Notice of Funding Availability for the Department of Transportation's National Infrastructure Investments under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014, 11854-11863 [2014-04627]
Download as PDF
11854
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 41 / Monday, March 3, 2014 / Notices
Number of
respondents
Type of respondent
Average
burden per
response
(minutes)
Frequency of
response
Estimated total
annual burden
(hours)
State/Local/Tribal Government ........................................................................
150
1
3
8
Totals ........................................................................................................
300
........................
........................
28
Grand Total .......................................................................................
200,000
........................
........................
18,334
2. Work History Report—20 CFR
404.1515, 404.1560, 404.1565, 416.960
and 416.3965—0960–0578. Under
certain circumstances, SSA asks
individuals applying for disability about
work they have performed in the past.
medical evidence, to determine
eligibility for disability payments.
Respondents are disability applicants
and third parties assisting applicants.
Type of Request: Revision of an OMBapproved information collection.
Applicants use Form SSA–3369, Work
History Report, to provide detailed
information about jobs held prior to
becoming unable to work. State
Disability Determination Services
evaluate the information, together with
Number of
respondents
Modality of collection
Average
burden per
response
(minutes)
Frequency of
response
Estimated total
annual burden
(hours)
SSA–3369 (Paper form) ..................................................................................
Electronic Disability Collect System 3369 .......................................................
1,553,900
38,049
1
1
60
60
1,553,900
38,049
Totals ........................................................................................................
1,591,949
........................
........................
1,591,949
Dated: February 28, 2014.
Naomi Sipple,
Management Analyst, Reports Clearance,
Social Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014–04577 Filed 2–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary of
Transportation
[Docket No. DOT–OST–2014–XXXX]
Notice of Funding Availability for the
Department of Transportation’s
National Infrastructure Investments
under the Consolidated Appropriations
Act, 2014
Office of the Secretary of
Transportation, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Funding Availability.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
availability of funding and requests
proposals for the Department of
Transportation’s National Infrastructure
Investments. This notice is addressed to
organizations that are interested in
applying and provides guidance on
selection criteria and application
requirements for the National
Infrastructure Investments.
The Consolidated Appropriations Act,
2014 (Pub. L. 113–76, January 17, 2014)
(‘‘FY 2014 Appropriations Act’’)
appropriated $600 million to be
awarded by the Department of
Transportation (‘‘DOT’’) for National
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:40 Feb 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
Infrastructure Investments. This
appropriation is similar, but not
identical, to the program funded and
implemented pursuant to the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
(the ‘‘Recovery Act’’) known as the
Transportation Investment Generating
Economic Recovery, or ‘‘TIGER
Discretionary Grants,’’ program. Because
of the similarity in program structure,
DOT will continue to refer to the
program as ‘‘TIGER Discretionary
Grants.’’ As with previous rounds of
TIGER, funds for the FY 2014 TIGER
program (‘‘TIGER FY 2014’’) are to be
awarded on a competitive basis for
projects that will have a significant
impact on the Nation, a metropolitan
area, or a region.
Through this notice, DOT is soliciting
applications for TIGER Discretionary
Grants. In the event that this solicitation
does not result in the award and
obligation of all available funds, DOT
may decide to publish an additional
solicitation(s).
DATES: You must submit final
applications through Grants.gov by
April 28, 2014, at 5:00 p.m. EDT (the
‘‘Application Deadline’’). The
Grants.gov ‘‘Apply’’ function will open
on April 3, 2014, allowing applicants to
submit applications. You are strongly
encouraged to submit applications in
advance of the deadline. Please be
aware that you must complete the
registration process before submitting an
application, and that this process
usually takes 2–4 weeks to complete. If
interested parties experience difficulties
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
at any point during the registration or
application process, please call the
Grants.gov Customer Support Hotline at
1–800–518–4726, Monday-Friday from
7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. EDT. Additional
information on applying through
Grants.gov is available in Information
about Applying for Federal Grants
through Grants.gov at www.dot.gov/
TIGER.
You must submit
applications electronically through
Grants.gov. Only applications received
electronically through Grants.gov will
be deemed properly filed. Instructions
for submitting applications through
Grants.gov can be found on the TIGER
Web site (www.dot.gov/TIGER).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information concerning this
notice please contact the TIGER
Discretionary Grant program staff via
email at TIGERGrants@dot.gov, or call
Howard Hill at 202–366–0301. A TDD is
available for individuals who are deaf or
hard of hearing at 202–366–3993. In
addition, DOT will regularly post
answers to questions and requests for
clarifications on DOT’s Web site at
www.dot.gov/TIGER. Applicants are
encouraged to contact DOT directly
rather than rely on third parties to
receive information about TIGER
Discretionary Grants.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice is substantially similar to the
final notice published for the TIGER
Discretionary Grant program in the
Federal Register on April 26, 2013.
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\03MRN1.SGM
03MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 41 / Monday, March 3, 2014 / Notices
However, there are a few significant
differences:
1. Across the Federal Government, the
Administration is dedicated to
enhancing opportunity for all
Americans by investing in
transportation projects that better
connect communities to centers of
employment, education, and services
(including for non-drivers) and that
hold promise to stimulate long-term job
growth, especially in economically
distressed areas. Additional
consideration will be given to proposals
that seek to strengthen opportunities to
expand the middle class. While the
Department will award funds to a
variety of project types, priority
consideration will be given to
applications that address this objective.
2. TIGER FY 2014 is authorized to
award up to $35 million (of the
program’s $600 million total) for
planning grants. Planning grant
applications must identify themselves
as project-level or regional plan
applications.
3. In the previous round of TIGER,
funding was available for obligation for
a very short time. Therefore, DOT used
project readiness as a primary criterion
in awarding that funding. TIGER FY
2014 funds, in contrast, are available for
obligation until the statutory deadline of
September 30, 2016. This extended
schedule allows DOT to encourage the
submission of applications for complex
and multimodal projects that may
require slightly longer schedules.
However, all applicants should provide
schedules and evidence that they will
be able to obligate funds, if awarded, by
June of 2016 and expend such funds by
September 30, 2021 (31 U.S.C. 1552).
4. Applications that identify project
co-applicants or project partners in
addition to a lead applicant must be
signed by each co-applicant and/or
partner organization.
Other than the differences above, and
minor edits for clarification and those
made to conform the notice to the
statutory circumstances of this round of
TIGER Discretionary Grant funding,
there have been no material changes
made to the notice. Each section of this
notice contains information and
instructions relevant to the application
process for these TIGER Discretionary
Grants, and you should read this notice
in its entirety so that you have the
information you need to submit eligible
and competitive applications.
Table of Contents
I. Background and Outlook
II. Selection Criteria and Guidance on
Application of Selection Criteria
III. Evaluation and Selection Process
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:40 Feb 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
IV. Grant Administration
V. Projects in Rural Areas
VI. TIGER Planning Grants
VII. Application Cycle
VIII. Performance Management
IX. Questions and Clarifications
I. Background and Outlook
The Transportation Investment
Generating Economic Recovery or
‘‘TIGER Discretionary Grants’’ program
was first created in the Recovery Act of
2009. Through the Recovery Act and
subsequent four appropriations acts,
Congress provided DOT with funding
for five rounds of competitive grants
totaling more than $4.1 billion for
capital investments in surface
transportation infrastructure. See DOT’s
Web site at www.dot.gov/TIGER for
further background on the disbursement
of past rounds of TIGER Discretionary
Grants.
The FY 2014 Appropriations Act
appropriated $600 million to be
awarded by DOT for the TIGER
Discretionary Grants program. As in
previous rounds, the FY 2014 TIGER
Discretionary Grants are for capital
investments in surface transportation
infrastructure, and are to be awarded on
a competitive basis for projects that will
have a significant impact on the Nation,
a metropolitan area, or a region.
Additionally, as in the 2010 round, the
Act allows for up to $35 million (of the
$600 million) to be awarded as grants
for the planning of eligible
transportation facilities. DOT is
referring to these TIGER Discretionary
Grants for planning as TIGER Planning
Grants. The Act also allows DOT to use
a small portion of the $600 million for
oversight of grants.
‘‘Eligible Applicants’’ for TIGER
Discretionary Grants are State, local,
and tribal governments, including U.S.
territories, transit agencies, port
authorities, metropolitan planning
organizations (MPOs), other political
subdivisions of State or local
governments, and multi-State or multijurisdictional groups applying through a
single lead applicant (for multijurisdictional groups, each member of
the group, including the lead applicant,
must be an otherwise Eligible Applicant
as defined in this paragraph).
To ensure applicants receive the most
accurate information possible, you must
contact DOT directly, rather than
through intermediaries, to get answers
to questions, set up briefings on the
TIGER Discretionary Grants selection
and award process, or receive other
assistance. Assistance can be obtained
by simply contacting the TIGER
Discretionary Grant program staff via
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11855
email at TIGERGrants@dot.gov, or by
calling Howard Hill at 202–366–0301.
Projects that are eligible for TIGER
Discretionary Grants (‘‘Eligible
Projects’’) for capital projects include,
but are not limited to: (1) Highway or
bridge projects eligible under title 23,
United States Code (including bicycle
and pedestrian related projects); (2)
public transportation projects eligible
under chapter 53 of title 49, United
States Code; (3) passenger and freight
rail transportation projects; (4) port
infrastructure investments; and (5)
intermodal projects. Projects that are
eligible for TIGER Planning Grants
include, but are not limited to:
Activities related to the planning,
preparation, or design of a single surface
transportation project, or activities
related to regional transportation
investment planning, including
transportation planning that is
coordinated with interdisciplinary
factors including housing, economic
development, stormwater and other
infrastructure investments, and/or that
addresses future risks and
vulnerabilities, including extreme
weather and climate change. Federal
wage rate requirements included in
subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40,
United States Code, apply to all projects
receiving funds under this program, and
apply to all parts of the project, whether
funded with TIGER Discretionary Grant
funds, other Federal funds, or nonFederal funds. This description of
Eligible Projects is identical to the
description of eligible projects under
earlier rounds of the TIGER
Discretionary Grant program.1
As was the case in earlier rounds of
the TIGER Discretionary Grant program,
Eligible Projects do not include
research, demonstration, or pilot
projects that do not result in publicly
accessible surface transportation
infrastructure. To be funded, projects or
elements of a project must have
independent utility, which means that
the project provides transportation
1 Consistent with the FY 2014 Appropriations
Act, DOT will apply the following principles in
determining whether a project is eligible as a capital
investment or a planning study in surface
transportation: (1) Surface transportation facilities
generally include roads, highways and bridges,
marine ports, freight and passenger railroads, transit
systems, and projects that connect transportation
facilities to other modes of transportation; and (2)
surface transportation facilities also include any
highway or bridge project eligible under title 23,
U.S.C., or public transportation project eligible
under chapter 53 of title 49, U.S.C. Please note that
the Department may use a TIGER Discretionary
Grant to pay for the surface transportation
components of a broader project that has nonsurface transportation components, and applicants
are encouraged to apply for TIGER Discretionary
Grants to pay for the surface transportation
components of these projects.
E:\FR\FM\03MRN1.SGM
03MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
11856
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 41 / Monday, March 3, 2014 / Notices
benefits and is ready for its intended use
upon completion of project
construction.
Each applicant may submit no more
than three applications in each category
(3 capital applications and 3 planning
applications). You should focus on
applications that are most likely to align
well with DOT’s selection criteria.
While applications may include
requests to fund more than one project,
you may not bundle together unrelated
projects in the same application for
purposes of avoiding the threeapplication limit that applies to each
applicant. Please note that the threeapplication limit applies only to
applications where the applicant is the
lead applicant, and there is no limit on
applications for which an applicant can
be listed as a partnering agency. If you
submit more than three applications as
the lead applicant, only the first three
received in each category will be
considered.
The FY 2014 Appropriations Act
specifies that TIGER Discretionary
Grants may not be less than $10 million
(except in rural areas) and not greater
than $200 million. For projects located
in rural areas (as defined in Section V,
Projects in Rural Areas), the minimum
TIGER Discretionary Grant size is $1
million. For TIGER Planning Grants,
there is no statutory minimum grant
size, regardless of location.
DOT reserves the right to award funds
for a part of the project included in an
application, if a part of the project has
independent utility and aligns well with
the selection criteria specified in this
notice.
Pursuant to the FY 2014
Appropriations Act, no more than 25
percent of the funds made available for
TIGER Discretionary Grants (or $150
million) may be awarded to projects in
a single State.
The FY 2014 Appropriations Act
directs that not less than 20 percent of
the funds provided for TIGER
Discretionary Grants (or $120 million)
shall be used for projects located in
rural areas. Further, pursuant to the FY
2014 Appropriations Act, DOT must
take measures to ensure an equitable
geographic distribution of grant funds,
an appropriate balance in addressing the
needs of urban and rural areas, and
investment in a variety of transportation
modes.
TIGER Discretionary Grants may be
used for up to 80 percent of the costs of
a project. DOT may increase the Federal
share above 80 percent only for projects
located in rural areas, in which case
DOT may fund up to 100 percent of the
costs of a project. However, priority will
be given to projects that use Federal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:40 Feb 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
funds to complete an overall financing
package, and both urban and rural
projects can increase their
competitiveness for purposes of the
TIGER program by demonstrating
significant non-Federal financial
contributions. In the first five rounds,
on average, projects attracted more than
3.5 additional non-Federal dollars for
every TIGER grant dollar. DOT will
consider any non-Federal funds, as well
as funds from the Tribal Transportation
Program (formerly known as Indian
Reservation Roads), as a local match for
purposes of this program, whether such
funds are contributed by the public
sector (State or local) or the private
sector. However, DOT cannot consider
any funds already expended (or
otherwise encumbered) towards the
matching requirement. Federal
requirements also apply to any
matching funds in your application.
