Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes, 11016-11019 [2014-04259]
Download as PDF
11016
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(k) Other FAA AD Provisions
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Kathrine Rask, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–2180; fax 425–227–1149.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer, use these actions if they are
FAA-approved. Corrective actions are
considered FAA-approved if they were
approved by the State of Design Authority (or
its delegated agent, or the Design Approval
Holder with a State of Design Authority’s
design organization approval), as applicable.
You are required to ensure the product is
airworthy before it is returned to service.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(l) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information Brazilian
Airworthiness Directive 2012–10–01,
effective October 29, 2012, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the
AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA–2014–0059.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Embraer S.A., Technical
Publications Section (PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro
˜
Faria Lima, 2170—Putim—12227–901 Sao
Jose dos Campos—SP—BRASIL; telephone
+55 12 3927–5852 or +55 12 3309–0732; fax
+55 12 3927–7546; email distrib@
embraer.com.br; Internet https://
www.flyembraer.com. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February
14, 2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–04256 Filed 2–26–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0061; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–029–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede
airworthiness directive (AD) 2007–06–
12, that applies to certain Airbus Model
A330–200 and A330–300 airplanes. AD
2007–06–12 requires, for certain
airplanes, reinforcement of the structure
of the center fuselage by installing
external stiffeners (butt straps) at frame
(FR) 53.3 on the fuselage skin between
left-hand (LH) and right-hand (RH)
stringer (STR) 13, and related
investigative and corrective actions.
Since we issued AD 2007–06–12, we
have determined that the compliance
times must be reduced in order to
address the unsafe condition. This
proposed AD would reduce the
compliance times for reinforcing the
structure of the center fuselage at FR
53.3. We are proposing this AD to
prevent fatigue cracking of the fuselage,
which could result in reduced structural
integrity of the fuselage.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 14, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS,
Airworthiness Office—EAL, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
airworthiness.A330–A340@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–
0061; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–1138;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2014–0061; Directorate Identifier
2013–NM–029–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On March 7, 2007, we issued AD
2007–06–12, Amendment 39–14993 (72
FR 12555, March 16, 2007) (‘‘AD 2007–
06–12’’). AD 2007–06–12 requires
actions intended to address an unsafe
condition on the products listed above.
Since we issued AD 2007–06–12,
Amendment 39–14993 (72 FR 12555,
March 16, 2007), we have determined
that the compliance times must be
reduced in order to address the unsafe
condition. We have also added the
E:\FR\FM\27FEP1.SGM
27FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Proposed Rules
compliance time for short- and longrange airplane utilization based on the
new fatigue and damage tolerance
evaluation. The European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA), which is the
Technical Agent for the Member States
of the European Community, has issued
EASA Airworthiness Directive 2013–
0016, dated January 16, 2013 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
During the fatigue tests (EF2) of the Airbus
A330 test fuselage, initiation and
development of cracks were evidenced at the
circumferential joint of frame 53.3.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead
to a reduction in the structural integrity of
the fuselage.
EASA issued AD 2006–0266 [(https://
ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/easa_ad_2006_0266_
Superseded.pdf/AD_2006–0266_1), which
corresponds to FAA AD 2007–06–12,
Amendment 39–14993 (72 FR 12555, March
16, 2007)], which took over the requirements
´ ´
of Direction Generale de L’aviation Civile
[DGAC] France AD F–2003–415 for A330–
300 pre-mod 41652S11819, and required
reinforcement of the circumferential joint of
frame 53.3 by application of Airbus Service
Bulletin (SB) A330–53–3143 on A330–300
post modification 41652S11819 and pre-mod
49202, and all A330–200 pre-mod 49202 in
order to improve the fatigue life.
Since that [EASA] AD was issued, in the
frame of a new fatigue and damage tolerance
evaluation taking into account the aeroplane
utilisation, the thresholds for the
reinforcement were reassessed and the
conclusion is that some thresholds must be
reduced.
