New Animal Drug Applications; Confidentiality of Data and Information in a New Animal Drug Application File, 14609-14611 [2014-05430]
Download as PDF
14609
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 79, No. 51
Monday, March 17, 2014
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the
following ways:
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for
paper submissions): Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Agency name and
Docket No. FDA–2014–N–0108 for this
rulemaking. All comments received may
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
additional information on submitting
comments, see the ‘‘Comments’’ heading
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Fontana, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV–100), Food and Drug
Administration, 7500 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240–402–0656.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 514
[Docket No. FDA–2014–N–0108]
New Animal Drug Applications;
Confidentiality of Data and Information
in a New Animal Drug Application File
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Direct final rule.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is amending its
regulation regarding the confidentiality
of data and information in and about
new animal drug application files to
change when certain approval-related
information will be disclosed by the
Agency. This change will ensure that
the Agency is able to update its list of
approved new animal drug products
within the statutory timeframe. It will
also permit more timely public
disclosure of approval-related
information, increasing the transparency
of FDA decision making in the approval
of new animal drugs.
DATES: This rule is effective July 30,
2014. Submit either electronic or
written comments by June 2, 2014. If
FDA receives no significant adverse
comments within the specified
comment period, the Agency will
publish a document confirming the
effective date of the final rule in the
Federal Register within 30 days after
the comment period on this direct final
rule ends. If timely significant adverse
comments are received, the Agency will
publish a document in the Federal
Register withdrawing this direct final
rule before its effective date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. FDA–2014–N–
0108, by any of the following methods:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Mar 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
I. Background
Section 512(i) (21 U.S.C. 360b(i)) was
added to the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) by the
Animal Drug Amendments of 1968
(Pub. L. 90–399). Section 512(i) requires
the conditions and indications of use of
a new animal drug to be published in
the Federal Register upon approval of a
new animal drug application (NADA)
filed under section 512(b) of the FD&C
Act.
In 1974, FDA revised its regulations
regarding the confidentiality of
information in applications in § 135.33a
(21 CFR 135.33a) to include provisions
of the Freedom of Information Act (Pub.
L. 89–487). That revision established
that public disclosure by the Agency of
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
certain data and information in an
NADA file could not occur before the
Federal Register notice of approval
published (39 FR 44653, December 24,
1974). Shortly thereafter, § 135.33a was
redesignated as § 514.11 (21 CFR
514.11) (40 FR 13802 at 13825, March
27, 1975).
In 1988, the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Pub. L.
100–670) added section 512(n)(4)(A) of
the FD&C Act, which states that the
Agency shall publish a list of approved
new animal drug products and revise
that list every 30 days to include each
new animal drug that has been
approved during that 30-day period.
This list, as well as related patent
information and marketing exclusivity
periods, is contained in a document
generally known as the ‘‘Green Book,’’
available at the Agency’s public Web
site at https://www.fda.gov/
AnimalVeterinary/Products/
ApprovedAnimalDrugProducts.
The editorial and clearance processes
for publishing the Federal Register
notice announcing the approval of an
NADA varies from 1 to 2 months after
the approval letter is issued to the
applicant. Consequently, the addition of
newly approved product information to
the ‘‘Green Book’’ and public disclosure
of certain other approval-related
information at the Agency’s public Web
site is delayed until after that Federal
Register notice is published. Such other
approval-related information may
include the summary of information
forming the basis for approval (known
also as the Freedom of Information
Summary) and documentation of
environmental review. Trade and
proprietary information in the
application file remains confidential
and is not disclosed.
FDA is issuing this direct final rule
amending § 514.11 to change the time
when certain approval-related
information in an NADA file will be
publicly disclosed, from when notice of
the approval is published in the Federal
Register to when the application is
approved. This change will ensure that
the Agency is able to update the ‘‘Green
Book’’ within the 30-day statutory
timeframe (see section 512(n)(4)(A)(ii) of
the FD&C Act). It will also permit more
timely public disclosure of certain
approval-related information following
sponsor notification of application
approval, increasing the transparency of
E:\FR\FM\17MRR1.SGM
17MRR1
14610
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 51 / Monday, March 17, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Agency decision making in the approval
of new animal drugs.
II. Direct Final Rulemaking
FDA has determined that the subject
of this rulemaking is suitable for a direct
final rule. FDA is amending § 514.11 to
change the time when certain approvalrelated information in an NADA file
will be publicly disclosed to ensure that
the Agency is able to update the ‘‘Green
Book’’ within the 30-day statutory
timeframe. This rule is intended to
make noncontroversial changes to
existing regulations. The Agency does
not anticipate receiving any significant
adverse comment on this rule.
