Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company, 12431-12434 [2014-04898]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 43 / Wednesday, March 5, 2014 / Proposed Rules
mechanism assembly having P/N 48510–1 or
P/N 48510–3 with a new MLG AES cam
mechanism assembly having P/N 48510–5, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
84–32–100, Revision A, dated August 30,
2012. Accomplishing this replacement
terminates the repetitive inspections required
by this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February
26, 2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
(k) New Credit for Previous Actions
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
This paragraph provides credit for actions
required by paragraphs (j) of this AD, if those
actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD using Bombardier Service
Bulletin 84–32–100, dated August 15, 2012.
Federal Aviation Administration
(l) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. ATTN: Program
Manager, Continuing Operational Safety,
FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue,
Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone
516–228–7300; fax 516–794–5531. Before
using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a
principal inspector, the manager of the local
flight standards district office/certificate
holding district office. The AMOC approval
letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer, use these actions if they are
FAA-approved. Corrective actions are
considered FAA-approved if they were
approved by the State of Design Authority (or
its delegated agent, or the DAH with a State
of Design Authority’s design organization
approval, as applicable). You are required to
ensure the product is airworthy before it is
returned to service.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(m) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF–2011–01R2,
dated May 21, 2013, for related information.
This MCAI may be found in the AD docket
on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2014–0129.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., Q-Series
Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt Boulevard,
Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada;
telephone 416–375–4000; fax 416–375–4539;
email thd.qseries@aero.bombardier.com;
Internet https://www.bombardier.com. You
may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Mar 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
[FR Doc. 2014–04887 Filed 3–4–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0126; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–236–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all The
Boeing Company Model airplanes. This
proposed AD was prompted by reports
of latently failed fuel shutoff valves
discovered during fuel filter
replacement. This proposed AD would
require revising the maintenance or
inspection program to include new
airworthiness limitations. We are
proposing this AD to detect and correct
latent failures of the fuel shutoff valve
to the engine, which could result in the
inability to shut off fuel to the engine
and, in case of certain engine fires, an
uncontrollable fire that could lead to
wing failure.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUMMARY:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12431
0126; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebel Nichols, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; phone: (425) 917–6509;
fax: (425) 917–6590; email:
rebel.nichols@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2014–0126; Directorate Identifier 2013–
NM–236–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received reports of latently
failed fuel shutoff valves discovered
during fuel filter replacement.
Deficiencies in the valve actuator design
have resulted in latent failures of the
fuel shutoff valve to the engine. This
condition, if not detected and corrected,
could result in latent failures of the fuel
shutoff valve to the engine, which could
result in the inability to shut off fuel to
the engine and, in case of certain engine
fires, an uncontrollable fire that could
lead to wing failure.
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design.
E:\FR\FM\05MRP1.SGM
05MRP1
12432
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 43 / Wednesday, March 5, 2014 / Proposed Rules
This proposed AD would require
revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new
inspections. Compliance with these
inspections is required by section
91.403(c) of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 91.403(c)). For
airplanes that have been previously
modified, altered, or repaired in the
areas addressed by these inspections, an
operator might not be able to
accomplish the inspections described in
the revisions. In this situation, to
comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the
operator must request approval of an
alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) in accordance with the
provisions of paragraph (i) of this
proposed AD. The request should
include a description of changes to the
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
revising the maintenance or inspection
program to include new airworthiness
limitations. The airworthiness
limitations would allow an operator to
perform the operational check as either
a maintenance action or a flightcrew
action. The flightcrew or maintenance
crew would monitor the engine spar
valve lights for a few seconds
immediately after moving the engine
fuel condition levers. Flightcrews can
perform this operational check while
starting the engine or while shutting
down the engine. Maintenance crews
can do this operational check as a
separate action that does not require
actual starting of the engine.
proposed inspections that will ensure
the continued operational safety of the
airplane.
