Advisory Circular for Upset Prevention and Recovery Training and Advisory Circular for Stall Prevention and Recovery Training, 13592-13593 [2014-05287]
Download as PDF
13592
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 79, No. 47
Tuesday, March 11, 2014
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0128; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–133–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Correction
In proposed rule document 2014–
04568, appearing on pages 11725
through 11728 in the issue of Monday,
March 3, 2014, make the following
correction:
On page 11725, in the third column,
in the third line of the SUMMARY,
‘‘Boeing Company Model airplanes’’
should read ‘‘Boeing Company Model
777 airplanes’’.
[FR Doc. C1–2014–04568 Filed 3–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
recommended practices and guidance
for academic and flight simulation
training device (FSTD) training for
pilots to prevent developing upset
conditions and ensure correct and
consistent recovery responses to upsets.
AC 120–109A provides guidance and
best practices for training, testing, and
checking for pilots to ensure correct
responses to impending and full stalls.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before May 12, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by AC 120–UPRT or AC 120–109A
using any of the following methods:
• Aviation Safety Draft Document
Open for Comment Web site: Go to
https://www.faa.gov/aircraft/draft_docs/
afs_ac/ and follow the online
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to 1625 K
Street NW., Suite 300, Washington, DC
20006.
• Fax: Fax comments to 202–223–
4615. Attn: Susan Hill.
• Hand Delivery: Bring comments to
the 1625 K Street NW., Suite 300,
Washington, DC between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robyn LaPorte, Air Transportation
Division, Flight Standards Service,
Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone: 202–
267–8166; facsimile: 202–267–5229;
email: robyn.laporte@faa.gov.
14 CFR Parts 121, 135, and 142
Background
[AC 120–UPRT and AC 120–109A]
These draft ACs provide guidance
regarding the new training requirements
contained in the Qualification, Service,
and Use of Crewmembers and Aircraft
Dispatchers final rule published
November 12, 2013 (FAA Docket FAA–
2008–0677).
Advisory Circular for Upset Prevention
and Recovery Training and Advisory
Circular for Stall Prevention and
Recovery Training
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of availability of
proposed Advisory Circular for Upset
Prevention and Recovery Training and
proposed revision to Advisory Circular
for Stall Prevention and Recovery
Training, request for comment.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) is announcing the
availability of proposed Advisory
Circulars (AC) 120–UPRT and 120–
109A. AC 120–UPRT provides
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Mar 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
Advisory Circular 120–UPRT
The primary goal of this proposed AC
is to provide recommended practices
and guidance for academic and flight
simulation training device (FSTD)
training for pilots to prevent developing
upset conditions and ensure correct and
consistent recovery responses to upsets.
This AC was developed based on a
review of recommended practices
developed by major airplane
manufacturers, labor organizations, air
carriers, training organizations,
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
simulator manufacturers, and industry
representative organizations. This AC
provides guidance to Title 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 121
air carriers implementing the regulatory
requirements of § § 121.419, 121.423,
121.424, and 121.427. Core principles of
this AC include:
• Enhanced instructor training on the
limitations of simulation.
• Comprehensive pilot academic
training on aerodynamics.
• Early recognition of divergence
from intended flight path.
• Upset prevention through
improvements in manual handling
skills.
• Progressive intervention strategies
for the pilot monitoring.
Advisory Circular 120–109A
The primary goal of this proposed AC
revision is to provide guidance and best
practices for training, testing, and
checking for pilots to ensure correct
responses to impending and full stalls.
This AC was developed based on a
review of recommended practices
developed by major airplane
manufacturers, labor organizations, air
carriers, training organizations,
simulator manufacturers, and industry
representative organizations. Core
principles of this Advisory Circular
include:
• Reducing angle of attack is the most
important pilot action in an impending
or full stall.
• Pilot training should emphasize
teaching the same recovery technique
for impending stalls and full stalls.
• Evaluation criteria for a recovery
from an impending stall should not
include a predetermined value for
altitude loss. Instead, criteria should
consider the multitude of external and
internal variables which affect the
recovery altitude.
• Once the stall recovery procedure is
mastered by maneuver-based training,
stall prevention training should include
realistic scenarios that could be
encountered in operational conditions,
including impending stalls with the
autopilot engaged and at high altitudes.
• Full stall training should be led by
the instructor, but must allow the pilot
to experience the associated flight
dynamics and execute a recovery.