Consistent with FDA’s procedures on
direct final rulemaking, we are
publishing elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register a companion proposed
rule. The companion proposed rule and
this direct final rule are substantively
identical. The companion proposed rule
provides the procedural framework
within which the rule may be finalized
in the event the direct final rule is
withdrawn because of any significant
adverse comment. The comment period
for this direct final rule runs
concurrently with the comment period
of the companion proposed rule. Any
comments received in response to the
companion proposed rule will also be
considered as comments regarding this
direct final rule.
FDA is providing a comment period
for the direct final rule of 75 days after
the date of publication in the Federal
Register. If FDA receives any significant
adverse comment, we intend to
withdraw this direct final rule before its
effective date by publication of a notice
in the Federal Register within 30 days
after the comment period ends. A
significant adverse comment is one that
explains why the rule would be
inappropriate, including challenges to
the rule’s underlying premise or
approach, or would be ineffective or
unacceptable without a change. In
determining whether an adverse
comment is significant and warrants
withdrawing a direct final rule, the
Agency will consider whether the
comment raises an issue serious enough
to warrant a substantive response in a
notice-and-comment process in
accordance with section 553 of the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553).
Comments that are frivolous,
insubstantial, or outside the scope of the
direct final rule will not be considered
significant or adverse under this
procedure. For example, a comment
recommending a regulation change in
addition to those in the rule would not
be considered a significant adverse
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 Mar 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
comment unless the comment states
why the rule would be ineffective
without the additional change. In
addition, if a significant adverse
comment applies to an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and
that provision can be severed from the
remainder of the rule, FDA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of a significant
adverse comment.
If FDA does not receive significant
adverse comment in response to the
direct final rule, the Agency will
publish a document in the Federal
Register confirming the effective date of
the final rule. The Agency intends to
make the direct final rule effective 30
days after publication of the
confirmation document in the Federal
Register.
A full description of FDA’s policy on
direct final rule procedures may be
found in a guidance document
published in the Federal Register of
November 21, 1997 (62 FR 62466). The
guidance document may be accessed at:
https://www.fda.gov/
RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/
ucm125166.htm.
III. Legal Authority
FDA is issuing this direct final rule
under section 512(c) of the FD&C Act.
This section gives the Secretary of
Health and Human Services the
authority to approve new animal drug
applications. In addition, section 701(a)
of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 371(a)) gives
FDA general rulemaking authority to
issue regulations for the efficient
enforcement of the FD&C Act.
IV. Environmental Impact
FDA has determined under 21 CFR
25.30(h) that this action is of a type that
does not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. Therefore, neither an
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required.
V. Analysis of Impacts
FDA has examined the impacts of this
direct final rule under Executive Order
12866, Executive Order 13563, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601–612), and the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4).
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct Agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
impacts; and equity). The Agency
believes that this direct final rule is not
a significant regulatory action as defined
by Executive Order 12866.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires Agencies to analyze regulatory
options that would minimize any
significant impact of a rule on small
entities. Because this direct final rule
would not impose any compliance costs
on the sponsors of animal drug products
that are currently marketed or in
development, the Agency certifies that
this direct final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that Agencies prepare a written
statement, which includes an
assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits, before proposing ‘‘any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100,000,000
or more (adjusted annually for inflation)
in any one year.’’ The current threshold
after adjustment for inflation is $141
million, using the most current (2012)
Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross
Domestic Product. FDA does not expect
this direct final rule to result in any 1year expenditure that would meet or
exceed this amount.
VI. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this direct final
rule in accordance with the principles
set forth in Executive Order 13132. FDA
has determined that the direct final rule
does not contain policies that have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Accordingly, the
Agency concludes that the direct final
rule does not contain policies that have
federalism implications as defined in
the Executive Order and, consequently,
a federalism summary impact statement
is not required.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This direct final rule contains no
collection of information. Therefore,
clearance by the Office of Management
and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520) is not required.
VIII. Comments
Interested persons may submit either
electronic comments regarding this
document to https://www.regulations.gov
or written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It
E:\FR\FM\17MRR1.SGM
17MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 51 / Monday, March 17, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
is only necessary to send one set of
comments. Identify comments with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and
will be posted to the docket at https://
www.regulations.gov.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 514
PART 514—NEW ANIMAL DRUG
APPLICATIONS
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 514 continues to read as follows:
■
2. In § 514.11, revise paragraphs (b),
(d), (e) introductory text, and (e)(2)(ii)
introductory text to read as follows:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2013–0439; FRL–9907–55–
Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Texas;
Stage II Vapor Recovery Program and
Control of Air Pollution From Volatile
Organic Compounds
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving revisions to
the Texas State Implementation Plan
(SIP) that control emissions of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) at gasoline
dispensing facilities (GDFs) in Texas.
