Record of Decision for Final Environmental Impact Statement; Izembek National Wildlife Refuge Proposed Land Exchange/Road Corridor, Cold Bay, Alaska, 9759-9760 [2014-03605]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Notices
Quino checkerspot butterfly
(Euphydryas editha quino); and take
(capture, collect, and collect vouchers)
the Conservancy fairy shrimp
(Branchinecta conservatio), longhorn
fairy shrimp (Branchinecta
longiantenna), Riverside fairy shrimp
(Streptocephalus woottoni), San Diego
fairy shrimp (Branchinecta
sandiegonensis), and vernal pool
tadpole shrimp (Lepidurus packardi) in
conjunction with survey activities
throughout the range of each species in
California for the purpose of enhancing
the species’ survival.
Permit No. TE–795934
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Applicant: ICF Jones and Stokes,
Incorporated, Sacramento, California
The applicant requests a permit
renewal to take (harass by survey) the
southwestern willow flycatcher
(Empidonax traillii extimus), delta smelt
(Hypomesus transpacificus), and
California tiger salamander (Santa
Barbara County DPS and Sonoma
County DPS) (Ambystoma
californiense); and take (capture, collect,
and collect vouchers) the Conservancy
fairy shrimp (Branchinecta conservatio),
longhorn fairy shrimp (Branchinecta
longiantenna), Riverside fairy shrimp
(Streptocephalus woottoni), San Diego
fairy shrimp (Branchinecta
sandiegonensis), and vernal pool
tadpole shrimp (Lepidurus packardi) in
conjunction with survey activities
throughout the range of each species as
specified in the permit in California and
Oregon for the purpose of enhancing the
species’ survival.
Public Comments
We invite public review and comment
on each of these recovery permit
applications. Comments and materials
we receive will be available for public
inspection, by appointment, during
normal business hours at the address
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this
notice.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Michael Long,
Acting Regional Director, Pacific Southwest
Region, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 2014–03601 Filed 2–19–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R7–R–2013–N070;
FXRS12650700000–145–FF07R05000]
Record of Decision for Final
Environmental Impact Statement;
Izembek National Wildlife Refuge
Proposed Land Exchange/Road
Corridor, Cold Bay, Alaska
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: record of
decision.
AGENCY:
We, the Department of the
Interior (Department) and the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (Service),
announce the availability of the record
of decision (ROD) for the final
environmental impact statement (EIS)
for a proposed land exchange/road
corridor on the Izembek National
Wildlife Refuge (Refuge), Alaska. We
prepared this ROD pursuant to the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA) and its implementing
regulations. We provide this notice to
advise the public and other agencies of
our decision and of availability of the
ROD.
SUMMARY:
Both the Director of the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service and the Secretary
of the Interior signed the ROD on
December 23, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain
copies of the ROD by any of the
following methods:
Web site: Download a copy of the
document(s) at https://izembek.fws.gov/
eis.htm.
Email: izembek_eis@fws.gov; include
‘‘Izembek National Wildlife Refuge
ROD’’ in the subject line of the message.
Fax: Attn: Stephanie Brady, Project
Team Leader, 907–786–3901.
U.S. Mail: Stephanie Brady, Project
Team Leader, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 1011 East Tudor Rd., MS–231,
Anchorage, AK 99503.
In-Person Viewing or Pickup: You
may view or pick up a copy of the ROD
during regular business hours at the
address listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephanie Brady, 907–306–7448, or by
one of the addresses above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: With this
notice, we finalize the EIS process for
the Proposed Land Exchange/Road
Corridor in the Izembek Refuge, Alaska.
In accordance with National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (40
CFR 1506.6(b)) requirements, this notice
announces the availability of the ROD
for the final EIS for a Proposed Land
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9759
Exchange/Road Corridor in the Izembek
Refuge. We completed a thorough
analysis of the effects on the human
environment of each alternative
considered, including environmental,
social, and economic considerations,
which were included in the final EIS.
