Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Colorado; Construction Permit Program Fee Increases; Construction Permit Regulation of PM2.5, 8632-8635 [2014-03114]
Download as PDF
8632
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 30 / Thursday, February 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
(b) At the request of either party, the
action shall be tried by the court with
a jury.
(c) A proceeding under paragraph (a)
of this section shall be governed by the
same legal burdens of proof specified in
§ 1987.109. The court shall have
jurisdiction to grant all relief necessary
to make the employee whole, including
injunctive relief and compensatory
damages, including:
(1) Reinstatement with the same
seniority status that the employee
would have had, but for the discharge
or discrimination;
(2) The amount of back pay, with
interest;
(3) Compensation for any special
damages sustained as a result of the
discharge or discrimination; and
(4) Litigation costs, expert witness
fees, and reasonable attorney fees.
(d) Within seven days after filing a
complaint in federal court, a
complainant must file with OSHA, the
ALJ, or the ARB, depending on where
the proceeding is pending, a copy of the
file-stamped complaint. A copy of the
complaint also must be served on the
OSHA official who issued the findings
and/or preliminary order, the Assistant
Secretary, and the Associate Solicitor,
Division of Fair Labor Standards, U.S.
Department of Labor.
§ 1987.115
of rules.
Special circumstances; waiver
In special circumstances not
contemplated by the provisions of the
rules in this part, or for good cause
shown, the ALJ or the ARB on review
may, upon application, after three days
notice to all parties, waive any rule or
issue such orders that justice or the
administration of FSMA requires.
[FR Doc. 2014–03164 Filed 2–12–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
[EPA–R08–OAR–2013–0552, FRL–9903–94Region 8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Colorado; Construction Permit
Program Fee Increases; Construction
Permit Regulation of PM2.5;
Regulation 3
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
packages submitted by the State of
Colorado on June 18, 2009 and May 25,
2011. EPA approves the June 18, 2009
submittal revisions, which supersede
revisions submitted on June 11, 2008, to
Regulation 3, Part A, Section VI.D.1.,
regarding construction permit
processing fees. EPA approves
Colorado’s May 25, 2011 submittal,
which addresses regulation of fine
particulate matter (PM2.5) under
Colorado’s construction permit program.
EPA also approves minor editorial
changes to Regulation 3, Parts A, B, and
D in the May 25, 2011 submittal. This
action is being taken under section 110
of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This rule is effective March 17,
2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R08–OAR–2013–0552. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Program, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the individual
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to view the hard copy
of the docket. You may view the hard
copy of the docket Monday through
Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Komp, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P–AR,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202–1129, (303) 312–6022,
komp.mark@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
AGENCY:
I. Background Information
II. Response to Comments
III. EPA’s Evaluation of Part D Revisions to
Regulation Number 3
IV. Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving two State
Definitions
For the purpose of this document, we
are giving meaning to certain words or
initials as follows:
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:25 Feb 12, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(i) The words or initials Act or CAA
mean or refer to the Clean Air Act,
unless the context indicates otherwise.
(ii) The words or initials APEN mean
or refer to Air Pollution Emission
Notice.
(iii) The words EPA, we, us or our
mean or refer to the United States
Environmental Protection Agency.
(iv) The initials SIP mean or refer to
State Implementation Plan.
(v) The words State or Colorado mean
the State of Colorado, unless the context
indicates otherwise.
(vi) The initials NAAQS mean or refer
to national ambient air quality
standards.
(vii) The initials NSR mean or refer to
New Source Review.
(viii) The initials PM mean or refer to
particulate matter.
(ix) The initials PM2.5 mean or refer to
particulate matter with an aerodynamic
diameter of less than 2.5 micrometers
(fine particulate matter).
(x) The initials PSD mean or refer to
Prevention of Significant Deterioration.
(xi) The initials SIP mean or refer to
State Implementation Plan.
(xii) The initials tpy mean or refer to
tons per year.
I. Background Information
On September 6, 2013, 78 FR 76781,
EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for action on certain
SIP submittals by the State of Colorado.
The NPR proposed approval of revisions
to Regulation 3, Part A, Section VI.D.1.
to the extent the revisions reflect
changes to construction permit
processing fees as set forth in Colorado
Revised Statute Section 27–7–114.7.
In addition, the NPR proposed to
approve revisions to Parts A of
Regulation 3 to add PM2.5 to the
definitions of ‘‘air pollutant’’ and
‘‘criteria pollutant,’’ and to approve
revisions to Part B of Regulation 3 to
regulate PM2.5 in the State’s
construction permit program, including
PM2.5 thresholds. We also proposed to
approve Colorado’s reinstatement of
volatile organic compound (VOC)
sources to reasonably available control
technology (RACT) requirements in Part
B. Finally, minor editorial changes
made throughout Regulation 3, Parts A,
B, and D were proposed for approval.
