Commercial Driver's License Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse, 9703-9727 [2014-03213]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
will lead to SO2 emission reductions
and provide additional emission
reductions from Pennsylvania to
achieve further reasonable progress
towards reducing regional haze. EPA is
soliciting public comments on the
issues discussed in this document.
These comments will be considered
before taking final action.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
In addition, this proposed rule to
implement low sulfur fuel oil provisions
that will reduce the amount of sulfur in
fuel oils used in combustion units in
Pennsylvania does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), because the SIP is not approved
to apply in Indian country located in the
state, and EPA notes that it will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: February 7, 2014.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2014–03642 Filed 2–19–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 382
[Docket No. FMCSA–2010–0031]
RIN 2126–AB18
Commercial Driver’s License Drug and
Alcohol Clearinghouse
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
AGENCY:
FMCSA proposes to establish
the Commercial Driver’s License Drug
and Alcohol Clearinghouse
(Clearinghouse), a database under the
Agency’s administration that will
contain controlled substances (drug)
and alcohol test result information for
the holders of commercial driver’s
licenses (CDLs). The proposed rule
would require FMCSA-regulated motor
carrier employers, Medical Review
Officers (MROs), Substance Abuse
Professionals (SAPs), and consortia/
third party administrators (C/TPAs)
supporting U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT) testing programs
to report verified positive, adulterated,
and substituted drug test results,
positive alcohol test results, test
refusals, negative return-to-duty test
results, and information on follow-up
testing. The proposed rule would also
require employers to report actual
knowledge of traffic citations for driving
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9703
a commercial motor vehicle (CMV)
while under the influence (DUI) of
alcohol or drugs. The proposed rule
would establish the terms of access to
the database, including the conditions
under which information would be
submitted, accessed, maintained,
updated, removed, and released to
prospective employers, current
employers, and other authorized
entities. Finally, it would require
laboratories that provide FMCSAregulated motor carrier employers with
DOT drug testing services to report,
annual, summary information about
their testing activities. This rule is
mandated by Section 32402 of the
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st
Century Act.
DATES: You must submit comments by
April 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number FMCSA–
2010–0031 or RIN 2126–AB18, by any of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
• Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m. ET, Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Juan Moya,, Office of Enforcement and
Program Delivery, Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001, by telephone at (202.366.4844, or
via email at fmcsadrugandalcohol@
dot.gov.. FMCSA office hours are from
9 a.m. to 5 p.m., ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, contact Barbara
Hairston, Acting Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
A. Submitting Comments
B. Viewing Comments and Documents
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
9704
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
C. Privacy Act
II. Executive Summary
III. Background
A. Legal Basis for the Rulemaking
B. Current Regulations
C. Discussion of the Proposed Rule
1. Clearinghouse for CDL Drivers’ Drug and
Alcohol Test Results
2. FMCSA Oversight of Motor Carrier
Implementation of Drug and Alcohol
Testing Programs
IV. Section-by-Section Discussion of
Regulatory Changes
V. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
I. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
FMCSA encourages you to participate
in this rulemaking by submitting
comments, data, and related materials.
All comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal and/or copyrighted
information you provide.
search box insert the docket number
‘‘FMCSA–2010–0031’’ and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, click ‘‘Open Docket
Folder’’ and you will find all documents
and comments related to the proposed
rulemaking.
C. Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form for all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review the USDOT Privacy Act system
of records notice for the DOT Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS) in
the Federal Register published on
December 29, 2010 (75 FR 82132) at
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-201012-29/pdf/2010-32876.pdf.
II. Executive Summary
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Submitting Comments
A. Purpose of the Clearinghouse
You may submit your comments and
material online or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of
these means. FMCSA recommends that
you include your name and a mailing
address, an email address, or a phone
number in the body of your document
so that FMCSA can contact you if there
are questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov and in the
search box insert the docket number
‘‘FMCSA–2010–0031’’ and click the
search button. When the new screen
appears, click on the blue ‘‘Comment
Now!’’ button on the right hand side of
the page. On the new page, enter
information required including the
specific section of this document to
which each comment applies, and
provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. If you submit your
comments by mail or hand delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no
larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you
submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the
facility, please enclose a stamped, selfaddressed postcard or envelope.
We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment
period and may change this proposed
rule based on your comments. FMCSA
may issue a final rule at any time after
the close of the comment period.
CDL drivers who use drugs or alcohol
while operating a CMV pose a
significant risk to public safety. Under
the current drug and alcohol screening
program, employers do not have the
tools to identify CDL holders who have
received positive drug or alcohol test
results, have refused a drug or alcohol
test, or have otherwise violated the drug
and alcohol testing requirements and
thus, are not qualified to operate a CMV.
Employers must rely on information
provided by the driver, who might not
disclose prior positive drug or alcohol
test results, or refusals to test. As a
result, such drivers continue to operate
CMVs after violating the drug and
alcohol regulations without completing
the required return-to-duty process.
This proposed rule would require
employers and service agents to report
information about current and
prospective employees’ drug and
alcohol test results to a repository, the
Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse. It
would also require employers and
certain service agents to search the
database for current and prospective
employees’ positive drug and alcohol
test results, and refusals to test, as a
condition of permitting those employees
to perform safety-sensitive functions.
This would provide FMCSA and
employers the necessary tools to
identify drivers who are prohibited from
operating a CMV based on DOT drug
and alcohol program violations and
ensure that such drivers receive the
required evaluation and treatment
before performing safety-sensitive
functions.
The Moving Ahead for Progress in the
21st Century Act (MAP–21), enacted on
B. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as any
documents mentioned in this preamble,
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov and in the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
July 6, 2012,1 mandates that the
Secretary of Transportation (Secretary)
establish a national clearinghouse for
controlled substance and alcohol test
results of commercial motor vehicle
operators. The FMCSA also has
authority to promulgate safety standards
under the Motor Carrier Safety Act of
1984 (Pub. L. 98–554, Title II, 98 Stat.
2832, October 30, 1984) (the 1984 Act),
which provides authority to regulate
drivers, motor carriers, and vehicle
equipment and requires the Secretary to
prescribe minimum safety standards for
CMVs.
B. Summary of Major Provisions
The proposed rule would revise 49
CFR part 382, Controlled Substances
and Alcohol Use and Testing to
establish the Drug and Alcohol
Clearinghouse. It would require
employers and service agents to report
information about current and
prospective employees’ positive drug
and alcohol test results to the
Clearinghouse. In addition, it would
require employers to search the
Clearinghouse for positive drug and
alcohol test results, and refusals to test,
on an annual basis for current
employees and as a part of the preemployment process for prospective
employees. Finally, this proposal would
require laboratories to provide FMCSA
with annual summary reports on the
testing activities of FMCSA-regulated
motor carrier employers for whom they
have provided testing services.
Reporting positive test results and
refusals to test would create a database
employers could check to determine
whether current or prospective
employees are prohibited from
operating CMVs under the DOT drug
and alcohol screening program. This
would diminish or eliminate the
problem of a currently-employed
commercial-driver’s-license (CDL)
holder testing positive for illegal drug or
alcohol use with a second employer or
another potential employer while
continuing to operate commercial motor
vehicles (CMVs) under his or her
current employment without the current
employer knowing and acting on the
positive test.
It would also diminish or eliminate
the problem of a driver with previous
positive tests seeking and obtaining
work without prospective employers
knowing and acting on that information.
This could occur if a driver is fired for
a positive test but does not inform
prospective or future employers about
the previous positive test result. This
1 Public Law 112–141, 126 Stat. 405 (July 6,
2012).
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
9705
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
could also occur if a new driver entering
the workforce tests positive for drugs or
alcohol during a pre-employment test,
waits for the drugs to leave his/her
system, then takes and passes another
pre-employment test and gets hired
without the employer having any
knowledge of the previously failed preemployment test.
Currently motor carrier employers are
required to implement DOT drug and
alcohol testing programs for CDL
holders and they must provide FMCSA
with a summary of their annual drug
and alcohol testing results. To improve
employers’ compliance, the proposed
rule would require all laboratories
performing DOT drug and alcohol
testing for FMCSA-regulated employers
to file annual summary reports
identifying the motor carrier employers
for whom they performed testing
services. The FMCSA would use the
data provided by the laboratories to
identify employers of CDL drivers that
do not have an active drug and alcohol
testing program.
C. Benefits and Costs
The Agency estimates about $187
million in annual benefits from
increased crash reduction from the
rule—$53 million from the annual
queries and $134 million from the preemployment queries. FMCSA also
estimates that the rule would result in
$186 million in total annual costs,
which include costs for employers to
complete the annual ($28 million) and
pre-employment ($10 million) queries;
employers to designate service agents
and service agents to input information
from drivers undergoing the return-toduty process ($3 million); various
entities to report positive tests and
refusals ($1 million); various entities to
register with the Clearinghouse, verify
authorization, and become familiar with
the rule ($5 million); for employers to
obtain drivers’ consent for release of
their information ($35 million); for
development of the Clearinghouse and
management of records ($3 million); and
the cost for drivers to go through the
return-to-duty process ($101 million).
The estimated costs are about equal to
its benefits: Total net benefits of the rule
are just $1 million annually. The tenyear projection of net benefits is $8
million when discounted at seven
percent and $9 million when
discounted at three percent. However,
estimated benefits include only those
associated with reductions in CMV
crashes. FMCSA could not precisely
quantify improved health, quality-of-life
improvements, and increased life
expectancy for CMV drivers. The
Agency believes these non-quantified
benefits are significant, and, if they were
included in the benefits estimates,
would clearly demonstrate the positive
net benefits of this rule.
TOTAL NET BENEFIT PROJECTION OVER A TEN-YEAR PERIOD
Total
Ten-year
Ten-year
7%
3%
Annual
Discount rate
Total Benefits ...................................................................................................................
Total Costs ...............................................................................................................
$187,000,000
186,000,000
$1,406,000,000
1,398,000,000
$1,643,000,000
1,634,000,000
Total Net Benefits ..............................................................................................
1,000,000
8,000,000
9,000,000
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
III. Background
A. Legal Basis for the Rulemaking
The Agency proposes to revise 49 CFR
part 382, Controlled Substances and
Alcohol Use and Testing, to establish a
database, identified as the ‘‘Commercial
Driver’s License Drug and Alcohol
Clearinghouse’’ or ‘‘Clearinghouse,’’ for
reporting of verified positive,
adulterated, and substituted drug test
results, positive alcohol test results, test
refusals, negative return-to-duty test
results, and information on follow-up
testing. The proposed rule would also
require employers to report actual
knowledge of traffic citations for driving
a CMV while under the influence of
alcohol or drugs. Under the proposed
rule, motor carrier employers would be
required to query the Clearinghouse for
drug and alcohol test result information
on current and prospective employees
subject to FMCSA drug and alcohol
testing requirements. The proposed rule
is intended to increase compliance with
these testing requirements.
Section 32402 of the Moving Ahead
for Progress in the 21st Century Act
(MAP–21) (Pub. L. 112–141, 126 Stat.
405), codified at 49 U.S.C. 31306a,
directs the Secretary of Transportation
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
(Secretary) to establish a national
clearinghouse for controlled substance
and alcohol test results of commercial
motor vehicle operators. This proposed
rule would implement that mandate.
In addition, FMCSA has general
authority to promulgate safety
standards, including those governing
drivers’ use of drugs or alcohol while
operating a CMV. The Motor Carrier
Safety Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98–554, Title
II, 98 Stat. 2832, October 30, 1984) (the
1984 Act), as amended, provides
authority to regulate drivers, motor
carriers, and vehicle equipment and
requires the Secretary to prescribe
minimum safety standards for CMVs. At
a minimum, the regulations shall ensure
that— (1) CMVs are maintained,
equipped, loaded, and operated safely;
(2) the responsibilities imposed on CMV
operators do not impair their ability to
operate the vehicles safely; (3) the
physical condition of CMV operators is
adequate to enable them to operate the
vehicles safely; (4) CMV operation does
not have a deleterious effect on the
physical condition of the operators; and
(5) CMV drivers are not coerced by a
motor carrier, shipper, receiver, or
transportation intermediary to operate a
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
CMV in violation of regulations
promulgated under 49 U.S.C. 31136 or
under 49 U.S.C. chapters 51 or 313 (49
U.S.C. 31136(a)). Section 211 of the
1984 Act also grants the Secretary broad
power, in carrying out motor carrier
safety statutes and regulations, to
‘‘prescribe recordkeeping and reporting
requirements’’ and to ‘‘perform other
acts the Secretary considers
appropriate’’ (49 U.S.C. 31133(a)(8) and
(10)).
The FMCSA Administrator has been
delegated authority under 49 CFR
1.87(e), (f) to carry out the functions
vested in the Secretary by 49 U.S.C.
chapter 313 and 49 U.S.C. chapter 311,
subchapters I and III, relating to CMV
programs and safety regulation. This
proposed rule would implement, in
part, the Administrator’s delegated
authority under the 1984 Act to ensure
that the physical condition of CMV
operators is adequate to enable them to
operate vehicles safely by increasing
compliance with drug and alcohol
testing requirements. FMCSA believes
that this proposed rule would likely
have the effect of preventing employers
from exercising coercive influence over
drivers. The proposed rule would also
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
9706
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
exercise the broad recordkeeping and
implementation authority under Section
211. The other subsections of Section
206(a) do not apply because this
rulemaking would only address the
physical condition of CMV drivers.
The Omnibus Transportation
Employee Testing Act of 1991 (OTETA)
(Pub. L. 102–143, Title V, 105 Stat. 917,
at 952, October 28, 1991, codified at 49
U.S.C. 31306) mandated the alcohol and
controlled substances (drug) testing
program for DOT. OTETA required the
Secretary to promulgate regulations for
alcohol and drug testing for persons in
safety-sensitive positions in four modes
of transportation—motor carrier, airline,
railroad, and mass transit. Those
regulations, including subsequent
amendments, are codified at 49 CFR
part 40, ‘‘Procedures for Transportation
Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing
Programs.’’ Part 40 establishes
requirements for all DOT-regulated
parties, including employers of drivers
with CDLs subject to FMCSA testing
requirements, for conducting drug and
alcohol tests. Part 40 also defines the
roles and responsibilities of service
agents, including MROs, SAPs, and
C/TPAs, who perform critical functions
under DOT-wide drug and alcohol
testing program requirements.
In 1994, FMCSA’s predecessor agency
published a final rule addressing the
OTETA and creating regulations,
including penalties, codified in 49 CFR
part 382, ‘‘Controlled Substances and
Alcohol Use and Testing.’’ In 2001,
FMCSA revised its regulations in 49
CFR part 382 to make FMCSA’s drug
and alcohol testing procedures
consistent with and non-duplicative of
the revised regulations at 49 CFR part
40.
This proposed rule would incorporate
many of the findings and
recommendations contained in
FMCSA’s March 2004 report to
Congress, which was required under
section 226 of the Motor Carrier Safety
Improvement Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 106–
159, 113 Stat. 1748, December 9, 1999).
B. Current Regulations
Agency regulations at 49 CFR part 382
apply to persons and employers of such
persons who operate CMVs in
commerce in the United States and who
are subject to the CDL requirements in
49 CFR part 383 or the equivalent CDL
requirements for Canadian and Mexican
drivers (49 CFR 382.103(a)). Part 382
requires that employers conduct preemployment drug testing, post-accident
testing, random drug and alcohol
testing, and reasonable suspicion
testing, as well as return-to-duty testing
and follow-up testing for those drivers
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
who test positive or otherwise violate
DOT drug and alcohol program
requirements.
Motor carrier employers are
prohibited from allowing an employee
to perform safety-sensitive functions,
which include operating a CMV, if the
employee tests positive on a DOT drug
or alcohol test, refuses to take a required
test, or otherwise violates the DOT drug
and alcohol testing regulations. The
prohibition on performing safetysensitive functions continues until the
employee satisfies all of the
requirements of the return-to-duty
process prescribed in 49 CFR part 40,
subpart O. Additionally, part 382
provides that an employer may not
allow a covered employee to perform
safety-sensitive functions when the
employer has actual knowledge
concerning the driver’s use of alcohol or
drugs while performing safety-sensitive
functions. An employer has ‘‘actual
knowledge’’ of drug or alcohol use
while performing safety-sensitive
functions based upon the employer’s
direct observation of employee drug or
alcohol use, an admission by the
employee of drug or alcohol use,
information provided by a previous
employer, or if the employee receives a
traffic citation for driving a CMV while
under the influence of drugs or alcohol.
An employer may not use a driver under
these circumstances until the driver has
completed the return-to-duty process
prescribed in 49 CFR part 40, subpart O.
Positive test results or instances of
employers having actual knowledge can
lead to termination of the driver’s
employment without the opportunity to
complete the return-to-duty process.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations (FMCSRs) require that a
motor carrier employer obtain
information from job applicants that
includes the names and addresses of the
applicant’s employers for the past 3
years, and whether or not the applicant
was subject to the FMCSRs and to the
drug and alcohol testing requirements
under 49 CFR part 40 (49 CFR
391.21(b)). Interstate motor carrier
employers are then required to
investigate the applicant’s history under
the DOT drug and alcohol testing
program by contacting the named DOTregulated employers to determine
whether the applicant has, within the
past 3 years, violated the drug and
alcohol prohibitions under part 382 or
the testing requirements under part 40
(49 CFR 391.23(e)). A similar
background check requirement exists in
part 40. See 49 CFR 40.25 (DOTregulated employers must contact all of
the applicant’s employers for the 2 years
prior to the employee application and
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
obtain drug and alcohol test
information, including information that
these employers obtained from previous
employers).
Part 40 defines an ‘‘employee’’ as
‘‘any person who is designated in a DOT
agency regulation as subject to drug
testing and/or alcohol testing’’ including
‘‘applicants for employment subject to
pre-employment testing’’ (49 CFR 40.3).
Pursuant to this definition, an
individual is an employee of any DOTregulated employer for whom the
individual takes a pre-employment drug
test, regardless of whether the
individual is subsequently hired by the
employer. As a result, an individual
would be required to list such employer,
when applying for a new covered
position (see 49 CFR 40.25 and
391.21(b)).
In addition to pre-employment drug
testing, the background check process
detailed above is currently the primary
means by which an employer
determines whether a job applicant is
qualified to perform a safety-sensitive
function such as operating a CMV.
C. Discussion of the Proposed Rule
1. Clearinghouse for CDL Drivers’ Drug
and Alcohol Test Results
The current background check system
does not provide employers with
enough tools to accurately identify CDL
holders who have received positive drug
or alcohol test results or have otherwise
violated the drug and alcohol testing
requirements and who are, therefore,
not qualified to operate a CMV prior to
completing the return-to-duty process.
Employers must rely on information
provided by the driver, who might not
list part-time driving jobs or a prior or
prospective employer that has records of
positive drug or alcohol tests or other
related violations. Or, after testing
positive with one prospective employer,
the driver might wait until the
substance is out of his or her system and
apply with a different carrier. As a
result, such drivers continue to operate
CMVs after violating the drug and
alcohol regulations without completing
the required return-to-duty process.
CDL drivers who use drugs or alcohol
while operating a CMV pose a
significant risk to public safety. In 1999,
a New Orleans bus crash resulted in 22
passenger fatalities. The motorcoach
driver’s post-accident drug test showed
use of marijuana and a sedating antihistamine prior to going on duty. The
driver had also failed pre-employment
drug testing when applying for previous
positions, a fact not revealed or known
to the current employer. The driver also
failed to disclose on his employment
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
application a previous employer who
fired him after a positive drug test. As
a result of the investigations of the 1999
New Orleans bus crash, the National
Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)
recommended that FMCSA ‘‘develop a
system that records all positive drug and
alcohol test results and refusal
determinations resulting from the U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT)
testing requirements, require
prospective employers to query the
system before making a hiring decision,
and require certifying authorities to
query the system before making a
certification decision.’’ (‘‘Highway
Accident Report: Motorcoach Run-OffThe-Road, New Orleans, Louisiana, May
9, 1999,’’ NTSB Report Number: HAR–
01–01, NTSB, Washington, DC, page 67
(https://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/reports/
2001/HAR0101.pdf.)). This rulemaking
addresses the NTSB’s recommendations.
Two 2008 Government Accountability
Office (GAO) reports 2 also analyzed the
issue of CMV drivers who test positive
or refuse to submit to drug or alcohol
testing for one employer and then fail to
disclose this information to a
subsequent employer. GAO identified
43 instances in which a CMV driver
tested positive for illegal drugs, such as
cocaine, marijuana, and amphetamines,
with one employer and subsequently
tested negative with another employer
who was unaware of the prior positive
test. In its recommendations to
Congress, GAO proposed establishing a
national database, as outlined in this
rulemaking, as a possible solution to
these ‘‘job hopping’’ scenarios.
Through MAP–21, Congress directed
FMCSA to establish this clearinghouse
to improve compliance with DOT’s drug
and alcohol testing program, as well as
enhance safety by reducing accidents
and injuries resulting from the misuse of
alcohol and drugs by CDL holders.
MAP–21 directed a number of specific
requirements that FMCSA has
incorporated into this proposed rule.
For example, in accordance with the
requirements of MAP–21, this proposed
rule would require employers and
service agents to report information
about current and prospective
employees’ drug and alcohol test results
to the Clearinghouse and would require
employers and certain service agents to
check current and prospective
employees against the database. In
addition, employers would only access
data in the clearinghouse to determine
2 See GAO–08–600 ‘‘Improvements to Drug
Testing Programs Could Better Identify Illegal Drug
Users and Keep Them Off the Road,’’ May 15, 2008,
and GAO–08–829R, ‘‘Examples of Job Hopping by
Commercial Drivers After Failing Drug Tests,’’ June
30, 2008.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
whether an employment prohibition
exists (e.g., a positive test result or a
refusal for which an individual has not
completed the return-to-duty
requirements).
The proposed rule would provide
FMCSA and regulated employers the
necessary tools to identify drivers who
are prohibited from operating a CMV
based on DOT drug and alcohol program
violations and ensure that such drivers
receive the required evaluation and
treatment before continuing to perform
safety-sensitive functions. It would
apply to persons and employers of such
persons who operate CMVs in
commerce in the United States and are
subject to the CDL requirements in 49
CFR part 383 or the equivalent CDL
requirements for Canadian and Mexican
drivers. The proposed rule would not
supersede an employer’s obligation to
comply with the current requirements of
parts 40 and 382.The rule would also
affect service agents, including MROs,
C/TPAs and SAPs. MROs are licensed
physicians responsible for
independently receiving and reviewing
laboratory drug test results generated by
an employer’s testing program. Under
the proposed rule, MROs would report
to the Clearinghouse all positive,
adulterated, or substituted drug test
results and refusals to test that require
an MRO determination.
C/TPAs are consortia and third party
administrators who coordinate testing
services for regulated motor carrier
employers. FMCSA regulations require
any employer who employs only
himself/herself as a driver to join a
random test selection pool. Consortia
are the entities that manage these pools
(49 CFR 382.103(b)). Third party
administrators, which often include
consortia, are entities that regulated
motor carrier employers contract with to
implement drug and alcohol testing
programs. Under the proposed rule, C/
TPAs would be subject to the same
reporting requirements as employers
when they assume a regulated
employer’s drug and alcohol testing
functions. Specifically, C/TPAs that are
required by regulation to perform
employer functions (e.g., for selfemployed drivers) would be required to
report positive alcohol tests, drug or
alcohol test refusals, negative return-toduty tests, and successful completion of
all follow-up tests. Employers may
contract with C/TPAs to perform
reporting functions, but employers, in
addition to their C/TPAs, remain
responsible for meeting the reporting
requirements.
SAPs evaluate, assess and refer
drivers for education and/or treatment
after a positive test or refusal as a part
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9707
of the return-to-duty process (49 CFR
part 40, subpart O). Under the proposed
rule, SAPs would be required to report
to the Clearinghouse the date that a
driver began and successfully
completed the return to duty process
specified in 49 CFR part 40, subpart O,
indicating driver eligibility for return-toduty testing. The SAP would also be
required to report information on the
follow-up testing plan.
The requirements of this rule would
also affect motor carriers employing
owner-operators. The drug and alcohol
testing regulations in part 382 impose
requirements upon employers and
drivers; owner-operators can function as
both. Currently, when an owneroperator acts as a driver for another
employer, FMCSA requires that the
employer treat the owner-operator as if
he or she were an employee for the
purposes of the employer’s DOT drug
and alcohol testing program. As a result,
the proposed rule would require motor
carriers employing owner-operators to
treat those drivers as employees for
purposes of querying and reporting to
the database.
2. FMCSA Oversight of Motor Carrier
Implementation of Drug and Alcohol
Testing Programs
FMCSA primarily monitors motor
carrier compliance with DOT drug and
alcohol test program requirements
through motor carrier compliance
reviews and new entrant safety audits.
In 2010, the Agency and its State
partners conducted new entrant audits
and compliance reviews on
approximately 50,000 motor carriers.
Although FMCSA and its State partners
have significantly increased the number
of carriers that it reviews through
enhanced new entrant rules and
improved compliance programs, the
Agency captures only a small
percentage of the more than 520,000
motor carrier employers subject to the
DOT drug and alcohol testing
requirements. As a result, many motor
carrier employers that do not have a
testing program may go undetected.
Based on the Agency’s oversight
activities, some motor carrier employers
are not in compliance with the drug and
alcohol program requirements.3
Current regulations require motor
carrier employers to implement DOT
drug and alcohol testing programs for
CDL holders and to provide FMCSA
with a summary of their annual drug
and alcohol testing results upon the
3 FMCSA has found that eighty-six percent of new
entrant audit failures include either not having or
not properly implementing a drug and alcohol
program. (FMCSA, Office of Enforcement)
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
9708
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Agency’s request (49 CFR 382.403).
Every year, FMCSA randomly selects
and requires approximately 3,000
employers to submit a summary of
testing program results through
FMCSA’s Drug and Alcohol Testing
Survey. See Drug and Alcohol Testing
Survey: 2008 Results, https://
www.fmcsa.dot.gov/facts-research/
research-technology/report/Drug_
Alcohol_Survey_2008.pdf. The survey
has been largely used to determine
appropriate random testing rates for
carriers and has not generally been used
to monitor employer compliance with
testing requirements. To improve
employers’ compliance with the
requirement to implement a drug and
alcohol testing program, the proposed
rule would require all laboratories
performing DOT drug testing for
FMCSA-regulated employers to file
annual summary reports identifying the
motor carrier employers for whom they
performed testing services. The FMCSA
would use the data provided by the
laboratories to identify employers of
CDL drivers that do not have an active
drug and alcohol testing program.
IV. Section-by-Section Discussion of
Regulatory Changes
FMCSA is proposing to amend 49
CFR part 382 in the following ways.
Section 382.103
Some of the proposed changes to 49
CFR part 382 in today’s NPRM affect
service agents. As a result, FMCSA
proposes to amend existing § 382.103(a),
‘‘Applicability,’’ by adding an express
statement that the rules codified in 49
CFR part 382 would apply to service
agents.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Section 382.107
FMCSA proposes to add a new
definition, ‘‘Commercial Driver’s
License Drug and Alcohol
Clearinghouse,’’ to existing § 382.107.
The definition would explain that the
Clearinghouse is a drug and alcohol
testing information database to which
this rule would require employers and
service agents to report drug and alcohol
testing information and that the rule
would require employers and certain
service agents to query for information
on current and prospective employees’
drug and alcohol test results. FMCSA
proposes to add a definition for
‘‘positive alcohol test’’ to eliminate any
confusion as to the type of alcohol test
that constitutes a violation of the
Agency’s drug and alcohol program. As
such FMCSA proposes to add a
definition for ‘‘negative return to duty
test result’’ to clarify that it is a negative
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
drug test and/or an alcohol test with an
alcohol concentration of less than 0.02.
Section 382.123
FMCSA proposes to add a new
§ 382.123 that would require employers
to provide specific information on the
Alcohol Testing Form (ATF) and
Federal Drug Testing Custody and
Control Form (CCF) that identifies
drivers by use of their CDL number and
State of issuance. Recording CDL
number and State of issuance as the
primary method of identification serves
a critical data quality function. Using
CDLs along with State of issuance and
their unique record numbers to identify
drivers and their test information will
prevent misidentification resulting from
similar names or the use of nicknames
or initials. This proposal would allow
employers to shift from reliance on the
use of Social Security numbers on the
current ATF and CCF and to identify
drivers by better utilizing other types of
readily-available and reliable
information. Paragraph (a) would
require that the employer list the
driver’s CDL number and State of
issuance in Step 1, section B of the ATF.
Under this proposal, employers would
not be permitted to record drivers’
Social Security numbers, and the only
permitted employee ID number would
be the driver’s CDL number and State of
issuance. If the driver tests positive for
alcohol in violation of 49 CFR parts 40
and 382, the employer or consortium
responsible for reporting this
information would use the driver’s CDL
number and State of issuance to report
information to the Clearinghouse.
Paragraph (a) would also require the
employer to enter its USDOT or Internal
Revenue Service (IRS)-issued Employer
Identification Number (EIN) in Step 1,
section C of the ATF, in addition to the
information requested in that section of
the ATF (i.e., employer name, street,
city, State, and zip code). FMCSA
would use the USDOT or EIN number
as an employer identification to avoid
confusion between similarly-named
employers that enter information in the
Clearinghouse. These numbers would be
used to identify the employer for all
aspects of the part 382 requirements,
including reporting employers’ drug and
alcohol test results and the annual
summary laboratory test reports that
proposed § 382.404 would require.
Paragraph (b) would require the
employer to record its USDOT number
or EIN in Step 1, section A of the CCF.
This provision would clarify that for
FMCSA’s purposes, the USDOT number
or EIN fulfills the form’s requirement for
an employer ‘‘I.D. No.’’ Paragraph (b)
would also require the employer to
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
record the driver’s CDL number and
State of issuance in Step 1, section C of
the CCF. This proposal would change
the current requirement that permits
employers to use Social Security
numbers or employee ID numbers.
Under this proposal, employers would
not be permitted to record drivers’
Social Security numbers, and the only
permitted employee ID number would
be the driver’s CDL number and State of
issuance. If the driver tests positive for
drugs in violation of 49 CFR parts 40
and 382, the MRO responsible for
reporting this information would use
the driver’s CDL number and State of
issuance as employee identification to
report information to the Clearinghouse.
FMCSA is aware that some selfemployed drivers who are not required
to have USDOT numbers use their
Social Security numbers as their EINs
for tax purposes. Any driver who is not
comfortable using his or her Social
Security number as an EIN could pursue
one of two options. First, he or she
could obtain a USDOT number. Drivers
can get more information about
obtaining USDOT numbers at https://
www.fmcsa.dot.gov/registrationlicensing/registration-licensing.htm.
Second, he or she could change his or
her EIN to a number that is different
from his or her Social Security number.
Drivers can get more information about
changing their EINs by contacting the
IRS.
Section 382.217
FMCSA proposes to add a new
§ 382.217 that would provide that an
employer must not allow a driver to
operate a CMV if the Clearinghouse has
a record that shows that a driver has not
successfully completed the return-toduty process required by 49 CFR 40.305.
This section would implement that
portion of MAP–21, codified at 49
U.S.C. 31306a(f)(3), that requires
employers to use the Clearinghouse to
determine whether any employment
prohibitions exist for prospective CMV
drivers.
Section 382.401
FMCSA proposes to amend existing
§ 382.401(b)(1)(vi) to require employers
to maintain records related to drivers’
traffic citations that establish the
employer’s actual knowledge of an
employee driving a CMV under the
influence of drugs or alcohol in
violation of §§ 382.205 and 382.213(b).
This change clarifies that employers
who have actual knowledge of these
types of traffic citations must maintain
a record of them, just as they must for
other aspects of their drug and alcohol
testing programs. As is currently
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
required of all records that must be
retained under § 382.401(b)(1), these
records must be maintained for a
minimum of 5 years.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Section 382.404
FMCSA proposes to add a new
§ 382.404 to require each laboratory to
submit to FMCSA an annual, aggregate
statistical summary of test results for
each motor carrier employer regulated
under part 382 for which the laboratory
performs DOT testing services. The
reports would draw from the
information laboratories are currently
required to provide to employers under
part 40, Appendix B, but would be
limited to the annual number of drug
tests conducted by type of test. This
report would include all employers who
are testing under the FMCSA and DOT
requirements, and would be organized
by employer’s USDOT number or EIN.
