Announcement of Public Workshop, “Examining Health Care Competition”, 10153-10156 [2014-03765]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 36 / Monday, February 24, 2014 / Notices mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 26. Cargologic has failed to timely replace its QI, in violation of 46 CFR § 515.18(c). 27. Cargologic has failed to respond to BCL’s correspondence of March 25, 2013, November 21, 2013, and December 11, 2013, in violation of 46 CFR § 515.31(g). 28. Cargologic is no longer qualified to provide intermediary services within the meaning of 46 CFR § 515.16(a). Order Now therefore, it is ordered That, pursuant to Sections 11, 14 and 19 of the Shipping Act, 46 U.S.C. §§ 41302, 41304, 40903(a)(2), Cargologic USA LLC is directed to show cause no later than March 21, 2014, why the Commission should not revoke its license inasmuch as the licensee is otherwise not qualified to render intermediary services; It is further ordered That, pursuant to Sections 11, 14 and 19 of the Shipping Act, 46 U.S.C. §§ 41302, 41304, 40903(a)(2), Cargologic USA LLC is directed to show cause, no later than March 21, 2014, why the Commission should not order it to cease and desist from operating as an ocean transportation intermediary in the foreign trade of the United States inasmuch as the licensee is otherwise not qualified to render intermediary services; It is further ordered That, this proceeding be limited to the submission of affidavits of fact and memoranda of law; It is further ordered That, any person having an interest and desiring to intervene in this proceeding shall file a petition for leave to intervene in accordance with Rule 68 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 46 CFR § 502.68. Such petition shall be accompanied by the petitioner’s memorandum of law and affidavit of fact, if any, and shall be filed no later than March 21, 2014; It is further ordered That, Cargologic USA LLC be named as Respondent in this proceeding. Affidavits of fact and memoranda of law shall be filed by Respondent and any intervenors in support of Respondent no later than March 21, 2014; It is further ordered That, the Commission’s Bureau of Enforcement (BOE) be made a party to this proceeding; It is further ordered That, reply affidavits and memoranda of law shall be filed by BOE and intervenors in opposition to Respondent no later than April 7, 2014; It is further ordered That: (a) Should any party believe that an evidentiary hearing is required, that VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:16 Feb 21, 2014 Jkt 232001 party must submit a request for such hearing together with a statement setting forth in detail the facts to be proved, the relevance of those facts to the issues in this proceeding, a description of the evidence which would be adduced, and why such evidence cannot be submitted by affidavit; and (b) Any request for evidentiary hearing shall be filed no later than April 7, 2014; It is further ordered That, notice of this Order to Show Cause be published in the Federal Register, and that a copy thereof be served upon Respondent at its last known address; It is further ordered That, all documents submitted by any party of record in this proceeding shall be filed in accordance with Rule 2 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 46 CFR § 502.2, as well as mailed directly to all parties of record; Finally, it is ordered That, pursuant to the terms of Rule 61 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 46 CFR § 502.61, the final decision of the Commission in this proceeding shall be issued no later than June 24, 2014. By the Commission. Karen V. Gregory, Secretary. 10153 1. Michael R. Heebink, individually and as co-trustee of the Shirley E Heebink Family Trust, and as part of the group acting in concert with the Shirley E Heebink Trust; its co-trustees Shirley E Heebink, and Michael R. Heebink; and Mary Heebink, all of Baldwin, Wisconsin, and the Rasmussen Group, which includes Dane L. Rasmussen, the Debra L Rasmussen Irrevocable Trust Dated December 18, 2012, with Dane L Rasmussen, as trustee; Jack Rasmussen, all of Baldwin, Wisconsin; Emily Shimota, Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota; Sidney Rasmussen, St. Paul, Minnesota; Lynne VanDeelen, Duluth, Minnesota; and Nancy Fox, Maplewood, Minnesota; as a group acting in concert to retain voting shares of Baldwin Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of First Bank of Baldwin, both in Baldwin, Wisconsin. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 19, 2014. Michael J. Lewandowski, Associate Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. 2014–03815 Filed 2–21–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6210–01–P FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION [FR Doc. 2014–03731 Filed 2–21–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730–01–P Announcement of Public Workshop, ‘‘Examining Health Care Competition’’ Federal Trade Commission. Notice of public workshop and opportunity for comment. AGENCY: ACTION: FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank or Bank Holding Company The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than March 11, 2014. A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline K. Brunmeier, Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480–0291: PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 The Federal Trade Commission (‘‘FTC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) will hold a public workshop, ‘‘Examining Health Care Competition,’’ on March 20–21, 2014, to study certain activities and trends that may affect competition in the evolving health care industry. The workshop will explore current developments related to professional regulations; innovations in health care delivery; advancements in health care technology; measuring and assessing health care quality; and price transparency for health care services. This notice poses a series of questions upon which the FTC seeks public comment. The Commission will consider these comments as it prepares for the workshop and may use them in a subsequent report or policy paper. DATES: The workshop will be held on March 20–21, 2014, in the Conference Center of the FTC office building at 601 New Jersey Avenue NW., Washington, DC. For additional information, visit the workshop Web site at https:// www.ftc.gov/news-events/eventscalendar/2014/03/examining-healthcare-competition. Prior to the workshop, SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM 24FEN1 10154 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 36 / Monday, February 24, 2014 / Notices Professional Regulation of Health Care Providers The Commission has long been interested in the competitive implications of professional regulation in health care.1 The Commission seeks to inform itself of new developments and refine its understanding of the ways in which professional regulations governing the scope of practice for ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a health care providers may affect comment online or on paper by competition. following the instructions in the Professional regulations may protect SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section patient safety, improve