Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan; South Coast Air Quality Management District and El Dorado County Air Quality Management District, 14176-14178 [2014-05387]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
14176
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 49 / Thursday, March 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
71750), FDA announced that a food
additive petition (animal use) (FAP
2273) had been filed by DSM
Nutritional Products, 45 Waterview
Blvd., Parsippany, NJ 07054. The
petition proposed to amend the food
additive regulations to provide for the
safe use of benzoic acid as a feed
acidifier in swine feed. The notice of
filing provided for a 30-day comment
period on the petitioner’s environmental
assessment. One comment was received
that was not substantive.
II. Conclusion
FDA concludes that the data establish
the safety and utility of benzoic acid for
use as proposed with modification and
that the food additive regulations
should be amended as set forth in this
document.
III. Public Disclosure
In accordance with § 571.1(h) (21 CFR
571.1(h)), the petition and the
documents that FDA considered and
relied upon in reaching its decision to
approve the petition are available for
inspection at the Center for Veterinary
Medicine by appointment with the
information contact person (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). As
provided in § 571.1(h), the Agency will
delete from the documents materials
that are not available for public
disclosure before making the documents
available for inspection.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
IV. Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.32(r) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment,
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
V. Objections and Hearing Requests
Any person who will be adversely
affected by this regulation may file with
the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) either electronic or
written objections. Each objection shall
be separately numbered, and each
numbered objection shall specify with
particularity the provision of the
regulation to which objection is made
and the grounds for the objection. Each
numbered objection on which a hearing
is requested shall specifically so state.
Failure to request a hearing for any
particular objection shall constitute a
waiver of the right to a hearing on that
objection. Each numbered objection for
which a hearing is requested shall
include a detailed description and
analysis of the specific factual
information intended to be presented in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:05 Mar 12, 2014
Jkt 232001
support of the objection in the event
that a hearing is held. Failure to include
such a description and analysis for any
particular objection shall constitute a
waiver of the right to a hearing on the
objection.
It is only necessary to send one set of
documents. Identify documents with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Any
objections received in response to the
regulation may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and
will be posted to the docket at https://
www.regulations.gov.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 573
Animal feeds, Food additives.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs and redelegated to
the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21
CFR part 573 is amended as follows:
PART 573—FOOD ADDITIVES
PERMITTED IN FEED AND DRINKING
WATER OF ANIMALS
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 573 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 342, 348.
■
2. Add § 573.210 to read as follows:
§ 573.210
Benzoic acid.
The food additive, benzoic acid, may
be safely used in the manufacture of
complete swine feeds in accordance
with the following prescribed
conditions:
(a) The additive is used or intended
for use as a feed acidifying agent, to
lower the pH, in complete swine feeds
at levels not to exceed 0.5 percent of the
complete feed.
(b) The additive consists of not less
than 99.5 percent benzoic acid (CAS 65–
85–0) by weight with the sum of 2methylbiphenyl, 3-methylbiphenyl, 4methylbiphenyl, benzyl benzoate, and
isomers of dimethylbiphenyl not to
exceed 0.01 percent by weight.
(c) To assure safe use of the additive,
in addition to the other information
required by the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act and paragraph (b) of this
section, the label and labeling shall
contain:
(1) The name of the additive.
(2) Adequate directions for use
including a statement that benzoic acid
must be uniformly applied and
thoroughly mixed into complete swine
feeds and that the complete swine feeds
so treated shall be labeled as containing
benzoic acid.
(3) Appropriate warnings and safety
precautions concerning benzoic acid.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(4) A warning statement identifying
benzoic acid as a possible irritant.
(5) Information about emergency aid
in case of accidental exposure.
(6) Contact address and telephone
number for reporting adverse reactions
or to request a copy of the Material
Safety Data Sheet (MSDS).
Dated: March 6, 2014.
Bernadette Dunham,
Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. 2014–05440 Filed 3–12–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2013–0683; FRL–9905–26–
Region 9]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan; South Coast Air
Quality Management District and El
Dorado County Air Quality
Management District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is finalizing approval of
revisions to the South Coast Air Quality
Management District and El Dorado
County Air Quality Management District
portions of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The South
Coast action was proposed in the
Federal Register on September 13, 2013
and concerns carbon monoxide
emissions from cement kilns. The El
Dorado County action was proposed in
the Federal Register on October 25,
2013 and concerns the District’s
demonstration that its rules met
reasonably available control technology
(RACT) requirements under the 1997 8hour ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS). We are
approving these documents under the
Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).