Therefore, the extent that a project is
already underway or money intended to
be matching funds is already
encumbered, DOT will not consider
those funds to be matching funds for the
purposes of the TIGER Discretionary
Grant program. You should also take
note that even though ‘‘matching’’
funding may be provided by a State
DOT or transit agency, DOT will not
consider those funds to be matching
funds if the source of those funds is
ultimately a Federal program.
The FY 2014 Appropriations Act
requires that TIGER funds are only
available for obligation through
September 30, 2016. DOT will,
therefore, consider whether or not a
project is ready to proceed with
obligation of grant funds within the time
provided. Under the FY 2014
Appropriations Act, TIGER funding
expires automatically after the deadline
of September 30, 2016, if grant funds are
not obligated. There is no waiver
possible under the statute for this
deadline.
The FY 2014 Appropriations Act
allows for an amount not to exceed 35
percent of the available funds (or $210
million of the $600 million) to be used
by the Department to pay the subsidy
and administrative costs for a project
receiving credit assistance under the
Transportation Infrastructure Finance
and Innovation Act of 1998 (‘‘TIFIA’’)
program, if it would further the
purposes of the TIGER Discretionary
Grant program.
Recipients of TIGER Discretionary
Grants and TIGER Planning Grants in
prior rounds may apply for funding to
support additional phases of a project
awarded funds in earlier rounds of this
program. However, to be competitive,
the applicant should demonstrate the
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
extent to which the previously funded
project phase has been able to meet
estimated project schedules and budget,
including the ability to realize the
benefits expected for the project.
Transportation plays a critical role in
expanding opportunities for every
American. Recent research has found
that economic mobility varies by
geography, and poor transportation
connections are a factor preventing
some Americans from gaining access to
the middle class.2 This lack of access
limits labor mobility and can be a drag
on local and regional economic growth.
Improving transportation infrastructure
can be one of the easiest ways to address
this problem.
Recognizing economic mobility as a
defining trait of America’s promise, the
2014 TIGER program will, in part, seek
to improve access to reliable, safe, and
affordable transportation for
disconnected communities in urban,
suburban, and rural areas. Providing
opportunity to all Americans is a
connecting theme that weaves together
all of DOT’s primary criteria. The
concept can be found in the
explanations of the primary criteria in
this NOFA and should be addressed in
applications through the description of
how a proposed project addresses the
primary criteria. This may include, but
is not limited to, capital projects that
better connect people to jobs, remove
physical barriers to access, and
strengthen communities through
neighborhood redevelopment.
Additionally, this objective may include
capital projects with training
opportunities that focus on
strengthening human capital and
workforce opportunities.
The above examples are not intended
to be exhaustive, and project sponsors
are strongly encouraged to highlight in
their applications how their proposed
capital projects will promote
opportunities in ways not cited above.
DOT may consider the extent to
which a proposed project strengthens
access to opportunities through
transportation improvements—in
addition to the statutory requirements
for an appropriate geographic, modal,
and urban/rural distribution—as a factor
to differentiate meritorious applications
from one another. That said, the 2014
TIGER program will continue to fund
innovative and significant projects of all
types, and applications of all types are
encouraged.
The purpose of this notice is to solicit
applications for TIGER Discretionary
Grants. This is a final notice.
2 https://obs.rc.fas.harvard.edu/chetty/mobility_
geo.pdf
E:\FR\FM\03MRN1.SGM
03MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 41 / Monday, March 3, 2014 / Notices
II. Selection Criteria and Guidance on
Application of Selection Criteria
This section specifies the criteria that
DOT will use to evaluate applications
for TIGER Discretionary Grants for
capital projects. The criteria for TIGER
Planning Grants are described in
Section VI (D) of this notice. The criteria
incorporate the statutory eligibility
requirements for this program, which
are specified in this notice as relevant.
This section is divided into two parts.
Part A (Selection Criteria) specifies the
criteria that DOT will use to rate
projects. Additional guidance about
how DOT will apply these criteria,
including illustrative metrics and
examples, is provided in Part B
(Additional Guidance on Selection
Criteria).
TIGER Discretionary Grants will be
awarded based on the selection criteria
as outlined below. There are two
categories of selection criteria, ‘‘Primary
Selection Criteria’’ and ‘‘Secondary
Selection Criteria.’’
A. Primary Selection Criteria: The five
primary selection criteria are based on
the priorities included in DOT’s
Strategic Plan for FY 2012–FY 2016.
Applications that do not demonstrate a
likelihood of significant long-term
benefits based on these criteria will not
proceed in the evaluation process. For
more detail on DOT’s long-term
priorities, please refer to the Strategic
Plan, which can be found at: https://
www.dot.gov/sites/dot.dev/files/docs/
990_355_DOT_StrategicPlan_
508lowres.pdf. DOT does not consider
any primary selection criterion more
important than the others. The primary
selection criteria, which will receive
equal consideration, are:
1. State of Good Repair: Improving
the condition of existing transportation
facilities and systems, with particular
emphasis on projects that minimize lifecycle costs and improve resilience. DOT
will assess whether and to what extent
(i) the project is consistent with relevant
plans to maintain transportation
facilities or systems in a state of good
repair and address current and projected
vulnerabilities; (ii) if left unimproved,
the poor condition of the asset will
threaten future transportation network
efficiency, mobility of goods or
accessibility and mobility of people, or
economic growth; (iii) the project is
appropriately capitalized up front and
uses asset management approaches that
optimize its long-term cost structure;
(iv) a sustainable source of revenue is
available for operations and
maintenance of the project; and (v) the
project improves the transportation
asset’s ability to withstand probable
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:40 Feb 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
occurrence or recurrence of an
emergency or major disaster or other
impacts of climate change. Additional
consideration will be given to the
project’s contribution to improvement
in the overall reliability of a multimodal
transportation system that serves all
users.
2. Economic Competitiveness:
Contributing to the economic
competitiveness of the United States
over the medium- to long-term, and
creating and preserving jobs. DOT will
assess whether the project will (i)
improve long-term efficiency, reliability
or cost-competitiveness in the
movement of workers or goods, with a
particular focus on projects that have a
significant effect on reducing the costs
of transporting export cargoes; (ii)
increase the economic productivity of
land, capital, or labor at specific
locations, particularly in Economically
Distressed Areas; (iii) result in long-term
job creation and other economic
opportunities, particularly for lowincome workers or for people in
Economically Distressed Areas, and
opportunities for small businesses and
disadvantaged business enterprises,
including veteran-owned small
businesses and service-disabled veteranowned small businesses,3 and (iv)
improve economic mobility through
enhanced multimodal connections to
centers of employment, education, and
services or the stimulation of such
centers in Economically Distressed
Areas.
3. Quality of Life: Like the livability
criterion in past rounds, quality of life
is focused on increasing transportation
choices and access to transportation
services for people in communities
3 The Executive Office of the President, Council
of Economic Advisers (CEA), issued a
memorandum in May 2009 on ‘‘Estimates of Job
Creation from the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009.’’ That memorandum
provided a simple rule for estimating job-years
created by government spending, which is that
$92,000 of government spending creates one jobyear (or 10,870 job-years per billion dollars of
spending). More recently, in September 2011, based
on further analysis both of actual job-creation
experience from transportation projects under the
Recovery Act and on further macroeconomic
analysis, the CEA determined that a job-year is
created by every $76,923 in transportation
infrastructure spending (or 13,000 job-years per
billion dollars of transportation infrastructure
spending). This figure can be used in place of the
earlier $92,000/job-year estimate. Applicants can
use this estimate as an appropriate indicator of
direct, indirect and induced job-years created by
TIGER Discretionary Grant spending, but are
encouraged to supplement or modify this estimate
to the extent they can demonstrate that such
modifications are justified. However, since this
guidance makes job creation purely a function of
the level of expenditure, applicants should also
demonstrate how quickly jobs will be created under
the proposed project.
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11857
across the United States. DOT will
consider whether the project furthers
the six ‘‘Livability Principles’’
developed by DOT with the Department
of Housing and Urban Development
(HUD) and the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) as part of the
Partnership for Sustainable
Communities.4 DOT will focus on the
first principle, the creation of affordable
and convenient transportation choices.5
Projects that demonstrate this principle
by providing transportation choices to
connect economically disadvantaged
populations, non-drivers, senior
citizens, and persons with disabilities
with employment, training and
education will receive particular
consideration. Further, DOT will
prioritize projects developed in
coordination with land-use planning
and economic development decisions,
including through programs like TIGER
II Planning Grants, the Department of
Housing and Urban Development’s
Regional Planning Grants, or the
Environmental Protection Agency’s
Brownfield Area-Wide Planning Pilot
Program, as well as technical assistance
programs focused on quality of life or
economic development planning.
4. Environmental Sustainability:
Improving energy efficiency, reducing
dependence on oil, reducing greenhouse
gas emissions, addressing stormwater
through natural means, avoiding and
mitigating environmental impacts and
otherwise benefitting the environment.
DOT will assess the project’s ability to
(i) reduce energy use and air or water
pollution; (ii) avoid adverse
environmental impacts to air or water
quality, wetlands, and endangered
species; (iii) provide environmental
benefits, such as brownfield
redevelopment, ground water recharge
in areas of water scarcity, wetlands
creation or improved habitat
connectivity, and stormwater
mitigation, including green
infrastructure or (iv) improve the
resilience of a transportation asset or the
transportation system. Applicants are
encouraged to provide quantitative
information, including baseline
information, that demonstrates how the
project will reduce energy consumption,
stormwater runoff, or achieve other
benefits for the environment.
4 https://www.sustainablecommunities.gov/
index.html.
5 In full, this principle reads: ‘‘Provide more
transportation choices. Develop safe, reliable and
economical transportation choices to decrease
household transportation costs, reduce our nations’
dependence on foreign oil, improve air quality,
reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote
public health.’’
E:\FR\FM\03MRN1.SGM
03MRN1
11858
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 41 / Monday, March 3, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
5. Safety: Improving the safety of U.S.
transportation facilities and systems for
all modes of transportation and users.
DOT will assess the project’s ability to
reduce the number, rate, and
consequences of surface transportationrelated accidents, serious injuries, and
fatalities among operators, drivers and/
or non-drivers in the United States or in
the affected metropolitan area or region,
and/or the project’s contribution to the
elimination of highway/rail grade
crossings, or the prevention of
unintended releases of hazardous
materials. DOT will consider the
project’s ability to foster a safe,
connected, accessible transportation
system for the multimodal movement of
goods and people.
B. Secondary Selection Criteria
1. Innovation: Use of innovative
strategies to pursue the long-term
outcomes outlined above. DOT will
assess the extent to which the project
uses innovative technology (such as
intelligent transportation systems,
dynamic pricing, value capture, rail
wayside or on-board energy recovery,
smart cards, active traffic management
or radio frequency identification) to
pursue one or more of the long-term
outcomes outlined above and/or to
significantly enhance the operational
performance of the transportation
system. DOT will also assess the extent
to which the project incorporates
innovations in transportation funding
and finance and leverages both existing
and new sources of funding through
both traditional and innovative means.
Further, DOT will consider the extent to
which the project utilizes innovative
practices in contracting, congestion
management, safety management, asset
management, or long-term operations
and maintenance. DOT is particularly
interested in projects that apply
innovative strategies to improve the
efficiency of project development or
improve overall project delivery in the
area.
2. Partnership: Demonstrating strong
collaboration among a broad range of
participants, integration of
transportation with other public service
efforts, and/or projects that are the
product of a robust planning process.
(a) Jurisdictional and Stakeholder
Collaboration: DOT will consider the
extent to which projects involve
multiple partners in project
development and funding, such as State
and local governments, other public
entities, and/or private or nonprofit
entities. DOT will also assess the extent
to which the project application
demonstrates collaboration among
neighboring or regional jurisdictions to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:40 Feb 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
achieve national, regional, or
metropolitan benefits. In the context of
public private partnerships, DOT will
assess the extent to which partners are
incentivized to ensure long-term asset
performance, such as through pay for
success approaches. Multiple States or
jurisdictions may submit a joint
application and must identify a lead
applicant as the primary point of
contact. Joint applications must include
a description of the roles and
responsibilities of each project party
and must be signed by each project
party.
(b) Disciplinary Integration: DOT will
consider the extent to which projects
include partnerships that bring together
diverse transportation agencies and/or
are supported, financially or otherwise,
by non-transportation public agencies
that are pursuing similar objectives. For
example, DOT will give priority to
transportation projects that are
coordinated with economic
development, housing, water
infrastructure, and land use plans and
policies; similarly, DOT will give
priority to transportation projects that
encourage energy efficiency or improve
the environment and are supported by
relevant public agencies with energy or
environmental missions. Projects that
grow out of a robust planning process—
such as those conducted with DOT’s
various planning programs and
initiatives, the Department of Housing
and Urban Development’s Regional
Planning Grants and Choice
Neighborhood Planning Grants, or the
Environmental Protection Agency’s
Brownfield Area-Wide Planning Pilot
Program, as well as technical assistance
programs focused on livability or
economic development planning—will
also be given priority.
