Energy Conservation Program: Compliance Date for the Dehumidifier Test Procedure, 7366-7370 [2014-02355]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
7366
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
obligation imposed on handlers.
Assessments are applied uniformly on
all handlers, and some of the costs may
be passed on to producers. However,
decreasing the assessment rate reduces
the burden on handlers, and may reduce
the burden on producers.
In addition, the Committee’s meeting
was widely publicized throughout the
kiwifruit industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend the
meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all
Committee meetings, the July 11, 2013,
meeting was a public meeting. All
entities, both large and small, were able
to express views on this issue.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0189. No
changes in those requirements as a
result of this action are anticipated.
Should any changes become necessary,
they would be submitted to OMB for
approval.
This action imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large California
kiwifruit handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
Comments on the interim rule were
required to be received on or before
November 22, 2013. No comments were
received. Therefore, for the reasons
given in the interim rule, we are
adopting the interim rule as a final rule,
without change.
To view the interim rule, go to:
https://www.regulations.gov/#!document
Detail;D=AMS_FRDOC_0001-1100.
This action also affirms information
contained in the interim rule concerning
Executive Orders 12866, 12988, and
13563; the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35); and the E-Gov Act
(44 U.S.C. 101).
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, it is found that
finalizing the interim rule, without
change, as published in the Federal
Register (78 FR 62959, October 23,
2013), will tend to effectuate the
declared policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 920
Kiwifruit, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:20 Feb 06, 2014
Jkt 232001
PART 920—KIWIFRUIT GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 7 CFR part 920, which was
published at 78 FR 62959 on October
23, 2013, is adopted as final without
change.
Dated: January 31, 2014.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–02648 Filed 2–6–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[Docket No. EERE–2013–BT–TP–0044]
RIN 1904–AD06
Energy Conservation Program:
Compliance Date for the Dehumidifier
Test Procedure
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of Energy
(DOE) is issuing a final rule that will
require manufacturers to test
dehumidifiers using the active mode
provisions in the test procedure for
dehumidifiers currently found in DOE
regulations to determine compliance
with the existing energy conservation
standards. The appendix in its entirety
will be required for use by
manufacturers that make
representations of standby mode or off
mode energy use, and, after the
compliance date for any amended
energy conservation standards enacted
in the future that incorporate measures
of standby mode and off mode energy
use, to demonstrate compliance with
such amended standards. The
amendments in this final rule modify
the compliance dates to allow use of the
ANSI/AHAM DH–1–2008 in the near
term.
SUMMARY:
The effective date of this rule is
March 10, 2014. The incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed
in the rule is approved by the Director
of the Federal Register as of March 10,
2014.
ADDRESSES: The docket, which includes
Federal Register notices, comments,
and other supporting documents/
materials, is available for review at
regulations.gov. All documents in the
docket are listed in the regulations.gov
index. However, some documents listed
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
in the index, such as those containing
information that is exempt from public
disclosure, may not be publicly
available.
A link to the docket Web page can be
found at: https://www.regulations.gov/#
!docketDetail;D=EERE-2013-BT-TP0044. This Web page will contain a link
to the docket for this rule on the
regulations.gov site. The regulations.gov
Web page will contain simple
instructions on how to access all
documents, including public comments,
in the docket.
For further information on how to
review the docket, contact Ms. Brenda
Edwards at (202) 586–2945 or by email:
Brenda.Edwards@ee.doe.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ashley Armstrong, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Program, EE–2J, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121. Email:
dehumidifiers@ee.doe.gov.
Elizabeth Kohl, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of the General Counsel,
GC–71, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–7796. Email:
elizabeth.kohl@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Authority and Background
II. Discussion
III. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995
D. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995
H. Review Under the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 1999
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
J. Review Under Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 2001
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
L. Review Under Section 32 of the Federal
Energy Administration Act of 1974
M. Congressional Notification
IV. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Authority and Background
Title III of the Energy Policy and
Conservation Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C.
6291, et seq.; ‘‘EPCA’’ or ‘‘the Act’’) sets
forth a variety of provisions designed to
improve energy efficiency. (All
references to EPCA refer to the statute
as amended through the American
Energy Manufacturing Technical
Corrections Act (AEMTCA), Public Law
112–210 (Dec. 18, 2012).) Part B of title
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
III, which for editorial reasons was
redesignated as Part A upon
incorporation into the U. S. Code (42
U.S.C. 6291–6309, as codified),
establishes the ‘‘Energy Conservation
Program for Consumer Products Other
Than Automobiles.’’ The list of
‘‘covered products’’ under EPCA
includes dehumidifiers, which are the
subject of today’s rule. 42 U.S.C.
6292(a)(11).
Under EPCA, the energy conservation
program consists essentially of four
parts: (1) Testing, (2) labeling, (3)
Federal energy conservation standards,
and (4) certification and enforcement
procedures. The testing requirements
consist of test procedures that
manufacturers of products must use to:
(1) Ensure that their products meet the
applicable energy conservation
standards adopted under EPCA; and (2)
make representations about the
efficiency of those products. DOE must
use the test procedures to ensure
compliance with DOE’s energy
conservation standards. 42 U.S.C.
6295(s)
General Test Procedure Rulemaking
Process
Under 42 U.S.C. 6293, EPCA sets forth
the criteria and procedures DOE must
follow when prescribing or amending
test procedures for covered products.
EPCA provides in relevant part that any
test procedures prescribed or amended
under section 6293 must be reasonably
designed to produce test results which
measure energy efficiency, energy use,
or estimated annual operating cost of a
covered product during a representative
average use cycle or period of use and
shall not be unduly burdensome to
conduct. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(3)) In
addition, if DOE determines that a test
procedure amendment is warranted, it
must publish proposed test procedures
and offer the public an opportunity to
present oral and written comments on
them. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(2))
The Energy Policy Act of 2005
(EPACT) amended EPCA to specify that
the dehumidifier test criteria used under
the ENERGY STAR 1 program in effect
as of January 1, 2001, must serve as the
basis for the DOE test procedure for
dehumidifiers, unless revised by DOE.
(EPACT, section 135(b); 42 U.S.C.
