Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri, 12394-12396 [2014-04779]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
12394
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 43 / Wednesday, March 5, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 5—DESTINATION ENTRY SERVICE STANDARD DAY RANGES FOR MAIL TO THE CONTIGUOUS 48 STATES AND THE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Contiguous United States
Destination entry (at appropriate facility)
Mail class
DDU
(Days)
Periodicals .......................................................................................................
Standard Mail ...................................................................................................
Package Services ............................................................................................
SCF
(Days)
1
2
1
ADC
(Days)
1
3–4
2
NDC
(Days)
1–2
........................
........................
1–2
5
3
TABLE 6—DESTINATION ENTRY SERVICE STANDARD DAY RANGES FOR MAIL TO NON-CONTIGUOUS STATES AND
TERRITORIES
Destination entry (at appropriate facility)
SCF (days)
Mail class
DDU
(days)
Periodicals .................................................
Standard Mail ............................................
Package Services .....................................
1
................
................
2
1
ADC (days)
Alaska
Hawaii,
Guam, &
American
Samoa
Puerto
Rico &
USVI
Alaska
Hawaii,
Guam, &
American
Samoa
NDC (days)
Puerto
Rico &
USVI
Alaska
Hawaii,
Guam, &
American
Samoa
Puerto
Rico &
USVI
1–2
................
................
3–4
2
1
................
................
3–5
2
1–2
................
................
3–5
2–3
1–3 (AK)
11 (JNU)
11 (KTN)
................
................
1 (HI)
2 (GU)
................
................
................
1–2
................
................
................
................
10–11
................
................
14
12
10
................
................
13
11
8–10
................
................
12
11
AK = Alaska 3-digit ZIP Codes 995–997; JNU = Juneau AK 3-digit ZIP Code 998; KTN = Ketchikan AK 3-digit
ZIP Code 999; HI = Hawaii 3-digit ZIP Codes 967 and 968; GU = Guam 3-digit ZIP Code 969.
Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Legal Policy & Legislative Advice.
[FR Doc. 2014–04784 Filed 3–4–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2013–0698; FRL–9907–32–
Region 7]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; State of
Missouri
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a revision to
the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submitted by the State of Missouri
which revises the written reporting
requirements for maintenance, start-up,
or shutdown activities; updates the
information a source operator must
provide to the department when a
notice of excess emissions is received;
and corrects references in the reporting
and record keeping section.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
April 4, 2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R07–OAR–2013–0698. All
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:46 Mar 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Air Planning and Development Branch,
11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa,
Kansas 66219. The Regional Office’s
official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
excluding Federal holidays. The
interested persons wanting to examine
these documents should make an
appointment with the office at least 24
hours in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Bhesania, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at
913–551–7147, or by email at
bhesania.amy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section
provides additional information by
addressing the following:
I. What is being addressed in this document?
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
II. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
III. What is EPA’s response to comments?
IV. What action is EPA taking?
I. What is being addressed in this
document?
EPA is approving revisions to the
Missouri SIP submitted to EPA on July
8, 2010 which amends 10 CSR 10–6.050
Start-up, Shutdown, and Malfunction
Conditions. Specifically, Missouri
amended subsection 3(B) to remove the
option for verbal notification and
therefore only written notification is
allowed for any maintenance, start-up,
or shutdown activity which is expected
to cause an excess release of emissions
that exceeds one hour. This change
makes the written notification
requirements consistent for subsections
(3)(B) which covers maintenance, startup and shutdown, and (3)(A) which
covers malfunctions. Subparagrah
(3)(B)3. was removed because the
requirement was only applicable to
malfunctions which is addressed in
subsection (3)(A).
The remaining revisions to the rule
are administrative changes which revise
the rule to be consistent with the state’s
standard rule format or make other
minor clarifying changes.
Subparagraphs (3)(B)3 through (3)(B)9
were renumbered to adjust for the
removal of item (3)(B)3. Subparagraph
(3)(C)2 includes minor administrative
changes to meet the state’s standard rule
E:\FR\FM\05MRR1.SGM
05MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 43 / Wednesday, March 5, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
format. Subparagraphs (3)(C)2.A and
(3)(C)2.B were removed because they
were redundant and replaced with
references to the appropriate applicable
subsections of the rule. Subsection
(4)(B) was revised to be consistent with
the state’s standard rule format.
