National Environmental Policy Act; Santa Susana Field Laboratory, 14545-14547 [2014-05511]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 50 / Friday, March 14, 2014 / Notices
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
military compensation and retirement
systems.
DATES: The town hall meeting will be
held Tuesday, March 25, 2014.
ADDRESSES: The town hall meeting will
be held at the Sheraton Carlsbad Resort
& Spa Conference Center, 5480 Grand
Pacific Drive, Carlsbad, California
92008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Nuneviller, Associate
Director, Military Compensation and
Retirement Modernization Commission,
PO Box 13170, Arlington VA 22209,
telephone 703–692–2080, fax 703–697–
8330, email christopher.nuneviller@
mcrmc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Military Compensation and Retirement
Modernization Commission
(Commission) was established by the
National Defense Authorization Act FY
2013, Pub. L. 112–239, § 671, (amended
by National Defense Authorization Act
FY 2014, Pub. L. 113–66, § 1095). The
Commission conducting public hearings
and town halls across the United States
in order to solicit comments on the
modernization of the military
compensation and retirement systems.
The Commission seeks the views of
service members, retirees, their families
and other interested parties regarding
pay, retirement, health benefits and
quality of life programs of the
Uniformed Services. The Commission
will hear from senior commanders of
local military commands and their
senior enlisted advisors, unit
commanders and their family support
groups, local medical and education
community representatives, and other
quality of life organizations. These
meetings sites will be accessible to
members of the general public including
individuals with disabilities.
On the evening of Tuesday, March 25,
2014, the Chairman and Commissioners
will hear from the public. Attendees
will be given an opportunity to address
the Chairman and Commissioners and
relay to them their experience and
comments.
March 25, 2014 Agenda
7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Town Hall
Meeting.
Due to the deliberative, nascent and
formative nature of the Commission’s
work, the Commissioners are unable to
discuss their thoughts, plans or
intentions for specific recommendations
that will ultimately be made to the
President and Congress.
The public hearings will be
transcribed and placed on the
Commission’s Web site. In addition to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:18 Mar 13, 2014
Jkt 232001
public hearings, and due to the essential
need for input from the beneficiaries,
the Commission is accepting and
strongly encourages comments and
other submissions on its Web site
(www.mcrmc.gov).
Christopher Nuneviller,
Associate Director, Administration and
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014–05602 Filed 3–13–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINSTRATION
[Notice 14–025]
National Environmental Policy Act;
Santa Susana Field Laboratory
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of Availability of the
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(FEIS) for Demolition and
Environmental Cleanup Activities for
the NASA-administered portion of the
Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL),
Ventura County, California.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as
amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the
Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations for Implementing the
Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 CFR
Parts 1500–1508), and NASA’s NEPA
policy and procedures (14 CFR Part
1216, subpart 1216.3), NASA has
prepared a FEIS for demolition and
cleanup activities at SSFL in Ventura
County, California. Furthermore,
pursuant to 36 CFR 800.8(c) of the
National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA), NASA will use the NEPA
process and the FEIS it produces to
comply with Section 106 of NHPA in
lieu of the procedures set forth in
Sections 800.3 through 800.6.
DATES: NASA will take no final action
on the proposed action before thirty (30)
calendar days from the date of
publication in the Federal Register of
the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency’s Notice of Availability of the
FEIS. Once known, this date will be
published on the project Web site
address listed below.
https://www.nasa.gov/agency/nepa/
news/SSFL.html
ADDRESSES: The FEIS may be reviewed
at the following locations:
SUMMARY:
1. Simi Valley Library
2969 Tapo Canyon Road, Simi Valley,
CA 93063, Web site: https://
simivalleylibrary.org/home/, Phone:
(805) 526–1735.
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14545
2. Platt Library
23600 Victory Blvd., Woodland Hills,
CA 91367, Web site: https://
www.lapl.org/branches/platt, Phone:
(818) 340–9386.
