Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program Standards, 6200-6203 [2014-02191]
Download as PDF
6200
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 22 / Monday, February 3, 2014 / Notices
response are based on the average of
these estimates.
Dated: January 29, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–02190 Filed 1–31–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0017]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Voluntary National
Retail Food Regulatory Program
Standards
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the
proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the
PRA), Federal Agencies are required to
publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each proposed
extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for
public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on
the information collection provisions of
the Voluntary National Retail Food
Regulatory Program Standards.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on the collection of
information by April 4, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments on the collection of
information to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments on the collection of
information to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All
comments should be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document.
SUMMARY:
FDA
PRA Staff, Office of Operations, Food
and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard
Dr., PI50–400B, Rockville, MD 20850,
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:46 Jan 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined
in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests
or requirements that members of the
public submit reports, keep records, or
provide information to a third party.
Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal
Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in
the Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an
existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB
for approval. To comply with this
requirement, FDA is publishing notice
of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following
collection of information, FDA invites
comments on these topics: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of FDA’s functions, including whether
the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Voluntary National Retail Food
Regulatory Program Standards (OMB
Control Number 0910–0621—Extension)
The Voluntary National Retail Food
Regulatory Program Standards (the
Program Standards) define nine
essential elements of an effective
regulatory program for retail food
establishments, establish basic quality
control criteria for each element, and
provide a means of recognition for those
State, local, territorial, tribal and
Federal regulatory programs that meet
the Program Standards. The program
elements addressed by the Program
Standards are as follows: (1) Regulatory
foundation; (2) trained regulatory staff;
(3) inspection program based on Hazard
Analysis and Critical Control Point
(HACCP) principles; (4) uniform
inspection program, (5) foodborne
illness and food defense preparedness
and response; (6) compliance and
enforcement; (7) industry and
community relations; (8) program
support and resources; and (9) program
assessment. Each standard includes a
list of records needed to document
conformance with the standard (referred
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to in the Program Standards document
as ‘‘quality records’’) and has one or
more corresponding forms and
worksheets to facilitate the collection of
information needed to assess the retail
food regulatory program against that
standard. The respondents are State,
local, territorial, tribal, and potentially
other Federal regulatory agencies.
Regulatory agencies may use existing
available records or may choose to
develop and use alternate forms and
worksheets that capture the same
information.
In the course of their normal
activities, State, local, territorial, tribal,
and Federal regulatory agencies already
collect and keep on file many of the
records needed as quality records to
document compliance with each of the
Program Standards. Although the detail
and format in which this information is
collected and recorded may vary by
jurisdiction, records that are kept as a
usual and customary part of normal
agency activities include inspection
records, written quality assurance
procedures, records of quality assurance
checks, staff training certificates and
other training records, a log or database
of food-related illness or injury
complaints, records of investigations
resulting from such complaints, an
inventory of inspection equipment,
records of outside audits, and records of
outreach efforts (e.g., meeting agendas
and minutes, documentation of food
safety education activities). No new
recordkeeping burden is associated with
these existing records, which are
already a part of usual and customary
program recordkeeping activities by
State, local, territorial, tribal and
Federal regulatory agencies, and which
can serve as quality records under the
Program Standards.
State, local, territorial, tribal and
Federal regulatory agencies that enroll
in the Program Standards and seek
listing in the FDA National Registry are
required to report to FDA on the
completion of the following three
management tasks outlined in the
Program Standards: (1) Conducting a
program self-assessment; (2) conducting
a risk factor study of the regulated
industry; and (3) obtaining an
independent outside audit (verification
audit). The results are reported to FDA
on Form FDA 3519, ‘‘FDA National
Registry Report’’ and Form FDA 3520,
‘‘Permission to Publish in National
Registry.’’ These forms are provided in
the Program Standards document, and
are also provided on FDA’s Web site at:
https://www.fda.gov/Food/
GuidanceRegulation/
RetailFoodProtection/
ProgramStandards/default.htm. If a
E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM
03FEN1
6201
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 22 / Monday, February 3, 2014 / Notices
regulatory agency follows all the
recordkeeping recommendations in the
individual standards and their sample
worksheets, it will have all the
information needed to complete the
forms.
