GSA Bulletin FTR 14-04] Federal Travel Regulation (FTR); Relocation Allowances-Standard Mileage Rate for Moving Purposes, 4717-4718 [2014-01705]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 19 / Wednesday, January 29, 2014 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
grants your request in accordance with
the law and the public interest.
Postal mail addressed to the
Commission is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening. As a
result, we encourage you to submit your
comments online. To make sure that the
Commission considers your online
comment, you must file it at https://
ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
levelthreeconsent by following the
instructions on the web-based form. If
this Notice appears at https://
www.regulations.gov/#!home, you also
may file a comment through that Web
site.
If you file your comment on paper,
write ‘‘Level 3 Communications, LLC.—
Consent Agreement; File No. 142–3028’’
on your comment and on the envelope,
and mail or deliver it to the following
address: Federal Trade Commission,
Office of the Secretary, Room H–113
(Annex D), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20580. If possible,
submit your paper comment to the
Commission by courier or overnight
service.
Visit the Commission Web site at
https://www.ftc.gov to read this Notice
and the news release describing it. The
FTC Act and other laws that the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. The Commission will
consider all timely and responsive
public comments that it receives on or
before February 20, 2014. You can find
more information, including routine
uses permitted by the Privacy Act, in
the Commission’s privacy policy, at
https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.
Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To
Aid Public Comment
The Federal Trade Commission
(‘‘FTC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) has accepted,
subject to final approval, a consent
agreement applicable to Level 3
Communications, LLC (‘‘Level 3’’).
The proposed consent order has been
placed on the public record for thirty
(30) days for receipt of comments by
interested persons. Comments received
during this period will become part of
the public record. After thirty (30) days,
the Commission will again review the
agreement and the comments received,
and will decide whether it should
withdraw from the agreement and take
appropriate action or make final the
agreement’s proposed order.
This matter concerns alleged false or
misleading representations that Level 3
made to consumers concerning its
participation in the Safe Harbor privacy
frameworks agreed upon by the U.S. and
the European Union (‘‘EU’’) (‘‘U.S.-EU
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Jan 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
Safe Harbor Framework’’) and the U.S.
and Switzerland (‘‘U.S.-Swiss Safe
Harbor Framework’’). It is among several
actions the Commission is bringing to
enforce the promises that companies
make when they certify that they
participate in the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor
Framework and/or U.S.-Swiss Safe
Harbor Framework (‘‘Safe Harbor
Frameworks’’). The Safe Harbor
Frameworks allow U.S. companies to
transfer data outside the EU and
Switzerland consistent with European
law. To join the Safe Harbor
Frameworks, a company must selfcertify to the U.S. Department of
Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) that it
complies with a set of principles and
related requirements that have been
deemed by the European Commission
and Switzerland as providing
‘‘adequate’’ privacy protection. These
principles include notice, choice,
onward transfer, security, data integrity,
access, and enforcement. Commerce
maintains a public Web site,
www.export.gov/safeharbor, where it
posts the names of companies that have
self-certified to the Safe Harbor
Frameworks. The listing of companies
indicates whether their self-certification
is ‘‘current’’ or ‘‘not current.’’
Companies are required to re-certify
every year in order to retain their status
as ‘‘current’’ members of the Safe Harbor
Frameworks.
Level 3 is an international
communications provider and one of
the six largest internet service providers
in the world. According to the
Commission’s complaint, from June
2001 until November 2013, Level 3 set
forth on its Web site, www.level3.com,
privacy policies and statements about
its practices, including statements
related to its participation in the U.S.EU Safe Harbor Framework and the
U.S.-Swiss Safe Harbor Framework.
The Commission’s complaint alleges
that Level 3 falsely represented that it
was a ‘‘current’’ participant in the Safe
Harbor Frameworks when, in fact, from
June 2012 until November 2013, Level
3 was not a ‘‘current’’ participant in the
Safe Harbor Frameworks. The
Commission’s complaint alleges that in
June 2001, Level 3 submitted a selfcertification to the Safe Harbor
Frameworks. Level 3 did not renew its
self-certification in June 2012 and
Commerce subsequently updated Level
3’s status to ‘‘not current’’ on its public
Web site.
Part I of the proposed order prohibits
Level 3 from making misrepresentations
about its membership in any privacy or
security program sponsored by the
government or any other self-regulatory
or standard-setting organization,
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4717
including, but not limited to, the U.S.EU Safe Harbor Framework and the
U.S.-Swiss Safe Harbor Framework.
