International Fisheries; Pacific Tuna Fisheries; Fishing Restrictions in the Eastern Pacific Ocean, 6876-6880 [2014-02333]
Download as PDF
6876
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 2014 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 300
[Docket No. 130717632–4070–01]
RIN 0648–BD52
International Fisheries; Pacific Tuna
Fisheries; Fishing Restrictions in the
Eastern Pacific Ocean
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes regulations
under the Tuna Conventions Act of
1950, as amended, to implement
decisions of the Inter-American Tropical
Tuna Commission (IATTC). At its
Eighty-fifth Meeting in June 2013, the
IATTC adopted a number of resolutions,
some of which require rulemaking to
implement domestically in the United
States. This proposed rule would
implement one of these decisions: The
Resolution on a Multiannual Program
for the Conservation of Tuna in the
Eastern Pacific Ocean during 2014–2016
(Resolution C–13–01). This proposed
rule would: Extend the effective period
of the current regulations in the IATTC
Convention Area in 2014 through 2016;
and provide purse seine owners with
greater flexibility by allowing for an
exemption to the closure periods due to
force majeure. The existing regulations
include a 500-metric ton bigeye tuna
(Thunnus obesus) calendar year catch
limit applicable to longline vessels
greater than 24 meters in overall length
and a 62-day closure period applicable
each year to purse seine vessels of class
size 4 to 6 (greater than 182 metric tons).
The proposed rule would also include
an exemption to the purse seine
closures due to force majeure.
Implementation of Resolution C–13–01
is necessary for the United States to
satisfy its obligations as a member of the
IATTC.
DATES: Comments must be submitted in
writing by February 25, 2014. A public
hearing will be held from 1 p.m. to 4
p.m. PST, February 12, 2014, in Long
Beach, CA.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2014–0014, by any of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:14 Feb 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
https://www.regulations.gov/#!docket
Detail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2014-0014, click
the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, complete
the required fields, and enter or attach
your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Celia Barroso, NMFS West Coast Region,
501 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long
Beach, CA 90802. Include the identifier
‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2014–0014’’ in the
comments.
• Public hearing: The public is
welcome to attend a public hearing and
offer comments on this proposed rule
from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. PST, February 12,
2014 at 501 W. Ocean Boulevard, Suite
4200, Long Beach, CA 90802. The
public may also participate in the public
hearing via conference line: 1–888–790–
6181, passcode 33750.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter
‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if you wish
to remain anonymous). Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF
file formats only. Written comments
regarding the burden-hour estimates or
other aspects of the collection-ofinformation requirements contained in
this proposed rule may be submitted to
NMFS WCR Long Beach Office and by
email to OIRA_Submission
@omb.eop.gov. Copies of the draft
Regulatory Impact Review (RIR) and
other supporting documents are
available via the Federal e-Rulemaking
Portal: https://www.regulations.gov,
docket NOAA–NMFS–2014–0014 or
contact with the Regional
Administrator, William W. Stelle, Jr.,
NMFS West Coast Regional Office, 7600
Sand Point Way NE., Bldg 1, Seattle,
WA 98115–0070, or
RegionalAdministrato.
WCRHMS@noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heidi Taylor, NMFS, 562–980–4039 or
Celia Barroso, NOAA/NMFS Affiliate at
562–432–1850.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on the IATTC
The United States is a member of the
IATTC, which was established under
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the 1949 Convention for the
Establishment of an Inter-American
Tropical Tuna Commission. The full
text of the 1949 Convention is available
at: https://www.iattc.org/PDFFiles/IATTC
_convention_1949.pdf. The IATTC
facilitates scientific research into, as
well as conservation and management
of, highly migratory species of fish in
the IATTC Convention Area (defined as
the waters of the Eastern Pacific Ocean
(EPO)). Since 1998, conservation
resolutions adopted by the IATTC have
further defined the Convention Area as
the area bounded by the coast of the
Americas, the 50° N. and 50° S.
parallels, and the 150° W. meridian. The
IATTC has maintained a scientific
research and fishery monitoring
program for many years, and regularly
assesses the status of tuna and billfish
stocks in the EPO to determine
appropriate catch limits and other
measures deemed necessary to prevent
overexploitation of these stocks and to
promote sustainable fisheries. Current
IATTC member countries include:
Belize, Canada, China, Chinese Taipei
(Taiwan), Colombia, Costa Rica,
Ecuador, El Salvador, the European
Union, France, Guatemala, Japan,
Kiribati, the Republic of Korea, Mexico,
Nicaragua, Panama, Peru, the United
States, Vanuatu, and Venezuela. Bolivia,
Honduras, Indonesia and the Cook
Islands are cooperating non-members.
International Obligations of the United
States Under the Convention
As a Contracting Party to the 1949
Convention and a member of the IATTC,
the United States is legally bound to
implement IATTC resolutions. The
Tuna Conventions Act (16 U.S.C.
sections 951–962 and 971 et seq.)
directs the Secretary of Commerce, after
approval by the Secretary of State, to
promulgate such regulations as may be
necessary to implement resolutions
adopted by the IATTC. The Secretary’s
authority to promulgate such
regulations has been delegated to
NMFS.
IATTC Tuna Conservation and
Management Measures
At its 85th Meeting, in June 2013, the
IATTC by consensus adopted the
Multiannual Program for the
Conservation of Tuna in the Eastern
Pacific Ocean during 2014–2016
(Resolution C–13–01). Resolution C–13–
01 is very similar to the tuna
conservation measure adopted by the
IATTC in 2011 (Resolution C–11–01,
Resolution on a Multiannual Program
for the Conservation of Tuna in the
Eastern Pacific Ocean in 2011–2013).
Both resolutions include a bigeye tuna
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 2014 / Proposed Rules
annual catch limit applicable to longline
vessels greater than 24 meters in overall
length, a time/area closures, and a full
catch retention program applicable to
purse seine vessels greater than 182
metric tons in carrying capacity. For
purposes of domestic implementation,
NOAA treats the registered length that
appears on the vessels’ Coast Guard
Certificate of Documentation as the
‘‘overall length.’’ NMFS implemented
Resolution C–11–01 through regulations
codified at 50 CFR part 300, subpart C
(see final rule 76 FR 68332, November
4, 2011). Resolution C–13–01 includes
exemptions when a purse seine vessel is
rendered unable to return to sea due to
‘‘force majeure’’ (i.e., for purposes of
this Resolution this means disabled by
mechanical and/or structural failure,
fire, or explosion) for at least a period
equivalent to the 62-day annual closure
period.
