Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Northeast Multispecies Fishery; Reporting Requirements; Unused Catch Carryover, 14635-14639 [2014-05819]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 51 / Monday, March 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
elsewhere.’’ The Joint Motion also notes
that an extension of time would ‘‘enable
interested parties to consider comments
submitted in other proceedings,
including the Department of
Transportation Advance Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking seeking comment
on voice services onboard aircraft.’’
The CTIA Request similarly states that
an extension is needed so that parties
can ‘‘conduct much needed interference
and other technological analyses,
consider other existing studies beyond
those discussed in the NPRM, and
follow up on questions and issues
sparked by commenters who discussed
the inflight systems that have been
deployed abroad.’’ The CTIA Request
also notes the large number of
comments that have been filed in the
docket, stating that ‘‘[t]he Commission
should strive to ensure that the record
contains a meaningful opportunity to
contribute input into this highly
watched rulemaking.’’
It is the general policy of the
Commission that extensions of time
shall not be routinely granted. However,
under these circumstances, we agree
that an extension of time to file reply
comments is warranted to ensure that
the Commission obtains a complete and
thorough technical record in response to
the NPRM. The NPRM specifically
sought comment on technological
solutions that may enable interferencefree operation of wireless devices
aboard airborne aircraft, and requested
that commenters provide technical
analysis in support of their comments.
We conclude that a short extension of
time is warranted to enable interested
parties sufficient opportunity to review
and respond to the complex technical
issues raised by the NPRM. Accordingly,
pursuant to § 4(i) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, and § 1.46 of the
Commission’s rules, we extend the
deadline for filing reply comments until
May 16, 2014.
Federal Communications Commission.
Roger Sherman,
Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2014–05913 Filed 3–13–14; 4:15 pm]
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Mar 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 131030919–4173–01]
RIN 0648–BD73
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
Provisions; Fisheries of the
Northeastern United States; Northeast
Multispecies Fishery; Reporting
Requirements; Unused Catch
Carryover
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS is proposing two
actions in this rulemaking: A
requirement for daily Vessel Monitoring
System (VMS) catch reporting for
vessels declared to fish in the Eastern
U.S./Canada Area; and the de minimis
amount of unused fishing year (FY)
2013 sector annual catch entitlement
(ACE) that may be carried over,
beginning in FY 2014, without being
subject to potential accountability
measures. The revision to the reporting
requirement is necessary to better
ensure accurate and timely Eastern U.S./
Canada Area catch reporting for quota
monitoring purposes. The proposed de
minimis carryover amount is necessary
to complete the carryover process NMFS
described for FY 2014 in conjunction
with the May 2013 rulemaking for
Framework Adjustment 50 to the
Northeast (NE) Multispecies Fishery
Management Plan (FMP). The intended
effect of these actions is to inform the
public and solicit public comment on
NMFS’s proposed measures.
DATES: Comments must be received by
April 16, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2013–0179, by any of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
# !docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20130179, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
John K. Bullard, Regional
Administrator, National Marine
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14635
Fisheries Service, 55 Great Republic
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will general be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter
‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if you wish
to remain anonymous). Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF
file formats only.
Copies of Framework 50 and its
associated documents, including the
environmental assessment (EA), the
Regulatory Impact Review (RIR), and the
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(FRFA) prepared by the Council and
NMFS are available from John K.
Bullard, Regional Administrator, NMFS
Northeast Regional Office (NERO), 55
Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA
01930. The previously listed documents
are also accessible via the Internet at:
https://www.nero.noaa.gov/sfd/
sfdmulti.html.
For
information on the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area reporting requirements in this rule
contact Liz Sullivan, Fishery
Management Specialist, phone: 978–
282–8493. For information on the
unused ACE de minimis carryover
amount, contact Mike Ruccio, Fishery
Policy Analyst, phone: 978–281–9104.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
1. Background
Eastern U.S./Canada Area Daily VMS
Reporting. Prior to FY 2013, the
regulatory text for the catch monitoring/
attribution program for Georges Bank
(GB) cod and haddock required that all
GB cod and haddock caught on a trip in
which a vessel fished in both the
Western and Eastern U.S./Canada Areas
be attributed to the Eastern Area. In
practice, we attributed catch of these
stocks to areas fished based on our
understanding that Amendment 16 to
the FMP intended this result, and that
the regulatory text was inadvertently left
unchanged from pre-Amendment 16
measures.
In commenting on a proposed rule (78
FR 18188; March 25, 2013) that
included a measure to correct this
inadvertent language holdover, the New
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
14636
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 51 / Monday, March 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
England Fishery Management Council
(Council) objected to the proposed
revision, stating it was inconsistent with
their intent in Amendment 16. Because
the proposed change was meant to
reflect Council intent regarding
Amendment 16, we withdrew its
proposed revision, leaving the original
text in place in the final rule. We noted
this change as an interim measure, but
asked for comments as it varied from the
proposed rule. We then received a
second comment letter from the Council
on the interim measure, retracting the
first statement of intent, and supporting
the approach we first proposed, as well
as suggesting that the requirement for
daily reporting of catches in the Eastern
Area could be reinstituted as allowed
under Amendment 16 through Regional
Administrator authority.
Based on the second Council letter,
we announced on July 10, 2013, that
Eastern U.S./Canada Area catch
monitoring was being changed from the
interim method to a system that
apportions catch based on area fished,
consistent with the recommendation of
the Council and the 2013 proposed rule
measure. We published the final rule to
finalize this monitoring method on
August 29, 2013 (78 FR 53363).
Accounting for all FY 2013 trips has
been retroactively revised from the
interim approach to the area fished
method. Such changes were considered
to be within the purview of the Regional
Administrator (§ 648.85(a)(3)(ii)(A)).
The Amendment 16 final rule
published on April 9, 2010 (75 FR
18262) intended to remove the
requirement for sector vessels to submit
daily VMS catch reports when declared
into the U.S./Canada Management Area,
as well as the two Eastern U.S./Canada
Special Access Programs (SAPs; the
Closed Area II Yellowtail Flounder/
Haddock SAP and the Eastern U.S./
Canada Haddock SAP), because the
requirement for a weekly sector manager
report was determined to be sufficient
by the Regional Administrator. This was
captured in the preamble of the
proposed and final rules for
Amendment 16; however, this change
was not reflected in the regulatory text
at § 648.85(a)(3)(v). As part of a
rulemaking on August 29, 2013 (78 FR
53363), we announced our intention to
revert to the original requirement for
sector vessels declared to fish in the
Eastern U.S./Canada Area to submit
daily VMS catch reports. We did not,
nor do not, intend to change this
requirement for vessels declared only
into the Western U.S./Canada Area.
