Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes, 9398-9400 [2014-02996]
Download as PDF
9398
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 33 / Wednesday, February 19, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0791; Directorate
Identifier 2012–NM–026–AD; Amendment
39–17745; AD 2014–03–08]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and
A321 series airplanes. This AD was
prompted by a report that an
investigation showed that when a
certain combination of a target/
proximity sensor serial number is
installed on a flap interconnecting strut,
a ‘‘target FAR’’ signal cannot be detected
when it reaches the mechanical end
stop of the interconnecting strut. This
AD requires an inspection to determine
the part number of the interconnecting
struts installed on the wings, identifying
the part number and the serial number
of the associated target and proximity
sensor if applicable, and replacing or reidentifying the flap interconnecting
strut if applicable. We are issuing this
AD to detect and correct a latent failure
of the flap down drive disconnection
due to an already-failed interconnecting
strut sensor, which could result in
asymmetric flap panel movement and
consequent loss of control of the
airplane.
SUMMARY:
This AD becomes effective
March 26, 2014.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of March 26, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2013-0791; or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:22 Feb 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness
Office—EAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
61 93 44 51; email account.airwortheas@airbus.com; Internet https://
www.airbus.com. You may view this
referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM 116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–1405;
fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to all Airbus Model A318, A319,
A320, and A321 series airplanes. The
NPRM published in the Federal
Register on September 25, 2013 (78 FR
58975). The NPRM was prompted by a
report that an investigation showed that
when a certain combination of a target/
proximity sensor serial number is
installed on a flap interconnecting strut,
a ‘‘target FAR’’ signal cannot be detected
when it reaches the mechanical end
stop of the interconnecting strut. The
NPRM proposed to require an
inspection to determine the part number
of the interconnecting struts installed on
the wings, identifying the part number
and the serial number of the associated
target and proximity sensor if
applicable, and replacing or reidentifying the flap interconnecting
strut if applicable. We are issuing this
AD to detect and correct a latent failure
of the flap down drive disconnection
due to an already-failed interconnecting
strut sensor, which could result in
asymmetric flap panel movement and
consequent loss of control of the
airplane.
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2012–0012,
dated January 23, 2012 (referred to after
this as the Mandatory Continuing
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
The flap interconnecting strut is a safety
device of the High Lift System which acts as
an alternative load path from one flap surface
to another in case of a flap drive system
disconnection. In such a failure case, the
installed proximity provide information to
the slat flap control computer (SFCC) and the
operation of the flap drive system is
inhibited.
A recent engineering investigation has
shown that, when a certain combination of
target/sensor serial number (s/n) is installed
on a flap interconnecting strut, a ‘‘target
FAR’’ signal cannot be detected when
reaching the mechanical end stop of the
interconnecting strut.
This condition, if not corrected, could
cause a flap down drive disconnection to
remain undetected, due to an already-failed
interconnecting strut sensor, potentially
resulting in asymmetric flap panel movement
and consequent loss of control of the
aeroplane.
For the reason described above, this
[EASA] AD requires the identification and
replacement [or re-identifying] of struts that
have a certain target/sensor s/n combination
installed.
You may examine the MCAI in the
AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;
D=FAA-2013-0791-0002.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM (78
FR 58975, September 25, 2013) or on the
determination of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this AD
as proposed. We have determined that
these minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM (78 FR
58975, September 25, 2013) for
correcting the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 58975,
September 25, 2013).
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 755
airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this AD:
E:\FR\FM\19FER1.SGM
19FER1
9399
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 33 / Wednesday, February 19, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Inspection and Re-identification ...
8 work-hours × $85 per hour = $680 per inspection cycle ...............
We estimate the following costs to do
any necessary replacements that would
Parts cost
be required based on the results of the
inspection. We have no way of
$0
Cost per
product
$680
Cost on
U.S.
operators
$513,400
determining the number of aircraft that
might need these replacements:
ON-CONDITION COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Replacement ......................................
10 work-hours × $85 per hour = $850 ...........................................................
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:22 Feb 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
Parts cost
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2013-0791; or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this
AD, the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
2014–03–08 Airbus: Amendment 39–17745.