quality of care, below. Write ‘‘Health Care Workshop, Project No. P131207’’ on your comment and provide useful information to consumers who are choosing among and file your comment online at health care providers. Greater https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ ftc/healthcareworkshop by following the competition may result when regulatory changes expand the number of health instructions on the web-based form. If care providers or services available to you prefer to file your comment on consumers by increasing the use of paper, mail or deliver your comment to advanced practice nurses, dental the following address: Federal Trade therapists, and other qualified nonCommission, Office of the Secretary, physician or non-dentist professionals. Room H–113 (Annex X), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, Such increased competition may provide consumers with benefits such DC 20580. as lower prices and improved access to FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: health care services. Some regulations Patricia Schultheiss, Attorney Advisor, may, however, unnecessarily restrict the Office of Policy Planning, Federal Trade ability of non-physician health care Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue professionals to practice to the full NW., Washington, DC 20580, 202–326– extent of their training, imposing costly 2877, or Karen Goldman, Attorney limitations on professional services Advisor, Office of Policy Planning, without well-founded consumer safety Federal Trade Commission, 600 justifications or other consumer benefits Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, to offset those costs. Such overly DC 20580, 202–326–2574, restrictive professional regulations are examininghealthcareworkshop@ftc.gov. likely to suppress beneficial For more detailed information about the competition by non-physician health workshop, including an agenda, please care providers and may prevent visit the workshop Web site: https:// institutional providers (such as www.ftc.gov/news-events/eventshospitals) from developing innovative calendar/2014/03/examining-healthhealth care delivery models that rely care-competition. more heavily on non-physician providers to provide efficient, safe care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The While all patients may be affected by Federal Trade Commission seeks to reduced competition from nonbetter understand the competitive dynamics of evolving health care 1 See, e.g., FTC & U.S. Dep’t of Justice (‘‘DOJ’’), product and service markets. Improving Health Care: A Dose Of Competition Information obtained during this (2004), available at https://www.ftc.gov/reports/ workshop will enrich the Commission’s healthcare/040723healthcarerpt.pdf; FTC Staff Comment Before the Massachusetts House of knowledge in this critical sector of the Representatives Regarding House Bill 6 (H.2009) economy and thereby support the Concerning Supervisory Requirements for Nurse Commission’s enforcement, advocacy, Practitioners and Nurse Anesthetists (Jan. 2014), and consumer education efforts. The available at https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/ workshop will consider issues related to documents/advocacy_documents/ftc-staffcomment-massachusetts-house-representativesthe professional regulation of health care practitioners; innovations in health regarding-house-bill-6-h.2009-concerningsupervisory-requirements-nurse-practitioners-nursecare delivery; advancements in health anesthetists/140123massachusettnursesletter.pdf; Letter from FTC Staff to Hon. Timothy Burns, care technology; developments in Louisiana Legislature (May l, 2009) (regarding measuring and assessing health care restrictions on mobile dentistry), quality; and recent efforts to make price proposed at https://www.ftc.gov/policy/policyavailable information for health care services actions/advocacy-filings/2009/05/ftc-staffmore transparent. The Commission may comment-louisiana-house-representatives-0; FTC Staff Comment Before the Kentucky Cabinet for convene subsequent workshops in the Health and Family Services Concerning Regarding near future to examine additional Proposed Rule to Regulate Limited Service Clinics competition issues in the health care (Jan. 2010), available at https://www.ftc.gov/os/2010/ 02/100202kycomment.pdf. industry. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES the Commission will publish an agenda and additional information on its Web site. To be considered for the workshop, comments in response to this notice must be submitted by March 10, 2014. In addition, any interested person may submit written comments in response to this notice and workshop discussions until April 30, 2014. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:16 Feb 21, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 physician health care professionals, the impact may be particularly severe for vulnerable and underserved patient populations. In the workshop, the Commission intends to study developments in the regulation of health care professionals, including accreditation, credentialing, licensure, and supervision/cooperation requirements. The Commission also intends to examine scope of practice issues in emerging health care professions, such as dental therapy and care coordination. The Commission invites public comment on questions relevant to this topic, including: • What recent developments have occurred in the regulation of health care professionals, particularly with respect to accreditation, credentialing, licensure, and supervision/cooperation requirements? • What are the consequences of such regulations? To what extent are these regulations necessary to protect consumers or serve other important state interests? How do they affect the supply of services, patient safety, costs, care coordination, and quality of care? • Is there evidence that quality of care is improved when professional regulations are narrowly tailored to protect patient safety while facilitating greater deployment of non-physician or non-dentist health care professionals? • Do professional regulations affect staffing decisions at health care facilities? If so, how? • To what extent might professional regulations unnecessarily restrict the scope of practice of non-physician or non-dentist health care professionals? • What is the relationship between professional regulations and competition? Would changes to professional regulations enhance competition among health care providers? If so, what changes would be desirable? • What is the relationship between professional regulations and access to care, especially for vulnerable and underserved patient populations? • To what extent do professional regulations vary by state? Does state-bystate variation affect patient health, health care spending, or other important measures? • How do current regulations concerning licensure and credentialing affect the ability of health care professionals to relocate or practice in more than one geographic area, particularly across state lines? • Would greater state-to-state licensure portability improve competition? What issues would increased licensure portability raise? E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM 24FEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 36 / Monday, February 24, 2014 / Notices mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES • How do professional regulations affect reimbursement for health care services? Do professional regulations lead to reimbursement policies that reduce incentives for health care competition? • What is the relationship between accreditation of education programs and professional regulation? To what extent do accreditation standards affect competition? Would changes to accreditation standards enhance competition among health care providers? If so, what changes would be desirable? • Are there other factors that should be considered when analyzing the competitive implications of professional regulation in health care? Innovations in Health Care Delivery Several new models for health care delivery, including retail clinics and telemedicine, have emerged in recent years, spurring additional competition in the provision of health care services. These models may offer significant cost savings while maintaining, or even improving, quality of care. These models may also increase the supply of health care services, which may expand consumer access to care. The Commission seeks to better understand the potential benefits of these new health care delivery models. The Commission invites public comment on questions relevant to this topic, including: • What are the prevalent and emerging forms of health care delivery? • To what extent are health care services being delivered in new formats and locations, such as retail clinics? What trends are projected in the future? • What are the competitive implications of the increased use of retail clinics on the supply of services, cost, quality, and access to care? • To what extent is telemedicine being used today? What new developments are occurring in telemedicine? What role is telemedicine projected to play in the future? • What are the competitive implications of the increased use of telemedicine on the supply of services, cost, quality, and access to care? Does the increased use of telemedicine raise any patient safety concerns? • Are there regulatory or commercial barriers that may restrict the use of retail clinics, telemedicine, or other new models of health care delivery? If so, are there any valid justifications to support such restrictions? • How do professional regulations affect telemedicine or other innovations in delivering health care services or expertise across geographic areas or VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:16 Feb 21, 2014 Jkt 232001 jurisdictional boundaries, especially in rural or underserved areas? • What, if any, changes in government regulations would facilitate the emergence of new health care delivery models, enhance competition among health care providers, and encourage additional innovation? • What are the competitive implications of recent legislative proposals to expand or facilitate telemedicine across state lines? • How are new health care delivery models reimbursed for providing services? • Do regulations governing retail clinics, telemedicine, and other new models of health care delivery affect reimbursement? Could these regulations be modified in ways that would improve reimbursement for services provided under new models, better align incentives to implement new models, or otherwise promote innovation? • Are there other factors that should be considered when analyzing the competitive implications of retail clinics, telemedicine, and other new models of health care delivery? Advancements in Health Care Technology Recent advancements in health care technology may have competitive implications. The Commission seeks to better understand developments in electronic health records, health data exchanges, and technology platforms for health care payers and providers, including the current state of competition among hardware and software platforms. In addition, the workshop will examine certain new consumer-oriented health technologies, such as mobile medical applications and personal medical records technologies, that may improve patient engagement and quality of care. The Commission invites public comment on questions relevant to this topic, including: • What is the current state of competition in health information technology markets serving institutional providers, health care professionals, patients, and payers? • Do innovators in health information technology face barriers to entry? If so, are these barriers significant impediments to competition? How might these barriers be reduced? • What new and established technologies have been most important to the development and deployment of telemedicine or ‘‘telehealth’’? • What policies could further technical innovation conducive to effective and efficient telemedicine? PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 10155 • To what extent are information technology vendors and health care providers sharing patient health information? Are there significant impediments to the useful flow of patient health information to improve health care coordination and quality? • Do recent health care technology advancements raise standard-setting, network effects, or interoperability issues? • What has been the impact of health information technology advancements and policies on physicians and other caregivers? What has been the impact on patients? • Does the adoption of particular health care technologies lead to increased switching costs and customer lock-in issues? • Are there other factors that should be considered when analyzing the competitive implications of emerging health care technologies? Measuring and Assessing Quality of Health Care In the workshop, the Commission intends to examine recent developments in the measurement and assessment of health care quality. In particular, the Commission will consider whether, and to what extent, information related to quality of care affects competition and informs health care choices by patients, providers, employers, payers, and other health care decision-makers. The Commission invites public comment on questions relevant to this topic, including: • How is health care quality measured and evaluated, and for what purposes? Are these current measures effective? • Have there been any recent innovations in quality measurement? • What challenges are encountered when measuring quality? Do these challenges differ depending on whether process or structure measures are used, versus outcome measures? • To what extent is quality assessment shifting away from process and structure measures, and towards outcome measures? • How, and to what extent, do quality measures account for higher-risk patient populations, so that providers are neither penalized for treating sicker patients nor rewarded for selectively treating healthier patients? Can risk adjustment be improved? • How is quality information shared with various health care decisionmakers, including patients, providers, employers, and payers? Are there better ways to convey such information? • Does available quality information empower patients, providers, and other E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM 24FEN1 10156 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 36 / Monday, February 24, 