Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New York State Ozone Implementation Plan Revision, 12082-12084 [2014-04324]

Download as PDF 12082 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 42 / Tuesday, March 4, 2014 / Rules and Regulations located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 5, 2014. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See CAA section 307(b)(2).) emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES 17:49 Mar 03, 2014 Jkt 232001 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a revision to the New York State Implementation Plan (SIP) for ozone concerning the control of volatile organic compounds. The SIP revision consists of amendments to Part 228, ‘‘Surface Coating Processes, Commercial and Industrial Adhesives, Sealants and Primers.’’ The intended effect of this action is to approve control techniques, required by the Clean Air Act, which will result in emission reductions that will help attain and maintain the national ambient air quality standards for ozone. SUMMARY: For the reason stated in the preamble, the Environmental Protection Agency amends 40 CFR Part 52 as follows: VerDate Mar<15>2010 BILLING CODE 6560–50–P AGENCY: Dated: January 8, 2014. Howard M. Cantor, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. [FR Doc. 2014–04323 Filed 3–3–14; 8:45 am] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New York State Ozone Implementation Plan Revision Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: * * * * (c) * * * (92) On May 11, 2012, Colorado submitted a revision to its State Implementation Plan (SIP) that addresses updates to Colorado’s Regulation Number 10, Criteria for Analysis of Conformity, of the Colorado SIP. EPA is approving the May 11, 2012 revisions to Regulation No. 10 that update sections I, II, III, IV, and V so as to meet federal transportation conformity consultation requirements. EPA is also approving the removal of former Part A, Determining Conformity of General Federal Actions to State or Federal Implementation Plans, from the SIP. (i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Colorado’s Regulation Number 10, Criteria for Analysis of Conformity, except section VI, Statements of Basis, Specific Statutory Authority, and Purpose, as adopted by the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission on December 15, 2011 and state effective on January 30, 2012. * * * * * [EPA–R02–OAR–2013–0734, FRL–9907–02– Region–2] Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, and Volatile Organic Compounds. ■ Identification of plan. * 40 CFR Part 52 List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 2. Amend § 52.320 by revising paragraph (c)(92) to read as follows: ■ § 52.320 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 This rule will be effective on April 3, 2014. ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) which replaces the Regional Materials in EDOCKET (RME) docket system. The new FDMS is located at www.regulations.gov and the docket ID for this action is EPA–R02–OAR–2013– 0734. All documents in the docket are listed in the FDMS index. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in FDMS or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, Air Programs Branch, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10007–1866. Copies of the documents relevant to this action are also available for public inspection during normal business hours, by appointment at the Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC; and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Air Resources, 625 Broadway, Albany, New York 12233. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kirk J. Wieber, Air Programs Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10007–1866, (212) 637–3381. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DATES: Subpart G—Colorado I. What was included in New York’s submittals? On July 15, 2013, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), submitted to EPA revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP), which included State adopted revisions to Title 6 of the New York Code of Rules and Regulations (6 NYCRR) Part 228, ‘‘Surface Coating Processes, Commercial and Industrial Adhesives, Sealants and Primers,’’ with an effective date June 5, 2013. These revisions are applicable statewide and will therefore provide volatile organic compound (VOC) emission reductions statewide and will help in achieving attainment of the ozone standards in the New York portion of the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT nonattainment area and in meeting the reasonably available control technology (RACT) requirements. The revisions to Part 228 are also intended to satisfy certain control technique guideline (CTG) documents issued by EPA pursuant to section 182(b)(2)(A) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). New York also included a negative declaration in its July 15, 2013 E:\FR\FM\04MRR1.SGM 04MRR1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 42 / Tuesday, March 4, 2014 / Rules and Regulations emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES submittal. New York has certified, based on a review of operating permits and emissions inventory, no facilities exist in the State to which the Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials CTG or the Industrial Cleaning Solvents CTG apply. II. What is EPA’s evaluation of Part 228, ‘‘Surface Coating Processes, Commercial and Industrial Adhesives, Sealants and Primers?’’ Part 228 contains the required elements for a federally enforceable rule: emission limitations, compliance procedures and test methods, compliance dates and recordkeeping provisions. Part 228 includes provisions that prohibit the selling, supplying, offering for sale, soliciting, using, specifying or requiring the use of a non-compliant coating on a part or product at a facility in New York, unless allowed by other provisions of Part 228. Part 228 also includes provisions for handling, storage and disposal of VOCs. Facilities also have compliance options including the option of using add-on control equipment provided it achieves 90 percent control. EPA has evaluated New York’s submittal for consistency with the CAA, EPA regulations, and EPA policy and guideline documents. EPA has determined that Part 228 is as effective in regulating the source categories as the following CTGs: (1) Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations [EPA 453/R–96–007 (April 1996); 61 FR 25223 (May 20, 1996)]; (2) Flat Wood Paneling Coatings [EPA 453/R–06–004 (September 2006); 71 FR 58745 (Oct. 5, 2006)]; (3) Metal Furniture Coatings [EPA 453/R–07–005 (September 2007); 72 FR 57215 (Oct. 9, 2007)]; (4) Large Appliance Coatings [EPA 453/R–07–004 (September 2007); 72 FR 57215 (Oct. 9, 2007)]; (5) Paper, Film and Foil Coatings [EPA 453/R–07–003 (September 2007); 72 FR 57215 (Oct. 9, 