6293(b)(13)) The ENERGY STAR test
criteria required that the Canadian
Standards Association (CAN/CSA)
standard CAN/CSA–C749–1994
(R2005), ‘‘Performance of
Dehumidifiers,’’ be used to calculate the
energy factor (EF) and that ANSI/AHAM
1 For more information, please visit https://
www.energystar.gov/.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:20 Feb 06, 2014
Jkt 232001
Standard DH–1, ‘‘Dehumidifiers,’’ be
used to measure capacity. The ENERGY
STAR test criteria did not specify which
version of ANSI/AHAM Standard DH–1,
‘‘Dehumidifiers,’’ was to be used,
although the version in effect on January
1, 2001, was ANSI/AHAM DH–1–1992.
DOE adopted these test criteria, along
with related definitions and tolerances,
as its test procedure for dehumidifiers at
10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
part 430, subpart B, appendix X in 2006.
71 FR 71340, 71347, 71366, 713667–68
(Dec. 8, 2006).
On October 31, 2012, DOE published
a final rule to establish a new test
procedure for dehumidifiers that
references ANSI/AHAM Standard DH–
1–2008, ‘‘Dehumidifiers,’’ (ANSI/AHAM
DH–1–2008) rather than the ENERGY
STAR test criteria for both energy use
and capacity measurements. 77 FR
65995 (Oct. 31, 2012). The final rule
also adopted standby and off mode
provisions that satisfy the requirement
in the Energy Independence and
Security Act of 2007 (EISA) for DOE to
include measures of standby mode and
off mode energy consumption in its test
procedures for residential products, if
technically feasible. (42 U.S.C.
6295(gg)(2)(A)) This new DOE test
procedure, codified at 10 CFR part 430,
subpart B, appendix X1 (‘‘appendix
X1’’), establishes a new metric,
integrated energy factor (IEF), which
incorporates measures of active mode,
standby mode, and off mode energy use.
Appendix X1 is not currently required
to demonstrate compliance with energy
conservation standards, but would be
required after the compliance date of
any amended standards that include
standby mode and off mode energy
consumption. Manufacturers may
currently use the test procedure set forth
in either appendix X or appendix X1 to
make representations related to active
mode energy consumption of
dehumidifiers; however, manufacturers
are required to use the test procedure set
forth in appendix X1 to make any
representations related to standby mode
and off mode energy consumption.
On October 22, 2013, DOE published
a NOPR (‘‘October 2013 NOPR’’)
proposing to require manufacturers to
test using the active mode provisions in
appendix X1 to determine compliance
with the existing energy conservation
standards. DOE determined that the
active mode provisions of appendix X1
are the functional equivalent of the
active mode provisions of appendix X.
In addition, appendix X1 in its entirety
would be required for use by
manufacturers that make
representations of standby mode or off
mode energy use, and, after the
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7367
compliance date for any amended
energy conservation standards that
incorporate standby mode or off mode
energy use, to demonstrate compliance
with those standards. In addition, 30
days after publication of the final rule
in the Federal Register, the existing
appendix X would be removed from the
Federal Register, and appendix X1
would be re-designated as appendix X.
78 FR 62488 (Oct. 22, 2013).
II. Discussion
In the October 2013 NOPR, DOE
stated that although manufacturers may
currently test dehumidifiers using the
test procedure set forth in either
appendix X or appendix X1 to
determine compliance with existing
energy conservation standards and to
make representations related to active
mode energy consumption, DOE
believes that manufacturers and test
laboratories typically use ANSI/AHAM
DH–1–2008 for such purposes,
consistent with the requirements of
appendix X1. DOE further noted that the
use of the current version of ANSI/
AHAM DH–1 is required to be used for
other industry testing purposes, such as
for the AHAM dehumidifier verification
program, and at this time ANSI/AHAM
DH–1–2008 is the current version. In
addition, appendix X is functionally
equivalent to the active mode provisions
of appendix X1. 78 FR 62488, 62488
(Oct. 22, 2013).
Therefore, DOE proposed in the
October 2013 NOPR that, as of 30 days
after publication of the final rule,
manufacturers would demonstrate
compliance with existing energy
conservation standards using appendix
X1 (re-designated as appendix X) and
that appendix X would no longer be
used and would be removed from the
Federal Register. DOE also proposed to
clarify that, to preclude unnecessary
testing burden, manufacturers that do
not make representations with respect to
standby mode and off mode energy
consumption may perform only the
active mode test provisions when
testing to determine compliance with
existing standards. Manufacturers
would have 180 additional days to make
any changes needed to representations,
including labels, certification reports,
marketing materials, etc., although DOE
did not expect any modifications would
be needed because the proposal would
not change measured energy
consumption. Finally, DOE proposed to
amend the test procedures at 10 CFR
430.23(z) to require that EF, when
measured, be determined according to
the relevant active mode provisions of
appendix X1 (re-designated as appendix
X), and IEF, when measured, be
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
7368
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
determined according to appendix X1
(re-designated as appendix X) in its
entirety. Id.
In response to the October 2013
NOPR, AHAM expressed support for
DOE’s proposal to require the use of the
active mode provisions of appendix X1
to determine compliance with existing
energy conservation standards.
According to AHAM, current practice is
to test according to ANSI/AHAM DH–1–
2008. In addition, AHAM agreed that
appendix X is functionally equivalent to
the active mode provisions of appendix
X1, and that the proposal would not be
expected to cause changes in measured
dehumidifier energy efficiency. (AHAM,
No. 2 at p. 2) 2 AHAM also submitted
suggested clarifications to the active
mode provisions in appendix X1 related
to control settings and psychrometer
requirements. DOE will address such
proposals in a separate rulemaking. In
consideration of this support and for the
reasons discussed previously, DOE
adopts in this final rule the amendments
that were proposed in the October 2013
NOPR.
