Announcement of Public Workshop, “Examining Health Care Competition”, 10153-10156 [2014-03765]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 36 / Monday, February 24, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
26. Cargologic has failed to timely
replace its QI, in violation of 46 CFR
§ 515.18(c).
27. Cargologic has failed to respond to
BCL’s correspondence of March 25,
2013, November 21, 2013, and
December 11, 2013, in violation of 46
CFR § 515.31(g).
28. Cargologic is no longer qualified
to provide intermediary services within
the meaning of 46 CFR § 515.16(a).
Order
Now therefore, it is ordered That,
pursuant to Sections 11, 14 and 19 of
the Shipping Act, 46 U.S.C. §§ 41302,
41304, 40903(a)(2), Cargologic USA LLC
is directed to show cause no later than
March 21, 2014, why the Commission
should not revoke its license inasmuch
as the licensee is otherwise not qualified
to render intermediary services;
It is further ordered That, pursuant to
Sections 11, 14 and 19 of the Shipping
Act, 46 U.S.C. §§ 41302, 41304,
40903(a)(2), Cargologic USA LLC is
directed to show cause, no later than
March 21, 2014, why the Commission
should not order it to cease and desist
from operating as an ocean
transportation intermediary in the
foreign trade of the United States
inasmuch as the licensee is otherwise
not qualified to render intermediary
services;
It is further ordered That, this
proceeding be limited to the submission
of affidavits of fact and memoranda of
law;
It is further ordered That, any person
having an interest and desiring to
intervene in this proceeding shall file a
petition for leave to intervene in
accordance with Rule 68 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 46 CFR § 502.68. Such
petition shall be accompanied by the
petitioner’s memorandum of law and
affidavit of fact, if any, and shall be filed
no later than March 21, 2014;
It is further ordered That, Cargologic
USA LLC be named as Respondent in
this proceeding. Affidavits of fact and
memoranda of law shall be filed by
Respondent and any intervenors in
support of Respondent no later than
March 21, 2014;
It is further ordered That, the
Commission’s Bureau of Enforcement
(BOE) be made a party to this
proceeding;
It is further ordered That, reply
affidavits and memoranda of law shall
be filed by BOE and intervenors in
opposition to Respondent no later than
April 7, 2014;
It is further ordered That:
(a) Should any party believe that an
evidentiary hearing is required, that
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Feb 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
party must submit a request for such
hearing together with a statement setting
forth in detail the facts to be proved, the
relevance of those facts to the issues in
this proceeding, a description of the
evidence which would be adduced, and
why such evidence cannot be submitted
by affidavit; and
(b) Any request for evidentiary
hearing shall be filed no later than April
7, 2014;
It is further ordered That, notice of
this Order to Show Cause be published
in the Federal Register, and that a copy
thereof be served upon Respondent at
its last known address;
It is further ordered That, all
documents submitted by any party of
record in this proceeding shall be filed
in accordance with Rule 2 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 46 CFR § 502.2, as well as
mailed directly to all parties of record;
Finally, it is ordered That, pursuant to
the terms of Rule 61 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 46 CFR § 502.61, the final
decision of the Commission in this
proceeding shall be issued no later than
June 24, 2014.
By the Commission.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
10153
1. Michael R. Heebink, individually
and as co-trustee of the Shirley E
Heebink Family Trust, and as part of the
group acting in concert with the Shirley
E Heebink Trust; its co-trustees Shirley
E Heebink, and Michael R. Heebink; and
Mary Heebink, all of Baldwin,
Wisconsin, and the Rasmussen Group,
which includes Dane L. Rasmussen, the
Debra L Rasmussen Irrevocable Trust
Dated December 18, 2012, with Dane L
Rasmussen, as trustee; Jack Rasmussen,
all of Baldwin, Wisconsin; Emily
Shimota, Inver Grove Heights,
Minnesota; Sidney Rasmussen, St. Paul,
Minnesota; Lynne VanDeelen, Duluth,
Minnesota; and Nancy Fox, Maplewood,
Minnesota; as a group acting in concert
to retain voting shares of Baldwin
Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly
retain voting shares of First Bank of
Baldwin, both in Baldwin, Wisconsin.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, February 19, 2014.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014–03815 Filed 2–21–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[FR Doc. 2014–03731 Filed 2–21–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730–01–P
Announcement of Public Workshop,
‘‘Examining Health Care Competition’’
Federal Trade Commission.
Notice of public workshop and
opportunity for comment.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Change in Bank Control Notices;
Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank or
Bank Holding Company
The notificants listed below have
applied under the Change in Bank
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and
§ 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12
CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank
or bank holding company. The factors
that are considered in acting on the
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of
the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
The notices are available for
immediate inspection at the Federal
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices
also will be available for inspection at
the offices of the Board of Governors.
