impact to the environment.
``UN 2672, ammonia solutions''--PHMSA considered whether
the shipment of ammonia solutions in UN1H1 and UN6HA1 drums would pose
a risk to the environment. Ammonia can cause irritation and damage to
mucous membranes and lungs, depending on concentration. An accidental
release of Ammonia solutions could result in possible contamination of
surrounding environmental mediums (air, water, soil). However, as
described above, PHMSA has no reports of incidents under this special
permit and thus expects there will be no impact to the environment.
Hazardous materials shipments frequently move through densely
populated or environmentally sensitive areas where the consequences of
an incident could be loss of life, serious injury, or significant
environmental damage. Because of the vastness of transportation
networks, nearly any community or ecosystem could be affected by a
hazardous materials release during transportation. Therefore, impacts
from a release could affect include atmospheric, aquatic, terrestrial,
and vegetal resources (for example, wildlife habitats). The adverse
environmental impacts associated with releases of most hazardous
materials are short-term impacts that can be greatly reduced or
eliminated through prompt clean-up of the incident scene.
In all modes of transport, the potential for environmental damage
or contamination exists when packages of hazardous materials are
involved in transportation incidents. The process through which safety
permits are issued requires the applicant to demonstrate that the
alternative transportation method or packaging proposed provides an
equivalent level of safety as that provided in the HMR. Implicit in
this process is that the special permit must provide an equivalent
level of environmental protection as that provided in the HMR. Thus,
adoption of the special permits as regulations of general applicability
maintain the existing environmental protections built into the HMR. The
special permits and approvals adopted into the HMR have consistently
demonstrated a long history of safe use. In its review of these special
permits and approval, PHMSA did not identify any incidents that had a
significant effect on the environment. These special permits have a
long history of transporting the above mentioned hazardous materials
safely and without any effects on the environment. Therefore, we find
that adoption of the above described special permits into the HMR will
not have any significant positive or negative impact on the
environment.
Agencies and Persons Consulted During the Consideration Process
This final rule would affect some PHMSA stakeholders, including
hazardous materials shippers and carriers by air, highway, rail and
vessel. PHMSA sought comment on the environmental assessment contained
in the October 22, 2012, NPRM published under Docket PHMSA-2011-0158
[77 FR 64450] (HM-233C) however, PHMSA did not receive any comments on
the environmental assessment contained in that rulemaking. In addition,
PHMSA sought comment from the following modal partners:
Federal Aviation Administration
Environmental Protection Agency
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
United States Coast Guard
Conclusion
PHMSA is making numerous amendments to the HMR through the adoption
of special permits and approvals. The amendments adopted in this final
rule are intended to update, clarify, or provide relief from certain
existing regulatory requirements to promote safer transportation
practices; eliminate unnecessary regulatory requirements; finalize
outstanding petitions for rulemaking; facilitate international
commerce; and, in general, make the requirements easier to understand
and follow.
Given that this rulemaking amends the HMR to adopt provisions
contained in certain widely-used or longstanding special permits that
have an established safety record, these changes in regulation should
in fact increase safety and environmental protections. Furthermore,
while the net environmental impact of this rule will be positive, we
believe there will be no significant environmental impacts associated
with this final rule.
J. Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477), or at www.dot.gov/provacy.
K. Executive Order 13609 and International Trade Analysis
Under E.O. 13609, agencies must consider whether the impacts
associated with significant variations between domestic and
international regulatory approaches are unnecessary or may impair the
ability of American business to export and compete internationally. In
meeting shared challenges involving health, safety, labor, security,
environmental, and other issues, international regulatory cooperation
can identify approaches that are at least as protective as those that
are or would be adopted in the absence of such cooperation.
International regulatory cooperation can also reduce, eliminate, or
prevent unnecessary differences in regulatory requirements.
Similarly, the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96-39), as
amended by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub. L. 103-465),
prohibits Federal
[[Page 15043]]
agencies from establishing any standards or engaging in related
activities that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of
the United States. For purposes of these requirements, Federal agencies
may participate in the establishment of international standards, so
long as the standards have a legitimate domestic objective, such as
providing for safety, and do not operate to exclude imports that meet
this objective. The statute also requires consideration of
international standards and, where appropriate, that they be the basis
for U.S. standards.
PHMSA participates in the establishment of international standards
in order to protect the safety of the American public, and we have
assessed the effects of the final rule to ensure that it does not cause
unnecessary obstacles to foreign trade. Accordingly, this rulemaking is
consistent with E.O. 13609 and PHMSA's obligations.
List of Subjects
49 CFR Part 107
Administrative practice and procedure, Hazardous materials
transportation, Penalties, Reporting and record keeping requirements.
