Shielding and Radiation Protection Review Effort and Licensing Conditions for Dry Storage Applications, 13002-13003 [2014-05017]

Download as PDF 13002 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 45 / Friday, March 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules § 1007.82 Payments from the transportation credit balancing fund. * * * * * (d) * * * (2) * * * (ii) Multiply the number of miles so determined by the mileage rate for the month computed pursuant to § 1007.83(a)(6); * * * * * (3) * * * (iv) Multiply the remaining miles so computed by the mileage rate for the month computed pursuant to § 1007.83(a)(6); * * * * * ■ 9. Add a new Section 1007.83 to read as follows: § 1007.83 Mileage Rate for the Transportation Credit Balancing Fund. (a) The market administrator shall compute the mileage rate each month as follows: (1) Compute the simple average rounded to three decimal places for the most recent 4 weeks of the Diesel Price per Gallon as reported by the Energy Information Administration of the United States Department of Energy for the Lower Atlantic and Gulf Coast Districts combined. (2) From the result in paragraph (a)(1) in this section subtract $1.42 per gallon; (3) Divide the result in paragraph (a)(2) of this section by 5.5, and round down to three decimal places to compute the fuel cost adjustment factor; (4) Add the result in paragraph (a)(3) of this section to $1.91; (5) Divide the result in paragraph (a)(4) of this section by 480; (6) Round the result in paragraph (a)(5) of this section down to five decimal places to compute the MRF. (b) The market administrator shall announce publicly on or before the 23rd day of the month (except as provided in § 1000.90 of this chapter) the mileage rate pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section for the following month. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS [This marketing agreement will not appear in the Code of Federal Regulations.] Marketing Agreement Regulating the Handling of Milk in Certain Marketing Areas The parties hereto, in order to effectuate the declared policy of the Act, and in accordance with the rules of practice and procedure effective thereunder (7 CFR part 900), desire to enter into this marketing agreement and do hereby agree that the provisions referred to in paragraph I hereof, as augmented by the provisions specified in paragraph II hereof, shall be and are the provisions of this marketing agreement as if set out in full herein. I. The findings and determinations, order relative to handling, and the VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:32 Mar 06, 2014 Jkt 232001 provisions of § ll to ll7 all inclusive, of the order regulating the handling of milk in the lll8 marketing area (7 CFR Part ll9) which is annexed hereto; and II. The following provisions: § ll10 Record of milk handled and authorization to correct typographical errors. (a) Record of milk handled. The undersigned certifies that he/she handled during the month of lll,11 lll hundredweight of milk covered by this marketing agreement. (b) Authorization to correct typographical errors. The undersigned hereby authorizes the Deputy Administrator, or Acting Deputy Administrator, Dairy Programs, Agricultural Marketing Service, to correct any typographical errors which may have been made in this marketing agreement. Effective date. This marketing agreement shall become effective upon the execution of a counterpart hereof by the Department in accordance with Sec. 900.14(a) of the aforesaid rules of practice and procedure. In Witness Whereof, The contracting handlers, acting under the provisions of the Act, for the purposes and subject to the limitations herein contained and not otherwise, have hereunto set their respective hands and seals. Signature By (Name) lllllllllllllll (Title) lllllllllllllllll (Address) llllllllllllllll (Seal) Attest llllllllllllllllll Dated: February 25, 2014. Rex A. Barnes, Associate Administrator. [FR Doc. 2014–04693 Filed 3–6–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–02–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Part 72 [NRC–2013–0051] Shielding and Radiation Protection Review Effort and Licensing Conditions for Dry Storage Applications Nuclear Regulatory Commission. AGENCY: 7 First Frm 00040 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is announcing the withdrawal of draft Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation Interim Staff Guidance No. 26A (SFST–ISG–26A), Revision 0, ‘‘Shielding and Radiation Protection Review Effort and Licensing Parameters for 10 CFR Part 72 Applications.’’ SUMMARY: The withdrawal is effective as of March 7, 2014. ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2013–0051 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You may access publicly-available information related to this document using any of the following methods: • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC–2013–0051. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301–287–3422; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. • NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ adams.html. To begin the search, select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. Draft SFST–ISG–26A, Revision 0 is available electronically under ADAMS Accession No. ML13010A570. • NRC’s PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Michel Call, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–287– 9183; email: Michel.Call@nrc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DATES: I. Background and last section of order. 8 Name of order. 9 Appropriate Part number. 10 Next consecutive section number. 