III. Procedural Issues and Regulatory
Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that test
procedure rulemakings do not constitute
‘‘significant regulatory actions’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 FR
51735 (Oct. 4, 1993). Accordingly, this
action was not subject to review under
the Executive Order by the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
(OIRA) in the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
B. Review Under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires preparation
of an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis (IFRA) for any rule that by law
must be proposed for public comment,
unless the agency certifies that the rule,
if promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. As
required by Executive Order 13272,
‘‘Proper Consideration of Small Entities
in Agency Rulemaking,’’ 67 FR 53461
(August 16, 2002), DOE published
2 A notation in the form ‘‘AHAM, No. 2 at p. 2’’
identifies a written comment: (1) Made by the
Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers; (2)
recorded in document number 2 that is filed in the
docket of the residential dehumidifier test
procedure rulemaking (Docket No. EERE–2013–
BT–TP–0044) and available for review at
www.regulations.gov; and (3) which appears on
page 2 of document number 2.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:20 Feb 06, 2014
Jkt 232001
procedures and policies on February 19,
2003, to ensure that the potential
impacts of its rules on small entities are
properly considered during the DOE
rulemaking process. 68 FR 7990. DOE
has made its procedures and policies
available on the Office of the General
Counsel’s Web site: https://energy.gov/
gc/office-general-counsel.
DOE reviewed today’s final rule under
the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act and the procedures and
policies published on February 19,
2003. DOE has concluded that the rule
will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The factual basis for this certification is
as follows:
The Small Business Administration
(SBA) considers a business entity to be
small business, if, together with its
affiliates, it employs less than a
threshold number of workers specified
in 13 CFR part 121. These size standards
and codes are established by the North
American Industry Classification
System (NAICS). The threshold number
for NAICS classification code 335211,
‘‘Electric Housewares and Household
Fan Manufacturing,’’ which applies to
dehumidifier manufacturers, is 750
employees.
Most of the manufacturers supplying
residential dehumidifiers are large
multinational corporations. DOE
surveyed the AHAM member directory
to identify manufacturers of residential
dehumidifiers. DOE then consulted
publicly-available data, purchased
company reports from vendors such as
Dun and Bradstreet, and contacted
manufacturers, where needed, to
determine if they meet the SBA’s
definition of a ‘‘small business
manufacturing facility’’ and have their
manufacturing facilities located within
the United States. Based on this
analysis, DOE identified five small
businesses that manufacture residential
dehumidifiers.
Today’s final rule amends DOE’s test
procedures for dehumidifiers by
requiring use of the procedures at
appendix XI (re-designated as appendix
X), which DOE understands is
consistent with current industry
practice. These procedures require use
of an updated industry dehumidifier
test method, which may potentially
require manufacturers to install a larger
test chamber and different air handling
equipment. However, many
manufacturers may already be using
ANSI/AHAM DH–1–2008 in certifying
their products. DOE notes that one of
the small businesses has products listed
in AHAM’s current dehumidifier
database of verified products, indicating
that those tests were conducted
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
according to DH–1–2008. In addition,
AHAM selected an independent test
laboratory to conduct dehumidifier
testing and verification for its
certification program using DH–1–2008.
It is likely that this laboratory also
performs testing for manufacturers to
determine compliance with energy
conservation standards in the same
facility as the AHAM verification
testing. Therefore, DOE concluded in
the October 2012 final rule that
established these procedures that small
businesses will not be likely to require
investments in facility upgrades due to
the requirement to use the DOE
dehumidifier test procedure that
references DH–1–2008.
For these reasons, DOE concludes and
certifies that today’s final rule requiring
earlier use of these procedures,
consistent with current industry
practice, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Accordingly,
DOE has not prepared a regulatory
flexibility analysis for this rulemaking.
DOE has transmitted the certification
and supporting statement of factual
basis to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy
of the SBA for review under 5 U.S.C.
605(b).
C. Review Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995
Manufacturers of residential
dehumidifiers must certify to DOE that
their products comply with any
applicable energy conservation
standards. In certifying compliance,
manufacturers must test their products
according to the DOE test procedures for
dehumidifiers, including any
amendments adopted for those test
procedures. DOE has established
regulations for the certification and
recordkeeping requirements for all
covered consumer products and
commercial equipment, including
dehumidifiers. (76 FR 12422 (March 7,
2011). The collection-of-information
requirement for the certification and
recordkeeping is subject to review and
approval by OMB under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA). This requirement
has been approved by OMB under OMB
control number 1910–1400. Public
reporting burden for the certification is
estimated to average 20 hours per
response, including the time for
reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection
of information.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
D. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
In this final rule, DOE amends its test
procedure for dehumidifiers. DOE has
determined that this rule falls into a
class of actions that are categorically
excluded from review under the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and DOE’s
implementing regulations at 10 CFR part
1021. Specifically, this rule amends an
existing rule without affecting the
amount, quality or distribution of
energy usage, and, therefore, will not
result in any environmental impacts.
Thus, this rulemaking is covered by
Categorical Exclusion A5 under 10 CFR
part 1021, subpart D, which applies to
any rulemaking that interprets or
amends an existing rule without
changing the environmental effect of
that rule. Accordingly, neither an
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required.
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism,’’
64 FR 43255 (August 4, 1999) imposes
certain requirements on agencies
formulating and implementing policies
or regulations that preempt State law or
that have Federalism implications. The
Executive Order requires agencies to
examine the constitutional and statutory
authority supporting any action that
would limit the policymaking discretion
of the States and to carefully assess the
necessity for such actions. The
Executive Order also requires agencies
to have an accountable process to
ensure meaningful and timely input by
State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have Federalism implications. On
March 14, 2000, DOE published a
statement of policy describing the
intergovernmental consultation process
it will follow in the development of
such regulations. 65 FR 13735. DOE
examined this final rule and determined
that it will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. EPCA
governs and prescribes Federal
preemption of State regulations as to
energy conservation for the products
that are the subject of today’s final rule.
States can petition DOE for exemption
from such preemption to the extent, and
based on criteria, set forth in EPCA. (42
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:20 Feb 06, 2014
Jkt 232001
U.S.C. 6297(d)) No further action is
required by Executive Order 13132.