C. Demonstrated Project Readiness
Projects that receive funding in this
round of TIGER will have to obligate
funds by September 30, 2016, or the
funding will expire. Therefore, DOT
will assess every application to
determine whether the project is likely
to proceed to obligation within the
statutory deadline upon receipt of a
TIGER Discretionary Grant (see
Additional Information on Project
Readiness Guidelines located at
www.dot.gov/TIGER for further details),
as evidenced by:
1. Technical Feasibility: The technical
feasibility of the project should be
demonstrated by engineering and design
studies and activities; the development
of design criteria and/or a basis of
design; the basis for the cost estimate
presented in the TIGER application,
including the identification of
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
contingency levels appropriate to its
level of design; and any scope,
schedule, and budget risk-mitigation
measures. Applicants must include a
detailed statement of work that focuses
on the technical and engineering aspects
of the project and describes in detail the
project to be constructed;
2. Financial Feasibility: The viability
and completeness of the project’s
financing package (assuming the
availability of the requested TIGER
Discretionary Grant funds) should be
demonstrated including evidence of
stable and reliable capital and (as
appropriate) operating fund
commitments sufficient to cover
estimated costs; the availability of
contingency reserves should planned
capital or operating revenue sources not
materialize; evidence of the financial
condition of the project sponsor; and
evidence of the grant recipient’s ability
to manage grants. You must include a
detailed project budget in this section of
your application or applications
containing a detailed breakdown of how
the funds will be spent that provides
estimates—both dollar amount and
percentage of cost—of how much each
activity would cost—e.g., preparation,
grading, asphalt, etc. If the project will
be completed in individual segments or
phases, a budget for each individual
segment or phase must be included.
Budget spending categories must be
broken down between TIGER, other
Federal, and non-Federal sources, and
identify how each funding source will
share in each activity.
3. Project Schedule: You must include
a detailed project schedule that includes
all major project milestones—such as
start and completion of environmental
reviews and approvals; design; right of
way acquisition; approval of plan,
specification and estimate (PS&E);
procurement; and construction—in this
section of your application with
sufficiently detailed information to
demonstrate that:
(a) all necessary pre-construction
activities will be complete to allow for
any potential grant funding awarded to
be obligated no later than June 30, 2016,
to give DOT reasonable assurance that
the TIGER Discretionary Grant funds
will likely to be obligated sufficiently in
advance of the September 30, 2016,
statutory deadline, and that any
unexpected delays will not put TIGER
Discretionary Grant funds at risk of
expiring before they are obligated;
(b) the project can begin construction
quickly upon receipt of a TIGER
Discretionary Grant, and that the grant
funds will be spent steadily and
E:\FR\FM\03MRN1.SGM
03MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 41 / Monday, March 3, 2014 / Notices
expeditiously once construction starts; 6
and
(c) any applicant that is applying for
a TIGER Discretionary Grant and does
not own all of the property or right-ofway required to complete the project
should provide evidence that the
property and/or right-of-way acquisition
can and will be completed
expeditiously.
4. Assessment of Project Risks and
Mitigation Strategies: You should
identify the material risks to the project
and the strategies that the lead applicant
and any project partners have
undertaken or will undertake in order to
mitigate those risks. In past rounds of
TIGER Discretionary Grants, certain
projects have been affected by
procurement delays, environmental
uncertainties, and increases in real
estate acquisition costs. You must assess
the greatest risks to your projects and
identify how those risks will be
mitigated by the project parties.
Applicants, to the extent they are
unfamiliar with the Federal program,
should contact DOT modal field or
headquarters offices for information on
what steps are pre-requisite to the
obligation of Federal funds in order to
ensure that their project schedule is
reasonable and that there are no risks of
delays in satisfying federal
requirements. Contacts for the Federal
Highway Administration Division
offices—which are located in all 50
States, Washington, DC, and Puerto
Rico—can be found at https://
www.fhwa.dot.gov/about/field.cfm.
Contacts for the ten Federal Transit
Administration regional offices can be
found at https://www.fta.dot.gov/
12926.html.
D. Additional Guidance on Evaluation
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1. Project Costs and Benefits
Applicants for TIGER Discretionary
Grants are generally required to identify,
quantify, and compare expected benefits
and costs, subject to the following
qualifications: 7
Applicants will be expected to
prepare and submit an analysis of
benefits and costs; however, DOT
understands that the level of detail of
analysis that should be expected (for
items such as surveys, travel demand
forecasts, market forecasts, and
6 The schedule should show how many direct,
on-project jobs are expected to be created or
sustained during each calendar quarter after the
project is underway.
7 DOT has a responsibility under Executive Order
12893, Principles for Federal Infrastructure
Investments, 59 FR 4233, to base infrastructure
investments on systematic analysis of expected
benefits and costs, including both quantitative and
qualitative measures.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:40 Feb 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
statistical analyses) is less for smaller
projects than for larger projects. The
level of sophistication of the benefit-cost
analysis (BCA) should be reasonably
related to the size of the overall project
and the amount of grant funds requested
in the application. Any subjective
estimates of benefits and costs should
still be quantified, and applicants
should provide appropriate evidence to
lend credence to their subjective
estimates. Estimates of benefits should
be presented in monetary terms
whenever possible; if a monetary
estimate is not possible, then at least
another quantitative estimate (in
physical, non-monetary terms, such as
crash rates, ridership estimates,
emissions levels, energy efficiency
improvements, etc.) should be provided.
Based on feedback over previous
rounds of TIGER, DOT recognizes that
the benefit-cost analysis can be
particularly burdensome on Tribal
governments. Therefore, the Department
is providing additional flexibility to
Tribal governments for the purposes of
this notice. At their discretion, Tribal
applicants may elect to provide raw data
to support the need for a project (such
as crash rates, ridership estimates, and
the number of people who will benefit
from the project), without additional
analysis. This data will then be used to
allow DOT economists to make the best
estimates they can develop (given the
data provided) of benefits and costs.
Examples of BCAs by successful Tribal
applicants are also available online.8
The lack of a useful analysis of
expected project benefits and costs may
be the basis for not selecting a project
for award of a TIGER Discretionary
Grant. If it is clear to DOT that the total
benefits of a project are not reasonably
likely to justify the project’s costs, DOT
will not award a TIGER Discretionary
Grant to the project.
Detailed guidance for the preparation
of benefit-cost analyses is provided in
the 2014 Benefit-Cost Analyses
Guidance for TIGER Grant Applicants
and in the BCA Resource Guide
(available at www.dot.gov/TIGER). A
recording of the Benefit-Cost Analysis
Practitioner’s Workshop (2010) and two
BCA-related webinars are also available
for viewing at www.dot.gov/TIGER,
along with examples of benefit-cost
analyses that have been submitted in
previous rounds of TIGER.
Benefits should be presented,
whenever possible, in a tabular form
showing benefits and costs in each year
for the useful life of the project. Benefits
and costs should both be discounted to
8 https://www.dot.gov/policy-initiatives/tiger/
tribal-tiger-bca-examples.
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11859
the year 2014, and calculations should
be presented for discounted values of
both the stream of benefits and the
stream of costs. If the project has
multiple parts, each of which has
independent utility, the benefits and
costs of each part should be estimated
and presented separately. The results of
the benefit-cost analysis should be
summarized in the Project Narrative
section of the application itself, but the
details may be presented in an
attachment to the application if the full
analysis cannot be included within the
page limit for the project narrative. The
requirement to conduct an economic
analysis is not applicable to applicants
seeking TIGER Planning Grants;
however, such applicants should
describe the expected benefits of the
underlying project(s) that the planning
activities will help advance.
2. Other Environmental Reviews and
Approvals
(a) National Environmental Policy
Act: An application for a TIGER
Discretionary Grant must detail whether
the project will significantly impact the
natural, social and/or economic
environment. The application should
demonstrate receipt (or reasonably
anticipated receipt) of all environmental
approvals and permits necessary for the
project to proceed to construction on the
timeline specified in the project
schedule and necessary to meet the
statutory obligation deadline, including
satisfaction of all Federal, State and
local requirements and completion of
the National Environmental Policy Act
(‘‘NEPA’’) process. You should submit
the information listed below with your
application:
(i) Information about the NEPA status
of the project. If the NEPA process is
completed, an applicant must indicate
the date of, and provide a Web site link
or other reference to, the final
Categorical Exclusion, Finding of No
Significant Impact or Record of
Decision. If the NEPA process is
underway but not complete, the
application must detail the type of
NEPA review underway, where the
project is in the process, and indicate
the anticipated date of completion. You
must provide a Web site link or other
reference to copies of any NEPA
documents prepared.
(ii) Information on reviews by other
agencies. An application for a TIGER
Discretionary Grant must indicate
whether the proposed project requires
reviews or approval actions by other
agencies, indicate the status of such
actions, and provide detailed
information about the status of those
reviews or approvals and/or
E:\FR\FM\03MRN1.SGM
03MRN1
11860
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 41 / Monday, March 3, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
demonstrate compliance with any other
applicable Federal, State, or local
requirements.
(iii) Environmental studies or other
documents—preferably by way of a Web
site link—that describe in detail known
project impacts, and possible mitigation
for those impacts.
(iv) A description of discussions with
the appropriate DOT modal
administration field or headquarters
office regarding compliance with NEPA
and other applicable environmental
reviews and approvals.
(b) Legislative Approvals: Receipt of
all necessary legislative approvals (for
example, legislative authority to charge
user fees or set toll rates), and evidence
of support from State and local elected
officials. Support from all relevant State
and local officials is not required;
however, you should demonstrate that
the project is broadly supported.
(c) State and Local Planning: The
planning requirements of the operating
administration administering the TIGER
project will apply.9 You should
demonstrate that a project that is
required to be included in the relevant
State, metropolitan, and local planning
documents has been or will be included.
If the project is not included in the
relevant planning documents at the time
the application is submitted, you should
submit a certification from the
appropriate planning agency that
actions are underway to include the
project in the relevant planning
document. DOT reserves the right to
revoke any award of TIGER
Discretionary Grant funds and to award
such funds to another project to the
9 All regionally significant projects requiring an
action by the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) or the Federal Transit Administration
(FTA) must be in the metropolitan transportation
plan, transportation improvement program (TIP)
and statewide transportation improvement program
(STIP). Further, in air quality non-attainment and
maintenance areas, all regionally significant
projects, regardless of the funding source, must be
included in the conforming metropolitan
transportation plan and TIP. To the extent a project
is required to be on a metropolitan transportation
plan, TIP, and/or STIP, it will not receive a TIGER
Discretionary Grant until it is included in such
plans. Projects not currently included in these plans
can be amended by the State and metropolitan
planning organization (MPO). Projects that are not
required to be in long range transportation plans,
STIPs, and TIPs will not need to be included in
such plans in order to receive a TIGER
Discretionary Grant. Freight and passenger rail
projects are not required to be on the State Rail
Plans called for in the Passenger Rail Investment
and Improvement Act of 2008. This is consistent
with the exemption for high-speed and intercity
passenger rail projects under the Recovery Act.
However, applicants seeking funding for freight and
passenger rail projects are encouraged to
demonstrate that they have done sufficient planning
to ensure that projects fit into a prioritized list of
capital needs and are consistent with long-range
goals.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:40 Feb 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
extent either that such funds cannot be
timely expended and/or that
construction does not begin in
accordance with the project schedule.
Because projects have different
schedules, DOT will consider on a caseby-case basis how much time after
selection for award of a TIGER
Discretionary Grant each project has
before funds must be obligated
(consistent with law) and construction
started through an executed grant
agreement between the selected
applicant and the relevant modal
administration administering the grant.
This deadline will be specified for each
TIGER Discretionary Grant in the
project-specific grant agreements signed
by the grant recipients and will be based
on critical path items identified by
applicants in response to items (a)(i)
through (iv) above.
III. Evaluation and Selection Process
A. Evaluation Process
TIGER Discretionary Grant
applications will be evaluated in
accordance with the evaluation process
discussed below. DOT will establish
application evaluation teams to review
each application that is received by
DOT prior to the Application Deadline.
These evaluation teams will be
organized and led by the Office of the
Secretary of Transportation and will
include members from each of the
Relevant Modal Administrations and, in
some cases, staff from other Federal
agencies with relevant expertise,
including freight, resilience, quality of
life, environmental review, and
permitting expertise. The evaluation
teams will be responsible for evaluating
and rating all of the projects and making
funding recommendations to the
Secretary.
DOT will not assign specific
numerical scores to projects based on
the selection criteria outlined above in
Section II(A) (Selection Criteria). Rather,
ratings of ‘‘highly recommended,’’
‘‘recommended,’’ ‘‘acceptable,’’ or ‘‘not
recommended’’ will be assigned to
projects. DOT will award TIGER
Discretionary Grants to projects that are
well-aligned with one or more of the
selection criteria. In addition, DOT will
consider whether a project has a
negative effect on any of the selection
criteria, and any such negative effect
may reduce the likelihood that the
project will receive a TIGER
Discretionary Grant.
DOT will give more consideration to
the Primary Selection Criteria than to
the two Secondary Selection Criteria
(Innovation and Partnership), which
will also be considered equally
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Projects that are recommended by the
evaluation teams for further review will
have their benefit-cost analyses
evaluated by an Economic Analysis
Team, and will have their project
readiness evaluated by a Project
Readiness Team. The Economic
Analysis Team will assess the
likelihood that the project’s benefits will
exceed its costs, and the Project
Readiness Team will assess the
likelihood that the project will be able
to obligate any grant awarded to it by
the obligation deadline of September 30,
2016. The results of these evaluations
will also be taken into account in the
recommendations made to the
Secretary.