The main objectives of Resolution C–
13–01 are to ensure that the fishing
mortality of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus
albacares) does not increase and to
reduce the fishing mortality of bigeye
tuna in the Convention Area from 2014
through 2016. The measures are based
in part on the recommendations and
analysis of IATTC scientific staff, as
well as the 2013 updates to stock
assessments for bigeye tuna and
yellowfin tuna, both completed by
IATTC staff. A full assessment of
yellowfin tuna is planned for 2014.
Resolution C–13–01 requires the
United States to restrict catch of bigeye
tuna in the longline fishery and effort in
the purse seine fishery in the
Convention Area in each of the years
2014, 2015, and 2016. This proposed
rule would extend existing management
measures so that they apply in 2014
through 2016. The measures would
include the following: (1) a 500 metric
ton bigeye tuna calendar year catch
limit for longline vessels greater than 24
meters in overall length; and (2) time/
area closures for purse seine vessels of
class sizes 4 to 6 (greater than 182
metric tons carrying capacity).
Resolution C–13–01 also includes
provisions for 2014 through 2016
requiring purse seine vessels class sizes
4 to 6 to first retain on board, and then
land all bigeye, yellowfin, and skipjack
(Katsuwonus pelamis) tuna caught,
except fish unfit for human
consumption for reasons other than size.
A single exception to this full catch
retention program is on the final set of
a trip, when there may be insufficient
well space remaining to accommodate
all of the tuna caught in that set.
Resolution C–11–01 included the same
catch retention provisions, which have
been implemented by NMFS to apply
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:14 Feb 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
indefinitely (see 50 CFR 300.25(e))
because NMFS expected it to be
included in future IATTC tuna
conservation and management
resolutions. If the IATTC removes the
measure in the future, NMFS will
remove the regulation. Thus, further
regulatory action is not needed to
implement the catch retention
provisions of Resolution C–13–01.
Proposed Action
Tuna Conservation Measures for 2014
Through 2016
This proposed rule would continue
the purse seine closure period of 62
days in the years 2014, 2015, and 2016.
Therefore, this proposed rule would
prohibit purse seine vessels subject to
these requirements from fishing in the
Convention Area for a period of 62 days
in 2014, 62 days in 2015, and 62 days
in 2016. This proposed rule would also
continue giving applicable purse seine
vessel owners the ability to choose
between the two possible closure
periods for 2014, 2015, and 2016. These
closures would be in one of two periods
in each year as follows:
2014—29 July to 28 September, or
from 18 November to 18 January 2015.
2015—29 July to 28 September, or
from 18 November to 18 January 2016.
2016—29 July to 28 September, or
from 18 November to 18 January 2017.
Under the proposed rule, a vessel’s
owner, manager, or association
representative would be required to
provide the West Coast Regional
Administrator, via fax to (562) 980–4047
or email to RegionalAdministrator.
WCRHMS@noaa.gov, by July 1 of each
fishing year (2014, 2015, and 2016) with
the following information: (1) name and
official number of fishing vessel; (2) the
closure period the vessel will adhere to
in that year; and (3) the vessel owner or
managing owner’s name and signature.
If a vessel owner fails to notify the
Regional Administrator of his or her
choice by the July 1 deadline, the vessel
would be subject to the later closure
period (November 18 to January 18 of
the following calendar year) by default.
Under the proposed rule, a purse
seine vessel owner could request an
exemption to the 62-day closure
described in the paragraph above due to
force majeure, in which a vessel is
rendered unable to return to sea for a
period of at least 62 days. Force majeure
would be defined in the proposed rule
as a situation in which a vessel is
disabled due to mechanical and/or
structural failure, fire, or explosion. To
place a request for exemption due to
force majeure, the vessel operator would
be required to contact the NMFS West
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6877
Coast Region Sustainable Fisheries
Division Assistant Regional
Administrator, via email or fax, and
provide evidence necessary to
demonstrate that the vessel did not
proceed to sea for at least 62 days and
that the facts on which the request for
exemption is based were due to force
majeure. A request for reconsideration
of initial denial of the request may be
made within 10 days to the West Coast
Regional Administrator. If the request is
accepted, the purse seine vessel owner
may observe a reduced closure period of
30 consecutive days.
The proposed rule would also
continue the high seas time/area closure
for tuna purse seine vessels class sizes
4 to 6 during 2014 through 2016. The
area consists of the area bounded at the
east and west by 96° and 110° W.
longitude and bounded at the north and
south by 4° N. and 3° S. latitude. The
high seas time/area closure was
originally adopted by the IATTC under
Resolution C–09–01 and has been in
place in NMFS regulations at 50 CFR
300.25(f) since 2009.
In addition, this proposed rule would
extend from 2014 through 2016 the
annual bigeye tuna catch limit of 500
metric tons in the Convention Area for
U.S. longline vessels over 24 meters in
overall length. This catch limit has been
in place since 2007 in NMFS regulations
at 50 CFR 300.25(b) and had never been
reached until 2013; the U.S. fishery for
bigeye tuna by longline vessels greater
than 24 meters was closed on November
11, 2013 after NMFS forecasted that the
limit was going to be reached (see 78 FR
65887, November 4, 2013 and 78 FR
70002, November 22, 2013). Between
2008 and 2012 an average of 317 metric
tons (range 199 to 407 metric tons) of
bigeye tuna was caught annually in the
Convention Area by U.S. longline
vessels greater than 24 meters in overall
length. The members of the IATTC
agreed to continue the bigeye tuna catch
limits in the Convention Area after
review and analysis of the most recent
bigeye and yellowfin tuna stock
assessments.