In a separate action on February 22,
2013, EPA has proposed to address a
petition by Sierra Club related to SSM
provisions, including 10 CSR 10–
6.050(3)(C) (78 FR 12459). In this
separate action, EPA proposed to deny
the petitioner’s request that EPA take
action under Clean Air Act (CAA)
section 110(k)(5) or (6) to direct the state
to revise this provision. The revisions in
today’s action do not address the
sections of the regulation challenged by
the Sierra Club in its petition. The
revisions in today’s action clarify and
strengthen the Missouri SIP. By
removing the option for oral notification
in 10 CSR 10–6.050(3)(B), and requiring
written notification, the Missouri SIP is
more stringent. The revision in 10 CSR
10–6.050(3)(C)2.A clarifies the
notification requirements for
malfunctions by referring to section 10
CSR 10–6.050(3)(A). The revision in 10
CSR 10–6.050 (3)(C)2.B clarifies the
general notification requirements for
maintenance, startup, or shutdown
activities by referring to the general
notification requirements set forth in 10
CSR 10–6.050(3)(B).
The revisions in today’s action are
consistent with CAA requirements for
SIP provisions and do not violate the
anti-backsliding provisions in section
110(l) or section 193 of the CAA because
they are SIP strengthening and do not
interfere with any applicable
requirements concerning attainment or
reasonable further progress nor do they
affect control measures in effect prior to
the 1990 CAA Amendments related to
nonattainment areas. Further, these
revisions are consistent with the action
proposed by EPA on February 22, 2013
as mentioned above (78 FR 12459).
II. Have the requirements for approval
of a SIP revision been met?
The state submission has met the
public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The submission also satisfied
the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. In addition, as
explained above, the revision meets the
substantive SIP requirements of the
CAA, including section 110 and
implementing regulations.
III. What is EPA’s response to
comments?
The public comment period on EPA’s
proposed rule opened December 3,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:46 Mar 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
2013, the date of its publication in the
Federal Register, and closed on January
2, 2014 (78 FR 72608). During this
period, EPA received no comments.
IV. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is taking final action to amend
the Missouri SIP by approving the
state’s request to amend 10 CSR 10–
6.050 Start-Up, Shutdown, and
Malfunction to update written reporting
requirements, correct references, and
other minor clarifying changes.
Approval of these revisions ensures
consistency between state and
Federally-approved rules. EPA has
determined that these changes will not
relax the SIP or adversely impact air
emissions.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12395
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by May 5, 2014. Filing a petition
for reconsideration by the Administrator
of this final rule does not affect the
finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the
time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
E:\FR\FM\05MRR1.SGM
05MRR1
12396
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 43 / Wednesday, March 5, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: February 13, 2014.
Mike Brinks,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
Subpart AA—Missouri
2. In § 52.1320 the table in paragraph
(c), under Chapter 6 is amended by
revising the entry for ‘‘10–6.050’’ to read
as follows:
■
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1320
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
Missouri
citation
State effective
date
Title
EPA approval date
Explanation
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chapter 6—Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the State of
Missouri
*
10–6.050 .........
*
*
Start-up, Shutdown, and Malfunction Conditions.
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–04779 Filed 3–4–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0941; FRL–9906–19]
Fluopicolide; Pesticide Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes
tolerances for indirect or inadvertent
residues of fluopicolide in or on corn,
field, forage; corn, field, grain; corn,
field, stover. Valent U.S.A. Corporation
requested these tolerances under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective
March 5, 2014. Objections and requests
for hearings must be received on or
before May 5, 2014, and must be filed
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0941, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West
Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:46 Mar 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
*
07/30/10
*
*
03/05/14 [insert Federal Register page
number where the document begins].
*
*
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. The
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and
the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lois
Rossi, Registration Division (7505P),
Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 305–7090; email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR
site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2012–0941 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before May 5, 2014. Addresses for mail
and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR
178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
E:\FR\FM\05MRR1.SGM
05MRR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 43 (Wednesday, March 5, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12394-12396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04779]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2013-0698; FRL-9907-32-Region 7]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of
Missouri
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a
revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State
of Missouri which revises the written reporting requirements for
maintenance, start-up, or shutdown activities; updates the information
a source operator must provide to the department when a notice of
excess emissions is received; and corrects references in the reporting
and record keeping section.
