National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Minor Corrections to the Revisions to the Total Coliform Rule, 10752-10754 [2014-04171]
Download as PDF
10752
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 38 / Wednesday, February 26, 2014 / Proposed Rules
In addition, internal revenue code (IRC)
section 48A(g), codified at 26 USC section
48A(g), provides, insofar as is presently
relevant, that no use of technology (or level
of emission reduction solely by reason of the
use of the technology), and no achievement
of any emission reduction by the
demonstration of any technology or
performance level, by or at one or more
facilities with respect to which a credit is
allowed under this section, shall be
considered to indicate that the technology or
performance level is adequately
demonstrated for purposes of section 111 of
the Clean Air Act.
II. What are the background and
purpose of this NODA?
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
This table is not intended to be
exhaustive but to provide a guide for
readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this NODA. To determine
whether this NODA affects your facility,
company, business, organization, etc.,
you should examine the applicability
criteria in 40 CFR 60.1. If you have
questions regarding applicability,
consult either the air permitting
authority for the entity in question or
your EPA regional representative as
listed in 40 CFR 60.4 or 40 CFR 63.13
(General Provisions).
As explained in the TSD, the EPA’s
preliminary interpretation of these
provisions is that EPA may not rely on
information from facilities that have
received assistance under EPAct05,
including being allowed tax credits
under IRC section 48A, as the sole basis
for a determination that a particular
technology is the best system of
emission reduction adequately
demonstrated (BSER), but the EPA may
rely on information from those facilities
in conjunction from other information
to support such a determination, or to
corroborate an otherwise supported
determination. In the TSD, the EPA also
explains and solicits comments on other
issues of interpretation that arise from
the terms of IRC section 48A(g).
2014 Proposal BSER and EPAct05. In
the proposed rule, the EPA determined
that implementation of partial capture
CCS technology is the BSER for new
fossil fuel-fired boilers and IGCC units
because it fulfills the criteria established
under CAA section 111. The EPA’s
rationale, insofar as is relevant for
present purposes, is that partial capture
is technically feasible and can be
implemented at a reasonable cost. In
discussing its rationale, the EPA
referenced some facilities that have
received financial assistance under the
EPAct05, including being allocated tax
credits pursuant to IRC section 48A. As
explained in the TSD, however, the
EPA’s rationale does not depend solely
upon those projects, and the
determination remains adequately
supported without any information from
On January 8, 2014, the EPA
published the proposed rule,
‘‘Standards of Performance for
Greenhouse Gas Emissions From New
Stationary Sources: Electric Utility
Generating Units,’’ (79 FR 1430) which
was issued pursuant to Clean Air Act
(CAA) section 111. In the proposed rule,
the EPA explains its rationale for
emission standards for new fossil fuelfired boiler and integrated gasification
combined cycle (IGCC) electric utility
generating units (EGUs). These
standards are based on the
determination that the best system of
emission reduction (BSER) for those
sources is partial carbon capture and
sequestration (CCS). The EPA today is
providing a technical support document
(TSD) that addresses the interaction of
the determination of BSER in the
proposed rule and several provisions in
the Energy Policy Act of 2005
(EPAct05), which are described
immediately below.
Limitations associated with EPAct05.
In providing assistance to fossil fuelfired electricity generating plants and
other facilities that employ advanced
technology, EPAct05 included several
provisions that limit the EPA’s authority
to rely on information from those
facilities in conducting rulemaking or
taking other action under various
provisions of the CAA, including
section 111. Section 402(i) of the
EPAct05, codified at 42 U.S.C. section
15962(i), provides as follows, insofar as
is presently relevant, that no
technology, or level of emission
reduction, solely by reason of the use of
the technology, or the achievement of
the emission reduction, by one or more
facilities receiving assistance under
EPAct05, shall be considered to be
adequately demonstrated for purposes
of section 111 of the Clean Air Act.1
1 In addition, EPAct05 Title IV amended the
Energy Policy Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 13201 et seq.)
