Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree, 14279 [2014-05439]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 49 / Thursday, March 13, 2014 / Notices
and that it is in the interest of the public
and administrative economy to grant the
Motion. The Motion also requests that
the Commission limit service of the
confidential settlement documents to
the settling parties because the
disclosure of the documents will
prejudice Nokia’s ongoing discussions
with Google and its customers.
On February 12, 2014, Google stated
that it has no position on the Motion
because none of the patents upon which
it had intervened were currently before
the Commission.
The Commission finds that the
Motion complies with the Commission
Rules, and there is no evidence that the
proposed settlement will be contrary to
the public interest. The Commission
therefore determines to grant the
Motion, and to terminate the
investigation. The Commission also
finds that good cause exists to limit the
service of the confidential settlement
documents to the settling parties, and
grants the request to limit service of the
confidential settlement documents to
the settling parties.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
Issued: March 7, 2014.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–05468 Filed 3–12–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent
Decree
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
In accordance with Departmental
Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby
given that a proposed Consent Decree in
United States v. A. Derek Hoyte, et al.,
Case No. C10–2044BHS, was lodged
with the United States District Court for
the Western District of Washington on
February 28, 2014.
This proposed Consent Decree
concerns a complaint filed by the
United States against Defendants Derek
A. Hoyte, Columbia Pacific Enterprises,
Inc., and Columbia Crest Partners LLC,
in part pursuant to Section 309 of the
Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1319, to
obtain injunctive relief from and impose
civil penalties against the Defendants
for violating the Clean Water Act by
discharging pollutants without a permit
into waters of the United States. The
proposed Consent Decree resolves these
allegations by requiring the Defendants
to restore the impacted areas and to pay
a civil penalty.
The Department of Justice will accept
written comments relating to the Clean
Water Act aspects of this proposed
Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from
the date of publication of this Notice.
Please address comments to Brian C.
Kipnis, Assistant United States
Attorney, Office of the United States
Attorney for the Western District of
Washington, 5220 United States
Courthouse, 700 Stewart Street, Seattle,
Washington 98101 and refer to United
States v. Derek A. Hoyte, et al., Case No.
C10–2044BHS, U.S.A.O. #2010V00667.
The proposed Consent Decree may be
examined at the Clerk’s Office, United
States District Court for the Western
District of Washington in Seattle,
located at 700 Stewart Street, Suite
2310, Seattle, Washington 98101, or in
Tacoma, located at 1717 Pacific Avenue,
Room 3100, Tacoma, Washington
98402. In addition, the proposed
Consent Decree may be examined
electronically at https://www.justice.gov/
enrd/Consent_Decrees.html.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cherie L. Rogers,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Defense Section, Environment and Natural
Resources Division.
RESPONSE OF PLAINTIFF UNITED
STATES TO PUBLIC COMMENTS ON
THE PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT
Antitrust Division
United States, et al., v. US Airways
Group, Inc., et al.; Public Comments
and Response on Proposed Final
Judgment
Pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures
and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h),
the United States hereby publishes
below the Response of the United States
to Public Comments on the proposed
Final Judgment in United States, et al.,
v. US Airways Group, Inc., et al., Civil
Action No. 1:13–CV–1236–CKK (D.D.C.
2013).
Copies of the 14 Public Comments
and the Response of the United States
to Public Comments are available for
inspection at the Department of Justice
Antitrust Division, 450 Fifth Street NW.,
Suite 1010, Washington, DC 20530
(telephone: 202–514–2481); on the
Department of Justice’s Web site at
https://www.justice.gov/atr/cases/
usairways/; and at the Office
of the Clerk of the United States District
Court for the District of Columbia, 333
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20001. Copies of any of these
materials may also be obtained upon
request and payment of a copying fee.
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.
Plaintiffs, v. US AIRWAYS GROUP, INC. and
AMR CORPORATION DEFENDANTS.
Case No. 1:13–cv–1236 (CKK)
[FR Doc. 2014–05439 Filed 3–12–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................................................
I. Procedural History ................................................................................................................................................................................
II. The Complaint and the Proposed Settlement ....................................................................................................................................
A. The Complaint ..............................................................................................................................................................................
B. The Proposed Final Judgment ......................................................................................................................................................
1. Terms of the Proposed Final Judgment and Status of the Divestitures .............................................................................
2. Explanation of the Proposed Final Judgment ......................................................................................................................
a. Consumer Benefits from LCC Entry ...............................................................................................................................
b. The Importance of the Remedy Assets to Enhancing LCC Competition .....................................................................
III. Standard of Judicial Review ...............................................................................................................................................................
IV. Public Comments and the United States’ Response .........................................................................................................................
A. Any Challenge to the Merits of the Complaint Is Beyond the Scope of Tunney Act Review ................................................
B. The Proposed Settlement Will Counteract Competitive Harm From the Merger by Enhancing LCC Competition ...............
1. LCCs Provide Meaningful Competition ................................................................................................................................
2. The Remedy Adequately Addresses the Harms Alleged in the Complaint .......................................................................
C. The Remedy Does Not Mandate Changes in Service Patterns at Reagan National ..................................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:09 Mar 12, 2014
Jkt 232001
14279
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM
13MRN1
4
5
7
7
10
10
11
12
14
19
23
25
27
27
31
36
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 14279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05439]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree
In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is
hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. A.
Derek Hoyte, et al., Case No. C10-2044BHS, was lodged with the United
States District Court for the Western District of Washington on
February 28, 2014.
This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the
United States against Defendants Derek A. Hoyte, Columbia Pacific
Enterprises, Inc., and Columbia Crest Partners LLC, in part pursuant to
Section 309 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1319, to obtain
injunctive relief from and impose civil penalties against the
Defendants for violating the Clean Water Act by discharging pollutants
without a permit into waters of the United States. The proposed Consent
Decree resolves these allegations by requiring the Defendants to
restore the impacted areas and to pay a civil penalty.
The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to
the Clean Water Act aspects of this proposed Consent Decree for thirty
(30) days from the date of publication of this Notice. Please address
comments to Brian C. Kipnis, Assistant United States Attorney, Office
of the United States Attorney for the Western District of Washington,
5220 United States Courthouse, 700 Stewart Street, Seattle, Washington
98101 and refer to United States v. Derek A. Hoyte, et al., Case No.
C10-2044BHS, U.S.A.O. 2010V00667.
The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office,
United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in
Seattle, located at 700 Stewart Street, Suite 2310, Seattle, Washington
98101, or in Tacoma, located at 1717 Pacific Avenue, Room 3100, Tacoma,
Washington 98402. In addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be
examined electronically at https://www.justice.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html.
Cherie L. Rogers,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-05439 Filed 3-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