DATES: This rule will be effective on
April 14, 2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket
number EPA–R09–OAR–2013–0683 for
this action. Generally, documents in the
docket for this action are available
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California 94105–3901.
While all documents in the docket are
listed at https://www.regulations.gov,
some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location
(e.g., copyrighted material, large maps,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13MRR1.SGM
13MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 49 / Thursday, March 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
multi-volume reports), and some may
not be available in either location (e.g.,
confidential business information
(CBI)). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stanley Tong, EPA Region IX, (415)
947–4122, tong.stanley@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action.
14177
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses.
III. EPA Action.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews.
I. Proposed Action
On September 13, 2013 (78 FR 56639)
under Docket# EPA–R09–OAR–2013–
0596, EPA proposed to approve the
following rule into the California SIP.
Local agency
Rule #
Rule title
Amended
Submitted
SCAQMD ..........
1112.1
Emissions of Particulate Matter and Carbon Monoxide from Cement Kilns
12/4/09
07/20/10
On October 25, 2013 (78 FR 63934)
under Docket# EPA–R09–OAR–2013–
0683, EPA proposed to approve the
following document into the California
SIP.
Local agency
Document
Adopted
Submitted
EDAQMD ..........
EDAQMD Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) State Implementation Plan
(SIP) Update Analysis Staff Report (‘‘2006 RACT SIP’’).
02/06/07
07/11/07
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Our technical support document for
the proposed approval of EDAQMD’s
2006 RACT SIP included a suggestion
that EDAQMD submit negative
declarations for the metal parts and
products, solvent metal cleaning, and
graphic arts Control Technique
Guidelines categories. These negative
declarations were submitted to EPA on
September 30, 2013, and we are taking
separate action on them.
We proposed to approve SCAQMD
Rule 1112.1 and EDAQMD’s 2006 RACT
SIP because we determined that they
complied with the relevant CAA
requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the
submitted documents and our
evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
EPA’s proposed actions provided a
30-day public comment period. The
docket for South Coast Rule 1112.1
‘‘Emissions of Particulate Matter and
Carbon Monoxide from Cement Kilns’’
received one comment. The comment
was not germane to the proposed action
and requested clarification on the
geographic boundary to which the Santa
Barbara County Air Pollution Control
District’s outer continental shelf
applied. EPA provided a separate reply
to the commenter. We received no
comments on the proposed approval of
El Dorado County’s 2006 RACT SIP.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that
change our assessment of the submitted
documents as described in our proposed
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:05 Mar 12, 2014
Jkt 232001
actions. Therefore, as authorized in
section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully
approving these documents into the
California SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
State choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address
disproportionate human health or
environmental effects with practical,
appropriate, and legally permissible
methods under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
E:\FR\FM\13MRR1.SGM
13MRR1
14178
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 49 / Thursday, March 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by [insert date 60
days from date of publication of this
document in the Federal Register].
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220, is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(381) (i)(K) and
(382)(ii) to read as follows:
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(381) * * *
(i) * * *
(K) South Coast Air Quality
Management District.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:05 Mar 12, 2014
Jkt 232001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2013–0806; FRL–9905–18–
Region 9]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, Placer County
Air Pollution Control District
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the Placer
County Air Pollution Control District
(PCAPCD) portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern volatile organic
compound (VOC) emissions from
graphic arts operations and from surface
preparation and cleaning operations. We
are approving local rules that regulate
these emission sources under the Clean
Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the
Act).
DATES: This rule is effective on May 12,
2014 without further notice, unless EPA
receives adverse comments by April 14,
2014. If we receive such comments, we
will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register to notify the public
that this direct final rule will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number EPA–R09–
OAR–2013–0806, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions.
2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
SUMMARY:
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
Dated: December 16, 2013.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
■
[FR Doc. 2014–05387 Filed 3–12–14; 8:45 am]
AGENCY:
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
(1) Rule 1112.1, ‘‘Emissions of
Particulate Matter and Carbon
Monoxide from Cement Kilns,’’
amended on December 4, 2009.
*
*
*
*
*
(382) * * *
(i) * * *
(ii) Additional Material
(A) El Dorado County Air Quality
Management District.