3. California State University,
Northridge Oviatt Library
18111 Nordhoff Street, 2nd Floor, Room
265, Northridge, CA 91330, Web site:
https://library.csun.edu, Phone: (818)
677–2285.
4. Department of Toxic Substances
Control
9211 Oakdale Avenue, Chatsworth, CA
91311, Web site: https://
www.dtsc.ca.gov, Phone: (818) 717–
6521.
The FEIS is available on the internet
in Adobe® portable document format at
https://www.nasa.gov/agency/nepa/
news/SSFL.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Allen Elliott, SSFL Project Director, by
phone at (256) 544–0662 or by email at
msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov. Additional
information about NASA’s SSFL site,
the proposed demolition and cleanup
activities, and the associated EIS
planning process and documentation (as
available) may be found on the internet
at https://ssfl.msfc.nasa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Decision To Be Made
This FEIS informs NASA decision
makers, regulating agencies, and the
public of the potential environmental
consequences of the proposed
demolition of SSFL buildings and
structures and the impacts of using the
proposed technologies to achieve
groundwater and soil remediation, as
implemented through the Proposed
Action. This FEIS analyzes a range of
remedial technologies that might be
implemented to achieve the proposed
groundwater and soil remediation goals.
NASA will use the FEIS analysis to
consider the potential environmental
and socioeconomic impacts from the
Proposed Action. NASA’s analysis
includes evaluation of cumulative
activities that might occur in the same
area or timeframe as the Proposed
Action. These activities were evaluated
to identify potential environmental
impacts that, when added to the
Proposed Action’s impacts, would result
in a cumulative effect as a result of past,
present, and reasonably foreseeable
future actions. The EIS considered the
Proposed Action with the adjacent
environmental cleanup activities being
conducted by DOE and Boeing. On the
basis of the FEIS findings, NASA will
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
14546
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 50 / Friday, March 14, 2014 / Notices
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
issue a Record of Decision (ROD)
documenting the findings.
Site Description
The SSFL site is 2,850 acres located
in Ventura County, California,
approximately seven miles northwest of
Canoga Park and approximately 30
miles northwest of downtown Los
Angeles. SSFL is composed of four areas
known as Areas I, II, III, and IV and two
unnumbered areas known as the
‘‘undeveloped land.’’ NASA administers
41.7 acres within Area I and all 409.5
acres of Area II. The Boeing Company
manages the remaining 2,398.8 acres
within Areas I, III, and IV, and the two
undeveloped areas.
Since the mid-1950s, when the two
federally owned areas were
administered by the U.S. Air Force, this
site has been used for developing and
testing rocket engines. Four test stand
complexes were constructed in Area II
between 1954 and 1957 named Alfa,
Bravo, Coca, and Delta. Area II and the
LOX Plant portion of Area I were
acquired by NASA from the U.S. Air
Force in the 1970s. The extant test
stands and related ancillary structures
have been found to have historical
significance based on the historic
importance of the engine testing and the
engineering and design of the structures
and are eligible for listing on the
National Register of Historic Places
(NRHP).
The NASA-administered areas of
SSFL also contain cultural resources not
related to rocket development including
the Burro Flats Painted Cave listed on
the NRHP. SSFL is located near the crest
of the Simi Hills that are part of the
Santa Monica Mountains running eastwest across Southern California. The
diverse terrain consists of ridges,
canyons, and sandstone rock outcrops.
The region was occupied by Native
Americans from the earliest Chumash
˜
and Gabrieleno cultures.
Previous environmental sampling on
the NASA-administered property
indicates that metals, dioxins,
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs),
volatile organics, and semivolatile
organics are present in the soils and
upper groundwater (known as the
Surficial Media Operable Unit). Volatile
organics, metals, and semivolatile
organics are also present in the deeper
groundwater (known as the Chatsworth
Formation Operable Unit).