Because the daily reporting requirement
is already specified in the regulations
(§ 648.85(a)(3)(v)) for vessels declared
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Mar 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
into the Eastern U.S./Canada Area, this
provision need not change, except to
clarify that the daily reporting
requirement does not apply to vessels
declared only into the Western U.S./
Canada Area. Accordingly, this action
proposes to modify the reporting
requirement of § 648.85(a)(3)(v) such
that only sector vessels that have
declared into the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area would be required to submit daily
catch reports. The proposal also will
clarify that, for vessels declared only
into the Western U.S./Canada Area,
sectors must continue to submit weekly
sector catch reports. The intent of this
action is to improve the accuracy of
reporting of the Eastern U.S./Canada
Management Area.
De Minimis Unused Sector ACE
Carryover. Sectors are permitted to carry
forward up to 10 percent of unused ACE
from one FY to the next for many
groundfish stocks. The substantial
reduction in catch levels from FY 2012
to FY 2013 made clear that the way
carryover amounts had been accounted
for in previous FYs could, in some
situations, result in a potential catch
(i.e., available fishery-level annual catch
limit (ACL) plus 10-percent carryover
from previous year sector sub-ACL) of
some stocks that could exceed the
established Acceptable Biological Catch
(ABC), and possibly the Overfishing
Limit (OFL).
To address this possibility, we issued,
in conjunction with the rule
implementing Framework Adjustment
50 for FY 2013, rulemaking under
section 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act to clarify how accounting for yearto-year unused sector ACE carryover
would be handled beginning in FY 2014
(78 FR 26172; May 3, 2013). The
applicable regulations outlining the
carryover system, including the
revisions made in Framework
Adjustment 50, can be found in
§ 648.87(b)(1)(i)(F)(1)–(5).
Our clarification specified that sectors
would be held accountable for any
overage of the sector-specific sub-ACL if
the total fishery level ACL were
exceeded in any given year, consistent
with the existing accountability
measures regulations. The clarification
makes explicitly clear that sectors
would be accountable for carried overcatch used if the total ACL is exceeded,
except for a nominal de minimis amount
to be determined by NMFS. We believe
providing a nominal amount of
carryover is an important safety
consideration because, by allowing
some carryover, vessels could elect to
forego some portion of, or entire, lateseason fishing trips for safety reasons,
knowing that they could instead harvest
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the de minimis amount in the next
fishing year, irrespective of any
accountability measures. Prior to the
clarification, it was unclear from
Amendment 16 whether accountability
measures should apply to carried-over
catch. NMFS’ clarification was designed
to make the carryover program more
consistent with the National Standard 1
guidelines (§ 600.310(a)). Substantial
explanation of the carryover program
accounting is provided in Framework 50
and the associated rulemaking
documents and is not repeated here.
Given the need to complete other
components of the Framework 50
rulemaking for timely implementation
at the start of the FY 2013, NMFS was
unable to fully develop and analyze an
appropriate de minimis level in
conjunction with the framework
rulemaking. Instead, we established a
process wherein we would conduct
proposed rulemaking for an appropriate
de minimis carryover level. This is that
action.
2. Proposed Measures
Eastern U.S./Canada Area Daily VMS
Reporting. We propose to require sector
vessels declared to fish in the Eastern
U.S./Canada Area to submit daily VMS
catch reports. The reports would be
submitted in 24-hour intervals for each
day, and would be required to include
at least the following information:
1. VTR serial number or other
universal ID specified by the Regional
Administrator;
2. Date fish were caught and statistical
area in which the fish were caught; and
3. Total pounds of cod, haddock,
yellowtail flounder, winter flounder,
witch flounder, pollock, American
plaice, redfish, Atlantic halibut, ocean
pout, Atlantic wolffish, and white hake
kept (in pounds, live weight) in each
broad stock area, specified in
§ 648.10(k)(3), as instructed by the
Regional Administrator.
The regulations at § 648.85(a)(3)(v)
currently require sector vessels to
submit daily reports if they declare in
the Eastern U.S./Canada Area. As
discussed in the Background above, the
Amendment 16 final rule intended to
remove the requirement for daily
reporting, pursuant to the authority
granted to the NMFS Regional
Administrator by the FMP, as it was
determined at that time that the weekly
sector catch report was sufficient.
However, this change was not reflected
in the regulatory text, and so the current
proposal to revert to the original
requirement of daily reporting does not
require a substantive change to the
regulations for vessels declared into the
Eastern U.S./Canada Management Area.
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
14637
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 51 / Monday, March 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
However, although the current
regulatory text requires daily reporting
for vessels declared only into the
Western U.S./Canada Area, weekly
sector catch reports have been
determined to be sufficient, and
therefore the regulatory text at
§ 648.85(a)(3)(v) will be modified to
delete the daily reporting requirement
for such vessels.
Pursuant to the regulations at
§ 648.10(k)(2), vessels who have
declared their intent to fish within
multiple Broad Stock Areas must submit
a trip-level hail report via VMS. This
report must include the landed weight
of regulated species and total retained
catch, unless the vessel is fishing in a
special management program such as
the Eastern U.S./Canada Area, and is
required to submit daily reports via
VMS. As proposed in this rule, by
reverting to the daily reporting
requirement, a sector vessel on a trip
declared into the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area and fishing in multiple Broad
Stock Areas would be exempt from the
requirement to submit a trip-level catch
report.
De Minimis Unused Sector ACE
Carryover. We propose to provide 1
percent of the annual sector sub-annual
catch limit (sub-ACL) as the de minimis
carryover amount, starting in FY 2014.
This amount of carryover, if used, will
not be specifically counted against the
sector sub-ACL for accountability
purposes. The full sub-ACL would still
be allocated to sectors as ACE (i.e., not
reduced by 1 percent). The existing
carryover provision that allows up to 10
percent of unused sector ACE to be
carried over remains in effect; however,
any carried over catch in excess of the
de minimis amount would be counted
against the sub-ACL for accountability
purposes if the total fishery-level ACL is
exceeded.
By using a nominal amount of the
sector-specific sub-ACL in the
derivation process, the resulting 1percent amount provided as the de
minimis carryover falls within the
management uncertainty buffer
established for sectors. This approach
better ensures that the de minimis value
is in line with catch limits established
for the FY in which carryover may be
taken. For FY 2015 and beyond, we
propose this approach of using 1
percent of the sector sub-ACL for the
year in which carryover would be
harvested would be the default de
minimis amount. The actual value may
vary year-to-year based on the sub-ACLs
specified for the year. We propose to
publish the actual de minimis amount
in conjunction with either Council
initiated frameworks implementing
ACLs or in sector ACE adjustment rules.