The filing date would coincide with the
January filing date required under
§ 40.111(a). FMCSA proposes to require
laboratories to file this information
electronically. FMCSA envisions
designating a specific format for filing,
such as a commonly-available
spreadsheet that the affected
laboratories might already be using.
FMCSA would use this information to
improve its enforcement efforts in
identifying employers who are not in
compliance with drug and alcohol
testing requirements.
FMCSA seeks comments on what, if
any, burden this reporting requirement
would place on laboratories.
Specifically, FMCSA would like
comments on whether laboratories
could use existing data collected as a
part of existing business practices, or
whether they would have to establish
new processes and controls to collect
and aggregate this information. In
addition, FMCSA seeks comment on
what type of electronic format would be
the easiest and least burdensome
method for reporting this information,
or whether other less burdensome cost
effective methods could be used to
similarly identify employers who are
not in compliance with drug and
alcohol testing requirements.
Section 382.405
Section 382.405(d) currently requires
employers to make copies of all DOT
drug and alcohol test results available to
the Secretary, any DOT agency, or any
State or local officials with regulatory
authority over the employer. FMCSA
proposes to extend these requirements
to service agents who maintain records
for an employer. This change is
designed to make sure that the
appropriate officials have access to all
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
test results when employers use service
agents to manage their drug and alcohol
testing programs.
Section 382.405(e) currently
authorizes the NTSB to require
employers of CDL drivers involved in
crashes under investigation to produce
information on an employer’s
administration of post-accident alcohol
and drug tests. FMCSA proposes to
amend § 382.405(e) by adding a new
paragraph authorizing FMCSA to
provide the NTSB access to a CDL
driver’s records in the Clearinghouse
when that driver is involved in a crash
under investigation. This change would
implement the statutory requirement,
codified at 49 U.S.C. 31306a(i), that the
Agency establish a process for NTSB
access and would provide the NTSB
with additional tools to help it fulfill its
safety mission.
Section 382.409
FMCSA proposes to amend
§ 382.409(c) by including the
Clearinghouse in the list of entities to
which an MRO or C/TPA is authorized
to release a driver’s drug test results.
FMCSA also proposes to amend the title
of § 382.409 to add the words ‘‘or
consortium/third party administrator’’
so that it reads ‘‘Medical review officer
or consortium/third party administrator
record retention for controlled
substances’’ to reflect more accurately
the contents of the section.
Section 382.415
FMCSA proposes to add a new
§ 382.415 that would require a driver to
notify, in writing, all of his or her
employers if he or she violates the drug
and alcohol testing regulations in parts
40 or 382. Current regulations do not
require drivers who work for more than
one employer to report this information
to their other employers. This change
would place an affirmative obligation on
drivers to report drug and alcohol
violations to all current employers. The
penalties in current § 382.507, which
include civil and criminal penalties,
would apply to all drivers who do not
comply with this section.
Employers are reminded that, once
each employer is notified that an
employee has violated the drug and
alcohol regulations, each employer must
separately follow the return-to-duty
provisions of Parts 40 and 382 before
allowing an employee to serve in a
safety-sensitive position. This includes
the requirement that each employer
needs to implement a follow-up test
plan on its own for each employee.
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9709
Section 382.601
Current § 382.601 requires employers
to promulgate a policy on the misuse of
drugs and alcohol and to provide
educational materials on the subject to
its new and current employees. FMCSA
proposes to add a new § 382.601(b)(12),
that would require employers to notify
drivers that information about verified
positive, adulterated, or substituted
drug test results; positive alcohol test
results; refusals to submit to any test
required by subpart C of this part;
employers’ reports of actual knowledge
that the driver received a traffic citation
for driving a CMV while under the
influence of alcohol or drugs; negative
return-to-duty tests; employers’ reports
of completion of follow-up testing; and
SAP reports will be reported to the
Clearinghouse. Under this proposed
requirement, employers must include
all of this information in the educational
materials they provide to their drivers,
regardless of their internal employment
policies regarding drivers violating drug
and alcohol testing requirements.
Employers may clarify internal
employment policies pursuant to
existing § 382.601(c).
Part 382, Subpart G (§ 382.701 to
§ 382.727)
FMCSA proposes adding a new
subpart G, entitled ‘‘Requirements and
Procedures for Implementation of the
Commercial Driver’s License Drug and
Alcohol Clearinghouse,’’ to part 382.
Subpart G would describe employers’
and drivers’ rights and responsibilities
with respect to the Clearinghouse,
including how employers and service
agents become authorized to submit
information to the Clearinghouse and to
obtain information from the database. It
also would establish procedures for
correcting and/or updating information
in the database. New subpart G would
implement Congress’s general mandate
in MAP–21 that the Agency develop a
Clearinghouse to track CDL holders’
positive drug and alcohol test results,
and refusals to submit to drug and
alcohol tests.
Section 382.701
New § 382.701 establishes employers’
obligations to conduct pre-employment
and annual queries of the database and
prohibits them from using drivers in
safety-sensitive positions when the
queries return results showing certain
violations of FMCSA’s drug and alcohol
program. The scope of the queries is
covered later under proposed section
382.719.
Paragraph (a) would establish an
employer’s obligation to conduct pre-
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
9710
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
employment queries by prohibiting the
employer from hiring drivers without
first conducting a search of the
Clearinghouse for drug and alcohol
violations. Paragraph (a) would
implement the requirement in MAP–21,
codified at 49 U.S.C. 31306a(f)(3), that
employers search the Clearinghouse for
drug and alcohol violations prior to
hiring an individual to drive a CMV.
Paragraph (b) would establish an
employer’s obligation to conduct an
annual query on all currently-employed
drivers. Paragraph (b) would implement
the requirement, codified at 49 U.S.C.
31306a(f)(4), that employers conduct
annual searches of drivers’ drug and
alcohol test result histories using the
Clearinghouse. These requirements,
which would apply to all drivers subject
to the drug and alcohol testing
regulations at part 382, are designed to
make all current and prospective
employers aware of applicants’ and
employees’ reported drug and alcohol
violations. Paragraph (c) would
implement the statutory provision,
codified at 49 U.S.C. 31306a(b)(3)(A),
that requires FMCSA to notify an
employer if new information about a
driver is entered into the Clearinghouse
within seven days of an employer
conducting a query under this section.
Paragraph (d) would allow employers
to hire but would prohibit employers
from allowing a driver to perform safetysensitive functions if a query of the
database shows any of the following
violations of the drug and alcohol
testing program: A verified positive,
adulterated, or substituted drug test
result; a positive alcohol test result; a
refusal to submit to any test required by
subpart C of this part; or an employer’s
report of actual knowledge that the
driver received a traffic citation for
driving a CMV while under the
influence of alcohol or drugs. However,
FMCSA does not propose to require
employers and service agents to report
all violations of subpart B.
Under current regulations, an
employer may not allow a driver to
perform safety-sensitive functions if the
employer has actual knowledge that the
driver has used drugs or alcohol. Actual
knowledge is defined at § 382.107 to
mean that an employer has actual
knowledge of drug or alcohol use based
on: Direct observation of an employee;
information provided by the driver’s
previous employer(s); a traffic citation
for driving a CMV while under the
influence of drugs or alcohol; or an
employee’s admission of drug or alcohol
use (except as provided in § 382.21). As
a part of this proposed rule, employers
would only be required to report to the
Clearinghouse violations based on
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
actual knowledge of employees
receiving a citation for operating a CMV
under the influence of drugs or alcohol.
FMCSA proposes to require only this
one category of actual knowledge
violation because a traffic citation
provides objective documentation on
which to base a report to the
Clearinghouse. In the case of direct
observation or an employee’s admission,
the employer has the obligation to
remove the employee from performing
safety-sensitive functions until he or she
completes the return-to-duty process,
but there is no requirement to report the
observation or admission to the
Clearinghouse. In the case of
information provided by a previous
employer, current rules require the
employer to report the information to
prospective employers during the preemployment background check required
by §§ 40.25 and 391.23. If the
background check reveals prior drug or
alcohol violations for which the
employee has not successfully
completed the return-to-duty process,
the employer is prohibited from hiring
the employee to perform safety-sensitive
functions, such as driving.
New § 382.701(d) would also provide
that, if the database search revealed one
of these violations, an employer could
nonetheless allow a driver to perform
safety-sensitive functions if the driver
completed the return-to-duty process in
subpart O of part 40. Under subpart O,
a driver who has completed the returnto-duty process, but has not completed
all follow-up tests, would also be able
to perform safety-sensitive functions
provided the current employer assumes
responsibility for managing the followup testing process. Finally, an employer
may allow a driver to perform safetysensitive functions if, after the time for
final adjudication has expired, a traffic
citation for driving under the influence
of drugs or alcohol does not result in a
conviction (as defined at 49 CFR 383.5).
This provision does not permit an
employer to allow a driver to perform a
safety-sensitive function after receiving
a DUI traffic citation, prior to receiving
a final adjudication. All of the above
provisions of paragraph (d) would
implement the employment
prohibitions required by MAP–21,
codified at 49 U.S.C. 31306a(f)(3) &
(h)(1)(D).
In accordance with the statutory
mandate codified at 49 U.S.C.
31306a(h)(1)(c), paragraph (e) would
establish a record keeping requirement
under which employers would be
required to retain for three years a
record of each query made under this
section and the information received in
response. However, FMCSA would also
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
retain that information in the
Clearinghouse for a minimum of three
years for research and enforcement
purposes. The Agency does not believe
that it is necessary to burden employers
with a redundant recordkeeping
requirement. Accordingly, FMCSA will
deem an employer to have satisfied this
recordkeeping requirement if it
conducts its query in accordance with a
valid registration and the requirements
of new subpart G.
Section 382.703
In accordance with the requirements
of 49 U.S.C. 31306a(h)(1)(A), new
§ 382.703 would prohibit disclosure of
information in the Clearinghouse
without a driver’s consent. Paragraph (a)
would require an employer to obtain
consent from drivers before querying the
database to determine if there is any
information in the database on that
driver. Paragraph (b) would require the
employer to obtain written consent from
the driver for access to information in
the Clearinghouse.
These consents apply to the proposed
requirement (§ 382.701) that employers
conduct two types of queries: Preemployment and annual. To reduce the
burden on employers who would be
required to conduct annual queries on
multiple drivers at the same time,
FMCSA envisions establishing two
levels of queries. The first level, or ‘‘full
query,’’ would grant employers or
prospective employers access to the
reportable information in a driver’s
record and would require the employer
to obtain written consent from the
driver for access to Clearinghouse
information. FMCSA envisions using
technology similar to that it currently
uses in its Pre-Employer Screening
Program (PSP) to verify a driver’s
identity. FMCSA would then allow the
driver to designate which employer(s) or
prospective employer(s) may view his or
her record. All employers would be
required to conduct a full query to
satisfy the pre-employment query
requirement.
The second level, or ‘‘limited query,’’
would not grant access to information in
the Clearinghouse but would only
indicate whether information exists in
the database about a particular driver.
Prior to conducting a limited query, an
employer would have to obtain written
consent from a driver. Employers would
be required to retain this consent for 3
years after conducting a query and
would be subject to audit.
Employers would only be able to use
the limited query in connection with
annual searches on currently employed
drivers. If the query indicates that
information exists in the Clearinghouse
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
on a particular driver, then the
employer would be required to conduct
a full query, requiring the employer to
obtain written consent from the driver
to view the information in the
Clearinghouse.
FMCSA envisions that employers
would require drivers to give blanket
consent to allow employers to conduct
a limited query on an annual basis for
the duration of their employment.
However, no driver may give blanket
consent for a full query of his or her
information in the Clearinghouse.
Drivers must give specific written
consent each time they allow employers
to view their personal information in
the Clearinghouse.
Paragraph (c) would prohibit
employers from using any driver who
does not grant consent to search the
Clearinghouse. If a driver refuses to
grant consent for either the full or
limited query, that driver could not
perform any safety-sensitive function,
including driving. Paragraph (d) would
make clear that the consent granted
under this proposed section would
include consent for FMCSA to notify
employers of information on a driver
that was entered into the Clearinghouse
within seven days of the employer
conducting a query.
Section 382.705
In accordance with Congress’s
mandate that drug and alcohol refusals
and positive test results be reported to
the Clearinghouse (codified at 49 U.S.C.
31306a(g)), new § 382.705 would
establish reporting requirements,
assigning responsibility for inputting
and updating information to individuals
and entities. Paragraph (a) would
require MROs to report to the
Clearinghouse within 1 business day all
verified positive, adulterated, or
substituted drug test results and refusals
to test that require a determination by
the MRO as specified in 49 CFR 40.191.
In the event an MRO changes the
outcome of a test in accordance with 49
CFR part 40, he or she would be
required to report this change within 1
business day. This paragraph would
also require the MRO to provide the
reason for the test; the Federal Drug
Testing CCF specimen ID number; the
collection site name and address; the
driver’s name, date of birth, and CDL
number, and the State that issued the
CDL; the employer’s name, city/State,
and USDOT or EIN; the date of the test;
the date of the verified result; and the
test result. The test result would either
be (1) positive; (2) refusal to test:
Adulterated; (3) refusal to test:
Substituted; or (4) refusal to provide a
specimen. This information will allow
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
tracking and identification of specific
test results. Information about the driver
(i.e., name, date of birth, CDL number,
and issuing State) and the employer
(i.e., name, address, and USDOT or EIN
number) is intended to assist in making
a positive identification of the driver in
the Clearinghouse, because information
about more than one driver with the
same name may be present in the
database.
FMCSA proposes to have MROs,
rather than employers, report this
information to the Clearinghouse. A
large number of small motor carrier
employers (approximately 86%) are
responsible for administering drug and
alcohol programs. Based on the
Agency’s observation that smaller
employers have lower compliance rates
with FMCSA’s drug and alcohol testing
program, due in part to the inherent
business interests small companies have
in retaining employees, the Agency
believes that requiring MROs to report
verified drug results would produce
more accurate and comprehensive
reporting to the Clearinghouse.
The above notwithstanding, under
DOT rules, MROs do not verify alcohol
test results. As a result, paragraph (b)
would require employers to report the
following information to the
Clearinghouse: Alcohol test results with
an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or
greater; negative return-to-duty tests;
drug and alcohol test refusals; reports
that drivers have successfully
completed all follow-up tests; and
reports of actual knowledge that a driver
received a traffic citation for driving a
CMV under the influence of drugs or
alcohol. This section would also require
that employers report the reason for the
test; the driver’s name, date of birth,
CDL number and the State that issued
the CDL; the employer’s name, address,
and USDOT number or EIN; date of the
test; date the result was reported; and
test result. The test result would be one
of the following: Negative (for return-toduty tests only), positive, or refusal.
This information is required so that
information about drivers with similar
or identical names is not erroneously
posted to the wrong driver’s record.
Employers would also be required to
report each instance in which they have
actual knowledge that an employeedriver received a traffic citation for
driving a CMV under the influence of
drugs or alcohol. The report would
include the following information: The
driver’s name, date of birth, CDL
number and State that issued the CDL;
employer’s name, address, and USDOT
number or EIN; the date of the traffic
citation; the date the employer became
aware of the traffic citation; the name
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9711
and State of the law enforcement agency
issuing the traffic citation; the ticket or
docket number associated with the
citation; and the specific charge alleged
in the traffic citation. This information
is designed to ensure that a driver can
identify any traffic citation reported to
the database and verify that the
information is correctly reported with
the law enforcement agency that issued
it. If the citation does not result in a
conviction, a driver may request that
FMCSA remove the employer’s report
from the Clearinghouse (see proposed
§ 382.719). In that circumstance, the
information FMCSA proposes to require
in this paragraph will be important for
tracking the citation and its subsequent
adjudication. To the extent an employer
uses a TPA to comply with his or her
reporting duties, the employer remains
responsible for ensuring that the TPA
makes the required reports.
Similar to the requirements in
paragraph (b) that apply to employers,
paragraph (c) would require C/TPAs
acting on behalf of an employer who
employs himself/herself, as required by
49 CFR 382.103(b), to report the
following information to the
Clearinghouse: Alcohol test results with
an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or
greater; negative return-to-duty tests;
drug and alcohol test refusals; and
reports that drivers have successfully
completed all follow-up tests. This
section would also require that C/TPAs
report the reason for the test; the
driver’s name, date of birth, CDL
number and the State that issued the
CDL; the employer’s name, address, and
USDOT number or EIN; date of the test;
date the result was reported; and test
result. The test result would be one of
the following: Negative (for return-toduty tests only), positive, or refusal.
Paragraph (d) would require SAPs to
report information to the Clearinghouse
about drivers who begin the return-toduty process. That would include
information identifying the SAP and the
driver; the date of the initial SAP
assessment. The SAP would also enter
the date the SAP determined that the
driver successfully completed the
education and/or treatment process and
was eligible for return-to-duty testing;
and the frequency, number, and type of
required follow-up tests; the duration of
the follow-up testing plan; and any
subsequent modifications to the plan.
This information is important to
potential future employers so that they
may require a negative return-to-duty
test and comply with the follow-up
testing requirements. SAPs would be
required to report this information
within 1 business day of determining
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
9712
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
that the driver has completed the returnto-duty requirements.
Paragraph (e) would require persons
reporting information to the
Clearinghouse to do so truthfully and
accurately. FMCSA proposes to prohibit
anyone from reporting false or
inaccurate information. Anyone making
an inadvertent error should make a
correction immediately upon
discovering the error. Anyone violating
the provisions of this paragraph would
be subject to the civil and criminal
penalties set forth in current § 382.507,
as well as any other applicable
penalties.
Section 382.707
In accordance with the statutory
requirement, codified at 49 U.S.C.
31306a(g)(4), that requires the Agency to
notify individuals about changes to their
records in the Clearinghouse, new
§ 382.707 would require FMCSA to
notify a driver when information about
that driver is entered in, revised, or
removed from the Clearinghouse. It
would also require FMSA to notify a
driver when information from the
Clearinghouse is released to an
employer and to state the reason for the
release. The default method of
notification would be to send a letter by
U.S. Mail to the address on record with
the SDLA that issued the driver’s CDL.
However, drivers would be able to
provide an alternate address or method
of communications, such as electronic
mail. This section would require
FMCSA to alert a driver each time a
change occurred to his or her record in
the Clearinghouse. The driver would
then be able to access the Clearinghouse
to review the new or revised data and
request changes, if appropriate.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Section 382.709
As mandated by MAP–21 and
codified at 49 U.S.C. 31306a(j)(1), new
§ 382.709 would grant a driver the right
to review information in the
Clearinghouse about himself or herself,
except as otherwise restricted by law,
but reminds drivers that consistent with
Part 40, drivers cannot obtain their
follow-up testing plan.
Section 382.711
New § 382.711, implements the
statutory requirement, codified at 49
U.S.C. 31306a(h)(1) that the Agency
establish a process for employers and/or
their agents to request information from
the Clearinghouse. This section would
establish strict registration procedures
for employers and service agents. Only
employers and designated service
agents—MROs, C/TPAs, and SAPs—
would be authorized to submit
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
information on a driver to the
Clearinghouse. All Clearinghouse
registrants would be required to provide
their names, addresses, and telephone
numbers, as well as any other
information necessary to validate
identity. In addition, employers would
be required to submit their USDOT
numbers or EINs and the name of the
person or persons authorized to access
the Clearinghouse. C/TPAs would also
be required to identify the person or
persons authorized to access the
Clearinghouse. Employers and C/TPAs
would be required to update annually
the names of the people they authorize
to access the Clearinghouse. MROs and
SAPs would be required to provide a
certification and evidence that they
meet the DOT’s qualifications and
training requirements under 49 CFR part
40 in order to register.
DOT recognizes the uniqueness of
‘‘owner-operators’’ in the motor carrier
industry. 49 CFR 40.355(f)(h) & (j)
provide specific exceptions to enable
service agents (e.g., SAPs, C/TPAs, and
MROs) to better manage this situation
where the employee is also the
employer. Under 49 CFR 382.305,
FMCSA requires owner-operators to
participate in a consortium for random
testing. New § 382.711(b) would
expressly require employers that are
owner-operators to identify the C/TPA
that it uses for testing purposes and
authorize that C/TPA to submit
information on a driver, including
themselves, to the Clearinghouse. This
section would be mandatory for owneroperator and self-employed individuals
and permissive for other employers that
may use C/TPAs to perform testing
services.
Section 382.713
New § 382.713 would set forth the
terms under which Clearinghouse
registrations would remain active, or
would be revoked or cancelled. The
initial Clearinghouse registration term
would be 5 years unless the Agency
took action to revoke or cancel it. The
Agency proposes to cancel any
registrant that does not use the
Clearinghouse to view or input
information for 2 years. The Agency
would also have the authority to revoke
the Clearinghouse registration of entities
who do not comply with Clearinghouse
regulations.
If an entity’s Clearinghouse privileges
are revoked, they would still be
obligated to perform all of the functions
under this rule. If it was unable to do
so because of revocation, then FMCSA
staff would become involved and
process the requests on behalf of the
employers. There is no reason why an
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
entity could not request reconsideration
if its registration were revoked.
Section 382.715
New § 382.715 would require
employers to designate C/TPAs before
the C/TPA could enter information
relating to them into the Clearinghouse.
Section 382.717
New § 382.717 would implement the
statutory requirement, codified at 49
U.S.C. 31306a(j)(2), that the Agency
provide a dispute resolution procedure
to remedy administrative errors in an
individual’s Clearinghouse record. This
section would establish procedures for
drivers to petition FMCSA to correct
inaccurate information in the
Clearinghouse. Drivers would be
required to submit a petition within 18
months of the date the information in
question was reported to the
Clearinghouse. Drivers would need to
include information identifying
themselves and the information they
want to be corrected, the reasons they
believe the information is inaccurate,
and evidence supporting their
challenge. Drivers would not be able to
challenge the accuracy or validity of the
alcohol or controlled substance test
results under these new procedures.
Nothing in this rule would change the
limitation on a driver’s ability to
challenge the validity of a test result or
a refusal.
The procedures that would be
established under this section would be
used to correct clerical errors, such as
reporting results to the wrong driver’s
record; an incorrect name or CDL
number; a misidentified test type, such
as a pre-employment identified as a
random test; or other inaccuracies in the
reported data. These procedures could
also be used to request that an
employer’s report of actual knowledge
of a traffic citation for driving a CMV
under the influence of drugs or alcohol
be removed from the Clearinghouse if
the citation did not result in a
conviction. FMCSA would resolve
petitions and notify the driver of its
decision within 90 days of receiving a
complete petition. The rule would also
establish an expedited review to elevate
those petitions seeking correction of
critical information as opposed to those
petitions addressing errors that do not
impact an individual’s ability to
perform safety-sensitive functions. In
this manner, the Agency will be able to
provide the critical function served by
this section and appropriately manage
any number of petitions that seek lesscritical, but nevertheless valid, requests
for data correction. If resolution of the
decision would affect the driver’s ability
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
to perform safety-sensitive functions, he
or she could request expedited review.
If FMCSA granted expedited review, it
would inform the driver of its decision
within 30 days of receiving a complete
petition.
This section would also give drivers
the opportunity to request
administrative review of FMCSA’s
disposition of a petition to correct
information in the Clearinghouse. A
driver challenging FMCSA’s decision
would be required to present his or her
request in writing to the Associate
Administrator for Enforcement and
Program Delivery, along with an
explanation of the error he or she asserts
FMCSA made and documentation to
support his or her position. The
Associate Administrator would make a
decision within 60 days, and this would
constitute final Agency action.
With respect to the administrative
review procedures for denials of
requests for data correction in
382.717(f), we would note that this is
not an appeal of a factual or evidentiary
nature it is a second level of review of
a data correction system. The Agency
based the procedures for administrative
review in the NPRM on existing
procedures in FMCSA regulations
where the administrative review is
similarly based on ‘‘agency error.’’ See
49 CFR 385.15 (administrative review of
safety ratings), 385.113 (administrative
review of Mexican carrier safety
ratings), 385.327 (administrative review
of new entrant safety audits), 385.423
(administrative review of hazmat safety
permit denials). None of these existing
processes include an explicit standard
for review, explanation of how
decisions will be made by the identified
deciding official, or evidentiary
standards. None of these sections have
been deemed inadequate. The standard,
as here, is whether the Agency erred in
making its initial decision. In addition,
all petitioners will have the right to
obtain counsel if they so choose.
Section 382.719
New § 382.719 would provide that an
employer seeking to determine whether
an employment prohibition exists
would not have access to information
about a particular violation once certain
conditions are met. FMCSA proposes
that once a driver successfully
completes all aspects of the return-toduty process, information about a
positive test result or a refusal will
remain accessible to employers for a
period of either three or five years.
FMCSA proposes both options based on
two provisions in MAP–21 that can be
interpreted to require employers to have
access to this information for either a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
three or five-year period. Compare 49
U.S.C. 31306a(f) (requiring employers to
determine whether a driver has had an
employment prohibition for a three-year
period prior to hiring), with 49 U.S.C.
31306(g)(6) (requiring the Secretary to
retain records in the clearinghouse for
five years, and remove records after five
years, ‘‘unless the individual fails to
meet a return-to-duty or follow-up
requirement under title 49, Code of
Federal Regulations’’).
Based on this analysis, FMCSA
proposes the following requirements to
determine when records will no longer
be available for review by employers
conducting queries of the database: (1)
The SAP reports that the driver has
successfully completed the prescribed
education and/or treatment as required
by 49 CFR 40.305 and is eligible for
return-to-duty testing; (2) the employer
or C/TPA reports that the driver has
received negative return-to-duty test
results; (3) the driver’s present employer
or employer’s consortium (for owner/
operators) reports that the driver has
successfully completed all follow-up
tests as prescribed in the SAP report in
accordance with §§ 40.307, 40.309, and
40.311; and (4) 3 years have passed
since the date of the violation
determination. As an alternate to
subparagraph (4), FMCSA proposes to
limit the time period during which an
employer could access information
about a violation that the driver has
addressed by successful completion of
the return to duty process to a period of
five years from the date of violation
instead of three years. FMCSA seeks
comment on whether three or five years
from the date of the violation is the
appropriate amount of time to make this
test result information available after a
driver has completed the return-to-duty
process.
Regardless of whether three years or
five years has passed since the date of
the violation determination, this section
would also provide that violation
information would remain in the
Clearinghouse indefinitely and be
available to employers conducting a
query if a driver failed to complete the
return-to-duty process. The above
notwithstanding, FMCSA will remove
information about a traffic citation for
driving a CMV under the influence of
drugs or alcohol within 2 business days
of making the determination that it did
not result in a conviction. This section
would also make clear that FMCSA
could continue to use data removed
from the Clearinghouse for research,
auditing, and enforcement purposes.
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9713
Section 382.721
As authorized by 49 U.S.C. 31306a(e),
new § 382.721 would establish the
Agency’s ability to collect reasonable
fees from entities that are required to
query the Clearinghouse. The Agency
would be prohibited from collecting fees
from drivers accessing their own
records.
Section 382.723
New § 382.723 would prohibit anyone
from accessing the Clearinghouse except
as authorized by this proposed rule. It
would also prohibit anyone from
reporting inaccurate or misleading
information to the Clearinghouse. No
one would be permitted to disclose or
disseminate any information obtained
from the Clearinghouse, except as
otherwise authorized by law. As
required by statute, codified at 49 U.S.C.
31306a(h)(1)(D), employers would be
specifically prohibited from using
information from the Clearinghouse for
any purpose other than to assess or
evaluate whether a driver is prohibited
from operating a CMV. Employers
would be further prohibited from
divulging any such information to
anyone not directly involved in that
assessment or evaluation, as required by
49 U.S.C. 31306a(h)(1)(E)(ii). Anyone
who violates this rule would be subject
to the civil and criminal penalties
established by existing § 382.507. In
addition, employers and service agents
remain subject to the requirements
concerning ‘‘Confidentiality and Release
of Information’’ found in 49 CFR part
40, subpart P. These provisions are
incorporated and made applicable to
motor carrier employers in 49 CFR
382.105. This section would not,
however, prohibit FMCSA from
accessing the information in the
Clearinghouse for research or
enforcement purposes. For example,
FMCSA could use the information in
the database to identify trends in testing
data that could help the Agency focus
its oversight activities.
Section 382.725
In accordance with Congress’s
mandate in MAP–21 (codified at 49
U.S.C. 31306a(h)(2), new § 382.725
would grant each State chief
commercial driver’s license official the
right to access information in the
Clearinghouse about an applicant for a
commercial driver’s license for the
purpose of determining whether that
applicant is qualified to operate a CMV.
The applicant is not required to grant
prior consent; an applicant is deemed to
have granted consent by virtue of
applying for a commercial driver’s
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
9714
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
license. The chief commercial driver’s
license officials are required to protect
the privacy and confidentiality of the
information they receive under this
proposed section. Failure to comply
with the terms of this proposed section
would result in the official losing his or
her right of access.
Section 382.727
As directed by Congress in MAP–21
(codified at 49 U.S.C. 31306a(k), new
§ 382.727 would establish civil and
criminal penalties for violations of the
proposed Clearinghouse regulations. As
stated above, 49 CFR 382.507 already
establishes civil and criminal liability
for employers and drivers that violate
any provision of 49 CFR part 382.
However, new § 382.727 would extend
civil and criminal liability to all
employees, medical review officers and
service agents for violations of 49 CFR
subpart G.
Summary of Responsibilities and Data
Access
Table 1 summarizes the obligations of
each entity responsible for reporting
information to the Clearinghouse
database.
TABLE 1—REPORTING ENTITIES AND CIRCUMSTANCES
Reporting entity
When information would be reported to clearinghouse
Prospective Employer of CDL Driver ......
—Positive pre-employment test result.
—Refusal to test (drug) not requiring a determination by the MRO as specified in 49 CFR 40.191.
—Positive alcohol test result.
—Refusal to test (alcohol) as specified in 49 CFR 40.261.
—Refusal to test (drug) not requiring a determination by the MRO as specified in 49 CFR 40.191.
—Citations (DUI in a CMV).
—Negative return-to-duty test results.
—Completion of follow-up testing.
—Verified positive, adulterated, or substituted drug test result.
—Refusal to test (drug) requiring a determination by the MRO as specified in 49 CFR 40.191.
—Positive alcohol test result.
—Refusal to test (alcohol) as specified in 49 CFR 40.261.
—Refusal to test (drug) not requiring a determination by the MRO as specified in 49 CFR 40.191.
—Negative return-to-duty test results.
—Positive alcohol test result.
—Refusal to test (alcohol) as specified in 49 CFR 40.261.
—Refusal to test (drug) not requiring a determination by the MRO as specified in 49 CFR 40.191.
—Identification of driver and date the initial assessment was initiated.
—Successful completion of treatment and/or education and the determination of eligibility for returnto-duty testing.
—Follow-up testing requirements.
Current Employer of CDL Driver .............
MRO ........................................................
Third Party Administrator (if designated
by employer to report on its behalf).
Consortium (reporting for owner/operators).
SAP ..........................................................
Table 2 summarizes the conditions
under which entities would be able to
view information in the Clearinghouse.
TABLE 2—QUERYING ENTITIES AND INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE CLEARINGHOUSE
Querying entity
Prospective Employer of
CDL Driver (full query).
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Current Employer of CDL
Driver (full query).
Current Employer of CDL
Driver (limited query).
CDL Driver ...........................
MRO .....................................
SAP ......................................
Consortium (full query) ........
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Type of data obtained
Requirements to obtain data
Records in the Clearinghouse pertaining to the applicant concerning:
—positive alcohol test result;
—verified positive, adulterated, or substituted drug
test result;
—refusal to test (alcohol or drug);
—citations (actual knowledge);
—return-to-duty negative test result;
—follow-up testing program information.
