Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest; Utah; Uinta Express Pipeline Project, 4657-4659 [2014-01692]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 19 / Wednesday, January 29, 2014 / Notices
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a currently valid OMB control
number and the agency informs
potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Rural Housing Service
Title: Rural Community Development
Initiative (RCDI).
OMB Control Number: 0575–0180.
Summary of Collection: Congress
created the Rural Community
Development Initiative (RCDI) in fiscal
year 2000 and funds was appropriated
under the Rural Community
Advancement Program. The intent of
the RCDI grant program is to develop
the capacity and ability of rural area
recipients to undertake projects through
a program of financial and technical
assistance provided by qualified
intermediary organizations. The
intermediary is the applicant and must
have been organized a minimum of 3
years at the time of application. The
intermediary may be a qualified private,
nonprofit, or public (including tribal)
organization. Intermediaries are
required to provide matching funds in
an amount equal to the RCDI grant.
Eligible recipients are private, nonprofit
community-based housing and
community development organizations,
low-income rural communities or
federally recognized Indian tribes.
Need and Use of the Information:
RHS will collect information to
determine applicant/grantee eligibility,
project feasibility, and to ensure that
grantees operate on a sound basis and
use grant funds for authorized purposes.
Failure to collect this information could
result in improper use of Federal funds.
Description of Respondents: Not-forprofit institutions; State, Local or Tribal
Government.
Number of Respondents: 1,260.
Frequency of Responses:
Recordkeeping; Reporting: Quarterly;
Annually; Third party disclosure.
Total Burden Hours: 4,188.
Charlene Parker,
Departmental Information Collection
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–01701 Filed 1–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XV–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Jan 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest;
Utah; Uinta Express Pipeline Project
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Uinta Express Pipeline
Company LLC, a subsidiary of Tesoro
Refining & Marketing Company LLC,
has submitted a special use application
requesting authorization to construct
and maintain a crude oil pipeline from
the Uinta Basin to Salt Lake City, Utah.
The project is known as the Uinta
Express Pipeline (‘‘Project’’). The UintaWasatch-Cache National Forest
(UWCNF) is responding to the
application to determine if a special use
authorization should be granted, what
terms and conditions such an
authorization should contain, and
evaluate if any project specific land use
plan amendments may be required. The
objective of Project proponents is to
transport crude oil from the Uinta Basin
and transport it via pipeline rather than
trucks for refining in Salt Lake City. The
pipeline and its alternatives are
comprised of approximately 120 to 135
miles of underground 12-inch pipeline
and ancillary facilities.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by 45
days from date of publication in the Salt
Lake Tribune (Newspaper of Record).
The draft environmental impact
statement is expected in winter of 2014
and the final environmental impact
statement is expected spring of 2015.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Uinta-Wasatch-Cache Forest
Supervisor’s Office, Attn: Nelson
Gonzalez-Sullow, 857 West South
Jordan Parkway, South Jordan, UT
84095–8594. Comments may also be
sent via email to uwc_info@fs.fed.us or
via facsimile to (801) 253–8118.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Larry Lucas, Recreation and Lands Staff
Officer by phone at (801) 999–2157 or
by email at lclucas@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Purpose and Need for Action
The UWCNF is intending to develop
an Environmental Impact Statement in
response to the applicants request for a
special use authorization.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4657
The objective of the project applicant
is to seek permission from the UWCNF
to transport crude oil from the Uinta
Basin via pipeline rather than trucks for
refining in Salt Lake City. The pipeline
is comprised of approximately 135
miles of underground 12-inch pipeline
and ancillary facilities. Approximately
14 miles are proposed to cross NFS land
administered by the UWCNF.
The construction of this project is
desired to provide a safer and more
efficient transportation route for crude
oil produced in the Uinta Basin of Utah.
Production of crude oil within
Duchesne County, Utah has increased
from 8.7 Million Barrels (MM BBL) in
2008 to 11.9 MM BBL in 2011.
Production in 2012 was nearly 14 MM
BBL, and 2013 is on pace for 18 MM
BBL. This represents a 54% increase
over the last five years. New drilling
technology continues to improve the
ability for economical extraction of
Uinta Basin crude. The majority of this
production is currently transported via
tanker truck to Salt Lake City.