As an example:
• If the FY 2014 sector sub-ACL for
species X is 100 mt, the de minimis
amount would be 1 mt.
• If the FY 2013 sector sub-ACL
species X is 200 mt, up to 20 mt (10
percent of the FY 2013 sub-ACL) could
be carried over from FY 2013 to 2014.
• Of this 20 mt, sectors would not be
required to repay 1 mt (i.e., the de
minimis amount) if the accountability
repayment were triggered. Sectors
would be required to repay up to 19 mt
(i.e., the remaining carryover balance
that is not considered de minimis) if the
total ACL and sector sub-ACL were
exceeded.
The 1-percent de minimis amount
would ensure that overfishing will not
occur, because the value would only be
a minor portion of the Council’s
management uncertainty buffer that
offsets the ABC and sub-ACLs. The
Council has identified several
unquantified management uncertainties
as part of a 3 to 5-percent management
uncertainty buffer. Currently, the
Council uses a management uncertainty
buffer of 5 percent for all but one stock.
NMFS considers the 1-percent amount
to be de minimis because, when it is
combined with the full harvest of a
corresponding stock-level ACL, it does
not cause the fishery ABC to be
exceeded. It would cause an ACL
overage in this circumstance, but only if
the full de minimis carryover amounts
are harvested and all of the sector subACL is harvested. Even in the unlikely
event that this occurs, a 1-percent de
minimis overage would still be well
below the 3 to 5-percent management
uncertainty buffer used by the Council
when it determines the ACL. Because
the 1-percent de minimis amount is a
minor portion of the management
uncertainty buffer, NMFS would not
invoke the overage payback
accountability measure.
The Council is still in the process of
finalizing for recommendation to NMFS
the FY 2014 ABCs and ACLs for many
groundfish stocks. These values will
likely be finalized in late spring 2014,
for use in FY 2014, which begins May
1, 2014. If the de minimis approach
outlined here is adopted, NMFS will
publish final de minimis values in
conjunction with rules for FY 2014. In
the interim, the current FY 2014 ABC
and ACL values either already put in
place by Framework 50 or under
discussion by the Council for inclusion
in Framework 51 are provided in Table
1 to show the derivation of the potential
de minimis value that would result.
TABLE 1—POTENTIAL FY 2014 CATCH LIMIT INFORMATION, de minimis CARRYOVER AMOUNTS, TOTAL POTENTIAL CATCH,
AND IMPACT OF REALIZING TOTAL POTENTIAL CATCH. ALL WEIGHTS IN METRIC TONS
2014 Potential Catch Limit Information
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Stock or species
FY 2014
OFL
Georges Bank (GB) Atlantic cod ......................
Gulf of Maine (GOM) Atlantic cod ....................
GB Haddock ......................................................
GOM Haddock ..................................................
S. New England (SNE) yellowtail flounder .......
Cape Cod/GOM yellowtail flounder ..................
American Plaice ................................................
Witch Flounder ..................................................
GB Winter Flounder ..........................................
GOM Winter Flounder .......................................
SNE/Mid-Atlantic Winter Flounder ....................
Acadian Redfish ................................................
White Hake ........................................................
Pollock ...............................................................
FY 2014
ABC
3,570
1,917
46,268
440
1,042
936
1,981
1,512
4,626
1,458
3,372
16,130
6,237
20,554
FY 2014
Total ACL
2,506
1,550
35,699
341
700
548
1,515
783
3,598
1,078
1,676
11,465
4,713
16,000
1,867
1,470
18,312
323
665
523
1,442
751
3,493
1,040
1,612
10,909
4,417
15,304
de minimus amount and evaluation
FY 2014
Sector subACL
De Minimis
Value-1
Percent of
Sector subACL
Total potential catch
(de minimis
+ total ACL)
1,776
812
17,116
218
469
466
1,357
599
3,364
688
1,074
10,523
4,247
13,131
18
8
171
2
5
5
14
6
34
7
11
105
42
131
1,885
1,478
18,483
325
670
528
1,456
757
3,527
1,047
1,623
11,014
4,459
15,435
Percent of
Total ACL
101.0
100.6
100.9
100.7
100.7
100.9
100.9
100.8
101.0
100.7
100.7
101.0
101.0
100.9
All stocks are expected to continue use of a 5 percent uncertainty buffer between ABC and ACL in FY 2014 except for GB winter flounder (3 percent).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Mar 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
Percent of
ABC
75.2
95.4
51.8
95.4
95.7
96.3
96.1
96.7
98.0
97.1
96.8
96.1
94.6
96.5
14638
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 51 / Monday, March 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
To assist the public in providing
effective comment on the de minimis
proposal, NMFS is asking the following
questions:
1. Is the concept of a de minimis
carryover amount clear? Is the process
we intend to use to track and account
for unused ACE carryover in FY 2014
clear, including when sectors may be
subject to accountability measures if
carried-over catch has been harvested? If
not, what needs to be clarified in the
final rule?
2. Is the de minimis amount an
appropriate balance between making
available some amount of carryover that
may be used without payback
implications and providing sufficient
protection to stocks so that management
uncertainty offsets are maintained and
overfishing does not occur?
3. Are there alternate de minimis
values or derivation approaches NMFS
should consider?
In responding to these questions we
remind the public that full-scale
revision of the Amendment 16 carryover
program would require a further
Council-initiated action.
We considered higher amounts as the
de minimis level (e.g., 2 percent or more
of the sector sub-ACL), but were
concerned that a higher amount could
raise the likelihood that ACLs could be
exceeded. Further, a higher amount
would constitute a significant portion of
the management uncertainty buffer and
would potentially degrade its ability to
prevent overfishing. To maintain the
protection of this buffer, additional
carryover catch above the de minimis
amount would be subject to the overage
payback accountability measure. Sectors
could continue to use up to the full 10
percent available as carryover, but its
use would be subject to accountability
measures if the fishery level ACL is
exceeded.
Corrections
NMFS proposes to modify the text at
§ 648.14(k)(11)(iv) to clarify the
reporting requirements by removing the
word ‘‘landings’’ from the paragraph.