Interested persons may express their
views in writing to the Reserve Bank
indicated for that notice or to the offices
of the Board of Governors. Comments
must be received not later than March
11, 2014.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of
Minneapolis (Jacqueline K. Brunmeier,
Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin
Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota
55480–0291:
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Federal Trade
Commission (‘‘FTC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’)
will hold a public workshop,
‘‘Examining Health Care Competition,’’
on March 20–21, 2014, to study certain
activities and trends that may affect
competition in the evolving health care
industry. The workshop will explore
current developments related to
professional regulations; innovations in
health care delivery; advancements in
health care technology; measuring and
assessing health care quality; and price
transparency for health care services.
This notice poses a series of questions
upon which the FTC seeks public
comment. The Commission will
consider these comments as it prepares
for the workshop and may use them in
a subsequent report or policy paper.
DATES: The workshop will be held on
March 20–21, 2014, in the Conference
Center of the FTC office building at 601
New Jersey Avenue NW., Washington,
DC. For additional information, visit the
workshop Web site at https://
www.ftc.gov/news-events/eventscalendar/2014/03/examining-healthcare-competition. Prior to the workshop,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
10154
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 36 / Monday, February 24, 2014 / Notices
Professional Regulation of Health Care
Providers
The Commission has long been
interested in the competitive
implications of professional regulation
in health care.1 The Commission seeks
to inform itself of new developments
and refine its understanding of the ways
in which professional regulations
governing the scope of practice for
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a
health care providers may affect
comment online or on paper by
competition.
following the instructions in the
Professional regulations may protect
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
patient safety, improve quality of care,
below. Write ‘‘Health Care Workshop,
Project No. P131207’’ on your comment and provide useful information to
consumers who are choosing among
and file your comment online at
health care providers. Greater
https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/
ftc/healthcareworkshop by following the competition may result when regulatory
changes expand the number of health
instructions on the web-based form. If
care providers or services available to
you prefer to file your comment on
consumers by increasing the use of
paper, mail or deliver your comment to
advanced practice nurses, dental
the following address: Federal Trade
therapists, and other qualified nonCommission, Office of the Secretary,
physician or non-dentist professionals.
Room H–113 (Annex X), 600
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, Such increased competition may
provide consumers with benefits such
DC 20580.
as lower prices and improved access to
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
health care services. Some regulations
Patricia Schultheiss, Attorney Advisor,
may, however, unnecessarily restrict the
Office of Policy Planning, Federal Trade ability of non-physician health care
Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue professionals to practice to the full
NW., Washington, DC 20580, 202–326–
extent of their training, imposing costly
2877, or Karen Goldman, Attorney
limitations on professional services
Advisor, Office of Policy Planning,
without well-founded consumer safety
Federal Trade Commission, 600
justifications or other consumer benefits
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, to offset those costs. Such overly
DC 20580, 202–326–2574,
restrictive professional regulations are
examininghealthcareworkshop@ftc.gov. likely to suppress beneficial
For more detailed information about the competition by non-physician health
workshop, including an agenda, please
care providers and may prevent
visit the workshop Web site: https://
institutional providers (such as
www.ftc.gov/news-events/eventshospitals) from developing innovative
calendar/2014/03/examining-healthhealth care delivery models that rely
care-competition.
more heavily on non-physician
providers to provide efficient, safe care.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
While all patients may be affected by
Federal Trade Commission seeks to
reduced competition from nonbetter understand the competitive
dynamics of evolving health care
1 See, e.g., FTC & U.S. Dep’t of Justice (‘‘DOJ’’),
product and service markets.
Improving Health Care: A Dose Of Competition
Information obtained during this
(2004), available at https://www.ftc.gov/reports/
workshop will enrich the Commission’s healthcare/040723healthcarerpt.pdf; FTC Staff
Comment Before the Massachusetts House of
knowledge in this critical sector of the
Representatives Regarding House Bill 6 (H.2009)
economy and thereby support the
Concerning Supervisory Requirements for Nurse
Commission’s enforcement, advocacy,
Practitioners and Nurse Anesthetists (Jan. 2014),
and consumer education efforts. The
available at https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/
workshop will consider issues related to documents/advocacy_documents/ftc-staffcomment-massachusetts-house-representativesthe professional regulation of health
care practitioners; innovations in health regarding-house-bill-6-h.2009-concerningsupervisory-requirements-nurse-practitioners-nursecare delivery; advancements in health
anesthetists/140123massachusettnursesletter.pdf;
Letter from FTC Staff to Hon. Timothy Burns,
care technology; developments in
Louisiana Legislature (May l, 2009) (regarding
measuring and assessing health care
restrictions on mobile dentistry),
quality; and recent efforts to make price proposed at https://www.ftc.gov/policy/policyavailable
information for health care services
actions/advocacy-filings/2009/05/ftc-staffmore transparent. The Commission may comment-louisiana-house-representatives-0; FTC
Staff Comment Before the Kentucky Cabinet for
convene subsequent workshops in the
Health and Family Services Concerning Regarding
near future to examine additional
Proposed Rule to Regulate Limited Service Clinics
competition issues in the health care
(Jan. 2010), available at https://www.ftc.gov/os/2010/
02/100202kycomment.pdf.