The revisions were submitted to the
EPA by the Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality (TCEQ) on
October 31, 2013 and address the
maintenance and removal of Stage II
vapor recovery equipment at GDFs. The
EPA is also approving related revisions
to the Stage II SIP narrative that pertain
to the maintenance and removal of Stage
II vapor recovery equipment and
demonstrate that the absence of Stage II
equipment in the Beaumont-Port Arthur
(BPA), Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) and
Houston-Galveston Brazoria (HGB)
areas, and in El Paso County would not
interfere with attainment of the national
ambient air quality standards,
reasonable further progress or any other
requirement of the Clean Air Act (CAA
or Act). The EPA is approving these
revisions pursuant to sections 110 and
202 of the Act and consistent with the
EPA’s guidance.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
April 16, 2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R06–OAR–2013–0439. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
SUMMARY:
§ 514.11 Confidentiality of data and
information in a new animal drug
application file.
*
*
*
*
(b) The existence of an NADA file will
not be disclosed by the Food and Drug
Administration before the application
has been approved, unless it has been
previously disclosed or acknowledged.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) If the existence of an NADA file
has been publicly disclosed or
acknowledged before the application
has been approved, no data or
information contained in the file is
available for public disclosure, but the
Commissioner may, in his discretion,
disclose a summary of such selected
portions of the safety and effectiveness
data as are appropriate for public
consideration of a specific pending
issue, i.e., at an open session of a Food
and Drug Administration advisory
committee or pursuant to an exchange
of important regulatory information
with a foreign government.
(e) After an application has been
approved, the following data and
information in the NADA file are
immediately available for public
disclosure unless extraordinary
circumstances are shown:
*
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
(ii) For an NADA approved after July
1, 1975, a summary of such data and
Jkt 232001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
■
16:27 Mar 14, 2014
[FR Doc. 2014–05430 Filed 3–14–14; 8:45 am]
AGENCY:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352,
356a, 360b, 371, 379e, 381.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Dated: March 7, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
Administrative practice and
procedure, Animal drugs, Confidential
business information, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Therefore under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 514 is
amended as follows:
*
information prepared in one of the
following two alternative ways shall be
publicly released when the application
is approved.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
14611
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Planning Section (6PD–L),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas
75202–2733. To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an
appointment with the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
paragraph below or Mr. Bill Deese at
214–665–7253.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Carrie Paige, Air Planning Section
(6PD–L); telephone (214) 665–6521;
email address paige.carrie@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ means EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
The background for today’s final rule
is discussed in our December 30, 2013
proposal to approve revisions to the
Texas SIP (78 FR 79340). In that action,
we proposed to approve the Texas SIP
revisions submitted by the TCEQ on
October 31, 2013, which specify that
new GDFs would not be required to
install Stage II equipment and provide
removal (decommissioning) procedures
that existing GDFs in the 16 counties 1
must complete by August 31, 2018. The
revisions to the Stage II SIP describe the
removal of Stage II equipment at GDFs
and require maintenance of the Stage II
equipment until decommissioning
occurs. The revisions to the SIP
narrative also include a demonstration
that the removal of, or failure to install,
Stage II equipment in the 16 counties is
consistent with section 110(l) of the Act
which precludes approval of revisions
to the SIP that contribute to
nonattainment or interfere with
maintenance of any National Ambient
Air Quality Standard.
Our December 30, 2013 proposal
provides a detailed description of the
revisions and the rationale for EPA’s
proposed actions, together with a
1 The four areas in Texas where Stage II is
required comprise 16 counties: BPA, containing
Hardin, Jefferson and Orange counties; DFW,
involving Collin, Dallas, Denton and Tarrant
counties; El Paso County; and HGB, containing
Brazoria, Chambers, Fort Bend, Galveston, Harris,
Liberty, Montgomery, and Waller counties.
E:\FR\FM\17MRR1.SGM
17MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 51 (Monday, March 17, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14609-14611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05430]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 51 / Monday, March 17, 2014 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 14609]]
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 514
[Docket No. FDA-2014-N-0108]
New Animal Drug Applications; Confidentiality of Data and
Information in a New Animal Drug Application File
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending its
regulation regarding the confidentiality of data and information in and
about new animal drug application files to change when certain
approval-related information will be disclosed by the Agency. This
change will ensure that the Agency is able to update its list of
approved new animal drug products within the statutory timeframe. It
will also permit more timely public disclosure of approval-related
information, increasing the transparency of FDA decision making in the
approval of new animal drugs.