The agency will consider all
comments received by May 12, 2014.
Comments received after that date may
be considered if consideration will not
E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM
11MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 47 / Tuesday, March 11, 2014 / Proposed Rules
13593
electronic or written comments to FDA’s
Division of Dockets Management.
Comments on the scope of issues the
Agency should include in the EIS may
be submitted until April 18, 2014.
ADDRESSES: See section II, ‘‘How to
Participate in the Public Meeting’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document. You may submit
comments on the scope of issues the
Agency should include in the EIS,
identified by Docket No. FDA–2011–N–
0921 and/or Regulatory Information
Number (RIN) 0910–AG35, by any of the
following methods:
Issued in Washington, DC on March 5,
2014.
John S. Duncan,
Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–05287 Filed 3–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0921]
RIN 0910–AG35
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Proposed Rule, Standards for
Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and
Holding of Produce for Human
Consumption; Public Meeting on
Scoping of Environmental Impact
Statement and Extension of Comment
Period for Environmental Impact
Statement
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Notification of public scoping
meeting; extension of comment period
for the Environmental Impact
Statement.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or we) is
announcing the extension of the public
scoping period for Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS), as well as a
public scoping meeting to discuss the
scope of the EIS for the proposed rule
to establish standards for growing,
harvesting, packing, and holding of
produce for human consumption. FDA
is holding a public scoping meeting as
part of our ongoing efforts to seek public
input on the issues and alternatives that
we should consider when preparing the
EIS and to provide information about
the EIS process (including how to
submit comments, data, and other
information to the rulemaking docket),
to solicit oral stakeholder and public
comments on the scope of the EIS, and
to respond to questions about the EIS.
DATES: See section II, ‘‘How to
Participate in the Public Meeting’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document for date and time of the
public meeting, closing dates for
advance registration, and information
on deadlines for submitting either
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Mar 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
I. Background
The FDA Food Safety Modernization
Act (FSMA) (Pub. L. 111–353), signed
into law by President Obama on January
4, 2011, enables FDA to better protect
public health by helping to ensure the
safety and security of the food supply.
FSMA amends the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) to
establish the foundation of a
modernized, prevention-based food
safety system. As part of our
implementation of FSMA, we published
the Proposed Rule, Standards for the
Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and
Holding of Produce for Human
Consumption (hereafter referred to as
‘‘the Produce Safety proposed rule’’) to
establish science-based minimum
standards for the safe growing,
harvesting, packing, and holding of
produce (78 FR 3503, January 16, 2013).
We recently announced plans to
propose revised rule language for key
parts of the Produce Safety proposed
rule, including those related to water
quality and the use of raw manure and
compost (Ref. 1).
In publishing the Produce Safety
proposed rule, we relied on a categorical
exclusion from the need to prepare an
Environmental Assessment or EIS under
21 CFR 25.30(j) (78 FR 3503 at 3616).
However, on August 19, 2013, we issued
a Notice of Intent to Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for the
Proposed Rule, Standards for Growing,
Harvesting, Packing, and Holding of
Produce for Human Consumption (NOI),
based on additional information,
including comments received, and upon
further analysis. In the NOI, we
explained that FDA has determined that
the proposed action may significantly
affect the quality of the human
environment (21 CFR 25.22(b)), and
therefore, an EIS is necessary for the
final rule (78 FR 50358, August 19,
2013). In the NOI, FDA also announced
the beginning of the scoping process
and solicited public comments to
identify issues to be analyzed in an EIS.
The NOI asked for public comment by
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
21 CFR Parts 16 and 112
AGENCY:
accommodations due to a disability:
Cynthia Wise, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS–009), Food
and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint
Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740,
240–402–1357, email: cynthia.wise@
fda.hhs.gov.
For further information about
comments for the docket: Annette
McCarthy, Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition (HFS–205), Food and
Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch
Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 240–
402–1200.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Submissions
delay agency action on the review. A
copy of the advisory circulars is
available for review at https://
www.faa.gov/aircraft/draft_docs/
afs_ac/.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the
following ways:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
paper submissions): Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Agency name and
Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0921, and RIN
0910–AG35 for this rulemaking. All
comments received may be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
additional information on submitting
comments, see the ‘‘Request for
Comments’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions about registering for the
meeting, to register by phone, or to
submit a notice of participation by mail,
FAX or email: Rick Williams, c/o FDA
EIS, 72 Loveton Circle, Sparks, MD
21152, 410–316–2377; FAX: 410–472–
3289, email: RWilliams@jmt.com.