2007)]; (6) Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings [EPA–453/R–08–006 (September 2008); 73 FR 58481 (Oct. 7, 2008)]; and (7) Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings [EPA–453/R–08–003 (September, 2008); 73 FR 58481 (Oct. 7, 2008)]. EPA has determined that the VOC content limits associated with the various surface coating processes included in the revised Part 228 are consistent with the VOC content limits recommended in the applicable surface coating CTGs, as are all of the other recommended control options (i.e., addon controls efficiency, work practices VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:49 Mar 03, 2014 Jkt 232001 for coating-related activities and work practices for cleaning materials) and applicability thresholds. Therefore, EPA is approving it as part of the SIP and as meeting the requirement to adopt a RACT rule for the CTG categories listed above. With regard to New York’s negative declaration for Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials and Industrial Cleaning Solvents, EPA agrees with New York’s evaluation that no facilities exist in the State to which the Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials CTG apply. However, at this time, EPA is not taking action on the negative declaration as it applies to the Industrial Cleaning Solvents CTG because further EPA evaluation and discussions with the State are necessary to adequately assess the applicability of the Industrial Cleaning Solvents CTG to potentially affected facilities that may be operating in New York State. III. What comments did EPA receive in response to its proposal? On November 20, 2013 (78 FR 69625), EPA proposed to approve New York’s revised Part 228. For a detailed discussion on the content and requirements of the revisions to New York’s regulation, the reader is referred to EPA’s proposed rulemaking action. In response to EPA’s November 20, 2013 proposed rulemaking action, EPA received no comments. IV. What is EPA’s conclusion? EPA has evaluated New York’s July 15, 2013 SIP revision submittal for consistency with the CAA, EPA regulations, and EPA policy and guideline documents. EPA is approving the revisions made to Title 6 of the New York Code of Rules and Regulations (6 NYCRR) Part 228, ‘‘Surface Coating Processes, Commercial and Industrial Adhesives, Sealants and Primers,’’ with an effective date of June 5, 2013. The revisions to Part 228 meet the SIP requirements of the CAA and fulfill the recommended controls identified in the applicable CTGs. EPA is approving these revisions and is also approving New York’s July 15, 2013 negative declaration, which certifies that based on a review of operating permits and emissions inventory, no facilities exist in the State to which the Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials CTG apply. Therefore, New York will not have to incorporate provisions consistent with the Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials CTG into Part 228 or any other regulation. PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 12083 V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); • does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104–4); • does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and • does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. E:\FR\FM\04MRR1.SGM 04MRR1 12084 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 42 / Tuesday, March 4, 2014 / Rules and Regulations The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 5, 2014. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Dated: February 10, 2014. Judith A. Enck, Regional Administrator, Region 2. Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTAION PLANS 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Oxides of nitrogen, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Subpart HH—New York 2. In § 52.1670, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising the entry for Title 6, Part 228 to read as follows: ■ § 52.1670 * Identification of plan. * * (c) * * * * * EPA—APPROVED NEW YORK STATE REGULATIONS AND LAWS State effective date New York State regulation Comments Latest EPA approval date Title 6: * * * Part 228, Surface Coating Processes, Commercial and Industrial Adhesives, Sealants and Primers. * * * 6/5/13 * * 3/4/14 [FR page citation]. * DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY § 52.1683 Coast Guard Control strategy: Ozone. * * * * * (b) The State of New York has certified to the satisfaction of the EPA that no sources are located in the State which are covered by the following Control Techniques Guidelines: (1) Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials. (2) [Reserved] * * * * * [FR Doc. 2014–04324 Filed 3–3–14; 8:45 am] emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES BILLING CODE 6560–50–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:49 Mar 03, 2014 Jkt 232001 46 CFR Part 401 [USCG–2013–0534] RIN 1625–AC07 Great Lakes Pilotage Rates—2014 Annual Review and Adjustment Coast Guard, DHS. Final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: The Coast Guard is adjusting Great Lakes pilotage rates that were last amended in February 2013. The adjustments establish new base rates, and are made in accordance with a full ratemaking procedure. The Coast Guard is exercising its discretion to establish new base rates to more closely align with recent Canadian rate increases. The final rule also adjusts weighting factors used to determine rates for vessels of different size, adopts a new procedure for temporary surcharges, applies a temporary surcharge for one pilotage association, and allows pilotage SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 * * * 3. Section 52.1683 is amended, by adding paragraph (b) to read as follows: ■ * * associations to recoup the cost of dues paid to the American Pilots Association. This rulemaking promotes the Coast Guard’s maritime safety mission. DATES: Effective August 1, 2014 except for §§ 401.400 and 401.401 which are effective April 3, 2014. ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, are part of docket USCG–2013–0534 and are available for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may also find this docket online by going to http://www.regulations.gov and following the instructions on that Web site. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, call or email Mr. Todd Haviland, Coast Guard; telephone 202–372–2037, email Todd.A.Haviland@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing material to the E:\FR\FM\04MRR1.SGM 04MRR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 42 (Tuesday, March 4, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12082-12084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04324]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R02-OAR-2013-0734, FRL-9907-02-Region-2]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New York State 
Ozone Implementation Plan Revision

