Airworthiness Directives; the Boeing Company Airplanes, 7377-7380 [2014-02419]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 2014 / Rules and Regulations paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. (3) The following service information was approved for IBR on November 3, 2003 (68 FR 55812, September 29, 2003). (i) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A60– 28–3, Revision 2, dated October 26, 1998. (ii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 60–28–4, Revision 2, dated August 22, 2001. (4) For service information identified in this AD, contact Learjet, Inc., One Learjet Way, Wichita, KS 67209–2942; telephone 316–946–2000; fax 316–946–2220; email ac.ict@aero.bombardier.com; Internet https:// www.bombardier.com. (5) You may view this service information at FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. (6) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to: https:// www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 27, 2013. Jeffrey E. Duven, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2014–02464 Filed 2–6–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2013–0538; Directorate Identifier 2012–NM–212–AD; Amendment 39–17728; AD 2014–01–05] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; the Boeing Company Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain the Boeing Company Model 737–100, –200, –200C, –300, –400, and –500 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report of cracks in stringer splices at body station STA 360 and STA 908, between stringer (S) S–10L and S–10R; cracks in butt straps between S–5L and S–3L, and S–3R and S–5R; vertical chem-mill fuselage skin cracks at certain butt joints; and an instance of cracking that occurred in all those three structural mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:41 Feb 06, 2014 Jkt 232001 elements on one airplane. This AD requires repetitive inspections for any cracking of stringer splices and butt straps, and related corrective and investigative actions if necessary. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking in the three structural elements, which could result in the airplane not being able to sustain limit load requirements and possibly result in uncontrolled decompression. DATES: This AD is effective March 14, 2014. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of March 14, 2014. ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; Internet https:// www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2013– 0538; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wayne Lockett, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: (425) 917–6447; fax: (425) 917–6590; email: wayne.lockett@faa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discussion We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing Company Model 737–100, –200, –200C, –300, –400, and –500 series airplanes. The PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 7377 NPRM published in the Federal Register on June 27, 2013 (78 FR 38608). The NPRM was prompted by a report of cracks in stringer splices at body station STA 360 and STA 908, between stringer (S) S–10L and S–10R; cracks in butt straps between S–5L and S–3L, and S–3R and S–5R; vertical chem-mill fuselage skin cracks at certain butt joints; and an instance of cracking that occurred in all those three structural elements on one airplane. The NPRM proposed to require repetitive inspections for any cracking of stringer splices and butt straps, and related corrective and investigative actions if necessary. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking in the three structural elements, which could result in the airplane not being able to sustain limit load requirements and possibly result in uncontrolled decompression. Comments We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. The following presents the comments received on the proposal (78 FR 38608, June 27, 2013) and the FAA’s response to each comment. Request to Clarify That Post-Repair Inspections Are Not Required by This Final Rule Boeing requested clarification that Table 11, ‘‘Stringer Splice Post Repair Inspection,’’ in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, is not required by paragraph (h) of the NPRM (78 FR 38608, June 27, 2013). Boeing suggested that paragraph (h) of the NPRM be revised to include an exception phrase that references paragraph (i) of the NPRM. Boeing stated that the inspections specified in Table 11, ‘‘Stringer Splice Post Repair Inspection,’’ in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, are required to support operating requirements for complying with section 121.1109(c)(2) or 129.109(b)(2) of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 121.1109(c)(2) or 14 CFR 129.109(b)(2)). Boeing also stated that the way the sentences of paragraph (h) of the NPRM are arranged, the sentences for doing corrective actions and repeating inspections seem to link the corrective actions and the repetitive inspections and imply that Table 11, ‘‘Stringer Splice Post Repair Inspection,’’ in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, is required by both the NPRM and the Federal Aviation Regulations. E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM 07FER1 7378 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 2014 / Rules and Regulations mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES We agree to provide clarification, but we do not agree to revise this final rule. Paragraph (h) of the final rule indicates that after the corrective actions are accomplished on a cracked stringer splice, the repetitive inspections are terminated for that stringer splice only. The sentence that includes the phrase ‘‘repeat the applicable inspections’’ is not intended to imply any requirement to accomplish the post repair inspections specified in Table 11, ‘‘Stringer Splice Post Repair Inspection,’’ in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1322, dated November 5, 2012. Paragraph (i) of this final rule also indicates that accomplishing Table 11, ‘‘Stringer Splice Post Repair Inspection,’’ in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, is not required. No change to the final rule is necessary in this regard. Request To Reference Alternative Service Information Instead of Contacting the Manufacturer for Corrective Actions Southwest Airlines requested that paragraph (j)(1) of the NPRM (78 FR 38608, June 27, 2013) be revised to reference certain service information for corrective action instructions instead of requiring corrective actions that involve contacting the FAA or the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) for instructions. Southwest Airlines proposed that paragraph (j)(1) of the NPRM be changed to instead require replacement of cracked butt splice straps using a Boeing production drawing and require inspections for cracking in the fuselage skin using certain portions and revisions of Boeing Service Bulletins 737–53A1210 or 737– 53A1234. Southwest Airlines also suggested referencing Repair 31 of section 53–00–01–2R in the Boeing 737– 300/–500 Structural Repair Manual as an acceptable means of compliance for repairing any cracking or damage found on the fuselage skins. We do not agree. The specific skin inspection requirements after finding a cracked butt joint splice strap might not be covered by the inspections provided in Boeing Service Bulletins 737– 53A1210 or 737–53A1234. The specific skin inspection requirements will be developed based on the specific butt VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:20 Feb 06, 2014 Jkt 232001 strap cracking that is found, and specific repairs will be developed based on the skin cracking that is found. Operators may request approval of an alternative method of compliance using the procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this AD. We have not changed this final rule in this regard. Request To Exclude Service Information Note for Corrosion Findings Southwest Airlines requested that the NPRM (78 FR 38608, June 27, 2013) be revised to exclude General Information Note 12 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, from the required actions of the final rule. Southwest Airlines stated that General Information Note 12 specifies to contact Boeing for repair instructions if corrosion is found. Southwest Airlines pointed out that the NPRM does not propose any inspections for corrosion and suggested that any findings of corrosion during the accomplishment of the requirements of this final rule be addressed using the operator’s maintenance program. We agree to revise this final rule. Cracking, not corrosion, is the primary safety concern addressed by this final rule. If any corrosion is found during any inspection for cracking that is required by this final rule, the corrective action for the corrosion should be provided by the operator’s maintenance program. We have added paragraph (j)(3) to this final rule to remove the requirement to comply with General Information Note 12 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1322, dated November 5, 2012. Request To Exclude Service Information Note for Deviations From Modification Drawings Southwest Airlines requested that paragraph (j) of the NPRM (78 FR 38608, June 27, 2013) be revised to provide an exclusion of General Information Note 16 from the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1322, dated November 5, 2012. Southwest Airlines describes General Information Note 16 as specifying to contact Boeing if the fastener patterns, types, and sizes, or the structure does not agree with the production drawing requirements or PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 applicable modification drawing requirements. Southwest Airlines stated that since there are previous FAAapproved repairs and deviations to modification drawings, and the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, specify actions to remove and install structure and fasteners, Southwest Airlines expected to encounter numerous conditions that would prevent complying with the actions detailed in the figures of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1322, dated November 5, 2012. We do not agree to exclude General Information Note 16 from the requirements of this final rule to accomplish actions in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737– 53A1322, dated November 5, 2012. The previously approved repairs or deviations to modification drawings may require changes to the inspection methods used and structure that may require removal to accomplish the inspection required by this final rule. Any change from the procedures specified in the service information must be approved as an AMOC under paragraph (k) of the final rule. We have not changed this final rule in this regard. Conclusion We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes: • Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 38608, June 27, 2013) for correcting the unsafe condition; and • Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 38608, June 27, 2013). We also determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD. Costs of Compliance We estimate that this AD affects 612 airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD: E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM 07FER1 7379 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 2014 / Rules and Regulations ESTIMATED COSTS Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Inspections .............................. Up to 362 work-hours × $85 per hour = $30,770, per inspection cycle. Up to 2 work-hours × $85 per hour = $170, per inspection cycle. None ........... Up to $30,770, per inspection cycle. Up to $18,831,240, per inspection cycle. $0 ................ Up to $170, per inspection cycle. Up to $104,040, per inspection cycle. Removal and reinstallation of butt strap fastener(s). We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements that will be required based on the results of the inspection. We have no way of Cost on U.S. operators determining the number of aircraft that might need these replacements: ON-CONDITION COSTS Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Stringer splice replacement ....................... 3 work-hours × $85 per hour = $255 ......... Operator-supplied, information not available. $255 The work-hour estimate and parts cost information are not available for estimating the cost of a butt strap replacement. Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 16:20 Feb 06, 2014 List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 [Amended] 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): ■ Regulatory Findings VerDate Mar<15>2010 (2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Jkt 232001 2014–01–05 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39–17728; Docket No. FAA–2013–0538; Directorate Identifier 2012–NM–212–AD. (a) Effective Date This AD is effective March 14, 2014. (b) Affected ADs None. (c) Applicability This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737–100, –200, –200C, –300, –400, PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 and –500 series airplanes, certified in any category, as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1322, dated November 5, 2012. (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage. (e) Unsafe Condition This AD was prompted by a report of cracks in stringer splices at body station STA 360 and STA 908, between stringer (S) S–10L and S–10R; cracks in butt straps between S– 5L and S–3L, and S–3R and S–5R; vertical chem-mill fuselage skin cracks at certain butt joints; and an instance of cracking that occurred in all those three structural elements on one airplane. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking in the three structural elements, which could result in the airplane not being able to sustain limit load requirements and possibly result in uncontrolled decompression. (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. (g) Actions for Group 1 Airplanes For Group 1 airplanes, as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1322, dated November 5, 2012: At the compliance time specified in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, except as provided by paragraph (j)(2) of this AD, inspect the stringers and butt straps and repair as applicable, using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this AD. (h) Actions for Groups 2 Through 6 Airplanes For Groups 2 through 6 airplanes, as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1322, dated November 5, 2012: At the applicable compliance time specified in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM 07FER1 7380 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 2014 / Rules and Regulations Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, do the applicable inspections for cracking identified in paragraphs (h)(1) through (h)(4) of this AD, and all applicable corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, except as provided by paragraph (j) of this AD. Do all applicable corrective actions before further flight. Thereafter, repeat the applicable inspections at the compliance times specified in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1322, dated November 5, 2012. Accomplishing the corrective actions for a cracked stringer splice, as specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, terminates the repetitive inspections required by this paragraph for that stringer splice only. (1) Internal detailed inspections of the stringer splices and butt straps. (2) Internal high-frequency eddy current (HFEC) surface inspections of the butt straps. (3) Internal low-frequency eddy current (LFEC) inspection of the butt straps. (4) HFEC open hole rotary probe inspections of butt straps or of one location of a butt strap, as applicable. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES (i) Post-Repair Inspections The post-repair inspection specified in Table 11 of paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, is not required by this AD. Note 1 to paragraph (i) of this AD: The post-repair inspections specified in Table 11 of paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, may be used in support of compliance with section 121.1109(c)(2) or 129.109(b)(2) of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 121.1109(c)(2) or 14 CFR 129.109(b)(2)). The corresponding actions specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, are not required by this AD. (j) Exceptions to the Service Information (1) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, specifies to contact Boeing for appropriate action: Before further flight, repair using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this AD. (2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, specifies a compliance time ‘‘after the original issue date of this service bulletin,’’ this AD requires compliance within the specified compliance time after the effective date of this AD. (3) Where General Information Note 12 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, specifies contacting Boeing, this AD does not require the actions specified in that note. (k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:20 Feb 06, 2014 Jkt 232001 authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (l) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov. (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/ certificate holding district office. (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD. (l) Related Information For more information about this AD, contact Wayne Lockett, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: (425) 917–6447; fax: (425) 917–6590; email: wayne.lockett@faa.gov. (m) Material Incorporated by Reference (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. (i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737– 53A1322, dated November 5, 2012. (ii) Reserved. (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206– 544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. (4) You may view this service information at FAA, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate; 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to: https:// www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 7, 2014. Jeffrey E. Duven, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2014–02419 Filed 2–6–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2013–0793; Directorate Identifier 2012–NM–138–AD; Amendment 39–17727; AD 2014–01–04] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Bae Systems (Operations) Limited Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Bae Systems (Operations) Limited Model BAe 146 series airplanes and Model Avro 146–RJ series airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of excess solder deposited during overhaul on the frangible plug of a fire extinguisher, which prevented the release of the extinguishant. This AD requires a onetime inspection of certain engine and auxiliary power unit (APU) fire extinguishers to determine if the fire extinguishers are affected by excessive solder and corrective actions if necessary. We are issuing this AD to prevent the failure of a fire extinguisher to discharge, which reduces the ability of the fire protection system to extinguish fires in the engine or APU fire zones, possibly resulting in damage to the airplane and injury to the passengers. SUMMARY: This AD becomes effective March 14, 2014. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of March 14, 2014. ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www. regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA2013-0793 or in person at the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC. For Bae Systems (Operations) Limited service information identified in this AD, contact Bae Systems (Operations) Limited, Customer Information Department, Prestwick International Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 2RW, Scotland, United Kingdom; telephone +44 1292 675207; fax +44 1292 675704; email RApublications@baesystems.com; Internet https://www.baesystems.com/ Businesses/RegionalAircraft/index.htm. For Kidde Graviner service information DATES: E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM 07FER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 26 (Friday, February 7, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7377-7380]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02419]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0538; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-212-AD; 
Amendment 39-17728; AD 2014-01-05]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; the Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 
the Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 
series airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report of cracks in 
stringer splices at body station STA 360 and STA 908, between stringer 
(S) S-10L and S-10R; cracks in butt straps between S-5L and S-3L, and 
S-3R and S-5R; vertical chem-mill fuselage skin cracks at certain butt 
joints; and an instance of cracking that occurred in all those three 
structural elements on one airplane. This AD requires repetitive 
inspections for any cracking of stringer splices and butt straps, and 
related corrective and investigative actions if necessary. We are 
issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking in the three structural 
elements, which could result in the airplane not being able to sustain 
limit load requirements and possibly result in uncontrolled 
decompression.