The formal SIP revisions were
submitted by the State of Colorado on
June 11, 2008, June 18, 2009 and May
25, 2011. The State’s June 11, 2008 and
June 18, 2009 submittals contained
permitting fee increases in Part A,
Section VI.D.1. of Regulation 3. The
State increased its fees with the 2008
submittal to $17.97 per ton for regulated
pollutants and $119.96 per ton for
E:\FR\FM\13FER1.SGM
13FER1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 30 / Thursday, February 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
hazardous air pollutants. In the State’s
2009 submittal, these fees were
increased to $22.90 and $152.10,
respectively. Section VI.D.1. also
requires permit processing fees to be
collected. The 2009 submittal was
adopted by the State on September 18,
2008 and became effective on October
30, 2008.
EPA determined that both submittals
contain increased emission fees that
appear to be for the purpose of
implementing and enforcing the State’s
Title V operating permit program. These
emission fee increases are non-SIP
regulatory fees and therefore any
increases are outside the scope of the
SIP revision process. Conversely, the
permit processing fees, with respect to
the processing of construction permits,
are appropriate for approval into the
SIP. (see, CAA Section 110(a)(2)(L)(i)).
Therefore, we are approving the
submitted provisions only to the extent
that they impose fees on processing of
construction permits.
The May 25, 2011 submittal revised
the definition of ‘‘air pollutant’’ in Part
A of Regulation Number 3 to add PM2.5.
Consistent with EPA’s 2008 PM2.5 New
Source Review (NSR) Implementation
Rule (73 FR 28321), the submittal
revised the definition of ‘‘criteria
pollutant’’ in Part A to include PM2.5
and to recognize sulfur dioxide and
nitrogen oxides as precursors to PM2.5.
With these changes, PM2.5 and its
precursors are regulated under
Colorado’s construction permit program
in Part B of Regulation Number 3.1
In areas which are nonattainment for
any criteria pollutant, facilities with
total annual uncontrolled emissions of
PM2.5 less than one ton per year (tpy) are
exempt; in areas that are in attainment
for all criteria pollutants, facilities with
total annual uncontrolled emissions of
PM2.5 less than five tpy are exempt.
These levels are identical to the existing
PM10 permit thresholds. The State also
retained the existing thresholds for the
pollutants identified as PM2.5
precursors, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen
oxides: five tpy in areas which are
nonattainment for any criteria
pollutants, and ten tpy in areas that are
in attainment for all criteria pollutants.
The State adopted the revisions on
February 21, 2008 and became effective
on April 30, 2008. EPA proposed to
approve these revisions to Parts A and
B.
1 On September 23, 2013 (78 FR 58186), we
approved revisions to Colorado’s PSD program in
Part D of Regulation Number 3 to address the
requirements for PSD programs set out in the 2008
PM2.5 NSR Implementation Rule, including
recognition of PM2.5 precursors in the definition of
‘‘regulated NSR pollutant.’’
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:25 Feb 12, 2014
Jkt 232001
In addition, in paragraph III.D.2 of
Part B, which contains RACT
requirements for certain new or
modified minor sources, Colorado
added sources of VOCs. This responded
to Colorado’s previous removal of these
sources, which would have relaxed the
stringency of the SIP. As Colorado’s
reinstatement of VOC sources restores
this provision to its previous state, we
proposed to approve the change.
The cover letter to Colorado’s May 25,
2011 submittal identified the specific
regulations the State requested that EPA
approve into the SIP, including minor
editorial changes in Parts A, B, and D of
Regulation 3. These parts of Colorado’s
Regulation 3 address the State’s
permitting and Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD) program. However,
editorial changes were also made to Part
C of the regulation. Part C is the State’s
Title V permitting program and is not
part of the SIP. EPA takes no action on
these non-SIP regulatory changes in Part
C.
II. Response to Comments
EPA received no comments regarding
our proposed approval of Colorado’s
revisions to its Regulation 3.
III. EPA’s Evaluation of Part D
Revisions to Regulation Number 3
The May 25, 2011 submittal contains
revisions to the Part D portion of the
State’s Regulation 3 for major stationary
sources subject to NSR and PSD. As
discussed in earlier notices regarding
revisions to Part D of Colorado’s
Regulation Number 3, for example 77
FR 1027 (Jan. 9, 2012), Colorado
reorganized Regulation No. 3 in
previous SIP submissions by moving
much of the previously approved
language from other sections of
Regulation 3 into newly created Part D.