Records in the Clearinghouse pertaining to the CDL
driver concerning:
—positive alcohol test result;
—verified positive, adulterated, or substituted drugs
test result;
—refusal to test (alcohol or drug);
—citations (actual knowledge);
—return-to-duty negative test result;
—follow-up testing program information.
Notice of whether information for the driver exists in the
Clearinghouse.
Records in the Clearinghouse pertaining to the CDL
driver.
No access.
No access.
Records in the Clearinghouse pertaining to the CDL
driver concerning:
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Employer obtains written consent from driver.
Employer obtains written consent from driver.
Employer obtains written consent for a limited query.
Specific request of the CDL driver; FMCSA verifies
driver identity.
Consortium obtains written consent for a full query.
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
9715
TABLE 2—QUERYING ENTITIES AND INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE CLEARINGHOUSE—Continued
Querying entity
Type of data obtained
Consortium (limited query) ...
Third Party Administrator .....
FMCSA .................................
NTSB ....................................
Requirements to obtain data
—positive alcohol test result;
—verified positive, adulterated, or substituted drugs
test result;
—refusal to test (alcohol or drug);
—citations (actual knowledge);
—return-to-duty negative test result;
—follow-up testing program information.
Notice of whether information for the driver exists in the
Clearinghouse.
Access limited to authority delegated by employer to review data in Clearinghouse.
Full access ......................................................................
Records of driver involved in accidents under investigation.
Consortium obtains written consent for a limited query.
TPA obtains written consent for a limited or full query;
TPA must have specific written consent from the employer of the CDL driver.
No consent required.
No consent required.
Table 3 summarizes the types of
queries that an employer is required to
conduct.
TABLE 3—TYPES OF QUERIES
Type of query
Type of consent
When required
Type of data obtained
Full query ................
Employer obtains written consent from
driver.
Employer obtains written consent from
driver.
Pre-employment screening ..................
Information on driver’s drug and alcohol test results.
Information on driver’s drug and alcohol test results.
Full query ................
Limited query ..........
Employer must obtain and maintain
written consent for at least 3 years
following the query.
Notice of whether information for the
driver exists in the Clearinghouse.
RIA Estimates of Benefits and Costs
All employers subject to the drug and
alcohol testing regulations would be
required to query the database (1) on an
annual basis to examine each driver’s
positive test record and (2) as part of a
prospective driver’s pre-employment
screening process.
Given the established, sizeable
success of mandatory testing programs
on crash reduction,4 5 concrete
improvements in the process of
disseminating positive-test results and
making them accessible to employers
are expected to bring substantial
benefits.
The Agency estimates about $187
million in annual benefits from
increased crash reduction from the
rule—$53 million from the annual
queries and $134 from the preemployment queries. FMCSA estimates
about $186 million in total annual costs,
which include costs for: Employers to
complete the annual ($28 million) and
pre-employment ($10 million) queries;
employers and drivers to designate
service agents and report driver
information ($3 million); various
entities to report positive tests ($1
million) and to register, verify
authorization, and become familiar with
the rule ($5 million); consent to release
driver information ($35 million);
clearinghouse development and records
management ($3 million); and the cost
for drivers to go through the return-toduty process ($101 million). The
estimated costs are about equal to its
benefits: Total net benefits of the rule
are just $1 million annually. The tenyear projection of net benefits is $8
million when discounted at seven
percent and $9 million when
discounted at three percent. However,
estimated benefits include only those
associated with reductions in CMV
crashes. FMCSA could not precisely
quantify improved health, quality-of-life
improvements, and increased life
expectancy for CMV drivers. The
Agency believes these non-quantified
benefits are significant, and, if they were
included in the benefits estimates,
would clearly demonstrate the positive
net benefits of this rule. The table below
summarizes these net-benefit estimates.
4 Jacobson, Mireille, ‘‘Drug Testing in the
Trucking Industry: The Effect on Highway Safety,’’
The Journal of Law and Economics, April 2003, Vol.
46, pp. 130–156.
5 Brady, Joanne E., Susan P. Baker, Charles
DiMaggio, Melissa McCarthy, George W. Rebok, and
Guohua Li, ‘‘Effectiveness of Mandatory Alcohol
Testing Programs in Reducing Alcohol Involvement
in Fatal Motor Carrier Crashes,’’ American Journal
of Epidemiology, Vol. 170, No. 6, pp. 775–782
(Advance Access Publication 19–August–2009).
V. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule is a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review. The Office of
Management and Budget has reviewed it
under that Order. It requires an
assessment of potential costs and
benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. A draft Regulatory Impact
Analysis (RIA) is available in the docket
where indicated under the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ section of this preamble. A
summary of the RIA follows:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Annual query results show that the
driver has drug or alcohol testing information in the Clearinghouse.
Annually ................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
9716
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
TOTAL AND ANNUAL NET BENEFIT PROJECTION OVER A TEN-YEAR PERIOD
Total
Annual
10-Year
7%
Discount Rate
10-Year
3%
Total Benefits ...................................................................................................................
Total Costs .......................................................................................................................
$187,000,000
186,000,000
$1,406,000,000
1,398,000,000
$1,643,000,000
1,634,000,000
Total Net Benefits .....................................................................................................
1,000,000
8,000,000
9,000,000
The RIA contains sections describing
the benefits and costs associated with
implementing the following provisions
of the proposed rule:
• Mandatory Queries
a. Employers would be required to
query the Clearinghouse annually for
each of their drivers in order to
ascertain if any of them failed drug or
alcohol tests during the previous year.
b. Prospective employers would be
required to query the Clearinghouse as
part of their pre-employment screening
process of potential hires in order to
ascertain if a prospective employee
failed a drug or alcohol test with a
previous employer or prospective
employer.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
• Designating Service Agents
c. Employers would be required to
designate (and submit authorization for)
their C/TPAs and SAPs with the
Clearinghouse.
• Reports and Notifications of Positive
Tests
d. MROs would report verified
positive controlled-substances test
results for CDL drivers to the
Clearinghouse. Each test would be
identified as pre-employment, postaccident, random, reasonable suspicion,
return-to-duty, or follow-up. MROs
would also be required to report certain
drug test refusals to the Clearinghouse.
e. FMCSA would notify each driver
testing positive that information about
them has been reported to, revised or
removed from the Clearinghouse. The
drivers would also have the opportunity
to review this information.
f. SAPs would report to the
Clearinghouse information about the
evaluation and treatment process as
well as the number of required followup tests to be given after a return-toduty test.
g. Employers or C/TPAs acting on the
employer’s behalf would report verified
alcohol test results at or above 0.04
alcohol concentration for CDL drivers to
the Clearinghouse, subsequent followup test results stemming from the initial
test at or above 0.04 alcohol
concentration, and refusals. Each test
would be identified as pre-employment,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
post-accident, random, reasonable
suspicion, return-to-duty, or follow-up.
Employers or TPAs would also report
negative return-to-duty test results.
h. All employers subject to 49 CFR
part 382, or C/TPAs acting on the
employer’s behalf would report
information on refusals to test.
i. Employers would be required to
report actual knowledge of a driver’s
traffic citation for driving a CMV under
the influence of drugs or alcohol).
• Clearinghouse Registration
j. Employers, C/TPAs, MROs, and
SAPs would be required to register with
the Clearinghouse.
k. Employers (and C/TPAs) would be
required to verify, on an annual basis,
the names of person(s) authorized to
report and obtain information from the
Clearinghouse.
• Driver Consent Verification
l. Written consent must be obtained
from the driver prior to release of
information from the Clearinghouse.
• Submission of Annual Reports
m. All drug-testing laboratories would
submit employer specific summary
reports of test results directly to FMCSA
annually.
Benefit Analysis
The benefits to the rule derive from
reductions in crashes due to the
additional information on employeefailed and refused drug and alcohol tests
disseminated to employers solely
because of the annual and preemployment queries. This represents
information that employers would not
otherwise know about and act on.
The current drug-testing program is
estimated to generate $160 million in
annual crash-reduction benefits from
35,145 annual positive tests, which
averages to approximately $4,600 per
positive drug test ($160 million/35,145,
rounded to the nearest hundred). The
mandated annual query in the proposed
rule would result in 9,200 instances of
employer alerts to positive drug tests of
their drivers that current employers
would not otherwise have known about.
A requirement that disseminates
additional information on 9,200 other
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
positive testing drivers can be estimated
to generate the same proportion of
benefits that the 35,145 from the current
program generates. If 35,145 positive
tests and consequent alerts generate
$160 million in benefits, then 9,200
additional alerts would generate $42
million in benefits (($160 million/
35,145) = ($41.9 million/9,200),
rounded to the nearest million).
The current alcohol testing program is
estimated to generate $43 million in
annual crash-reduction benefits from
3,465 annual positive alcohol tests,
which averages to approximately $9,200
per positive alcohol test ($43 million/
3,465, rounded to nearest hundred). The
mandated annual query in the proposed
rule would result in 900 instances of
employer alerts to positive tests of their
drivers that current employers would
not otherwise have known about. A
requirement that disseminates
additional information on 900 other
positive testing drivers can be estimated
to generate the same proportion of
benefits that the 3,465 from the current
program generates. If 3,465 positive tests
and consequent alerts generate $43
million in benefits, then 900 additional
alerts would generate about $11 million
in benefits (($43 million/3,465) = ($11.2
million/900), rounded to the nearest
million).
With annual benefits to the drugtesting side of the annual queries
estimated at $42 million and the
alcohol-testing side at $11 million, total
annual benefits to mandated annual
queries are thus estimated at $53 million
($42 million + $11 million).
The mandated pre-employment query
in the proposed rule would result in
23,100 instances of employer alerts to
positive drug tests that prospective
employers would not otherwise have
known about. A requirement that
disseminates additional information on
23,100 other positive drug testing
drivers can be estimated to generate the
same proportion of benefits that the
35,145 from the current program
generates. If 35,145 positive tests and
consequent alerts generate $160 million
in benefits, then 23,100 additional alerts
would generate $105 million in benefits
(($160 million/35,145) = ($105.2
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
million/23,100), rounded to the nearest
million).
The mandated pre-employment query
in the proposed rule would result in
2,300 instances of employer alerts to
positive alcohol tests of their drivers
that prospective employers would not
otherwise have known about. A
requirement that disseminates
additional information on 2,300 other
positive testing drivers can be estimated
to generate the same proportion of
benefits that the 3,465 from the current
program generates. If 3,465 positive tests
and consequent alerts generate $43
million in benefits, then 2,300
additional alerts would generate $29
million in benefits (($43 million/3,465)
= ($28.5 million/2,300), rounded to the
nearest million).
With annual benefits to the drugtesting side of the pre-employment
queries estimated at $105 million and
the alcohol-testing side at $29 million,
total annual benefits to mandated preemployment queries are thus estimated
at $134 million ($105 million + $29
million).
9717
Given the $53 million in annual
benefits from the information on
positive tests disseminated because of
the mandatory annual queries ($42
million drug and $11 million alcohol)
and the $134 million in annual benefits
from the information on positive tests
disseminated because of the mandatory
pre-employment queries ($105 million
drug and $29 million alcohol), the total
benefits to the proposed rule are $187
million annually. The table below
presents these benefit totals.
TOTAL ANNUAL BENEFITS OF THE RULE
Queries
Drug
Alcohol
Total
Annual ..........................................................................................................................................
Pre-Employment ..........................................................................................................................
$42,000,000
105,000,000
$11,000,000
29,000,000
$53,000,000
134,000,000
Total ......................................................................................................................................
147,000,000
40,000,000
187,000,000
Based on the annual benefits of $187
million, the 10-year benefit projection is
$1.406 billion when discounted at 7
percent and $1.643 billion when
discounted at 3 percent
By reducing drug and alcohol abuse
by drivers, this rule could also lead to
improved health, quality-of-life
improvements, and increased life
expectancy for drivers beyond those
associated with reductions in vehicle
crashes.
Cost Analysis
FMCSA estimates that the costs of the
proposed rule total $186 million
annually, which can be separated into
nine categories. From the above
descriptions of the requirements of the
rule (a though m above): (a) The cost to
employers to complete the annual
queries of their drivers is estimated at
$28 million annually; (b) the cost to
prospective employers to complete preemployment queries as part of the preemployment screening process is $10
million annually; (c) the cost to
employers to designate their C/TPAs
and SAPs to input driver information is
$3 million annually; (d, e, f, g, h, and
i) the cost to MROs, SAPs, C/TPAs, and
employers to report positive tests to the
Agency totals $1 million annually; (j
and k) the cost for employers, C/TPAs,
MROs, and SAPs to register with the
Agency, verify persons authorized to
access, and become familiar with the
new processes (this familiarization is
not, per se, ‘‘required’’ by the
rulemaking, but is an obvious result of
it) is $5 million annually: (l) The cost to
process access requests is $35 million
annually, (m) the cost to FMCSA to
develop the clearinghouse and manage
driver records is $3 million annually,
the cost for drivers to undergo the
return-to-duty process is $101 million
annually, and the cost for laboratories to
submit annual reports of test results to
FMCSA is insignificant (less than
$1,500). These components of the cost
estimate are presented in the table
below and FMCSA seeks comment on
the estimates summarized here and
discussed further in the RIA.
SUMMARY OF THE TOTAL ANNUAL COSTS OF THE RULE
Entity
Annual Queries .............................................................................................................
Pre-Employment Queries .............................................................................................
Designate Service Agents/Input Driver Information .....................................................
Report Positive Tests ...................................................................................................
Register, Rule Familiarize, Verify Authorization ..........................................................
Access ..........................................................................................................................
Development and Records Management ....................................................................
Return-to-Duty Process ................................................................................................
Employers .................................................
Employers .................................................
Employers .................................................
Various ......................................................
Various ......................................................
Drivers .......................................................
FMCSA .....................................................
Drivers .......................................................
$28,000,000
10,000,000
3,000,000
1,000,000
5,000,000
35,000,000
3,000,000
101,000,000
Grand Total ...........................................................................................................
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Cost category
...................................................................
186,000,000
Based on the annual cost of $186
million, the ten-year cost projection
would be $1.398 billion when
discounted at 7 percent and $1.634
billion when discounted at 3 percent.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
Regulatory Flexibility Act and Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
as amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
(SBREFA), (5 U.S.C. 601–612), requires
Federal agencies to consider the effects
of the regulatory action on small
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Annual cost
business and other small entities and to
minimize any significant economic
impact. The term ‘‘small entities’’
comprises small businesses and not-forprofit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and
are not dominant in their fields and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
9718
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Accordingly, DOT policy requires an
analysis of the impact of all regulations
(or proposals) on small entities, and
mandates that agencies shall strive to
lessen any adverse effects on these
businesses. The initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) must cover
the following topics:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(1) A Description of the Reasons Why
Action by the Agency Is Being
Considered
A 1999 bus crash in New Orleans
resulted in 22 passenger fatalities. The
driver of the motor-coach had failed preemployment drug testing when applying
for previous positions. He had also
failed to disclose on his employment
application that a previous employer
had fired him after he tested positive for
a controlled substance. His employer at
the time of the crash did not know about
any of this.
As a result, the National
Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)
made recommendations to the Agency
pertaining to the reporting of CMV
driver drug and alcohol testing results.
Specifically, the NTSB recommended
that FMCSA ‘‘develop a system that
records all positive drug and alcohol
test results and refusal determinations
that are conducted under the U.S.
Department of Transportation (USDOT)
testing requirements, require
prospective employers to query the
system before making a hiring decision,
and require certifying authorities to
query the system before making a
certification decision.’’ This proposed
rulemaking addresses the NTSB’s
recommendation.
Two recent Government
Accountability Office (GAO) reports
discuss ‘‘job hopping’’ by CMV drivers
after failing, or refusing to submit to,
drug or alcohol tests (see: GAO–08–600
and GAO–08–0829R). The GAO
identified and verified 43 cases (based
on insider information supplied by a
third party to a Congressman) where
CMV drivers had tested positive for
illegal drugs (such as cocaine,
marijuana, and amphetamines) with one
employer and within 1 month tested
negative with another employer. In its
recommendations to Congress, the GAO
advocated a national database and this
rulemaking as possible methods to
eliminate the job-hopping problems.
The purpose of this rule is to mandate
that employers annually query the
Clearinghouse to determine whether
each of their drivers has tested positive
for illegal drug or alcohol use in the
previous year. Additionally, the rule
mandates that employers query the
Clearinghouse as part of their pre-
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
employment screening process of
prospective drivers.
The purpose of the annual query is to
diminish or eliminate the problem of a
currently-employed CDL holder testing
positive for illegal drug or alcohol use
with another or prospective employer,
but then simply continuing to operate
CMVs with his or her current employer
without that employer knowing and
acting on the positive test.
The purpose of the pre-employment
query is to diminish or eliminate the
problem of a driver with previous
positive tests seeking and obtaining
work without prospective employers
knowing and acting on the information.
This could occur if a driver is fired for
a positive test—for example, failing a
post-accident or reasonable-suspicion
test—but does not inform future
employers about the previous employer
that fired her.
This could also occur if a new driver
entering the workforce tests positive for
drugs or alcohol during a preemployment test, waits for the drugs to
leave her system, then takes and passes
another pre-employment test and gets
hired without the employer having any
knowledge of the previously failed preemployment test.
(2) A Succinct Statement of the
Objectives of, and Legal Basis for, the
Proposed Rule
The Agency proposes to revise 49 CFR
part 382, Controlled Substances and
Alcohol Use and Testing, to establish a
database, identified as the ‘‘Commercial
Driver’s License Drug and Alcohol
Clearinghouse,’’ for reporting of verified
positive, adulterated, or substituted
drug test results; positive alcohol test
results; refusals; and negative return-toduty test results. Under the proposed
rule, motor carrier would be required to
query the Clearinghouse for drug and
alcohol test result information on
employees and prospective employees.
The proposed rule is intended to
increase compliance with drug and
alcohol testing requirements.
FMCSA has general authority to
promulgate safety standards, including
those governing drivers’ use of drugs or
alcohol while operating a CMV. The
Motor Carrier Safety Act of 1984 (Pub.
L. 98–554, Title II, 98 Stat. 2832,
October 30, 1984) (the 1984 Act)
provides authority to regulate drivers,
motor carriers, and vehicle equipment
and requires the Secretary to prescribe
minimum safety standards for CMVs.
The Omnibus Transportation Employee
Testing Act of 1991 (OTETA) (Pub. L.
102–143, Title V, 105 Stat. 917, at 952,
October 28, 1991, codified at 49 U.S.C.
31306) mandated the alcohol and
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
controlled substances (drug) testing
program for DOT. OTETA required the
Secretary of Transportation to
promulgate regulations for alcohol and
drug testing for persons in safetysensitive positions in four modes of
transportation, motor carrier, airline,
railroad, and mass transit.
(3) A Description—and, Where Feasible,
an Estimate of the Number—of Small
Entities to Which the Proposed Rule
Will Apply
Carriers are not required to report
revenue to the Agency, but are required
to provide the Agency with the number
of CMVs they operate, when they
register with the Agency, and to update
this figure biennially. Because FMCSA
does not have direct revenue figures for
all motor carriers, CMVs serve as a
proxy to determine the carrier size that
would qualify as a small business given
the SBA’s revenue threshold. In order to
produce this estimate, it is necessary to
determine the average revenue
generated by a CMV.
With regard to truck CMVs, the
Agency determined in the Hours-ofService Supporting Documents
Rulemaking RIA 6 that a CMV produces
about $173,000 in revenue annually
(adjusted for inflation to 2012 dollars).7
According to the SBA, motor carriers
with annual revenue of $25.5 million
are considered small businesses.8 This
equates to about 147 CMVs (147.4 =
$25,500,000/$173,000). Thus, FMCSA
considers motor carriers of property
with 147 CMVs or fewer to be small
businesses for purposes of this analysis.
The Agency then looked at the number
and percentage of property carriers with
recent activity that would fall under that
definition (of having 147 CMVs or
fewer). The results indicate that at least
99 percent of all interstate property
carriers with recent activity have 147
CMVs or fewer.9 This amounts to
6 FMCSA Regulatory Analysis, ‘‘Hours of Service
of Drivers,’’ Final Rule. Federal Register/Vol. 76,
No. 248/Tuesday, December 27, 2011/Rules and
Regulations, p. 81181. Using data from the 2007
Economic Census, FMCSA estimated that the
average carrier earns roughly $160,000 in annual
revenue per truck (in year 2007 dollars).
7 GDP Deflator. Available from the Bureau of
Economic Analysis online, NIPA tables, Section 1,
Table 1.1.4, ‘‘Price Indexes for Gross Domestic
Product,’’ years 2007–2012. Accessed on July 29,
2013 at https://www.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm.
8 U.S. Small Business Administration Table of
Small Business Size Standards matched to North
American Industry Classification System (NAICS)
codes, effective January 7, 2013. See NAIC
subsector 484, Truck Transportation. Accessed on
July 26, 2013 at https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/
files/files/Size_Standards_Table.pdf.
9 An August 24, 2012 MCMIS snapshot indicates
that carriers possessing 100 CMVs or less comprise
of 99.26 percent of all interstate motor carriers with
recent activity.
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
515,000 carriers (99 percent of 520,000
active motor carriers = 514,800, rounded
to the nearest thousand). Therefore, an
overwhelming majority of interstate
carriers of property would be
considered small entities.
To provide a conservative estimate on
the impact of small entities, the Agency
assumes that every active motor carrier
would be subject to this regulation
because under full participation all
carriers would complete annual and
pre-employment queries. Hence the rule
applies to all (estimated) 515,000 motor
carriers considered small entities.
Assuming there are 1.05 drivers per
CMV 10 and a maximum of 147 CMVs
per small entity, FMCSA estimates that
at most 154 drivers (154.35 = 147 × 1.05)
would be annually queried by a small
entity. With an annual average of
1,876,000 drug pre-employment tests
conducted on 4 million CDL drivers, the
estimated rate of pre-employment tests
per population would be 47 percent
(0.469 = 1,876,000/4,000,000). With the
assumption that this rate is
proportionate to a 154-driver entity, it
would result in about 72 preemployment tests (47 percent of 154
drivers) and consequently 72 preemployment queries per year, on
average. In total, the maximum number
of annual and pre-employment queries
that a small entity may encounter would
be 226 per year (154 annual + 72 preemployment).
At ten minutes per query, 38 hours
would be required to complete 226
queries (37.67 = 226 queries × 1⁄6 queries
per hour). About another half-hour
would be necessary to designate and
verify a C/TPA (10 minutes), register
with the Clearinghouse (10 minutes)
and become familiar with the rule (10
minutes). In total, then, a 154-driver
small entity would need to spend 38.5
hours (38 + 1⁄2) to comply with the rule.
The occupational salary of a
bookkeeping, accounting, or auditing
clerk is taken as the median of $16.91
per hour (BLS, May 2012).11 Two
adjustments are made to this hourly
compensation estimate. First, employee
benefits are estimated at 50 percent of
the employee wage.12 Second, the
employee wage and benefits are
increased by 27 percent to include
relevant firm overhead.13 Applying the
estimated 50 percent of wages for
employee benefits and 27 percent for
overhead results in $32.21 in hourly
compensation for the clerk ($32.21 =
$16.91 × (1 + 0.50) × (1 + 0.27). Given
$32.21 per hour for 38.5 hours, the
annual cost of the queries incurred by
a bookkeeping clerk would be $1,240
($1,240.22 = 38.5 × $32.21, rounded to
the nearest dollar) for a 154-driver small
entity.
In addition, a fee would be required
to access the Clearinghouse during the
query process. A full query would cost
$5 and a limited query would cost
$2.50. Full queries are required by all
pre-employment screening. Given 72
pre-employment queries for a 154-driver
small entity, fees for access would be
$360 (72 × $5). If an annual query
indicates that information exists on a
particular driver in the Clearinghouse,
then a limited query would lead to a full
9719
query. As explained in Section 7.6,
there are an estimated 512,000 full
queries, annually. Given 4,000,000
drivers in the industry, there would be
a 12.8 percent chance (512,000/
4,000,000 = 0.128) that a driver would
require a full query during an annual
screening. Therefore, a 154-driver small
entity is estimated to perform about 20
full queries annually (154 × 0.128 =
19.7). The amount of limited queries to
be performed would be 134 (154 total
queries—20 full queries). Accordingly,
the cost of access requests for annual
queries is $335 (134 × $2.50) for limited
queries and $100 (20 × $5) for full
queries. In sum, the annual cost of fees
for access for pre-employment and
annual queries is $795 ($360 + $335 +
$100) for a 154-driver small entity.
The maximum possible cost to a small
entity thus totals $2,035 annually
($1,240 + $795). This sets the maximum
cost for a small entity as defined by the
SBA Most motor carriers, however,
employ significantly fewer drivers than
the estimated 154 SBA limit. The
Agency estimates that nearly 75 percent
of motor carriers employ three drivers or
less.14 Under this proposed rule, a
motor carrier would incur
approximately $13.22 per driver
($2,035/154 drivers) annually.
Accordingly, a motor carrier that
employs four drivers—a more typical
carrier in the industry—would pay less
than $40 annually for this testing.
The table below summarizes the cost
analysis.
MAXIMUM POSSIBLE COST TO SMALL ENTITIES
Fees for access
Maximum number for a small entity
Annual
Notes
Limited query
Full query
147
1.05
154
........................
........................
134
........................
........................
20
Estimated Percentage of Pre-Employment
Queries.
Pre-Employment Queries ................................
47%
........................
........................
72
0
72
47% of 154.
Total Queries ..................................................
Hours Per Query (10 minutes) .......................
Total Hours for Annual and Pre-Employment
Queries.
Hours for Designation and Verification of a C/
TPA.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
CMVs ..............................................................
Drivers Per CMV .............................................
Drivers and Annual Queries ...........................
226
1/6
38
134
........................
........................
92
........................
........................
154 + 72.
10 minutes.
226 × 1/6.
1/6
........................
........................
FMCSA Estimate.
10 There was a total of 4,211,880 interstate drivers
and 4,020,464 CMVs according to a MCMIS August
24, 2012 snapshot based on count of interstate
drivers and CMVs (4,211,880/4,020,464 = 1.05).
Further, the driver-to-CMV ratio remains at 1.05
when considering carriers that possess 200 CMVs
or less.
11 Occupational Employment Statistics,
Occupational Employment and Wages, May 2012,
43–3031 Bookkeeping, Accounting, or Auditing
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
Clerks. Accessed on July 29, 2013 at https://
www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes433031.htm.
12 See FMCSA’s calculation of the employee
benefit rate at Section 7.1, above.
13 Berwick, Farooq. ‘‘Truck Costing Model for
Transportation Managers’’. Upper Great Plains
Transportation Institute, North Dakota State
University (2003). Weighted average management
and overhead costs total $10,721 annually for a
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Small Entity Maximum.
MCMIS.
147 × 1.05. 154 ¥ (0.128 × 154). 0.128 ×
154.
1,876,000/4,000,000.
truck travelling 100,000 miles (page 29), or $0.107
per mile ($10,721/100,000 on page 47). Labor costs
total $0.39 per mile (pages 42–43). Management/
overhead costs are thus 27% of labor costs (0.107/
0.390). Accessed at https://ntl.bts.gov/lib/24000/
24200/24223/24223.pdf on 8-March=2011.
14 From an August 24, 2012 MCMIS snapshot, less
than 74.5 percent of active interstate motor carriers
employed 3 CMVs or less.
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
9720
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
MAXIMUM POSSIBLE COST TO SMALL ENTITIES—Continued
Fees for access
Maximum number for a small entity
Annual
Notes
Limited query
1/3
........................
........................
FMCSA Estimate.
38.5
$16.91
50%
27%
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
38 + 1/6 + 1/3
BLS, General Office Clerk.
BLS, Employee Compensation.
BLS, Employee Compensation.
$32.21
$1,240
Hours for Registration and Rule Familiarization.
Total Hours .....................................................
Wage ($) Per Hour .........................................
Fringe Benefits (as a % of Wage) ..................
Overhead (as a % of Wage and Fringe Benefits).
Total Compensation Per Hour/Fee per Query
Cost for Annual and Pre-Employment Queries.
Full query
$2.50
$335
$5.00
$460
Total Cost (146 Drivers) ..........................
Total Cost per Driver ...............................
$2,035
$13.22
$16.91 × (1 + 0.50) × (1 + 0.27).
38.5 hrs × $32.21 per hr. 134 × $2.50. 92 ×
$5.
$1,240 + $335 + $460.
$2,035/154 drivers.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(4) Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other
Compliance Requirements (for Small
Entities) of the Proposed Rule, Including
an Estimate of the Classes of Small
Entities That Will Be Subject to the
Requirement and the Types of
Professional Skills Necessary for
Preparation of the Report or Record
There are an estimated 82,900 annual
positive drug (75,800) and alcohol
(7,100) test-results at full participation
(including refusals). Each positive drug
test result would be reported by an
MRO. Each positive alcohol test would
be reported by an employer or a C/TPA.
Each driver’s subsequent return-to-duty
process for positive test results and test
refusals would be reported by an SAP.
Ninety-nine percent of motor carriers,
MROs, C/TPAs, and SAPs are most
likely small entities. FMCSA estimates
that bookkeeping clerks would perform
this reporting.
summary information specific to each
motor carrier for which the laboratory
provide services, FMCSA cannot use
this information to identify noncompliant motor-carriers. In addition
the Agency requests drug and alcohol
testing summary reports from
approximately 3,000 employers per year
through FMCSA’s Drug and Alcohol
Testing Survey. This information is not
collected from every covered motor
carrier. Instead, the purpose of the
survey is to produce nationally
representative estimates for drug and
alcohol usage rates among CDL drivers,
in order to determine whether to
increase or decrease random testing
rates in accordance with 49 CFR
382.305(c).
(6) A Description of Any Significant
Alternatives to the Proposed Rule
Which Minimize Any Significant
Impacts on Small Entities
expenditures of $186 million, which is
in excess of the $151 million threshold.
The estimated costs are about equal to
its benefits: Total net benefits of the rule
are just $1 million annually. The tenyear projection of net benefits is $8
million when discounted at seven
percent and $9 million when
discounted at three percent. However,
estimated benefits include only those
associated with reductions in CMV
crashes. FMCSA could not precisely
quantify improved health, quality-of-life
improvements, and increased life
expectancy for CMV drivers. The
Agency believes these non-quantified
benefits are significant, and, if they were
included in the benefits estimates,
would clearly demonstrate the positive
net benefits of this rule.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
Reform)
(5) Duplicative, Overlapping, or
Conflicting Federal Rules
FMCSA is not aware of any other
rules which conflict with the proposed
action. The proposed rule would require
laboratories to report summary test
information on each motor carrier
covered by FMCSA’s drug and alcohol
rules for which they perform tests. The
purpose of this requirement is to help
FMCSA identify motor carriers that do
not comply with mandatory drug and
alcohol testing requirements. Currently,
there exists a DOT-wide requirement for
laboratories to report summary
information on testing services provided
to DOT-regulated entities, but does not
require the information to be broken
down on a carrier-by-carrier basis. The
DOT-wide report overlaps with the
proposed rule in the sense that it
contains some of the same aggregate
information that would be required
under the proposed rule. However,
since the reports do not contain
The Agency did not identify any
significant alternatives to the rule that
could lessen the burden on small
entities without compromising its goals
or the Agency’s statutory mandate.
Because small businesses are such a
large part of the demographic the
Agency regulates, providing alternatives
to small business to permit
noncompliance with FMCSA
regulations is not feasible and not
consistent with sound public policy.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1532, et seq.) requires
Agencies to evaluate whether an Agency
action would result in the expenditure
by State, local and tribal governments,
in the aggregate, or by the private sector,
of $151 million or more (as adjusted for
inflation) in any one year, and if so, to
take steps to minimize these unfunded
mandates. The proposed rulemaking
would result in private sector
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children)
FMCSA has analyzed this proposed
action under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. We have determined
preliminarily that this rulemaking
would not create an environmental risk
to health or safety that would
disproportionately affect children.
