Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission Under Delegated Authority, 14708-14709 [2014-05747]

Download as PDF tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 14708 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 51 / Monday, March 17, 2014 / Notices submitting PRA comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the FCC contact listed below as soon as possible. ADDRESSES: Submit your PRA comments to Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), via fax at 202–395–5167, or via the Internet at Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and to Leslie Smith, Office of Managing Director (OMD), Federal Communications Commission (FCC), via the Internet at Leslie.Smith@fcc.gov. To submit your PRA comments by email, send them to: PRA@fcc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie Smith, OMD, FCC, at 202–418– 0217, or via the Internet at: Leslie.Smith@fcc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB Control Number: 3060–0391. Title: Parts 54 and 36, Program to Monitor the Impacts of the Universal Service Support Mechanisms. Form Number: N/A. Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection. Respondents: Business or other forprofit. Number of Respondents and Responses: 313 respondents; 1,252 responses. Estimated Time per Response: 40 minutes. Frequency of Response: Quarterly reporting requirement and third party disclosure requirement. Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. Statutory authority for this information collection is contained in 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154, 201–205, 215, 218, 220, 229, 254, and 410. Total Annual Burden: 836 hours. Total Annual Cost: No costs. Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No impact(s). Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: The data requested are regarded as nonproprietary. If the FCC requests that respondents submit information which respondents believe is confidential, respondents may request confidential treatment of such information pursuant to Section 0.459 of the FCC’s rules, 47 CFR 0.459. Needs and Uses: The monitoring program is necessary for the Commission, the Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Congress and the general public to assess the impact of the universal service support mechanisms. This information collection should be continued because network usage and growth data have proven to be a valuable source of information about the advancement of universal service. VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:45 Mar 14, 2014 Jkt 232001 Federal Communications Commission. Gloria J. Miles, Federal Register Liaison, Office of the Secretary, Office of Managing Director. [FR Doc. 2014–05746 Filed 3–14–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission Under Delegated Authority Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. AGENCY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 3520), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or the Commission) invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection. Comments are requested concerning: Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission’s burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees. The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. DATES: Written PRA comments should be submitted on or before May 16, 2014. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the contact listed below as soon as possible. ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Cathy Williams, FCC, via email PRA@ fcc.gov and to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 For additional information about the information collection, contact Cathy Williams at (202) 418–2918. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB Control Number: 3060–0996. Title: AM Auction Section 307(b) Submissions. Form Number: N/A. Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection. Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities; Not-for-profit entities; State, local or Tribal governments. Number of Respondents and Responses: 210 respondents; 210 responses. Estimated Time per Response: 0.5–6 hours. Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement. Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. Statutory authority for the information collection requirements is contained in Sections 154(i), 307(b) and 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Total Annual Burden: 1,029 hours. Total Annual Costs: $2,126,100. Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: There is no need for confidentiality with this collection of information. Privacy Impact Assessment: No impact(s). Needs and Uses: On January 28, 2010, the Commission adopted a First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (‘‘First R&O’’) in MB Docket No. 09–52, FCC 10–24. The First R&O adopted changes to certain procedures associated with the award of broadcast radio construction permits by competitive bidding, including modifications to the manner in which it awards preferences to applicants under the provisions of Section 307(b). In the First R&O, the Commission added a new Section 307(b) priority that would apply only to Native American and Alaska Native Tribes, Tribal consortia, and majority Tribal-owned entities proposing to serve Tribal lands. As adopted in the First R&O, the priority is only available when all of the following conditions are met: (1) The applicant is either a Federally recognized Tribe or Tribal consortium, or an entity that is 51 percent or more owned or controlled by a Tribe or Tribes; (2) at least 50 percent of the area within the proposed station’s daytime principal community contour is over that Tribe’s Tribal lands, in addition to meeting all other Commission technical standards; (3) the specified community of license is located on Tribal lands; and (4) in the commercial AM service, the applicant FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: E:\FR\FM\17MRN1.SGM 17MRN1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 51 / Monday, March 17, 2014 / Notices must propose first or second aural reception service or first local commercial Tribal-owned transmission service to the proposed community of