Classification
The NMFS Assistant Administrator
has determined that this proposed rule
is consistent with the Tuna Conventions
Act and other applicable laws, subject to
further consideration after public
comment.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the Chief
Counsel for Regulation of the
Department of Commerce certified to
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
6878
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 2014 / Proposed Rules
the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The rationale for the certification is as
follows:
The purpose of Resolution C–13–01 is
to prevent overfishing by restricting the
catch of bigeye tuna in the longline
fishery and to restrict fishing effort in
the purse seine fishery for bigeye,
yellowfin, and skipjack tuna in the
Convention Area (eastern Pacific Ocean)
in each of the years 2014, 2015, and
2016. Resolution C–13–01 includes
provisions for a force majeure
exemption to the purse seine closure
periods that were first adopted in
Resolution C–12–01 (Amendment to
Resolution C–11–01 on Tuna
Conservation) in 2012. This proposed
rule would: (1) Implement a 500 metric
ton calendar year catch limit on bigeye
tuna caught by longline vessels over 24
meters in length in the Convention Area
from 2014 through 2016; and (2)
prohibit purse seine vessels of class size
4 to 6 (greater than 182 metric tons in
carrying capacity) from fishing for
yellowfin, bigeye, and skipjack tunas in
the Convention Area for a period of 62
days in each of the years 2014, 2015,
and 2016. Purse seine vessels of class
size 4 (between 182 and 272 metric tons
carrying capacity) would be able to
make a single fishing trip of up to 30
days duration during the closed period,
provided that the vessel carries an
observer of the On-Board Observer
Program of the Agreement on the
International Dolphin Conservation
Program. In the event of a force majeure
(a situation in which vessels are
disabled by mechanical and/or
structural failure, fire, or explosion)
rendering a purse seine vessel unable to
proceed to sea outside of a closure
period for at least 62 days (the
prescribed closure period), the vessel
owner may request an exemption from
the closure period and if the request is
accepted by the IATTC, the purse seine
vessel owner may observe a reduced
closure period of 30 consecutive days.
This proposed rule would also close the
fishery for yellowfin, bigeye, and
skipjack tuna within the area of 96° and
110° W and between 4° N and 3° S to
purse seine vessels of class sizes 4 to 6
from 0000 hours UTC (Coordinated
Universal Time) on September 29 to
2400 hours UTC on October 29, in years
2014, 2015, and 2016.
There are only slight adjustments
being made to the existing tuna
conservation measures, which were
implemented (see 76 FR 68332,
November 4, 2011) as a result of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:14 Feb 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
adoption of Resolution C–11–01 in 2011
and expire at the end of 2013. The
proposed adjustments would be the
following: (1) Extend the effective
period of the current regulations in 2014
through 2016; and (2) provide purse
seine owners with greater flexibility by
allowing for an exemption to the closure
periods due to force majeure. The
proposed rule would extend regulations
currently in place, including the 500
metric ton catch limit and 62-day
closure period; because these
regulations are currently in force,
extending them would neither reduce
the profitability of the fishery nor
require any additional compliance effort
or expense by affected vessels. As a
result, environmental and
socioeconomic impacts are expected to
be minimal.
The absence of the proposed action
would allow U.S. fisheries to target
bigeye, yellowfin, and skipjack tunas
unrestricted (except for existing permit
requirements) in the Convention Area.
This may contribute to overfishing or
overfished conditions of tuna resources.
Alternatively, the implementation of
Resolution C–13–01 will result in the
sharing of sustainable benefits from
Pacific tuna fishery resources among the
IATTC member and Cooperating nonmember countries.
The Small Business Administration
(SBA) revised its small business size
standards for several industries in a
final rule effective July 22, 2013 (see 78
FR 37398, June 20, 2013). The rule
increased the size standard for Finfish
Fishing from $ 4.0 to 19.0 million,
Shellfish Fishing from $ 4.0 to 5.0
million, and Other Marine Fishing from
$4.0 to 7.0 million. Id. at 37400 (Table
1).
NMFS has reviewed the analyses
prepared for this action in light of the
new size standards. The new standards
could result in a few more entities being
considered small. However, NMFS does
not think that the new size standards
affect its decision to certify this action.
The small entities that would be
affected by the proposed action are
purse seine vessels of class size 4 to 6
and longline vessels over 24 meters in
length overall. The U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA) defines small
businesses engaged in fishing as those
vessels with annual revenues of or
below $19 million from finfish fishing.
The average revenue per vessel for the
U.S. Hawaii-based longline fleet in 2011
and for the U.S. purse seine fleet in each
year 2010 through 2012 was below $19
million; there is effort in the West Coastbased longline fleet, however, its
revenue cannot be reported due to
confidentiality concerns. Therefore, all
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
of these vessels are considered small
businesses under the RFA.
Estimates of ex-vessel revenues in the
U.S. purse seine fishery in the
Convention Area since 2005, which
would be indicative of current
conditions, are confidential and may not
be publicly disclosed because of the
small number of vessels in the fishery.
Since 2004, an average of only two U.S.
purse seine vessels class sizes 4 to 6
have made landings of catch each year
in the Convention Area. From 2005
through 2008, fewer than three vessels
made landings in the Convention Area,
thus the landings and revenue data from
these years are confidential and cannot
be released. Currently there are four
class size 6 vessels and no class size 5
and 4 vessels likely to be affected by the
rule in the near future. Two vessels
transited through the Convention Area
in 2010, but did not fish. Only three and
two class size 6 vessels fished tunas in
Convention Area in 2011 and 2012,
respectively.
In 2012, the U.S. Hawaii-based
longline fleet consisted of 129 vessels
permitted under the Fishery
Management Plan for Pelagics in the
Western Pacific Region. However,
relatively few are large-scale longline
vessels (vessels over 24 meters in
overall length). From 2008 through
2012, 29 large-scale longline vessels, on
average, annually reported catches of
bigeye tuna in the Convention Area
(combining shallow-sets and deep-sets).
In 2011, when there were 28 large-scale
longline vessels fishing in the
Convention Area, the Hawaii-based
longline fleet landed about 26.11
million pounds or 11,846 metric tons of
pelagic species for an ex-vessel value of
about $78 million. Bigeye and yellowfin
tuna represented about 47 percent and
eight percent of the total longline
landings, respectively. The total revenue
represents average gross revenue per
vessel of about $604,651.