Environmental Commitments and
Associated Environmental Review
Consistent with statute and
regulations, on September 14, 2009,
NASA notified the General Services
Administration (GSA) that it reported
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:18 Mar 13, 2014
Jkt 232001
the NASA-administered SSFL parcels as
excess. GSA is the federal agency
responsible for undertaking all activities
relating to transfer of these federal lands
to another party, including how the
public will be kept involved. NASA
remains the landholder and custodian of
the site. GSA has conditionally accepted
that report pending (i) NASA’s
certification that all action necessary to
protect human health and the
environment with respect to hazardous
substances on the property has been
taken or receipt of EPA’s written
concurrence that an approved and
installed remedial design is operating
properly and successfully; OR (ii) the
Governor’s concurrence in the
suitability of the property for transfer
per CERCLA Section 120(h)(3)(C).
In 2007, a Consent Order among
NASA, Boeing, the Department of
Energy (DOE), and Department of Toxic
Substances Control (DTSC) for the State
of California was signed addressing the
environmental cleanup of soil and
groundwater at SSFL. NASA entered
into an Administrative Order on
Consent (AOC) for Remedial Action
with DTSC on December 6, 2010 with
respect to the cleanup of soils at SSFL.
Based on the 2010 AOC, NASA is
required to complete a federal
environmental review pursuant to
NEPA. An EIS is being prepared by
NASA to include demolition of site
infrastructure and soil cleanup
(pursuant to the AOC), and groundwater
remediation within Area II and a
portion of Area I (Liquid Oxygen [LOX]
Plant) of SSFL (pursuant to the 2007
Consent Order). As part of the
environmental review process, certain
studies have been or are being
completed, to characterize the existing
conditions and to inform the analysis
and consultation. These include surveys
for wildlife, critical habitat, rare plants,
wetlands, and archaeological and
cultural resources. The findings of these
studies have been incorporated into the
FEIS.
Alternatives
To prepare SSFL for disposition,
NASA describes the demolition of SSFL
structures and cleanup of the site
necessary to meet only the strictest
cleanup alternative, as dictated by the
2007 Consent Order and the 2010 AOC
requirements, and the ‘‘No Action’’
alternative required by NEPA. During
the Scoping Process, per the standard
consistent with the alternatives
evaluated under previous Superfund or
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) cleanup processes, NASA
originally proposed to evaluate a range
of cleanup standard levels, including
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the ‘‘Cleanup to Background’’
alternative required by the AOC, the
‘‘No Action’’ alternative required by
NEPA, and other alternatives that are,
consistent with the potential future use
of the land. The latter alternatives
included soil cleanup requirements to
suburban residential, to industrial, and
to recreational cleanup standards. Based
on comments from some members of the
public, DTSC, Congressional members,
and guidance from the White House’s
Council on Environmental Quality, the
FEIS now considers only the strictest
‘‘Cleanup to Background’’ and the
required ‘‘No Action’’ alternatives. All
other cleanup alternatives proposed
during Scoping Process were
specifically removed from the FEIS.
The FEIS will consider a range of
alternative technologies that meet
NASA’s objectives to clean up soil and
groundwater contamination at the
portion of the SSFL site administered by
NASA. Implementation of this Proposed
Action would occur by implementing
one Demolition Alternative and one or
more Cleanup Technologies, from the
following: (1) Soil Cleanup
Technologies: Excavation and Offsite
Disposal, Soil Washing, Soil Vapor
Extraction, Ex Situ Treatment Using
Land Farming, Ex Situ Treatment Using
oxidation, In Situ Chemical Oxidation,
In Situ Anaerobic or Aerobic Biological
Treatment; (2) Groundwater Treatment
Technologies: Pump and Treat, Vacuum
Extraction, Heat Driven Extraction, In
situ Chemical Oxidation, In situ
Enhanced Bioremediation, and
Monitored Natural Attenuation.
NEPA requires analysis of the ‘‘No
Action’’ alternative, which in this case
means no environmental cleanup at the
site and/or no demolition of test stands
and ancillary structures on the NASAadministered property.
GSA will conduct a separate
environmental review under NEPA for
the action of transferring the land out of
NASA stewardship. The options could
include reuse or redevelopment of the
property under tribal, federal, local,
state, or private ownership.