The oil produced from the Uinta
Basin is paraffinic crude that is not
compatible with the current pipeline
infrastructure in Utah. The product
must be maintained at an elevated
temperature in order to flow through a
pipeline. Other pipelines in the area
were not designed to maintain the
temperatures that Uinta crude requires.
Therefore, the Uinta crude is currently
loaded into trucks and transported via
road to refineries. The unique
composition of the Uinta crude also
hinders its transportation to markets
outside of the Salt Lake metropolitan
area.
Several refineries in the Salt Lake
metropolitan area have announced
planned upgrades to increase the
capacity to process crude produced in
Utah, including the Uinta Basin.1 These
planned upgrades will take advantage of
the relatively lower price of locally
produced crude. The project provides
infrastructure to deliver typically lower
priced, locally produced crude oil to
market in an environmentally
responsible and safe manner.
The planned increases in production
and refining capacities have state
lawmakers and transportation officials
concerned about the capacity and
capability of the existing highway
infrastructure.2 The construction of the
1 Salt Lake Tribune, 6/1/2012; https://
www.sltrib.com/sltrib/money/54044681-79/utahrefinery-oil-crude.html.csp; Accessed 8/21/2012.
2 Salt Lake Tribune, 8/15/2012; https://
www.sltrib.com/sltrib/money/54703446-79/uintacrude-transportation-basin.html.csp; Accessed 8/
21/2012.
E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM
29JAN1
4658
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 19 / Wednesday, January 29, 2014 / Notices
project considers pipeline transmission
as more viable long-term method of
delivery to the Salt Lake metropolitan
area. In addition, the project considers
it a benefit to the public by removing a
portion of the tanker truck traffic from
the highways in the region thereby
potentially reducing the cost of highway
maintenance and upgrades.
Proposed Action
Five principal facilities will be
located along the project, one origin
station and four intermediate stations.
The origin station will consist of truck
offloading racks, product storage,
pumps, launcher/receivers, piping,
valves, fittings, and power generation.
This origination facility would be
located on private property and would
be approximately 20 acres. The four
intermediate stations for the project are
approximately five acres each and
located on private property. There are
seven main line block valves locations
and other minor above ground
appurtenances that also will be located
on private property.
The project would be constructed
primarily on private lands and cross
approximately 14 miles of NFS land
administered by the UWCNF, U.S.
Forest Service (FS). The proposed
pipeline right-of-way would be a
minimum of 50-feet wide and up to 100feet wide on National Forest System
lands once constructed (right-of-way
may be wider off of NFS lands). Many
areas of the proposed pipeline route
would utilize existing pipeline right-ofway routes or utility corridors and
parallel Chevron, Questar and Kern
River pipelines. The pipeline is further
described as 12″ carbon steel pipe, .375
WT, API 5L, X52, insulated (HDPE)
jacketed, externally coated, and buried
at a minimum depth of three feet.
System pressure designs are currently
projected to be between 1,200 and 1,400
psi maximum operating pressure (MOP).
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Possible Alternatives
A route review and investigation was
conducted that identified three options:
• Northern Route (Proposed Action)
• East Canyon Route
• Southern Route
The northern route is generally a 135
mile option that parallels portions of the
existing Chevron crude pipeline for the
first 40 miles from the origin point to
Francis, UT. From Francis, the pipeline
bears north to Coalville, UT in many
areas paralleling existing Questar
distribution pipelines. At Coalville it
meets with the Kern River natural gas
pipeline. The pipeline would then
parallel the Kern River pipeline to about
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Jan 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
the top of the Wasatch Range. From here
the route would roughly parallel a
Questar natural gas pipeline west to the
town of Bountiful, UT, and on to the
east side of Utah Highway 67. The
pipeline would then bear south
connecting to multiple Salt Lake area
refineries.
The east canyon route is generally a
135-mile option that follows the
northern route for the first 90 miles,
then bears west to the Park City area.