DATES: This AD is effective March 14, 2014.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by 
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of March 14, 
2014.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact 
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, 
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information 
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the 
FAA, call 425-227-1221.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2013-
0538; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket 
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and 
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wayne Lockett, Aerospace Engineer, 
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: (425) 917-6447; 
fax: (425) 917-6590; email: wayne.lockett@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing Company 
Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. The 
NPRM published in the Federal Register on June 27, 2013 (78 FR 38608). 
The NPRM was prompted by a report of cracks in stringer splices at body 
station STA 360 and STA 908, between stringer (S) S-10L and S-10R; 
cracks in butt straps between S-5L and S-3L, and S-3R and S-5R; 
vertical chem-mill fuselage skin cracks at certain butt joints; and an 
instance of cracking that occurred in all those three structural 
elements on one airplane. The NPRM proposed to require repetitive 
inspections for any cracking of stringer splices and butt straps, and 
related corrective and investigative actions if necessary. We are 
issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking in the three structural 
elements, which could result in the airplane not being able to sustain 
limit load requirements and possibly result in uncontrolled 
decompression.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing 
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the proposal 
(78 FR 38608, June 27, 2013) and the FAA's response to each comment.

Request to Clarify That Post-Repair Inspections Are Not Required by 
This Final Rule