Interim Action
We consider this proposed AD
interim action. The manufacturer is
currently developing a modification that
will address the unsafe condition
identified in this proposed AD. Once
this modification is developed,
approved, and available, we might
consider additional rulemaking.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 590 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Incorporating Airworthiness Limitation .........
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ..............
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Mar 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
Cost per
product
Parts cost
$0
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
$50,150
(b) Affected ADs
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
$85
Cost on U.S.
operators
(e) Unsafe Condition
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. Amend § 39.13 by adding the
following new airworthiness directive
(AD):
■
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–
2014–0126; Directorate Identifier 2013–
NM–236–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by April 21,
2014.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all The Boeing
Company Model 757–200, –200PF, –200CB,
and –300 series airplanes, certificated in any
category.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)
Code 2823, Fuel Selector/Shut-off Valve.
This AD was prompted by reports of
latently failed fuel shutoff valves discovered
during fuel filter replacement. We are issuing
this AD to detect and correct latent failures
of the fuel shutoff valve to the engine, which
could result in the inability to shut off fuel
to the engine and, in case of certain engine
fires, an uncontrollable fire that could lead to
wing failure.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Revision of Maintenance or Inspection
Program
Within 30 days after the effective date of
this AD, revise the maintenance or inspection
program, as applicable, to add airworthiness
limitation numbers 28–AWL–ENG and 28–
AWL–APU, by incorporating the information
specified in Figure 1 and Figure 2 to
paragraph (g) of this AD into the
Airworthiness Limitations Section of the
Instructions for Continued Airworthiness.
The initial compliance time for
accomplishing the actions specified in Figure
1 and Figure 2 to paragraph (g) of this AD is
within 7 days after accomplishing the
E:\FR\FM\05MRP1.SGM
05MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 43 / Wednesday, March 5, 2014 / Proposed Rules
12433
maintenance or inspection program revision
required by this paragraph.
FIGURE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (g) OF THIS AD: ENGINE SHUT-OFF VALVE (FUEL SPAR VALVE) POSITION INDICATION
OPERATIONAL CHECK
Task
Interval
Applicability
Description
28–AWL–ENG
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
AWL No.
ALI ....
DAILY ......
ALL ........................
Engine Shut-Off Valve (Fuel Spar Valve) Position Indication Operational Check
Concern: The MOV actuator design can result in airplanes operating with a failed
MOV actuator that is not reported. A latently failed MOV actuator could prevent
fuel shutoff to an engine. In the event of certain engine fires, the potential exists
for an engine fire to be uncontrollable.
Perform one of the following operational checks of the Fuel Spar Valve position
indication (unless checked by the flight crew in a manner approved by the principal operations inspector):
A. Operational Check during engine shutdown
1. Do an operational check of the left engine fuel spar valve actuator.
a. As the L FUEL CONTROL switch on the quadrant control stand is moved to
the CUTOFF position, verify the left SPAR VALVE disagreement light on the
quadrant control stand illuminates and then goes off.
b. If the test fails (light fails to illuminate), before further flight, repair faults as required (refer to Boeing Airplane Maintenance Manual (AMM) 28–22–11).
2. Do an operational check of the right engine fuel spar valve actuator.
a. As the R FUEL CONTROL switch on the quadrant control stand is moved to
the CUTOFF position, verify the right SPAR VALVE disagreement light on the
quadrant control stand illuminates and then goes off.
b. If the test fails (light fails to illuminate), before further flight, repair faults as required (refer to Boeing AMM 28–22–11).
B. Operational check during engine start
1. Do an operational check of the left engine fuel spar valve actuator.
a. As the L FUEL CONTROL switch on the quadrant control stand is moved to
the RUN position, verify the left SPAR VALVE disagreement light on the quadrant control stand illuminates and then goes off.
b. If the test fails (light fails to illuminate), before further flight, repair faults as required (refer to Boeing AMM 28–22–11).