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of
Private Property)
This proposed rule would not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities do not
apply to this program.
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
A rule has implications for
Federalism under Executive Order
13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial
direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt
State law or impose a substantial direct
cost of compliance on them. FMCSA
recognizes that, as a practical matter,
this rule may have an impact on the
States. Accordingly, by letters sent
March 28, 2011, the Agency sought
advice from the National Governors
Association (NGA), National Conference
of State Legislators (NCSL), and the
American Association of Motor Vehicle
Administrators (AAMVA) on the topic
of developing a database that the
Agency believes may increase the
effectiveness of its drug and alcohol
testing program. (Copies of the letters
are available in the docket for this
rulemaking.) FMCSA offered NGA,
NCSL, and AAMVA officials the
opportunity to meet and discuss issues
of concern to the States. FMCSA did not
receive a response to this letter. State
and local governments will also be able
to raise Federalism issues during the
comment period for this NPRM.
In addition, § 32402 of MAP–21
preempts State and local laws
inconsistent with the Clearinghouse.
Preemption specifically applies to the
reporting of drug and alcohol tests,
refusals and any other violation of
FMCSA’s drug and alcohol testing
program. MAP–21 does not preempt
State laws related to a driver’s CDL or
driving record.
Executive Order 12372
(Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), a
Federal agency must obtain approval
from OMB for each collection of
information it conducts, sponsors, or
requires through regulations. FMCSA
analyzed this proposal and
preliminarily determined that its
implementation would create a new
information collection burden on CDL
holders, motor carriers, and entities that
provide services as part of the FMCSA’s
mandatory alcohol and controlled
substances testing process under 49 CFR
part 382. FMCSA will seek approval of
the information collection requirements
in a new information collection to be
entitled ‘‘Commercial Driver’s License
Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse.’’
The collected information
encompasses information that is
generated, maintained, retained,
disclosed, and provided to, or for, the
Agency under a proposal for a database
that will be entitled the ‘‘Commercial
Driver’s License Drug and Alcohol
Clearinghouse’’ or Clearinghouse.
DOT currently has approval for two
information collections for its alcohol
and controlled substances testing
programs: (1) The Federal Chain of
Custody and Control Form, OMB
control number 0930–0158, and (2) the
U.S. Department of Transportation
Alcohol and Controlled Substances
Testing Program, OMB control number
2105–0529. Although the proposed
Clearinghouse will obtain information
from the forms covered by the two
information collections, this proposal
does not create any revisions or
additional burden under those
collections.
9721
This proposal would create a new
information collection to cover the
requirements set forth in the proposed
amendments to 49 CFR parts 382. These
amendments would create new
requirements for CDL drivers, carriers/
employers of CDL drivers, MROs, SAPs,
and C/TPAs to register with the new
database, which would be created and
administered by the FMCSA.
Clearinghouse registration will be a
prerequisite to both placing information
in the database and obtaining
information from the database. Access
to information in the database will be
strictly limited and controlled, and
available only with the consent of the
CDL holders about whom information is
sought.
Prospective employers of CDL drivers
would be required to query the
Clearinghouse to determine if job
applicants have controlled substance or
alcohol testing violations that should
preclude them, under existing FMCSA
regulations in part 382, from carrying
out safety-sensitive functions.
Employers will also be required to query
the database once annually for
information about drivers whom they
currently employ. Carriers, C/TPAs that
perform testing and other services for
carriers, MROs, and SAPs will place
information into the database about
alcohol and controlled substances
testing violations. The proposed rule
contains procedures for correcting
information in the database and
specifies that most interactions with the
database will be carried out using
electronic media.
The total burden to respondents for
queries, designations, registration,
familiarization, reporting, and
recordkeeping to the Clearinghouse is
estimated at about 1.86 million hours
annually. The hours attributed to each
activity are presented in the table below.
TOTAL ANNUAL NUMBER OF BURDEN HOURS
Responsible
Performed by
Annual Queries .....................................
Pre-Employment Queries .....................
Designate C/TPAs ................................
SAPs Inputting Driver Information ........
Report/Notify Positive Tests .................
Register/Familiarize/Verify ....................
Driver Consent Verifications .................
Annual Summaries ...............................
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Submissions
Carriers ................
Carriers ................
Carriers ................
SAPs ....................
Various .................
Various .................
Drivers ..................
Laboratories .........
Bookkeeping Clerk .................
Bookkeeping Clerk .................
Bookkeeping Clerk .................
SAPs ......................................
Bookkeeping Clerk .................
Bookkeeping Clerk .................
Drivers ....................................
Bookkeeping Clerk .................
5,200,000
1,876,000
520,000
82,900
165,800
792,750
2,388,000
32
10
10
10
10
10
20. 10
10
90
866,667
312,667
86,667
13,817
27,633
155,083
398,000
48
Total Instances/Hours ...................
..............................
.................................................
11,025,482
........................
1,860,581
FMCSA has prepared an information
collection request and supporting
statement that is being submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
that will be made available for public
comment pursuant to a notice to be
published in the Federal Register.
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Instances
Minutes
Total hours
National Environmental Policy Act and
Clean Air Act
FMCSA analyzed this proposal for the
purpose of the National Environmental
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
9722
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.). FMCSA conducted an
environmental assessment (EA) of the
proposed alternatives considered by
FMCSA and determined that if the rule
reduced CMV crashes as estimated,
there would be a small net benefit to the
environment. These benefits result from
the reduction of CMV crashes and
include: Lives saved and injuries
prevented from reducing CMV crashes,
the reduction of fuel consumed and
prevention of air emissions from traffic
congestion caused by a CMV crash, the
reduction of solid waste generated in
CMV crashes from damaged vehicles,
infrastructure and goods, and hazardous
materials spilled during a CMV crash.
FMCSA does not, however, expect these
environmental impacts to be considered
significant under NEPA and do not
require further analysis in an
Environmental Impact Statement.
FMCSA does not believe the EA results
require any type of mitigation, as the
impacts to the environment are
beneficial in nature. The EA has been
placed in the rulemaking docket.
FMCSA requests comments on this EA.
In addition to the NEPA requirements
to examine impacts on air quality, the
Clean Air Act (CAA) as amended (42
U.S.C. 7401 et seq.) also requires
FMCSA to analyze the potential impact
of its actions on air quality and to
ensure that FMCSA actions conform to
State and local air quality
implementation plans. The additional
reductions to air emissions from either
of the alternatives are expected to fall
within the CAA de minimis standards
and are not expected to be subject to the
Environmental Protection Agency’s
General Conformity Rule (40 CFR parts
51 and 93).
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
FMCSA has analyzed this proposed
rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. While FMCSA’s
analysis shows a small reduction in fuel
used due to eliminating traffic idling
caused by CMV crashes, we have
determined preliminarily that it would
not be a ‘‘significant energy action’’
under that Executive Order because it
would not be likely to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy.
Privacy Impact Assessment
FMCSA conducted a privacy impact
assessment of this rule as required by
section 522(a)(5) of division H of the FY
2005 Omnibus Appropriations Act,
Public Law 108–447, 118 Stat. 3268
(Dec. 8, 2004) [set out as a note to 5
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
U.S.C. 552a]. The assessment considers
any impacts of the final rule on the
privacy of information in an identifiable
form and related matters. FMCSA has
determined that this NPRM would
impact the handling of PII. FMCSA has
also determined the risks and effects the
rulemaking might have on collecting,
storing, and sharing PII and has
examined and evaluated protections and
alternative information handling
processes in developing the proposal in
order to mitigate potential privacy risks.
The PIA for this proposed rulemaking is
available for review in the docket for
this rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 382
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alcohol abuse, Drug abuse,
Drug testing, Highway safety, Motor
carriers, Penalties, Safety,
Transportation.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration proposes to
amend 49 CFR part 382 as follows:
PART 382—CONTROLLED
SUBSTANCES AND ALCOHOL USE
AND TESTING
1. The authority citation for part 382
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31133, 31136, 31301
et seq., 31502; and 49 CFR 1.73.
2. Amend § 382.103 by revising the
introductory text of paragraph(a) to read
as follows:
■
§ 382.103
Applicability.
(a) This part applies to service agents
and to every person and to all
employers of such persons who operate
a commercial motor vehicle in
commerce in any State and is subject to:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 382.107 to add the
following definitions in alphabetical
order:
§ 382.107
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Commercial Driver’s License Drug and
Alcohol Clearinghouse (Clearinghouse)
means the FMCSA database that subpart
G of this part requires employers and
service agents to report information to
and to query regarding drivers who are
subject to the DOT controlled substance
and alcohol testing regulations.
*
*
*
*
*
Negative return-to-duty test result
means a negative drug test result and/
or an alcohol test with an alcohol
concentration of less than 0.02.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Positive alcohol test means a DOT
alcohol confirmation test having an
alcohol concentration of 0.04 or greater.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Add new § 382.123 to read as
follows:
§ 382.123
Driver identification.
(a) Identification information on the
Alcohol Testing Form (ATF). For each
alcohol test performed under this part,
the employer shall provide the
following information, which must be
recorded as follows:
(1) The driver’s commercial driver’s
license number and State of issuance in
Step 1, section B of the ATF.
(2) The employer’s USDOT number or
Internal Revenue Service Employer
Identification Number (EIN) and the
employer’s name and other identifying
information required in Step 1, section
C of the ATF.
(b) Identification information on the
Federal Drug Testing Custody and
Control Form (CCF). For each controlled
substance test performed under this
part, the employer shall provide the
following information, which must be
recorded as follows:
(1) The employer’s USDOT number or
Internal Revenue Service Employer
Identification Number (EIN) in Step 1,
section A of the CCF.
(2) The driver’s commercial driver’s
license number and State of issuance in
Step 1, section C of the CCF in place of
the ‘‘donor SSN or Employee I.D. No.’’
■ 5. Add new § 382.217 to read as
follows:
§ 382.217
Employer responsibilities.
No employer may allow, require,
permit or authorize a driver to operate
a commercial motor vehicle during any
period in which an employer
determines that a driver is not in
compliance with the return-to-duty
requirements in 49 CFR part 40, subpart
O, after the occurrence of any of the
following events:
(a) The driver receives a positive,
adulterated, or substituted drug test
result conducted under part 40 of this
title;
(b) The driver receives a positive
alcohol test result of 0.04 or higher
alcohol concentration conducted under
part 40 of this title; or
(c) The driver refused to submit to a
test for drugs or alcohol required under
part 382 of this chapter.
(d) An employer has actual
knowledge that a driver has used
alcohol or controlled substances, as
defined at § 382.107.
■ 6. Amend § 382.401 by revising
paragraph (b)(1)(vi) to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
§ 382.401
Retention of records.
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(vi) Records related to the
administration of the controlled
substances and alcohol testing
programs, including records related to
traffic citations establishing employer
actual knowledge of driving under the
influence of alcohol or controlled
substances, and
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Add § 382.404 to read as follows:
§ 382.404 Laboratories’ duty to report
controlled substances test results.
(a) Annually, each laboratory
performing controlled substances testing
for an employer regulated by this part
must submit an aggregate statistical
summary of the number of drug tests, by
drug test type, organized by employers’
USDOT number or Internal Revenue
Service issued Employer Identification
Number (EIN).
(b) The summary must be sent by
January 31 of each year for January 1
through December 31 of the previous
year.
(c) The summary must be submitted
in electronic format to: Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Administration, Office of
Enforcement and Compliance, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
■ 8. Amend § 382.405 by revising
paragraphs (d) and (e) to read as follows:
§ 382.405
Access to facilities and records.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Each employer, and each service
agent who maintains records for an
employer, must make available copies of
all results for DOT alcohol and/or
controlled substances testing conducted
by the employer under this part and any
other information pertaining to the
employer’s alcohol misuse and/or
controlled substances use prevention
program when requested by the
Secretary of Transportation, any DOT
agency, or any State or local officials
with regulatory authority over the
employer or any of its drivers.
(e) When requested by the National
Transportation Safety Board as a part of
a crash investigation:
(1) Employers must disclose
information related to the employer’s
administration of a post-accident
alcohol and/or a controlled substances
test administered following the crash
under investigation; and
(2) FMCSA will provide access to
information in the Clearinghouse
concerning drivers that are involved
with the crash under investigation.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
9. Amend § 382.409 by revising the
section heading and paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
■
*
§ 382.409 Medical review officer or
consortium/third party administrator record
retention for controlled substances.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) No person may obtain the
individual controlled substances test
results retained by a medical review
officer or a consortium/third party
administrator, and no medical review
officer or consortium/third party
administrator may release the
individual controlled substances test
results of any driver to any person,
without first obtaining a specific,
written authorization from the tested
driver. Nothing in this paragraph (c)
shall prohibit a medical review officer
or a consortium/third party
administrator from releasing to the
employer, the Clearinghouse, or to
officials of the Secretary of
Transportation, any DOT agency, or any
State or local officials with regulatory
authority over the controlled substances
and alcohol testing program under this
part, the information delineated in part
40, subpart G, of this title.
■ 10. Add a new § 382.415 to read as
follows:
§ 382.415 Notification to employers of a
controlled substances or alcohol testing
program violation.
Each person holding a commercial
driver’s license and subject to the DOT
controlled substances and alcohol
testing requirements in this part who
has violated the alcohol and controlled
substances prohibitions under parts 40
or 382 of this title, must notify in
writing all current employers of such
violation(s). The notification must be
made before the end of the business day
following the day the employee received
notice of the violation, or prior to
performing any safety-sensitive
function, whichever comes first.
■ 11. Amend § 382.601 by adding a new
paragraph (b)(12) to read as follows:
§ 382.601 Employer obligation to
promulgate a policy on the misuse of
alcohol and use of controlled substances.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(12) The requirement that the
following personal information
collected and maintained under this
part shall be reported to the
Clearinghouse:
(i) A verified positive, adulterated, or
substituted drug test result;
(ii) A positive alcohol test result;
(iii) A refusal to submit to any test
required by subpart C of this part;
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9723
(iv) An employer’s report of actual
knowledge that the driver received a
traffic citation for driving a commercial
motor vehicle while under the influence
of alcohol or controlled substances;
(v) A substance-abuse-professional
report of the successful completion of
the return-to-duty process, and the
follow-up testing plan;
(vi) A negative return-to-duty test; and
(vii) An employer’s report of
completion of follow-up testing.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 12. Add a new Subpart G to part 382
to read as follows:
Subpart G—Requirements and
Procedures for Implementation of the
Commercial Driver’s License Drug and
Alcohol Clearinghouse
Sec.
382.701 Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse.
382.703 Driver consent to permit access to
information in the Clearinghouse.
382.705 Reporting to the Clearinghouse.
382.707 Notice to drivers and employers of
placement, revision, removal, or release
of information.
382.709 Drivers’ access to information in
the Clearinghouse.
382.711 Clearinghouse registration.
382.713 Duration, cancellation, and
revocation of access.
382.715 Authorization to enter information
into the Clearinghouse.
382.717 Procedures for correcting
information in the database.
382.719 Availability and removal of
information.
382.721 Fees.
382.723 Unauthorized access or use
prohibited.
382.725 Access by State licensing
authorities.
382.727 Penalties.
Subpart G—Requirements and
Procedures for Implementation of the
Commercial Driver’s License Drug and
Alcohol Clearinghouse
§ 382.701 Drug and Alcohol
Clearinghouse.
(a) Employers may not employ a
driver subject to controlled substances
and alcohol testing under this part to
perform a safety-sensitive function
without first conducting a preemployment query of the Clearinghouse
to obtain information on whether the
driver has a verified positive,
adulterated, or substituted controlled
substances test result; has a positive
alcohol test result; has refused to submit
to any test required by subpart C of this
part; or that an employer has reported
actual knowledge that the driver
received a traffic citation for driving a
commercial motor vehicle while under
the influence of alcohol or controlled
substances.
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
9724
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(b) Employers must conduct annual
queries of the Clearinghouse for
information on all employees subject to
controlled substance and alcohol testing
under this part to determine whether
information exists in the Clearinghouse
about those employees. If an annual
query indicates that information exists
in the Clearinghouse, the employer must
conduct the same query required in
paragraph (a) of this section.
(c) If any information described in
paragraph (a) of this section is entered
into the Clearinghouse about a driver
during the seven-day period
immediately following an employer
conducting a query of that driver’s
records, FMCSA will notify the
employer of that additional information.
(d) No employer may allow a driver
to perform any safety-sensitive function
if the results of a database query
demonstrate that the driver has a
verified positive, adulterated, or
substituted controlled substances test
result; has a positive alcohol test result;
has refused to submit to any test
required by subpart C of this part; or
that an employer has reported actual
knowledge that the driver received a
traffic citation for driving a commercial
motor vehicle while under the influence
of alcohol or controlled substances,
except where a query of the
Clearinghouse demonstrates the
following circumstances:
(1) The driver has successfully
completed the substance-abuseprofessional evaluation, referral, and
education/treatment process set forth in
part 40, subpart O, of this title; achieves
a negative return-to-duty test result; and
completes the follow-up testing process
prescribed by the substance abuse
professional.
(2) If the driver has not completed all
follow-up tests as prescribed by the
substance abuse professional in
accordance with § 40.307 of this title
and specified in the substance-abuseprofessional report required by § 40.311
of this title, the employer may only use
the driver in a safety-sensitive position
if the driver has completed the
substance-abuse-professional
evaluation, referral, and education/
treatment process set forth in part 40,
subpart O, of this title and achieves a
negative return-to-duty test result, and
the employer assumes the responsibility
for managing the follow-up testing
process associated with the testing
violation.
(e) Employers must retain for three
years a record of each query and all
information received in response to
each query made under this section.
Exception: An employer with valid
registration that queries the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
Clearinghouse in accordance with the
requirements of this subpart, will be
deemed to have satisfied this
requirement.
§ 382.703 Driver consent to permit access
to information in the Clearinghouse.
(a) No employer may search the
Clearinghouse to determine whether a
record exists on any particular driver
without first obtaining that driver’s
written consent. The employer
conducting the search must retain the
written consent for 3 years from the date
of the last search.
(b) Before receiving access to
information contained in the
Clearinghouse record, the employer
must obtain written consent from the
driver for access to the following
specific records:
(1) A verified positive, adulterated, or
substituted controlled substances test
result;
(2) A positive alcohol test result;
(3) A refusal to submit to any test
required by subpart C of this part;
(4) An employer’s report of actual
knowledge that the driver received a
traffic citation for driving a commercial
motor vehicle while under the influence
of alcohol or controlled substances;
(5) A substance-abuse-professional
report of the successful completion of
the return-to-duty process, and the
follow-up testing plan;
(6) A negative return-to-duty test; and
(7) An employer’s report of
completion of follow-up testing.
(c) No employer may permit a driver
to perform a safety-sensitive function if
the driver refuses to grant the consent
required by paragraphs (a) and (b) of
this section.
(d) A driver granting consent under
this section grants consent for FMCSA
to release information to an employer in
accordance with § 382.701(c).
§ 382.705
Reporting to the Clearinghouse.
(a) Medical Review Officers (MROs).
(1) Within 1 business day of making a
determination or verification, medical
review officers must report the
following information about a driver to
the Clearinghouse:
(i) Verified positive, adulterated, or
substituted controlled substances test
results;
(ii) Refusal-to-test determination by
the medical review officer as described
in 49 CFR 40.191.
(2) Medical review officers must
provide the following information for
each controlled substances test result
specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this
section:
(i) Reason for the test;
(ii) Federal Drug Testing Custody and
Control Form specimen ID number;
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(iii) Driver’s name, date of birth, and
commercial driver’s license number and
commercial driver’s license-issuing
State’s abbreviation (U.S. Postal Service
abbreviation. See Publication 59,
‘‘Abbreviations for Use with ZIP Code,’’
U.S. Postal Service, October 1963);
(iv) Employer’s name, address, and
USDOT number or Internal Revenue
Service issued Employer Identification
Number (EIN);
(v) Date of the test;
(vi) Date of the verified result; and
(vii) Test result. The test result must
be one of the following:
(A) Positive (including the controlled
substance(s) identified);
(B) Refusal to test: Adulterated;
(C) Refusal to test: Substituted; or
(D) Refusal to provide a sufficient
specimen after the MRO makes a
determination, in accordance with
§ 40.193 of this title, that the employee
does not have a medical condition that
has, or with a high degree of probability
could have, precluded the employee
from providing a sufficient amount of
urine.
(3) Within 1 business day of making
any change to the results report in
accordance with paragraph (a)(1) of this
section, a medical review officer must
report that changed result to the
Clearinghouse.
(b) Employers. (1) Employers must
report the following information about a
driver to the Clearinghouse within 1
business day of obtaining that
information:
(i) An alcohol test result with an
alcohol concentration of 0.04 or greater;
(ii) A negative return-to-duty test
result;
(iii) A refusal to take an alcohol test
pursuant to 49 CFR 40.261;
(iv) A refusal pursuant to 49 CFR
40.191;
(v) A report that the driver has
successfully completed all follow-up
tests as prescribed in the substanceabuse-professional report in accordance
with §§ 40.307, 40.309, and 40.311 of
this title; and
(vi) Actual knowledge that the driver
received a traffic citation for driving a
commercial motor vehicle while under
the influence of alcohol or controlled
substances.
(2) Employers must report the
following information concerning each
positive alcohol test result, refusal to
submit to alcohol testing pursuant to 49
CFR 40.261, and refusal to provide a
specimen for controlled substances
testing listed in 49 CFR 40.191:
(i) Reason for the test;
(ii) Driver’s name, date of birth, and
commercial driver’s license number and
the commercial driver’s license-issuing
State’s abbreviation;
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(iii) Employer name, address, and
USDOT number or Internal Revenue
Service-issued Employer Identification
Number (EIN);
(iv) Date of the test;
(v) Date of result reported; and
(vi) Test result. The test result must be
one of the following:
(A) Negative (only required for returnto-duty tests administered in accordance
with § 382.309);
(B) Positive; or
(C) Refusal to take a test.
(3) Employers must report the
following information concerning each
instance in which the employer has
actual knowledge that a driver received
a traffic citation for driving a
commercial motor vehicle while under
the influence of alcohol or controlled
substances, as defined at § 383.5 of this
chapter:
(i) Driver’s name, date of birth,
commercial driver’s license number,
and the commercial driver’s licenseissuing State abbreviation;
(ii) Employer name, address, and
USDOT number or Employer
Identification Number (EIN);
(iii) Date of the traffic citation;
(iv) Date the employer became aware
of the traffic citation.
(v) The name and State of the law
enforcement agency issuing the traffic
citation;
(vi) The ticket or docket number
associated with the citation; and
(vii) The specific charge alleged in the
traffic citation.
(c) C/TPAs. (1) C/TPAs acting on
behalf of an employer who employs
himself/herself, as required by
§ 382.103(b) must immediately report
the following information about a driver
to the Clearinghouse within one
business day of obtaining that
information:
(i) An alcohol test result with an
alcohol concentration of 0.04 or greater;
(ii) A negative return-to-duty test
result;
(iii) A refusal to take an alcohol test
pursuant to 49 CFR 40.261;
(iv) A refusal to provide a specimen
for controlled substances testing
pursuant to 49 CFR 40.191;
(v) A report that the driver has
successfully completed all follow-up
tests as prescribed in the substanceabuse-professional report in accordance
with §§ 40.307, 40.309, and 40.311 of
this title; and
(2) C/TPAs acting on behalf of an
employer who employs himself/herself,
as required by 49 CFR 382.103(b) must
report the following information
concerning each positive alcohol test
result, refusal to submit to alcohol
testing pursuant to 49 CFR 40.261, and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
refusal to provide a specimen for
controlled substances testing listed in
49 CFR 40.191:
(i) Reason for the test;
(ii) Driver’s name, date of birth, and
commercial driver’s license number and
the commercial driver’s license-issuing
State’s abbreviation;
(iii) Employer name, address, and
USDOT number or Internal Revenue
Service-issued Employer Identification
Number (EIN);
(iv) Date of the test;
(v) Date of result reported; and
(vi) Test result. The test result must be
one of the following:
(A) Negative (only required for returnto-duty tests administered in accordance
with § 382.309);
(B) Positive; or
(C) Refusal to provide a specimen or
take a test.
(d) Substance Abuse Professionals
(SAPs). (1) Substance abuse
professionals must report to the
Clearinghouse for each driver who has
completed the return-to-duty process for
a DOT verified positive, adulterated, or
substituted controlled substances test
result, a positive alcohol test result, a
testing refusal, or actual knowledge that
the driver received a traffic citation for
driving a commercial motor vehicle
while under the influence of alcohol or
controlled substances the following
information:
(i) Substance abuse professional’s
name, address, and telephone number;
(ii) Driver’s name, date of birth, and
commercial driver’s license number and
the commercial driver’s license-issuing
State’s abbreviation;
(iii) Date of the initial substanceabuse-professional assessment;
(iv) Date the substance abuse
professional determined that the driver
successfully completed the education
and/or treatment process as defined in
49 CFR part 40, subpart O, and was
eligible for return-to-duty testing under
this part;
(v) Frequency, number, and type of
required follow-up tests, the duration of
the follow-up testing plan; and
(vi) Any modifications to the followup testing plan.
(2) Substance abuse professionals
must report the information required by
paragraphs (d)(1)(i)–(iii) of this section
within 1 business day of the date of the
initial substance abuse assessment, and
must report the information required by
paragraphs (d)(1)(iv)–(vi) of this section
within 1 business day of determining
that the driver has completed the returnto-duty process.
(e) Reporting truthfully and
accurately. Every person or entity with
access must report truthfully and
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9725
accurately to the Clearinghouse and is
expressly prohibited from knowingly
reporting false or inaccurate
information.
§ 382.707 Notice to drivers and employers
of placement, revision, removal, or release
of information.
(a) FMCSA must notify a driver when
information concerning that driver has
been added to, revised, or removed from
the Clearinghouse.
(b) FMCSA must notify a driver when
information concerning that driver has
been released from the Clearinghouse to
an employer and specify the reason for
the release.
(c) Drivers will be notified by letter
sent by U.S. Mail to the address on
record with the State Driver Licensing
Agency that issued the driver’s
commercial driver’s license. Exception:
A driver may provide the Clearinghouse
with an alternative means or address for
notification, including electronic mail.
§ 382.709 Drivers’ access to information in
the Clearinghouse.
A driver may review information in
the Clearinghouse about himself or
herself, except as otherwise restricted by
law.
§ 382.711
Clearinghouse registration.
(a) Clearinghouse registration
required. Each employer and designated
service agent to an employer supporting
its controlled substances and/or alcohol
testing program must register with
FMCSA before accessing or reporting
information in the Clearinghouse.
(b) Employers. Employer
Clearinghouse registration must include:
(1) Name, address, and telephone
number;
(2) USDOT number or Internal
Revenue Service-issued Employer
Identification Number (EIN); and
(3) Name of the person(s) and their
position(s) that the employer authorizes
to report information to and obtain
information from the Clearinghouse and
any additional information FMCSA
needs to validate the applicant’s
identity.
(4) Employers must verify the names
of the person(s) authorized under
paragraph (b)(3) of this section annually.
(5) Identification of the C/TPA used
for testing purposes and authorization
for the C/TPA to report information to
the Clearinghouse for self-employed
individuals or owner-operators that are
required to use C/TPAs for testing
purposes. Employers subject to this
requirement must update any changes to
this information.
(c) Medical review officers and
substance abuse professionals. Each
medical review officer or substance
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
9726
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
abuse professional must provide the
following to apply for Clearinghouse
registration:
(1) Name, address, telephone number,
and any additional information FMCSA
needs to validate the applicant’s
identity;
(2) A certification that the applicant’s
access to the Clearinghouse is
conditioned on his or her compliance
with the applicable qualification and/or
training requirements in 49 CFR part 40;
and
(3) Evidence of required professional
credentials to verify that the applicant
currently meets the applicable
qualification and/or training
requirements in 49 CFR part 40.
(d) Consortia/third party
administrators. Each consortium or
third party administrator must provide
the following to apply for Clearinghouse
registration:
(1) Name, address, telephone number,
and any additional information FMCSA
needs to validate the applicant’s
identity; and
(2) Name, title, and telephone number
of the person(s) authorized to report
information to and obtain information
from the Clearinghouse.
(3) Each consortium or third party
administrator must verify the names of
the person(s) authorized under
paragraph (d)(2) of this section
annually.
§ 382.713 Duration, cancellation, and
revocation of access.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(a) Term. Clearinghouse registration is
valid for 5 years, unless cancelled or
revoked.
(b) Cancellation. FMCSA will cancel
Clearinghouse registrations that are
inactive for 2 years.
(c) Revocation. FMCSA has the right
to revoke the Clearinghouse registration
of anyone who fails to comply with any
of the prescribed rights and restrictions
on access to the Clearinghouse,
including but not limited to, submission
of inaccurate information and misuse or
misappropriation of access rights or
protected information from the
Clearinghouse and failure to maintain
the requisite qualifications,
certifications and/or training
requirements in part 40 of this title.
§ 382.715 Authorization to enter
information into the Clearinghouse.
No consortium/third party
administrator may enter information
into the Clearinghouse on an employer’s
behalf unless the employer designates
the consortium/third party
administrator as its service agent.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
§ 382.717 Procedures for correcting
information in the database.
(a) Petition. Any driver or authorized
representative of the driver may submit
a petition to the FMCSA contesting the
accuracy of information within 18
months of the date the information was
reported to the Clearinghouse. The
petition must include:
(1) The petitioner’s name, address,
telephone number and commercial
driver’s license number with State of
issuance;
(2) Detailed description of the basis
for the allegation that the information is
not accurate;
(3) Evidence supporting the allegation
that the information is not accurate.
Failure to submit evidence is cause for
dismissing the petition.
(b) Address. The petition must be
submitted to: Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration, Office of
Enforcement and Compliance, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
(c) Petitions limited to inaccurately
reported information. (1) Under this
section, petitioners may challenge only
the accuracy of information reporting,
not the accuracy or validity of positive
test results or refusals.
(2) Exception. Petitioners may request
that FMCSA remove from the
Clearinghouse an employer’s report of
actual knowledge that the driver
received a traffic citation for driving a
commercial motor vehicle while under
the influence of alcohol or controlled
substances if the citation did not result
in a conviction. For the purposes of this
section, conviction has the same
meaning as used in 49 CFR part 383.
(d) Notice of decision. FMCSA will
inform the driver in writing within 90
days of receipt of a complete petition
whether FMCSA will remove, retain, or
correct the information in the database
and provide the basis for the decision.
(e) Request for expedited treatment. A
driver may request expedited treatment
of his or her petition to correct
inaccurate information if the inaccuracy
is currently preventing him or her from
performing safety-sensitive functions. If
FMCSA grants expedited treatment, it
will inform the driver of its decision in
writing within 30 days of receipt of a
complete petition. This request may be
included in the original petition or as a
separate document.
(f) Administrative review. (1) A driver
may request FMCSA to conduct an
administrative review if he or she
believes that a decision made in
accordance with paragraphs (d) or (e) of
this section was in error.
(2) The driver must submit his/her
request in writing to the Associate
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Administrator for Enforcement and
Program Delivery (MC–E), Federal
Motor Carrier Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
(3) The driver’s request must explain
the error it believes FMCSA committed
and provide information and/or
documents to support his or her
argument.
(4) FMCSA will complete its
administrative review no later than 60
days after receiving the driver’s request
for review. The Associate
Administrator’s decision will constitute
the final Agency action.
§ 382.719 Availability and removal of
information.
(a) Information about a driver’s drug
or alcohol violation will not be available
to an employer conducting a query of
the Clearinghouse after all of the
following conditions relating to the
violation are satisfied:
(1) The substance abuse professional
reports to the Clearinghouse the
information required in § 382.705(d);
(2) The employer or consortium/third
party administrator reports to the
Clearinghouse that the driver received
negative return-to-duty test results;
(3) The driver’s current employer or
consortium reports that the driver has
successfully completed all follow-up
tests as prescribed in the substanceabuse-professional report in accordance
with §§ 40.307, 40.309, and 40.311 of
this title; and
(4) Three years have passed since the
date of the violation determination.