    Boeing requested clarification that Table 11, ``Stringer Splice 
Post Repair Inspection,'' in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing 
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, is not 
required by paragraph (h) of the NPRM (78 FR 38608, June 27, 2013). 
Boeing suggested that paragraph (h) of the NPRM be revised to include 
an exception phrase that references paragraph (i) of the NPRM. Boeing 
stated that the inspections specified in Table 11, ``Stringer Splice 
Post Repair Inspection,'' in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing 
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, are 
required to support operating requirements for complying with section 
121.1109(c)(2) or 129.109(b)(2) of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
CFR 121.1109(c)(2) or 14 CFR 129.109(b)(2)). Boeing also stated that 
the way the sentences of paragraph (h) of the NPRM are arranged, the 
sentences for doing corrective actions and repeating inspections seem 
to link the corrective actions and the repetitive inspections and imply 
that Table 11, ``Stringer Splice Post Repair Inspection,'' in paragraph 
1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1322, 
dated November 5, 2012, is required by both the NPRM and the Federal 
Aviation Regulations.

[[Page 7378]]

    We agree to provide clarification, but we do not agree to revise 
this final rule. Paragraph (h) of the final rule indicates that after 
the corrective actions are accomplished on a cracked stringer splice, 
the repetitive inspections are terminated for that stringer splice 
only. The sentence that includes the phrase ``repeat the applicable 
inspections'' is not intended to imply any requirement to accomplish 
the post repair inspections specified in Table 11, ``Stringer Splice 
Post Repair Inspection,'' in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing 
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1322, dated November 5, 2012. Paragraph 
(i) of this final rule also indicates that accomplishing Table 11, 
``Stringer Splice Post Repair Inspection,'' in paragraph 1.E., 
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1322, dated 
November 5, 2012, is not required. No change to the final rule is 
necessary in this regard.