Upon completion of this rating
process, DOT will analyze the
preliminary list and determine whether
highly-rated projects are consistent with
the distributional requirements of the
FY 2014 Appropriations Act, including
an equitable geographic distribution of
grant funds, an appropriate balance in
addressing the needs of urban and rural
areas, and investment in a variety of
transportation modes. If necessary, DOT
will adjust the list of recommended
projects to satisfy the statutory
distributional requirements while
remaining as consistent as possible with
the competitive ratings. The Secretary of
Transportation will make the final
project selections.
B. Evaluation of Eligibility
To be selected for a TIGER
Discretionary Grant, a project must be
an Eligible Project and the applicant
must be an Eligible Applicant. DOT may
consider one or more components of a
large project to be an Eligible Project,
but only to the extent that the
components have independent utility,
meaning the components themselves,
not the project of which they are a part,
are Eligible Projects and satisfy the
selection criteria identified above in
Section II(A) (Selection Criteria). For
these projects, the benefits described in
an application must be related to the
components of the project for which
funding is requested, not the full project
of which they are a part. DOT will not
fund individual phases of a project if
the benefits of completing only these
phases would not align well with the
selection criteria specified in this notice
because the overall project would still
be incomplete.
IV. Grant Administration
DOT expects that each TIGER
Discretionary Grant will be
administered by one of the Relevant
Modal Administrations, pursuant to a
grant agreement between the TIGER
E:\FR\FM\03MRN1.SGM
03MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 41 / Monday, March 3, 2014 / Notices
Discretionary Grant recipient and the
Relevant Modal Administration. Service
Outcome Agreements, Stakeholder
Agreements, Buy America compliance,
and other requirements under DOT’s
other highway, transit, rail, and port
grant programs will be incorporated into
the TIGER grant agreements, where
appropriate. The Secretary has the
discretion to delegate such
responsibilities to the appropriate
Relevant Modal Administration.
Applicable Federal laws, rules, and
regulations of the Relevant Modal
Administration administering the
project will apply to projects that
receive TIGER Discretionary Grants.
V. Projects in Rural Areas
The FY 2014 Appropriations Act
directs that not less than $120 million
of the funds provided for TIGER
Discretionary Grants are to be used for
projects in rural areas. For purposes of
this notice, DOT is defining ‘‘rural area’’
as any area not in an Urbanized Area,
as such term is defined by the Census
Bureau,10 and will consider a project to
be in a rural area if all or the majority
of a project (determined by geographic
location(s) where the majority of project
money is to be spent) is located in a
rural area. Therefore, if all or the
majority of a project is located in a rural
area, such a project is eligible to apply
for less than $10 million, but at least $1
million in TIGER Discretionary Grant
funds, and up to 100 percent of the
project’s costs may be paid for with
Federal funds. To the extent more than
a de minimis portion of a project is
located in an Urbanized Area, you
should identify the estimated
percentage of project costs that will be
spent in Urbanized Areas and the
estimated percentage that will be spent
in rural areas.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
VI. TIGER Planning Grants
A. Background
On December 16, 2009, the President
signed the Fiscal Year (FY) 2010
Consolidated Appropriations Act,
which appropriated $600 million to
DOT for National Infrastructure
Investments, including up to $35
million for planning.
That round of planning grants was
conducted in conjunction with $40
million in HUD Community Challenge
grants. Thirty-three total DOT planning
grants were made, including 14 joint
10 For Census 2010, the Census Bureau defined an
Urbanized Area (UA) as an area that consists of
densely settled territory that contains 50,000 or
more people. Updated lists of UAs are available on
the Census Bureau Web site. Urban Clusters (UCs)
will be considered rural areas for purposes of the
TIGER Discretionary Grant program.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:40 Feb 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
grants with HUD. In this round, DOT
will not be able to pair TIGER planning
grants with HUD Community Challenge
grants due to the lack of available HUD
funds. However, those applicants
seeking to fund regional transportation
planning grants should show strong
coordination with housing, land use,
economic development, stormwater,
and other infrastructure needs,
including identifying risks from extreme
weather and climate change, and plans
to mitigate that risk.
B. Eligible Planning Activities
Activities eligible for funding under
TIGER Planning Grants are related to the
planning, preparation, or design—
including environmental analysis,
feasibility studies, and other preconstruction activities—of surface
transportation projects, including, but
not limited to:
(1) Highway or bridge projects eligible
under Title 23, United States Code
(including bicycle and pedestrian
related projects);
(2) Public transportation projects
eligible under Chapter 53 of Title 49,
United States Code;
(3) Passenger and freight rail
transportation projects;
(4) Port infrastructure investments;
and
(5) Intermodal projects.
In addition, eligible activities related
to multidisciplinary projects or regional
planning may include:
(1) Development of master plans,
comprehensive plans, or corridor plans
that will provide connection to jobs for
disadvantaged populations, or include
affordable housing components.
(2) Planning activities related to the
development of a multimodal freight
corridor, including those that seek to
reduce conflicts with residential areas
and with passenger and non-motorized
traffic.
(3) Development of port and regional
port planning grants, including Statewide or multi-port planning within a
single jurisdiction or region.
(4) Planning to encourage multiple
projects within a common area to
engage in programmatic mitigation in
order to increase efficiency and improve
outcomes for communities and the
environment.
(5) Risk assessments and planning to
identify vulnerabilities and address the
transportation system’s ability to
withstand probable occurrence or
recurrence of an emergency or major
disaster or impacts of climate change.
C. Selection Criteria
Planning grant applications will be
evaluated against the same criteria as
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11861
capital grants. For project-level
planning, this means considering how
the project resulting from the plan will
ultimately further the five primary and
two secondary criteria. For regional
transportation planning efforts,
applications should demonstrate how
the regional plan will help lead to these
outcomes.
Similar to capital grant applications,
planning applications will be more
competitive if they can demonstrate
funding support above the 20 percent
match requirement for urban areas, and
the 0 percent match requirement for
rural areas.
Additionally, applicants should show
the capacity to successfully implement
the proposed activities in a timely
manner.
VII. Application Cycle
A. Contents of Applications
You must include all of the
information requested below in your
application. DOT reserves the right to
ask any applicant to supplement data in
its application, but expects applications
to be complete upon submission. To the
extent practical, you should provide
data and evidence of project merits in a
form that is publicly available or
verifiable.
1. Standard Form 424, Application for
Federal Assistance
Additional clarifying guidance and
FAQs to assist you in completing the
SF–424 will be available at
www.dot.gov/TIGER by April 3, 2014,
when the ‘‘Apply’’ function within
Grants.gov opens to accept applications
under this notice.
2. Title Page
The title page must include the
project title, location (city, State,
district), type of application (capitol,
project planning, or regional planning),
the applicant organization name, the
type of eligible applicant (State
government, local government, U.S.
territory, Tribal government, transit
agency, port authority, MPO, RDO, other
unit of government), and the amount of
TIGER funding being applied for. The
information may be presented in a table
or formatted list.
3. Project Narrative (Attachment to SF
424)
The project narrative must respond to
the application requirements outlined
below. DOT recommends that the
project narrative be prepared with
standard formatting preferences (.i.e., a
single-spaced document, using a
standard 12-point font, such as Times
New Roman, with 1-inch margins).
E:\FR\FM\03MRN1.SGM
03MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
11862
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 41 / Monday, March 3, 2014 / Notices
Your application must include
information required for DOT to assess
each of the criteria specified in Section
II (A) (Selection Criteria), as such
criteria are explained in Section II(B)
(Additional Guidance on Selection
Criteria). You must demonstrate the
responsiveness of a project to any
pertinent selection criteria with the
most relevant information that you can
provide, regardless of whether such
information has been specifically
requested, or identified, in this notice.
You should provide concrete evidence
of the feasibility of achieving project
milestones, and of financial capacity
and commitment in order to support
project readiness. DOT will give priority
to projects for which a TIGER
Discretionary Grant will help to
complete an overall funding package, so
you should clearly demonstrate the
extent to which the project cannot be
readily and efficiently completed
without a TIGER Discretionary Grant,
and the extent to which other sources of
funds, including Federal, State, or local
funding, may or may not be readily
available for the project. Any such
information shall be considered part of
the application, not supplemental, for
purposes of the application size limits
identified below in Part B (Length of
Applications). Information provided
pursuant to this paragraph must be
quantified, to the extent possible, to
describe the project’s benefits to the
Nation, a metropolitan area, or a region.
Information provided pursuant to this
paragraph should include projections
for both the build and no-build
scenarios for the project for each year
between the completion of the project
and a point in time at least 20 years
beyond the project’s completion date or
the lifespan of the project, whichever is
closer to the present.
All applications should include a
detailed description of the proposed
project and geospatial data for the
project, including a map of the project’s
location and its connections to existing
transportation infrastructure. An
application should also include a
description of how the project addresses
the needs of an urban and/or rural area.
An application should clearly describe
the transportation challenges that the
project aims to address, the project’s
potential vulnerabilities to extreme
weather and climate change throughout
its projected life, and how the project
will address these challenges. The
description should include relevant
data, such as passenger or freight
volumes, congestion levels,
infrastructure condition, and safety
experience.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:40 Feb 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
DOT recommends that the project
narrative generally adhere to the
following basic outline and, in addition
to a detailed statement of work, detailed
project schedule, and detailed project
budget, you should include a table of
contents, maps, and graphics that make
the information easier to review:
I. Project Description (including
information on the expected users of the
project, a description of the
transportation challenges that the
project aims to address, and how the
project will address these challenges);
II. Project Parties (information about
the grant recipient and other project
parties);
III. Grant Funds and Sources/Uses of
Project Funds (information about the
amount of grant funding requested,
availability/commitment of funds
sources and uses of all project funds,
total project costs, percentage of project
costs that would be paid for with TIGER
Discretionary Grant funds, and the
identity and percentage shares of all
parties providing funds for the project
(including any other pending or past
Federal funding requests for the project
as well as Federal funds already
provided under other programs and
required match for those funds);
IV. Selection Criteria (information
about how the project aligns with each
of the primary and secondary selection
criteria and a description of the results
of the benefit-cost analysis):
a. Primary Selection Criteria
i. State of Good Repair
ii. Economic Competitiveness
iii. Quality of Life
iv. Environmental Sustainability
v. Safety
b. Secondary Selection Criteria
i. Innovation
ii. Partnership
c. Results of Benefit-Cost Analysis
V. Project readiness, including
planning approvals, NEPA and other
environmental reviews/approvals,
(including information about
permitting, legislative approvals, State
and local planning, and project
partnership and implementation
agreements); and
VI. Federal Wage Rate Certification
(an application must include a
certification, signed by the applicant(s),
stating that it will comply with the
requirements of subchapter IV of
chapter 31 of title 40, United States
Code (Federal wage rate requirements),
as required by the FY 2014 Continuing
Appropriations Act).
The purpose of this recommended
format is to ensure that applications
clearly address the program
requirements and make critical
information readily apparent.
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
B. Length of Applications
The project narrative may not exceed
30 pages in length. Documentation
supporting the assertions made in the
narrative portion may also be provided,
but should be limited to relevant
information. If possible, Web site links
to supporting documentation (including
a more detailed discussion of the
benefit-cost analysis) should be
provided rather than copies of these
materials. Spreadsheets supporting the
benefit-cost analysis should be original
Excel spreadsheets, not PDFs of those
spreadsheets. At your discretion,
relevant materials provided previously
to a Relevant Modal Administration in
support of a different DOT discretionary
program (for example, New Starts or
TIFIA) may be referenced and described
as unchanged. To the extent referenced,
this information need not be
resubmitted for the TIGER Discretionary
Grant application (although provision of
a Web site link would facilitate DOT’s
consideration of the information). DOT
recommends use of appropriately
descriptive file names (e.g., ‘‘Project
Narrative,’’ ‘‘Maps,’’ ‘‘Memoranda of
Understanding and Letters of Support,’’
etc.) for all attachments. Cover pages
and tables of contents do not count
towards the 30-page limit for the
narrative portion of the application, and
the federal wage rate certification may
also be outside of the 30-page narrative.
Otherwise, the only substantive portions
of the application that should exceed
the 30-page limit are any supporting
documents (including a more detailed
discussion of the benefit-cost analysis)
provided to support assertions or
conclusions made in the 30-page
narrative section.
C. Contact Information
Contact information for a direct
employee of the lead applicant
organization is required as part of the
SF–424. DOT will use this information
to inform parties of DOT’s decision
regarding selection of projects, as well
as to contact parties in the event that
DOT needs additional information about
an application. Contact information for
a contractor, agent, or consultant of the
lead applicant organization is
insufficient for DOT’s purposes.
D. Protection of Confidential Business
Information
All information submitted as part of
or in support of any application shall
use publicly available data or data that
can be made public and methodologies
that are accepted by industry practice
and standards, to the extent possible. If
the application includes information
E:\FR\FM\03MRN1.SGM
03MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 41 / Monday, March 3, 2014 / Notices
you consider to be a trade secret or
confidential commercial or financial
information, you should do the
following: (1) Note on the front cover
that the submission ‘‘Contains
Confidential Business Information
(CBI);’’ (2) mark each affected page
‘‘CBI;’’ and (3) highlight or otherwise
denote the CBI portions. DOT protects
such information from disclosure to the
extent allowed under applicable law. In
the event DOT receives a Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) request for the
information, DOT will follow the
procedures described in its FOIA
regulations at 49 CFR 7.17. Only
information that is ultimately
determined to be confidential under that
procedure will be exempt from
disclosure under FOIA.
