Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest; Utah; Uinta Express Pipeline Project, 4657-4659 [2014-01692]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 19 / Wednesday, January 29, 2014 / Notices An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a currently valid OMB control number and the agency informs potential persons who are to respond to the collection of information that such persons are not required to respond to the collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Rural Housing Service Title: Rural Community Development Initiative (RCDI). OMB Control Number: 0575–0180. Summary of Collection: Congress created the Rural Community Development Initiative (RCDI) in fiscal year 2000 and funds was appropriated under the Rural Community Advancement Program. The intent of the RCDI grant program is to develop the capacity and ability of rural area recipients to undertake projects through a program of financial and technical assistance provided by qualified intermediary organizations. The intermediary is the applicant and must have been organized a minimum of 3 years at the time of application. The intermediary may be a qualified private, nonprofit, or public (including tribal) organization. Intermediaries are required to provide matching funds in an amount equal to the RCDI grant. Eligible recipients are private, nonprofit community-based housing and community development organizations, low-income rural communities or federally recognized Indian tribes. Need and Use of the Information: RHS will collect information to determine applicant/grantee eligibility, project feasibility, and to ensure that grantees operate on a sound basis and use grant funds for authorized purposes. Failure to collect this information could result in improper use of Federal funds. Description of Respondents: Not-forprofit institutions; State, Local or Tribal Government. Number of Respondents: 1,260. Frequency of Responses: Recordkeeping; Reporting: Quarterly; Annually; Third party disclosure. Total Burden Hours: 4,188. Charlene Parker, Departmental Information Collection Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. 2014–01701 Filed 1–28–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–XV–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:05 Jan 28, 2014 Jkt 232001 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest; Utah; Uinta Express Pipeline Project Forest Service, USDA. Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement. AGENCY: ACTION: Uinta Express Pipeline Company LLC, a subsidiary of Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company LLC, has submitted a special use application requesting authorization to construct and maintain a crude oil pipeline from the Uinta Basin to Salt Lake City, Utah. The project is known as the Uinta Express Pipeline (‘‘Project’’). The UintaWasatch-Cache National Forest (UWCNF) is responding to the application to determine if a special use authorization should be granted, what terms and conditions such an authorization should contain, and evaluate if any project specific land use plan amendments may be required. The objective of Project proponents is to transport crude oil from the Uinta Basin and transport it via pipeline rather than trucks for refining in Salt Lake City. The pipeline and its alternatives are comprised of approximately 120 to 135 miles of underground 12-inch pipeline and ancillary facilities. DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received by 45 days from date of publication in the Salt Lake Tribune (Newspaper of Record). The draft environmental impact statement is expected in winter of 2014 and the final environmental impact statement is expected spring of 2015. ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Uinta-Wasatch-Cache Forest Supervisor’s Office, Attn: Nelson Gonzalez-Sullow, 857 West South Jordan Parkway, South Jordan, UT 84095–8594. Comments may also be sent via email to uwc_info@fs.fed.us or via facsimile to (801) 253–8118. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Lucas, Recreation and Lands Staff Officer by phone at (801) 999–2157 or by email at lclucas@fs.fed.us. Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: Purpose and Need for Action The UWCNF is intending to develop an Environmental Impact Statement in response to the applicants request for a special use authorization. PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 4657 The objective of the project applicant is to seek permission from the UWCNF to transport crude oil from the Uinta Basin via pipeline rather than trucks for refining in Salt Lake City. The pipeline is comprised of approximately 135 miles of underground 12-inch pipeline and ancillary facilities. Approximately 14 miles are proposed to cross NFS land administered by the UWCNF. The construction of this project is desired to provide a safer and more efficient transportation route for crude oil produced in the Uinta Basin of Utah. Production of crude oil within Duchesne County, Utah has increased from 8.7 Million Barrels (MM BBL) in 2008 to 11.9 MM BBL in 2011. Production in 2012 was nearly 14 MM BBL, and 2013 is on pace for 18 MM BBL. This represents a 54% increase over the last five years. New drilling technology continues to improve the ability for economical extraction of Uinta Basin crude. The majority of this production is currently transported via tanker truck to Salt Lake City. The oil produced from the Uinta Basin is paraffinic crude that is not compatible with the current pipeline infrastructure in Utah. The product must be maintained at an elevated temperature in order to flow through a pipeline. Other pipelines in the area were not designed to maintain the temperatures that Uinta crude requires. Therefore, the Uinta crude is currently loaded into trucks and transported via road to refineries. The unique composition of the Uinta crude also hinders its transportation to markets outside of the Salt Lake metropolitan area. Several refineries in the Salt Lake metropolitan area have announced planned upgrades to increase the capacity to process crude produced in Utah, including the Uinta Basin.1 These planned upgrades will take advantage of the relatively lower price of locally produced crude. The project provides infrastructure to deliver typically lower priced, locally produced crude oil to market in an environmentally responsible and safe manner. The planned increases in production and refining capacities have state lawmakers and transportation officials concerned about the capacity and capability of the existing highway infrastructure.2 The construction of the 1 Salt Lake Tribune, 6/1/2012; https:// www.sltrib.com/sltrib/money/54044681-79/utahrefinery-oil-crude.html.csp; Accessed 8/21/2012. 2 Salt Lake Tribune, 8/15/2012; https:// www.sltrib.com/sltrib/money/54703446-79/uintacrude-transportation-basin.html.csp; Accessed 8/ 21/2012. E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM 29JAN1 4658 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 19 / Wednesday, January 29, 2014 / Notices project considers pipeline transmission as more viable long-term method of delivery to the Salt Lake metropolitan area. In addition, the project considers it a benefit to the public by removing a portion of the tanker truck traffic from the highways in the region thereby potentially reducing the cost of highway maintenance and upgrades. Proposed Action Five principal facilities will be located along the project, one origin station and four intermediate stations. The origin station will consist of truck offloading racks, product storage, pumps, launcher/receivers, piping, valves, fittings, and power generation. This origination facility would be located on private property and would be approximately 20 acres. The four intermediate stations for the project are approximately five acres each and located on private property. There are seven main line block valves locations and other minor above ground appurtenances that also will be located on private property. The project would be constructed primarily on private lands and cross approximately 14 miles of NFS land administered by the UWCNF, U.S. Forest Service (FS). The proposed pipeline right-of-way would be a minimum of 50-feet wide and up to 100feet wide on National Forest System lands once constructed (right-of-way may be wider off of NFS lands). Many areas of the proposed pipeline route would utilize existing pipeline right-ofway routes or utility corridors and parallel Chevron, Questar and Kern River pipelines. The pipeline is further described as 12″ carbon steel pipe, .375 WT, API 5L, X52, insulated (HDPE) jacketed, externally coated, and buried at a minimum depth of three feet. System pressure designs are currently projected to be between 1,200 and 1,400 psi maximum operating pressure (MOP). tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Possible Alternatives A route review and investigation was conducted that identified three options: • Northern Route (Proposed Action) • East Canyon Route • Southern Route The northern route is generally a 135 mile option that parallels portions of the existing Chevron crude pipeline for the first 40 miles from the origin point to Francis, UT. From Francis, the pipeline bears north to Coalville, UT in many areas paralleling existing Questar distribution pipelines. At Coalville it meets with the Kern River natural gas pipeline. The pipeline would then parallel the Kern River pipeline to about VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:05 Jan 28, 2014 Jkt 232001 the top of the Wasatch Range. From here the route would roughly parallel a Questar natural gas pipeline west to the town of Bountiful, UT, and on to the east side of Utah Highway 67. The pipeline would then bear south connecting to multiple Salt Lake area refineries. The east canyon route is