Proposed Significant New Use Rule on Certain Chemical Substances, 7621-7627 [2014-02846]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules
safety or health standard is a standard
‘‘which requires conditions, or the
adoption or use of one or more
practices, means, methods, operations,
or processes, reasonably necessary or
appropriate to provide safe or healthful
employment or places of employment.’’
29 U.S.C. 652(8). A standard is
reasonably necessary or appropriate
within the meaning of Section 652(8)
when a significant risk of material harm
exists in the workplace and the standard
would substantially reduce or eliminate
that workplace risk. See Industrial
Union Department, AFL–CIO v.
American Petroleum Institute, 448 U.S.
607 (1980). In the cranes rulemaking,
OSHA made such a determination with
respect to the use of cranes and derricks
in construction (75 FR 47913, 47920–
21). This proposed rule does not impose
any new requirements on employers.
Therefore, this proposal does not
require an additional significant risk
finding (see Edison Electric Institute v.
OSHA, 849 F.2d 611, 620 (D.C. Cir.
1988)).
In addition to materially reducing a
significant risk, a safety standard must
be technologically feasible. See UAW v.
OSHA, 37 F.3d 665, 668 (D.C. Cir.
1994). A standard is technologically
feasible when the protective measures it
requires already exist, when available
technology can bring the protective
measures into existence, or when that
technology is reasonably likely to
develop (see American Textile Mfrs.
Institute v. OSHA, 452 U.S. 490, 513
(1981); American Iron and Steel
Institute v. OSHA, 939 F.2d 975, 980
(D.C. Cir. 1991)). In the 2010 Final
Economic Analysis for the cranes
standard, OSHA found the standard to
be technologically feasible (75 FR
48079). This proposed rule would,
therefore, be technologically feasible as
well because it would not require
employers to implement any additional
protective measures; it would simply
extend the duration of existing
requirements.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 1926
Construction industry, Cranes,
Derricks, Occupational safety and
health, Safety.
Authority and Signature
David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20210,
authorized the preparation of this
notice. OSHA is issuing this proposed
rule under the following authorities: 29
U.S.C. 653, 655, 657; 40 U.S.C. 3701 et
seq.; 5 U.S.C. 553; Secretary of Labor’s
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Feb 07, 2014
Jkt 232001
Order No. 1–2012 (77 FR 3912, Jan. 25,
2012); and 29 CFR part 1911.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Signed at Washington, DC, on February 3,
2014.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health.
7621
40 CFR Part 721
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2013–0399; FRL–9903–43]
RIN 2070–AB27
Proposed Significant New Use Rule on
Certain Chemical Substances
Amendments to Standards
For the reasons stated in the preamble
of this proposed rule, OSHA proposes to
amend 29 CFR part 1926 as follows:
AGENCY:
PART 1926—[AMENDED]
SUMMARY:
Subpart CC—Cranes and Derricks in
Construction
1. The authority citation for subpart
CC of 29 CFR part 1926 continues to
read as follows:
■
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 3701 et seq.; 29
U.S.C. 653, 655, 657; and Secretary of Labor’s
Orders 5–2007 (72 FR 31159) or 1–2012 (77
FR 3912), as applicable; and 29 CFR part
1911.
2. In § 1926.1427, revise paragraph (k)
to read as follows:
■
§ 1926,1427 Operator qualification and
certification.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) Phase-in. (1) The provisions of this
section became applicable on November
8, 2010, except for paragraphs (a)(2) and
(f) of this section, which are applicable
November 10, 2017.
(2) When paragraph (a)(1) of this
section is not applicable, all of the
requirements in paragraphs (k)(2)(i) and
(ii) of this section apply until November
10, 2017.
(i) The employer must ensure that
operators of equipment covered by this
standard are competent to operate the
equipment safely.
(ii) When an employee assigned to
operate machinery does not have the
required knowledge or ability to operate
the equipment safely, the employer
must train that employee prior to
operating the equipment. The employer
must ensure that each operator is
evaluated to confirm that he/she
understands the information provided
in the training.
[FR Doc. 2014–02579 Filed 2–7–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
EPA is proposing significant
new use rules (SNURs) under the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) for three
chemical substances which were the
subject of premanufacture notices
(PMNs). This action would require
persons who intend to manufacture
(including import) or process any of the
chemical substances for an activity that
is designated as a significant new use by
this proposed rule to notify EPA at least
90 days before commencing that
activity. The required notification
would provide EPA with the
opportunity to evaluate the intended
use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit
the activity before it occurs.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 11, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2013–0399, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Document Control Office
(7407M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: OPPT Document
Control Office (DCO), EPA East Bldg.,
Rm. 6428, 1201 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC. ATTN: Docket ID
Number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2013–0399.
The DCO is open from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
DCO is (202) 564–8930. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the DCO’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPPT–
2013–0399. EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM
10FEP1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
7622
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through regulations.gov or
email. The regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your email address will
be automatically captured and included
as part of the comment that is placed in
the docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the docket index available
at https://www.regulations.gov. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPPT
Docket. The OPPT Docket is located in
the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) at Rm.
3334, EPA West Bldg., 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington,
DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room
hours of operation are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number of
the EPA/DC Public Reading Room is
(202) 566–1744, and the telephone
number for the OPPT Docket is (202)
566–0280. Docket visitors are required
to show photographic identification,
pass through a metal detector, and sign
the EPA visitor log. All visitor bags are
processed through an X-ray machine
and subject to search. Visitors will be
provided an EPA/DC badge that must be
visible at all times in the building and
returned upon departure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical information contact: Kenneth
Moss, Chemical Control Division
(7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Feb 07, 2014
Jkt 232001
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (202) 564–9232; email address:
moss.kenneth@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The
TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422
South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY
14620; telephone number: (202) 554–
1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you manufacture, process,
or use the chemical substances
contained in this proposed rule. The
following list of North American
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Manufacturers (including
importers) or processors of one or more
subject chemical substances (NAICS
codes 325 and 324110), e.g., chemical
manufacturing and petroleum refineries.
This action may also affect certain
entities through pre-existing import
certification and export notification
rules under TSCA. Chemical importers
are subject to the TSCA section 13 (15
U.S.C. 2612) import certification
requirements promulgated at 19 CFR
12.118 through 12.127; see also 19 CFR
127.28. Chemical importers must certify
that the shipment of the chemical
substance complies with all applicable
rules and orders under TSCA. Importers
of chemicals subject to a final SNUR
must certify their compliance with the
SNUR requirements. The EPA policy in
support of import certification appears
at 40 CFR part 707, subpart B. In
addition, any persons who export or
intend to export a chemical substance
that is the subject of a proposed or final
SNUR, are subject to the export
notification provisions of TSCA section
12(b) (15 U.S.C. 2611(b)) (see § 721.20),
and must comply with the export
notification requirements in 40 CFR part
707, subpart D.
B. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this
information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark
the part or all of the information that
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD–ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedures set forth in
40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns and suggest
alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Background
A. What action is the Agency taking?
EPA is proposing these SNURs under
TSCA section 5(a)(2) for three chemical
substances which were the subject of
PMNs P–12–539, P–13–107, and P–13–
109. These SNURs would require
persons who intend to manufacture or
process any of these chemical
substances for an activity that is
designated as a significant new use to
notify EPA at least 90 days before
commencing that activity.
In the Federal Register of August 7,
2013 (78 FR 48051) (FRL–9393–4), EPA
issued direct final SNURs on these three
chemical substances in accordance with
the procedures at § 721.160(c)(3)(i). EPA
received notices of intent to submit
adverse comments on these SNURs.
