Revisions to Test Methods and Testing Regulations, 11227-11294 [2014-02704]
Download as PDF
Vol. 79
Thursday,
No. 39
February 27, 2014
Part III
Environmental Protection Agency
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
40 CFR Parts 51, 60, 61, et al.
Revisions to Test Methods and Testing Regulations; Final Rule
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4717
Sfmt 4717
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
11228
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
number: (919) 541–0516; email address:
melton.lula@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 51, 60, 61, and 63
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–0114; FRL–9906–23–
OAR]
RIN 2060–AQ01
Revisions to Test Methods and Testing
Regulations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action promulgates
technical and editorial corrections for
source testing of emissions and
operations. Some current testing
provisions contain inaccuracies and
outdated procedures, and new
alternatives that have been approved are
being added. These revisions will
improve the quality of data and will
give testers additional flexibility to use
the newly approved alternative
procedures.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
February 27, 2014. The incorporation by
reference materials listed in the rule are
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of February 27, 2014.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–0114. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., confidential business information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically at
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Docket, EPA/DC, William
Jefferson Clinton (WJC) Building, Room
3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC. The Docket Facility
and the Public Reading Room are open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the Air
Docket is (202) 566–1742.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Lula Melton, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, Air Quality
Assessment Division, Measurement
Technology Group (E143–02), Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711;
telephone number: (919) 541–2910; fax
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
Table of Contents
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
B. Where can I obtain a copy of this action?
C. Judicial Review
II. Background
III. Summary of Amendments
A. Appendix M of Part 51
B. Method 201A of Appendix M of Part 51
C. Method 202 of Appendix M of Part 51
D. General Provisions (Subpart A) Part 60
E. Industrial-Commercial-Institutional
Steam Generating Units (Subpart Db)
Part 60
F. Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste
Incinerators (Subpart Ec) Part 60
G. Sulfuric Acid Plants (Subpart H) Part 60
H. Sewage Treatment Plants (Subpart O)
Part 60
I. Kraft Pulp Mills (Subpart BB) Part 60
J. Stationary Gas Turbines (Subpart GG)
Part 60
K. Lead-Acid Battery Manufacturing Plants
(Subpart KK) Part 60
L. Metallic Mineral Processing Plants
(Subpart LL) Part 60
M. Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing
Manufacture (Subpart UU) Part 60
N. Volatile Organic Chemical (VOC)
Emissions From Synthetic Organic
Compound Manufacturing Industry
(SOCMI) Distillation Operations (Subpart
NNN) Part 60
O. Stationary Compression Ignition
Internal Combustion Engines (Subpart
IIII) Part 60
P. Stationary Spark Ignition Internal
Combustion Engines (Subpart JJJJ) Part
60
Q. Method 1 of Appendix A–1 of Part 60
R. Method 2 of Appendix A–1 of Part 60
S. Method 2A of Appendix A–1 of Part 60
T. Method 2B of Appendix A–1 of Part 60
U. Method 2D of Appendix A–1 of Part 60
V. Method 3A of Appendix A–2 of Part 60
W. Method 3C of Appendix A–2 of Part 60
X. Method 4 of Appendix A–3 of Part 60
Y. Method 5 of Appendix A–3 of Part 60
Z. Method 5A of Appendix A–3 of Part 60
AA. Method 5E of Appendix A–3 of Part
60
BB. Method 5H of Appendix A–3 of Part
60
CC. Method 6 of Appendix A–4 of Part 60
DD. Method 6C of Appendix A–4 of Part
60
EE. Method 7 of Appendix A–4 of Part 60
FF. Method 7A of Appendix A–4 of Part 60
GG. Method 7E of Appendix A–4 of Part
60
HH. Method 8 of Appendix A–4 of Part 60
II. Method 10 of Appendix A–4 of Part 60
JJ. Methods 10A and 10B of Appendix A–
4 of Part 60
KK. Method 11 of Appendix A–5 of Part 60
LL. Method 12 of Appendix A–5 of Part 60
MM. Method 14A of Appendix A–5 of Part
60
NN. Method 16A of Appendix A–6 of Part
60
OO. Method 16C of Appendix A–6 of Part
60
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
PP. Method 18 of Appendix A–6 of Part 60
QQ. Method 23 of Appendix A–7 of Part
60
RR. Method 24 of Appendix A–7 of Part 60
SS. Method 25 of Appendix A–7 of Part 60
TT. Method 25C of Appendix A–7 of Part
60
UU. Method 25D of Appendix A–7 of Part
60
VV. Method 26 of Appendix A–8 of Part 60
WW. Method 26A of Appendix A–8 of Part
60
XX. Method 29 of Appendix A–8 of Part 60
YY. Method 30B of Appendix A–8 of Part
60
ZZ. Performance Specification 3 of
Appendix B of Part 60
AAA. Performance Specification 4 of
Appendix B of Part 60
BBB. Performance Specification 4B of
Appendix B of Part 60
CCC. Performance Specification 7 of
Appendix B of Part 60
DDD. Performance Specification 11 of
Appendix B of Part 60
EEE. Performance Specification 12B of
Appendix B of Part 60
FFF. Performance Specification 15 of
Appendix B of Part 60
GGG. Performance Specification 16 of
Appendix B of Part 60
HHH. Procedure 1 of Appendix F of Part
60
III. Procedure 2 of Appendix F of Part 60
JJJ. Procedure 5 of Appendix F of Part 60
KKK. General Provisions (Subpart A) Part
61
LLL. Beryllium (Subpart C) Part 61
MMM. Beryllium Rocket Motor Firing
(Subpart D) Part 61
NNN. Mercury (Subpart E) Part 61
OOO. Inorganic Arsenic Emissions From
Glass Manufacturing Plants (Subpart N)
Part 61
PPP. Method 101 of Appendix B of Part 61
QQQ. Method 101A of Appendix B of Part
61
RRR. Method 102 of Appendix B of Part 61
SSS. Method 104 of Appendix B of Part 61
TTT. Methods 108 and 108A of Appendix
B of Part 61
UUU. General Provisions (Subpart A) Part
63
VVV. Synthetic Organic Chemical
Manufacturing Industry (Subpart G) Part
63
WWW. Chromium Emissions From Hard
and Decorative Chromium Electroplating
and Chromium Anodizing Tanks
(Subpart N) Part 63
XXX. Ethylene Oxide Emissions Standards
for Sterilization Facilities (Subpart O)
Part 63
YYY. Marine Tank Vessel Loading
Operations (Subpart Y) Part 63
ZZZ. Aerospace Manufacturing and
Rework Facilities (Subpart GG) Part 63
AAAA. Pharmaceuticals Production
(Subpart GGG) Part 63
BBBB. Secondary Aluminum Production
(Subpart RRR) Part 63
CCCC. Manufacturing of Nutritional Yeast
(Subpart CCCC) Part 63
DDDD. Petroleum Refineries: Catalytic
Cracking Units, Catalytic Reforming
Units, and Sulfur Recovery Units
(Subpart UUUU) Part 63
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
EEEE. Stationary Reciprocating Internal
Combustion Engines (Subpart ZZZZ)
Part 63
FFFF. Method 306 of Appendix A of Part
63
GGGG. Method 306A of Appendix A of
Part 63
HHHH. Methods 308, 315, and 316 of
Appendix A of Part 63
IIII. Method 321 of Appendix A of Part 63
IV. Public Comments on the Proposed
Amendments
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
To Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
K. Congressional Review Act
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
The revisions promulgated in this
final rule apply to testing at a number
of source categories. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed in the preceding FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
B. Where can I obtain a copy of this
action?
In addition to being available in the
docket, an electronic copy of this rule
will also be available on the Worldwide
Web (WWW) through the Technology
Transfer Network (TTN). Following the
Administrator’s signature, a copy of the
final rule will be placed on the TTN’s
policy and guidance page for newly
proposed or promulgated rules at
https://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg. The TTN
provides information and technology
exchange in various areas of air
pollution control.
C. Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act (CAA), judicial review of this
final rule is available by filing a petition
for review in the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia Circuit by
April 28, 2014. Under section
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
307(d)(7)(B) of the CAA, only an
objection to this final rule that was
raised with reasonable specificity
during the period for public comment
can be raised during judicial review.
Moreover, under section 307(b)(2) of the
CAA, the requirements established by
this action may not be challenged
separately in any civil or criminal
proceedings brought by EPA to enforce
these requirements.
II. Background
The revisions to test methods and
testing regulations were proposed in the
Federal Register on January 9, 2012,
with a public comment period that
ended March 9, 2012. Thirty-eight
comment letters were received from the
public. Changes were made to this final
rule based on the public comments.
III. Summary of Amendments
In the introduction of Appendix M of
part 51, Methods 3A and 19 are added
to the list of methods not requiring the
use of audit samples.
B. Method 201A of Appendix M of Part
51
Revisions are made to Method 201A
as published on December 21, 2010.
Typographical errors in references to
acetone blanks, isokinetic sampling rate,
source gas temperatures, stack blockage
dimensions by the sampling heads, and
particulate matter with an aerodynamic
diameter less than or equal to 10
micrometers (PM10) in Sections 7.2.1,
8.3.4(b), 8.3.4.1, 8.7.2.2, and 8.7.5.5(a),
respectively, are corrected. An
erroneous reference to Methods 4A and
5 in Section 10.1 when using a standard
pitot tube is corrected to refer to
Methods 1 and 2. Section 10.5, which
addresses Class A volumetric glassware
is deleted because it is not needed. For
those filters that cannot be weighed to
a constant weight in Section 11.2.1,
instructions are added to flag and report
the data as a minimum value. It is noted
that the nozzle, front half, and in-stack
filter samples need to be speciated into
organic and inorganic fractions similar
to the practice in Method 17. The
method now notes that neither Method
17 nor 201A require a separate analysis
of the filter for inorganic and organic
particulate matter. Clarity is added for
using Method 17 for quantifying
condensable particulate matter. An
incorrect term in Equation 9 of Section
12.5 is corrected. In the nomenclature in
Section 12.1, Vb, the volume of aliquot
taken for ion chromatography (IC)
analysis, is deleted.
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
C. Method 202 of Appendix M of Part
51
Revisions are made to Method 202 as
published on December 21, 2010. In
Sections 7.2.1 and 7.2.2, an error in the
units of the acetone blank is corrected.
In Section 8.5.3.1, the text erroneously
referring to empty impingers is deleted.
Section 11.2.1 is clarified concerning
the use of Method 17 for quantifying
condensable particulate matter. Figures
2 and 3 are revised to correctly show the
first impinger with an extended stem
instead of a shortened one to be
consistent with the method text, and the
condensed moisture and sample portion
of the sampling train are labeled to
make it easy to identify. Figures 4, 5,
and 6 are republished because of the
poor print quality in the December 21,
2010, publication.
D. General Provisions (Subpart A) Part
60
A. Appendix M of Part 51
PO 00000
11229
In the General Provisions of part 60,
Section 60.13(d)(1) is revised to remove
the phrase ‘‘automatically, intrinsic to
the opacity monitor.’’ Methods 3A and
19 are added to the list of methods not
requiring the use of audit samples in
Section 60.8(g). A new Section 60.8(i) is
added to allow the use of Method 205
of 40 CFR part 51, Appendix M,
‘‘Verification of Gas Dilution Systems
for Field Instrument Calibrations,’’ as an
alternative provision whenever multiple
calibration gases are required under part
60. The agency notes, however, that the
use of calibration gas dilution devices
continues to be disallowed for part 75
applications (see 40 CFR 75.22(a)(5)(i)).
Section 60.17 is revised to arrange the
consensus standards that are
incorporated by reference in alphanumeric order.
E. Industrial-Commercial-Institutional
Steam Generating Units (Subpart Db)
Part 60
In subpart Db, Method 320 is allowed
as an alternative for determining
nitrogen oxides (NOX) concentration in
Section 60.46b(f)(1)(ii), (h)(1) and (2),
and sulfur dioxide (SO2) concentration
in Section 60.47b(b)(2).
F. Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste
Incinerators (Subpart Ec) Part 60
In subpart Ec, the definition of
medical/infectious wastes in Section
60.51c is revised to correct the
misspelling of ‘‘cremation.’’
G. Sulfuric Acid Plants (Subpart H) Part
60
In subpart H, an equation for
calculating the SO2 emission rate in
Section 60.84(d) is corrected.
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
11230
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
H. Sewage Treatment Plants (Subpart O)
Part 60
In subpart O, a reference to Method
209F in Section 60.154(b)(5) is revised
to reflect a newer available version of
the method (i.e., 2540G).
I. Kraft Pulp Mills (Subpart BB) Part 60
In subpart BB, a typographical error is
corrected in the equation for correcting
the total reduced sulfur concentration to
10 percent oxygen.
J. Stationary Gas Turbines (Subpart GG)
Part 60
In subpart GG, the definitions of terms
for the equation in Section 60.335(b)(l)
are revised to allow the reference
combustor inlet absolute pressure to be
measured in millimeters of mercury
(mm Hg). The site barometric pressure
is allowed as an alternative to the
observed combustor inlet absolute
pressure for calculating the mean NOX
emission concentration.
K. Lead-Acid Battery Manufacturing
Plants (Subpart KK) Part 60
In subpart KK, Method 29 is allowed
as an alternative to Method 12 in
Section 60.374(b)(1) and (c)(2) for
determining the lead concentration and
flow rate of the effluent gas. An error in
the equation for calculating the lead
emission concentration in 60.374(b)(2)
is corrected.
L. Metallic Mineral Processing Plants
(Subpart LL) Part 60
In subpart LL, an error in the value of
the particulate matter standard in
Section 60.382(a)(1) is corrected from
0.02 g/dscm to 0.05 g/dscm. An
alternative procedure, wherein a single
visible emission observer can conduct
visible emission observations for up to
three fugitive, stack, or vent emission
points within a 15-second interval, is
allowed.
M. Asphalt Processing and Asphalt
Roofing Manufacture (Subpart UU) Part
60
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
In subpart UU, an error in the value
of the particulate matter standard for
saturated felt or smooth-surfaced roll
roofing is corrected from 0.04 kg/Mg to
0.4 kg/Mg.
N. Volatile Organic Compound (VOC)
Emissions from Synthetic Organic
Chemical Manufacturing Industry
(SOCMI) Distillation Operations
(Subpart NNN) Part 60
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
In Subpart IIII, the requirement to use
Method 1 or 1A for sampling point
selection in testing gaseous emission
from engines with smaller ducts is
dropped, and single- or three-point
sampling, depending on duct size, is
added.
P. Stationary Spark Ignition Internal
Combustion Engines (Subpart JJJJ) Part
60
In Subpart JJJJ, the requirement to use
Method 1 or 1A for sampling point
selection in testing gaseous emissions
from engines with smaller ducts is
dropped, and single- or three-point
sampling, depending on duct size, is
added.
Q. Method 1 of Appendix A–1 of Part 60
In Method 1, the distances from the
sampling point to flow disturbances is
clarified in Figure 1–1, and Figure 1–2
is corrected to show the proper
demarcation between the requirement
for 12 and 16 sampling points.
R. Method 2 of Appendix A–1 of Part 60
In Method 2, a pressure stability
specification for the pitot tube leakcheck is added. An erroneous reference
to Figure 2–6B is corrected to reference
Figure 2–7B. An error in a term in the
denominator of Equation 2–7 is
corrected. The velocity constant in
English units used in Equation 2–7 is
corrected by changing the units from m/
sec to ft/sec. The term for absolute
temperature in Equations 2–7 and 2–8 is
corrected to represent the average of the
absolute temperatures; an inadvertently
omitted term is added to Section 12.1
for the average absolute temperature;
and calibrating a barometer against a
NIST-traceable barometer is allowed as
an alternative to calibrating against a
mercury barometer.
S. Method 2A of Appendix A–1 of Part
60
In Method 2A, calibrating a barometer
against a NIST-traceable barometer is
allowed as an alternative to calibrating
against a mercury barometer.
T. Method 2B of Appendix A–1 of Part
60
In subpart NNN, references to
paragraphs in Section 60.660(c)(4) and
Section 60.665(h)(2) and (3) are
corrected.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
O. Stationary Compression Ignition
Internal Combustion Engines (Subpart
IIII) Part 60
In Method 2B, nomenclature errors
are corrected and the assumed ambient
carbon dioxide concentration used in
the calculations is changed from 300 to
380 ppm to closer approximate current
ambient levels.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
U. Method 2D of Appendix A–1 of Part
60
In Method 2D, calibrating a barometer
against a NIST-traceable barometer is
allowed as an alternative to calibrating
against a mercury barometer.
V. Method 3A of Appendix A–2 of Part
60
In Method 3A, a redundant sentence
noting that pre-cleaned air may be used
for the high-level calibration gas is
deleted.
W. Method 3C of Appendix A–2 of Part
60
In Method 3C, an equation for
correcting the sample nitrogen
concentration for tank dilution is added
as a supplemental calculation option for
Method 25C samples.
X. Method 4 of Appendix A–3 of Part 60
In Method 4, the English value for the
leak rate exceedance in Section 9.1 is
corrected from 0.20 cfm to 0.020 cfm.
Method 6A, Method 320, and a
calculation using F-factors are added as
alternatives to Method 4 for the
moisture determination.
Y. Method 5 of Appendix A–3 of Part 60
In Method 5, it is clarified that the
deionized water used in the analysis of
material caught in the impingers must
have ≤0.001 percent residue; the factor
K is corrected to read K’ in Equation 5–
13; calibrating a barometer against a
NIST-traceable barometer is allowed as
an alternative to calibrating against a
mercury barometer; calibrating a
temperature sensor against a
thermometer equivalent to a mercury-inglass thermometer is allowed as an
alternative to calibrating against a
mercury-in-glass thermometer;
rechecking temperature sensors for the
filter holder and metering system after
each test is allowed in place of having
sensors calibrated within 3 °F; the
option to check the probe heater
calibration after a test at a single point
using a reference thermometer is added;
the use of weather station barometric
pressure corrected to testing point
elevation is added as an option to
having an on-site barometer; a single
acetone blank per container is allowed
in place of a blank from each wash
bottle; Section 10.3.3 is clarified as a
post-test metering system calibration
check rather than a metering system
calibration, and an alternative metering
check procedure is added; the use of
filter holder supports or frits made of
Teflon is allowed without having to first
obtain the Administrator’s approval;
and Reference 13 for post-test
calibration is added to the method.
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
11231
Z. Method 5A of Appendix A–3 of Part
60
In Method 5A, mercury-free
thermometers are allowed as an
alternative to mercury-in-glass
thermometers.
concentrations, and calibrating a
temperature sensor against a
thermometer equivalent to a mercury-inglass thermometer is added as an
acceptable alternative to using a
mercury-in-glass thermometer.
MM. Method 14A of Appendix A–5 of
Part 60
AA. Method 5E of Appendix A–3 of Part
60
In Method 5E, the requirement to use
the Rosemount Model 2100A total
organic content analyzer is replaced
with the Tekmar-Dohrmann or
equivalent analyzer. In Section 12.5, the
equation for total particulate
concentration is correctly labeled as Eq.
5E–5.
GG. Method 7E of Appendix A–4 of Part
60
NN. Method 16A of Appendix A–6 of
Part 60
In Method 7E, the instructions for
choosing the high-level calibration gas
are clarified. Instructions are added to
minimize contact of the sample with
any condensate to reduce the chance of
sample loss, and an error in the traverse
point locations used to determine
stratification across large stacks is
corrected. The basis of a stable response
for measurements in the system
response time determination is revised
in Section 8.2.5 to conform with Section
8.2.6. Alternative sampling bags made of
materials other than Tedlar are allowed
if the materials are applicable for
retaining the compounds of interest.
In Method 16A, the applicability
section notes that method results may
be biased low if used at sources other
than kraft pulp mills where stack
oxygen levels may be lower.
BB. Method 5H of Appendix A–3 of Part
60
In Method 5H, Section 12.1 is revised
to add missing terms Ci, Co, Qi, and Qo;
and procedures for the determination of
an alternative tracer gas flow rate are
added.
CC. Method 6 of Appendix A–4 of Part
60
In Method 6, calibrating a temperature
sensor against a thermometer equivalent
to a mercury-in-glass thermometer is
allowed as an alternative to using a
mercury-in-glass thermometer, and
calibrating a barometer against a NISTtraceable barometer is allowed as an
alternative to calibrating against a
mercury barometer.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
DD. Method 6C of Appendix A–4 of Part
60
In Section 4.0 of Method 6C, an
incorrect reference to Section 4.1 of
Method 6 is corrected to reference
Section 4.0 of Method 7E. Provisions
that were removed from the original
method that addressed potential
quenching effects in fluorescence
analyzers are added to the method.
EE. Method 7 of Appendix A–4 of Part
60
In Method 7, procedures are added to
avoid biasing the results when sampling
under conditions of high SO2
concentrations; calibrating a barometer
against a NIST-traceable barometer is
added as an alternative to calibrating
against a mercury barometer; and
calibrating a temperature sensor against
a thermometer equivalent to a mercuryin-glass thermometer is an acceptable
alternative to using a mercury-in-glass
thermometer.
FF. Method 7A of Appendix A–4 of Part
60
In Method 7A, new procedures are
added to avoid biasing the results when
sampling under conditions of high SO2
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
HH. Method 8 of Appendix A–4 of Part
60
In Method 8, an error in the definition
of Vsoln is corrected. Figure 8–1 is
clarified to identify which impingers
collect sulfuric acid/sulfur trioxide and
which collect SO2.
II. Method 10 of Appendix A–4 of Part
60
Method 10 is revised to allow the use
of sample tanks as an alternative to
flexible bags for sample collection.
JJ. Methods 10A and 10B of Appendix
A–4 of Part 60
In Methods 10A and 10B, sampling
bags made of materials other than
Tedlar are allowed if the materials have
the sample retaining qualities of Tedlar.
KK. Method 11 of Appendix A–5 of Part
60
Method 11 is revised to address
sample breakthrough at high
concentrations by using an additional
collection impinger. Calibrating a
temperature sensor against a
thermometer equivalent to a mercury-inglass thermometer is an acceptable
alternative to using a mercury-in-glass
thermometer.
In Section 10.1.1 of Method 14A, an
incorrect reference to Figure 5–6 is
corrected to reference Figure 5–5.
OO. Method 16C of Appendix A–6 of
Part 60
In Method 16C, errors in the
nomenclature and the equation for
calculating the total reduced sulfur
concentration are corrected.
PP. Method 18 of Appendix A–6 of Part
60
In Method 18, sampling bags made of
materials other than Tedlar are allowed
if the materials are applicable for
retaining the compounds of interest.
QQ. Method 23 of Appendix A–7 of Part
60
In Method 23, the requirement in
Section 2.2.7 that silica gel be stored in
metal containers has been deleted.
Section 4.2.7 is clarified to note that the
used silica gel should be transferred to
its original container or other suitable
vessel if moisture is being determined or
discarded if not needed. Mercury-free
thermometers are allowed as
alternatives to mercury-in-glass
thermometers. Section 8.0, which was
inadvertently removed in a previous
rulemaking, has been added.
RR. Method 24 of Appendix A–7 of Part
60
In Method 24, ASTM Method D2369
is cited without referencing specific
sections to preclude confusion if the
method sections are revised in the
future.
SS. Method 25 of Appendix A–7 of Part
60
In Method 25, more detailed
information is given to describe the
filters used for sample collection.
LL. Method 12 of Appendix A–5 of Part
60
TT. Method 25C of Appendix A–7 of
Part 60
Method 12 is revised to allow for
analysis by inductively coupled plasmaatomic emission spectrometry (ICP–
AES) and cold vapor atomic
fluorescence spectrometry (CVAFS) as
alternatives to atomic absorption (AA)
analysis.
Method 25C is revised to allow
sampling lines made of Teflon. Probes
that have closed points and are driven
below the surface in a single step and
withdrawn a distance to create a gas gap
are allowed as acceptable substitutes to
pilot probes and the auger procedure.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
11232
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
UU. Method 25D of Appendix A–7 of
Part 60
In Method 25D, errors in crossreferences within the method are
corrected.
VV. Method 26 of Appendix A–8 of Part
60
Method 26 is revised to allow the use
of heated Teflon probes in place of
glass-lined probes. Conflicting
temperature requirements for the
sampling system are clarified, and the
note to keep the probe and filter
temperature at least 20 °C above the
source temperature is removed. The
location of the thermocouple that
monitors the collected gas temperature
is clarified as being as close to the filter
holder as practicable instead of in the
gas stream. Method 26A is allowed as an
acceptable alternative when Method 26
is required.
WW. Method 26A of Appendix A–8 of
Part 60
Method 26A is revised to clearly state
that the temperature of the probe and
filter must be maintained between 120
and 134 °C.
XX. Method 29 of Appendix A–8 of Part
60
Method 29 is revised to allow sample
analysis by CVAFS as an alternative to
AA analysis.
YY. Method 30B of Appendix A–8 of
Part 60
In Method 30B, calibrating a
barometer against a NIST-traceable
barometer is allowed as an alternative to
calibrating against a mercury barometer.
Table 9–1 and the method text are
revised to amend the quality assurance/
quality control criteria for sorbent trap
section 2 breakthrough and sample
analysis to address compliance testing
and relative accuracy testing of mercury
monitoring systems currently being
conducted at much lower emission
concentrations. The method is revised
to include the most up-to-date citation
for determining the method detection
limit.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
ZZ. Performance Specification 3 of
Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 3, a
statement that was inadvertently
removed that allows the relative
accuracy to be within 20 percent of the
reference method mean value is added
to establish the original intent of the
rule.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
AAA. Performance Specification 4 of
Appendix B of Part 60
Performance Specification 4 is revised
to remove the interference trap specified
in Method 10 when evaluating nondispersive infrared continuous emission
monitoring systems against Method 10.
relative accuracy test audit clearly notes
that the statistical tests in Section 8.3
are not required for this test. An
incorrect reference to Equation 16–4 in
Section 12.4 is corrected.
BBB. Performance Specification 4B of
Appendix B of Part 60
Performance Specification 4B is
clarified to note that Equation 1 in
Section 7.1.1 for calculating calibration
error only applies to the carbon
monoxide monitor and not the oxygen
monitor. It is noted for the oxygen
monitor that the calibration error should
be expressed as the oxygen
concentration difference between the
mean monitor and reference value at
three levels.
In Procedure 1, the relevant
performance specification would be
cited for the RAA calculation instead of
using the current Equation 1–1, which
is not appropriate for all pollutants.
CCC. Performance Specification 7 of
Appendix B of Part 60
Performance Specification 7 is revised
to allow Methods 15 and 16 as reference
methods in addition to Method 11.
DDD. Performance Specification 11 of
Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 11,
errors in the denominators of Equations
11–1 and 11–2 are corrected.
EEE. Performance Specification 12B of
Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 12B,
allowance is made for using a single
good trap when one is lost, broken or
damaged. More flexibility is also
allowed in meeting the stack flow-tosample flow ratio.
FFF. Performance Specification 15 of
Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 15, the
general references to 40 CFR part 60,
Appendix B, for the relative accuracy
analysis procedure are revised to
specifically cite Performance
Specification 2 of 40 CFR part 60,
Appendix B.
GGG. Performance Specification 16 of
Appendix B of Part 60
Performance Specification 16 is
revised to clarify the retesting of a
predictive emission monitoring system
(PEMS) after a sensor is replaced.
Relative accuracy testing at three load or
production rate levels is allowed in
cases where the key operating parameter
is not readily alterable. Additional
instruction is added for performing the
relative accuracy audit (RAA). An error
in the RAA acceptance criterion is
corrected, and an alternative acceptance
criterion for low concentration
measurements is added. The yearly
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
HHH. Procedure 1 of Appendix F of Part
60
III. Procedure 2 of Appendix F of Part
60
In Procedure 2, Equations 2–2 and 2–
3 are revised to have the full-scale value
in the denominator, which is more
appropriate than the up-scale check
value. The denominator of equation 2–
4 is revised to include the volume of the
reference device rather than the fullscale value.
JJJ. Procedure 5 of Appendix F of Part
60
In Procedure 5, the second section
listed as Section 6.2.6 is correctly
numbered as Section 6.2.7.
KKK. General Provisions (Subpart A)
Part 61
In the General Provisions of part 61,
Methods 3A and 19 are added to the list
of methods not requiring the use of
audit samples in Section 61.13(e).
LLL. Beryllium (Subpart C) Part 61
In the Beryllium National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAP), Method 29 of part 60 is
added as an acceptable alternative to
Method 104 in Section 61.33(a) for
emissions testing.
MMM. Beryllium Rocket Motor Firing
(Subpart D) Part 61
In the beryllium rocket motor firing
NESHAP, a conversion error in the
emission standard in Section 61.42(a) is
corrected.
NNN. Mercury (Subpart E) Part 61
In the mercury NESHAP, Method 29
of part 60 is added as an acceptable
alternative to Method 101A in Section
61.53(d)(2) for emissions testing.
OOO. Inorganic Arsenic Emissions From
Glass Manufacturing Plants (Subpart N)
Part 61
In the glass manufacturing plants
NESHAP, Method 29 in Appendix A of
part 60 is added as an acceptable
alternative to Method 108 in Section
61.164(d)(2)(i) for determining the
arsenic emissions rate and in Section
61.164(e)(1)(i) and (e)(2) for determining
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
the arsenic concentration in a gas
stream.
PPP. Method 101 of Appendix B of Part
61
XXX. Ethylene Oxide Emissions
Standards for Sterilization Facilities
(Subpart O) Part 63
Method 101A is revised to allow
analysis by ICP–AES or CVAFS as
alternatives to AA analysis.
The ethylene oxide emissions
standard for sterilization facilities is
revised to allow California Air
Resources Board (CARB) Method 431 as
an alternative to the procedures in
Section 63.365(b) for determining the
efficiency at the sterilization chamber
vent. An error in a reference to a section
in Performance Specification 8 is also
corrected.
RRR. Method 102 of Appendix B of Part
61
YYY. Marine Tank Vessel Loading
Operations (Subpart Y) Part 63
In Method 102, mercury-free
thermometers are allowed in place of
mercury-in-glass thermometers.
The marine tank vessel loading
operations emissions standard is revised
to allow Method 25B as an alternative
to Method 25A in Section 63.565(d)(5)
for determining the average VOC
concentration upstream and
downstream of recovery devices.
Method 25B is allowed as an alternative
to Methods 25 and 25A for determining
the percent reduction in VOC in Section
63.565(d)(8), and the requirement that
Method 25B be validated according to
Method 301 in Section 63.565(d)(10) is
added. Method 25B is also added as an
alternative to Method 25A in
determining the baseline outlet VOC
concentration in Section 63.565(g).
Method 101 is revised to allow
analysis by ICP–AES or CVAFS as
alternatives to AA analysis.
QQQ. Method 101A of Appendix B of
Part 61
SSS. Method 104 of Appendix B of Part
61
Method 104 is revised to allow
analysis by ICP–AES and CVAFS as
alternatives to AA analysis. A new
alternative procedures section is added
to address ICP–AES.
TTT. Methods 108 and 108A of
Appendix B of Part 61
Methods 108 and 108A are revised to
allow analysis by ICP–AES as an
alternative to AA analysis. A new
alternative procedures section is added
to address ICP–AES.
UUU. General Provisions (Subpart A)
Part 63
In the General Provisions of part 63,
Methods 3A and 19 are added to the list
of methods not requiring the use of
audit samples in Section 63.7(c). In
Section 63.8(f)(6)(iii), an incorrect
reference to a section of Performance
Specification 2 is corrected. Section
63.14 is revised to arrange the materials
that are incorporated by reference in
alpha-numeric order.
VVV. Synthetic Organic Chemical
Manufacturing Industry (Subpart G)
Part 63
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
WWW. Chromium Emissions From Hard
and Decorative Chromium
Electroplating and Chromium
Anodizing Tanks (Subpart N) Part 63
South Coast Air Quality Management
District Method 205.1 is added as a
testing option for measuring total
chromium.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
DDDD. Petroleum Refineries: Catalytic
Cracking Units, Catalytic Reforming
Units, and Sulfur Recovery Units
(Subpart UUUU) Part 63
Table 4 in the petroleum refineries
emissions standard is revised to allow
Method 320 as an alternative to Method
18 for determining control device
efficiency for organic compounds.
EEEE. Stationary Reciprocating Internal
Combustion Engines (Subpart ZZZZ)
Part 63
Table 4 in the stationary reciprocating
internal combustion engines emissions
standard is revised to clarify that a
heated probe is not necessary when
using ASTM D6522 to measure oxygen
or carbon dioxide concentrations. The
requirement to use Method 1 or 1A for
sampling site and sampling point
selection in testing gaseous emissions
from engines with smaller ducts is
deleted, and single- or three-point
sampling, depending on duct size, is
added.
ZZZ. Aerospace Manufacturing and
Rework Facilities (Subpart GG) Part 63
FFFF. Method 306 of Appendix A of
Part 63
Method 306 is revised to remove
references to two figures that do not
exist and to clarify the conditions under
which ICP is appropriate for sample
analysis. Alternative mercury-free
thermometers are allowed as
alternatives to mercury-in-glass
thermometers.
The aerospace manufacturing and
rework facilities emissions standard is
revised to remove an incorrect reference
to the location of Method 319 in Section
63.750(o).
GGGG. Method 306A of Appendix A of
Part 63
In Method 306A, information is added
to clarify the conditions under which
sample filtering is required.
AAAA. Pharmaceuticals Production
(Subpart GGG) Part 63
HHHH. Methods 308, 315, and 316 of
Appendix A of Part 63
In Methods 308, 315, and 316,
calibrating a temperature sensor against
a thermometer equivalent to a mercuryin-glass thermometer is added as an
alternative to mercury-in-glass
thermometers. Alternative mercury-free
thermometers are allowed as
alternatives to mercury-in-glass
thermometers.
The pharmaceuticals production
emissions standard is revised to allow
Method 320 as an alternative to Method
18 for demonstrating that a vent is not
a process vent.
BBBB. Secondary Aluminum Production
(Subpart RRR) Part 63
Subpart G is revised to allow the use
of Method 316 or Method 8260B in the
SW–846 Compendium of Methods to
determine hazardous air pollutant
concentrations in wastewater streams in
Section 63.144(b)(5)(i).
11233
The secondary aluminum production
emissions standard is revised to allow
Method 26 as an alternative to Method
26A in Section 63.1511(c)(9) for
determining hydrochloric acid (HCl)
concentration.
CCCC. Manufacturing of Nutritional
Yeast (Subpart CCCC) Part 63
Table 2 in the manufacturing of
nutritional yeast emissions standard is
revised to delete the requirement to use
Methods 1, 2, 3, and 4 when measuring
VOC by Method 25A.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
IIII. Method 321 of Appendix A of Part
63
In Method 321, the term for dilution
factor in the calculations is clarified.
IV. Public Comments on the Proposed
Amendments
Thirty-eight comment letters were
received on the proposed rule. The
public comments and the agency’s
responses are summarized in the
Summary of Comments and Responses
Document that has been added to the
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
11234
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
docket that is accessible at the address
given in the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under the terms of
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and is, therefore, not
subject to review under Executive
Orders 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011). It does not involve
the expenditure of $100 million in a
year and does not raise significant
issues. This final rule amends current
testing regulations by removing errors
and obsolete provisions and adding
approved alternative procedures.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Burden is
defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). This final
rule does not add information collection
requirements beyond those currently
required under the applicable
regulations. This final rule amends
current testing regulations by removing
errors and obsolete provisions and
adding approved alternative procedures.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
generally requires an agency to prepare
a regulatory flexibility analysis of any
rule subject to notice and comment
rulemaking requirements under the
Administrative Procedure Act or any
other statute unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Small entities
include small businesses, small
organizations, and small governmental
jurisdictions.
For purposes of assessing the impacts
of this rule on small entities, small
entity is defined as: (1) A small business
as defined by the Small Business
Administration’s (SBA) regulations at 13
CFR 121.201; (2) a small governmental
jurisdiction that is a government of a
city, county, town, school district or
special district with a population of less
than 50,000; and (3) a small
organization that is any not-for-profit
enterprise which is independently
owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field.
After considering the economic
impacts of this final rule on small
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
entities, I certify that this action will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This final rule will not impose any
requirements on small entities since it
only corrects and updates current
requirements and adds new testing
options.
EO 13045 because it does not establish
an environmental standard intended to
mitigate health or safety risks.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This action contains no federal
mandates under the provisions of Title
II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C. 1531–
1538, for state, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector. This
action imposes no enforceable duty on
any state, local or tribal governments or
the private sector. Therefore, this action
is not subject to the requirements of
sections 202 or 205 of the UMRA. This
action is also not subject to the
requirements of section 203 of UMRA
because it contains no regulatory
requirements that might significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. The
alternative procedure being added will
give small entities more flexibility in
choosing testing procedures in
applicable situations.
This rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 (66 FR 28355 (May 22,
2001)), because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132. This final rule
corrects and updates current testing
requirements. Thus, Executive Order
13132 does not apply to this action.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000). This final rule corrects and
updates testing provisions that are
already currently mandated. It does not
add any new requirements and does not
affect pollutant emissions or air quality.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets EO 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997) as applying only
to those regulatory actions that concern
health or safety risks, such that the
analysis required under section 5–501 of
the EO has the potential to influence the
regulation. This action is not subject to
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law
104–113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
directs the EPA to use voluntary
consensus standards in its regulatory
activities unless to do so would be
inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary
consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications,
test methods, sampling procedures, and
business practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. The NTTAA directs
the EPA to provide Congress, through
OMB, explanations when the agency
decides not to use available and
applicable voluntary consensus
standards. This action does not involve
technical standards. Therefore, the EPA
did not consider the use of any
voluntary consensus standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
Executive Order (EO) 12898 (59 FR
7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
The EPA has determined that this
final rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects
on minority or low-income populations
because it does not affect the level of
protection provided to human health or
the environment. This final rule does
not relax the control measures on
sources regulated by the rule and,
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
therefore, will not cause emissions
increases from these sources.
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2). This rule will be effective on
February 27, 2014.
List of Subjects
40 CFR Parts 51 and 61
Air pollution control, Environmental
protection, Performance specifications,
and Test methods and procedures.
40 CFR Parts 60 and 63
Air pollution control, Environmental
protection, Incorporation by reference,
Performance specifications, and Test
methods and procedures.
Dated: January 28, 2014.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, Title 40, Chapter I of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 51—REQUIREMENTS FOR
PREPARATION, ADOPTION, AND
SUBMITTAL OF IMPLEMENTATION
PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 51
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et. seq.
2. Amend appendix M to part 51 as
follows:
■ a. By revising section 4.0.a.
■ b. By amending Method 201A as
follows:
■ i. By revising section 7.2.1.
■ ii. By revising paragraph 8.3.4(b).
■ iii. By revising section 8.3.4.1.
■ iv. By revising section 8.7.2.2.
■ v. By revising paragraph 8.7.5.5(a).
■ vi. By revising the introductory text of
section 10.1.
■ vii. By removing section 10.5.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
viii. By revising section 11.2.1.
ix. By removing the term ‘‘Vb’’ and its
definition from section 12.1.
■ x. By revising Equations 8 and 9 in
section 12.5.
■ c. By amending Method 202 as
follows:
■ i. By revising sections 7.2.1 and 7.2.2.
■ ii. By revising section 8.5.1.
■ iii. By revising section 8.5.3.1.
■ iv. By revising sections 11.2.1 and
11.2.2.
■ vi. By revising Figures 2, 3, 4, 5, and
6 in section 18.0.
■
■
Appendix M to Part 51—Recommended
Test Methods for State Implementation
Plans
*
*
*
*
*
4.0. * * *
a. The source owner, operator, or
representative of the tested facility shall
obtain an audit sample, if commercially
available, from an AASP for each test method
used for regulatory compliance purposes. No
audit samples are required for the following
test methods: Methods 3A and 3C of
appendix A–3 of part 60, Methods 6C, 7E, 9,
and 10 of appendix A–4 of part 60, Methods
18 and 19 of appendix A–6 of part 60,
Methods 20, 22, and 25A of appendix A–7 of
part 60, and Methods 303, 318, 320, and 321
of appendix A of part 63 of this chapter. If
multiple sources at a single facility are tested
during a compliance test event, only one
audit sample is required for each method
used during a compliance test. The
compliance authority responsible for the
compliance test may waive the requirement
to include an audit sample if they believe
that an audit sample is not necessary.
‘‘Commercially available’’ means that two or
more independent AASPs have blind audit
samples available for purchase. If the source
owner, operator, or representative cannot
find an audit sample for a specific method,
the owner, operator, or representative shall
consult the EPA Web site at the following
URL, https://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc, to confirm
whether there is a source that can supply an
audit sample for that method. If the EPA Web
site does not list an available audit sample
at least 60 days prior to the beginning of the
compliance test, the source owner, operator,
or representative shall not be required to
include an audit sample as part of the quality
assurance program for the compliance test.
When ordering an audit sample, the source
owner, operator, or representative shall give
the sample provider an estimate for the
concentration of each pollutant that is
emitted by the source or the estimated
concentration of each pollutant based on the
permitted level and the name, address, and
phone number of the compliance authority.
The source owner, operator, or representative
shall report the results for the audit sample
along with a summary of the emission test
results for the audited pollutant to the
compliance authority and shall report the
results of the audit sample to the AASP. The
source owner, operator, or representative
shall make both reports at the same time and
in the same manner or shall report to the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
11235
compliance authority first and report to the
AASP. If the method being audited is a
method that allows the samples to be
analyzed in the field, and the tester plans to
analyze the samples in the field, the tester
may analyze the audit samples prior to
collecting the emission samples provided a
representative of the compliance authority is
present at the testing site. The tester may
request and the compliance authority may
grant a waiver to the requirement that a
representative of the compliance authority
must be present at the testing site during the
field analysis of an audit sample. The source
owner, operator, or representative may report
the results of the audit sample to the
compliance authority and then report the
results of the audit sample to the AASP prior
to collecting any emission samples. The test
protocol and final test report shall document
whether an audit sample was ordered and
utilized and the pass/fail results as
applicable.
*
*
*
*
*
Method 201A—Determination of PM10 and
PM2.5 Emissions From Stationary Sources
(Constant Sampling Rate Procedure)
*
*
*
*
*
7.2.1 Acetone. Use acetone that is stored
in a glass bottle. Do not use acetone from a
metal container because it will likely
produce a high residue in the laboratory and
field reagent blanks. You must use acetone
with blank values less than 1 part per million
by weight residue. Analyze acetone blanks
prior to field use to confirm low blank
values. In no case shall a blank value of
greater than 0.0001 percent (1 part per
million by weight) of the weight of acetone
used in sample recovery be subtracted from
the sample weight (i.e., the maximum blank
correction is 0.1 mg per 100 g of acetone used
to recover samples).
*
*
*
*
*
8.3.4 * * *
(b) The appropriate nozzle to maintain the
required gas sampling rate for the velocity
pressure range and isokinetic range. If the
isokinetic range cannot be met (e.g., batch
processes, extreme process flow or
temperature variation), void the sample or
use methods subject to the approval of the
Administrator to correct the data. The
acceptable variation from isokinetic sampling
is 80 to 120 percent and no more than 100
± 21 percent (2 out of 12 or 5 out of 24)
sampling points outside of this criteria.
*
*
*
*
*
8.3.4.1 Preliminary traverse. You must
use an S-type pitot tube with a conventional
thermocouple to conduct the traverse.
Conduct the preliminary traverse as close as
possible to the anticipated testing time on
sources that are subject to hour-by-hour gas
flow rate variations of approximately ± 20
percent and/or gas temperature variations of
approximately ± 28 °C (± 50 °F). (Note: You
should be aware that these variations can
cause errors in the cyclone cut diameters and
the isokinetic sampling velocities.)
*
*
*
*
*
8.7.2.2 Probe blockage factor. You must
use Equation 26 to calculate an average probe
blockage correction factor (bf) if the diameter
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
11236
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Method 202—Dry Impinger Method for
Determining Condensable Particulate
Emissions From Stationary Sources
*
*
*
*
*
7.2.1 Acetone. Use acetone that is stored
in a glass bottle. Do not use acetone from a
metal container because it normally produces
a high residual mass in the laboratory and
field reagent blanks. You must use acetone
that has a blank value less than 1.0 ppmw
(0.1 mg/100 g) residue.
7.2.2 Hexane, American Chemical Society
grade. You must use hexane that has a blank
residual mass value less than 1.0 ppmw (0.1
mg/100 g) residue.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
8.5.1 Impinger and CPM Filter Assembly.
8.5.1.1 Monitor the moisture
condensation in the knockout and backup
impingers. If the accumulated water from
moisture condensation overwhelms the
knockout impinger, i.e., the water level is
more than approximately one-half the
capacity of the knockout impinger, or if water
accumulates in the backup impinger
sufficient to cover the impinger insert tip,
then you may interrupt the sampling run,
recover and weigh the moisture accumulated
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
8.7.5.5 * * *
(a) Container #1, Less than or equal to
PM2.5 micrometer filterable particulate. Use
tweezers and/or clean disposable surgical
gloves to remove the filter from the filter
holder. Place the filter in the Petri dish that
you labeled with the test identification and
Container #1. Using a dry brush and/or a
sharp-edged blade, carefully transfer any PM
and/or filter fibers that adhere to the filter
holder gasket or filter support screen to the
Petri dish. Seal the container. This container
holds particles less than or equal to 2.5
micrometers that are caught on the in-stack
filter. (Note: If the test is conducted for PM10
only, then Container #1 would be for less
than or equal to PM10 micrometer filterable
particulate.)
*
*
*
*
*
10.1 Gas Flow Velocities. You must use
an S-type pitot tube that meets the required
EPA specifications (EPA Publication 600/4–
77–0217b) during these velocity
measurements. (Note: If, as specified in
Section 8.7.2.3, testing is performed in stacks
in the knockout and backup impinger,
reassemble and leak check the sampling
train, and resume the sampling run. You
must purge the water collected during the
test interruption as soon as practical
following the procedures in Section 8.5.3.
8.5.1.2 You must include the weight or
volume of the moisture in your moisture
calculation and you must combine the
recovered water with the appropriate sample
fraction for subsequent CPM analysis.
8.5.1.3 Use the field data sheet for the
filterable particulate method to record the
CPM filter temperature readings at the
beginning of each sample time increment and
when sampling is halted. Maintain the CPM
filter greater than 20 °C (greater than 65 °F)
but less than or equal to 30 °C (less than or
equal to 85 °F) during sample collection.
(Note: Maintain the temperature of the CPM
filter assembly as close to 30 °C (85 °F) as
feasible.)
*
*
*
*
*
8.5.3.1 If you choose to conduct a
pressurized nitrogen purge at the completion
of CPM sample collection, you may purge the
entire CPM sample collection train from the
condenser inlet to the CPM filter holder
outlet or you may quantitatively transfer the
water collected in the condenser and the
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
less than 26.5 inches in diameter, testers may
use a standard pitot tube according to the
requirements in Method 1 or 2 of appendix
A–3 to part 60 of this chapter.) You must also
complete the following:
*
*
*
*
*
11.2.1 Container #1, Less than or Equal to
PM2.5 Micrometer Filterable Particulate.
Transfer the filter and any loose particulate
from the sample container to a tared
weighing dish or pan that is inert to solvent
or mineral acids. Desiccate for 24 hours in a
dessicator containing anhydrous calcium
sulfate. Weigh to a constant weight and
report the results to the nearest 0.1 mg. (See
Section 3.0 for a definition of Constant
weight.) If constant weight requirements
cannot be met, the filter must be treated as
described in Section 11.2.1 of Method 202 of
appendix M to this part. Note: The nozzle
and front half wash and filter collected at or
below 30 °C (85 °F) may not be heated and
must be maintained at or below 30 °C (85 °F).
*
*
*
*
*
12.5 * * *
water dropout impinger to the backup
impinger and purge only the backup
impinger and the CPM filter. You must
measure the water in the knockout and
backup impingers and record the volume or
weight as part of the moisture collected
during sampling as specified in Section
8.5.3.4.
8.5.3.1.1 If you choose to conduct a purge
of the entire CPM sampling train, you must
replace the short stem impinger insert in the
knock out impinger with a standard modified
Greenburg Smith impinger insert.
8.5.3.1.2 If you choose to combine the
knockout and backup impinger catch prior to
purge, you must purge the backup impinger
and CPM filter holder.
8.5.3.1.3 If the tip of the impinger insert
does not extend below the water level
(including the water transferred from the first
impinger if this option was chosen), you
must add a measured amount of degassed,
deionized ultra-filtered water that contains 1
ppmw (1 mg/L) residual mass or less until
the impinger tip is at least 1 centimeter
below the surface of the water. You must
record the amount of water added to the
water dropout impinger (Vp)(see Figure 4 of
Section 18) to correct the moisture content of
the effluent gas. (Note: Prior to use, water
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
ER27FE14.001
of your stack or duct is between 25.7 and
36.4 inches for the combined PM2.5/PM10
sampling head and pitot and between 18.8
and 26.5 inches for the PM2.5 cyclone and
pitot. A probe blockage factor is calculated
because of the flow blockage caused by the
relatively large cross-sectional area of the
cyclone sampling head, as discussed in
Section 8.3.2.2 and illustrated in Figures 8
and 9 of Section 17. You must determine the
cross-sectional area of the cyclone head you
use and determine its stack blockage factor.
(Note: Commercially-available sampling
heads (including the PM10 cyclone, PM2.5
cyclone, pitot and filter holder) have a
projected area of approximately 31.2 square
inches when oriented into the gas stream.) As
the probe is moved from the outermost to the
innermost point, the amount of blockage that
actually occurs ranges from approximately 13
square inches to the full 31.2 square inches
plus the blockage caused by the probe
extension. The average cross-sectional area
blocked is 22 square inches.
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
must be degassed using a nitrogen purge
bubbled through the water for at least 15
minutes to remove dissolved oxygen).
8.5.3.1.4 To perform the nitrogen purge
using positive pressure nitrogen flow, you
must start with no flow of gas through the
clean purge line and fittings. Connect the
filter outlet to the input of the impinger train
and disconnect the vacuum line from the exit
of the silica moisture collection impinger (see
Figure 3 of Section 18). You may purge only
the CPM train by disconnecting the moisture
train components if you measure moisture in
the field prior to the nitrogen purge. You
must increase the nitrogen flow gradually to
avoid over-pressurizing the impinger array.
You must purge the CPM train at a minimum
of 14 liters per minute for at least one hour.
At the conclusion of the purge, turn off the
nitrogen delivery system.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
*
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
11.2.1 Container #3, CPM Filter Sample.
If the sample was collected by Method 17 or
Method 201A with a stack temperature below
30 °C (85 °F), transfer the filter and any loose
PM from the sample container to a tared glass
weighing dish. (See Section 3.0 for a
definition of constant weight.) Desiccate the
sample for 24 hours in a desiccator
containing anhydrous calcium sulfate. Weigh
to a constant weight and report the results to
the nearest 0.1 mg. [Note: In-stack filter
samples collected at 30 °C (85 °F) may
include both filterable insoluble particulate
and condensable particulate. The nozzle and
front half wash and filter collected at or
below 30 °C (85 °F) may not be heated and
must be maintained at or below 30 °C (85
°F).]
11.2.2 CPM Container #1, Aqueous
Liquid Impinger Contents. Analyze the water
soluble CPM in Container #1 as described in
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
11237
this section. Place the contents of Container
#1 into a separatory funnel. Add
approximately 30 ml of hexane to the funnel,
mix well, and pour off the upper organic
phase. Repeat this procedure twice with 30
ml of hexane each time combining the
organic phase from each extraction. Each
time, leave a small amount of the organic/
hexane phase in the separatory funnel,
ensuring that no water is collected in the
organic phase. This extraction should yield
about 90 ml of organic extract. Combine the
organic extract from Container #1 with the
organic train rinse in Container #2.
*
*
18.0
*
*
* * *
BILLING CODE 6560–N–P
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
ER27FE14.002
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
11238
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
11239
ER27FE14.003
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
ER27FE14.004
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
11240
BILLING CODE 6560–50–C
*
*
*
*
*
PART 60—STANDARDS OF
PERFORMANCE FOR NEW
STATIONARY SOURCES
3. The authority citation for part 60
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et. seq.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Subpart A—[Amended]
4. Amend § 60.8 by revising paragraph
(g)(1) and adding new paragraphs (h)
and (i) to read as follows:
■
§ 60.8
*
Performance tests.
*
*
(g) * * *
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
*
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
(1) The source owner, operator, or
representative of the tested facility shall
obtain an audit sample, if commercially
available, from an AASP for each test
method used for regulatory compliance
purposes. No audit samples are required
for the following test methods: Methods
3A and 3C of appendix A–3 of part 60,
Methods 6C, 7E, 9, and 10 of appendix
A–4 of part 60, Methods 18 and 19 of
appendix A–6 of part 60, Methods 20,
22, and 25A of appendix A–7 of part 60,
Methods 30A and 30B of appendix A–
8 of part 60, and Methods 303, 318, 320,
and 321 of appendix A of part 63 of this
chapter. If multiple sources at a single
facility are tested during a compliance
test event, only one audit sample is
required for each method used during a
compliance test. The compliance
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
11241
authority responsible for the compliance
test may waive the requirement to
include an audit sample if they believe
that an audit sample is not necessary.
‘‘Commercially available’’ means that
two or more independent AASPs have
blind audit samples available for
purchase. If the source owner, operator,
or representative cannot find an audit
sample for a specific method, the owner,
operator, or representative shall consult
the EPA Web site at the following URL,
www.epa.gov/ttn/emc, to confirm
whether there is a source that can
supply an audit sample for that method.
If the EPA Web site does not list an
available audit sample at least 60 days
prior to the beginning of the compliance
test, the source owner, operator, or
representative shall not be required to
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
ER27FE14.005
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
11242
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
include an audit sample as part of the
quality assurance program for the
compliance test. When ordering an
audit sample, the source owner,
operator, or representative shall give the
sample provider an estimate for the
concentration of each pollutant that is
emitted by the source or the estimated
concentration of each pollutant based
on the permitted level and the name,
address, and phone number of the
compliance authority. The source
owner, operator, or representative shall
report the results for the audit sample
along with a summary of the emission
test results for the audited pollutant to
the compliance authority and shall
report the results of the audit sample to
the AASP. The source owner, operator,
or representative shall make both
reports at the same time and in the same
manner or shall report to the
compliance authority first and then
report to the AASP. If the method being
audited is a method that allows the
samples to be analyzed in the field and
the tester plans to analyze the samples
in the field, the tester may analyze the
audit samples prior to collecting the
emission samples provided a
representative of the compliance
authority is present at the testing site.
The tester may request and the
compliance authority may grant a
waiver to the requirement that a
representative of the compliance
authority must be present at the testing
site during the field analysis of an audit
sample. The source owner, operator, or
representative may report the results of
the audit sample to the compliance
authority and report the results of the
audit sample to the AASP prior to
collecting any emission samples. The
test protocol and final test report shall
document whether an audit sample was
ordered and utilized and the pass/fail
results as applicable.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) Unless otherwise specified in the
applicable subpart, each test location
must be verified to be free of cyclonic
flow and evaluated for the existence of
emission gas stratification and the
required number of sampling traverse
points. If other procedures are not
specified in the applicable subpart to
the regulations, use the appropriate
procedures in Method 1 to check for
cyclonic flow and Method 7E to
evaluate emission gas stratification and
selection of sampling points.
(i) Whenever the use of multiple
calibration gases is required by a test
method, performance specification, or
quality assurance procedure in a part 60
standard or appendix, Method 205 of 40
CFR part 51, appendix M of this
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
chapter, ‘‘Verification of Gas Dilution
Systems for Field Instrument
Calibrations,’’ may be used.
5. Amend § 60.13 by revising
paragraph (d)(1) to read as follows:
■
§ 60.13
Monitoring requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(d)(1) Owners and operators of a
CEMS installed in accordance with the
provisions of this part, must check the
zero (or low level value between 0 and
20 percent of span value) and span (50
to 100 percent of span value) calibration
drifts at least once each operating day in
accordance with a written procedure.
The zero and span must, at a minimum,
be adjusted whenever either the 24-hour
zero drift or the 24-hour span drift
exceeds two times the limit of the
applicable performance specification in
appendix B of this part. The system
must allow the amount of the excess
zero and span drift to be recorded and
quantified whenever specified. Owners
and operators of a COMS installed in
accordance with the provisions of this
part must check the zero and upscale
(span) calibration drifts at least once
daily. For a particular COMS, the
acceptable range of zero and upscale
calibration materials is defined in the
applicable version of PS–1 in appendix
B of this part. For a COMS, the optical
surfaces, exposed to the effluent gases,
must be cleaned before performing the
zero and upscale drift adjustments,
except for systems using automatic zero
adjustments. The optical surfaces must
be cleaned when the cumulative
automatic zero compensation exceeds 4
percent opacity.
*
*
*
*
*
■
6. Revise § 60.17 to read as follows:
§ 60.17
Incorporations by reference.
(a) Certain material is incorporated by
reference into this part with the
approval of the Director of the Federal
Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. To enforce any edition
other than that specified in this section,
the EPA must publish notice of change
in the Federal Register and the material
must be available to the public. All
approved material is available for
inspection at the Air and Radiation
Docket and Information Center, U.S.
EPA, 401 M St. SW., Washington, DC,
telephone number 202–566, and is
available from the sources listed below.
It is also available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call (202) 741–6030
or go to https://www.archives.gov/
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html.
(b) American Gas Association,
available through ILI Infodisk, 610
Winters Avenue, Paramus, New Jersey
07652:
(1) American Gas Association Report
No. 3: Orifice Metering for Natural Gas
and Other Related Hydrocarbon Fluids,
Part 1: General Equations and
Uncertainty Guidelines (1990), IBR
approved for § 60.107a(d).
(2) American Gas Association Report
No. 3: Orifice Metering for Natural Gas
and Other Related Hydrocarbon Fluids,
Part 2: Specification and Installation
Requirements (2000), IBR approved for
§ 60.107a(d).
(3) American Gas Association Report
No. 11: Measurement of Natural Gas by
Coriolis Meter (2003), IBR approved for
§ 60.107a(d).
(4) American Gas Association
Transmission Measurement Committee
Report No. 7: Measurement of Gas by
Turbine Meters (Revised February
2006), IBR approved for § 60.107a(d).
(c) American Hospital Association
(AHA) Service, Inc., Post Office Box
92683, Chicago, Illinois 60675–2683.
You may inspect a copy at the EPA’s Air
and Radiation Docket and Information
Center (Docket A–91–61, Item IV–J–
124), Room M–1500, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.
(1) An Ounce of Prevention: Waste
Reduction Strategies for Health Care
Facilities. American Society for Health
Care Environmental Services of the
American Hospital Association.
Chicago, Illinois. 1993. AHA Catalog
No. 057007. ISBN 0–87258–673–5. IBR
approved for §§ 60.35e and 60.55c.
(2) [Reserved]
(d) American Petroleum Institute
(API), 1220 L Street NW., Washington,
DC 20005.
(1) API Publication 2517, Evaporation
Loss from External Floating Roof Tanks,
Second Edition, February 1980, IBR
approved for §§ 60.111(i), 60.111a(f),
and 60.116b(e).
(2) API Manual of Petroleum
Measurement Standards, Chapter 22—
Testing Protocol, Section 2—Differential
Pressure Flow Measurement Devices,
First Edition, August 2005, IBR
approved for § 60.107a(d).
(e) American Public Health
Association, 1015 18th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20036.
(1) ‘‘Standard Methods for the
Examination of Water and Wastewater,’’
16th edition, 1985. Method 303F:
‘‘Determination of Mercury by the Cold
Vapor Technique.’’ Incorporated by
reference for appendix A–8 to part 60,
Method 29, §§ 9.2.3, 10.3, and 11.1.3.
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
(2) 2540 G. Total, Fixed, and Volatile
Solids in Solid and Semisolid Samples,
in Standard Methods for the
Examination of Water and Wastewater,
20th Edition, 1998, IBR approved for
§ 60.154(b).
(f) American Society of Mechanical
Engineers (ASME), Three Park Avenue,
New York, NY 10016–5990, Telephone
(800) 843–2763, https://www.asme.org.
(1) ASME Interim Supplement 19.5 on
Instruments and Apparatus:
Application, Part II of Fluid Meters, 6th
Edition (1971), IBR approved for
§§ 60.58a(h), 60.58b(i), 60.1320(a), and
60.1810(a).
(2) ASME MFC–3M–2004,
Measurement of Fluid Flow in Pipes
Using Orifice, Nozzle, and Venturi, IBR
approved for § 60.107a(d).
(3) ASME/ANSI MFC–4M–1986
(Reaffirmed 2008), Measurement of Gas
Flow by Turbine Meters, IBR approved
for § 60.107a(d).
(4) ASME/ANSI MFC–5M–1985
(Reaffirmed 2006), Measurement of
Liquid Flow in Closed Conduits Using
Transit-Time Ultrasonic Flowmeters,
IBR approved for § 60.107a(d).
(5) ASME MFC–6M–1998 (Reaffirmed
2005), Measurement of Fluid Flow in
Pipes Using Vortex Flowmeters, IBR
approved for § 60.107a(d).
(6) ASME/ANSI MFC–7M–1987
(Reaffirmed 2006), Measurement of Gas
Flow by Means of Critical Flow Venturi
Nozzles, IBR approved for § 60.107a(d).
(7) ASME/ANSI MFC–9M–1988
(Reaffirmed 2006), Measurement of
Liquid Flow in Closed Conduits by
Weighing Method, IBR approved for
§ 60.107a(d).
(8) ASME MFC–11M–2006,
Measurement of Fluid Flow by Means of
Coriolis Mass Flowmeters, IBR
approved for § 60.107a(d).
(9) ASME MFC–14M–2003,
Measurement of Fluid Flow Using Small
Bore Precision Orifice Meters, IBR
approved for § 60.107a(d).
(10) ASME MFC–16–2007,
Measurement of Liquid Flow in Closed
Conduits with Electromagnetic
Flowmeters, IBR approved for
§ 60.107a(d).
(11) ASME MFC–18M–2001,
Measurement of Fluid Flow Using
Variable Area Meters, IBR approved for
§ 60.107a(d).
(12) ASME MFC–22–2007,
Measurement of Liquid by Turbine
Flowmeters, IBR approved for
§ 60.107a(d).
(13) ASME PTC 4.1–1964 (Reaffirmed
1991), Power Test Codes: Test Code for
Steam Generating Units (with 1968 and
1969 Addenda), IBR approved for
§§ 60.46b, 60.58a(h), 60.58b(i),
60.1320(a), and 60.1810(a).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
(14) ASME/ANSI PTC 19.10–1981,
Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses [Part 10,
Instruments and Apparatus], (Issued
August 31, 1981), IBR approved for
§§ 60.56c(b), 60.63(f), 60.106(e),
60.104a(d), (h), (i), and (j), 60.105a(d),
(f), and (g), § 60.106a(a), § 60.107a(a),
(c), and (d), tables 1 and 3 to subpart
EEEE, tables 2 and 4 to subpart FFFF,
table 2 to subpart JJJJ, §§ 60.4415(a),
60.2145(s) and (t), 60.2710(s), (t), and
(w), 60.2730(q), 60.4900(b), 60.5220(b),
tables 1 and 2 to subpart LLLL, tables 2
and 3 to subpart MMMM, §§ 60.5406(c)
and 60.5413(b).
(15) ASME QRO–1–1994, Standard for
the Qualification and Certification of
Resource Recovery Facility Operators,
IBR approved for §§ 60.54b(a) and (b),
60.56a, 60.1185(a) and (c), and
60.1675(a) and (c).
(g) American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM), 100 Barr Harbor
Drive, Post Office Box C700, West
Conshohocken, PA 19428–2959; also
available through ProQuest, 300 North
Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.
(1) ASTM A99–76, Standard
Specification for Ferromanganese, IBR
approved for § 60.261.
(2) ASTM A99–82 (Reapproved 1987),
Standard Specification for
Ferromanganese, IBR approved for
§ 60.261.
(3) ASTM A100–69, Standard
Specification for Ferrosilicon, IBR
approved for § 60.261.
(4) ASTM A100–74, Standard
Specification for Ferrosilicon, IBR
approved for § 60.261.
(5) ASTM A100–93, Standard
Specification for Ferrosilicon, IBR
approved for § 60.261.
(6) ASTM A101–73, Standard
Specification for Ferrochromium, IBR
approved for § 60.261.
(7) ASTM A101–93, Standard
Specification for Ferrochromium, IBR
approved for § 60.261.
(8) ASTM A482–76, Standard
Specification for Ferrochromesilicon,
IBR approved for § 60.261.
(9) ASTM A482–93, Standard
Specification for Ferrochromesilicon,
IBR approved for § 60.261.
(10) ASTM A483–64, Standard
Specification for Silicomanganese, IBR
approved for § 60.261.
(11) ASTM A483–74 (Reapproved
1988), Standard Specification for
Silicomanganese, IBR approved for
§ 60.261.
(12) ASTM A495–76, Standard
Specification for Calcium-Silicon and
Calcium Manganese-Silicon, IBR
approved for § 60.261.
(13) ASTM A495–94, Standard
Specification for Calcium-Silicon and
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
11243
Calcium Manganese-Silicon, IBR
approved for § 60.261.
(14) ASTM D86–78, Distillation of
Petroleum Products, IBR approved for
§§ 60.562–2(d), 60.593(d), 60.593a(d),
60.633(h).
(15) ASTM D86–82, Distillation of
Petroleum Products, IBR approved for
§§ 60.562–2(d), 60.593(d), 60.593a(d),
60.633(h).
(16) ASTM D86–90, Distillation of
Petroleum Products, IBR approved for
§§ 60.562–2(d), 60.593(d), 60.593a(d),
60.633(h).
(17) ASTM D86–93, Distillation of
Petroleum Products, IBR approved for
§§ 60.562–2(d), 60.593(d), 60.593a(d),
60.633(h).
(18) ASTM D86–95, Distillation of
Petroleum Products, IBR approved for
§§ 60.562–2(d), 60.593(d), 60.593a(d),
60.633(h).
(19) ASTM D86–96, Distillation of
Petroleum Products, (Approved April
10, 1996), IBR approved for §§ 60.562–
2(d), 60.593(d), 60.593a(d), 60.633(h),
and 60.5401(f).
(20) ASTM D129–64, Standard Test
Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products (General Bomb Method), IBR
approved for §§ 60.106(j) and appendix
A–7 to part 60: Method 19, Section
12.5.2.2.3.
(21) ASTM D129–78, Standard Test
Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products (General Bomb Method), IBR
approved for §§ 60.106(j) and appendix
A–7 to part 60: Method 19, Section
12.5.2.2.3.
(22) ASTM D129–95, Standard Test
Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products (General Bomb Method), IBR
approved for §§ 60.106(j) and appendix
A–7 to part 60: Method 19, Section
12.5.2.2.3.
(23) ASTM D129–00, Standard Test
Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products (General Bomb Method), IBR
approved for § 60.335(b).
(24) ASTM D129–00 (Reapproved
2005), Standard Test Method for Sulfur
in Petroleum Products (General Bomb
Method), IBR approved for § 60.4415(a).
(25) ASTM D240–76, Standard Test
Method for Heat of Combustion of
Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb
Calorimeter, IBR approved for
§§ 60.46(c), 60.296(b), and appendix A–
7 to part 60: Method 19, Section
12.5.2.2.3.
(26) ASTM D240–92, Standard Test
Method for Heat of Combustion of
Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb
Calorimeter, IBR approved for
§§ 60.46(c), 60.296(b), and appendix A–
7: Method 19, Section 12.5.2.2.3.
(27) ASTM D240–02 (Reapproved
2007), Standard Test Method for Heat of
Combustion of Liquid Hydrocarbon
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
11244
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter, (Approved
May 1, 2007), IBR approved for
§ 60.107a(d).
(28) ASTM D270–65, Standard
Method of Sampling Petroleum and
Petroleum Products, IBR approved for
appendix A–7 to part 60: Method 19,
Section 12.5.2.2.1.
(29) ASTM D270–75, Standard
Method of Sampling Petroleum and
Petroleum Products, IBR approved for
appendix A–7 to part 60: Method 19,
Section 12.5.2.2.1.
(30) ASTM D323–82, Test Method for
Vapor Pressure of Petroleum Products
(Reid Method), IBR approved for
§§ 60.111(l), 60.111a(g), 60.111b, and
60.116b(f).
(31) ASTM D323–94, Test Method for
Vapor Pressure of Petroleum Products
(Reid Method), IBR approved for
§§ 60.111(l), 60.111a(g), 60.111b, and
60.116b(f).
(32) ASTM D388–77, Standard
Specification for Classification of Coals
by Rank, IBR approved for §§ 60.41,
60.45(f), 60.41Da, 60.41b, 60.41c, and
60.251.
(33) ASTM D388–90, Standard
Specification for Classification of Coals
by Rank, IBR approved for §§ 60.41,
60.45(f), 60.41Da, 60.41b, 60.41c, and
60.251.
(34) ASTM D388–91, Standard
Specification for Classification of Coals
by Rank, IBR approved for §§ 60.41,
60.45(f), 60.41Da, 60.41b, 60.41c, and
60.251.
(35) ASTM D388–95, Standard
Specification for Classification of Coals
by Rank, IBR approved for §§ 60.41,
60.45(f), 60.41Da, 60.41b, 60.41c, and
60.251.
(36) ASTM D388–98a, Standard
Specification for Classification of Coals
by Rank, IBR approved for §§ 60.41,
60.45(f), 60.41Da, 60.41b, 60.41c, and
60.251.
(37) ASTM D388–99 (Reapproved
2004) e,1 Standard Specification for
Classification of Coals by Rank, IBR
approved for §§ 60.41, 60.45(f), 60.41Da,
60.41b, 60.41c, and 60.251.
(38) ASTM D396–78, Standard
Specification for Fuel Oils, IBR
approved for §§ 60.41b, 60.41c,
60.111(b), and 60.111a(b).
(39) ASTM D396–89, Standard
Specification for Fuel Oils, IBR
approved for §§ 60.41b, 60.41c,
60.111(b), and 60.111a(b).
(40) ASTM D396–90, Standard
Specification for Fuel Oils, IBR
approved for §§ 60.41b, 60.41c,
60.111(b), and 60.111a(b).
(41) ASTM D396–92, Standard
Specification for Fuel Oils, IBR
approved for §§ 60.41b, 60.41c,
60.111(b), and 60.111a(b).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
(42) ASTM D396–98, Standard
Specification for Fuel Oils, IBR
approved for §§ 60.41b, 60.41c,
60.111(b), and 60.111a(b).
(43) ASTM D975–78, Standard
Specification for Diesel Fuel Oils, IBR
approved for §§ 60.111(b) and
60.111a(b).
(44) ASTM D975–96, Standard
Specification for Diesel Fuel Oils, IBR
approved for §§ 60.111(b) and
60.111a(b).
(45) ASTM D975–98a, Standard
Specification for Diesel Fuel Oils, IBR
approved for §§ 60.111(b) and
60.111a(b).
(46) ASTM D975–08a, Standard
Specification for Diesel Fuel Oils, IBR
approved for §§ 60.41b and 60.41c.
(47) ASTM D1072–80, Standard Test
Method for Total Sulfur in Fuel Gases,
IBR approved for § 60.335(b).
(48) ASTM D1072–90 (Reapproved
1994), Standard Test Method for Total
Sulfur in Fuel Gases, IBR approved for
§ 60.335(b).
(49) ASTM D1072–90 (Reapproved
1999), Standard Test Method for Total
Sulfur in Fuel Gases, IBR approved for
§ 60.4415(a).
(50) ASTM D1137–53, Standard
Method for Analysis of Natural Gases
and Related Types of Gaseous Mixtures
by the Mass Spectrometer, IBR approved
for § 60.45(f).
(51) ASTM D1137–75, Standard
Method for Analysis of Natural Gases
and Related Types of Gaseous Mixtures
by the Mass Spectrometer, IBR approved
for § 60.45(f).
(52) ASTM D1193–77, Standard
Specification for Reagent Water, IBR
approved for appendix A–3 to part 60:
Method 5, Section 7.1.3; Method 5E,
Section 7.2.1; Method 5F, Section 7.2.1;
appendix A–4 to part 60: Method 6,
Section 7.1.1; Method 7, Section 7.1.1;
Method 7C, Section 7.1.1; Method 7D,
Section 7.1.1; Method 10A, Section
7.1.1; appendix A–5 to part 60: Method
11, Section 7.1.3; Method 12, Section
7.1.3; Method 13A, Section 7.1.2;
appendix A–8 to part 60: Method 26,
Section 7.1.2; Method 26A, Section
7.1.2; and Method 29, Section 7.2.2.
(53) ASTM D1193–91, Standard
Specification for Reagent Water, IBR
approved for appendix A–3 to part 60:
Method 5, Section 7.1.3; Method 5E,
Section 7.2.1; Method 5F, Section 7.2.1;
appendix A–4 to part 60: Method 6,
Section 7.1.1; Method 7, Section 7.1.1;
Method 7C, Section 7.1.1; Method 7D,
Section 7.1.1; Method 10A, Section
7.1.1; appendix A–5 to part 60: Method
11, Section 7.1.3; Method 12, Section
7.1.3; Method 13A, Section 7.1.2;
appendix A–8 to part 60: Method 26,
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Section 7.1.2; Method 26A, Section
7.1.2; and Method 29, Section 7.2.2.
(54) ASTM D1266–87, Standard Test
Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products (Lamp Method), IBR approved
for §§ 60.106(j) and 60.335(b).
(55) ASTM D1266–91, Standard Test
Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products (Lamp Method), IBR approved
for §§ 60.106(j) and 60.335(b).
(56) ASTM D1266–98, Standard Test
Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products (Lamp Method), IBR approved
for §§ 60.106(j) and 60.335(b).
(57) ASTM D1266–98 (Reapproved
2003) e,1 Standard Test Method for
Sulfur in Petroleum Products (Lamp
Method), IBR approved for § 60.4415(a).
(58) ASTM D1475–60 (Reapproved
1980), Standard Test Method for Density
of Paint, Varnish Lacquer, and Related
Products, IBR approved for § 60.435(d),
appendix A–8 to part 60: Method 24,
Section 6.1; and Method 24A, Sections
6.5 and 7.1.
(59) ASTM D1475–90, Standard Test
Method for Density of Paint, Varnish
Lacquer, and Related Products, IBR
approved for § 60.435(d), appendix A–8
to part 60: Method 24, Section 6.1; and
Method 24A, §§ 6.5 and 7.1.
(60) ASTM D1552–83, Standard Test
Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products (High-Temperature Method),
IBR approved for §§ 60.106(j), 60.335(b),
and appendix A–7 to part 60: Method
19, Section 12.5.2.2.3.
(61) ASTM D1552–95, Standard Test
Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products (High-Temperature Method),
IBR approved for §§ 60.106(j), 60.335(b),
and appendix A–7 to part 60: Method
19, Section 12.5.2.2.3.
(62) ASTM D1552–01, Standard Test
Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products (High-Temperature Method),
IBR approved for §§ 60.106(j), 60.335(b),
and appendix A–7 to part 60: Method
19, Section 12.5.2.2.3.
(63) ASTM D1552–03, Standard Test
Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products (High-Temperature Method),
IBR approved for § 60.4415(a).
(64) ASTM D1826–77, Standard Test
Method for Calorific Value of Gases in
Natural Gas Range by Continuous
Recording Calorimeter, IBR approved
for §§ 60.45(f), 60.46(c), 60.296(b), and
appendix A–7 to part 60: Method 19,
Section 12.3.2.4.
(65) ASTM D1826–94, Standard Test
Method for Calorific Value of Gases in
Natural Gas Range by Continuous
Recording Calorimeter, IBR approved
for §§ 60.45(f), 60.46(c), 60.296(b), and
appendix A–7 to part 60: Method 19,
Section 12.3.2.4.
(66) ASTM D1826–94 (Reapproved
2003), Standard Test Method for
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Calorific (Heating) Value of Gases in
Natural Gas Range by Continuous
Recording Calorimeter, (Approved May
10, 2003), IBR approved for
§ 60.107a(d).
(67) ASTM D1835–87, Standard
Specification for Liquefied Petroleum
(LP) Gases, IBR approved for
§§ 60.41Da, 60.41b, and 60.41c.
(68) ASTM D1835–91, Standard
Specification for Liquefied Petroleum
(LP) Gases, IBR approved for
§§ 60.41Da, 60.41b, and 60.41c.