The submissions then incorporated
EPA’s December 31, 2002 NSR Reform
rule (67 FR 80186) into Part D, applying
the reforms to both the State’s PSD and
nonattainment NSR permit programs. In
its submissions, Colorado distinguished
the revised language that incorporated
NSR Reform from the language for the
existing PSD and NSR programs (as
reorganized into part D) by italicizing
language that was to be added to the
existing programs and by underlining
language that was to be removed from
the existing programs. Colorado’s
submissions indicated that the addition
of the italicized language and removal of
the underlined language was to become
effective only after EPA approved those
changes into Colorado’s SIP. The same
convention regarding italicized and
underlined language applies to the May
25, 2011 submittal.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8633
EPA completed its approval of
Colorado’s NSR Reform revisions on
April 10, 2012. 77 FR 21453. EPA also
has also completed approval of
subsequent revisions to Part D that
renumbered Part D to reflect the
removal of provisions that had been
vacated or remanded by the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
78 FR 5140 (Jan. 24, 2013). As a result,
the italicized language in Part D is
effective and the underlined language is
removed. Our approval of editorial
changes to Part D reflects this. In
addition, on September 23, 2013, EPA
approved more recent revisions to
certain provisions in Part D. See 78 FR
58186 (Sept. 23, 2013). These
provisions, addressing PM2.5 precursors
and increments, were submitted by
Colorado on May 11, 2012 and May 13,
2013, respectively. As those two
submittals were made after the May 25,
2011 submittal we are approving today,
the provisions we approved on
September 23, 2013 already reflect and
supersede the editorial changes made to
the corresponding provisions in the
State’s May 25, 2011 submittal. We are
therefore not reapproving those
provisions already approved in our
September 23, 2013 action.
In addition, in a previous final rule
regarding Regulation Number 3, 76 FR
61054 (Oct. 3, 2011), we partially
disapproved Colorado’s SIP revisions
for air pollutant emission notice (APEN)
requirements and exemptions. In a
subsequent submittal, dated May 11,
2012, Colorado repealed certain APEN
provisions that we disapproved on
October 3, 2011. As a result, we
consider those provisions effectively
withdrawn from the May 25, 2011
submittal.
IV. Final Action
We are approving revisions to
Regulation 3 as submitted on June 18,
2009, and May 25, 2011. EPA is
approving permitting fee revisions in
the June 18, 2009 submittal to Part A,
Section VI.D.1. of Regulation 3, to the
extent that the revisions apply to
construction permits. The June 18, 2009
submittal supersedes the June 11, 2008
submittal, which also revised fee
provisions.
The May 25, 2011 submittal revised
the definition of ‘‘air pollutant’’ in Part
A of Regulation Number 3 to add PM2.5
and the definition of ‘‘criteria pollutant’’
in Part A to include PM2.5 and to
recognize sulfur dioxide and nitrogen
oxides as precursors to PM2.5. The
submittal also added PM2.5 emission
thresholds for exemptions from the
construction permit requirements in
Part B. In areas which are
E:\FR\FM\13FER1.SGM
13FER1
8634
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 30 / Thursday, February 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
nonattainment for any criteria pollutant,
facilities with total annual uncontrolled
emissions of PM2.5 less than one tpy are
exempt; in areas that are in attainment
for all criteria pollutants, facilities with
total annual uncontrolled emissions of
PM2.5 less than five tpy are exempt. The
State also retained the existing
thresholds for the pollutants identified
as PM2.5 precursors, sulfur dioxide and
nitrogen oxides: Five tpy in areas which
are nonattainment for any criteria
pollutants, and ten tpy in areas that are
in attainment for all criteria pollutants.
In addition, in paragraph III.D.2 of
Part B, which contains RACT
requirements for certain new or
modified minor sources, Colorado
added sources of VOCs. EPA approves
these revisions to Parts A and B.
The May 25, 2011 submittal included
minor editorial changes in Parts A, B,
and D of Regulation 3. We are approving
these changes. For reasons discussed in
the NPR, 78 FR 76871, EPA will not act
on editorial changes made to Part C of
the regulation. Part C is the State’s Title
V operating permit program and is not
part of the SIP.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
V. Statutory and Executive Orders
Review
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 USC 7410(k); 40
CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
USC 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
USC 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Public Law 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:25 Feb 12, 2014
Jkt 232001
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 USC 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by April 14, 2014.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: November 8, 2013.