generally a 135-mile option that follows the northern route for the first 90 miles, then bears west to the Park City area. From Park City, the pipeline would parallel East Canyon Creek to join with the Kern River pipeline. The pipeline would then parallel the Kern River pipeline to about the top of the Wasatch Range. From here the route would roughly parallel a Questar natural gas pipeline west to the town of Bountiful, UT, and on to the east side of Utah Highway 67. The pipeline would then bear south connecting to multiple Salt Lake area refineries. The southern route is generally a 120mile option that follows the northern route for the first 90 miles and then roughly parallels the existing Chevron crude oil pipeline into and through Salt Lake City connecting to multiple Salt Lake area refineries. The northern route was identified as the proposed action, based principally on permitting and ‘‘Right of Way’’ (ROW) acquisition, minimizing areas of disturbance, and utilizing previously established utility corridors, despite being the longest route of the proposed options. Under all alternatives, approximately 14 miles are on NFS land and the remainder on private lands. The segments crossing NFS land follow forest plan (both Uinta and WasatchCache Forest Plans were revised in 2003) designated utility corridors. The right-of-way would be a minimum of 50feet wide and up to 100-feet wide on NFS land once constructed (right-of-way may be wider off of NFS land). Many reaches of the pipeline route would utilize existing pipeline routes or utility corridors and parallel Chevron, Questar and Kern River pipelines right-of-way. These existing corridors form portions of the boundaries of 4 Inventoried Roadless Area (IRAs). Under all alternatives, the project would be located outside of the IRAs on the opposite (non-roadless) side of the existing pipeline, except at one point where two of these IRAs come together and encroachment into an IRA cannot be avoided. At this point, the project must cross the tip of the 8,810 acre Nobletts IRAs. Routing around the IRAs is not feasible. No roads will be constructed in IRAs, but a small amount PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 of incidental tree clearing (<1.0 acre) will be required at this point. Responsible Official Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Supervisor. Nature of Decision To Be Made The decision to be made is whether or not to approve grantng a special use authorization for the construction and maintenance of the Uinta Express Pipeline. Preliminary Issues Preliminary issues are the effects of the project on transportation safety, air quality, visual resources, surface and groundwater quality, noise levels, land use (including roadless area impact), vegetation and wildlife. Scoping Process This notice of intent initiates the 45day scoping process, which guides the development of the environmental impact statement. Two open house meetings will be held—one in Bountiful City and another in Heber City—to provide stakeholders and the general public with information about the proposed project and to provide a forum for submitting comments. • Wednesday, February 19, 2014; 6–8 p.m., Wasatch High School, Heber City, UT • Thursday, February 20, 2014; 6–8 p.m., Bountiful High School, Bountiful, UT Written comments will be accepted throughout the 45-day period. Comments can be hand delivered from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding federal holidays. Electronic comments must be submitted in a format such as an email message, rich text format (.rtf) or Word (.doc) to uwc_info@fs.fed.us, by facsimile to (801) 253–8118, or to: Nelson GonzalezSullow, Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Supervisor’s Office, 857 West South Jordan Parkway, South Jordan, UT 84095–8594. It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times and in such manner that they are useful to the agency’s preparation of the environmental impact statement; therefore, comments should be provided prior to the close of the 45-day scoping period and should clearly articulate the reviewer’s concerns and contentions. The scoping period begins when the Legal Notice is published in The Salt Lake Tribune. Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names and addresses of those who comment, will E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM 29JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 19 / Wednesday, January 29, 2014 / Notices be part of the public record for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered, however. Dated: January 21, 2014. David C. Whittekiend, Forest Supervisor. [FR Doc. 2014–01692 Filed 1–28–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–11–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Mineral County Resource Advisory Committee Forest Service, USDA. Notice of meeting. AGENCY: ACTION: The Mineral County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in Superior, MT. The purpose of the meetings is to review and vote on submitted proposals, and receive public comment on the meeting subjects and proceedings. SUMMARY: The meetings will be held March 20, 2014, April 3, 2014, and April 10, 2014, 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. ADDRESSES: Superior Ranger District, 209 W. Riverside Ave., Superior, MT 59872. DATES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tawnya Brummett, District Ranger at 406–822–3928 or email: tbrummett@ fs.fed.us. The following business will be conducted: (1) Review presentation and written proposals (2) Brief discussion of proposals (3) prioritize projects by vote and choose which projects to fund as funding allows. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Dated: January 22, 2014. Tawnya Brummett, District Ranger. [FR Doc. 2014–01690 Filed 1–28–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–11–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:05 Jan 28, 2014 Jkt 232001 Title: Amendment 80 Economic Data Report (EDR) for the Catcher/Processor Non-AFA Trawl Sector. OMB Control Number: 0648–0564. Form Number(s): NA. Type of Request: Regular submission (extension of a current information collection). Number of Respondents: 25. Average Hours per Response: 20. Burden Hours: 500. Needs and Uses: This request is for extension of a current information collection. Amendment 80 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area primarily allocates several Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area non-pollock trawl groundfish fisheries among fishing sectors, and facilitates the formation of harvesting cooperatives in the catcher/ processor sector of the Non-American Fisheries Act (AFA) Trawl Catcher/ Processor Cooperative Program (Program). The Program established a limited access privilege program for the Non-AFA trawl catcher/processor sector. The Amendment 80 economic data report (EDR) collects cost, revenue, ownership, and employment data on an annual basis and provides information unavailable through other means to review the Program. The purpose of the EDR is to understand the economic effects of the Amendment 80 program on vessels or entities regulated by the Program, and to inform future management actions. Data collected through the EDR is mandatory for all Amendment 80 quota share (QS) holders. Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations. Frequency: Annually. Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. OMB Desk Officer: OIRA_ Submission@omb.eop.gov. Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained by calling or writing Jennifer Jessup, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, (202) 482–0336, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at JJessup@ doc.gov). Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to OIRA_Submission@ omb.eop.gov. PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 4659 Dated: January 23, 2014. Gwellnar Banks, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2014–01664 Filed 1–28–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Agency: International Trade Administration. Title: Request for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments or Apparatus. OMB Control Number: 0625–0037. Form Number(s): ITA–338P. Type of Request: Regular submission (extension of a current information collection). Burden Hours: 130. Number of Respondents: 65 Average Hours per Response: 2. Needs and Uses: The Departments of Commerce and Homeland Security (‘‘DHS’’) are required to determine whether non-profit institutions established for scientific or educational purposes are entitled to duty-free entry for scientific instruments that the institutions import under the Florence Agreement. Form ITA–338P enables: (1) DHS to determine whether the statutory eligibility requirements for the institution and the instrument are fulfilled, and (2) Commerce to make a comparison and finding as to the scientific equivalency of comparable instruments being manufactured in the United States. Without the collection of the information, DHS and Commerce would be unable to carry out the responsibilities assigned by law. Affected Public: Federal, state or local government; not-for-profit institutions. Frequency: On occasion. Respondent’s Obligation: Required to obtain or retain a benefit. Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained by calling or writing Jennifer Jessup, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, (202) 482–0336, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at JJessup@ doc.gov). Written comments and recommendations for the proposed E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM 29JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4657-4659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01692]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest; Utah; Uinta Express Pipeline 
Project