(EPAct92) by adding the ‘‘Clean Air Coal Program’’
to support and promote the production and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Feb 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
generation of clean coal-based power, including
supporting air pollution control technologies. These
provisions included, in EPAct05 § 421(a), a
constraint similar to EPAct05 § 402(i). As amended
by EPAct05 § 421(a), EPAct92 § 3103(e) (42 U.S.C.
13573(e)) and EPAct92 § 3104(d) (42 U.S.C.
13574(d)), provides, insofar as is presently relevant,
under the heading, ‘‘Applicability,’’ that no
technology, or level of emission reduction, shall be
treated as adequately demonstrated for purpose of
section 111 of the Clean Air Act solely by reason
of the use of such technology, or the achievement
of such emission reduction, by one or more
facilities receiving assistance under section
3102(a)(1) or (2) of the Energy Policy Act of 1992,
as amended (42 U.S.C. 13572(a)(1)).
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
facilities that have been allocated the
IRC section 48A tax credit.
Thus, the EPA’s proposed standards,
which are based on its determination
that partial capture CCS represents the
best system of emission reduction
adequately demonstrated, are not
beyond the scope of its legal authority.
As indicated in the TSD, the EPA
solicits comment on all aspects of the
interpretation of the provisions in
EPAct05, including IRC section 48A(g),
that limit the EPA’s authority to rely on
certain information in rulemaking under
CAA section 111.
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 60
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
40 CFR Part 70
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
40 CFR Part 71
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
40 CFR Part 98
Environmental protection,
Greenhouse gases and monitoring,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: February 5, 2014.
Mary E. Henigin,
Acting Director, Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2014–03115 Filed 2–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 141 and 142
[EPA–HQ–OW–2008–0878; FRL–9906–88–
OW]
National Primary Drinking Water
Regulations: Minor Corrections to the
Revisions to the Total Coliform Rule
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
In this action, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
is proposing minor corrections to the
final Revisions to the Total Coliform
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26FEP1.SGM
26FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 38 / Wednesday, February 26, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Rule (RTCR), as authorized under the
Safe Drinking Water Act, to correct
typographical errors in sections relating
to recordkeeping and State primacy
requirements, which could affect
implementation and enforcement of the
RTCR if they were left uncorrected. This
proposed action also includes other
edits to the final rule language that are
intended to improve the understanding
of the rule and avoid confusion. This
proposed action does not impose new
requirements; rather it clarifies what
must be included in States’ primacy
applications related to this rule and the
specific records water systems must
keep. In the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’
section of this Federal Register, EPA is
making these minor corrections and
edits to the final RTCR as a direct final
rule without a prior proposed rule. If we
receive no adverse comment, we will
not take further action on this proposed
rule.
Written comments must be
received by March 28, 2014.
DATES:
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
ADDRESSES:
OW–2008–0878, by mail to Water
Docket, Environmental Protection
Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460. Comments may also be
submitted electronically or through
hand delivery/courier by following the
detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES
section of the direct final rule located in
the rules section of this Federal
Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sean Conley, Standards and Risk
Management Division, Office of Ground
Water and Drinking Water (MC–4607M),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460; telephone number: (202)
564–1781; email address: conley.sean@
epa.gov. For general information,
contact the Safe Drinking Water Hotline,
telephone number: (800) 426–4791. The
Safe Drinking Water Hotline is open
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays, from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Eastern
time.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
10753
I. General Information
A. Why is EPA issuing this proposed
rule?
EPA is proposing minor corrections to
the final Revisions to the Total Coliform
Rule (RTCR) to correct typographical
errors in sections relating to
recordkeeping and State primacy
requirements, which could affect
implementation and enforcement of the
RTCR if left uncorrected. This proposed
action also includes other edits to the
final rule language that are intended to
improve the understanding of the rule
and avoid confusion. This proposed
action does not impose new
requirements; rather it clarifies what
must be included in States’ primacy
applications related to this rule and the
specific records water systems must
keep.