NMFS proposes to modify the text at
§ 648.85(a)(3)(v) in order to clarify that
the authority granted to the NMFS
Regional Administrator to remove the
daily reporting requirements for special
management programs is separate and
distinct from the regulatory
requirement. This modification would
move the language explaining the
Regional Administrator’s authority to a
new subsection (§ 648.85(a)(3)(v)(B))
with a further clarification that the
Regional Administrator’s authority also
includes modification of reporting
requirements.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Mar 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has determined
that the management measures in this
proposed rule are consistent with the
NE Multispecies FMP, other provisions
of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other
applicable law, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
Pursuant to the procedures
established to implement section 6 of
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, the Office
of Management and Budget has
determined that this proposed rule is
not significant.
This proposed rule does not contain
policies with federalism or ‘‘takings’’
implications as those terms are defined
in E.O. 13132 and E.O. 12630,
respectively.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The proposed rule contains two actions:
A requirement for daily VMS catch
reporting for vessels declared to fish in
the Eastern U.S./Canada Area; and the
de minimis amount of unused FY 2013
sector ACE that may be carried over
beginning in FY 2014 without being
subject to potential accountability
measures. The revision to the reporting
requirement is necessary to better
ensure accurate and timely Eastern U.S./
Canada Area catch reporting for quota
monitoring purposes. The proposed de
minimis carryover amount is necessary
to complete the carryover process NMFS
described for FY 2014 in conjunction
with the May 2013 rulemaking for
Framework Adjustment 50 to the NE
Multispecies FMP.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
requires Federal agencies to consider
disproportionality and profitability to
determine the significance of regulatory
impacts. There are no disproportionate
impacts as a result of the two actions
being proposed. Analyses being
prepared for an upcoming multispecies
action indicate 822 unique entities in
the fishery, 806 of which are considered
small business entities under Small
Business Administration criteria and 16
that are considered large entities. These
16 large entities have ownership interest
in finfish businesses, but obtain the
majority of their gross sales from
shellfish-related businesses. All
businesses obtaining the majority of
their gross sales from finfish are
considered small businesses.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The change in VMS reporting
frequency for vessels participating in
the Eastern U.S./Canada Area will
require catch data to be transmitted to
NMFS once daily. Vessels participating
in the overarching multispecies fishery
already have onboard VMS units and
submit various types of reports and
declarations to participate in the fishery.
The proposed change in reporting
frequency implements the daily report
structure contemplated in conjunction
with Amendment 16 to the FMP.
Previous analysis for Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) collection Office of
Management and Budged Control No.
0648–0202 estimated the cost of daily
reporting as up to $1.00 per day. Vessels
that have not previously submitted daily
reports or that have not participated in
the area will now be required to report
more frequently, thereby increasing
VMS operating costs. The reporting
requirement would be imposed on all
vessels choosing to fish in the area;
fishing in the mandatory reporting area
is voluntary. Moreover, as noted below,
the charge is small enough and affects
all vessels equally. Therefore, this rule
will not result in disproportionate
impacts on small entities.
In FY 2012, 62 sector vessels fished in
the Eastern Area, taking a total of 398
sector trips, with an assumed length of
4 fishing days, based on the assumed
trip length information used in the PRA
analysis. The expected cost of sending
a daily report on a per vessel basis is
approximately $25.68 annually and
$4.00 per trip. This cost is not expected
to affect profitability for either small or
large entities. Information compiled for
FY 2011 in the final report on the
performance of the NE multispecies
fishery published by the Northeast
Fisheries Science Center indicates the
lowest nominal revenue from
groundfish-specific landings was $730
per trip (vessels category of < 30 feet
(9.1m) in length overall). Thus, the cost
of daily reporting will be less than 0.5
percent of the lowest average nominal
revenue in the fishery. Given that larger
vessels or entities whose business
involves multiple vessels of varying
sizes would realize even lower potential
operating cost, the impacts from daily
reporting relative to nominal revenue
are miniscule. Vessels may also land
non-groundfish species in conjunction
with fishing effort in the area, further
reducing the potential impact of daily
reporting costs on nominal revenue.
Based on this, NMFS asserts the
profitability criterion is not met.
Similarly, the de minimis carryover
amount does not have disproportionate
impacts on small entities. Adequate
revenue information is available to
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 51 / Monday, March 17, 2014 / Proposed Rules
NMFS to ascertain the impact of de
minimis carryover on regulated entities.
Prior rulemaking for Amendment 16
allowed sectors to carry over up to 10
percent of their overall allocation if, for
any reason, they were unable to utilize
that allocation in one FY. This
allowance is designed to allow
flexibility so that vessels do not fish
during unsafe conditions to utilize their
last units of catch allocations. The
ability to carry over allocation is
simultaneously constrained by a fisherywide ACL that cannot be exceeded.
Prior rulemaking created a provision for
a de minimis carryover amount in
excess of the ACL. This proposed rule
establishes that amount at 1 percent of
the upcoming FY ACL. The additional
allocation, in excess of the ACL, will
allow sectors and sector-enrolled
entities to increase their gross sales
slightly relative to being restricted to the
ACL level, creating positive economic
impacts for those enrolled in sectors.
These benefits are not disproportionate,
as the de minimis carryover amount is
available to all sector-enrolled fishery
participants.
For these reasons, the proposed rule,
if implemented, will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Accordingly, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required and
none has been prepared.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Recordkeeping and
reporting requirements.
Dated: March 11, 2014.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 648 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 648—FISHERIES OF THE
NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
1. The authority citation for part 648
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 648.14, revise paragraph
(k)(11)(iv) to read as follows:
■
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 648.14
*
*
*
*
(k) * * *
(11) * * *
(iv) Reporting requirements for all
persons. (A) If fishing under a NE
multispecies DAS or on a sector trip in
the Western U.S./Canada Area or
Eastern U.S./Canada Area specified in
16:33 Mar 14, 2014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
§ 648.85
[Docket No. 131115971–4214–01]
Special management programs.
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(v) Reporting. (A) The owner or
operator of a common pool vessel must
submit reports via VMS, in accordance
with instructions provided by the
Regional Administrator, for each day of
the fishing trip when declared into
either of the U.S./Canada Management
Areas. The owner or operator of a sector
vessel must submit daily reports via
VMS, in accordance with instructions
provided by the Regional Administrator,
for each day of the fishing trip when
declared into the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area. Vessels subject to the daily
reporting requirement must report daily
for the entire fishing trip, regardless of
what areas are fished. The reports must
be submitted in 24-hr intervals for each
day, beginning at 0000 hr and ending at
2359 hr, and must be submitted by 0900
hr of the following day, or as instructed
by the Regional Administrator. The
reports must include at least the
following information:
(1) VTR serial number or other
universal ID specified by the Regional
Administrator;
(2) Date fish were caught and
statistical area in which fish were
caught; and
(3) Total pounds of cod, haddock,
yellowtail flounder, winter flounder,
witch flounder, pollock, American
plaice, redfish, Atlantic halibut, ocean
pout, Atlantic wolffish, and white hake
kept (in pounds, live weight) in each
broad stock area, specified in
§ 648.10(k)(3), as instructed by the
Regional Administrator.