Howard M. Cantor,
Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 8.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart G—Colorado
2. Section 52.320 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(127) to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.320
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(127) On June 11, 2008, June 18, 2009,
and May 25, 2011 the State of Colorado
submitted revisions to 5 CCR 1001–5,
Regulation 3, Parts A, B, and D. The
June 11, 2008 and June 18, 2009
submittals incorporated changes to fee
amounts which the State charges for the
processing and annual renewal of air
emission permits. These fees support
Colorado’s construction and operating
permit programs. EPA is approving fees
submitted by the State on June 18, 2009,
which superseded changes submitted on
June 11, 2008, to the extent that the fees
support the construction permit
program. EPA is also approving
revisions made to 5 CCR 1001–5,
Regulation 3, Parts A, B, and D
submitted by the State on May 25, 2011
for Parts A, B and D.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) 5 CCR 1001–5, Regulation Number
3, Stationary Source Permitting and Air
Pollutant Emission Notice
Requirements, Part A, Concerning
General Provisions Applicable to
Reporting and Permitting, VI. Fees,
VI.D. Fee Schedule, VI.D.1.; adopted
September 18, 2008 and effective
October 30, 2008.
(B) 5 CCR 1001–5, Regulation Number
3, Stationary Source Permitting and Air
Pollutant Emission Notice
Requirements, Part A, Concerning
General Provisions Applicable to
Reporting and Permitting, except
Section II., Air Pollutant Emission
E:\FR\FM\13FER1.SGM
13FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 30 / Thursday, February 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Notice (APEN) Requirements, II.D.,
Exemptions from Air Pollutant Emission
Notice Requirements, Section II.D.1.sss,
II.D.1.ttt, II.D.1.xxx, and II.D.1.ffff; and
Section VI., Fees, VI.D., Fee Schedule,
VI.D.1., adopted February 21, 2008 and
effective April 30, 2008.
(C) 5 CCR 1001–5, Regulation Number
3, Stationary Source Permitting and Air
Pollutant Emission Notice
Requirements, Part B, Concerning
Construction Permits; adopted February
21, 2008 and effective April 30, 2008.
(D) 5 CCR 1001–5, Regulation Number
3, Stationary Source Permitting and Air
Pollutant Emission Notice
Requirements, Part D, Concerning Major
Stationary Source New Source Review
and Prevention of Significant
Deterioration; adopted February 21,
2008 and effective April 30, 2008:
(1) Excluding underlined text in
Section II, Definitions, Section II.A.1.,
Actual Emissions, II.A.1.a., II.A.1.c., and
II.A.1.e.; II.A.8., Best Available Control
Technology (BACT), first paragraph;
II.A.20., Lowest Achievable Emissions
Rate (LAER), II.A.20.b.; II.A.22., Major
Modification, introductory paragraph;
II.A.24., Major Stationary Source,
II.A.24.b.; II.A.26., Net Emissions
Increase, II.A.26.a.(i) and II.A.26.g.(iii);
II.A.40.5, Representative Actual Annual
Emissions, introductory paragraph and
II.A.40.5(a); and, VI. Requirements
applicable to attainment and
unclassifiable areas and pollutants
implemented under Section 110 of the
Federal Act (Prevention of Significant
Deterioration Program), VI.A. Major
Stationary Sources and Major
Modifications, VI.A.1., Control
Technology Review, VI.A.1.c.; and
(2) With the following exceptions:
Section II, Definitions, Section II.A.5.,
Baseline Area, II.A.5.a. and II.A.5.b.;
Section II.A.23., Major Source Baseline
Date; II.A.25., Minor Source Baseline
Date, II.A.25.a., II.A.25.b., introductory
text, and II.A.25.b(i); II.A.38, Regulated
NSR Pollutant, II.A.38.c.; II.A.42.,
Significant, II.A.42.a.; Section X, Air
Quality Limitations, X.A., Ambient Air
Increments, X.A.1.
[FR Doc. 2014–03114 Filed 2–12–14; 8:45 am]
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:25 Feb 12, 2014
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 120919470–3513–02]
RIN 0648–XD122
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Shrimp
Fishery Off the Southern Atlantic
States; Closure of the Penaeid Shrimp
Fishery Off South Carolina
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule; closure.
AGENCY:
NMFS closes the penaeid
shrimp commercial sector to trawling,
i.e., brown, pink, and white shrimp, in
the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off
South Carolina in the South Atlantic.
This closure is necessary to protect the
spawning stock of white shrimp that has
been subject to unusually cold weather
conditions where state water
temperatures have been 9 °C (48 °F), or
less, for at least 7 consecutive days.