Request To Reference Alternative Service Information Instead of 
Contacting the Manufacturer for Corrective Actions

    Southwest Airlines requested that paragraph (j)(1) of the NPRM (78 
FR 38608, June 27, 2013) be revised to reference certain service 
information for corrective action instructions instead of requiring 
corrective actions that involve contacting the FAA or the Boeing 
Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) for 
instructions. Southwest Airlines proposed that paragraph (j)(1) of the 
NPRM be changed to instead require replacement of cracked butt splice 
straps using a Boeing production drawing and require inspections for 
cracking in the fuselage skin using certain portions and revisions of 
Boeing Service Bulletins 737-53A1210 or 737-53A1234. Southwest Airlines 
also suggested referencing Repair 31 of section 53-00-01-2R in the 
Boeing 737-300/-500 Structural Repair Manual as an acceptable means of 
compliance for repairing any cracking or damage found on the fuselage 
skins.
    We do not agree. The specific skin inspection requirements after 
finding a cracked butt joint splice strap might not be covered by the 
inspections provided in Boeing Service Bulletins 737-53A1210 or 737-
53A1234. The specific skin inspection requirements will be developed 
based on the specific butt strap cracking that is found, and specific 
repairs will be developed based on the skin cracking that is found. 
Operators may request approval of an alternative method of compliance 
using the procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this AD. We have not 
changed this final rule in this regard.

Request To Exclude Service Information Note for Corrosion Findings

    Southwest Airlines requested that the NPRM (78 FR 38608, June 27, 
2013) be revised to exclude General Information Note 12 of the 
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, from the required actions of the final 
rule. Southwest Airlines stated that General Information Note 12 
specifies to contact Boeing for repair instructions if corrosion is 
found. Southwest Airlines pointed out that the NPRM does not propose 
any inspections for corrosion and suggested that any findings of 
corrosion during the accomplishment of the requirements of this final 
rule be addressed using the operator's maintenance program.
    We agree to revise this final rule. Cracking, not corrosion, is the 
primary safety concern addressed by this final rule. If any corrosion 
is found during any inspection for cracking that is required by this 
final rule, the corrective action for the corrosion should be provided 
by the operator's maintenance program. We have added paragraph (j)(3) 
to this final rule to remove the requirement to comply with General 
Information Note 12 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert 
Service Bulletin 737-53A1322, dated November 5, 2012.

Request To Exclude Service Information Note for Deviations From 
Modification Drawings

    Southwest Airlines requested that paragraph (j) of the NPRM (78 FR 
38608, June 27, 2013) be revised to provide an exclusion of General 
Information Note 16 from the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1322, dated November 5, 2012. Southwest 
Airlines describes General Information Note 16 as specifying to contact 
Boeing if the fastener patterns, types, and sizes, or the structure 
does not agree with the production drawing requirements or applicable 
modification drawing requirements. Southwest Airlines stated that since 
there are previous FAA-approved repairs and deviations to modification 
drawings, and the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service 
Bulletin 737-53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, specify actions to remove 
and install structure and fasteners, Southwest Airlines expected to 
encounter numerous conditions that would prevent complying with the 
actions detailed in the figures of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1322, dated November 5, 2012.
    We do not agree to exclude General Information Note 16 from the 
requirements of this final rule to accomplish actions in accordance 
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 
737-53A1322, dated November 5, 2012. The previously approved repairs or 
deviations to modification drawings may require changes to the 
inspection methods used and structure that may require removal to 
accomplish the inspection required by this final rule. Any change from 
the procedures specified in the service information must be approved as 
an AMOC under paragraph (k) of the final rule. We have not changed this 
final rule in this regard.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, 
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting 
this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial 
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     [Agr]re consistent with the intent that was proposed in 
the NPRM (78 FR 38608, June 27, 2013) for correcting the unsafe 
condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was 
already proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 38608, June 27, 2013).
    We also determined that these changes will not increase the 
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 612 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

[[Page 7379]]



                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                 Cost on U.S.
             Action                  Labor cost           Parts cost       Cost per product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections....................  Up to 362 work-     None...............  Up to $30,770, per  Up to $18,831,240,
                                  hours x $85 per                          inspection cycle.   per inspection
                                  hour = $30,770,                                              cycle.
                                  per inspection
                                  cycle.
Removal and reinstallation of    Up to 2 work-hours  $0.................  Up to $170, per     Up to $104,040,
 butt strap fastener(s).          x $85 per hour =                         inspection cycle.   per inspection
                                  $170, per                                                    cycle.
                                  inspection cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements 
that will be required based on the results of the inspection. We have 
no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these 
replacements:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                       Cost per
                  Action                            Labor cost                    Parts cost            product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stringer splice replacement..............  3 work-hours x $85 per hour   Operator-supplied,                $255
                                            = $255.                       information not available.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The work-hour estimate and parts cost information are not available 
for estimating the cost of a butt strap replacement.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, 
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various 
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness 
directive (AD):