In April 2012, the Conference for
Food Protection recommended that FDA
make two changes to the Program
Standards. The changes have been
incorporated into the 2013 version, the
draft of which is available on FDA’s
Web site. The first change was the
addition of a new criterion in Standard
9. In order to show conformance with
Standard 9, jurisdictions must
implement an intervention strategy to
address risk factors identified in the risk
factor study, and then assess the
effectiveness of the intervention strategy
through subsequent risk factor studies
or other similar tools. The second
change was the creation of an
Administrative Procedures document.
The procedures for enrolling and
participating in the Program Standards
were previously included in Standard 9,
along with other criteria specific to
conducting a risk factor study.
Stakeholders requested that information
pertaining to enrollment and
participation in the Program Standards
be included in a separate, stand-alone
document. Therefore, the information
about the administration of the Program
Standards, previously in Standard 9, is
now provided in the Administrative
Procedures document.
FDA analyzed whether incorporation
of these two changes alters its estimate
of the recordkeeping and reporting
burdens. FDA concluded that there will
be no change to the annual
recordkeeping burden estimate. In the
course of their normal activities, State,
local, territorial, tribal, and Federal
regulatory agencies already implement
and document intervention strategies to
address identified risk factors at
regulated food establishments. The
intention of the new criterion in
Standard 9 is twofold: (1) To ensure that
development and implementation of the
intervention strategy is guided by data
collected through the risk factor study,
or other similar tools and (2) to ensure
that the regulatory agency considers the
effectiveness of the implemented
intervention strategy in light of
subsequent data. FDA notes that
jurisdictions have the option to analyze
their inspection data as indicated by the
Standard 9 criteria, in lieu of
conducting a risk factor study. This is a
less resource-intensive method for
tracking risk factor trends over time.
However, the Agency has not changed
its estimate of 333 hours for Standard 9
shown in Table 2 of this document. The
Agency will reevaluate its estimate
based on data it receives in the future
from participating jurisdictions. As
stated in the preceding paragraph, the
second change resulted in the relocation
of existing information from Standard 9
to the Administrative Procedures
document in the 2013 version of the
Program Standards. Because there were
no changes to content, there will be no
changes to the annual recordkeeping
burden. The two noted changes had no
effect on the reporting burden hour
estimates shown in Table 2 of this
document.
Recordkeeping
FDA’s recordkeeping burden estimate
includes time required for a state, local,
territorial, tribal, or Federal agency to
review the instructions in the Program
Standards, compile information from
existing sources, and create any records
recommended in the Program Standards
that are not already kept in the normal
course of the agency’s usual and
customary activities. Sample worksheets
are provided to assist in this
compilation. In estimating the time
needed for the program self-assessment
(Program Standards 1 through 8, shown
in Table 1 of this document), FDA
considered responses from four State
and three local jurisdictions that
participated in an FDA Program
Standards Pilot study. Table 2 of this
document shows the estimated
recordkeeping burden for the
completion of the baseline data
collection, and Table 3 of this document
shows the estimated recordkeeping
burden for the verification audit.
TABLE 1—SELF-ASSESSMENT
Hours per
record
Standard
Recordkeeping activity
No. 1: Regulatory Foundation ..................
No. 7: Industry & Community Relations ...
No. 8: Program Support and Resources ..
Self-Assessment: Completion of worksheet recording results of evaluations and
comparison on worksheets.1
Self-Assessment: Completion of CFP Field Training Manual and Documentation of
Successful Completion—Field Training Process; completion of summary worksheet of each employee training records.1 2
Self-Assessment: Completion of worksheet documentation 1 .....................................