VIII. Performance Management
Each applicant selected for TIGER
Discretionary Grant capital grant
funding will be required to work with
DOT on the development and
implementation of a plan to collect
information and report on the project’s
performance with respect to the relevant
long-term outcomes that are expected to
be achieved through construction of the
project. Each recipient of a TIGER
Discretionary Grant will, in accordance
with its grant agreement, report on
specified performance indicators for its
project. Performance indicators will be
negotiated for each project, considerate
of the individual project’s stated goals
as well as resource constraints of
applicants. Performance indicators will
not include formal goals or targets, but
will include baseline measures as well
as post-project outcomes for an agreedupon timeline, and will inform the
TIGER Discretionary Grant program in
working towards best practices,
programmatic performance measures,
and future decisionmaking guidelines.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IX. Questions and Clarifications
For further information concerning
this notice please contact the TIGER
Discretionary Grant program staff via
email at TIGERGrants@dot.gov, or call
Howard Hill at 202–366–0301. A TDD is
available for individuals who are deaf or
hard of hearing at 202–366–3993. DOT
will regularly post answers to these
questions and other important
clarifications on DOT’s Web site at
www.dot.gov/TIGER.
Issued on February 25, 2014.
Anthony R. Foxx,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–04627 Filed 2–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:40 Feb 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
11863
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Working Group Two (WG2)–DO–272/
DO–291
Federal Aviation Administration
• WG–2 Action Item Status Review
• Sub-Group Status Reports (Content,
Connectivity, Consistency, etc)
• Document Editor, Introduction and
Status
• Review of Working Papers, Discussion
Papers, Information Papers
• New Presentations, not related to
WPs, DPs or IPs.
Nineteenth Meeting: RTCA Special
Committee 217—Aeronautical
Databases Joint With EUROCAE WG–
44—Aeronautical Databases
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special
Committee 217—Aeronautical Databases
Joint with EUROCAE WG–44—
Aeronautical Databases.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice
to advise the public of a meeting of
RTCA Special Committee 217—
Aeronautical Databases being held
jointly with EUROCAE WG–44—
Aeronautical Databases.
DATES: The meeting will be held March
17–21, 2014 from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be hosted
by AIRBUS, Site de Saint Martin du
Touch, 316 route de Bayonne, 1060
Toulouse Cedex 9 FRANCE.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sophie Bousquet, SBousquet@rtca.org,
202–330–0663 or The RTCA Secretariat,
1150 18th Street NW., Suite 910,
Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone
at (202) 833–9339, fax at (202) 833–
9434, or Web site at https://www.rtca.org.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is hereby
given for a meeting of RTCA Special
Committee 217—Aeronautical Databases
held jointly with EUROCAE WG–44—
Aeronautical Databases. The agenda will
include the following:
Monday, March 17, Opening Plenary
• Co-Chairmen’s remarks and
introductions
• Approve minutes from 18th meeting
• Review and approve meeting agenda
for 19th meeting
• Review of joint WG–1/WG–2 Action
Items
• ToR Update
• SC–216/SC–217 ISRA Update
• SWIM, Presentations and Discussion
• Continuation, ‘‘Data Terms
Definitions’’ Review
Monday Thru Thursday, March 17–
20—Working Group One (WG1)–DO–
200A/ED–76
• Review of WG–1 Action Items Status
• Discussion and progress on ED76/
DO200A update
• Process to develop a first mature draft
update to ED76/DO200A
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Closing Plenary Session (9:00 a.m. to
Noon)
• Presentation of WG1 and WG2
conclusions
• Working arrangements for the
remaining work
• Review of action items
• Next meetings, dates and locations
• Any other business and Adjourn
Attendance is open to the interested
public but limited to space availability.
With the approval of the chairman,
members of the public may present oral
statements at the meeting.
Persons wishing to present statements
or obtain information should contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members
of the public may present a written
statement to the committee at any time.
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 25,
2014.
Paige L. Williams,
Management Analyst, Business Operations
Group, ANG–A12, Federal Aviation
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014–04635 Filed 2–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Sixtieth Meeting: RTCA Special
Committee 186, Automatic Dependent
Surveillance—Broadcast (ADS–B)
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special
Committee 186, Automatic Dependent
Surveillance—Broadcast (ADS–B).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice
to advise the public of the sixtieth
meeting of the RTCA Special Committee
186, Automatic Dependent
Surveillance—Broadcast (ADS–B)
DATES: The meeting will be held March
17–20, 2014 from 9:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the RTCA Headquarters, 1150 18th
Street NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC
20036.
E:\FR\FM\03MRN1.SGM
03MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 41 (Monday, March 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11854-11863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04627]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary of Transportation
[Docket No. DOT-OST-2014-XXXX]
Notice of Funding Availability for the Department of
Transportation's National Infrastructure Investments under the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary of Transportation, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Funding Availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of funding and requests
proposals for the Department of Transportation's National
Infrastructure Investments. This notice is addressed to organizations
that are interested in applying and provides guidance on selection
criteria and application requirements for the National Infrastructure
Investments.
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014 (Pub. L. 113-76, January
17, 2014) (``FY 2014 Appropriations Act'') appropriated $600 million to
be awarded by the Department of Transportation (``DOT'') for National
Infrastructure Investments. This appropriation is similar, but not
identical, to the program funded and implemented pursuant to the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the ``Recovery Act'')
known as the Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery, or
``TIGER Discretionary Grants,'' program. Because of the similarity in
program structure, DOT will continue to refer to the program as ``TIGER
Discretionary Grants.'' As with previous rounds of TIGER, funds for the
FY 2014 TIGER program (``TIGER FY 2014'') are to be awarded on a
competitive basis for projects that will have a significant impact on
the Nation, a metropolitan area, or a region.
Through this notice, DOT is soliciting applications for TIGER
Discretionary Grants. In the event that this solicitation does not
result in the award and obligation of all available funds, DOT may
decide to publish an additional solicitation(s).
DATES: You must submit final applications through Grants.gov by April
28, 2014, at 5:00 p.m. EDT (the ``Application Deadline''). The
Grants.gov ``Apply'' function will open on April 3, 2014, allowing
applicants to submit applications. You are strongly encouraged to
submit applications in advance of the deadline. Please be aware that
you must complete the registration process before submitting an
application, and that this process usually takes 2-4 weeks to complete.
If interested parties experience difficulties at any point during the
registration or application process, please call the Grants.gov
Customer Support Hotline at 1-800-518-4726, Monday-Friday from 7:00
a.m. to 9:00 p.m. EDT. Additional information on applying through
Grants.gov is available in Information about Applying for Federal
Grants through Grants.gov at www.dot.gov/TIGER.
ADDRESSES: You must submit applications electronically through
Grants.gov. Only applications received electronically through
Grants.gov will be deemed properly filed. Instructions for submitting
applications through Grants.gov can be found on the TIGER Web site
(www.dot.gov/TIGER).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information concerning
this notice please contact the TIGER Discretionary Grant program staff
via email at TIGERGrants@dot.gov, or call Howard Hill at 202-366-0301.
A TDD is available for individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing at
202-366-3993. In addition, DOT will regularly post answers to questions
and requests for clarifications on DOT's Web site at www.dot.gov/TIGER.
Applicants are encouraged to contact DOT directly rather than rely on
third parties to receive information about TIGER Discretionary Grants.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is substantially similar to the
final notice published for the TIGER Discretionary Grant program in the
Federal Register on April 26, 2013.
[[Page 11855]]
However, there are a few significant differences:
1. Across the Federal Government, the Administration is dedicated
to enhancing opportunity for all Americans by investing in
transportation projects that better connect communities to centers of
employment, education, and services (including for non-drivers) and
that hold promise to stimulate long-term job growth, especially in
economically distressed areas. Additional consideration will be given
to proposals that seek to strengthen opportunities to expand the middle
class. While the Department will award funds to a variety of project
types, priority consideration will be given to applications that
address this objective.
2. TIGER FY 2014 is authorized to award up to $35 million (of the
program's $600 million total) for planning grants. Planning grant
applications must identify themselves as project-level or regional plan
applications.
3. In the previous round of TIGER, funding was available for
obligation for a very short time. Therefore, DOT used project readiness
as a primary criterion in awarding that funding. TIGER FY 2014 funds,
in contrast, are available for obligation until the statutory deadline
of September 30, 2016. This extended schedule allows DOT to encourage
the submission of applications for complex and multimodal projects that
may require slightly longer schedules. However, all applicants should
provide schedules and evidence that they will be able to obligate
funds, if awarded, by June of 2016 and expend such funds by September
30, 2021 (31 U.S.C. 1552).
4. Applications that identify project co-applicants or project
partners in addition to a lead applicant must be signed by each co-
applicant and/or partner organization.
Other than the differences above, and minor edits for clarification
and those made to conform the notice to the statutory circumstances of
this round of TIGER Discretionary Grant funding, there have been no
material changes made to the notice. Each section of this notice
contains information and instructions relevant to the application
process for these TIGER Discretionary Grants, and you should read this
notice in its entirety so that you have the information you need to
submit eligible and competitive applications.
Table of Contents
I. Background and Outlook
II. Selection Criteria and Guidance on Application of Selection
Criteria
III. Evaluation and Selection Process
IV. Grant Administration
V. Projects in Rural Areas
VI. TIGER Planning Grants
VII. Application Cycle
VIII. Performance Management
IX. Questions and Clarifications
I. Background and Outlook
The Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery or
``TIGER Discretionary Grants'' program was first created in the
Recovery Act of 2009. Through the Recovery Act and subsequent four
appropriations acts, Congress provided DOT with funding for five rounds
of competitive grants totaling more than $4.1 billion for capital
investments in surface transportation infrastructure. See DOT's Web
site at www.dot.gov/TIGER for further background on the disbursement of
past rounds of TIGER Discretionary Grants.
The FY 2014 Appropriations Act appropriated $600 million to be
awarded by DOT for the TIGER Discretionary Grants program. As in
previous rounds, the FY 2014 TIGER Discretionary Grants are for capital
investments in surface transportation infrastructure, and are to be
awarded on a competitive basis for projects that will have a
significant impact on the Nation, a metropolitan area, or a region.
Additionally, as in the 2010 round, the Act allows for up to $35
million (of the $600 million) to be awarded as grants for the planning
of eligible transportation facilities. DOT is referring to these TIGER
Discretionary Grants for planning as TIGER Planning Grants. The Act
also allows DOT to use a small portion of the $600 million for
oversight of grants.
``Eligible Applicants'' for TIGER Discretionary Grants are State,
local, and tribal governments, including U.S. territories, transit
agencies, port authorities, metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs),
other political subdivisions of State or local governments, and multi-
State or multi-jurisdictional groups applying through a single lead
applicant (for multi-jurisdictional groups, each member of the group,
including the lead applicant, must be an otherwise Eligible Applicant
as defined in this paragraph).
To ensure applicants receive the most accurate information
possible, you must contact DOT directly, rather than through
intermediaries, to get answers to questions, set up briefings on the
TIGER Discretionary Grants selection and award process, or receive
other assistance. Assistance can be obtained by simply contacting the
TIGER Discretionary Grant program staff via email at
TIGERGrants@dot.gov, or by calling Howard Hill at 202-366-0301.
Projects that are eligible for TIGER Discretionary Grants
(``Eligible Projects'') for capital projects include, but are not
limited to: (1) Highway or bridge projects eligible under title 23,
United States Code (including bicycle and pedestrian related projects);
(2) public transportation projects eligible under chapter 53 of title
49, United States Code; (3) passenger and freight rail transportation
projects; (4) port infrastructure investments; and (5) intermodal
projects. Projects that are eligible for TIGER Planning Grants include,
but are not limited to: Activities related to the planning,
preparation, or design of a single surface transportation project, or
activities related to regional transportation investment planning,
including transportation planning that is coordinated with
interdisciplinary factors including housing, economic development,
stormwater and other infrastructure investments, and/or that addresses
future risks and vulnerabilities, including extreme weather and climate
change. Federal wage rate requirements included in subchapter IV of
chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code, apply to all projects
receiving funds under this program, and apply to all parts of the
project, whether funded with TIGER Discretionary Grant funds, other
Federal funds, or non-Federal funds. This description of Eligible
Projects is identical to the description of eligible projects under
earlier rounds of the TIGER Discretionary Grant program.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Consistent with the FY 2014 Appropriations Act, DOT will
apply the following principles in determining whether a project is
eligible as a capital investment or a planning study in surface
transportation: (1) Surface transportation facilities generally
include roads, highways and bridges, marine ports, freight and
passenger railroads, transit systems, and projects that connect
transportation facilities to other modes of transportation; and (2)
surface transportation facilities also include any highway or bridge
project eligible under title 23, U.S.C., or public transportation
project eligible under chapter 53 of title 49, U.S.C. Please note
that the Department may use a TIGER Discretionary Grant to pay for
the surface transportation components of a broader project that has
non-surface transportation components, and applicants are encouraged
to apply for TIGER Discretionary Grants to pay for the surface
transportation components of these projects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As was the case in earlier rounds of the TIGER Discretionary Grant
program, Eligible Projects do not include research, demonstration, or
pilot projects that do not result in publicly accessible surface
transportation infrastructure. To be funded, projects or elements of a
project must have independent utility, which means that the project
provides transportation
[[Page 11856]]
benefits and is ready for its intended use upon completion of project
construction.
Each applicant may submit no more than three applications in each
category (3 capital applications and 3 planning applications). You
should focus on applications that are most likely to align well with
DOT's selection criteria. While applications may include requests to
fund more than one project, you may not bundle together unrelated
projects in the same application for purposes of avoiding the three-
application limit that applies to each applicant. Please note that the
three-application limit applies only to applications where the
applicant is the lead applicant, and there is no limit on applications
for which an applicant can be listed as a partnering agency. If you
submit more than three applications as the lead applicant, only the
first three received in each category will be considered.