(69) ASTM D1835–97, Standard
Specification for Liquefied Petroleum
(LP) Gases, IBR approved for
§§ 60.41Da, 60.41b, and 60.41c.
(70) ASTM D1835–03a, Standard
Specification for Liquefied Petroleum
(LP) Gases, IBR approved for
§§ 60.41Da, 60.41b, and 60.41c.
(71) ASTM D1945–64, Standard
Method for Analysis of Natural Gas by
Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for
§ 60.45(f).
(72) ASTM D1945–76, Standard
Method for Analysis of Natural Gas by
Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for
§ 60.45(f).
(73) ASTM D1945–91, Standard
Method for Analysis of Natural Gas by
Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for
§ 60.45(f).
(74) ASTM D1945–96, Standard
Method for Analysis of Natural Gas by
Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for
§ 60.45(f).
(75) ASTM D1945–03 (Reapproved
2010), Standard Method for Analysis of
Natural Gas by Gas Chromatography,
(Approved January 1, 2010), IBR
approved for §§ 60.107a(d) and
60.5413(d).
(76) ASTM D1946–77, Standard
Method for Analysis of Reformed Gas by
Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for
§§ 60.18(f), 60.45(f), 60.564(f), 60.614(e),
60.664(e), and 60.704(d).
(77) ASTM D1946–90 (Reapproved
1994), Standard Method for Analysis of
Reformed Gas by Gas Chromatography,
IBR approved for §§ 60.18(f), 60.45(f),
60.564(f), 60.614(e), 60.664(e), and
60.704(d).
(78) ASTM D1946–90 (Reapproved
2006), Standard Method for Analysis of
Reformed Gas by Gas Chromatography,
(Approved June 1, 2006), IBR approved
for § 60.107a(d).
(79) ASTM D2013–72, Standard
Method of Preparing Coal Samples for
Analysis, IBR approved for appendix A–
7 to part 60: Method 19, Section
12.5.2.1.3.
(80) ASTM D2013–86, Standard
Method of Preparing Coal Samples for
Analysis, IBR approved for appendix A–
7 to part 60: Method 19, Section
12.5.2.1.3.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
(81) ASTM D2015–77 (Reapproved
1978), Standard Test Method for Gross
Calorific Value of Solid Fuel by the
Adiabatic Bomb Calorimeter, IBR
approved for §§ 60.45(f), 60.46(c), and
appendix A–7 to part 60: Method 19,
Section 12.5.2.1.3.
(82) ASTM D2015–96, Standard Test
Method for Gross Calorific Value of
Solid Fuel by the Adiabatic Bomb
Calorimeter, IBR approved for
§§ 60.45(f), 60.46(c), and appendix A–7
to part 60: Method 19, Section
12.5.2.1.3.
(83) ASTM D2016–74, Standard Test
Methods for Moisture Content of Wood,
IBR approved for appendix A–8 to part
60: Method 28, Section 16.1.1.
(84) ASTM D2016–83, Standard Test
Methods for Moisture Content of Wood,
IBR approved for appendix A–8 to part
60: Method 28, Section 16.1.1.
(85) ASTM D2234–76, Standard
Methods for Collection of a Gross
Sample of Coal, IBR approved for
appendix A–7 to part 60: Method 19,
Section 12.5.2.1.1.
(86) ASTM D2234–96, Standard
Methods for Collection of a Gross
Sample of Coal, IBR approved for
appendix A–7 to part 60: Method 19,
Section 12.5.2.1.1.
(87) ASTM D2234–97b, Standard
Methods for Collection of a Gross
Sample of Coal, IBR approved for
appendix A–7 to part 60: Method 19,
Section 12.5.2.1.1.
(88) ASTM D2234–98, Standard
Methods for Collection of a Gross
Sample of Coal, IBR approved for
appendix A–7 to part 60: Method 19,
Section 12.5.2.1.1.
(89) ASTM D2369–81, Standard Test
Method for Volatile Content of Coatings,
IBR approved for appendix A–8 to part
60: Method 24, Section 6.2.
(90) ASTM D2369–87, Standard Test
Method for Volatile Content of Coatings,
IBR approved for appendix A–8 to part
60: Method 24, Section 6.2.
(91) ASTM D2369–90, Standard Test
Method for Volatile Content of Coatings,
IBR approved for appendix A–8 to part
60: Method 24, Section 6.2.
(92) ASTM D2369–92, Standard Test
Method for Volatile Content of Coatings,
IBR approved for appendix A–8 to part
60: Method 24, Section 6.2.
(93) ASTM D2369–93, Standard Test
Method for Volatile Content of Coatings,
IBR approved for appendix A–8 to part
60: Method 24, Section 6.2.
(94) ASTM D2369–95, Standard Test
Method for Volatile Content of Coatings,
IBR approved for appendix A–8 to part
60: Method 24, Section 6.2.
(95) ASTM D2382–76, Heat of
Combustion of Hydrocarbon Fuels by
Bomb Calorimeter (High-Precision
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
11245
Method), IBR approved for §§ 60.18(f),
60.485(g), 60.485a(g), 60.564(f),
60.614(e), 60.664(e), and 60.704(d).
(96) ASTM D2382–88, Heat of
Combustion of Hydrocarbon Fuels by
Bomb Calorimeter (High-Precision
Method), IBR approved for §§ 60.18(f),
60.485(g), 60.485a(g), 60.564(f),
60.614(e), 60.664(e), and 60.704(d).
(97) ASTM D2504–67,
Noncondensable Gases in C3 and
Lighter Hydrocarbon Products by Gas
Chromatography, IBR approved for
§§ 60.485(g) and 60.485a(g).
(98) ASTM D2504–77,
Noncondensable Gases in C3 and
Lighter Hydrocarbon Products by Gas
Chromatography, IBR approved for
§§ 60.485(g) and 60.485a(g).
(99) ASTM D2504–88 (Reapproved
1993), Noncondensable Gases in C3 and
Lighter Hydrocarbon Products by Gas
Chromatography, IBR approved for
§§ 60.485(g) and 60.485a(g).
(100) ASTM D2584–68(Reapproved
1985), Standard Test Method for
Ignition Loss of Cured Reinforced
Resins, IBR approved for § 60.685(c).
(101) ASTM D2584–94, Standard Test
Method for Ignition Loss of Cured
Reinforced Resins, IBR approved for
§ 60.685(c).
(102) ASTM D2597–94 (Reapproved
1999), Standard Test Method for
Analysis of Demethanized Hydrocarbon
Liquid Mixtures Containing Nitrogen
and Carbon Dioxide by Gas
Chromatography, IBR approved for
§ 60.335(b).
(103) ASTM D2622–87, Standard Test
Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products by Wavelength Dispersive XRay Fluorescence Spectrometry, IBR
approved for §§ 60.106(j) and 60.335(b).
(104) ASTM D2622–94, Standard Test
Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products by Wavelength Dispersive XRay Fluorescence Spectrometry, IBR
approved for §§ 60.106(j) and 60.335(b).
(105) ASTM D2622–98, Standard Test
Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products by Wavelength Dispersive XRay Fluorescence Spectrometry, IBR
approved for §§ 60.106(j) and 60.335(b).
(106) ASTM D2622–05, Standard Test
Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products by Wavelength Dispersive XRay Fluorescence Spectrometry, IBR
approved for § 60.4415(a).
(107) ASTM D2879–83Test Method
for Vapor Pressure-Temperature
Relationship and Initial Decomposition
Temperature of Liquids by Isoteniscope,
IBR approved for §§ 60.111b(f)(3),
60.116b(e), 60.116b(f), 60.485(e), and
60.485a(e).
(108) ASTM D2879–96, Test Method
for Vapor Pressure-Temperature
Relationship and Initial Decomposition
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
11246
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Temperature of Liquids by Isoteniscope,
IBR approved for §§ 60.111b(f)(3),
60.116b(e), 60.116b(f), 60.485(e), and
60.485a(e).
(109) ASTM D2879–97, Test Method
for Vapor Pressure-Temperature
Relationship and Initial Decomposition
Temperature of Liquids by Isoteniscope,
IBR approved for §§ 60.111b(f)(3),
60.116b(e), 60.116b(f), 60.485(e), and
60.485a(e).
(110) ASTM D2880–78, Standard
Specification for Gas Turbine Fuel Oils,
IBR approved for §§ 60.111(b),
60.111a(b), and 60.335(d).
(111) ASTM D2880–96, Standard
Specification for Gas Turbine Fuel Oils,
IBR approved for §§ 60.111(b),
60.111a(b), and 60.335(d).
(112) ASTM D2908–74, Standard
Practice for Measuring Volatile Organic
Matter in Water by Aqueous-Injection
Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for
§ 60.564(j).
(113) ASTM D2908–91, Standard
Practice for Measuring Volatile Organic
Matter in Water by Aqueous-Injection
Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for
§ 60.564(j).
(114) ASTM D2986–71, Standard
Method for Evaluation of Air, Assay
Media by the Monodisperse DOP
(Dioctyl Phthalate) Smoke Test, IBR
approved for appendix A–3 to part 60:
Method 5, Section 7.1.1; appendix A–5
to part 60: Method 12, Section 7.1.1; and
Method 13A, Section 7.1.1.2.
(115) ASTM D2986–78, Standard
Method for Evaluation of Air, Assay
Media by the Monodisperse DOP
(Dioctyl Phthalate) Smoke Test, IBR
approved for appendix A–3 to part 60:
Method 5, Section 7.1.1; appendix A–5
to part 60: Method 12, Section 7.1.1; and
Method 13A, Section 7.1.1.2.
(116) ASTM D2986–95a, Standard
Method for Evaluation of Air, Assay
Media by the Monodisperse DOP
(Dioctyl Phthalate) Smoke Test, IBR
approved for appendix A–3 to part 60:
Method 5, Section 7.1.1; appendix A–5
to part 60: Method 12, Section 7.1.1; and
Method 13A, Section 7.1.1.2.
(117) ASTM D3173–73, Standard Test
Method for Moisture in the Analysis
Sample of Coal and Coke, IBR approved
for appendix A–7 to part 60: Method 19,
Section 12.5.2.1.3.
(118) ASTM D3173–87, Standard Test
Method for Moisture in the Analysis
Sample of Coal and Coke, IBR approved
for appendix A–7 to part 60: Method 19,
Section 12.5.2.1.3.
(119) ASTM D3176–74, Standard
Method for Ultimate Analysis of Coal
and Coke, IBR approved for
§ 60.45(f)(5)(i) and appendix A–7 to part
60: Method 19, Section 12.3.2.3.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
(120) ASTM D3176–89, Standard
Method for Ultimate Analysis of Coal
and Coke, IBR approved for
§ 60.45(f)(5)(i) and appendix A–7 to part
60: Method 19, Section 12.3.2.3.
(121) ASTM D3177–75, Standard Test
Method for Total Sulfur in the Analysis
Sample of Coal and Coke, IBR approved
for appendix A–7 to part 60: Method 19,
Section 12.5.2.1.3.
(122) ASTM D3177–89, Standard Test
Method for Total Sulfur in the Analysis
Sample of Coal and Coke, IBR approved
for appendix A–7 to part 60: Method 19,
Section 12.5.2.1.3.
(123) ASTM D3178–73 (Reapproved
1979), Standard Test Methods for
Carbon and Hydrogen in the Analysis
Sample of Coal and Coke, IBR approved
for § 60.45(f).
(124) ASTM D3178–89, Standard Test
Methods for Carbon and Hydrogen in
the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke,
IBR approved for § 60.45(f).
(125) ASTM D3246–81, Standard Test
Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Gas by
Oxidative Microcoulometry, IBR
approved for § 60.335(b).
(126) ASTM D3246–92, Standard Test
Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Gas by
Oxidative Microcoulometry, IBR
approved for § 60.335(b).
(127) ASTM D3246–96, Standard Test
Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Gas by
Oxidative Microcoulometry, IBR
approved for § 60.335(b).
(128) ASTM D3246–05, Standard Test
Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Gas by
Oxidative Microcoulometry, IBR
approved for § 60.4415(a)(1).
(129) ASTM D3270–73T, Standard
Test Methods for Analysis for Fluoride
Content of the Atmosphere and Plant
Tissues (Semiautomated Method), IBR
approved for appendix A–5 to part 60:
Method 13A, Section 16.1.
(130) ASTM D3270–80, Standard Test
Methods for Analysis for Fluoride
Content of the Atmosphere and Plant
Tissues (Semiautomated Method), IBR
approved for appendix A–5 to part 60:
Method 13A, Section 16.1.
(131) ASTM D3270–91, Standard Test
Methods for Analysis for Fluoride
Content of the Atmosphere and Plant
Tissues (Semiautomated Method), IBR
approved for appendix A–5 to part 60:
Method 13A, Section 16.1.
(132) ASTM D3270–95, Standard Test
Methods for Analysis for Fluoride
Content of the Atmosphere and Plant
Tissues (Semiautomated Method), IBR
approved for appendix A–5 to part 60:
Method 13A, Section 16.1.
(133) ASTM D3286–85, Standard Test
Method for Gross Calorific Value of Coal
and Coke by the Isoperibol Bomb
Calorimeter, IBR approved for appendix
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
A–7 to part 60: Method 19, Section
12.5.2.1.3.
(134) ASTM D3286–96, Standard Test
Method for Gross Calorific Value of Coal
and Coke by the Isoperibol Bomb
Calorimeter, IBR approved for appendix
A–7 to part 60: Method 19, Section
12.5.2.1.3.
(135) ASTM D3370–76, Standard
Practices for Sampling Water, IBR
approved for § 60.564(j).
(136) ASTM D3370–95a, Standard
Practices for Sampling Water, IBR
approved for § 60.564(j).
(137) ASTM D3588–98 (Reapproved
2003), Standard Practice for Calculating
Heat Value, Compressibility Factor, and
Relative Density of Gaseous Fuels,
(Approved May 10, 2003), IBR approved
for §§ 60.107a(d) and 60.5413(d).
(138) ASTM D3699–08, Standard
Specification for Kerosine, including
Appendix X1, (Approved September 1,
2008), IBR approved for §§ 60.41b and
60.41c.
(139) ASTM D3792–79, Standard Test
Method for Water Content of WaterReducible Paints by Direct Injection into
a Gas Chromatograph, IBR approved for
appendix A–7 to part 60: Method 24,
Section 6.3.
(140) ASTM D3792–91, Standard Test
Method for Water Content of WaterReducible Paints by Direct Injection into
a Gas Chromatograph, IBR approved for
appendix A–7 to part 60: Method 24,
Section 6.3.
(141) ASTM D4017–81, Standard Test
Method for Water in Paints and Paint
Materials by the Karl Fischer Titration
Method, IBR approved for appendix A–
7 to part 60: Method 24, Section 6.4.
(142) ASTM D4017–90, Standard Test
Method for Water in Paints and Paint
Materials by the Karl Fischer Titration
Method, IBR approved for appendix A–
7 to part 60: Method 24, Section 6.4.
(143) ASTM D4017–96a, Standard
Test Method for Water in Paints and
Paint Materials by the Karl Fischer
Titration Method, IBR approved for
appendix A–7 to part 60: Method 24,
Section 6.4.
(144) ASTM D4057–81, Standard
Practice for Manual Sampling of
Petroleum and Petroleum Products, IBR
approved for appendix A–7 to part 60:
Method 19, Section 12.5.2.2.3.
(145) ASTM D4057–95, Standard
Practice for Manual Sampling of
Petroleum and Petroleum Products, IBR
approved for appendix A–7 to part 60:
Method 19, Section 12.5.2.2.3.
(146) ASTM D4057–95 (Reapproved
2000), Standard Practice for Manual
Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum
Products, IBR approved for § 60.4415(a).
(147) ASTM D4084–82, Standard Test
Method for Analysis of Hydrogen
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Sulfide in Gaseous Fuels (Lead Acetate
Reaction Rate Method), IBR approved
for § 60.334(h).
(148) ASTM D4084–94, Standard Test
Method for Analysis of Hydrogen
Sulfide in Gaseous Fuels (Lead Acetate
Reaction Rate Method), IBR approved
for § 60.334(h).
(149) ASTM D4084–05, Standard Test
Method for Analysis of Hydrogen
Sulfide in Gaseous Fuels (Lead Acetate
Reaction Rate Method), IBR approved
for §§ 60.4360 and 60.4415(a).
(150) ASTM D4177–95, Standard
Practice for Automatic Sampling of
Petroleum and Petroleum Products, IBR
approved for appendix A–7 to part 60:
Method 19, Section 12.5.2.2.1.
(151) ASTM D4177–95 (Reapproved
2000), Standard Practice for Automatic
Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum
Products, IBR approved for § 60.4415(a).
(152) ASTM D4239–85, Standard Test
Methods for Sulfur in the Analysis
Sample of Coal and Coke Using High
Temperature Tube Furnace Combustion
Methods, IBR approved for appendix A–
7 to part 60: Method 19, Section
12.5.2.1.3.
(153) ASTM D4239–94, Standard Test
Methods for Sulfur in the Analysis
Sample of Coal and Coke Using High
Temperature Tube Furnace Combustion
Methods, IBR approved for appendix A–
7 to part 60: Method 19, Section
12.5.2.1.3.
(154) ASTM D4239–97, Standard Test
Methods for Sulfur in the Analysis
Sample of Coal and Coke Using High
Temperature Tube Furnace Combustion
Methods, IBR approved for appendix A–
7 to part 60: Method 19, Section
12.5.2.1.3.
(155) ASTM D4294–02, Standard Test
Method for Sulfur in Petroleum and
Petroleum Products by EnergyDispersive X-Ray Fluorescence
Spectrometry, IBR approved for
§ 60.335(b).
(156) ASTM D4294–03, Standard Test
Method for Sulfur in Petroleum and
Petroleum Products by EnergyDispersive X-Ray Fluorescence
Spectrometry, IBR approved for
§ 60.4415(a).
(157) ASTM D4442–84, Standard Test
Methods for Direct Moisture Content
Measurement in Wood and Wood-base
Materials, IBR approved for appendix
A–8 to part 60: Method 28, Section
16.1.1.
(158) ASTM D4442–92, Standard Test
Methods for Direct Moisture Content
Measurement in Wood and Wood-base
Materials, IBR approved for appendix
A–8 to part 60: Method 28, Section
16.1.1.
(159) ASTM D4444–92, Standard Test
Methods for Use and Calibration of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
Hand-Held Moisture Meters, IBR
approved for appendix A–8 to part 60:
Method 28, Section 16.1.1.
(160) ASTM D4457–85 (Reapproved
1991), Test Method for Determination of
Dichloromethane and 1,1,1Trichloroethane in Paints and Coatings
by Direct Injection into a Gas
Chromatograph, IBR approved for
appendix A–7 to part 60: Method 24,
Section 6.5.
(161) ASTM D4468–85 (Reapproved
2000), Standard Test Method for Total
Sulfur in Gaseous Fuels by
Hydrogenolysis and Rateometric
Colorimetry, IBR approved for
§§ 60.335(b) and 60.4415(a).
(162) ASTM D4468–85 (Reapproved
2006), Standard Test Method for Total
Sulfur in Gaseous Fuels by
Hydrogenolysis and Rateometric
Colorimetry, (Approved June 1, 2006),
IBR approved for § 60.107a(e).
(163) ASTM D4629–02, Standard Test
Method for Trace Nitrogen in Liquid
Petroleum Hydrocarbons by Syringe/
Inlet Oxidative Combustion and
Chemiluminescence Detection, IBR
approved for §§ 60.49b(e) and 60.335(b).
(164) ASTM D4809–95, Standard Test
Method for Heat of Combustion of
Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb
Calorimeter (Precision Method), IBR
approved for §§ 60.18(f), 60.485(g),
60.485a(g), 60.564(f), 60.614(d),
60.664(e), and 60.704(d).
(165) ASTM D4809–06, Standard Test
Method for Heat of Combustion of
Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb
Calorimeter (Precision Method),
(Approved December 1, 2006), IBR
approved for § 60.107a(d).
(166) ASTM D4810–88 (Reapproved
1999), Standard Test Method for
Hydrogen Sulfide in Natural Gas Using
Length of Stain Detector Tubes, IBR
approved for §§ 60.4360 and 60.4415(a).
(167) ASTM D4891–89 (Reapproved
2006) Standard Test Method for Heating
Value of Gases in Natural Gas Range by
Stoichiometric Combustion, (Approved
June 1, 2006), IBR approved for
§§ 60.107a(d) and 60.5413(d).
(168) ASTM D5287–97 (Reapproved
2002), Standard Practice for Automatic
Sampling of Gaseous Fuels, IBR
approved for § 60.4415(a).
(169) ASTM D5403–93, Standard Test
Methods for Volatile Content of
Radiation Curable Materials, IBR
approved for appendix A–7 to part 60:
Method 24, Section 6.6.
(170) ASTM D5453–00, Standard Test
Method for Determination of Total
Sulfur in Light Hydrocarbons, Motor
Fuels and Oils by Ultraviolet
Fluorescence, IBR approved for
§ 60.335(b).
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
11247
(171) ASTM D5453–05, Standard Test
Method for Determination of Total
Sulfur in Light Hydrocarbons, Motor
Fuels and Oils by Ultraviolet
Fluorescence, IBR approved for
§ 60.4415(a).
(172) ASTM D5504–01, Standard Test
Method for Determination of Sulfur
Compounds in Natural Gas and Gaseous
Fuels by Gas Chromatography and
Chemiluminescence, IBR approved for
§§ 60.334(h) and 60.4360.
(173) ASTM D5504–08, Standard Test
Method for Determination of Sulfur
Compounds in Natural Gas and Gaseous
Fuels by Gas Chromatography and
Chemiluminescence, (Approved June
15, 2008), IBR approved for
§§ 60.107a(e) and 60.5413(d).
(174) ASTM D5762–02, Standard Test
Method for Nitrogen in Petroleum and
Petroleum Products by Boat-Inlet
Chemiluminescence, IBR approved for
§ 60.335(b).
(175) ASTM D5865–98, Standard Test
Method for Gross Calorific Value of Coal
and Coke, IBR approved for §§ 60.45(f)
and 60.46(c), and appendix A–7 to part
60: Method 19, Section 12.5.2.1.3.
(176) ASTM D5865–10, Standard Test
Method for Gross Calorific Value of Coal
and Coke, (Approved January 1, 2010),
IBR approved for §§ 60.45(f), 60.46(c),
and appendix A–7 to part 60: Method
19, section 12.5.2.1.3.
(177) ASTM D6216–98, Standard
Practice for Opacity Monitor
Manufacturers to Certify Conformance
with Design and Performance
Specifications, IBR approved for
appendix B to part 60: Performance
Specification 1.
(178) ASTM D6228–98, Standard Test
Method for Determination of Sulfur
Compounds in Natural Gas and Gaseous
Fuels by Gas Chromatography and
Flame Photometric Detection, IBR
approved for § 60.334(h).
(179) ASTM D6228–98 (Reapproved
2003), Standard Test Method for
Determination of Sulfur Compounds in
Natural Gas and Gaseous Fuels by Gas
Chromatography and Flame Photometric
Detection, IBR approved for §§ 60.4360
and 60.4415.
(180) ASTM D6348–03, Standard Test
Method for Determination of Gaseous
Compounds by Extractive Direct
Interface Fourier Transform Infrared
(FTIR) Spectroscopy, (Approved
October 1, 2003), IBR approved for
§ 60.73a(b), table 7 to subpart IIII, and
table 2 to subpart JJJJ.
(181) ASTM D6366–99, Standard Test
Method for Total Trace Nitrogen and Its
Derivatives in Liquid Aromatic
Hydrocarbons by Oxidative Combustion
and Electrochemical Detection, IBR
approved for § 60.335(b)(9).
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
11248
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
(182) ASTM D6420–99 (Reapproved
2004), Standard Test Method for
Determination of Gaseous Organic
Compounds by Direct Interface Gas
Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry,
(Approved October 1, 2004), IBR
approved for § 60.107a(d) and table 2 to
subpart JJJJ.
(183) ASTM D6522–00, Standard Test
Method for Determination of Nitrogen
Oxides, Carbon Monoxide, and Oxygen
Concentrations in Emissions from
Natural Gas-Fired Reciprocating
Engines, Combustion Turbines, Boilers,
and Process Heaters Using Portable
Analyzers, IBR approved for § 60.335(a).
(184) ASTM D6522–00 (Reapproved
2005), Standard Test Method for
Determination of Nitrogen Oxides,
Carbon Monoxide, and Oxygen
Concentrations in Emissions from
Natural Gas-Fired Reciprocating
Engines, Combustion Turbines, Boilers,
and Process Heaters Using Portable
Analyzers, (Approved October 1, 2005),
IBR approved for table 2 to subpart JJJJ,
and §§ 60.5413(b) and (d).
(185) ASTM D6667–01, Standard Test
Method for Determination of Total
Volatile Sulfur in Gaseous
Hydrocarbons and Liquefied Petroleum
Gases by Ultraviolet Fluorescence, IBR
approved for § 60.335(b).
(186) ASTM D6667–04, Standard Test
Method for Determination of Total
Volatile Sulfur in Gaseous
Hydrocarbons and Liquefied Petroleum
Gases by Ultraviolet Fluorescence, IBR
approved for § 60.4415(a).
(187) ASTM D6751–11b, Standard
Specification for Biodiesel Fuel Blend
Stock (B100) for Middle Distillate Fuels,
including Appendices X1 through X3,
(Approved July 15, 2011), IBR approved
for §§ 60.41b and 60.41c.
(188) ASTM D6784–02, Standard Test
Method for Elemental, Oxidized,
Particle-Bound and Total Mercury in
Flue Gas Generated from Coal-Fired
Stationary Sources (Ontario Hydro
Method), IBR approved for § 60.56c(b)
and appendix B to part 60: Performance
Specification 12A, Section 8.6.2.
(189) ASTM D6784–02 (Reapproved
2008) Standard Test Method for
Elemental, Oxidized, Particle-Bound
and Total Mercury in Flue Gas
Generated from Coal-Fired Stationary
Sources (Ontario Hydro Method),
(Approved April 1, 2008), IBR approved
for §§ 60.2165(j) and 60.2730(j), tables 1,
5, 6 and 8 to subpart CCCC, and tables
2, 6, 7, and 9 to subpart DDDD,
§§ 60.4900(b), 60.5220(b), tables 1 and 2
to subpart LLLL, and tables 2 and 3 to
subpart MMMM.
(190) ASTM D7467–10, Standard
Specification for Diesel Fuel Oil,
Biodiesel Blend (B6 to B20), including
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
Appendices X1 through X3, (Approved
August 1, 2010), IBR approved for
§§ 60.41b and 60.41c.
(191) ASTM E168–67, General
Techniques of Infrared Quantitative
Analysis, IBR approved for
§§ 60.485a(d), 60.593(b), 60.593a(b), and
60.632(f).
(192) ASTM E168–77, General
Techniques of Infrared Quantitative
Analysis, IBR approved for
§§ 60.485a(d), 60.593(b), 60.593a(b), and
60.632(f).
(193) ASTM E168–92, General
Techniques of Infrared Quantitative
Analysis, IBR approved for
§§ 60.485a(d)(1), 60.593(b)(2),
60.593a(b)(2), 60.632(f), and 60.5400.
(194) ASTM E169–63, General
Techniques of Ultraviolet Quantitative
Analysis, IBR approved for
§§ 60.485a(d), 60.593(b), 60.593a(b), and
60.632(f) .
(195) ASTM E169–77, General
Techniques of Ultraviolet Quantitative
Analysis, IBR approved for
§§ 60.485a(d), 60.593(b), and 60.593a(b),
60.632(f).
(196) ASTM E169–93, General
Techniques of Ultraviolet Quantitative
Analysis, (Approved May 15, 1993), IBR
approved for §§ 60.485a(d), 60.593(b),
60.593a(b), 60.632(f), and 60.5400(f).
(197) ASTM E260–73, General Gas
Chromatography Procedures, IBR
approved for §§ 60.485a(d), 60.593(b),
60.593a(b), and 60.632(f).
(198) ASTM E260–91, General Gas
Chromatography Procedures, (IBR
approved for §§ 60.485a(d), 60.593(b),
60.593a(b), and 60.632(f).
(199) ASTM E260–96, General Gas
Chromatography Procedures, (Approved
April 10, 1996), IBR approved for
§§ 60.485a(d), 60.593(b), 60.593a(b),
60.632(f), 60.5400(f), and 60.5406(b).
(200) ASTM E1584–11, Standard Test
Method for Assay of Nitric Acid,
(Approved August 1, 2011), IBR
approved for § 60.73a(c).
(201) ASTM UOP539–97, Refinery
Gas Analysis by Gas Chromatography,
(Copyright 1997), IBR approved for
§ 60.107a(d).
(h) Association of Official Analytical
Chemists, 1111 North 19th Street, Suite
210, Arlington, VA 22209.
(1) AOAC Method 9, Official Methods
of Analysis of the Association of Official
Analytical Chemists (AOAC), 11th
edition, 1970, pp. 11–12, IBR approved
for §§ 60.204(b), 60.214(b), 60.224(b),
and 60.234(b).
(2) [Reserved]
(i) U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 272–
0167, https://www.epa.gov.
(1) EPA–454/R–98–015, Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(OAQPS) Fabric Filter Bag Leak
Detection Guidance, September 1997,
IBR approved for §§ 60.2145(r),
60.2710(r), 60.4905(b), and 60.5225(b).
(2) [Reserved]
(j) The Gas Processors Association,
6526 East 60th Street, Tulsa, OK 74145;
also available through Information
Handling Services, 15 Inverness Way
East, PO Box 1154, Englewood, CO
80150–1154. You may inspect a copy at
the EPA’s Air and Radiation Docket and
Information Center, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460.
(1) Gas Processors Association
Standard 2172–09, Calculation of Gross
Heating Value, Relative Density,
Compressibility and Theoretical
Hydrocarbon Liquid Content for Natural
Gas Mixtures for Custody Transfer
(2009), IBR approved for § 60.107a(d).
(2) Gas Processors Association
Standard 2261–00, Analysis for Natural
Gas and Similar Gaseous Mixtures by
Gas Chromatography (2000), IBR
approved for § 60.107a(d).
(3) Gas Processors Association
Standard 2377–86, Test for Hydrogen
Sulfide and Carbon Dioxide in Natural
Gas Using Length of Stain Tubes, 1986
Revision, IBR approved for §§ 60.105(b),
60.107a(b), 60.334(h), 60.4360, and
60.4415(a).
(k) International Organization for
Standardization (ISO) available through
IHS Inc., 15 Inverness Way East,
Englewood, CO 80112.
(1) ISO 8178–4: 1996(E),
Reciprocating Internal Combustion
Engines—Exhaust Emission
Measurement—part 4: Test Cycles for
Different Engine Applications, IBR
approved for § 60.4241(b).
(2) [Reserved]
(l) International Organization for
Standardization (ISO), 1, ch. de la VoieCreuse, Case postale 56, CH–1211
Geneva 20, Switzerland, +41 22 749 01
11, https://www.iso.org/iso/home.htm.
(1) ISO 8316: Measurement of Liquid
Flow in Closed Conduits—Method by
Collection of the Liquid in a Volumetric
Tank (1987–10–01)—First Edition, IBR
approved for § 60.107a(d).
(2) [Reserved]
(m) This material is available for
purchase from the National Technical
Information Services (NTIS), 5285 Port
Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161.
You may inspect a copy at the EPA’s Air
and Radiation Docket and Information
Center (Docket A–91–61, Item IV–J–
125), Room M–1500, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.
(1) OMB Bulletin No. 93–17: Revised
Statistical Definitions for Metropolitan
Areas. Office of Management and
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Budget, June 30, 1993. NTIS No. PB 93–
192–664. IBR approved for § 60.31e.
(2) [Reserved]
(n) North American Electric
Reliability Corporation, 1325 G Street
NW., Suite 600, Washington, DC 20005–
3801, https://www.nerc.com.
(1) North American Electric
Reliability Corporation Reliability
Standard EOP–002–3, Capacity and
Energy Emergencies, updated November
19, 2012, IBR approved for §§ 60.4211(f)
and 60.4243(d). Also available online:
https://www.nerc.com/files/EOP-002-3_
1.pdf.
(2) [Reserved]
(o) Technical Association of the Pulp
and Paper Industry (TAPPI), Dunwoody
Park, Atlanta, GA 30341.
(1) TAPPI Method T624 os–68, IBR
approved for § 60.285(d).
(2) [Reserved]
(p) Underwriter’s Laboratories, Inc.
(UL), 333 Pfingsten Road, Northbrook,
IL 60062.
(1) UL 103, Sixth Edition revised as of
September 3, 1986, Standard for
Chimneys, Factory-built, Residential
Type and Building Heating Appliance,
IBR approved for Appendix A–8 to part
60.
(2) [Reserved]
(q) Water Pollution Control
Federation (WPCF), 2626 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20037.
(1) Method 209A, Total Residue Dried
at 103–105 °C, in Standard Methods for
the Examination of Water and
Wastewater, 15th Edition, 1980, IBR
approved for § 60.683(b).
(2) [Reserved]
(r) West Coast Lumber Inspection
Bureau, 6980 SW. Barnes Road,
Portland, OR 97223.
(1) West Coast Lumber Standard
Grading Rules No. 16, pages 5–21, 90
and 91, September 3, 1970, revised
1984, IBR approved for Appendix A–8
to part 60.
(2) [Reserved]
Subpart Db—[Amended]
7. Amend § 60.46b by revising
paragraphs (f)(1)(ii) and (h)(1) and (h)(2)
to read as follows:
■
§ 60.46b Compliance and performance test
methods and procedures for particulate
matter and nitrogen oxides.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Method 7E of appendix A of this
part or Method 320 of appendix A of
part 63 shall be used to determine the
NOX concentrations. Method 3A or 3B
of appendix A of this part shall be used
to determine O2 concentration.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
(h) * * *
(1) Conduct an initial performance
test as required under § 60.8 over a
minimum of 24 consecutive steam
generating unit operating hours at
maximum heat input capacity to
demonstrate compliance with the NOX
emission standards under § 60.44b using
Method 7, 7A, or 7E of appendix A of
this part, Method 320 of appendix A of
part 63 of this chapter, or other
approved reference methods; and
(2) Conduct subsequent performance
tests once per calendar year or every 400
hours of operation (whichever comes
first) to demonstrate compliance with
the NOX emission standards under
§ 60.44b over a minimum of 3
consecutive steam generating unit
operating hours at maximum heat input
capacity using Method 7, 7A, or 7E of
appendix A of this part, Method 320 of
appendix A of part 63, or other
approved reference methods.
*
*
*
*
*
8. Amend § 60.47b by revising
paragraph (b)(2) to read as follows:
■
§ 60.47b
dioxide.
Emission monitoring for sulfur
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) Measuring SO2 according to
Method 6B of appendix A of this part
at the inlet or outlet to the SO2 control
system. An initial stratification test is
required to verify the adequacy of the
sampling location for Method 6B of
appendix A of this part. The
stratification test shall consist of three
paired runs of a suitable SO2 and CO2
measurement train operated at the
candidate location and a second similar
train operated according to the
procedures in Section 3.2 and the
applicable procedures in Section 7 of
Performance Specification 2. Method 6B
of appendix A of this part, Method 6A
of appendix A of this part, or a
combination of Methods 6 and 3 or 3B
of appendix A of this part or Methods
6C or Method 320 of appendix A of part
63 of this chapter and 3A of appendix
A of this part are suitable measurement
techniques. If Method 6B of appendix A
of this part is used for the second train,
sampling time and timer operation may
be adjusted for the stratification test as
long as an adequate sample volume is
collected; however, both sampling trains
are to be operated similarly. For the
location to be adequate for Method 6B
of appendix A of this part, 24-hour tests,
the mean of the absolute difference
between the three paired runs must be
less than 10 percent.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
11249
Subpart Ec—[Amended]
9. Amend § 60.51c by revising the
definition of ‘‘Medical/infectious waste’’
to read as follows:
■
§ 60.51c
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Medical/infectious waste means any
waste generated in the diagnosis,
treatment, or immunization of human
beings or animals, in research pertaining
thereto, or in the production or testing
of biologicals that are listed in
paragraphs (1) through (7) of this
definition. The definition of medical/
infectious waste does not include
hazardous waste identified or listed
under the regulations in part 261 of this
chapter; household waste, as defined in
§ 261.4(b)(1) of this chapter; ash from
incineration of medical/infectious
waste, once the incineration process has
been completed; human corpses,
remains, and anatomical parts that are
intended for interment or cremation;
and domestic sewage materials
identified in § 261.4(a)(1) of this
chapter.
(1) Cultures and stocks of infectious
agents and associated biologicals,
including: Cultures from medical and
pathological laboratories; cultures and
stocks of infectious agents from research
and industrial laboratories; wastes from
the production of biologicals; discarded
live and attenuated vaccines; and
culture dishes and devices used to
transfer, inoculate, and mix cultures.
(2) Human pathological waste,
including tissues, organs, and body
parts and body fluids that are removed
during surgery or autopsy, or other
medical procedures, and specimens of
body fluids and their containers.
(3) Human blood and blood products
including:
(i) Liquid waste human blood;
(ii) Products of blood;
(iii) Items saturated and/or dripping
with human blood; or
(iv) Items that were saturated and/or
dripping with human blood that are
now caked with dried human blood;
including serum, plasma, and other
blood components, and their containers,
which were used or intended for use in
either patient care, testing and
laboratory analysis or the development
of pharmaceuticals. Intravenous bags are
also included in this category.
(4) Sharps that have been used in
animal or human patient care or
treatment or in medical, research, or
industrial laboratories, including
hypodermic needles, syringes (with or
without the attached needle), pasteur
pipettes, scalpel blades, blood vials,
needles with attached tubing, and
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
11250
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Subpart H—[Amended]
10. Amend § 60.84 by revising the
equation in paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
■
§ 60.84
Subpart O—[Amended]
11. Amend § 60.154 by revising the
introductory text to paragraph (b)(5) to
read as follows:
■
Test methods and procedures.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(5) Samples of the sludge charged to
the incinerator shall be collected in
nonporous jars at the beginning of each
run and at approximately 1-hour
intervals thereafter until the test ends;
and ‘‘2540 G. Total, Fixed, and Volatile
Solids in Solid and Semisolid Samples,
in Standard Methods for the
Examination of Water and Wastewater,
20th Edition, 1998’’ (incorporated by
reference—see § 60.17) shall be used to
determine dry sludge content of each
sample (total solids residue), except
that:
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
N = total number of control devices to which
separate operations in the facility are
ducted.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
Ccorr = C meas × (21¥ X)/(21¥ Y)
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) Method 12 or Method 29 shall be
used to determine the lead
concentration (CPb) and the volumetric
flow rate (Qsd) of the effluent gas. The
sampling time and sample volume for
each run shall be at least 60 minutes
and 0.85 dscm (30 dscf).
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart GG—[Amended]
Subpart LL—[Amended]
13. Amend § 60.335 by revising the
terms Pr and Po for the equation in
paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows:
■
§ 60.335
(a) * * *
(1) Contain particulate matter in
excess of 0.05 grams per dry standard
cubic meter (0.05 g/dscm).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 16. Amend § 60.386 by revising
paragraph (b)(2) to read as follows:
§ 60.284 Monitoring of emissions and
operations.
■
Test methods and procedures.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
Pr = reference combustor inlet
absolute pressure at 101.3 kilopascals
ambient pressure. Alternatively, you
may use 760 mm Hg (29.92 in Hg),
Po = observed combustor inlet
absolute pressure at test, mm Hg.
Alternatively, you may use the
barometric pressure for the date of the
test,
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart KK—[Amended]
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
Es = (Cs S)/[0.265 ¥ (0.0126 %O2) ¥ (A
%CO2)]
*
*
*
*
*
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
12. Amend § 60.284 by revising the
equation in paragraph (c)(3) to read as
follows:
■
Emission monitoring.
*
§ 60.154
Subpart BB—[Amended]
14. Amend § 60.374 by revising
paragraphs (b)(1), (b)(2), and (c)(2) to
read as follows:
■
§ 60.374
Test methods and procedures.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) Method 12 or Method 29 shall be
used to determine the lead
concentration (CPb) and, if applicable,
the volumetric flow rate (Qsda) of the
effluent gas. The sampling time and
sample volume for each run shall be at
least 60 minutes and 0.85 dscm (30
dscf).
(2) When different operations in a
three-process operation facility are
ducted to separate control devices, the
lead emission concentration (C) from
the facility shall be determined as
follows:
*
15. Amend § 60.382 by revising
paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:
§ 60.382
§ 60.386
Standard for particulate matter.
Test methods and procedures.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) Method 9 and the procedures in
§ 60.11 shall be used to determine
opacity from stack emissions and
process fugitive emissions. The observer
shall read opacity only when emissions
are clearly identified as emanating
solely from the affected facility being
observed. A single visible emission
observer may conduct visible emission
observations for up to three fugitive,
stack, or vent emission points within a
15-second interval. This option is
subject to the following limitations:
(i) No more than three emission
points are read concurrently;
(ii) All three emission points must be
within a 70° viewing sector or angle in
front of the observer such that the
proper sun position can be maintained
for all three points; and
(iii) If an opacity reading for any one
of the three emission points is within 5
percent opacity of the application
standard, then the observer must stop
taking readings for the other two points
and continue reading just that single
point.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart UU—[Amended]
Where:
C = concentration of lead emissions for the
entire facility, mg/dscm (gr/dscf).
Ca = concentration of lead emissions from
facility ‘‘a’’, mg/dscm (gr/dscf).
Qsda = volumetric flow rate of effluent gas
from facility ‘‘a’’, dscm/hr (dscf/hr).
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
17. Amend § 60.472 by revising
paragraph (a)(1)(ii) to read as follows:
■
§ 60.472
Standards for particulate matter.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
ER27FE14.006
culture dishes (regardless of presence of
infectious agents). Also included are
other types of broken or unbroken
glassware that were in contact with
infectious agents, such as used slides
and cover slips.
(5) Animal waste including
contaminated animal carcasses, body
parts, and bedding of animals that were
known to have been exposed to
infectious agents during research
(including research in veterinary
hospitals), production of biologicals or
testing of pharmaceuticals.
(6) Isolation wastes including
biological waste and discarded materials
contaminated with blood, excretions,
exudates, or secretions from humans
who are isolated to protect others from
certain highly communicable diseases,
or isolated animals known to be infected
with highly communicable diseases.
(7) Unused sharps including the
following unused, discarded sharps:
hypodermic needles, suture needles,
syringes, and scalpel blades.
*
*
*
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
(ii) 0.4 kg/Mg (0.8 lb/ton) of saturated
felt or smooth-surfaced roll roofing
produced;
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart NNN—[Amended]
18. Amend § 60.660 by revising
paragraph (c)(4) to read as follows:
■
§ 60.660 Applicability and designation of
affected facility.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(4) Each affected facility that has a
total resource effectiveness (TRE) index
value greater than 8.0 is exempt from all
provisions of this subpart except for
§§ 60.662; 60.664 (e), (f), and (g); and
60.665 (h) and (l).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 19. Amend § 60.665 by revising
paragraphs (h)(2) and (h)(3) to read as
follows:
§ 60.665 Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(2) Any recalculation of the TRE
index value performed pursuant to
§ 60.664(g); and
11251
(3) The results of any performance test
performed pursuant to the methods and
procedures required by § 60.664(e).
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart IIII—[Amended]
20. Revise Table 7 to Subpart IIII of
part 60 to read as follows:
As stated in § 60.4213, you must
comply with the following requirements
for performance tests for stationary CI
ICE with a displacement of ≥30 liters
per cylinder:
■
TABLE 7 TO SUBPART IIII OF PART 60—REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS FOR STATIONARY CI ICE WITH A
DISPLACEMENT OF ≥30 LITERS PER CYLINDER
Each
Complying with the
requirement to
You must
1. Stationary CI internal
combustion engine with a
displacement of ≥ 30 liters per cylinder
a. Reduce NOX emissions
by 90 percent or more;
According to the following
requirements
i. Select the sampling port
location and number/location of traverse points
at the inlet and outlet of
the control device;
Using
(1) Method 3, 3A, or 3B of
40 CFR part 60, appendix A–2
iii. If necessary, measure
moisture content at the
inlet and outlet of the
control device; and
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
ii. Measure O2 at the inlet
and outlet of the control
device;
(2) Method 4 of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A–3,
Method 320 of 40 CFR
part 63, appendix A, or
ASTM D 6348–03 (incorporated by reference,
see § 60.17)
(3) Method 7E of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A–4,
Method 320 of 40 CFR
part 63, appendix A, or
ASTM D 6348–03 (incorporated by reference,
see § 60.17)
iv. Measure NOX at the
inlet and outlet of the
control device.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
(a) For NOX, O2, and
moisture measurement,
ducts ≤6 inches in diameter may be sampled
at a single point located
at the duct centroid and
ducts >6 and ≤12
inches in diameter may
be sampled at 3 traverse points located at
16.7, 50.0, and 83.3%
of the measurement line
(‘3-point long line’). If
the duct is >12 inches in
diameter and the sampling port location meets
the two and half-diameter criterion of Section
11.1.1 of Method 1 of
40 CFR part 60, appendix A–1, the duct may
be sampled at ‘3-point
long line’; otherwise,
conduct the stratification
testing and select sampling points according to
Section 8.1.2 of Method
7E of 40 CFR part 60,
appendix A–4.
(b) Measurements to determine O2 concentration must be made at
the same time as the
measurements for NOX
concentration.
(c) Measurements to determine moisture content must be made at
the same time as the
measurements for NOX
concentration.
(d) NOX concentration
must be at 15 percent
O2, dry basis. Results of
this test consist of the
average of the three 1hour or longer runs.
11252
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 7 TO SUBPART IIII OF PART 60—REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS FOR STATIONARY CI ICE WITH A
DISPLACEMENT OF ≥30 LITERS PER CYLINDER—Continued
Complying with the
requirement to
You must
b. Limit the concentration
of NOX in the stationary
CI internal combustion
engine exhaust.
i. Select the sampling port
location and number/location of traverse points
at the exhaust of the
stationary internal combustion engine;
Each
ii. Determine the O2 concentration of the stationary internal combustion engine exhaust at
the sampling port location;
iii. If necessary, measure
moisture content of the
stationary internal combustion engine exhaust
at the sampling port location; and
c. Reduce PM emissions
by 60 percent or more
According to the following
requirements
Using
iv. Measure NOX at the
exhaust of the stationary
internal combustion engine; if using a control
device, the sampling
site must be located at
the outlet of the control
device.
i. Select the sampling port
location and the number
of traverse points;
(1) Method 3, 3A, or 3B of
40 CFR part 60, appendix A–2
(2) Method 4 of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A–3,
Method 320 of 40 CFR
part 63, appendix A, or
ASTM D 6348–03 (incorporated by reference,
see § 60.17)
(3) Method 7E of 40 CFR
part 60, Appendix A–4,
Method 320 of 40 CFR
part 63, appendix A, or
ASTM D 6348–03 (incorporated by reference,
see § 60.17)
(1) Method 1 or 1A of 40
CFR part 60, appendix
A–1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
ii. Measure O2 at the inlet
and outlet of the control
device;
iii. If necessary, measure
moisture content at the
inlet and outlet of the
control device; and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
(2) Method 3, 3A, or 3B of
40 CFR part 60, appendix A–2
(3) Method 4 of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A–3
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
(a) For NOX, O2, and
moisture measurement,
ducts ≤6 inches in diameter may be sampled
at a single point located
at the duct centroid and
ducts >6 and ≤12
inches in diameter may
be sampled at 3 traverse points located at
16.7, 50.0, and 83.3%
of the measurement line
(‘3-point long line’). If
the duct is >12 inches in
diameter and the sampling port location meets
the two and half-diameter criterion of Section
11.1.1 of Method 1 of
40 CFR part 60, appendix A–1, the duct may
be sampled at ‘3-point
long line’; otherwise,
conduct the stratification
testing and select sampling points according to
Section 8.1.2 of Method
7E of 40 CFR part 60,
appendix A–4.
(b) Measurements to determine O2 concentration must be made at
the same time as the
measurement for NOX
concentration.
(c) Measurements to determine moisture content must be made at
the same time as the
measurement for NOX
concentration.
(d) NOX concentration
must be at 15 percent
O2, dry basis. Results of
this test consist of the
average of the three 1hour or longer runs.
(a) Sampling sites must be
located at the inlet and
outlet of the control device.
(b) Measurements to determine O2 concentration must be made at
the same time as the
measurements for PM
concentration.
(c) Measurements to determine and moisture
content must be made
at the same time as the
measurements for PM
concentration.
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
11253
TABLE 7 TO SUBPART IIII OF PART 60—REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS FOR STATIONARY CI ICE WITH A
DISPLACEMENT OF ≥30 LITERS PER CYLINDER—Continued
Complying with the
requirement to
Each
You must
According to the following
requirements
Using
iv. Measure PM at the
inlet and outlet of the
control device.
Subpart JJJJ—[Amended]
21. Revise Table 2 to Subpart JJJJ of
part 60 to read as follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
i. Select the sampling port
location and the number
of traverse points;
(1) Method 1 or 1A of 40
CFR part 60, appendix
A–1
ii. Determine the O2 concentration of the stationary internal combustion engine exhaust at
the sampling port location;
iii. If necessary, measure
moisture content of the
stationary internal combustion engine exhaust
at the sampling port location; and
iv. Measure PM at the exhaust of the stationary
internal combustion engine.
d. Limit the concentration
of PM in the stationary
CI internal combustion
engine exhaust
(4) Method 5 of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A–3
(2) Method 3, 3A, or 3B of
40 CFR part 60, appendix A–2
(3) Method 4 of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A–3
(4) Method 5 of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A–3.
As stated in § 60.4244, you must
comply with the following requirements
for performance tests within 10 percent
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(d) PM concentration must
be at 15 percent O2, dry
basis. Results of this
test consist of the average of the three 1-hour
or longer runs.
(a) If using a control device, the sampling site
must be located at the
outlet of the control device.
(b) Measurements to determine O2 concentration must be made at
the same time as the
measurements for PM
concentration.
(c) Measurements to determine moisture content must be made at
the same time as the
measurements for PM
concentration.
(d) PM concentration must
be at 15 percent O2, dry
basis. Results of this
test consist of the average of the three 1-hour
or longer runs.
of 100 percent peak (or the highest
achievable) load:
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
11254
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2 TO SUBPART JJJJ OF PART 60—REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS
Complying with the
requirement to
You must
1. Stationary SI internal
combustion engine demonstrating compliance according to § 60.4244.
a. limit the concentration
of NOX in the stationary
SI internal combustion
engine exhaust.
i. Select the sampling port
location and the number/location of traverse
points at the exhaust of
the stationary internal
combustion engine;
(1) Method 1 or 1A of 40
CFR part 60, appendix
A–1, if measuring flow
rate.
ii. Determine the O2 concentration of the stationary internal combustion engine exhaust at
the sampling port location;
iii. If necessary, determine
the exhaust flowrate of
the stationary internal
combustion engine exhaust;
iv. If necessary, measure
moisture content of the
stationary internal combustion engine exhaust
at the sampling port location; and
v. Measure NOX at the exhaust of the stationary
internal combustion engine; if using a control
device, the sampling
site must be located at
the outlet of the control
device.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
For each
(2) Method 3, 3A, or 3Bb
of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A–2 or ASTM
Method D6522–00 (Reapproved 2005) a e.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:52 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
According to the following
requirements
Using
(3) Method 2 or 2C of 40
CFR part 60, appendix
A–1 or Method 19 of 40
CFR part 60, appendix
A–7.
(4) Method 4 of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A–3,
Method 320 of 40 CFR
part 63, appendix A, or
ASTM Method D 6348–
03 e.
(5) Method 7E of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A–4,
ASTM Method D6522–
00 (Reapproved
2005) a e, Method 320 of
40 CFR part 63, appendix A, or ASTM Method
D 6348–03 e.
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
(a) Alternatively, for NOX,
O2, and moisture measurement, ducts ≤6
inches in diameter may
be sampled at a single
point located at the duct
centroid and ducts >6
and ≤12 inches in diameter may be sampled
at 3 traverse points located at 16.7, 50.0, and
83.3% of the measurement line (‘3-point long
line’). If the duct is >12
inches in diameter and
the sampling port location meets the two and
half-diameter criterion of
Section 11.1.1 of Method 1 of 40 CFR part 60,
Appendix A, the duct
may be sampled at ‘3point long line’; otherwise, conduct the stratification testing and select sampling points according to Section 8.1.2
of Method 7E of 40 CFR
part 60, Appendix A.
(b) Measurements to determine O2 concentration must be made at
the same time as the
measurements for NOX
concentration.
(c) Measurements to determine moisture must
be made at the same
time as the measurement for NOX concentration.
(d) Results of this test
consist of the average
of the three 1-hour or
longer runs.
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
11255
TABLE 2 TO SUBPART JJJJ OF PART 60—REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS—Continued
Complying with the
requirement to
For each
According to the following
requirements
Using
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:52 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
i. Select the sampling port
location and the number/location of traverse
points at the exhaust of
the stationary internal
combustion engine;
(1) Method 1 or 1A of 40
CFR part 60, appendix
A–1, if measuring flow
rate.
ii. Determine the O2 concentration of the stationary internal combustion engine exhaust at
the sampling port location;
iii. If necessary, determine
the exhaust flowrate of
the stationary internal
combustion engine exhaust;
iv. If necessary, measure
moisture content of the
stationary internal combustion engine exhaust
at the sampling port location; and
v. Measure CO at the exhaust of the stationary
internal combustion engine; if using a control
device, the sampling
site must be located at
the outlet of the control
device.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
b. limit the concentration
of CO in the stationary
SI internal combustion
engine exhaust.
You must
(2) Method 3, 3A, or 3B b
of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A–2 or ASTM
Method D6522–00 (Reapproved 2005) a e.
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(3) Method 2 or 2C of 40
CFR part 60, appendix
A–1 or Method 19 of 40
CFR part 60, appendix
A–7.
(4) Method 4 of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A–3,
Method 320 of 40 CFR
part 63, appendix A, or
ASTM Method D 6348–
03 e.
(5) Method 10 of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A4,
ASTM Method D6522–
00 (Reapproved
2005) a e, Method 320 of
40 CFR part 63, appendix A, or ASTM Method
D 6348–03 e.
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
(a) Alternatively, for CO,
O2, and moisture measurement, ducts ≤6
inches in diameter may
be sampled at a single
point located at the duct
centroid and ducts >6
and ≤12 inches in diameter may be sampled
at 3 traverse points located at 16.7, 50.0, and
83.3% of the measurement line (‘3-point long
line’). If the duct is >12
inches in diameter and
the sampling port location meets the two and
half-diameter criterion of
Section 11.1.1 of Method 1 of 40 CFR part 60,
Appendix A, the duct
may be sampled at ‘3point long line’; otherwise, conduct the stratification testing and select sampling points according to Section 8.1.2
of Method 7E of 40 CFR
part 60, Appendix A.
(b) Measurements to determine O2 concentration must be made at
the same time as the
measurements for CO
concentration.
(c) Measurements to determine moisture must
be made at the same
time as the measurement for CO concentration.
(d) Results of this test
consist of the average
of the three 1-hour or
longer runs.
11256
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2 TO SUBPART JJJJ OF PART 60—REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS—Continued
Complying with the
requirement to
You must
c. limit the concentration
of VOC in the stationary
SI internal combustion
engine exhaust
i. Select the sampling port
location and the number/location of traverse
points at the exhaust of
the stationary internal
combustion engine;
(1) Method 1 or 1A of 40
CFR part 60, appendix
A–1, if measuring flow
rate.
ii. Determine the O2 concentration of the stationary internal combustion engine exhaust at
the sampling port location;
iii. If necessary, determine
the exhaust flowrate of
the stationary internal
combustion engine exhaust;
iv. If necessary, measure
moisture content of the
stationary internal combustion engine exhaust
at the sampling port location; and
v. Measure VOC at the
exhaust of the stationary
internal combustion engine; if using a control
device, the sampling
site must be located at
the outlet of the control
device.
(2) Method 3, 3A, or 3B b
of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A–2 or ASTM
Method D6522–00 (Reapproved 2005) a e.
For each
According to the following
requirements
Using
(3) Method 2 or 2C of 40
CFR part 60, appendix
A–1 or Method 19 of 40
CFR part 60, appendix
A–7.
(4) Method 4 of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A–3,
Method 320 of 40 CFR
part 63, appendix A, or
ASTM Method D 6348–
03 e.
(5) Methods 25A and 18
of 40 CFR part 60, appendices A–6 and A–7,
Method 25A with the
use of a methane cutter
as described in 40 CFR
1065.265, Method 18 of
40 CFR part 60, appendix A–6 c d, Method 320
of 40 CFR part 63, appendix A, or ASTM
Method D 6348–03 e.
a Also,
(c) Measurements to determine moisture must
be made at the same
time as the measurement for VOC concentration.
(d) Results of this test
consist of the average
of the three 1-hour or
longer runs.
you may petition the Administrator for approval to use alternative methods for portable analyzer.
may use ASME PTC 19.10–1981, Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses, for measuring the O2 content of the exhaust gas as an alternative to
EPA Method 3B. AMSE PTC 19.10–1981 incorporated by reference, see 40 CFR 60.17
c You may use EPA Method 18 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A–6, provided that you conduct an adequate pre-survey test prior to the emissions test, such as the one described in OTM 11 on EPA’s Web site (https://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/prelim/otm11.pdf).
d You may use ASTM D6420–99 (2004), Test Method for Determination of Gaseous Organic Compounds by Direct Interface Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry as an alternative to EPA Method 18 for measuring total nonmethane organic. ASTM D6420–99(2004) incorporated
by reference; see 40 CFR 60.17.
e Incorporated by reference; see 40 CFR 60.17.
b You
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
(a) Alternatively, for VOC,
O2, and moisture measurement, ducts ≤6
inches in diameter may
be sampled at a single
point located at the duct
centroid and ducts >6
and ≤12 inches in diameter may be sampled
at 3 traverse points located at 16.7, 50.0, and
83.3% of the measurement line (‘3-point long
line’). If the duct is >12
inches in diameter and
the sampling port location meets the two and
half-diameter criterion of
Section 11.1.1 of Method 1 of 40 CFR part 60,
Appendix A, the duct
may be sampled at ‘3point long line’; otherwise, conduct the stratification testing and select sampling points according to Section 8.1.2
of Method 7E of 40 CFR
part 60, Appendix A.
(b) Measurements to determine O2 concentration must be made at
the same time as the
measurements for VOC
concentration.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:52 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
22. Amend appendix A–1 to part 60
as follows:
■ a. By amending Method 1 as follows:
■ i. By revising Figure 1–1 in section 17.
■ ii. By adding Figure 1–2 to section 17.
■ b. By amending Method 2 as follows:
■ i. By revising section 8.1, the note at
the end of 10.1.1, and sections 10.4,
12.6, and 12.7.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
ii. By removing the definition for
Ts(abs) in section 12.1.
■ iii. By adding a definition for
Ts(abavg) in alphabetical order to
section 12.1.
■ c. By revising Method 2A, sections
10.3 and 12.2.
■ d. By revising Method 2B, section
12.1.
■
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
11257
e. By revising Method 2D, section
10.4.
■
Appendix A–1 to Part 60—Test
Methods 1 Through 2F
*
*
*
*
*
Method 1—Sample and Velocity Traverses
From Stationary Sources
*
*
*
17.0 * * *
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
*
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
ER27FE14.007
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
11258
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
Method 2—Determination of Stack Gas
Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate (Type S
Pitot Tube)
*
*
*
*
*
8.1 Set up the apparatus as shown in
Figure 2–1. Capillary tubing or surge tanks
installed between the manometer and pitot
tube may be used to dampen DP fluctuations.
It is recommended, but not required, that a
pretest leak-check be conducted as follows:
(1) blow through the pitot impact opening
until at least 7.6 cm (3.0 in.) H2O velocity
head registers on the manometer; then, close
off the impact opening. The pressure shall
*
*
*
*
remain stable (±2.5 mm H2O, ±0.10 in. H2O)
for at least 15 seconds; (2) do the same for
the static pressure side, except using suction
to obtain the minimum of 7.6 cm (3.0 in.)
H2O. Other leak-check procedures, subject to
the approval of the Administrator, may be
used.
*
*
*
*
*
10.1.1 * * *
Note: Do not use a Type S pitot tube
assembly that is constructed such that the
impact pressure opening plane of the pitot
tube is below the entry plane of the nozzle
(see Figure 2–7B).
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(CO2)e = Mean carbon dioxide concentration
in system exhaust, ppm.
HCe = Mean organic concentration in system
exhaust as defined by the calibration gas,
ppm.
Hci = Mean organic concentration in system
inlet as defined by the calibration gas,
ppm.
Ke = Hydrocarbon calibration gas factor for
the exhaust hydrocarbon analyzer,
unitless [equal to the number of carbon
atoms per molecule of the gas used to
calibrate the analyzer (2 for ethane, 3 for
propane, etc.)].
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Method 2B—Determination of Exhaust Gas
Volume Flow Rate From Gasoline Vapor
Incinerators
*
*
*
12.1 Nomenclature.
COe = Mean carbon monoxide concentration
in system exhaust, ppm.
(CO2)a = Ambient carbon dioxide
concentration, ppm (if not measured
during the test period, may be assumed
to equal 380 ppm).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:52 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00033
*
Fmt 4701
*
*
*
12.1
Nomenclature
*
*
*
*
*
*
Ts(abavg) = Average absolute stack
temperature, °K (°R).
= 273 + Ts for metric units,
= 460 + Ts for English units.
*
*
*
*
*
12.6
Average Stack Gas Velocity.
12.2
Test Meter Calibration Coefficient.
*
*
*
*
10.3 Barometer. Calibrate the barometer
used against a mercury barometer or NISTtraceable barometer prior to the field test.
*
Method 2A—Direct Measurement of Gas
Volume Through Pipes and Small Ducts
*
10.4 Barometer. Calibrate the barometer
used against a mercury barometer or NISTtraceable barometer prior to each field test.
*
Sfmt 4700
Ki = Hydrocarbon calibration gas factor for
the inlet hydrocarbon analyzer, unitless.
Ves = Exhaust gas volume, m3.
Vis = Inlet gas volume, m3.
Qes = Exhaust gas volume flow rate, m3/min.
Qis = Inlet gas volume flow rate, m3/min.
q = Sample run time, min.
S = Standard conditions: 20° C, 760 mm
Hg.
*
*
*
*
*
Method 2D—Measurement of Gas Volume
Flow Rates in Small Pipes and Ducts
*
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
*
*
27FER2
*
*
ER27FE14.008 ER27FE14.009
*
11259
11260
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
10.4 Barometer. Calibrate the barometer
used against a mercury barometer or NISTtraceable barometer prior to the field test.
*
*
*
*
*
23. Amend appendix A–2 to part 60
as follows:
■ a. By revising Method 3A, section 7.1.
■ b. By amending Method 3C as follows:
■ i. By revising section 7.1.
■ ii. By adding section 7.3.
■
*
Appendix A–2 to Part 60—Test
Methods 2G Through 3C
*
*
*
*
other gases that interfere with the O2
measurement.
(a) CO2 in Nitrogen (N2).
(b) CO2/SO2 gas mixture in N2.
(c) O2/SO2 gas mixture in N2.
(d) O2/CO2/SO2 gas mixture in N2.
(e) CO2/NOX gas mixture in N2.
(f) CO2/SO2/NOX gas mixture in N2.
The tests for analyzer calibration error and
system bias require high-, mid-, and lowlevel gases.
*
*
*
*
Method 3C—Determination of Carbon
Dioxide, Methane, Nitrogen, and Oxygen
from Stationary Sources
*
Method 3A—Determination of Oxygen and
Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in Emissions
From Stationary Sources (Instrumental
Analyzer Procedure)
*
*
*
*
*
7.1 Calibration Gas. What calibration
gases do I need? Refer to Section 7.1 of
Method 7E for the calibration gas
requirements. Example calibration gas
mixtures are listed below. Pre-cleaned or
scrubbed air may be used for the O2 highcalibration gas provided it does not contain
7.1 Nomenclature.
Bw = Moisture content in the sample,
fraction.
CN2 = Measured N2 concentration (by Method
3C), fraction.
CN2Corr = Measured N2 concentration
corrected only for dilution, fraction.
Ct = Calculated NMOC concentration, ppmv
C equivalent.
Ctm = Measured NMOC concentration, ppmv
C equivalent.
*
■
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
24. Amend appendix A–3 to part 60
as follows:
■ a. By revising Method 4, sections 9.1
and 16.0.
■ b. Amend Method 5 as follows:
■ i. By revising sections 6.1.1.5, 6.1.1.6,
6.1.1.7, 6.1.1.9, 7.1.3, 8.1, 8.3.4, 8.5,
8.5.6, 8.7.3, 8.7.5, 10.3.3, 10.5, 10.6.
■ ii. By removing section 7.1.5.
■ iii. By revising Equation 5–13 in
section 16.2.3.3.
■ iv. By adding section 16.3.
■
v. By adding reference 13 to section
17.0.
■ c. By revising Method 5A, section 8.1.
■ d. By amending Method 5E as follows:
■ i. By redesignating sections 16.0 and
17.0 as sections 17.0 and 18.0,
respectively.
■ ii. By adding a new section 16.0.
■ e. By amending Method 5H as follows:
■ i. By revising section 12.1.
■ ii. By adding section 12.15.
Pb = Barometric pressure, mm Hg.
Pt = Gas sample tank pressure after sampling,
but before pressurizing, mm Hg absolute.
Ptf = Final gas sample tank pressure after
pressurizing, mm Hg absolute.
Pti = Gas sample tank pressure after
evacuation, mm Hg absolute.
Pw = Vapor pressure of H2O (from Table 25C–
1), mm Hg.
r = Total number of analyzer injections of
sample tank during analysis (where j =
injection number, 1 . . . r).
R = Mean calibration response factor for
specific sample component, area/ppm.
Tt = Sample tank temperature at completion
of sampling, °K.
Tti = Sample tank temperature before
sampling, °K.
Ttf = Sample tank temperature after
pressurizing, °K.
*
*
*
*
*
7.3 Measured N2 Concentration
Correction. Calculate the reported N2
correction for Method 25–C using Eq. 3C–4.
If oxygen is determined in place of N2,
substitute the oxygen concentration for the
nitrogen concentration in the equation.
iii. By redesignating sections 16.0 and
17.0 as sections 17.0 and 18.0,
respectively.
■ iv. By adding a new section 16.
■
Appendix A–3 to Part 60—Test
Methods 4 Through 5I
*
*
*
*
*
Method 4—Determination of Moisture
Content in Stack Gases
*
*
*
*
*
9.1 Miscellaneous Quality Control
Measures.
Section
Quality control measure
Effect
Section 8.1.1.4 .....................
Leak rate of the sampling system cannot exceed four
percent of the average sampling rate or 0.00057 m3/
min (0.020 cfm).
Leak rate of the sampling system cannot exceed two
percent of the average sampling rate.
Ensures the accuracy of the volume of gas sampled.
(Reference Method).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
16.0
Alternative Procedures
16.1 The procedure described in Method
5 for determining moisture content is an
acceptable alternative to Method 4.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
Ensures the accuracy of the volume of gas sampled.
(Approximation Method).
16.2 The procedures in Method 6A for
determining moisture is an acceptable
alternative to Method 4.
16.3 Method 320 is an acceptable
alternative to Method 4 for determining
moisture.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
16.4 Using F-factors to determine
moisture is an acceptable alternative to
Method 4 for a combustion stack not using
a scrubber. If this option is selected, calculate
the moisture content as follows:
BWS ¥ BH + BA + BF
Where:
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
ER27FE14.010
Section 8.2.1 ........................
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Method 5—Determination of Particulate
Matter Emissions From Stationary Sources
The monitoring and regulation of the
temperature around the filter may be done
with the filter temperature sensor or another
temperature sensor.
6.1.1.7 Filter Temperature Sensor. A
temperature sensor capable of measuring
temperature to within ±3 °C (5.4 °F) shall be
installed so that the sensing tip of the
temperature sensor is in direct contact with
the sample gas exiting the filter. The sensing
tip of the sensor may be encased in glass,
Teflon, or metal and must protrude at least
1⁄2 in. into the sample gas exiting the filter.
The filter temperature sensor must be
monitored and recorded during sampling to
ensure a sample gas temperature exiting the
filter of 120 ± 14 °C (248 ± 25 °F), or such
other temperature as specified by an
applicable subpart of the standards or
approved by the Administrator for a
particular application.
*
*
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
6.1.1.5 Filter Holder. Borosilicate glass,
with a glass or Teflon frit filter support and
a silicone rubber gasket. Other materials of
construction (e.g., stainless steel or Viton)
may be used, subject to the approval of the
Administrator. The holder design shall
provide a positive seal against leakage from
the outside or around the filter. The holder
shall be attached immediately at the outlet of
the probe (or cyclone, if used).
6.1.1.6 Filter Heating System. Any
heating system capable of monitoring and
maintaining temperature around the filter
shall be used to ensure the sample gas
temperature exiting the filter of 120 ± 14 °C
(248 ± 25 °F) during sampling or such other
temperature as specified by an applicable
subpart of the standards or approved by the
Administrator for a particular application.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
*
*
*
*
6.1.1.9 Metering System. Vacuum gauge,
leak-free pump, calibrated temperature
sensors (rechecked at at least one point after
each test), dry gas meter (DGM) capable of
measuring volume to within 2 percent, and
related equipment, as shown in Figure 5–1.
Alternatively, an Isostack metering system
may be used if all Method 5 calibrations are
performed, with the exception of those
related to DH@ in Section 9.2.1, wherein the
sample flow rate system shall be calibrated
in lieu of DH@ and shall not deviate by more
than 5 percent. Other metering systems
capable of maintaining sampling rates within
10 percent of isokinetic and of determining
sample volumes to within 2 percent may be
used, subject to the approval of the
Administrator. When the metering system is
used in conjunction with a pitot tube, the
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
system shall allow periodic checks of
isokinetic rates.
*
*
*
*
*
7.1.3 Water. When analysis of the
material caught in the impingers is required,
deionized distilled water [to conform to
ASTM D1193–77 or 91 Type 3 (incorporated
by reference—see § 60.17)] with at least
<0.001 percent residue shall be used or as
specified in the applicable method requiring
analysis of the water. Run reagent blanks
prior to field use to eliminate a high blank
on test samples.
*
*
*
*
*
8.1 Pretest Preparation. It is suggested
that sampling equipment be maintained
according to the procedures described in
APTD–0576. Alternative mercury-free
thermometers may be used if the
thermometers are at a minimum equivalent
in terms of performance or suitably effective
for the specific temperature measurement
application.
*
*
*
*
*
8.3.4 Set up the train as shown in Figure
5–1 ensuring that the connections are leaktight. Subject to the approval of the
Administrator, a glass cyclone may be used
between the probe and filter holder when the
total particulate catch is expected to exceed
100 mg or when water droplets are present
in the stack gas.
*
*
*
*
*
8.5 Sampling Train Operation. During the
sampling run, maintain an isokinetic
sampling rate (within 10 percent of true
isokinetic unless otherwise specified by the
Administrator) and a sample gas temperature
through the filter of 120 ± 14 °C (248 ± 25
°F) or such other temperature as specified by
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
ER27FE14.011
Bws = Mole fraction of moisture in the stack
gas.
Fd = Volume of dry combustion components
per unit of heat content at 0 percent
oxygen, dscf/106 Btu (scm/J). See Table
19–2 in Method 19.
FW = Volume of wet combustion components
per unit of heat content at 0 percent
oxygen, wet scf/106 Btu (scm/J). See
Table 19–2 in Method 19.
%RH = Percent relative humidity (calibrated
hydrometer acceptable), percent.
PBar = Barometric pressure, in. Hg.
T = Ambient temperature, °F.
W = Percent free water by weight, percent.
O2 = Percent oxygen in stack gas, dry basis,
percent.
11261
11262
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
an applicable subpart of the standards or
approved by the Administrator.
caps, or serum caps may be used to close
these openings.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
8.7.3 Before moving the sample train to
the cleanup site, remove the probe from the
sample train and cap the open outlet of the
probe. Be careful not to lose any condensate
that might be present. Cap the filter inlet
where the probe was fastened. Remove the
umbilical cord from the last impinger, and
cap the impinger. If a flexible line is used
between the first impinger or condenser and
the filter holder, disconnect the line at the
filter holder, and let any condensed water or
liquid drain into the impingers or condenser.
Cap off the filter holder outlet and impinger
inlet. Either ground-glass stoppers, plastic
*
*
*
*
*
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
16.3 Alternative Post-Test Metering
System Calibration. The following procedure
may be used as an alternative to the post-test
calibration described in Section 10.3.2. This
alternative procedure does not detect
leakages between the inlet of the metering
system and the dry gas meter. Therefore, two
steps must be included to make it an
equivalent alternative:
Where:
Yqa = Dry gas meter calibration check value,
dimensionless.
0.0319 = (29.92/528) (0.75) 2 (in. Hg/°R) cfm2.
DH@ = Orifice meter calibration coefficient,
in. H2O.
Md = Dry molecular weight of stack gas, lb/
lb-mole.
29 = Dry molecular weight of air, lb/lb-mole.
16.3.2 After each test run series, do the
following:
16.3.2.1 Average the three or more Yqa’s
obtained from the test run series and
compare this average Yqa with the dry gas
meter calibration factor Y. The average Yqa
must be within 5 percent of Y.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
*
*
*
*
8.7.5 Save a portion of the acetone used
for cleanup as a blank. From each storage
container of acetone used for cleanup, save
200 ml and place in a glass sample container
labeled ‘‘acetone blank.’’ To minimize any
particulate contamination, rinse the wash
bottle prior to filling from the tested
container.
*
*
*
*
*
10.3.3 Acceptable Variation in
Calibration Check. If the DGM coefficient
values obtained before and after a test series
differ by more than 5 percent, the test series
shall either be voided, or calculations for the
test series shall be performed using
whichever meter coefficient value (i.e., before
or after) gives the lower value of total sample
volume.
*
*
*
*
*
10.5 Temperature Sensors. Use the
procedure in Section 10.3 of Method 2 to
calibrate in-stack temperature sensors. Dial
thermometers, such as are used for the DGM
and condenser outlet, shall be calibrated
against mercury-in-glass thermometers. An
*
*
*
16.2.3.3
*
*
*
*
*
(1) The metering system must pass the
post-test leak-check from either the inlet of
the sampling train or the inlet of the metering
system. Therefore, if the train fails the former
leak-check, another leak-check from the inlet
of the metering system must be conducted;
(2) The metering system must pass the
leak-check of that portion of the train from
the pump to the orifice meter as described in
Section 8.4.1.
16.3.1 After each test run, do the
following:
16.3.1.1 Ensure that the metering system
has passed the post-test leak-check. If not,
conduct a leak-check of the metering system
from its inlet.
16.3.1.2 Conduct the leak-check of that
portion of the train from the pump to the
orifice meter as described in Section 10.3.1.1.
16.3.1.3 Calculate Yqa for each test run
using the following equation:
16.3.2.2 If the average Yqa does not meet
the 5 percent criterion, recalibrate the meter
over the full range of orifice settings as
detailed in Section 10.3.1. Then follow the
procedure in Section 10.3.3.
17.0 * * *
13. Shigehara, Roger T., P.G. Royals, and
E.W. Steward. ‘‘Alternative Method 5 PostTest Calibration.’’ Entropy Incorporated,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
8.1 Pretest Preparation. Unless otherwise
specified, maintain and calibrate all
components according to the procedure
described in APTD–0576, ‘‘Maintenance,
Calibration, and Operation of Isokinetic
Source-Sampling Equipment’’ (Reference 3 in
Method 5, Section 17.0). Alternative
mercury-free thermometers may be used if
the thermometers are, at a minimum,
equivalent in terms of performance or
suitably effective for the specific temperature
measurement application.
*
*
*
*
*
Method 5A—Determination of Particulate
Matter Emissions From the Asphalt
Processing and Asphalt Roofing Industry
*
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00036
*
Fmt 4701
*
*
*
*
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
*
*
ER27FE14.012 ER27FE14.013
*
8.5.6 During the test run, make periodic
adjustments to keep the temperature around
the filter holder at the proper level to
maintain the sample gas temperature exiting
the filter; add more ice and, if necessary, salt
to maintain a temperature of less than 20 °C
(68 °F) at the condenser/silica gel outlet.
