Responsibilities of Boards of Directors, Corporate Practices and Corporate Governance Matters, 4414-4429 [2014-01173]
Download as PDF
4414
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2014 / Proposed Rules
concerning our proposed information
collection and recordkeeping
requirements. These comments will
help us:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information collection is necessary for
the proper performance of our agency s
functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of our
estimate of the burden of the proposed
information collection, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
information collection on those who are
to respond (such as through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses).
Estimate of burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 0.78 hours per
response.
Respondents: Foreign government,
importers and growers of bananas from
the Philippines.
Estimated annual number of
respondents: 46.
Estimated annual number of
responses per respondent: 5.34.
Estimated annual number of
responses: 246.
Estimated total annual burden on
respondents: 192 hours. (Due to
averaging, the total annual burden hours
may not equal the product of the annual
number of responses multiplied by the
reporting burden per response.)
Copies of this information collection
can be obtained from Mrs. Celeste
Sickles, APHIS’ Information Collection
Coordinator, at (301) 851–2908.
PART 319—FOREIGN QUARANTINE
NOTICES
12 CFR Parts 1236 and 1239
Office of Federal Housing Enterprise
Oversight
2. Section 319.56–58 is amended as
follows:
■ a. The introductory text is revised;
■ b. In paragraph (c), the date,
‘‘February 9, 2015’’ is removed and the
date ‘‘[date 2 years after the effective
date of final rule]’’ is added in its place;
■ c. In paragraph (h)(2), in the second
sentence, the words ‘‘introductory text
of this section’’ are removed and the
words ‘‘operational workplan required
by paragraph (a)(1) of this section’’ are
added in their place.
The revision reads as follows:
■
§ 319.56–58
Bananas from the Philippines.
Bananas (Musa spp., which include
M. acuminate cultivars and M.
acuminate x M. balbisiana hybrids) may
be imported into the continental United
States, Guam, Hawaii, and the Northern
Mariana Islands from the Philippines
only under the conditions described in
this section.
*
*
*
*
*
Done in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of
January 2014.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs,
Nursery stock, Plant diseases and pests,
Quarantine, Reporting and
Jkt 232001
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE
AGENCY
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, and
7781–7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR
2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
13:35 Jan 27, 2014
12 CFR Parts 914 and 917
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the E-Government Act
to promote the use of the Internet and
other information technologies, to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes. For information pertinent to
E-Government Act compliance related
to this proposed rule, please contact
Mrs. Celeste Sickles, APHIS’
Information Collection Coordinator, at
(301) 851–2908.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD
1. The authority citation for part 319
continues to read as follows:
■
[FR Doc. 2014–01581 Filed 1–27–14; 8:45 am]
E-Government Act Compliance
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
recordkeeping requirements, Rice,
Vegetables.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 7
CFR part 319 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12 CFR Parts 1710 and 1720
RIN 2590–AA59
Responsibilities of Boards of
Directors, Corporate Practices and
Corporate Governance Matters
Federal Housing Finance
Board; Federal Housing Finance
Agency; Office of Federal Housing
Enterprise Oversight.
ACTION: Proposed rule; with request for
comments.
AGENCIES:
The Federal Housing Finance
Agency (FHFA) is proposing to amend
its regulations by relocating and
consolidating certain Federal Housing
Finance Board (Finance Board) and
Office of Federal Housing Enterprise
Oversight (OFHEO) regulations that
pertain to the responsibilities of boards
of directors, corporate practices, and
corporate governance matters. The
OFHEO regulations address corporate
governance matters at the Federal
National Mortgage Association and the
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation (Enterprises), while the
Finance Board regulations address the
powers and responsibilities of the
boards of directors and management of
the Federal Home Loan Banks (Banks).
The proposed rule would consolidate
most of those existing regulations into a
new FHFA regulation, parts of which
would apply to both the Banks and the
Enterprises (together, regulated entities),
and parts of which would apply only to
the Banks or only to the Enterprises.
Most of the content of the new
regulation has been derived from the
existing regulations, with such
modifications as are necessary to apply
certain provisions to all regulated
entities. The proposal also would
include a new provision on risk
management and a new definition of
‘‘credit risk,’’ which is a term that is
used only within the proposed risk
management provision. Those
provisions would apply to both the
Banks and the Enterprises. FHFA also is
proposing to amend a definition within
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2014 / Proposed Rules
its Prudential Management and
Operations Standards (Prudential
Standards) regulations and the
introductory language to the standards
themselves. Together, those
amendments would explicitly include
certain introductory language—
pertaining to the general responsibilities
of senior management and boards of
directors—as part of the standards. The
proposed rule also would repeal a
separate provision of the OFHEO
regulations that relate to minimum
safety and soundness requirements.
DATES: Written comments on the
proposed rule must be received on or
before March 31, 2014. For additional
information, see SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your
comments on the proposed rule,
identified by regulatory information
number ‘‘RIN 2590–AA59,’’ by any of
the following methods:
• Email: Comments to Alfred M.
Pollard, General Counsel, may be sent
by email to RegComments@FHFA.gov.