For the reason described above, this
[EASA] AD retains the requirements of EASA
AD 2006–0266, which is superseded, and
requires reinforcement of structure of the
centre fuselage at the upper circumferential
joint of frame 53.3 within the new
thresholds.
The initial compliance times range
between 15,700 total flight cycles or
94,600 total flight hours, whichever
occurs first; and 25,600 total flight
cycles or 77,000 total flight hours,
whichever occurs first; depending on
airplane configuration. You may
examine the MCAI in the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating it in Docket No. FAA–
2014–0061.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Mandatory Service
Bulletin A330–53–3127 Revision 02,
including Appendix 01, dated December
7, 2011, and Mandatory Service Bulletin
A330–53–3143 Revision 05, including
Appendix 01, dated May 29, 2012. The
actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the
MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Repair Approvals
In many FAA transport ADs, when
the service information specifies to
contact the manufacturer for further
instructions if certain discrepancies are
found, we typically include in the AD
a requirement to accomplish the action
using a method approved by either the
FAA or the State of Design Authority (or
its delegated agent).
We have recently been notified that
certain laws in other countries do not
11017
allow such delegation of authority, but
some countries do recognize design
approval organizations. In addition, we
have become aware that some U.S.
operators have used repair instructions
that were previously approved by a
State of Design Authority or a Design
Approval Holder (DAH) as a method of
compliance with this provision in FAA
ADs. Frequently, in these cases, the
previously approved repair instructions
come from the airplane structural repair
manual or the DAH repair approval
statements that were not specifically
developed to address the unsafe
condition corrected by the AD. Using
repair instructions that were not
specifically approved for a particular
AD creates the potential for doing
repairs that were not developed to
address the unsafe condition identified
by the MCAI AD, the FAA AD, or the
applicable service information, which
could result in the unsafe condition not
being fully corrected.
To prevent the use of repairs that
were not specifically developed to
correct the unsafe condition, certain
requirements of this proposed AD
would require that the repair approval
specifically refer to the FAA AD. This
change is intended to clarify the method
of compliance and to provide operators
with better visibility of repairs that are
specifically developed and approved to
correct the unsafe condition. In
addition, we use the phrase ‘‘its
delegated agent, or the DAH with State
of Design Authority design organization
approval, as applicable’’ in this
proposed AD to refer to a DAH
authorized to approve certain required
repairs for this proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 9 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this proposed AD.
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per product
Installation .....................
Up to 327 work-hour × $85 per hour = $27,795
$17,850
Up to $45,645 ..............
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Cost on U.S. operators
Up to $410,805.
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
E:\FR\FM\27FEP1.SGM
27FEP1
11018
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Proposed Rules
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2007–06–12, Amendment 39–14993 (72
FR 12555, March 16, 2007), and adding
the following new AD:
■
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2014–0061;
Directorate Identifier 2013–NM–029–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by April 14,
2014.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2007–06–12,
Amendment 39–14993 (72 FR 12555, March
16, 2007).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Model A330–
201, –202, –203, –223, and –243 airplanes;
and A330–301, –321, –322, –323, –341, –342,
and –343 airplanes, certificated in any
category, except those on which Airbus
modification 49202 has been embodied in
production.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53, Fuselage.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a new fatigue
and damage tolerance evaluation that
concluded the compliance time for an
existing reinforcement of the fuselage has to
be reduced. We are issuing this AD to
prevent fatigue cracking of the fuselage,
which could result in reduced structural
integrity of the fuselage.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Installation for Model A330–300 Series
Airplanes
For Airbus Model A330–301, A330–321,
A330–322, A330–323, A330–341, A330–342,
and A330–343 airplanes, except those on
which Airbus modification 41652S11819 has
been incorporated in production: At the time
specified in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this
AD, whichever occurs later, install butt
straps at FR53.3 on the fuselage skin between
left-hand (LH) and right-hand (RH) stringer
(STR) 13, and do all related investigative and
corrective actions before further flight.
Except as provided by paragraph (h) of this
AD, do all actions in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–53–3127,
Revision 02, including Appendix 01, dated
December 7, 2011.