(B) The Regional Administrator may
remove or modify the reporting
requirement for sector vessels in
§ 648.85(a)(3)(v) in a manner consistent
with the Administrative Procedure Act.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–05819 Filed 3–14–14; 8:45 am]
Prohibitions.
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
§ 648.85(a)(1), fail to report in
accordance with § 648.85(a)(3)(v).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 648.85, revise paragraph
(a)(3)(v) to read as follows:
Jkt 232001
14639
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
RIN 0648–XC995
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Northeast Multispecies
Fishery; 2014 Sector Operations Plans
and Contracts and Allocation of
Northeast Multispecies Annual Catch
Entitlements
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
We propose to approve 19
sector operations plans and contracts for
fishing year (FY) 2014, provide
Northeast (NE) multispecies annual
catch entitlements (ACE) to these
sectors, and grant regulatory
exemptions. We request comment on
the proposed sector operations plans
and contracts; the environmental
assessment (EA) analyzing the impacts
of the operations plans; and our
proposal to grant 20 of the 28 regulatory
exemptions requested by the sectors.
Approval of sector operations plans is
necessary to allocate ACE to the sectors
and for the sectors to operate. The NE
Multispecies Fishery Management Plan
(FMP) allows limited access permit
holders to form sectors, and requires
sectors to submit their operations plans
and contracts to us, NMFS, for approval
or disapproval. Approved sectors are
exempt from certain effort control
regulations and receive allocation of NE
multispecies (groundfish) based on its
members’ fishing history.
This rule also announces the target atsea monitoring (ASM) coverage rate for
sector trips for FY 2014.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before April 1, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2014–0001, by any of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20140001, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17MRP1.SGM
17MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14635-14639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05819]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 131030919-4173-01]
RIN 0648-BD73
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act
Provisions; Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Northeast
Multispecies Fishery; Reporting Requirements; Unused Catch Carryover
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS is proposing two actions in this rulemaking: A
requirement for daily Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) catch reporting
for vessels declared to fish in the Eastern U.S./Canada Area; and the
de minimis amount of unused fishing year (FY) 2013 sector annual catch
entitlement (ACE) that may be carried over, beginning in FY 2014,
without being subject to potential accountability measures. The
revision to the reporting requirement is necessary to better ensure
accurate and timely Eastern U.S./Canada Area catch reporting for quota
monitoring purposes. The proposed de minimis carryover amount is
necessary to complete the carryover process NMFS described for FY 2014
in conjunction with the May 2013 rulemaking for Framework Adjustment 50
to the Northeast (NE) Multispecies Fishery Management Plan (FMP). The
intended effect of these actions is to inform the public and solicit
public comment on NMFS's proposed measures.
DATES: Comments must be received by April 16, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by
NOAA-NMFS-2013-0179, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/# !docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2013-0179, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to John K. Bullard, Regional
Administrator, National Marine Fisheries Service, 55 Great Republic
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will general be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
Copies of Framework 50 and its associated documents, including the
environmental assessment (EA), the Regulatory Impact Review (RIR), and
the Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) prepared by the
Council and NMFS are available from John K. Bullard, Regional
Administrator, NMFS Northeast Regional Office (NERO), 55 Great Republic
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. The previously listed documents are also
accessible via the Internet at: https://www.nero.noaa.gov/sfd/sfdmulti.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information on the Eastern U.S./
Canada Area reporting requirements in this rule contact Liz Sullivan,
Fishery Management Specialist, phone: 978-282-8493. For information on
the unused ACE de minimis carryover amount, contact Mike Ruccio,
Fishery Policy Analyst, phone: 978-281-9104.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Background
Eastern U.S./Canada Area Daily VMS Reporting. Prior to FY 2013, the
regulatory text for the catch monitoring/attribution program for
Georges Bank (GB) cod and haddock required that all GB cod and haddock
caught on a trip in which a vessel fished in both the Western and
Eastern U.S./Canada Areas be attributed to the Eastern Area. In
practice, we attributed catch of these stocks to areas fished based on
our understanding that Amendment 16 to the FMP intended this result,
and that the regulatory text was inadvertently left unchanged from pre-
Amendment 16 measures.
In commenting on a proposed rule (78 FR 18188; March 25, 2013) that
included a measure to correct this inadvertent language holdover, the
New
[[Page 14636]]
England Fishery Management Council (Council) objected to the proposed
revision, stating it was inconsistent with their intent in Amendment
16. Because the proposed change was meant to reflect Council intent
regarding Amendment 16, we withdrew its proposed revision, leaving the
original text in place in the final rule. We noted this change as an
interim measure, but asked for comments as it varied from the proposed
rule. We then received a second comment letter from the Council on the
interim measure, retracting the first statement of intent, and
supporting the approach we first proposed, as well as suggesting that
the requirement for daily reporting of catches in the Eastern Area
could be reinstituted as allowed under Amendment 16 through Regional
Administrator authority.
Based on the second Council letter, we announced on July 10, 2013,
that Eastern U.S./Canada Area catch monitoring was being changed from
the interim method to a system that apportions catch based on area
fished, consistent with the recommendation of the Council and the 2013
proposed rule measure. We published the final rule to finalize this
monitoring method on August 29, 2013 (78 FR 53363). Accounting for all
FY 2013 trips has been retroactively revised from the interim approach
to the area fished method. Such changes were considered to be within
the purview of the Regional Administrator (Sec. 648.85(a)(3)(ii)(A)).
The Amendment 16 final rule published on April 9, 2010 (75 FR
18262) intended to remove the requirement for sector vessels to submit
daily VMS catch reports when declared into the U.S./Canada Management
Area, as well as the two Eastern U.S./Canada Special Access Programs
(SAPs; the Closed Area II Yellowtail Flounder/Haddock SAP and the
Eastern U.S./Canada Haddock SAP), because the requirement for a weekly
sector manager report was determined to be sufficient by the Regional
Administrator. This was captured in the preamble of the proposed and
final rules for Amendment 16; however, this change was not reflected in
the regulatory text at Sec. 648.85(a)(3)(v). As part of a rulemaking
on August 29, 2013 (78 FR 53363), we announced our intention to revert
to the original requirement for sector vessels declared to fish in the
Eastern U.S./Canada Area to submit daily VMS catch reports. We did not,
nor do not, intend to change this requirement for vessels declared only
into the Western U.S./Canada Area. Because the daily reporting
requirement is already specified in the regulations (Sec.