Alternate: (4) Five years have passed
since the date of the violation
determination.
(b) Information about a particular
driver’s drug or alcohol violation will
remain in the Clearinghouse record and
be available to employers conducting a
query until all requirements in
paragraph (a) of this section have been
met.
(c) Exception. Within 2 business days
of granting a request pursuant to
§ 382.717(c)(2), FMCSA will remove
information from the Clearinghouse
about an employer’s report of actual
knowledge that a driver received a
traffic citation for driving a commercial
motor vehicle while under the influence
of alcohol or controlled substances.
(d) Nothing in this part shall prevent
FMCSA from using information
removed under this section for research,
auditing or enforcement purposes.
§ 382.721
Fees.
FMCSA may collect a reasonable fee
from entities required to query the
Clearinghouse. Exception: No driver
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2014 / Proposed Rules
may be required to pay a fee to access
his or her own information in the
Clearinghouse.
§ 382.723 Unauthorized access or use
prohibited.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(a) Except as expressly authorized in
this subpart, no person or entity may
access the Clearinghouse. No person or
entity may share, distribute, publish, or
otherwise release any information in the
Clearinghouse except as specifically
authorized by law. No person may
report inaccurate or misleading
information to the Clearinghouse.
(b) An employer’s use of information
received from the Clearinghouse is
limited to assessing or evaluating
whether a prohibition applies to a driver
operating a commercial motor vehicle.
No employer may divulge or permit any
other person or entity to divulge any
information from the Clearinghouse to
any person or entity not directly
involved in assessing or evaluating
whether a prohibition applies to a driver
operating a commercial motor vehicle.
(c) Violations of this section are
subject to civil and criminal penalties in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Feb 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
accordance with applicable law,
including those set forth at § 382.507.
(d) Nothing in this part shall prohibit
FMCSA from accessing information
about individual drivers in the
Clearinghouse for research or
enforcement purposes.
§ 382.725 Access by State licensing
authorities.
(a) The chief commercial driver’s
licensing official of a State may request
and receive a driver’s record from the
Clearinghouse if the driver has applied
for a commercial driver’s license from
that State.
(b) By applying for a commercial
driver’s license, a driver is deemed to
have consented to the release of
information from the Clearinghouse in
accordance with this section.
(c) The chief driver’s licensing
official’s use of information received
from the Clearinghouse is limited to
assessing or evaluating an individual’s
qualifications to operate a commercial
motor vehicle. No chief driver’s
licensing official may divulge or permit
any other person or entity to divulge
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
9727
any information from the Clearinghouse
to any person or entity not directly
involved in assessing or evaluating an
individual’s qualifications to operate a
commercial motor vehicle.
(d) A chief commercial driver’s
licensing official that does not take
appropriate safeguards to protect the
privacy and confidentiality of
information obtained under this section
is subject to revocation of his or her
right of access under this section.
§ 382.727
Penalties.
An employer, employee, medical
review officer, or service agent who
violates any provision of this subpart
shall be subject to the civil and/or
criminal penalty provisions of 49 U.S.C.
521(b)(2)(C).
Issued under the authority delegated in 49
CFR 1.87 on: February 3, 2014.
Anne S. Ferro,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014–03213 Filed 2–19–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 34 (Thursday, February 20, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9703-9727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-03213]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 382
[Docket No. FMCSA-2010-0031]
RIN 2126-AB18
Commercial Driver's License Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA proposes to establish the Commercial Driver's License
Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse (Clearinghouse), a database under the
Agency's administration that will contain controlled substances (drug)
and alcohol test result information for the holders of commercial
driver's licenses (CDLs). The proposed rule would require FMCSA-
regulated motor carrier employers, Medical Review Officers (MROs),
Substance Abuse Professionals (SAPs), and consortia/third party
administrators (C/TPAs) supporting U.S. Department of Transportation
(DOT) testing programs to report verified positive, adulterated, and
substituted drug test results, positive alcohol test results, test
refusals, negative return-to-duty test results, and information on
follow-up testing. The proposed rule would also require employers to
report actual knowledge of traffic citations for driving a commercial
motor vehicle (CMV) while under the influence (DUI) of alcohol or
drugs. The proposed rule would establish the terms of access to the
database, including the conditions under which information would be
submitted, accessed, maintained, updated, removed, and released to
prospective employers, current employers, and other authorized
entities. Finally, it would require laboratories that provide FMCSA-
regulated motor carrier employers with DOT drug testing services to
report, annual, summary information about their testing activities.
This rule is mandated by Section 32402 of the Moving Ahead for Progress
in the 21st Century Act.
DATES: You must submit comments by April 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number FMCSA-
2010-0031 or RIN 2126-AB18, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department
of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The
telephone number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods. See
the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Juan Moya,, Office of Enforcement
and Program Delivery, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001, by telephone at
(202.366.4844, or via email at fmcsadrugandalcohol@dot.gov.. FMCSA
office hours are from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., ET, Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, contact Barbara Hairston, Acting Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Public Participation and Request for Comments
A. Submitting Comments
B. Viewing Comments and Documents
[[Page 9704]]
C. Privacy Act
II. Executive Summary
III. Background
A. Legal Basis for the Rulemaking
B. Current Regulations
C. Discussion of the Proposed Rule
1. Clearinghouse for CDL Drivers' Drug and Alcohol Test Results
2. FMCSA Oversight of Motor Carrier Implementation of Drug and
Alcohol Testing Programs
IV. Section-by-Section Discussion of Regulatory Changes
V. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
I. Public Participation and Request for Comments
FMCSA encourages you to participate in this rulemaking by
submitting comments, data, and related materials. All comments received
will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will
include any personal and/or copyrighted information you provide.
A. Submitting Comments
You may submit your comments and material online or by fax, mail,
or hand delivery, but please use only one of these means. FMCSA
recommends that you include your name and a mailing address, an email
address, or a phone number in the body of your document so that FMCSA
can contact you if there are questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov and
in the search box insert the docket number ``FMCSA-2010-0031'' and
click the search button. When the new screen appears, click on the blue
``Comment Now!'' button on the right hand side of the page. On the new
page, enter information required including the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\
by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to know that they reached the facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope.
We will consider all comments and material received during the
comment period and may change this proposed rule based on your
comments. FMCSA may issue a final rule at any time after the close of
the comment period.
B. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as any documents mentioned in this
preamble, To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov and in the search box insert the docket number
``FMCSA-2010-0031'' and click ``Search.'' Next, click ``Open Docket
Folder'' and you will find all documents and comments related to the
proposed rulemaking.
C. Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the electronic form for all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the
USDOT Privacy Act system of records notice for the DOT Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) in the Federal Register published on December
29, 2010 (75 FR 82132) at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-12-29/pdf/2010-32876.pdf.
II. Executive Summary
A. Purpose of the Clearinghouse
CDL drivers who use drugs or alcohol while operating a CMV pose a
significant risk to public safety. Under the current drug and alcohol
screening program, employers do not have the tools to identify CDL
holders who have received positive drug or alcohol test results, have
refused a drug or alcohol test, or have otherwise violated the drug and
alcohol testing requirements and thus, are not qualified to operate a
CMV. Employers must rely on information provided by the driver, who
might not disclose prior positive drug or alcohol test results, or
refusals to test. As a result, such drivers continue to operate CMVs
after violating the drug and alcohol regulations without completing the
required return-to-duty process.
This proposed rule would require employers and service agents to
report information about current and prospective employees' drug and
alcohol test results to a repository, the Drug and Alcohol
Clearinghouse. It would also require employers and certain service
agents to search the database for current and prospective employees'
positive drug and alcohol test results, and refusals to test, as a
condition of permitting those employees to perform safety-sensitive
functions. This would provide FMCSA and employers the necessary tools
to identify drivers who are prohibited from operating a CMV based on
DOT drug and alcohol program violations and ensure that such drivers
receive the required evaluation and treatment before performing safety-
sensitive functions.
The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21),
enacted on July 6, 2012,\1\ mandates that the Secretary of
Transportation (Secretary) establish a national clearinghouse for
controlled substance and alcohol test results of commercial motor
vehicle operators. The FMCSA also has authority to promulgate safety
standards under the Motor Carrier Safety Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-554,
Title II, 98 Stat. 2832, October 30, 1984) (the 1984 Act), which
provides authority to regulate drivers, motor carriers, and vehicle
equipment and requires the Secretary to prescribe minimum safety
standards for CMVs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Public Law 112-141, 126 Stat. 405 (July 6, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Summary of Major Provisions
The proposed rule would revise 49 CFR part 382, Controlled
Substances and Alcohol Use and Testing to establish the Drug and
Alcohol Clearinghouse. It would require employers and service agents to
report information about current and prospective employees' positive
drug and alcohol test results to the Clearinghouse. In addition, it
would require employers to search the Clearinghouse for positive drug
and alcohol test results, and refusals to test, on an annual basis for
current employees and as a part of the pre-employment process for
prospective employees. Finally, this proposal would require
laboratories to provide FMCSA with annual summary reports on the
testing activities of FMCSA-regulated motor carrier employers for whom
they have provided testing services.
Reporting positive test results and refusals to test would create a
database employers could check to determine whether current or
prospective employees are prohibited from operating CMVs under the DOT
drug and alcohol screening program. This would diminish or eliminate
the problem of a currently-employed commercial-driver's-license (CDL)
holder testing positive for illegal drug or alcohol use with a second
employer or another potential employer while continuing to operate
commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) under his or her current employment
without the current employer knowing and acting on the positive test.
It would also diminish or eliminate the problem of a driver with
previous positive tests seeking and obtaining work without prospective
employers knowing and acting on that information. This could occur if a
driver is fired for a positive test but does not inform prospective or
future employers about the previous positive test result. This
[[Page 9705]]
could also occur if a new driver entering the workforce tests positive
for drugs or alcohol during a pre-employment test, waits for the drugs
to leave his/her system, then takes and passes another pre-employment
test and gets hired without the employer having any knowledge of the
previously failed pre-employment test.
Currently motor carrier employers are required to implement DOT
drug and alcohol testing programs for CDL holders and they must provide
FMCSA with a summary of their annual drug and alcohol testing results.
To improve employers' compliance, the proposed rule would require all
laboratories performing DOT drug and alcohol testing for FMCSA-
regulated employers to file annual summary reports identifying the
motor carrier employers for whom they performed testing services. The
FMCSA would use the data provided by the laboratories to identify
employers of CDL drivers that do not have an active drug and alcohol
testing program.
C. Benefits and Costs
The Agency estimates about $187 million in annual benefits from
increased crash reduction from the rule--$53 million from the annual
queries and $134 million from the pre-employment queries. FMCSA also
estimates that the rule would result in $186 million in total annual
costs, which include costs for employers to complete the annual ($28
million) and pre-employment ($10 million) queries; employers to
designate service agents and service agents to input information from
drivers undergoing the return-to-duty process ($3 million); various
entities to report positive tests and refusals ($1 million); various
entities to register with the Clearinghouse, verify authorization, and
become familiar with the rule ($5 million); for employers to obtain
drivers' consent for release of their information ($35 million); for
development of the Clearinghouse and management of records ($3
million); and the cost for drivers to go through the return-to-duty
process ($101 million). The estimated costs are about equal to its
benefits: Total net benefits of the rule are just $1 million annually.
The ten-year projection of net benefits is $8 million when discounted
at seven percent and $9 million when discounted at three percent.
However, estimated benefits include only those associated with
reductions in CMV crashes. FMCSA could not precisely quantify improved
health, quality-of-life improvements, and increased life expectancy for
CMV drivers. The Agency believes these non-quantified benefits are
significant, and, if they were included in the benefits estimates,
would clearly demonstrate the positive net benefits of this rule.
Total Net Benefit Projection Over a Ten-Year Period
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Ten-year Ten-year
----------------------------------------------------------- Annual -----------------------------------
Discount rate 7% 3%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Benefits............................................ $187,000,000 $1,406,000,000 $1,643,000,000
Total Costs........................................... 186,000,000 1,398,000,000 1,634,000,000
-----------------------------------------------------
Total Net Benefits................................ 1,000,000 8,000,000 9,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Background
A. Legal Basis for the Rulemaking
The Agency proposes to revise 49 CFR part 382, Controlled
Substances and Alcohol Use and Testing, to establish a database,
identified as the ``Commercial Driver's License Drug and Alcohol
Clearinghouse'' or ``Clearinghouse,'' for reporting of verified
positive, adulterated, and substituted drug test results, positive
alcohol test results, test refusals, negative return-to-duty test
results, and information on follow-up testing. The proposed rule would
also require employers to report actual knowledge of traffic citations
for driving a CMV while under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Under
the proposed rule, motor carrier employers would be required to query
the Clearinghouse for drug and alcohol test result information on
current and prospective employees subject to FMCSA drug and alcohol
testing requirements. The proposed rule is intended to increase
compliance with these testing requirements.
Section 32402 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century
Act (MAP-21) (Pub. L. 112-141, 126 Stat. 405), codified at 49 U.S.C.
31306a, directs the Secretary of Transportation (Secretary) to
establish a national clearinghouse for controlled substance and alcohol
test results of commercial motor vehicle operators. This proposed rule
would implement that mandate.
In addition, FMCSA has general authority to promulgate safety
standards, including those governing drivers' use of drugs or alcohol
while operating a CMV. The Motor Carrier Safety Act of 1984 (Pub. L.
98-554, Title II, 98 Stat. 2832, October 30, 1984) (the 1984 Act), as
amended, provides authority to regulate drivers, motor carriers, and
vehicle equipment and requires the Secretary to prescribe minimum
safety standards for CMVs. At a minimum, the regulations shall ensure
that-- (1) CMVs are maintained, equipped, loaded, and operated safely;
(2) the responsibilities imposed on CMV operators do not impair their
ability to operate the vehicles safely; (3) the physical condition of
CMV operators is adequate to enable them to operate the vehicles
safely; (4) CMV operation does not have a deleterious effect on the
physical condition of the operators; and (5) CMV drivers are not
coerced by a motor carrier, shipper, receiver, or transportation
intermediary to operate a CMV in violation of regulations promulgated
under 49 U.S.C. 31136 or under 49 U.S.C. chapters 51 or 313 (49 U.S.C.
31136(a)). Section 211 of the 1984 Act also grants the Secretary broad
power, in carrying out motor carrier safety statutes and regulations,
to ``prescribe recordkeeping and reporting requirements'' and to
``perform other acts the Secretary considers appropriate'' (49 U.S.C.
31133(a)(8) and (10)).
The FMCSA Administrator has been delegated authority under 49 CFR
1.87(e), (f) to carry out the functions vested in the Secretary by 49
U.S.C. chapter 313 and 49 U.S.C. chapter 311, subchapters I and III,
relating to CMV programs and safety regulation. This proposed rule
would implement, in part, the Administrator's delegated authority under
the 1984 Act to ensure that the physical condition of CMV operators is
adequate to enable them to operate vehicles safely by increasing
compliance with drug and alcohol testing requirements. FMCSA believes
that this proposed rule would likely have the effect of preventing
employers from exercising coercive influence over drivers. The proposed
rule would also
[[Page 9706]]
exercise the broad recordkeeping and implementation authority under
Section 211. The other subsections of Section 206(a) do not apply
because this rulemaking would only address the physical condition of
CMV drivers.
The Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991 (OTETA)
(Pub. L. 102-143, Title V, 105 Stat. 917, at 952, October 28, 1991,
codified at 49 U.S.C. 31306) mandated the alcohol and controlled
substances (drug) testing program for DOT. OTETA required the Secretary
to promulgate regulations for alcohol and drug testing for persons in
safety-sensitive positions in four modes of transportation--motor
carrier, airline, railroad, and mass transit. Those regulations,
including subsequent amendments, are codified at 49 CFR part 40,
``Procedures for Transportation Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing
Programs.'' Part 40 establishes requirements for all DOT-regulated
parties, including employers of drivers with CDLs subject to FMCSA
testing requirements, for conducting drug and alcohol tests. Part 40
also defines the roles and responsibilities of service agents,
including MROs, SAPs, and C/TPAs, who perform critical functions under
DOT-wide drug and alcohol testing program requirements.
In 1994, FMCSA's predecessor agency published a final rule
addressing the OTETA and creating regulations, including penalties,
codified in 49 CFR part 382, ``Controlled Substances and Alcohol Use
and Testing.'' In 2001, FMCSA revised its regulations in 49 CFR part
382 to make FMCSA's drug and alcohol testing procedures consistent with
and non-duplicative of the revised regulations at 49 CFR part 40.
This proposed rule would incorporate many of the findings and
recommendations contained in FMCSA's March 2004 report to Congress,
which was required under section 226 of the Motor Carrier Safety
Improvement Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 106-159, 113 Stat. 1748, December 9,
1999).
B. Current Regulations
Agency regulations at 49 CFR part 382 apply to persons and
employers of such persons who operate CMVs in commerce in the United
States and who are subject to the CDL requirements in 49 CFR part 383
or the equivalent CDL requirements for Canadian and Mexican drivers (49
CFR 382.103(a)). Part 382 requires that employers conduct pre-
employment drug testing, post-accident testing, random drug and alcohol
testing, and reasonable suspicion testing, as well as return-to-duty
testing and follow-up testing for those drivers who test positive or
otherwise violate DOT drug and alcohol program requirements.
Motor carrier employers are prohibited from allowing an employee to
perform safety-sensitive functions, which include operating a CMV, if
the employee tests positive on a DOT drug or alcohol test, refuses to
take a required test, or otherwise violates the DOT drug and alcohol
testing regulations. The prohibition on performing safety-sensitive
functions continues until the employee satisfies all of the
requirements of the return-to-duty process prescribed in 49 CFR part
40, subpart O. Additionally, part 382 provides that an employer may not
allow a covered employee to perform safety-sensitive functions when the
employer has actual knowledge concerning the driver's use of alcohol or
drugs while performing safety-sensitive functions. An employer has
``actual knowledge'' of drug or alcohol use while performing safety-
sensitive functions based upon the employer's direct observation of
employee drug or alcohol use, an admission by the employee of drug or
alcohol use, information provided by a previous employer, or if the
employee receives a traffic citation for driving a CMV while under the
influence of drugs or alcohol. An employer may not use a driver under
these circumstances until the driver has completed the return-to-duty
process prescribed in 49 CFR part 40, subpart O. Positive test results
or instances of employers having actual knowledge can lead to
termination of the driver's employment without the opportunity to
complete the return-to-duty process.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) require that
a motor carrier employer obtain information from job applicants that
includes the names and addresses of the applicant's employers for the
past 3 years, and whether or not the applicant was subject to the
FMCSRs and to the drug and alcohol testing requirements under 49 CFR
part 40 (49 CFR 391.21(b)). Interstate motor carrier employers are then
required to investigate the applicant's history under the DOT drug and
alcohol testing program by contacting the named DOT-regulated employers
to determine whether the applicant has, within the past 3 years,
violated the drug and alcohol prohibitions under part 382 or the
testing requirements under part 40 (49 CFR 391.23(e)). A similar
background check requirement exists in part 40. See 49 CFR 40.25 (DOT-
regulated employers must contact all of the applicant's employers for
the 2 years prior to the employee application and obtain drug and
alcohol test information, including information that these employers
obtained from previous employers).
Part 40 defines an ``employee'' as ``any person who is designated
in a DOT agency regulation as subject to drug testing and/or alcohol
testing'' including ``applicants for employment subject to pre-
employment testing'' (49 CFR 40.3). Pursuant to this definition, an
individual is an employee of any DOT-regulated employer for whom the
individual takes a pre-employment drug test, regardless of whether the
individual is subsequently hired by the employer. As a result, an
individual would be required to list such employer, when applying for a
new covered position (see 49 CFR 40.25 and 391.21(b)).
In addition to pre-employment drug testing, the background check
process detailed above is currently the primary means by which an
employer determines whether a job applicant is qualified to perform a
safety-sensitive function such as operating a CMV.
C. Discussion of the Proposed Rule
1. Clearinghouse for CDL Drivers' Drug and Alcohol Test Results
The current background check system does not provide employers with
enough tools to accurately identify CDL holders who have received
positive drug or alcohol test results or have otherwise violated the
drug and alcohol testing requirements and who are, therefore, not
qualified to operate a CMV prior to completing the return-to-duty
process. Employers must rely on information provided by the driver, who
might not list part-time driving jobs or a prior or prospective
employer that has records of positive drug or alcohol tests or other
related violations. Or, after testing positive with one prospective
employer, the driver might wait until the substance is out of his or
her system and apply with a different carrier. As a result, such
drivers continue to operate CMVs after violating the drug and alcohol
regulations without completing the required return-to-duty process.
CDL drivers who use drugs or alcohol while operating a CMV pose a
significant risk to public safety. In 1999, a New Orleans bus crash
resulted in 22 passenger fatalities. The motorcoach driver's post-
accident drug test showed use of marijuana and a sedating anti-
histamine prior to going on duty. The driver had also failed pre-
employment drug testing when applying for previous positions, a fact
not revealed or known to the current employer. The driver also failed
to disclose on his employment
[[Page 9707]]
application a previous employer who fired him after a positive drug
test. As a result of the investigations of the 1999 New Orleans bus
crash, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) recommended that
FMCSA ``develop a system that records all positive drug and alcohol
test results and refusal determinations resulting from the U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT) testing requirements, require
prospective employers to query the system before making a hiring
decision, and require certifying authorities to query the system before
making a certification decision.'' (``Highway Accident Report:
Motorcoach Run-Off-The-Road, New Orleans, Louisiana, May 9, 1999,''
NTSB Report Number: HAR-01-01, NTSB, Washington, DC, page 67 (https://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/reports/2001/HAR0101.pdf.)). This rulemaking
addresses the NTSB's recommendations.
Two 2008 Government Accountability Office (GAO) reports \2\ also
analyzed the issue of CMV drivers who test positive or refuse to submit
to drug or alcohol testing for one employer and then fail to disclose
this information to a subsequent employer. GAO identified 43 instances
in which a CMV driver tested positive for illegal drugs, such as
cocaine, marijuana, and amphetamines, with one employer and
subsequently tested negative with another employer who was unaware of
the prior positive test. In its recommendations to Congress, GAO
proposed establishing a national database, as outlined in this
rulemaking, as a possible solution to these ``job hopping'' scenarios.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See GAO-08-600 ``Improvements to Drug Testing Programs Could
Better Identify Illegal Drug Users and Keep Them Off the Road,'' May
15, 2008, and GAO-08-829R, ``Examples of Job Hopping by Commercial
Drivers After Failing Drug Tests,'' June 30, 2008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Through MAP-21, Congress directed FMCSA to establish this
clearinghouse to improve compliance with DOT's drug and alcohol testing
program, as well as enhance safety by reducing accidents and injuries
resulting from the misuse of alcohol and drugs by CDL holders. MAP-21
directed a number of specific requirements that FMCSA has incorporated
into this proposed rule. For example, in accordance with the
requirements of MAP-21, this proposed rule would require employers and
service agents to report information about current and prospective
employees' drug and alcohol test results to the Clearinghouse and would
require employers and certain service agents to check current and
prospective employees against the database. In addition, employers
would only access data in the clearinghouse to determine whether an
employment prohibition exists (e.g., a positive test result or a
refusal for which an individual has not completed the return-to-duty
requirements).
The proposed rule would provide FMCSA and regulated employers the
necessary tools to identify drivers who are prohibited from operating a
CMV based on DOT drug and alcohol program violations and ensure that
such drivers receive the required evaluation and treatment before
continuing to perform safety-sensitive functions. It would apply to
persons and employers of such persons who operate CMVs in commerce in
the United States and are subject to the CDL requirements in 49 CFR
part 383 or the equivalent CDL requirements for Canadian and Mexican
drivers. The proposed rule would not supersede an employer's obligation
to comply with the current requirements of parts 40 and 382.The rule
would also affect service agents, including MROs, C/TPAs and SAPs. MROs
are licensed physicians responsible for independently receiving and
reviewing laboratory drug test results generated by an employer's
testing program. Under the proposed rule, MROs would report to the
Clearinghouse all positive, adulterated, or substituted drug test
results and refusals to test that require an MRO determination.
C/TPAs are consortia and third party administrators who coordinate
testing services for regulated motor carrier employers. FMCSA
regulations require any employer who employs only himself/herself as a
driver to join a random test selection pool. Consortia are the entities
that manage these pools (49 CFR 382.103(b)). Third party
administrators, which often include consortia, are entities that
regulated motor carrier employers contract with to implement drug and
alcohol testing programs. Under the proposed rule, C/TPAs would be
subject to the same reporting requirements as employers when they
assume a regulated employer's drug and alcohol testing functions.
Specifically, C/TPAs that are required by regulation to perform
employer functions (e.g., for self-employed drivers) would be required
to report positive alcohol tests, drug or alcohol test refusals,
negative return-to-duty tests, and successful completion of all follow-
up tests. Employers may contract with C/TPAs to perform reporting
functions, but employers, in addition to their C/TPAs, remain
responsible for meeting the reporting requirements.
SAPs evaluate, assess and refer drivers for education and/or
treatment after a positive test or refusal as a part of the return-to-
duty process (49 CFR part 40, subpart O). Under the proposed rule, SAPs
would be required to report to the Clearinghouse the date that a driver
began and successfully completed the return to duty process specified
in 49 CFR part 40, subpart O, indicating driver eligibility for return-
to-duty testing. The SAP would also be required to report information
on the follow-up testing plan.
The requirements of this rule would also affect motor carriers
employing owner-operators. The drug and alcohol testing regulations in
part 382 impose requirements upon employers and drivers; owner-
operators can function as both. Currently, when an owner-operator acts
as a driver for another employer, FMCSA requires that the employer
treat the owner-operator as if he or she were an employee for the
purposes of the employer's DOT drug and alcohol testing program. As a
result, the proposed rule would require motor carriers employing owner-
operators to treat those drivers as employees for purposes of querying
and reporting to the database.
2. FMCSA Oversight of Motor Carrier Implementation of Drug and Alcohol
Testing Programs
FMCSA primarily monitors motor carrier compliance with DOT drug and
alcohol test program requirements through motor carrier compliance
reviews and new entrant safety audits. In 2010, the Agency and its
State partners conducted new entrant audits and compliance reviews on
approximately 50,000 motor carriers. Although FMCSA and its State
partners have significantly increased the number of carriers that it
reviews through enhanced new entrant rules and improved compliance
programs, the Agency captures only a small percentage of the more than
520,000 motor carrier employers subject to the DOT drug and alcohol
testing requirements. As a result, many motor carrier employers that do
not have a testing program may go undetected. Based on the Agency's
oversight activities, some motor carrier employers are not in
compliance with the drug and alcohol program requirements.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ FMCSA has found that eighty-six percent of new entrant audit
failures include either not having or not properly implementing a
drug and alcohol program. (FMCSA, Office of Enforcement)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current regulations require motor carrier employers to implement
DOT drug and alcohol testing programs for CDL holders and to provide
FMCSA with a summary of their annual drug and alcohol testing results
upon the
[[Page 9708]]
Agency's request (49 CFR 382.403). Every year, FMCSA randomly selects
and requires approximately 3,000 employers to submit a summary of
testing program results through FMCSA's Drug and Alcohol Testing
Survey. See Drug and Alcohol Testing Survey: 2008 Results, https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/facts-research/research-technology/report/Drug_Alcohol_Survey_2008.pdf. The survey has been largely used to
determine appropriate random testing rates for carriers and has not
generally been used to monitor employer compliance with testing
requirements. To improve employers' compliance with the requirement to
implement a drug and alcohol testing program, the proposed rule would
require all laboratories performing DOT drug testing for FMCSA-
regulated employers to file annual summary reports identifying the
motor carrier employers for whom they performed testing services. The
FMCSA would use the data provided by the laboratories to identify
employers of CDL drivers that do not have an active drug and alcohol
testing program.
IV. Section-by-Section Discussion of Regulatory Changes
FMCSA is proposing to amend 49 CFR part 382 in the following ways.
Section 382.103
Some of the proposed changes to 49 CFR part 382 in today's NPRM
affect service agents. As a result, FMCSA proposes to amend existing
Sec. 382.103(a), ``Applicability,'' by adding an express statement
that the rules codified in 49 CFR part 382 would apply to service
agents.
Section 382.107
FMCSA proposes to add a new definition, ``Commercial Driver's
License Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse,'' to existing Sec. 382.107.
The definition would explain that the Clearinghouse is a drug and
alcohol testing information database to which this rule would require
employers and service agents to report drug and alcohol testing
information and that the rule would require employers and certain
service agents to query for information on current and prospective
employees' drug and alcohol test results. FMCSA proposes to add a
definition for ``positive alcohol test'' to eliminate any confusion as
to the type of alcohol test that constitutes a violation of the
Agency's drug and alcohol program. As such FMCSA proposes to add a
definition for ``negative return to duty test result'' to clarify that
it is a negative drug test and/or an alcohol test with an alcohol
concentration of less than 0.02.
Section 382.123
FMCSA proposes to add a new Sec. 382.123 that would require
employers to provide specific information on the Alcohol Testing Form
(ATF) and Federal Drug Testing Custody and Control Form (CCF) that
identifies drivers by use of their CDL number and State of issuance.
Recording CDL number and State of issuance as the primary method of
identification serves a critical data quality function. Using CDLs
along with State of issuance and their unique record numbers to
identify drivers and their test information will prevent
misidentification resulting from similar names or the use of nicknames
or initials. This proposal would allow employers to shift from reliance
on the use of Social Security numbers on the current ATF and CCF and to
identify drivers by better utilizing other types of readily-available
and reliable information. Paragraph (a) would require that the employer
list the driver's CDL number and State of issuance in Step 1, section B
of the ATF. Under this proposal, employers would not be permitted to
record drivers' Social Security numbers, and the only permitted
employee ID number would be the driver's CDL number and State of
issuance. If the driver tests positive for alcohol in violation of 49
CFR parts 40 and 382, the employer or consortium responsible for
reporting this information would use the driver's CDL number and State
of issuance to report information to the Clearinghouse. Paragraph (a)
would also require the employer to enter its USDOT or Internal Revenue
Service (IRS)-issued Employer Identification Number (EIN) in Step 1,
section C of the ATF, in addition to the information requested in that
section of the ATF (i.e., employer name, street, city, State, and zip
code). FMCSA would use the USDOT or EIN number as an employer
identification to avoid confusion between similarly-named employers
that enter information in the Clearinghouse. These numbers would be
used to identify the employer for all aspects of the part 382
requirements, including reporting employers' drug and alcohol test
results and the annual summary laboratory test reports that proposed
Sec. 382.404 would require.
Paragraph (b) would require the employer to record its USDOT number
or EIN in Step 1, section A of the CCF. This provision would clarify
that for FMCSA's purposes, the USDOT number or EIN fulfills the form's
requirement for an employer ``I.D. No.'' Paragraph (b) would also
require the employer to record the driver's CDL number and State of
issuance in Step 1, section C of the CCF. This proposal would change
the current requirement that permits employers to use Social Security
numbers or employee ID numbers. Under this proposal, employers would
not be permitted to record drivers' Social Security numbers, and the
only permitted employee ID number would be the driver's CDL number and
State of issuance. If the driver tests positive for drugs in violation
of 49 CFR parts 40 and 382, the MRO responsible for reporting this
information would use the driver's CDL number and State of issuance as
employee identification to report information to the Clearinghouse.
FMCSA is aware that some self-employed drivers who are not required
to have USDOT numbers use their Social Security numbers as their EINs
for tax purposes. Any driver who is not comfortable using his or her
Social Security number as an EIN could pursue one of two options.
First, he or she could obtain a USDOT number. Drivers can get more
information about obtaining USDOT numbers at https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/registration-licensing/registration-licensing.htm. Second, he or she
could change his or her EIN to a number that is different from his or
her Social Security number. Drivers can get more information about
changing their EINs by contacting the IRS.