(1) At the applicable time specified in
paragraph (g)(1)(i) or (g)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Airplanes with a short-range mission as
specified in Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A330–53–3127, Revision 02, dated
December 7, 2011: Within 15,300 flight
cycles or 46,100 flight hours, whichever
occurs first, after the first flight of the
airplane.
(ii) Airplanes with a long-range mission as
specified in Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A330–53–3127, Revision 02, dated
December 7, 2011: Within 13,200 flight
cycles or 79,300 flight hours, whichever
occurs first after the first flight of the
airplane.
(2) Within 24 months after the effective
date of this AD, but not to exceed 14,700 total
flight cycles or 51,400 total flight hours,
whichever occurs earlier.
(h) Corrective Actions
For Airbus Model A330–301, –321, –322,
–323, –341, –342, and –343 airplanes, except
those on which Airbus Modification
41652S11819 has been incorporated in
production: If any crack is detected during
the related investigative actions (rototest)
required by paragraph (g) of this AD, before
further flight, repair using a method
approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA; or the EASA (or its
delegated agent, or by the Design Approval
Holder (DAH) with EASA design
organization approval). For a repair method
to be approved, the repair approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(i) Installation for Model A330–200 and –300
Series Airplanes
For airplanes specified in paragraph (c) of
this AD on which Airbus modification
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41652S11819 has been embodied in
production: At the time specified in
paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2) of this AD,
whichever occurs later, install butt straps at
FR53.3 on the fuselage skin between LH and
RH STR13; and do all related investigative
and other specified actions before further
flight, as applicable. Do all actions in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A330–53–3143, Revision 05, dated
May 29, 2012, including Appendix 1; except,
if any crack is detected during a related
investigative action (rototest), before further
flight, repair the crack using a method
approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM 116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA; or the EASA (or its
delegated agent, or by the Design Approval
Holder (DAH) with EASA design
organization approval). For a repair method
to be approved, the repair approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(1) At the applicable times specified in the
‘‘threshold’’ column of the table in 1.E.
‘‘Compliance’’ of Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A330–53–3143, Revision 05, dated
May 29, 2012. Where paragraph 1.E.
‘‘Compliance’’ of Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A330 53–3143, Revision 05, dated
May 29, 2012, specifies a time in the
‘‘threshold’’ column, this AD requires
compliance within the corresponding times
after the first flight of the airplane.
(2) Within 24 months after the effective
date of this AD, but not to exceed 17,600 total
flight cycles or 61,600 total flight hours,
whichever occurs earlier.
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
(1) This paragraph provides credit for
actions required by paragraphs (g) of this AD
if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Airbus Service
Bulletin A330–53–3127, Revision 01,
including Appendix 01, dated November 21,
2003 (which is not incorporated by reference
in this AD).
(2) This paragraph provides credit for
actions required by paragraph (i) of this AD
if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using any service
information specified in paragraphs (j)(2)(i)
through (j)(2)(v) of this AD; this service
information is not incorporated by reference
in this AD.
(i) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A330–53–3143, including Appendix 01,
dated December 24, 2004.
(ii) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A330–53–3143, Revision 01, including
Appendix 01, dated June 29, 2006.
(iii) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A330–53–3143, Revision 02, including
Appendix 01, dated August 31, 2010.
(iv) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A330–53–3143, Revision 03, including
Appendix 01, dated March 3, 2011.
(v) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A330–53–3143, Revision 04, including
Appendix 01, dated December 6, 2011.
(k) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
E:\FR\FM\27FEP1.SGM
27FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 227–1138; fax (425) 227–
1149. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD. AMOCs approved previously for AD
2007–06–12, Amendment 39–14993 (72 FR
12555, March 16, 2007), are approved as
AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of
paragraph (i) of this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer, use these actions if they are
FAA-approved. Corrective actions are
considered FAA-approved if they were
approved by the State of Design Authority (or
its delegated agent, or the DAH with a State
of Design Authority’s design organization
approval). You are required to ensure the
product is airworthy before it is returned to
service.