Docket No. FAA–2013–0791; Directorate
Identifier 2012–NM–026–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes
effective March 26, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Airbus Model A318–
111, –112, –121, and –122 airplanes; Model
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Cost per
product
$0
$850
A319–111, –112, –113, –114, –115, –131,
–132, and –133 airplanes; Model A320–111,
–211, –212, –214, –231, –232, and –233
airplanes; and Model A321–111, –112, –131,
–211, –212, –213, –231, and –232 airplanes;
certificated in any category; all manufacturer
serial numbers.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 27, Flight controls.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report that an
investigation showed that when a certain
combination of a target/proximity sensor
serial number is installed on a flap
interconnecting strut, a ‘‘target FAR’’ signal
cannot be detected when reaching the
mechanical end stop of the interconnecting
strut. We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct a latent failure of the flap down drive
disconnection due to an already-failed
interconnecting strut sensor, which could
result in asymmetric flap panel movement
and consequent loss of control of the
airplane.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions
required by this AD performed within the
compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
(g) Inspection To Determine the Part Number
of the Interconnecting Struts
Within 8,000 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD, inspect to determine the part
number of the interconnecting struts
installed on both the left-hand (LH) and
right-hand (RH) wings of the airplane, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320–
27–1206, Revision 01, dated October 10,
2011. A review of the airplane maintenance
records is acceptable for determining the part
number of the installed interconnecting
struts, in lieu of the inspection, if the part
number of the installed interconnecting
struts, and the part number and the serial
number of the associated target and
proximity sensor, can be conclusively
determined from that review.
(1) Airplanes on which Airbus
Modification 27956 has been embodied in
E:\FR\FM\19FER1.SGM
19FER1
9400
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 33 / Wednesday, February 19, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
production, and on which no interconnecting
strut has been replaced with a strut having
a part number specified in figure 1 to
paragraph (g) of this AD since the airplane’s
first flight: No further work is required by
paragraph (g) of this AD.
(2) If, during the inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, any interconnecting
strut is installed with a part number specified
in figure 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD: Within
8,000 flight hours after the effective date of
this AD, determine the part number and the
serial number of the associated target and
proximity sensor.
FIGURE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (G) OF THIS
AD—INTERCONNECTING
STRUT
PART NUMBERS
Interconnecting strut part numbers
D5757030500000
D5757030500100
D5757030500200
D5757030500600
D5757030500800
D5757030501000
D5757030501200
D5757032200000
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(i) For airplanes having conditions
specified in paragraphs (g)(2)(i)(A),
(g)(2)(i)(B), (g)(2)(i)(C), and (g)(2)(i)(D) of this
AD: Before further flight, replace the
interconnecting strut with a serviceable unit,
in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320–
27–1206, Revision 01, dated October 10,
2011. For the purposes of this AD, a
serviceable interconnecting strut is a unit
which has been determined to be in
compliance with the following requirements
of this AD:
(A) A target part number (P/N) ABS0121–
13 or P/N 8–536–01; and
(B) A target serial number lower than 1600,
or a target serial number that is unreadable;
and
(C) A proximity sensor having P/N
ABS0121–31 or P/N 8–372–04; and
(D) A proximity sensor having a serial
number between C59198 and C59435, or a
serial number (S/N) C500000 or higher.
(ii) For a target having S/N 1600 or higher
and target P/N ABS0121–13 or P/N 8–536–
01: Within 8,000 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, re-identify the
interconnecting strut, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–27–1206, Revision 01,
dated October 10, 2011.
(h) Parts Installation Prohibition
As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install an interconnecting strut
with a part number specified in figure 1 to
paragraph (g) of this AD, on any airplane,
except for parts identified in paragraph
(g)(2)(ii) of this AD, provided that the actions
in paragraph (g)(2)(ii) are done.
(i) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the
actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD,
if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Airbus Service
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:22 Feb 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
Bulletin A320–27–1206, dated January 28,
2011, and if additional work has been
accomplished using Airbus Service Bulletin
A320–27–1206, Revision 01, dated October
10, 2011. Airbus Service Bulletin A320–27–
1206, dated January 28, 2011, is not
incorporated by reference in this AD.
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; telephone (425) 227–1405; fax (425)
227–1149. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference
this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(k) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2012–0012, dated
January 23, 2012, for related information.
This MCAI may be found in the AD docket
on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2013-0791-0002.