2014 / Notices health care decision-makers to choose more cost-effective and better care? • Does available quality information facilitate improved care coordination? • Are there ways to improve quality information so that it is more useful to patients, providers, and other health care decision-makers? • Is a standard measure likely to emerge that would allow patients, providers, and other health care decision-makers to effectively compare providers based on quality? • Are there other factors that should be considered when analyzing the competitive implications of quality measurement and assessment? mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Price Transparency of Health Care Services Payers, employer groups, and health care systems are engaged in efforts to make price information (often combined with quality information) more transparent to patients, providers, employers, payers, and other health care decision-makers. Price transparency may be used as a means to control costs while maintaining quality in the provision of health care services. A potential benefit of price transparency is that it may enhance competition among health care providers or between different, potentially substitutable, treatments, thereby leading to reduced prices for health care services and a more efficient allocation of health care resources. Some forms of price transparency may, however, facilitate price coordination among health care providers, thereby dampening competition. The Commission seeks to better understand the competitive implications of price transparency for health care services. The Commission invites public comment on questions relevant to this topic, including: • What types of benefit designs (e.g., co-insurance, high-deductible health plans, reference pricing) utilize price transparency as a means to control costs while maintaining quality? What degree of transparency is necessary to achieve each type of benefit design? • To what extent might price transparency enhance competition among health care providers or between different treatments? • To what extent might price transparency facilitate price coordination among health care providers and thereby undermine the potential benefits of competition? • Are there ways to focus the use of price transparency so that it enhances competition without resulting in negative consequences? VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:16 Feb 21, 2014 Jkt 232001 • What is the relationship between transparency of price and quality information? Is price information more meaningful to patients, providers, and other health care decision-makers when combined with quality information? Do pricing data alone provide sufficient information to enable meaningful health care decisions? • Are there other factors that should be considered when analyzing the competitive implications of price transparency in the health care industry? Request for Comment You can file a comment online or on paper. To be considered for the workshop, comments in response to this notice must be submitted by March 10, 2014. In addition, any interested person may submit written comments in response to this notice and workshop discussions until April 30, 2014. Write ‘‘Health Care Workshop, Project No. P131207’’ on your comment. Your comment—including your name and state—will be placed on the public record of this proceeding, including on the publicly accessible FTC Web site, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/ publiccomments.shtm. As a matter of discretion, the Commission tries to remove individuals’ home contact information from comments before placing them on the Commission Web site. Because your comment will be made public, you are solely responsible for making sure that your comment does not include any sensitive personal information, like anyone’s Social Security number, date of birth, driver’s license number or other state identification number or foreign country equivalent, passport number, financial account number, or credit or debit card number. You are also solely responsible for making sure that your comment does not include any sensitive health information, like medical records or other individually identifiable health information. In addition, do not include any ‘‘[t]rade secret or any commercial or financial information which . . . is privileged or confidential,’’ as discussed in Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2). In particular, do not include competitively sensitive information such as costs, sales statistics, inventories, formulas, patterns, devices, manufacturing processes, or customer names. If you want the Commission to give your comment confidential treatment, you must file it in paper form, with a request for confidential treatment, and you have to follow the procedure PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 explained in FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c). Your comment will be kept confidential only if the FTC General Counsel, in his or her sole discretion, grants your request in accordance with the law and the public interest. Postal mail addressed to the Commission is subject to delay due to heightened security screening. As a result, we encourage you to submit your comments online. To make sure that the Commission considers your online comment, you must file it at https:// ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/ healthcareworkshop by following the instructions on the web-based form. If this Notice appears at https:// www.regulations.gov/#!home, you also may file a comment through that Web site. If you file your comment on paper, write ‘‘Health Care Workshop, Project No. P131207’’ on your comment and on the envelope, and mail or deliver it to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Room H–113 (Annex X), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580. If possible, submit your paper comment to the Commission by courier or overnight service. Visit the Commission Web site at https://www.ftc.gov to read this Notice and the news release describing it. The FTC Act and other laws that the Commission administers permit the collection of public comments to consider and use in this proceeding as appropriate. The Commission will consider all timely and responsive public comments that it receives on or before April 30, 2014. You can find more information, including routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, in the Commission’s privacy policy, at https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm. By direction of the Commission. Donald S. Clark, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2014–03765 Filed 2–21–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6750–01–P GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION [Notice–GTAC–2014–01; Docket No. 2014– 0002; Sequence 7] Government-Wide Travel Advisory Committee (GTAC); Public Advisory Committee Meetings Office of Government-Wide Policy, General Services Administration (GSA). ACTION: Meeting notice. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM 24FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10153-10156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-03765]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION


Announcement of Public Workshop, ``Examining Health Care 
Competition''

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice of public workshop and opportunity for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Trade Commission (``FTC'' or ``Commission'') will 
hold a public workshop, ``Examining Health Care Competition,'' on March 
20-21, 2014, to study certain activities and trends that may affect 
competition in the evolving health care industry. The workshop will 
explore current developments related to professional regulations; 
innovations in health care delivery; advancements in health care 
technology; measuring and assessing health care quality; and price 
transparency for health care services. This notice poses a series of 
questions upon which the FTC seeks public comment. The Commission will 
consider these comments as it prepares for the workshop and may use 
them in a subsequent report or policy paper.

DATES: The workshop will be held on March 20-21, 2014, in the 
Conference Center of the FTC office building at 601 New Jersey Avenue 
NW., Washington, DC. For additional information, visit the workshop Web 
site at https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/events-calendar/2014/03/examining-health-care-competition. Prior to the workshop,

[[Page 10154]]

the Commission will publish an agenda and additional information on its 
Web site. To be considered for the workshop, comments in response to 
this notice must be submitted by March 10, 2014. In addition, any 
interested person may submit written comments in response to this 
notice and workshop discussions until April 30, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a comment online or on paper by 
following the instructions in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 
below. Write ``Health Care Workshop, Project No. P131207'' on your 
comment and file your comment online at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/healthcareworkshop by following the 
instructions on the web-based form. If you prefer to file your comment 
on paper, mail or deliver your comment to the following address: 
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Room H-113 (Annex 
X), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Schultheiss, Attorney 
Advisor, Office of Policy Planning, Federal Trade Commission, 600 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580, 202-326-2877, or Karen 
Goldman, Attorney Advisor, Office of Policy Planning, Federal Trade 
Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580, 202-326-
2574, examininghealthcareworkshop@ftc.gov. For more detailed 
information about the workshop, including an agenda, please visit the 
workshop Web site: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/events-calendar/2014/03/examining-health-care-competition.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Trade Commission seeks to better 
understand the competitive dynamics of evolving health care product and 
service markets. Information obtained during this workshop will enrich 
the Commission's knowledge in this critical sector of the economy and 
thereby support the Commission's enforcement, advocacy, and consumer 
education efforts. The workshop will consider issues related to the 
professional regulation of health care practitioners; innovations in 
health care delivery; advancements in health care technology; 
developments in measuring and assessing health care quality; and recent 
efforts to make price information for health care services more 
transparent. The Commission may convene subsequent workshops in the 
near future to examine additional competition issues in the health care 
industry.

