Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Diabetes Mellitus, 12567-12568 [2014-04823]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 43 / Wednesday, March 5, 2014 / Notices
and medical condition of each applicant
for an exemption from the vision
requirements. That information is
available by consulting the above cited
Federal Register publications.
Interested parties or organizations
possessing information that would
otherwise show that any, or all, of these
drivers are not currently achieving the
statutory level of safety should
immediately notify FMCSA. The
Agency will evaluate any adverse
evidence submitted and, if safety is
being compromised or if continuation of
the exemption would not be consistent
with the goals and objectives of 49
U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA will
take immediate steps to revoke the
exemption of a driver.
Submitting Comments
You may submit your comments and
material online or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of
these means. FMCSA recommends that
you include your name and a mailing
address, an email address, or a phone
number in the body of your document
so that FMCSA can contact you if there
are questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov and in the
search box insert the docket numbers
FMCSA–2011–0365 and click the search
button. When the new screen appears,
click on the blue ‘‘Comment Now!’’
button on the right hand side of the
page. On the new page, enter
information required including the
specific section of this document to
which each comment applies, and
provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. If you submit your
comments by mail or hand delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no
larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you
submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the
facility, please enclose a stamped, selfaddressed postcard or envelope.
We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment
period and may change this proposed
rule based on your comments. FMCSA
may issue a final rule at any time after
the close of the comment period.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as any
documents mentioned in this preamble,
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov and in the
search box insert the docket number
FMCSA–2011–0365 and click ‘‘Search.’’
Next, click ‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ and
you will find all documents and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:13 Mar 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
comments related to the proposed
rulemaking.
Issued on: February 12, 2014.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–04849 Filed 3–4–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[FMCSA Docket No. FMCSA–2013–0193]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
Applications; Diabetes Mellitus
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
AGENCY:
FMCSA announces its
decision to exempt 65 individuals from
its rule prohibiting persons with
insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (ITDM)
from operating commercial motor
vehicles (CMVs) in interstate commerce.
The exemptions will enable these
individuals to operate CMVs in
interstate commerce.
DATES: The exemptions are effective
March 5, 2014. The exemptions expire
on March 7, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elaine M. Papp, Chief, Medical
Programs Division, (202) 366–4001,
fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA, Room
W64–224, Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online
through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at: https://
www.regulations.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and/or Room
W12–140 on the ground level of the
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone may search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of DOT’s dockets by
the name of the individual submitting
the comment (or of the person signing
the comment, if submitted on behalf of
an association, business, labor union, or
other entity). You may review DOT’s
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12567
Privacy Act Statement for the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS)
published in the Federal Register on
January 17, 2008 (73 FR 3316).
Background
On December 27, 2013, FMCSA
published a notice of receipt of Federal
diabetes exemption applications from
65 individuals and requested comments
from the public (78 FR 79062). The
public comment period closed on
January 27, 2014, and twenty-two
comments were received.
FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility
of the 65 applicants and determined that
granting the exemptions to these
individuals would achieve a level of
safety equivalent to or greater than the
level that would be achieved by
complying with the current regulation
49 CFR 391.41(b)(3).
Diabetes Mellitus and Driving
Experience of the Applicants
The Agency established the current
requirement for diabetes in 1970
because several risk studies indicated
that drivers with diabetes had a higher
rate of crash involvement than the
general population. The diabetes rule
provides that ‘‘A person is physically
qualified to drive a commercial motor
vehicle if that person has no established
medical history or clinical diagnosis of
diabetes mellitus currently requiring
insulin for control’’ (49 CFR
391.41(b)(3)).