Also, periodically check the level and zero of
the manometer.
alternative mercury-free NIST-traceable
thermometer may be used if the thermometer
is, at a minimum, equivalent in terms of
performance or suitably effective for the
specific temperature measurement
application. As an alternative, the following
single-point calibration procedure may be
used. After each test run series, check the
accuracy (and, hence, the calibration) of each
thermocouple system at ambient
temperature, or any other temperature,
within the range specified by the
manufacturer, using a reference thermometer
(either ASTM reference thermometer or a
thermometer that has been calibrated against
an ASTM reference thermometer). The
temperatures of the thermocouple and
reference thermometers shall agree to within
±2 °F.
10.6 Barometer. Calibrate against a
mercury barometer or NIST-traceable
barometer prior to the field test.
Alternatively, barometric pressure may be
obtained from a weather report that has been
adjusted for the test point (on the stack)
elevation.
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
16.0
Alternative Procedures
*
*
*
16.1 Total Organic Carbon Analyzer.
Tekmar-Dohrmann analyzers using the single
injection technique may be used as an
alternative to Rosemount Model 2100A
analyzers.
*
*
*
*
*
Method 5H—Determination of Particulate
Matter Emissions From Wood Heaters From
a Stack Location
*
*
*
*
*
12.1 Nomenclature.
A = Sample flow rate adjustment factor.
BR = Dry wood burn rate, kg/hr (lb/hr), from
Method 28, Section 8.3.
Bws = Water vapor in the gas stream,
proportion by volume.
Ci = Tracer gas concentration at inlet, ppmv.
Co = Tracer gas concentration at outlet,
ppmv.
Cs = Concentration of particulate matter in
stack gas, dry basis, corrected to standard
conditions, g/dscm (g/dscf).
E = Particulate emission rate, g/hr (lb/hr).
DH = Average pressure differential across the
orifice meter (see Figure 5H–1), mm H2O
(in. H2O).
La = Maximum acceptable leakage rate for
either a post-test leak-check or for a leakcheck following a component change;
equal to 0.00057 cmm (0.020 cfm) or 4
percent of the average sampling rate,
whichever is less.
L1 = Individual leakage rate observed during
the leak-check conducted before a
component change, cmm (cfm).
Lp = Leakage rate observed during the posttest leak-check, cmm (cfm).
mn = Total amount of particulate matter
collected, mg.
Ma = Mass of residue of solvent after
evaporation, mg.
NC = Grams of carbon/gram of dry fuel (lb/
lb), equal to 0.0425.
NT = Total dry moles of exhaust gas/kg of dry
wood burned, g-moles/kg (lb-moles/lb).
PR = Percent of proportional sampling rate.
Pbar = Barometric pressure at the sampling
site, mm Hg (in.Hg).
Pstd = Standard absolute pressure, 760 mm Hg
(29.92 in.Hg).
Qi = Gas volumetric flow rate at inlet, cfm (l/
min).
Qo = Gas volumetric flow rate at outlet, cfm
(l/min).
*
*
*
*
*
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
12.15 Alternative Tracer Gas Flow Rate
Determination.
Note: This gives Q for a single instance
only. Repeated multiple determinations are
needed to track temporal variations. Very
small variations in Qi, Ci, or Co may give very
large variations in Qo.
*
*
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
*
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
16.0 Alternative Procedures
16.1 Alternative Stack Gas Volumetric
Flow Rate Determination (Tracer Gas).
16.1.1 Apparatus.
16.1.1.1 Tracer Gas Injector System. This
is to inject a known concentration of tracer
gas into the stack. This system consists of a
cylinder of tracer gas, a gas cylinder
regulator, a stainless steel needle valve or a
flow controller, a nonreactive (stainless steel
or glass) rotameter, and an injection loop to
disperse the tracer gas evenly in the stack.
16.1.1.2 Tracer Gas Probe. A glass or
stainless steel sampling probe.
16.1.1.3 Gas Conditioning System. A gas
conditioning system is suitable for delivering
a cleaned sample to the analyzer consisting
of a filter to remove particulate and a
condenser capable of lowering the dew point
of the sample gas to less than 5 °C (40 °F).
A desiccant such as anhydrous calcium
sulfate may be used to dry the sample gas.
Desiccants which react or absorb tracer gas or
stack gas may not be used, e.g. silica gel
absorbs CO2.
16.1.1.4. Pump. An inert (i.e., stainless
steel or Teflon head) pump to deliver more
than the total sample required by the
manufacturer’s specifications for the analyzer
used to measure the downstream tracer gas
concentration.
16.1.1.5 Gas Analyzer. A gas analyzer is
any analyzer capable of measuring the tracer
gas concentration in the range necessary at
least every 10 minutes. A means of
controlling the analyzer flow rate and a
device for determining proper sample flow
rate shall be provided unless data is provided
to show that the analyzer is insensitive to
flow variations over the range encountered
during the test. The gas analyzer needs to
meet or exceed the following performance
specifications:
Linearity ..........
Calibration
Error.
Response Time
Zero Drift (24
hour).
Span Drift (24
hour).
Resolution .......
±1 percent of full scale.
≤2 percent of span.
≤10 seconds.
≤2 percent of full scale.
≤2 percent of full scale.
≤0.5 percent of span.
16.1.1.6 Recorder (optional). To provide a
permanent record of the analyzer output.
16.1.2 Reagents.
16.1.2.1 Tracer Gas. The tracer gas is
sulfur hexafluoride in an appropriate
concentration for accurate analyzer
measurement or pure sulfur dioxide. The gas
used must be nonreactive with the stack
effluent and give minimal (<3 percent)
interference to measurement by the gas
analyzer.
16.1.3 Procedure. Select upstream and
downstream locations in the stack or duct for
introducing the tracer gas and delivering the
sampled gas to the analyzer. The inlet
location should be 8 or more duct diameters
beyond any upstream flow disturbance. The
outlet should be 8 or more undisturbed duct
diameters from the inlet and 2 or more duct
diameters from the duct exit. After installing
the apparatus, meter a known concentration
of the tracer gas into the stack at the inlet
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
location. Use the gas sample probe and
analyzer to show that no stratification of the
tracer gas is found in the stack at the
measurement locations. Monitor the tracer
gas concentration from the outlet location
and record the concentration at 10-minute
intervals or more often at the option of the
tester. A minimum of three measured
intervals is recommended to determine the
stack gas volumetric flow rate. Other
statistical procedures may be applied for
complete flow characterization and
additional QA/QC.
*
*
*
*
*
25. Amend appendix A–4 to part 60
as follows:
■ a. By revising Method 6, sections 10.2
and 10.4.
■ b. By revising Method 6C, sections 4.0
and 8.3.
■ c. By revising Method 7, sections 4.0,
10.2, and 10.3.
■ d. By revising Method 7A, sections 4.0
and 10.4.
■ e. By revising Method 7E, sections 6.1,
7.1.1, the introductory text in section
8.2.5, the introductory text in section
8.2.7, and the introductory text in
section 16.2.2.
■ f. By revising Method 8, the definition
for Vsoln in section 12.1, and Figure 8–
1 in section 17.0.
■ g. By revising Method 10, sections
6.2.5 and 8.4.2.
■ h. By revising Method 10A, sections
2.0, 8.2.1, 8.2.3, 11.1, 11.2, the
introductory text in section 12.3, and
13.5.
■ i. By revising Method 10B, section 2.1,
6.2.3, the introductory text in section
12.2.
■
Appendix A–4 to Part 60—Test
Methods 6 Through 10B
*
*
*
*
*
Method 6—Determination of Sulfur Dioxide
Emissions From Stationary Sources
*
*
*
*
*
10.2 Temperature Sensors. Calibrate
against mercury-in-glass thermometers. An
alternative mercury-free thermometer may be
used if the thermometer is, at a minimum,
equivalent in terms of performance or
suitably effective for the specific temperature
measurement application.
*
*
*
*
*
10.4 Barometer. Calibrate against a
mercury barometer or NIST-traceable
barometer prior to the field test.
*
*
*
*
*
Method 6C—Determination of Sulfur
Dioxide Emissions From Stationary Sources
(Instrumental Analyzer Procedure)
*
*
*
*
*
4.0 Interferences
Refer to Section 4.0 of Method 7E.
*
*
*
*
*
8.3 Interference Check. You must follow
the procedures of Section 8.2.7 of Method 7E
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
ER27FE14.014
Method 5E—Determination of Particulate
Matter Emissions From the Wool Fiberglass
Insulation Manufacturing Industry
11263
11264
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
to conduct an interference check, substituting
SO2 for NOX as the method pollutant. For
dilution-type measurement systems, you
must use the alternative interference check
procedure in Section 16 and a co-located,
unmodified Method 6 sampling train.
Quenching in fluorescence analyzers must be
evaluated and remedied unless a dilution
system and ambient-level analyzer is used.
This may be done by preparing the
calibration gas to contain within 1 percent of
the absolute oxygen and carbon dioxide
content of the measured gas, preparing the
calibration gas in air and using vendor
nomographs, or by other acceptable means.
*
*
*
*
*
Method 7—Determination of Nitrogen Oxide
Emissions From Stationary Sources
*
*
*
*
*
4.0 Interferences
Biased results have been observed when
sampling under conditions of high sulfur
dioxide concentrations. At or above 2100
ppm SO2, use five times the H2O2
concentration of the Method 7 absorbing
solution. Laboratory tests have shown that
high concentrations of SO2 (about 2100 ppm)
cause low results in Method 7 and 7A.
Increasing the H2O2 concentration to five
times the original concentration eliminates
this bias. However, when no SO2 is present,
increasing the concentration by five times
results in a low bias.
*
*
*
*
*
10.2 Barometer. Calibrate against a
mercury barometer or NIST-traceable
barometer prior to the field test.
10.3 Temperature Gauge. Calibrate dial
thermometers against mercury-in-glass
thermometers. An alternative mercury-free
thermometer may be used if the thermometer
is, at a minimum, equivalent in terms of
performance or suitably effective for the
specific temperature measurement
application.
*
*
*
*
*
Method 7A—Determination of Nitrogen
Oxide Emissions From Stationary Sources
(Ion Chromatographic Method)
*
*
*
*
*
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
*
*
*
*
*
10.4 Temperature Gauge. Calibrate dial
thermometers against mercury-in-glass
thermometers. An alternative mercury-free
thermometer may be used if the thermometer
is, at a minimum, equivalent in terms of
performance or suitably effective for the
specific temperature measurement
application.
*
*
*
*
*
Method 7E—Determination of Nitrogen
Oxides Emissions From Stationary Sources
(Instrumental Analyzer Procedure)
*
*
*
*
*
6.1 What do I need for the measurement
system? You may use any equipment and
supplies meeting the following
specifications:
(1) Sampling system components that are
not evaluated in the system bias or system
calibration error test must be glass, Teflon, or
stainless steel. Other materials are potentially
acceptable, subject to approval by the
Administrator.
(2) The interference, calibration error, and
system bias criteria must be met.
(3) Sample flow rate must be maintained
within 10 percent of the flow rate at which
the system response time was measured.
(4) All system components (excluding
sample conditioning components, if used)
must maintain the sample temperature above
the moisture dew point. Ensure minimal
contact between any condensate and the
sample gas. Section 6.2 provides example
equipment specifications for a NOX
measurement system. Figure 7E–1 is a
diagram of an example dry-basis
measurement system that is likely to meet the
method requirements and is provided as
guidance. For wet-basis systems, you may
use alternative equipment and supplies as
needed (some of which are described in
Section 6.2), provided that the measurement
system meets the applicable performance
specifications of this method.
*
4.0 Interferences
Biased results have been observed when
sampling under conditions of high sulfur
dioxide concentrations. At or above 2100
ppm SO2, use five times the H2O2
concentration of the Method 7 absorbing
solution. Laboratory tests have shown that
high concentrations of SO2 (about 2100 ppm)
cause low results in Method 7 and 7A.
Increasing the H2O2 concentration to five
times the original concentration eliminates
VerDate Mar<15>2010
this bias. However, when no SO2 is present,
increasing the concentration by five times
results in a low bias.
*
*
*
*
7.1.1 High-Level Gas. This concentration
is chosen to set the calibration span as
defined in Section 3.4.
*
*
*
*
*
8.2.5 Initial System Bias and System
Calibration Error Checks. Before sampling
begins, determine whether the high-level or
mid-level calibration gas best approximates
the emissions and use it as the upscale gas.
Introduce the upscale gas at the probe
upstream of all sample conditioning
components in system calibration mode.
Record the time it takes for the measured
concentration to increase to a value that is at
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
least 95 percent or within 0.5 ppm
(whichever is less restrictive) of a stable
response for both the low-level and upscale
gases. Continue to observe the gas
concentration reading until it has reached a
final, stable value. Record this value on a
form similar to Table 7E–2.
*
*
*
*
*
8.2.7 Interference Check. Conduct an
interference response test of the gas analyzer
prior to its initial use in the field. If you have
multiple analyzers of the same make and
model, you need only perform this
alternative interference check on one
analyzer. You may also meet the interference
check requirement if the instrument
manufacturer performs this or a similar check
on an analyzer of the same make and model
of analyzer that you use and provides you
with documented results. Analytical
quenching must be evaluated and remedied
unless a dilution system and ambient-level
analyzer are used. The analyzer must be
checked for quenching at concentrations of
approximately 4 and 12 percent CO2 at a
mid-range concentration for each analyzer
range which is commonly used. The analyzer
must be rechecked after it has been repaired
or modified or on another periodic basis.
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
16.2.2 Bag Procedure. Perform the
analyzer calibration error test to document
the calibration (both NO and NOX modes, as
applicable). Fill a Tedlar or equivalent bag
approximately half full with either ambient
air, pure oxygen, or an oxygen standard gas
with at least 19.5 percent by volume oxygen
content. Fill the remainder of the bag with
mid- to high-level NO in N2 (or other
appropriate concentration) calibration gas.
(Note that the concentration of the NO
standard should be sufficiently high enough
for the diluted concentration to be easily and
accurately measured on the scale used. The
size of the bag should be large enough to
accommodate the procedure and time
required. Verify through the manufacturer
that the Tedlar alternative is suitable for NO
and make this verifed information available
for inspection.)
*
*
*
*
*
Method 8—Determination of Sulfuric Acid
Mist and Sulfur Dioxide Emissions From
Stationary Sources
*
*
*
*
*
12.1 * * *
Vsoln = Total volume of solution in which the
sample is contained, 1000 ml for the SO2
sample and 250 ml for the H2SO4
sample.
*
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
*
*
27FER2
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
11265
17.0 Tables, Diagrams, Flowcharts, and
Validation Data
*
*
*
*
Method 10—Determination of Carbon
Monoxide Emissions From Stationary
Sources
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
6.2.5 Flexible Bag. Tedlar, or equivalent,
with a capacity of 60 to 90 liters (2 to 3 ft3).
(Verify through the manufacturer that the
Tedlar alternative is suitable for CO and
make this verified information available for
inspection.) Leak-test the bag in the
laboratory before using by evacuating with a
pump followed by a dry gas meter. When the
evacuation is complete, there should be no
flow through the meter. Gas tanks may be
used in place of bags if the samples are
analyzed within one week.
*
*
*
*
*
8.4.2 Integrated Sampling. Evacuate the
flexible bag. Set up the equipment as shown
in Figure 10–1 with the bag disconnected.
Place the probe in the stack and purge the
sampling line. Connect the bag, making sure
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
that all connections are leak-free. Sample at
a rate proportional to the stack velocity. If
needed, the CO2 content of the gas may be
determined by using the Method 3 integrated
sample procedures, or by weighing an
ascarite CO2 removal tube used and
computing CO2 concentration from the gas
volume sampled and the weight gain of the
tube. Data may be recorded on a form similar
to Table 10–1. If a tank is used for sample
collection, follow procedures similar to those
in Sections 8.1.2, 8.2.3, 8.3, and 12.4 of
Method 25 as appropriate to prepare the tank,
conduct the sampling, and correct the
measured sample concentration.
*
*
*
*
*
Method 10A—Determination of Carbon
Monoxide Emissions in Certifying
Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems at
Petroleum Refineries
*
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00039
*
Fmt 4701
*
Sfmt 4700
2.0
Summary of Method
An integrated gas sample is extracted from
the stack, passed through an alkaline
permanganate solution to remove sulfur
oxides and nitrogen oxides, and collected in
a Tedlar or equivalent bag. (Verify through
the manufacturer that the Tedlar alternative
is suitable for NO and make this verified
information available for inspection.) The CO
concentration in the sample is measured
spectrophotometrically using the reaction of
CO with p-sulfaminobenzoic acid.
*
*
*
*
*
8.2.1 Evacuate the bag completely using a
vacuum pump. Assemble the apparatus as
shown in Figure 10A–1. Loosely pack glass
wool in the tip of the probe. Place 400 ml of
alkaline permanganate solution in the first
two impingers and 250 ml in the third.
Connect the pump to the third impinger, and
follow this with the surge tank, rate meter,
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
ER27FE14.015
*
11266
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
and 3-way valve. Do not connect the bag to
the system at this time.
*
*
*
*
*
8.2.3 Purge the system with sample gas
by inserting the probe into the stack and
drawing the sample gas through the system
at 300 ml/min ±10 percent for 5 minutes.
Connect the evacuated bag to the system,
record the starting time, and sample at a rate
of 300 ml/min for 30 minutes, or until the
bag is nearly full. Record the sampling time,
the barometric pressure, and the ambient
temperature. Purge the system as described
above immediately before each sample.
*
*
*
*
*
11.1 Assemble the system shown in
Figure 10A–3, and record the information
required in Table 10A–1 as it is obtained.
Pipet 10.0 ml of the colorimetric reagent into
each gas reaction bulb, and attach the bulbs
to the system. Open the stopcocks to the
reaction bulbs, but leave the valve to the bag
closed. Turn on the pump, fully open the
coarse-adjust flow valve, and slowly open the
fine-adjust valve until the pressure is
reduced to at least 40 mm Hg. Now close the
coarse adjust valve, and observe the
manometer to be certain that the system is
leak-free. Wait a minimum of 2 minutes. If
the pressure has increased less than 1 mm
Hg, proceed as described below. If a leak is
present, find and correct it before proceeding
further.
11.2 Record the vacuum pressure (Pv) to
the nearest 1 mm Hg, and close the reaction
bulb stopcocks. Open the bag valve, and
allow the system to come to atmospheric
pressure. Close the bag valve, open the pump
coarse adjust valve, and evacuate the system
again. Repeat this fill/evacuation procedure
at least twice to flush the manifold
completely. Close the pump coarse adjust
valve, open the bag valve, and let the system
fill to atmospheric pressure. Open the
stopcocks to the reaction bulbs, and let the
entire system come to atmospheric pressure.
Close the bulb stopcocks, remove the bulbs,
record the room temperature and barometric
pressure (Pbar, to nearest mm Hg), and place
the bulbs on the shaker table with their main
axis either parallel to or perpendicular to the
plane of the table top. Purge the bulb-filling
system with ambient air for several minutes
between samples. Shake the samples for
exactly 2 hours.
*
*
*
*
*
12.3 CO Concentration in the Bag.
Calculate Cb using Equations 10A–2 and
10A–3. If condensate is visible in the bag,
calculate Bw using Table 10A–2 and the
temperature and barometric pressure in the
analysis room. If condensate is not visible,
calculate Bw using the temperature and
barometric pressure at the sampling site.
* * *
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
Method 10B—Determination of Carbon
Monoxide Emissions From Stationary
Sources
Method 12—Determination of Inorganic
Lead Emissions From Stationary Sources
*
16.1 Simultaneous Determination of
Particulate Matter and Lead Emissions.
Method 12 may be used to simultaneously
determine Pb provided:
(1) Acetone is used to remove particulate
from the probe and inside of the filter holder
as specified by Method 5,
(2) 0.1 N HNO3 is used in the impingers,
(3) A glass fiber filter with a low Pb
background is used, and
(4) The entire train contents, including the
impingers, are treated and analyzed for Pb as
described in Sections 8.0 and 11.0 of this
method.
*
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
26. Amend appendix A–5 to part 60
as follows:
■ a. By revising Method 11, sections 8.5
and 10.1.2.
■ b. Amend Method 12 as follows:
■ i. By revising section 16.1.
■ ii. By adding sections 16.4, 16.5, and
16.6.
■ c. By adding a sentence to the end of
Method 14A, section 10.1.1.
■
Appendix A–5 to Part 60—Test
Methods 11 Through 15A
*
*
*
*
*
Method 11—Determination of Hydrogen
Sulfide Content of Fuel Gas Streams in
Petroleum Refineries
*
*
*
*
*
8.5 Sample for at least 10 minutes. At the
end of the sampling time, close the sampling
valve, and record the final volume and
temperature readings. Conduct a leak-check
as described in Section 8.2. A yellow color
in the final cadmium sulfate impinger
indicates depletion of the absorbing solution.
An additional cadmium sulfate impinger
should be added for subsequent samples and
the sample with yellow color in the final
impinger should be voided.
*
*
*
12.2 CO Concentration in the Bag.
Calculate Cb using Equations 10B–1 and 10B–
2. If condensate is visible in the bag,
calculate Bw using Table 10A–2 of Method
10A and the temperature and barometric
pressure in the analysis room. If condensate
is not visible, calculate Bw using the
temperature and barometric pressure at the
sampling site.
*
*
*
6.2.3 Sample Injection System. Same as
in Method 25, Section 6.3.1.4, equipped to
accept a sample line from the bag.
*
*
*
2.1 An integrated gas sample is extracted
from the sampling point, passed through a
conditioning system to remove interferences,
and collected in a Tedlar or equivalent bag.
(Verify through the manufacturer that the
Tedlar alternative is suitable for NO and
make this verifying information available for
inspection.) The CO is separated from the
sample by gas chromatography (GC) and
catalytically reduced to methane (CH4) which
is determined by flame ionization detection
(FID). The analytical portion of this method
is identical to applicable sections in Method
25 detailing CO measurement.
13.5 Stability. The individual
components of the colorimetric reagent are
stable for at least one month. The
colorimetric reagent must be used within two
days after preparation to avoid excessive
blank correction. The samples in the bag
should be stable for at least one week if the
bags are leak-free.
*
*
*
*
*
*
10.1.2 Temperature Sensors. Calibrate
against mercury-in-glass thermometers. An
alternative mercury-free thermometer may be
used if the thermometer is at a minimum
equivalent in terms of performance or
suitably effective for the specific temperature
measurement application.
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00040
*
Fmt 4701
*
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
16.4 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic
Emission Spectrometry (ICP–AES) Analysis.
ICP–AES may be used as an alternative to
atomic absorption analysis provided the
following conditions are met:
16.4.1 Sample collection, sample
preparation, and analytical preparation
procedures are as defined in the method
except as necessary for the ICP–AES
application.
16.4.2 The limit of quantitation for the
ICP–AES must be demonstrated, and the
sample concentrations reported should be no
less than two times the limit of quantitation.
The limit of quantitation is defined as ten
times the standard deviation of the blank
value. The standard deviation of the blank
value is determined from the analysis of
seven blanks. It has been reported that for
mercury and those elements that form
hydrides, a continuous-flow generator
coupled to an ICP–AES offers detection
limits comparable to cold vapor atomic
absorption.
16.5 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass
Spectrometry (ICP–MS) Analysis. ICP–MS
may be used as an alternative to atomic
absorption analysis.
16.6 Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence
Spectrometry (CVAFS) Analysis. CVAFS may
be used as an alternative to atomic absorption
analysis.
*
*
*
*
*
Method 14A—Determination of Total
Fluoride Emissions From Selected Sources at
Primary Aluminum Production Facilities
*
*
*
*
*
10.1.1 * * * Allowable tolerances for Y
and DH@ are given in Figure 5–5 of Method
5 of this appendix.
*
*
*
*
*
27. Amend appendix A–6 to part 60
as follows:
■ a. By revising Method 16A, section
1.2.
■ b. By revising Method 16C, sections
12.1 and 12.5.
■ c. By revising Method 18, sections
8.2.1.1.2, 8.2.1.4, 8.2.1.4.2, 16.1.1.12,
16.1.3.2, and the headings of figures 18–
3 and 18–10.
■ d. By redesignating section 8.2.1.5.2.3
as section 8.2.1.5.2.2.
■ e. By adding a new section 8.2.1.5.2.3.
■
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
*
Method 16A—Determination of Total
Reduced Sulfur Emissions From Stationary
Sources (Impinger Technique)
*
*
*
*
*
1.2 Applicability. This method is
applicable for the determination of TRS
emissions from recovery boilers, lime kilns,
and smelt dissolving tanks at kraft pulp
mills, reduced sulfur compounds (H2S,
carbonyl sulfide, and carbon disulfide) from
sulfur recovery units at onshore natural gas
processing facilities, and from other sources
when specified in an applicable subpart of
the regulations. The flue gas must contain at
least 1 percent oxygen for complete oxidation
of all TRS to SO2. Note: If sources other than
kraft pulp mills experience low oxygen levels
in the emissions, the method results may be
biased low.
*
*
*
*
*
Method 16C—Determination of Total
Reduced Sulfur Emissions From Stationary
Sources
*
*
*
*
*
12.1 Nomenclature.
ACE = Analyzer calibration error, percent of
calibration span.
CD = Calibration drift, percent.
CDir = Measured concentration of a
calibration gas (low, mid, or high) when
introduced in direct calibration mode,
ppmv.
CH2S = Concentration of the system
performance check gas, ppmv H2S.
CS = Measured concentration of the system
performance gas when introduced in
system calibration mode, ppmv H2S.
CV = Manufacturer certified concentration of
a calibration gas (low, mid, or high),
ppmv SO2.
CSO2 = Unadjusted sample SO2 concentration,
ppmv.
CTRS = Total reduced sulfur concentration
corrected for system performance, ppmv.
DF = Dilution system (if used) dilution factor,
dimensionless.
SP = System performance, percent.
*
*
*
*
*
12.5 TRS Concentration as SO2. For each
sample or test run, calculate the arithmetic
average of SO2 concentration values (e.g., 1minute averages). Then calculate the sample
TRS concentration by adjusting the average
value of CSO2 for system performance using
Equation 16C–4.
the container. Connect the vacuum line from
the needle valve to the Teflon sample line
from the probe. Place the end of the probe
at the centroid of the stack or at a point no
closer to the walls than 1 in., and start the
pump. Set the flow rate so that the final
volume of the sample is approximately 80
percent of the bag capacity. After allowing
sufficient time to purge the line several
times, connect the vacuum line to the bag,
and evacuate until the rotameter indicates no
flow. Then position the sample and vacuum
lines for sampling, and begin the actual
sampling, keeping the rate proportional to
the stack velocity. As a precaution, direct the
gas exiting the rotameter away from sampling
personnel. At the end of the sample period,
shut off the pump, disconnect the sample
line from the bag, and disconnect the vacuum
line from the bag container. Record the
source temperature, barometric pressure,
ambient temperature, sampling flow rate, and
initial and final sampling time on the data
sheet shown in Figure 18–10. Protect the bag
and its container from sunlight. Record the
time lapsed between sample collection and
analysis, and then conduct the recovery
procedure in Section 8.4.2.
*
*
*
*
*
8.2.1.4 Other Modified Bag Sampling
Procedures. In the event that condensation is
observed in the bag while collecting the
sample and a direct interface system cannot
be used, heat the bag during collection and
maintain it at a suitably elevated temperature
during all subsequent operations. (Note: Take
care to leak-check the system prior to the
dilutions so as not to create a potentially
explosive atmosphere.) As an alternative,
collect the sample gas, and simultaneously
dilute it in the bag.
*
*
*
*
*
8.2.1.4.2 Second Alternative Procedure.
Prefill the bag with a known quantity of inert
gas. Meter the inert gas into the bag according
to the procedure for the preparation of gas
concentration standards of volatile liquid
materials (Section 10.1.2.2), but eliminate the
midget impinger section. Take the partly
filled bag to the source, and meter the source
gas into the bag through heated sampling
lines and a heated flowmeter, or Teflon
positive displacement pump. Verify the
dilution factors before sampling each bag
through dilution and analysis of gases of
known concentration.
Mylar) bag, or equivalent, can be used to
obtain the pre-survey sample. Use new bags,
and leak-check them before field use. In
addition, check the bag before use for
contamination by filling it with nitrogen or
air and analyzing the gas by GC at high
sensitivity. Experience indicates that it is
desirable to allow the inert gas to remain in
the bag about 24 hours or longer to check for
desorption of organics from the bag. Follow
the leak-check and sample collection
procedures given in Section 8.2.1.
*
*
*
*
*
18.0 * * *
Figure 18–3. Preparation of Standards in
Tedlar or Tedlar-Equlivalent Bags and
Calibration Curve
*
*
*
*
*
Figure 18–10. Field Sample Data Sheet—
Tedlar or Tedlar-Equivalent Bag Collection
Method
*
*
*
*
*
28. Amend appendix A–7 to part 60
as follows:
■ a. By amending Method 23 as follows:
■ i. By revising sections 2.2.7, 4.1.1.3,
and 4.2.7.
■ ii. By adding and reserving section
8.0.
■ b. By revising Method 24, section
11.2.2.
■ c. By revising Method 25, section
7.1.3.
■ d. Amend Method 25C as follows:
■ i. By revising sections 6.1 and 12.1.
■ ii. By adding a new section 8.2.3.
■ e. By revising Method 25D, the first
sentence in section 9.1.
■
Appendix A–7 to Part 60—Test
Methods 19 Through 25E
*
*
*
*
*
Method 23—Determination of
Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and
Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans From
Stationary Sources
*
*
*
*
*
2.2.7 Storage Container. Air-tight
container to store silica gel.
*
*
*
*
*
*
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
8.2.1.5.2.3 Analyze the two field audit
samples as described in Section 9.2 by
connecting each bag containing an audit gas
mixture to the sampling valve. Calculate the
results; record and report the data to the
audit supervisor.
4.1.1.3 Sample Train. It is suggested that
all components be maintained according to
the procedure described in APTD–0576.
Alternative mercury-free thermometers may
be used if the thermometers are, at a
minimum, equivalent in terms of
performance or suitably effective for the
specific temperature measurement
application.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Method 18—Measurement of Gaseous
Organic Compound Emissions by Gas
Chromatography
16.1.1.12 Flexible Bags. Tedlar or
equivalent, 10- and 50-liter capacity, for
preparation of standards. (Verify through the
manufacturer that the Tedlar alternative is
suitable for the compound of interest and
make this verifying information available for
inspection.)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
8.2.1.1.2 Sampling Procedure. To obtain a
sample, assemble the sample train as shown
in Figure 18–9. Leak-check both the bag and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
*
*
*
*
16.1.3.2 Flexible Bag Procedure. Any
leak-free plastic (e.g., Tedlar, Mylar, Teflon)
or plastic-coated aluminum (e.g., aluminized
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
4.2.7 Silica Gel. Note the color of the
indicating silica gel to determine if it has
been completely spent and make a mention
of its condition. Transfer the silica gel from
the fifth impinger to its original container
and seal. If a moisture determination is made,
follow the applicable procedures in sections
8.7.6.3 and 11.2.3 of Method 5 to handle and
weigh the silica gel. If moisture is not
measured, the silica gel may be disposed.
*
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
*
*
27FER2
*
*
ER27FE14.016
Appendix A–6 to Part 60—Test
Methods 16 Through 18
11267
11268
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
8.0 [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
Method 24—Determination of Volatile
Matter Content, Water Content, Density,
Volume Solids, and Weight Solids of Surface
Coatings
*
*
*
*
*
11.2.2 Volatile Content. To determine
total volatile content, use the apparatus and
reagents described in ASTM D2369
(incorporated by reference; see § 60.17 for the
approved versions of the standard),
respectively, and use the following
procedures:
*
*
*
*
*
Method 25—Determination of Total Gaseous
Nonmethane Organic Emissions as Carbon
*
*
*
*
*
7.1.3 Filters. Glass fiber filters, without
organic binder, exhibiting at least 99.95
percent efficiency (<0.05 percent penetration)
on 0.3 micron dioctyl phthalate smoke
particles. The filter efficiency test shall be
conducted in accordance with ASTM Method
D2986–71, 78, or 95a (incorporated by
reference—see § 60.17). Test data from the
supplier’s quality control program are
sufficient for this purpose.
*
*
*
*
*
Method 25C—Determination of Nonmethane
Organic Compounds (NMOC) in MSW
Landfill Gases
*
*
*
*
*
6.1 Sample Probe. Stainless steel, with
the bottom third perforated. Teflon probe
liners and sampling lines are also allowed.
Non-perforated probes are allowed as long as
they are withdrawn to create a gap equivalent
to having the bottom third perforated. The
sample probe must be capped at the bottom
and must have a threaded cap with a
sampling attachment at the top. The sample
probe must be long enough to go through and
extend no less than 0.9 m (3 ft) below the
landfill cover. If the sample probe is to be
driven into the landfill, the bottom cap
should be designed to facilitate driving the
probe into the landfill.
*
*
*
*
*
8.2.3 Driven Probes. Closed-point probes
may be driven directly into the landfill in a
single step. This method may not require
backfilling if the probe is adequately sealed
by its insertion. Unperforated probes that are
inserted in this manner and withdrawn at a
distance from a detachable tip to create an
open space are also acceptable.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
12.1 Nomenclature.
Bw = Moisture content in the sample,
fraction.
CN2 = Reported N2 concentration (CN2Corr by
Method 3C), fraction.
Ct = Calculated NMOC concentration, ppmv
C equivalent.
Ctm = Measured NMOC concentration, ppmv
C equivalent.
Pb = Barometric pressure, mm Hg.
Pt = Gas sample tank pressure after sampling,
but before pressurizing, mm Hg absolute.
Ptf = Final gas sample tank pressure after
pressurizing, mm Hg absolute.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
Pti = Gas sample tank pressure after
evacuation, mm Hg absolute.
Pw = Vapor pressure of H2O (from Table 25C–
1), mm Hg.
r = Total number of analyzer injections of
sample tank during analysis (where
j=injection number, 1 . . . r).
Tt = Sample tank temperature at completion
of sampling, °K.
Tti = Sample tank temperature before
sampling, °K.
Ttf = Sample tank temperature after
pressurizing, °K.
applicable subpart of the standards or
approved by the Administrator for a
particular application.
*
*
*
*
*
9.1 Quality Control Samples. If audit
samples are not available, prepare and
analyze the two types of quality control
samples (QCS) listed in Sections 9.1.1 and
9.1.2. * * *
8.1.2 Adjust the probe temperature and
the temperature of the filter and the stopcock
(i.e., the heated area in Figure 26–1) to a
temperature sufficient to prevent water
condensation. This temperature must be
maintained between 120 and 134 °C (248 and
273 °F). The temperature should be
monitored throughout a sampling run to
ensure that the desired temperature is
maintained. It is important to maintain a
temperature around the probe and filter in
this range since it is extremely difficult to
purge acid gases off these components.
(These components are not quantitatively
recovered and, hence, any collection of acid
gases on these components would result in
potential undereporting of these emissions.
The applicable subparts may specify
alternative higher temperatures.)
*
*
■
16.0 Alternative Procedures
Method 26A. Method 26A, which uses
isokinetic sampling equipment, is an
acceptable alternative to Method 26.
*
*
*
*
*
Method 25D—Determination of the Volatile
Organic Concentration of Waste Samples
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
29. Amend appendix A–8 to part 60
as follows:
■ a. By amending Method 26 as follows:
■ i. By revising sections 6.1.1, 6.1.5, and
8.1.2.
■ ii. By redesignating sections 16.0 and
17.0 as sections 17.0 and 18.0,
respectively.
■ iii. By adding a new section 16.0.
■ b. By revising Method 26A, sections
6.1.7, 8.1.5, and 8.1.6.
■ c. By amending Method 29 as follows:
■ i. By redesignating sections 16.0 and
17.0 as sections 17.0 and 18.0,
respectively.
■ ii. By adding a new section 16.0.
■ d. By revising Method 30B, the
introductory text to section 8.2.2.1, the
note to section 8.2.4, the note to section
8.2.6.2, and sections 9.0, 10.3, 10.4,
11.3.
Appendix A–8 to Part 60—Text
Methods 26 Through 30B
*
*
*
*
*
Method 26—Determination of Hydrogen
Halide and Halogen Emissions From
Stationary Sources Non-Isokinetic Method
*
*
*
*
*
6.1.1 Probe. Borosilicate glass,
approximately 3/8-in. (9-mm) I.D. with a
heating system capable of maintaining a
probe gas temperature during sampling
between 120 and 134 °C (248 and 273 °F) to
prevent moisture condensation; or Teflon
where stack probes are below 210 °C. If HF
is a target analyte, then preconditioning of
new teflon components by heating should be
considered to prevent potential HF
outgassing. A Teflon-glass filter in a mat
configuration should be installed to remove
particulate matter from the gas stream.
*
*
*
*
*
6.1.5 Heating System. Any heating system
capable of maintaining a temperature around
the probe and filter holder between 120 and
134 °C (248 and 273 °F) during sampling, or
such other temperature as specified by an
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Method 26A—Determination of Hydrogen
Halide and Halogen Emissions From
Stationary Sources—Isokinetic Method
*
*
*
*
*
6.1.7 Heating System. Any heating system
capable of maintaining a temperature around
the probe and filter holder between 120 and
134 °C (248 to 273 °F) during sampling, or
such other temperature as specified by an
applicable subpart of the standards or
approved by the Administrator for a
particular application.
*
*
*
*
*
8.1.5 Sampling Train Operation. Follow
the general procedure given in Method 5,
Section 8.5. It is important to maintain a
temperature around the probe, filter (and
cyclone, if used) between 120 and 134 °C
(248 and 273 °F) since it is extremely
difficult to purge acid gases off these
components. (These components are not
quantitatively recovered and hence any
collection of acid gases on these components
would result in potential undereporting these
emissions. The applicable subparts may
specify alternative higher temperatures.) For
each run, record the data required on a data
sheet such as the one shown in Method 5,
Figure 5–3. If the condensate impinger
becomes too full, it may be emptied,
recharged with 50 ml of 0.1 N H2SO4, and
replaced during the sample run. The
condensate emptied must be saved and
included in the measurement of the volume
of moisture collected and included in the
sample for analysis. The additional 50 ml of
absorbing reagent must also be considered in
calculating the moisture. Before the sampling
train integrity is compromised by removing
the impinger, conduct a leak-check as
described in Method 5, Section 8.4.2.
8.1.6 Post-Test Moisture Removal
(Optional). When the optional cyclone is
included in the sampling train or when
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
liquid is visible on the filter at the end of a
sample run even in the absence of a cyclone,
perform the following procedure. Upon
completion of the test run, connect the
ambient air conditioning tube at the probe
inlet and operate the train with the filter
heating system between 120 and 134 °C (248
and 275 °F) at a low flow rate (e.g., DH = 1
in. H2O) to vaporize any liquid and hydrogen
halides in the cyclone or on the filter and
pull them through the train into the
impingers. After 30 minutes, turn off the
flow, remove the conditioning tube, and
examine the cyclone and filter for any visible
liquid. If liquid is visible, repeat this step for
15 minutes and observe again. Keep
repeating until the cyclone is dry.
Method 29—Determination of Metals
Emissions From Stationary Sources
8.2.2.1 Determination of Minimum
Calibration Concentration or Mass. Based on
your instrument’s sensitivity and linearity,
determine the calibration concentrations or
masses that make up a representative low
level calibration range. Verify that you are
able to meet the multipoint calibration
performance criteria in section 11.0 of this
method. Select a calibration concentration or
mass that is no less than 2 times the lowest
concentration or mass in your calibration
curve. The lowest point in your calibration
curve must be at least 5, and preferably 10,
times the Method Detection Limit (MDL),
which is the minimum amount of the analyte
that can be detected and reported. The MDL
must be determined at least once for the
analytical system using an MDL study such
as that found in section 15.0 to Method 301
of appendix A to part 63 of this chapter.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
16.0 Alternative Procedures
16.1 Alternative Analyzer. Samples may
also be analyzed by cold vapor atomic
fluorescence spectrometry.
16.2 [Reserved].
*
*
*
*
*
Method 30B—Determination of Total Vapor
Phase Mercury Emissions From Coal-Fired
Combustion Sources Using Carbon Sorbent
Traps
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
8.2.4 * * *
Note to Section 8.2.4: For the purposes of
relative accuracy testing of Hg monitoring
systems under subpart UUUUU of part 63 of
this chapter and Performance Specifications
12A and 12B in appendix B to this part,
when the stack gas Hg concentration is
expected to be very low (<0.5 mg/dscm), you
may estimate the Hg concentration at 0.5 mg/
dscm.
*
*
*
*
*
8.2.6.2 * * *
11269
Note to Section 8.2.6.2: It is acceptable to
perform the field recovery test concurrent
with actual test runs (e.g., through the use of
a quad probe). It is also acceptable to use the
field recovery test runs as test runs for
emissions testing or for the RATA of a Hg
monitoring system under subpart UUUUU of
part 63 of this chapter and Performance
Specifications 12A and 12B in appendix B to
this part, if certain conditions are met. To
determine whether a particular field recovery
test run may be used as a RATA run, subtract
the mass of the Hg0 spike from the total Hg
mass collected in sections 1 and 2 of the
spiked trap. The difference represents the
mass of Hg in the stack gas sample. Divide
this mass by the sample volume to obtain the
Hg concentration in the effluent gas stream,
as measured with the spiked trap. Compare
this concentration to the corresponding Hg
concentration measured with the unspiked
trap. If the paired trains meet the relative
deviation and other applicable data
validation criteria in Table 9–1, then the
average of the two Hg concentrations may be
used as an emissions test run value or as the
reference method value for a RATA run.
*
9.0
*
*
*
*
Quality Assurance and Quality Control
Table 9–1 summarizes the QA/QC
performance criteria that are used to validate
the Hg emissions data from Method 30B
sorbent trap measurement systems.
TABLE 9–1—QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL CRITERIA FOR METHOD 30B
QA/QC test or specification
Acceptance criteria
Frequency
Consequences if not met
Gas flow meter calibration (At 3
settings or points).
Calibration factor (Yi) at each flow
rate must be within ±2% of the
average value (Y).
Calibration factor (Yi) must be
within ±5% of the Y value from
the most recent 3-point calibration.
Prior to initial use and when posttest check is not within ±5% of
Y.
After each field test. For mass
flow meters, must be done onsite, using stack gas.
Recalibrate at 3 points until the
acceptance criteria are met.
Absolute temperature measures
by sensor within ±1.5% of a reference sensor.
Absolute pressure measured by
instrument within ±10 mm Hg of
reading with a mercury barometer or NIST traceable barometer.
≤4% of target sampling rate .........
Prior to initial use and before
each test thereafter.
Gas flow meter post-test calibration check (Single-point).
Temperature sensor calibration .....
Barometer calibration .....................
Pre-test leak check ........................
Post-test leak check ......................
Analytical matrix interference test
(wet chemical analysis, only).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Analytical bias test .........................
Multipoint analyzer calibration .......
Analysis of independent calibration
standard.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
≤4% of average sampling rate .....
Establish minimum dilution (if any)
needed to eliminate sorbent
matrix interferences.
Average recovery between 90%
and 110% for Hg0 and HgCl2 at
each of the 2 spike concentration levels.
Each analyzer reading within
±10% of true value and r2≥0.99.
Within ±10% of true value ............
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Recalibrate gas flow meter at 3
points to determine a new value
of Y. For mass flow meters,
must be done on-site, using
stack gas. Apply the new Y
value to the field test data.
Recalibrate; sensor may not be
used until specification is met.
Prior to initial use and before
each test thereafter.
Recalibrate; instrument may not
be used until specification is
met.
Prior to sampling ..........................
Sampling shall not commence
until the leak check is passed.
Sample invalidated.*
Field sample results not validated.
After sampling ...............................
Prior to analyzing any field samples; repeat for each type of
sorbent used.
Prior to analyzing field samples
and prior to use of new sorbent
media.
On the day of analysis, before
analyzing any samples.
Following daily calibration, prior to
analyzing field samples.
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
Field samples shall not be analyzed until the percent recovery
criteria has been met.
Recalibrate until successful.
Recalibrate and repeat independent standard analysis until
successful.
27FER2
11270
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 9–1—QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL CRITERIA FOR METHOD 30B—Continued
QA/QC test or specification
Acceptance criteria
Frequency
Consequences if not met
Analysis of continuing calibration
verification standard (CCVS).
Within ±10% of true value ............
Following daily calibration, after
analyzing ≤10 field samples,
and at end of each set of analyses.
Test run total sample volume ........
Within ±20% of total volume sampled during field recovery test.
For compliance/emissions testing:
Each individual sample .................
Recalibrate and repeat independent standard analysis, reanalyze samples until successful, if possible; for destructive
techniques, samples invalidated.
Sample invalidated.
Every sample ................................
Sample invalidated.*
Every run ......................................
Run invalidated.*
All Section 1 samples where
stack Hg concentration is ≥0.02
μg/dscm except in case where
stack Hg concentration is ≤30%
of the applicable emission limit.
All Section 1 samples where
stack Hg concentration is ≥0.5
μg/dscm.
Once per field test ........................
Reanalyze at more concentrated
level if possible, samples invalidated if not within calibrated
range.
Sorbent trap
through.
section
2
break-
Paired sorbent trap agreement ......
Sample analysis .............................
≤10% of section 1 Hg mass
for Hg concentrations >1
μg/dscm;
≤20% of section 1 Hg mass
for Hg concentrations ≤1
μg/dscm.
≤50% of section 1 Hg mass if
the stack Hg concentration
is ≤30% of the Hg concentration that is equivalent
to the applicable emission
limit.
For relative accuracy testing:
≤10% of section 1 Hg mass
for Hg concentrations >1
μg/dscm;
≤20% of section 1 Hg mass
for Hg concentrations ≤1
μg/dscm and >0.5 μg/
dscm;
≤50% of section 1 Hg mass
for Hg concentrations ≤0.5
μg/dscm >0.1 μg/dscm;
no criterion for Hg concentrations ≤0.1 μg/dscm (must
meet all other QA/QC
specifications).
≤10% Relative Deviation (RD)
mass for Hg concentrations >1
μg/dscm;
≤20% RD or ≤0.2 μg/dscm absolute difference for Hg concentrations ≤1 μg/dscm.
Within valid calibration range
(within calibration curve).
Sample analysis .............................
Within bounds of Hg0 and HgCl2
Analytical Bias Test.
Field recovery test .........................
Average recovery between 85%
and 115% for Hg0.
Expand bounds of Hg0 and HgCl2
Analytical Bias Test; if not successful, samples invalidated.
Field sample runs not validated
without successful field recovery test.
* And data from the pair of sorbent traps are also invalidated.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
10.3 Thermocouples and Other
Temperature Sensors. Use the procedures
and criteria in Section 10.3 of Method 2 in
appendix A–1 to this part to calibrate instack temperature sensors and
thermocouples. Dial thermometers shall be
calibrated against mercury-in-glass
thermometers or equivalent. Calibrations
must be performed prior to initial use and
before each field test thereafter. At each
calibration point, the absolute temperature
measured by the temperature sensor must
agree to within ±1.5 percent of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
temperature measured with the reference
sensor, otherwise the sensor may not
continue to be used.
10.4 Barometer. Calibrate against a
mercury barometer or other NIST-traceable
barometer as per Section 10.6 of Method 5 in
appendix A–3 to this part. Calibration must
be performed prior to initial use and before
each test program, and the absolute pressure
measured by the barometer must agree to
within ±10 mm Hg of the pressure measured
by the mercury or other NIST-traceable
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
barometer, otherwise the barometer may not
continue to be used.
*
*
*
*
*
11.3 Field Sample Analyses. Analyze the
sorbent trap samples following the same
procedures that were used for conducting the
Hg0 and HgCl2 analytical bias tests. The
individual sections of the sorbent trap and
their respective components must be
analyzed separately (i.e., section 1 and its
components, then section 2 and its
components). All sorbent trap section 1
sample analyses must be within the
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
*
30. Amend appendix B to part 60 as
follows:
■ a. By revising Performance
Specification 3, section 13.2.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
■
Where:
UD = The upscale (high-level) drift of your
PM CEMS in percent,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:52 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
b. By revising Performance
Specification 4, section 8.2.
■ c. By revising Performance
Specification 4B, section 7.1.1.
■ d. By amending Performance
Specification 7 as follows:
■ i. By revising section 8.4.
■ ii. By adding reference 5. to section
16.0.
■ e. By revising Performance
Specification 11, sections 12.1(1) and
(2).
■ f. By revising Performance
Specification 12B, table 12B–1 in
section 9.0 and section 12.8.3.
■ g. By revising Performance
Specification 15, sections 11.1.1.4.2 and
11.1.1.4.3.
■ h. By revising Performance
Specification 16, sections 6.1.7, 8.2.1,
9.1, 9.3, 9.4, 12.4, and 13.5.
■
Appendix B to Part 60—Performance
Specifications
*
*
*
*
*
Performance Specification 3—Specifications
and Test Procedures for O2 and CO2
Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems in
Stationary Sources
*
*
*
*
*
13.2 CEMS Relative Accuracy
Performance Specification. The RA of the
CEMS must be no greater than 20 percent of
the mean value of the reference method (RM)
data. The results are also acceptable if the
absolute value of the difference between the
mean RM value and the mean CEMS value
is less than or equal to 1.0 percent O2 (or
CO2).
*
*
*
*
*
Performance Specification 4—Specifications
and Test Procedures for Carbon Monoxide
Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems in
Stationary Sources
*
*
*
*
*
between the instrument response and the
certified cylinder gas value for each gas.
Calculate the CE results for the CO monitor
according to:
CE = | d/FS | x 100 (1)
Where d is the mean difference between the
CEMS response and the known reference
concentration, and FS is the span value.
The CE for the O2 monitor is the average
percent O2 difference between the O2
monitor and the certified cylinder gas
value for each gas.
*
*
*
*
*
Performance Specification 7—Specifications
and Test Procedures for Hydrogen Sulfide
Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems in
Stationary Sources
*
*
*
*
*
8.4 Relative Accuracy Test Procedure.
8.4.1 Sampling Strategy for RM Tests,
Number of RM Tests, Correlation of RM and
CEMS Data, and Calculations. These are the
same as that in PS–2, Sections 8.4.3 (except
as specified below), 8.4.4, 8.4.5, and 8.4.6,
respectively.
8.4.2 Reference Methods. Unless
otherwise specified in an applicable subpart
of the regulation, Methods 11, 15, and 16
may be used for the RM for this PS.
8.4.2.1 Sampling Time Per Run—Method
11. A sampling run, when Method 11
(integrated sampling) is used, shall consist of
a single measurement for at least 10 minutes
and 0.010 dscm (0.35 dscf). Each sample
shall be taken at approximately 30-minute
intervals.
8.4.2.2 Sampling Time Per Run—
Methods 15 and 16. The sampling run shall
consist of two injections equally spaced over
a 30-minute period following the procedures
described in the particular method. Note:
Caution! Heater or non-approved electrical
probes should not be used around explosive
or flammable sources.
*
*
*
*
*
8.2 Reference Methods. Unless otherwise
specified in an applicable subpart of the
regulation, Method 10, 10A, 10B or other
approved alternative are the RM for this PS.
16.0 * * *
5. Letter to RAMCON Environmental Corp.
from Robert Kellam, December 27, 1992.
*
Performance Specification 11—
Specifications and Test Procedures for
Particulate Matter Continuous Emission
Monitoring Systems at Stationary Sources
*
*
*
*
Performance Specification 4B—
Specifications and Test Procedures for
Carbon Monoxide and Oxygen Continuous
Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources
*
*
*
*
*
7.1.1 Calculations. Summarize the results
on a data sheet. Average the differences
RCEM = The measured PM CEMS response to
the upscale reference standard, and
RU = The pre-established numerical value of
the upscale reference standard.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
12.1 * * *
(1) Calculate the upscale drift (UD) using
Equation 11–1:
FS= Full-scale value.
(2) Calculate the zero drift (ZD) using
Equation 11–2:
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
ER27FE14.017
calibrated range of the analytical system as
specified in Table 9–1. For wet analyses, the
sample can simply be diluted to fall within
the calibrated range. However, for the
destructive thermal analyses, samples that
are not within the calibrated range cannot be
re-analyzed. As a result, the sample cannot
be validated, and another sample must be
collected. It is strongly suggested that the
analytical system be calibrated over multiple
ranges so that thermally analyzed samples
fall within the calibrated range. The total
mass of Hg measured in each sorbent trap
section 1 must also fall within the lower and
upper mass limits established during the
initial Hg0 and HgCl2 analytical bias test. If
a sample is analyzed and found to fall
outside of these limits, it is acceptable for an
additional Hg0 and HgCl2 analytical bias test
to be performed that now includes this level.
However, some samples (e.g., the mass
collected in trap section 2), may have Hg
levels so low that it may not be possible to
quantify them in the analytical system’s
calibrated range. Because a reliable estimate
of these low-level Hg measurements is
necessary to fully validate the emissions
data, the MDL (see section 8.2.2.1 of this
method) is used to establish the minimum
amount that can be detected and reported. If
the measured mass or concentration is below
the lowest point in the calibration curve and
above the MDL, the analyst must estimate the
mass or concentration of the sample based on
the analytical instrument response relative to
an additional calibration standard at a
concentration or mass between the MDL and
the lowest point in the calibration curve.
This is accomplished by establishing a
response factor (e.g., area counts per Hg mass
or concentration) and estimating the amount
of Hg present in the sample based on the
analytical response and this response factor.
Example: The analysis of a particular
sample results in a measured mass above the
MDL, but below the lowest point in the
calibration curve which is 10 ng. An MDL of
1.3 ng Hg has been established by the MDL
study. A calibration standard containing 5 ng
of Hg is analyzed and gives an analytical
response of 6,170 area counts, which equates
to a response factor of 1,234 area counts/ng
Hg. The analytical response for the sample is
4,840 area counts. Dividing the analytical
response for the sample (4,840 area counts)
by the response factor gives 3.9 ng Hg, which
is the estimated mass of Hg in the sample.
11271
11272
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Where:
ZD = The zero (low-level) drift of your PM
CEMS in percent,
RCEM = The measured PM CEMS response to
the zero reference standard,
RL = The pre-established numerical value of
the zero reference standard, and
FS = Full-scale value.
*
*
*
*
Performance Specification 12B—
Specifications and Test Procedures for
Monitoring Total Vapor Phase Mercury
Emissions from Stationary Sources Using a
Sorbent Trap Monitoring System
*
*
*
9.0
*
*
*
* * *
TABLE 12B–1—QA/QC CRITERIA FOR SORBENT TRAP MONITORING SYSTEMS
QA/QC test or
specification
Acceptance criteria
Frequency
Consequences if not met
Pre-test leak check ........................
≤4% of target sampling rate .........
Prior to monitoring ........................
Post-test leak check ......................
≤4% of average sampling rate .....
After monitoring ............................
Ratio of stack gas flow rate to
sample flow rate.
No more than 5% of the hourly
ratios or 5 hourly ratios (whichever is less restrictive) may deviate from the reference ratio by
more than ±25%.
≤5% of Section 1 Hg mass ..........
≤10% of Section 1 Hg mass if average Hg concentration is ≤0.5
μg/scm.
Every hour throughout monitoring
period.
Monitoring must not commence
until the leak check is passed.
Invalidate the data from the
paired traps or, if certain conditions are met, report adjusted
data from a single trap (see
Section 12.8.3).
Invalidate the data from the
paired traps or, if certain conditions are met, report adjusted
data from a single trap (see
Section 12.8.3).
Invalidate the data from the
paired traps or, if certain conditions are met, report adjusted
data from a single trap (see
Section 12.8.3).
section
2
break-
Paired sorbent trap agreement ......
Spike Recovery Study ...................
Multipoint analyzer calibration .......
Analysis of independent calibration
standard.
No criterion when Hg concentration for trap less than 10% of
the applicable emission limit
(must meet all other QA/QC
specifications).
≤10% Relative Deviation (RD) if
the average concentration is >
1.0 μg/m3.
≤20% RD if the average concentration is ≤1.0 μg/m3.
Results also acceptable if absolute difference between concentrations from paired traps is
≤ 0.03 μg/m3.
Average recovery between 85%
and 115% for each of the 3
spike concentration levels.
Each analyzer reading within ±
10% of true value and r2 ≥ 0.99.
Within ± 10% of true value ...........
Every sample ................................
Every sample ................................
Either invalidate the data from the
paired traps or report the results from the trap with the
higher Hg concentration.
Prior to analyzing field samples
and prior to use of new sorbent
media.
On the day of analysis, before
analyzing any samples.
Following daily calibration, prior to
analyzing field samples.
Field samples must not be analyzed until the percent recovery
criteria have been met.
Recalibrate until successful.
75–125% of spike amount ............
Every sample ................................
Relative Accuracy ..........................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Spike recovery from section 3 of
both sorbent traps.
RA ≤ 20.0% of RM mean value;
or if RM mean value ≤5.0 μg/
scm, absolute difference between RM and sorbent trap
monitoring system mean values
≤1.0 μg/scm.
RA specification must be met for
initial certification.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
Recalibrate and repeat independent standard analysis until
successful.
Invalidate the data from the
paired traps or, if certain conditions are met, report adjusted
data from a single trap (see
Section 12.8.3).
Data from the system are invalid
until a RA test is passed.
27FER2
ER27FE14.018
Sorbent trap
through.
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
11273
TABLE 12B–1—QA/QC CRITERIA FOR SORBENT TRAP MONITORING SYSTEMS—Continued
QA/QC test or
specification
Acceptance criteria
Frequency
Consequences if not met
Gas flow meter calibration .............
An initial calibration factor (Y) has
been determined at 3 settings;
for mass flow meters, initial calibration with stack gas has been
performed. For subsequent calibrations, Y within ±5% of average value from the most recent
3-point calibration.
Absolute temperature measured
by sensor within ± 1.5% of a
reference sensor.
Absolute pressure measured by
instrument within ± 10 mm Hg
of reading with a NIST-traceable barometer.
At 3 settings prior to initial use
and at least quarterly at one
setting thereafter.
Recalibrate meter at 3 settings to
determine a new value of Y.
Prior to initial use and at least
quarterly thereafter.
Recalibrate; sensor may not be
used until specification is met.
Prior to initial use and at least
quarterly thereafter.
Recalibrate; instrument may not
be used until specification is
met.
Temperature sensor calibration .....
Barometer calibration .....................
*
*
*
*
*
12.8.3 For the routine, day-to-day
operation of the monitoring system, when
one of the two sorbent trap samples or
sampling systems either: (a) Fails the postmonitoring leak check; or (b) has excessive
section 2 breakthrough; or (c) fails to
maintain the proper stack flow-to-sample
flow ratio; or (d) fails to achieve the required
section 3 spike recovery; or (e) is lost, broken,
or damaged, provided that the other trap
meets the acceptance criteria for all four of
these QC specifications, the Hg concentration
measured by the valid trap may be multiplied
by a factor of 1.111 and then used for
reporting purposes. Further, if both traps
meet the acceptance criteria for all four of
these QC specifications, but the acceptance
criterion for paired trap agreement is not met,
the owner or operator may report the higher
of the two Hg concentrations measured by
the traps, in lieu of invalidating the data from
the paired traps.
*
*
*
*
*
Performance Specification 15—Performance
Specification for Extractive FTIR Continuous
Emission Monitoring Systems in Stationary
Sources
*
*
*
*
*
11.1.1.4.2 RMs Using a Grab Sampling
Technique. Synchronize the RM and FTIR
CEM measurements as closely as possible.
For a grab sampling RM, record the volume
collected and the exact sampling period for
each sample. Synchronize the FTIR CEM so
that the FTIR measures a spectrum of a
similar cell volume at the same time as the
RM grab sample was collected. Measure at
least five independent samples with both the
FTIR CEM and the RM for each of the
minimum nine runs. Compare the run
concentration averages by using the relative
accuracy analysis procedure in Performance
Specification 2 of appendix B of 40 CFR part
60.
11.1.1.4.3 Continuous Emission Monitors
as RMs. If the RM is a CEM, synchronize the
sampling flow rates of the RM and the FTIR
CEM. Each run is at least 1 hour long and
consists of at least 10 FTIR CEM
measurements and the corresponding 10 RM
measurements (or averages). For the
statistical comparison, use the relative
accuracy analysis procedure in Performance
Specification 2 of appendix B of 40 CFR part
60. If the RM time constant is < 1⁄2 the FTIR
CEM time constant, brief fluctuations in
analyte concentrations that are not
adequately measured with the slower FTIR
CEM time constant can be excluded from the
run average along with the corresponding RM
measurements. However, the FTIR CEM run
average must still include at least 10
measurements over a 1-hour period.
*
*
*
*
*
Performance Specification 16—
Specifications and Test Procedures for
Predictive Emission Monitoring Systems in
Stationary Sources
*
*
*
*
*
6.1.7 Sensor Location and Repair. We
recommend you install sensors in an
accessible location in order to perform
repairs and replacements. Permanently-
installed platforms or ladders may not be
needed. If you install sensors in an area that
is not accessible, you may be required to shut
down the emissions unit to repair or replace
a sensor. Conduct a new RATA after
replacing a sensor that supplies a critical
PEMS parameter if the new sensor provides
a different output or scaling or changes the
historical training dataset of the PEMS.
Replacement of a non-critical sensor that
does not cause an impact in the accuracy of
the PEMS does not trigger a RATA. All
sensors must be calibrated as often as needed
but at least as often as recommended by the
manufacturers.
*
*
*
*
*
8.2.1 Reference Methods. Unless
otherwise specified in the applicable
regulations, you must use the test methods in
appendix A of this part for the RM test.
Conduct the RM tests at three operating
levels. The RM tests shall be performed at a
low-load (or production) level between the
minimum safe, stable load and 50 percent of
the maximum level load, at the mid-load
level (an intermediary level between the low
and high levels), and at a high-load level
between 80 percent and the maximum load.
Alternatively, if practicable, you may test at
three levels of the key operating parameter
(e.g. selected based on a covariance analysis
between each parameter and the PEMS
output) equally spaced within the normal
range of the parameter.
*
*
*
*
*
9.1 QA/QC Summary. Conduct the
applicable ongoing tests listed below.
ONGOING QUALITY ASSURANCE TESTS
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Test
PEMS regulatory
purpose
Acceptability
Frequency
Sensor Evaluation ..........................
RAA ................................................
All ..................................................
Compliance ...................................
RATA .............................................
All ..................................................
.......................................................
3-test avg ≤10% of simultaneous
analyzer or RM average.
Same as for RA in Sec. 13.1 .......
Bias Correction ..............................
All ..................................................
If davg ≤ |cc| ...................................
PEMS Training ...............................
All ..................................................
If Fcritical ≥F ...................................
r ≥0.8 ............................................
Daily.
Each quarter except quarter when
RATA performed.
Yearly in quarter when RAA not
performed.
Bias test passed (no correction
factor needed).
Optional after initial and subsequent RATAs.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
11274
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
ONGOING QUALITY ASSURANCE TESTS—Continued
Test
PEMS regulatory
purpose
Acceptability
Sensor Evaluation Alert Test (optional).
All ..................................................
See Section 6.1.8 .........................
Frequency
After each PEMS training.
9.3 Quarterly Relative Accuracy Audits.
In the first year of operation after the initial
certification, perform a RAA consisting of at
least three 30-minute portable analyzer or
RM determinations each quarter a RATA is
not performed. To conduct a RAA, follow the
procedures in Section 8.2 for the relative
accuracy test, except that only three sets of
measurement data are required, and the
statistical tests are not required. The average
of the three or more portable analyzer or RM
determinations must not exceed the limits
given in Section 13.5. Report the data from
all sets of measurement data. If a PEMS
passes all quarterly RAAs in the first year
and also passes the subsequent yearly RATA
in the second year, you may elect to perform
a single mid-year RAA in the second year in
place of the quarterly RAAs. This option may
be repeated, but only until the PEMS fails
either a mid-year RAA or a yearly RATA.
When such a failure occurs, you must resume
quarterly RAAs in the quarter following the
failure and continue conducting quarterly
RAAs until the PEMS successfully passes
both a year of quarterly RAAs and a
subsequent RATA.
9.4 Yearly Relative Accuracy Test.
Perform a minimum 9-run RATA at the
normal operating level on a yearly basis in
the quarter that the RAA is not performed.
The statistical tests in Section 8.3 are not
required for the yearly RATA.
*
■
b. By revising Procedure 2, paragraphs
(3) and (4) of section 12.0.
■ c. By redesignating the second listing
of section 6.2.6 as section 6.2.7 in
Procedure 5.
accuracy for the RAA. The RAA must be
calculated in the units of the applicable
emission standard.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
13.5 Relative Accuracy Audits. The
average of the three portable analyzer or RM
determinations must not differ from the
simultaneous PEMS average value by more
than 10 percent of the analyzer or RM for
concentrations greater than 100 ppm or 20
percent for concentrations between 100 and
20 ppm, or the test is failed. For
measurements at 20 ppm or less, this
difference must not exceed 2 ppm for a
pollutant PEMS and 1 percent absolute for a
diluents PEMS.
Appendix F to Part 60—Quality
Assurance Procedures
*
*
*
*
*
*
Procedure 1—Quality Assurance
Requirements for Gas Continuous Emission
Monitoring Systems Used for Compliance
Determination
■
*
*
*
*
*
31. Amend appendix F to Part 60 as
follows:
■ a. By revising Procedure 1, section
6.2.
*
*
*
*
6.2 RAA Accuracy Calculation. Use the
calculation procedure in the relevant
performance specification to calculate the
*
*
*
*
*
12.4 Relative Accuracy Audit. Calculate
the quarterly RAA using Equation 16–9.
*
*
*
*
*
Procedure 2—Quality Assurance
Requirements for Particulate Matter
Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems at
Stationary Sources
*
*
*
*
*
12.0 What calculations and data analysis
must I perform for my PM CEMS?
*
*
*
*
*
(3) How do I calculate daily upscale and
zero drift? You must calculate the upscale
drift using Equation 2–2 and the zero drift
using Equation 2–3:
RCEM = Your PM CEMS response to the
upscale check value, and
RU = The upscale check value.
FS = Full-scale value.
Where:
ZD = The zero (low-level) drift of your PM
CEMS, in percent,
RCEM = Your PM CEMS response of the zero
check value,
RL = The zero check value.
(4) How do I calculate SVA accuracy? You
must use Equation 2–4 to calculate the
accuracy, in percent, for each of the three
SVA tests or the daily sample volume check:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
ER27FE14.022
ER27FE14.019 ER27FE14.021
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
ER27FE14.023
Where:
UD = The upscale drift of your PM CEMS,
in percent,
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Where:
VM = Sample gas volume determined/
reported by your PM CEMS (e.g., dscm),
VR = Sample gas volume measured by the
independent calibrated reference device
(e.g., dscm) for the SVA or the reference
value for the daily sample volume check.
Note: Before calculating SVA accuracy, you
must correct the sample gas volumes
measured by your PM CEMS and the
independent calibrated reference device to
the same basis of temperature, pressure, and
moisture content. You must document all
data and calculations.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 61—NATIONAL EMISSION
STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR
POLLUTANTS
32. The authority citation for part 61
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
Subpart A—[Amended]
33. Amend § 61.13 by revising
paragraph (e)(1)(i) to read as follows:
■
§ 61.13 Emission tests and waiver of
emission tests.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) The source owner, operator, or
representative of the tested facility shall
obtain an audit sample, if commercially
available, from an AASP for each test
method used for regulatory compliance
purposes. No audit samples are required
for the following test methods: Methods
3A and 3C of appendix A–3 of part 60;
Methods 6C, 7E, 9, and 10 of appendix
A–4 of part 60; Method 18 and 19 of
appendix A–6 of part 60; Methods 20,
22, and 25A of appendix A–7 of part 60;
and Methods 303, 318, 320, and 321 of
appendix A of part 63. If multiple
sources at a single facility are tested
during a compliance test event, only one
audit sample is required for each
method used during a compliance test.
The compliance authority responsible
for the compliance test may waive the
requirement to include an audit sample
if they believe that an audit sample is
not necessary. ‘‘Commercially
available’’ means that two or more
independent AASPs have blind audit
samples available for purchase. If the
source owner, operator, or
representative cannot find an audit
sample for a specific method, the owner,
operator, or representative shall consult
the EPA Web site at the following URL,
www.epa.gov/ttn/emc, to confirm
whether there is a source that can
supply an audit sample for that method.
If the EPA Web site does not list an
available audit sample at least 60 days
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
prior to the beginning of the compliance
test, the source owner, operator, or
representative shall not be required to
include an audit sample as part of the
quality assurance program for the
compliance test. When ordering an
audit sample, the source owner,
operator, or representative shall give the
sample provider an estimate for the
concentration of each pollutant that is
emitted by the source or the estimated
concentration of each pollutant based
on the permitted level and the name,
address, and phone number of the
compliance authority. The source
owner, operator, or representative shall
report the results for the audit sample
along with a summary of the emission
test results for the audited pollutant to
the compliance authority and shall
report the results of the audit sample to
the AASP. The source owner, operator,
or representative shall make both
reports at the same time and in the same
manner or shall report to the
compliance authority first and report to
the AASP. If the method being audited
is a method that allows the samples to
be analyzed in the field and the tester
plans to analyze the samples in the
field, the tester may analyze the audit
samples prior to collecting the emission
samples provided a representative of the
compliance authority is present at the
testing site. The tester may request, and
the compliance authority may grant, a
waiver to the requirement that a
representative of the compliance
authority must be present at the testing
site during the field analysis of an audit
sample. The source owner, operator, or
representative may report the results of
the audit sample to the compliance
authority and then report the results of
the audit sample to the AASP prior to
collecting any emission samples. The
test protocol and final test report shall
document whether an audit sample was
ordered and utilized and the pass/fail
results as applicable.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart C—[Amended]
34. Amend § 61.33 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
§ 61.33
Stack sampling.
(a) Unless a waiver of emission testing
is obtained under § 61.13, each owner or
operator required to comply with
§ 61.32(a) shall test emissions from the
source according to Method 104 of
appendix B to this part or according to
Method 29 of appendix A to part 60.
Method 103 of appendix B to this part
is approved by the Administrator as an
alternative method for sources subject to
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
11275
§ 61.32(a). The emission test shall be
performed:
(1) By May 28, 2014 in the case of an
existing source or a new source which
has an initial startup date preceding
February 27, 2014; or
(2) Within 90 days of startup in the
case of a new source which did not have
an initial startup date preceding
February 27, 2014.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart D—[Amended]
35. Amend § 61.42 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
§ 61.42
Emission standard.
(a) Emissions to the atmosphere from
rocket-motor test sites shall not cause
time-weighted atmospheric
concentrations of beryllium to exceed
75 microgram minutes per cubic meter
(mg-min/m3)(4.68 x 10¥9 pound minutes
per cubic foot (lb-min/ft3)) of air within
the limits of 10 to 60 minutes,
accumulated during any 2 consecutive
weeks, in any area in which an adverse
effect to public health could occur.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart E—[Amended]
36. Amend § 61.53 by revising
paragraph (d)(2) to read as follows:
■
§ 61.53
Stack sampling.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) Method 101A in appendix B or
Method 29 in appendix A to part 60
shall be used to test emissions as
follows:
(i) The test shall be performed by May
28, 2014 in the case of an existing
source or a new source which has an
initial startup date preceding February
27, 2014.
(ii) The test shall be performed within
90 days of startup in the case of a new
source which did not have an initial
startup date preceding February 27,
2014.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart N—[Amended]
37. Amend § 61.164 as follows:
a. By revising paragraph (d)(2)(i).
b. By revising paragraph (e)(1)(i).
c. By revising paragraph (e)(2) to read
as follows:
■
■
■
■
§ 61.164
Test methods and procedures.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Use Method 108 in appendix B to
this part or Method 29 in appendix A to
part 60 for determining the arsenic
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
11276
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Where:
D = the percent emission reduction.
Cb = the arsenic concentration of the stack
gas entering the control device, as
measured by Method 108 or Method 29.
Ca = the arsenic concentration of the stack gas
exiting the control device, as measured
by Method 108 or Method 29.
*
*
*
*
*
38. Amend appendix B to part 61 to
read as follows:
■ a. By amending Method 101 by
redesignating sections 16.0 and 17.0 as
sections 17.0 and 18.0, respectively, and
by adding a new section 16.0.
■ b. By amending Method 101A by
redesignating sections 16.0 and 17.0 as
sections 17.0 and 18.0, respectively, and
by adding a new section 16.0.
■ c. By revising Method 102, section
8.1.1.1.
■ d. By amending Method 104 as
follows:
■ i. By revising sections 4.1 and 11.5.3.
■ ii. By redesignating sections 16.0 and
17.0 as sections 17.0 and 18.0,
respectively.
■ iii. By adding a new section 16.0.
■ e. By amending Method 108 by
redesignating sections 16.0 and 17.0 as
sections 17.0 and 18.0, respectively, and
by adding a new section 16.0.
■ f. By amending Method 108A by
redesignating sections 16.0 and 17.0 as
sections 17.0 and 18.0 respectively, and
by adding a new section 16.0.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
■
Appendix B to Part 61—Test Methods
*
*
*
*
*
Method 101—Determination of Particulate
and Gaseous Mercury Emissions From
Chlor-Alkali Plants (Air Streams)
*
*
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
*
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
16.0 Alternative Procedures
16.1 Alternative Analyzer. Samples may
also be analyzed by cold vapor atomic
fluorescence spectrometry.
*
*
*
*
*
Method 101A—Determination of Particulate
and Gaseous Mercury Emissions From
Sewage Sludge Incinerators
*
*
*
*
*
16.0 Alternative Procedures
16.1 Alternative Analyzers.
16.1.1 Inductively coupled plasmaatomic emission spectrometry (ICP–AES)
may be used as an alternative to atomic
absorption analysis provided the following
conditions are met:
16.1.1.1 Sample collection, sample
preparation, and analytical preparation
procedures are as defined in the method
except as necessary for the ICP–AES
application.
16.1.1.2 The quality control procedures
are conducted as prescribed.
16.1.1.3 The limit of quantitation for the
ICP–AES must be demonstrated and the
sample concentrations reported should be no
less than two times the limit of quantitation.
The limit of quantitation is defined as ten
times the standard deviation of the blank
value. The standard deviation of the blank
value is determined from the analysis of
seven blanks. It has been reported that for
mercury and those elements that form
hydrides, a continuous-flow generator
coupled to an ICP–AES offers detection
limits comparable to cold vapor atomic
absorption.
16.1.2 Samples may also be analyzed by
cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry.
*
*
*
*
*
Method 102—Determination of Particulate
and Gaseous Mercury Emissions From
Chlor-Alkali Plants (Hydrogen Streams)
*
*
*
*
*
8.1.1.1 Calibrate the meter box orifice.
Use the techniques described in APTD–0576
(see Reference 9 in Section 17.0 of Method
5 of appendix A to part 60). Calibration of the
orifice meter at flow conditions that simulate
the conditions at the source is suggested.
Calibration should either be done with
hydrogen or with some other gas having a
similar Reynolds Number so that there is
similarity between the Reynolds Numbers
during calibration and during sampling.
Alternative mercury-free thermometers may
be used if the thermometers are, at a
minimum, equivalent in terms of
performance or suitably effective for the
specific temperature measurement
application.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
4.1 Matrix Effects. Analysis for Be by
flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry
is sensitive to the chemical composition and
to the physical properties (e.g., viscosity, pH)
of the sample. Aluminum and silicon, in
particular, are known to interfere when
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
*
11.5.3 Check for Matrix Effects (optional).
Use the Method of Standard Additions (see
Reference 2 in Section 17.0) to check at least
one sample from each source for matrix
effects on the Be results. If the results of the
Method of Standard Additions procedure
used on the single source sample do not
agree to within 5 percent of the value
obtained by the routine atomic absorption
analysis, then reanalyze all samples from the
source using the Method of Standard
Additions procedure.
*
*
*
*
*
16.0 Alternative Procedures
16.1 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic
Emission Spectrometry (ICP–AES) Analysis.
ICP–AES may be used as an alternative to
atomic absorption analysis provided the
following conditions are met:
16.1.1 Sample collection, sample
preparation, and analytical preparation
procedures are as defined in the method
except as necessary for the ICP–AES
application.
16.1.2 Quality Assurance/Quality Control
procedures, including audit material
analysis, are conducted as prescribed in the
method. The QA acceptance conditions must
be met.