Please include ‘‘RIN 2590–AA59’’ in the
subject line of the message.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments. If
you submit your comment to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal, please also
send it by email to FHFA at
RegComments@FHFA.gov to ensure
timely receipt by the agency. Include
the following information in the subject
line of your submission: Comments/RIN
2590–AA59.
• U.S. Mail, United Parcel Post,
Federal Express, or Other Mail Service:
The mailing address for comments is:
Alfred M. Pollard, General Counsel,
Attention: Comments/RIN 2590–AA59,
Federal Housing Finance Agency,
Constitution Center, Eighth Floor (OGC),
400 7th Street SW., Washington, DC
20024.
• Hand Delivered/Courier: The hand
delivery address is: Alfred M. Pollard,
General Counsel; Attention: Comments/
RIN 2590–AA59, Federal Housing
Finance Agency, Constitution Center,
Eighth Floor (OGC), 400 7th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20024. The package
should be logged at the Guard Desk,
First Floor, on business days between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Bogdon, Amy.Bogdon@fhfa.gov,
(202) 649–3320, Associate Director,
Division of Federal Home Loan Bank
Regulation; or Michou Nguyen,
Michou.Nguyen@fhfa.gov, (202) 649–
3081 (not toll-free numbers), Assistant
General Counsel, Office of General
Counsel, Federal Housing Finance
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Jan 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
Agency, Constitution Center, Eighth
Floor (OGC), 400 7th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20024. The telephone
number for the Telecommunications
Device for the Hearing Impaired is (800)
877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Comments
FHFA invites comments on all aspects
of the proposed rule in addition to
requesting comments in response to
specific questions that appear
throughout this document. FHFA will
take all comments into consideration
before issuing a final regulation. All
comments received will be posted
without change on the FHFA Web site
at https://www.fhfa.gov, and will include
any personal information you provide,
such as your name, address (mailing
and email), and telephone numbers. In
addition, copies of all comments
received will be available for
examination by the public on business
days between the hours of 10 a.m. and
3 p.m., at the Federal Housing Finance
Agency, Eighth Floor, 400 7th Street
SW., Washington, DC 20024. To make
an appointment to inspect comments,
please call the Office of General Counsel
at (202) 649–3804.
II. Background
A. Purpose of the Proposed Rule
This proposed rule is the next phase
in FHFA’s effort to repeal or relocate all
remaining OFHEO and Finance Board
regulations. Both of the predecessor
agencies had adopted regulations
addressing director responsibilities,
corporate practices, and corporate
governance matters. Pursuant to the
Housing and Economic Recovery Act of
2008 (HERA), Public Law 110–289, 122
Stat. 2654, those regulations remain in
effect until they are superseded by
regulations issued by FHFA. See id. at
sections 1301, 1302, 1311, 1312, 122
Stat. 2794–95, 2797–98. The intent of
this proposed rule is to consolidate or
relocate certain of the existing
regulations into a new set of FHFA
regulations that would address those
same matters. FHFA would expand the
scope of certain of the existing
regulations to both the Enterprises and
the Banks. Those provisions address
matters of general corporate governance
or corporate practices that are common
to all the regulated entities. For certain
other provisions of the existing
regulations, FHFA would continue to
apply them only to the Banks or only to
the Enterprises, as they address topics
that are unique to the particular entity,
as permitted by statute. The proposed
rule would carry over most of those
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4415
provisions without change. The
proposed rule is not intended to address
conservatorship matters. Rather, the
proposal addresses matters of corporate
practice and governance, as well as
compliance and risk management
practices, nearly all of which currently
apply to the Enterprises through the
OFHEO regulations and all of which
remain relevant to their safe and sound
operation.
The regulations of the predecessor
agencies that would be relocated by this
rulemaking are located at parts 914, 917,
and 1710 of title 12 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR). The Finance
Board regulations at part 914 address
regulatory reporting for the Banks.
FHFA is proposing to relocate that
provision without substantive change
and apply it to all of the regulated
entities. All of the relocated regulations
would be adopted as a new part, 12 CFR
1239 (part 1239), in the FHFA section of
title 12 of the CFR. Any regulations of
the predecessor agencies that are not
being adopted as FHFA regulations
would be repealed.
As part of this rulemaking, FHFA is
also proposing to amend one of the
definitions within its Prudential
Standards regulations, as well as one
aspect of the Prudential Standards
themselves. Together, those
amendments would explicitly provide
that the introductory language within
the Prudential Standards, which
appears immediately before the
enumerated 10 standards, is considered
a part of the standards and is to be
treated in the same manner as the 10
enumerated standards. The introductory
section of the Prudential Standards
recites general concepts of corporate
governance and responsibilities, as they
relate to the subject matter of the
individual standards, that are a part of
the typical responsibilities of the board
of directors and senior management of
any financial institution. FHFA believes
that it would be more appropriate to
include those paragraphs as explicitly
part of the standards, and having the
same substantive effect under the
Prudential Standards regime. Lastly,
FHFA is proposing to repeal in its
entirety part 1720 of the OFHEO
regulations, which established certain
safety and soundness standards for the
Enterprises. Because many of the
matters addressed by part 1720 are also
addressed by the Prudential Standards
and by parts of this proposed rule,
FHFA has determined that the repeal of
part 1720 will not change the standards
applicable to the Enterprises. The
following sections briefly describe each
of the provisions in proposed part 1239
and its origin.