Professional Regulation of Health Care Providers

    The Commission has long been interested in the competitive 
implications of professional regulation in health care.\1\ The 
Commission seeks to inform itself of new developments and refine its 
understanding of the ways in which professional regulations governing 
the scope of practice for health care providers may affect competition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See, e.g., FTC & U.S. Dep't of Justice (``DOJ''), Improving 
Health Care: A Dose Of Competition (2004), available at https://www.ftc.gov/reports/healthcare/040723healthcarerpt.pdf; FTC Staff 
Comment Before the Massachusetts House of Representatives Regarding 
House Bill 6 (H.2009) Concerning Supervisory Requirements for Nurse 
Practitioners and Nurse Anesthetists (Jan. 2014), available at 
https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/advocacy_documents/ftc-staff-comment-massachusetts-house-representatives-regarding-house-bill-6-h.2009-concerning-supervisory-requirements-nurse-practitioners-nurse-anesthetists/140123massachusettnursesletter.pdf; Letter from FTC Staff to Hon. 
Timothy Burns, Louisiana Legislature (May l, 2009) (regarding 
proposed restrictions on mobile dentistry), available at https://www.ftc.gov/policy/policy-actions/advocacy-filings/2009/05/ftc-staff-comment-louisiana-house-representatives-0; FTC Staff Comment 
Before the Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services 
Concerning Regarding Proposed Rule to Regulate Limited Service 
Clinics (Jan. 2010), available at https://www.ftc.gov/os/2010/02/100202kycomment.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Professional regulations may protect patient safety, improve 
quality of care, and provide useful information to consumers who are 
choosing among health care providers. Greater competition may result 
when regulatory changes expand the number of health care providers or 
services available to consumers by increasing the use of advanced 
practice nurses, dental therapists, and other qualified non-physician 
or non-dentist professionals. Such increased competition may provide 
consumers with benefits such as lower prices and improved access to 
health care services. Some regulations may, however, unnecessarily 
restrict the ability of non-physician health care professionals to 
practice to the full extent of their training, imposing costly 
limitations on professional services without well-founded consumer 
safety justifications or other consumer benefits to offset those costs. 
Such overly restrictive professional regulations are likely to suppress 
beneficial competition by non-physician health care providers and may 
prevent institutional providers (such as hospitals) from developing 
innovative health care delivery models that rely more heavily on non-
physician providers to provide efficient, safe care. While all patients 
may be affected by reduced competition from non-physician health care 
professionals, the impact may be particularly severe for vulnerable and 
underserved patient populations.
    In the workshop, the Commission intends to study developments in 
the regulation of health care professionals, including accreditation, 
credentialing, licensure, and supervision/cooperation requirements. The 
Commission also intends to examine scope of practice issues in emerging 
health care professions, such as dental therapy and care coordination.
    The Commission invites public comment on questions relevant to this 
topic, including:
     What recent developments have occurred in the regulation 
of health care professionals, particularly with respect to 
accreditation, credentialing, licensure, and supervision/cooperation 
requirements?
     What are the consequences of such regulations? To what 
extent are these regulations necessary to protect consumers or serve 
other important state interests? How do they affect the supply of 
services, patient safety, costs, care coordination, and quality of 
care?
     Is there evidence that quality of care is improved when 
professional regulations are narrowly tailored to protect patient 
safety while facilitating greater deployment of non-physician or non-
dentist health care professionals?
     Do professional regulations affect staffing decisions at 
health care facilities? If so, how?
     To what extent might professional regulations 
unnecessarily restrict the scope of practice of non-physician or non-
dentist health care professionals?
     What is the relationship between professional regulations 
and competition? Would changes to professional regulations enhance 
competition among health care providers? If so, what changes would be 
desirable?
     What is the relationship between professional regulations 
and access to care, especially for vulnerable and underserved patient 
populations?
     To what extent do professional regulations vary by state? 
Does state-by-state variation affect patient health, health care 
spending, or other important measures?
     How do current regulations concerning licensure and 
credentialing affect the ability of health care professionals to 
relocate or practice in more than one geographic area, particularly 
across state lines?
     Would greater state-to-state licensure portability improve 
competition? What issues would increased licensure portability raise?

[[Page 10155]]

     How do professional regulations affect reimbursement for 
health care services? Do professional regulations lead to reimbursement 
policies that reduce incentives for health care competition?
     What is the relationship between accreditation of 
education programs and professional regulation? To what extent do 
accreditation standards affect competition? Would changes to 
accreditation standards enhance competition among health care 
providers? If so, what changes would be desirable?
     Are there other factors that should be considered when 
analyzing the competitive implications of professional regulation in 
health care?