Therefore, as required by
§ 721.160(c)(3)(ii), EPA removed the
direct final SNURs in a separate final
rule published in the Federal Register
of November 5, 2013 (78 FR 66279)
(FRL–9902–16), and is now issuing this
E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM
10FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules
proposed rule on the three chemical
substances. The record for the direct
final SNURs on these chemical
substances was established as docket
EPA–HQ–OPPT–2013–0399. That
record includes information considered
by the Agency in developing the direct
final rule.
B. What is the Agency’s authority for
taking this action?
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA (15 U.S.C.
2604(a)(2)) authorizes EPA to determine
that a use of a chemical substance is a
‘‘significant new use.’’ EPA must make
this determination by rule after
considering all relevant factors,
including the four bulleted TSCA
section 5(a)(2) factors listed in Unit III.
Once EPA determines that a use of a
chemical substance is a significant new
use, TSCA section 5(a)(1)(B) requires
persons to submit a significant new use
notice (SNUN) to EPA at least 90 days
before they manufacture or process the
chemical substance for that use. Persons
who must report are described in
§ 721.5.
C. Applicability of General Provisions
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
General provisions for SNURs appear
in 40 CFR part 721, subpart A. These
provisions describe persons subject to
the rule, recordkeeping requirements,
exemptions to reporting requirements,
and applicability of the rule to uses
occurring before the effective date of the
rule. Provisions relating to user fees
appear at 40 CFR part 700. According to
§ 721.1(c), persons subject to these
SNURs must comply with the same
notice requirements and EPA regulatory
procedures as submitters of PMNs under
TSCA section 5(a)(1)(A). In particular,
these requirements include the
information submission requirements of
TSCA section 5(b) and 5(d)(1), the
exemptions authorized by TSCA section
5(h)(1), (h)(2), (h)(3), and (h)(5), and the
regulations at 40 CFR part 720. Once
EPA receives a SNUN, EPA may take
regulatory action under TSCA section
5(e), 5(f), 6, or 7 to control the activities
for which it has received the SNUN. If
EPA does not take action, EPA is
required under TSCA section 5(g) to
explain in the Federal Register its
reasons for not taking action.
III. Significant New Use Determination
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA states that
EPA’s determination that a use of a
chemical substance is a significant new
use must be made after consideration of
all relevant factors, including:
• The projected volume of
manufacturing and processing of a
chemical substance.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Feb 07, 2014
Jkt 232001
• The extent to which a use changes
the type or form of exposure of human
beings or the environment to a chemical
substance.
• The extent to which a use increases
the magnitude and duration of exposure
of human beings or the environment to
a chemical substance.
• The reasonably anticipated manner
and methods of manufacturing,
processing, distribution in commerce,
and disposal of a chemical substance.
In addition to these factors
enumerated in TSCA section 5(a)(2), the
statute authorized EPA to consider any
other relevant factors.
To determine what would constitute a
significant new use for the three
chemical substances that are the subject
of this proposed rule, EPA considered
relevant information about the toxicity
of the chemical substances, likely
human exposures and environmental
releases associated with possible uses,
and the four bulleted TSCA section
5(a)(2) factors listed in this unit.
IV. Substances Subject to This Proposed
Rule
EPA is proposing significant new use
and recordkeeping requirements for
three chemical substances in 40 CFR
part 721, subpart E. In this unit, EPA
provides the following information for
each chemical substance:
• PMN number.
• Chemical name.
• Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS)
Registry number (assigned for nonconfidential chemical identities).
• Basis for the TSCA section 5(e)
consent order.
• Tests recommended by EPA to
provide sufficient information to
evaluate the chemical substance (see
Unit VII. for more information).
• CFR citation assigned in the
regulatory text section of this proposed
rule.
The regulatory text section of this
proposed rule specifies the activities
designated as significant new uses.
Certain new uses, including production
volume limits (i.e., limits on
manufacture and importation volume)
and other uses designated in this
proposed rule, may be claimed as CBI.
This proposed rule includes PMN
substances P–12–539, P–13–107, and P–
13–109 that are subject to a ‘‘risk-based’’
and ‘‘exposure-based’’ consent order
under TSCA section 5(e)(1)(A)(i),
5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I), and 5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(II)
where EPA determined that activities
associated with the PMN substances
may present unreasonable risk to human
health or the environment, that the PMN
substances are expected to be produced
in substantial quantities, and that there
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7623
may either be significant or substantial
human exposure and/or the PMN
substance may enter the environment in
substantial quantities. This consent
order requires protective measures to
limit exposures or otherwise mitigate
the potential unreasonable risk. The socalled ‘‘TSCA section 5(e) SNURs’’ on
these PMN substances are proposed
pursuant to § 721.160, and are based on
and consistent with the provisions in
the underlying consent order. The TSCA
section 5(e) SNURs designate as a
‘‘significant new use’’ the absence of the
protective measures required in the
corresponding consent order.
PMN Numbers P–12–539, P–13–107, and
P–13–109
Chemical names: Alkanes, C21–34branched and linear, chloro (P–12–539),
alkanes, C22–30-branched and linear,
chloro (P–13–107), and alkanes, C24–28,
chloro (P–13–109).
CAS numbers: 1417900–96–9 (P–12–
539), 1401947–24–0 (P–13–107), and
1402738–52–6 (P–13–109).
Effective date of TSCA section 5(e)
consent order: March 19, 2013.
Basis for TSCA section 5(e) consent
order: The PMNs state that the uses of
the PMN substances are as flame
retardants/plasticizers in polymers and
extreme pressure lubricants in metal
working fluids (MWFs). There are also
several CBI uses that are generically
described as: Plasticizer and lubricant
with flame retardant properties. By
analogy to medium chain chlorinated
paraffins (MCCPs—alkyl chain length of
14 to 17), EPA expects very long chain
chlorinated paraffins (vLCCPs) and
possible degradation products to be
potentially highly persistent, potentially
bioaccumulative, and potentially toxic.
Transport and magnification across
trophic levels may also result in toxicity
to higher organisms, including fish,
higher predators, and potentially
humans. EPA has concerns about the
potential for the vLCCPs to degrade to
shorter chain chlorinated compounds,
as well as concerns about potential
impurities or small fractions of MCCPs
and/or long-chain chlorinated paraffins
(LCCPs—alkyl chain length of 18 to 20).
The consent order was issued under
TSCA sections 5(e)(1)(A)(i),
5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I), and 5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(II)
based on a finding that these PMN
substances may present an unreasonable
risk of injury to the environment and
the PMN substances may be produced
in substantial quantities and may
reasonably be anticipated to enter the
environment in substantial quantities,
and there may be significant (or
substantial) human exposures to the
E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM
10FEP1
7624
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules
PMN substances. To protect against
these risks, the consent order requires:
1. Manufacture (including import) of
the PMN substances at a cumulative,
aggregate volume not to exceed
1,200,000 kilograms (kg), 14,100,000 kg,
59,100,000 kg, 78,400,000 kg, and
86,100,000 kg unless the company has
submitted the results of certain
environmental effects studies.
2. No manufacture of the PMN
substances with the amount of
chlorinated paraffins, with an alkyl
chain less than or equal to 20, to exceed
more than 1% of that PMN substance by
weight.
3. Risk notification.
Recommended testing: EPA has
determined that analysis for chain
length and percent chlorination (for
example by gas chromatography-mass
spectrometry or high performance liquid
chromatography-mass spectrometry
(GC/MS HPLC/MS)); a modified semicontinuous activated sludge (SCAS) test
(OPPTS Test Guideline 835.3210), a
modified SCAS test for insoluble and
volatile chemicals (OPPTS Test
Guideline 835.5045) or Zahn Wellens/
EMPA test (OPPTS Test Guideline
835.3200); an aerobic and anaerobic
transformation in soil test (Organisation
for Economic Co-operation and
Development (OECD) Test Guideline
307); a bioaccumulation in sedimentdwelling benthic oligochaetes (OECD
Test Guideline 315) on the PMN
substances and their potential
degradation products; and sedimentwater chironomid life-cycle toxicity test
using spiked water or spiked sediment
(OECD Test Guideline 233) or a
sediment-water lumbriculus toxicity test
using spiked sediment (OECD Test
Guideline 225) on the PMN substances
and their presumed degradation
products would help characterize the
effects of the PMN substances. Testing
specifications are stated in the TSCA
section 5(e) consent order for P–12–539,
P–13–107, and P–13–109 which is
available in the docket under docket ID
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2013–0399.