From Park City, the pipeline would
parallel East Canyon Creek to join with
the Kern River pipeline. The pipeline
would then parallel the Kern River
pipeline to about the top of the Wasatch
Range. From here the route would
roughly parallel a Questar natural gas
pipeline west to the town of Bountiful,
UT, and on to the east side of Utah
Highway 67. The pipeline would then
bear south connecting to multiple Salt
Lake area refineries.
The southern route is generally a 120mile option that follows the northern
route for the first 90 miles and then
roughly parallels the existing Chevron
crude oil pipeline into and through Salt
Lake City connecting to multiple Salt
Lake area refineries.
The northern route was identified as
the proposed action, based principally
on permitting and ‘‘Right of Way’’
(ROW) acquisition, minimizing areas of
disturbance, and utilizing previously
established utility corridors, despite
being the longest route of the proposed
options.
Under all alternatives, approximately
14 miles are on NFS land and the
remainder on private lands. The
segments crossing NFS land follow
forest plan (both Uinta and WasatchCache Forest Plans were revised in
2003) designated utility corridors. The
right-of-way would be a minimum of 50feet wide and up to 100-feet wide on
NFS land once constructed (right-of-way
may be wider off of NFS land). Many
reaches of the pipeline route would
utilize existing pipeline routes or utility
corridors and parallel Chevron, Questar
and Kern River pipelines right-of-way.
These existing corridors form portions
of the boundaries of 4 Inventoried
Roadless Area (IRAs). Under all
alternatives, the project would be
located outside of the IRAs on the
opposite (non-roadless) side of the
existing pipeline, except at one point
where two of these IRAs come together
and encroachment into an IRA cannot
be avoided. At this point, the project
must cross the tip of the 8,810 acre
Nobletts IRAs. Routing around the IRAs
is not feasible. No roads will be
constructed in IRAs, but a small amount
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of incidental tree clearing (<1.0 acre)
will be required at this point.
Responsible Official
Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest
Supervisor.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The decision to be made is whether or
not to approve grantng a special use
authorization for the construction and
maintenance of the Uinta Express
Pipeline.
Preliminary Issues
Preliminary issues are the effects of
the project on transportation safety, air
quality, visual resources, surface and
groundwater quality, noise levels, land
use (including roadless area impact),
vegetation and wildlife.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the 45day scoping process, which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement.
Two open house meetings will be
held—one in Bountiful City and another
in Heber City—to provide stakeholders
and the general public with information
about the proposed project and to
provide a forum for submitting
comments.
• Wednesday, February 19, 2014; 6–8
p.m., Wasatch High School, Heber
City, UT
• Thursday, February 20, 2014; 6–8
p.m., Bountiful High School,
Bountiful, UT
Written comments will be accepted
throughout the 45-day period.
Comments can be hand delivered from
8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding federal holidays.
Electronic comments must be submitted
in a format such as an email message,
rich text format (.rtf) or Word (.doc) to
uwc_info@fs.fed.us, by facsimile to (801)
253–8118, or to: Nelson GonzalezSullow, Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National
Forest Supervisor’s Office, 857 West
South Jordan Parkway, South Jordan,
UT 84095–8594.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such manner that they are useful to the
agency’s preparation of the
environmental impact statement;
therefore, comments should be provided
prior to the close of the 45-day scoping
period and should clearly articulate the
reviewer’s concerns and contentions.
The scoping period begins when the
Legal Notice is published in The Salt
Lake Tribune.
Comments received in response to
this solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM
29JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 19 / Wednesday, January 29, 2014 / Notices
be part of the public record for this
proposed action. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered, however.
Dated: January 21, 2014.
David C. Whittekiend,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2014–01692 Filed 1–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Mineral County Resource Advisory
Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Mineral County Resource
Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in
Superior, MT. The purpose of the
meetings is to review and vote on
submitted proposals, and receive public
comment on the meeting subjects and
proceedings.
SUMMARY:
The meetings will be held March
20, 2014, April 3, 2014, and April 10,
2014, 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Superior Ranger District,
209 W. Riverside Ave., Superior, MT
59872.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tawnya Brummett, District Ranger at
406–822–3928 or email: tbrummett@
fs.fed.us.
The
following business will be conducted:
(1) Review presentation and written
proposals (2) Brief discussion of
proposals (3) prioritize projects by vote
and choose which projects to fund as
funding allows.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: January 22, 2014.