DATES: The closure is effective 12:01
a.m., local time, February 13, 2014, until
the effective date of a notification of
opening which NOAA will publish in
the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate
Michie, 727–570–5305; email:
Kate.Michie@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
penaeid shrimp fishery of the South
Atlantic is managed under the Fishery
Management Plan for the Shrimp
Fishery of the South Atlantic Region
(FMP). The FMP was prepared by the
South Atlantic Fishery Management
Council (Council) and is implemented
under the authority of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens
Act) by regulations at 50 CFR part 622.
Amendment 9 to the FMP revised the
criteria and procedures by which a
South Atlantic state may request a
concurrent closure of the EEZ to the
harvest of penaeid shrimp when state
waters close as a result of severe winter
weather (78 FR 35571, June 13, 2013).
Under 50 CFR 622.206(a), NMFS may
close the EEZ adjacent to South Atlantic
states that have closed their waters to
harvest of brown, pink, and white
shrimp to protect the white shrimp
spawning stock that has been severely
depleted by cold weather or when
applicable state water temperatures are
9 °C (48 °F), or less, for at least 7
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8635
consecutive days. Consistent with those
procedures and criteria, the state of
South Carolina has determined, based
on the information from standardized
assessments, that unusually cold
temperatures have occurred and that
state water temperatures have been 9 °C
(48 °F), or less, for at least 7 consecutive
days and that these cold weather
conditions pose a risk to the condition
and vulnerability of overwintering
white shrimp populations in its state
waters. South Carolina closed its waters
on January 13, 2014, to the harvest of
brown, pink, and white shrimp, and has
requested that the Council and NMFS
implement a concurrent closure of the
EEZ off South Carolina. In accordance
with the procedures described in the
FMP, the state of South Carolina
submitted a letter to the NMFS Regional
Administrator (RA) on February 5, 2014,
requesting that NMFS close the EEZ
adjacent to South Carolina to penaeid
shrimp harvest as a result of severe cold
weather conditions.
NMFS has determined that the
recommended Federal closure conforms
with the procedures and criteria
specified in the FMP and the MagnusonStevens Act, and, therefore, implements
the Federal closure effective 12:01 a.m.,
local time, February 13, 2014. The
closure will be effective until the ending
date of the closure in South Carolina
state waters, but may be ended earlier
based on a request from the state. In no
case will the Federal closure remain
effective after May 31, 2014. NMFS will
terminate the closure of the EEZ by
filing a notification to that effect with
the Office of the Federal Register.
During the closure, as specified in 50
CFR 622.206(a)(2), no person may: (1)
Trawl for brown, pink, or white shrimp
in the EEZ off South Carolina; (2)
possess on board a fishing vessel brown,
pink, or white shrimp in or from the
EEZ off South Carolina unless the vessel
is in transit through the area and all nets
with a mesh size of less than 4 inches
(10.2 cm), as measured between the
centers of opposite knots when pulled
taut, are stowed below deck; or (3) for
a vessel trawling within 25 nautical
miles of the baseline from which the
territorial sea is measured, use or have
on board a trawl net with a mesh size
less than 4 inches (10.2 cm), as
measured between the centers of
opposite knots when pulled taut.
Classification
The RA, Southeast Region, NMFS, has
determined this temporary rule is
necessary for the conservation and
management of the spawning stock of
white shrimp off South Carolina and is
E:\FR\FM\13FER1.SGM
13FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8632-8635]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-03114]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R08-OAR-2013-0552, FRL-9903-94-Region 8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Colorado; Construction Permit Program Fee Increases; Construction
Permit Regulation of PM2.5; Regulation 3
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving two
State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision packages submitted by the
State of Colorado on June 18, 2009 and May 25, 2011. EPA approves the
June 18, 2009 submittal revisions, which supersede revisions submitted
on June 11, 2008, to Regulation 3, Part A, Section VI.D.1., regarding
construction permit processing fees. EPA approves Colorado's May 25,
2011 submittal, which addresses regulation of fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) under Colorado's construction permit program. EPA
also approves minor editorial changes to Regulation 3, Parts A, B, and
D in the May 25, 2011 submittal. This action is being taken under
section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This rule is effective March 17, 2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R08-OAR-2013-0552. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air
Program, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view the hard copy of the docket. You
may view the hard copy of the docket Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m.
to 4:00 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Komp, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P-AR, 1595
Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-6022,
komp.mark@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background Information
II. Response to Comments
III. EPA's Evaluation of Part D Revisions to Regulation Number 3
IV. Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
Definitions
For the purpose of this document, we are giving meaning to certain
words or initials as follows:
(i) The words or initials Act or CAA mean or refer to the Clean Air
Act, unless the context indicates otherwise.