Self-Assessment: Completion of worksheet documentation of jurisdiction’s quality
assurance procedures.1 2
Self-Assessment: Completion of worksheet documentation 1 .....................................
Self-Assessment: Selection and review of 20 to 70 establishment files at 25 minutes per file. Estimate is based on a mean number of 45. Completion of worksheet.1
Self-Assessment: Completion of worksheet 1 ..............................................................
Self-Assessment: Selection and review of establishment files 1 .................................
Total ...................................................
.......................................................................................................................................
No. 2: Trained Regulatory Staff ................
No. 3: HACCP Principles ..........................
No. 4: Uniform Inspection Program ..........
No. 5: Foodborne Illness Investigation .....
No. 6: Compliance Enforcement ...............
16
19.3
4
19
5
19
2
8
92.3
1 Or
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
comparable documentation.
2 Estimates will vary depending on number of regulated food establishments and the number of inspectors employed by the jurisdiction.
TABLE 2—BASELINE DATA COLLECTION
Hours per
record
Standard
Recordkeeping activity
No. 9: Program Assessment .....................
Risk Factor Study and Intervention Strategy 1 .............................................................
1 Calculation
333
based on mean sample size of 39 and average FDA inspection time for each establishment type. Estimates will vary depending
on number of regulated food establishments within a jurisdiction and the number of inspectors employed by the jurisdiction.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:46 Jan 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM
03FEN1
6202
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 22 / Monday, February 3, 2014 / Notices
TABLE 3—VERIFICATION AUDIT
Hours per
record
Activity
Recordkeeping activity
Administrative Procedures ........................
Verification Audit 1 ........................................................................................................
46.15
1 We
estimate that no more than 50% of time spent to complete self-assessment of all 9 Standards is spent completing verification audit worksheets. Time will be considerably less if less than 9 standards require verification audits.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 4—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 1
Number of
recordkeepers
Activity
Recordkeeping for FDA Worksheets 2 .................................
Number of
records per
recordkeeper
500
Total annual
records
1
500
Average
burden per
recordkeeping
94.29
Total hours
47,145
1 There
2 Or
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
comparable documentation.
FDA bases its estimates of the number
of recordkeepers and the hours per
record on its experience with the
Program Standards. As of September 30,
2013, 563 jurisdictions were enrolled in
the Program Standards. However, based
upon the level of ongoing support
provided by FDA to enrolled
jurisdictions and the number of forms
submitted annually, FDA estimates that
no more than 500 jurisdictions actively
participate in the Program Standards
during any given year. There are
approximately 3,000 jurisdictions in the
United States and its territories that
have retail food regulatory programs.
Enrollment in the Program Standards is
voluntary and, therefore, FDA does not
expect all jurisdictions to participate.
FDA bases its estimate of the hours
per record on the recordkeeping
estimates for the management tasks of
self-assessment, risk factor study, and
verification audit (Tables 1, 2, and 3 of
this document) that enrolled
jurisdictions must perform a total of
471.45 hours (92.3 + 333 + 46.15 =
471.45). Enrolled jurisdictions must
conduct the work described in Tables 1,
2, and 3 over a 5-year period. Therefore
FDA estimates that, annually, 500
recordkeepers will spend 94.29 hours
(471.45 ÷ 5 = 94.29) performing the
required recordkeeping for a total of
47,145 hours as shown in Table 4 of this
document.
Reporting
FDA requires regulatory jurisdictions
that participate in the Program
Standards to submit two forms
annually: Form FDA 3519, ‘‘FDA
National Registry Report,’’ and Form
FDA 3520, ‘‘Permission to Publish in
National Registry.’’ Form FDA 3519
requires the name and address of the
jurisdiction; completion dates for the
self-assessment, risk factor study
(original and update), and verification
audit; names of the person(s) who
completed the self-assessment,
verification audit, risk factor study
(baseline report), risk factor study
(update), and action plan; signature of
the program manager; and date the form
was completed. Form FDA 3520
requires the name and address of the
jurisdiction, contact information for the
enrollee’s designated contact person,
completion date of the self-assessment,
date of the verification audit report,
name of the auditor, signature of the
official completing the form, and date
the form was completed.
