Safety Zone; Alaska Marine Highway System Port Valdez Ferry Terminal, Port Valdez; Valdez, AK, 6468-6470 [2014-02219]
Download as PDF
6468
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 23 / Tuesday, February 4, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1 TO § 100.1104—Continued
[All coordinates referenced use datum NAD 83.]
Location ....................................................................................................
Regulated Area .........................................................................................
Dated: January 16, 2014.
K.L. Schultz,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Eleventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2014–02217 Filed 2–3–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
Long Beach Harbor, CA, to Santa Catalina Island, CA and back.
The waters of Long Beach Harbor bordered by Queens Way Bridge,
the Long Beach Breakwater, and the Alamitos Bay West Jetty.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Jason A. Smiley,
Waterways Management Division, U.S.
Coast Guard Marine Safety Unit Valdez,
telephone 907–835–7223, email
jason.a.smiley@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Barbara
Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[Docket Number USCG–2012–0365]
Table of Acronyms
RIN 1625–AA00
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Safety Zone; Alaska Marine Highway
System Port Valdez Ferry Terminal,
Port Valdez; Valdez, AK
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a permanent safety zone on
the navigable waters of Port Valdez
within a 200-yard radius of the Alaska
Marine Highway System (AMHS) Port
Valdez Ferry Terminal. The purpose of
the safety zone is to restrict all vessels
except AMHS vessels from entering
within 200-yards of the AMHS Port
Valdez Ferry Terminal whenever an
AMHS ferry is underway within 200
yards of the terminal and there is a
declared Commercial Salmon Fishery
Opener. This safety zone is necessary to
provide for the safety of life, property
and the environment during periods of
vessel traffic congestion during a
declared Commercial Salmon Fishery
Opener.
DATES: This rule is effective March 6,
2014.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble are part of docket [USCG–
2012–0365]. To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type the docket
number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:57 Feb 03, 2014
Jkt 232001
Fishery Openers are not announced
until the night before the opener, these
temporary final rules were issued late in
the evening or at night (becoming
effective the following morning) leaving
very little time to disseminate news of
the safety zone to affected waterway
users.
Given that, the Coast Guard proposed
to establish a permanent safety zone to
restrict non-AMHS vessels from
entering within a 200-yard radius of the
AMHS Port Valdez Ferry Terminal
whenever an AMHS ferry is underway
within a 200-yard radius of the AMHS
Terminal and there is a declared
Commercial Salmon Fishery Opener
that includes the navigable waters
within 200 yards of the terminal.
A. Regulatory History and Information
On February 1, 2013, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
in the Federal Register (78 FR 7336).
We received no comments on the
proposed rule. No public meeting was
requested and none was held.
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes
and the Final Rule
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the rule is the
Coast Guard’s authority to establish
limited access areas: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46
U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1,
6.04–6, 160.5; Public Law 107–295, 116
Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
A representative of the Alaska Marine
Highway System requested that the
Coast Guard establish a safety zone in
the immediate vicinity of the AMHS
Port Valdez Ferry Terminal whenever a
Commercial Salmon Fishery Opener is
declared, because of previous incidents
of near collisions in the vicinity of the
ferry terminal between AMHS ferry
vessels and commercial fishing vessels.
During Commercial Salmon Fishery
Openers, increased vessel traffic in the
vicinity of the AMHS Port Valdez Ferry
Terminal adds additional congestion to
the waterways and is a cause for
navigational safety concerns, especially
when the commercial fleet is active
along the shoreline adjacent to the
AMHS Port Valdez Ferry Terminal.
The Coast Guard began issuing
temporary final rules to establish
temporary safety zones during
Commercial Salmon Fishery Openers in
2010. Because Commercial Salmon
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive
orders.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
No comments were received. No
changes were made to the regulatory
text as published in the NPRM.
D. Regulatory Analyses
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders. The Coast Guard enforcement of
this safety zone will be of short
duration. The safety zone will be
enforced for a limited amount of time,
only when there is a declared
Commercial Salmon Fishery Opener
and there is an AMHS ferry underway
within 200 yards of the AMHS Port
Valdez Ferry Terminal. Vessels will be
able to navigate around the safety zone.