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
Regarding the review of existing
regulations and the promulgation of
new regulations, section 3(a) of
Executive Order 12988, ‘‘Civil Justice
Reform,’’ 61 FR 4729 (Feb. 7, 1996),
imposes on Federal agencies the general
duty to adhere to the following
requirements: (1) Eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity; (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation; (3)
provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct rather than a general
standard; and (4) promote simplification
and burden reduction. Section 3(b) of
Executive Order 12988 specifically
requires that Executive agencies make
every reasonable effort to ensure that the
regulation: (1) Clearly specifies the
preemptive effect, if any; (2) clearly
specifies any effect on existing Federal
law or regulation; (3) provides a clear
legal standard for affected conduct
while promoting simplification and
burden reduction; (4) specifies the
retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately
defines key terms; and (6) addresses
other important issues affecting clarity
and general draftsmanship under any
guidelines issued by the Attorney
General. Section 3(c) of Executive Order
12988 requires Executive agencies to
review regulations in light of applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b) to
determine whether they are met or it is
unreasonable to meet one or more of
them. DOE has completed the required
review and determined that, to the
extent permitted by law, this final rule
meets the relevant standards of
Executive Order 12988.
G. Review Under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) requires
each Federal agency to assess the effects
of Federal regulatory actions on State,
local, and Tribal governments and the
private sector. Public Law 104–4, sec.
201 (codified at 2 U.S.C. 1531). For a
regulatory action resulting in a rule that
may cause the expenditure by State,
local, and Tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100 million or more in any one year
(adjusted annually for inflation), section
202 of UMRA requires a Federal agency
to publish a written statement that
estimates the resulting costs, benefits,
and other effects on the national
economy. (2 U.S.C. 1532(a), (b)) The
UMRA also requires a Federal agency to
develop an effective process to permit
timely input by elected officers of State,
local, and Tribal governments on a
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7369
proposed ‘‘significant intergovernmental
mandate,’’ and requires an agency plan
for giving notice and opportunity for
timely input to potentially affected
small governments before establishing
any requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. On March 18, 1997, DOE
published a statement of policy on its
process for intergovernmental
consultation under UMRA. 62 FR
12820; also available at https://
energy.gov/gc/office-general-counsel.
DOE examined today’s final rule
according to UMRA and its statement of
policy and determined that the rule
contains neither an intergovernmental
mandate, nor a mandate that may result
in the expenditure of $100 million or
more in any year, so these requirements
do not apply.
H. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105–277) requires
Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rule
that may affect family well-being.
Today’s final rule will not have any
impact on the autonomy or integrity of
the family as an institution.
Accordingly, DOE has concluded that it
is not necessary to prepare a Family
Policymaking Assessment.
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
DOE has determined, under Executive
Order 12630, ‘‘Governmental Actions
and Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights’’ 53 FR 8859
(March 18, 1988), that this regulation
will not result in any takings that might
require compensation under the Fifth
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
J. Review Under Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 2001
Section 515 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001 (44 U.S.C. 3516 note) provides
for agencies to review most
disseminations of information to the
public under guidelines established by
each agency pursuant to general
guidelines issued by OMB. OMB’s
guidelines were published at 67 FR
8452 (Feb. 22, 2002), and DOE’s
guidelines were published at 67 FR
62446 (Oct. 7, 2002). DOE has reviewed
today’s final rule under the OMB and
DOE guidelines and has concluded that
it is consistent with applicable policies
in those guidelines.
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
7370
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use,’’ 66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001), requires Federal agencies to
prepare and submit to OMB, a
Statement of Energy Effects for any
significant energy action. A ‘‘significant
energy action’’ is defined as any action
by an agency that promulgated or is
expected to lead to promulgation of a
final rule, and that: (1) Is a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866, or any successor order; and (2)
is likely to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy; or (3) is designated by the
Administrator of OIRA as a significant
energy action. For any significant energy
action, the agency must give a detailed
statement of any adverse effects on
energy supply, distribution, or use if the
regulation is implemented, and of
reasonable alternatives to the action and
their expected benefits on energy
supply, distribution, and use.
Today’s regulatory action is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866. Moreover, it
would not have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, nor has it been designated as
a significant energy action by the
Administrator of OIRA. Therefore, it is
not a significant energy action, and,
accordingly, DOE has not prepared a
Statement of Energy Effects.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Jkt 232001
As required by 5 U.S.C. 801, DOE will
report to Congress on the promulgation
of today’s rule before its effective date.
The report will state that it has been
determined that the rule is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
IV. Approval of the Office of the
Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved
publication of this final rule.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 430
Administrative practice and
procedure, Confidential business
information, Energy conservation,
Household appliances, Imports,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Small
businesses.
Issued in Washington, DC, on January 29,
2014.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy
Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, DOE amends part 430 of
Chapter II of Title 10, Code of Federal
Regulations as set forth below:
PART 430—ENERGY CONSERVATION
PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER
PRODUCTS
determined according to paragraph 5.2
of appendix X to this subpart.
*
*
*
*
*
Appendix X to Subpart B of Part 430—
[Removed]
4. Appendix X to subpart B of part 430
is removed.
■
Appendix X1 to Subpart B of Part 430—
[Redesignated as Appendix X]
5. Appendix X1 to subpart B of part
430 is redesignated as appendix X.
■ 6. Redesignated appendix X to subpart
B of part 430 is amended by revising the
Note after the heading to read as
follows:
■
Appendix X to Subpart B of Part 430–
Uniform Test Method for Measuring the
Energy Consumption of Dehumidifiers
Note: After August 6, 2014, any
representations made with respect to the
energy use or efficiency of dehumidifiers
must be made in accordance with the results
of testing pursuant to this appendix. After
this date, if a manufacturer elects to make
representations with regard to standby mode
and off mode energy consumption, then
testing must also include the provisions of
this appendix related to standby mode and
off mode energy consumption.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–02355 Filed 2–6–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1. The authority citation for part 430
continues to read as follows:
Federal Aviation Administration
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291–6309; 28 U.S.C.
2461 note.
Under section 301 of the Department
of Energy Organization Act (Pub. L. 95–
91; 42 U.S.C. 7101), DOE must comply
with section 32 of the Federal Energy
Administration Act of 1974, as amended
by the Federal Energy Administration
Authorization Act of 1977. (15 U.S.C.
