Olives Grown in California; Decreased Assessment Rate, 14367-14369 [2014-05557]
Download as PDF
14367
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 79, No. 50
Friday, March 14, 2014
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 932
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–14–0002; FV14–932–1
IR]
Olives Grown in California; Decreased
Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Interim rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
This rule decreases the
assessment rate established for the
California Olive Committee (Committee)
for the 2014 and subsequent fiscal years
from $21.16 to $15.21 per ton of
assessable olives handled. The
Committee locally administers the
marketing order, which regulates the
handling of olives grown in California.
Assessments upon olive handlers are
used by the Committee to fund
reasonable and necessary expenses of
the program. The fiscal year began
January 1 and ends December 31. The
assessment rate will remain in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Effective March 15, 2014;
comments received by May 13, 2014
will be considered prior to issuance of
a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order and Agreement Division, Fruit
and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax:
(202) 720–8938; or Internet: https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments should
reference the document number and the
date and page number of this issue of
the Federal Register and will be
available for public inspection in the
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:05 Mar 13, 2014
Jkt 232001
Office of the Docket Clerk during regular
business hours, or can be viewed at:
https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments submitted in response to this
rule will be included in the record and
will be made available to the public.
Please be advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the
comments will be made public on the
internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry
L. Simmons, Marketing Specialist, or
Martin Engeler, Regional Director,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or Email:
Jerry.Simmons@ams.usda.gov or
Martin.Engeler@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jeffrey Smutny,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
No. 148 and Order No. 932, both as
amended (7 CFR part 932), regulating
the handling of olives grown in
California, hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
12866, 13175, and 13563.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the marketing order now
in effect, California olive handlers are
subject to assessments. Funds to
administer the order are derived from
such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as issued herein will be
applicable to all assessable olives
beginning on January 1, 2014, and
continue until amended, suspended, or
terminated.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing, USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule decreases the assessment
rate established for the Committee for
the 2014 and subsequent fiscal years
from $21.16 to $15.21 per ton of
assessable olives.
The California olive marketing order
provides authority for the Committee,
with the approval of USDA, to formulate
an annual budget of expenses and
collect assessments from handlers to
administer the program. The members
of the Committee are producers and
handlers of California olives. They are
familiar with the Committee’s needs and
with the costs for goods and services in
their local area, and are thus in a
position to formulate an appropriate
budget and assessment rate. The
assessment rate is formulated and
discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all
directly affected persons have an
opportunity to participate and provide
input.
For the 2013 and subsequent fiscal
years, the Committee recommended,
and USDA approved, an assessment rate
of $21.16 per ton of assessable olives
that would continue in effect from fiscal
year to fiscal year unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
information available to USDA.
The Committee met on December 9,
2013, and unanimously recommended
2014 fiscal year expenditures of
$1,262,460 and an assessment rate of
$15.21 per ton of assessable olives. In
comparison, last year’s budgeted
expenditures were $1,289,198. The
assessment rate of $15.21 is $5.95 lower
than the rate currently in effect. The
Committee recommended the lower
assessment rate because the 2013–14
assessable olive receipts as reported by
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
14368
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 50 / Friday, March 14, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
the California Agricultural Statistics
Service (CASS) are 79,495 tons,
compared to 90,790 tons in 2012–13.
Olives are an alternate-bearing crop,
where crop size alternates between
small and large crops, resulting in a
higher 2012–13 volume crop and a
lower 2013–14 volume crop. The lower
assessment rate is possible due to a
decrease in the overall budget and
utilization of part of the reserve.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2014 fiscal year include $346,500 for
General Administration; $565,600 for
Marketing Programs; $37,800 for
Inspection Equipment Development;
and $312,560 for Research Programs.
Budgeted expenses for these items in
2013 were $333,800, $637,380,
$105,000, and $213,018, respectively.