Section 382.217
FMCSA proposes to add a new Sec. 382.217 that would provide that
an employer must not allow a driver to operate a CMV if the
Clearinghouse has a record that shows that a driver has not
successfully completed the return-to-duty process required by 49 CFR
40.305. This section would implement that portion of MAP-21, codified
at 49 U.S.C. 31306a(f)(3), that requires employers to use the
Clearinghouse to determine whether any employment prohibitions exist
for prospective CMV drivers.
Section 382.401
FMCSA proposes to amend existing Sec. 382.401(b)(1)(vi) to require
employers to maintain records related to drivers' traffic citations
that establish the employer's actual knowledge of an employee driving a
CMV under the influence of drugs or alcohol in violation of Sec. Sec.
382.205 and 382.213(b). This change clarifies that employers who have
actual knowledge of these types of traffic citations must maintain a
record of them, just as they must for other aspects of their drug and
alcohol testing programs. As is currently
[[Page 9709]]
required of all records that must be retained under Sec.
382.401(b)(1), these records must be maintained for a minimum of 5
years.
Section 382.404
FMCSA proposes to add a new Sec. 382.404 to require each
laboratory to submit to FMCSA an annual, aggregate statistical summary
of test results for each motor carrier employer regulated under part
382 for which the laboratory performs DOT testing services. The reports
would draw from the information laboratories are currently required to
provide to employers under part 40, Appendix B, but would be limited to
the annual number of drug tests conducted by type of test. This report
would include all employers who are testing under the FMCSA and DOT
requirements, and would be organized by employer's USDOT number or EIN.
The filing date would coincide with the January filing date required
under Sec. 40.111(a). FMCSA proposes to require laboratories to file
this information electronically. FMCSA envisions designating a specific
format for filing, such as a commonly-available spreadsheet that the
affected laboratories might already be using.
FMCSA would use this information to improve its enforcement efforts
in identifying employers who are not in compliance with drug and
alcohol testing requirements.
FMCSA seeks comments on what, if any, burden this reporting
requirement would place on laboratories. Specifically, FMCSA would like
comments on whether laboratories could use existing data collected as a
part of existing business practices, or whether they would have to
establish new processes and controls to collect and aggregate this
information. In addition, FMCSA seeks comment on what type of
electronic format would be the easiest and least burdensome method for
reporting this information, or whether other less burdensome cost
effective methods could be used to similarly identify employers who are
not in compliance with drug and alcohol testing requirements.
Section 382.405
Section 382.405(d) currently requires employers to make copies of
all DOT drug and alcohol test results available to the Secretary, any
DOT agency, or any State or local officials with regulatory authority
over the employer. FMCSA proposes to extend these requirements to
service agents who maintain records for an employer. This change is
designed to make sure that the appropriate officials have access to all
test results when employers use service agents to manage their drug and
alcohol testing programs.
Section 382.405(e) currently authorizes the NTSB to require
employers of CDL drivers involved in crashes under investigation to
produce information on an employer's administration of post-accident
alcohol and drug tests. FMCSA proposes to amend Sec. 382.405(e) by
adding a new paragraph authorizing FMCSA to provide the NTSB access to
a CDL driver's records in the Clearinghouse when that driver is
involved in a crash under investigation. This change would implement
the statutory requirement, codified at 49 U.S.C. 31306a(i), that the
Agency establish a process for NTSB access and would provide the NTSB
with additional tools to help it fulfill its safety mission.
Section 382.409
FMCSA proposes to amend Sec. 382.409(c) by including the
Clearinghouse in the list of entities to which an MRO or C/TPA is
authorized to release a driver's drug test results. FMCSA also proposes
to amend the title of Sec. 382.409 to add the words ``or consortium/
third party administrator'' so that it reads ``Medical review officer
or consortium/third party administrator record retention for controlled
substances'' to reflect more accurately the contents of the section.
Section 382.415
FMCSA proposes to add a new Sec. 382.415 that would require a
driver to notify, in writing, all of his or her employers if he or she
violates the drug and alcohol testing regulations in parts 40 or 382.
Current regulations do not require drivers who work for more than one
employer to report this information to their other employers. This
change would place an affirmative obligation on drivers to report drug
and alcohol violations to all current employers. The penalties in
current Sec. 382.507, which include civil and criminal penalties,
would apply to all drivers who do not comply with this section.
Employers are reminded that, once each employer is notified that an
employee has violated the drug and alcohol regulations, each employer
must separately follow the return-to-duty provisions of Parts 40 and
382 before allowing an employee to serve in a safety-sensitive
position. This includes the requirement that each employer needs to
implement a follow-up test plan on its own for each employee.
Section 382.601
Current Sec. 382.601 requires employers to promulgate a policy on
the misuse of drugs and alcohol and to provide educational materials on
the subject to its new and current employees. FMCSA proposes to add a
new Sec. 382.601(b)(12), that would require employers to notify
drivers that information about verified positive, adulterated, or
substituted drug test results; positive alcohol test results; refusals
to submit to any test required by subpart C of this part; employers'
reports of actual knowledge that the driver received a traffic citation
for driving a CMV while under the influence of alcohol or drugs;
negative return-to-duty tests; employers' reports of completion of
follow-up testing; and SAP reports will be reported to the
Clearinghouse. Under this proposed requirement, employers must include
all of this information in the educational materials they provide to
their drivers, regardless of their internal employment policies
regarding drivers violating drug and alcohol testing requirements.
Employers may clarify internal employment policies pursuant to existing
Sec. 382.601(c).
Part 382, Subpart G (Sec. 382.701 to Sec. 382.727)
FMCSA proposes adding a new subpart G, entitled ``Requirements and
Procedures for Implementation of the Commercial Driver's License Drug
and Alcohol Clearinghouse,'' to part 382. Subpart G would describe
employers' and drivers' rights and responsibilities with respect to the
Clearinghouse, including how employers and service agents become
authorized to submit information to the Clearinghouse and to obtain
information from the database. It also would establish procedures for
correcting and/or updating information in the database. New subpart G
would implement Congress's general mandate in MAP-21 that the Agency
develop a Clearinghouse to track CDL holders' positive drug and alcohol
test results, and refusals to submit to drug and alcohol tests.
Section 382.701
New Sec. 382.701 establishes employers' obligations to conduct
pre-employment and annual queries of the database and prohibits them
from using drivers in safety-sensitive positions when the queries
return results showing certain violations of FMCSA's drug and alcohol
program. The scope of the queries is covered later under proposed
section 382.719.
Paragraph (a) would establish an employer's obligation to conduct
pre-
[[Page 9710]]
employment queries by prohibiting the employer from hiring drivers
without first conducting a search of the Clearinghouse for drug and
alcohol violations. Paragraph (a) would implement the requirement in
MAP-21, codified at 49 U.S.C. 31306a(f)(3), that employers search the
Clearinghouse for drug and alcohol violations prior to hiring an
individual to drive a CMV. Paragraph (b) would establish an employer's
obligation to conduct an annual query on all currently-employed
drivers. Paragraph (b) would implement the requirement, codified at 49
U.S.C. 31306a(f)(4), that employers conduct annual searches of drivers'
drug and alcohol test result histories using the Clearinghouse. These
requirements, which would apply to all drivers subject to the drug and
alcohol testing regulations at part 382, are designed to make all
current and prospective employers aware of applicants' and employees'
reported drug and alcohol violations. Paragraph (c) would implement the
statutory provision, codified at 49 U.S.C. 31306a(b)(3)(A), that
requires FMCSA to notify an employer if new information about a driver
is entered into the Clearinghouse within seven days of an employer
conducting a query under this section.
Paragraph (d) would allow employers to hire but would prohibit
employers from allowing a driver to perform safety-sensitive functions
if a query of the database shows any of the following violations of the
drug and alcohol testing program: A verified positive, adulterated, or
substituted drug test result; a positive alcohol test result; a refusal
to submit to any test required by subpart C of this part; or an
employer's report of actual knowledge that the driver received a
traffic citation for driving a CMV while under the influence of alcohol
or drugs. However, FMCSA does not propose to require employers and
service agents to report all violations of subpart B.
Under current regulations, an employer may not allow a driver to
perform safety-sensitive functions if the employer has actual knowledge
that the driver has used drugs or alcohol. Actual knowledge is defined
at Sec. 382.107 to mean that an employer has actual knowledge of drug
or alcohol use based on: Direct observation of an employee; information
provided by the driver's previous employer(s); a traffic citation for
driving a CMV while under the influence of drugs or alcohol; or an
employee's admission of drug or alcohol use (except as provided in
Sec. 382.21). As a part of this proposed rule, employers would only be
required to report to the Clearinghouse violations based on actual
knowledge of employees receiving a citation for operating a CMV under
the influence of drugs or alcohol. FMCSA proposes to require only this
one category of actual knowledge violation because a traffic citation
provides objective documentation on which to base a report to the
Clearinghouse. In the case of direct observation or an employee's
admission, the employer has the obligation to remove the employee from
performing safety-sensitive functions until he or she completes the
return-to-duty process, but there is no requirement to report the
observation or admission to the Clearinghouse. In the case of
information provided by a previous employer, current rules require the
employer to report the information to prospective employers during the
pre-employment background check required by Sec. Sec. 40.25 and
391.23. If the background check reveals prior drug or alcohol
violations for which the employee has not successfully completed the
return-to-duty process, the employer is prohibited from hiring the
employee to perform safety-sensitive functions, such as driving.
New Sec. 382.701(d) would also provide that, if the database
search revealed one of these violations, an employer could nonetheless
allow a driver to perform safety-sensitive functions if the driver
completed the return-to-duty process in subpart O of part 40. Under
subpart O, a driver who has completed the return-to-duty process, but
has not completed all follow-up tests, would also be able to perform
safety-sensitive functions provided the current employer assumes
responsibility for managing the follow-up testing process. Finally, an
employer may allow a driver to perform safety-sensitive functions if,
after the time for final adjudication has expired, a traffic citation
for driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol does not result in
a conviction (as defined at 49 CFR 383.5). This provision does not
permit an employer to allow a driver to perform a safety-sensitive
function after receiving a DUI traffic citation, prior to receiving a
final adjudication. All of the above provisions of paragraph (d) would
implement the employment prohibitions required by MAP-21, codified at
49 U.S.C. 31306a(f)(3) & (h)(1)(D).
In accordance with the statutory mandate codified at 49 U.S.C.
31306a(h)(1)(c), paragraph (e) would establish a record keeping
requirement under which employers would be required to retain for three
years a record of each query made under this section and the
information received in response. However, FMCSA would also retain that
information in the Clearinghouse for a minimum of three years for
research and enforcement purposes. The Agency does not believe that it
is necessary to burden employers with a redundant recordkeeping
requirement. Accordingly, FMCSA will deem an employer to have satisfied
this recordkeeping requirement if it conducts its query in accordance
with a valid registration and the requirements of new subpart G.
Section 382.703
In accordance with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 31306a(h)(1)(A),
new Sec. 382.703 would prohibit disclosure of information in the
Clearinghouse without a driver's consent. Paragraph (a) would require
an employer to obtain consent from drivers before querying the database
to determine if there is any information in the database on that
driver. Paragraph (b) would require the employer to obtain written
consent from the driver for access to information in the Clearinghouse.
These consents apply to the proposed requirement (Sec. 382.701)
that employers conduct two types of queries: Pre-employment and annual.
To reduce the burden on employers who would be required to conduct
annual queries on multiple drivers at the same time, FMCSA envisions
establishing two levels of queries. The first level, or ``full query,''
would grant employers or prospective employers access to the reportable
information in a driver's record and would require the employer to
obtain written consent from the driver for access to Clearinghouse
information. FMCSA envisions using technology similar to that it
currently uses in its Pre-Employer Screening Program (PSP) to verify a
driver's identity. FMCSA would then allow the driver to designate which
employer(s) or prospective employer(s) may view his or her record. All
employers would be required to conduct a full query to satisfy the pre-
employment query requirement.
The second level, or ``limited query,'' would not grant access to
information in the Clearinghouse but would only indicate whether
information exists in the database about a particular driver. Prior to
conducting a limited query, an employer would have to obtain written
consent from a driver. Employers would be required to retain this
consent for 3 years after conducting a query and would be subject to
audit.
Employers would only be able to use the limited query in connection
with annual searches on currently employed drivers. If the query
indicates that information exists in the Clearinghouse
[[Page 9711]]
on a particular driver, then the employer would be required to conduct
a full query, requiring the employer to obtain written consent from the
driver to view the information in the Clearinghouse.
FMCSA envisions that employers would require drivers to give
blanket consent to allow employers to conduct a limited query on an
annual basis for the duration of their employment. However, no driver
may give blanket consent for a full query of his or her information in
the Clearinghouse. Drivers must give specific written consent each time
they allow employers to view their personal information in the
Clearinghouse.
Paragraph (c) would prohibit employers from using any driver who
does not grant consent to search the Clearinghouse. If a driver refuses
to grant consent for either the full or limited query, that driver
could not perform any safety-sensitive function, including driving.
Paragraph (d) would make clear that the consent granted under this
proposed section would include consent for FMCSA to notify employers of
information on a driver that was entered into the Clearinghouse within
seven days of the employer conducting a query.
Section 382.705
In accordance with Congress's mandate that drug and alcohol
refusals and positive test results be reported to the Clearinghouse
(codified at 49 U.S.C. 31306a(g)), new Sec. 382.705 would establish
reporting requirements, assigning responsibility for inputting and
updating information to individuals and entities. Paragraph (a) would
require MROs to report to the Clearinghouse within 1 business day all
verified positive, adulterated, or substituted drug test results and
refusals to test that require a determination by the MRO as specified
in 49 CFR 40.191. In the event an MRO changes the outcome of a test in
accordance with 49 CFR part 40, he or she would be required to report
this change within 1 business day. This paragraph would also require
the MRO to provide the reason for the test; the Federal Drug Testing
CCF specimen ID number; the collection site name and address; the
driver's name, date of birth, and CDL number, and the State that issued
the CDL; the employer's name, city/State, and USDOT or EIN; the date of
the test; the date of the verified result; and the test result. The
test result would either be (1) positive; (2) refusal to test:
Adulterated; (3) refusal to test: Substituted; or (4) refusal to
provide a specimen. This information will allow tracking and
identification of specific test results. Information about the driver
(i.e., name, date of birth, CDL number, and issuing State) and the
employer (i.e., name, address, and USDOT or EIN number) is intended to
assist in making a positive identification of the driver in the
Clearinghouse, because information about more than one driver with the
same name may be present in the database.
FMCSA proposes to have MROs, rather than employers, report this
information to the Clearinghouse. A large number of small motor carrier
employers (approximately 86%) are responsible for administering drug
and alcohol programs. Based on the Agency's observation that smaller
employers have lower compliance rates with FMCSA's drug and alcohol
testing program, due in part to the inherent business interests small
companies have in retaining employees, the Agency believes that
requiring MROs to report verified drug results would produce more
accurate and comprehensive reporting to the Clearinghouse.
The above notwithstanding, under DOT rules, MROs do not verify
alcohol test results. As a result, paragraph (b) would require
employers to report the following information to the Clearinghouse:
Alcohol test results with an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or greater;
negative return-to-duty tests; drug and alcohol test refusals; reports
that drivers have successfully completed all follow-up tests; and
reports of actual knowledge that a driver received a traffic citation
for driving a CMV under the influence of drugs or alcohol. This section
would also require that employers report the reason for the test; the
driver's name, date of birth, CDL number and the State that issued the
CDL; the employer's name, address, and USDOT number or EIN; date of the
test; date the result was reported; and test result. The test result
would be one of the following: Negative (for return-to-duty tests
only), positive, or refusal. This information is required so that
information about drivers with similar or identical names is not
erroneously posted to the wrong driver's record.
Employers would also be required to report each instance in which
they have actual knowledge that an employee-driver received a traffic
citation for driving a CMV under the influence of drugs or alcohol. The
report would include the following information: The driver's name, date
of birth, CDL number and State that issued the CDL; employer's name,
address, and USDOT number or EIN; the date of the traffic citation; the
date the employer became aware of the traffic citation; the name and
State of the law enforcement agency issuing the traffic citation; the
ticket or docket number associated with the citation; and the specific
charge alleged in the traffic citation. This information is designed to
ensure that a driver can identify any traffic citation reported to the
database and verify that the information is correctly reported with the
law enforcement agency that issued it. If the citation does not result
in a conviction, a driver may request that FMCSA remove the employer's
report from the Clearinghouse (see proposed Sec. 382.719). In that
circumstance, the information FMCSA proposes to require in this
paragraph will be important for tracking the citation and its
subsequent adjudication. To the extent an employer uses a TPA to comply
with his or her reporting duties, the employer remains responsible for
ensuring that the TPA makes the required reports.
Similar to the requirements in paragraph (b) that apply to
employers, paragraph (c) would require C/TPAs acting on behalf of an
employer who employs himself/herself, as required by 49 CFR 382.103(b),
to report the following information to the Clearinghouse: Alcohol test
results with an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or greater; negative
return-to-duty tests; drug and alcohol test refusals; and reports that
drivers have successfully completed all follow-up tests. This section
would also require that C/TPAs report the reason for the test; the
driver's name, date of birth, CDL number and the State that issued the
CDL; the employer's name, address, and USDOT number or EIN; date of the
test; date the result was reported; and test result. The test result
would be one of the following: Negative (for return-to-duty tests
only), positive, or refusal.
Paragraph (d) would require SAPs to report information to the
Clearinghouse about drivers who begin the return-to-duty process. That
would include information identifying the SAP and the driver; the date
of the initial SAP assessment. The SAP would also enter the date the
SAP determined that the driver successfully completed the education
and/or treatment process and was eligible for return-to-duty testing;
and the frequency, number, and type of required follow-up tests; the
duration of the follow-up testing plan; and any subsequent
modifications to the plan. This information is important to potential
future employers so that they may require a negative return-to-duty
test and comply with the follow-up testing requirements. SAPs would be
required to report this information within 1 business day of
determining
[[Page 9712]]
that the driver has completed the return-to-duty requirements.
Paragraph (e) would require persons reporting information to the
Clearinghouse to do so truthfully and accurately. FMCSA proposes to
prohibit anyone from reporting false or inaccurate information. Anyone
making an inadvertent error should make a correction immediately upon
discovering the error. Anyone violating the provisions of this
paragraph would be subject to the civil and criminal penalties set
forth in current Sec. 382.507, as well as any other applicable
penalties.
Section 382.707
In accordance with the statutory requirement, codified at 49 U.S.C.
31306a(g)(4), that requires the Agency to notify individuals about
changes to their records in the Clearinghouse, new Sec. 382.707 would
require FMCSA to notify a driver when information about that driver is
entered in, revised, or removed from the Clearinghouse. It would also
require FMSA to notify a driver when information from the Clearinghouse
is released to an employer and to state the reason for the release. The
default method of notification would be to send a letter by U.S. Mail
to the address on record with the SDLA that issued the driver's CDL.
However, drivers would be able to provide an alternate address or
method of communications, such as electronic mail. This section would
require FMCSA to alert a driver each time a change occurred to his or
her record in the Clearinghouse. The driver would then be able to
access the Clearinghouse to review the new or revised data and request
changes, if appropriate.
Section 382.709
As mandated by MAP-21 and codified at 49 U.S.C. 31306a(j)(1), new
Sec. 382.709 would grant a driver the right to review information in
the Clearinghouse about himself or herself, except as otherwise
restricted by law, but reminds drivers that consistent with Part 40,
drivers cannot obtain their follow-up testing plan.
Section 382.711
New Sec. 382.711, implements the statutory requirement, codified
at 49 U.S.C. 31306a(h)(1) that the Agency establish a process for
employers and/or their agents to request information from the
Clearinghouse. This section would establish strict registration
procedures for employers and service agents. Only employers and
designated service agents--MROs, C/TPAs, and SAPs--would be authorized
to submit information on a driver to the Clearinghouse. All
Clearinghouse registrants would be required to provide their names,
addresses, and telephone numbers, as well as any other information
necessary to validate identity. In addition, employers would be
required to submit their USDOT numbers or EINs and the name of the
person or persons authorized to access the Clearinghouse. C/TPAs would
also be required to identify the person or persons authorized to access
the Clearinghouse. Employers and C/TPAs would be required to update
annually the names of the people they authorize to access the
Clearinghouse. MROs and SAPs would be required to provide a
certification and evidence that they meet the DOT's qualifications and
training requirements under 49 CFR part 40 in order to register.
DOT recognizes the uniqueness of ``owner-operators'' in the motor
carrier industry. 49 CFR 40.355(f)(h) & (j) provide specific exceptions
to enable service agents (e.g., SAPs, C/TPAs, and MROs) to better
manage this situation where the employee is also the employer. Under 49
CFR 382.305, FMCSA requires owner-operators to participate in a
consortium for random testing. New Sec. 382.711(b) would expressly
require employers that are owner-operators to identify the C/TPA that
it uses for testing purposes and authorize that C/TPA to submit
information on a driver, including themselves, to the Clearinghouse.
This section would be mandatory for owner-operator and self-employed
individuals and permissive for other employers that may use C/TPAs to
perform testing services.
Section 382.713
New Sec. 382.713 would set forth the terms under which
Clearinghouse registrations would remain active, or would be revoked or
cancelled. The initial Clearinghouse registration term would be 5 years
unless the Agency took action to revoke or cancel it. The Agency
proposes to cancel any registrant that does not use the Clearinghouse
to view or input information for 2 years. The Agency would also have
the authority to revoke the Clearinghouse registration of entities who
do not comply with Clearinghouse regulations.
If an entity's Clearinghouse privileges are revoked, they would
still be obligated to perform all of the functions under this rule. If
it was unable to do so because of revocation, then FMCSA staff would
become involved and process the requests on behalf of the employers.
There is no reason why an entity could not request reconsideration if
its registration were revoked.
Section 382.715
New Sec. 382.715 would require employers to designate C/TPAs
before the C/TPA could enter information relating to them into the
Clearinghouse.
Section 382.717
New Sec. 382.717 would implement the statutory requirement,
codified at 49 U.S.C. 31306a(j)(2), that the Agency provide a dispute
resolution procedure to remedy administrative errors in an individual's
Clearinghouse record. This section would establish procedures for
drivers to petition FMCSA to correct inaccurate information in the
Clearinghouse. Drivers would be required to submit a petition within 18
months of the date the information in question was reported to the
Clearinghouse. Drivers would need to include information identifying
themselves and the information they want to be corrected, the reasons
they believe the information is inaccurate, and evidence supporting
their challenge. Drivers would not be able to challenge the accuracy or
validity of the alcohol or controlled substance test results under
these new procedures. Nothing in this rule would change the limitation
on a driver's ability to challenge the validity of a test result or a
refusal.
The procedures that would be established under this section would
be used to correct clerical errors, such as reporting results to the
wrong driver's record; an incorrect name or CDL number; a misidentified
test type, such as a pre-employment identified as a random test; or
other inaccuracies in the reported data. These procedures could also be
used to request that an employer's report of actual knowledge of a
traffic citation for driving a CMV under the influence of drugs or
alcohol be removed from the Clearinghouse if the citation did not
result in a conviction. FMCSA would resolve petitions and notify the
driver of its decision within 90 days of receiving a complete petition.
The rule would also establish an expedited review to elevate those
petitions seeking correction of critical information as opposed to
those petitions addressing errors that do not impact an individual's
ability to perform safety-sensitive functions. In this manner, the
Agency will be able to provide the critical function served by this
section and appropriately manage any number of petitions that seek
less-critical, but nevertheless valid, requests for data correction. If
resolution of the decision would affect the driver's ability
[[Page 9713]]
to perform safety-sensitive functions, he or she could request
expedited review. If FMCSA granted expedited review, it would inform
the driver of its decision within 30 days of receiving a complete
petition.
This section would also give drivers the opportunity to request
administrative review of FMCSA's disposition of a petition to correct
information in the Clearinghouse. A driver challenging FMCSA's decision
would be required to present his or her request in writing to the
Associate Administrator for Enforcement and Program Delivery, along
with an explanation of the error he or she asserts FMCSA made and
documentation to support his or her position. The Associate
Administrator would make a decision within 60 days, and this would
constitute final Agency action.
With respect to the administrative review procedures for denials of
requests for data correction in 382.717(f), we would note that this is
not an appeal of a factual or evidentiary nature it is a second level
of review of a data correction system. The Agency based the procedures
for administrative review in the NPRM on existing procedures in FMCSA
regulations where the administrative review is similarly based on
``agency error.'' See 49 CFR 385.15 (administrative review of safety
ratings), 385.113 (administrative review of Mexican carrier safety
ratings), 385.327 (administrative review of new entrant safety audits),
385.423 (administrative review of hazmat safety permit denials). None
of these existing processes include an explicit standard for review,
explanation of how decisions will be made by the identified deciding
official, or evidentiary standards. None of these sections have been
deemed inadequate. The standard, as here, is whether the Agency erred
in making its initial decision. In addition, all petitioners will have
the right to obtain counsel if they so choose.
Section 382.719
New Sec. 382.719 would provide that an employer seeking to
determine whether an employment prohibition exists would not have
access to information about a particular violation once certain
conditions are met. FMCSA proposes that once a driver successfully
completes all aspects of the return-to-duty process, information about
a positive test result or a refusal will remain accessible to employers
for a period of either three or five years. FMCSA proposes both options
based on two provisions in MAP-21 that can be interpreted to require
employers to have access to this information for either a three or
five-year period. Compare 49 U.S.C. 31306a(f) (requiring employers to
determine whether a driver has had an employment prohibition for a
three-year period prior to hiring), with 49 U.S.C. 31306(g)(6)
(requiring the Secretary to retain records in the clearinghouse for
five years, and remove records after five years, ``unless the
individual fails to meet a return-to-duty or follow-up requirement
under title 49, Code of Federal Regulations'').
Based on this analysis, FMCSA proposes the following requirements
to determine when records will no longer be available for review by
employers conducting queries of the database: (1) The SAP reports that
the driver has successfully completed the prescribed education and/or
treatment as required by 49 CFR 40.305 and is eligible for return-to-
duty testing; (2) the employer or C/TPA reports that the driver has
received negative return-to-duty test results; (3) the driver's present
employer or employer's consortium (for owner/operators) reports that
the driver has successfully completed all follow-up tests as prescribed
in the SAP report in accordance with Sec. Sec. 40.307, 40.309, and
40.311; and (4) 3 years have passed since the date of the violation
determination. As an alternate to subparagraph (4), FMCSA proposes to
limit the time period during which an employer could access information
about a violation that the driver has addressed by successful
completion of the return to duty process to a period of five years from
the date of violation instead of three years. FMCSA seeks comment on
whether three or five years from the date of the violation is the
appropriate amount of time to make this test result information
available after a driver has completed the return-to-duty process.
Regardless of whether three years or five years has passed since
the date of the violation determination, this section would also
provide that violation information would remain in the Clearinghouse
indefinitely and be available to employers conducting a query if a
driver failed to complete the return-to-duty process. The above
notwithstanding, FMCSA will remove information about a traffic citation
for driving a CMV under the influence of drugs or alcohol within 2
business days of making the determination that it did not result in a
conviction. This section would also make clear that FMCSA could
continue to use data removed from the Clearinghouse for research,
auditing, and enforcement purposes.
Section 382.721
As authorized by 49 U.S.C. 31306a(e), new Sec. 382.721 would
establish the Agency's ability to collect reasonable fees from entities
that are required to query the Clearinghouse. The Agency would be
prohibited from collecting fees from drivers accessing their own
records.
Section 382.723
New Sec. 382.723 would prohibit anyone from accessing the
Clearinghouse except as authorized by this proposed rule. It would also
prohibit anyone from reporting inaccurate or misleading information to
the Clearinghouse. No one would be permitted to disclose or disseminate
any information obtained from the Clearinghouse, except as otherwise
authorized by law. As required by statute, codified at 49 U.S.C.
31306a(h)(1)(D), employers would be specifically prohibited from using
information from the Clearinghouse for any purpose other than to assess
or evaluate whether a driver is prohibited from operating a CMV.
Employers would be further prohibited from divulging any such
information to anyone not directly involved in that assessment or
evaluation, as required by 49 U.S.C. 31306a(h)(1)(E)(ii). Anyone who
violates this rule would be subject to the civil and criminal penalties
established by existing Sec. 382.507. In addition, employers and
service agents remain subject to the requirements concerning
``Confidentiality and Release of Information'' found in 49 CFR part 40,
subpart P. These provisions are incorporated and made applicable to
motor carrier employers in 49 CFR 382.105. This section would not,
however, prohibit FMCSA from accessing the information in the
Clearinghouse for research or enforcement purposes. For example, FMCSA
could use the information in the database to identify trends in testing
data that could help the Agency focus its oversight activities.
Section 382.725
In accordance with Congress's mandate in MAP-21 (codified at 49
U.S.C. 31306a(h)(2), new Sec. 382.725 would grant each State chief
commercial driver's license official the right to access information in
the Clearinghouse about an applicant for a commercial driver's license
for the purpose of determining whether that applicant is qualified to
operate a CMV. The applicant is not required to grant prior consent; an
applicant is deemed to have granted consent by virtue of applying for a
commercial driver's
[[Page 9714]]
license. The chief commercial driver's license officials are required
to protect the privacy and confidentiality of the information they
receive under this proposed section. Failure to comply with the terms
of this proposed section would result in the official losing his or her
right of access.
Section 382.727
As directed by Congress in MAP-21 (codified at 49 U.S.C. 31306a(k),
new Sec. 382.727 would establish civil and criminal penalties for
violations of the proposed Clearinghouse regulations. As stated above,
49 CFR 382.507 already establishes civil and criminal liability for
employers and drivers that violate any provision of 49 CFR part 382.
However, new Sec. 382.727 would extend civil and criminal liability to
all employees, medical review officers and service agents for
violations of 49 CFR subpart G.
Summary of Responsibilities and Data Access
Table 1 summarizes the obligations of each entity responsible for
reporting information to the Clearinghouse database.
Table 1--Reporting Entities and Circumstances
------------------------------------------------------------------------
When information would be
Reporting entity reported to clearinghouse
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prospective Employer of CDL Driver... --Positive pre-employment test
result.
--Refusal to test (drug) not
requiring a determination by the
MRO as specified in 49 CFR
40.191.
Current Employer of CDL Driver....... --Positive alcohol test result.
--Refusal to test (alcohol) as
specified in 49 CFR 40.261.
--Refusal to test (drug) not
requiring a determination by the
MRO as specified in 49 CFR
40.191.
--Citations (DUI in a CMV).
--Negative return-to-duty test
results.
--Completion of follow-up
testing.
MRO.................................. --Verified positive, adulterated,
or substituted drug test result.
--Refusal to test (drug)
requiring a determination by the
MRO as specified in 49 CFR
40.191.
Third Party Administrator (if --Positive alcohol test result.
designated by employer to report on --Refusal to test (alcohol) as
its behalf). specified in 49 CFR 40.261.
--Refusal to test (drug) not
requiring a determination by the
MRO as specified in 49 CFR
40.191.
--Negative return-to-duty test
results.
Consortium (reporting for owner/ --Positive alcohol test result.
operators). --Refusal to test (alcohol) as
specified in 49 CFR 40.261.
--Refusal to test (drug) not
requiring a determination by the
MRO as specified in 49 CFR
40.191.
SAP.................................. --Identification of driver and
date the initial assessment was
initiated.
--Successful completion of
treatment and/or education and
the determination of eligibility
for return-to-duty testing.
--Follow-up testing requirements.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2 summarizes the conditions under which entities would be
able to view information in the Clearinghouse.
Table 2--Querying Entities and Information Obtained From the
Clearinghouse
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type of data Requirements to
Querying entity obtained obtain data
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prospective Employer of CDL Records in the Employer obtains
Driver (full query). Clearinghouse written consent
pertaining to the from driver.
applicant
concerning:
--positive alcohol
test result;
--verified positive,
adulterated, or
substituted drug
test result;
--refusal to test
(alcohol or drug);
--citations (actual
knowledge);
--return-to-duty
negative test
result;
--follow-up testing
program
information.