Furthermore, vessels may be authorized
to transit through the safety zone with
the permission of the COTP.
E:\FR\FM\04FER1.SGM
04FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 23 / Tuesday, February 4, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received no comments
from the Small Business Administration
on this rule. The Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
a portion of the navigable waters of Port
Valdez whenever a Commercial Salmon
Fishery Opener is declared and there is
an AMHS ferry underway within 200
yards of the AMHS Port Valdez Ferry
Terminal.
This safety zone would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. This safety zone
would be activated, and thus subject to
enforcement, only when there is an
announced Commercial Salmon Fishery
Opener and there is an AMHS ferry
underway within 200 yards of the
AMHS Port Valdez Terminal. Vessel
traffic could pass safely around the
safety zone. Before the activation of the
zone, we would issue maritime
advisories widely available to users of
the waterway.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:57 Feb 03, 2014
Jkt 232001
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
6469
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a permanent safety
zone on the navigable waters of Port
Valdez. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
E:\FR\FM\04FER1.SGM
04FER1
6470
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 23 / Tuesday, February 4, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
■
2. Add § 165.1712 to read as follows:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 165.1712 Safety Zone; Alaska Marine
Highway System Port Valdez Ferry
Terminal, Port Valdez; Valdez, AK.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: all navigable waters of Port
Valdez extending 200 yards in all
directions from the edges of the Alaska
Marine Highway System Terminal dock
located in Port Valdez at 61 °07′26″ N
and 146 °21′50″ W.
(b) Enforcement period. The rule will
be enforced whenever there is an Alaska
Marine Highway System Ferry vessel
transiting within the area described in
paragraph (a) of this section and there
is a Commercial Salmon Fishery Opener
that includes the navigable waters
within the safety zone. Each
enforcement period will be announced
by a broadcast notice to mariners when
the Commercial Salmon Fishery Opener
is announced.
(c) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section:
(1) The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
of the U. S. Coast Guard who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port,
Prince William Sound, to act on his or
her behalf.
(2) The term ‘‘official patrol vessel’’
may consist of any Coast Guard, Coast
Guard Auxiliary, state, or local law
enforcement vessels assigned or
approved by the COTP, Prince William
Sound.
(3) The term ‘AMHS vessel’ means
any vessel owned or operated by the
Alaska Marine Highway System,
including, but not limited to: M/V
AURORA, M/V CHENEGA, M/V
COLUMBIA, M/V FAIRWEATHER, M/V
KENNICOTT, M/V LECONTE, M/V
LITUYA, M/V MALASPINA, M/V
MATANUSKA, M/V TAKU and M/V
TUSTUMENA.
(d) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23,
as well as the requirements in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:57 Feb 03, 2014
Jkt 232001
paragraphs (d)(2) through (5) of this
section, apply.
(2) No vessels, except for AMHS
ferries and vessels owned or operated by
AMHS will be allowed to transit the
safety zone without the permission of
the COTP Prince William Sound or the
designated representative during
periods of enforcement.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
COTP or the designated representative.
Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast
Guard vessel or other official patrol
vessel by siren, radio, flashing light or
other means, the operator of the hailed
vessel shall proceed as directed.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the regulated area may
contact the COTP or the designated
representative via VHF channel 16 or
907–835–7205 (Prince William Sound
Vessel Traffic Service) to request
permission to do so.
(5) The COTP, Prince William Sound
may be aided by other Federal, state,
borough and local law enforcement
officials in the enforcement of this
regulation. In addition, members of the
Coast Guard Auxiliary may be present to
inform vessel operators of this
regulation.
Dated: January 9, 2013.
Benjamin J. Hawkins,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port, Prince William Sound.