Tawnya Brummett,
District Ranger.
[FR Doc. 2014–01690 Filed 1–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
Agency: National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Jan 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
Title: Amendment 80 Economic Data
Report (EDR) for the Catcher/Processor
Non-AFA Trawl Sector.
OMB Control Number: 0648–0564.
Form Number(s): NA.
Type of Request: Regular submission
(extension of a current information
collection).
Number of Respondents: 25.
Average Hours per Response: 20.
Burden Hours: 500.
Needs and Uses: This request is for
extension of a current information
collection.
Amendment 80 to the Fishery
Management Plan for Groundfish of the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Management Area primarily allocates
several Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Management Area non-pollock trawl
groundfish fisheries among fishing
sectors, and facilitates the formation of
harvesting cooperatives in the catcher/
processor sector of the Non-American
Fisheries Act (AFA) Trawl Catcher/
Processor Cooperative Program
(Program). The Program established a
limited access privilege program for the
Non-AFA trawl catcher/processor
sector.
The Amendment 80 economic data
report (EDR) collects cost, revenue,
ownership, and employment data on an
annual basis and provides information
unavailable through other means to
review the Program. The purpose of the
EDR is to understand the economic
effects of the Amendment 80 program
on vessels or entities regulated by the
Program, and to inform future
management actions. Data collected
through the EDR is mandatory for all
Amendment 80 quota share (QS)
holders.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.
Frequency: Annually.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
OMB Desk Officer: OIRA_
Submission@omb.eop.gov.
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Jennifer Jessup,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482–0336, Department of
Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at JJessup@
doc.gov).
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4659
Dated: January 23, 2014.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–01664 Filed 1–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
Agency: International Trade
Administration.
Title: Request for Duty-Free Entry of
Scientific Instruments or Apparatus.
OMB Control Number: 0625–0037.
Form Number(s): ITA–338P.
Type of Request: Regular submission
(extension of a current information
collection).
Burden Hours: 130.
Number of Respondents: 65
Average Hours per Response: 2.
Needs and Uses: The Departments of
Commerce and Homeland Security
(‘‘DHS’’) are required to determine
whether non-profit institutions
established for scientific or educational
purposes are entitled to duty-free entry
for scientific instruments that the
institutions import under the Florence
Agreement. Form ITA–338P enables: (1)
DHS to determine whether the statutory
eligibility requirements for the
institution and the instrument are
fulfilled, and
(2) Commerce to make a comparison
and finding as to the scientific
equivalency of comparable instruments
being manufactured in the United
States. Without the collection of the
information, DHS and Commerce would
be unable to carry out the
responsibilities assigned by law.
Affected Public: Federal, state or local
government; not-for-profit institutions.
Frequency: On occasion.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain a benefit.
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Jennifer Jessup,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482–0336, Department of
Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at JJessup@
doc.gov).
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM
29JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4657-4659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01692]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest; Utah; Uinta Express Pipeline
Project
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Uinta Express Pipeline Company LLC, a subsidiary of Tesoro
Refining & Marketing Company LLC, has submitted a special use
application requesting authorization to construct and maintain a crude
oil pipeline from the Uinta Basin to Salt Lake City, Utah. The project
is known as the Uinta Express Pipeline (``Project''). The Uinta-
Wasatch-Cache National Forest (UWCNF) is responding to the application
to determine if a special use authorization should be granted, what
terms and conditions such an authorization should contain, and evaluate
if any project specific land use plan amendments may be required. The
objective of Project proponents is to transport crude oil from the
Uinta Basin and transport it via pipeline rather than trucks for
refining in Salt Lake City. The pipeline and its alternatives are
comprised of approximately 120 to 135 miles of underground 12-inch
pipeline and ancillary facilities.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by 45 days from date of publication in the Salt Lake Tribune (Newspaper
of Record). The draft environmental impact statement is expected in
winter of 2014 and the final environmental impact statement is expected
spring of 2015.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Uinta-Wasatch-Cache Forest
Supervisor's Office, Attn: Nelson Gonzalez-Sullow, 857 West South
Jordan Parkway, South Jordan, UT 84095-8594. Comments may also be sent
via email to uwc_info@fs.fed.us or via facsimile to (801) 253-8118.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Lucas, Recreation and Lands
Staff Officer by phone at (801) 999-2157 or by email at
lclucas@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD)
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The UWCNF is intending to develop an Environmental Impact Statement
in response to the applicants request for a special use authorization.