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
4416
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Also with respect to the Prudential
Standards, FHFA acknowledges that
there is substantial overlap between
some of these proposed regulations and
the Prudential Standards, and requests
comment on appropriate modifications
to the regulations to harmonize them
with the Prudential Standards to create
a unified set of corporate governance
requirements with appropriate levels of
specificity and appropriate enforcement
mechanisms.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
B. Overview of Part 1239
Part 1239 of the proposed rule would
be structured into a subpart (A) for
definitions and four substantive
subparts (B through E). Subpart B would
consist of regulations relating to core
corporate governance principles, which
would apply to both the Banks and the
Enterprises. Subpart C would include
regulations addressing codes of conduct,
risk management, compliance programs,
and regulatory reports, which also
would apply to all regulated entities.
Subparts D and E would consist of
regulations that address matters specific
to the Banks (such as those relating to
a Bank’s member product policy) and to
the Enterprises (such as those relating to
the Enterprise boards), respectively.
Much of the content of part 1239,
with the exception of the provision on
risk management, has been derived from
the current Finance Board and OFHEO
regulations, with modifications as
necessary to apply certain of the
provisions to all regulated entities and
to clarify, update, or supplement the
existing regulations, as appropriate.
FHFA believes that the current Finance
Board risk management regulation
would benefit from updates.
Accordingly, FHFA has rewritten this
provision in its entirety and is
proposing to apply the revised provision
to the Enterprises as well as to the
Banks. FHFA believes that the Finance
Board regulations dealing with audit
committees and internal controls could
be similarly updated and extended to
the Enterprises, but is soliciting
comment on how best to do that, rather
than proposing revised language for
those provisions, as discussed in more
detail in part III.E. (Bank Specific
Requirements).
C. Considerations of Differences
Between the Banks and the Enterprises
When promulgating regulations or
taking other actions that relate to the
Banks, section 1313(f) of the Federal
Housing Enterprises Financial Safety
and Soundness Act of 1992 (Safety and
Soundness Act), as amended by section
1201 of HERA, requires the Director to
consider the differences between the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Jan 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
Banks and the Enterprises with respect
to the Banks’ cooperative ownership
structure; mission of providing liquidity
to members; affordable housing and
community development mission;
capital structure; and joint and several
liability. 12 U.S.C. 4513(f). In preparing
the proposed rule, the Director has
considered the differences between the
Banks and the Enterprises as they relate
to the above factors and has determined
that none of the statutory factors would
be adversely affected by the proposed
rule. The Director is requesting
comments from the public about
whether differences related to these
factors should result in a revision of the
proposed rule as it relates to the Banks.
III. Part 1239
A. Subpart A—General
Definitions (1239.2)
The definitions section of the
proposed rule consists of definitions
from parts 914, 917, and 1710, most of
which are being relocated without any
substantive change, apart from
conforming changes that are necessary
to make certain of the defined terms
applicable to both the Banks and the
Enterprises. The proposed rule would
substantively amend certain of the
existing definitions, as described below.
First, the proposed rule would replace
the term ‘‘reportable conditions’’ (which
currently appears only in the Finance
Board regulation on audit committees)
with the term ‘‘significant deficiency.’’
That revision would better align the
concept with current accounting and
financial reporting standards. Second,
the proposed rule would amend the
definition of ‘‘credit risk,’’ which
currently appears only in the Finance
Board provision pertaining to risk
management. The proposed definition
would define credit risk as the potential
that a borrower or counterparty will fail
to meet its financial obligations in
accordance with the agreed terms.
FHFA believes that is a better definition
than the current provision, which
focuses on the decline in value of an
obligation as a result of a deterioration
in creditworthiness. Third, the proposal
would revise the definition of
‘‘operational risk’’ to follow the
definition used by the other federal
banking regulators in their risk-based
capital regulations, which also is
consistent with the definition of the
term from the Basel Committee on
Banking Supervision.1 Fourth, the
1 See Basel Committee on Banking Supervision,
International Convergence of Capital Measurement
and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework—
Comprehensive Version, Section V (Operational
Risk), paragraph 644, Basel, June 2006.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
proposed rule would delete the
definition of ‘‘senior executive officer’’
but add the substance of that definition
into the definition of ‘‘executive
officer.’’ The term ‘‘senior executive
officer’’ is not used in any of the
substantive provisions of the proposed
regulations, and appears only within the
definition of ‘‘executive officer.’’ Rather
than retain a definition of a term that
appears only within another defined
term, FHFA believes it is more
appropriate to relocate the operative
language from the definition of ‘‘senior
executive officer’’ into the definition of
‘‘executive officer.’’ A number of terms
that will no longer be used in the
proposed regulations will not be carried
forward into the proposed rule, nor will
any terms that FHFA has defined in the
general definitions section of its
regulations, 12 CFR part 1201.