788; FEAA) Section 32 essentially
provides in relevant part that, where a
proposed rule authorizes or requires use
of commercial standards, the notice of
proposed rulemaking must inform the
public of the use and background of
such standards. In addition, section
32(c) requires DOE to consult with the
Attorney General and the Chairman of
the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
concerning the impact of the
commercial or industry standards on
competition. DOE required the use of a
commercial standard (DH–1–2008) in
the October 2012 final rule. This rule
requires earlier use of the October 2012
test procedures in this rulemaking, but
does not require the use of a commercial
16:20 Feb 06, 2014
M. Congressional Notification
14 CFR Part 25
§ 430.3
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0942; Special
Conditions No. 25–515–SC]
■
L. Review Under Section 32 of the
Federal Energy Administration Act of
1974
VerDate Mar<15>2010
standard, so these requirements do not
apply.
[Amended]
2. Section 430.3 is amended by
removing ‘‘X1’’ from paragraphs (h)(1)
and (o)(4) and adding ‘‘X’’ in its place.
■ 3. Section 430.23 is amended by
revising paragraph (z) to read as follows:
■
Special Conditions: Bombardier
Aerospace Inc., Models BD–500–1A10
and BD–500–1A11 Series Airplanes;
Autobraking System Loads
§ 430.23 Test procedures for the
measurement of energy and water
consumption.
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions.
*
SUMMARY:
*
*
*
*
(z) Dehumidifiers. (1) When
measuring the energy factor for
dehumidifiers (see the note at the
beginning of appendix X to this
subpart), expressed in liters per kilowatt
hour (L/kWh), energy factor shall be
measured in accordance with section
4.1 of appendix X to this subpart.
(2) When measuring the integrated
energy factor for dehumidifiers (see the
note at the beginning of appendix X to
this subpart), expressed in L/kWh,
integrated energy factor shall be
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
AGENCY:
These special conditions are
issued for the Bombardier Aerospace
Inc. Models BD–500–1A10 and BD–
500–1A11 series airplanes. These
airplanes will have novel or unusual
design features associated with the
autobraking system for use during
landing. The applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for this
design feature. These special conditions
contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers
necessary to establish a level of safety
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 26 (Friday, February 7, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7366-7370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02355]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[Docket No. EERE-2013-BT-TP-0044]
RIN 1904-AD06
Energy Conservation Program: Compliance Date for the Dehumidifier
Test Procedure
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) is issuing a final rule that
will require manufacturers to test dehumidifiers using the active mode
provisions in the test procedure for dehumidifiers currently found in
DOE regulations to determine compliance with the existing energy
conservation standards. The appendix in its entirety will be required
for use by manufacturers that make representations of standby mode or
off mode energy use, and, after the compliance date for any amended
energy conservation standards enacted in the future that incorporate
measures of standby mode and off mode energy use, to demonstrate
compliance with such amended standards. The amendments in this final
rule modify the compliance dates to allow use of the ANSI/AHAM DH-1-
2008 in the near term.
DATES: The effective date of this rule is March 10, 2014. The
incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the rule
is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of March 10,
2014.
ADDRESSES: The docket, which includes Federal Register notices,
comments, and other supporting documents/materials, is available for
review at regulations.gov. All documents in the docket are listed in
the regulations.gov index. However, some documents listed in the index,
such as those containing information that is exempt from public
disclosure, may not be publicly available.
A link to the docket Web page can be found at: https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EERE-2013-BT-TP-0044. This Web
page will contain a link to the docket for this rule on the
regulations.gov site. The regulations.gov Web page will contain simple
instructions on how to access all documents, including public comments,
in the docket.
For further information on how to review the docket, contact Ms.
Brenda Edwards at (202) 586-2945 or by email:
Brenda.Edwards@ee.doe.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ashley Armstrong, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Program, EE-2J, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington,
DC 20585-0121. Email: dehumidifiers@ee.doe.gov.
Elizabeth Kohl, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General
Counsel, GC-71, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585-
0121. Telephone: (202) 586-7796. Email: elizabeth.kohl@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Authority and Background
II. Discussion
III. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
J. Review Under Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
L. Review Under Section 32 of the Federal Energy Administration
Act of 1974
M. Congressional Notification
IV. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Authority and Background
Title III of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 (42
U.S.C. 6291, et seq.; ``EPCA'' or ``the Act'') sets forth a variety of
provisions designed to improve energy efficiency. (All references to
EPCA refer to the statute as amended through the American Energy
Manufacturing Technical Corrections Act (AEMTCA), Public Law 112-210
(Dec. 18, 2012).) Part B of title
[[Page 7367]]
III, which for editorial reasons was redesignated as Part A upon
incorporation into the U. S. Code (42 U.S.C. 6291-6309, as codified),
establishes the ``Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products
Other Than Automobiles.'' The list of ``covered products'' under EPCA
includes dehumidifiers, which are the subject of today's rule. 42
U.S.C. 6292(a)(11).