(l) Related Information
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2013–0016, dated
January 16, 2013, for related information.
This MCAI may be found in the AD docket
on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2014–0061.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness
Office—EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33
5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may
view this service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February
14, 2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–04259 Filed 2–26–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:29 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2014–0060; Directorate
Identifier 2012–NM–194–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede
Airworthiness Directives (AD) 2006–21–
08, AD 2007–14–01, AD 2008–25–02,
AD 2010–04–09, AD 2011–01–02, and
AD 2012–16–05, for certain Airbus
Model A330 and 340 series airplanes.
AD 2006–21–08, AD 2007–14–01, AD
2008–25–02, AD 2010–04–09, AD 2011–
01–02, and AD 2012–16–05 currently
require revising the maintenance
program or inspection program to
incorporate certain maintenance
requirements and airworthiness
limitations for fuel tank systems. Since
we issued AD 2006–21–08, AD 2007–
14–01, AD 2008–25–02, AD 2010–04–
09, AD 2011–01–02, and AD 2012–16–
05, we have determined that more
restrictive maintenance requirements
and airworthiness limitations are
necessary. This proposed AD would
require a new maintenance or
inspection program revision. We are
proposing this AD to prevent the
potential of ignition sources inside fuel
tanks, which, in combination with
flammable fuel vapors, could result in
fuel tank explosions and consequent
loss of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 14, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS,
Airworthiness Office—EAL, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11019
96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–
0060; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–1138;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2014–0060; Directorate Identifier
2012–NM–194–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On October 10, 2006, we issued AD
2006–21–08, Amendment 39–14793 (71
FR 61639, October 19, 2006), for certain
Airbus Model A330–200, A340–200,
and A340–300 airplanes. AD 2006–21–
08 requires installation of heat shields
in the belly fairing of the center
fuselage. AD 2006–21–08 resulted from
fuel system reviews conducted by the
E:\FR\FM\27FEP1.SGM
27FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11016-11019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04259]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2014-0061; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-029-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to supersede airworthiness directive (AD) 2007-06-
12, that applies to certain Airbus Model A330-200 and A330-300
airplanes. AD 2007-06-12 requires, for certain airplanes, reinforcement
of the structure of the center fuselage by installing external
stiffeners (butt straps) at frame (FR) 53.3 on the fuselage skin
between left-hand (LH) and right-hand (RH) stringer (STR) 13, and
related investigative and corrective actions. Since we issued AD 2007-
06-12, we have determined that the compliance times must be reduced in
order to address the unsafe condition. This proposed AD would reduce
the compliance times for reinforcing the structure of the center
fuselage at FR 53.3. We are proposing this AD to prevent fatigue
cracking of the fuselage, which could result in reduced structural
integrity of the fuselage.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 14, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 45 80; email airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0061; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1138;
fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2014-0061;
Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-029-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On March 7, 2007, we issued AD 2007-06-12, Amendment 39-14993 (72
FR 12555, March 16, 2007) (``AD 2007-06-12''). AD 2007-06-12 requires
actions intended to address an unsafe condition on the products listed
above.
Since we issued AD 2007-06-12, Amendment 39-14993 (72 FR 12555,
March 16, 2007), we have determined that the compliance times must be
reduced in order to address the unsafe condition. We have also added
the
[[Page 11017]]
compliance time for short- and long-range airplane utilization based on
the new fatigue and damage tolerance evaluation. The European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member
States of the European Community, has issued EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2013-0016, dated January 16, 2013 (referred to after this as
the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''),
to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
During the fatigue tests (EF2) of the Airbus A330 test fuselage,
initiation and development of cracks were evidenced at the
circumferential joint of frame 53.3.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead to a reduction in
the structural integrity of the fuselage.