2. Do an operational check of the right engine fuel spar valve actuator.
a. As the R FUEL CONTROL switch on the quadrant control stand is moved to
the RUN position, verify the right SPAR VALVE disagreement light on the quadrant control stand illuminates and then goes off.
b. If the test fails (light fails to illuminate), before further flight, repair faults as required (refer to Boeing AMM 28–22–11).
C. Operational check without engine operation
1. Make sure all fuel pump switches on the Overhead Panel are in the OFF position.
2. If the APU is running, open and collar the L FWD FUEL BOOST PUMP
(C00372) circuit breaker on the Main Power Distribution Panel.
3. Make sure LEFT and RIGHT ENG FIRE switches on the Aft Aisle Stand are in
the NORMAL (IN) position.
4. Make sure L and R Engine Start Selector Switches on the Overhead Panel are
in the OFF position.
5. Do an operational check of the left engine fuel spar valve actuator.
a. Move L FUEL CONTROL switch on the quadrant control stand to the RUN position and wait 10 seconds.
NOTE: It is normal under this test condition for the ENG VALVE disagreement
light on the quadrant control stand to stay illuminated.
b. Move L FUEL CONTROL switch on the quadrant control stand to the CUTOFF
position.
c. Verify the left SPAR VALVE disagreement light on the quadrant control stand illuminates and then goes off.
d. If the test fails (light fails to illuminate), before further flight, repair faults as required (refer to Boeing AMM 28–22–11).
6. Do an operational check of the right engine fuel spar valve actuator.
a. Move R FUEL CONTROL switch on the quadrant control stand to the RUN position and wait 10 seconds.
NOTE: It is normal under this test condition for the ENG VALVE disagreement
light on the quadrant control stand to stay illuminated.
b. Move R FUEL CONTROL switch on the quadrant control stand to the CUTOFF
position.
c. Verify the right SPAR VALVE disagreement light on the quadrant control stand
illuminates and then goes off.
d. If the test fails, (light fails to illuminate), before further flight, repair faults as required (refer to Boeing AMM 28–22–11).
7. If the L FWD FUEL BOOST PUMP circuit breaker was collared in step C.2., remove collar and close.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Mar 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\05MRP1.SGM
05MRP1
12434
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 43 / Wednesday, March 5, 2014 / Proposed Rules
FIGURE 2 TO PARAGRAPH (g) OF THIS AD: APU FUEL VALVE POSITION INDICATION OPERATIONAL CHECK
AWL No.
Task
Interval
Applicability
Description
28–AWL–APU
ALI ....
10 DAYS ..
ALL ........................
APU Fuel Valve Position Indication Operational Check
Concern: The MOV actuator design can result in airplanes operating with a failed
MOV actuator that is not reported. A latently failed MOV actuator could prevent
fuel shutoff to the APU. In the event of certain APU fires, the potential exists for
an APU fire to be uncontrollable.
Perform the operational check of the APU Fuel Valve position indication (unless
checked by the flight crew in a manner approved by the principal operations inspector).
A. Operational check of the APU Fuel Valve position indication
1. If the APU is running, unload and shut down the APU using standard practices.
2. Make sure the APU FIRE switch on the Aft Aisle Stand is in the NORMAL (IN)
position.
3. Make sure there is at least 700 lbs (300 kgs) of fuel in the Left Main Tank.
4. Move APU Selector switch on the Overhead Panel to the ON position and wait
10 seconds.
5. Move APU Selector switch on the Overhead Panel to the OFF position.
6. Verify the APU FAULT light on the Overhead Panel illuminates and then goes
off.
7. If the test fails (light fails to illuminate), before further flight requiring APU availability, repair faults as required (refer to Boeing AMM 28–25–11).
NOTE: Dispatch may be permitted per MMEL 28–25–02 if APU is not required for
flight.
(h) No Alternative Actions and Intervals
After accomplishment of the maintenance
or inspection program revision required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative
actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals may be
used unless the actions or intervals are
approved as an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (i)(1) of
this AD.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Rebel Nichols, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
phone: (425) 917–6509; fax: (425) 917–6590;
email: rebel.nichols@faa.gov.