FMCSA established its diabetes
exemption program, based on the
Agency’s July 2000 study entitled ‘‘A
Report to Congress on the Feasibility of
a Program to Qualify Individuals with
Insulin-Treated Diabetes Mellitus to
Operate in Interstate Commerce as
Directed by the Transportation Act for
the 21st Century.’’ The report concluded
that a safe and practicable protocol to
allow some drivers with ITDM to
operate CMVs is feasible. The
September 3, 2003 (68 FR 52441),
Federal Register notice in conjunction
with the November 8, 2005 (70 FR
67777), Federal Register notice provides
the current protocol for allowing such
drivers to operate CMVs in interstate
commerce.
These 65 applicants have had ITDM
over a range of 1 to 46 years. These
applicants report no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss
of consciousness or seizure, requiring
the assistance of another person, or
resulting in impaired cognitive function
that occurred without warning
symptoms, in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (2 or more) severe
hypoglycemic episodes in the past 5
years. In each case, an endocrinologist
E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM
05MRN1
12568
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 43 / Wednesday, March 5, 2014 / Notices
verified that the driver has
demonstrated a willingness to properly
monitor and manage his/her diabetes
mellitus, received education related to
diabetes management, and is on a stable
insulin regimen. These drivers report no
other disqualifying conditions,
including diabetes-related
complications. Each meets the vision
requirement at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10).
The qualifications and medical
condition of each applicant were stated
and discussed in detail in the December
27, 2013, Federal Register notice and
they will not be repeated in this notice.
Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received twenty-two
comments in this proceeding. The
comments are discussed and considered
below.
Eleven of the comments received were
in favor of granting Scott A. Stout an
exemption from the diabetes standard.
Seven of the comments received were
in favor of granting Anthony D. Chrisley
an exemption from the diabetes
standard.
Larry Dewald is in favor of granting
Delayne B. Irwin an exemption from the
diabetes standard.
Jami Pierce is in favor of granting
Randall D. Pierce an exemption from the
diabetes standard.
John Riley is in favor of granting
Michael M. Canup an exemption from
the diabetes standard.
An anonymous commenter believes
that if a driver has over 5 years of
experience with no traffic violations
that they should be grandfathered into
the Diabetes Exemption Program.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Basis for Exemption Determination
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
FMCSA may grant an exemption from
the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(3) if the exemption is likely to
achieve an equivalent or greater level of
safety than would be achieved without
the exemption. The exemption allows
the applicants to operate CMVs in
interstate commerce.
To evaluate the effect of these
exemptions on safety, FMCSA
considered medical reports about the
applicants’ ITDM and vision, and
reviewed the treating endocrinologists’
medical opinion related to the ability of
the driver to safely operate a CMV while
using insulin.
Consequently, FMCSA finds that in
each case exempting these applicants
from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(3) is likely to achieve a level
of safety equal to that existing without
the exemption.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:13 Mar 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
Conditions and Requirements
The terms and conditions of the
exemption will be provided to the
applicants in the exemption document
and they include the following: (1) That
each individual submit a quarterly
monitoring checklist completed by the
treating endocrinologist as well as an
annual checklist with a comprehensive
medical evaluation; (2) that each
individual reports within 2 business
days of occurrence, all episodes of
severe hypoglycemia, significant
complications, or inability to manage
diabetes; also, any involvement in an
accident or any other adverse event in
a CMV or personal vehicle, whether or
not it is related to an episode of
hypoglycemia; (3) that each individual
provide a copy of the ophthalmologist’s
or optometrist’s report to the medical
examiner at the time of the annual
medical examination; and (4) that each
individual provide a copy of the annual
medical certification to the employer for
retention in the driver’s qualification
file, or keep a copy in his/her driver’s
qualification file if he/she is selfemployed. The driver must also have a
copy of the certification when driving,
for presentation to a duly authorized
Federal, State, or local enforcement
official.
Conclusion
Based upon its evaluation of the 65
exemption applications, FMCSA
exempts Bruce S. Allen (ME), David E.
Ames (IL), Michael R. Boland (IL),
Taylor D. Bruce (MO), Christopher D.
Burks (MA), Larry D. Burton (IL), James
B. Cameron (PA), Michael M. Canup
(AL), John M. Catron (MO), Anthony D.