[FR Doc. 2014–02219 Filed 2–3–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 9 and 721
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2012–0182; FRL–9399–1]
RIN 2070–AB27
Significant New Use Rule on Certain
Chemical Substances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is finalizing a significant
new use rule (SNUR) under the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) for
chemical substances identified
generically as complex strontium
aluminate, rare earth doped, which were
the subject of several premanufacture
notices (PMNs). This action requires
persons who intend to manufacture
(including import) or process any of the
chemical substances for an activity that
is designated as a significant new use by
this final rule to notify EPA at least 90
days before commencing that activity.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The required notification would provide
EPA with the opportunity to evaluate
the intended use and, if necessary, to
prohibit or limit the activity before it
occurs.
DATES: This final rule is effective April
7, 2014.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2012–0182, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics Docket (OPPT Docket),
Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West
Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Public Reading Room is
(202) 566–1744, and the telephone
number for the OPPT Docket is (202)
566–0280. Please review the visitor
instructions and additional information
about the docket available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical information contact: Kenneth
Moss, Chemical Control Division
(7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (202) 564–9232; email address:
moss.kenneth@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The
TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422
South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY
14620; telephone number: (202) 554–
1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you manufacture, process,
or use the chemical substances
contained in this final rule. The
following list of North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
to help readers determine whether this
document applies to them. Potentially
affected entities may include:
• Manufacturers or processors of one
or more subject chemical substances
(NAICS codes 325 and 324110), e.g.,
chemical manufacturing and petroleum
refineries.
This action may also affect certain
entities through pre-existing import
certification and export notification
rules under TSCA. Chemical importers
are subject to the TSCA section 13 (15
U.S.C. 2612) import certification
requirements promulgated at 19 CFR
E:\FR\FM\04FER1.SGM
04FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 4, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6468-6470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02219]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2012-0365]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Alaska Marine Highway System Port Valdez Ferry
Terminal, Port Valdez; Valdez, AK
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a permanent safety zone on the
navigable waters of Port Valdez within a 200-yard radius of the Alaska
Marine Highway System (AMHS) Port Valdez Ferry Terminal. The purpose of
the safety zone is to restrict all vessels except AMHS vessels from
entering within 200-yards of the AMHS Port Valdez Ferry Terminal
whenever an AMHS ferry is underway within 200 yards of the terminal and
there is a declared Commercial Salmon Fishery Opener. This safety zone
is necessary to provide for the safety of life, property and the
environment during periods of vessel traffic congestion during a
declared Commercial Salmon Fishery Opener.
DATES: This rule is effective March 6, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
[USCG-2012-0365]. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Jason A. Smiley, Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Unit Valdez, telephone 907-
835-7223, email jason.a.smiley@uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Barbara Hairston,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Regulatory History and Information
On February 1, 2013, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) in the Federal Register (78 FR 7336). We received no comments on
the proposed rule. No public meeting was requested and none was held.
B. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the rule is the Coast Guard's authority to
establish limited access areas: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701,
3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5;
Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
A representative of the Alaska Marine Highway System requested that
the Coast Guard establish a safety zone in the immediate vicinity of
the AMHS Port Valdez Ferry Terminal whenever a Commercial Salmon
Fishery Opener is declared, because of previous incidents of near
collisions in the vicinity of the ferry terminal between AMHS ferry
vessels and commercial fishing vessels. During Commercial Salmon
Fishery Openers, increased vessel traffic in the vicinity of the AMHS
Port Valdez Ferry Terminal adds additional congestion to the waterways
and is a cause for navigational safety concerns, especially when the
commercial fleet is active along the shoreline adjacent to the AMHS
Port Valdez Ferry Terminal.
The Coast Guard began issuing temporary final rules to establish
temporary safety zones during Commercial Salmon Fishery Openers in
2010. Because Commercial Salmon Fishery Openers are not announced until
the night before the opener, these temporary final rules were issued
late in the evening or at night (becoming effective the following
morning) leaving very little time to disseminate news of the safety
zone to affected waterway users.
Given that, the Coast Guard proposed to establish a permanent
safety zone to restrict non-AMHS vessels from entering within a 200-
yard radius of the AMHS Port Valdez Ferry Terminal whenever an AMHS
ferry is underway within a 200-yard radius of the AMHS Terminal and
there is a declared Commercial Salmon Fishery Opener that includes the
navigable waters within 200 yards of the terminal.
C. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Final Rule
No comments were received. No changes were made to the regulatory
text as published in the NPRM.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. The Coast Guard
enforcement of this safety zone will be of short duration. The safety
zone will be enforced for a limited amount of time, only when there is
a declared Commercial Salmon Fishery Opener and there is an AMHS ferry
underway within 200 yards of the AMHS Port Valdez Ferry Terminal.
Vessels will be able to navigate around the safety zone. Furthermore,
vessels may be authorized to transit through the safety zone with the
permission of the COTP.
[[Page 6469]]
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rule. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule would affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in a portion of the navigable waters of Port Valdez
whenever a Commercial Salmon Fishery Opener is declared and there is an
AMHS ferry underway within 200 yards of the AMHS Port Valdez Ferry
Terminal.
This safety zone would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
safety zone would be activated, and thus subject to enforcement, only
when there is an announced Commercial Salmon Fishery Opener and there
is an AMHS ferry underway within 200 yards of the AMHS Port Valdez
Terminal. Vessel traffic could pass safely around the safety zone.
Before the activation of the zone, we would issue maritime advisories
widely available to users of the waterway.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the establishment of a permanent safety
zone on the navigable waters of Port Valdez. This rule is categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the
Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist supporting
this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping
[[Page 6470]]
requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.1712 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.1712 Safety Zone; Alaska Marine Highway System Port Valdez
Ferry Terminal, Port Valdez; Valdez, AK.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: all navigable
waters of Port Valdez extending 200 yards in all directions from the
edges of the Alaska Marine Highway System Terminal dock located in Port
Valdez at 61 [deg]07'26'' N and 146 [deg]21'50'' W.
(b) Enforcement period. The rule will be enforced whenever there is
an Alaska Marine Highway System Ferry vessel transiting within the area
described in paragraph (a) of this section and there is a Commercial
Salmon Fishery Opener that includes the navigable waters within the
safety zone. Each enforcement period will be announced by a broadcast
notice to mariners when the Commercial Salmon Fishery Opener is
announced.
(c) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
(1) The term ``designated representative'' means any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer of the U. S. Coast Guard who has
been designated by the Captain of the Port, Prince William Sound, to
act on his or her behalf.
(2) The term ``official patrol vessel'' may consist of any Coast
Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, or local law enforcement vessels
assigned or approved by the COTP, Prince William Sound.
(3) The term `AMHS vessel' means any vessel owned or operated by
the Alaska Marine Highway System, including, but not limited to: M/V
AURORA, M/V CHENEGA, M/V COLUMBIA, M/V FAIRWEATHER, M/V KENNICOTT, M/V
LECONTE, M/V LITUYA, M/V MALASPINA, M/V MATANUSKA, M/V TAKU and M/V
TUSTUMENA.
(d) Regulations. (1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR
165.23, as well as the requirements in paragraphs (d)(2) through (5) of
this section, apply.
(2) No vessels, except for AMHS ferries and vessels owned or
operated by AMHS will be allowed to transit the safety zone without the
permission of the COTP Prince William Sound or the designated
representative during periods of enforcement.
(3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the COTP or the designated representative. Upon being hailed by a U.S.
Coast Guard vessel or other official patrol vessel by siren, radio,
flashing light or other means, the operator of the hailed vessel shall
proceed as directed.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the
regulated area may contact the COTP or the designated representative
via VHF channel 16 or 907-835-7205 (Prince William Sound Vessel Traffic
Service) to request permission to do so.
(5) The COTP, Prince William Sound may be aided by other Federal,
state, borough and local law enforcement officials in the enforcement
of this regulation. In addition, members of the Coast Guard Auxiliary
may be present to inform vessel operators of this regulation.
Dated: January 9, 2013.
Benjamin J. Hawkins,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Prince William Sound.
[FR Doc. 2014-02219 Filed 2-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P