DATES: This final rule is effective on April 4, 2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R07-OAR-2013-0698. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard,
Lenexa, Kansas 66219. The Regional Office's official hours of business
are Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal
holidays. The interested persons wanting to examine these documents
should make an appointment with the office at least 24 hours in
advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Bhesania, Environmental Protection
Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard,
Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at 913-551-7147, or by email at
bhesania.amy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' or
``our'' refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by
addressing the following:
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
III. What is EPA's response to comments?
IV. What action is EPA taking?
I. What is being addressed in this document?
EPA is approving revisions to the Missouri SIP submitted to EPA on
July 8, 2010 which amends 10 CSR 10-6.050 Start-up, Shutdown, and
Malfunction Conditions. Specifically, Missouri amended subsection 3(B)
to remove the option for verbal notification and therefore only written
notification is allowed for any maintenance, start-up, or shutdown
activity which is expected to cause an excess release of emissions that
exceeds one hour. This change makes the written notification
requirements consistent for subsections (3)(B) which covers
maintenance, start-up and shutdown, and (3)(A) which covers
malfunctions. Subparagrah (3)(B)3. was removed because the requirement
was only applicable to malfunctions which is addressed in subsection
(3)(A).
The remaining revisions to the rule are administrative changes
which revise the rule to be consistent with the state's standard rule
format or make other minor clarifying changes. Subparagraphs (3)(B)3
through (3)(B)9 were renumbered to adjust for the removal of item
(3)(B)3. Subparagraph (3)(C)2 includes minor administrative changes to
meet the state's standard rule
[[Page 12395]]
format. Subparagraphs (3)(C)2.A and (3)(C)2.B were removed because they
were redundant and replaced with references to the appropriate
applicable subsections of the rule. Subsection (4)(B) was revised to be
consistent with the state's standard rule format.
In a separate action on February 22, 2013, EPA has proposed to
address a petition by Sierra Club related to SSM provisions, including
10 CSR 10-6.050(3)(C) (78 FR 12459). In this separate action, EPA
proposed to deny the petitioner's request that EPA take action under
Clean Air Act (CAA) section 110(k)(5) or (6) to direct the state to
revise this provision. The revisions in today's action do not address
the sections of the regulation challenged by the Sierra Club in its
petition. The revisions in today's action clarify and strengthen the
Missouri SIP. By removing the option for oral notification in 10 CSR
10-6.050(3)(B), and requiring written notification, the Missouri SIP is
more stringent. The revision in 10 CSR 10-6.050(3)(C)2.A clarifies the
notification requirements for malfunctions by referring to section 10
CSR 10-6.050(3)(A). The revision in 10 CSR 10-6.050 (3)(C)2.B clarifies
the general notification requirements for maintenance, startup, or
shutdown activities by referring to the general notification
requirements set forth in 10 CSR 10-6.050(3)(B).
The revisions in today's action are consistent with CAA
requirements for SIP provisions and do not violate the anti-backsliding
provisions in section 110(l) or section 193 of the CAA because they are
SIP strengthening and do not interfere with any applicable requirements
concerning attainment or reasonable further progress nor do they affect
control measures in effect prior to the 1990 CAA Amendments related to
nonattainment areas. Further, these revisions are consistent with the
action proposed by EPA on February 22, 2013 as mentioned above (78 FR
12459).
II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
The state submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. In
addition, as explained above, the revision meets the substantive SIP
requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and implementing
regulations.
III. What is EPA's response to comments?
The public comment period on EPA's proposed rule opened December 3,
2013, the date of its publication in the Federal Register, and closed
on January 2, 2014 (78 FR 72608). During this period, EPA received no
comments.
IV. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is taking final action to amend the Missouri SIP by approving
the state's request to amend 10 CSR 10-6.050 Start-Up, Shutdown, and
Malfunction to update written reporting requirements, correct
references, and other minor clarifying changes. Approval of these
revisions ensures consistency between state and Federally-approved
rules. EPA has determined that these changes will not relax the SIP or
adversely impact air emissions.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by May 5, 2014. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
[[Page 12396]]
Dated: February 13, 2014.
Mike Brinks,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA--Missouri
0
2. In Sec. 52.1320 the table in paragraph (c), under Chapter 6 is
amended by revising the entry for ``10-6.050'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Missouri citation Title effective date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
* * * * * * *
Chapter 6--Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control
Regulations for the State of Missouri
* * * * * * *
10-6.050................ Start-up, Shutdown, 07/30/10 03/05/14 [insert .........................
and Malfunction Federal Register
Conditions. page number where
the document
begins].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2014-04779 Filed 3-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