16.1.3 The limit of quantitation for the
ICP–AES must be demonstrated and the
sample concentrations reported should be no
less than two times the limit of quantitation.
The limit of quantitation is defined as ten
times the standard deviation of the blank
value. The standard deviation of the blank
value is determined from the analysis of
seven blanks. It has been reported that for
mercury and those elements that form
hydrides, a continuous-flow generator
coupled to an ICP–AES offers detection
limits comparable to cold vapor atomic
absorption.
16.2 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass
Spectrometry (ICP–MS) Analysis. ICP–MS
may be used as an alternative to atomic
absorption analysis.
16.3 Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence
Spectrometry (CVAFS) Analysis. CVAFS may
be used as an alternative to atomic absorption
analysis.
*
*
*
*
*
Method 108—Determination of Particulate
and Gaseous Arsenic Emissions
*
Method 104—Determination of Beryllium
Emissions From Stationary Sources
*
present in appreciable quantities. The
analytical procedure includes (optionally)
the use of the Method of Standard Additions
to check for these matrix effects, and sample
analysis using the Method of Standard
Additions if significant matrix effects are
found to be present (see Reference 2 in
Section 17.0).
*
*
*
*
16.0 Alternative Procedures
16.1 Inductively coupled plasma-atomic
emission spectrometry (ICP–AES) Analysis.
ICP–AES may be used as an alternative to
atomic absorption analysis provided the
following conditions are met:
16.1.1 Sample collection, sample
preparation, and analytical preparation
procedures are as defined in the method
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
ER27FE14.024
emission rate, g/hr (lb/hr). The emission
rate shall equal the arithmetic mean of
the results of three 60-minute test runs.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Use Method 108 in appendix B to
this part or Method 29 in appendix A to
part 60 to determine the concentration
of arsenic in the gas streams entering
and exiting the control device. Conduct
three 60-minute test runs, each
consisting of simultaneous testing of the
inlet and outlet gas streams. The gas
streams shall contain all the gas
exhausted from the glass melting
furnace.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) Calculate the percent emission
reduction for each run as follows:
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
except as necessary for the ICP–AES
application.
16.1.2 Quality Assurance/Quality Control
procedures, including audit material
analysis, are conducted as prescribed in the
method. The QA acceptance conditions must
be met.
16.1.3 The limit of quantitation for the
ICP–AES must be demonstrated and the
sample concentrations reported should be no
less than two times the limit of quantitation.
The limit of quantitation is defined as ten
times the standard deviation of the blank
value. The standard deviation of the blank
value is determined from the analysis of
seven blanks. It has been reported that for
mercury and those elements that form
hydrides, a continuous-flow generator
coupled to an ICP–AES offers detection
limits comparable to cold vapor atomic
absorption.
16.2 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass
Spectrometry (ICP–MS) Analysis. ICP–MS
may be used as an alternative to atomic
absorption analysis.
16.3 Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence
Spectrometry (CVAFS) Analysis. CVAFS may
be used as an alternative to atomic absorption
analysis.
*
*
*
*
*
Method 108A—Determination of Arsenic
Content in Ore Samples From Nonferrous
Smelters
*
*
*
*
*
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
16.0 Alternative Procedures
16.1 Alternative Analyzer. Inductively
coupled plasma-atomic emission
spectrometry (ICP–AES) may be used as an
alternative to atomic absorption analysis
provided the following conditions are met:
16.1.1 Sample collection, sample
preparation, and analytical preparation
procedures are as defined in the method
except as necessary for the ICP–AES
application.
16.1.2 Quality Assurance/Quality Control
procedures, including audit material
analysis, are conducted as prescribed in the
method. The QA acceptance conditions must
be met.
16.1.3 The limit of quantitation for the
ICP–AES must be demonstrated and the
sample concentrations reported should be no
less than two times the limit of quantitation.
The limit of quantitation is defined as ten
times the standard deviation of the blank
value. The standard deviation of the blank
value is determined from the analysis of
seven blanks. It has been reported that for
mercury and those elements that form
hydrides, a continuous-flow generator
coupled to an ICP–AES offers detection
limits comparable to cold vapor atomic
absorption.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 63—NATIONAL EMISSION
STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR
POLLUTANTS FOR SOURCE
CATEGORIES
39. The authority citation for part 63
continues to read as follows:
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart A—[Amended]
40. Amend § 63.7 by revising
paragraph (c)(2)(iii)(A) to read as
follows:
■
§ 63.7
Performance testing requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) * * *
(A) The source owner, operator, or
representative of the tested facility shall
obtain an audit sample, if commercially
available, from an AASP for each test
method used for regulatory compliance
purposes. No audit samples are required
for the following test methods: Methods
3A and 3C of appendix A–3 of part 60;
Methods 6C, 7E, 9, and 10 of appendix
A–4 of part 60; Methods 18 and 19 of
appendix A–6 of part 60; Methods 20,
22, and 25A of appendix A–7 of part 60;
and Methods 303, 318, 320, and 321 of
appendix A of part 63. If multiple
sources at a single facility are tested
during a compliance test event, only one
audit sample is required for each
method used during a compliance test.
The compliance authority responsible
for the compliance test may waive the
requirement to include an audit sample
if they believe that an audit sample is
not necessary. ‘‘Commercially
available’’ means that two or more
independent AASPs have blind audit
samples available for purchase. If the
source owner, operator, or
representative cannot find an audit
sample for a specific method, the owner,
operator, or representative shall consult
the EPA Web site at the following URL,
www.epa.gov/ttn/emc, to confirm
whether there is a source that can
supply an audit sample for that method.
If the EPA Web site does not list an
available audit sample at least 60 days
prior to the beginning of the compliance
test, the source owner, operator, or
representative shall not be required to
include an audit sample as part of the
quality assurance program for the
compliance test. When ordering an
audit sample, the source owner,
operator, or representative shall give the
sample provider an estimate for the
concentration of each pollutant that is
emitted by the source or the estimated
concentration of each pollutant based
on the permitted level and the name,
address, and phone number of the
compliance authority. The source
owner, operator, or representative shall
report the results for the audit sample
along with a summary of the emission
test results for the audited pollutant to
the compliance authority and shall
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
11277
report the results of the audit sample to
the AASP. The source owner, operator,
or representative shall make both
reports at the same time and in the same
manner or shall report to the
compliance authority first and report to
the AASP. If the method being audited
is a method that allows the samples to
be analyzed in the field and the tester
plans to analyze the samples in the
field, the tester may analyze the audit
samples prior to collecting the emission
samples provided a representative of the
compliance authority is present at the
testing site. The tester may request, and
the compliance authority may grant, a
waiver to the requirement that a
representative of the compliance
authority must be present at the testing
site during the field analysis of an audit
sample. The source owner, operator, or
representative may report the results of
the audit sample to the compliance
authority and then report the results of
the audit sample to the AASP prior to
collecting any emission samples. The
test protocol and final test report shall
document whether an audit sample was
ordered and utilized and the pass/fail
results as applicable.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 41. Amend § 63.8 by adding a
sentence to the end of paragraph
(f)(6)(iii) to read as follows:
§ 63.8
Monitoring requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(6) * * *
(iii) * * * The Administrator will
review the notification and may rescind
permission to use an alternative and
require the owner or operator to conduct
a relative accuracy test of the CEMS as
specified in section 8.4 of Performance
Specification 2.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 42. Revise § 63.14 to read as follows:
§ 63.14
Incorporations by reference.
(a) Certain material is incorporated by
reference into this part with the
approval of the Director of the Federal
Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. To enforce any edition
other than that specified in this section,
the EPA must publish notice of change
in the Federal Register and the material
must be available to the public. All
approved material is available for
inspection at the Air and Radiation
Docket and Information Center, U.S.
EPA, 401 M St. SW., Washington, DC,
telephone number 202–566, and is
available from the sources listed below.
It is also available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
11278
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030 or
go to https://www.archives.gov/federal_
register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
(b) The Association of Florida
Phosphate Chemists, P.O. Box 1645,
Bartow, Florida 33830.
(1) Book of Methods Used and
Adopted By The Association of Florida
Phosphate Chemists, Seventh Edition
1991:
(i) Section IX, Methods of Analysis for
Phosphate Rock, No. 1 Preparation of
Sample, IBR approved for §§ 63.606(c)
and 63.626(c).
(ii) Section IX, Methods of Analysis
for Phosphate Rock, No. 3 Phosphorus—
P2O5 or Ca3(PO4)2, Method A—
Volumetric Method, IBR approved for
§§ 63.606(c) and 63.626(c).
(iii) Section IX, Methods of Analysis
for Phosphate Rock, No. 3 PhosphorusP2O5 or Ca3(PO4)2, Method B—
Gravimetric Quimociac Method, IBR
approved for §§ 63.606(c) and 63.626(c).
(iv) Section IX, Methods of Analysis
For Phosphate Rock, No. 3
Phosphorus—P2O5 or Ca3(PO4)2, Method
C—Spectrophotometric Method, IBR
approved for §§ 63.606(c) and 63.626(c).
(v) Section XI, Methods of Analysis
for Phosphoric Acid, Superphosphate,
Triple Superphosphate, and
Ammonium Phosphates, No. 3 Total
Phosphorus—P2O5, Method A—
Volumetric Method, IBR approved for
§§ 63.606(c) and 63.626(c) and (d).
(vi) Section XI, Methods of Analysis
for Phosphoric Acid, Superphosphate,
Triple Superphosphate, and
Ammonium Phosphates, No. 3 Total
Phosphorus—P2O5, Method B—
Gravimetric Quimociac Method, IBR
approved for §§ 63.606(c) and 63.626(c)
and (d).
(vii) Section XI, Methods of Analysis
for Phosphoric Acid, Superphosphate,
Triple Superphosphate, and
Ammonium Phosphates, No. 3 Total
Phosphorus—P2O5, Method C—
Spectrophotometric Method, IBR
approved for §§ 63.606(c) and 63.626(c)
and (d).
(2) [Reserved]
(c) Association of Official Analytical
Chemists (AOAC) International,
Customer Services, Suite 400, 2200
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia
22201–3301, Telephone (703) 522–3032,
Fax (703) 522–5468.
(1) AOAC Official Method 929.01
Sampling of Solid Fertilizers, Sixteenth
edition, 1995, IBR approved for
§ 63.626(d).
(2) AOAC Official Method 929.02
Preparation of Fertilizer Sample,
Sixteenth edition, 1995, IBR approved
for § 63.626(d).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
(3) AOAC Official Method 957.02
Phosphorus (Total) in Fertilizers,
Preparation of Sample Solution,
Sixteenth edition, 1995, IBR approved
for § 63.626(d).
(4) AOAC Official Method 958.01
Phosphorus (Total) in Fertilizers,
Spectrophotometric
Molybdovanadophosphate Method,
Sixteenth edition, 1995, IBR approved
for § 63.626(d).
(5) AOAC Official Method 962.02
Phosphorus (Total) in Fertilizers,
Gravimetric Quinolinium
Molybdophosphate Method, Sixteenth
edition, 1995, IBR approved for
§ 63.626(d).
(6) AOAC Official Method 969.02
Phosphorus (Total) in Fertilizers,
Alkalimetric Quinolinium
Molybdophosphate Method, Sixteenth
edition, 1995, IBR approved for
§ 63.626(d).
(7) AOAC Official Method 978.01
Phosphorus (Total) in Fertilizers,
Automated Method, Sixteenth edition,
1995, IBR approved for § 63.626(d).
(d) American Petroleum Institute
(API), 1220 L Street NW., Washington,
DC 20005.
(1) API Publication 2517, Evaporative
Loss from External Floating-Roof Tanks,
Third Edition, February 1989, IBR
approved for §§ 63.111 and 63.2406.
(2) API Publication 2518, Evaporative
Loss from Fixed-roof Tanks, Second
Edition, October 1991, IBR approved for
§ 63.150(g).
(3) API Manual of Petroleum
Measurement Specifications (MPMS)
Chapter 19.2 (API MPMS 19.2),
Evaporative Loss From Floating-Roof
Tanks, First Edition, April 1997, IBR
approved for §§ 63.1251 and 63.12005.
(e) American Society of Heating,
Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning
Engineers at 1791 Tullie Circle, NE.,
Atlanta, GA 30329 orders@ashrae.org.
(1) American Society of Heating,
Refrigerating, and Air Conditioning
Engineers Method 52.1, ‘‘Gravimetric
and Dust-Spot Procedures for Testing
Air-Cleaning Devices Used in General
Ventilation for Removing Particulate
Matter, June 4, 1992,’’ IBR approved for
§§ 63.11173(e) and 63.11516(d).
(2) [Reserved]
(f) American Society of Mechanical
Engineers (ASME), Three Park Avenue,
New York, NY 10016–5990, Telephone
(800) 843–2763, https://www.asme.org;
also available from HIS, Incorporated,
15 Inverness Way East, Englewood, CO
80112, Telephone (877) 413–5184,
https://global.ihs.com.
(1) ANSI/ASME PTC 19.10–1981,
Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses [Part 10,
Instruments and Apparatus], issued
August 31, 1981, IBR approved for
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
§§ 63.309(k), 63.457(k), 63.772(e) and
(h), 63.865(b), 63.1282(d) and (g),
63.3166(a), 63.3360(e), 63.3545(a),
63.3555(a), 63.4166(a), 63.4362(a),
63.4766(a), 63.4965(a), 63.5160(d), table
4 to subpart UUUU, 63.9307(c),
63.9323(a), 63.11148(e), 63.11155(e),
63.11162(f), 63.11163(g), 63.11410(j),
63.11551(a), 63.11646(a), and 63.11945,
table 5 to subpart DDDDD, table 4 to
subpart JJJJJ, tables 4 and 5 of subpart
UUUUU, and table 1 to subpart ZZZZZ.
(2) [Reserved]
(g) American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM), 100 Barr Harbor
Drive, Post Office Box C700, West
Conshohocken, PA 19428–2959,
Telephone (610) 832–9585, https://
www.astm.org; also available from
ProQuest, 789 East Eisenhower
Parkway, Ann Arbor, MI 48106–1346,
Telephone (734) 761–4700, https://
www.proquest.com.
(1) ASTM D95–05 (Reapproved 2010),
Standard Test Method for Water in
Petroleum Products and Bituminous
Materials by Distillation, approved May
1, 2010, IBR approved for § 63.10005(i)
and table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(2) ASTM D240–09 Standard Test
Method for Heat of Combustion of
Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb
Calorimeter, approved July 1, 2009, IBR
approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(3) ASTM Method D388–05, Standard
Classification of Coals by Rank,
approved September 15, 2005, IBR
approved for §§ 63.7575, 63.10042, and
63.11237.
(4) ASTM Method D396–10, Standard
Specification for Fuel Oils, including
Appendix X1, approved October 1,
2010, IBR approved for § 63.10042.
(5) ASTM D396–10, Standard
Specification for Fuel Oils, approved
October 1, 2010, IBR approved for
§§ 63.7575 and 63.11237.
(6) ASTM D523–89, Standard Test
Method for Specular Gloss, IBR
approved for § 63.782.
(7) ASTM D975–11b, Standard
Specification for Diesel Fuel Oils,
approved December 1, 2011, IBR
approved for § 63.7575.
(8) ASTM D1193–77, Standard
Specification for Reagent Water, IBR
approved for appendix A to part 63:
Method 306, Sections 7.1.1 and 7.4.2.
(9) ASTM D1193–91, Standard
Specification for Reagent Water, IBR
approved for appendix A to part 63:
Method 306, Sections 7.1.1 and 7.4.2.
(10) ASTM D1331–89, Standard Test
Methods for Surface and Interfacial
Tension of Solutions of Surface Active
Agents, IBR approved for appendix A to
part 63: Method 306B, Sections 6.2,
11.1, and 12.2.2.
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
(11) ASTM D1475–90, Standard Test
Method for Density of Paint, Varnish
Lacquer, and Related Products, IBR
approved for appendix A to subpart II.
(12) ASTM D1475–98 (Reapproved
2003), ‘‘Standard Test Method for
Density of Liquid Coatings, Inks, and
Related Products,’’ IBR approved for
§§ 63.3151(b), 63.3941(b) and (c),
63.3951(c), 63.4141(b) and (c), and
63.4551(c).
(13) ASTM Method D1835–05,
Standard Specification for Liquefied
Petroleum (LP) Gases, approved April 1,
2005, IBR approved for §§ 63.7575 and
63.11237.
(14) ASTM D1945–03 (Reapproved
2010), Standard Test Method for
Analysis of Natural Gas by Gas
Chromatography, (Approved January 1,
2010), IBR approved for §§ 63.772(h),
and 63.1282(g).
(15) ASTM D1946–77, Standard
Method for Analysis of Reformed Gas by
Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for
§ 63.11(b).
(16) ASTM D1946–90 (Reapproved
1994), Standard Method for Analysis of
Reformed Gas by Gas Chromatography,
IBR approved for § 63.11(b).
(17) ASTM D2013/D2013M–09,
Standard Practice for Preparing Coal
Samples for Analysis, (Approved
November 1, 2009), IBR approved for
table 6 to subpart DDDDD and table 5 to
subpart JJJJJJ.
(18) ASTM D2099–00, Standard Test
Method for Dynamic Water Resistance
of Shoe Upper Leather by the Maeser
Water Penetration Tester, IBR approved
for § 63.5350.
(19) ASTM D2216–05, Standard Test
Methods for Laboratory Determination
of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and
Rock by Mass, IBR approved for the
definition of ‘‘Free organic liquids’’ in
§ 63.10692.
(20) ASTM D2234/D2234M–10,
Standard Practice for Collection of a
Gross Sample of Coal, approved January
1, 2010, IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD and table 5 to subpart
JJJJJJ .
(21) ASTM D2369–93, Standard Test
Method for Volatile Content of Coatings,
IBR approved for appendix A to subpart
II.
(22) ASTM D2369–95, Standard Test
Method for Volatile Content of Coatings,
IBR approved for appendix A to subpart
II.
(23) ASTM D2382–76, Heat of
Combustion of Hydrocarbon Fuels by
Bomb Calorimeter (High-Precision
Method), IBR approved for § 63.11(b).
(24) ASTM D2382–88, Heat of
Combustion of Hydrocarbon Fuels by
Bomb Calorimeter (High-Precision
Method), IBR approved for § 63.11(b).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
(25) ASTM D2697–86 (Reapproved
1998), Standard Test Method for
Volume Nonvolatile Matter in Clear or
Pigmented Coatings, IBR approved for
§§ 63.3161(f), 63.3521(b), 63.3941(b),
63.4141(b), 63.4741(b), 63.4941(b), and
63.5160(c).
(26) ASTM D2879–83, Standard
Method for Vapor Pressure-Temperature
Relationship and Initial Decomposition
Temperature of Liquids by Isoteniscope,
IBR approved for §§ 63.111, 63.2406,
and 63.12005.
(27) ASTM D2879–96, Test Method
for Vapor Pressure-Temperature
Relationship and Initial Decomposition
Temperature of Liquids by Isoteniscope,
(Approved 1996), IBR approved for
§§ 63.111, 63.2406, and 63.12005.
(28) ASTM D3173–03 (Reapproved
2008), Standard Test Method for
Moisture in the Analysis Sample of Coal
and Coke, (Approved February 1, 2008),
IBR approved for table 6 to subpart
DDDDD and table 5 to subpart JJJJJJ.
(29) ASTM D3257–93, Standard Test
Methods for Aromatics in Mineral
Spirits by Gas Chromatography, IBR
approved for § 63.786(b).
(30) ASTM D3588–98 (Reapproved
2003), Standard Practice for Calculating
Heat Value, Compressibility Factor, and
Relative Density of Gaseous Fuels,
(Approved May 10, 2003), IBR approved
for §§ 63.772(h) and 63.1282(g).
(31) ASTM D3695–88, Standard Test
Method for Volatile Alcohols in Water
by Direct Aqueous-Injection Gas
Chromatography, IBR approved for
§ 63.365(e).
(32) ASTM D3792–91, Standard
Method for Water Content of WaterReducible Paints by Direct Injection into
a Gas Chromatograph, IBR approved for
appendix A to subpart II.
(33) ASTM D3912–80, Standard Test
Method for Chemical Resistance of
Coatings Used in Light-Water Nuclear
Power Plants, IBR approved for
§ 63.782.
(34) ASTM D4006–11, Standard Test
Method for Water in Crude Oil by
Distillation, including Annex A1 and
Appendix X1, (Approved June 1, 2011),
IBR approved for § 63.10005(i) and table
6 to subpart DDDDD.
(35) ASTM D4017–81, Standard Test
Method for Water in Paints and Paint
Materials by the Karl Fischer Titration
Method, IBR approved for appendix A
to subpart II.
(36) ASTM D4017–90, Standard Test
Method for Water in Paints and Paint
Materials by the Karl Fischer Titration
Method, IBR approved for appendix A
to subpart II.
(37) ASTM D4017–96a, Standard Test
Method for Water in Paints and Paint
Materials by the Karl Fischer Titration
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
11279
Method, IBR approved for appendix A
to subpart II.
(38) ASTM D4057–06 (Reapproved
2011), Standard Practice for Manual
Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum
Products, including Annex A1,
(Approved June 1, 2011), IBR approved
for § 63.10005(i) and table 6 to subpart
DDDDD.
(39) ASTM D4082–89, Standard Test
Method for Effects of Gamma Radiation
on Coatings for Use in Light-Water
Nuclear Power Plants, IBR approved for
§ 63.782.
(40) ASTM D4084–07, Standard Test
Method for Analysis of Hydrogen
Sulfide in Gaseous Fuels (Lead Acetate
Reaction Rate Method), (Approved June
1, 2007), IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
(41) ASTM D4177–95 (Reapproved
2010), Standard Practice for Automatic
Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum
Products, including Annexes A1
through A6 and Appendices X1 and X2,
(Approved May 1, 2010), IBR approved
for § 63.10005(i) and table 6 to subpart
DDDDD.
(42) ASTM D4208–02 (Reapproved
2007), Standard Test Method for Total
Chlorine in Coal by the Oxygen Bomb
Combustion/Ion Selective Electrode
Method, approved May 1, 2007, IBR
approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(43) ASTM D4256–89, Standard Test
Method for Determination of the
Decontaminability of Coatings Used in
Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants, IBR
approved for § 63.782.
(44) ASTM D4256–89 (Reapproved
94), Standard Test Method for
Determination of the Decontaminability
of Coatings Used in Light-Water Nuclear
Power Plants, IBR approved for
§ 63.782.
(45) ASTM D4606–03 (Reapproved
2007), Standard Test Method for
Determination of Arsenic and Selenium
in Coal by the Hydride Generation/
Atomic Absorption Method, (Approved
October 1, 2007), IBR approved for table
6 to subpart DDDDD.
(46) ASTM D4809–95, Standard Test
Method for Heat of Combustion of
Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb
Calorimeter (Precision Method), IBR
approved for § 63.11(b).
(47) ASTM D4891–89 (Reapproved
2006), Standard Test Method for
Heating Value of Gases in Natural Gas
Range by Stoichiometric Combustion,
(Approved June 1, 2006), IBR approved
for §§ 63.772(h) and 63.1282(g).
(48) ASTM D5066–91 (Reapproved
2001), Standard Test Method for
Determination of the Transfer Efficiency
Under Production Conditions for Spray
Application of Automotive Paints-
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
11280
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Weight Basis, IBR approved for
§ 63.3161(g).
(49) ASTM D5087–02, Standard Test
Method for Determining Amount of
Volatile Organic Compound (VOC)
Released from Solventborne Automotive
Coatings and Available for Removal in
a VOC Control Device (Abatement), IBR
approved for § 63.3165(e) and appendix
A to subpart IIII.
(50) ASTM D5192–09, Standard
Practice for Collection of Coal Samples
from Core, (Approved June 1, 2009), IBR
approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(51) ASTM D5198–09, Standard
Practice for Nitric Acid Digestion of
Solid Waste, (Approved February 1,
2009), IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD and table 5 to subpart
JJJJJJ.
(52) ASTM D5228–92, Standard Test
Method for Determination of Butane
Working Capacity of Activated Carbon,
(Reapproved 2005), IBR approved for
§ 63.11092(b).
(53) ASTM D5291–02, Standard Test
Methods for Instrumental Determination
of Carbon, Hydrogen, and Nitrogen in
Petroleum Products and Lubricants, IBR
approved for appendix A to subpart
MMMM.
(54) ASTM D5790–95, Standard Test
Method for Measurement of Purgeable
Organic Compounds in Water by
Capillary Column Gas Chromatography/
Mass Spectrometry, IBR approved for
Table 4 to subpart UUUU.
(55) ASTM D5864–11, Standard Test
Method for Determining Aerobic
Aquatic Biodegradation of Lubricants or
Their Components, (Approved March 1,
2011), IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
(56) ASTM D5865–10a, Standard Test
Method for Gross Calorific Value of Coal
and Coke, (Approved May 1, 2010), IBR
approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD
and table 5 to subpart JJJJJJ.
(57) ASTM D5954–98 (Reapproved
2006), Test Method for Mercury
Sampling and Measurement in Natural
Gas by Atomic Absorption
Spectroscopy, (Approved December 1,
2006), IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
(58) ASTM D5965–02, Standard Test
Methods for Specific Gravity of Coating
Powders, IBR approved for
§§ 63.3151(b) and 63.3951(c).
(59) ASTM D6053–00, Standard Test
Method for Determination of Volatile
Organic Compound (VOC) Content of
Electrical Insulating Varnishes, IBR
approved for appendix A to subpart
MMMM.
(60) ASTM D6093–97 (Reapproved
2003), Standard Test Method for Percent
Volume Nonvolatile Matter in Clear or
Pigmented Coatings Using a Helium Gas
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
Pycnometer, IBR approved for
§§ 63.3161, 63.3521, 63.3941, 63.4141,
63.4741(b), 63.4941(b), and 63.5160(c).
(61) ASTM D6266–00a, Test Method
for Determining the Amount of Volatile
Organic Compound (VOC) Released
from Waterborne Automotive Coatings
and Available for Removal in a VOC
Control Device (Abatement), IBR
approved for § 63.3165(e).
(62) ASTM D6323–98 (Reapproved
2003), Standard Guide for Laboratory
Subsampling of Media Related to Waste
Management Activities, (Approved
August 10, 2003), IBR approved for table
6 to subpart DDDDD and table 5 to
subpart JJJJJJ.
(63) ASTM D6348–03, Standard Test
Method for Determination of Gaseous
Compounds by Extractive Direct
Interface Fourier Transform Infrared
(FTIR) Spectroscopy, IBR approved for
§§ 63.457(b) and 63.1349, table 4 to
subpart DDDD, table 4 to subpart ZZZZ,
and table 8 to subpart HHHHHHH.
(64) ASTM D6348–03 (Reapproved
2010), Standard Test Method for
Determination of Gaseous Compounds
by Extractive Direct Interface Fourier
Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy,
including Annexes A1 through A8,
(Approved October 1, 2010), IBR
approved for tables 1, 2, and 5 to
subpart UUUUU and appendix B to
subpart UUUUU.
(65) ASTM D6350–98 (Reapproved
2003), Standard Test Method for
Mercury Sampling and Analysis in
Natural Gas by Atomic Fluorescence
Spectroscopy, (Approved May 10,
2003), IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
(66) ASTM D6357–11, Test Methods
for Determination of Trace Elements in
Coal, Coke, and Combustion Residues
from Coal Utilization Processes by
Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic
Emission Spectrometry, (Approved
April 1, 2011), IBR approved for table 6
to subpart DDDDD.
(67) ASTM D6420–99, Standard Test
Method for Determination of Gaseous
Organic Compounds by Direct Interface
Gas Chromatography-Mass
Spectrometry, IBR approved for
§§ 63.5799, 63.5850, and Table 4 of
Subpart UUUU.
(68) ASTM D6420–99 (Reapproved
2004), Standard Test Method for
Determination of Gaseous Organic
Compounds by Direct Interface Gas
Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry,
(Approved October 1, 2004), IBR
approved for §§ 63.457(b), 63.485(g),
60.485a(g), 63.772(a), 63.772(e),
63.1282(a) and (d), 63.2351(b), and
63.2354(b), and table 8 to subpart
HHHHHHH.
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(69) ASTM D6522–00, Standard Test
Method for Determination of Nitrogen
Oxides, Carbon Monoxide, and Oxygen
Concentrations in Emissions from
Natural Gas Fired Reciprocating
Engines, Combustion Turbines, Boilers,
and Process Heaters Using Portable
Analyzers, IBR approved for
§ 63.9307(c).
(70) ASTM D6522–00 (Reapproved
2005), Standard Test Method for
Determination of Nitrogen Oxides,
Carbon Monoxide, and Oxygen
Concentrations in Emissions from
Natural Gas Fired Reciprocating
Engines, Combustion Turbines, Boilers,
and Process Heaters Using Portable
Analyzers, (Approved October 1, 2005),
IBR approved for table 4 to subpart
ZZZZ, table 5 to subpart DDDDDD, table
4 to subpart JJJJJJ, and §§ 63.772(e) and
(h)) and 63.1282(d) and (g).
(71) ASTM D6721–01 (Reapproved
2006), Standard Test Method for
Determination of Chlorine in Coal by
Oxidative Hydrolysis Microcoulometry,
(Approved April 1, 2006), IBR approved
for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(72) ASTM D6722–01 (Reapproved
2006), Standard Test Method for Total
Mercury in Coal and Coal Combustion
Residues by the Direct Combustion
Analysis, (Approved April 1, 2006), IBR
approved for Table 6 to subpart DDDDD
and Table 5 to subpart JJJJJJ.
(73) ASTM D6751–11b, Standard
Specification for Biodiesel Fuel Blend
Stock (B100) for Middle Distillate Fuels,
(Approved July 15, 2011), IBR approved
for §§ 63.7575 and 63.11237.
(74) ASTM D6784–02 (Reapproved
2008), Standard Test Method for
Elemental, Oxidized, Particle-Bound
and Total Mercury in Flue Gas
Generated from Coal-Fired Stationary
Sources (Ontario Hydro Method),
(Approved April 1, 2008), IBR approved
for §§ 63.11646(a), 63.11647(a) and (d),
tables 1, 2, 5, 11, 12t, and 13 to subpart
DDDDD, table 4 to subpart JJJJJJ, table 5
to subpart UUUUU, and appendix A to
subpart UUUUU.
(75) ASTM D6883–04, Standard
Practice for Manual Sampling of
Stationary Coal from Railroad Cars,
Barges, Trucks, or Stockpiles,
(Approved June 1, 2004), IBR approved
for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(76) ASTM D7430–11ae1, Standard
Practice for Mechanical Sampling of
Coal, (Approved October 1, 2011), IBR
approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(77) ASTM E145–94 (Reapproved
2001), Standard Specification for
Gravity-Convection and ForcedVentilation Ovens, IBR approved for
appendix A to subpart PPPP.
(78) ASTM E180–93, Standard
Practice for Determining the Precision of
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
ASTM Methods for Analysis and
Testing of Industrial Chemicals, IBR
approved for § 63.786(b).
(79) ASTM E260–91, General Practice
for Packed Column Gas
Chromatography, IBR approved for
§§ 63.750(b) and 63.786(b).
(80) ASTM E260–96, General Practice
for Packed Column Gas
Chromatography, IBR approved for
§§ 63.750(b) and 63.786(b).
(81) ASTM E515–95 (Reapproved
2000), Standard Test Method for Leaks
Using Bubble Emission Techniques, IBR
approved for § 63.425(i).
(82) ASTM E711–87 (Reapproved
2004), Standard Test Method for Gross
Calorific Value of Refuse-Derived Fuel
by the Bomb Calorimeter, (Approved
August 28, 1987), IBR approved for table
6 to subpart DDDDD and table 5 to
subpart JJJJJJ.
(83) ASTM E776–87 (Reapproved
2009), Standard Test Method for Forms
of Chlorine in Refuse-Derived Fuel,
(Approved July 1, 2009), IBR approved
for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(84) ASTM E871–82 (Reapproved
2006), Standard Test Method for
Moisture Analysis of Particulate Wood
Fuels, (Approved November 1, 2006),
IBR approved for table 6 to subpart
DDDDD and table 5 to subpart JJJJJJ.
(h) Bay Area Air Quality Management
District (BAAQMD), 939 Ellis Street,
San Francisco, California 94109, https://
www.arb.ca.gov/DRDB/BA/CURHTML/
ST/st30.pdf.
(1) ‘‘BAAQMD Source Test Procedure
ST–30—Static Pressure Integrity Test,
Underground Storage Tanks,’’ adopted
November 30, 1983, and amended
December 21, 1994, IBR approved for
§ 63.11120(a).
(2) [Reserved]
(i) British Standards Institute, 389
Chiswick High Road, London W4 4AL,
United Kingdom.
(1) BS EN 1593:1999, Non-destructive
Testing: Leak Testing—Bubble Emission
Techniques, IBR approved for
§ 63.425(i).
(2) [Reserved]
(j) California Air Resources Board
(CARB), Engineering and Certification
Branch, 1001 I Street, P.O. Box 2815,
Sacramento, CA 95812–2815, Telephone
(916) 327–0900, https://www.arb.ca.gov/
vapor/vapor.htm.
(1) California Air Resources Board
Vapor Recovery Test Procedure TP–
201.1—‘‘Volumetric Efficiency for Phase
I Vapor Recovery Systems,’’ adopted
April 12, 1996, and amended February
1, 2001 and October 8, 2003, IBR
approved for § 63.11120(b).
(2) California Air Resources Board
Vapor Recovery Test Procedure TP–
201.1E—‘‘Leak Rate and Cracking
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
Pressure of Pressure/Vacuum Vent
Valves,’’ adopted October 8, 2003, IBR
approved for § 63.11120(a).
(3) California Air Resources Board
Vapor Recovery Test Procedure TP–
201.3—‘‘Determination of 2-Inch WC
Static Pressure Performance of Vapor
Recovery Systems of Dispensing
Facilities,’’ adopted April 12, 1996 and
amended March 17, 1999, IBR approved
for § 63.11120(a).
(k) Environmental Protection Agency.
Air and Radiation Docket and
Information Center, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460,
telephone number (202) 566–1745.
(1) California Regulatory
Requirements Applicable to the Air
Toxics Program, November 16, 2010,
IBR approved for § 63.99(a).
(2) New Jersey’s Toxic Catastrophe
Prevention Act Program, (July 20, 1998),
IBR approved for § 63.99(a).
(3) Delaware Department of Natural
Resources and Environmental Control,
Division of Air and Waste Management,
Accidental Release Prevention
Regulation, sections 1 through 5 and
sections 7 through 14, effective January
11, 1999, IBR approved for § 63.99(a).
(4) State of Delaware Regulations
Governing the Control of Air Pollution
(October 2000), IBR approved for
§ 63.99(a).
(5) Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection regulations at
310 CMR 7.26(10)–(16), Air Pollution
Control, effective as of September 5,
2008, corrected March 6, 2009, and 310
CMR 70.00, Environmental Results
Program Certification, effective as of
December 28, 2007. IBR approved for
§ 63.99(a).
(6)(i) New Hampshire Regulations
Applicable to Hazardous Air Pollutants,
March, 2003. IBR approved for
§ 63.99(a).
(ii) New Hampshire Regulations
Applicable to Hazardous Air Pollutants,
September 2006. IBR approved for
§ 63.99(a).
(7) Maine Department of
Environmental Protection regulations at
Chapter 125, Perchloroethylene Dry
Cleaner Regulation, effective as of June
2, 1991, last amended on June 24, 2009.
IBR approved for § 63.99(a).
(8) California South Coast Air Quality
Management District’s ‘‘Spray
Equipment Transfer Efficiency Test
Procedure for Equipment User, May 24,
1989,’’ IBR approved for §§ 63.11173(e)
and 63.11516(d).
(9) California South Coast Air Quality
Management District’s ‘‘Guidelines for
Demonstrating Equivalency with
District Approved Transfer Efficient
Spray Guns, September 26, 2002,’’
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
11281
Revision 0, IBR approved for
§§ 63.11173(e) and 63.11516(d).
(10) Rhode Island Department of
Environmental Management regulations
at Air Pollution Control Regulation No.
36, Control of Emissions from Organic
Solvent Cleaning, effective April 8,
1996, last amended October 9, 2008, IBR
approved for § 63.99(a).
(11) Rhode Island Air Pollution
Control, General Definitions Regulation,
effective July 19, 2007, last amended
October 9, 2008. IBR approved for
§ 63.99(a).
(12) Alaska Statute 42.45.045.
Renewable energy grant fund and
recommendation program, available at
https://www.legis.state.ak.us/basis/
folio.asp, IBR approved for § 63.6675.
(l) U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 272–
0167, https://www.epa.gov.
(1) EPA–453/R–01–005, National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) for Integrated Iron
and Steel Plants—Background
Information for Proposed Standards,
Final Report, January 2001, IBR
approved for § 63.7491(g).
(2) EPA–454/R–98–015, Office Of Air
Quality Planning And Standards
(OAQPS), Fabric Filter Bag Leak
Detection Guidance, September 1997,
IBR approved for §§ 63.548(e),
63.7525(j), and 63.11224(f).
(3) SW–846–3020A, Acid Digestion of
Aqueous Samples And Extracts For
Total Metals For Analysis By GFAA
Spectroscopy, Revision 1, July 1992, in
EPA Publication No. SW–846, Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods, Third
Edition, IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD and table 5 to subpart
JJJJJJ.
(4) SW–846–3050B, Acid Digestion of
Sediments, Sludges, and Soils, Revision
2, December 1996, in EPA Publication
No. SW–846, Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods, Third Edition, IBR
approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD
and table 5 to subpart JJJJJJ.
(5) SW–846–7470A, Mercury In
Liquid Waste (Manual Cold-Vapor
Technique), Revision 1, September
1994, in EPA Publication No. SW–846,
Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods,
Third Edition, IBR approved for table 6
to subpart DDDDD and table 5 to
subpart JJJJJJ.
(6) SW–846–7471B, Mercury In Solid
Or Semisolid Waste (Manual ColdVapor Technique), Revision 2, February
2007, in EPA Publication No. SW–846,
Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods,
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
11282
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Third Edition, IBR approved for table 6
to subpart DDDDD and table 5 to
subpart JJJJJJ.
(7) SW–846–8015C, Nonhalogenated
Organics by Gas Chromatography,
Revision 3, February 2007, in EPA
Publication No. SW–846, Test Methods
for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods, Third Edition, IBR
approved for §§ 63.11960, 63.11980, and
table 10 to subpart HHHHHHH.
(8) SW–846–8260B, Volatile Organic
Compounds by Gas Chromatography/
Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), Revision
2, December 1996, in EPA Publication
No. SW–846, Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods, Third Edition, IBR
approved for §§ 63.11960, 63.11980, and
table 10 to subpart HHHHHHH.
(9) SW–846–8270D, Semivolatile
Organic Compounds by Gas
Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
(GC/MS), Revision 4, February 2007, in
EPA Publication No. SW–846, Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods, Third
Edition, IBR approved for §§ 63.11960,
63.11980, and table 10 to subpart
HHHHHHH.
(10) SW–846–8315A, Determination
of Carbonyl Compounds by High
Performance Liquid Chromatography
(HPLC), Revision 1, December 1996, in
EPA Publication No. SW–846, Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods, Third
Edition, IBR approved for §§ 63.11960
and 63.11980, and table 10 to subpart
HHHHHHH.
(11) SW–846–5050, Bomb Preparation
Method for Solid Waste, Revision 0,
September 1994, in EPA Publication No.
SW–846, Test Methods for Evaluating
Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical
Methods, Third Edition IBR approved
for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(12) SW–846–6010C, Inductively
Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission
Spectrometry, Revision 3, February
2007, in EPA Publication No. SW–846,
Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods,
Third Edition, IBR approved for table 6
to subpart DDDDD.
(13) SW–846–6020A, Inductively
Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry,
Revision 1, February 2007, in EPA
Publication No. SW–846, Test Methods
for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods, Third Edition, IBR
approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(14) SW–846–7060A, Arsenic (Atomic
Absorption, Furnace Technique),
Revision 1, September 1994, in EPA
Publication No. SW–846, Test Methods
for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods, Third Edition, IBR
approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
(15) SW–846–7740, Selenium (Atomic
Absorption, Furnace Technique),
Revision 0, September 1986, in EPA
Publication No. SW–846, Test Methods
for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods, Third Edition, IBR
approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(16) SW–846–9056, Determination of
Inorganic Anions by Ion
Chromatography, Revision 1, February
2007, in EPA Publication No. SW–846,
Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods,
Third Edition, IBR approved for table 6
to subpart DDDDD.
(17) SW–846–9076, Test Method for
Total Chlorine in New and Used
Petroleum Products by Oxidative
Combustion and Microcoulometry,
Revision 0, September 1994, in EPA
Publication No. SW–846, Test Methods
for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods, Third Edition, IBR
approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(18) SW–846–9250, Chloride
(Colorimetric, Automated Ferricyanide
AAI), Revision 0, September 1986, in
EPA Publication No. SW–846, Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods, Third
Edition, IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
(19) Method 200.8, Determination of
Trace Elements in Waters and Wastes by
Inductively Coupled Plasma—Mass
Spectrometry, Revision 5.4, 1994, IBR
approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(20) Method 1631 Revision E,
Mercury in Water by Oxidation, Purge
and Trap, and Cold Vapor Atomic
Absorption Fluorescence Spectrometry,
Revision E, EPA–821–R–02–019, August
2002, IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
(m) International Standards
Organization (ISO), 1, ch. de la VoieCreuse, Case postale 56, CH–1211
Geneva 20, Switzerland, +41 22 749 01
11, https://www.iso.org/iso/home.htm.
(1) ISO 6978–1:2003(E), Natural Gas—
Determination of Mercury—Part 1:
Sampling of Mercury by Chemisorption
on Iodine, First edition, October 15,
2003, IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
(2) ISO 6978–2:2003(E), Natural gas—
Determination of Mercury—Part 2:
Sampling of Mercury by Amalgamation
on Gold/Platinum Alloy, First edition,
October 15, 2003, IBR approved for table
6 to subpart DDDDD.
(n) National Council of the Paper
Industry for Air and Stream
Improvement, Inc. (NCASI), P.O. Box
133318, Research Triangle Park, NC
27709–3318 or at https://www.ncasi.org.
(1) NCASI Method DI/MEOH–94.03,
Methanol in Process Liquids and
Wastewaters by GC/FID, Issued May
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
2000, IBR approved for §§ 63.457 and
63.459.
(2) NCASI Method CI/WP–98.01,
Chilled Impinger Method For Use At
Wood Products Mills to Measure
Formaldehyde, Methanol, and Phenol,
1998, Methods Manual, IBR approved
for table 4 to subpart DDDD.
(3) NCASI Method DI/HAPS–99.01,
Selected HAPs In Condensates by GC/
FID, Issued February 2000, IBR
approved for § 63.459(b).
(4) NCASI Method IM/CAN/WP–
99.02, Impinger/Canister Source
Sampling Method for Selected HAPs
and Other Compounds at Wood
Products Facilities, January 2004,
Methods Manual, IBR approved for table
4 to subpart DDDD.
(5) NCASI Method ISS/FP A105.01,
Impinger Source Sampling Method for
Selected Aldehydes, Ketones, and Polar
Compounds, December 2005, Methods
Manual, IBR approved for table 4 to
subpart DDDD.
(o) National Technical Information
Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road,
Springfield, VA 22161, (703) 605–6000
or (800) 553–6847; or for purchase from
the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.
Government Printing Office,
Washington, DC 20402, (202) 512–1800.
(1) Handbook 44, Specificiations,
Tolerances, and Other Technical
Requirements for Weighing and
Measuring Devices 1998, IBR approved
for § 63.1303(e).
(2) ‘‘Test Methods for Evaluating
Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical
Methods,’’ EPA Publication SW–846,
Third Edition. (A suffix of ‘‘A’’ in the
method number indicates revision one
(the method has been revised once). A
suffix of ‘‘B’’ in the method number
indicates revision two (the method has
been revised twice).
(i) Method 0023A, ‘‘Sampling Method
for Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins
and Polychlorinated Dibenzofuran
Emissions from Stationary Sources,’’
dated December 1996, IBR approved for
§ 63.1208(b).
(ii) Method 9071B, ‘‘n-Hexane
Extractable Material (HEM) for Sludge,
Sediment, and Solid Samples,’’ dated
April 1998, IBR approved for
§ 63.7824(e).
(iii) Method 9095A, ‘‘Paint Filter
Liquids Test,’’ dated December 1996,
IBR approved for §§ 63.7700(b) and
63.7765.
(iv) Method 9095B, ‘‘Paint Filter
Liquids Test,’’ (revision 2), dated
November 2004, IBR approved for the
definition of ‘‘Free organic liquids’’ in
§§ 63.10692, 63.10885(a), and the
definition of ‘‘Free liquids’’ in
§ 63.10906.
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
43. Amend § 63.144 by adding
paragraphs (b)(5)(i)(G) and (H) to read as
follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
■
§ 63.144 Process wastewater provisions—
test methods and procedures for
determining applicability and Group 1/
Group 2 determinations (determining which
wastewater streams require control).
*
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
*
20:52 Feb 26, 2014
Subpart N—[Amended]
44. Amend § 63.344 by adding
paragraph (c)(5) to read as follows:
■
§ 63.344 Performance test requirements
and test methods.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(5) The South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD)
Method 205.1 (which is available by
contacting the South Coast AQMD,
21865 Copley Dr, Diamond Bar, CA
91765) may be used to determine the
total chromium concentration from hard
and decorative chromium electroplating
tanks and chromium anodizing tanks.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart O—[Amended]
45. Amend § 63.364 by revising
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
■
§ 63.364
Jkt 232001
Monitoring requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Measure and record once per hour
the ethylene oxide concentration at the
outlet to the atmosphere after any
control device according to the
procedures specified in § 63.365(c)(1).
The owner or operator shall compute
and record a 24-hour average daily. The
owner or operator will install, calibrate,
operate, and maintain a monitor
consistent with the requirements of
performance specification (PS) 8 or 9 in
40 CFR part 60, appendix B, to measure
ethylene oxide. The daily calibration
requirements of section 7.2 of PS–9 or
Section 13.1 of PS–8 are required only
on days when ethylene oxide emissions
are vented to the control device.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 46. Amend § 63.365 by revising the
introductory text of paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
§ 63.365
Subpart G—[Amended]
*
(b) * * *
(5) * * *
(i) * * *
(G) Method 8260B. Use procedures
specified in Method 8260B in the SW–
846 Compendium of Methods.
(H) Method 316. Use Method 316 to
determine formaldehyde concentration.
*
*
*
*
*
Test methods and procedures.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Efficiency at the sterilization
chamber vent. California Air Resources
Board (CARB) Method 431 or the
following procedures shall be used to
determine the efficiency of all types of
control devices used to comply with
§ 63.362(c), sterilization chamber vent
standard.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Subpart Y—[Amended]
47. Amend § 63.565 by revising
paragraphs (d)(5), (8), and (10) and (g)
to read as follows:
■
§ 63.565
Test methods and procedures.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(5) Recovery devices. The average
VOC concentration in the vent upstream
and downstream of the control device
shall be determined using Method 25A
or 25B of appendix A–7 to part 60 of
this chapter for recovery devices. The
average VOC concentration shall
correspond to the volume measurement
by taking into account the sampling
system response time.
*
*
*
*
*
(8) Where Method 25, 25A, or 25B is
used to measure the percent reduction
in VOC, the percent reduction across the
combustion or recovery device shall be
calculated as follows:
Where:
R = control efficiency of control device,
percent.
Ei = mass flow rate of VOC at the inlet to the
combustion or recovery device as
calculated under paragraph (c)(7) of this
section, kg/hr.
Eo = mass flow rate of VOC at the outlet of
the combustion or recovery device, as
calculated under paragraph (c)(7) of this
section, kg/hr.
*
*
*
*
*
(10) Use of methods other than
Method 25, 25A, or 25B shall be
validated pursuant to Method 301 of
appendix A to part 63 of this chapter.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Baseline outlet VOC concentration.
The procedures in this paragraph shall
be used to determine the outlet VOC
concentration required in § 63.563(b)(4),
(6), (7), and (8) for combustion devices
except flare, carbon adsorbers,
condenser/refrigeration units, and
absorbers, respectively, and to monitor
the VOC concentration as required in
§ 63.564(e), (g), (h), and (i). The owner
or operator shall use the procedures
outlined in Method 25A or 25B. For the
baseline VOC concentration, the
arithmetic average of the outlet VOC
concentration from three test runs from
paragraph (d) of this section shall be
calculated for the control device. The
VOC concentration shall be measured at
least every 15 minutes. Compliance
testing of VOC CEMS shall be performed
using PS 8.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
ER27FE14.025
(v) SW–846 74741B, Revision 2,
‘‘Mercury in Solid or Semisolid Waste
(Manual Cold-Vapor Technique),’’
February 2007, IBR approved for
§ 63.11647(f).
(3) National Institute of Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH) test method
compendium, ‘‘NIOSH Manual of
Analytical Methods,’’ NIOSH
publication no. 94–113, Fourth Edition,
August 15, 1994.
(i) NIOSH Method 2010, ‘‘Amines,
Aliphatic,’’ Issue 2, August 15, 1994,
IBR approved for § 63.7732(g).
(ii) [Reserved]
(p) North American Electric
Reliability Corporation, 1325 G Street,
NW., Suite 600, Washington, DC 20005–
3801, https://www.nerc.com, https://
www.nerc.com/files/EOP0002-3_1.pdf.
(1) North American Electric
Reliability Corporation Reliability
Standard EOP–002–3, Capacity and
Energy Emergencies, adopted August 5,
2010, IBR approved for § 63.6640(f).
(2)[Reserved]
(q) Technical Association of the Pulp
and Paper Industry (TAPPI), 15
Technology Parkway South, Norcross,
GA 30092, (800) 332–8686, https://
www.tappi.org.
(1) TAPPI T 266, Determination of
Sodium, Calcium, Copper, Iron, and
Manganese in Pulp and Paper by
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
(Reaffirmation of T 266 om-02), Draft
No. 2, July 2006, IBR approved for table
6 to subpart DDDDD.
(2) [Reserved]
(r) Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Library,
Post Office Box 13087, Austin, Texas
78711–3087, telephone number (512)
239–0028, https://www.tceq.state.tx.us/
assets/public/implementation/air/sip/
sipdocs/2002-12-HGB/02046sipapp_
ado.pdf.
(1) ‘‘Air Stripping Method (Modified
El Paso Method) for Determination of
Volatile Organic Compound Emissions
from Water Sources,’’ Revision Number
One, dated January 2003, Sampling
Procedures Manual, Appendix P:
Cooling Tower Monitoring, January 31,
2003, IBR approved for §§ 63.654 and
63.11920.
(2) [Reserved]
11283
11284
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Subpart GG—[Amended]
48. Amend § 63.750 by revising
paragraph (o) to read as follows:
■
§ 63.750
Test methods and procedures.
*
*
*
*
*
(o) Inorganic HAP emissions—dry
particulate filter certification
requirements. Dry particulate filters
used to comply with § 63.745(g)(2) or
§ 63.746(b)(4) must be certified by the
filter manufacturer or distributor, paint/
depainting booth supplier, and/or the
facility owner or operator using method
319 in appendix A of this part, to meet
or exceed the efficiency data points
found in Tables 1 and 2, or 3 and 4 of
§ 63.745 for existing or new sources
respectively.
Subpart GGG—[Amended]
49. Amend § 63.1251 by revising the
definition of ‘‘Process vent’’ to read as
follows:
■
§ 63.1251
potential to be, released to the
atmosphere. Examples of process vents
include, but are not limited to, vents on
condensers used for product recovery,
bottom receivers, surge control vessels,
reactors, filters, centrifuges, and process
tanks. Emission streams that are
undiluted and uncontrolled containing
less than 50 ppmv HAP, as determined
through process knowledge that no HAP
are present in the emission stream or
using an engineering assessment as
discussed in § 63.1257(d)(2)(ii); test data
using Method 18 of 40 CFR part 60,
appendix A–6; Method 320 of 40 CFR
part 63; or any other test method that
has been validated according to the
procedures in Method 301 of appendix
A of this part, are not considered
process vents. Process vents do not
include vents on storage tanks regulated
under § 63.1253, vents on wastewater
emission sources regulated under
§ 63.1256, or pieces of equipment
regulated under § 63.1255.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(9) Method 26A for the concentration
of HCl. Where a lime-injected fabric
filter is used as the control device to
comply with the 90 percent reduction
standard, the owner or operator must
measure the fabric filter inlet
concentration of HCl at a point before
lime is introduced to the system.
Method 26 may be used in place of
Method 26A where it can be
demonstrated that there are no water
droplets in the emission stream. This
can be demonstrated by showing that
the vapor pressure of water in the
emission stream that you are testing is
less than the equilibrium vapor pressure
of water at the emission stream
temperature, and by certifying that the
emission stream is not controlled by a
wet scrubber.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart RRR—[Amended]
■
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Process vent means a vent from a unit
operation or vents from multiple unit
operations within a process that are
manifolded together into a common
header, through which a HAPcontaining gas stream is, or has the
50. Amend § 63.1511 by revising
paragraph (c)(9) as to read follows:
■
§ 63.1511 Performance test/compliance
demonstration general requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart CCCC—[Amended]
51. Revise Table 2 to subpart CCCC to
read as follows:
As stated in § 63.2161, if you
demonstrate compliance by monitoring
brew ethanol, you must comply with the
requirements for performance tests in
the following table:
TABLE 2 TO SUBPART CCCC OF PART 63—REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS
[Brew Ethanol Monitoring Only]
For each fed-batch fermenter for which compliance is determined by monitoring brew ethanol
concentration and calculating VOC concentration in the fermenter exhaust according to the
procedures in § 63.2161, you must . . .
1. Measure VOC as propane .............................
Using . . .
According to the following requirements . . .
Method 25A *, or an alternative validated by
EPA Method 301 * and approved by the Administrator.
You must measure the VOC concentration in
the fermenter exhaust at any point prior to
the dilution of the exhaust stream.
* EPA Test Methods found in Appendix A of 40 CFR part 60.
Subpart UUUU—[Amended]
52. Revise Table 4 to subpart UUUU
to read as follows:
■
As required in §§ 63.5530(b) and
63.5535(a), (b), (g)(1), and (h)(1), you
must conduct performance tests, other
initial compliance demonstrations, and
CEMS performance evaluations and
establish operating limits according to
the requirements in the following table:
TABLE 4 TO SUBPART UUUU OF PART 63—REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS
at . . .
1. the sum of all process vents.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
For . . .
a. each existing or
i. select sampling
new affected source.
port’s location and
the number of traverse points;
ii. determine velocity
and volumetric flow
rate;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
you must . . .
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00058
using . . .
Fmt 4701
according to the following requirements . . .
EPA Method 1 or 1A
in appendix A to 40
CFR § 63.7(d)(1)(i);
sampling sites must be located at the inlet
and outlet to each control device;
EPA Method 2, 2A,
2C, 2D, 2F, or 2G
in appendices A–1
and A–2 to part 60
of this chapter;
you may use EPA Method 2A, 2C, 2D, 2F,
or 2G as an alternative to using EPA
Method 2, as appropriate;
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
11285
TABLE 4 TO SUBPART UUUU OF PART 63—REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS—Continued
For . . .
at . . .
a. each existing or
new viscose process source.
using . . .
according to the following requirements . . .
iii. conduct gas analysis; and,
2. the sum of all viscose process vents.
you must . . .
(1) EPA Method 3,
3A, or 3B in appendix A–2 to part 60
of this chapter; or,
(2) ASME PTC 19.10–
1981—Part 10; and,
you may use EPA Method 3A or 3B as an
alternative to using EPA Method 3; or,
iv. measure moisture
content of the stack
gas.
i. measure total sulfide
emissions.
EPA Method 4 in appendix A–3 to part
60 of this chapter.
(1) EPA Method 15 in
appendix A–5 to
part 60 of this chapter; or
(2) carbon disulfide
and/or hydrogen
sulfide CEMS, as
applicable;
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
3. the sum of all solvent coating process vents.
a. each existing or
new cellophane operation.
i. measure toluene
emissions.
(1) EPA Method 18 in
appendix A–6 to
part 60 of this chapter, or Method 320
in appendix A to
part 63, or
you may use ASME PTC 19.10–1981—Part
10 (available for purchase from Three
Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016–5990)
as an alternative to using EPA Method 3B.
(a) you must conduct testing of emissions at
the inlet and outlet of each control device;
(b) you must conduct testing of emissions
from continuous viscose process vents
and combinations of batch and continuous
viscose process vents at normal operating
conditions, as specified in §§ 63.7(e)(1)
and 63.5535;
(c) you must conduct testing of emissions
from batch viscose process vents as specified in § 63.490(c), except that the emission reductions required for process vents
under this subpart supersede the emission
reductions required for process vents
under subpart U of this part; and
(d) you must collect CPMS data during the
period of the initial compliance demonstration and determine the CPMS operating
limit during the period of the initial compliance demonstration; or
(a) you must measure emissions at the inlet
and outlet of each control device using
CEMS;
(b) you must install, operate, and maintain
the CEMS according to the applicable performance specification (PS–7, PS–8, PS–
9, or PS–15) of 40 CFR part 60, appendix
B; and
(c) you must collect CEMS emissions data at
the inlet and outlet of each control device
during the period of the initial compliance
demonstration and determine the CEMS
operating limit during the period of the initial compliance demonstration.
(a) you must conduct testing of emissions at
the inlet and outlet of each control device;
(b) you may use EPA Method 18 or 320 to
determine the control efficiency of any
control device for organic compounds; for
a combustion device, you must use only
HAP that are present in the inlet to the
control device to characterize the percent
reduction across the combustion device;
(c) you must conduct testing of emissions
from continuous solvent coating process
vents and combinations of batch and continuous solvent coating process vents at
normal operating conditions, as specified
in §§ 63.7(e)(1) and 63.5535;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
11286
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 4 TO SUBPART UUUU OF PART 63—REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS—Continued
For . . .
at . . .
you must . . .
using . . .
(2) ASTM D6420–99 ..
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
4. the sum of all cellulose ether process
vents.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
a. each existing or
new cellulose ether
operation.
20:52 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
i. measure total organic HAP emissions.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4701
(1) EPA Method 18 in
appendix A–6 to
part 60 of this chapter or Method 320 in
appendix A to part
63, or
Sfmt 4700
according to the following requirements . . .
(d) you must conduct testing of emissions
from batch solvent coating process vents
as specified in § 63.490(c), except that the
emission reductions required for process
vents under this subpart supersede the
emission reductions required for process
vents under subpart U of this part; and
(e) you must collect CPMS data during the
period of the initial compliance demonstration and determine the CPMS operating
limit during the initial compliance demonstration; or
(a) you must conduct testing of emissions at
the inlet and outlet of each control device;
(b) you may use ASTM D6420–99 (available
for purchase from at least one of the following addresses: 100 Barr Harbor Drive,
West Conshohocken, PA 19428–2959; or
University Microfilms International, 300
North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106)
as an alternative to EPA Method 18 only
where: the target compound(s) are those
listed in Section 1.1 of ASTM D6420–99;
and the target concentration is between
150 parts per billion by volume (ppbv) and
100 ppmv; for target compound(s) not listed in Section 1.1 of ASTM D6420–99, but
potentially detected by mass spectrometry,
the additional system continuing calibration
check after each run, as detailed in Section 10.5.3 of the ASTM method, must be
followed, met, documented, and submitted
with the data report even if there is no
moisture condenser used or the compound
is not considered water soluble; and for
target compound(s) not listed in Section
1.1 of ASTM D6420–99 and not amenable
to detection by mass spectrometry, ASTM
D6420–99 does not apply;
(c) you must conduct testing of emissions
from continuous solvent coating process
vents and combinations of batch and continuous solvent coating process vents at
normal operating conditions, as specified
in §§ 63.7(e)(1) and 63.5535;
(d) you must conduct testing of emissions
from batch solvent coating process vents
as specified in § 63.490(c), except that the
emission reductions required for process
vents under this subpart supersede the
emission reductions required for process
vents under subpart U of this part; and,
(e) you must collect CPMS data during the
period of the initial compliance demonstration and determine the CPMS operating
limit during the period of the initial compliance demonstration.
(a) you must conduct testing of emissions at
the inlet and outlet of each control device;
(b) you may use EPA Method 18 or 320 to
determine the control efficiency of any
control device for organic compounds; for
a combustion device, you must use only
HAP that are present in the inlet to the
control device to characterize the percent
reduction across the combustion device;
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
11287
TABLE 4 TO SUBPART UUUU OF PART 63—REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS—Continued
For . . .
at . . .
you must . . .
using . . .
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
(2) ASTM D6420–99 ..
(3) EPA Method 25 in
appendix A–7 to
part 60 of this chapter; or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
according to the following requirements . . .
(c) you must conduct testing of emissions
from continuous cellulose ether process
vents and combinations of batch and continuous cellulose ether process vents at
normal operating conditions, as specified
in §§ 63.7(e)(1) and 63.5535;
(d) you must conduct testing of emissions
from batch cellulose ether process vents
as specified in § 63.490(c), except that the
emission reductions required for process
vents under this subpart supersede the
emission reductions required for process
vents under subpart U of this part; and
(e) you must collect CPMS data during the
period of the initial performance test and
determine the CPMS operating limit during
the period of the initial performance test;
(a) you must conduct testing of emissions at
the inlet and outlet of each control device;
(b) you may use ASTM D6420–99 (available
for purchase from at least one of the following addresses: 100 Barr Harbor Drive,
West Conshohocken, PA 19428–2959; or
University Microfilms International, 300
North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106)
as an alternative to EPA Method 18 only
where: the target compound(s) are those
listed in Section 1.1 of ASTM D6420–99;
and the target concentration is between
150 ppbv and 100 ppmv; for target compound(s) not listed in Section 1.1 of ASTM
D6420–99, but potentially detected by
mass spectrometry, the additional system
continuing calibration check after each run,
as detailed in Section 10.5.3 of the ASTM
method, must be followed, met, documented, and submitted with the data report even if there is no moisture condenser used or the compound is not considered water soluble; and for target compound(s) not listed in Section 1.1 of ASTM
D6420–99 and not amenable to detection
by mass spectrometry, ASTM D6420–99
does not apply; target concentration is between 150 ppbv and 100 ppmv for target
compound(s).
(c) you must conduct testing of emissions
from continuous cellulose ether process
vents and combinations of batch and continuous cellulose ether process vents at
normal operating conditions, as specified
in §§ 63.7(e)(1) and 63.5535;
(d) you must conduct testing of emissions
from batch cellulose ether process vents
as specified in § 63.490(c), except that the
emission reductions required for process
vents under this subpart supersede the
emission reductions required for process
vents under subpart U of this part; and
(e) you must collect CPMS data during the
period of the initial performance test and
determine the CPMS operating limit during
the period of the initial performance test.
(a) you must conduct testing of emissions at
the inlet and outlet of each control device;
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
11288
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 4 TO SUBPART UUUU OF PART 63—REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS—Continued
For . . .
at . . .
you must . . .
using . . .
(4) EPA Method 25A
in appendix A–7 to
part 60 of this chapter
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
5. each toluene storage vessel.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
a. each existing or
new cellophane operation.
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
i. measure toluene
emissions.
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4701
(1) EPA Method 18 in
appendix A–6 to
part 60 of this chapter or Method 320 in
appendix A to part
63; or
Sfmt 4700
according to the following requirements . . .
(b) you may use EPA Method 25 to determine the control efficiency of combustion
devices for organic compounds; you may
not use EPA Method 25 to determine the
control efficiency of noncombustion control
devices;
(c) you must conduct testing of emissions
from continuous cellulose ether process
vents and combinations of batch and continuous cellulose ether process vents at
normal operating conditions, as specified
in §§ 63.7(e)(1) and 63.5535;
(d) you must conduct testing of emissions
from batch cellulose ether process vents
as specified in § 63.490(c), except that the
emission reductions required for process
vents under this subpart supersede the
emission reductions required for process
vents under subpart U of this part; and
(e) you must collect CPMS data during the
period of the initial performance test and
determine the CPMS operating limit during
the period of the initial performance test;
or
(a) you must conduct testing of emissions at
the inlet and outlet of each control device;
(b) you may use EPA Method 25A if: an exhaust gas volatile organic matter concentration of 50 ppmv or less is required in
order to comply with the emission limit; the
volatile organic matter concentration at the
inlet to the control device and the required
level of control are such as to result in exhaust volatile organic matter concentrations of 50 ppmv or less; or because of
the high control efficiency of the control
device, the anticipated volatile organic
matter concentration at the control device
exhaust is 50 ppmv or less, regardless of
the inlet concentration;
(c) you must conduct testing of emissions
from continuous cellulose ether process
vents and combinations of batch and continuous cellulose ether process vents at
normal operating conditions, as specified
in §§ 63.7(e)(1) and 63.5535;
(d) you must conduct testing of emissions
from batch cellulose ether process vents
as specified in § 63.490(c), except that the
emission reductions required for process
vents under this subpart supersede the
emission reductions required for process
vents under subpart U of this part; and,
(e) you must collect CPMS data during the
period of the initial performance test and
determine the CPMS operating limit during
the period of the initial performance test.
(a) if venting to a control device to reduce
emissions, you must conduct testing of
emissions at the inlet and outlet of each
control device;
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
11289
TABLE 4 TO SUBPART UUUU OF PART 63—REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS—Continued
For . . .
at . . .
you must . . .
using . . .
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
(2) ASTM D6420–99 ..
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
according to the following requirements . . .
(b) you may use EPA Method 18 or 320 to
determine the control efficiency of any
control device for organic compounds; for
a combustion device, you must use only
HAP that are present in the inlet to the
control device to characterize the percent
reduction across the combustion device;
(c) you must conduct testing of emissions
from continuous storage vessel vents and
combinations of batch and continuous
storage vessel vents at normal operating
conditions, as specified in §§ 63.7(e)(1)
and 63.5535 for continuous process vents;
(d) you must conduct testing of emissions
from batch storage vessel vents as specified in § 63.490(c) for batch process vents,
except that the emission reductions required for process vents under this subpart
supersede the emission reductions required for process vents under subpart U
of this part; and,
(e) you must collect CPMS data during the
period of the initial compliance demonstration and determine the CPMS operating
limit during the period of the initial compliance demonstration; or
(a) if venting to a control device to reduce
emissions, you must conduct testing of
emissions at the inlet and outlet of each
control device;
(b) you may use ASTM D6420–99 (available
for purchase from at least one of the following addresses: 100 Barr Harbor Drive,
West Conshohocken, PA 19428–2959; or
University Microfilms International, 300
North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106)
as an alternative to EPA Method 18 only
where: the target compound(s) are those
listed in Section 1.1 of ASTM D6420–99,
and the target concentration is between
150 ppbv and 100 ppmv; for target compound(s) not listed in Section 1.1 of ASTM
D6420–99, but potentially detected by
mass spectrometry, the additional system
continuing calibration check after each run,
as detailed in Section 10.5.3 of the ASTM
method, must be followed, met, documented, and submitted with the data report even if there is no moisture condenser used or the compound is not considered water soluble; and for target compound(s) not listed in Section 1.1 of ASTM
D6420–99 and not amenable to detection
by mass spectrometry, ASTM D6420–99
does not apply;
(c) you must conduct testing of emissions
from continuous storage vessel vents and
combinations of batch and continuous
storage vessel vents at normal operating
conditions, as specified in §§ 63.7(e)(1)
and 63.5535 for continuous process vents;
(d) you must conduct testing of emissions
from batch storage vessel vents as specified in § 63.490(c) for batch process vents,
except that the emission reductions required for process vents under this subpart
supersede the emission reductions required for process vents under subpart U
of this part; and,
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
11290
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 4 TO SUBPART UUUU OF PART 63—REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS—Continued
For . . .
at . . .
you must . . .
using . . .
6. the sum of all process vents controlled
using a flare.
a. each existing or
i. measure visible
new affected source.
emissions.
7. equipment leaks ....
a. each existing or
new cellulose ether
operation.
8. all sources of
wastewater emissions.
9. any emission point
a. each existing or
new cellulose ether
operation.
a. each existing or
new affected source
using a CEMS to
demonstrate compliance.
Subpart ZZZZ—[Amended]
53. Revise Table 4 to subpart ZZZZ to
read as follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:52 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
i. measure leak rate ...
i. measure wastewater
HAP emissions.
i. conduct a CEMS
performance evaluation.
(1) EPA Method 22 in
appendix A–7 to
part 60 of this chapter.
(1) applicable equipment leak test
methods in
§ 63.180; or
(2) applicable equipment leak test
methods in
§ 63.1023
(1) applicable wastewater test methods
and procedures in
§§ 63.144 and
63.145; or
(2) applicable wastewater test methods
and procedures in
§§ 63.144 and
63.145, using ASTM
D5790–95 as an alternative to EPA
Method 624 in appendix A to part 163
of this chapter.
(1) applicable requirements in § 63.8 and
applicable performance specification
(PS–7, PS–8, PS–9,
or PS–15) in appendix B to part 60 of
this chapter.
As stated in §§ 63.6610, 63.6611,
63.6620, and 63.6640, you must comply
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
according to the following requirements . . .
(e) you must collect CPMS data during the
period of the initial compliance demonstration and determine the CPMS operating
limit during the period of the initial compliance demonstration.
(a) you must conduct the flare visible emissions test according to § 63.11(b).
(a) you must follow all requirements for the
applicable equipment leak test methods in
§ 63.180; or
(a) you must follow all requirements for the
applicable equipment leak test methods in
§ 63.1023.
(a) You must follow all requirements for the
applicable wastewater test methods and
procedures in §§ 63.144 and 63.145; or
(a) you must follow all requirements for the
applicable waste water test methods and
procedures in §§ 63.144 and 63.145, except that you may use ASTM D5790–95
(available for purchase from at least one
of the following addresses: 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA
19428–2959; or University Microfilms International, 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann
Arbor, MI 48106) as an alternative to EPA
Method 624, under the condition that this
ASTM method be used with the sampling
procedures of EPA Method 25D or an
equivalent method.
(a) you must conduct the CEMS performance evaluation during the period of the
initial compliance demonstration according
to the applicable requirements in § 63.8
and the applicable performance specification (PS–7, PS–8, PS–9, or PS–15) of 40
CFR part 60, appendix B;
(b) you must install, operate, and maintain
the CEMS according to the applicable performance specification (PS–7, PS–8, PS–
9, or PS–15) of 40 CFR part 60, appendix
B; and
(c) you must collect CEMS emissions data at
the inlet and outlet of each control device
during the period of the initial compliance
demonstration and determine the CEMS
operating limit during the period of the initial compliance demonstration.
with the following requirements for
performance tests for stationary RICE:
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
11291
TABLE 4 TO SUBPART ZZZZ OF PART 63—REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS
For each . . .
Complying with the
requirement to . . .
You must . . .
Using . . .
According to the
following requirements . . .
1. 2SLB, 4SLB, and
CI stationary RICE.
a. reduce CO emissions.
i. Select the sampling
port location and
the number/location
of traverse points at
the inlet and outlet
of the control device; and
....................................
ii. Measure the O2 at
the inlet and outlet
of the control device; and
(1) Method 3 or 3A or
3B of 40 CFR part
60, appendix A–2,
or ASTM Method
D6522–00 (Reapproved 2005)a c
(heated probe not
necessary).
(1) ASTM D6522–00
(Reapproved
2005)a b c (heated
probe not necessary) or Method
10 of 40 CFR part
60, appendix A–4.
....................................
(a) For CO and O2 measurement, ducts ≤6
inches in diameter may be sampled at a
single point located at the duct centroid
and ducts >6 and ≤12 inches in diameter
may be sampled at 3 traverse points located at 16.7, 50.0, and 83.3% of the
measurement line (‘3-point long line’). If
the duct is >12 inches in diameter and the
sampling port location meets the two and
half-diameter criterion of Section 11.1.1 of
Method 1 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A–
1, the duct may be sampled at ‘3-point
long line’; otherwise, conduct the stratification testing and select sampling points according to Section 8.1.2 of Method 7E of
40 CFR part 60, appendix A–4.
(b) Measurements to determine O2 must be
made at the same time as the measurements for CO concentration.
iii. Measure the CO at
the inlet and the
outlet of the control
device.
2. 4SRB stationary
RICE.
a. reduce formaldehyde emissions.
i. Select the sampling
port location and
the number/location
of traverse points at
the inlet and outlet
of the control device; and
ii. Measure O2 at the
inlet and outlet of
the control device;
and
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
iii. Measure moisture
content at the inlet
and outlet of the
control device; and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4701
(1) Method 3 or 3A or
3B of 40 CFR part
60, appendix A–2,
or ASTM Method
D6522–00 (Reapproved 2005) a
(heated probe not
necessary).
(1) Method 4 of 40
CFR part 60, appendix A–3, or
Method 320 of 40
CFR part 63, appendix A, or ASTM
D 6348–03 a.
Sfmt 4700
(c) The CO concentration must be at 15 percent O2, dry basis.
(a) For formaldehyde, O2, and moisture
measurement, ducts ≤6 inches in diameter
may be sampled at a single point located
at the duct centroid and ducts >6 and ≤12
inches in diameter may be sampled at 3
traverse points located at 16.7, 50.0, and
83.3% of the measurement line (‘3-point
long line’). If the duct is >12 inches in diameter and the sampling port location
meets the two and half-diameter criterion
of Section 11.1.1 of Method 1 of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A, the duct may be sampled at ‘3-point long line’; otherwise, conduct the stratification testing and select
sampling points according to Section 8.1.2
of Method 7E of 40 CFR part 60, appendix
A.
(a) Measurements to determine O2 concentration must be made at the same time
as the measurements for formaldehyde or
THC concentration.
(a) Measurements to determine moisture
content must be made at the same time
and location as the measurements for
formaldehyde or THC concentration.
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
11292
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 4 TO SUBPART ZZZZ OF PART 63—REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS—Continued
Complying with the
requirement to . . .
For each . . .
According to the
following requirements . . .
a. limit the concentration of formaldehyde or CO in the
stationary RICE exhaust.
Using . . .
iv. If demonstrating
compliance with the
formaldehyde percent reduction requirement, measure
formalde-hyde at
the inlet and the
outlet of the control
device.
3. Stationary RICE .....
You must . . .
(1) Method 320 or 323 (a) Formaldehyde concentration must be at
15 percent O2, dry basis. Results of this
of 40 CFR part 63,
test consist of the average of the three 1appendix A; or
hour or longer runs.
ASTM D6348–03 a,
provided in ASTM
D6348–03 Annex
A5 (Analyte Spiking
Technique), the percent R must be
greater than or
equal to 70 and less
than or equal to 130.
(1) Method 25A, re(a) THC concentration must be at 15 percent
ported as propane,
O2, dry basis. Results of this test consist
of 40 CFR part 60,
of the average of the three 1-hour or
appendix A–7.
longer runs.
v. If demonstrating
compliance with the
THC percent reduction requirement,
measure THC at the
inlet and the outlet
of the control device.
i. Select the sampling
port location and
the number/location
of traverse points at
the exhaust of the
stationary RICE;
and
ii. Determine the O2
concentration of the
stationary RICE exhaust at the sampling port location;
and
iii. Measure moisture
content of the station-ary RICE exhaust at the sampling port location;
and
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
iv. Measure formaldehyde at the exhaust
of the station-ary
RICE; or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4701
....................................
(a) For formaldehyde, CO, O2, and moisture
measurement, ducts ≤6 inches in diameter
may be sampled at a single point located
at the duct centroid and ducts >6 and ≤12
inches in diameter may be sampled at 3
traverse points located at 16.7, 50.0, and
83.3% of the measurement line (‘3-point
long line’). If the duct is >12 inches in diameter and the sampling port location
meets the two and half-diameter criterion
of Section 11.1.1 of Method 1 of 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A, the duct may be sampled at ‘3-point long line’; otherwise, conduct the stratification testing and select
sampling points according to Section 8.1.2
of Method 7E of 40 CFR part 60, appendix
A. If using a control device, the sampling
site must be located at the outlet of the
control device.
(a) Measurements to determine O2 concentration must be made at the same time
and location as the measurements for
formaldehyde or CO concentration.
(1) Method 3 or 3A or
3B of 40 CFR part
60, appendix A–2,
or ASTM Method
D6522–00 (Reapproved 2005) a
(heated probe not
necessary).