II. Regulated Categories and Entities
Entities potentially regulated by the
proposed corrections to the final RTCR
are all public water systems (PWSs).
Regulated categories and entities
include the following:
Category
Examples of regulated entities
Industry ....................................................
Privately-owned community water systems (CWSs), transient non-community water systems
(TNCWSs), and non-transient non-community water systems (NTNCWSs).
Publicly-owned CWSs, TNCWSs, and NTNCWSs.
Federal, State, Tribal, and local governments.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
This table is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities regulated
by this action. This table lists the types
of entities that EPA is now aware of that
could potentially be regulated by this
action. Other types of entities not listed
in the table could also be regulated. To
determine whether your facility is
regulated by this action, you should
carefully examine the definition of
‘‘public water system’’ in § 141.2 and
the section entitled ‘‘Coverage’’ in
§ 141.3 in title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR), and the applicability
criteria in § 141.851(b) of the final
RTCR. If you have questions regarding
the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person
listed in the preceding FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
C. Copies of This Document and Other
Related Information
This document is available for
download at https://water.epa.gov/
lawsregs/rulesregs/sdwa/tcr/regulation_
revisions.cfm. For other related
information, see the docket section of
the direct final rule located in the rules
section of this Federal Register.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Feb 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
D. Minor Corrections to the Revisions to
the Total Coliform Rule (RTCR)
Today’s proposed rule corrects, as
authorized under the Safe Drinking
Water Act (SDWA), two typographical
errors in the final RTCR (78 FR 10269,
February 13, 2013) rule language. First,
this proposed action corrects a mistaken
cross-reference regarding water system
recordkeeping requirements for
assessment forms and documentation of
corrective actions and sanitary defects.
EPA is correcting the cross-reference at
§ 141.861(b)(1) to correctly provide that
assessments, corrective actions and
identification of sanitary defects are
required under the treatment technique
requirements of section 141.859 of the
final RTCR. The burden for these
recordkeeping requirements was
reflected in the Revised Total Coliform
Rule and in section 7 of the Economic
Analysis (EA) for the Revised Total
Coliform Rule (EPA–815–R–12–004).
EPA also discussed these
requirements in the preamble to the
final RTCR on page 10295. Second,
today’s proposed rule also corrects the
introductory paragraph at § 142.16(q)(2)
to correctly indicate that the State’s
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
application for primacy must contain a
written description of all provisions
included in the subsections of the
paragraph, (q)(2)(i) through (q)(2)(ix). It
was always EPA’s intent that primacy
applications must contain a written
description of all provisions in
142.16(q)(2), but when EPA added
subparagraph (q)(2)(ix) to the final rule,
EPA neglected to change the numbering
in the paragraph (2) lead-in to the list of
elements. EPA intended this to be the
case, as demonstrated in the preamble to
the final RTCR on page 10301. In
addition, the burden for this State
activity was also included in section 7
of the Economic Analysis (EA) for the
RTCR. EPA is not developing a new EA
for today’s action because the EA for the
final RTCR accounts for all costs
associated with this rule.
Today’s proposed rule also corrects
the numbering in § 141.855(a) by adding
subparagraph (d)(2) and reserving it, to
most simply correct a numbering error
that identified a subparagraph (d)(1)
without a subsequent (d)(2). Correcting
the numbering in this fashion will not
interfere with any cross references to
subparagraph (d)(1).
E:\FR\FM\26FEP1.SGM
26FEP1
10754
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 38 / Wednesday, February 26, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Today’s proposed rule also includes
clarifying revisions to the language
regarding primacy applications in
§ 142.16(q)(2)(ii) to make it more clear
in the special primacy requirements
section of the RTCR that systems must
implement at least one of listed
additional criteria to qualify for reduced
monitoring. EPA clearly intended this to
be the case, as reflected in
§ 141.854(h)(2) for NCWSs and
§ 141.855(d) for CWSs, and in the
preamble to the final RTCR at pages
10281 and 10282.