49 CFR Part 171
Exports, Hazardous materials transportation, Hazardous waste,
Imports, Incorporation by reference, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
49 CFR Part 172
Education, Hazardous materials transportation, Hazardous waste,
Incorporation by reference, Labeling, Markings, Packaging and
containers, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
49 CFR Part 173
Hazardous materials transportation, Packaging and containers,
Radioactive materials, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Uranium.
49 CFR Part 175
Hazardous materials transportation, Air carriers, Radioactive
materials, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
49 CFR Part 178
Hazardous materials transportation, Motor vehicle safety, Packaging
and containers, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, we are amending 49 CFR Chapter I
as follows:
PART 107--HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PROGRAM PROCEDURES
0
1. The authority citation for part 107 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128, 44701; Pub. L. 101-410 section 4
(28 U.S.C. 2461 note); Pub. L. 104-121 sections 212-213; Pub. L.
104-134 section 31001; 49 CFR 1.45, 1.53.
0
2. In Sec. 107.705, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 107.705 Registrations, reports, and applications for approval.
* * * * *
(c) For an approval with an expiration date, each application for
renewal or modification must be filed in the same manner as an original
application. If, at least 60 days before an existing approval expires
the holder files an application for renewal that is complete and
conforms to the requirements of this section, the approval will not
expire until final administrative action on the application for renewal
has been taken. Operation under an expired approval not filed within 60
days of the expiration date is prohibited. This paragraph does not
limit the authority of the Associate Administrator to modify, suspend
or terminate an approval under Sec. 107.713.
* * * * *
PART 171--GENERAL INFORMATION, REGULATIONS, AND DEFINITIONS
0
3. The authority citation for part 171 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128, 44701; 49 CFR 1.45 and 1.53;
Pub. L. 101-410 section 4 (28 U.S.C. 2461 note); Pub. L. 104-134
section 31001.
0
4. In Sec. 171.7, revise paragraph (n)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 171.7 Reference material.
* * * * *
(n) * * *
(3) CGA Pamphlet C-6, Standards for Visual Inspection of Steel
Compressed Gas Cylinders, 1993, into Sec. 172.102, Sec. 173.3,
173.198, 180.205, 180.209, 180.211, 180.411, 180.519.
* * * * *
PART 172--HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TABLE, SPECIAL PROVISIONS, HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS COMMUNICATIONS, EMERGENCY RESPONSE INFORMATION, TRAINING
REQUIREMENTS, AND SECURITY PLANS
0
5. The authority citation for part 172 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128; 44701; 49 CFR 1.53.
0
6. In Sec. 172.101, revise following entries in the Hazardous
Materials Table to read as follows:
Sec. 172.101 Purpose and use of hazardous materials table.
[[Page 15044]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hazardous (8) Packaging (Sec. 173.***) (9) Quantity limitations (see (10) Vessel stowage
materials Hazard Special ------------------------------------------------ Sec. Sec. 173.27 and -------------------------------
Symbols descriptions and class or Identification PG Label Codes Provisions -------------175.75)------------
proper shipping division Numbers (Sec. Exceptions Non-bulk Bulk Passenger Cargo air- Location Other
names 172.102) aircraft/rail craft only
(1) (2)............... (3) (4).............. (5)............ (6)............... (7)........... (8A).......... (8B).......... (8C).......... (9A).......... (9B).......... (10A)......... (10B)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Revise]
Ammonia solutions, 8 UN2672........... III............ 8................. 336, IB3, IP8, 154........... 203........... 241........... 5L............ 60L........... A............. 40, 52, 85
relative density T7, TP1.
between 0.880 and
0.957 at 15
degrees C in
water, with more
than 10 percent
but not more than
35 percent
ammonia.
* * * * * * *
Environmentally 9 UN3077........... III............ 9................. 8,146, 335, 155........... 213........... 240........... No Limit...... No Limit...... A.............
hazardous A112, B54,
substances, B120, IB8,
solid, n.o.s. IP3, N20,
N91, T1, TP33.
* * * * * * *
Life-saving 9 UN2990........... ............... None.............. 338........... None.......... 219........... None.......... No limit...... No limit...... A.............
appliances, self-
inflating.
* * * * * * *
Regulated medical 6.2 UN3291........... II............. 6.2............... 41, A13, 337.. 134........... 197........... 197........... No limit...... No limit...... B............. 40
waste, n.o.s. or
Clinical waste,
unspecified,
n.o.s. or (BIO)
Medical waste,
n.o.s., or
Biomedical waste,
n.o.s. or Medical
waste, n.o.s.
Self-heating 4.2 UN3088........... II............. 4.2............... IB6, IP2, T3, None.......... 212........... 241........... 15kg.......... 50kg.......... C.............
solid, organic, TP33.
n.o.s.