(1) El Dorado County Air Quality
Management District Reasonably
Available Control Technology (RACT)
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Update
Analysis Staff Report (‘‘2006 RACT
SIP’’) adopted on February 6, 2007.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
www.regulations.gov or email.
www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, and EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send email
directly to EPA, your email address will
be automatically captured and included
as part of the public comment. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: Generally, documents in the
docket for this action are available
electronically at www.regulations.gov
and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California. While all documents in the
docket are listed at
www.regulations.gov, some information
may be publicly available only at the
hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material, large maps), and some may not
be publicly available in either location
(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew Steckel, EPA Region IX, (415)
947–4115, steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
Table of Contents
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rules?
II. EPA’s Evaluation and Action
A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation
criteria?
C. EPA recommendations to further
improve the rules.
D. Public comment and final action.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
E:\FR\FM\13MRR1.SGM
13MRR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 49 (Thursday, March 13, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14176-14178]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05387]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2013-0683; FRL-9905-26-Region 9]
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan; South
Coast Air Quality Management District and El Dorado County Air Quality
Management District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing
approval of revisions to the South Coast Air Quality Management
District and El Dorado County Air Quality Management District portions
of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The South Coast
action was proposed in the Federal Register on September 13, 2013 and
concerns carbon monoxide emissions from cement kilns. The El Dorado
County action was proposed in the Federal Register on October 25, 2013
and concerns the District's demonstration that its rules met reasonably
available control technology (RACT) requirements under the 1997 8-hour
ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). We are approving
these documents under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).
DATES: This rule will be effective on April 14, 2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2013-0683 for
this action. Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105-
3901. While all documents in the docket are listed at https://www.regulations.gov, some information may be publicly available only at
the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps,
[[Page 14177]]
multi-volume reports), and some may not be available in either location
(e.g., confidential business information (CBI)). To inspect the hard
copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley Tong, EPA Region IX, (415)
947-4122, tong.stanley@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses.
III. EPA Action.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews.
I. Proposed Action
On September 13, 2013 (78 FR 56639) under Docket EPA-R09-
OAR-2013-0596, EPA proposed to approve the following rule into the
California SIP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule Rule title Amended Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCAQMD.......................... 1112.1 Emissions of Particulate 12/4/09 07/20/10
Matter and Carbon Monoxide
from Cement Kilns.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On October 25, 2013 (78 FR 63934) under Docket EPA-R09-
OAR-2013-0683, EPA proposed to approve the following document into the
California SIP.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Document Adopted Submitted
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EDAQMD............... EDAQMD 02/06/07 07/11/07
Reasonably
Available
Control
Technology
(RACT) State
Implementation
Plan (SIP)
Update
Analysis Staff
Report (``2006
RACT SIP'').
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our technical support document for the proposed approval of
EDAQMD's 2006 RACT SIP included a suggestion that EDAQMD submit
negative declarations for the metal parts and products, solvent metal
cleaning, and graphic arts Control Technique Guidelines categories.
These negative declarations were submitted to EPA on September 30,
2013, and we are taking separate action on them.
We proposed to approve SCAQMD Rule 1112.1 and EDAQMD's 2006 RACT
SIP because we determined that they complied with the relevant CAA
requirements. Our proposed action contains more information on the
submitted documents and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
EPA's proposed actions provided a 30-day public comment period. The
docket for South Coast Rule 1112.1 ``Emissions of Particulate Matter
and Carbon Monoxide from Cement Kilns'' received one comment. The
comment was not germane to the proposed action and requested
clarification on the geographic boundary to which the Santa Barbara
County Air Pollution Control District's outer continental shelf
applied. EPA provided a separate reply to the commenter. We received no
comments on the proposed approval of El Dorado County's 2006 RACT SIP.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the
submitted documents as described in our proposed actions. Therefore, as
authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully approving
these documents into the California SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the
[[Page 14178]]
Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will
submit a report containing this action and other required information
to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the
rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60
days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not
a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by [insert date 60 days from
date of publication of this document in the Federal Register]. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: December 16, 2013.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220, is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(381) (i)(K) and
(382)(ii) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(381) * * *
(i) * * *
(K) South Coast Air Quality Management District.
(1) Rule 1112.1, ``Emissions of Particulate Matter and Carbon
Monoxide from Cement Kilns,'' amended on December 4, 2009.
* * * * *
(382) * * *
(i) * * *
(ii) Additional Material
(A) El Dorado County Air Quality Management District.
(1) El Dorado County Air Quality Management District Reasonably
Available Control Technology (RACT) State Implementation Plan (SIP)
Update Analysis Staff Report (``2006 RACT SIP'') adopted on February 6,
2007.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-05387 Filed 3-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