The ROD documents our selection of
Alternative 1, the No Land Exchange
Alternative (No Action Alternative),
which was the Service’s preferred
alternative in the final EIS. Under this
decision, the Service will not exchange
land with the State of Alaska and the
King Cove Corporation for the purpose
of constructing a road between the
communities of King Cove and Cold
Bay, Alaska. Under this decision, we
will continue to manage lands within
the Refuge consistent with and
following the Izembek Refuge
Comprehensive Conservation Plan. For
more background on the Refuge, and the
public involvement process to date,
please see our notice published
Wednesday, February 6, 2013 (78 FR
8577).
Background
The Omnibus Public Land
Management Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111–
11, Title VI, Subtitle E) (OPLMA)
directed the Secretary of the Interior to
analyze the land exchange, alternatives
for road construction and operation, and
a specific road corridor through the
Izembek Refuge and the Izembek
Wilderness. The proposed land
exchange would transfer to the State of
Alaska all right, title, and interest to a
road corridor for the construction,
operation, and maintenance of a singlelane gravel road between the
communities of King Cove and Cold
Bay, Alaska. As provided by OPLMA,
the road ‘‘shall be used primarily for
health and safety purposes (including
access to and from the Cold Bay Airport)
and only for noncommercial purposes.’’
The OPLMA requires the Secretary to
make this decision in compliance with
NEPA, which requires analysis of the
effects of alternatives, including a ‘‘no
action’’ alternative, and any other
applicable law.
Alternatives Considered
The Final EIS evaluated in detail five
alternatives, including a No Action
Alternative and four action alternatives:
Alternative 1—No Action and Preferred
Alternative
Under Alternative 1, the Service
would not exchange lands with the King
Cove Corporation and the State of
Alaska for the purpose of constructing a
road between King Cove and Cold Bay,
Alaska. Current modes of transportation
E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM
20FEN1
9760
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Notices
between the cities of King Cove and
Cold Bay, including air and marine
routes, would continue to operate and
be developed.
Alternative 2—Land Exchange and
Southern Road Alignment
Alternative 2 proposed a land
exchange between the Federal
Government, the State of Alaska, and
the King Cove Corporation that would
result in a road/road corridor through
Izembek Refuge and Izembek
Wilderness. Under the proposed land
exchange, approximately 201 acres of
federal land (surface and subsurface
estate) of the Izembek Refuge and
Izembek Wilderness as well as 1,600
acres (surface and subsurface estate)
within the Alaska Maritime National
Wildlife Refuge on Sitkinak Island
would be conveyed to the State of
Alaska. In exchange, the Service would
receive approximately 43,093 acres of
land owned by the State of Alaska (to be
designated wilderness), as well as
approximately 13,300 acres of land
owned by King Cove Corporation. In
addition, the King Cove Corporation
would relinquish 5,430 acres of selected
lands within the Izembek Refuge and
Izembek Wilderness boundary. The
proposed road/road corridor would be
located approximately 1⁄2 mile to 1 mile
north of Kinzarof Lagoon.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Alternative 3—Land Exchange and
Central Road Alignment
Alternative 3 proposed a land
exchange between the Federal
Government, the State of Alaska, and
the King Cove Corporation that would
result in a road/road corridor through
Izembek Refuge and Izembek
Wilderness. Under the proposed land
exchange, approximately 227 acres of
federal land (surface and subsurface
estate) of the Izembek Refuge and
Izembek Wilderness as well as 1,600
acres (surface and subsurface estate)
within the Alaska Maritime National
Wildlife Refuge on Sitkinak Island
would be conveyed to the State of
Alaska. In exchange, the Service would
receive approximately 43,093 acres of
land owned by the State of Alaska (to be
designated wilderness), as well as
approximately 13,300 acres of land
owned by King Cove Corporation. In
addition, the King Cove Corporation
would relinquish 5,430 acres of selected
lands within the Izembek Refuge and
Izembek Wilderness boundary. The
proposed road/road corridor would be
located more centrally within the
Izembek isthmus approximately 1 to 11⁄2
mile north of Kinzarof lagoon and 1⁄2 to
1 mile south of Izembek Lagoon.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
Alternative 4—Hovercraft Operations
From the Northeast Terminal to Cross
Wind Cove
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Alternative 4 proposed operation of a
hovercraft service 6 days per week to
provide access between the
communities of King Cove and Cold
Bay, running between the Northeast
Terminal and Cross Wind Cove. A land
exchange was not considered under this
alternative.