Innovations in Health Care Delivery

    Several new models for health care delivery, including retail 
clinics and telemedicine, have emerged in recent years, spurring 
additional competition in the provision of health care services. These 
models may offer significant cost savings while maintaining, or even 
improving, quality of care. These models may also increase the supply 
of health care services, which may expand consumer access to care. The 
Commission seeks to better understand the potential benefits of these 
new health care delivery models.
    The Commission invites public comment on questions relevant to this 
topic, including:
     What are the prevalent and emerging forms of health care 
delivery?
     To what extent are health care services being delivered in 
new formats and locations, such as retail clinics? What trends are 
projected in the future?
     What are the competitive implications of the increased use 
of retail clinics on the supply of services, cost, quality, and access 
to care?
     To what extent is telemedicine being used today? What new 
developments are occurring in telemedicine? What role is telemedicine 
projected to play in the future?
     What are the competitive implications of the increased use 
of telemedicine on the supply of services, cost, quality, and access to 
care? Does the increased use of telemedicine raise any patient safety 
concerns?
     Are there regulatory or commercial barriers that may 
restrict the use of retail clinics, telemedicine, or other new models 
of health care delivery? If so, are there any valid justifications to 
support such restrictions?
     How do professional regulations affect telemedicine or 
other innovations in delivering health care services or expertise 
across geographic areas or jurisdictional boundaries, especially in 
rural or underserved areas?
     What, if any, changes in government regulations would 
facilitate the emergence of new health care delivery models, enhance 
competition among health care providers, and encourage additional 
innovation?
     What are the competitive implications of recent 
legislative proposals to expand or facilitate telemedicine across state 
lines?
     How are new health care delivery models reimbursed for 
providing services?
     Do regulations governing retail clinics, telemedicine, and 
other new models of health care delivery affect reimbursement? Could 
these regulations be modified in ways that would improve reimbursement 
for services provided under new models, better align incentives to 
implement new models, or otherwise promote innovation?
     Are there other factors that should be considered when 
analyzing the competitive implications of retail clinics, telemedicine, 
and other new models of health care delivery?

Advancements in Health Care Technology

    Recent advancements in health care technology may have competitive 
implications. The Commission seeks to better understand developments in 
electronic health records, health data exchanges, and technology 
platforms for health care payers and providers, including the current 
state of competition among hardware and software platforms. In 
addition, the workshop will examine certain new consumer-oriented 
health technologies, such as mobile medical applications and personal 
medical records technologies, that may improve patient engagement and 
quality of care. The Commission invites public comment on questions 
relevant to this topic, including:
     What is the current state of competition in health 
information technology markets serving institutional providers, health 
care professionals, patients, and payers?
     Do innovators in health information technology face 
barriers to entry? If so, are these barriers significant impediments to 
competition? How might these barriers be reduced?
     What new and established technologies have been most 
important to the development and deployment of telemedicine or 
``telehealth''?
     What policies could further technical innovation conducive 
to effective and efficient telemedicine?
     To what extent are information technology vendors and 
health care providers sharing patient health information? Are there 
significant impediments to the useful flow of patient health 
information to improve health care coordination and quality?
     Do recent health care technology advancements raise 
standard-setting, network effects, or interoperability issues?
     What has been the impact of health information technology 
advancements and policies on physicians and other caregivers? What has 
been the impact on patients?
     Does the adoption of particular health care technologies 
lead to increased switching costs and customer lock-in issues?
     Are there other factors that should be considered when 
analyzing the competitive implications of emerging health care 
technologies?

Measuring and Assessing Quality of Health Care

    In the workshop, the Commission intends to examine recent 
developments in the measurement and assessment of health care quality. 
In particular, the Commission will consider whether, and to what 
extent, information related to quality of care affects competition and 
informs health care choices by patients, providers, employers, payers, 
and other health care decision-makers.
    The Commission invites public comment on questions relevant to this 
topic, including:
     How is health care quality measured and evaluated, and for 
what purposes? Are these current measures effective?
     Have there been any recent innovations in quality 
measurement?
     What challenges are encountered when measuring quality? Do 
these challenges differ depending on whether process or structure 
measures are used, versus outcome measures?
     To what extent is quality assessment shifting away from 
process and structure measures, and towards outcome measures?
     How, and to what extent, do quality measures account for 
higher-risk patient populations, so that providers are neither 
penalized for treating sicker patients nor rewarded for selectively 
treating healthier patients? Can risk adjustment be improved?
     How is quality information shared with various health care 
decision-makers, including patients, providers, employers, and payers? 
Are there better ways to convey such information?
     Does available quality information empower patients, 
providers, and other

[[Page 10156]]

health care decision-makers to choose more cost-effective and better 
care?
     Does available quality information facilitate improved 
care coordination?
     Are there ways to improve quality information so that it 
is more useful to patients, providers, and other health care decision-
makers?
     Is a standard measure likely to emerge that would allow 
patients, providers, and other health care decision-makers to 
effectively compare providers based on quality?
     Are there other factors that should be considered when 
analyzing the competitive implications of quality measurement and 
assessment?