(1) Method 4 of 40
(a) Measurements to determine moisture
CFR part 60, apcontent must be made at the same time
pendix A–3, or
and location as the measurements for
Method 320 of 40
formaldehyde or CO concentration.
CFR part 63, appendix A, or ASTM
D 6348–03 a.
(1) Method 320 or 323 (a) Formaldehyde concentration must be at
of 40 CFR part 63,
15 percent O2, dry basis. Results of this
appendix A; or
test consist of the average of the three 1ASTM D6348–03 a,
hour or longer runs.
provided in ASTM
D6348–03 Annex
A5 (Analyte Spiking
Technique), the percent R must be
greater than or
equal to 70 and less
than or equal to 130.
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
11293
TABLE 4 TO SUBPART ZZZZ OF PART 63—REQUIREMENTS FOR PERFORMANCE TESTS—Continued
Complying with the
requirement to . . .
You must . . .
Using . . .
According to the
following requirements . . .
v. measure CO at the
exhaust of the station-ary RICE.
For each . . .
(1) Method 10 of 40
CFR part 60, appendix A–4, ASTM
Method D6522–00
(2005) a c, Method
320 of 40 CFR part
63, appendix A, or
ASTM D6348–03 a.
(a) CO concentration must be at 15 percent
O2, dry basis. Results of this test consist
of the average of the three 1-hour or
longer runs.
a You may also use Methods 3A and 10 as options to ASTM–D6522–00 (2005). You may obtain a copy of ASTM–D6522–00 (2005) from at
least one of the following addresses: American Society for Testing and Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428–2959,
or University Microfilms International, 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.
b You may obtain a copy of ASTM–D6348–03 from at least one of the following addresses: American Society for Testing and Materials, 100
Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428–2959, or University Microfilms International, 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.
54. Amend appendix A to part 63 to
read as follows:
■ a. By revising Method 306, sections
2.2.1 and 6.1.4, and the Note to section
8.0.
■ b. By revising Method 306A, section
8.2.
■ c. By revising Method 308, section
10.1.3.
■ d. By amending Method 315 as
follows:
■ i. By revising section 6.1.1.
■ ii. By redesignating section 8.11 as
section 8.1.
■ iii. By revising newly designated
section 8.1.
■ iv. By revising section 10.5.
■ e. By revising Method 316, section
10.5.
■ f. By revising Method 321, the
definition for the term ‘‘Df’’ in section
9.3.1.
■
Appendix A to Part 63—Test Methods
Pollutant Measurement Methods From
Various Waste Media
*
*
*
*
*
Method 306—Determination of Chromium
Emissions From Decorative and Hard
Chromium Electroplating and Chromium
Anodizing Operations—Isokinetic Method
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
2.2.1 Total chromium samples with high
chromium concentrations (≥35 mg/L) may be
analyzed using inductively coupled plasma
emission spectrometry (ICP) at 267.72 nm.
Note: The ICP analysis is applicable for this
method only when the solution analyzed has
a Cr concentration greater than or equal to 35
mg/L or five times the method detection limit
as determined according to appendix B in 40
CFR part 136. Similarly, inductively coupled
plasma-mass spectroscopy (ICP–MS) may be
used for total chromium analysis provided
the procedures for ICP–MS analysis
described in Method 6020 or 6020A (EPA
Office of Solid Waste, publication SW–846)
are followed.
*
*
*
*
*
6.1.4 Operating and maintenance
procedures for the sampling train are
described in APTD–0576 of Method 5. Users
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
should read the APTD–0576 document and
adopt the outlined procedures. Alternative
mercury-free thermometers may be used if
the thermometers are, at a minimum,
equivalent in terms of performance or
suitably effective for the specific temperature
measurement application.
10.1.3 Temperature Sensors. Calibrate
against mercury-in-glass thermometers. An
alternative mercury-free thermometer may be
used if the thermometer is, at a minimum,
equivalent in terms of performance or
suitably effective for the specific temperature
measurement application.
*
*
*
*
*
*
8.0 Sample Collection, Preservation,
Holding Times, Storage, and Transport
Note: Prior to sample collection,
consideration should be given to the type of
analysis (Cr+6 or total Cr) that will be
performed. Which analysis option(s) will be
performed will determine which sample
recovery and storage procedures will be
required to process the sample.
*
*
*
*
*
Method 306A—Determination of Chromium
Emissions From Decorative and Hard
Chromium Electroplating and Chromium
Anodizing Operations
*
*
*
*
*
8.2 Sample Recovery. After the train has
been transferred to the sample recovery area,
disconnect the tubing that connects the jar/
impingers. The tester shall select either the
total Cr or Cr+6 sample recovery option.
Samples to be analyzed for both total Cr and
Cr+6 shall be recovered using the Cr+6 sample
option (Section 8.2.2). Note: Collect a reagent
blank sample for each of the total Cr or the
Cr+6 analytical options. If both analyses (Cr
and Cr+6) are to be conducted on the samples,
collect separate reagent blanks for each
analysis. Also, since particulate matter is not
usually present at chromium electroplating
and/or chromium anodizing operations, it is
not necessary to filter the Cr+6 samples
unless there is observed sediment in the
collected solutions. If it is necessary to filter
the Cr+6 solutions, please refer to Method
0061, Determination of Hexavalent
Chromium Emissions from Stationary
Sources, Section 7.4, Sample Preparation in
SW–846 (see Reference 1).
*
*
*
*
Method 315—Determination of Particulate
and Methylene Chloride Extractable Matter
(MCEM) From Selected Sources at Primary
Aluminum Production Facilities
*
*
*
*
*
6.1.1 Sampling train. A schematic of the
sampling train used in this method is shown
in Figure 5–1, Method 5, 40 CFR part 60,
appendix A–3. Complete construction details
are given in APTD–0581 (Reference 2 in
section 17.0 of this method); commercial
models of this train are also available. For
changes from APTD–0581 and for allowable
modifications of the train shown in Figure 5–
1, Method 5, 40 CFR part 60, appendix A–
3, see the following subsections. Note: The
operating and maintenance procedures for
the sampling train are described in APTD–
0576 (Reference 3 in section 17.0 of this
method). Since correct usage is important in
obtaining valid results, all users should read
APTD–0576 and adopt the operating and
maintenance procedures outlined in it,
unless otherwise specified herein.
Alternative mercury-free thermometers may
be used if the thermometers are, at a
minimum, equivalent in terms of
performance or suitably effective for the
specific temperature measurement
application. The use of grease for sealing
sampling train components is not
recommended because many greases are
soluble in methylene chloride. The sampling
train consists of the following components:
*
*
*
*
*
Method 308—Procedure for Determination
of Methanol Emission From Stationary
Sources
8.1 Pretest preparation. It is suggested
that sampling equipment be maintained
according to the procedures described in
APTD–0576. Alternative mercury-free
thermometers may be used if the
thermometers are at a minimum equivalent
in terms of performance or suitably effective
for the specific temperature measurement
application.
*
*
*
PO 00000
*
*
*
*
Frm 00067
*
*
Fmt 4701
*
*
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
*
*
27FER2
*
*
11294
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
10.5 Temperature sensors. Use the
procedure in Section 10.3 of Method 2, 40
CFR part 60, appendix A–1 to calibrate instack temperature sensors. Dial
thermometers, such as are used for the DGM
and condenser outlet, shall be calibrated
against mercury-in-glass thermometers. An
alternative mercury-free thermometer may be
used if the thermometer is, at a minimum,
equivalent in terms of performance or
suitably effective for the specific temperature
measurement application.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
*
19:11 Feb 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
Method 316—Sampling and Analysis for
Formaldehyde Emissions From Stationary
Sources in the Mineral Wool and Wool
Fiberglass Industries
*
*
*
*
*
10.5 Temperature gauges: Use the
procedure in Section 4.3 of EPA Method 2 to
calibrate in-stack temperature gauges. Dial
thermometers, such as are used for the dry
gas meter and condenser outlet, shall be
calibrated against mercury-in-glass
thermometers. An alternative mercury-free
thermometer may be used if the thermometer
is, at a minimum, equivalent in terms of
performance or suitably effective for the
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
specific temperature measurement
application.
*
*
*
*
*
Test Method 321—Measurement of Gaseous
Hydrogen Chloride Emissions at Portland
Cement Kilns by Fourier Transform Infrared
(FTIR) Spectroscopy
*
*
*
*
*
9.3.1 * * *
DF = Dilution Factor (Total flow/Spike flow).
Total flow = spike flow plus effluent
flow.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–02704 Filed 2–26–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\27FER2.SGM
27FER2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11227-11294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02704]
[[Page 11227]]
Vol. 79
Thursday,
No. 39
February 27, 2014
Part III
Environmental Protection Agency
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
40 CFR Parts 51, 60, 61, et al.
Revisions to Test Methods and Testing Regulations; Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 79 , No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 11228]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 51, 60, 61, and 63
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0114; FRL-9906-23-OAR]
RIN 2060-AQ01
Revisions to Test Methods and Testing Regulations
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action promulgates technical and editorial corrections
for source testing of emissions and operations. Some current testing
provisions contain inaccuracies and outdated procedures, and new
alternatives that have been approved are being added. These revisions
will improve the quality of data and will give testers additional
flexibility to use the newly approved alternative procedures.
DATES: This final rule is effective on February 27, 2014. The
incorporation by reference materials listed in the rule are approved by
the Director of the Federal Register as of February 27, 2014.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0114. All documents in the docket are
listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential
business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically at www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
at the Air Docket, EPA/DC, William Jefferson Clinton (WJC) Building,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. The Docket
Facility and the Public Reading Room are open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone
number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-1742.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Lula Melton, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air
Quality Assessment Division, Measurement Technology Group (E143-02),
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number: (919)
541-2910; fax number: (919) 541-0516; email address:
melton.lula@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
B. Where can I obtain a copy of this action?
C. Judicial Review
II. Background
III. Summary of Amendments
A. Appendix M of Part 51
B. Method 201A of Appendix M of Part 51
C. Method 202 of Appendix M of Part 51
D. General Provisions (Subpart A) Part 60
E. Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units
(Subpart Db) Part 60
F. Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators (Subpart Ec)
Part 60
G. Sulfuric Acid Plants (Subpart H) Part 60
H. Sewage Treatment Plants (Subpart O) Part 60
I. Kraft Pulp Mills (Subpart BB) Part 60
J. Stationary Gas Turbines (Subpart GG) Part 60
K. Lead-Acid Battery Manufacturing Plants (Subpart KK) Part 60
L. Metallic Mineral Processing Plants (Subpart LL) Part 60
M. Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacture (Subpart
UU) Part 60
N. Volatile Organic Chemical (VOC) Emissions From Synthetic
Organic Compound Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI) Distillation
Operations (Subpart NNN) Part 60
O. Stationary Compression Ignition Internal Combustion Engines
(Subpart IIII) Part 60
P. Stationary Spark Ignition Internal Combustion Engines
(Subpart JJJJ) Part 60
Q. Method 1 of Appendix A-1 of Part 60
R. Method 2 of Appendix A-1 of Part 60
S. Method 2A of Appendix A-1 of Part 60
T. Method 2B of Appendix A-1 of Part 60
U. Method 2D of Appendix A-1 of Part 60
V. Method 3A of Appendix A-2 of Part 60
W. Method 3C of Appendix A-2 of Part 60
X. Method 4 of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
Y. Method 5 of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
Z. Method 5A of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
AA. Method 5E of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
BB. Method 5H of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
CC. Method 6 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
DD. Method 6C of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
EE. Method 7 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
FF. Method 7A of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
GG. Method 7E of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
HH. Method 8 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
II. Method 10 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
JJ. Methods 10A and 10B of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
KK. Method 11 of Appendix A-5 of Part 60
LL. Method 12 of Appendix A-5 of Part 60
MM. Method 14A of Appendix A-5 of Part 60
NN. Method 16A of Appendix A-6 of Part 60
OO. Method 16C of Appendix A-6 of Part 60
PP. Method 18 of Appendix A-6 of Part 60
QQ. Method 23 of Appendix A-7 of Part 60
RR. Method 24 of Appendix A-7 of Part 60
SS. Method 25 of Appendix A-7 of Part 60
TT. Method 25C of Appendix A-7 of Part 60
UU. Method 25D of Appendix A-7 of Part 60
VV. Method 26 of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
WW. Method 26A of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
XX. Method 29 of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
YY. Method 30B of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
ZZ. Performance Specification 3 of Appendix B of Part 60
AAA. Performance Specification 4 of Appendix B of Part 60
BBB. Performance Specification 4B of Appendix B of Part 60
CCC. Performance Specification 7 of Appendix B of Part 60
DDD. Performance Specification 11 of Appendix B of Part 60
EEE. Performance Specification 12B of Appendix B of Part 60
FFF. Performance Specification 15 of Appendix B of Part 60
GGG. Performance Specification 16 of Appendix B of Part 60
HHH. Procedure 1 of Appendix F of Part 60
III. Procedure 2 of Appendix F of Part 60
JJJ. Procedure 5 of Appendix F of Part 60
KKK. General Provisions (Subpart A) Part 61
LLL. Beryllium (Subpart C) Part 61
MMM. Beryllium Rocket Motor Firing (Subpart D) Part 61
NNN. Mercury (Subpart E) Part 61
OOO. Inorganic Arsenic Emissions From Glass Manufacturing Plants
(Subpart N) Part 61
PPP. Method 101 of Appendix B of Part 61
QQQ. Method 101A of Appendix B of Part 61
RRR. Method 102 of Appendix B of Part 61
SSS. Method 104 of Appendix B of Part 61
TTT. Methods 108 and 108A of Appendix B of Part 61
UUU. General Provisions (Subpart A) Part 63
VVV. Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (Subpart
G) Part 63
WWW. Chromium Emissions From Hard and Decorative Chromium
Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks (Subpart N) Part 63
XXX. Ethylene Oxide Emissions Standards for Sterilization
Facilities (Subpart O) Part 63
YYY. Marine Tank Vessel Loading Operations (Subpart Y) Part 63
ZZZ. Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities (Subpart GG)
Part 63
AAAA. Pharmaceuticals Production (Subpart GGG) Part 63
BBBB. Secondary Aluminum Production (Subpart RRR) Part 63
CCCC. Manufacturing of Nutritional Yeast (Subpart CCCC) Part 63
DDDD. Petroleum Refineries: Catalytic Cracking Units, Catalytic
Reforming Units, and Sulfur Recovery Units (Subpart UUUU) Part 63
[[Page 11229]]
EEEE. Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines
(Subpart ZZZZ) Part 63
FFFF. Method 306 of Appendix A of Part 63
GGGG. Method 306A of Appendix A of Part 63
HHHH. Methods 308, 315, and 316 of Appendix A of Part 63
IIII. Method 321 of Appendix A of Part 63
IV. Public Comments on the Proposed Amendments
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
K. Congressional Review Act
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
The revisions promulgated in this final rule apply to testing at a
number of source categories. If you have any questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person
listed in the preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
B. Where can I obtain a copy of this action?
In addition to being available in the docket, an electronic copy of
this rule will also be available on the Worldwide Web (WWW) through the
Technology Transfer Network (TTN). Following the Administrator's
signature, a copy of the final rule will be placed on the TTN's policy
and guidance page for newly proposed or promulgated rules at https://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg. The TTN provides information and technology
exchange in various areas of air pollution control.
C. Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), judicial review
of this final rule is available by filing a petition for review in the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit by April 28,
2014. Under section 307(d)(7)(B) of the CAA, only an objection to this
final rule that was raised with reasonable specificity during the
period for public comment can be raised during judicial review.
Moreover, under section 307(b)(2) of the CAA, the requirements
established by this action may not be challenged separately in any
civil or criminal proceedings brought by EPA to enforce these
requirements.
II. Background
The revisions to test methods and testing regulations were proposed
in the Federal Register on January 9, 2012, with a public comment
period that ended March 9, 2012. Thirty-eight comment letters were
received from the public. Changes were made to this final rule based on
the public comments.
III. Summary of Amendments
A. Appendix M of Part 51
In the introduction of Appendix M of part 51, Methods 3A and 19 are
added to the list of methods not requiring the use of audit samples.
B. Method 201A of Appendix M of Part 51
Revisions are made to Method 201A as published on December 21,
2010. Typographical errors in references to acetone blanks, isokinetic
sampling rate, source gas temperatures, stack blockage dimensions by
the sampling heads, and particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter
less than or equal to 10 micrometers (PM10) in Sections
7.2.1, 8.3.4(b), 8.3.4.1, 8.7.2.2, and 8.7.5.5(a), respectively, are
corrected. An erroneous reference to Methods 4A and 5 in Section 10.1
when using a standard pitot tube is corrected to refer to Methods 1 and
2. Section 10.5, which addresses Class A volumetric glassware is
deleted because it is not needed. For those filters that cannot be
weighed to a constant weight in Section 11.2.1, instructions are added
to flag and report the data as a minimum value. It is noted that the
nozzle, front half, and in-stack filter samples need to be speciated
into organic and inorganic fractions similar to the practice in Method
17. The method now notes that neither Method 17 nor 201A require a
separate analysis of the filter for inorganic and organic particulate
matter. Clarity is added for using Method 17 for quantifying
condensable particulate matter. An incorrect term in Equation 9 of
Section 12.5 is corrected. In the nomenclature in Section 12.1,
Vb, the volume of aliquot taken for ion chromatography (IC)
analysis, is deleted.
C. Method 202 of Appendix M of Part 51
Revisions are made to Method 202 as published on December 21, 2010.
In Sections 7.2.1 and 7.2.2, an error in the units of the acetone blank
is corrected. In Section 8.5.3.1, the text erroneously referring to
empty impingers is deleted. Section 11.2.1 is clarified concerning the
use of Method 17 for quantifying condensable particulate matter.
Figures 2 and 3 are revised to correctly show the first impinger with
an extended stem instead of a shortened one to be consistent with the
method text, and the condensed moisture and sample portion of the
sampling train are labeled to make it easy to identify. Figures 4, 5,
and 6 are republished because of the poor print quality in the December
21, 2010, publication.
D. General Provisions (Subpart A) Part 60
In the General Provisions of part 60, Section 60.13(d)(1) is
revised to remove the phrase ``automatically, intrinsic to the opacity
monitor.'' Methods 3A and 19 are added to the list of methods not
requiring the use of audit samples in Section 60.8(g). A new Section
60.8(i) is added to allow the use of Method 205 of 40 CFR part 51,
Appendix M, ``Verification of Gas Dilution Systems for Field Instrument
Calibrations,'' as an alternative provision whenever multiple
calibration gases are required under part 60. The agency notes,
however, that the use of calibration gas dilution devices continues to
be disallowed for part 75 applications (see 40 CFR 75.22(a)(5)(i)).
Section 60.17 is revised to arrange the consensus standards that are
incorporated by reference in alpha-numeric order.
E. Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units (Subpart
Db) Part 60
In subpart Db, Method 320 is allowed as an alternative for
determining nitrogen oxides (NOX) concentration in Section
60.46b(f)(1)(ii), (h)(1) and (2), and sulfur dioxide (SO2)
concentration in Section 60.47b(b)(2).
F. Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators (Subpart Ec) Part 60
In subpart Ec, the definition of medical/infectious wastes in
Section 60.51c is revised to correct the misspelling of ``cremation.''
G. Sulfuric Acid Plants (Subpart H) Part 60
In subpart H, an equation for calculating the SO2
emission rate in Section 60.84(d) is corrected.
[[Page 11230]]
H. Sewage Treatment Plants (Subpart O) Part 60
In subpart O, a reference to Method 209F in Section 60.154(b)(5) is
revised to reflect a newer available version of the method (i.e.,
2540G).
I. Kraft Pulp Mills (Subpart BB) Part 60
In subpart BB, a typographical error is corrected in the equation
for correcting the total reduced sulfur concentration to 10 percent
oxygen.
J. Stationary Gas Turbines (Subpart GG) Part 60
In subpart GG, the definitions of terms for the equation in Section
60.335(b)(l) are revised to allow the reference combustor inlet
absolute pressure to be measured in millimeters of mercury (mm Hg). The
site barometric pressure is allowed as an alternative to the observed
combustor inlet absolute pressure for calculating the mean
NOX emission concentration.
K. Lead-Acid Battery Manufacturing Plants (Subpart KK) Part 60
In subpart KK, Method 29 is allowed as an alternative to Method 12
in Section 60.374(b)(1) and (c)(2) for determining the lead
concentration and flow rate of the effluent gas. An error in the
equation for calculating the lead emission concentration in
60.374(b)(2) is corrected.
L. Metallic Mineral Processing Plants (Subpart LL) Part 60
In subpart LL, an error in the value of the particulate matter
standard in Section 60.382(a)(1) is corrected from 0.02 g/dscm to 0.05
g/dscm. An alternative procedure, wherein a single visible emission
observer can conduct visible emission observations for up to three
fugitive, stack, or vent emission points within a 15-second interval,
is allowed.
M. Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacture (Subpart UU) Part
60
In subpart UU, an error in the value of the particulate matter
standard for saturated felt or smooth-surfaced roll roofing is
corrected from 0.04 kg/Mg to 0.4 kg/Mg.
N. Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Emissions from Synthetic Organic
Chemical Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI) Distillation Operations
(Subpart NNN) Part 60
In subpart NNN, references to paragraphs in Section 60.660(c)(4)
and Section 60.665(h)(2) and (3) are corrected.
O. Stationary Compression Ignition Internal Combustion Engines (Subpart
IIII) Part 60
In Subpart IIII, the requirement to use Method 1 or 1A for sampling
point selection in testing gaseous emission from engines with smaller
ducts is dropped, and single- or three-point sampling, depending on
duct size, is added.
P. Stationary Spark Ignition Internal Combustion Engines (Subpart JJJJ)
Part 60
In Subpart JJJJ, the requirement to use Method 1 or 1A for sampling
point selection in testing gaseous emissions from engines with smaller
ducts is dropped, and single- or three-point sampling, depending on
duct size, is added.
Q. Method 1 of Appendix A-1 of Part 60
In Method 1, the distances from the sampling point to flow
disturbances is clarified in Figure 1-1, and Figure 1-2 is corrected to
show the proper demarcation between the requirement for 12 and 16
sampling points.
R. Method 2 of Appendix A-1 of Part 60
In Method 2, a pressure stability specification for the pitot tube
leak-check is added. An erroneous reference to Figure 2-6B is corrected
to reference Figure 2-7B. An error in a term in the denominator of
Equation 2-7 is corrected. The velocity constant in English units used
in Equation 2-7 is corrected by changing the units from m/sec to ft/
sec. The term for absolute temperature in Equations 2-7 and 2-8 is
corrected to represent the average of the absolute temperatures; an
inadvertently omitted term is added to Section 12.1 for the average
absolute temperature; and calibrating a barometer against a NIST-
traceable barometer is allowed as an alternative to calibrating against
a mercury barometer.
S. Method 2A of Appendix A-1 of Part 60
In Method 2A, calibrating a barometer against a NIST-traceable
barometer is allowed as an alternative to calibrating against a mercury
barometer.
T. Method 2B of Appendix A-1 of Part 60
In Method 2B, nomenclature errors are corrected and the assumed
ambient carbon dioxide concentration used in the calculations is
changed from 300 to 380 ppm to closer approximate current ambient
levels.
U. Method 2D of Appendix A-1 of Part 60
In Method 2D, calibrating a barometer against a NIST-traceable
barometer is allowed as an alternative to calibrating against a mercury
barometer.
V. Method 3A of Appendix A-2 of Part 60
In Method 3A, a redundant sentence noting that pre-cleaned air may
be used for the high-level calibration gas is deleted.
W. Method 3C of Appendix A-2 of Part 60
In Method 3C, an equation for correcting the sample nitrogen
concentration for tank dilution is added as a supplemental calculation
option for Method 25C samples.
X. Method 4 of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
In Method 4, the English value for the leak rate exceedance in
Section 9.1 is corrected from 0.20 cfm to 0.020 cfm. Method 6A, Method
320, and a calculation using F-factors are added as alternatives to
Method 4 for the moisture determination.
Y. Method 5 of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
In Method 5, it is clarified that the deionized water used in the
analysis of material caught in the impingers must have <=0.001 percent
residue; the factor K is corrected to read K' in Equation 5-13;
calibrating a barometer against a NIST-traceable barometer is allowed
as an alternative to calibrating against a mercury barometer;
calibrating a temperature sensor against a thermometer equivalent to a
mercury-in-glass thermometer is allowed as an alternative to
calibrating against a mercury-in-glass thermometer; rechecking
temperature sensors for the filter holder and metering system after
each test is allowed in place of having sensors calibrated within 3
[deg]F; the option to check the probe heater calibration after a test
at a single point using a reference thermometer is added; the use of
weather station barometric pressure corrected to testing point
elevation is added as an option to having an on-site barometer; a
single acetone blank per container is allowed in place of a blank from
each wash bottle; Section 10.3.3 is clarified as a post-test metering
system calibration check rather than a metering system calibration, and
an alternative metering check procedure is added; the use of filter
holder supports or frits made of Teflon is allowed without having to
first obtain the Administrator's approval; and Reference 13 for post-
test calibration is added to the method.
[[Page 11231]]
Z. Method 5A of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
In Method 5A, mercury-free thermometers are allowed as an
alternative to mercury-in-glass thermometers.
AA. Method 5E of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
In Method 5E, the requirement to use the Rosemount Model 2100A
total organic content analyzer is replaced with the Tekmar-Dohrmann or
equivalent analyzer. In Section 12.5, the equation for total
particulate concentration is correctly labeled as Eq. 5E-5.
BB. Method 5H of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
In Method 5H, Section 12.1 is revised to add missing terms
Ci, Co, Qi, and Qo; and
procedures for the determination of an alternative tracer gas flow rate
are added.
CC. Method 6 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
In Method 6, calibrating a temperature sensor against a thermometer
equivalent to a mercury-in-glass thermometer is allowed as an
alternative to using a mercury-in-glass thermometer, and calibrating a
barometer against a NIST-traceable barometer is allowed as an
alternative to calibrating against a mercury barometer.
DD. Method 6C of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
In Section 4.0 of Method 6C, an incorrect reference to Section 4.1
of Method 6 is corrected to reference Section 4.0 of Method 7E.
Provisions that were removed from the original method that addressed
potential quenching effects in fluorescence analyzers are added to the
method.
EE. Method 7 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
In Method 7, procedures are added to avoid biasing the results when
sampling under conditions of high SO2 concentrations;
calibrating a barometer against a NIST-traceable barometer is added as
an alternative to calibrating against a mercury barometer; and
calibrating a temperature sensor against a thermometer equivalent to a
mercury-in-glass thermometer is an acceptable alternative to using a
mercury-in-glass thermometer.
FF. Method 7A of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
In Method 7A, new procedures are added to avoid biasing the results
when sampling under conditions of high SO2 concentrations,
and calibrating a temperature sensor against a thermometer equivalent
to a mercury-in-glass thermometer is added as an acceptable alternative
to using a mercury-in-glass thermometer.
GG. Method 7E of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
In Method 7E, the instructions for choosing the high-level
calibration gas are clarified. Instructions are added to minimize
contact of the sample with any condensate to reduce the chance of
sample loss, and an error in the traverse point locations used to
determine stratification across large stacks is corrected. The basis of
a stable response for measurements in the system response time
determination is revised in Section 8.2.5 to conform with Section
8.2.6. Alternative sampling bags made of materials other than Tedlar
are allowed if the materials are applicable for retaining the compounds
of interest.
HH. Method 8 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
In Method 8, an error in the definition of Vsoln is
corrected. Figure 8-1 is clarified to identify which impingers collect
sulfuric acid/sulfur trioxide and which collect SO2.
II. Method 10 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
Method 10 is revised to allow the use of sample tanks as an
alternative to flexible bags for sample collection.
JJ. Methods 10A and 10B of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
In Methods 10A and 10B, sampling bags made of materials other than
Tedlar are allowed if the materials have the sample retaining qualities
of Tedlar.
KK. Method 11 of Appendix A-5 of Part 60
Method 11 is revised to address sample breakthrough at high
concentrations by using an additional collection impinger. Calibrating
a temperature sensor against a thermometer equivalent to a mercury-in-
glass thermometer is an acceptable alternative to using a mercury-in-
glass thermometer.
LL. Method 12 of Appendix A-5 of Part 60
Method 12 is revised to allow for analysis by inductively coupled
plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) and cold vapor atomic
fluorescence spectrometry (CVAFS) as alternatives to atomic absorption
(AA) analysis.
MM. Method 14A of Appendix A-5 of Part 60
In Section 10.1.1 of Method 14A, an incorrect reference to Figure
5-6 is corrected to reference Figure 5-5.
NN. Method 16A of Appendix A-6 of Part 60
In Method 16A, the applicability section notes that method results
may be biased low if used at sources other than kraft pulp mills where
stack oxygen levels may be lower.
OO. Method 16C of Appendix A-6 of Part 60
In Method 16C, errors in the nomenclature and the equation for
calculating the total reduced sulfur concentration are corrected.
PP. Method 18 of Appendix A-6 of Part 60
In Method 18, sampling bags made of materials other than Tedlar are
allowed if the materials are applicable for retaining the compounds of
interest.
QQ. Method 23 of Appendix A-7 of Part 60
In Method 23, the requirement in Section 2.2.7 that silica gel be
stored in metal containers has been deleted. Section 4.2.7 is clarified
to note that the used silica gel should be transferred to its original
container or other suitable vessel if moisture is being determined or
discarded if not needed. Mercury-free thermometers are allowed as
alternatives to mercury-in-glass thermometers. Section 8.0, which was
inadvertently removed in a previous rulemaking, has been added.
RR. Method 24 of Appendix A-7 of Part 60
In Method 24, ASTM Method D2369 is cited without referencing
specific sections to preclude confusion if the method sections are
revised in the future.
SS. Method 25 of Appendix A-7 of Part 60
In Method 25, more detailed information is given to describe the
filters used for sample collection.
TT. Method 25C of Appendix A-7 of Part 60
Method 25C is revised to allow sampling lines made of Teflon.
Probes that have closed points and are driven below the surface in a
single step and withdrawn a distance to create a gas gap are allowed as
acceptable substitutes to pilot probes and the auger procedure.
[[Page 11232]]
UU. Method 25D of Appendix A-7 of Part 60
In Method 25D, errors in cross-references within the method are
corrected.
VV. Method 26 of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
Method 26 is revised to allow the use of heated Teflon probes in
place of glass-lined probes. Conflicting temperature requirements for
the sampling system are clarified, and the note to keep the probe and
filter temperature at least 20 [deg]C above the source temperature is
removed. The location of the thermocouple that monitors the collected
gas temperature is clarified as being as close to the filter holder as
practicable instead of in the gas stream. Method 26A is allowed as an
acceptable alternative when Method 26 is required.
WW. Method 26A of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
Method 26A is revised to clearly state that the temperature of the
probe and filter must be maintained between 120 and 134 [deg]C.
XX. Method 29 of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
Method 29 is revised to allow sample analysis by CVAFS as an
alternative to AA analysis.
YY. Method 30B of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
In Method 30B, calibrating a barometer against a NIST-traceable
barometer is allowed as an alternative to calibrating against a mercury
barometer. Table 9-1 and the method text are revised to amend the
quality assurance/quality control criteria for sorbent trap section 2
breakthrough and sample analysis to address compliance testing and
relative accuracy testing of mercury monitoring systems currently being
conducted at much lower emission concentrations. The method is revised
to include the most up-to-date citation for determining the method
detection limit.
ZZ. Performance Specification 3 of Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 3, a statement that was inadvertently
removed that allows the relative accuracy to be within 20 percent of
the reference method mean value is added to establish the original
intent of the rule.
AAA. Performance Specification 4 of Appendix B of Part 60
Performance Specification 4 is revised to remove the interference
trap specified in Method 10 when evaluating non-dispersive infrared
continuous emission monitoring systems against Method 10.
BBB. Performance Specification 4B of Appendix B of Part 60
Performance Specification 4B is clarified to note that Equation 1
in Section 7.1.1 for calculating calibration error only applies to the
carbon monoxide monitor and not the oxygen monitor. It is noted for the
oxygen monitor that the calibration error should be expressed as the
oxygen concentration difference between the mean monitor and reference
value at three levels.
CCC. Performance Specification 7 of Appendix B of Part 60
Performance Specification 7 is revised to allow Methods 15 and 16
as reference methods in addition to Method 11.
DDD. Performance Specification 11 of Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 11, errors in the denominators of
Equations 11-1 and 11-2 are corrected.
EEE. Performance Specification 12B of Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 12B, allowance is made for using a
single good trap when one is lost, broken or damaged. More flexibility
is also allowed in meeting the stack flow-to-sample flow ratio.
FFF. Performance Specification 15 of Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 15, the general references to 40 CFR
part 60, Appendix B, for the relative accuracy analysis procedure are
revised to specifically cite Performance Specification 2 of 40 CFR part
60, Appendix B.
GGG. Performance Specification 16 of Appendix B of Part 60
Performance Specification 16 is revised to clarify the retesting of
a predictive emission monitoring system (PEMS) after a sensor is
replaced. Relative accuracy testing at three load or production rate
levels is allowed in cases where the key operating parameter is not
readily alterable. Additional instruction is added for performing the
relative accuracy audit (RAA). An error in the RAA acceptance criterion
is corrected, and an alternative acceptance criterion for low
concentration measurements is added. The yearly relative accuracy test
audit clearly notes that the statistical tests in Section 8.3 are not
required for this test. An incorrect reference to Equation 16-4 in
Section 12.4 is corrected.
HHH. Procedure 1 of Appendix F of Part 60
In Procedure 1, the relevant performance specification would be
cited for the RAA calculation instead of using the current Equation 1-
1, which is not appropriate for all pollutants.
III. Procedure 2 of Appendix F of Part 60
In Procedure 2, Equations 2-2 and 2-3 are revised to have the full-
scale value in the denominator, which is more appropriate than the up-
scale check value. The denominator of equation 2-4 is revised to
include the volume of the reference device rather than the full-scale
value.
JJJ. Procedure 5 of Appendix F of Part 60
In Procedure 5, the second section listed as Section 6.2.6 is
correctly numbered as Section 6.2.7.
KKK. General Provisions (Subpart A) Part 61
In the General Provisions of part 61, Methods 3A and 19 are added
to the list of methods not requiring the use of audit samples in
Section 61.13(e).
LLL. Beryllium (Subpart C) Part 61
In the Beryllium National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP), Method 29 of part 60 is added as an acceptable
alternative to Method 104 in Section 61.33(a) for emissions testing.
MMM. Beryllium Rocket Motor Firing (Subpart D) Part 61
In the beryllium rocket motor firing NESHAP, a conversion error in
the emission standard in Section 61.42(a) is corrected.
NNN. Mercury (Subpart E) Part 61
In the mercury NESHAP, Method 29 of part 60 is added as an
acceptable alternative to Method 101A in Section 61.53(d)(2) for
emissions testing.
OOO. Inorganic Arsenic Emissions From Glass Manufacturing Plants
(Subpart N) Part 61
In the glass manufacturing plants NESHAP, Method 29 in Appendix A
of part 60 is added as an acceptable alternative to Method 108 in
Section 61.164(d)(2)(i) for determining the arsenic emissions rate and
in Section 61.164(e)(1)(i) and (e)(2) for determining
[[Page 11233]]
the arsenic concentration in a gas stream.
PPP. Method 101 of Appendix B of Part 61
Method 101 is revised to allow analysis by ICP-AES or CVAFS as
alternatives to AA analysis.
QQQ. Method 101A of Appendix B of Part 61
Method 101A is revised to allow analysis by ICP-AES or CVAFS as
alternatives to AA analysis.
RRR. Method 102 of Appendix B of Part 61
In Method 102, mercury-free thermometers are allowed in place of
mercury-in-glass thermometers.
SSS. Method 104 of Appendix B of Part 61
Method 104 is revised to allow analysis by ICP-AES and CVAFS as
alternatives to AA analysis. A new alternative procedures section is
added to address ICP-AES.
TTT. Methods 108 and 108A of Appendix B of Part 61
Methods 108 and 108A are revised to allow analysis by ICP-AES as an
alternative to AA analysis. A new alternative procedures section is
added to address ICP-AES.
UUU. General Provisions (Subpart A) Part 63
In the General Provisions of part 63, Methods 3A and 19 are added
to the list of methods not requiring the use of audit samples in
Section 63.7(c). In Section 63.8(f)(6)(iii), an incorrect reference to
a section of Performance Specification 2 is corrected. Section 63.14 is
revised to arrange the materials that are incorporated by reference in
alpha-numeric order.
VVV. Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (Subpart G) Part
63
Subpart G is revised to allow the use of Method 316 or Method 8260B
in the SW-846 Compendium of Methods to determine hazardous air
pollutant concentrations in wastewater streams in Section
63.144(b)(5)(i).
WWW. Chromium Emissions From Hard and Decorative Chromium
Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks (Subpart N) Part 63
South Coast Air Quality Management District Method 205.1 is added
as a testing option for measuring total chromium.
XXX. Ethylene Oxide Emissions Standards for Sterilization Facilities
(Subpart O) Part 63
The ethylene oxide emissions standard for sterilization facilities
is revised to allow California Air Resources Board (CARB) Method 431 as
an alternative to the procedures in Section 63.365(b) for determining
the efficiency at the sterilization chamber vent. An error in a
reference to a section in Performance Specification 8 is also
corrected.
YYY. Marine Tank Vessel Loading Operations (Subpart Y) Part 63
The marine tank vessel loading operations emissions standard is
revised to allow Method 25B as an alternative to Method 25A in Section
63.565(d)(5) for determining the average VOC concentration upstream and
downstream of recovery devices. Method 25B is allowed as an alternative
to Methods 25 and 25A for determining the percent reduction in VOC in
Section 63.565(d)(8), and the requirement that Method 25B be validated
according to Method 301 in Section 63.565(d)(10) is added. Method 25B
is also added as an alternative to Method 25A in determining the
baseline outlet VOC concentration in Section 63.565(g).
ZZZ. Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities (Subpart GG) Part 63
The aerospace manufacturing and rework facilities emissions
standard is revised to remove an incorrect reference to the location of
Method 319 in Section 63.750(o).
AAAA. Pharmaceuticals Production (Subpart GGG) Part 63
The pharmaceuticals production emissions standard is revised to
allow Method 320 as an alternative to Method 18 for demonstrating that
a vent is not a process vent.
BBBB. Secondary Aluminum Production (Subpart RRR) Part 63
The secondary aluminum production emissions standard is revised to
allow Method 26 as an alternative to Method 26A in Section
63.1511(c)(9) for determining hydrochloric acid (HCl) concentration.
CCCC. Manufacturing of Nutritional Yeast (Subpart CCCC) Part 63
Table 2 in the manufacturing of nutritional yeast emissions
standard is revised to delete the requirement to use Methods 1, 2, 3,
and 4 when measuring VOC by Method 25A.
DDDD. Petroleum Refineries: Catalytic Cracking Units, Catalytic
Reforming Units, and Sulfur Recovery Units (Subpart UUUU) Part 63
Table 4 in the petroleum refineries emissions standard is revised
to allow Method 320 as an alternative to Method 18 for determining
control device efficiency for organic compounds.
EEEE. Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines (Subpart
ZZZZ) Part 63
Table 4 in the stationary reciprocating internal combustion engines
emissions standard is revised to clarify that a heated probe is not
necessary when using ASTM D6522 to measure oxygen or carbon dioxide
concentrations. The requirement to use Method 1 or 1A for sampling site
and sampling point selection in testing gaseous emissions from engines
with smaller ducts is deleted, and single- or three-point sampling,
depending on duct size, is added.
FFFF. Method 306 of Appendix A of Part 63
Method 306 is revised to remove references to two figures that do
not exist and to clarify the conditions under which ICP is appropriate
for sample analysis. Alternative mercury-free thermometers are allowed
as alternatives to mercury-in-glass thermometers.
GGGG. Method 306A of Appendix A of Part 63
In Method 306A, information is added to clarify the conditions
under which sample filtering is required.
HHHH. Methods 308, 315, and 316 of Appendix A of Part 63
In Methods 308, 315, and 316, calibrating a temperature sensor
against a thermometer equivalent to a mercury-in-glass thermometer is
added as an alternative to mercury-in-glass thermometers. Alternative
mercury-free thermometers are allowed as alternatives to mercury-in-
glass thermometers.
IIII. Method 321 of Appendix A of Part 63
In Method 321, the term for dilution factor in the calculations is
clarified.
IV. Public Comments on the Proposed Amendments
Thirty-eight comment letters were received on the proposed rule.
The public comments and the agency's responses are summarized in the
Summary of Comments and Responses Document that has been added to the
[[Page 11234]]
docket that is accessible at the address given in the ADDRESSES section
of this preamble.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the
terms of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is,
therefore, not subject to review under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
(76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011). It does not involve the expenditure of
$100 million in a year and does not raise significant issues. This
final rule amends current testing regulations by removing errors and
obsolete provisions and adding approved alternative procedures.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). This final rule does not add
information collection requirements beyond those currently required
under the applicable regulations. This final rule amends current
testing regulations by removing errors and obsolete provisions and
adding approved alternative procedures.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency
to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative
Procedure Act or any other statute unless the agency certifies that the
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Small entities include small businesses,
small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions.
For purposes of assessing the impacts of this rule on small
entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A small business as defined
by the Small Business Administration's (SBA) regulations at 13 CFR
121.201; (2) a small governmental jurisdiction that is a government of
a city, county, town, school district or special district with a
population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small organization that is
any not-for-profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated
and is not dominant in its field.
After considering the economic impacts of this final rule on small
entities, I certify that this action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This final
rule will not impose any requirements on small entities since it only
corrects and updates current requirements and adds new testing options.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This action contains no federal mandates under the provisions of
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C.
1531-1538, for state, local, or tribal governments or the private
sector. This action imposes no enforceable duty on any state, local or
tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore, this action is not
subject to the requirements of sections 202 or 205 of the UMRA. This
action is also not subject to the requirements of section 203 of UMRA
because it contains no regulatory requirements that might significantly
or uniquely affect small governments. The alternative procedure being
added will give small entities more flexibility in choosing testing
procedures in applicable situations.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132. This final rule corrects and
updates current testing requirements. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does
not apply to this action.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This final rule
corrects and updates testing provisions that are already currently
mandated. It does not add any new requirements and does not affect
pollutant emissions or air quality. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does
not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets EO 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) as
applying only to those regulatory actions that concern health or safety
risks, such that the analysis required under section 5-501 of the EO
has the potential to influence the regulation. This action is not
subject to EO 13045 because it does not establish an environmental
standard intended to mitigate health or safety risks.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001)), because it is not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (``NTTAA''), Public Law 104-113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
directs the EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory
activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling
procedures, and business practices) that are developed or adopted by
voluntary consensus standards bodies. The NTTAA directs the EPA to
provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when the agency decides not
to use available and applicable voluntary consensus standards. This
action does not involve technical standards. Therefore, the EPA did not
consider the use of any voluntary consensus standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Executive Order (EO) 12898 (59 FR 7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes
federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
The EPA has determined that this final rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority or low-income populations because it does not
affect the level of protection provided to human health or the
environment. This final rule does not relax the control measures on
sources regulated by the rule and,
[[Page 11235]]
therefore, will not cause emissions increases from these sources.
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2). This rule will be effective on February 27, 2014.
List of Subjects
40 CFR Parts 51 and 61
Air pollution control, Environmental protection, Performance
specifications, and Test methods and procedures.
40 CFR Parts 60 and 63
Air pollution control, Environmental protection, Incorporation by
reference, Performance specifications, and Test methods and procedures.
Dated: January 28, 2014.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, Title 40, Chapter I of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 51--REQUIREMENTS FOR PREPARATION, ADOPTION, AND SUBMITTAL OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 51 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et. seq.
0
2. Amend appendix M to part 51 as follows:
0
a. By revising section 4.0.a.
0
b. By amending Method 201A as follows:
0
i. By revising section 7.2.1.
0
ii. By revising paragraph 8.3.4(b).
0
iii. By revising section 8.3.4.1.
0
iv. By revising section 8.7.2.2.
0
v. By revising paragraph 8.7.5.5(a).
0
vi. By revising the introductory text of section 10.1.
0
vii. By removing section 10.5.
0
viii. By revising section 11.2.1.
0
ix. By removing the term ``Vb'' and its definition from section 12.1.
0
x. By revising Equations 8 and 9 in section 12.5.
0
c. By amending Method 202 as follows:
0
i. By revising sections 7.2.1 and 7.2.2.
0
ii. By revising section 8.5.1.
0
iii. By revising section 8.5.3.1.
0
iv. By revising sections 11.2.1 and 11.2.2.
0
vi. By revising Figures 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 in section 18.0.
Appendix M to Part 51--Recommended Test Methods for State
Implementation Plans
* * * * *
4.0. * * *
a. The source owner, operator, or representative of the tested
facility shall obtain an audit sample, if commercially available,
from an AASP for each test method used for regulatory compliance
purposes. No audit samples are required for the following test
methods: Methods 3A and 3C of appendix A-3 of part 60, Methods 6C,
7E, 9, and 10 of appendix A-4 of part 60, Methods 18 and 19 of
appendix A-6 of part 60, Methods 20, 22, and 25A of appendix A-7 of
part 60, and Methods 303, 318, 320, and 321 of appendix A of part 63
of this chapter. If multiple sources at a single facility are tested
during a compliance test event, only one audit sample is required
for each method used during a compliance test. The compliance
authority responsible for the compliance test may waive the
requirement to include an audit sample if they believe that an audit
sample is not necessary. ``Commercially available'' means that two
or more independent AASPs have blind audit samples available for
purchase. If the source owner, operator, or representative cannot
find an audit sample for a specific method, the owner, operator, or
representative shall consult the EPA Web site at the following URL,
https://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc, to confirm whether there is a source
that can supply an audit sample for that method. If the EPA Web site
does not list an available audit sample at least 60 days prior to
the beginning of the compliance test, the source owner, operator, or
representative shall not be required to include an audit sample as
part of the quality assurance program for the compliance test. When
ordering an audit sample, the source owner, operator, or
representative shall give the sample provider an estimate for the
concentration of each pollutant that is emitted by the source or the
estimated concentration of each pollutant based on the permitted
level and the name, address, and phone number of the compliance
authority. The source owner, operator, or representative shall
report the results for the audit sample along with a summary of the
emission test results for the audited pollutant to the compliance
authority and shall report the results of the audit sample to the
AASP. The source owner, operator, or representative shall make both
reports at the same time and in the same manner or shall report to
the compliance authority first and report to the AASP. If the method
being audited is a method that allows the samples to be analyzed in
the field, and the tester plans to analyze the samples in the field,
the tester may analyze the audit samples prior to collecting the
emission samples provided a representative of the compliance
authority is present at the testing site. The tester may request and
the compliance authority may grant a waiver to the requirement that
a representative of the compliance authority must be present at the
testing site during the field analysis of an audit sample. The
source owner, operator, or representative may report the results of
the audit sample to the compliance authority and then report the
results of the audit sample to the AASP prior to collecting any
emission samples. The test protocol and final test report shall
document whether an audit sample was ordered and utilized and the
pass/fail results as applicable.
* * * * *
Method 201A--Determination of PM10 and PM2.5
Emissions From Stationary Sources (Constant Sampling Rate Procedure)
* * * * *
7.2.1 Acetone. Use acetone that is stored in a glass bottle. Do
not use acetone from a metal container because it will likely
produce a high residue in the laboratory and field reagent blanks.
You must use acetone with blank values less than 1 part per million
by weight residue. Analyze acetone blanks prior to field use to
confirm low blank values. In no case shall a blank value of greater
than 0.0001 percent (1 part per million by weight) of the weight of
acetone used in sample recovery be subtracted from the sample weight
(i.e., the maximum blank correction is 0.1 mg per 100 g of acetone
used to recover samples).
* * * * *
8.3.4 * * *
(b) The appropriate nozzle to maintain the required gas sampling
rate for the velocity pressure range and isokinetic range. If the
isokinetic range cannot be met (e.g., batch processes, extreme
process flow or temperature variation), void the sample or use
methods subject to the approval of the Administrator to correct the
data. The acceptable variation from isokinetic sampling is 80 to 120
percent and no more than 100 21 percent (2 out of 12 or
5 out of 24) sampling points outside of this criteria.
* * * * *
8.3.4.1 Preliminary traverse. You must use an S-type pitot tube
with a conventional thermocouple to conduct the traverse. Conduct
the preliminary traverse as close as possible to the anticipated
testing time on sources that are subject to hour-by-hour gas flow
rate variations of approximately 20 percent and/or gas
temperature variations of approximately 28 [deg]C
( 50 [deg]F). (Note: You should be aware that these
variations can cause errors in the cyclone cut diameters and the
isokinetic sampling velocities.)
* * * * *
8.7.2.2 Probe blockage factor. You must use Equation 26 to
calculate an average probe blockage correction factor
(bf) if the diameter
[[Page 11236]]
of your stack or duct is between 25.7 and 36.4 inches for the
combined PM2.5/PM10 sampling head and pitot
and between 18.8 and 26.5 inches for the PM2.5 cyclone
and pitot. A probe blockage factor is calculated because of the flow
blockage caused by the relatively large cross-sectional area of the
cyclone sampling head, as discussed in Section 8.3.2.2 and
illustrated in Figures 8 and 9 of Section 17. You must determine the
cross-sectional area of the cyclone head you use and determine its
stack blockage factor. (Note: Commercially-available sampling heads
(including the PM10 cyclone, PM2.5 cyclone,
pitot and filter holder) have a projected area of approximately 31.2
square inches when oriented into the gas stream.) As the probe is
moved from the outermost to the innermost point, the amount of
blockage that actually occurs ranges from approximately 13 square
inches to the full 31.2 square inches plus the blockage caused by
the probe extension. The average cross-sectional area blocked is 22
square inches.
* * * * *
8.7.5.5 * * *
(a) Container 1, Less than or equal to PM2.5
micrometer filterable particulate. Use tweezers and/or clean
disposable surgical gloves to remove the filter from the filter
holder. Place the filter in the Petri dish that you labeled with the
test identification and Container 1. Using a dry brush and/
or a sharp-edged blade, carefully transfer any PM and/or filter
fibers that adhere to the filter holder gasket or filter support
screen to the Petri dish. Seal the container. This container holds
particles less than or equal to 2.5 micrometers that are caught on
the in-stack filter. (Note: If the test is conducted for
PM10 only, then Container 1 would be for less
than or equal to PM10 micrometer filterable particulate.)
* * * * *
10.1 Gas Flow Velocities. You must use an S-type pitot tube that
meets the required EPA specifications (EPA Publication 600/4-77-
0217b) during these velocity measurements. (Note: If, as specified
in Section 8.7.2.3, testing is performed in stacks less than 26.5
inches in diameter, testers may use a standard pitot tube according
to the requirements in Method 1 or 2 of appendix A-3 to part 60 of
this chapter.) You must also complete the following:
* * * * *
11.2.1 Container 1, Less than or Equal to
PM2.5 Micrometer Filterable Particulate. Transfer the
filter and any loose particulate from the sample container to a
tared weighing dish or pan that is inert to solvent or mineral
acids. Desiccate for 24 hours in a dessicator containing anhydrous
calcium sulfate. Weigh to a constant weight and report the results
to the nearest 0.1 mg. (See Section 3.0 for a definition of Constant
weight.) If constant weight requirements cannot be met, the filter
must be treated as described in Section 11.2.1 of Method 202 of
appendix M to this part. Note: The nozzle and front half wash and
filter collected at or below 30 [deg]C (85 [deg]F) may not be heated
and must be maintained at or below 30 [deg]C (85 [deg]F).
* * * * *
12.5 * * *
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.001
* * * * *
Method 202--Dry Impinger Method for Determining Condensable Particulate
Emissions From Stationary Sources
* * * * *
7.2.1 Acetone. Use acetone that is stored in a glass bottle. Do
not use acetone from a metal container because it normally produces
a high residual mass in the laboratory and field reagent blanks. You
must use acetone that has a blank value less than 1.0 ppmw (0.1 mg/
100 g) residue.
7.2.2 Hexane, American Chemical Society grade. You must use
hexane that has a blank residual mass value less than 1.0 ppmw (0.1
mg/100 g) residue.
* * * * *
8.5.1 Impinger and CPM Filter Assembly.
8.5.1.1 Monitor the moisture condensation in the knockout and
backup impingers. If the accumulated water from moisture
condensation overwhelms the knockout impinger, i.e., the water level
is more than approximately one-half the capacity of the knockout
impinger, or if water accumulates in the backup impinger sufficient
to cover the impinger insert tip, then you may interrupt the
sampling run, recover and weigh the moisture accumulated in the
knockout and backup impinger, reassemble and leak check the sampling
train, and resume the sampling run. You must purge the water
collected during the test interruption as soon as practical
following the procedures in Section 8.5.3.
8.5.1.2 You must include the weight or volume of the moisture in
your moisture calculation and you must combine the recovered water
with the appropriate sample fraction for subsequent CPM analysis.
8.5.1.3 Use the field data sheet for the filterable particulate
method to record the CPM filter temperature readings at the
beginning of each sample time increment and when sampling is halted.
Maintain the CPM filter greater than 20 [deg]C (greater than 65
[deg]F) but less than or equal to 30 [deg]C (less than or equal to
85 [deg]F) during sample collection. (Note: Maintain the temperature
of the CPM filter assembly as close to 30 [deg]C (85 [deg]F) as
feasible.)
* * * * *
8.5.3.1 If you choose to conduct a pressurized nitrogen purge at
the completion of CPM sample collection, you may purge the entire
CPM sample collection train from the condenser inlet to the CPM
filter holder outlet or you may quantitatively transfer the water
collected in the condenser and the water dropout impinger to the
backup impinger and purge only the backup impinger and the CPM
filter. You must measure the water in the knockout and backup
impingers and record the volume or weight as part of the moisture
collected during sampling as specified in Section 8.5.3.4.
8.5.3.1.1 If you choose to conduct a purge of the entire CPM
sampling train, you must replace the short stem impinger insert in
the knock out impinger with a standard modified Greenburg Smith
impinger insert.
8.5.3.1.2 If you choose to combine the knockout and backup
impinger catch prior to purge, you must purge the backup impinger
and CPM filter holder.
8.5.3.1.3 If the tip of the impinger insert does not extend
below the water level (including the water transferred from the
first impinger if this option was chosen), you must add a measured
amount of degassed, deionized ultra-filtered water that contains 1
ppmw (1 mg/L) residual mass or less until the impinger tip is at
least 1 centimeter below the surface of the water. You must record
the amount of water added to the water dropout impinger (Vp)(see
Figure 4 of Section 18) to correct the moisture content of the
effluent gas. (Note: Prior to use, water
[[Page 11237]]
must be degassed using a nitrogen purge bubbled through the water
for at least 15 minutes to remove dissolved oxygen).
8.5.3.1.4 To perform the nitrogen purge using positive pressure
nitrogen flow, you must start with no flow of gas through the clean
purge line and fittings. Connect the filter outlet to the input of
the impinger train and disconnect the vacuum line from the exit of
the silica moisture collection impinger (see Figure 3 of Section
18). You may purge only the CPM train by disconnecting the moisture
train components if you measure moisture in the field prior to the
nitrogen purge. You must increase the nitrogen flow gradually to
avoid over-pressurizing the impinger array. You must purge the CPM
train at a minimum of 14 liters per minute for at least one hour. At
the conclusion of the purge, turn off the nitrogen delivery system.
* * * * *
11.2.1 Container 3, CPM Filter Sample. If the sample
was collected by Method 17 or Method 201A with a stack temperature
below 30 [deg]C (85 [deg]F), transfer the filter and any loose PM
from the sample container to a tared glass weighing dish. (See
Section 3.0 for a definition of constant weight.) Desiccate the
sample for 24 hours in a desiccator containing anhydrous calcium
sulfate. Weigh to a constant weight and report the results to the
nearest 0.1 mg. [Note: In-stack filter samples collected at 30
[deg]C (85 [deg]F) may include both filterable insoluble particulate
and condensable particulate. The nozzle and front half wash and
filter collected at or below 30 [deg]C (85 [deg]F) may not be heated
and must be maintained at or below 30 [deg]C (85 [deg]F).]
11.2.2 CPM Container 1, Aqueous Liquid Impinger
Contents. Analyze the water soluble CPM in Container 1 as
described in this section. Place the contents of Container
1 into a separatory funnel. Add approximately 30 ml of
hexane to the funnel, mix well, and pour off the upper organic
phase. Repeat this procedure twice with 30 ml of hexane each time
combining the organic phase from each extraction. Each time, leave a
small amount of the organic/hexane phase in the separatory funnel,
ensuring that no water is collected in the organic phase. This
extraction should yield about 90 ml of organic extract. Combine the
organic extract from Container 1 with the organic train
rinse in Container 2.
* * * * *
18.0 * * *
BILLING CODE 6560-N-P
[[Page 11238]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.002
[[Page 11239]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.003
[[Page 11240]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.004
[[Page 11241]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.005
BILLING CODE 6560-50-C
* * * * *
PART 60--STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW STATIONARY SOURCES
0
3. The authority citation for part 60 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et. seq.
Subpart A--[Amended]
0
4. Amend Sec. 60.8 by revising paragraph (g)(1) and adding new
paragraphs (h) and (i) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.8 Performance tests.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(1) The source owner, operator, or representative of the tested
facility shall obtain an audit sample, if commercially available, from
an AASP for each test method used for regulatory compliance purposes.
No audit samples are required for the following test methods: Methods
3A and 3C of appendix A-3 of part 60, Methods 6C, 7E, 9, and 10 of
appendix A-4 of part 60, Methods 18 and 19 of appendix A-6 of part 60,
Methods 20, 22, and 25A of appendix A-7 of part 60, Methods 30A and 30B
of appendix A-8 of part 60, and Methods 303, 318, 320, and 321 of
appendix A of part 63 of this chapter. If multiple sources at a single
facility are tested during a compliance test event, only one audit
sample is required for each method used during a compliance test. The
compliance authority responsible for the compliance test may waive the
requirement to include an audit sample if they believe that an audit
sample is not necessary. ``Commercially available'' means that two or
more independent AASPs have blind audit samples available for purchase.
If the source owner, operator, or representative cannot find an audit
sample for a specific method, the owner, operator, or representative
shall consult the EPA Web site at the following URL, www.epa.gov/ttn/emc, to confirm whether there is a source that can supply an audit
sample for that method. If the EPA Web site does not list an available
audit sample at least 60 days prior to the beginning of the compliance
test, the source owner, operator, or representative shall not be
required to
[[Page 11242]]
include an audit sample as part of the quality assurance program for
the compliance test. When ordering an audit sample, the source owner,
operator, or representative shall give the sample provider an estimate
for the concentration of each pollutant that is emitted by the source
or the estimated concentration of each pollutant based on the permitted
level and the name, address, and phone number of the compliance
authority. The source owner, operator, or representative shall report
the results for the audit sample along with a summary of the emission
test results for the audited pollutant to the compliance authority and
shall report the results of the audit sample to the AASP. The source
owner, operator, or representative shall make both reports at the same
time and in the same manner or shall report to the compliance authority
first and then report to the AASP. If the method being audited is a
method that allows the samples to be analyzed in the field and the
tester plans to analyze the samples in the field, the tester may
analyze the audit samples prior to collecting the emission samples
provided a representative of the compliance authority is present at the
testing site. The tester may request and the compliance authority may
grant a waiver to the requirement that a representative of the
compliance authority must be present at the testing site during the
field analysis of an audit sample. The source owner, operator, or
representative may report the results of the audit sample to the
compliance authority and report the results of the audit sample to the
AASP prior to collecting any emission samples. The test protocol and
final test report shall document whether an audit sample was ordered
and utilized and the pass/fail results as applicable.
* * * * *
(h) Unless otherwise specified in the applicable subpart, each test
location must be verified to be free of cyclonic flow and evaluated for
the existence of emission gas stratification and the required number of
sampling traverse points. If other procedures are not specified in the
applicable subpart to the regulations, use the appropriate procedures
in Method 1 to check for cyclonic flow and Method 7E to evaluate
emission gas stratification and selection of sampling points.
(i) Whenever the use of multiple calibration gases is required by a
test method, performance specification, or quality assurance procedure
in a part 60 standard or appendix, Method 205 of 40 CFR part 51,
appendix M of this chapter, ``Verification of Gas Dilution Systems for
Field Instrument Calibrations,'' may be used.
0
5. Amend Sec. 60.13 by revising paragraph (d)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.13 Monitoring requirements.
* * * * *
(d)(1) Owners and operators of a CEMS installed in accordance with
the provisions of this part, must check the zero (or low level value
between 0 and 20 percent of span value) and span (50 to 100 percent of
span value) calibration drifts at least once each operating day in
accordance with a written procedure. The zero and span must, at a
minimum, be adjusted whenever either the 24-hour zero drift or the 24-
hour span drift exceeds two times the limit of the applicable
performance specification in appendix B of this part. The system must
allow the amount of the excess zero and span drift to be recorded and
quantified whenever specified. Owners and operators of a COMS installed
in accordance with the provisions of this part must check the zero and
upscale (span) calibration drifts at least once daily. For a particular
COMS, the acceptable range of zero and upscale calibration materials is
defined in the applicable version of PS-1 in appendix B of this part.
For a COMS, the optical surfaces, exposed to the effluent gases, must
be cleaned before performing the zero and upscale drift adjustments,
except for systems using automatic zero adjustments. The optical
surfaces must be cleaned when the cumulative automatic zero
compensation exceeds 4 percent opacity.
* * * * *
0
6. Revise Sec. 60.17 to read as follows:
Sec. 60.17 Incorporations by reference.
(a) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part
with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To enforce any edition other than that
specified in this section, the EPA must publish notice of change in the
Federal Register and the material must be available to the public. All
approved material is available for inspection at the Air and Radiation
Docket and Information Center, U.S. EPA, 401 M St. SW., Washington, DC,
telephone number 202-566, and is available from the sources listed
below. It is also available for inspection at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of
this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030 or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
(b) American Gas Association, available through ILI Infodisk, 610
Winters Avenue, Paramus, New Jersey 07652:
(1) American Gas Association Report No. 3: Orifice Metering for
Natural Gas and Other Related Hydrocarbon Fluids, Part 1: General
Equations and Uncertainty Guidelines (1990), IBR approved for Sec.
60.107a(d).
(2) American Gas Association Report No. 3: Orifice Metering for
Natural Gas and Other Related Hydrocarbon Fluids, Part 2: Specification
and Installation Requirements (2000), IBR approved for Sec.
60.107a(d).
(3) American Gas Association Report No. 11: Measurement of Natural
Gas by Coriolis Meter (2003), IBR approved for Sec. 60.107a(d).
(4) American Gas Association Transmission Measurement Committee
Report No. 7: Measurement of Gas by Turbine Meters (Revised February
2006), IBR approved for Sec. 60.107a(d).
(c) American Hospital Association (AHA) Service, Inc., Post Office
Box 92683, Chicago, Illinois 60675-2683. You may inspect a copy at the
EPA's Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center (Docket A-91-61,
Item IV-J-124), Room M-1500, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460.
(1) An Ounce of Prevention: Waste Reduction Strategies for Health
Care Facilities. American Society for Health Care Environmental
Services of the American Hospital Association. Chicago, Illinois. 1993.
AHA Catalog No. 057007. ISBN 0-87258-673-5. IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
60.35e and 60.55c.
(2) [Reserved]
(d) American Petroleum Institute (API), 1220 L Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20005.
(1) API Publication 2517, Evaporation Loss from External Floating
Roof Tanks, Second Edition, February 1980, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
60.111(i), 60.111a(f), and 60.116b(e).
(2) API Manual of Petroleum Measurement Standards, Chapter 22--
Testing Protocol, Section 2--Differential Pressure Flow Measurement
Devices, First Edition, August 2005, IBR approved for Sec. 60.107a(d).
(e) American Public Health Association, 1015 18th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20036.
(1) ``Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater,'' 16th edition, 1985. Method 303F: ``Determination of
Mercury by the Cold Vapor Technique.'' Incorporated by reference for
appendix A-8 to part 60, Method 29, Sec. Sec. 9.2.3, 10.3, and 11.1.3.
[[Page 11243]]
(2) 2540 G. Total, Fixed, and Volatile Solids in Solid and
Semisolid Samples, in Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater, 20th Edition, 1998, IBR approved for Sec. 60.154(b).
(f) American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Three Park
Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990, Telephone (800) 843-2763, https://www.asme.org.
(1) ASME Interim Supplement 19.5 on Instruments and Apparatus:
Application, Part II of Fluid Meters, 6th Edition (1971), IBR approved
for Sec. Sec. 60.58a(h), 60.58b(i), 60.1320(a), and 60.1810(a).
(2) ASME MFC-3M-2004, Measurement of Fluid Flow in Pipes Using
Orifice, Nozzle, and Venturi, IBR approved for Sec. 60.107a(d).
(3) ASME/ANSI MFC-4M-1986 (Reaffirmed 2008), Measurement of Gas
Flow by Turbine Meters, IBR approved for Sec. 60.107a(d).
(4) ASME/ANSI MFC-5M-1985 (Reaffirmed 2006), Measurement of Liquid
Flow in Closed Conduits Using Transit-Time Ultrasonic Flowmeters, IBR
approved for Sec. 60.107a(d).
(5) ASME MFC-6M-1998 (Reaffirmed 2005), Measurement of Fluid Flow
in Pipes Using Vortex Flowmeters, IBR approved for Sec. 60.107a(d).
(6) ASME/ANSI MFC-7M-1987 (Reaffirmed 2006), Measurement of Gas
Flow by Means of Critical Flow Venturi Nozzles, IBR approved for Sec.
60.107a(d).
(7) ASME/ANSI MFC-9M-1988 (Reaffirmed 2006), Measurement of Liquid
Flow in Closed Conduits by Weighing Method, IBR approved for Sec.
60.107a(d).
(8) ASME MFC-11M-2006, Measurement of Fluid Flow by Means of
Coriolis Mass Flowmeters, IBR approved for Sec. 60.107a(d).
(9) ASME MFC-14M-2003, Measurement of Fluid Flow Using Small Bore
Precision Orifice Meters, IBR approved for Sec. 60.107a(d).
(10) ASME MFC-16-2007, Measurement of Liquid Flow in Closed
Conduits with Electromagnetic Flowmeters, IBR approved for Sec.
60.107a(d).
(11) ASME MFC-18M-2001, Measurement of Fluid Flow Using Variable
Area Meters, IBR approved for Sec. 60.107a(d).
(12) ASME MFC-22-2007, Measurement of Liquid by Turbine Flowmeters,
IBR approved for Sec. 60.107a(d).
(13) ASME PTC 4.1-1964 (Reaffirmed 1991), Power Test Codes: Test
Code for Steam Generating Units (with 1968 and 1969 Addenda), IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 60.46b, 60.58a(h), 60.58b(i), 60.1320(a), and
60.1810(a).
(14) ASME/ANSI PTC 19.10-1981, Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses [Part
10, Instruments and Apparatus], (Issued August 31, 1981), IBR approved
for Sec. Sec. 60.56c(b), 60.63(f), 60.106(e), 60.104a(d), (h), (i),
and (j), 60.105a(d), (f), and (g), Sec. 60.106a(a), Sec. 60.107a(a),
(c), and (d), tables 1 and 3 to subpart EEEE, tables 2 and 4 to subpart
FFFF, table 2 to subpart JJJJ, Sec. Sec. 60.4415(a), 60.2145(s) and
(t), 60.2710(s), (t), and (w), 60.2730(q), 60.4900(b), 60.5220(b),
tables 1 and 2 to subpart LLLL, tables 2 and 3 to subpart MMMM,
Sec. Sec. 60.5406(c) and 60.5413(b).
(15) ASME QRO-1-1994, Standard for the Qualification and
Certification of Resource Recovery Facility Operators, IBR approved for
Sec. Sec. 60.54b(a) and (b), 60.56a, 60.1185(a) and (c), and
60.1675(a) and (c).
(g) American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 100 Barr
Harbor Drive, Post Office Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959;
also available through ProQuest, 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI
48106.
(1) ASTM A99-76, Standard Specification for Ferromanganese, IBR
approved for Sec. 60.261.
(2) ASTM A99-82 (Reapproved 1987), Standard Specification for
Ferromanganese, IBR approved for Sec. 60.261.
(3) ASTM A100-69, Standard Specification for Ferrosilicon, IBR
approved for Sec. 60.261.
(4) ASTM A100-74, Standard Specification for Ferrosilicon, IBR
approved for Sec. 60.261.
(5) ASTM A100-93, Standard Specification for Ferrosilicon, IBR
approved for Sec. 60.261.
(6) ASTM A101-73, Standard Specification for Ferrochromium, IBR
approved for Sec. 60.261.
(7) ASTM A101-93, Standard Specification for Ferrochromium, IBR
approved for Sec. 60.261.
(8) ASTM A482-76, Standard Specification for Ferrochromesilicon,
IBR approved for Sec. 60.261.
(9) ASTM A482-93, Standard Specification for Ferrochromesilicon,
IBR approved for Sec. 60.261.
(10) ASTM A483-64, Standard Specification for Silicomanganese, IBR
approved for Sec. 60.261.
(11) ASTM A483-74 (Reapproved 1988), Standard Specification for
Silicomanganese, IBR approved for Sec. 60.261.
(12) ASTM A495-76, Standard Specification for Calcium-Silicon and
Calcium Manganese-Silicon, IBR approved for Sec. 60.261.
(13) ASTM A495-94, Standard Specification for Calcium-Silicon and
Calcium Manganese-Silicon, IBR approved for Sec. 60.261.
(14) ASTM D86-78, Distillation of Petroleum Products, IBR approved
for Sec. Sec. 60.562-2(d), 60.593(d), 60.593a(d), 60.633(h).
(15) ASTM D86-82, Distillation of Petroleum Products, IBR approved
for Sec. Sec. 60.562-2(d), 60.593(d), 60.593a(d), 60.633(h).
(16) ASTM D86-90, Distillation of Petroleum Products, IBR approved
for Sec. Sec. 60.562-2(d), 60.593(d), 60.593a(d), 60.633(h).
(17) ASTM D86-93, Distillation of Petroleum Products, IBR approved
for Sec. Sec. 60.562-2(d), 60.593(d), 60.593a(d), 60.633(h).
(18) ASTM D86-95, Distillation of Petroleum Products, IBR approved
for Sec. Sec. 60.562-2(d), 60.593(d), 60.593a(d), 60.633(h).
(19) ASTM D86-96, Distillation of Petroleum Products, (Approved
April 10, 1996), IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.562-2(d), 60.593(d),
60.593a(d), 60.633(h), and 60.5401(f).
(20) ASTM D129-64, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products (General Bomb Method), IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.106(j)
and appendix A-7 to part 60: Method 19, Section 12.5.2.2.3.
(21) ASTM D129-78, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products (General Bomb Method), IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.106(j)
and appendix A-7 to part 60: Method 19, Section 12.5.2.2.3.
(22) ASTM D129-95, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products (General Bomb Method), IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.106(j)
and appendix A-7 to part 60: Method 19, Section 12.5.2.2.3.
(23) ASTM D129-00, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products (General Bomb Method), IBR approved for Sec. 60.335(b).
(24) ASTM D129-00 (Reapproved 2005), Standard Test Method for
Sulfur in Petroleum Products (General Bomb Method), IBR approved for
Sec. 60.4415(a).
(25) ASTM D240-76, Standard Test Method for Heat of Combustion of
Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter, IBR approved for
Sec. Sec. 60.46(c), 60.296(b), and appendix A-7 to part 60: Method 19,
Section 12.5.2.2.3.
(26) ASTM D240-92, Standard Test Method for Heat of Combustion of
Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter, IBR approved for
Sec. Sec. 60.46(c), 60.296(b), and appendix A-7: Method 19, Section
12.5.2.2.3.
(27) ASTM D240-02 (Reapproved 2007), Standard Test Method for Heat
of Combustion of Liquid Hydrocarbon
[[Page 11244]]
Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter, (Approved May 1, 2007), IBR approved for
Sec. 60.107a(d).
(28) ASTM D270-65, Standard Method of Sampling Petroleum and
Petroleum Products, IBR approved for appendix A-7 to part 60: Method
19, Section 12.5.2.2.1.
(29) ASTM D270-75, Standard Method of Sampling Petroleum and
Petroleum Products, IBR approved for appendix A-7 to part 60: Method
19, Section 12.5.2.2.1.
(30) ASTM D323-82, Test Method for Vapor Pressure of Petroleum
Products (Reid Method), IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.111(l),
60.111a(g), 60.111b, and 60.116b(f).
(31) ASTM D323-94, Test Method for Vapor Pressure of Petroleum
Products (Reid Method), IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.111(l),
60.111a(g), 60.111b, and 60.116b(f).
(32) ASTM D388-77, Standard Specification for Classification of
Coals by Rank, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.41, 60.45(f), 60.41Da,
60.41b, 60.41c, and 60.251.
(33) ASTM D388-90, Standard Specification for Classification of
Coals by Rank, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.41, 60.45(f), 60.41Da,
60.41b, 60.41c, and 60.251.
(34) ASTM D388-91, Standard Specification for Classification of
Coals by Rank, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.41, 60.45(f), 60.41Da,
60.41b, 60.41c, and 60.251.
(35) ASTM D388-95, Standard Specification for Classification of
Coals by Rank, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.41, 60.45(f), 60.41Da,
60.41b, 60.41c, and 60.251.
(36) ASTM D388-98a, Standard Specification for Classification of
Coals by Rank, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.41, 60.45(f), 60.41Da,
60.41b, 60.41c, and 60.251.
(37) ASTM D388-99 (Reapproved 2004) [egr],\1\ Standard
Specification for Classification of Coals by Rank, IBR approved for
Sec. Sec. 60.41, 60.45(f), 60.41Da, 60.41b, 60.41c, and 60.251.
(38) ASTM D396-78, Standard Specification for Fuel Oils, IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 60.41b, 60.41c, 60.111(b), and 60.111a(b).
(39) ASTM D396-89, Standard Specification for Fuel Oils, IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 60.41b, 60.41c, 60.111(b), and 60.111a(b).
(40) ASTM D396-90, Standard Specification for Fuel Oils, IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 60.41b, 60.41c, 60.111(b), and 60.111a(b).
(41) ASTM D396-92, Standard Specification for Fuel Oils, IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 60.41b, 60.41c, 60.111(b), and 60.111a(b).
(42) ASTM D396-98, Standard Specification for Fuel Oils, IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 60.41b, 60.41c, 60.111(b), and 60.111a(b).
(43) ASTM D975-78, Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel Oils, IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 60.111(b) and 60.111a(b).
(44) ASTM D975-96, Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel Oils, IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 60.111(b) and 60.111a(b).
(45) ASTM D975-98a, Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel Oils,
IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.111(b) and 60.111a(b).
(46) ASTM D975-08a, Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel Oils,
IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.41b and 60.41c.
(47) ASTM D1072-80, Standard Test Method for Total Sulfur in Fuel
Gases, IBR approved for Sec. 60.335(b).
(48) ASTM D1072-90 (Reapproved 1994), Standard Test Method for
Total Sulfur in Fuel Gases, IBR approved for Sec. 60.335(b).
(49) ASTM D1072-90 (Reapproved 1999), Standard Test Method for
Total Sulfur in Fuel Gases, IBR approved for Sec. 60.4415(a).
(50) ASTM D1137-53, Standard Method for Analysis of Natural Gases
and Related Types of Gaseous Mixtures by the Mass Spectrometer, IBR
approved for Sec. 60.45(f).
(51) ASTM D1137-75, Standard Method for Analysis of Natural Gases
and Related Types of Gaseous Mixtures by the Mass Spectrometer, IBR
approved for Sec. 60.45(f).
(52) ASTM D1193-77, Standard Specification for Reagent Water, IBR
approved for appendix A-3 to part 60: Method 5, Section 7.1.3; Method
5E, Section 7.2.1; Method 5F, Section 7.2.1; appendix A-4 to part 60:
Method 6, Section 7.1.1; Method 7, Section 7.1.1; Method 7C, Section
7.1.1; Method 7D, Section 7.1.1; Method 10A, Section 7.1.1; appendix A-
5 to part 60: Method 11, Section 7.1.3; Method 12, Section 7.1.3;
Method 13A, Section 7.1.2; appendix A-8 to part 60: Method 26, Section
7.1.2; Method 26A, Section 7.1.2; and Method 29, Section 7.2.2.