Current Employer of CDL Records in the Employer obtains
Driver (full query). Clearinghouse written consent
pertaining to the from driver.
CDL driver
concerning:
--positive alcohol
test result;
--verified positive,
adulterated, or
substituted drugs
test result;
--refusal to test
(alcohol or drug);
--citations (actual
knowledge);
--return-to-duty
negative test
result;
--follow-up testing
program
information.
Current Employer of CDL Notice of whether Employer obtains
Driver (limited query). information for the written consent for
driver exists in a limited query.
the Clearinghouse.
CDL Driver.................. Records in the Specific request of
Clearinghouse the CDL driver;
pertaining to the FMCSA verifies
CDL driver. driver identity.
MRO......................... No access.
SAP......................... No access.
Consortium (full query)..... Records in the Consortium obtains
Clearinghouse written consent for
pertaining to the a full query.
CDL driver
concerning:
[[Page 9715]]
--positive alcohol
test result;
--verified positive,
adulterated, or
substituted drugs
test result;
--refusal to test
(alcohol or drug);
--citations (actual
knowledge);
--return-to-duty
negative test
result;
--follow-up testing
program
information.
Consortium (limited query).. Notice of whether Consortium obtains
information for the written consent for
driver exists in a limited query.
the Clearinghouse.
Third Party Administrator... Access limited to TPA obtains written
authority delegated consent for a
by employer to limited or full
review data in query;
Clearinghouse. TPA must have
specific written
consent from the
employer of the CDL
driver.
FMCSA....................... Full access......... No consent required.
NTSB........................ Records of driver No consent required.
involved in
accidents under
investigation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 3 summarizes the types of queries that an employer is
required to conduct.
Table 3--Types of Queries
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type of query Type of consent When required Type of data obtained
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Full query....................... Employer obtains written Pre-employment screening Information on driver's
consent from driver. drug and alcohol test
results.
Full query....................... Employer obtains written Annual query results Information on driver's
consent from driver. show that the driver drug and alcohol test
has drug or alcohol results.
testing information in
the Clearinghouse.
Limited query.................... Employer must obtain and Annually................ Notice of whether
maintain written consent information for the
for at least 3 years driver exists in the
following the query. Clearinghouse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule is a significant regulatory action under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. The
Office of Management and Budget has reviewed it under that Order. It
requires an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. A draft Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) is
available in the docket where indicated under the ``Public
Participation and Request for Comments'' section of this preamble. A
summary of the RIA follows:
RIA Estimates of Benefits and Costs
All employers subject to the drug and alcohol testing regulations
would be required to query the database (1) on an annual basis to
examine each driver's positive test record and (2) as part of a
prospective driver's pre-employment screening process.
Given the established, sizeable success of mandatory testing
programs on crash reduction,4 5 concrete improvements in the
process of disseminating positive-test results and making them
accessible to employers are expected to bring substantial benefits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Jacobson, Mireille, ``Drug Testing in the Trucking Industry:
The Effect on Highway Safety,'' The Journal of Law and Economics,
April 2003, Vol. 46, pp. 130-156.
\5\ Brady, Joanne E., Susan P. Baker, Charles DiMaggio, Melissa
McCarthy, George W. Rebok, and Guohua Li, ``Effectiveness of
Mandatory Alcohol Testing Programs in Reducing Alcohol Involvement
in Fatal Motor Carrier Crashes,'' American Journal of Epidemiology,
Vol. 170, No. 6, pp. 775-782 (Advance Access Publication 19-August-
2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Agency estimates about $187 million in annual benefits from
increased crash reduction from the rule--$53 million from the annual
queries and $134 from the pre-employment queries. FMCSA estimates about
$186 million in total annual costs, which include costs for: Employers
to complete the annual ($28 million) and pre-employment ($10 million)
queries; employers and drivers to designate service agents and report
driver information ($3 million); various entities to report positive
tests ($1 million) and to register, verify authorization, and become
familiar with the rule ($5 million); consent to release driver
information ($35 million); clearinghouse development and records
management ($3 million); and the cost for drivers to go through the
return-to-duty process ($101 million). The estimated costs are about
equal to its benefits: Total net benefits of the rule are just $1
million annually. The ten-year projection of net benefits is $8 million
when discounted at seven percent and $9 million when discounted at
three percent. However, estimated benefits include only those
associated with reductions in CMV crashes. FMCSA could not precisely
quantify improved health, quality-of-life improvements, and increased
life expectancy for CMV drivers. The Agency believes these non-
quantified benefits are significant, and, if they were included in the
benefits estimates, would clearly demonstrate the positive net benefits
of this rule. The table below summarizes these net-benefit estimates.
[[Page 9716]]
Total and Annual Net Benefit Projection Over a Ten-Year Period
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Annual 10-Year 10-Year
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discount Rate 7% 3%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Benefits............................................ $187,000,000 $1,406,000,000 $1,643,000,000
Total Costs............................................... 186,000,000 1,398,000,000 1,634,000,000
-----------------------------------------------------
Total Net Benefits.................................... 1,000,000 8,000,000 9,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The RIA contains sections describing the benefits and costs
associated with implementing the following provisions of the proposed
rule:
Mandatory Queries
a. Employers would be required to query the Clearinghouse annually
for each of their drivers in order to ascertain if any of them failed
drug or alcohol tests during the previous year.
b. Prospective employers would be required to query the
Clearinghouse as part of their pre-employment screening process of
potential hires in order to ascertain if a prospective employee failed
a drug or alcohol test with a previous employer or prospective
employer.
Designating Service Agents
c. Employers would be required to designate (and submit
authorization for) their C/TPAs and SAPs with the Clearinghouse.
Reports and Notifications of Positive Tests
d. MROs would report verified positive controlled-substances test
results for CDL drivers to the Clearinghouse. Each test would be
identified as pre-employment, post-accident, random, reasonable
suspicion, return-to-duty, or follow-up. MROs would also be required to
report certain drug test refusals to the Clearinghouse.
e. FMCSA would notify each driver testing positive that information
about them has been reported to, revised or removed from the
Clearinghouse. The drivers would also have the opportunity to review
this information.
f. SAPs would report to the Clearinghouse information about the
evaluation and treatment process as well as the number of required
follow-up tests to be given after a return-to-duty test.
g. Employers or C/TPAs acting on the employer's behalf would report
verified alcohol test results at or above 0.04 alcohol concentration
for CDL drivers to the Clearinghouse, subsequent follow-up test results
stemming from the initial test at or above 0.04 alcohol concentration,
and refusals. Each test would be identified as pre-employment, post-
accident, random, reasonable suspicion, return-to-duty, or follow-up.
Employers or TPAs would also report negative return-to-duty test
results.
h. All employers subject to 49 CFR part 382, or C/TPAs acting on
the employer's behalf would report information on refusals to test.
i. Employers would be required to report actual knowledge of a
driver's traffic citation for driving a CMV under the influence of
drugs or alcohol).
Clearinghouse Registration
j. Employers, C/TPAs, MROs, and SAPs would be required to register
with the Clearinghouse.
k. Employers (and C/TPAs) would be required to verify, on an annual
basis, the names of person(s) authorized to report and obtain
information from the Clearinghouse.
Driver Consent Verification
l. Written consent must be obtained from the driver prior to
release of information from the Clearinghouse.
Submission of Annual Reports
m. All drug-testing laboratories would submit employer specific
summary reports of test results directly to FMCSA annually.
Benefit Analysis
The benefits to the rule derive from reductions in crashes due to
the additional information on employee-failed and refused drug and
alcohol tests disseminated to employers solely because of the annual
and pre-employment queries. This represents information that employers
would not otherwise know about and act on.
The current drug-testing program is estimated to generate $160
million in annual crash-reduction benefits from 35,145 annual positive
tests, which averages to approximately $4,600 per positive drug test
($160 million/35,145, rounded to the nearest hundred). The mandated
annual query in the proposed rule would result in 9,200 instances of
employer alerts to positive drug tests of their drivers that current
employers would not otherwise have known about. A requirement that
disseminates additional information on 9,200 other positive testing
drivers can be estimated to generate the same proportion of benefits
that the 35,145 from the current program generates. If 35,145 positive
tests and consequent alerts generate $160 million in benefits, then
9,200 additional alerts would generate $42 million in benefits (($160
million/35,145) = ($41.9 million/9,200), rounded to the nearest
million).
The current alcohol testing program is estimated to generate $43
million in annual crash-reduction benefits from 3,465 annual positive
alcohol tests, which averages to approximately $9,200 per positive
alcohol test ($43 million/3,465, rounded to nearest hundred). The
mandated annual query in the proposed rule would result in 900
instances of employer alerts to positive tests of their drivers that
current employers would not otherwise have known about. A requirement
that disseminates additional information on 900 other positive testing
drivers can be estimated to generate the same proportion of benefits
that the 3,465 from the current program generates. If 3,465 positive
tests and consequent alerts generate $43 million in benefits, then 900
additional alerts would generate about $11 million in benefits (($43
million/3,465) = ($11.2 million/900), rounded to the nearest million).
With annual benefits to the drug-testing side of the annual queries
estimated at $42 million and the alcohol-testing side at $11 million,
total annual benefits to mandated annual queries are thus estimated at
$53 million ($42 million + $11 million).
The mandated pre-employment query in the proposed rule would result
in 23,100 instances of employer alerts to positive drug tests that
prospective employers would not otherwise have known about. A
requirement that disseminates additional information on 23,100 other
positive drug testing drivers can be estimated to generate the same
proportion of benefits that the 35,145 from the current program
generates. If 35,145 positive tests and consequent alerts generate $160
million in benefits, then 23,100 additional alerts would generate $105
million in benefits (($160 million/35,145) = ($105.2
[[Page 9717]]
million/23,100), rounded to the nearest million).
The mandated pre-employment query in the proposed rule would result
in 2,300 instances of employer alerts to positive alcohol tests of
their drivers that prospective employers would not otherwise have known
about. A requirement that disseminates additional information on 2,300
other positive testing drivers can be estimated to generate the same
proportion of benefits that the 3,465 from the current program
generates. If 3,465 positive tests and consequent alerts generate $43
million in benefits, then 2,300 additional alerts would generate $29
million in benefits (($43 million/3,465) = ($28.5 million/2,300),
rounded to the nearest million).
With annual benefits to the drug-testing side of the pre-employment
queries estimated at $105 million and the alcohol-testing side at $29
million, total annual benefits to mandated pre-employment queries are
thus estimated at $134 million ($105 million + $29 million).
Given the $53 million in annual benefits from the information on
positive tests disseminated because of the mandatory annual queries
($42 million drug and $11 million alcohol) and the $134 million in
annual benefits from the information on positive tests disseminated
because of the mandatory pre-employment queries ($105 million drug and
$29 million alcohol), the total benefits to the proposed rule are $187
million annually. The table below presents these benefit totals.
Total Annual Benefits of the Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Queries Drug Alcohol Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual.......................................................... $42,000,000 $11,000,000 $53,000,000
Pre-Employment.................................................. 105,000,000 29,000,000 134,000,000
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 147,000,000 40,000,000 187,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on the annual benefits of $187 million, the 10-year benefit
projection is $1.406 billion when discounted at 7 percent and $1.643
billion when discounted at 3 percent
By reducing drug and alcohol abuse by drivers, this rule could also
lead to improved health, quality-of-life improvements, and increased
life expectancy for drivers beyond those associated with reductions in
vehicle crashes.
Cost Analysis
FMCSA estimates that the costs of the proposed rule total $186
million annually, which can be separated into nine categories. From the
above descriptions of the requirements of the rule (a though m above):
(a) The cost to employers to complete the annual queries of their
drivers is estimated at $28 million annually; (b) the cost to
prospective employers to complete pre-employment queries as part of the
pre-employment screening process is $10 million annually; (c) the cost
to employers to designate their C/TPAs and SAPs to input driver
information is $3 million annually; (d, e, f, g, h, and i) the cost to
MROs, SAPs, C/TPAs, and employers to report positive tests to the
Agency totals $1 million annually; (j and k) the cost for employers, C/
TPAs, MROs, and SAPs to register with the Agency, verify persons
authorized to access, and become familiar with the new processes (this
familiarization is not, per se, ``required'' by the rulemaking, but is
an obvious result of it) is $5 million annually: (l) The cost to
process access requests is $35 million annually, (m) the cost to FMCSA
to develop the clearinghouse and manage driver records is $3 million
annually, the cost for drivers to undergo the return-to-duty process is
$101 million annually, and the cost for laboratories to submit annual
reports of test results to FMCSA is insignificant (less than $1,500).
These components of the cost estimate are presented in the table below
and FMCSA seeks comment on the estimates summarized here and discussed
further in the RIA.
Summary of the Total Annual Costs of the Rule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost category Entity Annual cost
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Queries.................... Employers........... $28,000,000
Pre-Employment Queries............ Employers........... 10,000,000
Designate Service Agents/Input Employers........... 3,000,000
Driver Information.
Report Positive Tests............. Various............. 1,000,000
Register, Rule Familiarize, Verify Various............. 5,000,000
Authorization.
Access............................ Drivers............. 35,000,000
Development and Records Management FMCSA............... 3,000,000
Return-to-Duty Process............ Drivers............. 101,000,000
---------------
Grand Total................... .................... 186,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on the annual cost of $186 million, the ten-year cost
projection would be $1.398 billion when discounted at 7 percent and
$1.634 billion when discounted at 3 percent.
Regulatory Flexibility Act and Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), as amended by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA), (5 U.S.C. 601-
612), requires Federal agencies to consider the effects of the
regulatory action on small business and other small entities and to
minimize any significant economic impact. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses and not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
[[Page 9718]]
Accordingly, DOT policy requires an analysis of the impact of all
regulations (or proposals) on small entities, and mandates that
agencies shall strive to lessen any adverse effects on these
businesses. The initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) must
cover the following topics:
(1) A Description of the Reasons Why Action by the Agency Is Being
Considered
A 1999 bus crash in New Orleans resulted in 22 passenger
fatalities. The driver of the motor-coach had failed pre-employment
drug testing when applying for previous positions. He had also failed
to disclose on his employment application that a previous employer had
fired him after he tested positive for a controlled substance. His
employer at the time of the crash did not know about any of this.
As a result, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) made
recommendations to the Agency pertaining to the reporting of CMV driver
drug and alcohol testing results. Specifically, the NTSB recommended
that FMCSA ``develop a system that records all positive drug and
alcohol test results and refusal determinations that are conducted
under the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) testing
requirements, require prospective employers to query the system before
making a hiring decision, and require certifying authorities to query
the system before making a certification decision.'' This proposed
rulemaking addresses the NTSB's recommendation.
Two recent Government Accountability Office (GAO) reports discuss
``job hopping'' by CMV drivers after failing, or refusing to submit to,
drug or alcohol tests (see: GAO-08-600 and GAO-08-0829R). The GAO
identified and verified 43 cases (based on insider information supplied
by a third party to a Congressman) where CMV drivers had tested
positive for illegal drugs (such as cocaine, marijuana, and
amphetamines) with one employer and within 1 month tested negative with
another employer. In its recommendations to Congress, the GAO advocated
a national database and this rulemaking as possible methods to
eliminate the job-hopping problems.
The purpose of this rule is to mandate that employers annually
query the Clearinghouse to determine whether each of their drivers has
tested positive for illegal drug or alcohol use in the previous year.
Additionally, the rule mandates that employers query the Clearinghouse
as part of their pre-employment screening process of prospective
drivers.
The purpose of the annual query is to diminish or eliminate the
problem of a currently-employed CDL holder testing positive for illegal
drug or alcohol use with another or prospective employer, but then
simply continuing to operate CMVs with his or her current employer
without that employer knowing and acting on the positive test.
The purpose of the pre-employment query is to diminish or eliminate
the problem of a driver with previous positive tests seeking and
obtaining work without prospective employers knowing and acting on the
information. This could occur if a driver is fired for a positive
test--for example, failing a post-accident or reasonable-suspicion
test--but does not inform future employers about the previous employer
that fired her.
This could also occur if a new driver entering the workforce tests
positive for drugs or alcohol during a pre-employment test, waits for
the drugs to leave her system, then takes and passes another pre-
employment test and gets hired without the employer having any
knowledge of the previously failed pre-employment test.
(2) A Succinct Statement of the Objectives of, and Legal Basis for, the
Proposed Rule
The Agency proposes to revise 49 CFR part 382, Controlled
Substances and Alcohol Use and Testing, to establish a database,
identified as the ``Commercial Driver's License Drug and Alcohol
Clearinghouse,'' for reporting of verified positive, adulterated, or
substituted drug test results; positive alcohol test results; refusals;
and negative return-to-duty test results. Under the proposed rule,
motor carrier would be required to query the Clearinghouse for drug and
alcohol test result information on employees and prospective employees.
The proposed rule is intended to increase compliance with drug and
alcohol testing requirements.
FMCSA has general authority to promulgate safety standards,
including those governing drivers' use of drugs or alcohol while
operating a CMV. The Motor Carrier Safety Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-554,
Title II, 98 Stat. 2832, October 30, 1984) (the 1984 Act) provides
authority to regulate drivers, motor carriers, and vehicle equipment
and requires the Secretary to prescribe minimum safety standards for
CMVs. The Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991 (OTETA)
(Pub. L. 102-143, Title V, 105 Stat. 917, at 952, October 28, 1991,
codified at 49 U.S.C. 31306) mandated the alcohol and controlled
substances (drug) testing program for DOT. OTETA required the Secretary
of Transportation to promulgate regulations for alcohol and drug
testing for persons in safety-sensitive positions in four modes of
transportation, motor carrier, airline, railroad, and mass transit.
(3) A Description--and, Where Feasible, an Estimate of the Number--of
Small Entities to Which the Proposed Rule Will Apply
Carriers are not required to report revenue to the Agency, but are
required to provide the Agency with the number of CMVs they operate,
when they register with the Agency, and to update this figure
biennially. Because FMCSA does not have direct revenue figures for all
motor carriers, CMVs serve as a proxy to determine the carrier size
that would qualify as a small business given the SBA's revenue
threshold. In order to produce this estimate, it is necessary to
determine the average revenue generated by a CMV.
With regard to truck CMVs, the Agency determined in the Hours-of-
Service Supporting Documents Rulemaking RIA \6\ that a CMV produces
about $173,000 in revenue annually (adjusted for inflation to 2012
dollars).\7\ According to the SBA, motor carriers with annual revenue
of $25.5 million are considered small businesses.\8\ This equates to
about 147 CMVs (147.4 = $25,500,000/$173,000). Thus, FMCSA considers
motor carriers of property with 147 CMVs or fewer to be small
businesses for purposes of this analysis. The Agency then looked at the
number and percentage of property carriers with recent activity that
would fall under that definition (of having 147 CMVs or fewer). The
results indicate that at least 99 percent of all interstate property
carriers with recent activity have 147 CMVs or fewer.\9\ This amounts
to
[[Page 9719]]
515,000 carriers (99 percent of 520,000 active motor carriers =
514,800, rounded to the nearest thousand). Therefore, an overwhelming
majority of interstate carriers of property would be considered small
entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ FMCSA Regulatory Analysis, ``Hours of Service of Drivers,''
Final Rule. Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 248/Tuesday, December 27,
2011/Rules and Regulations, p. 81181. Using data from the 2007
Economic Census, FMCSA estimated that the average carrier earns
roughly $160,000 in annual revenue per truck (in year 2007 dollars).
\7\ GDP Deflator. Available from the Bureau of Economic Analysis
online, NIPA tables, Section 1, Table 1.1.4, ``Price Indexes for
Gross Domestic Product,'' years 2007-2012. Accessed on July 29, 2013
at https://www.bea.gov/iTable/index_nipa.cfm.
\8\ U.S. Small Business Administration Table of Small Business
Size Standards matched to North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) codes, effective January 7, 2013. See NAIC subsector
484, Truck Transportation. Accessed on July 26, 2013 at https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/files/Size_Standards_Table.pdf.
\9\ An August 24, 2012 MCMIS snapshot indicates that carriers
possessing 100 CMVs or less comprise of 99.26 percent of all
interstate motor carriers with recent activity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To provide a conservative estimate on the impact of small entities,
the Agency assumes that every active motor carrier would be subject to
this regulation because under full participation all carriers would
complete annual and pre-employment queries. Hence the rule applies to
all (estimated) 515,000 motor carriers considered small entities.
Assuming there are 1.05 drivers per CMV \10\ and a maximum of 147
CMVs per small entity, FMCSA estimates that at most 154 drivers (154.35
= 147 x 1.05) would be annually queried by a small entity. With an
annual average of 1,876,000 drug pre-employment tests conducted on 4
million CDL drivers, the estimated rate of pre-employment tests per
population would be 47 percent (0.469 = 1,876,000/4,000,000). With the
assumption that this rate is proportionate to a 154-driver entity, it
would result in about 72 pre-employment tests (47 percent of 154
drivers) and consequently 72 pre-employment queries per year, on
average. In total, the maximum number of annual and pre-employment
queries that a small entity may encounter would be 226 per year (154
annual + 72 pre-employment).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ There was a total of 4,211,880 interstate drivers and
4,020,464 CMVs according to a MCMIS August 24, 2012 snapshot based
on count of interstate drivers and CMVs (4,211,880/4,020,464 =
1.05). Further, the driver-to-CMV ratio remains at 1.05 when
considering carriers that possess 200 CMVs or less.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At ten minutes per query, 38 hours would be required to complete
226 queries (37.67 = 226 queries x \1/6\ queries per hour). About
another half-hour would be necessary to designate and verify a C/TPA
(10 minutes), register with the Clearinghouse (10 minutes) and become
familiar with the rule (10 minutes). In total, then, a 154-driver small
entity would need to spend 38.5 hours (38 + \1/2\) to comply with the
rule.
The occupational salary of a bookkeeping, accounting, or auditing
clerk is taken as the median of $16.91 per hour (BLS, May 2012).\11\
Two adjustments are made to this hourly compensation estimate. First,
employee benefits are estimated at 50 percent of the employee wage.\12\
Second, the employee wage and benefits are increased by 27 percent to
include relevant firm overhead.\13\ Applying the estimated 50 percent
of wages for employee benefits and 27 percent for overhead results in
$32.21 in hourly compensation for the clerk ($32.21 = $16.91 x (1 +
0.50) x (1 + 0.27). Given $32.21 per hour for 38.5 hours, the annual
cost of the queries incurred by a bookkeeping clerk would be $1,240
($1,240.22 = 38.5 x $32.21, rounded to the nearest dollar) for a 154-
driver small entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Occupational Employment Statistics, Occupational Employment
and Wages, May 2012, 43-3031 Bookkeeping, Accounting, or Auditing
Clerks. Accessed on July 29, 2013 at https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes433031.htm.
\12\ See FMCSA's calculation of the employee benefit rate at
Section 7.1, above.
\13\ Berwick, Farooq. ``Truck Costing Model for Transportation
Managers''. Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute, North
Dakota State University (2003). Weighted average management and
overhead costs total $10,721 annually for a truck travelling 100,000
miles (page 29), or $0.107 per mile ($10,721/100,000 on page 47).
Labor costs total $0.39 per mile (pages 42-43). Management/overhead
costs are thus 27% of labor costs (0.107/0.390). Accessed at https://ntl.bts.gov/lib/24000/24200/24223/24223.pdf on 8-March=2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, a fee would be required to access the Clearinghouse
during the query process. A full query would cost $5 and a limited
query would cost $2.50. Full queries are required by all pre-employment
screening. Given 72 pre-employment queries for a 154-driver small
entity, fees for access would be $360 (72 x $5). If an annual query
indicates that information exists on a particular driver in the
Clearinghouse, then a limited query would lead to a full query. As
explained in Section 7.6, there are an estimated 512,000 full queries,
annually. Given 4,000,000 drivers in the industry, there would be a
12.8 percent chance (512,000/4,000,000 = 0.128) that a driver would
require a full query during an annual screening. Therefore, a 154-
driver small entity is estimated to perform about 20 full queries
annually (154 x 0.128 = 19.7). The amount of limited queries to be
performed would be 134 (154 total queries--20 full queries).
Accordingly, the cost of access requests for annual queries is $335
(134 x $2.50) for limited queries and $100 (20 x $5) for full queries.
In sum, the annual cost of fees for access for pre-employment and
annual queries is $795 ($360 + $335 + $100) for a 154-driver small
entity.
The maximum possible cost to a small entity thus totals $2,035
annually ($1,240 + $795). This sets the maximum cost for a small entity
as defined by the SBA Most motor carriers, however, employ
significantly fewer drivers than the estimated 154 SBA limit. The
Agency estimates that nearly 75 percent of motor carriers employ three
drivers or less.\14\ Under this proposed rule, a motor carrier would
incur approximately $13.22 per driver ($2,035/154 drivers) annually.
Accordingly, a motor carrier that employs four drivers--a more typical
carrier in the industry--would pay less than $40 annually for this
testing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ From an August 24, 2012 MCMIS snapshot, less than 74.5
percent of active interstate motor carriers employed 3 CMVs or less.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The table below summarizes the cost analysis.
Maximum Possible Cost to Small Entities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fees for access
Maximum number for a small entity Annual -------------------------------- Notes
Limited query Full query
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CMVs.................................. 147 .............. .............. Small Entity Maximum.
Drivers Per CMV....................... 1.05 .............. .............. MCMIS.
Drivers and Annual Queries............ 154 134 20 147 x 1.05. 154 - (0.128
x 154). 0.128 x 154.
Estimated Percentage of Pre-Employment 47% .............. .............. 1,876,000/4,000,000.
Queries.
Pre-Employment Queries................ 72 0 72 47% of 154.
------------------------------------------------
Total Queries......................... 226 134 92 154 + 72.
Hours Per Query (10 minutes).......... 1/6 .............. .............. 10 minutes.
Total Hours for Annual and Pre- 38 .............. .............. 226 x 1/6.
Employment Queries.
Hours for Designation and Verification 1/6 .............. .............. FMCSA Estimate.
of a C/TPA.
[[Page 9720]]
Hours for Registration and Rule 1/3 .............. .............. FMCSA Estimate.
Familiarization.
Total Hours........................... 38.5 .............. .............. 38 + 1/6 + 1/3
Wage ($) Per Hour..................... $16.91 .............. .............. BLS, General Office
Clerk.
Fringe Benefits (as a % of Wage)...... 50% .............. .............. BLS, Employee
Compensation.
Overhead (as a % of Wage and Fringe 27% .............. .............. BLS, Employee
Benefits). Compensation.
Total Compensation Per Hour/Fee per $32.21 $2.50 $5.00 $16.91 x (1 + 0.50) x (1
Query. + 0.27).
Cost for Annual and Pre-Employment $1,240 $335 $460 38.5 hrs x $32.21 per
Queries. hr. 134 x $2.50. 92 x
$5.
------------------------------------------------
Total Cost (146 Drivers).......... $2,035 $1,240 + $335 + $460.
Total Cost per Driver............. $13.22 $2,035/154 drivers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance Requirements (for
Small Entities) of the Proposed Rule, Including an Estimate of the
Classes of Small Entities That Will Be Subject to the Requirement and
the Types of Professional Skills Necessary for Preparation of the
Report or Record
There are an estimated 82,900 annual positive drug (75,800) and
alcohol (7,100) test-results at full participation (including
refusals). Each positive drug test result would be reported by an MRO.
Each positive alcohol test would be reported by an employer or a C/TPA.
Each driver's subsequent return-to-duty process for positive test
results and test refusals would be reported by an SAP. Ninety-nine
percent of motor carriers, MROs, C/TPAs, and SAPs are most likely small
entities. FMCSA estimates that bookkeeping clerks would perform this
reporting.
(5) Duplicative, Overlapping, or Conflicting Federal Rules
FMCSA is not aware of any other rules which conflict with the
proposed action. The proposed rule would require laboratories to report
summary test information on each motor carrier covered by FMCSA's drug
and alcohol rules for which they perform tests. The purpose of this
requirement is to help FMCSA identify motor carriers that do not comply
with mandatory drug and alcohol testing requirements. Currently, there
exists a DOT-wide requirement for laboratories to report summary
information on testing services provided to DOT-regulated entities, but
does not require the information to be broken down on a carrier-by-
carrier basis. The DOT-wide report overlaps with the proposed rule in
the sense that it contains some of the same aggregate information that
would be required under the proposed rule. However, since the reports
do not contain summary information specific to each motor carrier for
which the laboratory provide services, FMCSA cannot use this
information to identify non-compliant motor-carriers. In addition the
Agency requests drug and alcohol testing summary reports from
approximately 3,000 employers per year through FMCSA's Drug and Alcohol
Testing Survey. This information is not collected from every covered
motor carrier. Instead, the purpose of the survey is to produce
nationally representative estimates for drug and alcohol usage rates
among CDL drivers, in order to determine whether to increase or
decrease random testing rates in accordance with 49 CFR 382.305(c).
(6) A Description of Any Significant Alternatives to the Proposed Rule
Which Minimize Any Significant Impacts on Small Entities
The Agency did not identify any significant alternatives to the
rule that could lessen the burden on small entities without
compromising its goals or the Agency's statutory mandate. Because small
businesses are such a large part of the demographic the Agency
regulates, providing alternatives to small business to permit
noncompliance with FMCSA regulations is not feasible and not consistent
with sound public policy.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1532, et seq.)
requires Agencies to evaluate whether an Agency action would result in
the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of $151 million or more (as
adjusted for inflation) in any one year, and if so, to take steps to
minimize these unfunded mandates. The proposed rulemaking would result
in private sector expenditures of $186 million, which is in excess of
the $151 million threshold. The estimated costs are about equal to its
benefits: Total net benefits of the rule are just $1 million annually.
The ten-year projection of net benefits is $8 million when discounted
at seven percent and $9 million when discounted at three percent.
However, estimated benefits include only those associated with
reductions in CMV crashes. FMCSA could not precisely quantify improved
health, quality-of-life improvements, and increased life expectancy for
CMV drivers. The Agency believes these non-quantified benefits are
significant, and, if they were included in the benefits estimates,
would clearly demonstrate the positive net benefits of this rule.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children)
FMCSA has analyzed this proposed action under Executive Order
13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks. We have determined preliminarily that this rulemaking
would not create an environmental risk to health or safety that would
disproportionately affect children.
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of Private Property)
This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with
[[Page 9721]]
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
A rule has implications for Federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. FMCSA recognizes that, as a
practical matter, this rule may have an impact on the States.
Accordingly, by letters sent March 28, 2011, the Agency sought advice
from the National Governors Association (NGA), National Conference of
State Legislators (NCSL), and the American Association of Motor Vehicle
Administrators (AAMVA) on the topic of developing a database that the
Agency believes may increase the effectiveness of its drug and alcohol
testing program. (Copies of the letters are available in the docket for
this rulemaking.) FMCSA offered NGA, NCSL, and AAMVA officials the
opportunity to meet and discuss issues of concern to the States. FMCSA
did not receive a response to this letter. State and local governments
will also be able to raise Federalism issues during the comment period
for this NPRM.
In addition, Sec. 32402 of MAP-21 preempts State and local laws
inconsistent with the Clearinghouse. Preemption specifically applies to
the reporting of drug and alcohol tests, refusals and any other
violation of FMCSA's drug and alcohol testing program. MAP-21 does not
preempt State laws related to a driver's CDL or driving record.
Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities do
not apply to this program.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520), a Federal agency must obtain approval from OMB for each
collection of information it conducts, sponsors, or requires through
regulations. FMCSA analyzed this proposal and preliminarily determined
that its implementation would create a new information collection
burden on CDL holders, motor carriers, and entities that provide
services as part of the FMCSA's mandatory alcohol and controlled
substances testing process under 49 CFR part 382. FMCSA will seek
approval of the information collection requirements in a new
information collection to be entitled ``Commercial Driver's License
Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse.''
The collected information encompasses information that is
generated, maintained, retained, disclosed, and provided to, or for,
the Agency under a proposal for a database that will be entitled the
``Commercial Driver's License Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse'' or
Clearinghouse.