Price Transparency of Health Care Services

    Payers, employer groups, and health care systems are engaged in 
efforts to make price information (often combined with quality 
information) more transparent to patients, providers, employers, 
payers, and other health care decision-makers. Price transparency may 
be used as a means to control costs while maintaining quality in the 
provision of health care services. A potential benefit of price 
transparency is that it may enhance competition among health care 
providers or between different, potentially substitutable, treatments, 
thereby leading to reduced prices for health care services and a more 
efficient allocation of health care resources. Some forms of price 
transparency may, however, facilitate price coordination among health 
care providers, thereby dampening competition. The Commission seeks to 
better understand the competitive implications of price transparency 
for health care services.
    The Commission invites public comment on questions relevant to this 
topic, including:
     What types of benefit designs (e.g., co-insurance, high-
deductible health plans, reference pricing) utilize price transparency 
as a means to control costs while maintaining quality? What degree of 
transparency is necessary to achieve each type of benefit design?
     To what extent might price transparency enhance 
competition among health care providers or between different 
treatments?
     To what extent might price transparency facilitate price 
coordination among health care providers and thereby undermine the 
potential benefits of competition?
     Are there ways to focus the use of price transparency so 
that it enhances competition without resulting in negative 
consequences?
     What is the relationship between transparency of price and 
quality information? Is price information more meaningful to patients, 
providers, and other health care decision-makers when combined with 
quality information? Do pricing data alone provide sufficient 
information to enable meaningful health care decisions?
     Are there other factors that should be considered when 
analyzing the competitive implications of price transparency in the 
health care industry?

Request for Comment

    You can file a comment online or on paper. To be considered for the 
workshop, comments in response to this notice must be submitted by 
March 10, 2014. In addition, any interested person may submit written 
comments in response to this notice and workshop discussions until 
April 30, 2014. Write ``Health Care Workshop, Project No. P131207'' on 
your comment. Your comment--including your name and state--will be 
placed on the public record of this proceeding, including on the 
publicly accessible FTC Web site, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/publiccomments.shtm. As a matter of discretion, the Commission tries to 
remove individuals' home contact information from comments before 
placing them on the Commission Web site.
    Because your comment will be made public, you are solely 
responsible for making sure that your comment does not include any 
sensitive personal information, like anyone's Social Security number, 
date of birth, driver's license number or other state identification 
number or foreign country equivalent, passport number, financial 
account number, or credit or debit card number. You are also solely 
responsible for making sure that your comment does not include any 
sensitive health information, like medical records or other 
individually identifiable health information. In addition, do not 
include any ``[t]rade secret or any commercial or financial information 
which . . . is privileged or confidential,'' as discussed in Section 
6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 
4.10(a)(2). In particular, do not include competitively sensitive 
information such as costs, sales statistics, inventories, formulas, 
patterns, devices, manufacturing processes, or customer names.
    If you want the Commission to give your comment confidential 
treatment, you must file it in paper form, with a request for 
confidential treatment, and you have to follow the procedure explained 
in FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c). Your comment will be kept 
confidential only if the FTC General Counsel, in his or her sole 
discretion, grants your request in accordance with the law and the 
public interest.
    Postal mail addressed to the Commission is subject to delay due to 
heightened security screening. As a result, we encourage you to submit 
your comments online. To make sure that the Commission considers your 
online comment, you must file it at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/healthcareworkshop by following the instructions on the web-based 
form. If this Notice appears at https://www.regulations.gov/#!home, you 
also may file a comment through that Web site.
    If you file your comment on paper, write ``Health Care Workshop, 
Project No. P131207'' on your comment and on the envelope, and mail or 
deliver it to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office 
of the Secretary, Room H-113 (Annex X), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20580. If possible, submit your paper comment to the 
Commission by courier or overnight service.
    Visit the Commission Web site at https://www.ftc.gov to read this 
Notice and the news release describing it. The FTC Act and other laws 
that the Commission administers permit the collection of public 
comments to consider and use in this proceeding as appropriate. The 
Commission will consider all timely and responsive public comments that 
it receives on or before April 30, 2014. You can find more information, 
including routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, in the 
Commission's privacy policy, at https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.

    By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-03765 Filed 2-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.