(ii) The words or initials APEN mean or refer to Air Pollution
Emission Notice.
(iii) The words EPA, we, us or our mean or refer to the United
States Environmental Protection Agency.
(iv) The initials SIP mean or refer to State Implementation Plan.
(v) The words State or Colorado mean the State of Colorado, unless
the context indicates otherwise.
(vi) The initials NAAQS mean or refer to national ambient air
quality standards.
(vii) The initials NSR mean or refer to New Source Review.
(viii) The initials PM mean or refer to particulate matter.
(ix) The initials PM2.5 mean or refer to particulate matter with an
aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 micrometers (fine particulate
matter).
(x) The initials PSD mean or refer to Prevention of Significant
Deterioration.
(xi) The initials SIP mean or refer to State Implementation Plan.
(xii) The initials tpy mean or refer to tons per year.
I. Background Information
On September 6, 2013, 78 FR 76781, EPA published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPR) for action on certain SIP submittals by the
State of Colorado. The NPR proposed approval of revisions to Regulation
3, Part A, Section VI.D.1. to the extent the revisions reflect changes
to construction permit processing fees as set forth in Colorado Revised
Statute Section 27-7-114.7.
In addition, the NPR proposed to approve revisions to Parts A of
Regulation 3 to add PM2.5 to the definitions of ``air
pollutant'' and ``criteria pollutant,'' and to approve revisions to
Part B of Regulation 3 to regulate PM2.5 in the State's
construction permit program, including PM2.5 thresholds. We
also proposed to approve Colorado's reinstatement of volatile organic
compound (VOC) sources to reasonably available control technology
(RACT) requirements in Part B. Finally, minor editorial changes made
throughout Regulation 3, Parts A, B, and D were proposed for approval.
The formal SIP revisions were submitted by the State of Colorado on
June 11, 2008, June 18, 2009 and May 25, 2011. The State's June 11,
2008 and June 18, 2009 submittals contained permitting fee increases in
Part A, Section VI.D.1. of Regulation 3. The State increased its fees
with the 2008 submittal to $17.97 per ton for regulated pollutants and
$119.96 per ton for
[[Page 8633]]
hazardous air pollutants. In the State's 2009 submittal, these fees
were increased to $22.90 and $152.10, respectively. Section VI.D.1.
also requires permit processing fees to be collected. The 2009
submittal was adopted by the State on September 18, 2008 and became
effective on October 30, 2008.
EPA determined that both submittals contain increased emission fees
that appear to be for the purpose of implementing and enforcing the
State's Title V operating permit program. These emission fee increases
are non-SIP regulatory fees and therefore any increases are outside the
scope of the SIP revision process. Conversely, the permit processing
fees, with respect to the processing of construction permits, are
appropriate for approval into the SIP. (see, CAA Section
110(a)(2)(L)(i)). Therefore, we are approving the submitted provisions
only to the extent that they impose fees on processing of construction
permits.
The May 25, 2011 submittal revised the definition of ``air
pollutant'' in Part A of Regulation Number 3 to add PM2.5.
Consistent with EPA's 2008 PM2.5 New Source Review (NSR)
Implementation Rule (73 FR 28321), the submittal revised the definition
of ``criteria pollutant'' in Part A to include PM2.5 and to
recognize sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides as precursors to
PM2.5. With these changes, PM2.5 and its
precursors are regulated under Colorado's construction permit program
in Part B of Regulation Number 3.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ On September 23, 2013 (78 FR 58186), we approved revisions
to Colorado's PSD program in Part D of Regulation Number 3 to
address the requirements for PSD programs set out in the 2008
PM2.5 NSR Implementation Rule, including recognition of
PM2.5 precursors in the definition of ``regulated NSR
pollutant.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In areas which are nonattainment for any criteria pollutant,
facilities with total annual uncontrolled emissions of PM2.5
less than one ton per year (tpy) are exempt; in areas that are in
attainment for all criteria pollutants, facilities with total annual
uncontrolled emissions of PM2.5 less than five tpy are
exempt. These levels are identical to the existing PM10
permit thresholds. The State also retained the existing thresholds for
the pollutants identified as PM2.5 precursors, sulfur
dioxide and nitrogen oxides: five tpy in areas which are nonattainment
for any criteria pollutants, and ten tpy in areas that are in
attainment for all criteria pollutants. The State adopted the revisions
on February 21, 2008 and became effective on April 30, 2008. EPA
proposed to approve these revisions to Parts A and B.
