Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 7700-7701 [2014-02831]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
7700
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 2014 / Notices
for a carve-out for P&S GFCIs from any
general exclusion order. P&S argued that
Leviton deliberately avoided naming
P&S as a respondent or accusing P&S’s
products, and that any exclusion order
ought not reach P&S’s products. The
Commission rejected P&S’s argument,
and issued a general exclusion order,
but invited P&S to ‘‘avail itself of other
Commission procedures to obtain a
ruling as to whether its products are
subject to the general exclusion order.’’
Comm’n Op. 91–92 (Apr. 27, 2012).
On August 29, 2012, Leviton filed a
complaint for enforcement proceedings
under Commission rule 210.75(b).
Among Leviton’s allegations was that
Menard violated the cease and desist
order by selling P&S GFCIs. See
Enforcement Compl. ¶¶ 64–67. On
November 1, 2012, the Commission
instituted the enforcement proceeding
sought by Leviton. 77 FR 66080 (Nov. 1,
2012). On November 2, 2012, P&S
moved to intervene as a respondent, and
on November 27, 2012, the ALJ
substantially granted that motion. Order
No. 71 at 4–5 (Nov. 27, 2012) (granting
motion to intervene, but limiting P&S’s
participation to issues of infringement
and remedy). Leviton subsequently
entered a Settlement and License
Agreement with P&S, and Menard and
P&S were terminated from the
enforcement proceeding. Order No. 76
(Feb. 4, 2013), not reviewed, Notice
(Mar. 1, 2013).
On November 20, 2013, P&S filed a
request with the Commission for an
advisory opinion pursuant to
Commission rule 210.79, with regard to
certain redesigned P&S products. On
December 2, 2013, Leviton opposed. On
December 16, 2013, P&S moved for
leave to file a reply, which P&S
appended to its motion. The
Commission has determined to grant
P&S’s motion for leave to file the reply.
Upon consideration of this matter, the
Commission has determined to institute
an advisory opinion proceeding under
Commission rule 210.79 and has issued
an order concerning the scope of that
proceeding. The Commission has
referred P&S’s request to the Chief
Administrative Law Judge to designate a
presiding administrative law judge for
the proceedings. The following entities
are named as parties to the proceeding:
(1) Complainant Leviton; (2) respondent
P&S; and (3) the Office of Unfair Import
Investigations.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:25 Feb 07, 2014
Jkt 232001
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 4, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–02729 Filed 2–7–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE
UNITED STATES
Meeting of the Judicial Conference
Committee on Rules of Practice and
Procedure
Judicial Conference of the
United States Advisory Committee on
Rules of Evidence.
ACTION: Notice of open meeting.
AGENCY:
The Advisory Committee on
Rules of Evidence will hold a one-day
meeting. The meeting will be open to
public observation but not participation.
DATES: April 4, 2014.
TIME: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
ADDRESSES: University of Maine School
of Law, 246 Deering Avenue, Portland,
Maine 04102.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jonathan C. Rose, Secretary and Chief
Rules Officer, Rules Committee Support
Office, Administrative Office of the
United States Courts, Washington, DC
20544, telephone (202) 502–1820.
SUMMARY:
Dated: February 4, 2014.
Jonathan C. Rose,
Secretary and Chief Rules Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–02730 Filed 2–7–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act
On January 29, 2014 the Department
of Justice lodged a proposed Consent
Decree with the United States District
Court for the Central District of
California in the lawsuit entitled United
States v. Mitchell Rubber Products, Inc.,
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00708–ABC–
MAN.
The Consent Decree resolves claims
under Section 107 of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9607 related
to releases and threatened releases of
hazardous substances at the Puente
Valley Operable Unit (‘‘PVOU’’) of the
San Gabriel Valley Superfund Site, Area
4, Los Angeles County, California (the
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
‘‘Site’’). The Consent Decree resolves a
claim against Mitchell Rubber Products,
Inc., (‘‘Mitchell’’), and recovers
$434,000 in response costs. The Consent
Decree contains a covenant not to sue
for past and certain future costs and
response work at the Site under
Sections 106 and 107 of CERCLA and
Section 7003 of RCRA.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
Consent Decree. Comments should be
addressed to the Assistant Attorney
General, Environment and Natural
Resources Division, and should refer to
United States v. Mitchell Rubber
Products, Inc., D.J. Ref. No. 90–11–2–
354/34. All comments must be
submitted no later than thirty (30) days
after the publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
By e-mail ..
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov
Assistant Attorney General, U.S.
DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,
Washington, DC 20044–7611.
By mail .....
Under section 7003(d) of RCRA, a
commenter may request an opportunity
for a public meeting in the affected area.
During the public comment period,
the Consent Decree may be examined
and downloaded at this Justice
Department Web site: https://
www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_
Decrees.html. We will provide a paper
copy of the Consent Decree upon
written request and payment of
reproduction costs. Please mail your
request and payment to:
Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—
ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington,
DC 20044–7611.
Please enclose a check or money order
for $8.25 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United
States Treasury.
Maureen Katz,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2014–02824 Filed 2–7–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act
On January 31, 2014, the Department
of Justice lodged a proposed a Consent
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 2014 / Notices
Decree with the United States District
Court for the Southern District of Ohio
in the lawsuit entitled United States v.
3M Company, et al., Civil Action No.
3:14-cv-00032–WHR.