Parts II through VI of the proposed
order are reporting and compliance
provisions. Part II requires Level 3 to
retain documents relating to its
compliance with the order for a fiveyear period. Part III requires
dissemination of the order now and in
the future to persons with
responsibilities relating to the subject
matter of the order. Part IV ensures
notification to the FTC of changes in
company status. Part V mandates that
Level 3 submit an initial compliance
report to the FTC, and make available to
the FTC subsequent reports. Part VI is
a provision ‘‘sunsetting’’ the order after
twenty (20) years, with certain
exceptions.
The purpose of this analysis is to
facilitate public comment on the
proposed order. It is not intended to
constitute an official interpretation of
the proposed complaint or order or to
modify the order’s terms in any way.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–01746 Filed 1–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
[Notice-FTR–2014–01; Docket No: 2014–
0004; Sequence 1:
GSA Bulletin FTR 14–04] Federal
Travel Regulation (FTR); Relocation
Allowances—Standard Mileage Rate
for Moving Purposes
Office of Government-wide
Policy, U.S. General Services
Administration (GSA).
ACTION: Notice of a bulletin.
AGENCY:
The U.S. General Services
Administration (GSA) published FTR
Amendments 2007–03, June 27, 2007,
and 2007–06, December 11, 2007, in the
Federal Register (72 FR 35187 and 72
FR 70234 respectively) specifying that
the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
Standard Mileage Rate for moving
purposes would be the rate at which
agencies will reimburse an employee for
using a Privately Owned Vehicle (POV)
for relocation worldwide. The
amendment indicated that the change to
the IRS Standard Mileage Rate for
moving purposes applied to relocations
on and after September 25, 2007, and
that GSA would publish a bulletin
announcing any changes to that rate
made by the IRS thereafter. On
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM
29JAN1
4718
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 19 / Wednesday, January 29, 2014 / Notices
December 6, 2013, the IRS announced
that as of January 1, 2014, the relocation
mileage rate would decrease to $0.235
per mile for the 12-month period ending
on December 31, 2014. Thus, the
reimbursement rate for POVs used in
conjunction with official relocation will
also be $0.235 for the same period. FTR
Bulletin 14–04 is attached. FTR Bulletin
14–04 and all other FTR bulletins may
be found at www.gsa.gov/
federaltravelregulation.
Dated: November 13, 2013.
E.J. Holland, Jr.,
Assistant Secretary for Administration.
This notice is effective January
29, 2014 and applies to relocations
performed on or after January 1, 2014,
through December 31, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Ed Davis, GSA, Office of Governmentwide Policy (M), Office of Asset and
Transportation Management (MA), at
202–208–7638 or via email at ed.davis@
gsa.gov. Please cite FTR Bulletin 14–04.
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
DATES:
Dated: January 17, 2014.
Anne E. Rung,
Associate Administrator, Office of
Government-wide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–01705 Filed 1–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the Secretary
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Office of the Assistant Secretary for
Financial Resources (ASFR);
Statement of Organization, Functions,
and Delegations of Authority
Part A, Office of the Secretary,
Statement of Organization, Functions
and Delegations of Authority for the
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) is being amended at
Chapter AM, Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Financial Resources, as
last amended at 77 FR 19666–67, dated
April 2, 2012. This reorganization will
eliminate the Office of Executive
Program Information (AMW) within
ASFR through the following changes:
A. Under Section AM.10
Organization, delete the last sentence of
the section in its entirety and replace
with the following:
The office consists of the following
components:
• Immediate Office of the Assistant
Secretary (AM).
• Office of Budget (AML).
• Office of Finance (AMS).
• Office of Grants and Acquisition
Policy and Accountability (AMT).
B. Under Section AM.20 Functions,
delete Chapter AMW, Office of
Executive Program Information (OEPI),
in its entirety.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Jan 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
[FR Doc. 2014–01712 Filed 1–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–24–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality
Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice announces the
intention of the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) approve the proposed
information collection project: ‘‘Pilot
Test of an Emergency Department
Discharge Tool.’’ In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), AHRQ invites the
public to comment on this proposed
information collection.
This proposed information collection
was previously published in the Federal
Register on August 27th, 2013 and
allowed 60 days for public comment.
One comment was received. The
purpose of this notice is to allow an
additional 30 days for public comment.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by February 28, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be submitted to: Doris Lefkowitz,
Reports Clearance Officer, AHRQ, by
email at doris.lefkowitz@ahrq.hhs.gov.