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Uinta Express Pipeline Company LLC, a subsidiary of Tesoro 
Refining & Marketing Company LLC, has submitted a special use 
application requesting authorization to construct and maintain a crude 
oil pipeline from the Uinta Basin to Salt Lake City, Utah. The project 
is known as the Uinta Express Pipeline (``Project''). The Uinta-
Wasatch-Cache National Forest (UWCNF) is responding to the application 
to determine if a special use authorization should be granted, what 
terms and conditions such an authorization should contain, and evaluate 
if any project specific land use plan amendments may be required. The 
objective of Project proponents is to transport crude oil from the 
Uinta Basin and transport it via pipeline rather than trucks for 
refining in Salt Lake City. The pipeline and its alternatives are 
comprised of approximately 120 to 135 miles of underground 12-inch 
pipeline and ancillary facilities.

DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received 
by 45 days from date of publication in the Salt Lake Tribune (Newspaper 
of Record). The draft environmental impact statement is expected in 
winter of 2014 and the final environmental impact statement is expected 
spring of 2015.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Uinta-Wasatch-Cache Forest 
Supervisor's Office, Attn: Nelson Gonzalez-Sullow, 857 West South 
Jordan Parkway, South Jordan, UT 84095-8594. Comments may also be sent 
via email to uwc_info@fs.fed.us or via facsimile to (801) 253-8118.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Lucas, Recreation and Lands 
Staff Officer by phone at (801) 999-2157 or by email at 
lclucas@fs.fed.us.
    Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) 
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Purpose and Need for Action