DTSC is preparing a separate
Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
under the California Environmental
Quality Act, which requires that State
agencies give major consideration, when
regulating public and private activities,
to preventing environmental
degradation and to identifying
environmentally superior mitigations
and alternatives, when possible. This
State-led environmental review must
identify the potentially significant
environmental effects of a project and
environmentally preferable alternatives
to implementing the project. The EIR
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 50 / Friday, March 14, 2014 / Notices
also indicates the manner in which
significant effects could be mitigated or
avoided. DTSC will analyze the
potential environmental effects of
environmental cleanup activities
occurring SSFL-wide by NASA, Boeing,
and DOE. NASA and DTSC have
coordinated during these processes to
maintain consistency pertaining to the
analysis of the NASA-administered
demolition and remedial activities.
Cumulative effects of the proposed
Boeing, DOE, and NASA demolition and
remedial activities at SSFL will be
considered. The DTSC EIR is likely to be
prepared following publication of
NASA’s EIS, and could incorporate
some of NASA’s EIS analysis. A
programmatic EIR will be developed
that evaluates the remedial activities
that will be conducted at SSFL by
NASA, Boeing, and DOE, as well as
project-specific EIRs that evaluate the
localized remedial activities. These
DTSC evaluations must be completed
prior to NASA implementing its final
soil or groundwater cleanup actions.
telephonically and by WebEx. Any
interested person may call the USA toll
free conference call number 888–982–
4613, passcode Science, to participate in
this meeting by telephone. The WebEx
link is https://nasa.webex.com/,
meeting number 396 523 409, password
is SC@April9. The agenda for the
meeting includes the following topic:
—Science Mission Directorate FY 2015
Budget Request
It is imperative that the meeting be
held on this date to accommodate the
scheduling priorities of the key
participants.
Patricia D. Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer,
National Aeronautics and Space
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014–05644 Filed 3–13–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Notice of Submission to
OMB for Revision to a Currently
Approved Information Collection;
Comment Request
Olga M. Dominguez,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Strategic
Infrastructure.
[FR Doc. 2014–05511 Filed 3–13–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Request for comment.
[Notice: (14–027)]
SUMMARY:
AGENCY:
NASA Advisory Council; Science
Committee; Meeting
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public
Law 92–463, as amended, the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA) announces a meeting of the
Science Committee of the NASA
Advisory Council (NAC). This
Committee reports to the NAC. The
meeting will be held via Teleconference
and WebEx for the purpose of soliciting,
from the scientific community and other
persons, scientific and technical
information relevant to program
planning.
DATES: Wednesday, April 9, 2014, 2:00
p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Local Time
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Ann Delo, Science Mission Directorate,
NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC
20546, (202) 358–0750, fax (202) 358–
2779, or ann.b.delo@nasa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
meeting will be open to the public
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:18 Mar 13, 2014
Jkt 232001
The NCUA intends to submit
the following information collection to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
This information collection is published
to obtain comments from the public.
Prior notice of the proposed changes
and a request for comments was
published on January 28, 2014 (79 FR
4509). No comments were received.
NCUA is proposing to add fields to the
5300 Call Report to collect Bank Secrecy
Act/Anti-Money Laundering, charitable
donations, derivatives and investments
to fund employee benefits.
DATES: Comments must be submitted
April 14, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are
invited to submit written comments to
the NCUA Contact and the OMB
Reviewer listed below:
NCUA Contact: Tracy Crews, National
Credit Union Administration, 1775
Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia
22314–3428, Fax No. 703–837–2861,
Email: OCIOPRA@ncua.gov.