2014-01-05 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-17728; Docket No. FAA-
2013-0538; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-212-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective March 14, 2014.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -
200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes, certified in any 
category, as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1322, dated November 5, 2012.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report of cracks in stringer splices 
at body station STA 360 and STA 908, between stringer (S) S-10L and 
S-10R; cracks in butt straps between S-5L and S-3L, and S-3R and S-
5R; vertical chem-mill fuselage skin cracks at certain butt joints; 
and an instance of cracking that occurred in all those three 
structural elements on one airplane. We are issuing this AD to 
detect and correct cracking in the three structural elements, which 
could result in the airplane not being able to sustain limit load 
requirements and possibly result in uncontrolled decompression.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, 
unless already done.

(g) Actions for Group 1 Airplanes

    For Group 1 airplanes, as identified in Boeing Alert Service 
Bulletin 737-53A1322, dated November 5, 2012: At the compliance time 
specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service 
Bulletin 737-53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, except as provided by 
paragraph (j)(2) of this AD, inspect the stringers and butt straps 
and repair as applicable, using a method approved in accordance with 
the procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this AD.

(h) Actions for Groups 2 Through 6 Airplanes

    For Groups 2 through 6 airplanes, as identified in Boeing Alert 
Service Bulletin 737-53A1322, dated November 5, 2012: At the 
applicable compliance time specified in paragraph 1.E., 
``Compliance,'' of Boeing

[[Page 7380]]

Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, do the 
applicable inspections for cracking identified in paragraphs (h)(1) 
through (h)(4) of this AD, and all applicable corrective actions, in 
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert 
Service Bulletin 737-53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, except as 
provided by paragraph (j) of this AD. Do all applicable corrective 
actions before further flight. Thereafter, repeat the applicable 
inspections at the compliance times specified in paragraph 1.E., 
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1322, dated 
November 5, 2012. Accomplishing the corrective actions for a cracked 
stringer splice, as specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, terminates the repetitive 
inspections required by this paragraph for that stringer splice 
only.
    (1) Internal detailed inspections of the stringer splices and 
butt straps.
    (2) Internal high-frequency eddy current (HFEC) surface 
inspections of the butt straps.
    (3) Internal low-frequency eddy current (LFEC) inspection of the 
butt straps.
    (4) HFEC open hole rotary probe inspections of butt straps or of 
one location of a butt strap, as applicable.

(i) Post-Repair Inspections

    The post-repair inspection specified in Table 11 of paragraph 
1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1322, 
dated November 5, 2012, is not required by this AD.

    Note 1 to paragraph (i) of this AD:  The post-repair inspections 
specified in Table 11 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing 
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, may be 
used in support of compliance with section 121.1109(c)(2) or 
129.109(b)(2) of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 
121.1109(c)(2) or 14 CFR 129.109(b)(2)). The corresponding actions 
specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service 
Bulletin 737-53A1322, dated November 5, 2012, are not required by 
this AD.

(j) Exceptions to the Service Information

    (1) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1322, dated 
November 5, 2012, specifies to contact Boeing for appropriate 
action: Before further flight, repair using a method approved in 
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this 
AD.
    (2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1322, dated 
November 5, 2012, specifies a compliance time ``after the original 
issue date of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance 
within the specified compliance time after the effective date of 
this AD.
    (3) Where General Information Note 12 of the Accomplishment 
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1322, dated 
November 5, 2012, specifies contacting Boeing, this AD does not 
require the actions specified in that note.

(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local 
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending 
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 
attention of the person identified in paragraph (l) of this AD. 
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding 
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the 
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization 
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make 
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must 
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must 
specifically refer to this AD.

(l) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Wayne Lockett, 
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft 
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; 
phone: (425) 917-6447; fax: (425) 917-6590; email: 
wayne.lockett@faa.gov.

(m) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the 
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed 
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do 
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1322, dated November 5, 
2012.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact 
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, 
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, FAA, Transport 
Airplane Directorate; 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 
425-227-1221.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated 
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration 
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at 
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 7, 2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-02419 Filed 2-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.