(53) ASTM D1193-91, Standard Specification for Reagent Water, IBR
approved for appendix A-3 to part 60: Method 5, Section 7.1.3; Method
5E, Section 7.2.1; Method 5F, Section 7.2.1; appendix A-4 to part 60:
Method 6, Section 7.1.1; Method 7, Section 7.1.1; Method 7C, Section
7.1.1; Method 7D, Section 7.1.1; Method 10A, Section 7.1.1; appendix A-
5 to part 60: Method 11, Section 7.1.3; Method 12, Section 7.1.3;
Method 13A, Section 7.1.2; appendix A-8 to part 60: Method 26, Section
7.1.2; Method 26A, Section 7.1.2; and Method 29, Section 7.2.2.
(54) ASTM D1266-87, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products (Lamp Method), IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.106(j) and
60.335(b).
(55) ASTM D1266-91, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products (Lamp Method), IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.106(j) and
60.335(b).
(56) ASTM D1266-98, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products (Lamp Method), IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.106(j) and
60.335(b).
(57) ASTM D1266-98 (Reapproved 2003) [egr],\1\ Standard
Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (Lamp Method), IBR
approved for Sec. 60.4415(a).
(58) ASTM D1475-60 (Reapproved 1980), Standard Test Method for
Density of Paint, Varnish Lacquer, and Related Products, IBR approved
for Sec. 60.435(d), appendix A-8 to part 60: Method 24, Section 6.1;
and Method 24A, Sections 6.5 and 7.1.
(59) ASTM D1475-90, Standard Test Method for Density of Paint,
Varnish Lacquer, and Related Products, IBR approved for Sec.
60.435(d), appendix A-8 to part 60: Method 24, Section 6.1; and Method
24A, Sec. Sec. 6.5 and 7.1.
(60) ASTM D1552-83, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products (High-Temperature Method), IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
60.106(j), 60.335(b), and appendix A-7 to part 60: Method 19, Section
12.5.2.2.3.
(61) ASTM D1552-95, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products (High-Temperature Method), IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
60.106(j), 60.335(b), and appendix A-7 to part 60: Method 19, Section
12.5.2.2.3.
(62) ASTM D1552-01, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products (High-Temperature Method), IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
60.106(j), 60.335(b), and appendix A-7 to part 60: Method 19, Section
12.5.2.2.3.
(63) ASTM D1552-03, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products (High-Temperature Method), IBR approved for Sec. 60.4415(a).
(64) ASTM D1826-77, Standard Test Method for Calorific Value of
Gases in Natural Gas Range by Continuous Recording Calorimeter, IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 60.45(f), 60.46(c), 60.296(b), and appendix A-7
to part 60: Method 19, Section 12.3.2.4.
(65) ASTM D1826-94, Standard Test Method for Calorific Value of
Gases in Natural Gas Range by Continuous Recording Calorimeter, IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 60.45(f), 60.46(c), 60.296(b), and appendix A-7
to part 60: Method 19, Section 12.3.2.4.
(66) ASTM D1826-94 (Reapproved 2003), Standard Test Method for
[[Page 11245]]
Calorific (Heating) Value of Gases in Natural Gas Range by Continuous
Recording Calorimeter, (Approved May 10, 2003), IBR approved for Sec.
60.107a(d).
(67) ASTM D1835-87, Standard Specification for Liquefied Petroleum
(LP) Gases, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.41Da, 60.41b, and 60.41c.
(68) ASTM D1835-91, Standard Specification for Liquefied Petroleum
(LP) Gases, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.41Da, 60.41b, and 60.41c.
(69) ASTM D1835-97, Standard Specification for Liquefied Petroleum
(LP) Gases, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.41Da, 60.41b, and 60.41c.
(70) ASTM D1835-03a, Standard Specification for Liquefied Petroleum
(LP) Gases, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.41Da, 60.41b, and 60.41c.
(71) ASTM D1945-64, Standard Method for Analysis of Natural Gas by
Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for Sec. 60.45(f).
(72) ASTM D1945-76, Standard Method for Analysis of Natural Gas by
Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for Sec. 60.45(f).
(73) ASTM D1945-91, Standard Method for Analysis of Natural Gas by
Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for Sec. 60.45(f).
(74) ASTM D1945-96, Standard Method for Analysis of Natural Gas by
Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for Sec. 60.45(f).
(75) ASTM D1945-03 (Reapproved 2010), Standard Method for Analysis
of Natural Gas by Gas Chromatography, (Approved January 1, 2010), IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 60.107a(d) and 60.5413(d).
(76) ASTM D1946-77, Standard Method for Analysis of Reformed Gas by
Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.18(f), 60.45(f),
60.564(f), 60.614(e), 60.664(e), and 60.704(d).
(77) ASTM D1946-90 (Reapproved 1994), Standard Method for Analysis
of Reformed Gas by Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
60.18(f), 60.45(f), 60.564(f), 60.614(e), 60.664(e), and 60.704(d).
(78) ASTM D1946-90 (Reapproved 2006), Standard Method for Analysis
of Reformed Gas by Gas Chromatography, (Approved June 1, 2006), IBR
approved for Sec. 60.107a(d).
(79) ASTM D2013-72, Standard Method of Preparing Coal Samples for
Analysis, IBR approved for appendix A-7 to part 60: Method 19, Section
12.5.2.1.3.
(80) ASTM D2013-86, Standard Method of Preparing Coal Samples for
Analysis, IBR approved for appendix A-7 to part 60: Method 19, Section
12.5.2.1.3.
(81) ASTM D2015-77 (Reapproved 1978), Standard Test Method for
Gross Calorific Value of Solid Fuel by the Adiabatic Bomb Calorimeter,
IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.45(f), 60.46(c), and appendix A-7 to
part 60: Method 19, Section 12.5.2.1.3.
(82) ASTM D2015-96, Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value
of Solid Fuel by the Adiabatic Bomb Calorimeter, IBR approved for
Sec. Sec. 60.45(f), 60.46(c), and appendix A-7 to part 60: Method 19,
Section 12.5.2.1.3.
(83) ASTM D2016-74, Standard Test Methods for Moisture Content of
Wood, IBR approved for appendix A-8 to part 60: Method 28, Section
16.1.1.
(84) ASTM D2016-83, Standard Test Methods for Moisture Content of
Wood, IBR approved for appendix A-8 to part 60: Method 28, Section
16.1.1.
(85) ASTM D2234-76, Standard Methods for Collection of a Gross
Sample of Coal, IBR approved for appendix A-7 to part 60: Method 19,
Section 12.5.2.1.1.
(86) ASTM D2234-96, Standard Methods for Collection of a Gross
Sample of Coal, IBR approved for appendix A-7 to part 60: Method 19,
Section 12.5.2.1.1.
(87) ASTM D2234-97b, Standard Methods for Collection of a Gross
Sample of Coal, IBR approved for appendix A-7 to part 60: Method 19,
Section 12.5.2.1.1.
(88) ASTM D2234-98, Standard Methods for Collection of a Gross
Sample of Coal, IBR approved for appendix A-7 to part 60: Method 19,
Section 12.5.2.1.1.
(89) ASTM D2369-81, Standard Test Method for Volatile Content of
Coatings, IBR approved for appendix A-8 to part 60: Method 24, Section
6.2.
(90) ASTM D2369-87, Standard Test Method for Volatile Content of
Coatings, IBR approved for appendix A-8 to part 60: Method 24, Section
6.2.
(91) ASTM D2369-90, Standard Test Method for Volatile Content of
Coatings, IBR approved for appendix A-8 to part 60: Method 24, Section
6.2.
(92) ASTM D2369-92, Standard Test Method for Volatile Content of
Coatings, IBR approved for appendix A-8 to part 60: Method 24, Section
6.2.
(93) ASTM D2369-93, Standard Test Method for Volatile Content of
Coatings, IBR approved for appendix A-8 to part 60: Method 24, Section
6.2.
(94) ASTM D2369-95, Standard Test Method for Volatile Content of
Coatings, IBR approved for appendix A-8 to part 60: Method 24, Section
6.2.
(95) ASTM D2382-76, Heat of Combustion of Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb
Calorimeter (High-Precision Method), IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
60.18(f), 60.485(g), 60.485a(g), 60.564(f), 60.614(e), 60.664(e), and
60.704(d).
(96) ASTM D2382-88, Heat of Combustion of Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb
Calorimeter (High-Precision Method), IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
60.18(f), 60.485(g), 60.485a(g), 60.564(f), 60.614(e), 60.664(e), and
60.704(d).
(97) ASTM D2504-67, Noncondensable Gases in C3 and Lighter
Hydrocarbon Products by Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
60.485(g) and 60.485a(g).
(98) ASTM D2504-77, Noncondensable Gases in C3 and Lighter
Hydrocarbon Products by Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
60.485(g) and 60.485a(g).
(99) ASTM D2504-88 (Reapproved 1993), Noncondensable Gases in C3
and Lighter Hydrocarbon Products by Gas Chromatography, IBR approved
for Sec. Sec. 60.485(g) and 60.485a(g).
(100) ASTM D2584-68(Reapproved 1985), Standard Test Method for
Ignition Loss of Cured Reinforced Resins, IBR approved for Sec.
60.685(c).
(101) ASTM D2584-94, Standard Test Method for Ignition Loss of
Cured Reinforced Resins, IBR approved for Sec. 60.685(c).
(102) ASTM D2597-94 (Reapproved 1999), Standard Test Method for
Analysis of Demethanized Hydrocarbon Liquid Mixtures Containing
Nitrogen and Carbon Dioxide by Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for
Sec. 60.335(b).
(103) ASTM D2622-87, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products by Wavelength Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry, IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 60.106(j) and 60.335(b).
(104) ASTM D2622-94, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products by Wavelength Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry, IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 60.106(j) and 60.335(b).
(105) ASTM D2622-98, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products by Wavelength Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry, IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 60.106(j) and 60.335(b).
(106) ASTM D2622-05, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Products by Wavelength Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry, IBR
approved for Sec. 60.4415(a).
(107) ASTM D2879-83Test Method for Vapor Pressure-Temperature
Relationship and Initial Decomposition Temperature of Liquids by
Isoteniscope, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.111b(f)(3), 60.116b(e),
60.116b(f), 60.485(e), and 60.485a(e).
(108) ASTM D2879-96, Test Method for Vapor Pressure-Temperature
Relationship and Initial Decomposition
[[Page 11246]]
Temperature of Liquids by Isoteniscope, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
60.111b(f)(3), 60.116b(e), 60.116b(f), 60.485(e), and 60.485a(e).
(109) ASTM D2879-97, Test Method for Vapor Pressure-Temperature
Relationship and Initial Decomposition Temperature of Liquids by
Isoteniscope, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.111b(f)(3), 60.116b(e),
60.116b(f), 60.485(e), and 60.485a(e).
(110) ASTM D2880-78, Standard Specification for Gas Turbine Fuel
Oils, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.111(b), 60.111a(b), and 60.335(d).
(111) ASTM D2880-96, Standard Specification for Gas Turbine Fuel
Oils, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.111(b), 60.111a(b), and 60.335(d).
(112) ASTM D2908-74, Standard Practice for Measuring Volatile
Organic Matter in Water by Aqueous-Injection Gas Chromatography, IBR
approved for Sec. 60.564(j).
(113) ASTM D2908-91, Standard Practice for Measuring Volatile
Organic Matter in Water by Aqueous-Injection Gas Chromatography, IBR
approved for Sec. 60.564(j).
(114) ASTM D2986-71, Standard Method for Evaluation of Air, Assay
Media by the Monodisperse DOP (Dioctyl Phthalate) Smoke Test, IBR
approved for appendix A-3 to part 60: Method 5, Section 7.1.1; appendix
A-5 to part 60: Method 12, Section 7.1.1; and Method 13A, Section
7.1.1.2.
(115) ASTM D2986-78, Standard Method for Evaluation of Air, Assay
Media by the Monodisperse DOP (Dioctyl Phthalate) Smoke Test, IBR
approved for appendix A-3 to part 60: Method 5, Section 7.1.1; appendix
A-5 to part 60: Method 12, Section 7.1.1; and Method 13A, Section
7.1.1.2.
(116) ASTM D2986-95a, Standard Method for Evaluation of Air, Assay
Media by the Monodisperse DOP (Dioctyl Phthalate) Smoke Test, IBR
approved for appendix A-3 to part 60: Method 5, Section 7.1.1; appendix
A-5 to part 60: Method 12, Section 7.1.1; and Method 13A, Section
7.1.1.2.
(117) ASTM D3173-73, Standard Test Method for Moisture in the
Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke, IBR approved for appendix A-7 to part
60: Method 19, Section 12.5.2.1.3.
(118) ASTM D3173-87, Standard Test Method for Moisture in the
Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke, IBR approved for appendix A-7 to part
60: Method 19, Section 12.5.2.1.3.
(119) ASTM D3176-74, Standard Method for Ultimate Analysis of Coal
and Coke, IBR approved for Sec. 60.45(f)(5)(i) and appendix A-7 to
part 60: Method 19, Section 12.3.2.3.
(120) ASTM D3176-89, Standard Method for Ultimate Analysis of Coal
and Coke, IBR approved for Sec. 60.45(f)(5)(i) and appendix A-7 to
part 60: Method 19, Section 12.3.2.3.
(121) ASTM D3177-75, Standard Test Method for Total Sulfur in the
Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke, IBR approved for appendix A-7 to part
60: Method 19, Section 12.5.2.1.3.
(122) ASTM D3177-89, Standard Test Method for Total Sulfur in the
Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke, IBR approved for appendix A-7 to part
60: Method 19, Section 12.5.2.1.3.
(123) ASTM D3178-73 (Reapproved 1979), Standard Test Methods for
Carbon and Hydrogen in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke, IBR
approved for Sec. 60.45(f).
(124) ASTM D3178-89, Standard Test Methods for Carbon and Hydrogen
in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke, IBR approved for Sec.
60.45(f).
(125) ASTM D3246-81, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Gas by Oxidative Microcoulometry, IBR approved for Sec. 60.335(b).
(126) ASTM D3246-92, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Gas by Oxidative Microcoulometry, IBR approved for Sec. 60.335(b).
(127) ASTM D3246-96, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Gas by Oxidative Microcoulometry, IBR approved for Sec. 60.335(b).
(128) ASTM D3246-05, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
Gas by Oxidative Microcoulometry, IBR approved for Sec. 60.4415(a)(1).
(129) ASTM D3270-73T, Standard Test Methods for Analysis for
Fluoride Content of the Atmosphere and Plant Tissues (Semiautomated
Method), IBR approved for appendix A-5 to part 60: Method 13A, Section
16.1.
(130) ASTM D3270-80, Standard Test Methods for Analysis for
Fluoride Content of the Atmosphere and Plant Tissues (Semiautomated
Method), IBR approved for appendix A-5 to part 60: Method 13A, Section
16.1.
(131) ASTM D3270-91, Standard Test Methods for Analysis for
Fluoride Content of the Atmosphere and Plant Tissues (Semiautomated
Method), IBR approved for appendix A-5 to part 60: Method 13A, Section
16.1.
(132) ASTM D3270-95, Standard Test Methods for Analysis for
Fluoride Content of the Atmosphere and Plant Tissues (Semiautomated
Method), IBR approved for appendix A-5 to part 60: Method 13A, Section
16.1.
(133) ASTM D3286-85, Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value
of Coal and Coke by the Isoperibol Bomb Calorimeter, IBR approved for
appendix A-7 to part 60: Method 19, Section 12.5.2.1.3.
(134) ASTM D3286-96, Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value
of Coal and Coke by the Isoperibol Bomb Calorimeter, IBR approved for
appendix A-7 to part 60: Method 19, Section 12.5.2.1.3.
(135) ASTM D3370-76, Standard Practices for Sampling Water, IBR
approved for Sec. 60.564(j).
(136) ASTM D3370-95a, Standard Practices for Sampling Water, IBR
approved for Sec. 60.564(j).
(137) ASTM D3588-98 (Reapproved 2003), Standard Practice for
Calculating Heat Value, Compressibility Factor, and Relative Density of
Gaseous Fuels, (Approved May 10, 2003), IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
60.107a(d) and 60.5413(d).
(138) ASTM D3699-08, Standard Specification for Kerosine, including
Appendix X1, (Approved September 1, 2008), IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
60.41b and 60.41c.
(139) ASTM D3792-79, Standard Test Method for Water Content of
Water-Reducible Paints by Direct Injection into a Gas Chromatograph,
IBR approved for appendix A-7 to part 60: Method 24, Section 6.3.
(140) ASTM D3792-91, Standard Test Method for Water Content of
Water-Reducible Paints by Direct Injection into a Gas Chromatograph,
IBR approved for appendix A-7 to part 60: Method 24, Section 6.3.
(141) ASTM D4017-81, Standard Test Method for Water in Paints and
Paint Materials by the Karl Fischer Titration Method, IBR approved for
appendix A-7 to part 60: Method 24, Section 6.4.
(142) ASTM D4017-90, Standard Test Method for Water in Paints and
Paint Materials by the Karl Fischer Titration Method, IBR approved for
appendix A-7 to part 60: Method 24, Section 6.4.
(143) ASTM D4017-96a, Standard Test Method for Water in Paints and
Paint Materials by the Karl Fischer Titration Method, IBR approved for
appendix A-7 to part 60: Method 24, Section 6.4.
(144) ASTM D4057-81, Standard Practice for Manual Sampling of
Petroleum and Petroleum Products, IBR approved for appendix A-7 to part
60: Method 19, Section 12.5.2.2.3.
(145) ASTM D4057-95, Standard Practice for Manual Sampling of
Petroleum and Petroleum Products, IBR approved for appendix A-7 to part
60: Method 19, Section 12.5.2.2.3.
(146) ASTM D4057-95 (Reapproved 2000), Standard Practice for Manual
Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products, IBR approved for Sec.
60.4415(a).
(147) ASTM D4084-82, Standard Test Method for Analysis of Hydrogen
[[Page 11247]]
Sulfide in Gaseous Fuels (Lead Acetate Reaction Rate Method), IBR
approved for Sec. 60.334(h).
(148) ASTM D4084-94, Standard Test Method for Analysis of Hydrogen
Sulfide in Gaseous Fuels (Lead Acetate Reaction Rate Method), IBR
approved for Sec. 60.334(h).
(149) ASTM D4084-05, Standard Test Method for Analysis of Hydrogen
Sulfide in Gaseous Fuels (Lead Acetate Reaction Rate Method), IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 60.4360 and 60.4415(a).
(150) ASTM D4177-95, Standard Practice for Automatic Sampling of
Petroleum and Petroleum Products, IBR approved for appendix A-7 to part
60: Method 19, Section 12.5.2.2.1.
(151) ASTM D4177-95 (Reapproved 2000), Standard Practice for
Automatic Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products, IBR approved
for Sec. 60.4415(a).
(152) ASTM D4239-85, Standard Test Methods for Sulfur in the
Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke Using High Temperature Tube Furnace
Combustion Methods, IBR approved for appendix A-7 to part 60: Method
19, Section 12.5.2.1.3.
(153) ASTM D4239-94, Standard Test Methods for Sulfur in the
Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke Using High Temperature Tube Furnace
Combustion Methods, IBR approved for appendix A-7 to part 60: Method
19, Section 12.5.2.1.3.
(154) ASTM D4239-97, Standard Test Methods for Sulfur in the
Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke Using High Temperature Tube Furnace
Combustion Methods, IBR approved for appendix A-7 to part 60: Method
19, Section 12.5.2.1.3.
(155) ASTM D4294-02, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
and Petroleum Products by Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence
Spectrometry, IBR approved for Sec. 60.335(b).
(156) ASTM D4294-03, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum
and Petroleum Products by Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence
Spectrometry, IBR approved for Sec. 60.4415(a).
(157) ASTM D4442-84, Standard Test Methods for Direct Moisture
Content Measurement in Wood and Wood-base Materials, IBR approved for
appendix A-8 to part 60: Method 28, Section 16.1.1.
(158) ASTM D4442-92, Standard Test Methods for Direct Moisture
Content Measurement in Wood and Wood-base Materials, IBR approved for
appendix A-8 to part 60: Method 28, Section 16.1.1.
(159) ASTM D4444-92, Standard Test Methods for Use and Calibration
of Hand-Held Moisture Meters, IBR approved for appendix A-8 to part 60:
Method 28, Section 16.1.1.
(160) ASTM D4457-85 (Reapproved 1991), Test Method for
Determination of Dichloromethane and 1,1,1-Trichloroethane in Paints
and Coatings by Direct Injection into a Gas Chromatograph, IBR approved
for appendix A-7 to part 60: Method 24, Section 6.5.
(161) ASTM D4468-85 (Reapproved 2000), Standard Test Method for
Total Sulfur in Gaseous Fuels by Hydrogenolysis and Rateometric
Colorimetry, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.335(b) and 60.4415(a).
(162) ASTM D4468-85 (Reapproved 2006), Standard Test Method for
Total Sulfur in Gaseous Fuels by Hydrogenolysis and Rateometric
Colorimetry, (Approved June 1, 2006), IBR approved for Sec.
60.107a(e).
(163) ASTM D4629-02, Standard Test Method for Trace Nitrogen in
Liquid Petroleum Hydrocarbons by Syringe/Inlet Oxidative Combustion and
Chemiluminescence Detection, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.49b(e) and
60.335(b).
(164) ASTM D4809-95, Standard Test Method for Heat of Combustion of
Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter (Precision Method), IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 60.18(f), 60.485(g), 60.485a(g), 60.564(f),
60.614(d), 60.664(e), and 60.704(d).
(165) ASTM D4809-06, Standard Test Method for Heat of Combustion of
Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter (Precision Method),
(Approved December 1, 2006), IBR approved for Sec. 60.107a(d).
(166) ASTM D4810-88 (Reapproved 1999), Standard Test Method for
Hydrogen Sulfide in Natural Gas Using Length of Stain Detector Tubes,
IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.4360 and 60.4415(a).
(167) ASTM D4891-89 (Reapproved 2006) Standard Test Method for
Heating Value of Gases in Natural Gas Range by Stoichiometric
Combustion, (Approved June 1, 2006), IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
60.107a(d) and 60.5413(d).
(168) ASTM D5287-97 (Reapproved 2002), Standard Practice for
Automatic Sampling of Gaseous Fuels, IBR approved for Sec. 60.4415(a).
(169) ASTM D5403-93, Standard Test Methods for Volatile Content of
Radiation Curable Materials, IBR approved for appendix A-7 to part 60:
Method 24, Section 6.6.
(170) ASTM D5453-00, Standard Test Method for Determination of
Total Sulfur in Light Hydrocarbons, Motor Fuels and Oils by Ultraviolet
Fluorescence, IBR approved for Sec. 60.335(b).
(171) ASTM D5453-05, Standard Test Method for Determination of
Total Sulfur in Light Hydrocarbons, Motor Fuels and Oils by Ultraviolet
Fluorescence, IBR approved for Sec. 60.4415(a).
(172) ASTM D5504-01, Standard Test Method for Determination of
Sulfur Compounds in Natural Gas and Gaseous Fuels by Gas Chromatography
and Chemiluminescence, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.334(h) and
60.4360.
(173) ASTM D5504-08, Standard Test Method for Determination of
Sulfur Compounds in Natural Gas and Gaseous Fuels by Gas Chromatography
and Chemiluminescence, (Approved June 15, 2008), IBR approved for
Sec. Sec. 60.107a(e) and 60.5413(d).
(174) ASTM D5762-02, Standard Test Method for Nitrogen in Petroleum
and Petroleum Products by Boat-Inlet Chemiluminescence, IBR approved
for Sec. 60.335(b).
(175) ASTM D5865-98, Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value
of Coal and Coke, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.45(f) and 60.46(c),
and appendix A-7 to part 60: Method 19, Section 12.5.2.1.3.
(176) ASTM D5865-10, Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value
of Coal and Coke, (Approved January 1, 2010), IBR approved for
Sec. Sec. 60.45(f), 60.46(c), and appendix A-7 to part 60: Method 19,
section 12.5.2.1.3.
(177) ASTM D6216-98, Standard Practice for Opacity Monitor
Manufacturers to Certify Conformance with Design and Performance
Specifications, IBR approved for appendix B to part 60: Performance
Specification 1.
(178) ASTM D6228-98, Standard Test Method for Determination of
Sulfur Compounds in Natural Gas and Gaseous Fuels by Gas Chromatography
and Flame Photometric Detection, IBR approved for Sec. 60.334(h).
(179) ASTM D6228-98 (Reapproved 2003), Standard Test Method for
Determination of Sulfur Compounds in Natural Gas and Gaseous Fuels by
Gas Chromatography and Flame Photometric Detection, IBR approved for
Sec. Sec. 60.4360 and 60.4415.
(180) ASTM D6348-03, Standard Test Method for Determination of
Gaseous Compounds by Extractive Direct Interface Fourier Transform
Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy, (Approved October 1, 2003), IBR approved
for Sec. 60.73a(b), table 7 to subpart IIII, and table 2 to subpart
JJJJ.
(181) ASTM D6366-99, Standard Test Method for Total Trace Nitrogen
and Its Derivatives in Liquid Aromatic Hydrocarbons by Oxidative
Combustion and Electrochemical Detection, IBR approved for Sec.
60.335(b)(9).
[[Page 11248]]
(182) ASTM D6420-99 (Reapproved 2004), Standard Test Method for
Determination of Gaseous Organic Compounds by Direct Interface Gas
Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, (Approved October 1, 2004), IBR
approved for Sec. 60.107a(d) and table 2 to subpart JJJJ.
(183) ASTM D6522-00, Standard Test Method for Determination of
Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Monoxide, and Oxygen Concentrations in
Emissions from Natural Gas-Fired Reciprocating Engines, Combustion
Turbines, Boilers, and Process Heaters Using Portable Analyzers, IBR
approved for Sec. 60.335(a).
(184) ASTM D6522-00 (Reapproved 2005), Standard Test Method for
Determination of Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Monoxide, and Oxygen
Concentrations in Emissions from Natural Gas-Fired Reciprocating
Engines, Combustion Turbines, Boilers, and Process Heaters Using
Portable Analyzers, (Approved October 1, 2005), IBR approved for table
2 to subpart JJJJ, and Sec. Sec. 60.5413(b) and (d).
(185) ASTM D6667-01, Standard Test Method for Determination of
Total Volatile Sulfur in Gaseous Hydrocarbons and Liquefied Petroleum
Gases by Ultraviolet Fluorescence, IBR approved for Sec. 60.335(b).
(186) ASTM D6667-04, Standard Test Method for Determination of
Total Volatile Sulfur in Gaseous Hydrocarbons and Liquefied Petroleum
Gases by Ultraviolet Fluorescence, IBR approved for Sec. 60.4415(a).
(187) ASTM D6751-11b, Standard Specification for Biodiesel Fuel
Blend Stock (B100) for Middle Distillate Fuels, including Appendices X1
through X3, (Approved July 15, 2011), IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
60.41b and 60.41c.
(188) ASTM D6784-02, Standard Test Method for Elemental, Oxidized,
Particle-Bound and Total Mercury in Flue Gas Generated from Coal-Fired
Stationary Sources (Ontario Hydro Method), IBR approved for Sec.
60.56c(b) and appendix B to part 60: Performance Specification 12A,
Section 8.6.2.
(189) ASTM D6784-02 (Reapproved 2008) Standard Test Method for
Elemental, Oxidized, Particle-Bound and Total Mercury in Flue Gas
Generated from Coal-Fired Stationary Sources (Ontario Hydro Method),
(Approved April 1, 2008), IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.2165(j) and
60.2730(j), tables 1, 5, 6 and 8 to subpart CCCC, and tables 2, 6, 7,
and 9 to subpart DDDD, Sec. Sec. 60.4900(b), 60.5220(b), tables 1 and
2 to subpart LLLL, and tables 2 and 3 to subpart MMMM.
(190) ASTM D7467-10, Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel Oil,
Biodiesel Blend (B6 to B20), including Appendices X1 through X3,
(Approved August 1, 2010), IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.41b and
60.41c.
(191) ASTM E168-67, General Techniques of Infrared Quantitative
Analysis, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.485a(d), 60.593(b),
60.593a(b), and 60.632(f).
(192) ASTM E168-77, General Techniques of Infrared Quantitative
Analysis, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.485a(d), 60.593(b),
60.593a(b), and 60.632(f).
(193) ASTM E168-92, General Techniques of Infrared Quantitative
Analysis, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.485a(d)(1), 60.593(b)(2),
60.593a(b)(2), 60.632(f), and 60.5400.
(194) ASTM E169-63, General Techniques of Ultraviolet Quantitative
Analysis, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.485a(d), 60.593(b),
60.593a(b), and 60.632(f) .
(195) ASTM E169-77, General Techniques of Ultraviolet Quantitative
Analysis, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.485a(d), 60.593(b), and
60.593a(b), 60.632(f).
(196) ASTM E169-93, General Techniques of Ultraviolet Quantitative
Analysis, (Approved May 15, 1993), IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
60.485a(d), 60.593(b), 60.593a(b), 60.632(f), and 60.5400(f).
(197) ASTM E260-73, General Gas Chromatography Procedures, IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 60.485a(d), 60.593(b), 60.593a(b), and
60.632(f).
(198) ASTM E260-91, General Gas Chromatography Procedures, (IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 60.485a(d), 60.593(b), 60.593a(b), and
60.632(f).
(199) ASTM E260-96, General Gas Chromatography Procedures,
(Approved April 10, 1996), IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.485a(d),
60.593(b), 60.593a(b), 60.632(f), 60.5400(f), and 60.5406(b).
(200) ASTM E1584-11, Standard Test Method for Assay of Nitric Acid,
(Approved August 1, 2011), IBR approved for Sec. 60.73a(c).
(201) ASTM UOP539-97, Refinery Gas Analysis by Gas Chromatography,
(Copyright 1997), IBR approved for Sec. 60.107a(d).
(h) Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 1111 North 19th
Street, Suite 210, Arlington, VA 22209.
(1) AOAC Method 9, Official Methods of Analysis of the Association
of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC), 11th edition, 1970, pp. 11-12,
IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.204(b), 60.214(b), 60.224(b), and
60.234(b).
(2) [Reserved]
(i) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 272-0167, https://www.epa.gov.
(1) EPA-454/R-98-015, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
(OAQPS) Fabric Filter Bag Leak Detection Guidance, September 1997, IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 60.2145(r), 60.2710(r), 60.4905(b), and
60.5225(b).
(2) [Reserved]
(j) The Gas Processors Association, 6526 East 60th Street, Tulsa,
OK 74145; also available through Information Handling Services, 15
Inverness Way East, PO Box 1154, Englewood, CO 80150-1154. You may
inspect a copy at the EPA's Air and Radiation Docket and Information
Center, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.
(1) Gas Processors Association Standard 2172-09, Calculation of
Gross Heating Value, Relative Density, Compressibility and Theoretical
Hydrocarbon Liquid Content for Natural Gas Mixtures for Custody
Transfer (2009), IBR approved for Sec. 60.107a(d).
(2) Gas Processors Association Standard 2261-00, Analysis for
Natural Gas and Similar Gaseous Mixtures by Gas Chromatography (2000),
IBR approved for Sec. 60.107a(d).
(3) Gas Processors Association Standard 2377-86, Test for Hydrogen
Sulfide and Carbon Dioxide in Natural Gas Using Length of Stain Tubes,
1986 Revision, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.105(b), 60.107a(b),
60.334(h), 60.4360, and 60.4415(a).
(k) International Organization for Standardization (ISO) available
through IHS Inc., 15 Inverness Way East, Englewood, CO 80112.
(1) ISO 8178-4: 1996(E), Reciprocating Internal Combustion
Engines--Exhaust Emission Measurement--part 4: Test Cycles for
Different Engine Applications, IBR approved for Sec. 60.4241(b).
(2) [Reserved]
(l) International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 1, ch. de
la Voie-Creuse, Case postale 56, CH-1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland, +41 22
749 01 11, https://www.iso.org/iso/home.htm.
(1) ISO 8316: Measurement of Liquid Flow in Closed Conduits--Method
by Collection of the Liquid in a Volumetric Tank (1987-10-01)--First
Edition, IBR approved for Sec. 60.107a(d).
(2) [Reserved]
(m) This material is available for purchase from the National
Technical Information Services (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road,
Springfield, Virginia 22161. You may inspect a copy at the EPA's Air
and Radiation Docket and Information Center (Docket A-91-61, Item IV-J-
125), Room M-1500, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.
(1) OMB Bulletin No. 93-17: Revised Statistical Definitions for
Metropolitan Areas. Office of Management and
[[Page 11249]]
Budget, June 30, 1993. NTIS No. PB 93-192-664. IBR approved for Sec.
60.31e.
(2) [Reserved]
(n) North American Electric Reliability Corporation, 1325 G Street
NW., Suite 600, Washington, DC 20005-3801, https://www.nerc.com.
(1) North American Electric Reliability Corporation Reliability
Standard EOP-002-3, Capacity and Energy Emergencies, updated November
19, 2012, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 60.4211(f) and 60.4243(d). Also
available online: https://www.nerc.com/files/EOP-002-3_1.pdf.
(2) [Reserved]
(o) Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry (TAPPI),
Dunwoody Park, Atlanta, GA 30341.
(1) TAPPI Method T624 os-68, IBR approved for Sec. 60.285(d).
(2) [Reserved]
(p) Underwriter's Laboratories, Inc. (UL), 333 Pfingsten Road,
Northbrook, IL 60062.
(1) UL 103, Sixth Edition revised as of September 3, 1986, Standard
for Chimneys, Factory-built, Residential Type and Building Heating
Appliance, IBR approved for Appendix A-8 to part 60.
(2) [Reserved]
(q) Water Pollution Control Federation (WPCF), 2626 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20037.
(1) Method 209A, Total Residue Dried at 103-105 [deg]C, in Standard
Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 15th Edition,
1980, IBR approved for Sec. 60.683(b).
(2) [Reserved]
(r) West Coast Lumber Inspection Bureau, 6980 SW. Barnes Road,
Portland, OR 97223.
(1) West Coast Lumber Standard Grading Rules No. 16, pages 5-21, 90
and 91, September 3, 1970, revised 1984, IBR approved for Appendix A-8
to part 60.
(2) [Reserved]
Subpart Db--[Amended]
0
7. Amend Sec. 60.46b by revising paragraphs (f)(1)(ii) and (h)(1) and
(h)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.46b Compliance and performance test methods and procedures
for particulate matter and nitrogen oxides.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Method 7E of appendix A of this part or Method 320 of appendix
A of part 63 shall be used to determine the NOX
concentrations. Method 3A or 3B of appendix A of this part shall be
used to determine O2 concentration.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(1) Conduct an initial performance test as required under Sec.
60.8 over a minimum of 24 consecutive steam generating unit operating
hours at maximum heat input capacity to demonstrate compliance with the
NOX emission standards under Sec. 60.44b using Method 7,
7A, or 7E of appendix A of this part, Method 320 of appendix A of part
63 of this chapter, or other approved reference methods; and
(2) Conduct subsequent performance tests once per calendar year or
every 400 hours of operation (whichever comes first) to demonstrate
compliance with the NOX emission standards under Sec.
60.44b over a minimum of 3 consecutive steam generating unit operating
hours at maximum heat input capacity using Method 7, 7A, or 7E of
appendix A of this part, Method 320 of appendix A of part 63, or other
approved reference methods.
* * * * *
0
8. Amend Sec. 60.47b by revising paragraph (b)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.47b Emission monitoring for sulfur dioxide.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Measuring SO2 according to Method 6B of appendix A
of this part at the inlet or outlet to the SO2 control
system. An initial stratification test is required to verify the
adequacy of the sampling location for Method 6B of appendix A of this
part. The stratification test shall consist of three paired runs of a
suitable SO2 and CO2 measurement train operated
at the candidate location and a second similar train operated according
to the procedures in Section 3.2 and the applicable procedures in
Section 7 of Performance Specification 2. Method 6B of appendix A of
this part, Method 6A of appendix A of this part, or a combination of
Methods 6 and 3 or 3B of appendix A of this part or Methods 6C or
Method 320 of appendix A of part 63 of this chapter and 3A of appendix
A of this part are suitable measurement techniques. If Method 6B of
appendix A of this part is used for the second train, sampling time and
timer operation may be adjusted for the stratification test as long as
an adequate sample volume is collected; however, both sampling trains
are to be operated similarly. For the location to be adequate for
Method 6B of appendix A of this part, 24-hour tests, the mean of the
absolute difference between the three paired runs must be less than 10
percent.
* * * * *
Subpart Ec--[Amended]
0
9. Amend Sec. 60.51c by revising the definition of ``Medical/
infectious waste'' to read as follows:
Sec. 60.51c Definitions.
* * * * *
Medical/infectious waste means any waste generated in the
diagnosis, treatment, or immunization of human beings or animals, in
research pertaining thereto, or in the production or testing of
biologicals that are listed in paragraphs (1) through (7) of this
definition. The definition of medical/infectious waste does not include
hazardous waste identified or listed under the regulations in part 261
of this chapter; household waste, as defined in Sec. 261.4(b)(1) of
this chapter; ash from incineration of medical/infectious waste, once
the incineration process has been completed; human corpses, remains,
and anatomical parts that are intended for interment or cremation; and
domestic sewage materials identified in Sec. 261.4(a)(1) of this
chapter.
(1) Cultures and stocks of infectious agents and associated
biologicals, including: Cultures from medical and pathological
laboratories; cultures and stocks of infectious agents from research
and industrial laboratories; wastes from the production of biologicals;
discarded live and attenuated vaccines; and culture dishes and devices
used to transfer, inoculate, and mix cultures.
(2) Human pathological waste, including tissues, organs, and body
parts and body fluids that are removed during surgery or autopsy, or
other medical procedures, and specimens of body fluids and their
containers.
(3) Human blood and blood products including:
(i) Liquid waste human blood;
(ii) Products of blood;
(iii) Items saturated and/or dripping with human blood; or
(iv) Items that were saturated and/or dripping with human blood
that are now caked with dried human blood; including serum, plasma, and
other blood components, and their containers, which were used or
intended for use in either patient care, testing and laboratory
analysis or the development of pharmaceuticals. Intravenous bags are
also included in this category.
(4) Sharps that have been used in animal or human patient care or
treatment or in medical, research, or industrial laboratories,
including hypodermic needles, syringes (with or without the attached
needle), pasteur pipettes, scalpel blades, blood vials, needles with
attached tubing, and
[[Page 11250]]
culture dishes (regardless of presence of infectious agents). Also
included are other types of broken or unbroken glassware that were in
contact with infectious agents, such as used slides and cover slips.
(5) Animal waste including contaminated animal carcasses, body
parts, and bedding of animals that were known to have been exposed to
infectious agents during research (including research in veterinary
hospitals), production of biologicals or testing of pharmaceuticals.
(6) Isolation wastes including biological waste and discarded
materials contaminated with blood, excretions, exudates, or secretions
from humans who are isolated to protect others from certain highly
communicable diseases, or isolated animals known to be infected with
highly communicable diseases.
(7) Unused sharps including the following unused, discarded sharps:
hypodermic needles, suture needles, syringes, and scalpel blades.
* * * * *
Subpart H--[Amended]
0
10. Amend Sec. 60.84 by revising the equation in paragraph (d) to read
as follows:
Sec. 60.84 Emission monitoring.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
Es = (Cs S)/[0.265 - (0.0126 %O2) - (A
%CO2)]
* * * * *
Subpart O--[Amended]
0
11. Amend Sec. 60.154 by revising the introductory text to paragraph
(b)(5) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.154 Test methods and procedures.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(5) Samples of the sludge charged to the incinerator shall be
collected in nonporous jars at the beginning of each run and at
approximately 1-hour intervals thereafter until the test ends; and
``2540 G. Total, Fixed, and Volatile Solids in Solid and Semisolid
Samples, in Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater, 20th Edition, 1998'' (incorporated by reference--see Sec.
60.17) shall be used to determine dry sludge content of each sample
(total solids residue), except that:
* * * * *
Subpart BB--[Amended]
0
12. Amend Sec. 60.284 by revising the equation in paragraph (c)(3) to
read as follows:
Sec. 60.284 Monitoring of emissions and operations.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
Ccorr = C meas x (21- X)/(21- Y)
* * *
* * * * *
Subpart GG--[Amended]
0
13. Amend Sec. 60.335 by revising the terms Pr and
Po for the equation in paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.335 Test methods and procedures.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
Pr = reference combustor inlet absolute pressure at
101.3 kilopascals ambient pressure. Alternatively, you may use 760 mm
Hg (29.92 in Hg),
Po = observed combustor inlet absolute pressure at test,
mm Hg. Alternatively, you may use the barometric pressure for the date
of the test,
* * * * *
Subpart KK--[Amended]
0
14. Amend Sec. 60.374 by revising paragraphs (b)(1), (b)(2), and
(c)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.374 Test methods and procedures.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) Method 12 or Method 29 shall be used to determine the lead
concentration (CPb) and, if applicable, the volumetric flow
rate (Qsda) of the effluent gas. The sampling time and
sample volume for each run shall be at least 60 minutes and 0.85 dscm
(30 dscf).
(2) When different operations in a three-process operation facility
are ducted to separate control devices, the lead emission concentration
(C) from the facility shall be determined as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.006
Where:
C = concentration of lead emissions for the entire facility, mg/dscm
(gr/dscf).
Ca = concentration of lead emissions from facility ``a'',
mg/dscm (gr/dscf).
Qsda = volumetric flow rate of effluent gas from facility
``a'', dscm/hr (dscf/hr).
N = total number of control devices to which separate operations in
the facility are ducted.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) Method 12 or Method 29 shall be used to determine the lead
concentration (CPb) and the volumetric flow rate
(Qsd) of the effluent gas. The sampling time and sample
volume for each run shall be at least 60 minutes and 0.85 dscm (30
dscf).
* * * * *
Subpart LL--[Amended]
0
15. Amend Sec. 60.382 by revising paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.382 Standard for particulate matter.
(a) * * *
(1) Contain particulate matter in excess of 0.05 grams per dry
standard cubic meter (0.05 g/dscm).
* * * * *
0
16. Amend Sec. 60.386 by revising paragraph (b)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.386 Test methods and procedures.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Method 9 and the procedures in Sec. 60.11 shall be used to
determine opacity from stack emissions and process fugitive emissions.
The observer shall read opacity only when emissions are clearly
identified as emanating solely from the affected facility being
observed. A single visible emission observer may conduct visible
emission observations for up to three fugitive, stack, or vent emission
points within a 15-second interval. This option is subject to the
following limitations:
(i) No more than three emission points are read concurrently;
(ii) All three emission points must be within a 70[deg] viewing
sector or angle in front of the observer such that the proper sun
position can be maintained for all three points; and
(iii) If an opacity reading for any one of the three emission
points is within 5 percent opacity of the application standard, then
the observer must stop taking readings for the other two points and
continue reading just that single point.
* * * * *
Subpart UU--[Amended]
0
17. Amend Sec. 60.472 by revising paragraph (a)(1)(ii) to read as
follows:
Sec. 60.472 Standards for particulate matter.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
[[Page 11251]]
(ii) 0.4 kg/Mg (0.8 lb/ton) of saturated felt or smooth-surfaced
roll roofing produced;
* * * * *
Subpart NNN--[Amended]
0
18. Amend Sec. 60.660 by revising paragraph (c)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.660 Applicability and designation of affected facility.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(4) Each affected facility that has a total resource effectiveness
(TRE) index value greater than 8.0 is exempt from all provisions of
this subpart except for Sec. Sec. 60.662; 60.664 (e), (f), and (g);
and 60.665 (h) and (l).
* * * * *
0
19. Amend Sec. 60.665 by revising paragraphs (h)(2) and (h)(3) to read
as follows:
Sec. 60.665 Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(2) Any recalculation of the TRE index value performed pursuant to
Sec. 60.664(g); and
(3) The results of any performance test performed pursuant to the
methods and procedures required by Sec. 60.664(e).
* * * * *
Subpart IIII--[Amended]
0
20. Revise Table 7 to Subpart IIII of part 60 to read as follows:
As stated in Sec. 60.4213, you must comply with the following
requirements for performance tests for stationary CI ICE with a
displacement of >=30 liters per cylinder:
Table 7 to Subpart IIII of Part 60--Requirements for Performance Tests for Stationary CI ICE with a Displacement of >=30 Liters per Cylinder
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Complying with the According to the following
Each requirement to You must Using requirements
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Stationary CI internal a. Reduce NOX emissions by 90 i. Select the sampling port ............................. (a) For NOX, O2, and
combustion engine with a percent or more; location and number/location moisture measurement, ducts
displacement of >= 30 liters of traverse points at the <=6 inches in diameter may
per cylinder inlet and outlet of the be sampled at a single
control device; point located at the duct
centroid and ducts >6 and
<=12 inches in diameter may
be sampled at 3 traverse
points located at 16.7,
50.0, and 83.3% of the
measurement line (`3-point
long line'). If the duct is
>12 inches in diameter and
the sampling port location
meets the two and half-
diameter criterion of
Section 11.1.1 of Method 1
of 40 CFR part 60, appendix
A-1, the duct may be
sampled at `3-point long
line'; otherwise, conduct
the stratification testing
and select sampling points
according to Section 8.1.2
of Method 7E of 40 CFR part
60, appendix A-4.
............................. ii. Measure O2 at the inlet (1) Method 3, 3A, or 3B of 40 (b) Measurements to
and outlet of the control CFR part 60, appendix A-2 determine O2 concentration
device; must be made at the same
time as the measurements
for NOX concentration.
............................. iii. If necessary, measure (2) Method 4 of 40 CFR part (c) Measurements to
moisture content at the 60, appendix A-3, Method 320 determine moisture content
inlet and outlet of the of 40 CFR part 63, appendix must be made at the same
control device; and A, or ASTM D 6348-03 time as the measurements
(incorporated by reference, for NOX concentration.
see Sec. 60.17)
............................. iv. Measure NOX at the inlet (3) Method 7E of 40 CFR part (d) NOX concentration must
and outlet of the control 60, appendix A-4, Method 320 be at 15 percent O2, dry
device. of 40 CFR part 63, appendix basis. Results of this test
A, or ASTM D 6348-03 consist of the average of
(incorporated by reference, the three 1-hour or longer
see Sec. 60.17) runs.
[[Page 11252]]
b. Limit the concentration of i. Select the sampling port ............................. (a) For NOX, O2, and
NOX in the stationary CI location and number/location moisture measurement, ducts
internal combustion engine of traverse points at the <=6 inches in diameter may
exhaust. exhaust of the stationary be sampled at a single
internal combustion engine; point located at the duct
centroid and ducts >6 and
<=12 inches in diameter may
be sampled at 3 traverse
points located at 16.7,
50.0, and 83.3% of the
measurement line (`3-point
long line'). If the duct is
>12 inches in diameter and
the sampling port location
meets the two and half-
diameter criterion of
Section 11.1.1 of Method 1
of 40 CFR part 60, appendix
A-1, the duct may be
sampled at `3-point long
line'; otherwise, conduct
the stratification testing
and select sampling points
according to Section 8.1.2
of Method 7E of 40 CFR part
60, appendix A-4.
............................. ii. Determine the O2 (1) Method 3, 3A, or 3B of 40 (b) Measurements to
concentration of the CFR part 60, appendix A-2 determine O2 concentration
stationary internal must be made at the same
combustion engine exhaust at time as the measurement for
the sampling port location; NOX concentration.
............................. iii. If necessary, measure (2) Method 4 of 40 CFR part (c) Measurements to
moisture content of the 60, appendix A-3, Method 320 determine moisture content
stationary internal of 40 CFR part 63, appendix must be made at the same
combustion engine exhaust at A, or ASTM D 6348-03 time as the measurement for
the sampling port location; (incorporated by reference, NOX concentration.
and see Sec. 60.17)
............................. iv. Measure NOX at the (3) Method 7E of 40 CFR part (d) NOX concentration must
exhaust of the stationary 60, Appendix A-4, Method 320 be at 15 percent O2, dry
internal combustion engine; of 40 CFR part 63, appendix basis. Results of this test
if using a control device, A, or ASTM D 6348-03 consist of the average of
the sampling site must be (incorporated by reference, the three 1-hour or longer
located at the outlet of the see Sec. 60.17) runs.
control device.
c. Reduce PM emissions by 60 i. Select the sampling port (1) Method 1 or 1A of 40 CFR (a) Sampling sites must be
percent or more location and the number of part 60, appendix A-1 located at the inlet and
traverse points; outlet of the control
device.
............................. ii. Measure O2 at the inlet (2) Method 3, 3A, or 3B of 40 (b) Measurements to
and outlet of the control CFR part 60, appendix A-2 determine O2 concentration
device; must be made at the same
time as the measurements
for PM concentration.
............................. iii. If necessary, measure (3) Method 4 of 40 CFR part (c) Measurements to
moisture content at the 60, appendix A-3 determine and moisture
inlet and outlet of the content must be made at the
control device; and same time as the
measurements for PM
concentration.
[[Page 11253]]
............................. iv. Measure PM at the inlet (4) Method 5 of 40 CFR part (d) PM concentration must be
and outlet of the control 60, appendix A-3 at 15 percent O2, dry
device. basis. Results of this test
consist of the average of
the three 1-hour or longer
runs.
d. Limit the concentration of i. Select the sampling port (1) Method 1 or 1A of 40 CFR (a) If using a control
PM in the stationary CI location and the number of part 60, appendix A-1 device, the sampling site
internal combustion engine traverse points; must be located at the
exhaust outlet of the control
device.
............................. ii. Determine the O2 (2) Method 3, 3A, or 3B of 40 (b) Measurements to
concentration of the CFR part 60, appendix A-2 determine O2 concentration
stationary internal must be made at the same
combustion engine exhaust at time as the measurements
the sampling port location; for PM concentration.
............................. iii. If necessary, measure (3) Method 4 of 40 CFR part (c) Measurements to
moisture content of the 60, appendix A-3 determine moisture content
stationary internal must be made at the same
combustion engine exhaust at time as the measurements
the sampling port location; for PM concentration.
and
............................. iv. Measure PM at the exhaust (4) Method 5 of 40 CFR part (d) PM concentration must be
of the stationary internal 60, appendix A-3. at 15 percent O2, dry
combustion engine. basis. Results of this test
consist of the average of
the three 1-hour or longer
runs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subpart JJJJ--[Amended]
0
21. Revise Table 2 to Subpart JJJJ of part 60 to read as follows:
As stated in Sec. 60.4244, you must comply with the following
requirements for performance tests within 10 percent of 100 percent
peak (or the highest achievable) load:
[[Page 11254]]
Table 2 to Subpart JJJJ of Part 60--Requirements for Performance Tests
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Complying with the According to the following
For each requirement to You must Using requirements
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Stationary SI internal a. limit the concentration of i. Select the sampling port (1) Method 1 or 1A of 40 CFR (a) Alternatively, for NOX,
combustion engine NOX in the stationary SI location and the number/ part 60, appendix A-1, if O2, and moisture
demonstrating compliance internal combustion engine location of traverse points measuring flow rate. measurement, ducts <=6
according to Sec. 60.4244. exhaust. at the exhaust of the inches in diameter may be
stationary internal sampled at a single point
combustion engine; located at the duct
centroid and ducts >6 and
<=12 inches in diameter may
be sampled at 3 traverse
points located at 16.7,
50.0, and 83.3% of the
measurement line (`3-point
long line'). If the duct is
>12 inches in diameter and
the sampling port location
meets the two and half-
diameter criterion of
Section 11.1.1 of Method 1
of 40 CFR part 60, Appendix
A, the duct may be sampled
at `3-point long line';
otherwise, conduct the
stratification testing and
select sampling points
according to Section 8.1.2
of Method 7E of 40 CFR part
60, Appendix A.
............................. ii. Determine the O2 (2) Method 3, 3A, or 3B\b\ of (b) Measurements to
concentration of the 40 CFR part 60, appendix A-2 determine O2 concentration
stationary internal or ASTM Method D6522-00 must be made at the same
combustion engine exhaust at (Reapproved 2005) a e. time as the measurements
the sampling port location; for NOX concentration.
............................. iii. If necessary, determine (3) Method 2 or 2C of 40 CFR ............................
the exhaust flowrate of the part 60, appendix A-1 or
stationary internal Method 19 of 40 CFR part 60,
combustion engine exhaust; appendix A-7.
............................. iv. If necessary, measure (4) Method 4 of 40 CFR part (c) Measurements to
moisture content of the 60, appendix A-3, Method 320 determine moisture must be
stationary internal of 40 CFR part 63, appendix made at the same time as
combustion engine exhaust at A, or ASTM Method D 6348-03 the measurement for NOX
the sampling port location; \e\. concentration.
and
............................. v. Measure NOX at the exhaust (5) Method 7E of 40 CFR part (d) Results of this test
of the stationary internal 60, appendix A-4, ASTM consist of the average of
combustion engine; if using Method D6522-00 (Reapproved the three 1-hour or longer
a control device, the 2005) a e, Method 320 of 40 runs.
sampling site must be CFR part 63, appendix A, or
located at the outlet of the ASTM Method D 6348-03 \e\.
control device.
[[Page 11255]]
b. limit the concentration of i. Select the sampling port (1) Method 1 or 1A of 40 CFR (a) Alternatively, for CO,
CO in the stationary SI location and the number/ part 60, appendix A-1, if O2, and moisture
internal combustion engine location of traverse points measuring flow rate. measurement, ducts <=6
exhaust. at the exhaust of the inches in diameter may be
stationary internal sampled at a single point
combustion engine; located at the duct
centroid and ducts >6 and
<=12 inches in diameter may
be sampled at 3 traverse
points located at 16.7,
50.0, and 83.3% of the
measurement line (`3-point
long line'). If the duct is
>12 inches in diameter and
the sampling port location
meets the two and half-
diameter criterion of
Section 11.1.1 of Method 1
of 40 CFR part 60, Appendix
A, the duct may be sampled
at `3-point long line';
otherwise, conduct the
stratification testing and
select sampling points
according to Section 8.1.2
of Method 7E of 40 CFR part
60, Appendix A.
............................. ii. Determine the O2 (2) Method 3, 3A, or 3B \b\ (b) Measurements to
concentration of the of 40 CFR part 60, appendix determine O2 concentration
stationary internal A-2 or ASTM Method D6522-00 must be made at the same
combustion engine exhaust at (Reapproved 2005) a e. time as the measurements
the sampling port location; for CO concentration.
............................. iii. If necessary, determine (3) Method 2 or 2C of 40 CFR ............................
the exhaust flowrate of the part 60, appendix A-1 or
stationary internal Method 19 of 40 CFR part 60,
combustion engine exhaust; appendix A-7.
............................. iv. If necessary, measure (4) Method 4 of 40 CFR part (c) Measurements to
moisture content of the 60, appendix A-3, Method 320 determine moisture must be
stationary internal of 40 CFR part 63, appendix made at the same time as
combustion engine exhaust at A, or ASTM Method D 6348-03 the measurement for CO
the sampling port location; \e\. concentration.
and
............................. v. Measure CO at the exhaust (5) Method 10 of 40 CFR part (d) Results of this test
of the stationary internal 60, appendix A4, ASTM Method consist of the average of
combustion engine; if using D6522-00 (Reapproved 2005) a the three 1-hour or longer
a control device, the e, Method 320 of 40 CFR part runs.
sampling site must be 63, appendix A, or ASTM
located at the outlet of the Method D 6348-03 \e\.
control device.
[[Page 11256]]
c. limit the concentration of i. Select the sampling port (1) Method 1 or 1A of 40 CFR (a) Alternatively, for VOC,
VOC in the stationary SI location and the number/ part 60, appendix A-1, if O2, and moisture
internal combustion engine location of traverse points measuring flow rate. measurement, ducts <=6
exhaust at the exhaust of the inches in diameter may be
stationary internal sampled at a single point
combustion engine; located at the duct
centroid and ducts >6 and
<=12 inches in diameter may
be sampled at 3 traverse
points located at 16.7,
50.0, and 83.3% of the
measurement line (`3-point
long line'). If the duct is
>12 inches in diameter and
the sampling port location
meets the two and half-
diameter criterion of
Section 11.1.1 of Method 1
of 40 CFR part 60, Appendix
A, the duct may be sampled
at `3-point long line';
otherwise, conduct the
stratification testing and
select sampling points
according to Section 8.1.2
of Method 7E of 40 CFR part
60, Appendix A.
............................. ii. Determine the O2 (2) Method 3, 3A, or 3B \b\ (b) Measurements to
concentration of the of 40 CFR part 60, appendix determine O2 concentration
stationary internal A-2 or ASTM Method D6522-00 must be made at the same
combustion engine exhaust at (Reapproved 2005) a e. time as the measurements
the sampling port location; for VOC concentration.
............................. iii. If necessary, determine (3) Method 2 or 2C of 40 CFR ............................
the exhaust flowrate of the part 60, appendix A-1 or
stationary internal Method 19 of 40 CFR part 60,
combustion engine exhaust; appendix A-7.
............................. iv. If necessary, measure (4) Method 4 of 40 CFR part (c) Measurements to
moisture content of the 60, appendix A-3, Method 320 determine moisture must be
stationary internal of 40 CFR part 63, appendix made at the same time as
combustion engine exhaust at A, or ASTM Method D 6348-03 the measurement for VOC
the sampling port location; \e\. concentration.
and
............................. v. Measure VOC at the exhaust (5) Methods 25A and 18 of 40 (d) Results of this test
of the stationary internal CFR part 60, appendices A-6 consist of the average of
combustion engine; if using and A-7, Method 25A with the the three 1-hour or longer
a control device, the use of a methane cutter as runs.
sampling site must be described in 40 CFR
located at the outlet of the 1065.265, Method 18 of 40
control device. CFR part 60, appendix A-6 c
d, Method 320 of 40 CFR part
63, appendix A, or ASTM
Method D 6348-03 \e\.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Also, you may petition the Administrator for approval to use alternative methods for portable analyzer.
\b\ You may use ASME PTC 19.10-1981, Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses, for measuring the O2 content of the exhaust gas as an alternative to EPA Method 3B.
AMSE PTC 19.10-1981 incorporated by reference, see 40 CFR 60.17
\c\ You may use EPA Method 18 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A-6, provided that you conduct an adequate pre-survey test prior to the emissions test, such
as the one described in OTM 11 on EPA's Web site (https://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/prelim/otm11.pdf).
\d\ You may use ASTM D6420-99 (2004), Test Method for Determination of Gaseous Organic Compounds by Direct Interface Gas Chromatography/Mass
Spectrometry as an alternative to EPA Method 18 for measuring total nonmethane organic. ASTM D6420-99(2004) incorporated by reference; see 40 CFR
60.17.
\e\ Incorporated by reference; see 40 CFR 60.17.
[[Page 11257]]
0
22. Amend appendix A-1 to part 60 as follows:
0
a. By amending Method 1 as follows:
0
i. By revising Figure 1-1 in section 17.
0
ii. By adding Figure 1-2 to section 17.
0
b. By amending Method 2 as follows:
0
i. By revising section 8.1, the note at the end of 10.1.1, and sections
10.4, 12.6, and 12.7.
0
ii. By removing the definition for Ts(abs) in section 12.1.
0
iii. By adding a definition for Ts(abavg) in alphabetical order to
section 12.1.
0
c. By revising Method 2A, sections 10.3 and 12.2.
0
d. By revising Method 2B, section 12.1.
0
e. By revising Method 2D, section 10.4.
Appendix A-1 to Part 60--Test Methods 1 Through 2F
* * * * *
Method 1--Sample and Velocity Traverses From Stationary Sources
* * * * *
17.0 * * *
[[Page 11258]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.007
[[Page 11259]]
* * * * *
Method 2--Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate
(Type S Pitot Tube)
* * * * *
8.1 Set up the apparatus as shown in Figure 2-1. Capillary
tubing or surge tanks installed between the manometer and pitot tube
may be used to dampen [Delta]P fluctuations. It is recommended, but
not required, that a pretest leak-check be conducted as follows: (1)
blow through the pitot impact opening until at least 7.6 cm (3.0
in.) H2O velocity head registers on the manometer; then,
close off the impact opening. The pressure shall remain stable
(2.5 mm H2O, 0.10 in.
H2O) for at least 15 seconds; (2) do the same for the
static pressure side, except using suction to obtain the minimum of
7.6 cm (3.0 in.) H2O. Other leak-check procedures,
subject to the approval of the Administrator, may be used.
* * * * *
10.1.1 * * *
Note: Do not use a Type S pitot tube assembly that is
constructed such that the impact pressure opening plane of the pitot
tube is below the entry plane of the nozzle (see Figure 2-7B).
* * * * *
10.4 Barometer. Calibrate the barometer used against a mercury
barometer or NIST-traceable barometer prior to each field test.
* * * * *
12.1 Nomenclature
* * * * *
Ts(abavg) = Average absolute stack temperature, [deg]K
([deg]R).
= 273 + Ts for metric units,
= 460 + Ts for English units.
* * * * *
12.6 Average Stack Gas Velocity.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.008
* * * * *
Method 2A--Direct Measurement of Gas Volume Through Pipes and Small
Ducts
* * * * *
10.3 Barometer. Calibrate the barometer used against a mercury
barometer or NIST-traceable barometer prior to the field test.
* * * * *
12.2 Test Meter Calibration Coefficient.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.009
* * * * *
Method 2B--Determination of Exhaust Gas Volume Flow Rate From Gasoline
Vapor Incinerators
* * * * *
12.1 Nomenclature.
COe = Mean carbon monoxide concentration in system
exhaust, ppm.
(CO2)a = Ambient carbon dioxide concentration,
ppm (if not measured during the test period, may be assumed to equal
380 ppm).
(CO2)e = Mean carbon dioxide concentration in
system exhaust, ppm.
HCe = Mean organic concentration in system exhaust as
defined by the calibration gas, ppm.
Hci = Mean organic concentration in system inlet as
defined by the calibration gas, ppm.
Ke = Hydrocarbon calibration gas factor for the exhaust
hydrocarbon analyzer, unitless [equal to the number of carbon atoms
per molecule of the gas used to calibrate the analyzer (2 for
ethane, 3 for propane, etc.)].
Ki = Hydrocarbon calibration gas factor for the inlet
hydrocarbon analyzer, unitless.
Ves = Exhaust gas volume, m\3\.
Vis = Inlet gas volume, m\3\.
Qes = Exhaust gas volume flow rate, m\3\/min.
Qis = Inlet gas volume flow rate, m\3\/min.
[thgr] = Sample run time, min.
S = Standard conditions: 20[deg] C, 760 mm Hg.
* * * * *
Method 2D--Measurement of Gas Volume Flow Rates in Small Pipes and
Ducts
* * * * *
[[Page 11260]]
10.4 Barometer. Calibrate the barometer used against a mercury
barometer or NIST-traceable barometer prior to the field test.
* * * * *
0
23. Amend appendix A-2 to part 60 as follows:
0
a. By revising Method 3A, section 7.1.
0
b. By amending Method 3C as follows:
0
i. By revising section 7.1.
0
ii. By adding section 7.3.
Appendix A-2 to Part 60--Test Methods 2G Through 3C
* * * * *
Method 3A--Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in
Emissions From Stationary Sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure)
* * * * *
7.1 Calibration Gas. What calibration gases do I need? Refer to
Section 7.1 of Method 7E for the calibration gas requirements.
Example calibration gas mixtures are listed below. Pre-cleaned or
scrubbed air may be used for the O2 high-calibration gas
provided it does not contain other gases that interfere with the
O2 measurement.
(a) CO2 in Nitrogen (N2).
(b) CO2/SO2 gas mixture in N2.
(c) O2/SO2 gas mixture in N2.
(d) O2/CO2/SO2 gas mixture in
N2.
(e) CO2/NOX gas mixture in N2.
(f) CO2/SO2/NOX gas mixture in
N2.
The tests for analyzer calibration error and system bias require
high-, mid-, and low-level gases.
* * * * *
Method 3C--Determination of Carbon Dioxide, Methane, Nitrogen, and
Oxygen from Stationary Sources
* * * * *
7.1 Nomenclature.
Bw = Moisture content in the sample, fraction.
CN2 = Measured N2 concentration (by Method
3C), fraction.
CN2Corr = Measured N2 concentration corrected
only for dilution, fraction.
Ct = Calculated NMOC concentration, ppmv C equivalent.
Ctm = Measured NMOC concentration, ppmv C equivalent.
Pb = Barometric pressure, mm Hg.
Pt = Gas sample tank pressure after sampling, but before
pressurizing, mm Hg absolute.
Ptf = Final gas sample tank pressure after pressurizing,
mm Hg absolute.
Pti = Gas sample tank pressure after evacuation, mm Hg
absolute.
Pw = Vapor pressure of H2O (from Table 25C-1),
mm Hg.
r = Total number of analyzer injections of sample tank during
analysis (where j = injection number, 1 . . . r).
R = Mean calibration response factor for specific sample component,
area/ppm.
Tt = Sample tank temperature at completion of sampling,
[deg]K.
Tti = Sample tank temperature before sampling, [deg]K.
Ttf = Sample tank temperature after pressurizing, [deg]K.
* * * * *
7.3 Measured N2 Concentration Correction. Calculate
the reported N2 correction for Method 25-C using Eq. 3C-
4. If oxygen is determined in place of N2, substitute the
oxygen concentration for the nitrogen concentration in the equation.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.010
* * * * *
0
24. Amend appendix A-3 to part 60 as follows:
0
a. By revising Method 4, sections 9.1 and 16.0.
0
b. Amend Method 5 as follows:
0
i. By revising sections 6.1.1.5, 6.1.1.6, 6.1.1.7, 6.1.1.9, 7.1.3, 8.1,
8.3.4, 8.5, 8.5.6, 8.7.3, 8.7.5, 10.3.3, 10.5, 10.6.
0
ii. By removing section 7.1.5.
0
iii. By revising Equation 5-13 in section 16.2.3.3.
0
iv. By adding section 16.3.
0
v. By adding reference 13 to section 17.0.
0
c. By revising Method 5A, section 8.1.
0
d. By amending Method 5E as follows:
0
i. By redesignating sections 16.0 and 17.0 as sections 17.0 and 18.0,
respectively.
0
ii. By adding a new section 16.0.
0
e. By amending Method 5H as follows:
0
i. By revising section 12.1.
0
ii. By adding section 12.15.
0
iii. By redesignating sections 16.0 and 17.0 as sections 17.0 and 18.0,
respectively.
0
iv. By adding a new section 16.
Appendix A-3 to Part 60--Test Methods 4 Through 5I
* * * * *
Method 4--Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases
* * * * *
9.1 Miscellaneous Quality Control Measures.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quality control
Section measure Effect
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 8.1.1.4............. Leak rate of the Ensures the accuracy
sampling system of the volume of
cannot exceed four gas sampled.
percent of the (Reference Method).
average sampling
rate or 0.00057
m\3\/min (0.020
cfm).
Section 8.2.1............... Leak rate of the Ensures the accuracy
sampling system of the volume of
cannot exceed two gas sampled.
percent of the (Approximation
average sampling Method).
rate.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
16.0 Alternative Procedures
16.1 The procedure described in Method 5 for determining
moisture content is an acceptable alternative to Method 4.
16.2 The procedures in Method 6A for determining moisture is an
acceptable alternative to Method 4.
16.3 Method 320 is an acceptable alternative to Method 4 for
determining moisture.
16.4 Using F-factors to determine moisture is an acceptable
alternative to Method 4 for a combustion stack not using a scrubber.
If this option is selected, calculate the moisture content as
follows:
BWS - BH + BA + BF
Where:
[[Page 11261]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.011
Bws = Mole fraction of moisture in the stack gas.
Fd = Volume of dry combustion components per unit of heat
content at 0 percent oxygen, dscf/10\6\ Btu (scm/J). See Table 19-2
in Method 19.
FW = Volume of wet combustion components per unit of heat
content at 0 percent oxygen, wet scf/10\6\ Btu (scm/J). See Table
19-2 in Method 19.
%RH = Percent relative humidity (calibrated hydrometer acceptable),
percent.
PBar = Barometric pressure, in. Hg.
T = Ambient temperature, [deg]F.
W = Percent free water by weight, percent.
O2 = Percent oxygen in stack gas, dry basis, percent.
* * * * *
Method 5--Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions From Stationary
Sources
* * * * *
6.1.1.5 Filter Holder. Borosilicate glass, with a glass or
Teflon frit filter support and a silicone rubber gasket. Other
materials of construction (e.g., stainless steel or Viton) may be
used, subject to the approval of the Administrator. The holder
design shall provide a positive seal against leakage from the
outside or around the filter. The holder shall be attached
immediately at the outlet of the probe (or cyclone, if used).
6.1.1.6 Filter Heating System. Any heating system capable of
monitoring and maintaining temperature around the filter shall be
used to ensure the sample gas temperature exiting the filter of 120
14 [deg]C (248 25 [deg]F) during sampling
or such other temperature as specified by an applicable subpart of
the standards or approved by the Administrator for a particular
application. The monitoring and regulation of the temperature around
the filter may be done with the filter temperature sensor or another
temperature sensor.
6.1.1.7 Filter Temperature Sensor. A temperature sensor capable
of measuring temperature to within 3 [deg]C (5.4 [deg]F)
shall be installed so that the sensing tip of the temperature sensor
is in direct contact with the sample gas exiting the filter. The
sensing tip of the sensor may be encased in glass, Teflon, or metal
and must protrude at least \1/2\ in. into the sample gas exiting the
filter. The filter temperature sensor must be monitored and recorded
during sampling to ensure a sample gas temperature exiting the
filter of 120 14 [deg]C (248 25 [deg]F),
or such other temperature as specified by an applicable subpart of
the standards or approved by the Administrator for a particular
application.
* * * * *
6.1.1.9 Metering System. Vacuum gauge, leak-free pump,
calibrated temperature sensors (rechecked at at least one point
after each test), dry gas meter (DGM) capable of measuring volume to
within 2 percent, and related equipment, as shown in Figure 5-1.
Alternatively, an Isostack metering system may be used if all Method
5 calibrations are performed, with the exception of those related to
[Delta]H@ in Section 9.2.1, wherein the sample flow rate system
shall be calibrated in lieu of [Delta]H@ and shall not deviate by
more than 5 percent. Other metering systems capable of maintaining
sampling rates within 10 percent of isokinetic and of determining
sample volumes to within 2 percent may be used, subject to the
approval of the Administrator. When the metering system is used in
conjunction with a pitot tube, the system shall allow periodic
checks of isokinetic rates.
* * * * *
7.1.3 Water. When analysis of the material caught in the
impingers is required, deionized distilled water [to conform to ASTM
D1193-77 or 91 Type 3 (incorporated by reference--see Sec. 60.17)]
with at least <0.001 percent residue shall be used or as specified
in the applicable method requiring analysis of the water. Run
reagent blanks prior to field use to eliminate a high blank on test
samples.
* * * * *
8.1 Pretest Preparation. It is suggested that sampling equipment
be maintained according to the procedures described in APTD-0576.
Alternative mercury-free thermometers may be used if the
thermometers are at a minimum equivalent in terms of performance or
suitably effective for the specific temperature measurement
application.
* * * * *
8.3.4 Set up the train as shown in Figure 5-1 ensuring that the
connections are leak-tight. Subject to the approval of the
Administrator, a glass cyclone may be used between the probe and
filter holder when the total particulate catch is expected to exceed
100 mg or when water droplets are present in the stack gas.
* * * * *
8.5 Sampling Train Operation. During the sampling run, maintain
an isokinetic sampling rate (within 10 percent of true isokinetic
unless otherwise specified by the Administrator) and a sample gas
temperature through the filter of 120 14 [deg]C (248
25 [deg]F) or such other temperature as specified by
[[Page 11262]]
an applicable subpart of the standards or approved by the
Administrator.
* * * * *
8.5.6 During the test run, make periodic adjustments to keep the
temperature around the filter holder at the proper level to maintain
the sample gas temperature exiting the filter; add more ice and, if
necessary, salt to maintain a temperature of less than 20 [deg]C (68
[deg]F) at the condenser/silica gel outlet. Also, periodically check
the level and zero of the manometer.
* * * * *
8.7.3 Before moving the sample train to the cleanup site, remove
the probe from the sample train and cap the open outlet of the
probe. Be careful not to lose any condensate that might be present.
Cap the filter inlet where the probe was fastened. Remove the
umbilical cord from the last impinger, and cap the impinger. If a
flexible line is used between the first impinger or condenser and
the filter holder, disconnect the line at the filter holder, and let
any condensed water or liquid drain into the impingers or condenser.
Cap off the filter holder outlet and impinger inlet. Either ground-
glass stoppers, plastic caps, or serum caps may be used to close
these openings.
* * * * *
8.7.5 Save a portion of the acetone used for cleanup as a blank.
From each storage container of acetone used for cleanup, save 200 ml
and place in a glass sample container labeled ``acetone blank.'' To
minimize any particulate contamination, rinse the wash bottle prior
to filling from the tested container.
* * * * *
10.3.3 Acceptable Variation in Calibration Check. If the DGM
coefficient values obtained before and after a test series differ by
more than 5 percent, the test series shall either be voided, or
calculations for the test series shall be performed using whichever
meter coefficient value (i.e., before or after) gives the lower
value of total sample volume.
* * * * *
10.5 Temperature Sensors. Use the procedure in Section 10.3 of
Method 2 to calibrate in-stack temperature sensors. Dial
thermometers, such as are used for the DGM and condenser outlet,
shall be calibrated against mercury-in-glass thermometers. An
alternative mercury-free NIST-traceable thermometer may be used if
the thermometer is, at a minimum, equivalent in terms of performance
or suitably effective for the specific temperature measurement
application. As an alternative, the following single-point
calibration procedure may be used. After each test run series, check
the accuracy (and, hence, the calibration) of each thermocouple
system at ambient temperature, or any other temperature, within the
range specified by the manufacturer, using a reference thermometer
(either ASTM reference thermometer or a thermometer that has been
calibrated against an ASTM reference thermometer). The temperatures
of the thermocouple and reference thermometers shall agree to within
2 [deg]F.
10.6 Barometer. Calibrate against a mercury barometer or NIST-
traceable barometer prior to the field test. Alternatively,
barometric pressure may be obtained from a weather report that has
been adjusted for the test point (on the stack) elevation.
* * * * *
16.2.3.3 * * *
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.012
* * * * *
16.3 Alternative Post-Test Metering System Calibration. The
following procedure may be used as an alternative to the post-test
calibration described in Section 10.3.2. This alternative procedure
does not detect leakages between the inlet of the metering system
and the dry gas meter. Therefore, two steps must be included to make
it an equivalent alternative:
(1) The metering system must pass the post-test leak-check from
either the inlet of the sampling train or the inlet of the metering
system. Therefore, if the train fails the former leak-check, another
leak-check from the inlet of the metering system must be conducted;
(2) The metering system must pass the leak-check of that portion
of the train from the pump to the orifice meter as described in
Section 8.4.1.
16.3.1 After each test run, do the following:
16.3.1.1 Ensure that the metering system has passed the post-
test leak-check. If not, conduct a leak-check of the metering system
from its inlet.
16.3.1.2 Conduct the leak-check of that portion of the train
from the pump to the orifice meter as described in Section 10.3.1.1.
16.3.1.3 Calculate Yqa for each test run using the
following equation:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.013
Where:
Yqa = Dry gas meter calibration check value,
dimensionless.
0.0319 = (29.92/528) (0.75) \2\ (in. Hg/[deg]R) cfm\2\.
[Delta]H@ = Orifice meter calibration coefficient, in.
H2O.
Md = Dry molecular weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mole.
29 = Dry molecular weight of air, lb/lb-mole.
16.3.2 After each test run series, do the following:
16.3.2.1 Average the three or more Yqa's obtained
from the test run series and compare this average Yqa
with the dry gas meter calibration factor Y. The average
Yqa must be within 5 percent of Y.
16.3.2.2 If the average Yqa does not meet the 5
percent criterion, recalibrate the meter over the full range of
orifice settings as detailed in Section 10.3.1. Then follow the
procedure in Section 10.3.3.
17.0 * * *
13. Shigehara, Roger T., P.G. Royals, and E.W. Steward.
``Alternative Method 5 Post-Test Calibration.'' Entropy
Incorporated, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
* * * * *
Method 5A--Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions From the
Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Industry
* * * * *
8.1 Pretest Preparation. Unless otherwise specified, maintain
and calibrate all components according to the procedure described in
APTD-0576, ``Maintenance, Calibration, and Operation of Isokinetic
Source-Sampling Equipment'' (Reference 3 in Method 5, Section 17.0).