NMFS considers all entities subject to
this action to be small entities as
defined by the revised size standards
because average annual revenue from
fishing per vessel for all vessels in all
fleets operating in the Convention Area
has been below $19 million. Because
each affected vessel is a small business,
this proposed action has an equal effect
on all of these small entities, and
therefore will impact all these small
entities in the same manner. Based on
the analysis above, the proposed action,
if adopted, will not have an adverse or
disproportional economic impact on
these small business entities. Because
the proposed action would not have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities, an Initial
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not
required and none has been prepared.
NMFS solicits public comment on the
analyses in light of the new size
standards.
This proposed rule contains a
collection-of-information requirement
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) that has been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under control number 0648–
0387. Public reporting burden for a
request for exemption due to force
majeure is estimated to average 1 hour
per response (less than one response per
year is expected). Send comments
regarding this burden estimate, or any
other aspect of this data collection,
including suggestions for reducing the
burden, to NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and
by email to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov, or fax to (202) 395–7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 300
Administrative practice and
procedure, Fish, Fisheries, Fishing,
Marine resources, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Treaties.
§ 300.25 Eastern Pacific fisheries
management.
*
Dated: January 29, 2014.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 300, subpart C is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 300—INTERNATIONAL
FISHERIES REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR
part 300, subpart C, continues to read as
follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 951–961 et seq.
2. In § 300.21, revise the definition for
‘‘Regional Administrator’’, and add the
definitions for ‘‘Force majeure’’,
‘‘Overall length’’, and ‘‘Sustainable
Fisheries Division (SFD) ’’ in
alphabetical order to read as follows:
■
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 300.21
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Force majeure means, for the purpose
of § 300.25, a situation in which a vessel
is disabled by mechanical and/or
structural failure, fire or explosion.
*
*
*
*
*
Overall length means registered
length, or the horizontal distance
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:14 Feb 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
between the outboard side of the
foremost part of the stem and the
outboard side of the aftermost part of
the stern, excluding rudders, outboard
motor brackets, and other similar
fittings and attachments for a single-hull
vessel; for a multi-hull vessel, it is the
horizontal distance between the
outboard side of the foremost part of the
stem of the foremost hull and the
outboard side of the aftermost part of
the stern of the aftermost hull,
excluding fittings or attachments (See
46 CFR 69.203).
*
*
*
*
*
Regional Administrator means the
Regional Administrator for the West
Coast Region, National Marine Fisheries
Service, or a designee.
*
*
*
*
*
Sustainable Fisheries Division (SFD)
means the Assistant Regional
Administrator for the Sustainable
Fisheries Division, West Coast Region,
National Marine Fisheries Service, or a
designee.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 300.25, the heading of
paragraph (b) and paragraphs (b)(2) and
(f) are revised to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
(b) Tuna catch limits in the longline
fishery in the Convention Area. (1)
* * *
(2) For each of the calendar years
2014, 2015, and 2016, there is a limit of
500 metric tons of bigeye tuna that may
be captured and landed by longline gear
in the Convention Area by fishing
vessels of the United States that are over
24 meters in overall length.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Purse seine closures in the
Convention Area. (1) A fishing vessel of
the United States of class size 4–6 (more
than 182 metric tons carrying capacity)
may not be used to fish with purse seine
gear in the Convention Area for 62 days
in each of the years 2014, 2015, and
2016 during one of the following two
periods:
(i) From 0000 hours UTC on July 29
to 2400 hours UTC on September 28, or
(ii) From 0000 hours UTC on
November 18 to 2400 hours UTC on
January 18 of the following year.
(2) A vessel owner, manager, or
association representative of a vessel
that is subject to the requirements of
paragraph (f)(1) of this section must in
2014, 2015, and 2016 provide written
notification to the Regional
Administrator declaring to which one of
the two closure periods identified in
paragraph (f)(1) of this section his or her
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6879
vessel will adhere in that year. This
written notification must be submitted
by fax at (562) 980–4047 or email at
RegionalAdministrator.
WCRHMS@noaa.gov and must be
received no later than July 1 in each of
the years 2014, 2015, and 2016. The
written notification must include the
vessel name and registration number,
the closure dates that will be adhered to
by that vessel, and the vessel owner or
managing owner’s name, signature,
business address, and business
telephone number.
(3) If written notification is not
submitted per paragraph (f)(3) of this
section for a vessel subject to the
requirements under paragraph (f)(1) of
this section, that vessel must adhere to
the closure period under paragraph
(f)(1)(ii) of this section.
(4) Request for exemption due to force
majeure. A request for exemption due to
force majeure must be made to the
Sustainable Fisheries Division by fax at
(562) 980–4047 or emailed to Regional
Administrator.WCRHMS@noaa.gov. The
request must include the name and
official number of the vessel, vessel
owner or manager’s name and signature,
and evidence to support the request,
which may include but is not limited to
photographs, repair bills, certificates of
departure from port, and in the case of
a marine casualty a completed copy of
the U.S. Coast Guard Form CG–2692A
(See 46 CFR 4.05–10).
(i) If accepted by the Sustainable
Fisheries Division, the request for
exemption due to force majeure will be
forwarded to the IATTC Director. If
declined by the Sustainable Fisheries
Division, within 10 days of the date that
rejection, the applicant may give
additional information or
documentation to the Regional
Administrator with a request that the
initial decision be reconsidered by fax at
(562) 980–4047 or email to Regional
Administrator.WCRHMS@noaa.gov; the
Regional Administrator shall respond
within 14 business days.
(ii) If the request for an exemption
due to force majeure is accepted by the
IATTC, the vessel must observe a
closure period of 30 consecutive days in
the same year during which the force
majeure event occurred, in one of the
two closure periods described in
paragraph (f)(1) of this section.
(5) A vessel of class size 4 (182 to 272
metric tons carrying capacity) may make
one fishing trip of up to 30 days
duration during the specified closure
period in paragraph (f)(1) of this section,
provided that the vessel carries an
observer of the On-Board Observer
Program of the Agreement on the
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
6880
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 2014 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
International Dolphin Conservation
Program during the entire fishing trip.
(6) A fishing vessel of the United
States of class size 4–6 (more than 182
metric tons carrying capacity) may not
be used from 0000 hours on September
29 to 2400 hours on October 29 in the
years 2014, 2015, and 2016 to fish with
purse seine gear within the area
bounded at the east and west by 96° and
110° W. longitude and bounded at the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:14 Feb 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
north and south by 4° N. and 3° S.
latitude.