[FWS–R8–FHC–2014–N024;
FXFR1334088TWG0W4–123–FF08EACT00]
Alternative 5—Lenard Harbor Ferry
With Cold Bay Dock Improvements
Alternative 5 proposed use of a ferry
to provide access between King Cove
and Cold Bay that would travel 14 miles
between a terminal in Lenard Harbor to
a substantially modified Cold Bay dock.
Under this alternative, ferry service
would be provided 6 days per week and
a land exchange would not occur.
Factors We Considered in
Decisionmaking
We based our decision on a thorough
analysis of the effects to the human
environment, including environmental,
social, and economic considerations
found in the Final EIS. We have
evaluated the effects of proposed roads
through Izembek Refuge and Izembek
Wilderness in numerous analyses since
1960, including the 1985
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and
through the completion of the current
EIS. We have consistently found that the
impacts of building a proposed road on
the wildlife resources, habitats, and
designated Wilderness would create
irreversible change and damage to a
unique and ecologically important area,
and especially to designated
Wilderness. The no action alternative
selected in the ROD supports the
continued management of the Izembek
Refuge consistent with the purposes for
which it was established.
Decision: After a thorough review of
the potential environmental, social, and
economic consequences of all
alternatives evaluated in the Final EIS,
we selected Alternative 1, the No Action
Alternative. Selecting Alternative 1
preserves the integrity of the Izembek
National Wildlife Refuge and Izembek
Wilderness, ensures the continued
protection of unique and internationally
recognized habitats, and maintains the
integrity of designated Wilderness.
Dated: February 13, 2014.
Geoffrey L. Haskett,
Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Anchorage, Alaska.
[FR Doc. 2014–03605 Filed 2–19–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Fish and Wildlife Service
Trinity Adaptive Management Working
Group; Public Meeting and
Teleconference
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, announce a public
meeting and teleconference of the
Trinity Adaptive Management Working
Group (TAMWG). The TAMWG is a
Federal advisory committee that affords
stakeholders the opportunity to give
policy, management, and technical
input concerning Trinity River
(California) restoration efforts to the
Trinity Management Council (TMC).
The TMC interprets and recommends
policy, coordinates and reviews
management actions, and provides
organizational budget oversight.
DATES: Public meeting, and
Teleconference: TAMWG will meet
from 10 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Pacific Time
on Monday, March 17, 2014, and from
9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Pacific Time on
Tuesday, March 18, 2014.
Deadlines: For deadlines and directions
on registering to listen to the meeting by
phone, and submitting written material,
please see ‘‘Public Input’’ under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
ADDRESSES: The in-person meeting will
be held at the Weaverville Fire District,
125 Bremer Street, Weaverville, CA
96093. You may participate in person or
by teleconference.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth W. Hadley, Redding Electric
Utility, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding,
CA 96001; telephone: 530–339–7327;
email: ehadley@reupower.com.
Individuals with a disability may
request an accommodation by sending
an email to the point of contact, and
those accommodations will be provided.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with the requirements of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5
U.S.C. App., we announce that the
Trinity Adaptive Management Working
Group (TAMWG) will hold a meeting.