Chrisley (CA), Henry Collins (MO), John
B. Conway, Jr. (NC), James V. Davidson,
Jr. (UT), Michael A. De La Torre (CA),
Corrado DePalma (NJ), Eugene J. Dilley
(WI), Scott T. Early (NY), Carl
Ermentrout (PA), Douglas E. Erney (IN),
William C. Flom (IA), Seth E. Frost
(OR), Donald R. Fuller, Jr. (MN), Brian
A. Griep (IA), George E. Hagey (IL),
Ronnie L. Harrington (MS), Andrew P.
Hines (OH), Arlyn D. Holtrop (IA),
Stephan P. Hyre (OH), Delayne B. Irwin
(SD), Aaron C. Kaplan (CA), Sigmund E.
Keller (NY), Derl T. Martin (MO),
Waymond E. Mayfield, Jr. (MO), Senad
Mehmedovic (KY), Ronald E. Mullard
(AL), Francis L. Novotny (MN), Justin C.
Orr (CA), Kevin L. Otto (OH), Larry H.
Painter (PA), Robert K. Patterson (IA),
Alan A. Phillips (WI), Randall D. Pierce
(FL), Clyde R. Pitt (NY), Reynier Prieto
(FL), Albert R. Purdy (PA), Adam Razny
(MO), Thomas F. Scanlon (NJ),
Christopher J. Schmidt (PA), Harrison G.
Simmons (MO), Cleo W. Snyder (IL),
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Daniel E. Staack (NE), Scott A. Stout
(FL), Walter D. Strang, IV (CT), Mark A.
Torres (MA), Gerald L. Ulmer, Sr. (PA),
Eric A. Vernon (IA), Paul M. Vinacco
(RI), Marvin L. Vonk (IA), Kelly J.
Walstad (MN), John R. Wappes (OH),
James W. Watson (MO), Gordon E.
Williams, Jr. (PA), Ray C. Williams (CT),
Ricky A. Wulf (IA), and Brandon S.
Yarbrough (NC) from the ITDM
requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3),
subject to the conditions listed under
‘‘Conditions and Requirements’’ above.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315 each exemption will be valid
for two years unless revoked earlier by
FMCSA. The exemption will be revoked
if the following occurs: (1) The person
fails to comply with the terms and
conditions of the exemption; (2) the
exemption has resulted in a lower level
of safety than was maintained before it
was granted; or (3) continuation of the
exemption would not be consistent with
the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315. If the exemption is
still effective at the end of the 2-year
period, the person may apply to FMCSA
for a renewal under procedures in effect
at that time.
Issued on: February 25, 2014.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–04823 Filed 3–4–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. EP 558 (Sub-No. 17)]
Railroad Cost of Capital—2013
AGENCY:
Surface Transportation Board,
DOT.
Notice of decision instituting a
proceeding to determine the railroad
industry’s 2013 cost of capital.
ACTION:
The Board is instituting a
proceeding to determine the railroad
industry’s cost of capital for 2013. The
decision solicits comments on the
following issues: (1) The railroads’ 2013
current cost of debt capital; (2) the
railroads’ 2013 current cost of preferred
equity capital (if any); (3) the railroads’
2013 cost of common equity capital; and
(4) the 2013 capital structure mix of the
railroad industry on a market value
basis. Comments should focus on the
various cost of capital components
listed above using the same
methodology followed in Railroad Cost
of Capital—2012, EP 558 (Sub-No. 16)
(STB served Aug. 30, 2013).
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM
05MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 43 (Wednesday, March 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12567-12568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04823]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[FMCSA Docket No. FMCSA-2013-0193]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Diabetes
Mellitus
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to exempt 65 individuals from its
rule prohibiting persons with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (ITDM)
from operating commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in interstate commerce.
The exemptions will enable these individuals to operate CMVs in
interstate commerce.