(2) Service information identified in this
AD that is not incorporated by reference may
be viewed at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (l)(3) and (l)(4) of this AD.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–27–1206,
Revision 01, dated October 10, 2011.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness
Office—EAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33
5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet
https://www.airbus.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://www.archives.
gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January
22, 2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–02996 Filed 2–18–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0735; Directorate
Identifier 2013–SW–014–AD; Amendment
39–17748; AD 2014–03–11]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bell
Helicopter Textron, Inc. (Bell)
Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for Bell
Model 204B helicopters with a certain
cable assembly installed. This AD
requires inspecting the tail rotor (T/R)
cable assembly for an incorrectly
machined body. This AD is prompted
by a report from Bell that a defective
body on the cable prevents the barrel
assembly from fully engaging in the
body cavity. These actions are intended
to prevent disengagement of the cable
from the barrel, failure of the T/R pitch
control, and subsequent loss of control
of the helicopter.
DATES: This AD is effective March 26,
2014.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain document listed in this AD
as of March 26, 2014.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this AD, contact Bell
Helicopter Textron, Inc., P.O. Box 482,
Fort Worth, TX 76101; telephone (817)
280–3391; fax (817) 280–6466; or at
https://www.bellcustomer.com/files/.
You may review a copy of the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19FER1.SGM
19FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 33 (Wednesday, February 19, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9398-9400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02996]
[[Page 9398]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2013-0791; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-026-AD;
Amendment 39-17745; AD 2014-03-08]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes. This AD was
prompted by a report that an investigation showed that when a certain
combination of a target/proximity sensor serial number is installed on
a flap interconnecting strut, a ``target FAR'' signal cannot be
detected when it reaches the mechanical end stop of the interconnecting
strut. This AD requires an inspection to determine the part number of
the interconnecting struts installed on the wings, identifying the part
number and the serial number of the associated target and proximity
sensor if applicable, and replacing or re-identifying the flap
interconnecting strut if applicable. We are issuing this AD to detect
and correct a latent failure of the flap down drive disconnection due
to an already-failed interconnecting strut sensor, which could result
in asymmetric flap panel movement and consequent loss of control of the
airplane.
DATES: This AD becomes effective March 26, 2014.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of March 26,
2014.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2013-0791; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus,
Airworthiness Office--EAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51;
email account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com.
You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM 116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1405;
fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all Airbus Model A318,
A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on September 25, 2013 (78 FR 58975). The NPRM was
prompted by a report that an investigation showed that when a certain
combination of a target/proximity sensor serial number is installed on
a flap interconnecting strut, a ``target FAR'' signal cannot be
detected when it reaches the mechanical end stop of the interconnecting
strut. The NPRM proposed to require an inspection to determine the part
number of the interconnecting struts installed on the wings,
identifying the part number and the serial number of the associated
target and proximity sensor if applicable, and replacing or re-
identifying the flap interconnecting strut if applicable. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct a latent failure of the flap down
drive disconnection due to an already-failed interconnecting strut
sensor, which could result in asymmetric flap panel movement and
consequent loss of control of the airplane.
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2012-0012, dated January 23, 2012 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
The flap interconnecting strut is a safety device of the High
Lift System which acts as an alternative load path from one flap
surface to another in case of a flap drive system disconnection. In
such a failure case, the installed proximity provide information to
the slat flap control computer (SFCC) and the operation of the flap
drive system is inhibited.
A recent engineering investigation has shown that, when a
certain combination of target/sensor serial number (s/n) is
installed on a flap interconnecting strut, a ``target FAR'' signal
cannot be detected when reaching the mechanical end stop of the
interconnecting strut.
This condition, if not corrected, could cause a flap down drive
disconnection to remain undetected, due to an already-failed
interconnecting strut sensor, potentially resulting in asymmetric
flap panel movement and consequent loss of control of the aeroplane.
For the reason described above, this [EASA] AD requires the
identification and replacement [or re-identifying] of struts that
have a certain target/sensor s/n combination installed.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2013-0791-0002.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (78 FR 58975, September
25, 2013) or on the determination of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting this AD as proposed. We have
determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (78 FR 58975, September 25, 2013) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 58975, September 25, 2013).
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 755 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
[[Page 9399]]
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on
Action Labor cost Parts Cost per U.S.
cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection and Re-identification......... 8 work-hours x $85 per hour = $0 $680 $513,400
$680 per inspection cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements
that would be required based on the results of the inspection. We have
no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these
replacements:
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement................................... 10 work-hours x $85 per hour = $850... $0 $850
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2013-0791; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information.