DATES: This rule is effective July 30, 2014. Submit either electronic
or written comments by June 2, 2014. If FDA receives no significant
adverse comments within the specified comment period, the Agency will
publish a document confirming the effective date of the final rule in
the Federal Register within 30 days after the comment period on this
direct final rule ends. If timely significant adverse comments are
received, the Agency will publish a document in the Federal Register
withdrawing this direct final rule before its effective date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FDA-2014-
N-0108, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the following ways:
Mail/ Hand Delivery/ Courier (for paper submissions):
Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Agency name
and Docket No. FDA-2014-N-0108 for this rulemaking. All comments
received may be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided. For additional information
on submitting comments, see the ``Comments'' heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into
the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts and/ or go to the Division of
Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Fontana, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV-100), Food and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240-402-0656.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 512(i) (21 U.S.C. 360b(i)) was added to the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) by the Animal Drug Amendments of
1968 (Pub. L. 90-399). Section 512(i) requires the conditions and
indications of use of a new animal drug to be published in the Federal
Register upon approval of a new animal drug application (NADA) filed
under section 512(b) of the FD&C Act.
In 1974, FDA revised its regulations regarding the confidentiality
of information in applications in Sec. 135.33a (21 CFR 135.33a) to
include provisions of the Freedom of Information Act (Pub. L. 89-487).
That revision established that public disclosure by the Agency of
certain data and information in an NADA file could not occur before the
Federal Register notice of approval published (39 FR 44653, December
24, 1974). Shortly thereafter, Sec. 135.33a was redesignated as Sec.
514.11 (21 CFR 514.11) (40 FR 13802 at 13825, March 27, 1975).
In 1988, the Generic Animal Drug and Patent Term Restoration Act
(Pub. L. 100-670) added section 512(n)(4)(A) of the FD&C Act, which
states that the Agency shall publish a list of approved new animal drug
products and revise that list every 30 days to include each new animal
drug that has been approved during that 30-day period. This list, as
well as related patent information and marketing exclusivity periods,
is contained in a document generally known as the ``Green Book,''
available at the Agency's public Web site at https://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/Products/ApprovedAnimalDrugProducts ApprovedAnimalDrugProducts.
The editorial and clearance processes for publishing the Federal
Register notice announcing the approval of an NADA varies from 1 to 2
months after the approval letter is issued to the applicant.
Consequently, the addition of newly approved product information to the
``Green Book'' and public disclosure of certain other approval-related
information at the Agency's public Web site is delayed until after that
Federal Register notice is published. Such other approval-related
information may include the summary of information forming the basis
for approval (known also as the Freedom of Information Summary) and
documentation of environmental review. Trade and proprietary
information in the application file remains confidential and is not
disclosed.
FDA is issuing this direct final rule amending Sec. 514.11 to
change the time when certain approval-related information in an NADA
file will be publicly disclosed, from when notice of the approval is
published in the Federal Register to when the application is approved.
This change will ensure that the Agency is able to update the ``Green
Book'' within the 30-day statutory timeframe (see section
512(n)(4)(A)(ii) of the FD&C Act). It will also permit more timely
public disclosure of certain approval-related information following
sponsor notification of application approval, increasing the
transparency of
[[Page 14610]]
Agency decision making in the approval of new animal drugs.
II. Direct Final Rulemaking
FDA has determined that the subject of this rulemaking is suitable
for a direct final rule. FDA is amending Sec. 514.11 to change the
time when certain approval-related information in an NADA file will be
publicly disclosed to ensure that the Agency is able to update the
``Green Book'' within the 30-day statutory timeframe. This rule is
intended to make noncontroversial changes to existing regulations. The
Agency does not anticipate receiving any significant adverse comment on
this rule.
Consistent with FDA's procedures on direct final rulemaking, we are
publishing elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register a companion
proposed rule. The companion proposed rule and this direct final rule
are substantively identical. The companion proposed rule provides the
procedural framework within which the rule may be finalized in the
event the direct final rule is withdrawn because of any significant
adverse comment. The comment period for this direct final rule runs
concurrently with the comment period of the companion proposed rule.
Any comments received in response to the companion proposed rule will
also be considered as comments regarding this direct final rule.