CFR citations: 40 CFR 721.10673 (P–
12–539), 40 CFR 721.10674 (P–13–107),
and 40 CFR 721.10675 (P–13–109).
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Rationale and Objectives of the
Proposed Rule
A. Rationale
During review of the PMNs submitted
for the three chemical substances that
are subject to these proposed SNURs,
EPA concluded that regulation was
warranted under TSCA section 5(e),
pending the development of information
sufficient to make reasoned evaluations
of the health and environmental effects
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Feb 07, 2014
Jkt 232001
of the chemical substances. The basis
for these findings is outlined in Unit IV.
Based on these findings, TSCA section
5(e) consent orders requiring the use of
appropriate exposure controls were
negotiated with the PMN submitters.
The SNUR provisions for these chemical
substances are consistent with the
provisions of the TSCA section 5(e)
consent order.
B. Objectives
EPA is proposing these SNURs for
specific chemical substances that have
undergone premanufacture review
because the Agency wants to achieve
the following objectives with regard to
the significant new uses designated in
this proposed rule:
• EPA would receive notice of any
person’s intent to manufacture or
process a listed chemical substance for
the described significant new use before
that activity begins.
• EPA would have an opportunity to
review and evaluate data submitted in a
SNUN before the notice submitter
begins manufacturing or processing a
listed chemical substance for the
described significant new use.
• EPA would be able to regulate
prospective manufacturers or processors
of a listed chemical substance before the
described significant new use of that
chemical substance occurs, provided
that regulation is warranted pursuant to
TSCA sections 5(e), 5(f), 6, or 7.
• EPA would ensure that all
manufacturers and processors of the
same chemical substance that is subject
to a TSCA section 5(e) consent order are
subject to similar requirements.
Issuance of a SNUR for a chemical
substance does not signify that the
chemical substance is listed on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory
(TSCA Inventory). Guidance on how to
determine if a chemical substance is on
the TSCA Inventory is available on the
Internet at https://www.epa.gov/opptintr/
existingchemicals/pubs/tscainventory/
index.html.
VI. Applicability of the Proposed Rule
to Uses Occurring Before the Effective
Date of the Final Rule
To establish a significant ‘‘new’’ use,
EPA must determine that the use is not
ongoing. The chemical substances
subject to this proposed rule have
undergone premanufacture review. A
TSCA section 5(e) consent order has
been issued for these chemical
substances and the PMN submitters are
prohibited by the TSCA section 5(e)
consent order from undertaking
activities which EPA is designating as
significant new uses. In cases where
EPA has not received a notice of
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
commencement (NOC) and the chemical
substance has not been added to the
TSCA Inventory, no other person may
commence such activities without first
submitting a PMN. Therefore, for
chemical substances for which an NOC
has not been submitted EPA concludes
that the designated significant new uses
are not ongoing.
When chemical substances identified
in this proposed rule are added to the
TSCA Inventory, EPA recognizes that,
before the rule is effective, other persons
might engage in a use that has been
identified as a significant new use.
However, TSCA section 5(e) consent
orders have been issued for these
chemical substances, and the PMN
submitters are prohibited by the TSCA
section 5(e) consent order from
undertaking activities which would be
designated as significant new uses. The
identities of the chemical substances
subject to this proposed rule have not
been claimed as confidential and EPA
has received no post-PMN bona fide
submissions (per 40 CFR 720.25 and
§ 721.11). Based on this, the Agency
believes that it is highly unlikely that
any of the significant new uses
described in the regulatory text of this
proposed rule are ongoing.
Therefore, EPA designates February
10, 2014 as the cutoff date for
determining whether the new use is
ongoing. Persons who begin commercial
manufacture or processing of the
chemical substances for a significant
new use identified as of that date would
have to cease any such activity upon the
effective date of the final rule. To
resume their activities, these persons
would have to first comply with all
applicable SNUR notification
requirements and wait until the notice
review period, including any
extensions, expires. If such a person met
the conditions of advance compliance
under § 721.45(h), the person would be
considered exempt from the
requirements of the SNUR. Consult the
Federal Register document of April 24,
1990 (55 FR 17376) for a more detailed
discussion of the cutoff date for ongoing
uses.
VII. Test Data and Other Information
EPA recognizes that TSCA section 5
does not require developing any
particular test data before submission of
a SNUN. The two exceptions are:
1. Development of test data is
required where the chemical substance
subject to the SNUR is also subject to a
test rule under TSCA section 4 (see
TSCA section 5(b)(1)).
2. Development of test data may be
necessary where the chemical substance
E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM
10FEP1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules
has been listed under TSCA section
5(b)(4) (see TSCA section 5(b)(2)).
In the absence of a TSCA section 4
test rule or a TSCA section 5(b)(4)
listing covering the chemical substance,
persons are required only to submit test
data in their possession or control and
to describe any other data known to or
reasonably ascertainable by them (see 40
CFR 720.50). However, upon review of
PMNs and SNUNs, the Agency has the
authority to require appropriate testing.
In cases where EPA issued a TSCA
section 5(e) consent order that requires
or recommends certain testing, Unit IV.
lists those tests. Descriptions of tests are
provided for informational purposes.
EPA strongly encourages persons, before
performing any testing, to consult with
the Agency pertaining to protocol
selection. To access the OCSPP test
guidelines referenced in this document
electronically, please go to https://
www.epa.gov/ocspp and select ‘‘Test
Methods and Guidelines.’’ The OECD
test guidelines are available from the
OECD Bookshop at https://
www.oecdbookshop.org or SourceOECD
at https://www.sourceoecd.org.
In the TSCA section 5(e) consent
order for three of the chemical
substances in this proposed rule, EPA
has established production volume
limits in view of the lack of data on the
potential health and environmental
risks that may be posed by the
significant new uses or increased
exposure to the chemical substances.
These limits cannot be exceeded unless
the PMN submitter first submits the
results of toxicity tests that would
permit a reasoned evaluation of the
potential risks posed by these chemical
substances. Under recent TSCA section
5(e) consent orders, each PMN submitter
is required to submit each study before
reaching the specified production limit.
The SNURs contain the same
production volume limits as the TSCA
section 5(e) consent order. Exceeding
these production limits is defined as a
significant new use. Persons who intend
to exceed the production limit must
notify the Agency by submitting a
SNUN at least 90 days in advance of
commencement of non-exempt
commercial manufacture (including
import) or processing.
The recommended tests specified in
Unit IV. may not be the only means of
addressing the potential risks of the
chemical substance. However,
submitting a SNUN without any test
data may increase the likelihood that
EPA will take action under TSCA
section 5(e), particularly if satisfactory
test results have not been obtained from
a prior PMN or SNUN submitter. EPA
recommends that potential SNUN
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Feb 07, 2014
Jkt 232001
submitters contact EPA early enough so
that they will be able to conduct the
appropriate tests.
SNUN submitters should be aware
that EPA will be better able to evaluate
SNUNs which provide detailed
information on the following:
• Human exposure and
environmental release that may result
from the significant new use of the
chemical substances.
• Potential benefits of the chemical
substances.
• Information on risks posed by the
chemical substances compared to risks
posed by potential substitutes.