license, which must be located on Tribal lands. Applicants claiming Section 307(b) preferences using these factors will submit information to substantiate their claims. On March 3, 2011, the Commission adopted a Second Report and Order (‘‘Second R&O’’), First Order on Reconsideration, and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making in MB Docket No. 09–52, FCC 11–28. The First Order on Reconsideration modified the initially adopted Tribal Priority coverage requirement, by creating an alternate coverage standard under criterion (2), enabling Tribes to qualify for the Tribal Priority even when their Tribal lands are too small or irregularly shaped to comprise 50 percent of a station’s signal. In such circumstances, Tribes may claim the priority (i) if the proposed principal community contour encompasses 50 percent or more of that Tribe’s Tribal lands, but does not cover more than 50 percent of the Tribal lands of a non-applicant Tribe; (ii) serves at least 2,000 people living on Tribal lands, and (iii) the total population on Tribal lands residing within the station’s service contour constitutes at least 50 percent of the total covered population, with provision for waivers as necessary to effectuate the goals of the Tribal Priority. This modification will now enable Tribes with small or irregularly shaped lands to qualify for the Tribal Priority. The modifications to the Commission’s allotment and assignment policies adopted in the Second R&O included a rebuttable ‘‘Urbanized Area service presumption’’ under Priority (3), whereby an application to locate or relocate a station as the first local transmission service at a community located within an Urbanized Area, that would place a daytime principal community signal over 50 percent or more of an Urbanized Area, or that could be modified to provide such coverage, will be presumed to be a proposal to serve the Urbanized Area rather than the proposed community. In the case of an AM station, the determination of whether a proposed facility ‘‘could be modified’’ to cover 50 percent or more of an Urbanized Area will be made based on the applicant’s certification in the Section 307(b) showing that there could be no rulecompliant minor modifications to the proposal, based on the antenna configuration or site, and spectrum availability as of the filing date, that could cause the station to place a VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:45 Mar 14, 2014 Jkt 232001 principal community contour over 50 percent or more of an Urbanized Area. To the extent the applicant wishes to rebut the Urbanized Area service presumption, the Section 307(b) showing must include a compelling showing (a) that the proposed community is truly independent from the Urbanized Area; (b) of the community’s specific need for an outlet of local expression separate from the Urbanized Area; and (c) the ability of the proposed station to provide that outlet. In the case of applicants for new AM stations making a showing under Priority (4), other public interest matters, an applicant that can demonstrate that its proposed station would provide third, fourth, or fifth reception service to at least 25 percent of the population in the proposed primary service area, where the proposed community of license has two or fewer transmission services, may receive a dispositive Section 307(b) preference under Priority (4). An applicant for a new AM station that cannot demonstrate that it would provide the third, fourth, or fifth reception service to the required population at a community with two or fewer transmission services may also, under Priority (4), calculate a ‘‘service value index’’ as set forth in the case of Greenup, Kentucky and Athens, Ohio, Report and Order, 2 FCC Rcd 4319 (MMB 1987). If the applicant can demonstrate a 30 percent or greater difference in service value index between its proposal and the next highest ranking proposal, it can receive a dispositive Section 307(b) preference under Priority (4). Except under these circumstances, dispositive Section 307(b) preferences will not be granted under Priority (4) to applicants for new AM stations. The Commission specifically stated that these modified allotment and assignment procedures will not apply to pending applications for new AM stations and major modifications to AM facilities filed during the 2004 AM Auction 84 filing window. Federal Communications Commission. Gloria J. Miles, Federal Register Liaison, Office of the Secretary, Office of Managing Director. [FR Doc. 2014–05747 Filed 3–14–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 14709 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [60-Day–14–0212] Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for opportunity for public comment on proposed data collection projects, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects. To request more information on the proposed projects or to obtain a copy of the data collection plans and instruments, call 404–639–7570 or send comments to Leroy Richardson, at 1600 Clifton Road, MS D74, Atlanta, GA 30333 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Written comments should be received within 60 days of this notice. Proposed Project The National Hospital Care Survey (NHCS) (OMB No. 0920–0212, Expires 04–30–2016)—Revision—National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Background and Brief Description Section 306 of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act (42 U.S.C. 242k), as amended, authorizes that the Secretary of Health and Human Services (DHHS), acting through NCHS, shall collect statistics on the extent and nature of illness and disability of the population of the United States. This three-year clearance request for NHCS includes the collection of all impatient and ambulatory Uniform Bill–04 (UB–04) claims data or electronic health record (EHR) data from a sample of 581 hospitals as well as the collection of additional clinical data from a sample of E:\FR\FM\17MRN1.SGM 17MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14708-14709]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05747]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal 
Communications Commission Under Delegated Authority