The assessment rate recommended by
the Committee is based upon the actual
revenue necessary to meet anticipated
2014 fiscal year expenses, given the
actual olive tonnage received by
handlers during the 2013–14 crop year,
and taking into consideration the
potential tonnage diverted by handlers
into exempt uses. Actual assessable
tonnage for the 2014 fiscal year is
expected to be lower than the 2013–14
crop receipts of 79,495 tons reported by
CASS because some olives may be
diverted by handlers to uses that are
exempt from marketing order
requirements. Income derived from
handler assessments and carryover
reserve will be adequate to cover
budgeted expenses. Funds in the reserve
will be kept within the maximum
amount of one fiscal year’s expenses
permitted by the order.
The assessment rate established in
this rule will continue in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
based upon a recommendation and
information submitted by the
Committee or upon other available
information.
Although this assessment rate is
effective for an indefinite period, the
Committee will continue to meet prior
to or during each fiscal year to
recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of Committee meetings
are available from the Committee or
USDA. Committee meetings are open to
the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings.
USDA will evaluate Committee
recommendations and other available
information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is
needed. Further rulemaking will be
undertaken as necessary. The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:05 Mar 13, 2014
Jkt 232001
Committee’s 2014 budget and those for
subsequent fiscal years will be reviewed
and, as appropriate, approved by USDA.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 1,000
producers of California olives in the
production area and two handlers
subject to regulation under the
marketing order. Small agricultural
producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) as those
having annual receipts of less than
$750,000 and small agricultural service
firms are defined as those whose annual
receipts are less than $7,000,000. (13
CFR 121.201)
Based upon information from the
industry and CASS, the average grower
price for 2013 was approximately
$1,057.56 per ton of assessable olives
and total grower deliveries were 79,495
tons. Based on production, producer
prices, and the total number of
California olive producers, the average
annual producer revenue is less than
$750,000. Thus, the majority of olive
producers may be classified as small
entities. Neither of the handlers may be
classified as small entities.
This rule decreases the assessment
rate established for the Committee and
collected from handlers for the 2014 and
subsequent fiscal years from $21.16 to
$15.21 per ton of assessable olives, a
decrease of $5.95. The Committee
unanimously recommended 2014
expenditures of $1,262,460. The
quantity of assessable California olives
for the 2013–14 season is 79,495 tons.
However, the quantity of olives actually
assessed is expected to be slightly lower
because some of the tonnage may be
diverted by handlers to exempt outlets
on which assessments are not paid.
Income derived from the assessment
rate of $15.21 combined with carryover
reserve should provide an assessment
income adequate to meet this year’s
expenses.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2014 year includes $346,500 for General
Administration; $565,600 for Marketing
Programs; $37,800 for Inspection
Equipment Development; and $312,560
for Research Programs. Budgeted
expenses for these items in 2013 were
$333,800, $637,380, $105,000, and
$213,018, respectively.
The decrease in the assessment rate is
possible due to a decrease in the overall
budget and utilization of part of the
reserve. Funds in the reserve will be
kept within the maximum amount of
one fiscal year’s expenses permitted by
the order.
The Committee reviewed and
unanimously recommended 2014 fiscal
year expenditures of $1,262,460, which
included decreases in Marketing
Programs and Inspection Equipment
Development, and an increase in
Research Programs and General
Administration.
Prior to arriving at this budget, the
Committee considered information from
various sources, such as the Executive
Subcommittee, Marketing
Subcommittee, Inspection
Subcommittee, and the Research
Subcommittee. Alternative expenditure
levels were discussed by these groups
based upon the relative value of various
projects to the olive industry. The
assessment rate of $15.21 per ton of
assessable olives was derived by
considering anticipated expenses, the
volume of assessable olives, potentially
exempt olives, and other pertinent
factors.
A review of historical information and
preliminary information indicates that
the grower price for the 2013 fiscal year
was approximately $1,150.17 per ton for
canning fruit, and $384.56 per ton for
limited-use sizes. Approximately 87.9
percent of the olive crop were canning
fruit sizes and 12.1 percent were limited
use sizes. Grower revenue on 79,495
total tons of canning and limited-use
sizes would be $84,070,570, given the
current grower prices for those sizes.
Therefore, the estimated assessment
revenue for the 2014 fiscal year, as a
percentage of total grower revenue, is
expected to be approximately 1.4
percent.
This action decreases the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers.