VIII. SNUN Submissions
According to § 721.1(c), persons
submitting a SNUN must comply with
the same notice requirements and EPA
regulatory procedures as persons
submitting a PMN, including
submission of test data on health and
environmental effects as described in 40
CFR 720.50. SNUNs must be submitted
on EPA Form No. 7710–25, generated
using e-PMN software, and submitted to
the Agency in accordance with the
procedures set forth in 40 CFR 720.40
and § 721.25. E–PMN software is
available electronically at https://
www.epa.gov/opptintr/newchems.
IX. Economic Analysis
EPA has evaluated the potential costs
of establishing SNUN requirements for
potential manufacturers and processors
of the chemical substances during the
development of the direct final rule.
EPA’s complete economic analysis is
available in the docket under docket ID
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2013–0399.
X. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule would establish
SNURs for three chemical substances
that were the subject of PMNs and a
TSCA section 5(e) consent order. The
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has exempted these types of
actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993).
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
According to PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., an Agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
that requires OMB approval under PRA,
unless it has been approved by OMB
and displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
numbers for EPA’s regulations in title 40
of the CFR, after appearing in the
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7625
Federal Register, are listed in 40 CFR
part 9, and included on the related
collection instrument or form, if
applicable.
The information collection
requirements related to this action have
already been approved by OMB
pursuant to PRA under OMB control
number 2070–0012 (EPA ICR No. 574).
This action would not impose any
burden requiring additional OMB
approval. If an entity were to submit a
SNUN to the Agency, the annual burden
is estimated to average between 30 and
170 hours per response. This burden
estimate includes the time needed to
review instructions, search existing data
sources, gather and maintain the data
needed, and complete, review, and
submit the required SNUN.
Send any comments about the
accuracy of the burden estimate, and
any suggested methods for minimizing
respondent burden, including through
the use of automated collection
techniques, to the Director, Collection
Strategies Division, Office of
Environmental Information (2822T),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001. Please remember to
include the OMB control number in any
correspondence, but do not submit any
completed forms to this address.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
On February 18, 2012, EPA certified
pursuant to RFA section 605(b) (5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.), that promulgation of a
SNUR does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities where the
following are true:
1. A significant number of SNUNs
would not be submitted by small
entities in response to the SNUR.
2. The SNUR submitted by any small
entity would not cost significantly more
than $8,300.
A copy of that certification is
available in the docket for this proposed
rule.
This proposed rule is within the
scope of the February 18, 2012
certification. Based on the Economic
Analysis discussed in Unit IX., and
EPA’s experience promulgating SNURs
(discussed in the certification), EPA
believes that the following are true:
• A significant number of SNUNs
would not be submitted by small
entities in response to the SNUR.
• Submission of the SNUN would not
cost any small entity significantly more
than $8,300.
Therefore, the promulgation of these
SNURs would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM
10FEP1
7626
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
Based on EPA’s experience with
proposing and finalizing SNURs, State,
local, and Tribal governments have not
been impacted by these rulemakings,
and EPA does not have any reasons to
believe that any State, local, or Tribal
government would be impacted by this
proposed rule. As such, EPA has
determined that this proposed rule
would not impose any enforceable duty,
contain any unfunded mandate, or
otherwise have any effect on small
governments subject to the requirements
of UMRA sections 202, 203, 204, or 205
(2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
E. Executive Order 13132
This action would not have a
substantial direct effect on States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721
F. Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule would not have
Tribal implications because it is not
expected to have substantial direct
effects on Indian Tribes. This proposed
rule would not significantly nor
uniquely affect the communities of
Indian Tribal governments, nor would it
involve or impose any requirements that
affect Indian Tribes. Accordingly, the
requirements of Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply
to this proposed rule.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
G. Executive Order 13045
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because this is not an
economically significant regulatory
action as defined by Executive Order
12866, and this action does not address
environmental health or safety risks
disproportionately affecting children.
H. Executive Order 13211
This proposed rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13211, entitled
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001), because this action is not
expected to affect energy supply,
distribution, or use and because this
action is not a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:39 Feb 07, 2014
Jkt 232001
In addition, since this action would
not involve any technical standards,
NTTAA section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272
note), would not apply to this action.
J. Executive Order 12898
This action does not entail special
considerations of environmental justice
related issues as delineated by
Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Environmental protection, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: February 2, 2014.
Maria J. Doa,
Director, Chemical Control Division, Office
of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR
chapter I be amended as follows:
PART 721—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 721
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and
2625(c).
2. Add § 721.10673 to subpart E to
read as follows:
■
§ 721.10673 Alkanes, C21-34-branched
and linear, chloro.
(a) Chemical substance and
significant new uses subject to reporting.
(1) The chemical substance identified as
alkanes, C21–34-branched and linear,
chloro (PMN P–12–539; CAS No.
1417900–96–9) is subject to reporting
under this section for the significant
new uses described in paragraph (a)(2)
of this section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Industrial, commercial, and
consumer activities. Requirements as
specified in § 721.80(j) (manufacture of
the PMN substance with less than 1
weight percent of chlorinated paraffins
with an alkyl chain ≤20) and § 721.80(p)
(1,200,000 kilograms (kg), 14,100,000
kg, 59,100,000 kg, 78,400,000 kg, and
86,100,000 kg of the aggregate of the
PMN substances P–12–539 and P–13–
109).
(ii) [Reserved]
(b) Specific requirements. The
provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified
by this paragraph.
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping
requirements as specified in
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 721.125(a), (b), (c), and (i) are
applicable to manufacturers and
processors of this substance.
(2) Limitations or revocation of
certain notification requirements. The
provisions of § 721.185 apply to this
section.
■ 3. Add § 721.10674 to subpart E to
read as follows:
§ 721.10674 Alkanes, C22-30-branched
and linear, chloro.
(a) Chemical substance and
significant new uses subject to reporting.
(1) The chemical substance identified as
alkanes, C22-30-branched and linear,
chloro (PMN P–13–107; CAS No.
1401947–24–0) is subject to reporting
under this section for the significant
new uses described in paragraph (a)(2)
of this section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Industrial, commercial, and
consumer activities. Requirements as
specified in § 721.80(j) (manufacture of
the PMN substance with less than 1
weight percent of chlorinated paraffins
with an alkyl chain ≤ 20) and
§ 721.80(p) (14,100,000 kilograms (kg),
59,100,000 kg, 78,400,000 kg,
86,100,000 kg of PMN substance P-13107, from March 19, 2013).
(ii) [Reserved]
(b) Specific requirements. The
provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified
by this paragraph.
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping
requirements as specified in
§ 721.125(a), (b), (c), and (i) are
applicable to manufacturers and
processors of this substance.
(2) Limitations or revocation of
certain notification requirements. The
provisions of § 721.185 apply to this
section.
■ 4. Add § 721.10675 to subpart E to
read as follows:
§ 721.10675
Alkanes, C24-28, chloro.
(a) Chemical substance and
significant new uses subject to reporting.
(1) The chemical substance identified as
alkanes, C24-28, chloro (PMN P-13-109;
CAS No. 1402738–52–6) is subject to
reporting under this section for the
significant new uses described in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Industrial, commercial, and
consumer activities. Requirements as
specified in § 721.80(j) (manufacture of
the PMN substance with less than 1
weight percent of chlorinated paraffins
with an alkyl chain ≤ 20) and
§ 721.80(p) (1,200,000 kilograms (kg),
14,100,000 kg, 78,400,000 kg,
86,100,000 kg of the aggregate of the
PMN substances P-12-539 and P-13109).
E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM
10FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(ii) [Reserved]
(b) Specific requirements. The
provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified
by this paragraph.