DOT currently has approval for two information collections for its
alcohol and controlled substances testing programs: (1) The Federal
Chain of Custody and Control Form, OMB control number 0930-0158, and
(2) the U.S. Department of Transportation Alcohol and Controlled
Substances Testing Program, OMB control number 2105-0529. Although the
proposed Clearinghouse will obtain information from the forms covered
by the two information collections, this proposal does not create any
revisions or additional burden under those collections.
This proposal would create a new information collection to cover
the requirements set forth in the proposed amendments to 49 CFR parts
382. These amendments would create new requirements for CDL drivers,
carriers/employers of CDL drivers, MROs, SAPs, and C/TPAs to register
with the new database, which would be created and administered by the
FMCSA. Clearinghouse registration will be a prerequisite to both
placing information in the database and obtaining information from the
database. Access to information in the database will be strictly
limited and controlled, and available only with the consent of the CDL
holders about whom information is sought.
Prospective employers of CDL drivers would be required to query the
Clearinghouse to determine if job applicants have controlled substance
or alcohol testing violations that should preclude them, under existing
FMCSA regulations in part 382, from carrying out safety-sensitive
functions. Employers will also be required to query the database once
annually for information about drivers whom they currently employ.
Carriers, C/TPAs that perform testing and other services for carriers,
MROs, and SAPs will place information into the database about alcohol
and controlled substances testing violations. The proposed rule
contains procedures for correcting information in the database and
specifies that most interactions with the database will be carried out
using electronic media.
The total burden to respondents for queries, designations,
registration, familiarization, reporting, and recordkeeping to the
Clearinghouse is estimated at about 1.86 million hours annually. The
hours attributed to each activity are presented in the table below.
Total Annual Number of Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submissions Responsible Performed by Instances Minutes Total hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Queries............... Carriers....... Bookkeeping 5,200,000 10 866,667
Clerk.
Pre-Employment Queries....... Carriers....... Bookkeeping 1,876,000 10 312,667
Clerk.
Designate C/TPAs............. Carriers....... Bookkeeping 520,000 10 86,667
Clerk.
SAPs Inputting Driver SAPs........... SAPs............ 82,900 10 13,817
Information.
Report/Notify Positive Tests. Various........ Bookkeeping 165,800 10 27,633
Clerk.
Register/Familiarize/Verify.. Various........ Bookkeeping 792,750 20. 10 155,083
Clerk.
Driver Consent Verifications. Drivers........ Drivers......... 2,388,000 10 398,000
Annual Summaries............. Laboratories... Bookkeeping 32 90 48
Clerk.
-----------------------------------------------
Total Instances/Hours.... ............... ................ 11,025,482 .............. 1,860,581
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FMCSA has prepared an information collection request and supporting
statement that is being submitted to the Office of Management and
Budget and that will be made available for public comment pursuant to a
notice to be published in the Federal Register.
National Environmental Policy Act and Clean Air Act
FMCSA analyzed this proposal for the purpose of the National
Environmental
[[Page 9722]]
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). FMCSA conducted an
environmental assessment (EA) of the proposed alternatives considered
by FMCSA and determined that if the rule reduced CMV crashes as
estimated, there would be a small net benefit to the environment. These
benefits result from the reduction of CMV crashes and include: Lives
saved and injuries prevented from reducing CMV crashes, the reduction
of fuel consumed and prevention of air emissions from traffic
congestion caused by a CMV crash, the reduction of solid waste
generated in CMV crashes from damaged vehicles, infrastructure and
goods, and hazardous materials spilled during a CMV crash. FMCSA does
not, however, expect these environmental impacts to be considered
significant under NEPA and do not require further analysis in an
Environmental Impact Statement. FMCSA does not believe the EA results
require any type of mitigation, as the impacts to the environment are
beneficial in nature. The EA has been placed in the rulemaking docket.
FMCSA requests comments on this EA.
In addition to the NEPA requirements to examine impacts on air
quality, the Clean Air Act (CAA) as amended (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.)
also requires FMCSA to analyze the potential impact of its actions on
air quality and to ensure that FMCSA actions conform to State and local
air quality implementation plans. The additional reductions to air
emissions from either of the alternatives are expected to fall within
the CAA de minimis standards and are not expected to be subject to the
Environmental Protection Agency's General Conformity Rule (40 CFR parts
51 and 93).
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
FMCSA has analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. While FMCSA's analysis shows a small reduction in
fuel used due to eliminating traffic idling caused by CMV crashes, we
have determined preliminarily that it would not be a ``significant
energy action'' under that Executive Order because it would not be
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy.
Privacy Impact Assessment
FMCSA conducted a privacy impact assessment of this rule as
required by section 522(a)(5) of division H of the FY 2005 Omnibus
Appropriations Act, Public Law 108-447, 118 Stat. 3268 (Dec. 8, 2004)
[set out as a note to 5 U.S.C. 552a]. The assessment considers any
impacts of the final rule on the privacy of information in an
identifiable form and related matters. FMCSA has determined that this
NPRM would impact the handling of PII. FMCSA has also determined the
risks and effects the rulemaking might have on collecting, storing, and
sharing PII and has examined and evaluated protections and alternative
information handling processes in developing the proposal in order to
mitigate potential privacy risks. The PIA for this proposed rulemaking
is available for review in the docket for this rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 382
Administrative practice and procedure, Alcohol abuse, Drug abuse,
Drug testing, Highway safety, Motor carriers, Penalties, Safety,
Transportation.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Administration proposes to amend 49 CFR part 382 as
follows:
PART 382--CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES AND ALCOHOL USE AND TESTING
0
1. The authority citation for part 382 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31133, 31136, 31301 et seq., 31502; and 49
CFR 1.73.
0
2. Amend Sec. 382.103 by revising the introductory text of
paragraph(a) to read as follows:
Sec. 382.103 Applicability.
(a) This part applies to service agents and to every person and to
all employers of such persons who operate a commercial motor vehicle in
commerce in any State and is subject to:
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 382.107 to add the following definitions in alphabetical
order:
Sec. 382.107 Definitions.
* * * * *
Commercial Driver's License Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse
(Clearinghouse) means the FMCSA database that subpart G of this part
requires employers and service agents to report information to and to
query regarding drivers who are subject to the DOT controlled substance
and alcohol testing regulations.
* * * * *
Negative return-to-duty test result means a negative drug test
result and/or an alcohol test with an alcohol concentration of less
than 0.02.
* * * * *
Positive alcohol test means a DOT alcohol confirmation test having
an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or greater.
* * * * *
0
4. Add new Sec. 382.123 to read as follows:
Sec. 382.123 Driver identification.
(a) Identification information on the Alcohol Testing Form (ATF).
For each alcohol test performed under this part, the employer shall
provide the following information, which must be recorded as follows:
(1) The driver's commercial driver's license number and State of
issuance in Step 1, section B of the ATF.
(2) The employer's USDOT number or Internal Revenue Service
Employer Identification Number (EIN) and the employer's name and other
identifying information required in Step 1, section C of the ATF.
(b) Identification information on the Federal Drug Testing Custody
and Control Form (CCF). For each controlled substance test performed
under this part, the employer shall provide the following information,
which must be recorded as follows:
(1) The employer's USDOT number or Internal Revenue Service
Employer Identification Number (EIN) in Step 1, section A of the CCF.
(2) The driver's commercial driver's license number and State of
issuance in Step 1, section C of the CCF in place of the ``donor SSN or
Employee I.D. No.''
0
5. Add new Sec. 382.217 to read as follows:
Sec. 382.217 Employer responsibilities.
No employer may allow, require, permit or authorize a driver to
operate a commercial motor vehicle during any period in which an
employer determines that a driver is not in compliance with the return-
to-duty requirements in 49 CFR part 40, subpart O, after the occurrence
of any of the following events:
(a) The driver receives a positive, adulterated, or substituted
drug test result conducted under part 40 of this title;
(b) The driver receives a positive alcohol test result of 0.04 or
higher alcohol concentration conducted under part 40 of this title; or
(c) The driver refused to submit to a test for drugs or alcohol
required under part 382 of this chapter.
(d) An employer has actual knowledge that a driver has used alcohol
or controlled substances, as defined at Sec. 382.107.
0
6. Amend Sec. 382.401 by revising paragraph (b)(1)(vi) to read as
follows:
[[Page 9723]]
Sec. 382.401 Retention of records.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(vi) Records related to the administration of the controlled
substances and alcohol testing programs, including records related to
traffic citations establishing employer actual knowledge of driving
under the influence of alcohol or controlled substances, and
* * * * *
0
7. Add Sec. 382.404 to read as follows:
Sec. 382.404 Laboratories' duty to report controlled substances test
results.
(a) Annually, each laboratory performing controlled substances
testing for an employer regulated by this part must submit an aggregate
statistical summary of the number of drug tests, by drug test type,
organized by employers' USDOT number or Internal Revenue Service issued
Employer Identification Number (EIN).
(b) The summary must be sent by January 31 of each year for January
1 through December 31 of the previous year.
(c) The summary must be submitted in electronic format to: Federal
Motor Carrier Safety Administration, Office of Enforcement and
Compliance, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
0
8. Amend Sec. 382.405 by revising paragraphs (d) and (e) to read as
follows:
Sec. 382.405 Access to facilities and records.
* * * * *
(d) Each employer, and each service agent who maintains records for
an employer, must make available copies of all results for DOT alcohol
and/or controlled substances testing conducted by the employer under
this part and any other information pertaining to the employer's
alcohol misuse and/or controlled substances use prevention program when
requested by the Secretary of Transportation, any DOT agency, or any
State or local officials with regulatory authority over the employer or
any of its drivers.
(e) When requested by the National Transportation Safety Board as a
part of a crash investigation:
(1) Employers must disclose information related to the employer's
administration of a post-accident alcohol and/or a controlled
substances test administered following the crash under investigation;
and
(2) FMCSA will provide access to information in the Clearinghouse
concerning drivers that are involved with the crash under
investigation.
* * * * *
0
9. Amend Sec. 382.409 by revising the section heading and paragraph
(c) to read as follows:
Sec. 382.409 Medical review officer or consortium/third party
administrator record retention for controlled substances.
* * * * *
(c) No person may obtain the individual controlled substances test
results retained by a medical review officer or a consortium/third
party administrator, and no medical review officer or consortium/third
party administrator may release the individual controlled substances
test results of any driver to any person, without first obtaining a
specific, written authorization from the tested driver. Nothing in this
paragraph (c) shall prohibit a medical review officer or a consortium/
third party administrator from releasing to the employer, the
Clearinghouse, or to officials of the Secretary of Transportation, any
DOT agency, or any State or local officials with regulatory authority
over the controlled substances and alcohol testing program under this
part, the information delineated in part 40, subpart G, of this title.
0
10. Add a new Sec. 382.415 to read as follows:
Sec. 382.415 Notification to employers of a controlled substances or
alcohol testing program violation.
Each person holding a commercial driver's license and subject to
the DOT controlled substances and alcohol testing requirements in this
part who has violated the alcohol and controlled substances
prohibitions under parts 40 or 382 of this title, must notify in
writing all current employers of such violation(s). The notification
must be made before the end of the business day following the day the
employee received notice of the violation, or prior to performing any
safety-sensitive function, whichever comes first.
0
11. Amend Sec. 382.601 by adding a new paragraph (b)(12) to read as
follows:
Sec. 382.601 Employer obligation to promulgate a policy on the misuse
of alcohol and use of controlled substances.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(12) The requirement that the following personal information
collected and maintained under this part shall be reported to the
Clearinghouse:
(i) A verified positive, adulterated, or substituted drug test
result;
(ii) A positive alcohol test result;
(iii) A refusal to submit to any test required by subpart C of this
part;
(iv) An employer's report of actual knowledge that the driver
received a traffic citation for driving a commercial motor vehicle
while under the influence of alcohol or controlled substances;
(v) A substance-abuse-professional report of the successful
completion of the return-to-duty process, and the follow-up testing
plan;
(vi) A negative return-to-duty test; and
(vii) An employer's report of completion of follow-up testing.
* * * * *
0
12. Add a new Subpart G to part 382 to read as follows:
Subpart G--Requirements and Procedures for Implementation of the
Commercial Driver's License Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse
Sec.
382.701 Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse.
382.703 Driver consent to permit access to information in the
Clearinghouse.
382.705 Reporting to the Clearinghouse.
382.707 Notice to drivers and employers of placement, revision,
removal, or release of information.
382.709 Drivers' access to information in the Clearinghouse.
382.711 Clearinghouse registration.
382.713 Duration, cancellation, and revocation of access.
382.715 Authorization to enter information into the Clearinghouse.
382.717 Procedures for correcting information in the database.
382.719 Availability and removal of information.
382.721 Fees.
382.723 Unauthorized access or use prohibited.
382.725 Access by State licensing authorities.
382.727 Penalties.
Subpart G--Requirements and Procedures for Implementation of the
Commercial Driver's License Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse
Sec. 382.701 Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse.
(a) Employers may not employ a driver subject to controlled
substances and alcohol testing under this part to perform a safety-
sensitive function without first conducting a pre-employment query of
the Clearinghouse to obtain information on whether the driver has a
verified positive, adulterated, or substituted controlled substances
test result; has a positive alcohol test result; has refused to submit
to any test required by subpart C of this part; or that an employer has
reported actual knowledge that the driver received a traffic citation
for driving a commercial motor vehicle while under the influence of
alcohol or controlled substances.
[[Page 9724]]
(b) Employers must conduct annual queries of the Clearinghouse for
information on all employees subject to controlled substance and
alcohol testing under this part to determine whether information exists
in the Clearinghouse about those employees. If an annual query
indicates that information exists in the Clearinghouse, the employer
must conduct the same query required in paragraph (a) of this section.
(c) If any information described in paragraph (a) of this section
is entered into the Clearinghouse about a driver during the seven-day
period immediately following an employer conducting a query of that
driver's records, FMCSA will notify the employer of that additional
information.
(d) No employer may allow a driver to perform any safety-sensitive
function if the results of a database query demonstrate that the driver
has a verified positive, adulterated, or substituted controlled
substances test result; has a positive alcohol test result; has refused
to submit to any test required by subpart C of this part; or that an
employer has reported actual knowledge that the driver received a
traffic citation for driving a commercial motor vehicle while under the
influence of alcohol or controlled substances, except where a query of
the Clearinghouse demonstrates the following circumstances:
(1) The driver has successfully completed the substance-abuse-
professional evaluation, referral, and education/treatment process set
forth in part 40, subpart O, of this title; achieves a negative return-
to-duty test result; and completes the follow-up testing process
prescribed by the substance abuse professional.
(2) If the driver has not completed all follow-up tests as
prescribed by the substance abuse professional in accordance with Sec.
40.307 of this title and specified in the substance-abuse-professional
report required by Sec. 40.311 of this title, the employer may only
use the driver in a safety-sensitive position if the driver has
completed the substance-abuse-professional evaluation, referral, and
education/treatment process set forth in part 40, subpart O, of this
title and achieves a negative return-to-duty test result, and the
employer assumes the responsibility for managing the follow-up testing
process associated with the testing violation.
(e) Employers must retain for three years a record of each query
and all information received in response to each query made under this
section. Exception: An employer with valid registration that queries
the Clearinghouse in accordance with the requirements of this subpart,
will be deemed to have satisfied this requirement.
Sec. 382.703 Driver consent to permit access to information in the
Clearinghouse.
(a) No employer may search the Clearinghouse to determine whether a
record exists on any particular driver without first obtaining that
driver's written consent. The employer conducting the search must
retain the written consent for 3 years from the date of the last
search.
(b) Before receiving access to information contained in the
Clearinghouse record, the employer must obtain written consent from the
driver for access to the following specific records:
(1) A verified positive, adulterated, or substituted controlled
substances test result;
(2) A positive alcohol test result;
(3) A refusal to submit to any test required by subpart C of this
part;
(4) An employer's report of actual knowledge that the driver
received a traffic citation for driving a commercial motor vehicle
while under the influence of alcohol or controlled substances;
(5) A substance-abuse-professional report of the successful
completion of the return-to-duty process, and the follow-up testing
plan;
(6) A negative return-to-duty test; and
(7) An employer's report of completion of follow-up testing.
(c) No employer may permit a driver to perform a safety-sensitive
function if the driver refuses to grant the consent required by
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
(d) A driver granting consent under this section grants consent for
FMCSA to release information to an employer in accordance with Sec.
382.701(c).
Sec. 382.705 Reporting to the Clearinghouse.
(a) Medical Review Officers (MROs). (1) Within 1 business day of
making a determination or verification, medical review officers must
report the following information about a driver to the Clearinghouse:
(i) Verified positive, adulterated, or substituted controlled
substances test results;
(ii) Refusal-to-test determination by the medical review officer as
described in 49 CFR 40.191.
(2) Medical review officers must provide the following information
for each controlled substances test result specified in paragraph
(a)(1) of this section:
(i) Reason for the test;
(ii) Federal Drug Testing Custody and Control Form specimen ID
number;
(iii) Driver's name, date of birth, and commercial driver's license
number and commercial driver's license-issuing State's abbreviation
(U.S. Postal Service abbreviation. See Publication 59, ``Abbreviations
for Use with ZIP Code,'' U.S. Postal Service, October 1963);
(iv) Employer's name, address, and USDOT number or Internal Revenue
Service issued Employer Identification Number (EIN);
(v) Date of the test;
(vi) Date of the verified result; and
(vii) Test result. The test result must be one of the following:
(A) Positive (including the controlled substance(s) identified);
(B) Refusal to test: Adulterated;
(C) Refusal to test: Substituted; or
(D) Refusal to provide a sufficient specimen after the MRO makes a
determination, in accordance with Sec. 40.193 of this title, that the
employee does not have a medical condition that has, or with a high
degree of probability could have, precluded the employee from providing
a sufficient amount of urine.
(3) Within 1 business day of making any change to the results
report in accordance with paragraph (a)(1) of this section, a medical
review officer must report that changed result to the Clearinghouse.
(b) Employers. (1) Employers must report the following information
about a driver to the Clearinghouse within 1 business day of obtaining
that information:
(i) An alcohol test result with an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or
greater;
(ii) A negative return-to-duty test result;
(iii) A refusal to take an alcohol test pursuant to 49 CFR 40.261;
(iv) A refusal pursuant to 49 CFR 40.191;
(v) A report that the driver has successfully completed all follow-
up tests as prescribed in the substance-abuse-professional report in
accordance with Sec. Sec. 40.307, 40.309, and 40.311 of this title;
and
(vi) Actual knowledge that the driver received a traffic citation
for driving a commercial motor vehicle while under the influence of
alcohol or controlled substances.
(2) Employers must report the following information concerning each
positive alcohol test result, refusal to submit to alcohol testing
pursuant to 49 CFR 40.261, and refusal to provide a specimen for
controlled substances testing listed in 49 CFR 40.191:
(i) Reason for the test;
(ii) Driver's name, date of birth, and commercial driver's license
number and the commercial driver's license-issuing State's
abbreviation;
[[Page 9725]]
(iii) Employer name, address, and USDOT number or Internal Revenue
Service-issued Employer Identification Number (EIN);
(iv) Date of the test;
(v) Date of result reported; and
(vi) Test result. The test result must be one of the following:
(A) Negative (only required for return-to-duty tests administered
in accordance with Sec. 382.309);
(B) Positive; or
(C) Refusal to take a test.
(3) Employers must report the following information concerning each
instance in which the employer has actual knowledge that a driver
received a traffic citation for driving a commercial motor vehicle
while under the influence of alcohol or controlled substances, as
defined at Sec. 383.5 of this chapter:
(i) Driver's name, date of birth, commercial driver's license
number, and the commercial driver's license-issuing State abbreviation;
(ii) Employer name, address, and USDOT number or Employer
Identification Number (EIN);
(iii) Date of the traffic citation;
(iv) Date the employer became aware of the traffic citation.
(v) The name and State of the law enforcement agency issuing the
traffic citation;
(vi) The ticket or docket number associated with the citation; and
(vii) The specific charge alleged in the traffic citation.
(c) C/TPAs. (1) C/TPAs acting on behalf of an employer who employs
himself/herself, as required by Sec. 382.103(b) must immediately
report the following information about a driver to the Clearinghouse
within one business day of obtaining that information:
(i) An alcohol test result with an alcohol concentration of 0.04 or
greater;
(ii) A negative return-to-duty test result;
(iii) A refusal to take an alcohol test pursuant to 49 CFR 40.261;
(iv) A refusal to provide a specimen for controlled substances
testing pursuant to 49 CFR 40.191;
(v) A report that the driver has successfully completed all follow-
up tests as prescribed in the substance-abuse-professional report in
accordance with Sec. Sec. 40.307, 40.309, and 40.311 of this title;
and
(2) C/TPAs acting on behalf of an employer who employs himself/
herself, as required by 49 CFR 382.103(b) must report the following
information concerning each positive alcohol test result, refusal to
submit to alcohol testing pursuant to 49 CFR 40.261, and refusal to
provide a specimen for controlled substances testing listed in 49 CFR
40.191:
(i) Reason for the test;
(ii) Driver's name, date of birth, and commercial driver's license
number and the commercial driver's license-issuing State's
abbreviation;
(iii) Employer name, address, and USDOT number or Internal Revenue
Service-issued Employer Identification Number (EIN);
(iv) Date of the test;
(v) Date of result reported; and
(vi) Test result. The test result must be one of the following:
(A) Negative (only required for return-to-duty tests administered
in accordance with Sec. 382.309);
(B) Positive; or
(C) Refusal to provide a specimen or take a test.
(d) Substance Abuse Professionals (SAPs). (1) Substance abuse
professionals must report to the Clearinghouse for each driver who has
completed the return-to-duty process for a DOT verified positive,
adulterated, or substituted controlled substances test result, a
positive alcohol test result, a testing refusal, or actual knowledge
that the driver received a traffic citation for driving a commercial
motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or controlled
substances the following information:
(i) Substance abuse professional's name, address, and telephone
number;
(ii) Driver's name, date of birth, and commercial driver's license
number and the commercial driver's license-issuing State's
abbreviation;
(iii) Date of the initial substance-abuse-professional assessment;
(iv) Date the substance abuse professional determined that the
driver successfully completed the education and/or treatment process as
defined in 49 CFR part 40, subpart O, and was eligible for return-to-
duty testing under this part;
(v) Frequency, number, and type of required follow-up tests, the
duration of the follow-up testing plan; and
(vi) Any modifications to the follow-up testing plan.
(2) Substance abuse professionals must report the information
required by paragraphs (d)(1)(i)-(iii) of this section within 1
business day of the date of the initial substance abuse assessment, and
must report the information required by paragraphs (d)(1)(iv)-(vi) of
this section within 1 business day of determining that the driver has
completed the return-to-duty process.
(e) Reporting truthfully and accurately. Every person or entity
with access must report truthfully and accurately to the Clearinghouse
and is expressly prohibited from knowingly reporting false or
inaccurate information.
Sec. 382.707 Notice to drivers and employers of placement, revision,
removal, or release of information.
(a) FMCSA must notify a driver when information concerning that
driver has been added to, revised, or removed from the Clearinghouse.
(b) FMCSA must notify a driver when information concerning that
driver has been released from the Clearinghouse to an employer and
specify the reason for the release.
(c) Drivers will be notified by letter sent by U.S. Mail to the
address on record with the State Driver Licensing Agency that issued
the driver's commercial driver's license. Exception: A driver may
provide the Clearinghouse with an alternative means or address for
notification, including electronic mail.
Sec. 382.709 Drivers' access to information in the Clearinghouse.
A driver may review information in the Clearinghouse about himself
or herself, except as otherwise restricted by law.
Sec. 382.711 Clearinghouse registration.
(a) Clearinghouse registration required. Each employer and
designated service agent to an employer supporting its controlled
substances and/or alcohol testing program must register with FMCSA
before accessing or reporting information in the Clearinghouse.
(b) Employers. Employer Clearinghouse registration must include:
(1) Name, address, and telephone number;
(2) USDOT number or Internal Revenue Service-issued Employer
Identification Number (EIN); and
(3) Name of the person(s) and their position(s) that the employer
authorizes to report information to and obtain information from the
Clearinghouse and any additional information FMCSA needs to validate
the applicant's identity.
(4) Employers must verify the names of the person(s) authorized
under paragraph (b)(3) of this section annually.
(5) Identification of the C/TPA used for testing purposes and
authorization for the C/TPA to report information to the Clearinghouse
for self-employed individuals or owner-operators that are required to
use C/TPAs for testing purposes. Employers subject to this requirement
must update any changes to this information.
(c) Medical review officers and substance abuse professionals. Each
medical review officer or substance
[[Page 9726]]
abuse professional must provide the following to apply for
Clearinghouse registration:
(1) Name, address, telephone number, and any additional information
FMCSA needs to validate the applicant's identity;
(2) A certification that the applicant's access to the
Clearinghouse is conditioned on his or her compliance with the
applicable qualification and/or training requirements in 49 CFR part
40; and
(3) Evidence of required professional credentials to verify that
the applicant currently meets the applicable qualification and/or
training requirements in 49 CFR part 40.
(d) Consortia/third party administrators. Each consortium or third
party administrator must provide the following to apply for
Clearinghouse registration:
(1) Name, address, telephone number, and any additional information
FMCSA needs to validate the applicant's identity; and
(2) Name, title, and telephone number of the person(s) authorized
to report information to and obtain information from the Clearinghouse.
(3) Each consortium or third party administrator must verify the
names of the person(s) authorized under paragraph (d)(2) of this
section annually.
Sec. 382.713 Duration, cancellation, and revocation of access.
(a) Term. Clearinghouse registration is valid for 5 years, unless
cancelled or revoked.
(b) Cancellation. FMCSA will cancel Clearinghouse registrations
that are inactive for 2 years.
(c) Revocation. FMCSA has the right to revoke the Clearinghouse
registration of anyone who fails to comply with any of the prescribed
rights and restrictions on access to the Clearinghouse, including but
not limited to, submission of inaccurate information and misuse or
misappropriation of access rights or protected information from the
Clearinghouse and failure to maintain the requisite qualifications,
certifications and/or training requirements in part 40 of this title.
Sec. 382.715 Authorization to enter information into the
Clearinghouse.
No consortium/third party administrator may enter information into
the Clearinghouse on an employer's behalf unless the employer
designates the consortium/third party administrator as its service
agent.
Sec. 382.717 Procedures for correcting information in the database.
(a) Petition. Any driver or authorized representative of the driver
may submit a petition to the FMCSA contesting the accuracy of
information within 18 months of the date the information was reported
to the Clearinghouse. The petition must include:
(1) The petitioner's name, address, telephone number and commercial
driver's license number with State of issuance;
(2) Detailed description of the basis for the allegation that the
information is not accurate;
(3) Evidence supporting the allegation that the information is not
accurate. Failure to submit evidence is cause for dismissing the
petition.
(b) Address. The petition must be submitted to: Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Administration, Office of Enforcement and Compliance,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
(c) Petitions limited to inaccurately reported information. (1)
Under this section, petitioners may challenge only the accuracy of
information reporting, not the accuracy or validity of positive test
results or refusals.
(2) Exception. Petitioners may request that FMCSA remove from the
Clearinghouse an employer's report of actual knowledge that the driver
received a traffic citation for driving a commercial motor vehicle
while under the influence of alcohol or controlled substances if the
citation did not result in a conviction. For the purposes of this
section, conviction has the same meaning as used in 49 CFR part 383.
(d) Notice of decision. FMCSA will inform the driver in writing
within 90 days of receipt of a complete petition whether FMCSA will
remove, retain, or correct the information in the database and provide
the basis for the decision.
(e) Request for expedited treatment. A driver may request expedited
treatment of his or her petition to correct inaccurate information if
the inaccuracy is currently preventing him or her from performing
safety-sensitive functions. If FMCSA grants expedited treatment, it
will inform the driver of its decision in writing within 30 days of
receipt of a complete petition. This request may be included in the
original petition or as a separate document.
(f) Administrative review. (1) A driver may request FMCSA to
conduct an administrative review if he or she believes that a decision
made in accordance with paragraphs (d) or (e) of this section was in
error.
(2) The driver must submit his/her request in writing to the
Associate Administrator for Enforcement and Program Delivery (MC-E),
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
(3) The driver's request must explain the error it believes FMCSA
committed and provide information and/or documents to support his or
her argument.
(4) FMCSA will complete its administrative review no later than 60
days after receiving the driver's request for review. The Associate
Administrator's decision will constitute the final Agency action.
Sec. 382.719 Availability and removal of information.
(a) Information about a driver's drug or alcohol violation will not
be available to an employer conducting a query of the Clearinghouse
after all of the following conditions relating to the violation are
satisfied:
(1) The substance abuse professional reports to the Clearinghouse
the information required in Sec. 382.705(d);
(2) The employer or consortium/third party administrator reports to
the Clearinghouse that the driver received negative return-to-duty test
results;
(3) The driver's current employer or consortium reports that the
driver has successfully completed all follow-up tests as prescribed in
the substance-abuse-professional report in accordance with Sec. Sec.
40.307, 40.309, and 40.311 of this title; and
(4) Three years have passed since the date of the violation
determination.
Alternate: (4) Five years have passed since the date of the
violation determination.
(b) Information about a particular driver's drug or alcohol
violation will remain in the Clearinghouse record and be available to
employers conducting a query until all requirements in paragraph (a) of
this section have been met.
(c) Exception. Within 2 business days of granting a request
pursuant to Sec. 382.717(c)(2), FMCSA will remove information from the
Clearinghouse about an employer's report of actual knowledge that a
driver received a traffic citation for driving a commercial motor
vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or controlled substances.
(d) Nothing in this part shall prevent FMCSA from using information
removed under this section for research, auditing or enforcement
purposes.
Sec. 382.721 Fees.
FMCSA may collect a reasonable fee from entities required to query
the Clearinghouse. Exception: No driver
[[Page 9727]]
may be required to pay a fee to access his or her own information in
the Clearinghouse.
Sec. 382.723 Unauthorized access or use prohibited.
(a) Except as expressly authorized in this subpart, no person or
entity may access the Clearinghouse. No person or entity may share,
distribute, publish, or otherwise release any information in the
Clearinghouse except as specifically authorized by law. No person may
report inaccurate or misleading information to the Clearinghouse.
(b) An employer's use of information received from the
Clearinghouse is limited to assessing or evaluating whether a
prohibition applies to a driver operating a commercial motor vehicle.
No employer may divulge or permit any other person or entity to divulge
any information from the Clearinghouse to any person or entity not
directly involved in assessing or evaluating whether a prohibition
applies to a driver operating a commercial motor vehicle.
(c) Violations of this section are subject to civil and criminal
penalties in accordance with applicable law, including those set forth
at Sec. 382.507.
(d) Nothing in this part shall prohibit FMCSA from accessing
information about individual drivers in the Clearinghouse for research
or enforcement purposes.
Sec. 382.725 Access by State licensing authorities.
(a) The chief commercial driver's licensing official of a State may
request and receive a driver's record from the Clearinghouse if the
driver has applied for a commercial driver's license from that State.
(b) By applying for a commercial driver's license, a driver is
deemed to have consented to the release of information from the
Clearinghouse in accordance with this section.
(c) The chief driver's licensing official's use of information
received from the Clearinghouse is limited to assessing or evaluating
an individual's qualifications to operate a commercial motor vehicle.
No chief driver's licensing official may divulge or permit any other
person or entity to divulge any information from the Clearinghouse to
any person or entity not directly involved in assessing or evaluating
an individual's qualifications to operate a commercial motor vehicle.
(d) A chief commercial driver's licensing official that does not
take appropriate safeguards to protect the privacy and confidentiality
of information obtained under this section is subject to revocation of
his or her right of access under this section.
Sec. 382.727 Penalties.
An employer, employee, medical review officer, or service agent who
violates any provision of this subpart shall be subject to the civil
and/or criminal penalty provisions of 49 U.S.C. 521(b)(2)(C).
Issued under the authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.87 on: February
3, 2014.
Anne S. Ferro,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014-03213 Filed 2-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P