Assessments are applied uniformly on
all handlers, and some of the costs may
be passed on to producers. However,
decreasing the assessment rate reduces
the burden on handlers, and may reduce
the burden on producers. In addition,
the Committee’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the California
olive industry and all interested persons
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
14369
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 50 / Friday, March 14, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
were invited to attend the meeting and
participate in Committee deliberations
on all issues. Like all Committee
meetings, the December 9, 2013,
meeting was a public meeting and all
entities, both large and small, were able
to express views on this issue. Finally,
interested persons are invited to submit
comments on this interim rule,
including the regulatory and
informational impacts of this action on
small businesses.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178, Generic
Vegetable Crops. No changes in those
requirements as a result of this action
are necessary. Should any changes
become necessary, they would be
submitted to OMB for approval.
This action imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large California olive
handlers. As with all Federal marketing
order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or
conflict with this rule.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jeffrey Smutny
at the previously mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee, and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined upon good cause
that it is impracticable, unnecessary,
and contrary to the public interest to
give preliminary notice prior to putting
this rule into effect, and that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) The 2014 fiscal year began
on January 1, 2014, and the marketing
order requires that the rate of
assessment for each fiscal year apply to
all assessable olives handled during
such fiscal year; (2) this action decreases
the assessment rate for assessable olives
beginning with the 2014 fiscal year; (3)
handlers are aware of this action which
was unanimously recommended by the
Committee at a public meeting; and, (4)
this interim rule provides a 60-day
comment period, and all comments
timely received will be considered prior
to finalization of this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 932
Marketing agreements, Olives,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 932 is amended as
follows:
PART 932—OLIVES GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 932 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 932.230 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 932.230
Assessment rate.
On and after January 1, 2014, an
assessment rate of $15.21 per ton is
established for California olives.
Dated: February 18, 2014.
Rex A. Barnes,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–05557 Filed 3–13–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
18 CFR Part 35
[Docket Nos. RM01–8–000, RM10–12–000,
RM12–3–000]
Order Updating Electric Quarterly
Report Data Dictionary
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, DOE.
AGENCY:
Order Updating Electric
Quarterly Report (EQR) Data Dictionary.
ACTION:
In this order, the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission) updates the EQR Data
Dictionary to indicate how market
participants should enter information in
certain fields of the new EQR system so
that the new system’s validation process
will more readily accept filings. These
updates to the EQR Data Dictionary
enable the implementation of the
Commission’s revised EQR filing
process. This order also updates the
EQR Data Dictionary’s list of Balancing
Authority names and abbreviations to
reflect changes in the official source of
such data.
SUMMARY:
This order is effective March 14,
2014. The definitions adopted in this
order shall be used beginning with the
filing of the third quarter (Q3), 2013
EQR.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Astrid Kirstin Rapp (Technical
Information), Office of Enforcement,
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502–
6246.
Adam Batenhorst (Legal Information),
Office of the General Counsel, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426, (202) 502–6150.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Before Commissioners: Cheryl A. LaFleur,
Acting Chairman; Philip D. Moeller, John
R. Norris, and Tony Clark.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Docket No.
Filing Requirements for El. Utility S.A. ............................................................................................................................................
Electricity Market Transparency Provisions of Section 220 of the Federal Power Act ..................................................................