SUMMARY:
Background
The TAMWG affords stakeholders the
opportunity to give policy, management,
and technical input concerning Trinity
River (California) restoration efforts to
the Trinity Management Council (TMC).
The TMC interprets and recommends
E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM
20FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 34 (Thursday, February 20, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9759-9760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-03605]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R7-R-2013-N070; FXRS12650700000-145-FF07R05000]
Record of Decision for Final Environmental Impact Statement;
Izembek National Wildlife Refuge Proposed Land Exchange/Road Corridor,
Cold Bay, Alaska
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: record of decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Department of the Interior (Department) and the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the availability of the
record of decision (ROD) for the final environmental impact statement
(EIS) for a proposed land exchange/road corridor on the Izembek
National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge), Alaska. We prepared this ROD
pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and
its implementing regulations. We provide this notice to advise the
public and other agencies of our decision and of availability of the
ROD.
DATES: Both the Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the
Secretary of the Interior signed the ROD on December 23, 2013.
ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain copies of the ROD by any of the
following methods:
Web site: Download a copy of the document(s) at https://izembek.fws.gov/eis.htm.
Email: izembek_eis@fws.gov; include ``Izembek National Wildlife
Refuge ROD'' in the subject line of the message.
Fax: Attn: Stephanie Brady, Project Team Leader, 907-786-3901.
U.S. Mail: Stephanie Brady, Project Team Leader, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 1011 East Tudor Rd., MS-231, Anchorage, AK 99503.
In-Person Viewing or Pickup: You may view or pick up a copy of the
ROD during regular business hours at the address listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie Brady, 907-306-7448, or by
one of the addresses above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: With this notice, we finalize the EIS
process for the Proposed Land Exchange/Road Corridor in the Izembek
Refuge, Alaska. In accordance with National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) (40 CFR 1506.6(b)) requirements, this notice announces the
availability of the ROD for the final EIS for a Proposed Land Exchange/
Road Corridor in the Izembek Refuge. We completed a thorough analysis
of the effects on the human environment of each alternative considered,
including environmental, social, and economic considerations, which
were included in the final EIS. The ROD documents our selection of
Alternative 1, the No Land Exchange Alternative (No Action
Alternative), which was the Service's preferred alternative in the
final EIS. Under this decision, the Service will not exchange land with
the State of Alaska and the King Cove Corporation for the purpose of
constructing a road between the communities of King Cove and Cold Bay,
Alaska. Under this decision, we will continue to manage lands within
the Refuge consistent with and following the Izembek Refuge
Comprehensive Conservation Plan. For more background on the Refuge, and
the public involvement process to date, please see our notice published
Wednesday, February 6, 2013 (78 FR 8577).
Background
The Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-11,
Title VI, Subtitle E) (OPLMA) directed the Secretary of the Interior to
analyze the land exchange, alternatives for road construction and
operation, and a specific road corridor through the Izembek Refuge and
the Izembek Wilderness. The proposed land exchange would transfer to
the State of Alaska all right, title, and interest to a road corridor
for the construction, operation, and maintenance of a single-lane
gravel road between the communities of King Cove and Cold Bay, Alaska.
As provided by OPLMA, the road ``shall be used primarily for health and
safety purposes (including access to and from the Cold Bay Airport) and
only for noncommercial purposes.'' The OPLMA requires the Secretary to
make this decision in compliance with NEPA, which requires analysis of
the effects of alternatives, including a ``no action'' alternative, and
any other applicable law.
Alternatives Considered
The Final EIS evaluated in detail five alternatives, including a No
Action Alternative and four action alternatives:
Alternative 1--No Action and Preferred Alternative
Under Alternative 1, the Service would not exchange lands with the
King Cove Corporation and the State of Alaska for the purpose of
constructing a road between King Cove and Cold Bay, Alaska. Current
modes of transportation
[[Page 9760]]
between the cities of King Cove and Cold Bay, including air and marine
routes, would continue to operate and be developed.