11 Appropriate representative period for the order. PO 00000 Draft interim staff guidance; withdrawal. ACTION: Draft SFST–ISG–26A proposed guidance for the NRC staff to use when reviewing the shielding and radiation protection portions of applications for certificates of compliance (CoC), specific licenses, and amendments E:\FR\FM\07MRP1.SGM 07MRP1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 45 / Friday, March 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS submitted in accordance with part 72 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), ‘‘Licensing Requirements for the Independent Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel, HighLevel Radioactive Waste, and ReactorRelated Greater Than Class C Waste,’’ (10 CFR part 72) Subpart L, ‘‘Approval of Spent Fuel Storage Casks,’’ and Subpart B, ‘‘License Application, Form, and Contents.’’ Draft SFST–ISG–26A proposed to revise the shielding and radiation protection review procedures contained in NUREG–1536, Revision 1, ‘‘Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems at a General License Facility,’’ and NUREG–1567, ‘‘Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Facilities.’’ The staff began writing draft SFST– ISG–26A as a response to an event involving the use of a high dose-rate transfer cask. Its first intent was to provide reviewers guidance on how to review these systems. The scope had been expanded to also provide NRC reviewers with guidance on performing graded reviews based on system dose rates which modify the review ‘‘priority’’ as defined in NUREG–1536. The staff developed this part of the ISG in response to industry comments regarding the amount of details the staff reviewed in response to a 10 CFR part 72 license, certificate or amendment application. The staff published a notice of opportunity for public comment on draft SFST–ISG–26A in the Federal Register on March 29, 2013 (78 FR19148). The staff received two comments, with each commenter raising a significant number of substantive issues which has caused the staff to reconsider the need for and the clarity of the guidance. II. Discussion The staff considered the comments and has decided to defer pursuing action on the draft ISG. Thus, draft SFST–ISG–26A is being withdrawn. From the comments received, the staff concluded that the guidance as written is not clear and would require substantial revision to be well understood as well as meet the needs of the staff. Although the staff still finds that guidance regarding the issues addressed in draft SFST–ISG–26A would be useful, especially in relation to high dose-rate transfer casks, there are recent developments that also touch on some of these issues that the staff finds are appropriate to pursue in lieu of the ISG. This includes the staff’s consideration of a petition to make changes to 10 CFR Part 72 (PRM–72–7) and the staff’s consideration of an VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:32 Mar 06, 2014 Jkt 232001 update to NUREG–1745, ‘‘Standard Format and Content for Technical Specifications for 10 CFR part 72 Cask Certificates of Compliance.’’ The staff finds withdrawing the draft ISG is appropriate considering the initiating event that caused the staff to write draft SFST–ISG–26A has thus far been an isolated event from several years ago, and the staff has not seen any applications for the use of high doserate transfer casks since then. However, the staff will continue to monitor for events or actions (particularly those involving transfer casks) that may indicate there is a need for the ISG prior to completion of, or in addition to, the other efforts. With regard to the review procedure priority levels, the staff currently finds that the generic priority levels in NUREG–1536 sufficiently meet the staff’s commitment of ensuring the appropriate level of effort for these reviews. However, the staff will also monitor the use of these procedures to determine any further need for enhancement. 13003 [Docket No. FAA–2014–0137; Directorate Identifier 2013–NM–135–AD] doors and legs. This proposed AD would require repetitive inspections of the uplock springs of the NLG and MLG doors and legs for broken and damaged springs, and corrective actions if necessary. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct improper free fall extension of the MLG or NLG, which could lead to possible loss of control of the airplane on the ground, and consequent damage to the airplane and injury to occupants. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 21, 2014. ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. •Fax: (202) 493–2251. • Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. • Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office—EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. RIN 2120–AA64 Examining the AD Docket Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day of February 2014. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Mark D. Lombard, Director, Division of Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. [FR Doc. 2014–05017 Filed 3–6–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). AGENCY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Airbus Model A300 series airplanes; Model A300 B4–600, B4–600R, and F4– 600R series airplanes; Model A300 C4– 605R Variant F airplanes (collectively called Model A300–600 series airplanes); and Model A310 series airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports of rupture of the uplock springs of the nose landing gear (NLG) and main landing gear (MLG) SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– 0137; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, E:\FR\FM\07MRP1.SGM 07MRP1

Agencies

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 45 (Friday, March 7, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13002-13003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05017]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

10 CFR Part 72

[NRC-2013-0051]


Shielding and Radiation Protection Review Effort and Licensing 
Conditions for Dry Storage Applications

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Draft interim staff guidance; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is announcing the 
withdrawal of draft Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation Interim Staff 
Guidance No. 26A (SFST-ISG-26A), Revision 0, ``Shielding and Radiation 
Protection Review Effort and Licensing Parameters for 10 CFR Part 72 
Applications.''