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping
requirements as specified in
§ 721.125(a), (b), (c), and (i) are
applicable to manufacturers and
processors of this substance.
(2) Limitations or revocation of
certain notification requirements. The
provisions of § 721.185 apply to this
section.
[FR Doc. 2014–02846 Filed 2–7–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
49 CFR Chapter X
[Docket No. EP 711]
Petition for Rulemaking to Adopt
Revised Competitive Switching Rules
AGENCY:
Surface Transportation Board,
DOT.
Notice of rescheduled public
hearing.
ACTION:
The Surface Transportation
Board (the Board) will hold a public
hearing to explore further the issues
surrounding the petition by The
National Industrial Transportation
League (NITL) and the related
comments filed in this proceeding.
DATES: The hearing will be held on
March 25 and 26, 2014, beginning at
9:30 a.m., in the Hearing Room at the
Board’s headquarters located at 395 E
Street SW., Washington, DC. The
hearing will be open for public
observation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Valerie Quinn at (202) 245–0382.
Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
(800) 877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By
decision served on July 25, 2012, the
Board began a proceeding to consider a
proposal submitted by NITL to modify
the Board’s standards for mandatory
competitive switching. Under the
proposal, certain captive shippers
located in terminal areas would be
granted access to a competing railroad if
there is a working interchange within a
reasonable distance (30 miles under
NITL’s proposal). In its decision, the
Board sought empirical information
about the impact of the proposal if it
were to be adopted. The Board received
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Feb 07, 2014
Jkt 232001
numerous comments in response to its
decision. In order to explore further
NITL’s proposal and the issues raised in
the submitted comments, the Board
scheduled a public hearing for October
22, 2013. The Board received numerous
notices of intent to participate in that
hearing. By decision served on October
16, 2013, the Board postponed the
hearing due to the Government
shutdown. The Board is now
rescheduling the hearing for March 25
and 26, 2014.
Additional information—including
the schedule of appearances and time
allotments—is contained in the Board’s
decision, which is available on our Web
site, https://www.stb.dot.gov. Copies of
the decision may be purchased by
contacting the Office of Public
Assistance, Governmental Affairs, and
Compliance at (202) 245–0238.
Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through FIRS at (800) 877–
8339.
This action will not significantly
affect either the quality of the human
environment or the conservation of
energy resources.
It is ordered:
A public hearing in this proceeding
will be held on March 25 and 26, 2014,
at 9:30 a.m., in the Board’s Hearing
Room, at 395 E Street SW., Washington,
DC, as described above.
Decided: February 3, 2014.
By the Board, Joseph H. Dettmar, Acting
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2014–02941 Filed 2–7–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2013–0073;
FXES11130900000C2–134–FF09E32000]
RIN 1018–AY00
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Removing the Gray Wolf
(Canis lupus) From the List of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Maintaining Protections for the
Mexican Wolf (Canis lupus baileyi) by
Listing It as Endangered
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of
availability and reopening of comment
period.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7627
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
reopening of the public comment period
on our June 13, 2013, proposal to
remove the gray wolf (Canis lupus) from
the List of Endangered and Threatened
Wildlife but to maintain endangered
status for the Mexican wolf by listing it
as a subspecies (Canis lupus baileyi).
We also announce the availability of the
independent scientific peer review
report on the proposal. We are
reopening the comment period for 45
days to allow all interested parties an
opportunity to comment on our
proposed rule in light of the peer review
report on this proposal. The comment
period is scheduled to close on March
27, 2014. Comments previously
submitted need not be resubmitted and
will be fully considered in preparation
of the final rule.
DATES: The public comment period on
the proposal to remove the gray wolf
(Canis lupus) from the List of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
but to maintain endangered status for
the Mexican wolf by listing it as a
subspecies (Canis lupus baileyi) that
was published on June 13, 2013 (78 FR
35664), is reopened and will close on
March 27, 2014. Please note comments
submitted electronically using the
Federal eRulemaking Portal (see
ADDRESSES section, below) must be
received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on
the closing date. If you are submitting
your comments by hard copy, please
mail them by March 27, 2014, to ensure
that we receive them in time to give
them full consideration.
ADDRESSES: Document availability: The
June 13, 2013, proposal (78 FR 35664)
is available online at https://
www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS–HQ–ES–2013–0073 and at https://
www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-06-13/
pdf/2013-13982.pdf. The independent
scientific peer review report on the
proposal is available online at https://
www.fws.gov/home/wolfrecovery and at
https://www.regulations.gov under
Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2013–0073.
Written Comments: You may submit
comments by one of the following
methods:
(1) Electronically: Go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Search for Docket
No. FWS–HQ–ES–2013–0073. Please
ensure you have found the correct
document before submitting your
comments. If your comments will fit in
the provided comment box, please use
this feature of https://
www.regulations.gov, as it is most
compatible with our comment review
procedures. If you attach your
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM
10FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7621-7627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02846]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 721
[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2013-0399; FRL-9903-43]
RIN 2070-AB27
Proposed Significant New Use Rule on Certain Chemical Substances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing significant new use rules (SNURs) under the
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for three chemical substances which
were the subject of premanufacture notices (PMNs). This action would
require persons who intend to manufacture (including import) or process
any of the chemical substances for an activity that is designated as a
significant new use by this proposed rule to notify EPA at least 90
days before commencing that activity. The required notification would
provide EPA with the opportunity to evaluate the intended use and, if
necessary, to prohibit or limit the activity before it occurs.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 11, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2013-0399, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Document Control Office (7407M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: OPPT Document Control Office (DCO), EPA
East Bldg., Rm. 6428, 1201 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. ATTN:
Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2013-0399. The DCO is open from 8 a.m. to
4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the DCO is (202) 564-8930. Such deliveries are only accepted
during the DCO's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPPT-
2013-0399. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business
[[Page 7622]]
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or
otherwise protected through regulations.gov or email. The
regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means
EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available at https://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only
in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available
electronically at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in
hard copy, at the OPPT Docket. The OPPT Docket is located in the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) at Rm. 3334, EPA West Bldg., 1301 Constitution
Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room hours of
operation are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number of the EPA/DC Public Reading Room
is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPPT Docket is
(202) 566-0280. Docket visitors are required to show photographic
identification, pass through a metal detector, and sign the EPA visitor
log. All visitor bags are processed through an X-ray machine and
subject to search. Visitors will be provided an EPA/DC badge that must
be visible at all times in the building and returned upon departure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information contact:
Kenneth Moss, Chemical Control Division (7405M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(202) 564-9232; email address: moss.kenneth@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you manufacture,
process, or use the chemical substances contained in this proposed
rule. The following list of North American Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Manufacturers (including importers) or processors of one
or more subject chemical substances (NAICS codes 325 and 324110), e.g.,
chemical manufacturing and petroleum refineries.
This action may also affect certain entities through pre-existing
import certification and export notification rules under TSCA. Chemical
importers are subject to the TSCA section 13 (15 U.S.C. 2612) import
certification requirements promulgated at 19 CFR 12.118 through 12.127;
see also 19 CFR 127.28. Chemical importers must certify that the
shipment of the chemical substance complies with all applicable rules
and orders under TSCA. Importers of chemicals subject to a final SNUR
must certify their compliance with the SNUR requirements. The EPA
policy in support of import certification appears at 40 CFR part 707,
subpart B. In addition, any persons who export or intend to export a
chemical substance that is the subject of a proposed or final SNUR, are
subject to the export notification provisions of TSCA section 12(b) (15
U.S.C. 2611(b)) (see Sec. [emsp14]721.20), and must comply with the
export notification requirements in 40 CFR part 707, subpart D.
B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Background
A. What action is the Agency taking?
EPA is proposing these SNURs under TSCA section 5(a)(2) for three
chemical substances which were the subject of PMNs P-12-539, P-13-107,
and P-13-109. These SNURs would require persons who intend to
manufacture or process any of these chemical substances for an activity
that is designated as a significant new use to notify EPA at least 90
days before commencing that activity.