Alternative mercury-free thermometers may be used if the
thermometers are, at a minimum, equivalent in terms of performance
or suitably effective for the specific temperature measurement
application.
* * * * *
[[Page 11263]]
Method 5E--Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions From the Wool
Fiberglass Insulation Manufacturing Industry
* * * * *
16.0 Alternative Procedures
16.1 Total Organic Carbon Analyzer. Tekmar-Dohrmann analyzers
using the single injection technique may be used as an alternative
to Rosemount Model 2100A analyzers.
* * * * *
Method 5H--Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions From Wood
Heaters From a Stack Location
* * * * *
12.1 Nomenclature.
A = Sample flow rate adjustment factor.
BR = Dry wood burn rate, kg/hr (lb/hr), from Method 28, Section 8.3.
Bws = Water vapor in the gas stream, proportion by
volume.
Ci = Tracer gas concentration at inlet, ppmv.
Co = Tracer gas concentration at outlet, ppmv.
Cs = Concentration of particulate matter in stack gas,
dry basis, corrected to standard conditions, g/dscm (g/dscf).
E = Particulate emission rate, g/hr (lb/hr).
[Delta]H = Average pressure differential across the orifice meter
(see Figure 5H-1), mm H2O (in. H2O).
La = Maximum acceptable leakage rate for either a post-
test leak-check or for a leak-check following a component change;
equal to 0.00057 cmm (0.020 cfm) or 4 percent of the average
sampling rate, whichever is less.
L1 = Individual leakage rate observed during the leak-
check conducted before a component change, cmm (cfm).
Lp = Leakage rate observed during the post-test leak-
check, cmm (cfm).
mn = Total amount of particulate matter collected, mg.
Ma = Mass of residue of solvent after evaporation, mg.
NC = Grams of carbon/gram of dry fuel (lb/lb), equal to
0.0425.
NT = Total dry moles of exhaust gas/kg of dry wood
burned, g-moles/kg (lb-moles/lb).
PR = Percent of proportional sampling rate.
Pbar = Barometric pressure at the sampling site, mm Hg
(in.Hg).
Pstd = Standard absolute pressure, 760 mm Hg (29.92
in.Hg).
Qi = Gas volumetric flow rate at inlet, cfm (l/min).
Qo = Gas volumetric flow rate at outlet, cfm (l/min).
* * * * *
12.15 Alternative Tracer Gas Flow Rate Determination.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.014
Note: This gives Q for a single instance only. Repeated multiple
determinations are needed to track temporal variations. Very small
variations in Qi, Ci, or Co may
give very large variations in Qo.
* * * * *
16.0 Alternative Procedures
16.1 Alternative Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Rate Determination
(Tracer Gas).
16.1.1 Apparatus.
16.1.1.1 Tracer Gas Injector System. This is to inject a known
concentration of tracer gas into the stack. This system consists of
a cylinder of tracer gas, a gas cylinder regulator, a stainless
steel needle valve or a flow controller, a nonreactive (stainless
steel or glass) rotameter, and an injection loop to disperse the
tracer gas evenly in the stack.
16.1.1.2 Tracer Gas Probe. A glass or stainless steel sampling
probe.
16.1.1.3 Gas Conditioning System. A gas conditioning system is
suitable for delivering a cleaned sample to the analyzer consisting
of a filter to remove particulate and a condenser capable of
lowering the dew point of the sample gas to less than 5 [deg]C
(40[emsp14][deg]F). A desiccant such as anhydrous calcium sulfate
may be used to dry the sample gas. Desiccants which react or absorb
tracer gas or stack gas may not be used, e.g. silica gel absorbs
CO2.
16.1.1.4. Pump. An inert (i.e., stainless steel or Teflon head)
pump to deliver more than the total sample required by the
manufacturer's specifications for the analyzer used to measure the
downstream tracer gas concentration.
16.1.1.5 Gas Analyzer. A gas analyzer is any analyzer capable of
measuring the tracer gas concentration in the range necessary at
least every 10 minutes. A means of controlling the analyzer flow
rate and a device for determining proper sample flow rate shall be
provided unless data is provided to show that the analyzer is
insensitive to flow variations over the range encountered during the
test. The gas analyzer needs to meet or exceed the following
performance specifications:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Linearity....................... 1 percent of full scale.
Calibration Error............... <=2 percent of span.
Response Time................... <=10 seconds.
Zero Drift (24 hour)............ <=2 percent of full scale.
Span Drift (24 hour)............ <=2 percent of full scale.
Resolution...................... <=0.5 percent of span.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
16.1.1.6 Recorder (optional). To provide a permanent record of
the analyzer output.
16.1.2 Reagents.
16.1.2.1 Tracer Gas. The tracer gas is sulfur hexafluoride in an
appropriate concentration for accurate analyzer measurement or pure
sulfur dioxide. The gas used must be nonreactive with the stack
effluent and give minimal (<3 percent) interference to measurement
by the gas analyzer.
16.1.3 Procedure. Select upstream and downstream locations in
the stack or duct for introducing the tracer gas and delivering the
sampled gas to the analyzer. The inlet location should be 8 or more
duct diameters beyond any upstream flow disturbance. The outlet
should be 8 or more undisturbed duct diameters from the inlet and 2
or more duct diameters from the duct exit. After installing the
apparatus, meter a known concentration of the tracer gas into the
stack at the inlet location. Use the gas sample probe and analyzer
to show that no stratification of the tracer gas is found in the
stack at the measurement locations. Monitor the tracer gas
concentration from the outlet location and record the concentration
at 10-minute intervals or more often at the option of the tester. A
minimum of three measured intervals is recommended to determine the
stack gas volumetric flow rate. Other statistical procedures may be
applied for complete flow characterization and additional QA/QC.
* * * * *
0
25. Amend appendix A-4 to part 60 as follows:
0
a. By revising Method 6, sections 10.2 and 10.4.
0
b. By revising Method 6C, sections 4.0 and 8.3.
0
c. By revising Method 7, sections 4.0, 10.2, and 10.3.
0
d. By revising Method 7A, sections 4.0 and 10.4.
0
e. By revising Method 7E, sections 6.1, 7.1.1, the introductory text in
section 8.2.5, the introductory text in section 8.2.7, and the
introductory text in section 16.2.2.
0
f. By revising Method 8, the definition for Vsoln in section
12.1, and Figure 8-1 in section 17.0.
0
g. By revising Method 10, sections 6.2.5 and 8.4.2.
0
h. By revising Method 10A, sections 2.0, 8.2.1, 8.2.3, 11.1, 11.2, the
introductory text in section 12.3, and 13.5.
0
i. By revising Method 10B, section 2.1, 6.2.3, the introductory text in
section 12.2.
Appendix A-4 to Part 60--Test Methods 6 Through 10B
* * * * *
Method 6--Determination of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions From Stationary
Sources
* * * * *
10.2 Temperature Sensors. Calibrate against mercury-in-glass
thermometers. An alternative mercury-free thermometer may be used if
the thermometer is, at a minimum, equivalent in terms of performance
or suitably effective for the specific temperature measurement
application.
* * * * *
10.4 Barometer. Calibrate against a mercury barometer or NIST-
traceable barometer prior to the field test.
* * * * *
Method 6C--Determination of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions From Stationary
Sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure)
* * * * *
4.0 Interferences
Refer to Section 4.0 of Method 7E.
* * * * *
8.3 Interference Check. You must follow the procedures of
Section 8.2.7 of Method 7E
[[Page 11264]]
to conduct an interference check, substituting SO2 for
NOX as the method pollutant. For dilution-type
measurement systems, you must use the alternative interference check
procedure in Section 16 and a co-located, unmodified Method 6
sampling train. Quenching in fluorescence analyzers must be
evaluated and remedied unless a dilution system and ambient-level
analyzer is used. This may be done by preparing the calibration gas
to contain within 1 percent of the absolute oxygen and carbon
dioxide content of the measured gas, preparing the calibration gas
in air and using vendor nomographs, or by other acceptable means.
* * * * *
Method 7--Determination of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions From Stationary
Sources
* * * * *
4.0 Interferences
Biased results have been observed when sampling under conditions
of high sulfur dioxide concentrations. At or above 2100 ppm
SO2, use five times the H2O2
concentration of the Method 7 absorbing solution. Laboratory tests
have shown that high concentrations of SO2 (about 2100
ppm) cause low results in Method 7 and 7A. Increasing the
H2O2 concentration to five times the original
concentration eliminates this bias. However, when no SO2
is present, increasing the concentration by five times results in a
low bias.
* * * * *
10.2 Barometer. Calibrate against a mercury barometer or NIST-
traceable barometer prior to the field test.
10.3 Temperature Gauge. Calibrate dial thermometers against
mercury-in-glass thermometers. An alternative mercury-free
thermometer may be used if the thermometer is, at a minimum,
equivalent in terms of performance or suitably effective for the
specific temperature measurement application.
* * * * *
Method 7A--Determination of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions From Stationary
Sources (Ion Chromatographic Method)
* * * * *
4.0 Interferences
Biased results have been observed when sampling under conditions
of high sulfur dioxide concentrations. At or above 2100 ppm
SO2, use five times the H2O2
concentration of the Method 7 absorbing solution. Laboratory tests
have shown that high concentrations of SO2 (about 2100
ppm) cause low results in Method 7 and 7A. Increasing the
H2O2 concentration to five times the original
concentration eliminates this bias. However, when no SO2
is present, increasing the concentration by five times results in a
low bias.
* * * * *
10.4 Temperature Gauge. Calibrate dial thermometers against
mercury-in-glass thermometers. An alternative mercury-free
thermometer may be used if the thermometer is, at a minimum,
equivalent in terms of performance or suitably effective for the
specific temperature measurement application.
* * * * *
Method 7E--Determination of Nitrogen Oxides Emissions From Stationary
Sources (Instrumental Analyzer Procedure)
* * * * *
6.1 What do I need for the measurement system? You may use any
equipment and supplies meeting the following specifications:
(1) Sampling system components that are not evaluated in the
system bias or system calibration error test must be glass, Teflon,
or stainless steel. Other materials are potentially acceptable,
subject to approval by the Administrator.
(2) The interference, calibration error, and system bias
criteria must be met.
(3) Sample flow rate must be maintained within 10 percent of the
flow rate at which the system response time was measured.
(4) All system components (excluding sample conditioning
components, if used) must maintain the sample temperature above the
moisture dew point. Ensure minimal contact between any condensate
and the sample gas. Section 6.2 provides example equipment
specifications for a NOX measurement system. Figure 7E-1
is a diagram of an example dry-basis measurement system that is
likely to meet the method requirements and is provided as guidance.
For wet-basis systems, you may use alternative equipment and
supplies as needed (some of which are described in Section 6.2),
provided that the measurement system meets the applicable
performance specifications of this method.
* * * * *
7.1.1 High-Level Gas. This concentration is chosen to set the
calibration span as defined in Section 3.4.
* * * * *
8.2.5 Initial System Bias and System Calibration Error Checks.
Before sampling begins, determine whether the high-level or mid-
level calibration gas best approximates the emissions and use it as
the upscale gas. Introduce the upscale gas at the probe upstream of
all sample conditioning components in system calibration mode.
Record the time it takes for the measured concentration to increase
to a value that is at least 95 percent or within 0.5 ppm (whichever
is less restrictive) of a stable response for both the low-level and
upscale gases. Continue to observe the gas concentration reading
until it has reached a final, stable value. Record this value on a
form similar to Table 7E-2.
* * * * *
8.2.7 Interference Check. Conduct an interference response test
of the gas analyzer prior to its initial use in the field. If you
have multiple analyzers of the same make and model, you need only
perform this alternative interference check on one analyzer. You may
also meet the interference check requirement if the instrument
manufacturer performs this or a similar check on an analyzer of the
same make and model of analyzer that you use and provides you with
documented results. Analytical quenching must be evaluated and
remedied unless a dilution system and ambient-level analyzer are
used. The analyzer must be checked for quenching at concentrations
of approximately 4 and 12 percent CO2 at a mid-range
concentration for each analyzer range which is commonly used. The
analyzer must be rechecked after it has been repaired or modified or
on another periodic basis. * * *
* * * * *
16.2.2 Bag Procedure. Perform the analyzer calibration error
test to document the calibration (both NO and NOX modes,
as applicable). Fill a Tedlar or equivalent bag approximately half
full with either ambient air, pure oxygen, or an oxygen standard gas
with at least 19.5 percent by volume oxygen content. Fill the
remainder of the bag with mid- to high-level NO in N2 (or
other appropriate concentration) calibration gas. (Note that the
concentration of the NO standard should be sufficiently high enough
for the diluted concentration to be easily and accurately measured
on the scale used. The size of the bag should be large enough to
accommodate the procedure and time required. Verify through the
manufacturer that the Tedlar alternative is suitable for NO and make
this verifed information available for inspection.)
* * * * *
Method 8--Determination of Sulfuric Acid Mist and Sulfur Dioxide
Emissions From Stationary Sources
* * * * *
12.1 * * *
Vsoln = Total volume of solution in which the sample is
contained, 1000 ml for the SO2 sample and 250 ml for the
H2SO4 sample.
* * * * *
[[Page 11265]]
17.0 Tables, Diagrams, Flowcharts, and Validation Data
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.015
* * * * *
Method 10--Determination of Carbon Monoxide Emissions From Stationary
Sources
* * * * *
6.2.5 Flexible Bag. Tedlar, or equivalent, with a capacity of 60
to 90 liters (2 to 3 ft\3\). (Verify through the manufacturer that
the Tedlar alternative is suitable for CO and make this verified
information available for inspection.) Leak-test the bag in the
laboratory before using by evacuating with a pump followed by a dry
gas meter. When the evacuation is complete, there should be no flow
through the meter. Gas tanks may be used in place of bags if the
samples are analyzed within one week.
* * * * *
8.4.2 Integrated Sampling. Evacuate the flexible bag. Set up the
equipment as shown in Figure 10-1 with the bag disconnected. Place
the probe in the stack and purge the sampling line. Connect the bag,
making sure that all connections are leak-free. Sample at a rate
proportional to the stack velocity. If needed, the CO2
content of the gas may be determined by using the Method 3
integrated sample procedures, or by weighing an ascarite
CO2 removal tube used and computing CO2
concentration from the gas volume sampled and the weight gain of the
tube. Data may be recorded on a form similar to Table 10-1. If a
tank is used for sample collection, follow procedures similar to
those in Sections 8.1.2, 8.2.3, 8.3, and 12.4 of Method 25 as
appropriate to prepare the tank, conduct the sampling, and correct
the measured sample concentration.
* * * * *
Method 10A--Determination of Carbon Monoxide Emissions in Certifying
Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems at Petroleum Refineries
* * * * *
2.0 Summary of Method
An integrated gas sample is extracted from the stack, passed
through an alkaline permanganate solution to remove sulfur oxides
and nitrogen oxides, and collected in a Tedlar or equivalent bag.
(Verify through the manufacturer that the Tedlar alternative is
suitable for NO and make this verified information available for
inspection.) The CO concentration in the sample is measured
spectrophotometrically using the reaction of CO with p-
sulfaminobenzoic acid.
* * * * *
8.2.1 Evacuate the bag completely using a vacuum pump. Assemble
the apparatus as shown in Figure 10A-1. Loosely pack glass wool in
the tip of the probe. Place 400 ml of alkaline permanganate solution
in the first two impingers and 250 ml in the third. Connect the pump
to the third impinger, and follow this with the surge tank, rate
meter,
[[Page 11266]]
and 3-way valve. Do not connect the bag to the system at this time.
* * * * *
8.2.3 Purge the system with sample gas by inserting the probe
into the stack and drawing the sample gas through the system at 300
ml/min 10 percent for 5 minutes. Connect the evacuated
bag to the system, record the starting time, and sample at a rate of
300 ml/min for 30 minutes, or until the bag is nearly full. Record
the sampling time, the barometric pressure, and the ambient
temperature. Purge the system as described above immediately before
each sample.
* * * * *
11.1 Assemble the system shown in Figure 10A-3, and record the
information required in Table 10A-1 as it is obtained. Pipet 10.0 ml
of the colorimetric reagent into each gas reaction bulb, and attach
the bulbs to the system. Open the stopcocks to the reaction bulbs,
but leave the valve to the bag closed. Turn on the pump, fully open
the coarse-adjust flow valve, and slowly open the fine-adjust valve
until the pressure is reduced to at least 40 mm Hg. Now close the
coarse adjust valve, and observe the manometer to be certain that
the system is leak-free. Wait a minimum of 2 minutes. If the
pressure has increased less than 1 mm Hg, proceed as described
below. If a leak is present, find and correct it before proceeding
further.
11.2 Record the vacuum pressure (Pv) to the nearest 1
mm Hg, and close the reaction bulb stopcocks. Open the bag valve,
and allow the system to come to atmospheric pressure. Close the bag
valve, open the pump coarse adjust valve, and evacuate the system
again. Repeat this fill/evacuation procedure at least twice to flush
the manifold completely. Close the pump coarse adjust valve, open
the bag valve, and let the system fill to atmospheric pressure. Open
the stopcocks to the reaction bulbs, and let the entire system come
to atmospheric pressure. Close the bulb stopcocks, remove the bulbs,
record the room temperature and barometric pressure
(Pbar, to nearest mm Hg), and place the bulbs on the
shaker table with their main axis either parallel to or
perpendicular to the plane of the table top. Purge the bulb-filling
system with ambient air for several minutes between samples. Shake
the samples for exactly 2 hours.
* * * * *
12.3 CO Concentration in the Bag. Calculate Cb using
Equations 10A-2 and 10A-3. If condensate is visible in the bag,
calculate Bw using Table 10A-2 and the temperature and
barometric pressure in the analysis room. If condensate is not
visible, calculate Bw using the temperature and
barometric pressure at the sampling site. * * *
* * * * *
13.5 Stability. The individual components of the colorimetric
reagent are stable for at least one month. The colorimetric reagent
must be used within two days after preparation to avoid excessive
blank correction. The samples in the bag should be stable for at
least one week if the bags are leak-free.
* * * * *
Method 10B--Determination of Carbon Monoxide Emissions From Stationary
Sources
* * * * *
2.1 An integrated gas sample is extracted from the sampling
point, passed through a conditioning system to remove interferences,
and collected in a Tedlar or equivalent bag. (Verify through the
manufacturer that the Tedlar alternative is suitable for NO and make
this verifying information available for inspection.) The CO is
separated from the sample by gas chromatography (GC) and
catalytically reduced to methane (CH4) which is
determined by flame ionization detection (FID). The analytical
portion of this method is identical to applicable sections in Method
25 detailing CO measurement.
* * * * *
6.2.3 Sample Injection System. Same as in Method 25, Section
6.3.1.4, equipped to accept a sample line from the bag.
* * * * *
12.2 CO Concentration in the Bag. Calculate Cb using
Equations 10B-1 and 10B-2. If condensate is visible in the bag,
calculate Bw using Table 10A-2 of Method 10A and the
temperature and barometric pressure in the analysis room. If
condensate is not visible, calculate Bw using the
temperature and barometric pressure at the sampling site.
* * * * *
0
26. Amend appendix A-5 to part 60 as follows:
0
a. By revising Method 11, sections 8.5 and 10.1.2.
0
b. Amend Method 12 as follows:
0
i. By revising section 16.1.
0
ii. By adding sections 16.4, 16.5, and 16.6.
0
c. By adding a sentence to the end of Method 14A, section 10.1.1.
Appendix A-5 to Part 60--Test Methods 11 Through 15A
* * * * *
Method 11--Determination of Hydrogen Sulfide Content of Fuel Gas
Streams in Petroleum Refineries
* * * * *
8.5 Sample for at least 10 minutes. At the end of the sampling
time, close the sampling valve, and record the final volume and
temperature readings. Conduct a leak-check as described in Section
8.2. A yellow color in the final cadmium sulfate impinger indicates
depletion of the absorbing solution. An additional cadmium sulfate
impinger should be added for subsequent samples and the sample with
yellow color in the final impinger should be voided.
* * * * *
10.1.2 Temperature Sensors. Calibrate against mercury-in-glass
thermometers. An alternative mercury-free thermometer may be used if
the thermometer is at a minimum equivalent in terms of performance
or suitably effective for the specific temperature measurement
application.
* * * * *
Method 12--Determination of Inorganic Lead Emissions From Stationary
Sources
* * * * *
16.1 Simultaneous Determination of Particulate Matter and Lead
Emissions. Method 12 may be used to simultaneously determine Pb
provided:
(1) Acetone is used to remove particulate from the probe and
inside of the filter holder as specified by Method 5,
(2) 0.1 N HNO3 is used in the impingers,
(3) A glass fiber filter with a low Pb background is used, and
(4) The entire train contents, including the impingers, are
treated and analyzed for Pb as described in Sections 8.0 and 11.0 of
this method.
* * * * *
16.4 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry
(ICP-AES) Analysis. ICP-AES may be used as an alternative to atomic
absorption analysis provided the following conditions are met:
16.4.1 Sample collection, sample preparation, and analytical
preparation procedures are as defined in the method except as
necessary for the ICP-AES application.
16.4.2 The limit of quantitation for the ICP-AES must be
demonstrated, and the sample concentrations reported should be no
less than two times the limit of quantitation. The limit of
quantitation is defined as ten times the standard deviation of the
blank value. The standard deviation of the blank value is determined
from the analysis of seven blanks. It has been reported that for
mercury and those elements that form hydrides, a continuous-flow
generator coupled to an ICP-AES offers detection limits comparable
to cold vapor atomic absorption.
16.5 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS)
Analysis. ICP-MS may be used as an alternative to atomic absorption
analysis.
16.6 Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry (CVAFS)
Analysis. CVAFS may be used as an alternative to atomic absorption
analysis.
* * * * *
Method 14A--Determination of Total Fluoride Emissions From Selected
Sources at Primary Aluminum Production Facilities
* * * * *
10.1.1 * * * Allowable tolerances for Y and [Delta]H@ are given
in Figure 5-5 of Method 5 of this appendix.
* * * * *
0
27. Amend appendix A-6 to part 60 as follows:
0
a. By revising Method 16A, section 1.2.
0
b. By revising Method 16C, sections 12.1 and 12.5.
0
c. By revising Method 18, sections 8.2.1.1.2, 8.2.1.4, 8.2.1.4.2,
16.1.1.12, 16.1.3.2, and the headings of figures 18-3 and 18-10.
0
d. By redesignating section 8.2.1.5.2.3 as section 8.2.1.5.2.2.
0
e. By adding a new section 8.2.1.5.2.3.
[[Page 11267]]
Appendix A-6 to Part 60--Test Methods 16 Through 18
* * * * *
Method 16A--Determination of Total Reduced Sulfur Emissions From
Stationary Sources (Impinger Technique)
* * * * *
1.2 Applicability. This method is applicable for the
determination of TRS emissions from recovery boilers, lime kilns,
and smelt dissolving tanks at kraft pulp mills, reduced sulfur
compounds (H2S, carbonyl sulfide, and carbon disulfide)
from sulfur recovery units at onshore natural gas processing
facilities, and from other sources when specified in an applicable
subpart of the regulations. The flue gas must contain at least 1
percent oxygen for complete oxidation of all TRS to SO2.
Note: If sources other than kraft pulp mills experience low oxygen
levels in the emissions, the method results may be biased low.
* * * * *
Method 16C--Determination of Total Reduced Sulfur Emissions From
Stationary Sources
* * * * *
12.1 Nomenclature.
ACE = Analyzer calibration error, percent of calibration span.
CD = Calibration drift, percent.
CDir = Measured concentration of a calibration gas (low,
mid, or high) when introduced in direct calibration mode, ppmv.
CH2S = Concentration of the system performance check gas,
ppmv H2S.
CS = Measured concentration of the system performance gas
when introduced in system calibration mode, ppmv H2S.
CV = Manufacturer certified concentration of a
calibration gas (low, mid, or high), ppmv SO2.
CSO2 = Unadjusted sample SO2 concentration,
ppmv.
CTRS = Total reduced sulfur concentration corrected for
system performance, ppmv.
DF = Dilution system (if used) dilution factor, dimensionless.
SP = System performance, percent.
* * * * *
12.5 TRS Concentration as SO2. For each sample or
test run, calculate the arithmetic average of SO2
concentration values (e.g., 1-minute averages). Then calculate the
sample TRS concentration by adjusting the average value of
CSO2 for system performance using Equation 16C-4.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.016
* * * * *
Method 18--Measurement of Gaseous Organic Compound Emissions by Gas
Chromatography
* * * * *
8.2.1.1.2 Sampling Procedure. To obtain a sample, assemble the
sample train as shown in Figure 18-9. Leak-check both the bag and
the container. Connect the vacuum line from the needle valve to the
Teflon sample line from the probe. Place the end of the probe at the
centroid of the stack or at a point no closer to the walls than 1
in., and start the pump. Set the flow rate so that the final volume
of the sample is approximately 80 percent of the bag capacity. After
allowing sufficient time to purge the line several times, connect
the vacuum line to the bag, and evacuate until the rotameter
indicates no flow. Then position the sample and vacuum lines for
sampling, and begin the actual sampling, keeping the rate
proportional to the stack velocity. As a precaution, direct the gas
exiting the rotameter away from sampling personnel. At the end of
the sample period, shut off the pump, disconnect the sample line
from the bag, and disconnect the vacuum line from the bag container.
Record the source temperature, barometric pressure, ambient
temperature, sampling flow rate, and initial and final sampling time
on the data sheet shown in Figure 18-10. Protect the bag and its
container from sunlight. Record the time lapsed between sample
collection and analysis, and then conduct the recovery procedure in
Section 8.4.2.
* * * * *
8.2.1.4 Other Modified Bag Sampling Procedures. In the event
that condensation is observed in the bag while collecting the sample
and a direct interface system cannot be used, heat the bag during
collection and maintain it at a suitably elevated temperature during
all subsequent operations. (Note: Take care to leak-check the system
prior to the dilutions so as not to create a potentially explosive
atmosphere.) As an alternative, collect the sample gas, and
simultaneously dilute it in the bag.
* * * * *
8.2.1.4.2 Second Alternative Procedure. Prefill the bag with a
known quantity of inert gas. Meter the inert gas into the bag
according to the procedure for the preparation of gas concentration
standards of volatile liquid materials (Section 10.1.2.2), but
eliminate the midget impinger section. Take the partly filled bag to
the source, and meter the source gas into the bag through heated
sampling lines and a heated flowmeter, or Teflon positive
displacement pump. Verify the dilution factors before sampling each
bag through dilution and analysis of gases of known concentration.
* * * * *
8.2.1.5.2.3 Analyze the two field audit samples as described in
Section 9.2 by connecting each bag containing an audit gas mixture
to the sampling valve. Calculate the results; record and report the
data to the audit supervisor.
* * * * *
16.1.1.12 Flexible Bags. Tedlar or equivalent, 10- and 50-liter
capacity, for preparation of standards. (Verify through the
manufacturer that the Tedlar alternative is suitable for the
compound of interest and make this verifying information available
for inspection.)
* * * * *
16.1.3.2 Flexible Bag Procedure. Any leak-free plastic (e.g.,
Tedlar, Mylar, Teflon) or plastic-coated aluminum (e.g., aluminized
Mylar) bag, or equivalent, can be used to obtain the pre-survey
sample. Use new bags, and leak-check them before field use. In
addition, check the bag before use for contamination by filling it
with nitrogen or air and analyzing the gas by GC at high
sensitivity. Experience indicates that it is desirable to allow the
inert gas to remain in the bag about 24 hours or longer to check for
desorption of organics from the bag. Follow the leak-check and
sample collection procedures given in Section 8.2.1.
* * * * *
18.0 * * *
Figure 18-3. Preparation of Standards in Tedlar or Tedlar-Equlivalent
Bags and Calibration Curve
* * * * *
Figure 18-10. Field Sample Data Sheet--Tedlar or Tedlar-Equivalent Bag
Collection Method
* * * * *
0
28. Amend appendix A-7 to part 60 as follows:
0
a. By amending Method 23 as follows:
0
i. By revising sections 2.2.7, 4.1.1.3, and 4.2.7.
0
ii. By adding and reserving section 8.0.
0
b. By revising Method 24, section 11.2.2.
0
c. By revising Method 25, section 7.1.3.
0
d. Amend Method 25C as follows:
0
i. By revising sections 6.1 and 12.1.
0
ii. By adding a new section 8.2.3.
0
e. By revising Method 25D, the first sentence in section 9.1.
Appendix A-7 to Part 60--Test Methods 19 Through 25E
* * * * *
Method 23--Determination of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and
Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans From Stationary Sources
* * * * *
2.2.7 Storage Container. Air-tight container to store silica
gel.
* * * * *
4.1.1.3 Sample Train. It is suggested that all components be
maintained according to the procedure described in APTD-0576.
Alternative mercury-free thermometers may be used if the
thermometers are, at a minimum, equivalent in terms of performance
or suitably effective for the specific temperature measurement
application.
* * * * *
4.2.7 Silica Gel. Note the color of the indicating silica gel to
determine if it has been completely spent and make a mention of its
condition. Transfer the silica gel from the fifth impinger to its
original container and seal. If a moisture determination is made,
follow the applicable procedures in sections 8.7.6.3 and 11.2.3 of
Method 5 to handle and weigh the silica gel. If moisture is not
measured, the silica gel may be disposed.
* * * * *
[[Page 11268]]
8.0 [Reserved]
* * * * *
Method 24--Determination of Volatile Matter Content, Water Content,
Density, Volume Solids, and Weight Solids of Surface Coatings
* * * * *
11.2.2 Volatile Content. To determine total volatile content,
use the apparatus and reagents described in ASTM D2369 (incorporated
by reference; see Sec. 60.17 for the approved versions of the
standard), respectively, and use the following procedures:
* * * * *
Method 25--Determination of Total Gaseous Nonmethane Organic Emissions
as Carbon
* * * * *
7.1.3 Filters. Glass fiber filters, without organic binder,
exhibiting at least 99.95 percent efficiency (<0.05 percent
penetration) on 0.3 micron dioctyl phthalate smoke particles. The
filter efficiency test shall be conducted in accordance with ASTM
Method D2986-71, 78, or 95a (incorporated by reference--see Sec.
60.17). Test data from the supplier's quality control program are
sufficient for this purpose.
* * * * *
Method 25C--Determination of Nonmethane Organic Compounds (NMOC) in MSW
Landfill Gases
* * * * *
6.1 Sample Probe. Stainless steel, with the bottom third
perforated. Teflon probe liners and sampling lines are also allowed.
Non-perforated probes are allowed as long as they are withdrawn to
create a gap equivalent to having the bottom third perforated. The
sample probe must be capped at the bottom and must have a threaded
cap with a sampling attachment at the top. The sample probe must be
long enough to go through and extend no less than 0.9 m (3 ft) below
the landfill cover. If the sample probe is to be driven into the
landfill, the bottom cap should be designed to facilitate driving
the probe into the landfill.
* * * * *
8.2.3 Driven Probes. Closed-point probes may be driven directly
into the landfill in a single step. This method may not require
backfilling if the probe is adequately sealed by its insertion.
Unperforated probes that are inserted in this manner and withdrawn
at a distance from a detachable tip to create an open space are also
acceptable.
* * * * *
12.1 Nomenclature.
Bw = Moisture content in the sample, fraction.
CN2 = Reported N2 concentration
(CN2Corr by Method 3C), fraction.
Ct = Calculated NMOC concentration, ppmv C equivalent.
Ctm = Measured NMOC concentration, ppmv C equivalent.
Pb = Barometric pressure, mm Hg.
Pt = Gas sample tank pressure after sampling, but before
pressurizing, mm Hg absolute.
Ptf = Final gas sample tank pressure after pressurizing,
mm Hg absolute.
Pti = Gas sample tank pressure after evacuation, mm Hg
absolute.
Pw = Vapor pressure of H2O (from Table 25C-1),
mm Hg.
r = Total number of analyzer injections of sample tank during
analysis (where j=injection number, 1 . . . r).
Tt = Sample tank temperature at completion of sampling,
[deg]K.
Tti = Sample tank temperature before sampling, [deg]K.
Ttf = Sample tank temperature after pressurizing, [deg]K.
* * * * *
Method 25D--Determination of the Volatile Organic Concentration of
Waste Samples
* * * * *
9.1 Quality Control Samples. If audit samples are not available,
prepare and analyze the two types of quality control samples (QCS)
listed in Sections 9.1.1 and 9.1.2. * * *
* * * * *
0
29. Amend appendix A-8 to part 60 as follows:
0
a. By amending Method 26 as follows:
0
i. By revising sections 6.1.1, 6.1.5, and 8.1.2.
0
ii. By redesignating sections 16.0 and 17.0 as sections 17.0 and 18.0,
respectively.
0
iii. By adding a new section 16.0.
0
b. By revising Method 26A, sections 6.1.7, 8.1.5, and 8.1.6.
0
c. By amending Method 29 as follows:
0
i. By redesignating sections 16.0 and 17.0 as sections 17.0 and 18.0,
respectively.
0
ii. By adding a new section 16.0.
0
d. By revising Method 30B, the introductory text to section 8.2.2.1,
the note to section 8.2.4, the note to section 8.2.6.2, and sections
9.0, 10.3, 10.4, 11.3.
Appendix A-8 to Part 60--Text Methods 26 Through 30B
* * * * *
Method 26--Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions From
Stationary Sources Non-Isokinetic Method
* * * * *
6.1.1 Probe. Borosilicate glass, approximately 3/8-in. (9-mm)
I.D. with a heating system capable of maintaining a probe gas
temperature during sampling between 120 and 134 [deg]C (248 and
273[emsp14] [deg]F) to prevent moisture condensation; or Teflon
where stack probes are below 210 [deg]C. If HF is a target analyte,
then preconditioning of new teflon components by heating should be
considered to prevent potential HF outgassing. A Teflon-glass filter
in a mat configuration should be installed to remove particulate
matter from the gas stream.
* * * * *
6.1.5 Heating System. Any heating system capable of maintaining
a temperature around the probe and filter holder between 120 and 134
[deg]C (248 and 273[emsp14] [deg]F) during sampling, or such other
temperature as specified by an applicable subpart of the standards
or approved by the Administrator for a particular application.
* * * * *
8.1.2 Adjust the probe temperature and the temperature of the
filter and the stopcock (i.e., the heated area in Figure 26-1) to a
temperature sufficient to prevent water condensation. This
temperature must be maintained between 120 and 134 [deg]C (248 and
273 [deg]F). The temperature should be monitored throughout a
sampling run to ensure that the desired temperature is maintained.
It is important to maintain a temperature around the probe and
filter in this range since it is extremely difficult to purge acid
gases off these components. (These components are not quantitatively
recovered and, hence, any collection of acid gases on these
components would result in potential undereporting of these
emissions. The applicable subparts may specify alternative higher
temperatures.)
* * * * *
16.0 Alternative Procedures
Method 26A. Method 26A, which uses isokinetic sampling
equipment, is an acceptable alternative to Method 26.
* * * * *
Method 26A--Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions From
Stationary Sources--Isokinetic Method
* * * * *
6.1.7 Heating System. Any heating system capable of maintaining
a temperature around the probe and filter holder between 120 and 134
[deg]C (248 to 273[emsp14] [deg]F) during sampling, or such other
temperature as specified by an applicable subpart of the standards
or approved by the Administrator for a particular application.
* * * * *
8.1.5 Sampling Train Operation. Follow the general procedure
given in Method 5, Section 8.5. It is important to maintain a
temperature around the probe, filter (and cyclone, if used) between
120 and 134 [deg]C (248 and 273 [deg]F) since it is extremely
difficult to purge acid gases off these components. (These
components are not quantitatively recovered and hence any collection
of acid gases on these components would result in potential
undereporting these emissions. The applicable subparts may specify
alternative higher temperatures.) For each run, record the data
required on a data sheet such as the one shown in Method 5, Figure
5-3. If the condensate impinger becomes too full, it may be emptied,
recharged with 50 ml of 0.1 N H2SO4, and replaced during the sample
run. The condensate emptied must be saved and included in the
measurement of the volume of moisture collected and included in the
sample for analysis. The additional 50 ml of absorbing reagent must
also be considered in calculating the moisture. Before the sampling
train integrity is compromised by removing the impinger, conduct a
leak-check as described in Method 5, Section 8.4.2.
8.1.6 Post-Test Moisture Removal (Optional). When the optional
cyclone is included in the sampling train or when
[[Page 11269]]
liquid is visible on the filter at the end of a sample run even in
the absence of a cyclone, perform the following procedure. Upon
completion of the test run, connect the ambient air conditioning
tube at the probe inlet and operate the train with the filter
heating system between 120 and 134 [deg]C (248 and 275 [deg]F) at a
low flow rate (e.g., [Delta]H = 1 in. H2O) to vaporize
any liquid and hydrogen halides in the cyclone or on the filter and
pull them through the train into the impingers. After 30 minutes,
turn off the flow, remove the conditioning tube, and examine the
cyclone and filter for any visible liquid. If liquid is visible,
repeat this step for 15 minutes and observe again. Keep repeating
until the cyclone is dry.
* * * * *
Method 29--Determination of Metals Emissions From Stationary Sources
* * * * *
16.0 Alternative Procedures
16.1 Alternative Analyzer. Samples may also be analyzed by cold
vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry.
16.2 [Reserved].
* * * * *
Method 30B--Determination of Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emissions From
Coal-Fired Combustion Sources Using Carbon Sorbent Traps
* * * * *
8.2.2.1 Determination of Minimum Calibration Concentration or
Mass. Based on your instrument's sensitivity and linearity,
determine the calibration concentrations or masses that make up a
representative low level calibration range. Verify that you are able
to meet the multipoint calibration performance criteria in section
11.0 of this method. Select a calibration concentration or mass that
is no less than 2 times the lowest concentration or mass in your
calibration curve. The lowest point in your calibration curve must
be at least 5, and preferably 10, times the Method Detection Limit
(MDL), which is the minimum amount of the analyte that can be
detected and reported. The MDL must be determined at least once for
the analytical system using an MDL study such as that found in
section 15.0 to Method 301 of appendix A to part 63 of this chapter.
* * * * *
8.2.4 * * *
Note to Section 8.2.4: For the purposes of relative accuracy
testing of Hg monitoring systems under subpart UUUUU of part 63 of
this chapter and Performance Specifications 12A and 12B in appendix
B to this part, when the stack gas Hg concentration is expected to
be very low (<0.5 [mu]g/dscm), you may estimate the Hg concentration
at 0.5 [mu]g/dscm.
* * * * *
8.2.6.2 * * *
Note to Section 8.2.6.2: It is acceptable to perform the field
recovery test concurrent with actual test runs (e.g., through the
use of a quad probe). It is also acceptable to use the field
recovery test runs as test runs for emissions testing or for the
RATA of a Hg monitoring system under subpart UUUUU of part 63 of
this chapter and Performance Specifications 12A and 12B in appendix
B to this part, if certain conditions are met. To determine whether
a particular field recovery test run may be used as a RATA run,
subtract the mass of the Hg\0\ spike from the total Hg mass
collected in sections 1 and 2 of the spiked trap. The difference
represents the mass of Hg in the stack gas sample. Divide this mass
by the sample volume to obtain the Hg concentration in the effluent
gas stream, as measured with the spiked trap. Compare this
concentration to the corresponding Hg concentration measured with
the unspiked trap. If the paired trains meet the relative deviation
and other applicable data validation criteria in Table 9-1, then the
average of the two Hg concentrations may be used as an emissions
test run value or as the reference method value for a RATA run.
* * * * *
9.0 Quality Assurance and Quality Control
Table 9-1 summarizes the QA/QC performance criteria that are
used to validate the Hg emissions data from Method 30B sorbent trap
measurement systems.
Table 9-1--Quality Assurance/Quality Control Criteria for Method 30B
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QA/QC test or specification Acceptance criteria Frequency Consequences if not met
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gas flow meter calibration (At 3 Calibration factor (Yi) Prior to initial use Recalibrate at 3 points
settings or points). at each flow rate must and when post-test until the acceptance
be within 2% of the 5% of Y.
average value (Y).
Gas flow meter post-test calibration Calibration factor (Yi) After each field test. Recalibrate gas flow
check (Single-point). must be within 5% of the Y must be done on-site, determine a new value
value from the most using stack gas. of Y. For mass flow
recent 3-point meters, must be done
calibration. on-site, using stack
gas. Apply the new Y
value to the field
test data.
Temperature sensor calibration....... Absolute temperature Prior to initial use Recalibrate; sensor may
measures by sensor and before each test not be used until
within 1.5% of a
reference sensor.
Barometer calibration................ Absolute pressure Prior to initial use Recalibrate; instrument
measured by instrument and before each test may not be used until
within 10 thereafter. specification is met.
mm Hg of reading with
a mercury barometer or
NIST traceable
barometer.
Pre-test leak check.................. <=4% of target sampling Prior to sampling...... Sampling shall not
rate. commence until the
leak check is passed.
Post-test leak check................. <=4% of average After sampling......... Sample invalidated.*
sampling rate.
Analytical matrix interference test Establish minimum Prior to analyzing any Field sample results
(wet chemical analysis, only). dilution (if any) field samples; repeat not validated.
needed to eliminate for each type of
sorbent matrix sorbent used.
interferences.
Analytical bias test................. Average recovery Prior to analyzing Field samples shall not
between 90% and 110% field samples and be analyzed until the
for Hg\0\ and HgCl2 at prior to use of new percent recovery
each of the 2 spike sorbent media. criteria has been met.
concentration levels.
Multipoint analyzer calibration...... Each analyzer reading On the day of analysis, Recalibrate until
within 10% before analyzing any successful.
of true value and samples.
r\2\>=0.99.
Analysis of independent calibration Within 10% Following daily Recalibrate and repeat
standard. of true value. calibration, prior to independent standard
analyzing field analysis until
samples. successful.
[[Page 11270]]
Analysis of continuing calibration Within 10% Following daily Recalibrate and repeat
verification standard (CCVS). of true value. calibration, after independent standard
analyzing <=10 field analysis, reanalyze
samples, and at end of samples until
each set of analyses. successful, if
possible; for
destructive
techniques, samples
invalidated.
Test run total sample volume......... Within 20% Each individual sample. Sample invalidated.
of total volume
sampled during field
recovery test.
Sorbent trap section 2 breakthrough.. For compliance/ Every sample........... Sample invalidated.*
emissions testing:
<=10% of section 1 Hg
mass for Hg
concentrations >1
[mu]g/dscm;
<=20% of section 1
Hg mass for Hg
concentrations <=1
[mu]g/dscm.
<=50% of section 1
Hg mass if the
stack Hg
concentration is
<=30% of the Hg
concentration that
is equivalent to
the applicable
emission limit.
For relative accuracy
testing:
<=10% of section 1 Hg
mass for Hg
concentrations >1
[mu]g/dscm;
<=20% of section 1 Hg
mass for Hg
concentrations <=1
[mu]g/dscm and >0.5
[mu]g/dscm;
<=50% of section 1 Hg
mass for Hg
concentrations <=0.5
[mu]g/dscm >0.1 [mu]g/
dscm;
no criterion for Hg
concentrations
<=0.1 [mu]g/dscm
(must meet all
other QA/QC
specifications).
Paired sorbent trap agreement........ <=10% Relative Every run.............. Run invalidated.*
Deviation (RD) mass
for Hg concentrations
>1 [mu]g/dscm;
<=20% RD or <=0.2 [mu]g/
dscm absolute
difference for Hg
concentrations <=1
[mu]g/dscm.
Sample analysis...................... Within valid All Section 1 samples Reanalyze at more
calibration range where stack Hg concentrated level if
(within calibration concentration is possible, samples
curve). >=0.02 [mu]g/dscm invalidated if not
except in case where within calibrated
stack Hg concentration range.
is <=30% of the
applicable emission
limit.
Sample analysis...................... Within bounds of Hg\0\ All Section 1 samples Expand bounds of Hg\0\
and HgCl2 Analytical where stack Hg and HgCl2 Analytical
Bias Test. concentration is >=0.5 Bias Test; if not
[mu]g/dscm. successful, samples
invalidated.
Field recovery test.................. Average recovery Once per field test.... Field sample runs not
between 85% and 115% validated without
for Hg\0\. successful field
recovery test.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* And data from the pair of sorbent traps are also invalidated.
* * * * *
10.3 Thermocouples and Other Temperature Sensors. Use the
procedures and criteria in Section 10.3 of Method 2 in appendix A-1
to this part to calibrate in-stack temperature sensors and
thermocouples. Dial thermometers shall be calibrated against
mercury-in-glass thermometers or equivalent. Calibrations must be
performed prior to initial use and before each field test
thereafter. At each calibration point, the absolute temperature
measured by the temperature sensor must agree to within 1.5 percent of the temperature measured with the reference
sensor, otherwise the sensor may not continue to be used.
10.4 Barometer. Calibrate against a mercury barometer or other
NIST-traceable barometer as per Section 10.6 of Method 5 in appendix
A-3 to this part. Calibration must be performed prior to initial use
and before each test program, and the absolute pressure measured by
the barometer must agree to within 10 mm Hg of the
pressure measured by the mercury or other NIST-traceable barometer,
otherwise the barometer may not continue to be used.
* * * * *
11.3 Field Sample Analyses. Analyze the sorbent trap samples
following the same procedures that were used for conducting the
Hg\0\ and HgCl2 analytical bias tests. The individual
sections of the sorbent trap and their respective components must be
analyzed separately (i.e., section 1 and its components, then
section 2 and its components). All sorbent trap section 1 sample
analyses must be within the
[[Page 11271]]
calibrated range of the analytical system as specified in Table 9-1.
For wet analyses, the sample can simply be diluted to fall within
the calibrated range. However, for the destructive thermal analyses,
samples that are not within the calibrated range cannot be re-
analyzed. As a result, the sample cannot be validated, and another
sample must be collected. It is strongly suggested that the
analytical system be calibrated over multiple ranges so that
thermally analyzed samples fall within the calibrated range. The
total mass of Hg measured in each sorbent trap section 1 must also
fall within the lower and upper mass limits established during the
initial Hg\0\ and HgCl2 analytical bias test. If a sample
is analyzed and found to fall outside of these limits, it is
acceptable for an additional Hg\0\ and HgCl2 analytical
bias test to be performed that now includes this level. However,
some samples (e.g., the mass collected in trap section 2), may have
Hg levels so low that it may not be possible to quantify them in the
analytical system's calibrated range. Because a reliable estimate of
these low-level Hg measurements is necessary to fully validate the
emissions data, the MDL (see section 8.2.2.1 of this method) is used
to establish the minimum amount that can be detected and reported.
If the measured mass or concentration is below the lowest point in
the calibration curve and above the MDL, the analyst must estimate
the mass or concentration of the sample based on the analytical
instrument response relative to an additional calibration standard
at a concentration or mass between the MDL and the lowest point in
the calibration curve. This is accomplished by establishing a
response factor (e.g., area counts per Hg mass or concentration) and
estimating the amount of Hg present in the sample based on the
analytical response and this response factor.
Example: The analysis of a particular sample results in a
measured mass above the MDL, but below the lowest point in the
calibration curve which is 10 ng. An MDL of 1.3 ng Hg has been
established by the MDL study. A calibration standard containing 5 ng
of Hg is analyzed and gives an analytical response of 6,170 area
counts, which equates to a response factor of 1,234 area counts/ng
Hg. The analytical response for the sample is 4,840 area counts.
Dividing the analytical response for the sample (4,840 area counts)
by the response factor gives 3.9 ng Hg, which is the estimated mass
of Hg in the sample.
* * * * *
0
30. Amend appendix B to part 60 as follows:
0
a. By revising Performance Specification 3, section 13.2.
0
b. By revising Performance Specification 4, section 8.2.
0
c. By revising Performance Specification 4B, section 7.1.1.
0
d. By amending Performance Specification 7 as follows:
0
i. By revising section 8.4.
0
ii. By adding reference 5. to section 16.0.
0
e. By revising Performance Specification 11, sections 12.1(1) and (2).
0
f. By revising Performance Specification 12B, table 12B-1 in section
9.0 and section 12.8.3.
0
g. By revising Performance Specification 15, sections 11.1.1.4.2 and
11.1.1.4.3.
0
h. By revising Performance Specification 16, sections 6.1.7, 8.2.1,
9.1, 9.3, 9.4, 12.4, and 13.5.
Appendix B to Part 60--Performance Specifications
* * * * *
Performance Specification 3--Specifications and Test Procedures for
O2 and CO2 Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems
in Stationary Sources
* * * * *
13.2 CEMS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification. The RA of
the CEMS must be no greater than 20 percent of the mean value of the
reference method (RM) data. The results are also acceptable if the
absolute value of the difference between the mean RM value and the
mean CEMS value is less than or equal to 1.0 percent O2
(or CO2).
* * * * *
Performance Specification 4--Specifications and Test Procedures for
Carbon Monoxide Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems in Stationary
Sources
* * * * *
8.2 Reference Methods. Unless otherwise specified in an
applicable subpart of the regulation, Method 10, 10A, 10B or other
approved alternative are the RM for this PS.
* * * * *
Performance Specification 4B--Specifications and Test Procedures for
Carbon Monoxide and Oxygen Continuous Monitoring Systems in Stationary
Sources
* * * * *
7.1.1 Calculations. Summarize the results on a data sheet.
Average the differences between the instrument response and the
certified cylinder gas value for each gas. Calculate the CE results
for the CO monitor according to:
CE = [bond] d/FS [bond] x 100 (1)
Where d is the mean difference between the CEMS response and the
known reference concentration, and FS is the span value. The CE for
the O2 monitor is the average percent O2
difference between the O2 monitor and the certified
cylinder gas value for each gas.
* * * * *
Performance Specification 7--Specifications and Test Procedures for
Hydrogen Sulfide Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems in Stationary
Sources
* * * * *
8.4 Relative Accuracy Test Procedure.
8.4.1 Sampling Strategy for RM Tests, Number of RM Tests,
Correlation of RM and CEMS Data, and Calculations. These are the
same as that in PS-2, Sections 8.4.3 (except as specified below),
8.4.4, 8.4.5, and 8.4.6, respectively.
8.4.2 Reference Methods. Unless otherwise specified in an
applicable subpart of the regulation, Methods 11, 15, and 16 may be
used for the RM for this PS.
8.4.2.1 Sampling Time Per Run--Method 11. A sampling run, when
Method 11 (integrated sampling) is used, shall consist of a single
measurement for at least 10 minutes and 0.010 dscm (0.35 dscf). Each
sample shall be taken at approximately 30-minute intervals.
8.4.2.2 Sampling Time Per Run--Methods 15 and 16. The sampling
run shall consist of two injections equally spaced over a 30-minute
period following the procedures described in the particular method.
Note: Caution! Heater or non-approved electrical probes should not
be used around explosive or flammable sources.
* * * * *
16.0 * * *
5. Letter to RAMCON Environmental Corp. from Robert Kellam,
December 27, 1992.
* * * * *
Performance Specification 11-- Specifications and Test Procedures for
Particulate Matter Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems at Stationary
Sources
* * * * *
12.1 * * *
(1) Calculate the upscale drift (UD) using Equation 11-1:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.017
Where:
UD = The upscale (high-level) drift of your PM CEMS in percent,
RCEM = The measured PM CEMS response to the upscale
reference standard, and
RU = The pre-established numerical value of the upscale
reference standard.
FS= Full-scale value.
(2) Calculate the zero drift (ZD) using Equation 11-2:
[[Page 11272]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.018
Where:
ZD = The zero (low-level) drift of your PM CEMS in percent,
RCEM = The measured PM CEMS response to the zero
reference standard,
RL = The pre-established numerical value of the zero
reference standard, and
FS = Full-scale value.
* * * * *
Performance Specification 12B--Specifications and Test Procedures for
Monitoring Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emissions from Stationary Sources
Using a Sorbent Trap Monitoring System
* * * * *
9.0 * * *
Table 12B-1--QA/QC Criteria for Sorbent Trap Monitoring Systems
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QA/QC test or specification Acceptance criteria Frequency Consequences if not met
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-test leak check.................. <=4% of target sampling Prior to monitoring.... Monitoring must not
rate. commence until the
leak check is passed.
Post-test leak check................. <=4% of average After monitoring....... Invalidate the data
sampling rate. from the paired traps
or, if certain
conditions are met,
report adjusted data
from a single trap
(see Section 12.8.3).
Ratio of stack gas flow rate to No more than 5% of the Every hour throughout Invalidate the data
sample flow rate. hourly ratios or 5 monitoring period. from the paired traps
hourly ratios or, if certain
(whichever is less conditions are met,
restrictive) may report adjusted data
deviate from the from a single trap
reference ratio by (see Section 12.8.3).
more than 25%.
Sorbent trap section 2 breakthrough.. <=5% of Section 1 Hg Every sample........... Invalidate the data
mass. from the paired traps
<=10% of Section 1 Hg or, if certain
mass if average Hg conditions are met,
concentration is <=0.5 report adjusted data
[micro]g/scm. from a single trap
(see Section 12.8.3).
No criterion when Hg
concentration for trap
less than 10% of the
applicable emission
limit (must meet all
other QA/QC
specifications).
Paired sorbent trap agreement........ <=10% Relative Every sample........... Either invalidate the
Deviation (RD) if the data from the paired
average concentration traps or report the
is > 1.0 [micro]g/m\3\. results from the trap
<=20% RD if the average with the higher Hg
concentration is <=1.0 concentration.
[micro]g/m\3\.
Results also acceptable
if absolute difference
between concentrations
from paired traps is
<= 0.03 [micro]g/m\3\.
Spike Recovery Study................. Average recovery Prior to analyzing Field samples must not
between 85% and 115% field samples and be analyzed until the
for each of the 3 prior to use of new percent recovery
spike concentration sorbent media. criteria have been
levels. met.
Multipoint analyzer calibration...... Each analyzer reading On the day of analysis, Recalibrate until
within before analyzing any successful.
10% of true value and samples.
r\2\ >= 0.99.
Analysis of independent calibration Within 10% Following daily Recalibrate and repeat
standard. of true value. calibration, prior to independent standard
analyzing field analysis until
samples. successful.
Spike recovery from section 3 of both 75-125% of spike amount Every sample........... Invalidate the data
sorbent traps. from the paired traps
or, if certain
conditions are met,
report adjusted data
from a single trap
(see Section 12.8.3).
Relative Accuracy.................... RA <= 20.0% of RM mean RA specification must Data from the system
value; or if RM mean be met for initial are invalid until a RA
value <=5.0 [micro]g/ certification. test is passed.
scm, absolute
difference between RM
and sorbent trap
monitoring system mean
values <=1.0 [micro]g/
scm.
[[Page 11273]]
Gas flow meter calibration........... An initial calibration At 3 settings prior to Recalibrate meter at 3
factor (Y) has been initial use and at settings to determine
determined at 3 least quarterly at one a new value of Y.
settings; for mass setting thereafter.
flow meters, initial
calibration with stack
gas has been
performed. For
subsequent
calibrations, Y within
5% of
average value from the
most recent 3-point
calibration.
Temperature sensor calibration....... Absolute temperature Prior to initial use Recalibrate; sensor may
measured by sensor and at least quarterly not be used until
within thereafter. specification is met.
1.5% of a reference
sensor.
Barometer calibration................ Absolute pressure Prior to initial use Recalibrate; instrument
measured by instrument and at least quarterly may not be used until
within 10 thereafter. specification is met.
mm Hg of reading with
a NIST-traceable
barometer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
12.8.3 For the routine, day-to-day operation of the monitoring
system, when one of the two sorbent trap samples or sampling systems
either: (a) Fails the post-monitoring leak check; or (b) has
excessive section 2 breakthrough; or (c) fails to maintain the
proper stack flow-to-sample flow ratio; or (d) fails to achieve the
required section 3 spike recovery; or (e) is lost, broken, or
damaged, provided that the other trap meets the acceptance criteria
for all four of these QC specifications, the Hg concentration
measured by the valid trap may be multiplied by a factor of 1.111
and then used for reporting purposes. Further, if both traps meet
the acceptance criteria for all four of these QC specifications, but
the acceptance criterion for paired trap agreement is not met, the
owner or operator may report the higher of the two Hg concentrations
measured by the traps, in lieu of invalidating the data from the
paired traps.
* * * * *
Performance Specification 15--Performance Specification for Extractive
FTIR Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources
* * * * *
11.1.1.4.2 RMs Using a Grab Sampling Technique. Synchronize the
RM and FTIR CEM measurements as closely as possible. For a grab
sampling RM, record the volume collected and the exact sampling
period for each sample. Synchronize the FTIR CEM so that the FTIR
measures a spectrum of a similar cell volume at the same time as the
RM grab sample was collected. Measure at least five independent
samples with both the FTIR CEM and the RM for each of the minimum
nine runs. Compare the run concentration averages by using the
relative accuracy analysis procedure in Performance Specification 2
of appendix B of 40 CFR part 60.
11.1.1.4.3 Continuous Emission Monitors as RMs. If the RM is a
CEM, synchronize the sampling flow rates of the RM and the FTIR CEM.
Each run is at least 1 hour long and consists of at least 10 FTIR
CEM measurements and the corresponding 10 RM measurements (or
averages). For the statistical comparison, use the relative accuracy
analysis procedure in Performance Specification 2 of appendix B of
40 CFR part 60. If the RM time constant is < \1/2\ the FTIR CEM time
constant, brief fluctuations in analyte concentrations that are not
adequately measured with the slower FTIR CEM time constant can be
excluded from the run average along with the corresponding RM
measurements. However, the FTIR CEM run average must still include
at least 10 measurements over a 1-hour period.
* * * * *
Performance Specification 16--Specifications and Test Procedures for
Predictive Emission Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources
* * * * *
6.1.7 Sensor Location and Repair. We recommend you install
sensors in an accessible location in order to perform repairs and
replacements. Permanently-installed platforms or ladders may not be
needed. If you install sensors in an area that is not accessible,
you may be required to shut down the emissions unit to repair or
replace a sensor. Conduct a new RATA after replacing a sensor that
supplies a critical PEMS parameter if the new sensor provides a
different output or scaling or changes the historical training
dataset of the PEMS. Replacement of a non-critical sensor that does
not cause an impact in the accuracy of the PEMS does not trigger a
RATA. All sensors must be calibrated as often as needed but at least
as often as recommended by the manufacturers.
* * * * *
8.2.1 Reference Methods. Unless otherwise specified in the
applicable regulations, you must use the test methods in appendix A
of this part for the RM test. Conduct the RM tests at three
operating levels. The RM tests shall be performed at a low-load (or
production) level between the minimum safe, stable load and 50
percent of the maximum level load, at the mid-load level (an
intermediary level between the low and high levels), and at a high-
load level between 80 percent and the maximum load. Alternatively,
if practicable, you may test at three levels of the key operating
parameter (e.g. selected based on a covariance analysis between each
parameter and the PEMS output) equally spaced within the normal
range of the parameter.
* * * * *
9.1 QA/QC Summary. Conduct the applicable ongoing tests listed
below.
Ongoing Quality Assurance Tests
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PEMS regulatory
Test purpose Acceptability Frequency
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sensor Evaluation.................... All.................... ....................... Daily.
RAA.................................. Compliance............. 3-test avg <=10% of Each quarter except
simultaneous analyzer quarter when RATA
or RM average. performed.
RATA................................. All.................... Same as for RA in Sec. Yearly in quarter when
13.1. RAA not performed.
Bias Correction...................... All.................... If davg <= Bias test passed (no
[bond]cc[bond]. correction factor
needed).
PEMS Training........................ All.................... If Fcritical >=F....... Optional after initial
r >=0.8................ and subsequent RATAs.
[[Page 11274]]
Sensor Evaluation Alert Test All.................... See Section 6.1.8...... After each PEMS
(optional). training.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
9.3 Quarterly Relative Accuracy Audits. In the first year of
operation after the initial certification, perform a RAA consisting
of at least three 30-minute portable analyzer or RM determinations
each quarter a RATA is not performed. To conduct a RAA, follow the
procedures in Section 8.2 for the relative accuracy test, except
that only three sets of measurement data are required, and the
statistical tests are not required. The average of the three or more
portable analyzer or RM determinations must not exceed the limits
given in Section 13.5. Report the data from all sets of measurement
data. If a PEMS passes all quarterly RAAs in the first year and also
passes the subsequent yearly RATA in the second year, you may elect
to perform a single mid-year RAA in the second year in place of the
quarterly RAAs. This option may be repeated, but only until the PEMS
fails either a mid-year RAA or a yearly RATA. When such a failure
occurs, you must resume quarterly RAAs in the quarter following the
failure and continue conducting quarterly RAAs until the PEMS
successfully passes both a year of quarterly RAAs and a subsequent
RATA.
9.4 Yearly Relative Accuracy Test. Perform a minimum 9-run RATA
at the normal operating level on a yearly basis in the quarter that
the RAA is not performed. The statistical tests in Section 8.3 are
not required for the yearly RATA.
* * * * *
12.4 Relative Accuracy Audit. Calculate the quarterly RAA using
Equation 16-9.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.019
* * * * *
13.5 Relative Accuracy Audits. The average of the three portable
analyzer or RM determinations must not differ from the simultaneous
PEMS average value by more than 10 percent of the analyzer or RM for
concentrations greater than 100 ppm or 20 percent for concentrations
between 100 and 20 ppm, or the test is failed. For measurements at
20 ppm or less, this difference must not exceed 2 ppm for a
pollutant PEMS and 1 percent absolute for a diluents PEMS.
* * * * *
0
31. Amend appendix F to Part 60 as follows:
0
a. By revising Procedure 1, section 6.2.
0
b. By revising Procedure 2, paragraphs (3) and (4) of section 12.0.
0
c. By redesignating the second listing of section 6.2.6 as section
6.2.7 in Procedure 5.
Appendix F to Part 60--Quality Assurance Procedures
* * * * *
Procedure 1--Quality Assurance Requirements for Gas Continuous Emission
Monitoring Systems Used for Compliance Determination
* * * * *
6.2 RAA Accuracy Calculation. Use the calculation procedure in
the relevant performance specification to calculate the accuracy for
the RAA. The RAA must be calculated in the units of the applicable
emission standard.
* * * * *
Procedure 2--Quality Assurance Requirements for Particulate Matter
Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems at Stationary Sources
* * * * *
12.0 What calculations and data analysis must I perform for my PM
CEMS?
* * * * *
(3) How do I calculate daily upscale and zero drift? You must
calculate the upscale drift using Equation 2-2 and the zero drift
using Equation 2-3:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.021
Where:
UD = The upscale drift of your PM CEMS, in percent,
RCEM = Your PM CEMS response to the upscale check value,
and
RU = The upscale check value.
FS = Full-scale value.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.022
Where:
ZD = The zero (low-level) drift of your PM CEMS, in percent,
RCEM = Your PM CEMS response of the zero check value,
RL = The zero check value.
(4) How do I calculate SVA accuracy? You must use Equation 2-4
to calculate the accuracy, in percent, for each of the three SVA
tests or the daily sample volume check:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.023
[[Page 11275]]
Where:
VM = Sample gas volume determined/reported by your PM
CEMS (e.g., dscm),
VR = Sample gas volume measured by the independent
calibrated reference device (e.g., dscm) for the SVA or the
reference value for the daily sample volume check.
Note: Before calculating SVA accuracy, you must correct the
sample gas volumes measured by your PM CEMS and the independent
calibrated reference device to the same basis of temperature,
pressure, and moisture content. You must document all data and
calculations.
* * * * *
PART 61--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
0
32. The authority citation for part 61 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
Subpart A--[Amended]
0
33. Amend Sec. 61.13 by revising paragraph (e)(1)(i) to read as
follows:
Sec. 61.13 Emission tests and waiver of emission tests.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) The source owner, operator, or representative of the tested
facility shall obtain an audit sample, if commercially available, from
an AASP for each test method used for regulatory compliance purposes.
No audit samples are required for the following test methods: Methods
3A and 3C of appendix A-3 of part 60; Methods 6C, 7E, 9, and 10 of
appendix A-4 of part 60; Method 18 and 19 of appendix A-6 of part 60;
Methods 20, 22, and 25A of appendix A-7 of part 60; and Methods 303,
318, 320, and 321 of appendix A of part 63. If multiple sources at a
single facility are tested during a compliance test event, only one
audit sample is required for each method used during a compliance test.
The compliance authority responsible for the compliance test may waive
the requirement to include an audit sample if they believe that an
audit sample is not necessary. ``Commercially available'' means that
two or more independent AASPs have blind audit samples available for
purchase. If the source owner, operator, or representative cannot find
an audit sample for a specific method, the owner, operator, or
representative shall consult the EPA Web site at the following URL,
www.epa.gov/ttn/emc, to confirm whether there is a source that can
supply an audit sample for that method. If the EPA Web site does not
list an available audit sample at least 60 days prior to the beginning
of the compliance test, the source owner, operator, or representative
shall not be required to include an audit sample as part of the quality
assurance program for the compliance test. When ordering an audit
sample, the source owner, operator, or representative shall give the
sample provider an estimate for the concentration of each pollutant
that is emitted by the source or the estimated concentration of each
pollutant based on the permitted level and the name, address, and phone
number of the compliance authority. The source owner, operator, or
representative shall report the results for the audit sample along with
a summary of the emission test results for the audited pollutant to the
compliance authority and shall report the results of the audit sample
to the AASP. The source owner, operator, or representative shall make
both reports at the same time and in the same manner or shall report to
the compliance authority first and report to the AASP. If the method
being audited is a method that allows the samples to be analyzed in the
field and the tester plans to analyze the samples in the field, the
tester may analyze the audit samples prior to collecting the emission
samples provided a representative of the compliance authority is
present at the testing site. The tester may request, and the compliance
authority may grant, a waiver to the requirement that a representative
of the compliance authority must be present at the testing site during
the field analysis of an audit sample. The source owner, operator, or
representative may report the results of the audit sample to the
compliance authority and then report the results of the audit sample to
the AASP prior to collecting any emission samples. The test protocol
and final test report shall document whether an audit sample was
ordered and utilized and the pass/fail results as applicable.
* * * * *
Subpart C--[Amended]
0
34. Amend Sec. 61.33 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 61.33 Stack sampling.
(a) Unless a waiver of emission testing is obtained under Sec.
61.13, each owner or operator required to comply with Sec. 61.32(a)
shall test emissions from the source according to Method 104 of
appendix B to this part or according to Method 29 of appendix A to part
60. Method 103 of appendix B to this part is approved by the
Administrator as an alternative method for sources subject to Sec.
61.32(a). The emission test shall be performed:
(1) By May 28, 2014 in the case of an existing source or a new
source which has an initial startup date preceding February 27, 2014;
or
(2) Within 90 days of startup in the case of a new source which did
not have an initial startup date preceding February 27, 2014.
* * * * *
Subpart D--[Amended]
0
35. Amend Sec. 61.42 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 61.42 Emission standard.
(a) Emissions to the atmosphere from rocket-motor test sites shall
not cause time-weighted atmospheric concentrations of beryllium to
exceed 75 microgram minutes per cubic meter ([micro]g-min/m\3\)(4.68 x
10-9 pound minutes per cubic foot (lb-min/ft\3\)) of air
within the limits of 10 to 60 minutes, accumulated during any 2
consecutive weeks, in any area in which an adverse effect to public
health could occur.
* * * * *
Subpart E--[Amended]
0
36. Amend Sec. 61.53 by revising paragraph (d)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 61.53 Stack sampling.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) Method 101A in appendix B or Method 29 in appendix A to part 60
shall be used to test emissions as follows:
(i) The test shall be performed by May 28, 2014 in the case of an
existing source or a new source which has an initial startup date
preceding February 27, 2014.
(ii) The test shall be performed within 90 days of startup in the
case of a new source which did not have an initial startup date
preceding February 27, 2014.
* * * * *
Subpart N--[Amended]
0
37. Amend Sec. 61.164 as follows:
0
a. By revising paragraph (d)(2)(i).
0
b. By revising paragraph (e)(1)(i).
0
c. By revising paragraph (e)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 61.164 Test methods and procedures.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Use Method 108 in appendix B to this part or Method 29 in
appendix A to part 60 for determining the arsenic
[[Page 11276]]
emission rate, g/hr (lb/hr). The emission rate shall equal the
arithmetic mean of the results of three 60-minute test runs.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Use Method 108 in appendix B to this part or Method 29 in
appendix A to part 60 to determine the concentration of arsenic in the
gas streams entering and exiting the control device. Conduct three 60-
minute test runs, each consisting of simultaneous testing of the inlet
and outlet gas streams. The gas streams shall contain all the gas
exhausted from the glass melting furnace.
* * * * *
(2) Calculate the percent emission reduction for each run as
follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.024
Where:
D = the percent emission reduction.
Cb = the arsenic concentration of the stack gas entering
the control device, as measured by Method 108 or Method 29.
Ca = the arsenic concentration of the stack gas exiting
the control device, as measured by Method 108 or Method 29.
* * * * *
0
38. Amend appendix B to part 61 to read as follows:
0
a. By amending Method 101 by redesignating sections 16.0 and 17.0 as
sections 17.0 and 18.0, respectively, and by adding a new section 16.0.
0
b. By amending Method 101A by redesignating sections 16.0 and 17.0 as
sections 17.0 and 18.0, respectively, and by adding a new section 16.0.
0
c. By revising Method 102, section 8.1.1.1.
0
d. By amending Method 104 as follows:
0
i. By revising sections 4.1 and 11.5.3.
0
ii. By redesignating sections 16.0 and 17.0 as sections 17.0 and 18.0,
respectively.
0
iii. By adding a new section 16.0.
0
e. By amending Method 108 by redesignating sections 16.0 and 17.0 as
sections 17.0 and 18.0, respectively, and by adding a new section 16.0.
0
f. By amending Method 108A by redesignating sections 16.0 and 17.0 as
sections 17.0 and 18.0 respectively, and by adding a new section 16.0.
Appendix B to Part 61--Test Methods
* * * * *
Method 101--Determination of Particulate and Gaseous Mercury Emissions
From Chlor-Alkali Plants (Air Streams)
* * * * *
16.0 Alternative Procedures
16.1 Alternative Analyzer. Samples may also be analyzed by cold
vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry.
* * * * *
Method 101A--Determination of Particulate and Gaseous Mercury Emissions
From Sewage Sludge Incinerators
* * * * *
16.0 Alternative Procedures
16.1 Alternative Analyzers.
16.1.1 Inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry
(ICP-AES) may be used as an alternative to atomic absorption
analysis provided the following conditions are met:
16.1.1.1 Sample collection, sample preparation, and analytical
preparation procedures are as defined in the method except as
necessary for the ICP-AES application.
16.1.1.2 The quality control procedures are conducted as
prescribed.
16.1.1.3 The limit of quantitation for the ICP-AES must be
demonstrated and the sample concentrations reported should be no
less than two times the limit of quantitation. The limit of
quantitation is defined as ten times the standard deviation of the
blank value. The standard deviation of the blank value is determined
from the analysis of seven blanks. It has been reported that for
mercury and those elements that form hydrides, a continuous-flow
generator coupled to an ICP-AES offers detection limits comparable
to cold vapor atomic absorption.
16.1.2 Samples may also be analyzed by cold vapor atomic
fluorescence spectrometry.
* * * * *
Method 102--Determination of Particulate and Gaseous Mercury Emissions
From Chlor-Alkali Plants (Hydrogen Streams)
* * * * *
8.1.1.1 Calibrate the meter box orifice. Use the techniques
described in APTD-0576 (see Reference 9 in Section 17.0 of Method 5
of appendix A to part 60). Calibration of the orifice meter at flow
conditions that simulate the conditions at the source is suggested.
Calibration should either be done with hydrogen or with some other
gas having a similar Reynolds Number so that there is similarity
between the Reynolds Numbers during calibration and during sampling.
Alternative mercury-free thermometers may be used if the
thermometers are, at a minimum, equivalent in terms of performance
or suitably effective for the specific temperature measurement
application.
* * * * *
Method 104--Determination of Beryllium Emissions From Stationary
Sources
* * * * *
4.1 Matrix Effects. Analysis for Be by flame atomic absorption
spectrophotometry is sensitive to the chemical composition and to
the physical properties (e.g., viscosity, pH) of the sample.
Aluminum and silicon, in particular, are known to interfere when
present in appreciable quantities. The analytical procedure includes
(optionally) the use of the Method of Standard Additions to check
for these matrix effects, and sample analysis using the Method of
Standard Additions if significant matrix effects are found to be
present (see Reference 2 in Section 17.0).
* * * * *
11.5.3 Check for Matrix Effects (optional). Use the Method of
Standard Additions (see Reference 2 in Section 17.0) to check at
least one sample from each source for matrix effects on the Be
results. If the results of the Method of Standard Additions
procedure used on the single source sample do not agree to within 5
percent of the value obtained by the routine atomic absorption
analysis, then reanalyze all samples from the source using the
Method of Standard Additions procedure.
* * * * *
16.0 Alternative Procedures
16.1 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry
(ICP-AES) Analysis. ICP-AES may be used as an alternative to atomic
absorption analysis provided the following conditions are met:
16.1.1 Sample collection, sample preparation, and analytical
preparation procedures are as defined in the method except as
necessary for the ICP-AES application.
16.1.2 Quality Assurance/Quality Control procedures, including
audit material analysis, are conducted as prescribed in the method.
The QA acceptance conditions must be met.
16.1.3 The limit of quantitation for the ICP-AES must be
demonstrated and the sample concentrations reported should be no
less than two times the limit of quantitation. The limit of
quantitation is defined as ten times the standard deviation of the
blank value. The standard deviation of the blank value is determined
from the analysis of seven blanks. It has been reported that for
mercury and those elements that form hydrides, a continuous-flow
generator coupled to an ICP-AES offers detection limits comparable
to cold vapor atomic absorption.
16.2 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS)
Analysis. ICP-MS may be used as an alternative to atomic absorption
analysis.
16.3 Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry (CVAFS)
Analysis. CVAFS may be used as an alternative to atomic absorption
analysis.
* * * * *
Method 108--Determination of Particulate and Gaseous Arsenic Emissions
* * * * *
16.0 Alternative Procedures
16.1 Inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry
(ICP-AES) Analysis. ICP-AES may be used as an alternative to atomic
absorption analysis provided the following conditions are met:
16.1.1 Sample collection, sample preparation, and analytical
preparation procedures are as defined in the method
[[Page 11277]]
except as necessary for the ICP-AES application.
16.1.2 Quality Assurance/Quality Control procedures, including
audit material analysis, are conducted as prescribed in the method.
The QA acceptance conditions must be met.
16.1.3 The limit of quantitation for the ICP-AES must be
demonstrated and the sample concentrations reported should be no
less than two times the limit of quantitation. The limit of
quantitation is defined as ten times the standard deviation of the
blank value. The standard deviation of the blank value is determined
from the analysis of seven blanks. It has been reported that for
mercury and those elements that form hydrides, a continuous-flow
generator coupled to an ICP-AES offers detection limits comparable
to cold vapor atomic absorption.
16.2 Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS)
Analysis. ICP-MS may be used as an alternative to atomic absorption
analysis.
16.3 Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry (CVAFS)
Analysis. CVAFS may be used as an alternative to atomic absorption
analysis.
* * * * *
Method 108A--Determination of Arsenic Content in Ore Samples From
Nonferrous Smelters
* * * * *
16.0 Alternative Procedures
16.1 Alternative Analyzer. Inductively coupled plasma-atomic
emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) may be used as an alternative to
atomic absorption analysis provided the following conditions are
met:
16.1.1 Sample collection, sample preparation, and analytical
preparation procedures are as defined in the method except as
necessary for the ICP-AES application.
16.1.2 Quality Assurance/Quality Control procedures, including
audit material analysis, are conducted as prescribed in the method.
The QA acceptance conditions must be met.
16.1.3 The limit of quantitation for the ICP-AES must be
demonstrated and the sample concentrations reported should be no
less than two times the limit of quantitation. The limit of
quantitation is defined as ten times the standard deviation of the
blank value. The standard deviation of the blank value is determined
from the analysis of seven blanks. It has been reported that for
mercury and those elements that form hydrides, a continuous-flow
generator coupled to an ICP-AES offers detection limits comparable
to cold vapor atomic absorption.