648.85(a)(3)(v)) for vessels declared into the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area, this provision need not change, except to clarify that the daily
reporting requirement does not apply to vessels declared only into the
Western U.S./Canada Area. Accordingly, this action proposes to modify
the reporting requirement of Sec. 648.85(a)(3)(v) such that only
sector vessels that have declared into the Eastern U.S./Canada Area
would be required to submit daily catch reports. The proposal also will
clarify that, for vessels declared only into the Western U.S./Canada
Area, sectors must continue to submit weekly sector catch reports. The
intent of this action is to improve the accuracy of reporting of the
Eastern U.S./Canada Management Area.
De Minimis Unused Sector ACE Carryover. Sectors are permitted to
carry forward up to 10 percent of unused ACE from one FY to the next
for many groundfish stocks. The substantial reduction in catch levels
from FY 2012 to FY 2013 made clear that the way carryover amounts had
been accounted for in previous FYs could, in some situations, result in
a potential catch (i.e., available fishery-level annual catch limit
(ACL) plus 10-percent carryover from previous year sector sub-ACL) of
some stocks that could exceed the established Acceptable Biological
Catch (ABC), and possibly the Overfishing Limit (OFL).
To address this possibility, we issued, in conjunction with the
rule implementing Framework Adjustment 50 for FY 2013, rulemaking under
section 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act to clarify how accounting
for year-to-year unused sector ACE carryover would be handled beginning
in FY 2014 (78 FR 26172; May 3, 2013). The applicable regulations
outlining the carryover system, including the revisions made in
Framework Adjustment 50, can be found in Sec. 648.87(b)(1)(i)(F)(1)-
(5).
Our clarification specified that sectors would be held accountable
for any overage of the sector-specific sub-ACL if the total fishery
level ACL were exceeded in any given year, consistent with the existing
accountability measures regulations. The clarification makes explicitly
clear that sectors would be accountable for carried over-catch used if
the total ACL is exceeded, except for a nominal de minimis amount to be
determined by NMFS. We believe providing a nominal amount of carryover
is an important safety consideration because, by allowing some
carryover, vessels could elect to forego some portion of, or entire,
late-season fishing trips for safety reasons, knowing that they could
instead harvest the de minimis amount in the next fishing year,
irrespective of any accountability measures. Prior to the
clarification, it was unclear from Amendment 16 whether accountability
measures should apply to carried-over catch. NMFS' clarification was
designed to make the carryover program more consistent with the
National Standard 1 guidelines (Sec. 600.310(a)). Substantial
explanation of the carryover program accounting is provided in
Framework 50 and the associated rulemaking documents and is not
repeated here.
Given the need to complete other components of the Framework 50
rulemaking for timely implementation at the start of the FY 2013, NMFS
was unable to fully develop and analyze an appropriate de minimis level
in conjunction with the framework rulemaking. Instead, we established a
process wherein we would conduct proposed rulemaking for an appropriate
de minimis carryover level. This is that action.
2. Proposed Measures
Eastern U.S./Canada Area Daily VMS Reporting. We propose to require
sector vessels declared to fish in the Eastern U.S./Canada Area to
submit daily VMS catch reports. The reports would be submitted in 24-
hour intervals for each day, and would be required to include at least
the following information:
1. VTR serial number or other universal ID specified by the
Regional Administrator;
2. Date fish were caught and statistical area in which the fish
were caught; and
3. Total pounds of cod, haddock, yellowtail flounder, winter
flounder, witch flounder, pollock, American plaice, redfish, Atlantic
halibut, ocean pout, Atlantic wolffish, and white hake kept (in pounds,
live weight) in each broad stock area, specified in Sec. 648.10(k)(3),
as instructed by the Regional Administrator.
The regulations at Sec. 648.85(a)(3)(v) currently require sector
vessels to submit daily reports if they declare in the Eastern U.S./
Canada Area. As discussed in the Background above, the Amendment 16
final rule intended to remove the requirement for daily reporting,
pursuant to the authority granted to the NMFS Regional Administrator by
the FMP, as it was determined at that time that the weekly sector catch
report was sufficient. However, this change was not reflected in the
regulatory text, and so the current proposal to revert to the original
requirement of daily reporting does not require a substantive change to
the regulations for vessels declared into the Eastern U.S./Canada
Management Area.
[[Page 14637]]
However, although the current regulatory text requires daily reporting
for vessels declared only into the Western U.S./Canada Area, weekly
sector catch reports have been determined to be sufficient, and
therefore the regulatory text at Sec. 648.85(a)(3)(v) will be modified
to delete the daily reporting requirement for such vessels.
Pursuant to the regulations at Sec. 648.10(k)(2), vessels who have
declared their intent to fish within multiple Broad Stock Areas must
submit a trip-level hail report via VMS. This report must include the
landed weight of regulated species and total retained catch, unless the
vessel is fishing in a special management program such as the Eastern
U.S./Canada Area, and is required to submit daily reports via VMS. As
proposed in this rule, by reverting to the daily reporting requirement,
a sector vessel on a trip declared into the Eastern U.S./Canada Area
and fishing in multiple Broad Stock Areas would be exempt from the
requirement to submit a trip-level catch report.
De Minimis Unused Sector ACE Carryover. We propose to provide 1
percent of the annual sector sub-annual catch limit (sub-ACL) as the de
minimis carryover amount, starting in FY 2014. This amount of
carryover, if used, will not be specifically counted against the sector
sub-ACL for accountability purposes. The full sub-ACL would still be
allocated to sectors as ACE (i.e., not reduced by 1 percent). The
existing carryover provision that allows up to 10 percent of unused
sector ACE to be carried over remains in effect; however, any carried
over catch in excess of the de minimis amount would be counted against
the sub-ACL for accountability purposes if the total fishery-level ACL
is exceeded.
By using a nominal amount of the sector-specific sub-ACL in the
derivation process, the resulting 1-percent amount provided as the de
minimis carryover falls within the management uncertainty buffer
established for sectors. This approach better ensures that the de
minimis value is in line with catch limits established for the FY in
which carryover may be taken. For FY 2015 and beyond, we propose this
approach of using 1 percent of the sector sub-ACL for the year in which
carryover would be harvested would be the default de minimis amount.