The reporting burden in Table 5 of
this document includes only the time
necessary to fill out and send the forms,
as compiling the underlying information
(including self-assessment reports,
baseline surveys, outside audits, and
supporting documentation) is accounted
for under the recordkeeping estimates in
Table 4 of this document.
FDA estimates the reporting burden
for this collection of information as
follows:
TABLE 5—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Activity
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Submission of ‘‘FDA National Registry
Report’’ .................................................
Submission of ‘‘Permission to Publish in
National Registry’’ ................................
Request for documentation of successful
completion of staff training ...................
Total ..................................................
1 There
Number of
respondents
FDA form
Number of
responses per
respondent
Total annual
responses
20:46 Jan 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
Total hours
3519
500
1
500
0.1
50
3520
500
1
500
0.1
50
Conference for
Food
Protection
Training Plan
and Log
500
3
1,500
0.1
150
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
250
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Average
burden per
response
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM
03FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 22 / Monday, February 3, 2014 / Notices
FDA bases its estimates of the number
of respondents and the hours per
response on its experience with the
Program Standards. As explained
previously in this document, FDA
estimates that no more than 500
regulatory jurisdictions will participate
in the Program Standards in any given
year. FDA estimates a total of 12
minutes annually for each enrolled
jurisdiction to complete both forms.
FDA bases its estimate on the small
number of data elements on the two
forms and the ease of availability of the
information. FDA estimates that,
annually, 500 regulatory jurisdictions
will submit one Form FDA 3519 for a
total of 500 annual responses. Each
submission is estimated to take 0.1 hour
per response for a total of 50 hours. FDA
estimates that, annually, 500 regulatory
jurisdictions will submit one Form FDA
3520 for a total of 500 annual responses.
Each of these submissions is estimated
to take 0.1 hour per response for a total
of 50 hours. FDA estimates that,
annually, 500 regulatory jurisdictions
will submit three requests for
documentation of successful completion
of staff training using the CFP Training
Plan and Log for a total of 1,500 annual
responses. Each submission is estimated
to take 0.1 hour per response for a total
of 150 hours. Thus, the total reporting
burden for this information collection is
250 hours.
Dated: January 29, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–02191 Filed 1–31–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–N–0001]
American Glaucoma Society/Food and
Drug Administration Workshop on
Supporting Innovation for Safe and
Effective Minimally Invasive Glaucoma
Surgery; Public Workshop
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
Notice of public workshop.
The Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) is announcing the following
public workshop entitled ‘‘American
Glaucoma Society (AGS)/FDA
Workshop on Supporting Innovation for
Safe and Effective Minimally Invasive
Glaucoma Surgery.’’ This workshop will
address the current challenges in the
assessment of implantable minimally
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:46 Jan 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
invasive glaucoma surgical (MIGS)
devices with a focus on clinical trial
design and conduct. Glaucoma experts
will present evidence to better define
the appropriate patient population, as
well as the appropriate evaluation of
effectiveness and safety for MIGS
devices. The primary goal of the
workshop is to discuss the appropriate
clinical trial design and conduct for
MIGS devices in order to facilitate
bringing these innovative technologies
to the U.S. marketplace.
Date and Time: The public workshop
will be held on February 26, 2014, from
1 p.m. to 6 p.m. Materials may be
picked up starting at 12 noon.
Location: The public workshop will
be held at the Washington Marriott at
Metro Center, 775 12th St. NW.,
Washington, DC 20005.
Contact: Michelle Tarver, Center for
Devices and Radiological Health, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 2504,
Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301–796–
5620, FAX: 301–847–8126, email:
michelle.tarver@fda.hhs.gov.