Alternative 2--Land Exchange and Southern Road Alignment
Alternative 2 proposed a land exchange between the Federal
Government, the State of Alaska, and the King Cove Corporation that
would result in a road/road corridor through Izembek Refuge and Izembek
Wilderness. Under the proposed land exchange, approximately 201 acres
of federal land (surface and subsurface estate) of the Izembek Refuge
and Izembek Wilderness as well as 1,600 acres (surface and subsurface
estate) within the Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge on Sitkinak
Island would be conveyed to the State of Alaska. In exchange, the
Service would receive approximately 43,093 acres of land owned by the
State of Alaska (to be designated wilderness), as well as approximately
13,300 acres of land owned by King Cove Corporation. In addition, the
King Cove Corporation would relinquish 5,430 acres of selected lands
within the Izembek Refuge and Izembek Wilderness boundary. The proposed
road/road corridor would be located approximately \1/2\ mile to 1 mile
north of Kinzarof Lagoon.
Alternative 3--Land Exchange and Central Road Alignment
Alternative 3 proposed a land exchange between the Federal
Government, the State of Alaska, and the King Cove Corporation that
would result in a road/road corridor through Izembek Refuge and Izembek
Wilderness. Under the proposed land exchange, approximately 227 acres
of federal land (surface and subsurface estate) of the Izembek Refuge
and Izembek Wilderness as well as 1,600 acres (surface and subsurface
estate) within the Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge on Sitkinak
Island would be conveyed to the State of Alaska. In exchange, the
Service would receive approximately 43,093 acres of land owned by the
State of Alaska (to be designated wilderness), as well as approximately
13,300 acres of land owned by King Cove Corporation. In addition, the
King Cove Corporation would relinquish 5,430 acres of selected lands
within the Izembek Refuge and Izembek Wilderness boundary. The proposed
road/road corridor would be located more centrally within the Izembek
isthmus approximately 1 to 1\1/2\ mile north of Kinzarof lagoon and \1/
2\ to 1 mile south of Izembek Lagoon.
Alternative 4--Hovercraft Operations From the Northeast Terminal to
Cross Wind Cove
Alternative 4 proposed operation of a hovercraft service 6 days per
week to provide access between the communities of King Cove and Cold
Bay, running between the Northeast Terminal and Cross Wind Cove. A land
exchange was not considered under this alternative.
Alternative 5--Lenard Harbor Ferry With Cold Bay Dock Improvements
Alternative 5 proposed use of a ferry to provide access between
King Cove and Cold Bay that would travel 14 miles between a terminal in
Lenard Harbor to a substantially modified Cold Bay dock. Under this
alternative, ferry service would be provided 6 days per week and a land
exchange would not occur.
Factors We Considered in Decisionmaking
We based our decision on a thorough analysis of the effects to the
human environment, including environmental, social, and economic
considerations found in the Final EIS. We have evaluated the effects of
proposed roads through Izembek Refuge and Izembek Wilderness in
numerous analyses since 1960, including the 1985 Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and through the completion of the current EIS. We
have consistently found that the impacts of building a proposed road on
the wildlife resources, habitats, and designated Wilderness would
create irreversible change and damage to a unique and ecologically
important area, and especially to designated Wilderness. The no action
alternative selected in the ROD supports the continued management of
the Izembek Refuge consistent with the purposes for which it was
established.
Decision: After a thorough review of the potential environmental,
social, and economic consequences of all alternatives evaluated in the
Final EIS, we selected Alternative 1, the No Action Alternative.
Selecting Alternative 1 preserves the integrity of the Izembek National
Wildlife Refuge and Izembek Wilderness, ensures the continued
protection of unique and internationally recognized habitats, and
maintains the integrity of designated Wilderness.
Dated: February 13, 2014.
Geoffrey L. Haskett,
Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska.
[FR Doc. 2014-03605 Filed 2-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P