In the Federal Register of August 7, 2013 (78 FR 48051) (FRL-9393-
4), EPA issued direct final SNURs on these three chemical substances in
accordance with the procedures at Sec. 721.160(c)(3)(i). EPA received
notices of intent to submit adverse comments on these SNURs. Therefore,
as required by Sec. 721.160(c)(3)(ii), EPA removed the direct final
SNURs in a separate final rule published in the Federal Register of
November 5, 2013 (78 FR 66279) (FRL-9902-16), and is now issuing this
[[Page 7623]]
proposed rule on the three chemical substances. The record for the
direct final SNURs on these chemical substances was established as
docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2013-0399. That record includes information
considered by the Agency in developing the direct final rule.
B. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA (15 U.S.C. 2604(a)(2)) authorizes EPA to
determine that a use of a chemical substance is a ``significant new
use.'' EPA must make this determination by rule after considering all
relevant factors, including the four bulleted TSCA section 5(a)(2)
factors listed in Unit III. Once EPA determines that a use of a
chemical substance is a significant new use, TSCA section 5(a)(1)(B)
requires persons to submit a significant new use notice (SNUN) to EPA
at least 90 days before they manufacture or process the chemical
substance for that use. Persons who must report are described in Sec.
[emsp14]721.5.
C. Applicability of General Provisions
General provisions for SNURs appear in 40 CFR part 721, subpart A.
These provisions describe persons subject to the rule, recordkeeping
requirements, exemptions to reporting requirements, and applicability
of the rule to uses occurring before the effective date of the rule.
Provisions relating to user fees appear at 40 CFR part 700. According
to Sec. [emsp14]721.1(c), persons subject to these SNURs must comply
with the same notice requirements and EPA regulatory procedures as
submitters of PMNs under TSCA section 5(a)(1)(A). In particular, these
requirements include the information submission requirements of TSCA
section 5(b) and 5(d)(1), the exemptions authorized by TSCA section
5(h)(1), (h)(2), (h)(3), and (h)(5), and the regulations at 40 CFR part
720. Once EPA receives a SNUN, EPA may take regulatory action under
TSCA section 5(e), 5(f), 6, or 7 to control the activities for which it
has received the SNUN. If EPA does not take action, EPA is required
under TSCA section 5(g) to explain in the Federal Register its reasons
for not taking action.
III. Significant New Use Determination
Section 5(a)(2) of TSCA states that EPA's determination that a use
of a chemical substance is a significant new use must be made after
consideration of all relevant factors, including:
The projected volume of manufacturing and processing of a
chemical substance.
The extent to which a use changes the type or form of
exposure of human beings or the environment to a chemical substance.
The extent to which a use increases the magnitude and
duration of exposure of human beings or the environment to a chemical
substance.
The reasonably anticipated manner and methods of
manufacturing, processing, distribution in commerce, and disposal of a
chemical substance.
In addition to these factors enumerated in TSCA section 5(a)(2),
the statute authorized EPA to consider any other relevant factors.
To determine what would constitute a significant new use for the
three chemical substances that are the subject of this proposed rule,
EPA considered relevant information about the toxicity of the chemical
substances, likely human exposures and environmental releases
associated with possible uses, and the four bulleted TSCA section
5(a)(2) factors listed in this unit.
IV. Substances Subject to This Proposed Rule
EPA is proposing significant new use and recordkeeping requirements
for three chemical substances in 40 CFR part 721, subpart E. In this
unit, EPA provides the following information for each chemical
substance:
PMN number.
Chemical name.
Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Registry number (assigned
for non-confidential chemical identities).
Basis for the TSCA section 5(e) consent order.
Tests recommended by EPA to provide sufficient information
to evaluate the chemical substance (see Unit VII. for more
information).
CFR citation assigned in the regulatory text section of
this proposed rule.
The regulatory text section of this proposed rule specifies the
activities designated as significant new uses. Certain new uses,
including production volume limits (i.e., limits on manufacture and
importation volume) and other uses designated in this proposed rule,
may be claimed as CBI.
This proposed rule includes PMN substances P-12-539, P-13-107, and
P-13-109 that are subject to a ``risk-based'' and ``exposure-based''
consent order under TSCA section 5(e)(1)(A)(i), 5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I), and
5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(II) where EPA determined that activities associated with
the PMN substances may present unreasonable risk to human health or the
environment, that the PMN substances are expected to be produced in
substantial quantities, and that there may either be significant or
substantial human exposure and/or the PMN substance may enter the
environment in substantial quantities. This consent order requires
protective measures to limit exposures or otherwise mitigate the
potential unreasonable risk. The so-called ``TSCA section 5(e) SNURs''
on these PMN substances are proposed pursuant to Sec. [emsp14]721.160,
and are based on and consistent with the provisions in the underlying
consent order. The TSCA section 5(e) SNURs designate as a ``significant
new use'' the absence of the protective measures required in the
corresponding consent order.
PMN Numbers P-12-539, P-13-107, and P-13-109
Chemical names: Alkanes, C21-34-branched and linear, chloro (P-12-
539), alkanes, C22-30-branched and linear, chloro (P-13-107), and
alkanes, C24-28, chloro (P-13-109).
CAS numbers: 1417900-96-9 (P-12-539), 1401947-24-0 (P-13-107), and
1402738-52-6 (P-13-109).
Effective date of TSCA section 5(e) consent order: March 19, 2013.
Basis for TSCA section 5(e) consent order: The PMNs state that the
uses of the PMN substances are as flame retardants/plasticizers in
polymers and extreme pressure lubricants in metal working fluids
(MWFs). There are also several CBI uses that are generically described
as: Plasticizer and lubricant with flame retardant properties. By
analogy to medium chain chlorinated paraffins (MCCPs--alkyl chain
length of 14 to 17), EPA expects very long chain chlorinated paraffins
(vLCCPs) and possible degradation products to be potentially highly
persistent, potentially bioaccumulative, and potentially toxic.
Transport and magnification across trophic levels may also result in
toxicity to higher organisms, including fish, higher predators, and
potentially humans. EPA has concerns about the potential for the vLCCPs
to degrade to shorter chain chlorinated compounds, as well as concerns
about potential impurities or small fractions of MCCPs and/or long-
chain chlorinated paraffins (LCCPs--alkyl chain length of 18 to 20).
The consent order was issued under TSCA sections 5(e)(1)(A)(i),
5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I), and 5(e)(1)(A)(ii)(II) based on a finding that these
PMN substances may present an unreasonable risk of injury to the
environment and the PMN substances may be produced in substantial
quantities and may reasonably be anticipated to enter the environment
in substantial quantities, and there may be significant (or
substantial) human exposures to the
[[Page 7624]]
PMN substances. To protect against these risks, the consent order
requires:
1. Manufacture (including import) of the PMN substances at a
cumulative, aggregate volume not to exceed 1,200,000 kilograms (kg),
14,100,000 kg, 59,100,000 kg, 78,400,000 kg, and 86,100,000 kg unless
the company has submitted the results of certain environmental effects
studies.
2. No manufacture of the PMN substances with the amount of
chlorinated paraffins, with an alkyl chain less than or equal to 20, to
exceed more than 1% of that PMN substance by weight.