.......... III............ 4.2............... IB8, IP3, T1, None.......... 212........... 241........... 15kg.......... 50kg.......... C.............
TP33. B116.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 15045]]
0
7. Section 172.102 is amended:
0
a. In paragraph (c)(1), Special provisions 336, 337, and 338 are added;
0
b. In paragraph (c)(3), Special provision B116 is added; and
0
c. In paragraph (c)(5), Special provision N91 is added.
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 172.102 Special provisions.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
Code/Special Provisions
* * * * *
336 The use of UN1H1 drums, UN3H1 jerricans, and UN6HA1 composite
packagings which meet the requirements of Part 178 of the HMR at the
Packing Group I or II performance level. These packagings are not
required to: (1.) meet the venting requirements in Sec. 173.24(g) or
(2.) be marked with the hydrostatic pressure test marking specified in
Sec. 173.24a(b)(4). Shipment of packages under this special provision
must be made by private or contract motor carrier. Transportation of
these packages also requires the door of each van trailer to be marked
with ``Warning trailer may contain chemical vapor. Do not enter until
vapors have dissipated.'' The driver of the transport vehicle and the
consignee(s) must be trained not to enter the transport vehicle until
the ammonia vapors have dissipated, and the emergency response
information on the shipping paper must indicate that the vehicle
contains ammonia vapors. This training must be documented in training
records required by Sec. 172.704(d). Transport vehicles must be vented
to prevent accumulation of vapors at a poisonous or flammable
concentration.
337 Authorizes the use of regulated waste containers manufactured
prior to October 1, 2006 to be marked with the alternative shipping
name of Regulated medical waste, UN3291 and arrows that deviate as
prescribed in Sec. 172.312(a)(2) in that they may be black or white.
338 Life Saving appliances, self-inflating transported between an
U.S. Coast Guard approved inflatable life raft servicing facility and a
vessel are only subject to the following requirements:
a. Prior to repacking into the life-saving appliance, an installed
inflation cylinder must successfully meet and pass all inspection and
test criteria and standards of the raft manufacturer and the vessel
Flag State requirements for cylinders installed as part of life-saving
appliances, self-inflating (UN2990) used on marine vessels.
Additionally, each cylinder must be visually inspected in accordance
with CGA pamphlet, CGA C-6 (incorporated by reference, see Sec.
171.7). A current copy of CGA pamphlet, CGA C-6 must be available at
the facility servicing the life-saving appliance.
b. An installed inflation cylinder that requires recharging must be
filled in accordance with Sec. 173.301(l).
c. Every installed inflation cylinder, as associated equipment of
the life-saving appliance, must be packed within the protective
packaging of the life raft and the life raft itself must otherwise be
in compliance with Sec. 173.219.
d. The serial number for each cylinder must be recorded as part of
the life-saving appliance service record by the U.S. Coast Guard-
approved servicing facility.
* * * * *
(3) * * *
Code/Special Provisions
* * * * *
B116 The use of non specification, sift-proof dump or hopper type
vehicles, and sift-proof roll-on/roll-off bulk bins, which must be
covered by a tarpaulin, metal cover, or equivalent means is authorized
for the transportation of spent bleaching earth by motor vehicle. The
material is also be subject to operational controls which include not
exceeding a temperature of 55C (130F) at the time it is offered or
during transportation, not exceeding a transportation time of 24 hours,
and drivers transporting spent bleaching earth must be trained in the
properties and hazards of the spent bleaching earth. This training must
be documented in training records required by Sec. 172.704(d).
* * * * *
(5) * * *
Code/Special Provisions
* * * * *
N91 The use of a non specification sift-proof, non-bulk, metal can
with or without lid, or a non specification sift-proof, non-bulk fiber
drum, with or without lid is authorized when transporting coal tar
pitch compounds by motor vehicle or rail freight. The fiber drum must
to be fabricated with a three ply wall, as a minimum. The coal tar
pitch compound must be in a solid mass during transportation.
* * * * *
PART 173--SHIPPERS--GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SHIPMENTS AND
PACKAGINGS
0
8. The authority citation for part 173 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128, 44701; 49 CFR 1.45, 1.53.
0
9. In Sec. 173.150, paragraph (g) is added to read as follows.
Sec. 173.150 Exceptions for Class 3 (flammable and combustible
liquids).
* * * * *
(g) Limited quantities of retail products containing ethyl alcohol.