OMB Reviewer: Office of Management
and Budget, ATTN: Desk Officer for the
National Credit Union Administration,
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14547
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Washington, DC 20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information, a
copy of the information collection
request, or a copy of submitted
comments should be directed to Tracy
Crews at the National Credit Union
Administration, 1775 Duke Street,
Alexandria, VA 22314–3428, or at (703)
518–6444.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract and Request for Comments
NCUA is amending the currently
approved collection for 3133–0004. Two
specific forms are used, NCUA Form
5300 and NCUA Profile Form 4501A,
also known as the Call Report and
Profile, respectively. Section 741.6 of
the NCUA Rules and Regulations
requires all federally insured credit
unions to submit a Call Report
quarterly. 12 CFR 741.6. The
information enables NCUA to monitor
credit unions whose share accounts are
insured by the National Credit Union
Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF). NCUA
uses the information collected from
these Call Reports to fulfill its mission
of supervising credit unions, and the
Federal Reserve Board uses the
information to monitor and control the
nation’s money supply and the system
of financial institutions. Congress and
various state legislatures use this
information to monitor, regulate, and
control credit unions and financial
institutions. The changes made to the
Profile and Call Report forms for March
2014 will provide data to assist the
National Credit Union Administration
in assessing regulatory compliance and
financial and operational risks. There is
a decrease of 8,290 hours from the last
submission (2013). The decrease is a
result of an adjustment to the number of
credit unions completing the Call
Report from 6,864 to an estimated 6,550
for March 2014. This decline is from
credit union mergers and liquidations.
The NCUA requests that you send
your comments on this collection to the
location listed in the addresses section.
Your comments should address: (a) The
necessity of the information collection
for the proper performance of NCUA,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
our estimate of the burden (hours and
cost) of the collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways we could enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (d) ways we could
minimize the burden of the collection of
the information on the respondents such
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 50 (Friday, March 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14545-14547]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05511]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINSTRATION
[Notice 14-025]
National Environmental Policy Act; Santa Susana Field Laboratory
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS) for Demolition and Environmental Cleanup Activities
for the NASA-administered portion of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory
(SSFL), Ventura County, California.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as
amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 CFR
Parts 1500-1508), and NASA's NEPA policy and procedures (14 CFR Part
1216, subpart 1216.3), NASA has prepared a FEIS for demolition and
cleanup activities at SSFL in Ventura County, California. Furthermore,
pursuant to 36 CFR 800.8(c) of the National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA), NASA will use the NEPA process and the FEIS it produces to
comply with Section 106 of NHPA in lieu of the procedures set forth in
Sections 800.3 through 800.6.
DATES: NASA will take no final action on the proposed action before
thirty (30) calendar days from the date of publication in the Federal
Register of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Notice of
Availability of the FEIS. Once known, this date will be published on
the project Web site address listed below.
https://www.nasa.gov/agency/nepa/news/SSFL.html
ADDRESSES: The FEIS may be reviewed at the following locations:
1. Simi Valley Library
2969 Tapo Canyon Road, Simi Valley, CA 93063, Web site: https://simivalleylibrary.org/home/, Phone: (805) 526-1735.
2. Platt Library
23600 Victory Blvd., Woodland Hills, CA 91367, Web site: https://www.lapl.org/branches/platt, Phone: (818) 340-9386.
3. California State University, Northridge Oviatt Library
18111 Nordhoff Street, 2nd Floor, Room 265, Northridge, CA 91330, Web
site: https://library.csun.edu, Phone: (818) 677-2285.
4. Department of Toxic Substances Control
9211 Oakdale Avenue, Chatsworth, CA 91311, Web site: https://www.dtsc.ca.gov, Phone: (818) 717-6521.
The FEIS is available on the internet in Adobe[supreg] portable
document format at https://www.nasa.gov/agency/nepa/news/SSFL.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Allen Elliott, SSFL Project Director,
by phone at (256) 544-0662 or by email at msfc-ssfl-eis@mail.nasa.gov.