For general questions about the
meeting, to request an opportunity to
make an oral presentation at the public
meeting, to submit the full text,
comprehensive outline, or summary of
an oral presentation, or for special
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\11MRP1.SGM
11MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 47 (Tuesday, March 11, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13592-13593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05287]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Parts 121, 135, and 142
[AC 120-UPRT and AC 120-109A]
Advisory Circular for Upset Prevention and Recovery Training and
Advisory Circular for Stall Prevention and Recovery Training
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed Advisory Circular for Upset
Prevention and Recovery Training and proposed revision to Advisory
Circular for Stall Prevention and Recovery Training, request for
comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is announcing the
availability of proposed Advisory Circulars (AC) 120-UPRT and 120-109A.
AC 120-UPRT provides recommended practices and guidance for academic
and flight simulation training device (FSTD) training for pilots to
prevent developing upset conditions and ensure correct and consistent
recovery responses to upsets. AC 120-109A provides guidance and best
practices for training, testing, and checking for pilots to ensure
correct responses to impending and full stalls.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before May 12, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by AC 120-UPRT or AC 120-109A using
any of the following methods:
Aviation Safety Draft Document Open for Comment Web site:
Go to https://www.faa.gov/aircraft/draft_docs/afs_ac/ and follow the
online instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to 1625 K Street NW., Suite 300,
Washington, DC 20006.
Fax: Fax comments to 202-223-4615. Attn: Susan Hill.
Hand Delivery: Bring comments to the 1625 K Street NW.,
Suite 300, Washington, DC between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robyn LaPorte, Air Transportation
Division, Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration,
800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone: 202-267-
8166; facsimile: 202-267-5229; email: robyn.laporte@faa.gov.
Background
These draft ACs provide guidance regarding the new training
requirements contained in the Qualification, Service, and Use of
Crewmembers and Aircraft Dispatchers final rule published November 12,
2013 (FAA Docket FAA-2008-0677).
Advisory Circular 120-UPRT
The primary goal of this proposed AC is to provide recommended
practices and guidance for academic and flight simulation training
device (FSTD) training for pilots to prevent developing upset
conditions and ensure correct and consistent recovery responses to
upsets. This AC was developed based on a review of recommended
practices developed by major airplane manufacturers, labor
organizations, air carriers, training organizations, simulator
manufacturers, and industry representative organizations. This AC
provides guidance to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part
121 air carriers implementing the regulatory requirements of Sec.
Sec. 121.419, 121.423, 121.424, and 121.427. Core principles of this
AC include:
Enhanced instructor training on the limitations of
simulation.
Comprehensive pilot academic training on aerodynamics.
Early recognition of divergence from intended flight path.
Upset prevention through improvements in manual handling
skills.
Progressive intervention strategies for the pilot
monitoring.
Advisory Circular 120-109A
The primary goal of this proposed AC revision is to provide
guidance and best practices for training, testing, and checking for
pilots to ensure correct responses to impending and full stalls. This
AC was developed based on a review of recommended practices developed
by major airplane manufacturers, labor organizations, air carriers,
training organizations, simulator manufacturers, and industry
representative organizations. Core principles of this Advisory Circular
include:
Reducing angle of attack is the most important pilot
action in an impending or full stall.
Pilot training should emphasize teaching the same recovery
technique for impending stalls and full stalls.
Evaluation criteria for a recovery from an impending stall
should not include a predetermined value for altitude loss. Instead,
criteria should consider the multitude of external and internal
variables which affect the recovery altitude.
Once the stall recovery procedure is mastered by maneuver-
based training, stall prevention training should include realistic
scenarios that could be encountered in operational conditions,
including impending stalls with the autopilot engaged and at high
altitudes.
Full stall training should be led by the instructor, but
must allow the pilot to experience the associated flight dynamics and
execute a recovery.
The agency will consider all comments received by May 12, 2014.
Comments received after that date may be considered if consideration
will not
[[Page 13593]]
delay agency action on the review. A copy of the advisory circulars is
available for review at https://www.faa.gov/aircraft/draft_docs/afs_ac/.
Issued in Washington, DC on March 5, 2014.
John S. Duncan,
Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-05287 Filed 3-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P