DATES: The exemptions are effective March 5, 2014. The exemptions
expire on March 7, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elaine M. Papp, Chief, Medical
Programs Division, (202) 366-4001, fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA, Room
W64-224, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
You may see all the comments online through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at: https://www.regulations.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to https://www.regulations.gov and/or Room W12-140 on the
ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone may search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of DOT's dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or of the person signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, or other
entity). You may review DOT's Privacy Act Statement for the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS) published in the Federal Register on
January 17, 2008 (73 FR 3316).
Background
On December 27, 2013, FMCSA published a notice of receipt of
Federal diabetes exemption applications from 65 individuals and
requested comments from the public (78 FR 79062). The public comment
period closed on January 27, 2014, and twenty-two comments were
received.
FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility of the 65 applicants and
determined that granting the exemptions to these individuals would
achieve a level of safety equivalent to or greater than the level that
would be achieved by complying with the current regulation 49 CFR
391.41(b)(3).
Diabetes Mellitus and Driving Experience of the Applicants
The Agency established the current requirement for diabetes in 1970
because several risk studies indicated that drivers with diabetes had a
higher rate of crash involvement than the general population. The
diabetes rule provides that ``A person is physically qualified to drive
a commercial motor vehicle if that person has no established medical
history or clinical diagnosis of diabetes mellitus currently requiring
insulin for control'' (49 CFR 391.41(b)(3)).
FMCSA established its diabetes exemption program, based on the
Agency's July 2000 study entitled ``A Report to Congress on the
Feasibility of a Program to Qualify Individuals with Insulin-Treated
Diabetes Mellitus to Operate in Interstate Commerce as Directed by the
Transportation Act for the 21st Century.'' The report concluded that a
safe and practicable protocol to allow some drivers with ITDM to
operate CMVs is feasible. The September 3, 2003 (68 FR 52441), Federal
Register notice in conjunction with the November 8, 2005 (70 FR 67777),
Federal Register notice provides the current protocol for allowing such
drivers to operate CMVs in interstate commerce.
These 65 applicants have had ITDM over a range of 1 to 46 years.
These applicants report no severe hypoglycemic reactions resulting in
loss of consciousness or seizure, requiring the assistance of another
person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred
without warning symptoms, in the past 12 months and no recurrent (2 or
more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the past 5 years. In each case,
an endocrinologist
[[Page 12568]]
verified that the driver has demonstrated a willingness to properly
monitor and manage his/her diabetes mellitus, received education
related to diabetes management, and is on a stable insulin regimen.
These drivers report no other disqualifying conditions, including
diabetes-related complications. Each meets the vision requirement at 49
CFR 391.41(b)(10).
The qualifications and medical condition of each applicant were
stated and discussed in detail in the December 27, 2013, Federal
Register notice and they will not be repeated in this notice.
Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received twenty-two comments in this proceeding. The comments
are discussed and considered below.
Eleven of the comments received were in favor of granting Scott A.
Stout an exemption from the diabetes standard.
Seven of the comments received were in favor of granting Anthony D.
Chrisley an exemption from the diabetes standard.
Larry Dewald is in favor of granting Delayne B. Irwin an exemption
from the diabetes standard.
Jami Pierce is in favor of granting Randall D. Pierce an exemption
from the diabetes standard.
John Riley is in favor of granting Michael M. Canup an exemption
from the diabetes standard.
An anonymous commenter believes that if a driver has over 5 years
of experience with no traffic violations that they should be
grandfathered into the Diabetes Exemption Program.
Basis for Exemption Determination
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption
from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3) if the exemption
is likely to achieve an equivalent or greater level of safety than
would be achieved without the exemption. The exemption allows the
applicants to operate CMVs in interstate commerce.
To evaluate the effect of these exemptions on safety, FMCSA
considered medical reports about the applicants' ITDM and vision, and
reviewed the treating endocrinologists' medical opinion related to the
ability of the driver to safely operate a CMV while using insulin.