The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800)
647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2014-03-08 Airbus: Amendment 39-17745. Docket No. FAA-2013-0791;
Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-026-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective March 26,
2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Airbus Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -
122 airplanes; Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132,
and -133 airplanes; Model A320-111, -211, -212, -214, -231, -232,
and -233 airplanes; and Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -
213, -231, and -232 airplanes; certificated in any category; all
manufacturer serial numbers.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27, Flight
controls.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report that an investigation showed
that when a certain combination of a target/proximity sensor serial
number is installed on a flap interconnecting strut, a ``target
FAR'' signal cannot be detected when reaching the mechanical end
stop of the interconnecting strut. We are issuing this AD to detect
and correct a latent failure of the flap down drive disconnection
due to an already-failed interconnecting strut sensor, which could
result in asymmetric flap panel movement and consequent loss of
control of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.
(g) Inspection To Determine the Part Number of the Interconnecting
Struts
Within 8,000 flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
inspect to determine the part number of the interconnecting struts
installed on both the left-hand (LH) and right-hand (RH) wings of
the airplane, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-27-1206, Revision 01, dated October 10,
2011. A review of the airplane maintenance records is acceptable for
determining the part number of the installed interconnecting struts,
in lieu of the inspection, if the part number of the installed
interconnecting struts, and the part number and the serial number of
the associated target and proximity sensor, can be conclusively
determined from that review.
(1) Airplanes on which Airbus Modification 27956 has been
embodied in
[[Page 9400]]
production, and on which no interconnecting strut has been replaced
with a strut having a part number specified in figure 1 to paragraph
(g) of this AD since the airplane's first flight: No further work is
required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
(2) If, during the inspection required by paragraph (g) of this
AD, any interconnecting strut is installed with a part number
specified in figure 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD: Within 8,000
flight hours after the effective date of this AD, determine the part
number and the serial number of the associated target and proximity
sensor.
Figure 1 to Paragraph (g) of This AD--Interconnecting Strut Part Numbers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interconnecting strut part numbers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
D5757030500000
D5757030500100
D5757030500200
D5757030500600
D5757030500800
D5757030501000
D5757030501200
D5757032200000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) For airplanes having conditions specified in paragraphs
(g)(2)(i)(A), (g)(2)(i)(B), (g)(2)(i)(C), and (g)(2)(i)(D) of this
AD: Before further flight, replace the interconnecting strut with a
serviceable unit, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-27-1206, Revision 01, dated October
10, 2011. For the purposes of this AD, a serviceable interconnecting
strut is a unit which has been determined to be in compliance with
the following requirements of this AD:
(A) A target part number (P/N) ABS0121-13 or P/N 8-536-01; and
(B) A target serial number lower than 1600, or a target serial
number that is unreadable; and
(C) A proximity sensor having P/N ABS0121-31 or P/N 8-372-04;
and
(D) A proximity sensor having a serial number between C59198 and
C59435, or a serial number (S/N) C500000 or higher.
(ii) For a target having S/N 1600 or higher and target P/N
ABS0121-13 or P/N 8-536-01: Within 8,000 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, re-identify the interconnecting strut, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-27-1206, Revision 01, dated October 10, 2011.
(h) Parts Installation Prohibition
As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install an
interconnecting strut with a part number specified in figure 1 to
paragraph (g) of this AD, on any airplane, except for parts
identified in paragraph (g)(2)(ii) of this AD, provided that the
actions in paragraph (g)(2)(ii) are done.
(i) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Airbus Service Bulletin A320-27-
1206, dated January 28, 2011, and if additional work has been
accomplished using Airbus Service Bulletin A320-27-1206, Revision
01, dated October 10, 2011. Airbus Service Bulletin A320-27-1206,
dated January 28, 2011, is not incorporated by reference in this AD.
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Sanjay
Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington
98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1405; fax (425) 227-1149.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(k) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2012-0012, dated January 23,
2012, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD
docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2013-0791-0002.
(2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference may be viewed at the addresses specified
in paragraphs (l)(3) and (l)(4) of this AD.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-27-1206, Revision 01, dated
October 10, 2011.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 22, 2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-02996 Filed 2-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P