The objective of the project applicant is to seek permission from
the UWCNF to transport crude oil from the Uinta Basin via pipeline
rather than trucks for refining in Salt Lake City. The pipeline is
comprised of approximately 135 miles of underground 12-inch pipeline
and ancillary facilities. Approximately 14 miles are proposed to cross
NFS land administered by the UWCNF.
The construction of this project is desired to provide a safer and
more efficient transportation route for crude oil produced in the Uinta
Basin of Utah.
Production of crude oil within Duchesne County, Utah has increased
from 8.7 Million Barrels (MM BBL) in 2008 to 11.9 MM BBL in 2011.
Production in 2012 was nearly 14 MM BBL, and 2013 is on pace for 18 MM
BBL. This represents a 54% increase over the last five years. New
drilling technology continues to improve the ability for economical
extraction of Uinta Basin crude. The majority of this production is
currently transported via tanker truck to Salt Lake City.
The oil produced from the Uinta Basin is paraffinic crude that is
not compatible with the current pipeline infrastructure in Utah. The
product must be maintained at an elevated temperature in order to flow
through a pipeline. Other pipelines in the area were not designed to
maintain the temperatures that Uinta crude requires. Therefore, the
Uinta crude is currently loaded into trucks and transported via road to
refineries. The unique composition of the Uinta crude also hinders its
transportation to markets outside of the Salt Lake metropolitan area.
Several refineries in the Salt Lake metropolitan area have
announced planned upgrades to increase the capacity to process crude
produced in Utah, including the Uinta Basin.\1\ These planned upgrades
will take advantage of the relatively lower price of locally produced
crude. The project provides infrastructure to deliver typically lower
priced, locally produced crude oil to market in an environmentally
responsible and safe manner.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Salt Lake Tribune, 6/1/2012; https://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/money/54044681-79/utah-refinery-oil-crude.html.csp; Accessed 8/21/
2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The planned increases in production and refining capacities have
state lawmakers and transportation officials concerned about the
capacity and capability of the existing highway infrastructure.\2\ The
construction of the
[[Page 4658]]
project considers pipeline transmission as more viable long-term method
of delivery to the Salt Lake metropolitan area. In addition, the
project considers it a benefit to the public by removing a portion of
the tanker truck traffic from the highways in the region thereby
potentially reducing the cost of highway maintenance and upgrades.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Salt Lake Tribune, 8/15/2012; https://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/money/54703446-79/uinta-crude-transportation-basin.html.csp;
Accessed 8/21/2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Action
Five principal facilities will be located along the project, one
origin station and four intermediate stations. The origin station will
consist of truck offloading racks, product storage, pumps, launcher/
receivers, piping, valves, fittings, and power generation. This
origination facility would be located on private property and would be
approximately 20 acres. The four intermediate stations for the project
are approximately five acres each and located on private property.
There are seven main line block valves locations and other minor above
ground appurtenances that also will be located on private property.
The project would be constructed primarily on private lands and
cross approximately 14 miles of NFS land administered by the UWCNF,
U.S. Forest Service (FS). The proposed pipeline right-of-way would be a
minimum of 50-feet wide and up to 100-feet wide on National Forest
System lands once constructed (right-of-way may be wider off of NFS
lands). Many areas of the proposed pipeline route would utilize
existing pipeline right-of-way routes or utility corridors and parallel
Chevron, Questar and Kern River pipelines. The pipeline is further
described as 12'' carbon steel pipe, .375 WT, API 5L, X52, insulated
(HDPE) jacketed, externally coated, and buried at a minimum depth of
three feet. System pressure designs are currently projected to be
between 1,200 and 1,400 psi maximum operating pressure (MOP).