FDA is providing a comment period for the direct final rule of 75
days after the date of publication in the Federal Register. If FDA
receives any significant adverse comment, we intend to withdraw this
direct final rule before its effective date by publication of a notice
in the Federal Register within 30 days after the comment period ends. A
significant adverse comment is one that explains why the rule would be
inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's underlying premise or
approach, or would be ineffective or unacceptable without a change. In
determining whether an adverse comment is significant and warrants
withdrawing a direct final rule, the Agency will consider whether the
comment raises an issue serious enough to warrant a substantive
response in a notice-and-comment process in accordance with section 553
of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553).
Comments that are frivolous, insubstantial, or outside the scope of
the direct final rule will not be considered significant or adverse
under this procedure. For example, a comment recommending a regulation
change in addition to those in the rule would not be considered a
significant adverse comment unless the comment states why the rule
would be ineffective without the additional change. In addition, if a
significant adverse comment applies to an amendment, paragraph, or
section of this rule and that provision can be severed from the
remainder of the rule, FDA may adopt as final those provisions of the
rule that are not the subject of a significant adverse comment.
If FDA does not receive significant adverse comment in response to
the direct final rule, the Agency will publish a document in the
Federal Register confirming the effective date of the final rule. The
Agency intends to make the direct final rule effective 30 days after
publication of the confirmation document in the Federal Register.
A full description of FDA's policy on direct final rule procedures
may be found in a guidance document published in the Federal Register
of November 21, 1997 (62 FR 62466). The guidance document may be
accessed at: https://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm125166.htm.
III. Legal Authority
FDA is issuing this direct final rule under section 512(c) of the
FD&C Act. This section gives the Secretary of Health and Human Services
the authority to approve new animal drug applications. In addition,
section 701(a) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 371(a)) gives FDA general
rulemaking authority to issue regulations for the efficient enforcement
of the FD&C Act.
IV. Environmental Impact
FDA has determined under 21 CFR 25.30(h) that this action is of a
type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
V. Analysis of Impacts
FDA has examined the impacts of this direct final rule under
Executive Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), and the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct
Agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity). The Agency believes that this direct
final rule is not a significant regulatory action as defined by
Executive Order 12866.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires Agencies to analyze
regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule
on small entities. Because this direct final rule would not impose any
compliance costs on the sponsors of animal drug products that are
currently marketed or in development, the Agency certifies that this
direct final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that Agencies prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment
of anticipated costs and benefits, before proposing ``any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year.'' The current threshold after adjustment
for inflation is $141 million, using the most current (2012) Implicit
Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product. FDA does not expect this
direct final rule to result in any 1-year expenditure that would meet
or exceed this amount.
VI. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this direct final rule in accordance with the
principles set forth in Executive Order 13132. FDA has determined that
the direct final rule does not contain policies that have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Accordingly,
the Agency concludes that the direct final rule does not contain
policies that have federalism implications as defined in the Executive
Order and, consequently, a federalism summary impact statement is not
required.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This direct final rule contains no collection of information.
Therefore, clearance by the Office of Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) is not required.
VIII. Comments
Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding
this document to https://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It
[[Page 14611]]
is only necessary to send one set of comments. Identify comments with
the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document.
Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to
the docket at https://www.regulations.gov.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 514
Administrative practice and procedure, Animal drugs, Confidential
business information, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Therefore under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
514 is amended as follows:
PART 514--NEW ANIMAL DRUG APPLICATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 514 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352, 356a, 360b, 371, 379e,
381.
0
2. In Sec. 514.11, revise paragraphs (b), (d), (e) introductory text,
and (e)(2)(ii) introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 514.11 Confidentiality of data and information in a new animal
drug application file.
* * * * *
(b) The existence of an NADA file will not be disclosed by the Food
and Drug Administration before the application has been approved,
unless it has been previously disclosed or acknowledged.
* * * * *
(d) If the existence of an NADA file has been publicly disclosed or
acknowledged before the application has been approved, no data or
information contained in the file is available for public disclosure,
but the Commissioner may, in his discretion, disclose a summary of such
selected portions of the safety and effectiveness data as are
appropriate for public consideration of a specific pending issue, i.e.,
at an open session of a Food and Drug Administration advisory committee
or pursuant to an exchange of important regulatory information with a
foreign government.
(e) After an application has been approved, the following data and
information in the NADA file are immediately available for public
disclosure unless extraordinary circumstances are shown:
* * * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) For an NADA approved after July 1, 1975, a summary of such
data and information prepared in one of the following two alternative
ways shall be publicly released when the application is approved.
* * * * *
Dated: March 7, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-05430 Filed 3-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P