(7) At all times while a vessel is in a
time/area closed period established
under paragraphs (f)(1) or (f)(6) of this
section, unless fishing under exceptions
established under paragraphs (f)(4) or
(f)(5) of this section, the fishing gear of
the vessel must be stowed in a manner
as not to be readily available for fishing.
In particular, the boom must be lowered
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
as far as possible so that the vessel
cannot be used for fishing, but so that
the skiff is accessible for use in
emergency situations; the helicopter, if
any must be tied down; and launches
must be secured.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–02333 Filed 2–4–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6876-6880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02333]
[[Page 6876]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 300
[Docket No. 130717632-4070-01]
RIN 0648-BD52
International Fisheries; Pacific Tuna Fisheries; Fishing
Restrictions in the Eastern Pacific Ocean
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations under the Tuna Conventions Act of
1950, as amended, to implement decisions of the Inter-American Tropical
Tuna Commission (IATTC). At its Eighty-fifth Meeting in June 2013, the
IATTC adopted a number of resolutions, some of which require rulemaking
to implement domestically in the United States. This proposed rule
would implement one of these decisions: The Resolution on a Multiannual
Program for the Conservation of Tuna in the Eastern Pacific Ocean
during 2014-2016 (Resolution C-13-01). This proposed rule would: Extend
the effective period of the current regulations in the IATTC Convention
Area in 2014 through 2016; and provide purse seine owners with greater
flexibility by allowing for an exemption to the closure periods due to
force majeure. The existing regulations include a 500-metric ton bigeye
tuna (Thunnus obesus) calendar year catch limit applicable to longline
vessels greater than 24 meters in overall length and a 62-day closure
period applicable each year to purse seine vessels of class size 4 to 6
(greater than 182 metric tons). The proposed rule would also include an
exemption to the purse seine closures due to force majeure.
Implementation of Resolution C-13-01 is necessary for the United States
to satisfy its obligations as a member of the IATTC.
DATES: Comments must be submitted in writing by February 25, 2014. A
public hearing will be held from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. PST, February 12,
2014, in Long Beach, CA.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by
NOAA-NMFS-2014-0014, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2014-0014, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to Celia Barroso, NMFS West
Coast Region, 501 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802.
Include the identifier ``NOAA-NMFS-2014-0014'' in the comments.
Public hearing: The public is welcome to attend a public
hearing and offer comments on this proposed rule from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
PST, February 12, 2014 at 501 W. Ocean Boulevard, Suite 4200, Long
Beach, CA 90802. The public may also participate in the public hearing
via conference line: 1-888-790-6181, passcode 33750.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF file formats only. Written comments
regarding the burden-hour estimates or other aspects of the collection-
of-information requirements contained in this proposed rule may be
submitted to NMFS WCR Long Beach Office and by email to omb.eop.gov">OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov. Copies of the draft Regulatory Impact Review
(RIR) and other supporting documents are available via the Federal e-
Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov, docket NOAA-NMFS-2014-
0014 or contact with the Regional Administrator, William W. Stelle,
Jr., NMFS West Coast Regional Office, 7600 Sand Point Way NE., Bldg 1,
Seattle, WA 98115-0070, or RegionalAdministrato. WCRHMS@noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heidi Taylor, NMFS, 562-980-4039 or
Celia Barroso, NOAA/NMFS Affiliate at 562-432-1850.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on the IATTC
The United States is a member of the IATTC, which was established
under the 1949 Convention for the Establishment of an Inter-American
Tropical Tuna Commission. The full text of the 1949 Convention is
available at: https://www.iattc.org/PDFFiles/IATTC_convention_1949.pdf. The IATTC facilitates scientific research into, as well as
conservation and management of, highly migratory species of fish in the
IATTC Convention Area (defined as the waters of the Eastern Pacific
Ocean (EPO)). Since 1998, conservation resolutions adopted by the IATTC
have further defined the Convention Area as the area bounded by the
coast of the Americas, the 50[deg] N. and 50[deg] S. parallels, and the
150[deg] W. meridian. The IATTC has maintained a scientific research
and fishery monitoring program for many years, and regularly assesses
the status of tuna and billfish stocks in the EPO to determine
appropriate catch limits and other measures deemed necessary to prevent
overexploitation of these stocks and to promote sustainable fisheries.
Current IATTC member countries include: Belize, Canada, China, Chinese
Taipei (Taiwan), Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, the
European Union, France, Guatemala, Japan, Kiribati, the Republic of
Korea, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Peru, the United States, Vanuatu, and
Venezuela. Bolivia, Honduras, Indonesia and the Cook Islands are
cooperating non-members.
International Obligations of the United States Under the Convention
As a Contracting Party to the 1949 Convention and a member of the
IATTC, the United States is legally bound to implement IATTC
resolutions. The Tuna Conventions Act (16 U.S.C. sections 951-962 and
971 et seq.) directs the Secretary of Commerce, after approval by the
Secretary of State, to promulgate such regulations as may be necessary
to implement resolutions adopted by the IATTC. The Secretary's
authority to promulgate such regulations has been delegated to NMFS.
IATTC Tuna Conservation and Management Measures
At its 85th Meeting, in June 2013, the IATTC by consensus adopted
the Multiannual Program for the Conservation of Tuna in the Eastern
Pacific Ocean during 2014-2016 (Resolution C-13-01). Resolution C-13-01
is very similar to the tuna conservation measure adopted by the IATTC
in 2011 (Resolution C-11-01, Resolution on a Multiannual Program for
the Conservation of Tuna in the Eastern Pacific Ocean in 2011-2013).
Both resolutions include a bigeye tuna
[[Page 6877]]
annual catch limit applicable to longline vessels greater than 24
meters in overall length, a time/area closures, and a full catch
retention program applicable to purse seine vessels greater than 182
metric tons in carrying capacity. For purposes of domestic
implementation, NOAA treats the registered length that appears on the
vessels' Coast Guard Certificate of Documentation as the ``overall
length.'' NMFS implemented Resolution C-11-01 through regulations
codified at 50 CFR part 300, subpart C (see final rule 76 FR 68332,
November 4, 2011). Resolution C-13-01 includes exemptions when a purse
seine vessel is rendered unable to return to sea due to ``force
majeure'' (i.e., for purposes of this Resolution this means disabled by
mechanical and/or structural failure, fire, or explosion) for at least
a period equivalent to the 62-day annual closure period.