    The UWCNF is intending to develop an Environmental Impact Statement 
in response to the applicants request for a special use authorization.
    The objective of the project applicant is to seek permission from 
the UWCNF to transport crude oil from the Uinta Basin via pipeline 
rather than trucks for refining in Salt Lake City. The pipeline is 
comprised of approximately 135 miles of underground 12-inch pipeline 
and ancillary facilities. Approximately 14 miles are proposed to cross 
NFS land administered by the UWCNF.
    The construction of this project is desired to provide a safer and 
more efficient transportation route for crude oil produced in the Uinta 
Basin of Utah.
    Production of crude oil within Duchesne County, Utah has increased 
from 8.7 Million Barrels (MM BBL) in 2008 to 11.9 MM BBL in 2011. 
Production in 2012 was nearly 14 MM BBL, and 2013 is on pace for 18 MM 
BBL. This represents a 54% increase over the last five years. New 
drilling technology continues to improve the ability for economical 
extraction of Uinta Basin crude. The majority of this production is 
currently transported via tanker truck to Salt Lake City.
    The oil produced from the Uinta Basin is paraffinic crude that is 
not compatible with the current pipeline infrastructure in Utah. The 
product must be maintained at an elevated temperature in order to flow 
through a pipeline. Other pipelines in the area were not designed to 
maintain the temperatures that Uinta crude requires. Therefore, the 
Uinta crude is currently loaded into trucks and transported via road to 
refineries. The unique composition of the Uinta crude also hinders its 
transportation to markets outside of the Salt Lake metropolitan area.
    Several refineries in the Salt Lake metropolitan area have 
announced planned upgrades to increase the capacity to process crude 
produced in Utah, including the Uinta Basin.\1\ These planned upgrades 
will take advantage of the relatively lower price of locally produced 
crude. The project provides infrastructure to deliver typically lower 
priced, locally produced crude oil to market in an environmentally 
responsible and safe manner.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Salt Lake Tribune, 6/1/2012; https://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/money/54044681-79/utah-refinery-oil-crude.html.csp; Accessed 8/21/
2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The planned increases in production and refining capacities have 
state lawmakers and transportation officials concerned about the 
capacity and capability of the existing highway infrastructure.\2\ The 
construction of the