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a 
revision to the New York State Implementation Plan (SIP) for ozone 
concerning the control of volatile organic compounds. The SIP revision 
consists of amendments to Part 228, ``Surface Coating Processes, 
Commercial and Industrial Adhesives, Sealants and Primers.'' The 
intended effect of this action is to approve control techniques, 
required by the Clean Air Act, which will result in emission reductions 
that will help attain and maintain the national ambient air quality 
standards for ozone.

DATES: This rule will be effective on April 3, 2014.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under the 
Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) which replaces the Regional 
Materials in EDOCKET (RME) docket system. The new FDMS is located at 
www.regulations.gov and the docket ID for this action is EPA-R02-OAR-
2013-0734. All documents in the docket are listed in the FDMS index. 
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically 
in FDMS or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 
2 Office, Air Programs Branch, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New 
York 10007-1866. Copies of the documents relevant to this action are 
also available for public inspection during normal business hours, by 
appointment at the Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, 
Environmental Protection Agency, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue 
NW., Washington, DC; and the New York State Department of Environmental 
Conservation, Division of Air Resources, 625 Broadway, Albany, New York 
12233.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kirk J. Wieber, Air Programs Branch, 
Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, 
New York 10007-1866, (212) 637-3381.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. What was included in New York's submittals?

    On July 15, 2013, the New York State Department of Environmental 
Conservation (NYSDEC), submitted to EPA revisions to the State 
Implementation Plan (SIP), which included State adopted revisions to 
Title 6 of the New York Code of Rules and Regulations (6 NYCRR) Part 
228, ``Surface Coating Processes, Commercial and Industrial Adhesives, 
Sealants and Primers,'' with an effective date June 5, 2013. These 
revisions are applicable statewide and will therefore provide volatile 
organic compound (VOC) emission reductions statewide and will help in 
achieving attainment of the ozone standards in the New York portion of 
the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT nonattainment 
area and in meeting the reasonably available control technology (RACT) 
requirements. The revisions to Part 228 are also intended to satisfy 
certain control technique guideline (CTG) documents issued by EPA 
pursuant to section 182(b)(2)(A) of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
    New York also included a negative declaration in its July 15, 2013

[[Page 12083]]

submittal. New York has certified, based on a review of operating 
permits and emissions inventory, no facilities exist in the State to 
which the Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials CTG or the Industrial 
Cleaning Solvents CTG apply.

II. What is EPA's evaluation of Part 228, ``Surface Coating Processes, 
Commercial and Industrial Adhesives, Sealants and Primers?''