Registration: AGS will charge a
registration fee to cover its share of the
expenses associated with the workshop.
The registration fee is $150 for AGS
members and $300 for non-members in
advance. Registration is available on a
first-come, first-served basis. Persons
interested in attending this public
workshop may register online or by
telephone. The deadline for online
registration is February 10, 2014, at 5
p.m. EDT. There will be onsite
registration on the day of the public
workshop with the cost of onsite
registration being $150 for AGS
members and $500 for non-members.
Early registration is recommended
because facilities are limited.
If you need special accommodations
due to a disability, please contact Ms.
Susan Monahan at
susan.monahan@fda.hhs.gov or 301–
796–5661 no later than February 3,
2014.
To register for the public workshop,
please visit the AGS Web site (https://
www.americanglaucomasociety.net/
professionals/events/). Those interested
in attending but unable to access the
electronic registration site should
contact AGS Customer Service to
register at 415–561–8587 or 866–561–
8558 (toll free). Please provide complete
contact information for each attendee,
including name, title, affiliation,
address, email, and telephone number.
If there are any questions with
registration, please contact the AGS
administrative offices at 415–561–8587
or email to the attention of Amber
Mendez at ags@aao.org. Registrants will
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6203
receive confirmation after they have
been accepted. You will be notified if
you are on a waiting list.
Food and beverages will be available
for purchase by participants during the
workshop breaks.
For more information on the
workshop, please see the FDA’s Medical
Devices News & Events—Workshops &
Conferences calendar at https://
www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/
NewsEvents/WorkshopsConferences/
default.htm. (Select this public
workshop from the posted events list.)
Streaming Webcast of the Public
Workshop: This public workshop will
not be Webcast.
Transcripts: Please be advised that as
soon as a transcript is available, it will
be accessible at https://
www.regulations.gov. It may be viewed
at the Division of Dockets Management
(HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. A transcript
will also be available in either hardcopy
or on CD–ROM, after submission of a
Freedom of Information request. Written
requests are to be sent to the Division
of Freedom of Information (ELEM–
1029), Food and Drug Administration,
12420 Parklawn Dr., Element Bldg.,
Rockville, MD 20857. A link to the
transcript will also be available
approximately 45 days after the public
workshop on the Internet at https://
www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/
NewsEvents/WorkshopsConferences/
default.htm. (Select this public
workshop from the posted events list).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Glaucoma is estimated to be the
second leading cause of blindness
worldwide. Management of this often
chronic disease is a challenge for both
patients and health care providers,
requiring the use of multiple modalities
including drops, lasers, and surgery. In
recent years, innovative devices have
been developed to decrease the risk of
glaucoma surgery. These MIGS devices
have moved the option for surgical
intervention towards less severe forms
of the disease. Hence, the appropriate
clinical trial design and conduct for the
evaluation of the safety and
effectiveness of MIGS devices has
become a topic of debate. At this
workshop, we will discuss the
important clinical trial components
including subject enrollment criteria,
safety parameters, and effectiveness
endpoints. The workshop seeks to
involve industry and academia in
addressing the challenges in the
development of appropriate clinical
trials to adequately evaluate safety and
E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM
03FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6200-6203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02191]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0017]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program
Standards
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA), Federal Agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on the information collection
provisions of the Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program
Standards.
DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the collection
of information by April 4, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information
to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the
collection of information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400B, Rockville,
MD 20850, PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.
Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program Standards (OMB
Control Number 0910-0621--Extension)
The Voluntary National Retail Food Regulatory Program Standards
(the Program Standards) define nine essential elements of an effective
regulatory program for retail food establishments, establish basic
quality control criteria for each element, and provide a means of
recognition for those State, local, territorial, tribal and Federal
regulatory programs that meet the Program Standards. The program
elements addressed by the Program Standards are as follows: (1)
Regulatory foundation; (2) trained regulatory staff; (3) inspection
program based on Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP)
principles; (4) uniform inspection program, (5) foodborne illness and
food defense preparedness and response; (6) compliance and enforcement;
(7) industry and community relations; (8) program support and
resources; and (9) program assessment. Each standard includes a list of
records needed to document conformance with the standard (referred to
in the Program Standards document as ``quality records'') and has one
or more corresponding forms and worksheets to facilitate the collection
of information needed to assess the retail food regulatory program
against that standard. The respondents are State, local, territorial,
tribal, and potentially other Federal regulatory agencies. Regulatory
agencies may use existing available records or may choose to develop
and use alternate forms and worksheets that capture the same
information.
In the course of their normal activities, State, local,
territorial, tribal, and Federal regulatory agencies already collect
and keep on file many of the records needed as quality records to
document compliance with each of the Program Standards. Although the
detail and format in which this information is collected and recorded
may vary by jurisdiction, records that are kept as a usual and
customary part of normal agency activities include inspection records,
written quality assurance procedures, records of quality assurance
checks, staff training certificates and other training records, a log
or database of food-related illness or injury complaints, records of
investigations resulting from such complaints, an inventory of
inspection equipment, records of outside audits, and records of
outreach efforts (e.g., meeting agendas and minutes, documentation of
food safety education activities). No new recordkeeping burden is
associated with these existing records, which are already a part of
usual and customary program recordkeeping activities by State, local,
territorial, tribal and Federal regulatory agencies, and which can
serve as quality records under the Program Standards.
State, local, territorial, tribal and Federal regulatory agencies
that enroll in the Program Standards and seek listing in the FDA
National Registry are required to report to FDA on the completion of
the following three management tasks outlined in the Program Standards:
(1) Conducting a program self-assessment; (2) conducting a risk factor
study of the regulated industry; and (3) obtaining an independent
outside audit (verification audit). The results are reported to FDA on
Form FDA 3519, ``FDA National Registry Report'' and Form FDA 3520,
``Permission to Publish in National Registry.'' These forms are
provided in the Program Standards document, and are also provided on
FDA's Web site at: https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/RetailFoodProtection/ProgramStandards/default.htm. If a
[[Page 6201]]
regulatory agency follows all the recordkeeping recommendations in the
individual standards and their sample worksheets, it will have all the
information needed to complete the forms.
In April 2012, the Conference for Food Protection recommended that
FDA make two changes to the Program Standards. The changes have been
incorporated into the 2013 version, the draft of which is available on
FDA's Web site. The first change was the addition of a new criterion in
Standard 9. In order to show conformance with Standard 9, jurisdictions
must implement an intervention strategy to address risk factors
identified in the risk factor study, and then assess the effectiveness
of the intervention strategy through subsequent risk factor studies or
other similar tools. The second change was the creation of an
Administrative Procedures document. The procedures for enrolling and
participating in the Program Standards were previously included in
Standard 9, along with other criteria specific to conducting a risk
factor study. Stakeholders requested that information pertaining to
enrollment and participation in the Program Standards be included in a
separate, stand-alone document. Therefore, the information about the
administration of the Program Standards, previously in Standard 9, is
now provided in the Administrative Procedures document.
FDA analyzed whether incorporation of these two changes alters its
estimate of the recordkeeping and reporting burdens. FDA concluded that
there will be no change to the annual recordkeeping burden estimate. In
the course of their normal activities, State, local, territorial,
tribal, and Federal regulatory agencies already implement and document
intervention strategies to address identified risk factors at regulated
food establishments. The intention of the new criterion in Standard 9
is twofold: (1) To ensure that development and implementation of the
intervention strategy is guided by data collected through the risk
factor study, or other similar tools and (2) to ensure that the
regulatory agency considers the effectiveness of the implemented
intervention strategy in light of subsequent data. FDA notes that
jurisdictions have the option to analyze their inspection data as
indicated by the Standard 9 criteria, in lieu of conducting a risk
factor study. This is a less resource-intensive method for tracking
risk factor trends over time. However, the Agency has not changed its
estimate of 333 hours for Standard 9 shown in Table 2 of this document.