Revisions to Electric Quarterly Report Filing Process ....................................................................................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:05 Mar 13, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14MRR1.SGM
14MRR1
RM01–8–000
RM10–12–000
RM12–3–000
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 50 (Friday, March 14, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14367-14369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05557]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 50 / Friday, March 14, 2014 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 14367]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 932
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-14-0002; FV14-932-1 IR]
Olives Grown in California; Decreased Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Interim rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule decreases the assessment rate established for the
California Olive Committee (Committee) for the 2014 and subsequent
fiscal years from $21.16 to $15.21 per ton of assessable olives
handled. The Committee locally administers the marketing order, which
regulates the handling of olives grown in California. Assessments upon
olive handlers are used by the Committee to fund reasonable and
necessary expenses of the program. The fiscal year began January 1 and
ends December 31. The assessment rate will remain in effect
indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Effective March 15, 2014; comments received by May 13, 2014 will
be considered prior to issuance of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. Comments should reference the document number and
the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will
be available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk
during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this rule
will be included in the record and will be made available to the
public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or
entities submitting the comments will be made public on the internet at
the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry L. Simmons, Marketing
Specialist, or Martin Engeler, Regional Director, California Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and
Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559)
487-5906, or Email: Jerry.Simmons@ams.usda.gov or
Martin.Engeler@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jeffrey Smutny, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement No. 148 and Order No. 932, both as amended (7 CFR part 932),
regulating the handling of olives grown in California, hereinafter
referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders 12866, 13175, and 13563.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, California
olive handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the
order are derived from such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as issued herein will be applicable to all assessable
olives beginning on January 1, 2014, and continue until amended,
suspended, or terminated.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule decreases the assessment rate established for the
Committee for the 2014 and subsequent fiscal years from $21.16 to
$15.21 per ton of assessable olives.
The California olive marketing order provides authority for the
Committee, with the approval of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of
expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the
program. The members of the Committee are producers and handlers of
California olives. They are familiar with the Committee's needs and
with the costs for goods and services in their local area, and are thus
in a position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate.
The assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a public meeting.
Thus, all directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate
and provide input.
For the 2013 and subsequent fiscal years, the Committee
recommended, and USDA approved, an assessment rate of $21.16 per ton of
assessable olives that would continue in effect from fiscal year to
fiscal year unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon
recommendation and information submitted by the Committee or other
information available to USDA.
The Committee met on December 9, 2013, and unanimously recommended
2014 fiscal year expenditures of $1,262,460 and an assessment rate of
$15.21 per ton of assessable olives. In comparison, last year's
budgeted expenditures were $1,289,198. The assessment rate of $15.21 is
$5.95 lower than the rate currently in effect. The Committee
recommended the lower assessment rate because the 2013-14 assessable
olive receipts as reported by
[[Page 14368]]
the California Agricultural Statistics Service (CASS) are 79,495 tons,
compared to 90,790 tons in 2012-13. Olives are an alternate-bearing
crop, where crop size alternates between small and large crops,
resulting in a higher 2012-13 volume crop and a lower 2013-14 volume
crop. The lower assessment rate is possible due to a decrease in the
overall budget and utilization of part of the reserve.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2014
fiscal year include $346,500 for General Administration; $565,600 for
Marketing Programs; $37,800 for Inspection Equipment Development; and
$312,560 for Research Programs. Budgeted expenses for these items in
2013 were $333,800, $637,380, $105,000, and $213,018, respectively.
The assessment rate recommended by the Committee is based upon the
actual revenue necessary to meet anticipated 2014 fiscal year expenses,
given the actual olive tonnage received by handlers during the 2013-14
crop year, and taking into consideration the potential tonnage diverted
by handlers into exempt uses. Actual assessable tonnage for the 2014
fiscal year is expected to be lower than the 2013-14 crop receipts of
79,495 tons reported by CASS because some olives may be diverted by
handlers to uses that are exempt from marketing order requirements.
Income derived from handler assessments and carryover reserve will be
adequate to cover budgeted expenses. Funds in the reserve will be kept
within the maximum amount of one fiscal year's expenses permitted by
the order.
The assessment rate established in this rule will continue in
effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA
based upon a recommendation and information submitted by the Committee
or upon other available information.
Although this assessment rate is effective for an indefinite
period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each
fiscal year to recommend a budget of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and
times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or USDA.
Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings. USDA will evaluate Committee
recommendations and other available information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking will
be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's 2014 budget and those for
subsequent fiscal years will be reviewed and, as appropriate, approved
by USDA.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 1,000 producers of California olives in the
production area and two handlers subject to regulation under the
marketing order. Small agricultural producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) as those having annual receipts of less
than $750,000 and small agricultural service firms are defined as those
whose annual receipts are less than $7,000,000. (13 CFR 121.201)
Based upon information from the industry and CASS, the average
grower price for 2013 was approximately $1,057.56 per ton of assessable
olives and total grower deliveries were 79,495 tons. Based on
production, producer prices, and the total number of California olive
producers, the average annual producer revenue is less than $750,000.