[[Page 4658]]

project considers pipeline transmission as more viable long-term method 
of delivery to the Salt Lake metropolitan area. In addition, the 
project considers it a benefit to the public by removing a portion of 
the tanker truck traffic from the highways in the region thereby 
potentially reducing the cost of highway maintenance and upgrades.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Salt Lake Tribune, 8/15/2012; https://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/money/54703446-79/uinta-crude-transportation-basin.html.csp; 
Accessed 8/21/2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposed Action

    Five principal facilities will be located along the project, one 
origin station and four intermediate stations. The origin station will 
consist of truck offloading racks, product storage, pumps, launcher/
receivers, piping, valves, fittings, and power generation. This 
origination facility would be located on private property and would be 
approximately 20 acres. The four intermediate stations for the project 
are approximately five acres each and located on private property. 
There are seven main line block valves locations and other minor above 
ground appurtenances that also will be located on private property.
    The project would be constructed primarily on private lands and 
cross approximately 14 miles of NFS land administered by the UWCNF, 
U.S. Forest Service (FS). The proposed pipeline right-of-way would be a 
minimum of 50-feet wide and up to 100-feet wide on National Forest 
System lands once constructed (right-of-way may be wider off of NFS 
lands). Many areas of the proposed pipeline route would utilize 
existing pipeline right-of-way routes or utility corridors and parallel 
Chevron, Questar and Kern River pipelines. The pipeline is further 
described as 12'' carbon steel pipe, .375 WT, API 5L, X52, insulated 
(HDPE) jacketed, externally coated, and buried at a minimum depth of 
three feet. System pressure designs are currently projected to be 
between 1,200 and 1,400 psi maximum operating pressure (MOP).