The main objectives of Resolution C-13-01 are to ensure that the
fishing mortality of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) does not
increase and to reduce the fishing mortality of bigeye tuna in the
Convention Area from 2014 through 2016. The measures are based in part
on the recommendations and analysis of IATTC scientific staff, as well
as the 2013 updates to stock assessments for bigeye tuna and yellowfin
tuna, both completed by IATTC staff. A full assessment of yellowfin
tuna is planned for 2014.
Resolution C-13-01 requires the United States to restrict catch of
bigeye tuna in the longline fishery and effort in the purse seine
fishery in the Convention Area in each of the years 2014, 2015, and
2016. This proposed rule would extend existing management measures so
that they apply in 2014 through 2016. The measures would include the
following: (1) a 500 metric ton bigeye tuna calendar year catch limit
for longline vessels greater than 24 meters in overall length; and (2)
time/area closures for purse seine vessels of class sizes 4 to 6
(greater than 182 metric tons carrying capacity). Resolution C-13-01
also includes provisions for 2014 through 2016 requiring purse seine
vessels class sizes 4 to 6 to first retain on board, and then land all
bigeye, yellowfin, and skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis) tuna caught,
except fish unfit for human consumption for reasons other than size. A
single exception to this full catch retention program is on the final
set of a trip, when there may be insufficient well space remaining to
accommodate all of the tuna caught in that set. Resolution C-11-01
included the same catch retention provisions, which have been
implemented by NMFS to apply indefinitely (see 50 CFR 300.25(e))
because NMFS expected it to be included in future IATTC tuna
conservation and management resolutions. If the IATTC removes the
measure in the future, NMFS will remove the regulation. Thus, further
regulatory action is not needed to implement the catch retention
provisions of Resolution C-13-01.
Proposed Action
Tuna Conservation Measures for 2014 Through 2016
This proposed rule would continue the purse seine closure period of
62 days in the years 2014, 2015, and 2016. Therefore, this proposed
rule would prohibit purse seine vessels subject to these requirements
from fishing in the Convention Area for a period of 62 days in 2014, 62
days in 2015, and 62 days in 2016. This proposed rule would also
continue giving applicable purse seine vessel owners the ability to
choose between the two possible closure periods for 2014, 2015, and
2016. These closures would be in one of two periods in each year as
follows:
2014--29 July to 28 September, or from 18 November to 18 January
2015.
2015--29 July to 28 September, or from 18 November to 18 January
2016.
2016--29 July to 28 September, or from 18 November to 18 January
2017.
Under the proposed rule, a vessel's owner, manager, or association
representative would be required to provide the West Coast Regional
Administrator, via fax to (562) 980-4047 or email to
WCRHMS@noaa.gov">RegionalAdministrator.WCRHMS@noaa.gov, by July 1 of each fishing year
(2014, 2015, and 2016) with the following information: (1) name and
official number of fishing vessel; (2) the closure period the vessel
will adhere to in that year; and (3) the vessel owner or managing
owner's name and signature. If a vessel owner fails to notify the
Regional Administrator of his or her choice by the July 1 deadline, the
vessel would be subject to the later closure period (November 18 to
January 18 of the following calendar year) by default.
Under the proposed rule, a purse seine vessel owner could request
an exemption to the 62-day closure described in the paragraph above due
to force majeure, in which a vessel is rendered unable to return to sea
for a period of at least 62 days. Force majeure would be defined in the
proposed rule as a situation in which a vessel is disabled due to
mechanical and/or structural failure, fire, or explosion. To place a
request for exemption due to force majeure, the vessel operator would
be required to contact the NMFS West Coast Region Sustainable Fisheries
Division Assistant Regional Administrator, via email or fax, and
provide evidence necessary to demonstrate that the vessel did not
proceed to sea for at least 62 days and that the facts on which the
request for exemption is based were due to force majeure. A request for
reconsideration of initial denial of the request may be made within 10
days to the West Coast Regional Administrator. If the request is
accepted, the purse seine vessel owner may observe a reduced closure
period of 30 consecutive days.
The proposed rule would also continue the high seas time/area
closure for tuna purse seine vessels class sizes 4 to 6 during 2014
through 2016. The area consists of the area bounded at the east and
west by 96[deg] and 110[deg] W. longitude and bounded at the north and
south by 4[deg] N. and 3[deg] S. latitude. The high seas time/area
closure was originally adopted by the IATTC under Resolution C-09-01
and has been in place in NMFS regulations at 50 CFR 300.25(f) since
2009.
In addition, this proposed rule would extend from 2014 through 2016
the annual bigeye tuna catch limit of 500 metric tons in the Convention
Area for U.S. longline vessels over 24 meters in overall length. This
catch limit has been in place since 2007 in NMFS regulations at 50 CFR
300.25(b) and had never been reached until 2013; the U.S. fishery for
bigeye tuna by longline vessels greater than 24 meters was closed on
November 11, 2013 after NMFS forecasted that the limit was going to be
reached (see 78 FR 65887, November 4, 2013 and 78 FR 70002, November
22, 2013). Between 2008 and 2012 an average of 317 metric tons (range
199 to 407 metric tons) of bigeye tuna was caught annually in the
Convention Area by U.S. longline vessels greater than 24 meters in
overall length. The members of the IATTC agreed to continue the bigeye
tuna catch limits in the Convention Area after review and analysis of
the most recent bigeye and yellowfin tuna stock assessments.