    Part 228 contains the required elements for a federally enforceable 
rule: emission limitations, compliance procedures and test methods, 
compliance dates and recordkeeping provisions.
    Part 228 includes provisions that prohibit the selling, supplying, 
offering for sale, soliciting, using, specifying or requiring the use 
of a non-compliant coating on a part or product at a facility in New 
York, unless allowed by other provisions of Part 228. Part 228 also 
includes provisions for handling, storage and disposal of VOCs. 
Facilities also have compliance options including the option of using 
add-on control equipment provided it achieves 90 percent control.
    EPA has evaluated New York's submittal for consistency with the 
CAA, EPA regulations, and EPA policy and guideline documents. EPA has 
determined that Part 228 is as effective in regulating the source 
categories as the following CTGs:
    (1) Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations [EPA 453/R-96-007 
(April 1996); 61 FR 25223 (May 20, 1996)];
    (2) Flat Wood Paneling Coatings [EPA 453/R-06-004 (September 2006); 
71 FR 58745 (Oct. 5, 2006)];
    (3) Metal Furniture Coatings [EPA 453/R-07-005 (September 2007); 72 
FR 57215 (Oct. 9, 2007)];
    (4) Large Appliance Coatings [EPA 453/R-07-004 (September 2007); 72 
FR 57215 (Oct. 9, 2007)];
    (5) Paper, Film and Foil Coatings [EPA 453/R-07-003 (September 
2007); 72 FR 57215 (Oct. 9, 2007)];
    (6) Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings [EPA-453/R-
08-006 (September 2008); 73 FR 58481 (Oct. 7, 2008)]; and
    (7) Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings [EPA-453/R-08-
003 (September, 2008); 73 FR 58481 (Oct. 7, 2008)].
    EPA has determined that the VOC content limits associated with the 
various surface coating processes included in the revised Part 228 are 
consistent with the VOC content limits recommended in the applicable 
surface coating CTGs, as are all of the other recommended control 
options (i.e., add-on controls efficiency, work practices for coating-
related activities and work practices for cleaning materials) and 
applicability thresholds. Therefore, EPA is approving it as part of the 
SIP and as meeting the requirement to adopt a RACT rule for the CTG 
categories listed above.
    With regard to New York's negative declaration for Fiberglass Boat 
Manufacturing Materials and Industrial Cleaning Solvents, EPA agrees 
with New York's evaluation that no facilities exist in the State to 
which the Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials CTG apply. However, 
at this time, EPA is not taking action on the negative declaration as 
it applies to the Industrial Cleaning Solvents CTG because further EPA 
evaluation and discussions with the State are necessary to adequately 
assess the applicability of the Industrial Cleaning Solvents CTG to 
potentially affected facilities that may be operating in New York 
State.

III. What comments did EPA receive in response to its proposal?

    On November 20, 2013 (78 FR 69625), EPA proposed to approve New 
York's revised Part 228. For a detailed discussion on the content and 
requirements of the revisions to New York's regulation, the reader is 
referred to EPA's proposed rulemaking action.
    In response to EPA's November 20, 2013 proposed rulemaking action, 
EPA received no comments.

IV. What is EPA's conclusion?

    EPA has evaluated New York's July 15, 2013 SIP revision submittal 
for consistency with the CAA, EPA regulations, and EPA policy and 
guideline documents. EPA is approving the revisions made to Title 6 of 
the New York Code of Rules and Regulations (6 NYCRR) Part 228, 
``Surface Coating Processes, Commercial and Industrial Adhesives, 
Sealants and Primers,'' with an effective date of June 5, 2013. The 
revisions to Part 228 meet the SIP requirements of the CAA and fulfill 
the recommended controls identified in the applicable CTGs. EPA is 
approving these revisions and is also approving New York's July 15, 
2013 negative declaration, which certifies that based on a review of 
operating permits and emissions inventory, no facilities exist in the 
State to which the Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials CTG apply. 
Therefore, New York will not have to incorporate provisions consistent 
with the Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials CTG into Part 228 or 
any other regulation.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and 
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state 
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the Clean Air Act; and
     does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as 
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), 
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in 
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct 
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

[[Page 12084]]

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by May 5, 2014. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor 
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may 
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or 
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to 
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Oxides of 
nitrogen, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 
organic compounds.

    Dated: February 10, 2014.
Judith A. Enck,
Regional Administrator, Region 2.

    Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTAION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart HH--New York

0
2. In Sec.  52.1670, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising 
the entry for Title 6, Part 228 to read as follows:


Sec.  52.1670  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

            EPA--Approved New York State Regulations and Laws
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 State
  New York State regulation    effective      Latest EPA      Comments
                                  date      approval date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title 6:
 
                              * * * * * * *
Part 228, Surface Coating          6/5/13  3/4/14 [FR page
 Processes, Commercial and                  citation].
 Industrial Adhesives,
 Sealants and Primers.
 
                              * * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------


0
3. Section 52.1683 is amended, by adding paragraph (b) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  52.1683  Control strategy: Ozone.

* * * * *
    (b) The State of New York has certified to the satisfaction of the 
EPA that no sources are located in the State which are covered by the 
following Control Techniques Guidelines:
    (1) Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials.
    (2) [Reserved]
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-04324 Filed 3-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P