B. Subpart B—Corporate Practices and
Procedures Applicable to All Regulated
Entities
Subpart B includes three provisions
that address certain core principles of
corporate practices or governance that
FHFA believes should be applied to
both the Enterprises and the Banks. The
topics addressed by this part of the
proposed rule are choice of law, duties
of directors, and committees of the
boards of directors, and nearly all of
those provisions are derived from the
Finance Board or OFHEO regulations.
Choice of Law (1239.3)
Section 1239.3 of the proposed rule
would require each regulated entity to
designate a body of law to follow with
respect to its corporate governance and
indemnification practices. This
requirement already applies to the
Enterprises and the Office of Finance,
pursuant to 12 CFR 1710.10 of the
OFHEO regulations and 12 CFR
1273.7(i)(2) of the FHFA regulations,
respectively, but would be new for the
Banks. Under this provision, a regulated
entity would be required to designate in
its bylaws one of the following for its
corporate governance practices and
procedures: (1) The law of the
jurisdiction in which the entity
maintains its principal office; (2) the
Delaware General Corporation Law; or
(3) the Revised Model Business
Corporation Act. Technically, those
laws would not apply to, nor be binding
on, the Banks or Enterprises, because
they are not state-chartered
corporations. Rather, FHFA intends that
the entities would look to their chosen
body of law to address any governance
or indemnification issues that may arise
and for which no federal laws control.
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2014 / Proposed Rules
The proposed regulation also includes
a provision dealing with
indemnification, which is derived from
FHFA’s regulations governing the Office
of Finance, 12 CFR 1273.7(i)(3), and
from the OFHEO indemnification
provisions at 12 CFR 1710.20. The
proposed provision would state that a
regulated entity shall indemnify its
directors, officers, and employees under
terms and conditions to be determined
by the board, subject to any limitations
in federal law or the law of the
jurisdiction designated for an entity’s
corporate governance practices. The
proposal further requires each entity to
have policies and procedures regarding
the indemnification of its directors,
officers, and employees, which must
address how the board of directors is to
decide on requests for indemnification,
and must include standards relating to
indemnification, investigations by the
board of directors, and review by
independent counsel. The proposal also
authorizes FHFA to review an entity’s
indemnification policies, procedures,
and practices, and carries over a
provision of the OFHEO regulation that
authorized it to limit or prohibit
indemnification payments for reasons of
safety and soundness. Under that latter
provision, FHFA could limit or prohibit
indemnification payments to any person
found to have violated any law or
regulation, breached any material
elements of the entity’s bylaws or code
of conduct, or engaged in grossly
negligent actions.
FHFA is proposing to make these
provisions applicable to the Banks
because there are benefits to having all
regulated entities follow the same
regulatory standard with respect to their
corporate governance and
indemnification practices, and because
there currently is no definitive guidance
for the Banks on this matter. The
indemnification provision explicitly
states that it is subject to the other
provisions of the regulation, one of
which provides that the corporate
governance and indemnification
practices must comply with the
authorizing statutes and any other
applicable federal statutes or
regulations. That means that a regulated
entity’s ability to indemnify its
directors, officers, and employees will
be subject to any limitations that FHFA
imposes through its separate
indemnification regulations or through
this provision, regardless of what the
chosen state law may provide.
responsibilities of directors of a
regulated entity. This provision states
that the ultimate responsibility for
managing a regulated entity lies with
the board of directors. It also requires
directors to, among other things: (1) Act
in good faith and with due care, in the
best interest of the regulated entity, and
in a fair and impartial manner; (2) direct
the affairs of an entity in a manner
consistent with applicable statutes and
regulations; (3) have a working
familiarity with basic finance and
accounting practices; and (4) adopt
bylaws governing the manner in which
the regulated entity administers its
affairs. Directors must also put in place
policies relating to the board’s oversight
of risk management, compensation,
financial reporting, and responsiveness
to FHFA supervisory concerns.
The text of the proposed regulation
consists mostly of provisions carried
over from Finance Board regulation
(§ 917.2) and, to a lesser extent, OFHEO
regulation (§ 1710.15). The proposed
rule would carry over nearly all of the
provisions of (§ 917.2) of the Finance
Board regulations, and the substance of
the existing OFHEO regulations located
at 12 CFR 1710.15(b)(3), (5), and (7).
Those OFHEO provisions require the
boards of directors to have policies in
place to assure their oversight of
compensation programs, disclosures to
shareholders and investors, and
responsiveness to regulatory inquiries.
The proposed rule would add a
provision requiring the boards to have
policies in place to assure their
oversight of risk management, in light of
the importance of risk management
policies and controls to the safe and
sound operation of the entities. FHFA is
proposing not to carry over certain other
OFHEO regulations that require the
boards to have in place policies to
assure their oversight of corporate
strategy, hiring and retention of
qualified senior executive officers,
integrity of financial reporting, and
extensions of credit to board members.
See 12 CFR 1710.15(b)(1)–(2), (4), and
(6). FHFA believes that these topics are
covered adequately elsewhere. The
proposed rule also would repeal
1710.15(a) and (c), which state the
purpose of those OFHEO regulations
and direct Enterprise board members to
their chosen body of corporate law, as
well as to OFHEO pronouncements, for
additional guidance on these topics.