industry.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the Commission will publish an agenda
and additional information on its Web
site. To be considered for the workshop,
comments in response to this notice
must be submitted by March 10, 2014.
In addition, any interested person may
submit written comments in response to
this notice and workshop discussions
until April 30, 2014.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Feb 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
physician health care professionals, the
impact may be particularly severe for
vulnerable and underserved patient
populations.
In the workshop, the Commission
intends to study developments in the
regulation of health care professionals,
including accreditation, credentialing,
licensure, and supervision/cooperation
requirements. The Commission also
intends to examine scope of practice
issues in emerging health care
professions, such as dental therapy and
care coordination.
The Commission invites public
comment on questions relevant to this
topic, including:
• What recent developments have
occurred in the regulation of health care
professionals, particularly with respect
to accreditation, credentialing,
licensure, and supervision/cooperation
requirements?
• What are the consequences of such
regulations? To what extent are these
regulations necessary to protect
consumers or serve other important
state interests? How do they affect the
supply of services, patient safety, costs,
care coordination, and quality of care?
• Is there evidence that quality of care
is improved when professional
regulations are narrowly tailored to
protect patient safety while facilitating
greater deployment of non-physician or
non-dentist health care professionals?
• Do professional regulations affect
staffing decisions at health care
facilities? If so, how?
• To what extent might professional
regulations unnecessarily restrict the
scope of practice of non-physician or
non-dentist health care professionals?
• What is the relationship between
professional regulations and
competition? Would changes to
professional regulations enhance
competition among health care
providers? If so, what changes would be
desirable?
• What is the relationship between
professional regulations and access to
care, especially for vulnerable and
underserved patient populations?
• To what extent do professional
regulations vary by state? Does state-bystate variation affect patient health,
health care spending, or other important
measures?
• How do current regulations
concerning licensure and credentialing
affect the ability of health care
professionals to relocate or practice in
more than one geographic area,
particularly across state lines?
• Would greater state-to-state
licensure portability improve
competition? What issues would
increased licensure portability raise?
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 36 / Monday, February 24, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
• How do professional regulations
affect reimbursement for health care
services? Do professional regulations
lead to reimbursement policies that
reduce incentives for health care
competition?
• What is the relationship between
accreditation of education programs and
professional regulation? To what extent
do accreditation standards affect
competition? Would changes to
accreditation standards enhance
competition among health care
providers? If so, what changes would be
desirable?
• Are there other factors that should
be considered when analyzing the
competitive implications of professional
regulation in health care?
Innovations in Health Care Delivery
Several new models for health care
delivery, including retail clinics and
telemedicine, have emerged in recent
years, spurring additional competition
in the provision of health care services.
These models may offer significant cost
savings while maintaining, or even
improving, quality of care. These
models may also increase the supply of
health care services, which may expand
consumer access to care. The
Commission seeks to better understand
the potential benefits of these new
health care delivery models.
The Commission invites public
comment on questions relevant to this
topic, including:
• What are the prevalent and
emerging forms of health care delivery?
• To what extent are health care
services being delivered in new formats
and locations, such as retail clinics?
What trends are projected in the future?
• What are the competitive
implications of the increased use of
retail clinics on the supply of services,
cost, quality, and access to care?
• To what extent is telemedicine
being used today? What new
developments are occurring in
telemedicine? What role is telemedicine
projected to play in the future?
• What are the competitive
implications of the increased use of
telemedicine on the supply of services,
cost, quality, and access to care? Does
the increased use of telemedicine raise
any patient safety concerns?
• Are there regulatory or commercial
barriers that may restrict the use of retail
clinics, telemedicine, or other new
models of health care delivery? If so, are
there any valid justifications to support
such restrictions?
• How do professional regulations
affect telemedicine or other innovations
in delivering health care services or
expertise across geographic areas or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Feb 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
jurisdictional boundaries, especially in
rural or underserved areas?
• What, if any, changes in
government regulations would facilitate
the emergence of new health care
delivery models, enhance competition
among health care providers, and
encourage additional innovation?
• What are the competitive
implications of recent legislative
proposals to expand or facilitate
telemedicine across state lines?
• How are new health care delivery
models reimbursed for providing
services?