18:20 Mar 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
[FR Doc. 2014–04898 Filed 3–4–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[Docket No.: OJP (BJA) 1646]
RIN 1121–AA80
Public Safety Officers’ Benefits
Program
Office of Justice Programs,
Justice.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Office of Justice Programs
(OJP) of the U.S. Department of Justice
proposes this rule to amend the
regulation that implements the Public
Safety Officers’ Benefits (PSOB) Act and
associated statutes. Generally speaking,
these laws provide financial support to
certain public safety officers, or their
survivors and families, when such
officers die, or become permanently and
totally disabled, as a result of line-ofduty injuries, or when they die of heart
attacks or strokes sustained within
statutorily-specified timeframes of
engaging or participating in certain lineof-duty activity. The proposed rule
would amend the implementing
regulation in order to change the
definition of ‘‘Spouse.’’
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Written comments must be
postmarked and electronic comments
must be submitted on or before April 4,
2014. Comments received by mail will
be considered timely if they are
postmarked on or before that date. The
electronic Federal Docket Management
System (FDMS) will accept comments
until Midnight Eastern Time at the end
of that day.
DATES:
Please address all
comments regarding this rule by U.S.
mail, to: Hope Janke, Bureau of Justice
Assistance (BJA), Office of Justice
Programs, 810 7th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20531; or by
telefacsimile to (202) 354–4135. To
ensure proper handling, please
reference OJP Docket No. 1646 on your
correspondence. Comments may also be
sent electronically through https://
regulations.gov using the electronic
comment form provided on that site. An
electronic copy of this document is also
available at the https://regulations.gov
Web site. OJP will accept attachments to
electronic comments in Microsoft Word,
WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF formats
only. The public’s opportunity to
comment through https://regulations.gov
terminates at midnight Eastern Time on
the day that the comment period closes.
All comments received via U.S. mail, or
an express mail carrier, must be
postmarked on or before the day that the
comment period closes.
ADDRESSES:
28 CFR Part 32
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO) FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (j) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February
21, 2014.
John P. Piccola,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
Sfmt 4702
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hope Janke, BJA, OJP, at (202) 514–
6278, or toll-free at 1 (888) 744–6513.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\05MRP1.SGM
05MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 43 (Wednesday, March 5, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 12431-12434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04898]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2014-0126; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-236-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
The Boeing Company Model airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by
reports of latently failed fuel shutoff valves discovered during fuel
filter replacement. This proposed AD would require revising the
maintenance or inspection program to include new airworthiness
limitations. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct latent
failures of the fuel shutoff valve to the engine, which could result in
the inability to shut off fuel to the engine and, in case of certain
engine fires, an uncontrollable fire that could lead to wing failure.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0126; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebel Nichols, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: (425) 917-
6509; fax: (425) 917-6590; email: rebel.nichols@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2014-0126;
Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-236-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received reports of latently failed fuel shutoff valves
discovered during fuel filter replacement. Deficiencies in the valve
actuator design have resulted in latent failures of the fuel shutoff
valve to the engine. This condition, if not detected and corrected,
could result in latent failures of the fuel shutoff valve to the
engine, which could result in the inability to shut off fuel to the
engine and, in case of certain engine fires, an uncontrollable fire
that could lead to wing failure.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
[[Page 12432]]
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require revising the maintenance or
inspection program to include new airworthiness limitations. The
airworthiness limitations would allow an operator to perform the
operational check as either a maintenance action or a flightcrew
action. The flightcrew or maintenance crew would monitor the engine
spar valve lights for a few seconds immediately after moving the engine
fuel condition levers. Flightcrews can perform this operational check
while starting the engine or while shutting down the engine.
Maintenance crews can do this operational check as a separate action
that does not require actual starting of the engine.