EASA issued AD 2006-0266 [(https://ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/easa_ad_2006_0266_Superseded.pdf/AD_2006-0266_1), which corresponds
to FAA AD 2007-06-12, Amendment 39-14993 (72 FR 12555, March 16,
2007)], which took over the requirements of Direction
G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de L'aviation Civile [DGAC] France AD F-2003-
415 for A330-300 pre-mod 41652S11819, and required reinforcement of
the circumferential joint of frame 53.3 by application of Airbus
Service Bulletin (SB) A330-53-3143 on A330-300 post modification
41652S11819 and pre-mod 49202, and all A330-200 pre-mod 49202 in
order to improve the fatigue life.
Since that [EASA] AD was issued, in the frame of a new fatigue
and damage tolerance evaluation taking into account the aeroplane
utilisation, the thresholds for the reinforcement were reassessed
and the conclusion is that some thresholds must be reduced.
For the reason described above, this [EASA] AD retains the
requirements of EASA AD 2006-0266, which is superseded, and requires
reinforcement of structure of the centre fuselage at the upper
circumferential joint of frame 53.3 within the new thresholds.
The initial compliance times range between 15,700 total flight
cycles or 94,600 total flight hours, whichever occurs first; and 25,600
total flight cycles or 77,000 total flight hours, whichever occurs
first; depending on airplane configuration. You may examine the MCAI in
the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating it in Docket No. FAA-2014-0061.
Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-53-3127 Revision
02, including Appendix 01, dated December 7, 2011, and Mandatory
Service Bulletin A330-53-3143 Revision 05, including Appendix 01, dated
May 29, 2012. The actions described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Repair Approvals
In many FAA transport ADs, when the service information specifies
to contact the manufacturer for further instructions if certain
discrepancies are found, we typically include in the AD a requirement
to accomplish the action using a method approved by either the FAA or
the State of Design Authority (or its delegated agent).
We have recently been notified that certain laws in other countries
do not allow such delegation of authority, but some countries do
recognize design approval organizations. In addition, we have become
aware that some U.S. operators have used repair instructions that were
previously approved by a State of Design Authority or a Design Approval
Holder (DAH) as a method of compliance with this provision in FAA ADs.
Frequently, in these cases, the previously approved repair instructions
come from the airplane structural repair manual or the DAH repair
approval statements that were not specifically developed to address the
unsafe condition corrected by the AD. Using repair instructions that
were not specifically approved for a particular AD creates the
potential for doing repairs that were not developed to address the
unsafe condition identified by the MCAI AD, the FAA AD, or the
applicable service information, which could result in the unsafe
condition not being fully corrected.
To prevent the use of repairs that were not specifically developed
to correct the unsafe condition, certain requirements of this proposed
AD would require that the repair approval specifically refer to the FAA
AD. This change is intended to clarify the method of compliance and to
provide operators with better visibility of repairs that are
specifically developed and approved to correct the unsafe condition. In
addition, we use the phrase ``its delegated agent, or the DAH with
State of Design Authority design organization approval, as applicable''
in this proposed AD to refer to a DAH authorized to approve certain
required repairs for this proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 9 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD.
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Installation................... Up to 327 $17,850 Up to $45,645..... Up to $410,805.
work[dash]hour x $85
per hour = $27,795.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This
[[Page 11018]]
proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2007-06-12, Amendment 39-14993 (72 FR 12555, March 16, 2007), and
adding the following new AD:
Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2014-0061; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-
029-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by April 14, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2007-06-12, Amendment 39-14993 (72 FR
12555, March 16, 2007).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, and
-243 airplanes; and A330-301, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342, and -343
airplanes, certificated in any category, except those on which
Airbus modification 49202 has been embodied in production.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a new fatigue and damage tolerance
evaluation that concluded the compliance time for an existing
reinforcement of the fuselage has to be reduced. We are issuing this
AD to prevent fatigue cracking of the fuselage, which could result
in reduced structural integrity of the fuselage.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Installation for Model A330-300 Series Airplanes
For Airbus Model A330-301, A330-321, A330-322, A330-323, A330-
341, A330-342, and A330-343 airplanes, except those on which Airbus
modification 41652S11819 has been incorporated in production: At the
time specified in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, whichever
occurs later, install butt straps at FR53.3 on the fuselage skin
between left-hand (LH) and right-hand (RH) stringer (STR) 13, and do
all related investigative and corrective actions before further
flight. Except as provided by paragraph (h) of this AD, do all
actions in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-53-3127, Revision 02, including
Appendix 01, dated December 7, 2011.