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, 
and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
3501-3520), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or the 
Commission) invites the general public and other Federal agencies to 
take this opportunity to comment on the following information 
collection. Comments are requested concerning: Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information 
shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission's burden 
estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information collected; ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on the respondents, including the use of automated 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and 
ways to further reduce the information collection burden on small 
business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
    The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information 
unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be 
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of 
information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) control number.

DATES: Written PRA comments should be submitted on or before May 16, 
2014. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find 
it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, 
you should advise the contact listed below as soon as possible.

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Cathy Williams, FCC, via email 
PRA@fcc.gov and to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information about the 
information collection, contact Cathy Williams at (202) 418-2918.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 3060-0996.
    Title: AM Auction Section 307(b) Submissions.
    Form Number: N/A.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities; Not-for-profit 
entities; State, local or Tribal governments.
    Number of Respondents and Responses: 210 respondents; 210 
responses.
    Estimated Time per Response: 0.5-6 hours.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement.
    Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. 
Statutory authority for the information collection requirements is 
contained in Sections 154(i), 307(b) and 309 of the Communications Act 
of 1934, as amended.
    Total Annual Burden: 1,029 hours.
    Total Annual Costs: $2,126,100.
    Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: There is no need for 
confidentiality with this collection of information.
    Privacy Impact Assessment: No impact(s).
    Needs and Uses: On January 28, 2010, the Commission adopted a First 
Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (``First 
R&O'') in MB Docket No. 09-52, FCC 10-24. The First R&O adopted changes 
to certain procedures associated with the award of broadcast radio 
construction permits by competitive bidding, including modifications to 
the manner in which it awards preferences to applicants under the 
provisions of Section 307(b). In the First R&O, the Commission added a 
new Section 307(b) priority that would apply only to Native American 
and Alaska Native Tribes, Tribal consortia, and majority Tribal-owned 
entities proposing to serve Tribal lands. As adopted in the First R&O, 
the priority is only available when all of the following conditions are 
met: (1) The applicant is either a Federally recognized Tribe or Tribal 
consortium, or an entity that is 51 percent or more owned or controlled 
by a Tribe or Tribes; (2) at least 50 percent of the area within the 
proposed station's daytime principal community contour is over that 
Tribe's Tribal lands, in addition to meeting all other Commission 
technical standards; (3) the specified community of license is located 
on Tribal lands; and (4) in the commercial AM service, the applicant

[[Page 14709]]

must propose first or second aural reception service or first local 
commercial Tribal-owned transmission service to the proposed community 
of license, which must be located on Tribal lands. Applicants claiming 
Section 307(b) preferences using these factors will submit information 
to substantiate their claims.
    On March 3, 2011, the Commission adopted a Second Report and Order 
(``Second R&O''), First Order on Reconsideration, and Second Further 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making in MB Docket No. 09-52, FCC 11-28. The 
First Order on Reconsideration modified the initially adopted Tribal 
Priority coverage requirement, by creating an alternate coverage 
standard under criterion (2), enabling Tribes to qualify for the Tribal 
Priority even when their Tribal lands are too small or irregularly 
shaped to comprise 50 percent of a station's signal. In such 
circumstances, Tribes may claim the priority (i) if the proposed 
principal community contour encompasses 50 percent or more of that 
Tribe's Tribal lands, but does not cover more than 50 percent of the 
Tribal lands of a non-applicant Tribe; (ii) serves at least 2,000 
people living on Tribal lands, and (iii) the total population on Tribal 
lands residing within the station's service contour constitutes at 
least 50 percent of the total covered population, with provision for 
waivers as necessary to effectuate the goals of the Tribal Priority. 
This modification will now enable Tribes with small or irregularly 
shaped lands to qualify for the Tribal Priority.
    The modifications to the Commission's allotment and assignment 
policies adopted in the Second R&O included a rebuttable ``Urbanized 
Area service presumption'' under Priority (3), whereby an application 
to locate or relocate a station as the first local transmission service 
at a community located within an Urbanized Area, that would place a 
daytime principal community signal over 50 percent or more of an 
Urbanized Area, or that could be modified to provide such coverage, 
will be presumed to be a proposal to serve the Urbanized Area rather 
than the proposed community. In the case of an AM station, the 
determination of whether a proposed facility ``could be modified'' to 
cover 50 percent or more of an Urbanized Area will be made based on the 
applicant's certification in the Section 307(b) showing that there 
could be no rule-compliant minor modifications to the proposal, based 
on the antenna configuration or site, and spectrum availability as of 
the filing date, that could cause the station to place a principal 
community contour over 50 percent or more of an Urbanized Area. To the 
extent the applicant wishes to rebut the Urbanized Area service 
presumption, the Section 307(b) showing must include a compelling 
showing (a) that the proposed community is truly independent from the 
Urbanized Area; (b) of the community's specific need for an outlet of 
local expression separate from the Urbanized Area; and (c) the ability 
of the proposed station to provide that outlet.
    In the case of applicants for new AM stations making a showing 
under Priority (4), other public interest matters, an applicant that 
can demonstrate that its proposed station would provide third, fourth, 
or fifth reception service to at least 25 percent of the population in 
the proposed primary service area, where the proposed community of 
license has two or fewer transmission services, may receive a 
dispositive Section 307(b) preference under Priority (4). An applicant 
for a new AM station that cannot demonstrate that it would provide the 
third, fourth, or fifth reception service to the required population at 
a community with two or fewer transmission services may also, under 
Priority (4), calculate a ``service value index'' as set forth in the 
case of Greenup, Kentucky and Athens, Ohio, Report and Order, 2 FCC Rcd 
4319 (MMB 1987). If the applicant can demonstrate a 30 percent or 
greater difference in service value index between its proposal and the 
next highest ranking proposal, it can receive a dispositive Section 
307(b) preference under Priority (4). Except under these circumstances, 
dispositive Section 307(b) preferences will not be granted under 
Priority (4) to applicants for new AM stations. The Commission 
specifically stated that these modified allotment and assignment 
procedures will not apply to pending applications for new AM stations 
and major modifications to AM facilities filed during the 2004 AM 
Auction 84 filing window.

Federal Communications Commission.
Gloria J. Miles,
Federal Register Liaison, Office of the Secretary, Office of Managing 
Director.
[FR Doc. 2014-05747 Filed 3-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.