FHFA believes that these matters need
not be explicitly stated in the regulation.
Duties and Responsibilities of Board
Members (1239.4)
Section 1293.4 of the proposed rule
would set forth certain basic duties and
Board Committees (1239.5)
The last section in subpart B deals
with committees of the board of
directors, and is derived principally
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Jan 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4417
from § 1710.12 of the OFHEO
regulations. The proposed regulation
would require each regulated entity to
have certain specified committees of the
board of directors and would authorize
the entities to establish any other
committees they deem appropriate.
Each entity would be required to have
committees of the board of directors that
are responsible for each of the following
matters: (1) Risk management; (2) audit;
(3) compensation; and (4) corporate
governance. The rule would not require
the entities to establish committees with
those specific names, only that they
establish committees that are
responsible for overseeing those matters.
The proposed rule also would provide
that the risk management committee
and the audit committee cannot be
combined with any of the other
committees. The proposal would further
require that each committee have a
formal written charter and that it meet
with sufficient frequency to carry out its
responsibilities. The regulation retains,
for the Enterprises only, an OFHEO
provision requiring Enterprise audit
committees to comply with certain
provisions of section 301 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOA), which
relates to audit committees of public
companies, and that the audit
committee and other Enterprise
committees also comply with applicable
provisions of the rules of the New York
Stock Exchange (NYSE). That is the only
provision in this proposed regulation
that would not apply to the Banks.
Because the Federal Home Loan Bank
Act (Bank Act) mandates that a majority
of a Bank’s board of directors be officers
or directors of the Bank’s members,
these directors may not meet the
independence criteria in both of the
relevant SOA and NYSE provisions for
audit committee members. Indeed, nine
of the Banks have disclosed in their
federal securities law filings that the
member directors who serve on the
Banks’ audit committees did not meet
the NYSE independence requirement
because the member had a ‘‘material
relationship’’ with the Bank or failed the
NYSE’s revenue test.2
2 Under NYSE rules, an employee of a Bank
member would not be considered independent for
purposes of serving on the audit committee if: (1)
The member has made interest payments to the
Bank exceeding the greater of $1 million or 2
percent of the Bank’s gross annual revenue in any
of the past three fiscal years; or (2) if the Bank has
purchased loans from the member in an amount
exceeding the greater of $1 million or 2 percent of
the member’s gross annual revenue in any of the
past three fiscal years. In addition, an officer of a
Bank member is not considered independent if the
member has a ‘‘material relationship’’ with the
Bank. The rules list a banking relationship as an
example of a type of relationship that can constitute
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
Continued
28JAP1
4418
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2014 / Proposed Rules
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
The substance of the proposed rule
differs slightly from OFHEO regulation
§ 1710.12 in that it requires each board
to have a committee dealing with risk
management. The OFHEO rule
mandates that the Enterprises have the
other three committees mentioned
above. There is no equivalent Finance
Board regulation. FHFA believes that,
consistent with current best practices, it
is appropriate to add the risk
management committee to the list of
required committees and to make this
regulation applicable to the Banks as
these four areas are crucial to the safe
and sound operation of all regulated
entities.
FHFA also has considered whether
the proposed rule should require the
board of directors of each regulated
entity to have an executive committee,
in addition to the other four committees
that would be required by the proposed
rule. FHFA requests comments on
whether it would be appropriate for the
regulations to require the establishment
of executive committees as a matter of
course and, if so, what powers should
be delegated to those committees. An
executive committee that is authorized
to exercise the powers of the full board
of directors could enhance the
efficiency of the board’s operations,
particularly at Banks that have large
boards of directors. FHFA also requests
comment on whether the need for an
executive committee, or the benefits
from having such a committee, would
be any greater in the case of a Bank that
results from the merger of two other
Banks. In such cases, statutory
provisions that cause the resulting Bank
to have a very large board of directors
also may make board operations more
a material relationship. The board of directors of the
Bank is responsible for determining whether a
relationship is ‘‘material’’ after ‘‘broadly’’
considering all relevant facts and circumstances.
See NYSE Listed Company Manual Sect. 303A.02
and 303A.07(a).
Under SOA section 301, an audit committee
director is not considered independent if the
director is an ‘‘affiliated person’’ of the Bank. The
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 defines ‘‘affiliated
person’’ as a person who owns, directly or
indirectly, or controls 5% of the voting securities
of the Bank. A member director does not directly
own voting securities of a Bank but may be deemed
to indirectly own or control the securities under
certain scenarios (e.g., if the member director owns
25% of the voting securities of the member). See 15
U.S.C. 78c(a)(19) and 78j–1. Under SEC rule 10A–
3, promulgated pursuant to SOA section 301, an
audit committee director is considered ‘‘affiliated’’
if the director directly or indirectly ‘‘controls’’ the
Bank. Under rule 10A–3, a person will be deemed
not to have ‘‘control’’ if the person, directly or
indirectly, owns 10% or less of the voting securities
of the Bank. See 17 CFR 240.10A–3. Nine of the
Banks have stated in their federal securities laws
filings that all members of their audit committees
have satisfied the independence requirements
under SEC rule 10A–3.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Jan 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
cumbersome and thus less efficient. To
the extent that an executive committee
may address matters that otherwise
would have been addressed by the full
board, FHFA requests comments on
what limitations might be appropriate to
ensure that the ability of those directors
who are not on the executive committee
to exercise their own fiduciary duties is
not compromised.