The actual value may vary year-to-year based on the sub-ACLs specified
for the year. We propose to publish the actual de minimis amount in
conjunction with either Council initiated frameworks implementing ACLs
or in sector ACE adjustment rules.
As an example:
If the FY 2014 sector sub-ACL for species X is 100 mt, the
de minimis amount would be 1 mt.
If the FY 2013 sector sub-ACL species X is 200 mt, up to
20 mt (10 percent of the FY 2013 sub-ACL) could be carried over from FY
2013 to 2014.
Of this 20 mt, sectors would not be required to repay 1 mt
(i.e., the de minimis amount) if the accountability repayment were
triggered. Sectors would be required to repay up to 19 mt (i.e., the
remaining carryover balance that is not considered de minimis) if the
total ACL and sector sub-ACL were exceeded.
The 1-percent de minimis amount would ensure that overfishing will
not occur, because the value would only be a minor portion of the
Council's management uncertainty buffer that offsets the ABC and sub-
ACLs. The Council has identified several unquantified management
uncertainties as part of a 3 to 5-percent management uncertainty
buffer. Currently, the Council uses a management uncertainty buffer of
5 percent for all but one stock. NMFS considers the 1-percent amount to
be de minimis because, when it is combined with the full harvest of a
corresponding stock-level ACL, it does not cause the fishery ABC to be
exceeded. It would cause an ACL overage in this circumstance, but only
if the full de minimis carryover amounts are harvested and all of the
sector sub-ACL is harvested. Even in the unlikely event that this
occurs, a 1-percent de minimis overage would still be well below the 3
to 5-percent management uncertainty buffer used by the Council when it
determines the ACL. Because the 1-percent de minimis amount is a minor
portion of the management uncertainty buffer, NMFS would not invoke the
overage payback accountability measure.
The Council is still in the process of finalizing for
recommendation to NMFS the FY 2014 ABCs and ACLs for many groundfish
stocks. These values will likely be finalized in late spring 2014, for
use in FY 2014, which begins May 1, 2014. If the de minimis approach
outlined here is adopted, NMFS will publish final de minimis values in
conjunction with rules for FY 2014. In the interim, the current FY 2014
ABC and ACL values either already put in place by Framework 50 or under
discussion by the Council for inclusion in Framework 51 are provided in
Table 1 to show the derivation of the potential de minimis value that
would result.
Table 1--Potential FY 2014 catch limit information, de minimis carryover amounts, total potential catch, and impact of realizing total potential catch.
All Weights in Metric Tons
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014 Potential Catch Limit Information de minimus amount and evaluation
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
De Minimis Total
Stock or species FY 2014 Value-1 potential
FY 2014 OFL FY 2014 ABC FY 2014 Sector sub- Percent of catch (de Percent of Percent of
Total ACL ACL Sector sub- minimis + Total ACL ABC
ACL total ACL)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Georges Bank (GB) Atlantic cod.................. 3,570 2,506 1,867 1,776 18 1,885 101.0 75.2
Gulf of Maine (GOM) Atlantic cod................ 1,917 1,550 1,470 812 8 1,478 100.6 95.4
GB Haddock...................................... 46,268 35,699 18,312 17,116 171 18,483 100.9 51.8
GOM Haddock..................................... 440 341 323 218 2 325 100.7 95.4
S. New England (SNE) yellowtail flounder........ 1,042 700 665 469 5 670 100.7 95.7
Cape Cod/GOM yellowtail flounder................ 936 548 523 466 5 528 100.9 96.3
American Plaice................................. 1,981 1,515 1,442 1,357 14 1,456 100.9 96.1
Witch Flounder.................................. 1,512 783 751 599 6 757 100.8 96.7
GB Winter Flounder.............................. 4,626 3,598 3,493 3,364 34 3,527 101.0 98.0
GOM Winter Flounder............................. 1,458 1,078 1,040 688 7 1,047 100.7 97.1
SNE/Mid-Atlantic Winter Flounder................ 3,372 1,676 1,612 1,074 11 1,623 100.7 96.8
Acadian Redfish................................. 16,130 11,465 10,909 10,523 105 11,014 101.0 96.1
White Hake...................................... 6,237 4,713 4,417 4,247 42 4,459 101.0 94.6
Pollock......................................... 20,554 16,000 15,304 13,131 131 15,435 100.9 96.5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All stocks are expected to continue use of a 5 percent uncertainty buffer between ABC and ACL in FY 2014 except for GB winter flounder (3 percent).
[[Page 14638]]
To assist the public in providing effective comment on the de
minimis proposal, NMFS is asking the following questions:
1. Is the concept of a de minimis carryover amount clear? Is the
process we intend to use to track and account for unused ACE carryover
in FY 2014 clear, including when sectors may be subject to
accountability measures if carried-over catch has been harvested? If
not, what needs to be clarified in the final rule?
2. Is the de minimis amount an appropriate balance between making
available some amount of carryover that may be used without payback
implications and providing sufficient protection to stocks so that
management uncertainty offsets are maintained and overfishing does not
occur?
3. Are there alternate de minimis values or derivation approaches
NMFS should consider?
In responding to these questions we remind the public that full-
scale revision of the Amendment 16 carryover program would require a
further Council-initiated action.
We considered higher amounts as the de minimis level (e.g., 2
percent or more of the sector sub-ACL), but were concerned that a
higher amount could raise the likelihood that ACLs could be exceeded.
Further, a higher amount would constitute a significant portion of the
management uncertainty buffer and would potentially degrade its ability
to prevent overfishing. To maintain the protection of this buffer,
additional carryover catch above the de minimis amount would be subject
to the overage payback accountability measure. Sectors could continue
to use up to the full 10 percent available as carryover, but its use
would be subject to accountability measures if the fishery level ACL is
exceeded.
Corrections
NMFS proposes to modify the text at Sec. 648.14(k)(11)(iv) to
clarify the reporting requirements by removing the word ``landings''
from the paragraph.
NMFS proposes to modify the text at Sec. 648.85(a)(3)(v) in order
to clarify that the authority granted to the NMFS Regional
Administrator to remove the daily reporting requirements for special
management programs is separate and distinct from the regulatory
requirement. This modification would move the language explaining the
Regional Administrator's authority to a new subsection (Sec.
648.85(a)(3)(v)(B)) with a further clarification that the Regional
Administrator's authority also includes modification of reporting
requirements.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the
NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that the management
measures in this proposed rule are consistent with the NE Multispecies
FMP, other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable
law, subject to further consideration after public comment.
Pursuant to the procedures established to implement section 6 of
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, the Office of Management and Budget has
determined that this proposed rule is not significant.