• Do regulations governing retail
clinics, telemedicine, and other new
models of health care delivery affect
reimbursement? Could these regulations
be modified in ways that would
improve reimbursement for services
provided under new models, better
align incentives to implement new
models, or otherwise promote
innovation?
• Are there other factors that should
be considered when analyzing the
competitive implications of retail
clinics, telemedicine, and other new
models of health care delivery?
Advancements in Health Care
Technology
Recent advancements in health care
technology may have competitive
implications. The Commission seeks to
better understand developments in
electronic health records, health data
exchanges, and technology platforms for
health care payers and providers,
including the current state of
competition among hardware and
software platforms. In addition, the
workshop will examine certain new
consumer-oriented health technologies,
such as mobile medical applications
and personal medical records
technologies, that may improve patient
engagement and quality of care. The
Commission invites public comment on
questions relevant to this topic,
including:
• What is the current state of
competition in health information
technology markets serving institutional
providers, health care professionals,
patients, and payers?
• Do innovators in health information
technology face barriers to entry? If so,
are these barriers significant
impediments to competition? How
might these barriers be reduced?
• What new and established
technologies have been most important
to the development and deployment of
telemedicine or ‘‘telehealth’’?
• What policies could further
technical innovation conducive to
effective and efficient telemedicine?
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10155
• To what extent are information
technology vendors and health care
providers sharing patient health
information? Are there significant
impediments to the useful flow of
patient health information to improve
health care coordination and quality?
• Do recent health care technology
advancements raise standard-setting,
network effects, or interoperability
issues?
• What has been the impact of health
information technology advancements
and policies on physicians and other
caregivers? What has been the impact on
patients?
• Does the adoption of particular
health care technologies lead to
increased switching costs and customer
lock-in issues?
• Are there other factors that should
be considered when analyzing the
competitive implications of emerging
health care technologies?
Measuring and Assessing Quality of
Health Care
In the workshop, the Commission
intends to examine recent developments
in the measurement and assessment of
health care quality. In particular, the
Commission will consider whether, and
to what extent, information related to
quality of care affects competition and
informs health care choices by patients,
providers, employers, payers, and other
health care decision-makers.
The Commission invites public
comment on questions relevant to this
topic, including:
• How is health care quality
measured and evaluated, and for what
purposes? Are these current measures
effective?
• Have there been any recent
innovations in quality measurement?
• What challenges are encountered
when measuring quality? Do these
challenges differ depending on whether
process or structure measures are used,
versus outcome measures?
• To what extent is quality
assessment shifting away from process
and structure measures, and towards
outcome measures?
• How, and to what extent, do quality
measures account for higher-risk patient
populations, so that providers are
neither penalized for treating sicker
patients nor rewarded for selectively
treating healthier patients? Can risk
adjustment be improved?
• How is quality information shared
with various health care decisionmakers, including patients, providers,
employers, and payers? Are there better
ways to convey such information?
• Does available quality information
empower patients, providers, and other
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
10156
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 36 / Monday, February 24, 2014 / Notices
health care decision-makers to choose
more cost-effective and better care?
• Does available quality information
facilitate improved care coordination?
• Are there ways to improve quality
information so that it is more useful to
patients, providers, and other health
care decision-makers?
• Is a standard measure likely to
emerge that would allow patients,
providers, and other health care
decision-makers to effectively compare
providers based on quality?
• Are there other factors that should
be considered when analyzing the
competitive implications of quality
measurement and assessment?
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Price Transparency of Health Care
Services
Payers, employer groups, and health
care systems are engaged in efforts to
make price information (often combined
with quality information) more
transparent to patients, providers,
employers, payers, and other health care
decision-makers. Price transparency
may be used as a means to control costs
while maintaining quality in the
provision of health care services. A
potential benefit of price transparency is
that it may enhance competition among
health care providers or between
different, potentially substitutable,
treatments, thereby leading to reduced
prices for health care services and a
more efficient allocation of health care
resources. Some forms of price
transparency may, however, facilitate
price coordination among health care
providers, thereby dampening
competition. The Commission seeks to
better understand the competitive
implications of price transparency for
health care services.
The Commission invites public
comment on questions relevant to this
topic, including:
• What types of benefit designs (e.g.,
co-insurance, high-deductible health
plans, reference pricing) utilize price
transparency as a means to control costs
while maintaining quality? What degree
of transparency is necessary to achieve
each type of benefit design?
• To what extent might price
transparency enhance competition
among health care providers or between
different treatments?
• To what extent might price
transparency facilitate price
coordination among health care
providers and thereby undermine the
potential benefits of competition?
• Are there ways to focus the use of
price transparency so that it enhances
competition without resulting in
negative consequences?