* * * * *
PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES
0
39. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart A--[Amended]
0
40. Amend Sec. 63.7 by revising paragraph (c)(2)(iii)(A) to read as
follows:
Sec. 63.7 Performance testing requirements.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) * * *
(A) The source owner, operator, or representative of the tested
facility shall obtain an audit sample, if commercially available, from
an AASP for each test method used for regulatory compliance purposes.
No audit samples are required for the following test methods: Methods
3A and 3C of appendix A-3 of part 60; Methods 6C, 7E, 9, and 10 of
appendix A-4 of part 60; Methods 18 and 19 of appendix A-6 of part 60;
Methods 20, 22, and 25A of appendix A-7 of part 60; and Methods 303,
318, 320, and 321 of appendix A of part 63. If multiple sources at a
single facility are tested during a compliance test event, only one
audit sample is required for each method used during a compliance test.
The compliance authority responsible for the compliance test may waive
the requirement to include an audit sample if they believe that an
audit sample is not necessary. ``Commercially available'' means that
two or more independent AASPs have blind audit samples available for
purchase. If the source owner, operator, or representative cannot find
an audit sample for a specific method, the owner, operator, or
representative shall consult the EPA Web site at the following URL,
www.epa.gov/ttn/emc, to confirm whether there is a source that can
supply an audit sample for that method. If the EPA Web site does not
list an available audit sample at least 60 days prior to the beginning
of the compliance test, the source owner, operator, or representative
shall not be required to include an audit sample as part of the quality
assurance program for the compliance test. When ordering an audit
sample, the source owner, operator, or representative shall give the
sample provider an estimate for the concentration of each pollutant
that is emitted by the source or the estimated concentration of each
pollutant based on the permitted level and the name, address, and phone
number of the compliance authority. The source owner, operator, or
representative shall report the results for the audit sample along with
a summary of the emission test results for the audited pollutant to the
compliance authority and shall report the results of the audit sample
to the AASP. The source owner, operator, or representative shall make
both reports at the same time and in the same manner or shall report to
the compliance authority first and report to the AASP. If the method
being audited is a method that allows the samples to be analyzed in the
field and the tester plans to analyze the samples in the field, the
tester may analyze the audit samples prior to collecting the emission
samples provided a representative of the compliance authority is
present at the testing site. The tester may request, and the compliance
authority may grant, a waiver to the requirement that a representative
of the compliance authority must be present at the testing site during
the field analysis of an audit sample. The source owner, operator, or
representative may report the results of the audit sample to the
compliance authority and then report the results of the audit sample to
the AASP prior to collecting any emission samples. The test protocol
and final test report shall document whether an audit sample was
ordered and utilized and the pass/fail results as applicable.
* * * * *
0
41. Amend Sec. 63.8 by adding a sentence to the end of paragraph
(f)(6)(iii) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.8 Monitoring requirements.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(6) * * *
(iii) * * * The Administrator will review the notification and may
rescind permission to use an alternative and require the owner or
operator to conduct a relative accuracy test of the CEMS as specified
in section 8.4 of Performance Specification 2.
* * * * *
0
42. Revise Sec. 63.14 to read as follows:
Sec. 63.14 Incorporations by reference.
(a) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part
with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To enforce any edition other than that
specified in this section, the EPA must publish notice of change in the
Federal Register and the material must be available to the public. All
approved material is available for inspection at the Air and Radiation
Docket and Information Center, U.S. EPA, 401 M St. SW., Washington, DC,
telephone number 202-566, and is available from the sources listed
below. It is also available for inspection at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
[[Page 11278]]
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030 or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
(b) The Association of Florida Phosphate Chemists, P.O. Box 1645,
Bartow, Florida 33830.
(1) Book of Methods Used and Adopted By The Association of Florida
Phosphate Chemists, Seventh Edition 1991:
(i) Section IX, Methods of Analysis for Phosphate Rock, No. 1
Preparation of Sample, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 63.606(c) and
63.626(c).
(ii) Section IX, Methods of Analysis for Phosphate Rock, No. 3
Phosphorus--P2O5 or
Ca3(PO4)2, Method A--Volumetric
Method, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 63.606(c) and 63.626(c).
(iii) Section IX, Methods of Analysis for Phosphate Rock, No. 3
Phosphorus-P2O5 or
Ca3(PO4)2, Method B--Gravimetric
Quimociac Method, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 63.606(c) and 63.626(c).
(iv) Section IX, Methods of Analysis For Phosphate Rock, No. 3
Phosphorus--P2O5 or
Ca3(PO4)2, Method C--
Spectrophotometric Method, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 63.606(c) and
63.626(c).
(v) Section XI, Methods of Analysis for Phosphoric Acid,
Superphosphate, Triple Superphosphate, and Ammonium Phosphates, No. 3
Total Phosphorus--P2O5, Method A--Volumetric
Method, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 63.606(c) and 63.626(c) and (d).
(vi) Section XI, Methods of Analysis for Phosphoric Acid,
Superphosphate, Triple Superphosphate, and Ammonium Phosphates, No. 3
Total Phosphorus--P2O5, Method B--Gravimetric
Quimociac Method, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 63.606(c) and 63.626(c)
and (d).
(vii) Section XI, Methods of Analysis for Phosphoric Acid,
Superphosphate, Triple Superphosphate, and Ammonium Phosphates, No. 3
Total Phosphorus--P2O5, Method C--
Spectrophotometric Method, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 63.606(c) and
63.626(c) and (d).
(2) [Reserved]
(c) Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC)
International, Customer Services, Suite 400, 2200 Wilson Boulevard,
Arlington, Virginia 22201-3301, Telephone (703) 522-3032, Fax (703)
522-5468.
(1) AOAC Official Method 929.01 Sampling of Solid Fertilizers,
Sixteenth edition, 1995, IBR approved for Sec. 63.626(d).
(2) AOAC Official Method 929.02 Preparation of Fertilizer Sample,
Sixteenth edition, 1995, IBR approved for Sec. 63.626(d).
(3) AOAC Official Method 957.02 Phosphorus (Total) in Fertilizers,
Preparation of Sample Solution, Sixteenth edition, 1995, IBR approved
for Sec. 63.626(d).
(4) AOAC Official Method 958.01 Phosphorus (Total) in Fertilizers,
Spectrophotometric Molybdovanadophosphate Method, Sixteenth edition,
1995, IBR approved for Sec. 63.626(d).
(5) AOAC Official Method 962.02 Phosphorus (Total) in Fertilizers,
Gravimetric Quinolinium Molybdophosphate Method, Sixteenth edition,
1995, IBR approved for Sec. 63.626(d).
(6) AOAC Official Method 969.02 Phosphorus (Total) in Fertilizers,
Alkalimetric Quinolinium Molybdophosphate Method, Sixteenth edition,
1995, IBR approved for Sec. 63.626(d).
(7) AOAC Official Method 978.01 Phosphorus (Total) in Fertilizers,
Automated Method, Sixteenth edition, 1995, IBR approved for Sec.
63.626(d).
(d) American Petroleum Institute (API), 1220 L Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20005.
(1) API Publication 2517, Evaporative Loss from External Floating-
Roof Tanks, Third Edition, February 1989, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
63.111 and 63.2406.
(2) API Publication 2518, Evaporative Loss from Fixed-roof Tanks,
Second Edition, October 1991, IBR approved for Sec. 63.150(g).
(3) API Manual of Petroleum Measurement Specifications (MPMS)
Chapter 19.2 (API MPMS 19.2), Evaporative Loss From Floating-Roof
Tanks, First Edition, April 1997, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 63.1251
and 63.12005.
(e) American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-
Conditioning Engineers at 1791 Tullie Circle, NE., Atlanta, GA 30329
orders@ashrae.org.
(1) American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air
Conditioning Engineers Method 52.1, ``Gravimetric and Dust-Spot
Procedures for Testing Air-Cleaning Devices Used in General Ventilation
for Removing Particulate Matter, June 4, 1992,'' IBR approved for
Sec. Sec. 63.11173(e) and 63.11516(d).
(2) [Reserved]
(f) American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Three Park
Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990, Telephone (800) 843-2763, https://www.asme.org; also available from HIS, Incorporated, 15 Inverness Way
East, Englewood, CO 80112, Telephone (877) 413-5184, https://global.ihs.com.
(1) ANSI/ASME PTC 19.10-1981, Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses [Part
10, Instruments and Apparatus], issued August 31, 1981, IBR approved
for Sec. Sec. 63.309(k), 63.457(k), 63.772(e) and (h), 63.865(b),
63.1282(d) and (g), 63.3166(a), 63.3360(e), 63.3545(a), 63.3555(a),
63.4166(a), 63.4362(a), 63.4766(a), 63.4965(a), 63.5160(d), table 4 to
subpart UUUU, 63.9307(c), 63.9323(a), 63.11148(e), 63.11155(e),
63.11162(f), 63.11163(g), 63.11410(j), 63.11551(a), 63.11646(a), and
63.11945, table 5 to subpart DDDDD, table 4 to subpart JJJJJ, tables 4
and 5 of subpart UUUUU, and table 1 to subpart ZZZZZ.
(2) [Reserved]
(g) American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 100 Barr
Harbor Drive, Post Office Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,
Telephone (610) 832-9585, https://www.astm.org; also available from
ProQuest, 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346,
Telephone (734) 761-4700, https://www.proquest.com.
(1) ASTM D95-05 (Reapproved 2010), Standard Test Method for Water
in Petroleum Products and Bituminous Materials by Distillation,
approved May 1, 2010, IBR approved for Sec. 63.10005(i) and table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
(2) ASTM D240-09 Standard Test Method for Heat of Combustion of
Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter, approved July 1, 2009,
IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(3) ASTM Method D388-05, Standard Classification of Coals by Rank,
approved September 15, 2005, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 63.7575,
63.10042, and 63.11237.
(4) ASTM Method D396-10, Standard Specification for Fuel Oils,
including Appendix X1, approved October 1, 2010, IBR approved for Sec.
63.10042.
(5) ASTM D396-10, Standard Specification for Fuel Oils, approved
October 1, 2010, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 63.7575 and 63.11237.
(6) ASTM D523-89, Standard Test Method for Specular Gloss, IBR
approved for Sec. 63.782.
(7) ASTM D975-11b, Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel Oils,
approved December 1, 2011, IBR approved for Sec. 63.7575.
(8) ASTM D1193-77, Standard Specification for Reagent Water, IBR
approved for appendix A to part 63: Method 306, Sections 7.1.1 and
7.4.2.
(9) ASTM D1193-91, Standard Specification for Reagent Water, IBR
approved for appendix A to part 63: Method 306, Sections 7.1.1 and
7.4.2.
(10) ASTM D1331-89, Standard Test Methods for Surface and
Interfacial Tension of Solutions of Surface Active Agents, IBR approved
for appendix A to part 63: Method 306B, Sections 6.2, 11.1, and 12.2.2.
[[Page 11279]]
(11) ASTM D1475-90, Standard Test Method for Density of Paint,
Varnish Lacquer, and Related Products, IBR approved for appendix A to
subpart II.
(12) ASTM D1475-98 (Reapproved 2003), ``Standard Test Method for
Density of Liquid Coatings, Inks, and Related Products,'' IBR approved
for Sec. Sec. 63.3151(b), 63.3941(b) and (c), 63.3951(c), 63.4141(b)
and (c), and 63.4551(c).
(13) ASTM Method D1835-05, Standard Specification for Liquefied
Petroleum (LP) Gases, approved April 1, 2005, IBR approved for
Sec. Sec. 63.7575 and 63.11237.
(14) ASTM D1945-03 (Reapproved 2010), Standard Test Method for
Analysis of Natural Gas by Gas Chromatography, (Approved January 1,
2010), IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 63.772(h), and 63.1282(g).
(15) ASTM D1946-77, Standard Method for Analysis of Reformed Gas by
Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for Sec. 63.11(b).
(16) ASTM D1946-90 (Reapproved 1994), Standard Method for Analysis
of Reformed Gas by Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for Sec. 63.11(b).
(17) ASTM D2013/D2013M-09, Standard Practice for Preparing Coal
Samples for Analysis, (Approved November 1, 2009), IBR approved for
table 6 to subpart DDDDD and table 5 to subpart JJJJJJ.
(18) ASTM D2099-00, Standard Test Method for Dynamic Water
Resistance of Shoe Upper Leather by the Maeser Water Penetration
Tester, IBR approved for Sec. 63.5350.
(19) ASTM D2216-05, Standard Test Methods for Laboratory
Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and Rock by Mass, IBR
approved for the definition of ``Free organic liquids'' in Sec.
63.10692.
(20) ASTM D2234/D2234M-10, Standard Practice for Collection of a
Gross Sample of Coal, approved January 1, 2010, IBR approved for table
6 to subpart DDDDD and table 5 to subpart JJJJJJ .
(21) ASTM D2369-93, Standard Test Method for Volatile Content of
Coatings, IBR approved for appendix A to subpart II.
(22) ASTM D2369-95, Standard Test Method for Volatile Content of
Coatings, IBR approved for appendix A to subpart II.
(23) ASTM D2382-76, Heat of Combustion of Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb
Calorimeter (High-Precision Method), IBR approved for Sec. 63.11(b).
(24) ASTM D2382-88, Heat of Combustion of Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb
Calorimeter (High-Precision Method), IBR approved for Sec. 63.11(b).
(25) ASTM D2697-86 (Reapproved 1998), Standard Test Method for
Volume Nonvolatile Matter in Clear or Pigmented Coatings, IBR approved
for Sec. Sec. 63.3161(f), 63.3521(b), 63.3941(b), 63.4141(b),
63.4741(b), 63.4941(b), and 63.5160(c).
(26) ASTM D2879-83, Standard Method for Vapor Pressure-Temperature
Relationship and Initial Decomposition Temperature of Liquids by
Isoteniscope, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 63.111, 63.2406, and
63.12005.
(27) ASTM D2879-96, Test Method for Vapor Pressure-Temperature
Relationship and Initial Decomposition Temperature of Liquids by
Isoteniscope, (Approved 1996), IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 63.111,
63.2406, and 63.12005.
(28) ASTM D3173-03 (Reapproved 2008), Standard Test Method for
Moisture in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke, (Approved February 1,
2008), IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD and table 5 to subpart
JJJJJJ.
(29) ASTM D3257-93, Standard Test Methods for Aromatics in Mineral
Spirits by Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for Sec. 63.786(b).
(30) ASTM D3588-98 (Reapproved 2003), Standard Practice for
Calculating Heat Value, Compressibility Factor, and Relative Density of
Gaseous Fuels, (Approved May 10, 2003), IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
63.772(h) and 63.1282(g).
(31) ASTM D3695-88, Standard Test Method for Volatile Alcohols in
Water by Direct Aqueous-Injection Gas Chromatography, IBR approved for
Sec. 63.365(e).
(32) ASTM D3792-91, Standard Method for Water Content of Water-
Reducible Paints by Direct Injection into a Gas Chromatograph, IBR
approved for appendix A to subpart II.
(33) ASTM D3912-80, Standard Test Method for Chemical Resistance of
Coatings Used in Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants, IBR approved for
Sec. 63.782.
(34) ASTM D4006-11, Standard Test Method for Water in Crude Oil by
Distillation, including Annex A1 and Appendix X1, (Approved June 1,
2011), IBR approved for Sec. 63.10005(i) and table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(35) ASTM D4017-81, Standard Test Method for Water in Paints and
Paint Materials by the Karl Fischer Titration Method, IBR approved for
appendix A to subpart II.
(36) ASTM D4017-90, Standard Test Method for Water in Paints and
Paint Materials by the Karl Fischer Titration Method, IBR approved for
appendix A to subpart II.
(37) ASTM D4017-96a, Standard Test Method for Water in Paints and
Paint Materials by the Karl Fischer Titration Method, IBR approved for
appendix A to subpart II.
(38) ASTM D4057-06 (Reapproved 2011), Standard Practice for Manual
Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products, including Annex A1,
(Approved June 1, 2011), IBR approved for Sec. 63.10005(i) and table 6
to subpart DDDDD.
(39) ASTM D4082-89, Standard Test Method for Effects of Gamma
Radiation on Coatings for Use in Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants, IBR
approved for Sec. 63.782.
(40) ASTM D4084-07, Standard Test Method for Analysis of Hydrogen
Sulfide in Gaseous Fuels (Lead Acetate Reaction Rate Method), (Approved
June 1, 2007), IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(41) ASTM D4177-95 (Reapproved 2010), Standard Practice for
Automatic Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products, including
Annexes A1 through A6 and Appendices X1 and X2, (Approved May 1, 2010),
IBR approved for Sec. 63.10005(i) and table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(42) ASTM D4208-02 (Reapproved 2007), Standard Test Method for
Total Chlorine in Coal by the Oxygen Bomb Combustion/Ion Selective
Electrode Method, approved May 1, 2007, IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
(43) ASTM D4256-89, Standard Test Method for Determination of the
Decontaminability of Coatings Used in Light-Water Nuclear Power Plants,
IBR approved for Sec. 63.782.
(44) ASTM D4256-89 (Reapproved 94), Standard Test Method for
Determination of the Decontaminability of Coatings Used in Light-Water
Nuclear Power Plants, IBR approved for Sec. 63.782.
(45) ASTM D4606-03 (Reapproved 2007), Standard Test Method for
Determination of Arsenic and Selenium in Coal by the Hydride
Generation/Atomic Absorption Method, (Approved October 1, 2007), IBR
approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(46) ASTM D4809-95, Standard Test Method for Heat of Combustion of
Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter (Precision Method), IBR
approved for Sec. 63.11(b).
(47) ASTM D4891-89 (Reapproved 2006), Standard Test Method for
Heating Value of Gases in Natural Gas Range by Stoichiometric
Combustion, (Approved June 1, 2006), IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
63.772(h) and 63.1282(g).
(48) ASTM D5066-91 (Reapproved 2001), Standard Test Method for
Determination of the Transfer Efficiency Under Production Conditions
for Spray Application of Automotive Paints-
[[Page 11280]]
Weight Basis, IBR approved for Sec. 63.3161(g).
(49) ASTM D5087-02, Standard Test Method for Determining Amount of
Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Released from Solventborne Automotive
Coatings and Available for Removal in a VOC Control Device (Abatement),
IBR approved for Sec. 63.3165(e) and appendix A to subpart IIII.
(50) ASTM D5192-09, Standard Practice for Collection of Coal
Samples from Core, (Approved June 1, 2009), IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
(51) ASTM D5198-09, Standard Practice for Nitric Acid Digestion of
Solid Waste, (Approved February 1, 2009), IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD and table 5 to subpart JJJJJJ.
(52) ASTM D5228-92, Standard Test Method for Determination of
Butane Working Capacity of Activated Carbon, (Reapproved 2005), IBR
approved for Sec. 63.11092(b).
(53) ASTM D5291-02, Standard Test Methods for Instrumental
Determination of Carbon, Hydrogen, and Nitrogen in Petroleum Products
and Lubricants, IBR approved for appendix A to subpart MMMM.
(54) ASTM D5790-95, Standard Test Method for Measurement of
Purgeable Organic Compounds in Water by Capillary Column Gas
Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, IBR approved for Table 4 to subpart
UUUU.
(55) ASTM D5864-11, Standard Test Method for Determining Aerobic
Aquatic Biodegradation of Lubricants or Their Components, (Approved
March 1, 2011), IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(56) ASTM D5865-10a, Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value
of Coal and Coke, (Approved May 1, 2010), IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD and table 5 to subpart JJJJJJ.
(57) ASTM D5954-98 (Reapproved 2006), Test Method for Mercury
Sampling and Measurement in Natural Gas by Atomic Absorption
Spectroscopy, (Approved December 1, 2006), IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
(58) ASTM D5965-02, Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of
Coating Powders, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 63.3151(b) and 63.3951(c).
(59) ASTM D6053-00, Standard Test Method for Determination of
Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Content of Electrical Insulating
Varnishes, IBR approved for appendix A to subpart MMMM.
(60) ASTM D6093-97 (Reapproved 2003), Standard Test Method for
Percent Volume Nonvolatile Matter in Clear or Pigmented Coatings Using
a Helium Gas Pycnometer, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 63.3161, 63.3521,
63.3941, 63.4141, 63.4741(b), 63.4941(b), and 63.5160(c).
(61) ASTM D6266-00a, Test Method for Determining the Amount of
Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Released from Waterborne Automotive
Coatings and Available for Removal in a VOC Control Device (Abatement),
IBR approved for Sec. 63.3165(e).
(62) ASTM D6323-98 (Reapproved 2003), Standard Guide for Laboratory
Subsampling of Media Related to Waste Management Activities, (Approved
August 10, 2003), IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD and table 5
to subpart JJJJJJ.
(63) ASTM D6348-03, Standard Test Method for Determination of
Gaseous Compounds by Extractive Direct Interface Fourier Transform
Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 63.457(b) and
63.1349, table 4 to subpart DDDD, table 4 to subpart ZZZZ, and table 8
to subpart HHHHHHH.
(64) ASTM D6348-03 (Reapproved 2010), Standard Test Method for
Determination of Gaseous Compounds by Extractive Direct Interface
Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy, including Annexes A1
through A8, (Approved October 1, 2010), IBR approved for tables 1, 2,
and 5 to subpart UUUUU and appendix B to subpart UUUUU.
(65) ASTM D6350-98 (Reapproved 2003), Standard Test Method for
Mercury Sampling and Analysis in Natural Gas by Atomic Fluorescence
Spectroscopy, (Approved May 10, 2003), IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
(66) ASTM D6357-11, Test Methods for Determination of Trace
Elements in Coal, Coke, and Combustion Residues from Coal Utilization
Processes by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry,
(Approved April 1, 2011), IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(67) ASTM D6420-99, Standard Test Method for Determination of
Gaseous Organic Compounds by Direct Interface Gas Chromatography-Mass
Spectrometry, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 63.5799, 63.5850, and Table 4
of Subpart UUUU.
(68) ASTM D6420-99 (Reapproved 2004), Standard Test Method for
Determination of Gaseous Organic Compounds by Direct Interface Gas
Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, (Approved October 1, 2004), IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 63.457(b), 63.485(g), 60.485a(g), 63.772(a),
63.772(e), 63.1282(a) and (d), 63.2351(b), and 63.2354(b), and table 8
to subpart HHHHHHH.
(69) ASTM D6522-00, Standard Test Method for Determination of
Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Monoxide, and Oxygen Concentrations in
Emissions from Natural Gas Fired Reciprocating Engines, Combustion
Turbines, Boilers, and Process Heaters Using Portable Analyzers, IBR
approved for Sec. 63.9307(c).
(70) ASTM D6522-00 (Reapproved 2005), Standard Test Method for
Determination of Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Monoxide, and Oxygen
Concentrations in Emissions from Natural Gas Fired Reciprocating
Engines, Combustion Turbines, Boilers, and Process Heaters Using
Portable Analyzers, (Approved October 1, 2005), IBR approved for table
4 to subpart ZZZZ, table 5 to subpart DDDDDD, table 4 to subpart
JJJJJJ, and Sec. Sec. 63.772(e) and (h)) and 63.1282(d) and (g).
(71) ASTM D6721-01 (Reapproved 2006), Standard Test Method for
Determination of Chlorine in Coal by Oxidative Hydrolysis
Microcoulometry, (Approved April 1, 2006), IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
(72) ASTM D6722-01 (Reapproved 2006), Standard Test Method for
Total Mercury in Coal and Coal Combustion Residues by the Direct
Combustion Analysis, (Approved April 1, 2006), IBR approved for Table 6
to subpart DDDDD and Table 5 to subpart JJJJJJ.
(73) ASTM D6751-11b, Standard Specification for Biodiesel Fuel
Blend Stock (B100) for Middle Distillate Fuels, (Approved July 15,
2011), IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 63.7575 and 63.11237.
(74) ASTM D6784-02 (Reapproved 2008), Standard Test Method for
Elemental, Oxidized, Particle-Bound and Total Mercury in Flue Gas
Generated from Coal-Fired Stationary Sources (Ontario Hydro Method),
(Approved April 1, 2008), IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 63.11646(a),
63.11647(a) and (d), tables 1, 2, 5, 11, 12t, and 13 to subpart DDDDD,
table 4 to subpart JJJJJJ, table 5 to subpart UUUUU, and appendix A to
subpart UUUUU.
(75) ASTM D6883-04, Standard Practice for Manual Sampling of
Stationary Coal from Railroad Cars, Barges, Trucks, or Stockpiles,
(Approved June 1, 2004), IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(76) ASTM D7430-11ae1, Standard Practice for Mechanical Sampling of
Coal, (Approved October 1, 2011), IBR approved for table 6 to subpart
DDDDD.
(77) ASTM E145-94 (Reapproved 2001), Standard Specification for
Gravity-Convection and Forced-Ventilation Ovens, IBR approved for
appendix A to subpart PPPP.
(78) ASTM E180-93, Standard Practice for Determining the Precision
of
[[Page 11281]]
ASTM Methods for Analysis and Testing of Industrial Chemicals, IBR
approved for Sec. 63.786(b).
(79) ASTM E260-91, General Practice for Packed Column Gas
Chromatography, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 63.750(b) and 63.786(b).
(80) ASTM E260-96, General Practice for Packed Column Gas
Chromatography, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 63.750(b) and 63.786(b).
(81) ASTM E515-95 (Reapproved 2000), Standard Test Method for Leaks
Using Bubble Emission Techniques, IBR approved for Sec. 63.425(i).
(82) ASTM E711-87 (Reapproved 2004), Standard Test Method for Gross
Calorific Value of Refuse-Derived Fuel by the Bomb Calorimeter,
(Approved August 28, 1987), IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD
and table 5 to subpart JJJJJJ.
(83) ASTM E776-87 (Reapproved 2009), Standard Test Method for Forms
of Chlorine in Refuse-Derived Fuel, (Approved July 1, 2009), IBR
approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(84) ASTM E871-82 (Reapproved 2006), Standard Test Method for
Moisture Analysis of Particulate Wood Fuels, (Approved November 1,
2006), IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD and table 5 to subpart
JJJJJJ.
(h) Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), 939 Ellis
Street, San Francisco, California 94109, https://www.arb.ca.gov/DRDB/BA/CURHTML/ST/st30.pdf.
(1) ``BAAQMD Source Test Procedure ST-30--Static Pressure Integrity
Test, Underground Storage Tanks,'' adopted November 30, 1983, and
amended December 21, 1994, IBR approved for Sec. 63.11120(a).
(2) [Reserved]
(i) British Standards Institute, 389 Chiswick High Road, London W4
4AL, United Kingdom.
(1) BS EN 1593:1999, Non-destructive Testing: Leak Testing--Bubble
Emission Techniques, IBR approved for Sec. 63.425(i).
(2) [Reserved]
(j) California Air Resources Board (CARB), Engineering and
Certification Branch, 1001 I Street, P.O. Box 2815, Sacramento, CA
95812-2815, Telephone (916) 327-0900, https://www.arb.ca.gov/vapor/vapor.htm.
(1) California Air Resources Board Vapor Recovery Test Procedure
TP-201.1--``Volumetric Efficiency for Phase I Vapor Recovery Systems,''
adopted April 12, 1996, and amended February 1, 2001 and October 8,
2003, IBR approved for Sec. 63.11120(b).
(2) California Air Resources Board Vapor Recovery Test Procedure
TP-201.1E--``Leak Rate and Cracking Pressure of Pressure/Vacuum Vent
Valves,'' adopted October 8, 2003, IBR approved for Sec. 63.11120(a).
(3) California Air Resources Board Vapor Recovery Test Procedure
TP-201.3--``Determination of 2-Inch WC Static Pressure Performance of
Vapor Recovery Systems of Dispensing Facilities,'' adopted April 12,
1996 and amended March 17, 1999, IBR approved for Sec. 63.11120(a).
(k) Environmental Protection Agency. Air and Radiation Docket and
Information Center, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460,
telephone number (202) 566-1745.
(1) California Regulatory Requirements Applicable to the Air Toxics
Program, November 16, 2010, IBR approved for Sec. 63.99(a).
(2) New Jersey's Toxic Catastrophe Prevention Act Program, (July
20, 1998), IBR approved for Sec. 63.99(a).
(3) Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental
Control, Division of Air and Waste Management, Accidental Release
Prevention Regulation, sections 1 through 5 and sections 7 through 14,
effective January 11, 1999, IBR approved for Sec. 63.99(a).
(4) State of Delaware Regulations Governing the Control of Air
Pollution (October 2000), IBR approved for Sec. 63.99(a).
(5) Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
regulations at 310 CMR 7.26(10)-(16), Air Pollution Control, effective
as of September 5, 2008, corrected March 6, 2009, and 310 CMR 70.00,
Environmental Results Program Certification, effective as of December
28, 2007. IBR approved for Sec. 63.99(a).
(6)(i) New Hampshire Regulations Applicable to Hazardous Air
Pollutants, March, 2003. IBR approved for Sec. 63.99(a).
(ii) New Hampshire Regulations Applicable to Hazardous Air
Pollutants, September 2006. IBR approved for Sec. 63.99(a).
(7) Maine Department of Environmental Protection regulations at
Chapter 125, Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaner Regulation, effective as of
June 2, 1991, last amended on June 24, 2009. IBR approved for Sec.
63.99(a).
(8) California South Coast Air Quality Management District's
``Spray Equipment Transfer Efficiency Test Procedure for Equipment
User, May 24, 1989,'' IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 63.11173(e) and
63.11516(d).
(9) California South Coast Air Quality Management District's
``Guidelines for Demonstrating Equivalency with District Approved
Transfer Efficient Spray Guns, September 26, 2002,'' Revision 0, IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 63.11173(e) and 63.11516(d).
(10) Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management
regulations at Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 36, Control of
Emissions from Organic Solvent Cleaning, effective April 8, 1996, last
amended October 9, 2008, IBR approved for Sec. 63.99(a).
(11) Rhode Island Air Pollution Control, General Definitions
Regulation, effective July 19, 2007, last amended October 9, 2008. IBR
approved for Sec. 63.99(a).
(12) Alaska Statute 42.45.045. Renewable energy grant fund and
recommendation program, available at https://www.legis.state.ak.us/basis/folio.asp, IBR approved for Sec. 63.6675.
(l) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 272-0167, https://www.epa.gov.
(1) EPA-453/R-01-005, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) for Integrated Iron and Steel Plants--Background
Information for Proposed Standards, Final Report, January 2001, IBR
approved for Sec. 63.7491(g).
(2) EPA-454/R-98-015, Office Of Air Quality Planning And Standards
(OAQPS), Fabric Filter Bag Leak Detection Guidance, September 1997, IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 63.548(e), 63.7525(j), and 63.11224(f).
(3) SW-846-3020A, Acid Digestion of Aqueous Samples And Extracts
For Total Metals For Analysis By GFAA Spectroscopy, Revision 1, July
1992, in EPA Publication No. SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition, IBR approved for table
6 to subpart DDDDD and table 5 to subpart JJJJJJ.
(4) SW-846-3050B, Acid Digestion of Sediments, Sludges, and Soils,
Revision 2, December 1996, in EPA Publication No. SW-846, Test Methods
for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition,
IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD and table 5 to subpart
JJJJJJ.
(5) SW-846-7470A, Mercury In Liquid Waste (Manual Cold-Vapor
Technique), Revision 1, September 1994, in EPA Publication No. SW-846,
Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods,
Third Edition, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD and table 5 to
subpart JJJJJJ.
(6) SW-846-7471B, Mercury In Solid Or Semisolid Waste (Manual Cold-
Vapor Technique), Revision 2, February 2007, in EPA Publication No. SW-
846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical
Methods,
[[Page 11282]]
Third Edition, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD and table 5 to
subpart JJJJJJ.
(7) SW-846-8015C, Nonhalogenated Organics by Gas Chromatography,
Revision 3, February 2007, in EPA Publication No. SW-846, Test Methods
for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition,
IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 63.11960, 63.11980, and table 10 to subpart
HHHHHHH.
(8) SW-846-8260B, Volatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromatography/
Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), Revision 2, December 1996, in EPA
Publication No. SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
63.11960, 63.11980, and table 10 to subpart HHHHHHH.
(9) SW-846-8270D, Semivolatile Organic Compounds by Gas
Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), Revision 4, February 2007, in
EPA Publication No. SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
63.11960, 63.11980, and table 10 to subpart HHHHHHH.
(10) SW-846-8315A, Determination of Carbonyl Compounds by High
Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), Revision 1, December 1996, in
EPA Publication No. SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
63.11960 and 63.11980, and table 10 to subpart HHHHHHH.
(11) SW-846-5050, Bomb Preparation Method for Solid Waste, Revision
0, September 1994, in EPA Publication No. SW-846, Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition IBR
approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(12) SW-846-6010C, Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission
Spectrometry, Revision 3, February 2007, in EPA Publication No. SW-846,
Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods,
Third Edition, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(13) SW-846-6020A, Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry,
Revision 1, February 2007, in EPA Publication No. SW-846, Test Methods
for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition,
IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(14) SW-846-7060A, Arsenic (Atomic Absorption, Furnace Technique),
Revision 1, September 1994, in EPA Publication No. SW-846, Test Methods
for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition,
IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(15) SW-846-7740, Selenium (Atomic Absorption, Furnace Technique),
Revision 0, September 1986, in EPA Publication No. SW-846, Test Methods
for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition,
IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(16) SW-846-9056, Determination of Inorganic Anions by Ion
Chromatography, Revision 1, February 2007, in EPA Publication No. SW-
846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical
Methods, Third Edition, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(17) SW-846-9076, Test Method for Total Chlorine in New and Used
Petroleum Products by Oxidative Combustion and Microcoulometry,
Revision 0, September 1994, in EPA Publication No. SW-846, Test Methods
for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition,
IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(18) SW-846-9250, Chloride (Colorimetric, Automated Ferricyanide
AAI), Revision 0, September 1986, in EPA Publication No. SW-846, Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, Third
Edition, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(19) Method 200.8, Determination of Trace Elements in Waters and
Wastes by Inductively Coupled Plasma--Mass Spectrometry, Revision 5.4,
1994, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(20) Method 1631 Revision E, Mercury in Water by Oxidation, Purge
and Trap, and Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption Fluorescence Spectrometry,
Revision E, EPA-821-R-02-019, August 2002, IBR approved for table 6 to
subpart DDDDD.
(m) International Standards Organization (ISO), 1, ch. de la Voie-
Creuse, Case postale 56, CH-1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland, +41 22 749 01
11, https://www.iso.org/iso/home.htm.
(1) ISO 6978-1:2003(E), Natural Gas--Determination of Mercury--Part
1: Sampling of Mercury by Chemisorption on Iodine, First edition,
October 15, 2003, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(2) ISO 6978-2:2003(E), Natural gas--Determination of Mercury--Part
2: Sampling of Mercury by Amalgamation on Gold/Platinum Alloy, First
edition, October 15, 2003, IBR approved for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(n) National Council of the Paper Industry for Air and Stream
Improvement, Inc. (NCASI), P.O. Box 133318, Research Triangle Park, NC
27709-3318 or at https://www.ncasi.org.
(1) NCASI Method DI/MEOH-94.03, Methanol in Process Liquids and
Wastewaters by GC/FID, Issued May 2000, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
63.457 and 63.459.
(2) NCASI Method CI/WP-98.01, Chilled Impinger Method For Use At
Wood Products Mills to Measure Formaldehyde, Methanol, and Phenol,
1998, Methods Manual, IBR approved for table 4 to subpart DDDD.
(3) NCASI Method DI/HAPS-99.01, Selected HAPs In Condensates by GC/
FID, Issued February 2000, IBR approved for Sec. 63.459(b).
(4) NCASI Method IM/CAN/WP-99.02, Impinger/Canister Source Sampling
Method for Selected HAPs and Other Compounds at Wood Products
Facilities, January 2004, Methods Manual, IBR approved for table 4 to
subpart DDDD.
(5) NCASI Method ISS/FP A105.01, Impinger Source Sampling Method
for Selected Aldehydes, Ketones, and Polar Compounds, December 2005,
Methods Manual, IBR approved for table 4 to subpart DDDD.
(o) National Technical Information Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal
Road, Springfield, VA 22161, (703) 605-6000 or (800) 553-6847; or for
purchase from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing
Office, Washington, DC 20402, (202) 512-1800.
(1) Handbook 44, Specificiations, Tolerances, and Other Technical
Requirements for Weighing and Measuring Devices 1998, IBR approved for
Sec. 63.1303(e).
(2) ``Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical
Methods,'' EPA Publication SW-846, Third Edition. (A suffix of ``A'' in
the method number indicates revision one (the method has been revised
once). A suffix of ``B'' in the method number indicates revision two
(the method has been revised twice).
(i) Method 0023A, ``Sampling Method for Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-
Dioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofuran Emissions from Stationary
Sources,'' dated December 1996, IBR approved for Sec. 63.1208(b).
(ii) Method 9071B, ``n-Hexane Extractable Material (HEM) for
Sludge, Sediment, and Solid Samples,'' dated April 1998, IBR approved
for Sec. 63.7824(e).
(iii) Method 9095A, ``Paint Filter Liquids Test,'' dated December
1996, IBR approved for Sec. Sec. 63.7700(b) and 63.7765.
(iv) Method 9095B, ``Paint Filter Liquids Test,'' (revision 2),
dated November 2004, IBR approved for the definition of ``Free organic
liquids'' in Sec. Sec. 63.10692, 63.10885(a), and the definition of
``Free liquids'' in Sec. 63.10906.
[[Page 11283]]
(v) SW-846 74741B, Revision 2, ``Mercury in Solid or Semisolid
Waste (Manual Cold-Vapor Technique),'' February 2007, IBR approved for
Sec. 63.11647(f).
(3) National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
test method compendium, ``NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods,'' NIOSH
publication no. 94-113, Fourth Edition, August 15, 1994.
(i) NIOSH Method 2010, ``Amines, Aliphatic,'' Issue 2, August 15,
1994, IBR approved for Sec. 63.7732(g).
(ii) [Reserved]
(p) North American Electric Reliability Corporation, 1325 G Street,
NW., Suite 600, Washington, DC 20005-3801, https://www.nerc.com, https://www.nerc.com/files/EOP0002-3_1.pdf.
(1) North American Electric Reliability Corporation Reliability
Standard EOP-002-3, Capacity and Energy Emergencies, adopted August 5,
2010, IBR approved for Sec. 63.6640(f).
(2)[Reserved]
(q) Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry (TAPPI),
15 Technology Parkway South, Norcross, GA 30092, (800) 332-8686, https://www.tappi.org.
(1) TAPPI T 266, Determination of Sodium, Calcium, Copper, Iron,
and Manganese in Pulp and Paper by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy
(Reaffirmation of T 266 om-02), Draft No. 2, July 2006, IBR approved
for table 6 to subpart DDDDD.
(2) [Reserved]
(r) Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Library, Post
Office Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087, telephone number (512) 239-
0028, https://www.tceq.state.tx.us/assets/public/implementation/air/sip/sipdocs/2002-12-HGB/02046sipapp_ado.pdf.
(1) ``Air Stripping Method (Modified El Paso Method) for
Determination of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Water
Sources,'' Revision Number One, dated January 2003, Sampling Procedures
Manual, Appendix P: Cooling Tower Monitoring, January 31, 2003, IBR
approved for Sec. Sec. 63.654 and 63.11920.
(2) [Reserved]
Subpart G--[Amended]
0
43. Amend Sec. 63.144 by adding paragraphs (b)(5)(i)(G) and (H) to
read as follows:
Sec. 63.144 Process wastewater provisions--test methods and
procedures for determining applicability and Group 1/Group 2
determinations (determining which wastewater streams require control).
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(5) * * *
(i) * * *
(G) Method 8260B. Use procedures specified in Method 8260B in the
SW-846 Compendium of Methods.
(H) Method 316. Use Method 316 to determine formaldehyde
concentration.
* * * * *
Subpart N--[Amended]
0
44. Amend Sec. 63.344 by adding paragraph (c)(5) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.344 Performance test requirements and test methods.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(5) The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Method
205.1 (which is available by contacting the South Coast AQMD, 21865
Copley Dr, Diamond Bar, CA 91765) may be used to determine the total
chromium concentration from hard and decorative chromium electroplating
tanks and chromium anodizing tanks.
* * * * *
Subpart O--[Amended]
0
45. Amend Sec. 63.364 by revising paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.364 Monitoring requirements.
* * * * *
(e) Measure and record once per hour the ethylene oxide
concentration at the outlet to the atmosphere after any control device
according to the procedures specified in Sec. 63.365(c)(1). The owner
or operator shall compute and record a 24-hour average daily. The owner
or operator will install, calibrate, operate, and maintain a monitor
consistent with the requirements of performance specification (PS) 8 or
9 in 40 CFR part 60, appendix B, to measure ethylene oxide. The daily
calibration requirements of section 7.2 of PS-9 or Section 13.1 of PS-8
are required only on days when ethylene oxide emissions are vented to
the control device.
* * * * *
0
46. Amend Sec. 63.365 by revising the introductory text of paragraph
(b) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.365 Test methods and procedures.
* * * * *
(b) Efficiency at the sterilization chamber vent. California Air
Resources Board (CARB) Method 431 or the following procedures shall be
used to determine the efficiency of all types of control devices used
to comply with Sec. 63.362(c), sterilization chamber vent standard.
* * * * *
Subpart Y--[Amended]
0
47. Amend Sec. 63.565 by revising paragraphs (d)(5), (8), and (10) and
(g) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.565 Test methods and procedures.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(5) Recovery devices. The average VOC concentration in the vent
upstream and downstream of the control device shall be determined using
Method 25A or 25B of appendix A-7 to part 60 of this chapter for
recovery devices. The average VOC concentration shall correspond to the
volume measurement by taking into account the sampling system response
time.
* * * * *
(8) Where Method 25, 25A, or 25B is used to measure the percent
reduction in VOC, the percent reduction across the combustion or
recovery device shall be calculated as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR27FE14.025
Where:
R = control efficiency of control device, percent.
Ei = mass flow rate of VOC at the inlet to the combustion
or recovery device as calculated under paragraph (c)(7) of this
section, kg/hr.
Eo = mass flow rate of VOC at the outlet of the
combustion or recovery device, as calculated under paragraph (c)(7)
of this section, kg/hr.
* * * * *
(10) Use of methods other than Method 25, 25A, or 25B shall be
validated pursuant to Method 301 of appendix A to part 63 of this
chapter.
* * * * *
(g) Baseline outlet VOC concentration. The procedures in this
paragraph shall be used to determine the outlet VOC concentration
required in Sec. 63.563(b)(4), (6), (7), and (8) for combustion
devices except flare, carbon adsorbers, condenser/refrigeration units,
and absorbers, respectively, and to monitor the VOC concentration as
required in Sec. 63.564(e), (g), (h), and (i). The owner or operator
shall use the procedures outlined in Method 25A or 25B. For the
baseline VOC concentration, the arithmetic average of the outlet VOC
concentration from three test runs from paragraph (d) of this section
shall be calculated for the control device. The VOC concentration shall
be measured at least every 15 minutes. Compliance testing of VOC CEMS
shall be performed using PS 8.
* * * * *
[[Page 11284]]
Subpart GG--[Amended]
0
48. Amend Sec. 63.750 by revising paragraph (o) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.750 Test methods and procedures.
* * * * *
(o) Inorganic HAP emissions--dry particulate filter certification
requirements. Dry particulate filters used to comply with Sec.
63.745(g)(2) or Sec. 63.746(b)(4) must be certified by the filter
manufacturer or distributor, paint/depainting booth supplier, and/or
the facility owner or operator using method 319 in appendix A of this
part, to meet or exceed the efficiency data points found in Tables 1
and 2, or 3 and 4 of Sec. 63.745 for existing or new sources
respectively.
Subpart GGG--[Amended]
0
49. Amend Sec. 63.1251 by revising the definition of ``Process vent''
to read as follows:
Sec. 63.1251 Definitions.
* * * * *
Process vent means a vent from a unit operation or vents from
multiple unit operations within a process that are manifolded together
into a common header, through which a HAP-containing gas stream is, or
has the potential to be, released to the atmosphere. Examples of
process vents include, but are not limited to, vents on condensers used
for product recovery, bottom receivers, surge control vessels,
reactors, filters, centrifuges, and process tanks. Emission streams
that are undiluted and uncontrolled containing less than 50 ppmv HAP,
as determined through process knowledge that no HAP are present in the
emission stream or using an engineering assessment as discussed in
Sec. 63.1257(d)(2)(ii); test data using Method 18 of 40 CFR part 60,
appendix A-6; Method 320 of 40 CFR part 63; or any other test method
that has been validated according to the procedures in Method 301 of
appendix A of this part, are not considered process vents. Process
vents do not include vents on storage tanks regulated under Sec.
63.1253, vents on wastewater emission sources regulated under Sec.
63.1256, or pieces of equipment regulated under Sec. 63.1255.
* * * * *
Subpart RRR--[Amended]
0
50. Amend Sec. 63.1511 by revising paragraph (c)(9) as to read
follows:
Sec. 63.1511 Performance test/compliance demonstration general
requirements.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(9) Method 26A for the concentration of HCl. Where a lime-injected
fabric filter is used as the control device to comply with the 90
percent reduction standard, the owner or operator must measure the
fabric filter inlet concentration of HCl at a point before lime is
introduced to the system. Method 26 may be used in place of Method 26A
where it can be demonstrated that there are no water droplets in the
emission stream. This can be demonstrated by showing that the vapor
pressure of water in the emission stream that you are testing is less
than the equilibrium vapor pressure of water at the emission stream
temperature, and by certifying that the emission stream is not
controlled by a wet scrubber.
* * * * *
Subpart CCCC--[Amended]
0
51. Revise Table 2 to subpart CCCC to read as follows:
As stated in Sec. 63.2161, if you demonstrate compliance by
monitoring brew ethanol, you must comply with the requirements for
performance tests in the following table:
Table 2 to Subpart CCCC of Part 63--Requirements for Performance Tests
[Brew Ethanol Monitoring Only]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For each fed-batch fermenter
for which compliance is
determined by monitoring
brew ethanol concentration
and calculating VOC According to the
concentration in the Using . . . following
fermenter exhaust according requirements . . .
to the procedures in Sec.
63.2161, you must . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Measure VOC as propane... Method 25A *, or an You must measure the
alternative VOC concentration
validated by EPA in the fermenter
Method 301 * and exhaust at any
approved by the point prior to the
Administrator. dilution of the
exhaust stream.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* EPA Test Methods found in Appendix A of 40 CFR part 60.
Subpart UUUU--[Amended]
0
52. Revise Table 4 to subpart UUUU to read as follows:
As required in Sec. Sec. 63.5530(b) and 63.5535(a), (b), (g)(1),
and (h)(1), you must conduct performance tests, other initial
compliance demonstrations, and CEMS performance evaluations and
establish operating limits according to the requirements in the
following table:
Table 4 to Subpart UUUU of Part 63--Requirements for Performance Tests
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
according to the
For . . . at . . . you must . . . using . . . following requirements
. . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. the sum of all process vents a. each existing i. select EPA Method 1 or sampling sites must be
or new affected sampling port's 1A in appendix A located at the inlet
source. location and the to 40 CFR Sec. and outlet to each
number of 63.7(d)(1)(i); control device;
traverse points;
ii. determine EPA Method 2, 2A, you may use EPA Method
velocity and 2C, 2D, 2F, or 2A, 2C, 2D, 2F, or 2G
volumetric flow 2G in appendices as an alternative to
rate; A-1 and A-2 to using EPA Method 2,
part 60 of this as appropriate;
chapter;
[[Page 11285]]
iii. conduct gas (1) EPA Method 3, you may use EPA Method
analysis; and, 3A, or 3B in 3A or 3B as an
appendix A-2 to alternative to using
part 60 of this EPA Method 3; or,
chapter; or,
(2) ASME PTC you may use ASME PTC
19.10-1981--Part 19.10-1981--Part 10
10; and, (available for
purchase from Three
Park Avenue, New
York, NY 10016-5990)
as an alternative to
using EPA Method 3B.
iv. measure EPA Method 4 in
moisture content appendix A-3 to
of the stack part 60 of this
gas. chapter.
2. the sum of all viscose a. each existing i. measure total (1) EPA Method 15 (a) you must conduct
process vents. or new viscose sulfide in appendix A-5 testing of emissions
process source. emissions. to part 60 of at the inlet and
this chapter; or outlet of each
control device;
(b) you must conduct
testing of emissions
from continuous
viscose process vents
and combinations of
batch and continuous
viscose process vents
at normal operating
conditions, as
specified in Sec.
Sec. 63.7(e)(1) and
63.5535;
(c) you must conduct
testing of emissions
from batch viscose
process vents as
specified in Sec.
63.490(c), except
that the emission
reductions required
for process vents
under this subpart
supersede the
emission reductions
required for process
vents under subpart U
of this part; and
(d) you must collect
CPMS data during the
period of the initial
compliance
demonstration and
determine the CPMS
operating limit
during the period of
the initial
compliance
demonstration; or
(2) carbon (a) you must measure
disulfide and/or emissions at the
hydrogen sulfide inlet and outlet of
CEMS, as each control device
applicable; using CEMS;
(b) you must install,
operate, and maintain
the CEMS according to
the applicable
performance
specification (PS-7,
PS-8, PS-9, or PS-15)
of 40 CFR part 60,
appendix B; and
(c) you must collect
CEMS emissions data
at the inlet and
outlet of each
control device during
the period of the
initial compliance
demonstration and
determine the CEMS
operating limit
during the period of
the initial
compliance
demonstration.
3. the sum of all solvent a. each existing i. measure (1) EPA Method 18 (a) you must conduct
coating process vents. or new toluene in appendix A-6 testing of emissions
cellophane emissions. to part 60 of at the inlet and
operation. this chapter, or outlet of each
Method 320 in control device;
appendix A to
part 63, or
(b) you may use EPA
Method 18 or 320 to
determine the control
efficiency of any
control device for
organic compounds;
for a combustion
device, you must use
only HAP that are
present in the inlet
to the control device
to characterize the
percent reduction
across the combustion
device;
(c) you must conduct
testing of emissions
from continuous
solvent coating
process vents and
combinations of batch
and continuous
solvent coating
process vents at
normal operating
conditions, as
specified in Sec.
Sec. 63.7(e)(1) and
63.5535;
[[Page 11286]]
(d) you must conduct
testing of emissions
from batch solvent
coating process vents
as specified in Sec.
63.490(c), except
that the emission
reductions required
for process vents
under this subpart
supersede the
emission reductions
required for process
vents under subpart U
of this part; and
(e) you must collect
CPMS data during the
period of the initial
compliance
demonstration and
determine the CPMS
operating limit
during the initial
compliance
demonstration; or
(2) ASTM D6420-99 (a) you must conduct
testing of emissions
at the inlet and
outlet of each
control device;
(b) you may use ASTM
D6420-99 (available
for purchase from at
least one of the
following addresses:
100 Barr Harbor
Drive, West
Conshohocken, PA
19428-2959; or
University Microfilms
International, 300
North Zeeb Road, Ann
Arbor, MI 48106) as
an alternative to EPA
Method 18 only where:
the target
compound(s) are those
listed in Section 1.1
of ASTM D6420-99; and
the target
concentration is
between 150 parts per
billion by volume
(ppbv) and 100 ppmv;
for target
compound(s) not
listed in Section 1.1
of ASTM D6420-99, but
potentially detected
by mass spectrometry,
the additional system
continuing
calibration check
after each run, as
detailed in Section
10.5.3 of the ASTM
method, must be
followed, met,
documented, and
submitted with the
data report even if
there is no moisture
condenser used or the
compound is not
considered water
soluble; and for
target compound(s)
not listed in Section
1.1 of ASTM D6420-99
and not amenable to
detection by mass
spectrometry, ASTM
D6420-99 does not
apply;
(c) you must conduct
testing of emissions
from continuous
solvent coating
process vents and
combinations of batch
and continuous
solvent coating
process vents at
normal operating
conditions, as
specified in Sec.
Sec. 63.7(e)(1) and
63.5535;
(d) you must conduct
testing of emissions
from batch solvent
coating process vents
as specified in Sec.
63.490(c), except
that the emission
reductions required
for process vents
under this subpart
supersede the
emission reductions
required for process
vents under subpart U
of this part; and,
(e) you must collect
CPMS data during the
period of the initial
compliance
demonstration and
determine the CPMS
operating limit
during the period of
the initial
compliance
demonstration.
4. the sum of all cellulose a. each existing i. measure total (1) EPA Method 18 (a) you must conduct
ether process vents. or new cellulose organic HAP in appendix A-6 testing of emissions
ether operation. emissions. to part 60 of at the inlet and
this chapter or outlet of each
Method 320 in control device;
appendix A to (b) you may use EPA
part 63, or Method 18 or 320 to
determine the control
efficiency of any
control device for
organic compounds;
for a combustion
device, you must use
only HAP that are
present in the inlet
to the control device
to characterize the
percent reduction
across the combustion
device;
[[Page 11287]]
(c) you must conduct
testing of emissions
from continuous
cellulose ether
process vents and
combinations of batch
and continuous
cellulose ether
process vents at
normal operating
conditions, as
specified in Sec.
Sec. 63.7(e)(1) and
63.5535;
(d) you must conduct
testing of emissions
from batch cellulose
ether process vents
as specified in Sec.
63.490(c), except
that the emission
reductions required
for process vents
under this subpart
supersede the
emission reductions
required for process
vents under subpart U
of this part; and
(e) you must collect
CPMS data during the
period of the initial
performance test and
determine the CPMS
operating limit
during the period of
the initial
performance test;
(2) ASTM D6420-99 (a) you must conduct
testing of emissions
at the inlet and
outlet of each
control device;
(b) you may use ASTM
D6420-99 (available
for purchase from at
least one of the
following addresses:
100 Barr Harbor
Drive, West
Conshohocken, PA
19428-2959; or
University Microfilms
International, 300
North Zeeb Road, Ann
Arbor, MI 48106) as
an alternative to EPA
Method 18 only where:
the target
compound(s) are those
listed in Section 1.1
of ASTM D6420-99; and
the target
concentration is
between 150 ppbv and
100 ppmv; for target
compound(s) not
listed in Section 1.1
of ASTM D6420-99, but
potentially detected
by mass spectrometry,
the additional system
continuing
calibration check
after each run, as
detailed in Section
10.5.3 of the ASTM
method, must be
followed, met,
documented, and
submitted with the
data report even if
there is no moisture
condenser used or the
compound is not
considered water
soluble; and for
target compound(s)
not listed in Section
1.1 of ASTM D6420-99
and not amenable to
detection by mass
spectrometry, ASTM
D6420-99 does not
apply; target
concentration is
between 150 ppbv and
100 ppmv for target
compound(s).
(c) you must conduct
testing of emissions
from continuous
cellulose ether
process vents and
combinations of batch
and continuous
cellulose ether
process vents at
normal operating
conditions, as
specified in Sec.
Sec. 63.7(e)(1) and
63.5535;
(d) you must conduct
testing of emissions
from batch cellulose
ether process vents
as specified in Sec.
63.490(c), except
that the emission
reductions required
for process vents
under this subpart
supersede the
emission reductions
required for process
vents under subpart U
of this part; and
(e) you must collect
CPMS data during the
period of the initial
performance test and
determine the CPMS
operating limit
during the period of
the initial
performance test.
(3) EPA Method 25 (a) you must conduct
in appendix A-7 testing of emissions
to part 60 of at the inlet and
this chapter; or outlet of each
control device;
[[Page 11288]]
(b) you may use EPA
Method 25 to
determine the control
efficiency of
combustion devices
for organic
compounds; you may
not use EPA Method 25
to determine the
control efficiency of
noncombustion control
devices;
(c) you must conduct
testing of emissions
from continuous
cellulose ether
process vents and
combinations of batch
and continuous
cellulose ether
process vents at
normal operating
conditions, as
specified in Sec.
Sec. 63.7(e)(1) and
63.5535;
(d) you must conduct
testing of emissions
from batch cellulose
ether process vents
as specified in Sec.
63.490(c), except
that the emission
reductions required
for process vents
under this subpart
supersede the
emission reductions
required for process
vents under subpart U
of this part; and
(e) you must collect
CPMS data during the
period of the initial
performance test and
determine the CPMS
operating limit
during the period of
the initial
performance test; or
(4) EPA Method (a) you must conduct
25A in appendix testing of emissions
A-7 to part 60 at the inlet and
of this chapter outlet of each
control device;
(b) you may use EPA
Method 25A if: an
exhaust gas volatile
organic matter
concentration of 50
ppmv or less is
required in order to
comply with the
emission limit; the
volatile organic
matter concentration
at the inlet to the
control device and
the required level of
control are such as
to result in exhaust
volatile organic
matter concentrations
of 50 ppmv or less;
or because of the
high control
efficiency of the
control device, the
anticipated volatile
organic matter
concentration at the
control device
exhaust is 50 ppmv or
less, regardless of
the inlet
concentration;
(c) you must conduct
testing of emissions
from continuous
cellulose ether
process vents and
combinations of batch
and continuous
cellulose ether
process vents at
normal operating
conditions, as
specified in Sec.
Sec. 63.7(e)(1) and
63.5535;
(d) you must conduct
testing of emissions
from batch cellulose
ether process vents
as specified in Sec.
63.490(c), except
that the emission
reductions required
for process vents
under this subpart
supersede the
emission reductions
required for process
vents under subpart U
of this part; and,
(e) you must collect
CPMS data during the
period of the initial
performance test and
determine the CPMS
operating limit
during the period of
the initial
performance test.
5. each toluene storage vessel. a. each existing i. measure (1) EPA Method 18 (a) if venting to a
or new toluene in appendix A-6 control device to
cellophane emissions. to part 60 of reduce emissions, you
operation. this chapter or must conduct testing
Method 320 in of emissions at the
appendix A to inlet and outlet of
part 63; or each control device;
[[Page 11289]]
(b) you may use EPA
Method 18 or 320 to
determine the control
efficiency of any
control device for
organic compounds;
for a combustion
device, you must use
only HAP that are
present in the inlet
to the control device
to characterize the
percent reduction
across the combustion
device;
(c) you must conduct
testing of emissions
from continuous
storage vessel vents
and combinations of
batch and continuous
storage vessel vents
at normal operating
conditions, as
specified in Sec.
Sec. 63.7(e)(1) and
63.5535 for
continuous process
vents;
(d) you must conduct
testing of emissions
from batch storage
vessel vents as
specified in Sec.
63.490(c) for batch
process vents, except
that the emission
reductions required
for process vents
under this subpart
supersede the
emission reductions
required for process
vents under subpart U
of this part; and,
(e) you must collect
CPMS data during the
period of the initial
compliance
demonstration and
determine the CPMS
operating limit
during the period of
the initial
compliance
demonstration; or
(2) ASTM D6420-99 (a) if venting to a
control device to
reduce emissions, you
must conduct testing
of emissions at the
inlet and outlet of
each control device;
(b) you may use ASTM
D6420-99 (available
for purchase from at
least one of the
following addresses:
100 Barr Harbor
Drive, West
Conshohocken, PA
19428-2959; or
University Microfilms
International, 300
North Zeeb Road, Ann
Arbor, MI 48106) as
an alternative to EPA
Method 18 only where:
the target
compound(s) are those
listed in Section 1.1
of ASTM D6420-99, and
the target
concentration is
between 150 ppbv and
100 ppmv; for target
compound(s) not
listed in Section 1.1
of ASTM D6420-99, but
potentially detected
by mass spectrometry,
the additional system
continuing
calibration check
after each run, as
detailed in Section
10.5.3 of the ASTM
method, must be
followed, met,
documented, and
submitted with the
data report even if
there is no moisture
condenser used or the
compound is not
considered water
soluble; and for
target compound(s)
not listed in Section
1.1 of ASTM D6420-99
and not amenable to
detection by mass
spectrometry, ASTM
D6420-99 does not
apply;
(c) you must conduct
testing of emissions
from continuous
storage vessel vents
and combinations of
batch and continuous
storage vessel vents
at normal operating
conditions, as
specified in Sec.
Sec. 63.7(e)(1) and
63.5535 for
continuous process
vents;
(d) you must conduct
testing of emissions
from batch storage
vessel vents as
specified in Sec.
63.490(c) for batch
process vents, except
that the emission
reductions required
for process vents
under this subpart
supersede the
emission reductions
required for process
vents under subpart U
of this part; and,
[[Page 11290]]
(e) you must collect
CPMS data during the
period of the initial
compliance
demonstration and
determine the CPMS
operating limit
during the period of
the initial
compliance
demonstration.
6. the sum of all process vents a. each existing i. measure (1) EPA Method 22 (a) you must conduct
controlled using a flare. or new affected visible in appendix A-7 the flare visible
source. emissions. to part 60 of emissions test
this chapter. according to Sec.
63.11(b).
7. equipment leaks............. a. each existing i. measure leak (1) applicable (a) you must follow
or new cellulose rate. equipment leak all requirements for
ether operation. test methods in the applicable
Sec. 63.180; equipment leak test
or methods in Sec.
63.180; or
(2) applicable (a) you must follow
equipment leak all requirements for
test methods in the applicable
Sec. 63.1023 equipment leak test
methods in Sec.
63.1023.
8. all sources of wastewater a. each existing i. measure (1) applicable (a) You must follow
emissions. or new cellulose wastewater HAP wastewater test all requirements for
ether operation. emissions. methods and the applicable
procedures in wastewater test
Sec. Sec. methods and
63.144 and procedures in Sec.
63.145; or Sec. 63.144 and
63.145; or
(2) applicable (a) you must follow
wastewater test all requirements for
methods and the applicable waste
procedures in water test methods
Sec. Sec. and procedures in
63.144 and Sec. Sec. 63.144
63.145, using and 63.145, except
ASTM D5790-95 as that you may use ASTM
an alternative D5790-95 (available
to EPA Method for purchase from at
624 in appendix least one of the
A to part 163 of following addresses:
this chapter. 100 Barr Harbor
Drive, West
Conshohocken, PA
19428-2959; or
University Microfilms
International, 300
North Zeeb Road, Ann
Arbor, MI 48106) as
an alternative to EPA
Method 624, under the
condition that this
ASTM method be used
with the sampling
procedures of EPA
Method 25D or an
equivalent method.
9. any emission point.......... a. each existing i. conduct a CEMS (1) applicable (a) you must conduct
or new affected performance requirements in the CEMS performance
source using a evaluation. Sec. 63.8 and evaluation during the
CEMS to applicable period of the initial
demonstrate performance compliance
compliance. specification demonstration
(PS-7, PS-8, PS- according to the
9, or PS-15) in applicable
appendix B to requirements in Sec.
part 60 of this 63.8 and the
chapter. applicable
performance
specification (PS-7,
PS-8, PS-9, or PS-15)
of 40 CFR part 60,
appendix B;
(b) you must install,
operate, and maintain
the CEMS according to
the applicable
performance
specification (PS-7,
PS-8, PS-9, or PS-15)
of 40 CFR part 60,
appendix B; and
(c) you must collect
CEMS emissions data
at the inlet and
outlet of each
control device during
the period of the
initial compliance
demonstration and
determine the CEMS
operating limit
during the period of
the initial
compliance
demonstration.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subpart ZZZZ--[Amended]
0
53. Revise Table 4 to subpart ZZZZ to read as follows:
As stated in Sec. Sec. 63.6610, 63.6611, 63.6620, and 63.6640, you
must comply with the following requirements for performance tests for
stationary RICE:
[[Page 11291]]
Table 4 to Subpart ZZZZ of Part 63--Requirements for Performance Tests
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Complying with According to the
For each . . . the requirement You must . . . Using . . . following requirements
to . . . . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. 2SLB, 4SLB, and CI a. reduce CO i. Select the ................. (a) For CO and O2
stationary RICE. emissions. sampling port measurement, ducts
location and the <=6 inches in
number/location diameter may be
of traverse sampled at a single
points at the point located at the
inlet and outlet duct centroid and
of the control ducts >6 and <=12
device; and inches in diameter
may be sampled at 3
traverse points
located at 16.7,
50.0, and 83.3% of
the measurement line
(`3-point long
line'). If the duct
is >12 inches in
diameter and the
sampling port
location meets the
two and half-diameter
criterion of Section
11.1.1 of Method 1 of
40 CFR part 60,
appendix A-1, the
duct may be sampled
at `3-point long
line'; otherwise,
conduct the
stratification
testing and select
sampling points
according to Section
8.1.2 of Method 7E of
40 CFR part 60,
appendix A-4.
ii. Measure the (1) Method 3 or (b) Measurements to
O2 at the inlet 3A or 3B of 40 determine O2 must be
and outlet of CFR part 60, made at the same time
the control appendix A-2, or as the measurements
device; and ASTM Method for CO concentration.
D6522-00
(Reapproved
2005)a c (heated
probe not
necessary).
iii. Measure the (1) ASTM D6522-00 (c) The CO
CO at the inlet (Reapproved concentration must be
and the outlet 2005)a b c at 15 percent O2, dry
of the control (heated probe basis.
device. not necessary)
or Method 10 of
40 CFR part 60,
appendix A-4.
2. 4SRB stationary RICE........ a. reduce i. Select the ................. (a) For formaldehyde,
formaldehyde sampling port O2, and moisture
emissions. location and the measurement, ducts
number/location <=6 inches in
of traverse diameter may be
points at the sampled at a single
inlet and outlet point located at the
of the control duct centroid and
device; and ducts >6 and <=12
inches in diameter
may be sampled at 3
traverse points
located at 16.7,
50.0, and 83.3% of
the measurement line
(`3-point long
line'). If the duct
is >12 inches in
diameter and the
sampling port
location meets the
two and half-diameter
criterion of Section
11.1.1 of Method 1 of
40 CFR part 60,
appendix A, the duct
may be sampled at `3-
point long line';
otherwise, conduct
the stratification
testing and select
sampling points
according to Section
8.1.2 of Method 7E of
40 CFR part 60,
appendix A.
ii. Measure O2 at (1) Method 3 or (a) Measurements to
the inlet and 3A or 3B of 40 determine O2
outlet of the CFR part 60, concentration must be
control device; appendix A-2, or made at the same time
and ASTM Method as the measurements
D6522-00 for formaldehyde or
(Reapproved THC concentration.
2005) \a\
(heated probe
not necessary).
iii. Measure (1) Method 4 of (a) Measurements to
moisture content 40 CFR part 60, determine moisture
at the inlet and appendix A-3, or content must be made
outlet of the Method 320 of 40 at the same time and
control device; CFR part 63, location as the
and appendix A, or measurements for
ASTM D 6348-03 formaldehyde or THC
\a\. concentration.
[[Page 11292]]
iv. If (1) Method 320 or (a) Formaldehyde
demonstrating 323 of 40 CFR concentration must be
compliance with part 63, at 15 percent O2, dry
the formaldehyde appendix A; or basis. Results of
percent ASTM D6348-03 this test consist of
reduction \a\, provided in the average of the
requirement, ASTM D6348-03 three 1-hour or
measure formalde- Annex A5 longer runs.
hyde at the (Analyte Spiking
inlet and the Technique), the
outlet of the percent R must
control device. be greater than
or equal to 70
and less than or
equal to 130.
v. If (1) Method 25A, (a) THC concentration
demonstrating reported as must be at 15 percent
compliance with propane, of 40 O2, dry basis.
the THC percent CFR part 60, Results of this test
reduction appendix A-7. consist of the
requirement, average of the three
measure THC at 1-hour or longer
the inlet and runs.
the outlet of
the control
device.
3. Stationary RICE............. a. limit the i. Select the ................. (a) For formaldehyde,
concentra-tion sampling port CO, O2, and moisture
of formalde-hyde location and the measurement, ducts
or CO in the number/location <=6 inches in
stationary RICE of traverse diameter may be
exhaust. points at the sampled at a single
exhaust of the point located at the
stationary RICE; duct centroid and
and ducts >6 and <=12
inches in diameter
may be sampled at 3
traverse points
located at 16.7,
50.0, and 83.3% of
the measurement line
(`3-point long
line'). If the duct
is >12 inches in
diameter and the
sampling port
location meets the
two and half-diameter
criterion of Section
11.1.1 of Method 1 of
40 CFR part 60,
appendix A, the duct
may be sampled at `3-
point long line';
otherwise, conduct
the stratification
testing and select
sampling points
according to Section
8.1.2 of Method 7E of
40 CFR part 60,
appendix A. If using
a control device, the
sampling site must be
located at the outlet
of the control
device.
ii. Determine the (1) Method 3 or (a) Measurements to
O2 concentration 3A or 3B of 40 determine O2
of the CFR part 60, concentration must be
stationary RICE appendix A-2, or made at the same time
exhaust at the ASTM Method and location as the
sampling port D6522-00 measurements for
location; and (Reapproved formaldehyde or CO
2005) \a\ concentration.
(heated probe
not necessary).
iii. Measure (1) Method 4 of (a) Measurements to
moisture content 40 CFR part 60, determine moisture
of the station- appendix A-3, or content must be made
ary RICE exhaust Method 320 of 40 at the same time and
at the sampling CFR part 63, location as the
port location; appendix A, or measurements for
and ASTM D 6348-03 formaldehyde or CO
\a\. concentration.
iv. Measure (1) Method 320 or (a) Formaldehyde
formalde-hyde at 323 of 40 CFR concentration must be
the exhaust of part 63, at 15 percent O2, dry
the station-ary appendix A; or basis. Results of
RICE; or ASTM D6348-03 this test consist of
\a\, provided in the average of the
ASTM D6348-03 three 1-hour or
Annex A5 longer runs.
(Analyte Spiking
Technique), the
percent R must
be greater than
or equal to 70
and less than or
equal to 130.
[[Page 11293]]
v. measure CO at (1) Method 10 of (a) CO concentration
the exhaust of 40 CFR part 60, must be at 15 percent
the station-ary appendix A-4, O2, dry basis.
RICE. ASTM Method Results of this test
D6522-00 (2005) consist of the
a c, Method 320 average of the three
of 40 CFR part 1-hour or longer
63, appendix A, runs.
or ASTM D6348-03
\a\.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ You may also use Methods 3A and 10 as options to ASTM-D6522-00 (2005). You may obtain a copy of ASTM-D6522-
00 (2005) from at least one of the following addresses: American Society for Testing and Materials, 100 Barr
Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, or University Microfilms International, 300 North Zeeb Road,
Ann Arbor, MI 48106.
\b\ You may obtain a copy of ASTM-D6348-03 from at least one of the following addresses: American Society for
Testing and Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, or University Microfilms
International, 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.
0
54. Amend appendix A to part 63 to read as follows:
0
a. By revising Method 306, sections 2.2.1 and 6.1.4, and the Note to
section 8.0.
0
b. By revising Method 306A, section 8.2.
0
c. By revising Method 308, section 10.1.3.
0
d. By amending Method 315 as follows:
0
i. By revising section 6.1.1.
0
ii. By redesignating section 8.11 as section 8.1.
0
iii. By revising newly designated section 8.1.
0
iv. By revising section 10.5.
0
e. By revising Method 316, section 10.5.
0
f. By revising Method 321, the definition for the term ``Df'' in
section 9.3.1.
Appendix A to Part 63--Test Methods Pollutant Measurement Methods From
Various Waste Media
* * * * *
Method 306--Determination of Chromium Emissions From Decorative and
Hard Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Operations--
Isokinetic Method
* * * * *
2.2.1 Total chromium samples with high chromium concentrations
(>=35 [mu]g/L) may be analyzed using inductively coupled plasma
emission spectrometry (ICP) at 267.72 nm. Note: The ICP analysis is
applicable for this method only when the solution analyzed has a Cr
concentration greater than or equal to 35 [mu]g/L or five times the
method detection limit as determined according to appendix B in 40
CFR part 136. Similarly, inductively coupled plasma-mass
spectroscopy (ICP-MS) may be used for total chromium analysis
provided the procedures for ICP-MS analysis described in Method 6020
or 6020A (EPA Office of Solid Waste, publication SW-846) are
followed.
* * * * *
6.1.4 Operating and maintenance procedures for the sampling
train are described in APTD-0576 of Method 5. Users should read the
APTD-0576 document and adopt the outlined procedures. Alternative
mercury-free thermometers may be used if the thermometers are, at a
minimum, equivalent in terms of performance or suitably effective
for the specific temperature measurement application.
* * * * *
8.0 Sample Collection, Preservation, Holding Times, Storage, and
Transport
Note: Prior to sample collection, consideration should be given
to the type of analysis (Cr\+6\ or total Cr) that will be performed.
Which analysis option(s) will be performed will determine which
sample recovery and storage procedures will be required to process
the sample.
* * * * *
Method 306A--Determination of Chromium Emissions From Decorative and
Hard Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Operations
* * * * *
8.2 Sample Recovery. After the train has been transferred to the
sample recovery area, disconnect the tubing that connects the jar/
impingers. The tester shall select either the total Cr or Cr\+6\
sample recovery option. Samples to be analyzed for both total Cr and
Cr\+6\ shall be recovered using the Cr\+6\ sample option (Section
8.2.2). Note: Collect a reagent blank sample for each of the total
Cr or the Cr\+6\ analytical options. If both analyses (Cr and
Cr\+6\) are to be conducted on the samples, collect separate reagent
blanks for each analysis. Also, since particulate matter is not
usually present at chromium electroplating and/or chromium anodizing
operations, it is not necessary to filter the Cr\+6\ samples unless
there is observed sediment in the collected solutions. If it is
necessary to filter the Cr\+6\ solutions, please refer to Method
0061, Determination of Hexavalent Chromium Emissions from Stationary
Sources, Section 7.4, Sample Preparation in SW-846 (see Reference
1).
* * * * *
Method 308--Procedure for Determination of Methanol Emission From
Stationary Sources
* * * * *
10.1.3 Temperature Sensors. Calibrate against mercury-in-glass
thermometers. An alternative mercury-free thermometer may be used if
the thermometer is, at a minimum, equivalent in terms of performance
or suitably effective for the specific temperature measurement
application.
* * * * *
Method 315--Determination of Particulate and Methylene Chloride
Extractable Matter (MCEM) From Selected Sources at Primary Aluminum
Production Facilities
* * * * *
6.1.1 Sampling train. A schematic of the sampling train used in
this method is shown in Figure 5-1, Method 5, 40 CFR part 60,
appendix A-3. Complete construction details are given in APTD-0581
(Reference 2 in section 17.0 of this method); commercial models of
this train are also available. For changes from APTD-0581 and for
allowable modifications of the train shown in Figure 5-1, Method 5,
40 CFR part 60, appendix A-3, see the following subsections. Note:
The operating and maintenance procedures for the sampling train are
described in APTD-0576 (Reference 3 in section 17.0 of this method).
Since correct usage is important in obtaining valid results, all
users should read APTD-0576 and adopt the operating and maintenance
procedures outlined in it, unless otherwise specified herein.
Alternative mercury-free thermometers may be used if the
thermometers are, at a minimum, equivalent in terms of performance
or suitably effective for the specific temperature measurement
application. The use of grease for sealing sampling train components
is not recommended because many greases are soluble in methylene
chloride. The sampling train consists of the following components:
* * * * *
8.1 Pretest preparation. It is suggested that sampling equipment
be maintained according to the procedures described in APTD-0576.
Alternative mercury-free thermometers may be used if the
thermometers are at a minimum equivalent in terms of performance or
suitably effective for the specific temperature measurement
application.
* * * * *
[[Page 11294]]
10.5 Temperature sensors. Use the procedure in Section 10.3 of
Method 2, 40 CFR part 60, appendix A-1 to calibrate in-stack
temperature sensors. Dial thermometers, such as are used for the DGM
and condenser outlet, shall be calibrated against mercury-in-glass
thermometers. An alternative mercury-free thermometer may be used if
the thermometer is, at a minimum, equivalent in terms of performance
or suitably effective for the specific temperature measurement
application.
* * * * *
Method 316--Sampling and Analysis for Formaldehyde Emissions From
Stationary Sources in the Mineral Wool and Wool Fiberglass Industries
* * * * *
10.5 Temperature gauges: Use the procedure in Section 4.3 of EPA
Method 2 to calibrate in-stack temperature gauges. Dial
thermometers, such as are used for the dry gas meter and condenser
outlet, shall be calibrated against mercury-in-glass thermometers.
An alternative mercury-free thermometer may be used if the
thermometer is, at a minimum, equivalent in terms of performance or
suitably effective for the specific temperature measurement
application.
* * * * *
Test Method 321--Measurement of Gaseous Hydrogen Chloride Emissions at
Portland Cement Kilns by Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy
* * * * *
9.3.1 * * *
DF = Dilution Factor (Total flow/Spike flow). Total flow = spike
flow plus effluent flow.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-02704 Filed 2-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P