This proposed AD would require revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new inspections. Compliance with these
inspections is required by section 91.403(c) of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 91.403(c)). For airplanes that have been previously
modified, altered, or repaired in the areas addressed by these
inspections, an operator might not be able to accomplish the
inspections described in the revisions. In this situation, to comply
with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must request approval of an
alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the
provisions of paragraph (i) of this proposed AD. The request should
include a description of changes to the proposed inspections that will
ensure the continued operational safety of the airplane.
Interim Action
We consider this proposed AD interim action. The manufacturer is
currently developing a modification that will address the unsafe
condition identified in this proposed AD. Once this modification is
developed, approved, and available, we might consider additional
rulemaking.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 590 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Incorporating Airworthiness 1 work-hour x $85 per $0 $85 $50,150
Limitation. hour = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. Amend Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2014-0126; Directorate Identifier
2013-NM-236-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by April 21, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 757-200, -200PF,
-200CB, and -300 series airplanes, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 2823, Fuel Selector/
Shut-off Valve.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of latently failed fuel shutoff
valves discovered during fuel filter replacement. We are issuing
this AD to detect and correct latent failures of the fuel shutoff
valve to the engine, which could result in the inability to shut off
fuel to the engine and, in case of certain engine fires, an
uncontrollable fire that could lead to wing failure.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Revision of Maintenance or Inspection Program
Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to add
airworthiness limitation numbers 28-AWL-ENG and 28-AWL-APU, by
incorporating the information specified in Figure 1 and Figure 2 to
paragraph (g) of this AD into the Airworthiness Limitations Section
of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness. The initial
compliance time for accomplishing the actions specified in Figure 1
and Figure 2 to paragraph (g) of this AD is within 7 days after
accomplishing the
[[Page 12433]]
maintenance or inspection program revision required by this
paragraph.
Figure 1 to Paragraph (g) of This AD: Engine Shut-Off Valve (Fuel Spar Valve) Position Indication Operational
Check
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AWL No. Task Interval Applicability Description
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
28-AWL-ENG....... ALI...... DAILY........ ALL............ Engine Shut-Off Valve (Fuel Spar Valve) Position
Indication Operational Check
Concern: The MOV actuator design can result in
airplanes operating with a failed MOV actuator
that is not reported. A latently failed MOV
actuator could prevent fuel shutoff to an engine.
In the event of certain engine fires, the
potential exists for an engine fire to be
uncontrollable.
Perform one of the following operational checks of
the Fuel Spar Valve position indication (unless
checked by the flight crew in a manner approved
by the principal operations inspector):
A. Operational Check during engine shutdown
1. Do an operational check of the left engine fuel
spar valve actuator.
a. As the L FUEL CONTROL switch on the quadrant
control stand is moved to the CUTOFF position,
verify the left SPAR VALVE disagreement light on
the quadrant control stand illuminates and then
goes off.
b. If the test fails (light fails to illuminate),
before further flight, repair faults as required
(refer to Boeing Airplane Maintenance Manual
(AMM) 28-22-11).
2. Do an operational check of the right engine
fuel spar valve actuator.
a. As the R FUEL CONTROL switch on the quadrant
control stand is moved to the CUTOFF position,
verify the right SPAR VALVE disagreement light on
the quadrant control stand illuminates and then
goes off.
b. If the test fails (light fails to illuminate),
before further flight, repair faults as required
(refer to Boeing AMM 28-22-11).
B. Operational check during engine start
1. Do an operational check of the left engine fuel
spar valve actuator.
a. As the L FUEL CONTROL switch on the quadrant
control stand is moved to the RUN position,
verify the left SPAR VALVE disagreement light on
the quadrant control stand illuminates and then
goes off.
b. If the test fails (light fails to illuminate),
before further flight, repair faults as required
(refer to Boeing AMM 28-22-11).
2. Do an operational check of the right engine
fuel spar valve actuator.
a. As the R FUEL CONTROL switch on the quadrant
control stand is moved to the RUN position,
verify the right SPAR VALVE disagreement light on
the quadrant control stand illuminates and then
goes off.
b. If the test fails (light fails to illuminate),
before further flight, repair faults as required
(refer to Boeing AMM 28-22-11).