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:16 Feb 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
• What is the relationship between
transparency of price and quality
information? Is price information more
meaningful to patients, providers, and
other health care decision-makers when
combined with quality information? Do
pricing data alone provide sufficient
information to enable meaningful health
care decisions?
• Are there other factors that should
be considered when analyzing the
competitive implications of price
transparency in the health care
industry?
Request for Comment
You can file a comment online or on
paper. To be considered for the
workshop, comments in response to this
notice must be submitted by March 10,
2014. In addition, any interested person
may submit written comments in
response to this notice and workshop
discussions until April 30, 2014. Write
‘‘Health Care Workshop, Project No.
P131207’’ on your comment. Your
comment—including your name and
state—will be placed on the public
record of this proceeding, including on
the publicly accessible FTC Web site, at
https://www.ftc.gov/os/
publiccomments.shtm. As a matter of
discretion, the Commission tries to
remove individuals’ home contact
information from comments before
placing them on the Commission Web
site.
Because your comment will be made
public, you are solely responsible for
making sure that your comment does
not include any sensitive personal
information, like anyone’s Social
Security number, date of birth, driver’s
license number or other state
identification number or foreign country
equivalent, passport number, financial
account number, or credit or debit card
number. You are also solely responsible
for making sure that your comment does
not include any sensitive health
information, like medical records or
other individually identifiable health
information. In addition, do not include
any ‘‘[t]rade secret or any commercial or
financial information which . . . is
privileged or confidential,’’ as discussed
in Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C.
46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR
4.10(a)(2). In particular, do not include
competitively sensitive information
such as costs, sales statistics,
inventories, formulas, patterns, devices,
manufacturing processes, or customer
names.
If you want the Commission to give
your comment confidential treatment,
you must file it in paper form, with a
request for confidential treatment, and
you have to follow the procedure
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
explained in FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR
4.9(c). Your comment will be kept
confidential only if the FTC General
Counsel, in his or her sole discretion,
grants your request in accordance with
the law and the public interest.
Postal mail addressed to the
Commission is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening. As a
result, we encourage you to submit your
comments online. To make sure that the
Commission considers your online
comment, you must file it at https://
ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
healthcareworkshop by following the
instructions on the web-based form. If
this Notice appears at https://
www.regulations.gov/#!home, you also
may file a comment through that Web
site.
If you file your comment on paper,
write ‘‘Health Care Workshop, Project
No. P131207’’ on your comment and on
the envelope, and mail or deliver it to
the following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Room H–113 (Annex X), 600
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20580. If possible, submit your
paper comment to the Commission by
courier or overnight service.
Visit the Commission Web site at
https://www.ftc.gov to read this Notice
and the news release describing it. The
FTC Act and other laws that the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. The Commission will
consider all timely and responsive
public comments that it receives on or
before April 30, 2014. You can find
more information, including routine
uses permitted by the Privacy Act, in
the Commission’s privacy policy, at
https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–03765 Filed 2–21–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
[Notice–GTAC–2014–01; Docket No. 2014–
0002; Sequence 7]
Government-Wide Travel Advisory
Committee (GTAC); Public Advisory
Committee Meetings
Office of Government-Wide
Policy, General Services Administration
(GSA).
ACTION: Meeting notice.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\24FEN1.SGM
24FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10153-10156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-03765]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Announcement of Public Workshop, ``Examining Health Care
Competition''
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice of public workshop and opportunity for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Trade Commission (``FTC'' or ``Commission'') will
hold a public workshop, ``Examining Health Care Competition,'' on March
20-21, 2014, to study certain activities and trends that may affect
competition in the evolving health care industry. The workshop will
explore current developments related to professional regulations;
innovations in health care delivery; advancements in health care
technology; measuring and assessing health care quality; and price
transparency for health care services. This notice poses a series of
questions upon which the FTC seeks public comment. The Commission will
consider these comments as it prepares for the workshop and may use
them in a subsequent report or policy paper.