Copies of the proposed collection
plans, data collection instruments, and
specific details on the estimated burden
can be obtained from the AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer, (301) 427–1477, or by
email at doris.lefkowitz@ahrq.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Proposed Project
Pilot Test of an Emergency Department
Discharge Tool
The research study ‘‘Pilot Test of an
Emergency Discharge Tool’’ fully
supports AHRQ’s mission. The ultimate
aim of this study is to pilot test a
discharge tool which has the potential
to reduce unnecessary visits to the
Emergency Department (ED), reduce
healthcare expenditure in the ED, as
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
well as streamline and enhance the
quality of care delivered to ED patients.
The ED is an important and frequently
used setting of care for a large part of the
U.S. population. In 2006, there were
nearly 120 million ED visits in the U.S.,
of which only 15.5 million (14.7%)
resulted in admission to the hospital or
transfer to another hospital. Thus the
majority ED visits result in discharge to
home. Patients discharged from the ED
face significant risk for adverse
outcomes, with between 3–5 patients
per 100,000 visits experiencing an
unexpected death following discharge
from the ED. Additionally, a sizable
minority of patients return to the ED
frequently. Published studies estimate
that 4.5% to 8% of patients revisit the
ED 4 or more times per year, accounting
for 21% to 28% of all ED visits. Internal
data from John Hopkins Hospital,
AHRQ’s contractor for this pilot test,
supports these findings with 7% of their
patients accounting for 26% of visits to
the Johns Hopkins Hospital ED in 2011.
Patients who revisit the ED contribute
to overcrowding, unnecessary delays in
care, dissatisfaction, and avoidable
patient harm. ED revisits are also an
important contributor to rising health
care costs, as ED care is estimated to
cost two to five times as much as the
same treatment delivered by a primary
care physician. Thus it is estimated that
eliminating revisits and inappropriate
use of EDs could reduce health care
spending as much as $32 billion each
year. Overall, an effective and efficient
ED discharge process would improve
the quality of patient care in the ED as
well as reduce healthcare costs.
To respond to the challenges faced by
our nation’s EDs and the patients they
serve, AHRQ will develop and pilot test
a tool to improve the ED discharge
process. More specifically, this project
has the following goals:
(1) Develop and Pilot Test a Prototype
ED Discharge Tool in a limited number
of settings to assess:
(a) The feasibility for use with
patients;
(b) The methodological and resource
requirements associated with tool use;
(c) The feasibility of measuring
outcomes;
(d) The costs of implementation and;
(e) Preliminary outcomes or impacts
of tool use.
(2) Revise the Tool based on the
results from the Pilot Test.
This study is being conducted by
AHRQ through its contractor, John
Hopkins Hospital, pursuant to AHRQ’s
statutory authority to conduct and
support research on healthcare and on
systems for the delivery of such care,
including activities with respect to the
E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM
29JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4717-4718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01705]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
[Notice-FTR-2014-01; Docket No: 2014-0004; Sequence 1:
GSA Bulletin FTR 14-04] Federal Travel Regulation (FTR);
Relocation Allowances--Standard Mileage Rate for Moving Purposes
AGENCY: Office of Government-wide Policy, U.S. General Services
Administration (GSA).
ACTION: Notice of a bulletin.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) published FTR
Amendments 2007-03, June 27, 2007, and 2007-06, December 11, 2007, in
the Federal Register (72 FR 35187 and 72 FR 70234 respectively)
specifying that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Standard Mileage
Rate for moving purposes would be the rate at which agencies will
reimburse an employee for using a Privately Owned Vehicle (POV) for
relocation worldwide. The amendment indicated that the change to the
IRS Standard Mileage Rate for moving purposes applied to relocations on
and after September 25, 2007, and that GSA would publish a bulletin
announcing any changes to that rate made by the IRS thereafter. On
[[Page 4718]]
December 6, 2013, the IRS announced that as of January 1, 2014, the
relocation mileage rate would decrease to $0.235 per mile for the 12-
month period ending on December 31, 2014. Thus, the reimbursement rate
for POVs used in conjunction with official relocation will also be
$0.235 for the same period. FTR Bulletin 14-04 is attached. FTR
Bulletin 14-04 and all other FTR bulletins may be found at www.gsa.gov/federaltravelregulation.
DATES: This notice is effective January 29, 2014 and applies to
relocations performed on or after January 1, 2014, through December 31,
2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ed Davis, GSA, Office of
Government-wide Policy (M), Office of Asset and Transportation
Management (MA), at 202-208-7638 or via email at ed.davis@gsa.gov.
Please cite FTR Bulletin 14-04.
Dated: January 17, 2014.
Anne E. Rung,
Associate Administrator, Office of Government-wide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-01705 Filed 1-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-14-P