Classification
The NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed
rule is consistent with the Tuna Conventions Act and other applicable
laws, subject to further consideration after public comment.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 605(b),
the Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to
[[Page 6878]]
the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration
that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The
rationale for the certification is as follows:
The purpose of Resolution C-13-01 is to prevent overfishing by
restricting the catch of bigeye tuna in the longline fishery and to
restrict fishing effort in the purse seine fishery for bigeye,
yellowfin, and skipjack tuna in the Convention Area (eastern Pacific
Ocean) in each of the years 2014, 2015, and 2016. Resolution C-13-01
includes provisions for a force majeure exemption to the purse seine
closure periods that were first adopted in Resolution C-12-01
(Amendment to Resolution C-11-01 on Tuna Conservation) in 2012. This
proposed rule would: (1) Implement a 500 metric ton calendar year catch
limit on bigeye tuna caught by longline vessels over 24 meters in
length in the Convention Area from 2014 through 2016; and (2) prohibit
purse seine vessels of class size 4 to 6 (greater than 182 metric tons
in carrying capacity) from fishing for yellowfin, bigeye, and skipjack
tunas in the Convention Area for a period of 62 days in each of the
years 2014, 2015, and 2016. Purse seine vessels of class size 4
(between 182 and 272 metric tons carrying capacity) would be able to
make a single fishing trip of up to 30 days duration during the closed
period, provided that the vessel carries an observer of the On-Board
Observer Program of the Agreement on the International Dolphin
Conservation Program. In the event of a force majeure (a situation in
which vessels are disabled by mechanical and/or structural failure,
fire, or explosion) rendering a purse seine vessel unable to proceed to
sea outside of a closure period for at least 62 days (the prescribed
closure period), the vessel owner may request an exemption from the
closure period and if the request is accepted by the IATTC, the purse
seine vessel owner may observe a reduced closure period of 30
consecutive days. This proposed rule would also close the fishery for
yellowfin, bigeye, and skipjack tuna within the area of 96[deg] and
110[deg] W and between 4[deg] N and 3[deg] S to purse seine vessels of
class sizes 4 to 6 from 0000 hours UTC (Coordinated Universal Time) on
September 29 to 2400 hours UTC on October 29, in years 2014, 2015, and
2016.
There are only slight adjustments being made to the existing tuna
conservation measures, which were implemented (see 76 FR 68332,
November 4, 2011) as a result of the adoption of Resolution C-11-01 in
2011 and expire at the end of 2013. The proposed adjustments would be
the following: (1) Extend the effective period of the current
regulations in 2014 through 2016; and (2) provide purse seine owners
with greater flexibility by allowing for an exemption to the closure
periods due to force majeure. The proposed rule would extend
regulations currently in place, including the 500 metric ton catch
limit and 62-day closure period; because these regulations are
currently in force, extending them would neither reduce the
profitability of the fishery nor require any additional compliance
effort or expense by affected vessels. As a result, environmental and
socioeconomic impacts are expected to be minimal.
The absence of the proposed action would allow U.S. fisheries to
target bigeye, yellowfin, and skipjack tunas unrestricted (except for
existing permit requirements) in the Convention Area. This may
contribute to overfishing or overfished conditions of tuna resources.
Alternatively, the implementation of Resolution C-13-01 will result in
the sharing of sustainable benefits from Pacific tuna fishery resources
among the IATTC member and Cooperating non-member countries.
The Small Business Administration (SBA) revised its small business
size standards for several industries in a final rule effective July
22, 2013 (see 78 FR 37398, June 20, 2013). The rule increased the size
standard for Finfish Fishing from $ 4.0 to 19.0 million, Shellfish
Fishing from $ 4.0 to 5.0 million, and Other Marine Fishing from $4.0
to 7.0 million. Id. at 37400 (Table 1).
NMFS has reviewed the analyses prepared for this action in light of
the new size standards. The new standards could result in a few more
entities being considered small. However, NMFS does not think that the
new size standards affect its decision to certify this action.
The small entities that would be affected by the proposed action
are purse seine vessels of class size 4 to 6 and longline vessels over
24 meters in length overall. The U.S. Small Business Administration
(SBA) defines small businesses engaged in fishing as those vessels with
annual revenues of or below $19 million from finfish fishing. The
average revenue per vessel for the U.S. Hawaii-based longline fleet in
2011 and for the U.S. purse seine fleet in each year 2010 through 2012
was below $19 million; there is effort in the West Coast-based longline
fleet, however, its revenue cannot be reported due to confidentiality
concerns. Therefore, all of these vessels are considered small
businesses under the RFA.
Estimates of ex-vessel revenues in the U.S. purse seine fishery in
the Convention Area since 2005, which would be indicative of current
conditions, are confidential and may not be publicly disclosed because
of the small number of vessels in the fishery. Since 2004, an average
of only two U.S. purse seine vessels class sizes 4 to 6 have made
landings of catch each year in the Convention Area. From 2005 through
2008, fewer than three vessels made landings in the Convention Area,
thus the landings and revenue data from these years are confidential
and cannot be released. Currently there are four class size 6 vessels
and no class size 5 and 4 vessels likely to be affected by the rule in
the near future. Two vessels transited through the Convention Area in
2010, but did not fish. Only three and two class size 6 vessels fished
tunas in Convention Area in 2011 and 2012, respectively.
In 2012, the U.S. Hawaii-based longline fleet consisted of 129
vessels permitted under the Fishery Management Plan for Pelagics in the
Western Pacific Region. However, relatively few are large-scale
longline vessels (vessels over 24 meters in overall length). From 2008
through 2012, 29 large-scale longline vessels, on average, annually
reported catches of bigeye tuna in the Convention Area (combining
shallow-sets and deep-sets). In 2011, when there were 28 large-scale
longline vessels fishing in the Convention Area, the Hawaii-based
longline fleet landed about 26.11 million pounds or 11,846 metric tons
of pelagic species for an ex-vessel value of about $78 million. Bigeye
and yellowfin tuna represented about 47 percent and eight percent of
the total longline landings, respectively. The total revenue represents
average gross revenue per vessel of about $604,651.
NMFS considers all entities subject to this action to be small
entities as defined by the revised size standards because average
annual revenue from fishing per vessel for all vessels in all fleets
operating in the Convention Area has been below $19 million. Because
each affected vessel is a small business, this proposed action has an
equal effect on all of these small entities, and therefore will impact
all these small entities in the same manner. Based on the analysis
above, the proposed action, if adopted, will not have an adverse or
disproportional economic impact on these small business entities.
Because the proposed action would not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities, an Initial
[[Page 6879]]
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not required and none has been
prepared. NMFS solicits public comment on the analyses in light of the
new size standards.