DATES: The workshop will be held on March 20-21, 2014, in the
Conference Center of the FTC office building at 601 New Jersey Avenue
NW., Washington, DC. For additional information, visit the workshop Web
site at https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/events-calendar/2014/03/examining-health-care-competition. Prior to the workshop,
[[Page 10154]]
the Commission will publish an agenda and additional information on its
Web site. To be considered for the workshop, comments in response to
this notice must be submitted by March 10, 2014. In addition, any
interested person may submit written comments in response to this
notice and workshop discussions until April 30, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a comment online or on paper by
following the instructions in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below. Write ``Health Care Workshop, Project No. P131207'' on your
comment and file your comment online at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/healthcareworkshop by following the
instructions on the web-based form. If you prefer to file your comment
on paper, mail or deliver your comment to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Room H-113 (Annex
X), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Schultheiss, Attorney
Advisor, Office of Policy Planning, Federal Trade Commission, 600
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580, 202-326-2877, or Karen
Goldman, Attorney Advisor, Office of Policy Planning, Federal Trade
Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580, 202-326-
2574, examininghealthcareworkshop@ftc.gov. For more detailed
information about the workshop, including an agenda, please visit the
workshop Web site: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/events-calendar/2014/03/examining-health-care-competition.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Trade Commission seeks to better
understand the competitive dynamics of evolving health care product and
service markets. Information obtained during this workshop will enrich
the Commission's knowledge in this critical sector of the economy and
thereby support the Commission's enforcement, advocacy, and consumer
education efforts. The workshop will consider issues related to the
professional regulation of health care practitioners; innovations in
health care delivery; advancements in health care technology;
developments in measuring and assessing health care quality; and recent
efforts to make price information for health care services more
transparent. The Commission may convene subsequent workshops in the
near future to examine additional competition issues in the health care
industry.
Professional Regulation of Health Care Providers
The Commission has long been interested in the competitive
implications of professional regulation in health care.\1\ The
Commission seeks to inform itself of new developments and refine its
understanding of the ways in which professional regulations governing
the scope of practice for health care providers may affect competition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See, e.g., FTC & U.S. Dep't of Justice (``DOJ''), Improving
Health Care: A Dose Of Competition (2004), available at https://www.ftc.gov/reports/healthcare/040723healthcarerpt.pdf; FTC Staff
Comment Before the Massachusetts House of Representatives Regarding
House Bill 6 (H.2009) Concerning Supervisory Requirements for Nurse
Practitioners and Nurse Anesthetists (Jan. 2014), available at
https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/advocacy_documents/ftc-staff-comment-massachusetts-house-representatives-regarding-house-bill-6-h.2009-concerning-supervisory-requirements-nurse-practitioners-nurse-anesthetists/140123massachusettnursesletter.pdf; Letter from FTC Staff to Hon.
Timothy Burns, Louisiana Legislature (May l, 2009) (regarding
proposed restrictions on mobile dentistry), available at https://www.ftc.gov/policy/policy-actions/advocacy-filings/2009/05/ftc-staff-comment-louisiana-house-representatives-0; FTC Staff Comment
Before the Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services
Concerning Regarding Proposed Rule to Regulate Limited Service
Clinics (Jan. 2010), available at https://www.ftc.gov/os/2010/02/100202kycomment.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Professional regulations may protect patient safety, improve
quality of care, and provide useful information to consumers who are
choosing among health care providers. Greater competition may result
when regulatory changes expand the number of health care providers or
services available to consumers by increasing the use of advanced
practice nurses, dental therapists, and other qualified non-physician
or non-dentist professionals. Such increased competition may provide
consumers with benefits such as lower prices and improved access to
health care services. Some regulations may, however, unnecessarily
restrict the ability of non-physician health care professionals to
practice to the full extent of their training, imposing costly
limitations on professional services without well-founded consumer
safety justifications or other consumer benefits to offset those costs.
Such overly restrictive professional regulations are likely to suppress
beneficial competition by non-physician health care providers and may
prevent institutional providers (such as hospitals) from developing
innovative health care delivery models that rely more heavily on non-
physician providers to provide efficient, safe care. While all patients
may be affected by reduced competition from non-physician health care
professionals, the impact may be particularly severe for vulnerable and
underserved patient populations.
In the workshop, the Commission intends to study developments in
the regulation of health care professionals, including accreditation,
credentialing, licensure, and supervision/cooperation requirements. The
Commission also intends to examine scope of practice issues in emerging
health care professions, such as dental therapy and care coordination.
The Commission invites public comment on questions relevant to this
topic, including:
What recent developments have occurred in the regulation
of health care professionals, particularly with respect to
accreditation, credentialing, licensure, and supervision/cooperation
requirements?
What are the consequences of such regulations? To what
extent are these regulations necessary to protect consumers or serve
other important state interests? How do they affect the supply of
services, patient safety, costs, care coordination, and quality of
care?
Is there evidence that quality of care is improved when
professional regulations are narrowly tailored to protect patient
safety while facilitating greater deployment of non-physician or non-
dentist health care professionals?
Do professional regulations affect staffing decisions at
health care facilities? If so, how?
To what extent might professional regulations
unnecessarily restrict the scope of practice of non-physician or non-
dentist health care professionals?
What is the relationship between professional regulations
and competition? Would changes to professional regulations enhance
competition among health care providers? If so, what changes would be
desirable?
What is the relationship between professional regulations
and access to care, especially for vulnerable and underserved patient
populations?
To what extent do professional regulations vary by state?