Under EPCA, the energy conservation program consists essentially of
four parts: (1) Testing, (2) labeling, (3) Federal energy conservation
standards, and (4) certification and enforcement procedures. The
testing requirements consist of test procedures that manufacturers of
products must use to: (1) Ensure that their products meet the
applicable energy conservation standards adopted under EPCA; and (2)
make representations about the efficiency of those products. DOE must
use the test procedures to ensure compliance with DOE's energy
conservation standards. 42 U.S.C. 6295(s)
General Test Procedure Rulemaking Process
Under 42 U.S.C. 6293, EPCA sets forth the criteria and procedures
DOE must follow when prescribing or amending test procedures for
covered products. EPCA provides in relevant part that any test
procedures prescribed or amended under section 6293 must be reasonably
designed to produce test results which measure energy efficiency,
energy use, or estimated annual operating cost of a covered product
during a representative average use cycle or period of use and shall
not be unduly burdensome to conduct. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(3)) In
addition, if DOE determines that a test procedure amendment is
warranted, it must publish proposed test procedures and offer the
public an opportunity to present oral and written comments on them. (42
U.S.C. 6293(b)(2))
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT) amended EPCA to specify that
the dehumidifier test criteria used under the ENERGY STAR \1\ program
in effect as of January 1, 2001, must serve as the basis for the DOE
test procedure for dehumidifiers, unless revised by DOE. (EPACT,
section 135(b); 42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(13)) The ENERGY STAR test criteria
required that the Canadian Standards Association (CAN/CSA) standard
CAN/CSA-C749-1994 (R2005), ``Performance of Dehumidifiers,'' be used to
calculate the energy factor (EF) and that ANSI/AHAM Standard DH-1,
``Dehumidifiers,'' be used to measure capacity. The ENERGY STAR test
criteria did not specify which version of ANSI/AHAM Standard DH-1,
``Dehumidifiers,'' was to be used, although the version in effect on
January 1, 2001, was ANSI/AHAM DH-1-1992. DOE adopted these test
criteria, along with related definitions and tolerances, as its test
procedure for dehumidifiers at 10 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
part 430, subpart B, appendix X in 2006. 71 FR 71340, 71347, 71366,
713667-68 (Dec. 8, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For more information, please visit https://www.energystar.gov/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On October 31, 2012, DOE published a final rule to establish a new
test procedure for dehumidifiers that references ANSI/AHAM Standard DH-
1-2008, ``Dehumidifiers,'' (ANSI/AHAM DH-1-2008) rather than the ENERGY
STAR test criteria for both energy use and capacity measurements. 77 FR
65995 (Oct. 31, 2012). The final rule also adopted standby and off mode
provisions that satisfy the requirement in the Energy Independence and
Security Act of 2007 (EISA) for DOE to include measures of standby mode
and off mode energy consumption in its test procedures for residential
products, if technically feasible. (42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A)) This new
DOE test procedure, codified at 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix X1
(``appendix X1''), establishes a new metric, integrated energy factor
(IEF), which incorporates measures of active mode, standby mode, and
off mode energy use. Appendix X1 is not currently required to
demonstrate compliance with energy conservation standards, but would be
required after the compliance date of any amended standards that
include standby mode and off mode energy consumption. Manufacturers may
currently use the test procedure set forth in either appendix X or
appendix X1 to make representations related to active mode energy
consumption of dehumidifiers; however, manufacturers are required to
use the test procedure set forth in appendix X1 to make any
representations related to standby mode and off mode energy
consumption.
On October 22, 2013, DOE published a NOPR (``October 2013 NOPR'')
proposing to require manufacturers to test using the active mode
provisions in appendix X1 to determine compliance with the existing
energy conservation standards. DOE determined that the active mode
provisions of appendix X1 are the functional equivalent of the active
mode provisions of appendix X. In addition, appendix X1 in its entirety
would be required for use by manufacturers that make representations of
standby mode or off mode energy use, and, after the compliance date for
any amended energy conservation standards that incorporate standby mode
or off mode energy use, to demonstrate compliance with those standards.
In addition, 30 days after publication of the final rule in the Federal
Register, the existing appendix X would be removed from the Federal
Register, and appendix X1 would be re-designated as appendix X. 78 FR
62488 (Oct. 22, 2013).
II. Discussion
In the October 2013 NOPR, DOE stated that although manufacturers
may currently test dehumidifiers using the test procedure set forth in
either appendix X or appendix X1 to determine compliance with existing
energy conservation standards and to make representations related to
active mode energy consumption, DOE believes that manufacturers and
test laboratories typically use ANSI/AHAM DH-1-2008 for such purposes,
consistent with the requirements of appendix X1. DOE further noted that
the use of the current version of ANSI/AHAM DH-1 is required to be used
for other industry testing purposes, such as for the AHAM dehumidifier
verification program, and at this time ANSI/AHAM DH-1-2008 is the
current version. In addition, appendix X is functionally equivalent to
the active mode provisions of appendix X1. 78 FR 62488, 62488 (Oct. 22,
2013).
Therefore, DOE proposed in the October 2013 NOPR that, as of 30
days after publication of the final rule, manufacturers would
demonstrate compliance with existing energy conservation standards
using appendix X1 (re-designated as appendix X) and that appendix X
would no longer be used and would be removed from the Federal Register.
DOE also proposed to clarify that, to preclude unnecessary testing
burden, manufacturers that do not make representations with respect to
standby mode and off mode energy consumption may perform only the
active mode test provisions when testing to determine compliance with
existing standards. Manufacturers would have 180 additional days to
make any changes needed to representations, including labels,
certification reports, marketing materials, etc., although DOE did not
expect any modifications would be needed because the proposal would not
change measured energy consumption. Finally, DOE proposed to amend the
test procedures at 10 CFR 430.23(z) to require that EF, when measured,
be determined according to the relevant active mode provisions of
appendix X1 (re-designated as appendix X), and IEF, when measured, be
[[Page 7368]]
determined according to appendix X1 (re-designated as appendix X) in
its entirety. Id.
In response to the October 2013 NOPR, AHAM expressed support for
DOE's proposal to require the use of the active mode provisions of
appendix X1 to determine compliance with existing energy conservation
standards. According to AHAM, current practice is to test according to
ANSI/AHAM DH-1-2008. In addition, AHAM agreed that appendix X is
functionally equivalent to the active mode provisions of appendix X1,
and that the proposal would not be expected to cause changes in
measured dehumidifier energy efficiency. (AHAM, No. 2 at p. 2) \2\ AHAM
also submitted suggested clarifications to the active mode provisions
in appendix X1 related to control settings and psychrometer
requirements. DOE will address such proposals in a separate rulemaking.
In consideration of this support and for the reasons discussed
previously, DOE adopts in this final rule the amendments that were
proposed in the October 2013 NOPR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ A notation in the form ``AHAM, No. 2 at p. 2'' identifies a
written comment: (1) Made by the Association of Home Appliance
Manufacturers; (2) recorded in document number 2 that is filed in
the docket of the residential dehumidifier test procedure rulemaking
(Docket No. EERE-2013- BT-TP-0044) and available for review at
www.regulations.gov; and (3) which appears on page 2 of document
number 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that test
procedure rulemakings do not constitute ``significant regulatory
actions'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, 58 FR 51735 (Oct. 4, 1993). Accordingly, this
action was not subject to review under the Executive Order by the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires
preparation of an initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IFRA) for
any rule that by law must be proposed for public comment, unless the
agency certifies that the rule, if promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
As required by Executive Order 13272, ``Proper Consideration of Small
Entities in Agency Rulemaking,'' 67 FR 53461 (August 16, 2002), DOE
published procedures and policies on February 19, 2003, to ensure that
the potential impacts of its rules on small entities are properly
considered during the DOE rulemaking process. 68 FR 7990. DOE has made
its procedures and policies available on the Office of the General
Counsel's Web site: https://energy.gov/gc/office-general-counsel.