C. Subpart C—Other Requirements
Applicable to All Regulated Entities
Subpart C includes four provisions
that relate to certain other matters that
FHFA believes should apply to all of the
regulated entities, but are not the type
of governance provisions that are
included in Subpart B. These provisions
address: (1) Code of conduct; (2) risk
management; (3) compliance programs;
and (4) regulatory reports. The
substance of these provisions is derived
from parts 914, 917, and 1710 of the
Finance Board and OFHEO regulations,
respectively, except for the risk
management provision, which has been
rewritten in its entirety to better align it
with supervisory expectations for sound
risk management.
Code of Conduct (1239.10)
The first regulation in Subpart C
requires each regulated entity to
establish a written code of conduct for
directors, executive officers, and
employees that is designed to ensure
that they discharge their duties in an
objective and impartial manner. The
code of conduct must include standards
set forth in section 406 of the SOA,
which address promoting: (1) Honest
and ethical conduct, including the
handling of conflicts of interest between
personal and professional relationships;
(2) full, fair, accurate, timely, and
understandable disclosures in periodic
reports filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC); and (3)
compliance with applicable rules and
regulations. In addition, each regulated
entity must review the code at least
once every three years and make any
necessary revisions. The requirements
of proposed § 1239.10 are being
relocated from OFHEO regulation
§ 1710.14 without any substantive
changes, and are being made applicable
to the Banks as well as the Enterprises.
FHFA believes that a code of conduct is
an important tool to ensure the safe and
sound operation of a regulated entity
and therefore is proposing to extend the
requirements of this provision to the
Banks.
Risk Management (1239.11)
Both the Finance Board and OFHEO
regulations include provisions dealing
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
with the issue of risk management
responsibilities of the boards of
directors. See 12 CFR 917.3 and
§ 1710.19(b). In reviewing both of those
provisions, FHFA determined that they
may no longer reflect the current best
risk management practices and
concepts. Based in part on more recent
proposals of the Federal Reserve Board,3
FHFA is proposing to adopt a new risk
management regulation for all of the
regulated entities, which would
supplant the existing Finance Board and
OFHEO regulations. The proposed risk
management provision would require a
regulated entity to adopt an enterprisewide risk management program that
aligns the entity’s overall risk profile
with its strategic plan and mission
objectives. The regulation also would
require that the risk management
program address the regulated entity’s
risk profile and risk exposure. The
program also would have to include
appropriate risk limitations, risk
management practices, and compliance
monitoring provisions, while specifying
management’s authority and
independence to carry out its risk
management responsibilities.
The proposed rule would require each
regulated entity to have a risk
committee and that it be established
pursuant to a written charter approved
by the full board of directors. The risk
committee also would have to be
chaired by a director that does not serve
in a management capacity. That
provision would effectively apply only
to the Enterprises because the boards of
the Banks do not have any management
representatives. The committee must
have at least one member with risk
management expertise and all members
must have an understanding of risk
management principles and experience
developing and applying risk
management practices, identifying risks,
and monitoring risk controls for
financial services organizations. The
proposal would require the committee
to meet regularly and report directly to
the board of directors, and would
provide that the committee is
responsible for documenting and
overseeing the risk management policies
and practices, reviewing and approving
the risk management program, and
reviewing regular reports from the chief
risk officer (CRO).
The proposed rule would require each
regulated entity to appoint a CRO, who
would be responsible for the risk
management function. The proposed
3 See Enhanced Prudential Standards and Early
Remediation Requirements for Covered Companies,
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
77 FR 594 (Jan. 5, 2012).
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2014 / Proposed Rules
rule would specify certain
responsibilities of the CRO, which
would include: (1) Allocating delegated
risk limits; (2) establishing appropriate
policies, processes, and systems to
identify and report risks; (3) managing
risk exposures and controls; and (4)
reporting risk management issues
directly and regularly to the risk
committee and the chief executive
officer. The CRO also must have risk
management expertise commensurate
with the regulated entity’s capital
structure, risk profile, complexity,
activities, and size. The board would be
required to structure the CRO’s
compensation in such a manner as to
provide for an objective and
independent assessment of the risks
taken by the regulated entity.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Compliance Program (1239.12)
This provision of the proposed rule
would require the regulated entities to
establish a compliance program headed
by a compliance officer and would set
forth criteria for the program. These
provisions would be carried over, with
modest conforming changes, from
OFHEO regulation § 1710.19, and thus
would be new only for the Banks. The
compliance program to be established
under this provision must be reasonably
designed to ensure that the regulated
entity complies with applicable laws,
rules, regulations, and internal controls.
In addition to reporting directly to the
chief executive officer, the compliance
officer must report regularly to the
entity’s board of directors (or a
committee thereof) on the adequacy of
the entity’s compliance policies and
procedures, and must recommend any
appropriate adjustments to those
policies or procedures. Other provisions
of the OFHEO regulation, at § 1710.19(b)
and (c), which deal with risk
management and registration of
Enterprise stock under the federal
securities laws, would be repealed as
either being addressed elsewhere or no
longer being relevant.