Thus, the majority of olive producers may be classified as small
entities. Neither of the handlers may be classified as small entities.
This rule decreases the assessment rate established for the
Committee and collected from handlers for the 2014 and subsequent
fiscal years from $21.16 to $15.21 per ton of assessable olives, a
decrease of $5.95. The Committee unanimously recommended 2014
expenditures of $1,262,460. The quantity of assessable California
olives for the 2013-14 season is 79,495 tons. However, the quantity of
olives actually assessed is expected to be slightly lower because some
of the tonnage may be diverted by handlers to exempt outlets on which
assessments are not paid. Income derived from the assessment rate of
$15.21 combined with carryover reserve should provide an assessment
income adequate to meet this year's expenses.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2014
year includes $346,500 for General Administration; $565,600 for
Marketing Programs; $37,800 for Inspection Equipment Development; and
$312,560 for Research Programs. Budgeted expenses for these items in
2013 were $333,800, $637,380, $105,000, and $213,018, respectively.
The decrease in the assessment rate is possible due to a decrease
in the overall budget and utilization of part of the reserve. Funds in
the reserve will be kept within the maximum amount of one fiscal year's
expenses permitted by the order.
The Committee reviewed and unanimously recommended 2014 fiscal year
expenditures of $1,262,460, which included decreases in Marketing
Programs and Inspection Equipment Development, and an increase in
Research Programs and General Administration.
Prior to arriving at this budget, the Committee considered
information from various sources, such as the Executive Subcommittee,
Marketing Subcommittee, Inspection Subcommittee, and the Research
Subcommittee. Alternative expenditure levels were discussed by these
groups based upon the relative value of various projects to the olive
industry. The assessment rate of $15.21 per ton of assessable olives
was derived by considering anticipated expenses, the volume of
assessable olives, potentially exempt olives, and other pertinent
factors.
A review of historical information and preliminary information
indicates that the grower price for the 2013 fiscal year was
approximately $1,150.17 per ton for canning fruit, and $384.56 per ton
for limited-use sizes. Approximately 87.9 percent of the olive crop
were canning fruit sizes and 12.1 percent were limited use sizes.
Grower revenue on 79,495 total tons of canning and limited-use sizes
would be $84,070,570, given the current grower prices for those sizes.
Therefore, the estimated assessment revenue for the 2014 fiscal year,
as a percentage of total grower revenue, is expected to be
approximately 1.4 percent.
This action decreases the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. Assessments are applied uniformly on all handlers, and some
of the costs may be passed on to producers. However, decreasing the
assessment rate reduces the burden on handlers, and may reduce the
burden on producers. In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely
publicized throughout the California olive industry and all interested
persons
[[Page 14369]]
were invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the December
9, 2013, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and
small, were able to express views on this issue. Finally, interested
persons are invited to submit comments on this interim rule, including
the regulatory and informational impacts of this action on small
businesses.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581-0178, Generic Vegetable Crops. No changes in
those requirements as a result of this action are necessary. Should any
changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval.
This action imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large California olive handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap or conflict with this rule.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be sent to Jeffrey Smutny at the
previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee, and
other available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined upon good
cause that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule into
effect, and that good cause exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal
Register because: (1) The 2014 fiscal year began on January 1, 2014,
and the marketing order requires that the rate of assessment for each
fiscal year apply to all assessable olives handled during such fiscal
year; (2) this action decreases the assessment rate for assessable
olives beginning with the 2014 fiscal year; (3) handlers are aware of
this action which was unanimously recommended by the Committee at a
public meeting; and, (4) this interim rule provides a 60-day comment
period, and all comments timely received will be considered prior to
finalization of this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 932
Marketing agreements, Olives, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 932 is
amended as follows:
PART 932--OLIVES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 932 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Section 932.230 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 932.230 Assessment rate.
On and after January 1, 2014, an assessment rate of $15.21 per ton
is established for California olives.
Dated: February 18, 2014.
Rex A. Barnes,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-05557 Filed 3-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P