In addition, in paragraph III.D.2 of Part B, which contains RACT
requirements for certain new or modified minor sources, Colorado added
sources of VOCs. This responded to Colorado's previous removal of these
sources, which would have relaxed the stringency of the SIP. As
Colorado's reinstatement of VOC sources restores this provision to its
previous state, we proposed to approve the change.
The cover letter to Colorado's May 25, 2011 submittal identified
the specific regulations the State requested that EPA approve into the
SIP, including minor editorial changes in Parts A, B, and D of
Regulation 3. These parts of Colorado's Regulation 3 address the
State's permitting and Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD)
program. However, editorial changes were also made to Part C of the
regulation. Part C is the State's Title V permitting program and is not
part of the SIP. EPA takes no action on these non-SIP regulatory
changes in Part C.
II. Response to Comments
EPA received no comments regarding our proposed approval of
Colorado's revisions to its Regulation 3.
III. EPA's Evaluation of Part D Revisions to Regulation Number 3
The May 25, 2011 submittal contains revisions to the Part D portion
of the State's Regulation 3 for major stationary sources subject to NSR
and PSD. As discussed in earlier notices regarding revisions to Part D
of Colorado's Regulation Number 3, for example 77 FR 1027 (Jan. 9,
2012), Colorado reorganized Regulation No. 3 in previous SIP
submissions by moving much of the previously approved language from
other sections of Regulation 3 into newly created Part D. The
submissions then incorporated EPA's December 31, 2002 NSR Reform rule
(67 FR 80186) into Part D, applying the reforms to both the State's PSD
and nonattainment NSR permit programs. In its submissions, Colorado
distinguished the revised language that incorporated NSR Reform from
the language for the existing PSD and NSR programs (as reorganized into
part D) by italicizing language that was to be added to the existing
programs and by underlining language that was to be removed from the
existing programs. Colorado's submissions indicated that the addition
of the italicized language and removal of the underlined language was
to become effective only after EPA approved those changes into
Colorado's SIP. The same convention regarding italicized and underlined
language applies to the May 25, 2011 submittal.
EPA completed its approval of Colorado's NSR Reform revisions on
April 10, 2012. 77 FR 21453. EPA also has also completed approval of
subsequent revisions to Part D that renumbered Part D to reflect the
removal of provisions that had been vacated or remanded by the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. 78 FR 5140 (Jan. 24,
2013). As a result, the italicized language in Part D is effective and
the underlined language is removed. Our approval of editorial changes
to Part D reflects this. In addition, on September 23, 2013, EPA
approved more recent revisions to certain provisions in Part D. See 78
FR 58186 (Sept. 23, 2013). These provisions, addressing
PM2.5 precursors and increments, were submitted by Colorado
on May 11, 2012 and May 13, 2013, respectively. As those two submittals
were made after the May 25, 2011 submittal we are approving today, the
provisions we approved on September 23, 2013 already reflect and
supersede the editorial changes made to the corresponding provisions in
the State's May 25, 2011 submittal. We are therefore not reapproving
those provisions already approved in our September 23, 2013 action.
In addition, in a previous final rule regarding Regulation Number
3, 76 FR 61054 (Oct. 3, 2011), we partially disapproved Colorado's SIP
revisions for air pollutant emission notice (APEN) requirements and
exemptions. In a subsequent submittal, dated May 11, 2012, Colorado
repealed certain APEN provisions that we disapproved on October 3,
2011. As a result, we consider those provisions effectively withdrawn
from the May 25, 2011 submittal.
IV. Final Action
We are approving revisions to Regulation 3 as submitted on June 18,
2009, and May 25, 2011. EPA is approving permitting fee revisions in
the June 18, 2009 submittal to Part A, Section VI.D.1. of Regulation 3,
to the extent that the revisions apply to construction permits. The
June 18, 2009 submittal supersedes the June 11, 2008 submittal, which
also revised fee provisions.
The May 25, 2011 submittal revised the definition of ``air
pollutant'' in Part A of Regulation Number 3 to add PM2.5
and the definition of ``criteria pollutant'' in Part A to include
PM2.5 and to recognize sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides as
precursors to PM2.5. The submittal also added
PM2.5 emission thresholds for exemptions from the
construction permit requirements in Part B. In areas which are
[[Page 8634]]
nonattainment for any criteria pollutant, facilities with total annual
uncontrolled emissions of PM2.5 less than one tpy are
exempt; in areas that are in attainment for all criteria pollutants,
facilities with total annual uncontrolled emissions of PM2.5
less than five tpy are exempt. The State also retained the existing
thresholds for the pollutants identified as PM2.5
precursors, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides: Five tpy in areas which
are nonattainment for any criteria pollutants, and ten tpy in areas
that are in attainment for all criteria pollutants.