3. Risk notification.
Recommended testing: EPA has determined that analysis for chain
length and percent chlorination (for example by gas chromatography-mass
spectrometry or high performance liquid chromatography-mass
spectrometry (GC/MS HPLC/MS)); a modified semi-continuous activated
sludge (SCAS) test (OPPTS Test Guideline 835.3210), a modified SCAS
test for insoluble and volatile chemicals (OPPTS Test Guideline
835.5045) or Zahn Wellens/EMPA test (OPPTS Test Guideline 835.3200); an
aerobic and anaerobic transformation in soil test (Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Test Guideline 307); a
bioaccumulation in sediment-dwelling benthic oligochaetes (OECD Test
Guideline 315) on the PMN substances and their potential degradation
products; and sediment-water chironomid life-cycle toxicity test using
spiked water or spiked sediment (OECD Test Guideline 233) or a
sediment-water lumbriculus toxicity test using spiked sediment (OECD
Test Guideline 225) on the PMN substances and their presumed
degradation products would help characterize the effects of the PMN
substances. Testing specifications are stated in the TSCA section 5(e)
consent order for P-12-539, P-13-107, and P-13-109 which is available
in the docket under docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2013-0399.
CFR citations: 40 CFR 721.10673 (P-12-539), 40 CFR 721.10674 (P-13-
107), and 40 CFR 721.10675 (P-13-109).
V. Rationale and Objectives of the Proposed Rule
A. Rationale
During review of the PMNs submitted for the three chemical
substances that are subject to these proposed SNURs, EPA concluded that
regulation was warranted under TSCA section 5(e), pending the
development of information sufficient to make reasoned evaluations of
the health and environmental effects of the chemical substances. The
basis for these findings is outlined in Unit IV. Based on these
findings, TSCA section 5(e) consent orders requiring the use of
appropriate exposure controls were negotiated with the PMN submitters.
The SNUR provisions for these chemical substances are consistent with
the provisions of the TSCA section 5(e) consent order.
B. Objectives
EPA is proposing these SNURs for specific chemical substances that
have undergone premanufacture review because the Agency wants to
achieve the following objectives with regard to the significant new
uses designated in this proposed rule:
EPA would receive notice of any person's intent to
manufacture or process a listed chemical substance for the described
significant new use before that activity begins.
EPA would have an opportunity to review and evaluate data
submitted in a SNUN before the notice submitter begins manufacturing or
processing a listed chemical substance for the described significant
new use.
EPA would be able to regulate prospective manufacturers or
processors of a listed chemical substance before the described
significant new use of that chemical substance occurs, provided that
regulation is warranted pursuant to TSCA sections 5(e), 5(f), 6, or 7.
EPA would ensure that all manufacturers and processors of
the same chemical substance that is subject to a TSCA section 5(e)
consent order are subject to similar requirements.
Issuance of a SNUR for a chemical substance does not signify that
the chemical substance is listed on the TSCA Chemical Substance
Inventory (TSCA Inventory). Guidance on how to determine if a chemical
substance is on the TSCA Inventory is available on the Internet at
https://www.epa.gov/opptintr/existingchemicals/pubs/tscainventory/.
VI. Applicability of the Proposed Rule to Uses Occurring Before the
Effective Date of the Final Rule
To establish a significant ``new'' use, EPA must determine that the
use is not ongoing. The chemical substances subject to this proposed
rule have undergone premanufacture review. A TSCA section 5(e) consent
order has been issued for these chemical substances and the PMN
submitters are prohibited by the TSCA section 5(e) consent order from
undertaking activities which EPA is designating as significant new
uses. In cases where EPA has not received a notice of commencement
(NOC) and the chemical substance has not been added to the TSCA
Inventory, no other person may commence such activities without first
submitting a PMN. Therefore, for chemical substances for which an NOC
has not been submitted EPA concludes that the designated significant
new uses are not ongoing.
When chemical substances identified in this proposed rule are added
to the TSCA Inventory, EPA recognizes that, before the rule is
effective, other persons might engage in a use that has been identified
as a significant new use. However, TSCA section 5(e) consent orders
have been issued for these chemical substances, and the PMN submitters
are prohibited by the TSCA section 5(e) consent order from undertaking
activities which would be designated as significant new uses. The
identities of the chemical substances subject to this proposed rule
have not been claimed as confidential and EPA has received no post-PMN
bona fide submissions (per 40 CFR 720.25 and Sec. 721.11). Based on
this, the Agency believes that it is highly unlikely that any of the
significant new uses described in the regulatory text of this proposed
rule are ongoing.
Therefore, EPA designates February 10, 2014 as the cutoff date for
determining whether the new use is ongoing. Persons who begin
commercial manufacture or processing of the chemical substances for a
significant new use identified as of that date would have to cease any
such activity upon the effective date of the final rule. To resume
their activities, these persons would have to first comply with all
applicable SNUR notification requirements and wait until the notice
review period, including any extensions, expires. If such a person met
the conditions of advance compliance under Sec. 721.45(h), the person
would be considered exempt from the requirements of the SNUR. Consult
the Federal Register document of April 24, 1990 (55 FR 17376) for a
more detailed discussion of the cutoff date for ongoing uses.
VII. Test Data and Other Information
EPA recognizes that TSCA section 5 does not require developing any
particular test data before submission of a SNUN. The two exceptions
are:
1. Development of test data is required where the chemical
substance subject to the SNUR is also subject to a test rule under TSCA
section 4 (see TSCA section 5(b)(1)).
2. Development of test data may be necessary where the chemical
substance
[[Page 7625]]
has been listed under TSCA section 5(b)(4) (see TSCA section 5(b)(2)).
In the absence of a TSCA section 4 test rule or a TSCA section
5(b)(4) listing covering the chemical substance, persons are required
only to submit test data in their possession or control and to describe
any other data known to or reasonably ascertainable by them (see 40 CFR
720.50). However, upon review of PMNs and SNUNs, the Agency has the
authority to require appropriate testing. In cases where EPA issued a
TSCA section 5(e) consent order that requires or recommends certain
testing, Unit IV. lists those tests. Descriptions of tests are provided
for informational purposes. EPA strongly encourages persons, before
performing any testing, to consult with the Agency pertaining to
protocol selection. To access the OCSPP test guidelines referenced in
this document electronically, please go to https://www.epa.gov/ocspp and
select ``Test Methods and Guidelines.'' The OECD test guidelines are
available from the OECD Bookshop at https://www.oecdbookshop.org or
SourceOECD at https://www.sourceoecd.org.
In the TSCA section 5(e) consent order for three of the chemical
substances in this proposed rule, EPA has established production volume
limits in view of the lack of data on the potential health and
environmental risks that may be posed by the significant new uses or
increased exposure to the chemical substances. These limits cannot be
exceeded unless the PMN submitter first submits the results of toxicity
tests that would permit a reasoned evaluation of the potential risks
posed by these chemical substances. Under recent TSCA section 5(e)
consent orders, each PMN submitter is required to submit each study
before reaching the specified production limit. The SNURs contain the
same production volume limits as the TSCA section 5(e) consent order.
Exceeding these production limits is defined as a significant new use.
Persons who intend to exceed the production limit must notify the
Agency by submitting a SNUN at least 90 days in advance of commencement
of non-exempt commercial manufacture (including import) or processing.
The recommended tests specified in Unit IV. may not be the only
means of addressing the potential risks of the chemical substance.
However, submitting a SNUN without any test data may increase the
likelihood that EPA will take action under TSCA section 5(e),
particularly if satisfactory test results have not been obtained from a
prior PMN or SNUN submitter. EPA recommends that potential SNUN
submitters contact EPA early enough so that they will be able to
conduct the appropriate tests.
SNUN submitters should be aware that EPA will be better able to
evaluate SNUNs which provide detailed information on the following:
Human exposure and environmental release that may result
from the significant new use of the chemical substances.
Potential benefits of the chemical substances.
Information on risks posed by the chemical substances
compared to risks posed by potential substitutes.