Possible Alternatives

    A route review and investigation was conducted that identified 
three options:

 Northern Route (Proposed Action)
 East Canyon Route
 Southern Route

    The northern route is generally a 135 mile option that parallels 
portions of the existing Chevron crude pipeline for the first 40 miles 
from the origin point to Francis, UT. From Francis, the pipeline bears 
north to Coalville, UT in many areas paralleling existing Questar 
distribution pipelines. At Coalville it meets with the Kern River 
natural gas pipeline. The pipeline would then parallel the Kern River 
pipeline to about the top of the Wasatch Range. From here the route 
would roughly parallel a Questar natural gas pipeline west to the town 
of Bountiful, UT, and on to the east side of Utah Highway 67. The 
pipeline would then bear south connecting to multiple Salt Lake area 
refineries.
    The east canyon route is generally a 135-mile option that follows 
the northern route for the first 90 miles, then bears west to the Park 
City area. From Park City, the pipeline would parallel East Canyon 
Creek to join with the Kern River pipeline. The pipeline would then 
parallel the Kern River pipeline to about the top of the Wasatch Range. 
From here the route would roughly parallel a Questar natural gas 
pipeline west to the town of Bountiful, UT, and on to the east side of 
Utah Highway 67. The pipeline would then bear south connecting to 
multiple Salt Lake area refineries.
    The southern route is generally a 120-mile option that follows the 
northern route for the first 90 miles and then roughly parallels the 
existing Chevron crude oil pipeline into and through Salt Lake City 
connecting to multiple Salt Lake area refineries.
    The northern route was identified as the proposed action, based 
principally on permitting and ``Right of Way'' (ROW) acquisition, 
minimizing areas of disturbance, and utilizing previously established 
utility corridors, despite being the longest route of the proposed 
options.
    Under all alternatives, approximately 14 miles are on NFS land and 
the remainder on private lands. The segments crossing NFS land follow 
forest plan (both Uinta and Wasatch-Cache Forest Plans were revised in 
2003) designated utility corridors. The right-of-way would be a minimum 
of 50-feet wide and up to 100-feet wide on NFS land once constructed 
(right-of-way may be wider off of NFS land). Many reaches of the 
pipeline route would utilize existing pipeline routes or utility 
corridors and parallel Chevron, Questar and Kern River pipelines right-
of-way. These existing corridors form portions of the boundaries of 4 
Inventoried Roadless Area (IRAs). Under all alternatives, the project 
would be located outside of the IRAs on the opposite (non-roadless) 
side of the existing pipeline, except at one point where two of these 
IRAs come together and encroachment into an IRA cannot be avoided. At 
this point, the project must cross the tip of the 8,810 acre Nobletts 
IRAs. Routing around the IRAs is not feasible. No roads will be 
constructed in IRAs, but a small amount of incidental tree clearing 
(<1.0 acre) will be required at this point.

Responsible Official

Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Supervisor.

Nature of Decision To Be Made

    The decision to be made is whether or not to approve grantng a 
special use authorization for the construction and maintenance of the 
Uinta Express Pipeline.

Preliminary Issues

    Preliminary issues are the effects of the project on transportation 
safety, air quality, visual resources, surface and groundwater quality, 
noise levels, land use (including roadless area impact), vegetation and 
wildlife.

Scoping Process

    This notice of intent initiates the 45-day scoping process, which 
guides the development of the environmental impact statement.
    Two open house meetings will be held--one in Bountiful City and 
another in Heber City--to provide stakeholders and the general public 
with information about the proposed project and to provide a forum for 
submitting comments.

 Wednesday, February 19, 2014; 6-8 p.m., Wasatch High School, 
Heber City, UT
 Thursday, February 20, 2014; 6-8 p.m., Bountiful High School, 
Bountiful, UT

    Written comments will be accepted throughout the 45-day period. 
Comments can be hand delivered from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday 
through Friday, excluding federal holidays. Electronic comments must be 
submitted in a format such as an email message, rich text format (.rtf) 
or Word (.doc) to uwc_info@fs.fed.us, by facsimile to (801) 253-8118, 
or to: Nelson Gonzalez-Sullow, Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest 
Supervisor's Office, 857 West South Jordan Parkway, South Jordan, UT 
84095-8594.
    It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times 
and in such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of 
the environmental impact statement; therefore, comments should be 
provided prior to the close of the 45-day scoping period and should 
clearly articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions. The scoping 
period begins when the Legal Notice is published in The Salt Lake 
Tribune.
    Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names 
and addresses of those who comment, will

[[Page 4659]]

be part of the public record for this proposed action. Comments 
submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered, however.

    Dated: January 21, 2014.
David C. Whittekiend,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2014-01692 Filed 1-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.