This proposed rule does not contain policies with federalism or
``takings'' implications as those terms are defined in E.O. 13132 and
E.O. 12630, respectively.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The proposed rule contains two actions: A requirement for daily VMS
catch reporting for vessels declared to fish in the Eastern U.S./Canada
Area; and the de minimis amount of unused FY 2013 sector ACE that may
be carried over beginning in FY 2014 without being subject to potential
accountability measures. The revision to the reporting requirement is
necessary to better ensure accurate and timely Eastern U.S./Canada Area
catch reporting for quota monitoring purposes. The proposed de minimis
carryover amount is necessary to complete the carryover process NMFS
described for FY 2014 in conjunction with the May 2013 rulemaking for
Framework Adjustment 50 to the NE Multispecies FMP.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires Federal agencies to
consider disproportionality and profitability to determine the
significance of regulatory impacts. There are no disproportionate
impacts as a result of the two actions being proposed. Analyses being
prepared for an upcoming multispecies action indicate 822 unique
entities in the fishery, 806 of which are considered small business
entities under Small Business Administration criteria and 16 that are
considered large entities. These 16 large entities have ownership
interest in finfish businesses, but obtain the majority of their gross
sales from shellfish-related businesses. All businesses obtaining the
majority of their gross sales from finfish are considered small
businesses.
The change in VMS reporting frequency for vessels participating in
the Eastern U.S./Canada Area will require catch data to be transmitted
to NMFS once daily. Vessels participating in the overarching
multispecies fishery already have onboard VMS units and submit various
types of reports and declarations to participate in the fishery. The
proposed change in reporting frequency implements the daily report
structure contemplated in conjunction with Amendment 16 to the FMP.
Previous analysis for Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) collection Office
of Management and Budged Control No. 0648-0202 estimated the cost of
daily reporting as up to $1.00 per day. Vessels that have not
previously submitted daily reports or that have not participated in the
area will now be required to report more frequently, thereby increasing
VMS operating costs. The reporting requirement would be imposed on all
vessels choosing to fish in the area; fishing in the mandatory
reporting area is voluntary. Moreover, as noted below, the charge is
small enough and affects all vessels equally. Therefore, this rule will
not result in disproportionate impacts on small entities.
In FY 2012, 62 sector vessels fished in the Eastern Area, taking a
total of 398 sector trips, with an assumed length of 4 fishing days,
based on the assumed trip length information used in the PRA analysis.
The expected cost of sending a daily report on a per vessel basis is
approximately $25.68 annually and $4.00 per trip. This cost is not
expected to affect profitability for either small or large entities.
Information compiled for FY 2011 in the final report on the performance
of the NE multispecies fishery published by the Northeast Fisheries
Science Center indicates the lowest nominal revenue from groundfish-
specific landings was $730 per trip (vessels category of < 30 feet
(9.1m) in length overall). Thus, the cost of daily reporting will be
less than 0.5 percent of the lowest average nominal revenue in the
fishery. Given that larger vessels or entities whose business involves
multiple vessels of varying sizes would realize even lower potential
operating cost, the impacts from daily reporting relative to nominal
revenue are miniscule. Vessels may also land non-groundfish species in
conjunction with fishing effort in the area, further reducing the
potential impact of daily reporting costs on nominal revenue. Based on
this, NMFS asserts the profitability criterion is not met.
Similarly, the de minimis carryover amount does not have
disproportionate impacts on small entities. Adequate revenue
information is available to
[[Page 14639]]
NMFS to ascertain the impact of de minimis carryover on regulated
entities.
Prior rulemaking for Amendment 16 allowed sectors to carry over up
to 10 percent of their overall allocation if, for any reason, they were
unable to utilize that allocation in one FY. This allowance is designed
to allow flexibility so that vessels do not fish during unsafe
conditions to utilize their last units of catch allocations. The
ability to carry over allocation is simultaneously constrained by a
fishery-wide ACL that cannot be exceeded. Prior rulemaking created a
provision for a de minimis carryover amount in excess of the ACL. This
proposed rule establishes that amount at 1 percent of the upcoming FY
ACL. The additional allocation, in excess of the ACL, will allow
sectors and sector-enrolled entities to increase their gross sales
slightly relative to being restricted to the ACL level, creating
positive economic impacts for those enrolled in sectors. These benefits
are not disproportionate, as the de minimis carryover amount is
available to all sector-enrolled fishery participants.
For these reasons, the proposed rule, if implemented, will not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Accordingly, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis is
not required and none has been prepared.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
Dated: March 11, 2014.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 648 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 648--FISHERIES OF THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
0
1. The authority citation for part 648 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 648.14, revise paragraph (k)(11)(iv) to read as follows:
Sec. 648.14 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(k) * * *
(11) * * *
(iv) Reporting requirements for all persons. (A) If fishing under a
NE multispecies DAS or on a sector trip in the Western U.S./Canada Area
or Eastern U.S./Canada Area specified in Sec. 648.85(a)(1), fail to
report in accordance with Sec. 648.85(a)(3)(v).
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 648.85, revise paragraph (a)(3)(v) to read as follows:
Sec. 648.85 Special management programs.
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(v) Reporting. (A) The owner or operator of a common pool vessel
must submit reports via VMS, in accordance with instructions provided
by the Regional Administrator, for each day of the fishing trip when
declared into either of the U.S./Canada Management Areas. The owner or
operator of a sector vessel must submit daily reports via VMS, in
accordance with instructions provided by the Regional Administrator,
for each day of the fishing trip when declared into the Eastern U.S./
Canada Area. Vessels subject to the daily reporting requirement must
report daily for the entire fishing trip, regardless of what areas are
fished. The reports must be submitted in 24-hr intervals for each day,
beginning at 0000 hr and ending at 2359 hr, and must be submitted by
0900 hr of the following day, or as instructed by the Regional
Administrator. The reports must include at least the following
information:
(1) VTR serial number or other universal ID specified by the
Regional Administrator;
(2) Date fish were caught and statistical area in which fish were
caught; and
(3) Total pounds of cod, haddock, yellowtail flounder, winter
flounder, witch flounder, pollock, American plaice, redfish, Atlantic
halibut, ocean pout, Atlantic wolffish, and white hake kept (in pounds,
live weight) in each broad stock area, specified in Sec. 648.10(k)(3),
as instructed by the Regional Administrator.
(B) The Regional Administrator may remove or modify the reporting
requirement for sector vessels in Sec. 648.85(a)(3)(v) in a manner
consistent with the Administrative Procedure Act.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-05819 Filed 3-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P