Does state-by-state variation affect patient health, health care
spending, or other important measures?
How do current regulations concerning licensure and
credentialing affect the ability of health care professionals to
relocate or practice in more than one geographic area, particularly
across state lines?
Would greater state-to-state licensure portability improve
competition? What issues would increased licensure portability raise?
[[Page 10155]]
How do professional regulations affect reimbursement for
health care services? Do professional regulations lead to reimbursement
policies that reduce incentives for health care competition?
What is the relationship between accreditation of
education programs and professional regulation? To what extent do
accreditation standards affect competition? Would changes to
accreditation standards enhance competition among health care
providers? If so, what changes would be desirable?
Are there other factors that should be considered when
analyzing the competitive implications of professional regulation in
health care?
Innovations in Health Care Delivery
Several new models for health care delivery, including retail
clinics and telemedicine, have emerged in recent years, spurring
additional competition in the provision of health care services. These
models may offer significant cost savings while maintaining, or even
improving, quality of care. These models may also increase the supply
of health care services, which may expand consumer access to care. The
Commission seeks to better understand the potential benefits of these
new health care delivery models.
The Commission invites public comment on questions relevant to this
topic, including:
What are the prevalent and emerging forms of health care
delivery?
To what extent are health care services being delivered in
new formats and locations, such as retail clinics? What trends are
projected in the future?
What are the competitive implications of the increased use
of retail clinics on the supply of services, cost, quality, and access
to care?
To what extent is telemedicine being used today? What new
developments are occurring in telemedicine? What role is telemedicine
projected to play in the future?
What are the competitive implications of the increased use
of telemedicine on the supply of services, cost, quality, and access to
care? Does the increased use of telemedicine raise any patient safety
concerns?
Are there regulatory or commercial barriers that may
restrict the use of retail clinics, telemedicine, or other new models
of health care delivery? If so, are there any valid justifications to
support such restrictions?
How do professional regulations affect telemedicine or
other innovations in delivering health care services or expertise
across geographic areas or jurisdictional boundaries, especially in
rural or underserved areas?
What, if any, changes in government regulations would
facilitate the emergence of new health care delivery models, enhance
competition among health care providers, and encourage additional
innovation?
What are the competitive implications of recent
legislative proposals to expand or facilitate telemedicine across state
lines?
How are new health care delivery models reimbursed for
providing services?
Do regulations governing retail clinics, telemedicine, and
other new models of health care delivery affect reimbursement? Could
these regulations be modified in ways that would improve reimbursement
for services provided under new models, better align incentives to
implement new models, or otherwise promote innovation?
Are there other factors that should be considered when
analyzing the competitive implications of retail clinics, telemedicine,
and other new models of health care delivery?
Advancements in Health Care Technology
Recent advancements in health care technology may have competitive
implications. The Commission seeks to better understand developments in
electronic health records, health data exchanges, and technology
platforms for health care payers and providers, including the current
state of competition among hardware and software platforms. In
addition, the workshop will examine certain new consumer-oriented
health technologies, such as mobile medical applications and personal
medical records technologies, that may improve patient engagement and
quality of care. The Commission invites public comment on questions
relevant to this topic, including:
What is the current state of competition in health
information technology markets serving institutional providers, health
care professionals, patients, and payers?
Do innovators in health information technology face
barriers to entry? If so, are these barriers significant impediments to
competition? How might these barriers be reduced?
What new and established technologies have been most
important to the development and deployment of telemedicine or
``telehealth''?
What policies could further technical innovation conducive
to effective and efficient telemedicine?
To what extent are information technology vendors and
health care providers sharing patient health information? Are there
significant impediments to the useful flow of patient health
information to improve health care coordination and quality?
Do recent health care technology advancements raise
standard-setting, network effects, or interoperability issues?
What has been the impact of health information technology
advancements and policies on physicians and other caregivers? What has
been the impact on patients?
Does the adoption of particular health care technologies
lead to increased switching costs and customer lock-in issues?
Are there other factors that should be considered when
analyzing the competitive implications of emerging health care
technologies?
Measuring and Assessing Quality of Health Care
In the workshop, the Commission intends to examine recent
developments in the measurement and assessment of health care quality.
In particular, the Commission will consider whether, and to what
extent, information related to quality of care affects competition and
informs health care choices by patients, providers, employers, payers,
and other health care decision-makers.
The Commission invites public comment on questions relevant to this
topic, including:
How is health care quality measured and evaluated, and for
what purposes? Are these current measures effective?
Have there been any recent innovations in quality
measurement?
What challenges are encountered when measuring quality? Do
these challenges differ depending on whether process or structure
measures are used, versus outcome measures?
To what extent is quality assessment shifting away from
process and structure measures, and towards outcome measures?