This proposed rule contains a collection-of-information requirement
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that has been approved by
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under control number 0648-
0387. Public reporting burden for a request for exemption due to force
majeure is estimated to average 1 hour per response (less than one
response per year is expected). Send comments regarding this burden
estimate, or any other aspect of this data collection, including
suggestions for reducing the burden, to NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and by
email to omb.eop.gov">OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov, or fax to (202) 395-7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 300
Administrative practice and procedure, Fish, Fisheries, Fishing,
Marine resources, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Treaties.
Dated: January 29, 2014.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 300, subpart C
is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 300--INTERNATIONAL FISHERIES REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR part 300, subpart C, continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 951-961 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 300.21, revise the definition for ``Regional
Administrator'', and add the definitions for ``Force majeure'',
``Overall length'', and ``Sustainable Fisheries Division (SFD) '' in
alphabetical order to read as follows:
Sec. 300.21 Definitions.
* * * * *
Force majeure means, for the purpose of Sec. 300.25, a situation
in which a vessel is disabled by mechanical and/or structural failure,
fire or explosion.
* * * * *
Overall length means registered length, or the horizontal distance
between the outboard side of the foremost part of the stem and the
outboard side of the aftermost part of the stern, excluding rudders,
outboard motor brackets, and other similar fittings and attachments for
a single-hull vessel; for a multi-hull vessel, it is the horizontal
distance between the outboard side of the foremost part of the stem of
the foremost hull and the outboard side of the aftermost part of the
stern of the aftermost hull, excluding fittings or attachments (See 46
CFR 69.203).
* * * * *
Regional Administrator means the Regional Administrator for the
West Coast Region, National Marine Fisheries Service, or a designee.
* * * * *
Sustainable Fisheries Division (SFD) means the Assistant Regional
Administrator for the Sustainable Fisheries Division, West Coast
Region, National Marine Fisheries Service, or a designee.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 300.25, the heading of paragraph (b) and paragraphs (b)(2)
and (f) are revised to read as follows:
Sec. 300.25 Eastern Pacific fisheries management.
* * * * *
(b) Tuna catch limits in the longline fishery in the Convention
Area. (1) * * *
(2) For each of the calendar years 2014, 2015, and 2016, there is a
limit of 500 metric tons of bigeye tuna that may be captured and landed
by longline gear in the Convention Area by fishing vessels of the
United States that are over 24 meters in overall length.
* * * * *
(f) Purse seine closures in the Convention Area. (1) A fishing
vessel of the United States of class size 4-6 (more than 182 metric
tons carrying capacity) may not be used to fish with purse seine gear
in the Convention Area for 62 days in each of the years 2014, 2015, and
2016 during one of the following two periods:
(i) From 0000 hours UTC on July 29 to 2400 hours UTC on September
28, or
(ii) From 0000 hours UTC on November 18 to 2400 hours UTC on
January 18 of the following year.
(2) A vessel owner, manager, or association representative of a
vessel that is subject to the requirements of paragraph (f)(1) of this
section must in 2014, 2015, and 2016 provide written notification to
the Regional Administrator declaring to which one of the two closure
periods identified in paragraph (f)(1) of this section his or her
vessel will adhere in that year. This written notification must be
submitted by fax at (562) 980-4047 or email at
WCRHMS@noaa.gov">RegionalAdministrator.WCRHMS@noaa.gov and must be received no later
than July 1 in each of the years 2014, 2015, and 2016. The written
notification must include the vessel name and registration number, the
closure dates that will be adhered to by that vessel, and the vessel
owner or managing owner's name, signature, business address, and
business telephone number.
(3) If written notification is not submitted per paragraph (f)(3)
of this section for a vessel subject to the requirements under
paragraph (f)(1) of this section, that vessel must adhere to the
closure period under paragraph (f)(1)(ii) of this section.
(4) Request for exemption due to force majeure. A request for
exemption due to force majeure must be made to the Sustainable
Fisheries Division by fax at (562) 980-4047 or emailed to
WCRHMS@noaa.gov">RegionalAdministrator.WCRHMS@noaa.gov. The request must include the
name and official number of the vessel, vessel owner or manager's name
and signature, and evidence to support the request, which may include
but is not limited to photographs, repair bills, certificates of
departure from port, and in the case of a marine casualty a completed
copy of the U.S. Coast Guard Form CG-2692A (See 46 CFR 4.05-10).
(i) If accepted by the Sustainable Fisheries Division, the request
for exemption due to force majeure will be forwarded to the IATTC
Director. If declined by the Sustainable Fisheries Division, within 10
days of the date that rejection, the applicant may give additional
information or documentation to the Regional Administrator with a
request that the initial decision be reconsidered by fax at (562) 980-
4047 or email to WCRHMS@noaa.gov">RegionalAdministrator.WCRHMS@noaa.gov; the Regional
Administrator shall respond within 14 business days.
(ii) If the request for an exemption due to force majeure is
accepted by the IATTC, the vessel must observe a closure period of 30
consecutive days in the same year during which the force majeure event
occurred, in one of the two closure periods described in paragraph
(f)(1) of this section.
(5) A vessel of class size 4 (182 to 272 metric tons carrying
capacity) may make one fishing trip of up to 30 days duration during
the specified closure period in paragraph (f)(1) of this section,
provided that the vessel carries an observer of the On-Board Observer
Program of the Agreement on the
[[Page 6880]]
International Dolphin Conservation Program during the entire fishing
trip.
(6) A fishing vessel of the United States of class size 4-6 (more
than 182 metric tons carrying capacity) may not be used from 0000 hours
on September 29 to 2400 hours on October 29 in the years 2014, 2015,
and 2016 to fish with purse seine gear within the area bounded at the
east and west by 96[deg] and 110[deg] W. longitude and bounded at the
north and south by 4[deg] N. and 3[deg] S. latitude.
(7) At all times while a vessel is in a time/area closed period
established under paragraphs (f)(1) or (f)(6) of this section, unless
fishing under exceptions established under paragraphs (f)(4) or (f)(5)
of this section, the fishing gear of the vessel must be stowed in a
manner as not to be readily available for fishing. In particular, the
boom must be lowered as far as possible so that the vessel cannot be
used for fishing, but so that the skiff is accessible for use in
emergency situations; the helicopter, if any must be tied down; and
launches must be secured.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-02333 Filed 2-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P