VIII. SNUN Submissions
According to Sec. 721.1(c), persons submitting a SNUN must comply
with the same notice requirements and EPA regulatory procedures as
persons submitting a PMN, including submission of test data on health
and environmental effects as described in 40 CFR 720.50. SNUNs must be
submitted on EPA Form No. 7710-25, generated using e-PMN software, and
submitted to the Agency in accordance with the procedures set forth in
40 CFR 720.40 and Sec. 721.25. E-PMN software is available
electronically at https://www.epa.gov/opptintr/newchems.
IX. Economic Analysis
EPA has evaluated the potential costs of establishing SNUN
requirements for potential manufacturers and processors of the chemical
substances during the development of the direct final rule. EPA's
complete economic analysis is available in the docket under docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2013-0399.
X. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule would establish SNURs for three chemical
substances that were the subject of PMNs and a TSCA section 5(e)
consent order. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted
these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866,
entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993).
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
According to PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., an Agency may not conduct
or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of
information that requires OMB approval under PRA, unless it has been
approved by OMB and displays a currently valid OMB control number. The
OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after
appearing in the Federal Register, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, and
included on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable.
The information collection requirements related to this action have
already been approved by OMB pursuant to PRA under OMB control number
2070-0012 (EPA ICR No. 574). This action would not impose any burden
requiring additional OMB approval. If an entity were to submit a SNUN
to the Agency, the annual burden is estimated to average between 30 and
170 hours per response. This burden estimate includes the time needed
to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather and
maintain the data needed, and complete, review, and submit the required
SNUN.
Send any comments about the accuracy of the burden estimate, and
any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including
through the use of automated collection techniques, to the Director,
Collection Strategies Division, Office of Environmental Information
(2822T), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001. Please remember to include the OMB control
number in any correspondence, but do not submit any completed forms to
this address.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
On February 18, 2012, EPA certified pursuant to RFA section 605(b)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), that promulgation of a SNUR does not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
where the following are true:
1. A significant number of SNUNs would not be submitted by small
entities in response to the SNUR.
2. The SNUR submitted by any small entity would not cost
significantly more than $8,300.
A copy of that certification is available in the docket for this
proposed rule.
This proposed rule is within the scope of the February 18, 2012
certification. Based on the Economic Analysis discussed in Unit IX.,
and EPA's experience promulgating SNURs (discussed in the
certification), EPA believes that the following are true:
A significant number of SNUNs would not be submitted by
small entities in response to the SNUR.
Submission of the SNUN would not cost any small entity
significantly more than $8,300.
Therefore, the promulgation of these SNURs would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
[[Page 7626]]
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
Based on EPA's experience with proposing and finalizing SNURs,
State, local, and Tribal governments have not been impacted by these
rulemakings, and EPA does not have any reasons to believe that any
State, local, or Tribal government would be impacted by this proposed
rule. As such, EPA has determined that this proposed rule would not
impose any enforceable duty, contain any unfunded mandate, or otherwise
have any effect on small governments subject to the requirements of
UMRA sections 202, 203, 204, or 205 (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
E. Executive Order 13132
This action would not have a substantial direct effect on States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, entitled
``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
F. Executive Order 13175
This proposed rule would not have Tribal implications because it is
not expected to have substantial direct effects on Indian Tribes. This
proposed rule would not significantly nor uniquely affect the
communities of Indian Tribal governments, nor would it involve or
impose any requirements that affect Indian Tribes. Accordingly, the
requirements of Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), do not apply to this proposed rule.
G. Executive Order 13045
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because this is not an
economically significant regulatory action as defined by Executive
Order 12866, and this action does not address environmental health or
safety risks disproportionately affecting children.
H. Executive Order 13211
This proposed rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001),
because this action is not expected to affect energy supply,
distribution, or use and because this action is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
In addition, since this action would not involve any technical
standards, NTTAA section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note), would not apply to
this action.
J. Executive Order 12898
This action does not entail special considerations of environmental
justice related issues as delineated by Executive Order 12898, entitled
``Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 721
Environmental protection, Chemicals, Hazardous substances,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: February 2, 2014.
Maria J. Doa,
Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics.
Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR chapter I be amended as
follows:
PART 721--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 721 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2604, 2607, and 2625(c).
0
2. Add Sec. [emsp14]721.10673 to subpart E to read as follows:
Sec. [emsp14]721.10673 Alkanes, C21-34-branched and linear, chloro.
(a) Chemical substance and significant new uses subject to
reporting. (1) The chemical substance identified as alkanes, C21-34-
branched and linear, chloro (PMN P-12-539; CAS No. 1417900-96-9) is
subject to reporting under this section for the significant new uses
described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Industrial, commercial, and consumer activities. Requirements
as specified in Sec. 721.80(j) (manufacture of the PMN substance with
less than 1 weight percent of chlorinated paraffins with an alkyl chain
<=20) and Sec. 721.80(p) (1,200,000 kilograms (kg), 14,100,000 kg,
59,100,000 kg, 78,400,000 kg, and 86,100,000 kg of the aggregate of the
PMN substances P-12-539 and P-13-109).
(ii) [Reserved]
(b) Specific requirements. The provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified by this paragraph.
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping requirements as specified in Sec.
721.125(a), (b), (c), and (i) are applicable to manufacturers and
processors of this substance.
(2) Limitations or revocation of certain notification requirements.
The provisions of Sec. 721.185 apply to this section.
0
3. Add Sec. [emsp14]721.10674 to subpart E to read as follows:
Sec. [emsp14]721.10674 Alkanes, C22-30-branched and linear, chloro.
(a) Chemical substance and significant new uses subject to
reporting. (1) The chemical substance identified as alkanes, C22-30-
branched and linear, chloro (PMN P-13-107; CAS No. 1401947-24-0) is
subject to reporting under this section for the significant new uses
described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Industrial, commercial, and consumer activities. Requirements
as specified in Sec. 721.80(j) (manufacture of the PMN substance with
less than 1 weight percent of chlorinated paraffins with an alkyl chain
<= 20) and Sec. 721.80(p) (14,100,000 kilograms (kg), 59,100,000 kg,
78,400,000 kg, 86,100,000 kg of PMN substance P-13-107, from March 19,
2013).
(ii) [Reserved]
(b) Specific requirements. The provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified by this paragraph.
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping requirements as specified in Sec.
721.125(a), (b), (c), and (i) are applicable to manufacturers and
processors of this substance.
(2) Limitations or revocation of certain notification requirements.
The provisions of Sec. 721.185 apply to this section.
0
4. Add Sec. [emsp14]721.10675 to subpart E to read as follows:
Sec. [emsp14]721.10675 Alkanes, C24-28, chloro.
(a) Chemical substance and significant new uses subject to
reporting. (1) The chemical substance identified as alkanes, C24-28,
chloro (PMN P-13-109; CAS No. 1402738-52-6) is subject to reporting
under this section for the significant new uses described in paragraph
(a)(2) of this section.
(2) The significant new uses are:
(i) Industrial, commercial, and consumer activities. Requirements
as specified in Sec. 721.80(j) (manufacture of the PMN substance with
less than 1 weight percent of chlorinated paraffins with an alkyl chain
<= 20) and Sec. 721.80(p) (1,200,000 kilograms (kg), 14,100,000 kg,
78,400,000 kg, 86,100,000 kg of the aggregate of the PMN substances P-
12-539 and P-13-109).
[[Page 7627]]
(ii) [Reserved]
(b) Specific requirements. The provisions of subpart A of this part
apply to this section except as modified by this paragraph.
(1) Recordkeeping. Recordkeeping requirements as specified in Sec.
721.125(a), (b), (c), and (i) are applicable to manufacturers and
processors of this substance.
(2) Limitations or revocation of certain notification requirements.
The provisions of Sec. 721.185 apply to this section.
[FR Doc. 2014-02846 Filed 2-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P