Next, the final rule clarifies situations
requiring public notification in
Appendix A to Subpart Q of Part 141 to
list out all of the possible reporting
violations under the RTCR that will
require Tier 3 public notice. EPA clearly
intended this to be the case, as reflected
in item (6) in Table 1 to § 141.204
(Violation Categories and Other
Situations Requiring a Tier 3 Public
Notice), which provides that all
reporting and recordkeeping violations
under the RTCR require Tier 3 public
notice. Also, page 10294 of the preamble
to the final RTCR clearly states that Tier
3 PN is required for both monitoring
and reporting violations under the
RTCR.
Finally, the final rule clarifies the
analytical methods table in
§ 141.852(a)(5) to place the citation
‘‘Standard Methods Online 9223 B–97’’
for the Colilert analytical method in the
correct column.
These revisions do not change any
rule requirements, are consistent with
the rule requirements as intended by the
Total Coliform Rule/Distribution System
Advisory Committee that recommended
the revisions to the Total Coliform Rule,
and are intended only to clarify
requirements and reduce confusion.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
II. Additional Supplementary
Information
We are publishing a Direct Final Rule
to this parallel proposal in the final rule
section of today’s Federal Register.
Additional supplementary information
is available in the Direct Final Rule,
‘‘National Primary Drinking Water
Regulation: Minor Corrections to the
Revisions to the Total Coliform Rule.’’
Dated: February 10, 2014.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014–04171 Filed 2–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:33 Feb 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Part 414
[CMS–1460–ANPRM]
RIN 0938–AS05
Medicare Program; Methodology for
Adjusting Payment Amounts for
Certain Durable Medical Equipment,
Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies
(DMEPOS) Using Information From
Competitive Bidding Programs
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking (ANPRM).
AGENCY:
This advance notice of
proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) solicits
public comments on different
methodologies we may consider using
with regard to applying information
from the durable medical equipment,
prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies
(DMEPOS) competitive bidding
programs to adjust Medicare fee
schedule payment amounts or other
Medicare payment amounts for
DMEPOS items and services furnished
in areas that are not included in these
competitive bidding programs. In
addition, we are also requesting
comments on a different matter
regarding ideas for potentially changing
the payment methodologies used under
the competitive bidding programs for
certain durable medical equipment and
enteral nutrition.
DATES: To be assured consideration,
comments must be received at one of
the addresses provided below, no later
than 5 p.m. on March 28, 2014.
Customer Service Information:
Individuals interested in obtaining
information from the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services
concerning current Medicare payment
policies may call 1–800–MEDICARE
(633–4227) or visit the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Web site (https://
www.cms.gov) or (https://
www.medicare.gov).
SUMMARY:
In commenting, please refer
to file code CMS–1460–ANPRM.
Because of staff and resource
limitations, we cannot accept comments
by facsimile (FAX) transmission.
You may submit comments in one of
four ways (please choose only one of the
ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on this regulation
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the ‘‘Submit a comment’’ instructions.
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments to the following
address ONLY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention:
CMS–1460–ANPRM, P.O. Box 8010,
Baltimore, MD 21244–8010.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments to the
following address ONLY: Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human
Services, Attention: CMS–1460–
ANPRM, Mail Stop C4–26–05, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD
21244–1850.
4. By hand or courier. Alternatively,
you may deliver (by hand or courier)
your written comments ONLY to the
following addresses prior to the close of
the comment period:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Room 445–G, Hubert
H. Humphrey Building, 200
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20201
(Because access to the interior of the
Hubert H. Humphrey Building is not
readily available to persons without
Federal government identification,
commenters are encouraged to leave
their comments in the CMS drop slots
located in the main lobby of the
building. A stamp-in clock is available
for persons wishing to retain a proof of
filing by stamping in and retaining an
extra copy of the comments being filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
If you intend to deliver your
comments to the Baltimore address, call
telephone number (410) 786–9994 in
advance to schedule your arrival with
one of our staff members.