Additional information about NASA's SSFL site, the proposed demolition
and cleanup activities, and the associated EIS planning process and
documentation (as available) may be found on the internet at https://ssfl.msfc.nasa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Decision To Be Made
This FEIS informs NASA decision makers, regulating agencies, and
the public of the potential environmental consequences of the proposed
demolition of SSFL buildings and structures and the impacts of using
the proposed technologies to achieve groundwater and soil remediation,
as implemented through the Proposed Action. This FEIS analyzes a range
of remedial technologies that might be implemented to achieve the
proposed groundwater and soil remediation goals. NASA will use the FEIS
analysis to consider the potential environmental and socioeconomic
impacts from the Proposed Action. NASA's analysis includes evaluation
of cumulative activities that might occur in the same area or timeframe
as the Proposed Action. These activities were evaluated to identify
potential environmental impacts that, when added to the Proposed
Action's impacts, would result in a cumulative effect as a result of
past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions. The EIS
considered the Proposed Action with the adjacent environmental cleanup
activities being conducted by DOE and Boeing. On the basis of the FEIS
findings, NASA will
[[Page 14546]]
issue a Record of Decision (ROD) documenting the findings.
Site Description
The SSFL site is 2,850 acres located in Ventura County, California,
approximately seven miles northwest of Canoga Park and approximately 30
miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles. SSFL is composed of four areas
known as Areas I, II, III, and IV and two unnumbered areas known as the
``undeveloped land.'' NASA administers 41.7 acres within Area I and all
409.5 acres of Area II. The Boeing Company manages the remaining
2,398.8 acres within Areas I, III, and IV, and the two undeveloped
areas.
Since the mid-1950s, when the two federally owned areas were
administered by the U.S. Air Force, this site has been used for
developing and testing rocket engines. Four test stand complexes were
constructed in Area II between 1954 and 1957 named Alfa, Bravo, Coca,
and Delta. Area II and the LOX Plant portion of Area I were acquired by
NASA from the U.S. Air Force in the 1970s. The extant test stands and
related ancillary structures have been found to have historical
significance based on the historic importance of the engine testing and
the engineering and design of the structures and are eligible for
listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP).
The NASA-administered areas of SSFL also contain cultural resources
not related to rocket development including the Burro Flats Painted
Cave listed on the NRHP. SSFL is located near the crest of the Simi
Hills that are part of the Santa Monica Mountains running east-west
across Southern California. The diverse terrain consists of ridges,
canyons, and sandstone rock outcrops. The region was occupied by Native
Americans from the earliest Chumash and Gabriele[ntilde]o cultures.
Previous environmental sampling on the NASA-administered property
indicates that metals, dioxins, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs),
volatile organics, and semivolatile organics are present in the soils
and upper groundwater (known as the Surficial Media Operable Unit).
Volatile organics, metals, and semivolatile organics are also present
in the deeper groundwater (known as the Chatsworth Formation Operable
Unit).
Environmental Commitments and Associated Environmental Review
Consistent with statute and regulations, on September 14, 2009,
NASA notified the General Services Administration (GSA) that it
reported the NASA-administered SSFL parcels as excess. GSA is the
federal agency responsible for undertaking all activities relating to
transfer of these federal lands to another party, including how the
public will be kept involved. NASA remains the landholder and custodian
of the site. GSA has conditionally accepted that report pending (i)
NASA's certification that all action necessary to protect human health
and the environment with respect to hazardous substances on the
property has been taken or receipt of EPA's written concurrence that an
approved and installed remedial design is operating properly and
successfully; OR (ii) the Governor's concurrence in the suitability of
the property for transfer per CERCLA Section 120(h)(3)(C).
In 2007, a Consent Order among NASA, Boeing, the Department of
Energy (DOE), and Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) for the
State of California was signed addressing the environmental cleanup of
soil and groundwater at SSFL. NASA entered into an Administrative Order
on Consent (AOC) for Remedial Action with DTSC on December 6, 2010 with
respect to the cleanup of soils at SSFL. Based on the 2010 AOC, NASA is
required to complete a federal environmental review pursuant to NEPA.