DOE reviewed today's final rule under the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act and the procedures and policies published on
February 19, 2003. DOE has concluded that the rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. The
factual basis for this certification is as follows:
The Small Business Administration (SBA) considers a business entity
to be small business, if, together with its affiliates, it employs less
than a threshold number of workers specified in 13 CFR part 121. These
size standards and codes are established by the North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS). The threshold number for NAICS
classification code 335211, ``Electric Housewares and Household Fan
Manufacturing,'' which applies to dehumidifier manufacturers, is 750
employees.
Most of the manufacturers supplying residential dehumidifiers are
large multinational corporations. DOE surveyed the AHAM member
directory to identify manufacturers of residential dehumidifiers. DOE
then consulted publicly-available data, purchased company reports from
vendors such as Dun and Bradstreet, and contacted manufacturers, where
needed, to determine if they meet the SBA's definition of a ``small
business manufacturing facility'' and have their manufacturing
facilities located within the United States. Based on this analysis,
DOE identified five small businesses that manufacture residential
dehumidifiers.
Today's final rule amends DOE's test procedures for dehumidifiers
by requiring use of the procedures at appendix XI (re-designated as
appendix X), which DOE understands is consistent with current industry
practice. These procedures require use of an updated industry
dehumidifier test method, which may potentially require manufacturers
to install a larger test chamber and different air handling equipment.
However, many manufacturers may already be using ANSI/AHAM DH-1-2008 in
certifying their products. DOE notes that one of the small businesses
has products listed in AHAM's current dehumidifier database of verified
products, indicating that those tests were conducted according to DH-1-
2008. In addition, AHAM selected an independent test laboratory to
conduct dehumidifier testing and verification for its certification
program using DH-1-2008. It is likely that this laboratory also
performs testing for manufacturers to determine compliance with energy
conservation standards in the same facility as the AHAM verification
testing. Therefore, DOE concluded in the October 2012 final rule that
established these procedures that small businesses will not be likely
to require investments in facility upgrades due to the requirement to
use the DOE dehumidifier test procedure that references DH-1-2008.
For these reasons, DOE concludes and certifies that today's final
rule requiring earlier use of these procedures, consistent with current
industry practice, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Accordingly, DOE has not prepared
a regulatory flexibility analysis for this rulemaking. DOE has
transmitted the certification and supporting statement of factual basis
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the SBA for review under 5 U.S.C.
605(b).
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Manufacturers of residential dehumidifiers must certify to DOE that
their products comply with any applicable energy conservation
standards. In certifying compliance, manufacturers must test their
products according to the DOE test procedures for dehumidifiers,
including any amendments adopted for those test procedures. DOE has
established regulations for the certification and recordkeeping
requirements for all covered consumer products and commercial
equipment, including dehumidifiers. (76 FR 12422 (March 7, 2011). The
collection-of-information requirement for the certification and
recordkeeping is subject to review and approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). This requirement has been approved by
OMB under OMB control number 1910-1400. Public reporting burden for the
certification is estimated to average 20 hours per response, including
the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection of information.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply
[[Page 7369]]
with, a collection of information subject to the requirements of the
PRA, unless that collection of information displays a currently valid
OMB Control Number.
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
In this final rule, DOE amends its test procedure for
dehumidifiers. DOE has determined that this rule falls into a class of
actions that are categorically excluded from review under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and DOE's
implementing regulations at 10 CFR part 1021. Specifically, this rule
amends an existing rule without affecting the amount, quality or
distribution of energy usage, and, therefore, will not result in any
environmental impacts. Thus, this rulemaking is covered by Categorical
Exclusion A5 under 10 CFR part 1021, subpart D, which applies to any
rulemaking that interprets or amends an existing rule without changing
the environmental effect of that rule. Accordingly, neither an
environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is
required.
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism,'' 64 FR 43255 (August 4, 1999)
imposes certain requirements on agencies formulating and implementing
policies or regulations that preempt State law or that have Federalism
implications. The Executive Order requires agencies to examine the
constitutional and statutory authority supporting any action that would
limit the policymaking discretion of the States and to carefully assess
the necessity for such actions. The Executive Order also requires
agencies to have an accountable process to ensure meaningful and timely
input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have Federalism implications. On March 14, 2000, DOE
published a statement of policy describing the intergovernmental
consultation process it will follow in the development of such
regulations. 65 FR 13735. DOE examined this final rule and determined
that it will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. EPCA governs and prescribes Federal preemption of State
regulations as to energy conservation for the products that are the
subject of today's final rule. States can petition DOE for exemption
from such preemption to the extent, and based on criteria, set forth in
EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6297(d)) No further action is required by Executive
Order 13132.
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
Regarding the review of existing regulations and the promulgation
of new regulations, section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988, ``Civil
Justice Reform,'' 61 FR 4729 (Feb. 7, 1996), imposes on Federal
agencies the general duty to adhere to the following requirements: (1)
Eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity; (2) write regulations to
minimize litigation; (3) provide a clear legal standard for affected
conduct rather than a general standard; and (4) promote simplification
and burden reduction. Section 3(b) of Executive Order 12988
specifically requires that Executive agencies make every reasonable
effort to ensure that the regulation: (1) Clearly specifies the
preemptive effect, if any; (2) clearly specifies any effect on existing
Federal law or regulation; (3) provides a clear legal standard for
affected conduct while promoting simplification and burden reduction;
(4) specifies the retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately defines
key terms; and (6) addresses other important issues affecting clarity
and general draftsmanship under any guidelines issued by the Attorney
General. Section 3(c) of Executive Order 12988 requires Executive
agencies to review regulations in light of applicable standards in
sections 3(a) and 3(b) to determine whether they are met or it is
unreasonable to meet one or more of them. DOE has completed the
required review and determined that, to the extent permitted by law,
this final rule meets the relevant standards of Executive Order 12988.