Regulatory Reports (1239.13)
The last section of Subpart C would
require each regulated entity to provide
FHFA with such regulatory reports as
are necessary for it to evaluate the
condition of a regulated entity, or
compliance with applicable law, and to
do so in accordance with the forms and
instructions issued by FHFA from time
to time. This provision would be
relocated, with only minor nonsubstantive changes, from the Finance
Board regulations at 12 CFR 914.1 and
914.2. FHFA has the statutory authority
to compel all regulated entities to
submit the reports described in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Jan 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
§ 1239.13. 12 U.S.C. 4514. Therefore,
applying this provision to all regulated
entities would not impose any new
burdens on the Enterprises, but would
serve to highlight the importance of
timely and accurate data reporting.
D. Enterprise-Specific Requirements
(Subpart D)
Subpart D of the proposed rule would
carry over two OFHEO regulations
relating to: (1) Eligibility requirements
for the board of directors of the
Enterprises and conduct of their board
meetings; and (2) compensation for
Enterprise directors. The first provision
is substantively identical to the current
OFHEO regulation § 1710.11, while the
second provision is based on § 1710.13,
with minor changes that eliminate
portions relating to compensation of
executive officers and employees, which
are no longer necessary. Neither of these
two provisions would be applied to the
Banks because section 7 of the Bank
Act, 12 U.S.C. 1427, already establishes
eligibility requirements and mandates a
specific composition of Bank boards
between member directors and
independent directors, and because
section 7 and 12 CFR part 1261 of the
FHFA regulations already include
provisions governing compensation for
directors of the Banks.
Enterprise Board of Director
Requirements (1239.20)
The first provision of Subpart D
addresses age and term limits for
individual Enterprise board members
and requires that a majority of the
directors be independent, as defined
under the rules of the NYSE. It also
addresses the frequency of Enterprise
board meetings, quorum requirements,
and voting by directors. These
provisions are being carried over from
§ 1710.11 without substantive change
and would apply only to the
Enterprises. In addition, proposed
§ 1239.20 includes a new provision that
would prohibit the chief executive
officer (CEO) of an Enterprise from also
serving as the chairman of the board of
directors. FHFA is proposing to add this
requirement in order to promote the
board of directors’ oversight of senior
management. By separating the two
positions, FHFA intends to preclude the
possibility that a CEO would have an
opportunity to unduly influence the full
board of directors by virtue of holding
the chairman’s position.
Compensation of Enterprise Board
Members (1239.21)
The second provision of Subpart D
states that Enterprise director
compensation must be reasonable and
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4419
appropriate for the time required for the
performance of their duties. This
provision is based on § 1710.13 of the
OFHEO regulations, which addresses
compensation of Enterprise board
members, as well as Enterprise officers
and employees. The proposed rule
would differ from the OFHEO rule in
that it would apply only to
compensation paid to the directors of an
Enterprise. Because FHFA has recently
adopted an interim rule addressing
executive compensation matters for the
Banks and the Enterprises, there is no
longer any need to address the matter of
executive compensation in these
provisions. As for non-executive
employees, FHFA believes that a
separate regulation is not necessary as
those salaries will be set by an entity’s
executives, whose compensation is
subject to FHFA review.
E. Subpart E—Bank-Specific
Requirements
Subpart E of the proposed rule would
carry over from the Finance Board
regulations five provisions that address
a Bank’s: (1) Member products policy;
(2) strategic business plan; (3) internal
control system; (4) audit committee; and
(5) dividends. The proposed provisions
derive from current Finance Board
regulations on these topics, which will
be relocated to subpart E with only
minor and conforming changes. As
discussed in more detail below, FHFA
believes that three of these provisions—
regarding the member products policy,
business plan, and dividends—are
unique to the Banks and thus should not
be applied to the Enterprises. Although
FHFA is proposing to include the
Finance Board provisions on internal
controls and audit committees in the
‘‘Bank specific’’ portion of the rule, it
also is requesting comment on whether
it would be appropriate to revise those
provisions so that they could be applied
to both the Banks and the Enterprises.
Bank Member Product Policy (1239.30)
Finance Board regulations require
each Bank to have a member products
policy that addresses the Bank’s
management of products offered to
members and housing associates. See 12
CFR 917.4. Under that provision, a
Bank’s board of directors must review
the policy annually, amend it as
appropriate, and readopt it at least every
three years. The policy must address
certain specified topics, which are: (1)
Credit underwriting criteria; (2) levels of
collateralization; (3) fees and product
pricing; (4) maintenance of appropriate
systems, procedures, and internal
controls; and (5) maintenance of
appropriate operational and personnel
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
4420
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2014 / Proposed Rules
capacity. The proposed rule would
simply relocate the existing Finance
Board regulations without substantive
change.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Strategic Business Plan (1239.31)
Finance Board regulations also
require each Bank’s board of directors to
adopt a strategic business plan that
describes how each Bank will achieve
its housing finance mission, and how
each Bank establishes goals and
objectives for each of its business
activities. See 12 CFR § 917.5. The plan
must also: (1) Discuss how a Bank will
address credit needs and market
opportunities; (2) establish quantitative
performance goals for Bank products
related to multi-family housing, small
business, small farm, and small agribusiness lending; (3) describe proposed
new business activities; and (4) be
supported by appropriate research and
analysis of market developments and
member demand for products. Each
Bank’s board of directors must review
the plan at least annually, readopt it at
least every three years, and establish
management reporting requirements and
monitor implementation. The proposed
rule would simply relocate this
regulation without substantive change
to the FHFA regulations. FHFA is not
proposing to extend it to the Enterprises
because their strategic objectives are
subject to FHFA control as a result of
the conservatorships.