Consequently, FMCSA finds that in each case exempting these
applicants from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3) is
likely to achieve a level of safety equal to that existing without the
exemption.
Conditions and Requirements
The terms and conditions of the exemption will be provided to the
applicants in the exemption document and they include the following:
(1) That each individual submit a quarterly monitoring checklist
completed by the treating endocrinologist as well as an annual
checklist with a comprehensive medical evaluation; (2) that each
individual reports within 2 business days of occurrence, all episodes
of severe hypoglycemia, significant complications, or inability to
manage diabetes; also, any involvement in an accident or any other
adverse event in a CMV or personal vehicle, whether or not it is
related to an episode of hypoglycemia; (3) that each individual provide
a copy of the ophthalmologist's or optometrist's report to the medical
examiner at the time of the annual medical examination; and (4) that
each individual provide a copy of the annual medical certification to
the employer for retention in the driver's qualification file, or keep
a copy in his/her driver's qualification file if he/she is self-
employed. The driver must also have a copy of the certification when
driving, for presentation to a duly authorized Federal, State, or local
enforcement official.
Conclusion
Based upon its evaluation of the 65 exemption applications, FMCSA
exempts Bruce S. Allen (ME), David E. Ames (IL), Michael R. Boland
(IL), Taylor D. Bruce (MO), Christopher D. Burks (MA), Larry D. Burton
(IL), James B. Cameron (PA), Michael M. Canup (AL), John M. Catron
(MO), Anthony D. Chrisley (CA), Henry Collins (MO), John B. Conway, Jr.
(NC), James V. Davidson, Jr. (UT), Michael A. De La Torre (CA), Corrado
DePalma (NJ), Eugene J. Dilley (WI), Scott T. Early (NY), Carl
Ermentrout (PA), Douglas E. Erney (IN), William C. Flom (IA), Seth E.
Frost (OR), Donald R. Fuller, Jr. (MN), Brian A. Griep (IA), George E.
Hagey (IL), Ronnie L. Harrington (MS), Andrew P. Hines (OH), Arlyn D.
Holtrop (IA), Stephan P. Hyre (OH), Delayne B. Irwin (SD), Aaron C.
Kaplan (CA), Sigmund E. Keller (NY), Derl T. Martin (MO), Waymond E.
Mayfield, Jr. (MO), Senad Mehmedovic (KY), Ronald E. Mullard (AL),
Francis L. Novotny (MN), Justin C. Orr (CA), Kevin L. Otto (OH), Larry
H. Painter (PA), Robert K. Patterson (IA), Alan A. Phillips (WI),
Randall D. Pierce (FL), Clyde R. Pitt (NY), Reynier Prieto (FL), Albert
R. Purdy (PA), Adam Razny (MO), Thomas F. Scanlon (NJ), Christopher J.
Schmidt (PA), Harrison G. Simmons (MO), Cleo W. Snyder (IL), Daniel E.
Staack (NE), Scott A. Stout (FL), Walter D. Strang, IV (CT), Mark A.
Torres (MA), Gerald L. Ulmer, Sr. (PA), Eric A. Vernon (IA), Paul M.
Vinacco (RI), Marvin L. Vonk (IA), Kelly J. Walstad (MN), John R.
Wappes (OH), James W. Watson (MO), Gordon E. Williams, Jr. (PA), Ray C.
Williams (CT), Ricky A. Wulf (IA), and Brandon S. Yarbrough (NC) from
the ITDM requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3), subject to the conditions
listed under ``Conditions and Requirements'' above.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 each exemption will
be valid for two years unless revoked earlier by FMCSA. The exemption
will be revoked if the following occurs: (1) The person fails to comply
with the terms and conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than was maintained before it was
granted; or (3) continuation of the exemption would not be consistent
with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315. If the
exemption is still effective at the end of the 2-year period, the
person may apply to FMCSA for a renewal under procedures in effect at
that time.
Issued on: February 25, 2014.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-04823 Filed 3-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P