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
requires each Federal agency to assess the effects of Federal
regulatory actions on State, local, and Tribal governments and the
private sector. Public Law 104-4, sec. 201 (codified at 2 U.S.C. 1531).
For a regulatory action resulting in a rule that may cause the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector of $100 million or more in any one year
(adjusted annually for inflation), section 202 of UMRA requires a
Federal agency to publish a written statement that estimates the
resulting costs, benefits, and other effects on the national economy.
(2 U.S.C. 1532(a), (b)) The UMRA also requires a Federal agency to
develop an effective process to permit timely input by elected officers
of State, local, and Tribal governments on a proposed ``significant
intergovernmental mandate,'' and requires an agency plan for giving
notice and opportunity for timely input to potentially affected small
governments before establishing any requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. On March 18, 1997,
DOE published a statement of policy on its process for
intergovernmental consultation under UMRA. 62 FR 12820; also available
at https://energy.gov/gc/office-general-counsel. DOE examined today's
final rule according to UMRA and its statement of policy and determined
that the rule contains neither an intergovernmental mandate, nor a
mandate that may result in the expenditure of $100 million or more in
any year, so these requirements do not apply.
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105-277) requires Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rule that may affect family well-being.
Today's final rule will not have any impact on the autonomy or
integrity of the family as an institution. Accordingly, DOE has
concluded that it is not necessary to prepare a Family Policymaking
Assessment.
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
DOE has determined, under Executive Order 12630, ``Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights'' 53 FR 8859 (March 18, 1988), that this regulation will not
result in any takings that might require compensation under the Fifth
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
J. Review Under Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
2001
Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001 (44 U.S.C. 3516 note) provides for agencies to review most
disseminations of information to the public under guidelines
established by each agency pursuant to general guidelines issued by
OMB. OMB's guidelines were published at 67 FR 8452 (Feb. 22, 2002), and
DOE's guidelines were published at 67 FR 62446 (Oct. 7, 2002). DOE has
reviewed today's final rule under the OMB and DOE guidelines and has
concluded that it is consistent with applicable policies in those
guidelines.
[[Page 7370]]
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use,'' 66 FR 28355
(May 22, 2001), requires Federal agencies to prepare and submit to OMB,
a Statement of Energy Effects for any significant energy action. A
``significant energy action'' is defined as any action by an agency
that promulgated or is expected to lead to promulgation of a final
rule, and that: (1) Is a significant regulatory action under Executive
Order 12866, or any successor order; and (2) is likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy; or (3) is designated by the Administrator of OIRA as a
significant energy action. For any significant energy action, the
agency must give a detailed statement of any adverse effects on energy
supply, distribution, or use if the regulation is implemented, and of
reasonable alternatives to the action and their expected benefits on
energy supply, distribution, and use.
Today's regulatory action is not a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866. Moreover, it would not have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy, nor has
it been designated as a significant energy action by the Administrator
of OIRA. Therefore, it is not a significant energy action, and,
accordingly, DOE has not prepared a Statement of Energy Effects.
L. Review Under Section 32 of the Federal Energy Administration Act of
1974
Under section 301 of the Department of Energy Organization Act
(Pub. L. 95-91; 42 U.S.C. 7101), DOE must comply with section 32 of the
Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974, as amended by the Federal
Energy Administration Authorization Act of 1977. (15 U.S.C. 788; FEAA)
Section 32 essentially provides in relevant part that, where a proposed
rule authorizes or requires use of commercial standards, the notice of
proposed rulemaking must inform the public of the use and background of
such standards. In addition, section 32(c) requires DOE to consult with
the Attorney General and the Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission
(FTC) concerning the impact of the commercial or industry standards on
competition. DOE required the use of a commercial standard (DH-1-2008)
in the October 2012 final rule. This rule requires earlier use of the
October 2012 test procedures in this rulemaking, but does not require
the use of a commercial standard, so these requirements do not apply.
M. Congressional Notification
As required by 5 U.S.C. 801, DOE will report to Congress on the
promulgation of today's rule before its effective date. The report will
state that it has been determined that the rule is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
IV. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved publication of this final
rule.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 430
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Energy conservation, Household appliances, Imports,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Small
businesses.
Issued in Washington, DC, on January 29, 2014.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, DOE amends part 430 of
Chapter II of Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations as set forth below:
PART 430--ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 430 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291-6309; 28 U.S.C. 2461 note.
Sec. 430.3 [Amended]
0
2. Section 430.3 is amended by removing ``X1'' from paragraphs (h)(1)
and (o)(4) and adding ``X'' in its place.
0
3. Section 430.23 is amended by revising paragraph (z) to read as
follows:
Sec. 430.23 Test procedures for the measurement of energy and water
consumption.
* * * * *
(z) Dehumidifiers. (1) When measuring the energy factor for
dehumidifiers (see the note at the beginning of appendix X to this
subpart), expressed in liters per kilowatt hour (L/kWh), energy factor
shall be measured in accordance with section 4.1 of appendix X to this
subpart.
(2) When measuring the integrated energy factor for dehumidifiers
(see the note at the beginning of appendix X to this subpart),
expressed in L/kWh, integrated energy factor shall be determined
according to paragraph 5.2 of appendix X to this subpart.
* * * * *
Appendix X to Subpart B of Part 430--[Removed]
0
4. Appendix X to subpart B of part 430 is removed.
Appendix X1 to Subpart B of Part 430--[Redesignated as Appendix X]
0
5. Appendix X1 to subpart B of part 430 is redesignated as appendix X.
0
6. Redesignated appendix X to subpart B of part 430 is amended by
revising the Note after the heading to read as follows:
Appendix X to Subpart B of Part 430-Uniform Test Method for Measuring
the Energy Consumption of Dehumidifiers
Note: After August 6, 2014, any representations made with
respect to the energy use or efficiency of dehumidifiers must be
made in accordance with the results of testing pursuant to this
appendix. After this date, if a manufacturer elects to make
representations with regard to standby mode and off mode energy
consumption, then testing must also include the provisions of this
appendix related to standby mode and off mode energy consumption.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-02355 Filed 2-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P