An EIS is being prepared by NASA to include demolition of site
infrastructure and soil cleanup (pursuant to the AOC), and groundwater
remediation within Area II and a portion of Area I (Liquid Oxygen [LOX]
Plant) of SSFL (pursuant to the 2007 Consent Order). As part of the
environmental review process, certain studies have been or are being
completed, to characterize the existing conditions and to inform the
analysis and consultation. These include surveys for wildlife, critical
habitat, rare plants, wetlands, and archaeological and cultural
resources. The findings of these studies have been incorporated into
the FEIS.
Alternatives
To prepare SSFL for disposition, NASA describes the demolition of
SSFL structures and cleanup of the site necessary to meet only the
strictest cleanup alternative, as dictated by the 2007 Consent Order
and the 2010 AOC requirements, and the ``No Action'' alternative
required by NEPA. During the Scoping Process, per the standard
consistent with the alternatives evaluated under previous Superfund or
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) cleanup processes, NASA
originally proposed to evaluate a range of cleanup standard levels,
including the ``Cleanup to Background'' alternative required by the
AOC, the ``No Action'' alternative required by NEPA, and other
alternatives that are, consistent with the potential future use of the
land. The latter alternatives included soil cleanup requirements to
suburban residential, to industrial, and to recreational cleanup
standards. Based on comments from some members of the public, DTSC,
Congressional members, and guidance from the White House's Council on
Environmental Quality, the FEIS now considers only the strictest
``Cleanup to Background'' and the required ``No Action'' alternatives.
All other cleanup alternatives proposed during Scoping Process were
specifically removed from the FEIS.
The FEIS will consider a range of alternative technologies that
meet NASA's objectives to clean up soil and groundwater contamination
at the portion of the SSFL site administered by NASA. Implementation of
this Proposed Action would occur by implementing one Demolition
Alternative and one or more Cleanup Technologies, from the following:
(1) Soil Cleanup Technologies: Excavation and Offsite Disposal, Soil
Washing, Soil Vapor Extraction, Ex Situ Treatment Using Land Farming,
Ex Situ Treatment Using oxidation, In Situ Chemical Oxidation, In Situ
Anaerobic or Aerobic Biological Treatment; (2) Groundwater Treatment
Technologies: Pump and Treat, Vacuum Extraction, Heat Driven
Extraction, In situ Chemical Oxidation, In situ Enhanced
Bioremediation, and Monitored Natural Attenuation.
NEPA requires analysis of the ``No Action'' alternative, which in
this case means no environmental cleanup at the site and/or no
demolition of test stands and ancillary structures on the NASA-
administered property.
GSA will conduct a separate environmental review under NEPA for the
action of transferring the land out of NASA stewardship. The options
could include reuse or redevelopment of the property under tribal,
federal, local, state, or private ownership.
DTSC is preparing a separate Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
under the California Environmental Quality Act, which requires that
State agencies give major consideration, when regulating public and
private activities, to preventing environmental degradation and to
identifying environmentally superior mitigations and alternatives, when
possible. This State-led environmental review must identify the
potentially significant environmental effects of a project and
environmentally preferable alternatives to implementing the project.
The EIR
[[Page 14547]]
also indicates the manner in which significant effects could be
mitigated or avoided. DTSC will analyze the potential environmental
effects of environmental cleanup activities occurring SSFL-wide by
NASA, Boeing, and DOE. NASA and DTSC have coordinated during these
processes to maintain consistency pertaining to the analysis of the
NASA-administered demolition and remedial activities. Cumulative
effects of the proposed Boeing, DOE, and NASA demolition and remedial
activities at SSFL will be considered. The DTSC EIR is likely to be
prepared following publication of NASA's EIS, and could incorporate
some of NASA's EIS analysis. A programmatic EIR will be developed that
evaluates the remedial activities that will be conducted at SSFL by
NASA, Boeing, and DOE, as well as project-specific EIRs that evaluate
the localized remedial activities. These DTSC evaluations must be
completed prior to NASA implementing its final soil or groundwater
cleanup actions.
Olga M. Dominguez,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Strategic Infrastructure.
[FR Doc. 2014-05511 Filed 3-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P