(1) Beverages, food, cosmetics and medicines, medical screening
solutions, and concentrates sold as retail products containing ethyl
alcohol classed as a flammable liquid or flammable solid containing not
more than 70% ethyl alcohol by volume for liquids, by weight for solids
are excepted from the HMR provided that:
(i) For non-glass inner packagings:
(A) The volume does not exceed 16 fluid ounces in capacity for
liquids; or
(B) For volumes greater than 16 fluid ounces but not exceeding 1
gallon the company name and the words ``Contains Ethyl Alcohol'' are
marked on the package;
(C) Solids containing ethyl alcohol may be packaged in non-glass
inner packagings not exceeding 1 pounds capacity;
(D) For weight greater than one pound up to 8 pounds the company
name and the words ``Contains Ethyl Alcohol'' are marked on the
package.
(ii) For glass inner packagings:
(A) The volume does not exceed 8 fluid ounces in capacity; or
(B) For volumes greater than 8 fluid ounces to 16 fluid ounces the
company name and the words ``Contains Ethyl Alcohol'' are marked on the
package;
(C) Solids containing ethyl alcohol may be packaged in glass inner
packagings not exceeding \1/2\ pound;
(D) For weight greater than \1/2\ pound up to 1 pound the company
name and the words ``Contains Ethyl Alcohol'' are marked on the
package.
(iii) The net liquid contents of all inner packagings in any single
outer packaging may not exceed 192 fluid ounces. The net solid contents
of all inner packagings in any single outer packaging may not exceed 32
pounds. The gross weight of any single outer package shipped may not
exceed 65 pounds; Inner packagings must secured and cushioned within
the outer package to prevent breakage, leakage, and movement.
(2) Beverages, food, cosmetics and medicines, medical screening
solutions, and concentrates sold as retail products containing ethyl
alcohol classed as a flammable liquid or flammable solid containing
more than 70% ethyl alcohol by volume, by weight for solids are
excepted from the HMR provided that:
[[Page 15046]]
(i) For inner packagings containing liquids the volume does not
exceed 8 fluid ounces in capacity;
(ii) Solids containing ethyl alcohol are not packed in inner
packagings exceeding \1/2\ pound in weight;
(iii) The net liquid contents of all inner packagings in any single
outer packaging may not exceed 192 fluid ounces. The net solid contents
of all inner packagings in any single outer packaging may not exceed 32
pounds. The gross weight of any single outer package shipped may not
exceed 65 pounds. Inner packagings must be secured and cushioned within
the outer package to prevent breakage, leakage, and movement.
(3) For transportation by passenger or cargo aircraft, no outer
package may be transported which contains an inner packaging exceeding:
(i) 16 fluid ounces of flammable liquid, or
(ii) 1 pound of solids containing flammable liquid.
PART 175--CARRIAGE BY AIRCRAFT
0
10. The authority citation for part 175 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128, 44701; 49 CFR 1.45 and 1.53
0
11. Add Sec. 175.34 to read as follows:
Sec. 175.34 Exceptions for Cylinders of Compressed Oxygen or Other
Oxidizing Gases Transported Within the State of Alaska.
(a) Exceptions. When transported in the State of Alaska, cylinders
of compressed oxygen or other oxidizing gases aboard aircraft are
excepted from all the requirements of Sec. Sec. 173.302(f)(3) through
(5) and 173.304(f)(3) through (5) of this subchapter subject to the
following conditions:
(1) Transportation of the cylinders by a ground-based or water-
based mode of transportation is unavailable and transportation by
aircraft is the only practical means for transporting the cylinders to
their destination;
(2) Each cylinder is fully covered with a fire or flame resistant
blanket that is secured in place; and
(3) The operator of the aircraft complies with the applicable
notification procedures under Sec. 175.33.
(b) Aircraft restrictions. This exception only applies to the
following types of aircraft:
(1) Cargo-only aircraft transporting the cylinders to a delivery
destination that receives cargo-only service at least once a week.
(2) Passenger and cargo-only aircraft transporting the cylinders to
a delivery destination that does not receive cargo only service once a
week.
PART 178--SPECIFICATIONS FOR PACKAGINGS
0
12. The authority citation for part 178 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128; 49 CFR 1.53.
0
13. In 178.516, paragraph (b)(7) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 178.516 Standards for fiberboard boxes.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(7) Authorization to manufacture, mark, and sell UN4G combination
packagings with outer fiberboard boxes and with inner fiberboard
components that have individual containerboard or paper wall basis
weights that vary by not more than plus or minus 5% from the nominal
basis weight reported in the initial design qualification test report.
0
14. In 178.521, paragraph (b)(4) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 178.521 Standards for paper bags.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) UN5M1 and UN5M2 multi wall paper bags that have paper wall
basis weights that vary by not more than plus or minus 5% from the
nominal basis weight reported in the initial design qualification test
report.
Issued in Washington, DC on March 10, 2014 under authority
delegated in 49 CFR 1.97.
Cynthia L. Quarterman,
Administrator, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-05630 Filed 3-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P