(1) At the applicable time specified in paragraph (g)(1)(i) or
(g)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Airplanes with a short-range mission as specified in Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-53-3127, Revision 02, dated December
7, 2011: Within 15,300 flight cycles or 46,100 flight hours,
whichever occurs first, after the first flight of the airplane.
(ii) Airplanes with a long-range mission as specified in Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-53-3127, Revision 02, dated December
7, 2011: Within 13,200 flight cycles or 79,300 flight hours,
whichever occurs first after the first flight of the airplane.
(2) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, but
not to exceed 14,700 total flight cycles or 51,400 total flight
hours, whichever occurs earlier.
(h) Corrective Actions
For Airbus Model A330-301, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342, and -
343 airplanes, except those on which Airbus Modification 41652S11819
has been incorporated in production: If any crack is detected during
the related investigative actions (rototest) required by paragraph
(g) of this AD, before further flight, repair using a method
approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the EASA (or its delegated agent, or
by the Design Approval Holder (DAH) with EASA design organization
approval). For a repair method to be approved, the repair approval
must specifically refer to this AD.
(i) Installation for Model A330-200 and -300 Series Airplanes
For airplanes specified in paragraph (c) of this AD on which
Airbus modification 41652S11819 has been embodied in production: At
the time specified in paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2) of this AD,
whichever occurs later, install butt straps at FR53.3 on the
fuselage skin between LH and RH STR13; and do all related
investigative and other specified actions before further flight, as
applicable. Do all actions in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-53-3143,
Revision 05, dated May 29, 2012, including Appendix 1; except, if
any crack is detected during a related investigative action
(rototest), before further flight, repair the crack using a method
approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM 116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the EASA (or its delegated agent, or
by the Design Approval Holder (DAH) with EASA design organization
approval). For a repair method to be approved, the repair approval
must specifically refer to this AD.
(1) At the applicable times specified in the ``threshold''
column of the table in 1.E. ``Compliance'' of Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A330-53-3143, Revision 05, dated May 29, 2012.
Where paragraph 1.E. ``Compliance'' of Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A330 53-3143, Revision 05, dated May 29, 2012, specifies a
time in the ``threshold'' column, this AD requires compliance within
the corresponding times after the first flight of the airplane.
(2) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, but
not to exceed 17,600 total flight cycles or 61,600 total flight
hours, whichever occurs earlier.
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
(1) This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraphs (g) of this AD if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-
3127, Revision 01, including Appendix 01, dated November 21, 2003
(which is not incorporated by reference in this AD).
(2) This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraph (i) of this AD if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using any service information specified in
paragraphs (j)(2)(i) through (j)(2)(v) of this AD; this service
information is not incorporated by reference in this AD.
(i) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-53-3143, including
Appendix 01, dated December 24, 2004.
(ii) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-53-3143, Revision
01, including Appendix 01, dated June 29, 2006.
(iii) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-53-3143, Revision
02, including Appendix 01, dated August 31, 2010.
(iv) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-53-3143, Revision
03, including Appendix 01, dated March 3, 2011.
(v) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-53-3143, Revision 04,
including Appendix 01, dated December 6, 2011.
(k) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International
[[Page 11019]]
Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate.
If sending information directly to the International Branch, send it
to ATTN: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1138; fax (425) 227-1149.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD. AMOCs approved previously for AD 2007-06-12, Amendment 39-14993
(72 FR 12555, March 16, 2007), are approved as AMOCs for the
corresponding provisions of paragraph (i) of this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer, use these actions if they
are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered FAA-approved if
they were approved by the State of Design Authority (or its
delegated agent, or the DAH with a State of Design Authority's
design organization approval). You are required to ensure the
product is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(l) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2013-0016, dated January 16,
2013, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD
docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-0061.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 14, 2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-04259 Filed 2-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P