How, and to what extent, do quality measures account for
higher-risk patient populations, so that providers are neither
penalized for treating sicker patients nor rewarded for selectively
treating healthier patients? Can risk adjustment be improved?
How is quality information shared with various health care
decision-makers, including patients, providers, employers, and payers?
Are there better ways to convey such information?
Does available quality information empower patients,
providers, and other
[[Page 10156]]
health care decision-makers to choose more cost-effective and better
care?
Does available quality information facilitate improved
care coordination?
Are there ways to improve quality information so that it
is more useful to patients, providers, and other health care decision-
makers?
Is a standard measure likely to emerge that would allow
patients, providers, and other health care decision-makers to
effectively compare providers based on quality?
Are there other factors that should be considered when
analyzing the competitive implications of quality measurement and
assessment?
Price Transparency of Health Care Services
Payers, employer groups, and health care systems are engaged in
efforts to make price information (often combined with quality
information) more transparent to patients, providers, employers,
payers, and other health care decision-makers. Price transparency may
be used as a means to control costs while maintaining quality in the
provision of health care services. A potential benefit of price
transparency is that it may enhance competition among health care
providers or between different, potentially substitutable, treatments,
thereby leading to reduced prices for health care services and a more
efficient allocation of health care resources. Some forms of price
transparency may, however, facilitate price coordination among health
care providers, thereby dampening competition. The Commission seeks to
better understand the competitive implications of price transparency
for health care services.
The Commission invites public comment on questions relevant to this
topic, including:
What types of benefit designs (e.g., co-insurance, high-
deductible health plans, reference pricing) utilize price transparency
as a means to control costs while maintaining quality? What degree of
transparency is necessary to achieve each type of benefit design?
To what extent might price transparency enhance
competition among health care providers or between different
treatments?
To what extent might price transparency facilitate price
coordination among health care providers and thereby undermine the
potential benefits of competition?
Are there ways to focus the use of price transparency so
that it enhances competition without resulting in negative
consequences?
What is the relationship between transparency of price and
quality information? Is price information more meaningful to patients,
providers, and other health care decision-makers when combined with
quality information? Do pricing data alone provide sufficient
information to enable meaningful health care decisions?
Are there other factors that should be considered when
analyzing the competitive implications of price transparency in the
health care industry?
Request for Comment
You can file a comment online or on paper. To be considered for the
workshop, comments in response to this notice must be submitted by
March 10, 2014. In addition, any interested person may submit written
comments in response to this notice and workshop discussions until
April 30, 2014. Write ``Health Care Workshop, Project No. P131207'' on
your comment. Your comment--including your name and state--will be
placed on the public record of this proceeding, including on the
publicly accessible FTC Web site, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/publiccomments.shtm. As a matter of discretion, the Commission tries to
remove individuals' home contact information from comments before
placing them on the Commission Web site.
Because your comment will be made public, you are solely
responsible for making sure that your comment does not include any
sensitive personal information, like anyone's Social Security number,
date of birth, driver's license number or other state identification
number or foreign country equivalent, passport number, financial
account number, or credit or debit card number. You are also solely
responsible for making sure that your comment does not include any
sensitive health information, like medical records or other
individually identifiable health information. In addition, do not
include any ``[t]rade secret or any commercial or financial information
which . . . is privileged or confidential,'' as discussed in Section
6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR
4.10(a)(2). In particular, do not include competitively sensitive
information such as costs, sales statistics, inventories, formulas,
patterns, devices, manufacturing processes, or customer names.
If you want the Commission to give your comment confidential
treatment, you must file it in paper form, with a request for
confidential treatment, and you have to follow the procedure explained
in FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c). Your comment will be kept
confidential only if the FTC General Counsel, in his or her sole
discretion, grants your request in accordance with the law and the
public interest.
Postal mail addressed to the Commission is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening. As a result, we encourage you to submit
your comments online. To make sure that the Commission considers your
online comment, you must file it at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/healthcareworkshop by following the instructions on the web-based
form. If this Notice appears at https://www.regulations.gov/#!home, you
also may file a comment through that Web site.
If you file your comment on paper, write ``Health Care Workshop,
Project No. P131207'' on your comment and on the envelope, and mail or
deliver it to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office
of the Secretary, Room H-113 (Annex X), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20580. If possible, submit your paper comment to the
Commission by courier or overnight service.
Visit the Commission Web site at https://www.ftc.gov to read this
Notice and the news release describing it. The FTC Act and other laws
that the Commission administers permit the collection of public
comments to consider and use in this proceeding as appropriate. The
Commission will consider all timely and responsive public comments that
it receives on or before April 30, 2014. You can find more information,
including routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, in the
Commission's privacy policy, at https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-03765 Filed 2-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P