The United States filed this lawsuit
under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation
and Liability Act (CERCLA). The United
States’ complaint requests recovery of
costs that the United States incurred
responding to releases of hazardous
substances at the Lammers Barrel
Superfund Site (the ‘‘Site’’) in
BeaverCreek, Ohio. The complaint also
seeks injunctive relief, specifically,
performance of the remedial action for
Operable Unit 1 at the Site selected by
the United States Environmental
Protection Agency (‘‘EPA’’). Under the
terms of the Consent Decree, the
Defendants have agreed to (1) perform
the remedial action selected by EPA for
Operable Unit 1, at an estimate cost of
$3.4 million; (2) implement institutional
controls; (3) reimburse the United States
$1,496,689.04 for past response costs;
(4) reimburse the United States for
future response costs.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
proposed Consent Decree. Comments
should be addressed to the Assistant
Attorney General, Environment and
Natural Resources Division, and should
refer to United States v. 3M Company et
al., D.J. Ref. No. 90–11–3–07706. All
comments must be submitted no later
than thirty (30) days after the
publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
To submit
comments:
By e-mail ..
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
By mail .....
Send them to:
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General
U.S. DOJ—ENRD
P.O. Box 7611
Washington, D.C. 20044–7611.
During the public comment period,
the proposed Consent Decree may be
examined and downloaded at this
Justice Department Web site: https://
www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_
Decrees.html. We will provide a paper
copy of the proposed Consent Decree
upon written request and payment of
reproduction costs. Please mail your
request and payment to:
Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—
ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
Please enclose a check or money order
for $89.75 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United
States Treasury. For a paper copy
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:25 Feb 07, 2014
Jkt 232001
without the signature pages and
Appendices, the cost is $24.25.
Maureen Katz,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2014–02831 Filed 2–7–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of Justice Programs
[OMB #1121–NEW]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed collection;
Comment Requested; New Collection:
Census of Adult Probation Supervising
Agencies, 2014
ACTION:
60-Day notice.
The Department of Justice (DOJ),
Office of Justice Programs, will be
submitting the following information
collection to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The
proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. Comments
are encouraged and will be accepted for
‘‘sixty days’’ until April 11, 2014. This
process is conducted in accordance with
5 CFR 1320.10.
If you have comments especially
regarding the estimated public burden
and associated response time, or need a
copy of the proposed information
collection instrument with instructions
or additional information, please
contact Lauren Glaze, Statistician,
Bureau of Justice Statistics, 810 7th St.,
NW., Washington, DC 20531 (email
Lauren.Glaze@usdoj.gov; phone (202)
305–9628).
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address one or more
of the following four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7701
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g. permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of this information collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
New Collection. While the Bureau of
Justice Statistics conducted a census of
probation and parole agencies in 1991,
the 2014 Census of Adult Probation
Supervising Agencies is now a
standalone collection. This collection’s
scope is narrower and only includes
adult probation agencies. The scope of
the 1991 census was broader and
included both adult probation and
parole agencies.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection: 2014
Census of Adult Probation Supervising
Agencies.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department of Justice sponsoring the
collection:
(a) Form number: CAPSA–AIF is the
Agency Information Form (AIF) for
public agencies, CAPSA–CIF is the
Company Information Form (CIF) for
private probation companies, CAPSA–
1A is the questionnaire for public
probation agencies, and CAPSA–1B is
the questionnaire for private probation
companies. Corrections Statistics
Program, Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Office of Justice Programs, U.S.
Department of Justice.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
to respond, as well as a brief abstract:
Primary: State or local government.
Other: Federal government or private
companies. The primary goals of the
work under this clearance are to: 1)
enhance and validate a national roster of
probation agencies that supervise adults
on probation for a felony (or those that
supervise felons and misdemeanants)
and private companies that directly
supervise adult probationers; and 2)
collect information from those agencies
to report national and state-level
statistics that provide a clear
understanding of how adult probation
in the United States is currently
organized, the supervision policies and
practices agencies have established to
administer adult probation, the various
types of functions adult probation
agencies perform, and the different
types of individuals supervised by adult
probation agencies. The Bureau of
Justice Statistics will use this
information in published reports and for
the U.S. Congress, Executive Office of
the President, practitioners, researchers,
students, the media, and others
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7700-7701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02831]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
On January 31, 2014, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed a
Consent
[[Page 7701]]
Decree with the United States District Court for the Southern District
of Ohio in the lawsuit entitled United States v. 3M Company, et al.,
Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00032-WHR.
The United States filed this lawsuit under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). The
United States' complaint requests recovery of costs that the United
States incurred responding to releases of hazardous substances at the
Lammers Barrel Superfund Site (the ``Site'') in BeaverCreek, Ohio. The
complaint also seeks injunctive relief, specifically, performance of
the remedial action for Operable Unit 1 at the Site selected by the
United States Environmental Protection Agency (``EPA''). Under the
terms of the Consent Decree, the Defendants have agreed to (1) perform
the remedial action selected by EPA for Operable Unit 1, at an estimate
cost of $3.4 million; (2) implement institutional controls; (3)
reimburse the United States $1,496,689.04 for past response costs; (4)
reimburse the United States for future response costs.
The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on
the proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division,
and should refer to United States v. 3M Company et al., D.J. Ref. No.
90-11-3-07706. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30)
days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be
submitted either by email or by mail:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To submit comments: Send them to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By e-mail....................... pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov.
By mail......................... Assistant Attorney General
U.S. DOJ--ENRD
P.O. Box 7611
Washington, D.C. 20044-7611.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
During the public comment period, the proposed Consent Decree may
be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department Web site: https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html. We will provide a paper copy
of the proposed Consent Decree upon written request and payment of
reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to:
Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ--ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington,
DC 20044-7611.
Please enclose a check or money order for $89.75 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury. For a paper
copy without the signature pages and Appendices, the cost is $24.25.
Maureen Katz,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-02831 Filed 2-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P