Comments erroneously mailed to the
addresses indicated as appropriate for
hand or courier delivery may be delayed
and received after the comment period.
For information on viewing public
comments, see the beginning of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anita Greenberg, (410) 786–4601.
Karen Jacobs, (410) 786–2173.
Christopher Molling, (410) 786–6399.
Hafsa Vahora, (410) 786–7899.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Inspection
of Public Comments: All comments
E:\FR\FM\26FEP1.SGM
26FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 38 (Wednesday, February 26, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10752-10754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04171]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 141 and 142
[EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0878; FRL-9906-88-OW]
National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Minor Corrections to
the Revisions to the Total Coliform Rule
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this action, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is
proposing minor corrections to the final Revisions to the Total
Coliform
[[Page 10753]]
Rule (RTCR), as authorized under the Safe Drinking Water Act, to
correct typographical errors in sections relating to recordkeeping and
State primacy requirements, which could affect implementation and
enforcement of the RTCR if they were left uncorrected. This proposed
action also includes other edits to the final rule language that are
intended to improve the understanding of the rule and avoid confusion.
This proposed action does not impose new requirements; rather it
clarifies what must be included in States' primacy applications related
to this rule and the specific records water systems must keep. In the
``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal Register, EPA is
making these minor corrections and edits to the final RTCR as a direct
final rule without a prior proposed rule. If we receive no adverse
comment, we will not take further action on this proposed rule.
DATES: Written comments must be received by March 28, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-
2008-0878, by mail to Water Docket, Environmental Protection Agency,
Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.
Comments may also be submitted electronically or through hand delivery/
courier by following the detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section
of the direct final rule located in the rules section of this Federal
Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Conley, Standards and Risk
Management Division, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water (MC-
4607M), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202) 564-1781; email address:
conley.sean@epa.gov. For general information, contact the Safe Drinking
Water Hotline, telephone number: (800) 426-4791. The Safe Drinking
Water Hotline is open Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays,
from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Eastern time.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Why is EPA issuing this proposed rule?
EPA is proposing minor corrections to the final Revisions to the
Total Coliform Rule (RTCR) to correct typographical errors in sections
relating to recordkeeping and State primacy requirements, which could
affect implementation and enforcement of the RTCR if left uncorrected.
This proposed action also includes other edits to the final rule
language that are intended to improve the understanding of the rule and
avoid confusion. This proposed action does not impose new requirements;
rather it clarifies what must be included in States' primacy
applications related to this rule and the specific records water
systems must keep.
II. Regulated Categories and Entities
Entities potentially regulated by the proposed corrections to the
final RTCR are all public water systems (PWSs). Regulated categories
and entities include the following:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category Examples of regulated entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry............................. Privately-owned community water
systems (CWSs), transient non-
community water systems
(TNCWSs), and non-transient non-
community water systems
(NTNCWSs).
Federal, State, Tribal, and local Publicly-owned CWSs, TNCWSs, and
governments. NTNCWSs.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide for readers regarding entities regulated by this action. This
table lists the types of entities that EPA is now aware of that could
potentially be regulated by this action. Other types of entities not
listed in the table could also be regulated. To determine whether your
facility is regulated by this action, you should carefully examine the
definition of ``public water system'' in Sec. 141.2 and the section
entitled ``Coverage'' in Sec. 141.3 in title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR), and the applicability criteria in Sec. 141.851(b)
of the final RTCR. If you have questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed in the
preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
C. Copies of This Document and Other Related Information
This document is available for download at https://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/rulesregs/sdwa/tcr/regulation_revisions.cfm. For other
related information, see the docket section of the direct final rule
located in the rules section of this Federal Register.