The FY 2014 Appropriations Act specifies that TIGER Discretionary
Grants may not be less than $10 million (except in rural areas) and not
greater than $200 million. For projects located in rural areas (as
defined in Section V, Projects in Rural Areas), the minimum TIGER
Discretionary Grant size is $1 million. For TIGER Planning Grants,
there is no statutory minimum grant size, regardless of location.
DOT reserves the right to award funds for a part of the project
included in an application, if a part of the project has independent
utility and aligns well with the selection criteria specified in this
notice.
Pursuant to the FY 2014 Appropriations Act, no more than 25 percent
of the funds made available for TIGER Discretionary Grants (or $150
million) may be awarded to projects in a single State.
The FY 2014 Appropriations Act directs that not less than 20
percent of the funds provided for TIGER Discretionary Grants (or $120
million) shall be used for projects located in rural areas. Further,
pursuant to the FY 2014 Appropriations Act, DOT must take measures to
ensure an equitable geographic distribution of grant funds, an
appropriate balance in addressing the needs of urban and rural areas,
and investment in a variety of transportation modes.
TIGER Discretionary Grants may be used for up to 80 percent of the
costs of a project. DOT may increase the Federal share above 80 percent
only for projects located in rural areas, in which case DOT may fund up
to 100 percent of the costs of a project. However, priority will be
given to projects that use Federal funds to complete an overall
financing package, and both urban and rural projects can increase their
competitiveness for purposes of the TIGER program by demonstrating
significant non-Federal financial contributions. In the first five
rounds, on average, projects attracted more than 3.5 additional non-
Federal dollars for every TIGER grant dollar. DOT will consider any
non-Federal funds, as well as funds from the Tribal Transportation
Program (formerly known as Indian Reservation Roads), as a local match
for purposes of this program, whether such funds are contributed by the
public sector (State or local) or the private sector. However, DOT
cannot consider any funds already expended (or otherwise encumbered)
towards the matching requirement. Federal requirements also apply to
any matching funds in your application. Therefore, the extent that a
project is already underway or money intended to be matching funds is
already encumbered, DOT will not consider those funds to be matching
funds for the purposes of the TIGER Discretionary Grant program. You
should also take note that even though ``matching'' funding may be
provided by a State DOT or transit agency, DOT will not consider those
funds to be matching funds if the source of those funds is ultimately a
Federal program.
The FY 2014 Appropriations Act requires that TIGER funds are only
available for obligation through September 30, 2016. DOT will,
therefore, consider whether or not a project is ready to proceed with
obligation of grant funds within the time provided. Under the FY 2014
Appropriations Act, TIGER funding expires automatically after the
deadline of September 30, 2016, if grant funds are not obligated. There
is no waiver possible under the statute for this deadline.
The FY 2014 Appropriations Act allows for an amount not to exceed
35 percent of the available funds (or $210 million of the $600 million)
to be used by the Department to pay the subsidy and administrative
costs for a project receiving credit assistance under the
Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 1998
(``TIFIA'') program, if it would further the purposes of the TIGER
Discretionary Grant program.
Recipients of TIGER Discretionary Grants and TIGER Planning Grants
in prior rounds may apply for funding to support additional phases of a
project awarded funds in earlier rounds of this program. However, to be
competitive, the applicant should demonstrate the extent to which the
previously funded project phase has been able to meet estimated project
schedules and budget, including the ability to realize the benefits
expected for the project.
Transportation plays a critical role in expanding opportunities for
every American. Recent research has found that economic mobility varies
by geography, and poor transportation connections are a factor
preventing some Americans from gaining access to the middle class.\2\
This lack of access limits labor mobility and can be a drag on local
and regional economic growth. Improving transportation infrastructure
can be one of the easiest ways to address this problem.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ https://obs.rc.fas.harvard.edu/chetty/mobility_geo.pdf
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recognizing economic mobility as a defining trait of America's
promise, the 2014 TIGER program will, in part, seek to improve access
to reliable, safe, and affordable transportation for disconnected
communities in urban, suburban, and rural areas. Providing opportunity
to all Americans is a connecting theme that weaves together all of
DOT's primary criteria. The concept can be found in the explanations of
the primary criteria in this NOFA and should be addressed in
applications through the description of how a proposed project
addresses the primary criteria. This may include, but is not limited
to, capital projects that better connect people to jobs, remove
physical barriers to access, and strengthen communities through
neighborhood redevelopment. Additionally, this objective may include
capital projects with training opportunities that focus on
strengthening human capital and workforce opportunities.
The above examples are not intended to be exhaustive, and project
sponsors are strongly encouraged to highlight in their applications how
their proposed capital projects will promote opportunities in ways not
cited above.
DOT may consider the extent to which a proposed project strengthens
access to opportunities through transportation improvements--in
addition to the statutory requirements for an appropriate geographic,
modal, and urban/rural distribution--as a factor to differentiate
meritorious applications from one another. That said, the 2014 TIGER
program will continue to fund innovative and significant projects of
all types, and applications of all types are encouraged.
The purpose of this notice is to solicit applications for TIGER
Discretionary Grants. This is a final notice.
[[Page 11857]]
II. Selection Criteria and Guidance on Application of Selection
Criteria
This section specifies the criteria that DOT will use to evaluate
applications for TIGER Discretionary Grants for capital projects. The
criteria for TIGER Planning Grants are described in Section VI (D) of
this notice. The criteria incorporate the statutory eligibility
requirements for this program, which are specified in this notice as
relevant. This section is divided into two parts. Part A (Selection
Criteria) specifies the criteria that DOT will use to rate projects.
Additional guidance about how DOT will apply these criteria, including
illustrative metrics and examples, is provided in Part B (Additional
Guidance on Selection Criteria).
TIGER Discretionary Grants will be awarded based on the selection
criteria as outlined below. There are two categories of selection
criteria, ``Primary Selection Criteria'' and ``Secondary Selection
Criteria.''
A. Primary Selection Criteria: The five primary selection criteria
are based on the priorities included in DOT's Strategic Plan for FY
2012-FY 2016. Applications that do not demonstrate a likelihood of
significant long-term benefits based on these criteria will not proceed
in the evaluation process. For more detail on DOT's long-term
priorities, please refer to the Strategic Plan, which can be found at:
https://www.dot.gov/sites/dot.dev/files/docs/990_355_DOT_StrategicPlan_508lowres.pdf. DOT does not consider any primary
selection criterion more important than the others. The primary
selection criteria, which will receive equal consideration, are:
1. State of Good Repair: Improving the condition of existing
transportation facilities and systems, with particular emphasis on
projects that minimize life-cycle costs and improve resilience. DOT
will assess whether and to what extent (i) the project is consistent
with relevant plans to maintain transportation facilities or systems in
a state of good repair and address current and projected
vulnerabilities; (ii) if left unimproved, the poor condition of the
asset will threaten future transportation network efficiency, mobility
of goods or accessibility and mobility of people, or economic growth;
(iii) the project is appropriately capitalized up front and uses asset
management approaches that optimize its long-term cost structure; (iv)
a sustainable source of revenue is available for operations and
maintenance of the project; and (v) the project improves the
transportation asset's ability to withstand probable occurrence or
recurrence of an emergency or major disaster or other impacts of
climate change. Additional consideration will be given to the project's
contribution to improvement in the overall reliability of a multimodal
transportation system that serves all users.
2. Economic Competitiveness: Contributing to the economic
competitiveness of the United States over the medium- to long-term, and
creating and preserving jobs. DOT will assess whether the project will
(i) improve long-term efficiency, reliability or cost-competitiveness
in the movement of workers or goods, with a particular focus on
projects that have a significant effect on reducing the costs of
transporting export cargoes; (ii) increase the economic productivity of
land, capital, or labor at specific locations, particularly in
Economically Distressed Areas; (iii) result in long-term job creation
and other economic opportunities, particularly for low-income workers
or for people in Economically Distressed Areas, and opportunities for
small businesses and disadvantaged business enterprises, including
veteran-owned small businesses and service-disabled veteran-owned small
businesses,\3\ and (iv) improve economic mobility through enhanced
multimodal connections to centers of employment, education, and
services or the stimulation of such centers in Economically Distressed
Areas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Executive Office of the President, Council of Economic
Advisers (CEA), issued a memorandum in May 2009 on ``Estimates of
Job Creation from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009.'' That memorandum provided a simple rule for estimating job-
years created by government spending, which is that $92,000 of
government spending creates one job-year (or 10,870 job-years per
billion dollars of spending). More recently, in September 2011,
based on further analysis both of actual job-creation experience
from transportation projects under the Recovery Act and on further
macroeconomic analysis, the CEA determined that a job-year is
created by every $76,923 in transportation infrastructure spending
(or 13,000 job-years per billion dollars of transportation
infrastructure spending). This figure can be used in place of the
earlier $92,000/job-year estimate. Applicants can use this estimate
as an appropriate indicator of direct, indirect and induced job-
years created by TIGER Discretionary Grant spending, but are
encouraged to supplement or modify this estimate to the extent they
can demonstrate that such modifications are justified. However,
since this guidance makes job creation purely a function of the
level of expenditure, applicants should also demonstrate how quickly
jobs will be created under the proposed project.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Quality of Life: Like the livability criterion in past rounds,
quality of life is focused on increasing transportation choices and
access to transportation services for people in communities across the
United States. DOT will consider whether the project furthers the six
``Livability Principles'' developed by DOT with the Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) as part of the Partnership for Sustainable Communities.\4\
DOT will focus on the first principle, the creation of affordable and
convenient transportation choices.\5\ Projects that demonstrate this
principle by providing transportation choices to connect economically
disadvantaged populations, non-drivers, senior citizens, and persons
with disabilities with employment, training and education will receive
particular consideration. Further, DOT will prioritize projects
developed in coordination with land-use planning and economic
development decisions, including through programs like TIGER II
Planning Grants, the Department of Housing and Urban Development's
Regional Planning Grants, or the Environmental Protection Agency's
Brownfield Area-Wide Planning Pilot Program, as well as technical
assistance programs focused on quality of life or economic development
planning.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ https://www.sustainablecommunities.gov/.
\5\ In full, this principle reads: ``Provide more transportation
choices. Develop safe, reliable and economical transportation
choices to decrease household transportation costs, reduce our
nations' dependence on foreign oil, improve air quality, reduce
greenhouse gas emissions and promote public health.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Environmental Sustainability: Improving energy efficiency,
reducing dependence on oil, reducing greenhouse gas emissions,
addressing stormwater through natural means, avoiding and mitigating
environmental impacts and otherwise benefitting the environment. DOT
will assess the project's ability to (i) reduce energy use and air or
water pollution; (ii) avoid adverse environmental impacts to air or
water quality, wetlands, and endangered species; (iii) provide
environmental benefits, such as brownfield redevelopment, ground water
recharge in areas of water scarcity, wetlands creation or improved
habitat connectivity, and stormwater mitigation, including green
infrastructure or (iv) improve the resilience of a transportation asset
or the transportation system. Applicants are encouraged to provide
quantitative information, including baseline information, that
demonstrates how the project will reduce energy consumption, stormwater
runoff, or achieve other benefits for the environment.
[[Page 11858]]
5. Safety: Improving the safety of U.S. transportation facilities
and systems for all modes of transportation and users. DOT will assess
the project's ability to reduce the number, rate, and consequences of
surface transportation-related accidents, serious injuries, and
fatalities among operators, drivers and/or non-drivers in the United
States or in the affected metropolitan area or region, and/or the
project's contribution to the elimination of highway/rail grade
crossings, or the prevention of unintended releases of hazardous
materials. DOT will consider the project's ability to foster a safe,
connected, accessible transportation system for the multimodal movement
of goods and people.
B. Secondary Selection Criteria
1. Innovation: Use of innovative strategies to pursue the long-term
outcomes outlined above. DOT will assess the extent to which the
project uses innovative technology (such as intelligent transportation
systems, dynamic pricing, value capture, rail wayside or on-board
energy recovery, smart cards, active traffic management or radio
frequency identification) to pursue one or more of the long-term
outcomes outlined above and/or to significantly enhance the operational
performance of the transportation system. DOT will also assess the
extent to which the project incorporates innovations in transportation
funding and finance and leverages both existing and new sources of
funding through both traditional and innovative means. Further, DOT
will consider the extent to which the project utilizes innovative
practices in contracting, congestion management, safety management,
asset management, or long-term operations and maintenance. DOT is
particularly interested in projects that apply innovative strategies to
improve the efficiency of project development or improve overall
project delivery in the area.
2. Partnership: Demonstrating strong collaboration among a broad
range of participants, integration of transportation with other public
service efforts, and/or projects that are the product of a robust
planning process.
(a) Jurisdictional and Stakeholder Collaboration: DOT will consider
the extent to which projects involve multiple partners in project
development and funding, such as State and local governments, other
public entities, and/or private or nonprofit entities. DOT will also
assess the extent to which the project application demonstrates
collaboration among neighboring or regional jurisdictions to achieve
national, regional, or metropolitan benefits. In the context of public
private partnerships, DOT will assess the extent to which partners are
incentivized to ensure long-term asset performance, such as through pay
for success approaches. Multiple States or jurisdictions may submit a
joint application and must identify a lead applicant as the primary
point of contact. Joint applications must include a description of the
roles and responsibilities of each project party and must be signed by
each project party.