C. Operational check without engine operation
1. Make sure all fuel pump switches on the
Overhead Panel are in the OFF position.
2. If the APU is running, open and collar the L
FWD FUEL BOOST PUMP (C00372) circuit breaker on
the Main Power Distribution Panel.
3. Make sure LEFT and RIGHT ENG FIRE switches on
the Aft Aisle Stand are in the NORMAL (IN)
position.
4. Make sure L and R Engine Start Selector
Switches on the Overhead Panel are in the OFF
position.
5. Do an operational check of the left engine fuel
spar valve actuator.
a. Move L FUEL CONTROL switch on the quadrant
control stand to the RUN position and wait 10
seconds.
NOTE: It is normal under this test condition for
the ENG VALVE disagreement light on the quadrant
control stand to stay illuminated.
b. Move L FUEL CONTROL switch on the quadrant
control stand to the CUTOFF position.
c. Verify the left SPAR VALVE disagreement light
on the quadrant control stand illuminates and
then goes off.
d. If the test fails (light fails to illuminate),
before further flight, repair faults as required
(refer to Boeing AMM 28-22-11).
6. Do an operational check of the right engine
fuel spar valve actuator.
a. Move R FUEL CONTROL switch on the quadrant
control stand to the RUN position and wait 10
seconds.
NOTE: It is normal under this test condition for
the ENG VALVE disagreement light on the quadrant
control stand to stay illuminated.
b. Move R FUEL CONTROL switch on the quadrant
control stand to the CUTOFF position.
c. Verify the right SPAR VALVE disagreement light
on the quadrant control stand illuminates and
then goes off.
d. If the test fails, (light fails to illuminate),
before further flight, repair faults as required
(refer to Boeing AMM 28-22-11).
7. If the L FWD FUEL BOOST PUMP circuit breaker
was collared in step C.2., remove collar and
close.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 12434]]
Figure 2 to Paragraph (g) of This AD: APU Fuel Valve Position Indication Operational Check
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AWL No. Task Interval Applicability Description
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
28-AWL-APU....... ALI...... 10 DAYS...... ALL............ APU Fuel Valve Position Indication Operational
Check
Concern: The MOV actuator design can result in
airplanes operating with a failed MOV actuator
that is not reported. A latently failed MOV
actuator could prevent fuel shutoff to the APU.
In the event of certain APU fires, the potential
exists for an APU fire to be uncontrollable.
Perform the operational check of the APU Fuel
Valve position indication (unless checked by the
flight crew in a manner approved by the principal
operations inspector).
A. Operational check of the APU Fuel Valve
position indication
1. If the APU is running, unload and shut down the
APU using standard practices.
2. Make sure the APU FIRE switch on the Aft Aisle
Stand is in the NORMAL (IN) position.
3. Make sure there is at least 700 lbs (300 kgs)
of fuel in the Left Main Tank.
4. Move APU Selector switch on the Overhead Panel
to the ON position and wait 10 seconds.
5. Move APU Selector switch on the Overhead Panel
to the OFF position.
6. Verify the APU FAULT light on the Overhead
Panel illuminates and then goes off.
7. If the test fails (light fails to illuminate),
before further flight requiring APU availability,
repair faults as required (refer to Boeing AMM 28-
25-11).
NOTE: Dispatch may be permitted per MMEL 28-25-02
if APU is not required for flight.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(h) No Alternative Actions and Intervals
After accomplishment of the maintenance or inspection program
revision required by paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative
actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals may be used unless the
actions or intervals are approved as an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (i)(1) of this AD.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO)
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Rebel Nichols,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057-3356; phone: (425) 917-6509; fax: (425) 917-6590; email:
rebel.nichols@faa.gov.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 21, 2014.
John P. Piccola,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-04898 Filed 3-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P