In addition, in paragraph III.D.2 of Part B, which contains RACT
requirements for certain new or modified minor sources, Colorado added
sources of VOCs. EPA approves these revisions to Parts A and B.
The May 25, 2011 submittal included minor editorial changes in
Parts A, B, and D of Regulation 3. We are approving these changes. For
reasons discussed in the NPR, 78 FR 76871, EPA will not act on
editorial changes made to Part C of the regulation. Part C is the
State's Title V operating permit program and is not part of the SIP.
V. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 USC 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus,
in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly,
this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements
and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 USC 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 USC 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 USC 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by April 14, 2014. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: November 8, 2013.
Howard M. Cantor,
Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 8.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart G--Colorado
0
2. Section 52.320 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(127) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(127) On June 11, 2008, June 18, 2009, and May 25, 2011 the State
of Colorado submitted revisions to 5 CCR 1001-5, Regulation 3, Parts A,
B, and D. The June 11, 2008 and June 18, 2009 submittals incorporated
changes to fee amounts which the State charges for the processing and
annual renewal of air emission permits. These fees support Colorado's
construction and operating permit programs. EPA is approving fees
submitted by the State on June 18, 2009, which superseded changes
submitted on June 11, 2008, to the extent that the fees support the
construction permit program. EPA is also approving revisions made to 5
CCR 1001-5, Regulation 3, Parts A, B, and D submitted by the State on
May 25, 2011 for Parts A, B and D.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) 5 CCR 1001-5, Regulation Number 3, Stationary Source Permitting
and Air Pollutant Emission Notice Requirements, Part A, Concerning
General Provisions Applicable to Reporting and Permitting, VI. Fees,
VI.D. Fee Schedule, VI.D.1.; adopted September 18, 2008 and effective
October 30, 2008.
(B) 5 CCR 1001-5, Regulation Number 3, Stationary Source Permitting
and Air Pollutant Emission Notice Requirements, Part A, Concerning
General Provisions Applicable to Reporting and Permitting, except
Section II., Air Pollutant Emission
[[Page 8635]]
Notice (APEN) Requirements, II.D., Exemptions from Air Pollutant
Emission Notice Requirements, Section II.D.1.sss, II.D.1.ttt,
II.D.1.xxx, and II.D.1.ffff; and Section VI., Fees, VI.D., Fee
Schedule, VI.D.1., adopted February 21, 2008 and effective April 30,
2008.
(C) 5 CCR 1001-5, Regulation Number 3, Stationary Source Permitting
and Air Pollutant Emission Notice Requirements, Part B, Concerning
Construction Permits; adopted February 21, 2008 and effective April 30,
2008.
(D) 5 CCR 1001-5, Regulation Number 3, Stationary Source Permitting
and Air Pollutant Emission Notice Requirements, Part D, Concerning
Major Stationary Source New Source Review and Prevention of Significant
Deterioration; adopted February 21, 2008 and effective April 30, 2008:
(1) Excluding underlined text in Section II, Definitions, Section
II.A.1., Actual Emissions, II.A.1.a., II.A.1.c., and II.A.1.e.;
II.A.8., Best Available Control Technology (BACT), first paragraph;
II.A.20., Lowest Achievable Emissions Rate (LAER), II.A.20.b.;
II.A.22., Major Modification, introductory paragraph; II.A.24., Major
Stationary Source, II.A.24.b.; II.A.26., Net Emissions Increase,
II.A.26.a.(i) and II.A.26.g.(iii); II.A.40.5, Representative Actual
Annual Emissions, introductory paragraph and II.A.40.5(a); and, VI.
Requirements applicable to attainment and unclassifiable areas and
pollutants implemented under Section 110 of the Federal Act (Prevention
of Significant Deterioration Program), VI.A. Major Stationary Sources
and Major Modifications, VI.A.1., Control Technology Review, VI.A.1.c.;
and
(2) With the following exceptions: Section II, Definitions, Section
II.A.5., Baseline Area, II.A.5.a. and II.A.5.b.; Section II.A.23.,
Major Source Baseline Date; II.A.25., Minor Source Baseline Date,
II.A.25.a., II.A.25.b., introductory text, and II.A.25.b(i); II.A.38,
Regulated NSR Pollutant, II.A.38.c.; II.A.42., Significant, II.A.42.a.;
Section X, Air Quality Limitations, X.A., Ambient Air Increments,
X.A.1.
[FR Doc. 2014-03114 Filed 2-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P