The Agency will reevaluate its estimate based on data it receives in
the future from participating jurisdictions. As stated in the preceding
paragraph, the second change resulted in the relocation of existing
information from Standard 9 to the Administrative Procedures document
in the 2013 version of the Program Standards. Because there were no
changes to content, there will be no changes to the annual
recordkeeping burden. The two noted changes had no effect on the
reporting burden hour estimates shown in Table 2 of this document.
Recordkeeping
FDA's recordkeeping burden estimate includes time required for a
state, local, territorial, tribal, or Federal agency to review the
instructions in the Program Standards, compile information from
existing sources, and create any records recommended in the Program
Standards that are not already kept in the normal course of the
agency's usual and customary activities. Sample worksheets are provided
to assist in this compilation. In estimating the time needed for the
program self-assessment (Program Standards 1 through 8, shown in Table
1 of this document), FDA considered responses from four State and three
local jurisdictions that participated in an FDA Program Standards Pilot
study. Table 2 of this document shows the estimated recordkeeping
burden for the completion of the baseline data collection, and Table 3
of this document shows the estimated recordkeeping burden for the
verification audit.
Table 1--Self-Assessment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hours per
Standard Recordkeeping activity record
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 1: Regulatory Foundation............. Self-Assessment: Completion of worksheet recording 16
results of evaluations and comparison on
worksheets.\1\
No. 2: Trained Regulatory Staff.......... Self-Assessment: Completion of CFP Field Training 19.3
Manual and Documentation of Successful Completion--
Field Training Process; completion of summary
worksheet of each employee training records.1 2
No. 3: HACCP Principles.................. Self-Assessment: Completion of worksheet 4
documentation \1\.
No. 4: Uniform Inspection Program........ Self-Assessment: Completion of worksheet 19
documentation of jurisdiction's quality assurance
procedures.1 2
No. 5: Foodborne Illness Investigation... Self-Assessment: Completion of worksheet 5
documentation \1\.
No. 6: Compliance Enforcement............ Self-Assessment: Selection and review of 20 to 70 19
establishment files at 25 minutes per file. Estimate
is based on a mean number of 45. Completion of
worksheet.\1\
No. 7: Industry & Community Relations.... Self-Assessment: Completion of worksheet \1\......... 2
No. 8: Program Support and Resources..... Self-Assessment: Selection and review of 8
establishment files \1\.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total................................ ..................................................... 92.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Or comparable documentation.
\2\ Estimates will vary depending on number of regulated food establishments and the number of inspectors
employed by the jurisdiction.
Table 2--Baseline Data Collection
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hours per
Standard Recordkeeping activity record
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 9: Program Assessment................ Risk Factor Study and Intervention Strategy \1\...... 333
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Calculation based on mean sample size of 39 and average FDA inspection time for each establishment type.
Estimates will vary depending on number of regulated food establishments within a jurisdiction and the number
of inspectors employed by the jurisdiction.
[[Page 6202]]
Table 3--Verification Audit
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hours per
Activity Recordkeeping activity record
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative Procedures................ Verification Audit \1\............................... 46.15
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ We estimate that no more than 50% of time spent to complete self-assessment of all 9 Standards is spent
completing verification audit worksheets. Time will be considerably less if less than 9 standards require
verification audits.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Table 4--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average
Activity Number of records per Total annual burden per Total hours
recordkeepers recordkeeper records recordkeeping
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recordkeeping for FDA Worksheets 500 1 500 94.29 47,145
\2\............................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
\2\ Or comparable documentation.