DATES: The withdrawal is effective as of March 7, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2013-0051 when contacting the 
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You 
may access publicly-available information related to this document 
using any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2013-0051. Address 
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-287-
3422; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact 
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of 
this document.
     NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System 
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the 
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and 
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, 
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. 
Draft SFST-ISG-26A, Revision 0 is available electronically under ADAMS 
Accession No. ML13010A570.
     NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public 
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Michel Call, Office of Nuclear 
Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-287-9183; email: 
Michel.Call@nrc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Draft SFST-ISG-26A proposed guidance for the NRC staff to use when 
reviewing the shielding and radiation protection portions of 
applications for certificates of compliance (CoC), specific licenses, 
and amendments

[[Page 13003]]

submitted in accordance with part 72 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (10 CFR), ``Licensing Requirements for the Independent 
Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level Radioactive Waste, and 
Reactor-Related Greater Than Class C Waste,'' (10 CFR part 72) Subpart 
L, ``Approval of Spent Fuel Storage Casks,'' and Subpart B, ``License 
Application, Form, and Contents.'' Draft SFST-ISG-26A proposed to 
revise the shielding and radiation protection review procedures 
contained in NUREG-1536, Revision 1, ``Standard Review Plan for Spent 
Fuel Dry Storage Systems at a General License Facility,'' and NUREG-
1567, ``Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Facilities.''
    The staff began writing draft SFST-ISG-26A as a response to an 
event involving the use of a high dose-rate transfer cask. Its first 
intent was to provide reviewers guidance on how to review these 
systems. The scope had been expanded to also provide NRC reviewers with 
guidance on performing graded reviews based on system dose rates which 
modify the review ``priority'' as defined in NUREG-1536. The staff 
developed this part of the ISG in response to industry comments 
regarding the amount of details the staff reviewed in response to a 10 
CFR part 72 license, certificate or amendment application.
    The staff published a notice of opportunity for public comment on 
draft SFST-ISG-26A in the Federal Register on March 29, 2013 (78 
FR19148). The staff received two comments, with each commenter raising 
a significant number of substantive issues which has caused the staff 
to reconsider the need for and the clarity of the guidance.

II. Discussion

    The staff considered the comments and has decided to defer pursuing 
action on the draft ISG. Thus, draft SFST-ISG-26A is being withdrawn. 
From the comments received, the staff concluded that the guidance as 
written is not clear and would require substantial revision to be well 
understood as well as meet the needs of the staff. Although the staff 
still finds that guidance regarding the issues addressed in draft SFST-
ISG-26A would be useful, especially in relation to high dose-rate 
transfer casks, there are recent developments that also touch on some 
of these issues that the staff finds are appropriate to pursue in lieu 
of the ISG. This includes the staff's consideration of a petition to 
make changes to 10 CFR Part 72 (PRM-72-7) and the staff's consideration 
of an update to NUREG-1745, ``Standard Format and Content for Technical 
Specifications for 10 CFR part 72 Cask Certificates of Compliance.''
    The staff finds withdrawing the draft ISG is appropriate 
considering the initiating event that caused the staff to write draft 
SFST-ISG-26A has thus far been an isolated event from several years 
ago, and the staff has not seen any applications for the use of high 
dose-rate transfer casks since then. However, the staff will continue 
to monitor for events or actions (particularly those involving transfer 
casks) that may indicate there is a need for the ISG prior to 
completion of, or in addition to, the other efforts.
    With regard to the review procedure priority levels, the staff 
currently finds that the generic priority levels in NUREG-1536 
sufficiently meet the staff's commitment of ensuring the appropriate 
level of effort for these reviews. However, the staff will also monitor 
the use of these procedures to determine any further need for 
enhancement.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day of February 2014.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Mark D. Lombard,
Director, Division of Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation, Office of 
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2014-05017 Filed 3-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.