Possible Alternatives
A route review and investigation was conducted that identified
three options:
Northern Route (Proposed Action)
East Canyon Route
Southern Route
The northern route is generally a 135 mile option that parallels
portions of the existing Chevron crude pipeline for the first 40 miles
from the origin point to Francis, UT. From Francis, the pipeline bears
north to Coalville, UT in many areas paralleling existing Questar
distribution pipelines. At Coalville it meets with the Kern River
natural gas pipeline. The pipeline would then parallel the Kern River
pipeline to about the top of the Wasatch Range. From here the route
would roughly parallel a Questar natural gas pipeline west to the town
of Bountiful, UT, and on to the east side of Utah Highway 67. The
pipeline would then bear south connecting to multiple Salt Lake area
refineries.
The east canyon route is generally a 135-mile option that follows
the northern route for the first 90 miles, then bears west to the Park
City area. From Park City, the pipeline would parallel East Canyon
Creek to join with the Kern River pipeline. The pipeline would then
parallel the Kern River pipeline to about the top of the Wasatch Range.
From here the route would roughly parallel a Questar natural gas
pipeline west to the town of Bountiful, UT, and on to the east side of
Utah Highway 67. The pipeline would then bear south connecting to
multiple Salt Lake area refineries.
The southern route is generally a 120-mile option that follows the
northern route for the first 90 miles and then roughly parallels the
existing Chevron crude oil pipeline into and through Salt Lake City
connecting to multiple Salt Lake area refineries.
The northern route was identified as the proposed action, based
principally on permitting and ``Right of Way'' (ROW) acquisition,
minimizing areas of disturbance, and utilizing previously established
utility corridors, despite being the longest route of the proposed
options.
Under all alternatives, approximately 14 miles are on NFS land and
the remainder on private lands. The segments crossing NFS land follow
forest plan (both Uinta and Wasatch-Cache Forest Plans were revised in
2003) designated utility corridors. The right-of-way would be a minimum
of 50-feet wide and up to 100-feet wide on NFS land once constructed
(right-of-way may be wider off of NFS land). Many reaches of the
pipeline route would utilize existing pipeline routes or utility
corridors and parallel Chevron, Questar and Kern River pipelines right-
of-way. These existing corridors form portions of the boundaries of 4
Inventoried Roadless Area (IRAs). Under all alternatives, the project
would be located outside of the IRAs on the opposite (non-roadless)
side of the existing pipeline, except at one point where two of these
IRAs come together and encroachment into an IRA cannot be avoided. At
this point, the project must cross the tip of the 8,810 acre Nobletts
IRAs. Routing around the IRAs is not feasible. No roads will be
constructed in IRAs, but a small amount of incidental tree clearing
(<1.0 acre) will be required at this point.
Responsible Official
Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Supervisor.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The decision to be made is whether or not to approve grantng a
special use authorization for the construction and maintenance of the
Uinta Express Pipeline.
Preliminary Issues
Preliminary issues are the effects of the project on transportation
safety, air quality, visual resources, surface and groundwater quality,
noise levels, land use (including roadless area impact), vegetation and
wildlife.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the 45-day scoping process, which
guides the development of the environmental impact statement.
Two open house meetings will be held--one in Bountiful City and
another in Heber City--to provide stakeholders and the general public
with information about the proposed project and to provide a forum for
submitting comments.
Wednesday, February 19, 2014; 6-8 p.m., Wasatch High School,
Heber City, UT
Thursday, February 20, 2014; 6-8 p.m., Bountiful High School,
Bountiful, UT
Written comments will be accepted throughout the 45-day period.
Comments can be hand delivered from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding federal holidays. Electronic comments must be
submitted in a format such as an email message, rich text format (.rtf)
or Word (.doc) to uwc_info@fs.fed.us, by facsimile to (801) 253-8118,
or to: Nelson Gonzalez-Sullow, Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest
Supervisor's Office, 857 West South Jordan Parkway, South Jordan, UT
84095-8594.
It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times
and in such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of
the environmental impact statement; therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the 45-day scoping period and should
clearly articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions. The scoping
period begins when the Legal Notice is published in The Salt Lake
Tribune.
Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names
and addresses of those who comment, will
[[Page 4659]]
be part of the public record for this proposed action. Comments
submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered, however.
Dated: January 21, 2014.
David C. Whittekiend,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2014-01692 Filed 1-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P