D. Minor Corrections to the Revisions to the Total Coliform Rule (RTCR)
Today's proposed rule corrects, as authorized under the Safe
Drinking Water Act (SDWA), two typographical errors in the final RTCR
(78 FR 10269, February 13, 2013) rule language. First, this proposed
action corrects a mistaken cross-reference regarding water system
recordkeeping requirements for assessment forms and documentation of
corrective actions and sanitary defects. EPA is correcting the cross-
reference at Sec. 141.861(b)(1) to correctly provide that assessments,
corrective actions and identification of sanitary defects are required
under the treatment technique requirements of section 141.859 of the
final RTCR. The burden for these recordkeeping requirements was
reflected in the Revised Total Coliform Rule and in section 7 of the
Economic Analysis (EA) for the Revised Total Coliform Rule (EPA-815-R-
12-004).
EPA also discussed these requirements in the preamble to the final
RTCR on page 10295. Second, today's proposed rule also corrects the
introductory paragraph at Sec. 142.16(q)(2) to correctly indicate that
the State's application for primacy must contain a written description
of all provisions included in the subsections of the paragraph,
(q)(2)(i) through (q)(2)(ix). It was always EPA's intent that primacy
applications must contain a written description of all provisions in
142.16(q)(2), but when EPA added subparagraph (q)(2)(ix) to the final
rule, EPA neglected to change the numbering in the paragraph (2) lead-
in to the list of elements. EPA intended this to be the case, as
demonstrated in the preamble to the final RTCR on page 10301. In
addition, the burden for this State activity was also included in
section 7 of the Economic Analysis (EA) for the RTCR. EPA is not
developing a new EA for today's action because the EA for the final
RTCR accounts for all costs associated with this rule.
Today's proposed rule also corrects the numbering in Sec.
141.855(a) by adding subparagraph (d)(2) and reserving it, to most
simply correct a numbering error that identified a subparagraph (d)(1)
without a subsequent (d)(2). Correcting the numbering in this fashion
will not interfere with any cross references to subparagraph (d)(1).
[[Page 10754]]
Today's proposed rule also includes clarifying revisions to the
language regarding primacy applications in Sec. 142.16(q)(2)(ii) to
make it more clear in the special primacy requirements section of the
RTCR that systems must implement at least one of listed additional
criteria to qualify for reduced monitoring. EPA clearly intended this
to be the case, as reflected in Sec. 141.854(h)(2) for NCWSs and Sec.
141.855(d) for CWSs, and in the preamble to the final RTCR at pages
10281 and 10282.
Next, the final rule clarifies situations requiring public
notification in Appendix A to Subpart Q of Part 141 to list out all of
the possible reporting violations under the RTCR that will require Tier
3 public notice. EPA clearly intended this to be the case, as reflected
in item (6) in Table 1 to Sec. 141.204 (Violation Categories and Other
Situations Requiring a Tier 3 Public Notice), which provides that all
reporting and recordkeeping violations under the RTCR require Tier 3
public notice. Also, page 10294 of the preamble to the final RTCR
clearly states that Tier 3 PN is required for both monitoring and
reporting violations under the RTCR.
Finally, the final rule clarifies the analytical methods table in
Sec. 141.852(a)(5) to place the citation ``Standard Methods Online
9223 B-97'' for the Colilert analytical method in the correct column.
These revisions do not change any rule requirements, are consistent
with the rule requirements as intended by the Total Coliform Rule/
Distribution System Advisory Committee that recommended the revisions
to the Total Coliform Rule, and are intended only to clarify
requirements and reduce confusion.
II. Additional Supplementary Information
We are publishing a Direct Final Rule to this parallel proposal in
the final rule section of today's Federal Register. Additional
supplementary information is available in the Direct Final Rule,
``National Primary Drinking Water Regulation: Minor Corrections to the
Revisions to the Total Coliform Rule.''
Dated: February 10, 2014.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014-04171 Filed 2-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P