(b) Disciplinary Integration: DOT will consider the extent to which
projects include partnerships that bring together diverse
transportation agencies and/or are supported, financially or otherwise,
by non-transportation public agencies that are pursuing similar
objectives. For example, DOT will give priority to transportation
projects that are coordinated with economic development, housing, water
infrastructure, and land use plans and policies; similarly, DOT will
give priority to transportation projects that encourage energy
efficiency or improve the environment and are supported by relevant
public agencies with energy or environmental missions. Projects that
grow out of a robust planning process--such as those conducted with
DOT's various planning programs and initiatives, the Department of
Housing and Urban Development's Regional Planning Grants and Choice
Neighborhood Planning Grants, or the Environmental Protection Agency's
Brownfield Area-Wide Planning Pilot Program, as well as technical
assistance programs focused on livability or economic development
planning--will also be given priority.
C. Demonstrated Project Readiness
Projects that receive funding in this round of TIGER will have to
obligate funds by September 30, 2016, or the funding will expire.
Therefore, DOT will assess every application to determine whether the
project is likely to proceed to obligation within the statutory
deadline upon receipt of a TIGER Discretionary Grant (see Additional
Information on Project Readiness Guidelines located at www.dot.gov/TIGER for further details), as evidenced by:
1. Technical Feasibility: The technical feasibility of the project
should be demonstrated by engineering and design studies and
activities; the development of design criteria and/or a basis of
design; the basis for the cost estimate presented in the TIGER
application, including the identification of contingency levels
appropriate to its level of design; and any scope, schedule, and budget
risk-mitigation measures. Applicants must include a detailed statement
of work that focuses on the technical and engineering aspects of the
project and describes in detail the project to be constructed;
2. Financial Feasibility: The viability and completeness of the
project's financing package (assuming the availability of the requested
TIGER Discretionary Grant funds) should be demonstrated including
evidence of stable and reliable capital and (as appropriate) operating
fund commitments sufficient to cover estimated costs; the availability
of contingency reserves should planned capital or operating revenue
sources not materialize; evidence of the financial condition of the
project sponsor; and evidence of the grant recipient's ability to
manage grants. You must include a detailed project budget in this
section of your application or applications containing a detailed
breakdown of how the funds will be spent that provides estimates--both
dollar amount and percentage of cost--of how much each activity would
cost--e.g., preparation, grading, asphalt, etc. If the project will be
completed in individual segments or phases, a budget for each
individual segment or phase must be included. Budget spending
categories must be broken down between TIGER, other Federal, and non-
Federal sources, and identify how each funding source will share in
each activity.
3. Project Schedule: You must include a detailed project schedule
that includes all major project milestones--such as start and
completion of environmental reviews and approvals; design; right of way
acquisition; approval of plan, specification and estimate (PS&E);
procurement; and construction--in this section of your application with
sufficiently detailed information to demonstrate that:
(a) all necessary pre-construction activities will be complete to
allow for any potential grant funding awarded to be obligated no later
than June 30, 2016, to give DOT reasonable assurance that the TIGER
Discretionary Grant funds will likely to be obligated sufficiently in
advance of the September 30, 2016, statutory deadline, and that any
unexpected delays will not put TIGER Discretionary Grant funds at risk
of expiring before they are obligated;
(b) the project can begin construction quickly upon receipt of a
TIGER Discretionary Grant, and that the grant funds will be spent
steadily and
[[Page 11859]]
expeditiously once construction starts; \6\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The schedule should show how many direct, on-project jobs
are expected to be created or sustained during each calendar quarter
after the project is underway.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(c) any applicant that is applying for a TIGER Discretionary Grant
and does not own all of the property or right-of-way required to
complete the project should provide evidence that the property and/or
right-of-way acquisition can and will be completed expeditiously.
4. Assessment of Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies: You
should identify the material risks to the project and the strategies
that the lead applicant and any project partners have undertaken or
will undertake in order to mitigate those risks. In past rounds of
TIGER Discretionary Grants, certain projects have been affected by
procurement delays, environmental uncertainties, and increases in real
estate acquisition costs. You must assess the greatest risks to your
projects and identify how those risks will be mitigated by the project
parties.
Applicants, to the extent they are unfamiliar with the Federal
program, should contact DOT modal field or headquarters offices for
information on what steps are pre-requisite to the obligation of
Federal funds in order to ensure that their project schedule is
reasonable and that there are no risks of delays in satisfying federal
requirements. Contacts for the Federal Highway Administration Division
offices--which are located in all 50 States, Washington, DC, and Puerto
Rico--can be found at https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/about/field.cfm. Contacts
for the ten Federal Transit Administration regional offices can be
found at https://www.fta.dot.gov/12926.html.
D. Additional Guidance on Evaluation
1. Project Costs and Benefits
Applicants for TIGER Discretionary Grants are generally required to
identify, quantify, and compare expected benefits and costs, subject to
the following qualifications: \7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ DOT has a responsibility under Executive Order 12893,
Principles for Federal Infrastructure Investments, 59 FR 4233, to
base infrastructure investments on systematic analysis of expected
benefits and costs, including both quantitative and qualitative
measures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicants will be expected to prepare and submit an analysis of
benefits and costs; however, DOT understands that the level of detail
of analysis that should be expected (for items such as surveys, travel
demand forecasts, market forecasts, and statistical analyses) is less
for smaller projects than for larger projects. The level of
sophistication of the benefit-cost analysis (BCA) should be reasonably
related to the size of the overall project and the amount of grant
funds requested in the application. Any subjective estimates of
benefits and costs should still be quantified, and applicants should
provide appropriate evidence to lend credence to their subjective
estimates. Estimates of benefits should be presented in monetary terms
whenever possible; if a monetary estimate is not possible, then at
least another quantitative estimate (in physical, non-monetary terms,
such as crash rates, ridership estimates, emissions levels, energy
efficiency improvements, etc.) should be provided.
Based on feedback over previous rounds of TIGER, DOT recognizes
that the benefit-cost analysis can be particularly burdensome on Tribal
governments. Therefore, the Department is providing additional
flexibility to Tribal governments for the purposes of this notice. At
their discretion, Tribal applicants may elect to provide raw data to
support the need for a project (such as crash rates, ridership
estimates, and the number of people who will benefit from the project),
without additional analysis. This data will then be used to allow DOT
economists to make the best estimates they can develop (given the data
provided) of benefits and costs. Examples of BCAs by successful Tribal
applicants are also available online.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ https://www.dot.gov/policy-initiatives/tiger/tribal-tiger-bca-examples.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The lack of a useful analysis of expected project benefits and
costs may be the basis for not selecting a project for award of a TIGER
Discretionary Grant. If it is clear to DOT that the total benefits of a
project are not reasonably likely to justify the project's costs, DOT
will not award a TIGER Discretionary Grant to the project.
Detailed guidance for the preparation of benefit-cost analyses is
provided in the 2014 Benefit-Cost Analyses Guidance for TIGER Grant
Applicants and in the BCA Resource Guide (available at www.dot.gov/TIGER). A recording of the Benefit-Cost Analysis Practitioner's
Workshop (2010) and two BCA-related webinars are also available for
viewing at www.dot.gov/TIGER, along with examples of benefit-cost
analyses that have been submitted in previous rounds of TIGER.
Benefits should be presented, whenever possible, in a tabular form
showing benefits and costs in each year for the useful life of the
project. Benefits and costs should both be discounted to the year 2014,
and calculations should be presented for discounted values of both the
stream of benefits and the stream of costs. If the project has multiple
parts, each of which has independent utility, the benefits and costs of
each part should be estimated and presented separately. The results of
the benefit-cost analysis should be summarized in the Project Narrative
section of the application itself, but the details may be presented in
an attachment to the application if the full analysis cannot be
included within the page limit for the project narrative. The
requirement to conduct an economic analysis is not applicable to
applicants seeking TIGER Planning Grants; however, such applicants
should describe the expected benefits of the underlying project(s) that
the planning activities will help advance.
2. Other Environmental Reviews and Approvals
(a) National Environmental Policy Act: An application for a TIGER
Discretionary Grant must detail whether the project will significantly
impact the natural, social and/or economic environment. The application
should demonstrate receipt (or reasonably anticipated receipt) of all
environmental approvals and permits necessary for the project to
proceed to construction on the timeline specified in the project
schedule and necessary to meet the statutory obligation deadline,
including satisfaction of all Federal, State and local requirements and
completion of the National Environmental Policy Act (``NEPA'') process.
You should submit the information listed below with your application:
(i) Information about the NEPA status of the project. If the NEPA
process is completed, an applicant must indicate the date of, and
provide a Web site link or other reference to, the final Categorical
Exclusion, Finding of No Significant Impact or Record of Decision. If
the NEPA process is underway but not complete, the application must
detail the type of NEPA review underway, where the project is in the
process, and indicate the anticipated date of completion. You must
provide a Web site link or other reference to copies of any NEPA
documents prepared.
(ii) Information on reviews by other agencies. An application for a
TIGER Discretionary Grant must indicate whether the proposed project
requires reviews or approval actions by other agencies, indicate the
status of such actions, and provide detailed information about the
status of those reviews or approvals and/or
[[Page 11860]]
demonstrate compliance with any other applicable Federal, State, or
local requirements.
(iii) Environmental studies or other documents--preferably by way
of a Web site link--that describe in detail known project impacts, and
possible mitigation for those impacts.
(iv) A description of discussions with the appropriate DOT modal
administration field or headquarters office regarding compliance with
NEPA and other applicable environmental reviews and approvals.
(b) Legislative Approvals: Receipt of all necessary legislative
approvals (for example, legislative authority to charge user fees or
set toll rates), and evidence of support from State and local elected
officials. Support from all relevant State and local officials is not
required; however, you should demonstrate that the project is broadly
supported.
(c) State and Local Planning: The planning requirements of the
operating administration administering the TIGER project will apply.\9\
You should demonstrate that a project that is required to be included
in the relevant State, metropolitan, and local planning documents has
been or will be included. If the project is not included in the
relevant planning documents at the time the application is submitted,
you should submit a certification from the appropriate planning agency
that actions are underway to include the project in the relevant
planning document. DOT reserves the right to revoke any award of TIGER
Discretionary Grant funds and to award such funds to another project to
the extent either that such funds cannot be timely expended and/or that
construction does not begin in accordance with the project schedule.
Because projects have different schedules, DOT will consider on a case-
by-case basis how much time after selection for award of a TIGER
Discretionary Grant each project has before funds must be obligated
(consistent with law) and construction started through an executed
grant agreement between the selected applicant and the relevant modal
administration administering the grant. This deadline will be specified
for each TIGER Discretionary Grant in the project-specific grant
agreements signed by the grant recipients and will be based on critical
path items identified by applicants in response to items (a)(i) through
(iv) above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ All regionally significant projects requiring an action by
the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) or the Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) must be in the metropolitan transportation
plan, transportation improvement program (TIP) and statewide
transportation improvement program (STIP). Further, in air quality
non-attainment and maintenance areas, all regionally significant
projects, regardless of the funding source, must be included in the
conforming metropolitan transportation plan and TIP. To the extent a
project is required to be on a metropolitan transportation plan,
TIP, and/or STIP, it will not receive a TIGER Discretionary Grant
until it is included in such plans. Projects not currently included
in these plans can be amended by the State and metropolitan planning
organization (MPO). Projects that are not required to be in long
range transportation plans, STIPs, and TIPs will not need to be
included in such plans in order to receive a TIGER Discretionary
Grant. Freight and passenger rail projects are not required to be on
the State Rail Plans called for in the Passenger Rail Investment and
Improvement Act of 2008. This is consistent with the exemption for
high-speed and intercity passenger rail projects under the Recovery
Act. However, applicants seeking funding for freight and passenger
rail projects are encouraged to demonstrate that they have done
sufficient planning to ensure that projects fit into a prioritized
list of capital needs and are consistent with long-range goals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Evaluation and Selection Process
A. Evaluation Process
TIGER Discretionary Grant applications will be evaluated in
accordance with the evaluation process discussed below. DOT will
establish application evaluation teams to review each application that
is received by DOT prior to the Application Deadline. These evaluation
teams will be organized and led by the Office of the Secretary of
Transportation and will include members from each of the Relevant Modal
Administrations and, in some cases, staff from other Federal agencies
with relevant expertise, including freight, resilience, quality of
life, environmental review, and permitting expertise. The evaluation
teams will be responsible for evaluating and rating all of the projects
and making funding recommendations to the Secretary.
DOT will not assign specific numerical scores to projects based on
the selection criteria outlined above in Section II(A) (Selection
Criteria). Rather, ratings of ``highly recommended,'' ``recommended,''
``acceptable,'' or ``not recommended'' will be assigned to projects.
DOT will award TIGER Discretionary Grants to projects that are well-
aligned with one or more of the selection criteria. In addition, DOT
will consider whether a project has a negative effect on any of the
selection criteria, and any such negative effect may reduce the
likelihood that the project will receive a TIGER Discretionary Grant.
DOT will give more consideration to the Primary Selection Criteria
than to the two Secondary Selection Criteria (Innovation and
Partnership), which will also be considered equally
Projects that are recommended by the evaluation teams for further
review will have their benefit-cost analyses evaluated by an Economic
Analysis Team, and will have their project readiness evaluated by a
Project Readiness Team. The Economic Analysis Team will assess the
likelihood that the project's benefits will exceed its costs, and the
Project Readiness Team will assess the likelihood that the project will
be able to obligate any grant awarded to it by the obligation deadline
of September 30, 2016. The results of these evaluations will also be
taken into account in the recommendations made to the Secretary.
Upon completion of this rating process, DOT will analyze the
preliminary list and determine whether highly-rated projects are
consistent with the distributional requirements of the FY 2014
Appropriations Act, including an equitable geographic distribution of
grant funds, an appropriate balance in addressing the needs of urban
and rural areas, and investment in a variety of transportation modes.