FDA bases its estimates of the number of recordkeepers and the
hours per record on its experience with the Program Standards. As of
September 30, 2013, 563 jurisdictions were enrolled in the Program
Standards. However, based upon the level of ongoing support provided by
FDA to enrolled jurisdictions and the number of forms submitted
annually, FDA estimates that no more than 500 jurisdictions actively
participate in the Program Standards during any given year. There are
approximately 3,000 jurisdictions in the United States and its
territories that have retail food regulatory programs. Enrollment in
the Program Standards is voluntary and, therefore, FDA does not expect
all jurisdictions to participate.
FDA bases its estimate of the hours per record on the recordkeeping
estimates for the management tasks of self-assessment, risk factor
study, and verification audit (Tables 1, 2, and 3 of this document)
that enrolled jurisdictions must perform a total of 471.45 hours (92.3
+ 333 + 46.15 = 471.45). Enrolled jurisdictions must conduct the work
described in Tables 1, 2, and 3 over a 5-year period. Therefore FDA
estimates that, annually, 500 recordkeepers will spend 94.29 hours
(471.45 / 5 = 94.29) performing the required recordkeeping for a total
of 47,145 hours as shown in Table 4 of this document.
Reporting
FDA requires regulatory jurisdictions that participate in the
Program Standards to submit two forms annually: Form FDA 3519, ``FDA
National Registry Report,'' and Form FDA 3520, ``Permission to Publish
in National Registry.'' Form FDA 3519 requires the name and address of
the jurisdiction; completion dates for the self-assessment, risk factor
study (original and update), and verification audit; names of the
person(s) who completed the self-assessment, verification audit, risk
factor study (baseline report), risk factor study (update), and action
plan; signature of the program manager; and date the form was
completed. Form FDA 3520 requires the name and address of the
jurisdiction, contact information for the enrollee's designated contact
person, completion date of the self-assessment, date of the
verification audit report, name of the auditor, signature of the
official completing the form, and date the form was completed.
The reporting burden in Table 5 of this document includes only the
time necessary to fill out and send the forms, as compiling the
underlying information (including self-assessment reports, baseline
surveys, outside audits, and supporting documentation) is accounted for
under the recordkeeping estimates in Table 4 of this document.
FDA estimates the reporting burden for this collection of
information as follows:
Table 5--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Activity FDA form Number of responses per Total annual Average burden Total hours
respondents respondent responses per response
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submission of ``FDA National Registry Report''.......... 3519 500 1 500 0.1 50
Submission of ``Permission to Publish in National 3520 500 1 500 0.1 50
Registry''.............................................
Request for documentation of successful completion of Conference for 500 3 1,500 0.1 150
staff training......................................... Food
Protection
Training Plan
and Log
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................................... .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. 250
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
[[Page 6203]]
FDA bases its estimates of the number of respondents and the hours
per response on its experience with the Program Standards. As explained
previously in this document, FDA estimates that no more than 500
regulatory jurisdictions will participate in the Program Standards in
any given year. FDA estimates a total of 12 minutes annually for each
enrolled jurisdiction to complete both forms. FDA bases its estimate on
the small number of data elements on the two forms and the ease of
availability of the information. FDA estimates that, annually, 500
regulatory jurisdictions will submit one Form FDA 3519 for a total of
500 annual responses. Each submission is estimated to take 0.1 hour per
response for a total of 50 hours. FDA estimates that, annually, 500
regulatory jurisdictions will submit one Form FDA 3520 for a total of
500 annual responses. Each of these submissions is estimated to take
0.1 hour per response for a total of 50 hours. FDA estimates that,
annually, 500 regulatory jurisdictions will submit three requests for
documentation of successful completion of staff training using the CFP
Training Plan and Log for a total of 1,500 annual responses. Each
submission is estimated to take 0.1 hour per response for a total of
150 hours. Thus, the total reporting burden for this information
collection is 250 hours.
Dated: January 29, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-02191 Filed 1-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P