If necessary, DOT will adjust the list of recommended projects to
satisfy the statutory distributional requirements while remaining as
consistent as possible with the competitive ratings. The Secretary of
Transportation will make the final project selections.
B. Evaluation of Eligibility
To be selected for a TIGER Discretionary Grant, a project must be
an Eligible Project and the applicant must be an Eligible Applicant.
DOT may consider one or more components of a large project to be an
Eligible Project, but only to the extent that the components have
independent utility, meaning the components themselves, not the project
of which they are a part, are Eligible Projects and satisfy the
selection criteria identified above in Section II(A) (Selection
Criteria). For these projects, the benefits described in an application
must be related to the components of the project for which funding is
requested, not the full project of which they are a part. DOT will not
fund individual phases of a project if the benefits of completing only
these phases would not align well with the selection criteria specified
in this notice because the overall project would still be incomplete.
IV. Grant Administration
DOT expects that each TIGER Discretionary Grant will be
administered by one of the Relevant Modal Administrations, pursuant to
a grant agreement between the TIGER
[[Page 11861]]
Discretionary Grant recipient and the Relevant Modal Administration.
Service Outcome Agreements, Stakeholder Agreements, Buy America
compliance, and other requirements under DOT's other highway, transit,
rail, and port grant programs will be incorporated into the TIGER grant
agreements, where appropriate. The Secretary has the discretion to
delegate such responsibilities to the appropriate Relevant Modal
Administration.
Applicable Federal laws, rules, and regulations of the Relevant
Modal Administration administering the project will apply to projects
that receive TIGER Discretionary Grants.
V. Projects in Rural Areas
The FY 2014 Appropriations Act directs that not less than $120
million of the funds provided for TIGER Discretionary Grants are to be
used for projects in rural areas. For purposes of this notice, DOT is
defining ``rural area'' as any area not in an Urbanized Area, as such
term is defined by the Census Bureau,\10\ and will consider a project
to be in a rural area if all or the majority of a project (determined
by geographic location(s) where the majority of project money is to be
spent) is located in a rural area. Therefore, if all or the majority of
a project is located in a rural area, such a project is eligible to
apply for less than $10 million, but at least $1 million in TIGER
Discretionary Grant funds, and up to 100 percent of the project's costs
may be paid for with Federal funds. To the extent more than a de
minimis portion of a project is located in an Urbanized Area, you
should identify the estimated percentage of project costs that will be
spent in Urbanized Areas and the estimated percentage that will be
spent in rural areas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ For Census 2010, the Census Bureau defined an Urbanized
Area (UA) as an area that consists of densely settled territory that
contains 50,000 or more people. Updated lists of UAs are available
on the Census Bureau Web site. Urban Clusters (UCs) will be
considered rural areas for purposes of the TIGER Discretionary Grant
program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VI. TIGER Planning Grants
A. Background
On December 16, 2009, the President signed the Fiscal Year (FY)
2010 Consolidated Appropriations Act, which appropriated $600 million
to DOT for National Infrastructure Investments, including up to $35
million for planning.
That round of planning grants was conducted in conjunction with $40
million in HUD Community Challenge grants. Thirty-three total DOT
planning grants were made, including 14 joint grants with HUD. In this
round, DOT will not be able to pair TIGER planning grants with HUD
Community Challenge grants due to the lack of available HUD funds.
However, those applicants seeking to fund regional transportation
planning grants should show strong coordination with housing, land use,
economic development, stormwater, and other infrastructure needs,
including identifying risks from extreme weather and climate change,
and plans to mitigate that risk.
B. Eligible Planning Activities
Activities eligible for funding under TIGER Planning Grants are
related to the planning, preparation, or design--including
environmental analysis, feasibility studies, and other pre-construction
activities--of surface transportation projects, including, but not
limited to:
(1) Highway or bridge projects eligible under Title 23, United
States Code (including bicycle and pedestrian related projects);
(2) Public transportation projects eligible under Chapter 53 of
Title 49, United States Code;
(3) Passenger and freight rail transportation projects;
(4) Port infrastructure investments; and
(5) Intermodal projects.
In addition, eligible activities related to multidisciplinary
projects or regional planning may include:
(1) Development of master plans, comprehensive plans, or corridor
plans that will provide connection to jobs for disadvantaged
populations, or include affordable housing components.
(2) Planning activities related to the development of a multimodal
freight corridor, including those that seek to reduce conflicts with
residential areas and with passenger and non-motorized traffic.
(3) Development of port and regional port planning grants,
including State-wide or multi-port planning within a single
jurisdiction or region.
(4) Planning to encourage multiple projects within a common area to
engage in programmatic mitigation in order to increase efficiency and
improve outcomes for communities and the environment.
(5) Risk assessments and planning to identify vulnerabilities and
address the transportation system's ability to withstand probable
occurrence or recurrence of an emergency or major disaster or impacts
of climate change.
C. Selection Criteria
Planning grant applications will be evaluated against the same
criteria as capital grants. For project-level planning, this means
considering how the project resulting from the plan will ultimately
further the five primary and two secondary criteria. For regional
transportation planning efforts, applications should demonstrate how
the regional plan will help lead to these outcomes.
Similar to capital grant applications, planning applications will
be more competitive if they can demonstrate funding support above the
20 percent match requirement for urban areas, and the 0 percent match
requirement for rural areas.
Additionally, applicants should show the capacity to successfully
implement the proposed activities in a timely manner.
VII. Application Cycle
A. Contents of Applications
You must include all of the information requested below in your
application. DOT reserves the right to ask any applicant to supplement
data in its application, but expects applications to be complete upon
submission. To the extent practical, you should provide data and
evidence of project merits in a form that is publicly available or
verifiable.
1. Standard Form 424, Application for Federal Assistance
Additional clarifying guidance and FAQs to assist you in completing
the SF-424 will be available at www.dot.gov/TIGER by April 3, 2014,
when the ``Apply'' function within Grants.gov opens to accept
applications under this notice.
2. Title Page
The title page must include the project title, location (city,
State, district), type of application (capitol, project planning, or
regional planning), the applicant organization name, the type of
eligible applicant (State government, local government, U.S. territory,
Tribal government, transit agency, port authority, MPO, RDO, other unit
of government), and the amount of TIGER funding being applied for. The
information may be presented in a table or formatted list.
3. Project Narrative (Attachment to SF 424)
The project narrative must respond to the application requirements
outlined below. DOT recommends that the project narrative be prepared
with standard formatting preferences (.i.e., a single-spaced document,
using a standard 12-point font, such as Times New Roman, with 1-inch
margins).
[[Page 11862]]
Your application must include information required for DOT to
assess each of the criteria specified in Section II (A) (Selection
Criteria), as such criteria are explained in Section II(B) (Additional
Guidance on Selection Criteria). You must demonstrate the
responsiveness of a project to any pertinent selection criteria with
the most relevant information that you can provide, regardless of
whether such information has been specifically requested, or
identified, in this notice. You should provide concrete evidence of the
feasibility of achieving project milestones, and of financial capacity
and commitment in order to support project readiness. DOT will give
priority to projects for which a TIGER Discretionary Grant will help to
complete an overall funding package, so you should clearly demonstrate
the extent to which the project cannot be readily and efficiently
completed without a TIGER Discretionary Grant, and the extent to which
other sources of funds, including Federal, State, or local funding, may
or may not be readily available for the project. Any such information
shall be considered part of the application, not supplemental, for
purposes of the application size limits identified below in Part B
(Length of Applications). Information provided pursuant to this
paragraph must be quantified, to the extent possible, to describe the
project's benefits to the Nation, a metropolitan area, or a region.
Information provided pursuant to this paragraph should include
projections for both the build and no-build scenarios for the project
for each year between the completion of the project and a point in time
at least 20 years beyond the project's completion date or the lifespan
of the project, whichever is closer to the present.
All applications should include a detailed description of the
proposed project and geospatial data for the project, including a map
of the project's location and its connections to existing
transportation infrastructure. An application should also include a
description of how the project addresses the needs of an urban and/or
rural area. An application should clearly describe the transportation
challenges that the project aims to address, the project's potential
vulnerabilities to extreme weather and climate change throughout its
projected life, and how the project will address these challenges. The
description should include relevant data, such as passenger or freight
volumes, congestion levels, infrastructure condition, and safety
experience.
DOT recommends that the project narrative generally adhere to the
following basic outline and, in addition to a detailed statement of
work, detailed project schedule, and detailed project budget, you
should include a table of contents, maps, and graphics that make the
information easier to review:
I. Project Description (including information on the expected users
of the project, a description of the transportation challenges that the
project aims to address, and how the project will address these
challenges);
II. Project Parties (information about the grant recipient and
other project parties);
III. Grant Funds and Sources/Uses of Project Funds (information
about the amount of grant funding requested, availability/commitment of
funds sources and uses of all project funds, total project costs,
percentage of project costs that would be paid for with TIGER
Discretionary Grant funds, and the identity and percentage shares of
all parties providing funds for the project (including any other
pending or past Federal funding requests for the project as well as
Federal funds already provided under other programs and required match
for those funds);
IV. Selection Criteria (information about how the project aligns
with each of the primary and secondary selection criteria and a
description of the results of the benefit-cost analysis):
a. Primary Selection Criteria
i. State of Good Repair
ii. Economic Competitiveness
iii. Quality of Life
iv. Environmental Sustainability
v. Safety
b. Secondary Selection Criteria
i. Innovation
ii. Partnership
c. Results of Benefit-Cost Analysis
V. Project readiness, including planning approvals, NEPA and other
environmental reviews/approvals, (including information about
permitting, legislative approvals, State and local planning, and
project partnership and implementation agreements); and
VI. Federal Wage Rate Certification (an application must include a
certification, signed by the applicant(s), stating that it will comply
with the requirements of subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40,
United States Code (Federal wage rate requirements), as required by the
FY 2014 Continuing Appropriations Act).
The purpose of this recommended format is to ensure that
applications clearly address the program requirements and make critical
information readily apparent.
B. Length of Applications
The project narrative may not exceed 30 pages in length.
Documentation supporting the assertions made in the narrative portion
may also be provided, but should be limited to relevant information. If
possible, Web site links to supporting documentation (including a more
detailed discussion of the benefit-cost analysis) should be provided
rather than copies of these materials. Spreadsheets supporting the
benefit-cost analysis should be original Excel spreadsheets, not PDFs
of those spreadsheets. At your discretion, relevant materials provided
previously to a Relevant Modal Administration in support of a different
DOT discretionary program (for example, New Starts or TIFIA) may be
referenced and described as unchanged. To the extent referenced, this
information need not be resubmitted for the TIGER Discretionary Grant
application (although provision of a Web site link would facilitate
DOT's consideration of the information). DOT recommends use of
appropriately descriptive file names (e.g., ``Project Narrative,''
``Maps,'' ``Memoranda of Understanding and Letters of Support,'' etc.)
for all attachments. Cover pages and tables of contents do not count
towards the 30-page limit for the narrative portion of the application,
and the federal wage rate certification may also be outside of the 30-
page narrative. Otherwise, the only substantive portions of the
application that should exceed the 30-page limit are any supporting
documents (including a more detailed discussion of the benefit-cost
analysis) provided to support assertions or conclusions made in the 30-
page narrative section.
C. Contact Information
Contact information for a direct employee of the lead applicant
organization is required as part of the SF-424. DOT will use this
information to inform parties of DOT's decision regarding selection of
projects, as well as to contact parties in the event that DOT needs
additional information about an application. Contact information for a
contractor, agent, or consultant of the lead applicant organization is
insufficient for DOT's purposes.
D. Protection of Confidential Business Information
All information submitted as part of or in support of any
application shall use publicly available data or data that can be made
public and methodologies that are accepted by industry practice and
standards, to the extent possible. If the application includes
information
[[Page 11863]]
you consider to be a trade secret or confidential commercial or
financial information, you should do the following: (1) Note on the
front cover that the submission ``Contains Confidential Business
Information (CBI);'' (2) mark each affected page ``CBI;'' and (3)
highlight or otherwise denote the CBI portions. DOT protects such
information from disclosure to the extent allowed under applicable law.
In the event DOT receives a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request
for the information, DOT will follow the procedures described in its
FOIA regulations at 49 CFR 7.17. Only information that is ultimately
determined to be confidential under that procedure will be exempt from
disclosure under FOIA.
VIII. Performance Management
Each applicant selected for TIGER Discretionary Grant capital grant
funding will be required to work with DOT on the development and
implementation of a plan to collect information and report on the
project's performance with respect to the relevant long-term outcomes
that are expected to be achieved through construction of the project.
Each recipient of a TIGER Discretionary Grant will, in accordance with
its grant agreement, report on specified performance indicators for its
project. Performance indicators will be negotiated for each project,
considerate of the individual project's stated goals as well as
resource constraints of applicants. Performance indicators will not
include formal goals or targets, but will include baseline measures as
well as post-project outcomes for an agreed-upon timeline, and will
inform the TIGER Discretionary Grant program in working towards best
practices, programmatic performance measures, and future decisionmaking
guidelines.
IX. Questions and Clarifications
For further information concerning this notice please contact the
TIGER Discretionary Grant program staff via email at
TIGERGrants@dot.gov, or call Howard Hill at 202-366-0301. A TDD is
available for individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing at 202-366-
3993. DOT will regularly post answers to these questions and other
important clarifications on DOT's Web site at www.dot.gov/TIGER.
Issued on February 25, 2014.
Anthony R. Foxx,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-04627 Filed 2-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P