Internal Control System (1239.32)
The proposed rule would carry over,
without substantive change, the Finance
Board regulation dealing with internal
control systems at the Banks. See 12
CFR 917.6. The current Finance Board
regulation requires each Bank to
establish and maintain an effective
internal control system that addresses:
(1) The efficiency and effectiveness of
Bank activities; (2) the safeguarding of
Bank assets; (3) the reliability,
completeness, and timely reporting of
financial and management information;
and (4) compliance with applicable
laws, regulations, policies, and
management and board directives. The
regulation sets forth detailed
responsibilities of senior management
and the board of directors with respect
to internal controls. This regulation
would not apply to the Enterprises, as
many of the detailed requirements in
the provision are specific to the Banks
and reflect their unique structure.
Nonetheless, the topic of internal
controls is one that is relevant to both
the Banks and the Enterprises, and
FHFA is considering whether it should
adopt a regulation on internal controls
that would apply to all of the regulated
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Jan 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
entities. Accordingly, FHFA specifically
requests public comment on the
following questions:
1. In what manner should FHFA
revise the content of § 917.6 so that it
could be applied to all regulated
entities, and what specific revisions to
the regulatory text would be needed to
accomplish that objective?
2. What regulatory approach would be
best suited for addressing the topic of
internal controls at the Banks and
Enterprises, one based on general
principles, or one that includes detailed
requirements that prescribe particular
steps that an entity should take in
creating and operating a system of
internal controls?
3. If FHFA were to adopt a more
prescriptive approach to a regulation on
internal controls, is the current
approach, which separately addresses
the requirements of an internal control
system, the responsibilities of the board,
and the responsibilities of management,
appropriate?
4. If FHFA were to adopt a more
principles-based approach to internal
controls, what principles would be
necessary to assure that regulated
entities would establish and maintain
an effective system of internal controls?
5. What amendments to the regulation
or the Prudential Standards would be
most appropriate to ensure that they
complement each other with respect to
the entities’ internal control systems?
6. Should the proposed
§ 1239.32(a)(iv) retain the requirement
that the internal control system must
ensure that the entity complies with all
applicable laws and regulations if the
proposed rule will separately require
that the entities establish a compliance
program to address that same topic?
7. Are there any types of internal
control requirements that would be
unique to either the Banks or the
Enterprises and could not readily be
applied to the other entities?
Audit Committee (1239.33)
The proposed rule also would carry
over without substantive change the
provisions of the Finance Board
regulations dealing with Bank audit
committees. See 12 CFR 917.7. Those
provisions would set forth requirements
relating to the composition of the audit
committee and the content of the audit
committee charter. They would also
require that the audit committee
members be independent and establish
certain independence criteria. The
proposal would retain the provision
requiring the audit committee to include
a balance of representatives of
community financial institutions and
other members, as well as independent
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
directors and member directors. The
audit committee would be required to
have a charter that covers the selection
and retention of the internal auditor and
reporting channels for the auditor. The
regulation also lists numerous duties of
the audit committee, including: (1)
Directing senior management to
maintain the reliability and integrity of
the accounting policies; (2) reviewing
the basis for the Bank’s financial
statements and the external auditor’s
opinion; (3) overseeing the audit
function; and (4) conducting or
authorizing investigations.
The Finance Board regulation on
Bank audit committees reflects the
unique structure of the Banks as
member-owned cooperatives whose
boards of directors include a majority of
member directors that also serve as
officers or directors of their member
institutions. Because the board structure
of the Banks is unique and differs so
much from that of the Enterprises,
FHFA believes that it is appropriate to
retain the Bank-specific regulations for
the Banks’ audit committees. FHFA is
not proposing to impose these
requirements on the Enterprises because
of those differences and because the
Enterprises are separately required (by
the OFHEO regulations and by this
proposed rule) to comply with the audit
committee requirements of section 301
of the SOA and the rules of the NYSE.
Nonetheless, the topic of audit
committees is one that is relevant to
both the Banks and the Enterprises, and
FHFA requests comments on the
following questions:
1. By carrying over the existing
Finance Board and OFHEO regulations,
the proposed rule would effectively
retain the two distinct regulatory
approaches embodied in the current
rules, i.e., OFHEO’s approach of using a
cross-reference to the SOA audit
committee provisions and the Finance
Board’s approach of using the
considerably more detailed regulatory
provisions to address audit committee
responsibilities. FHFA requests
comment on whether it should continue
this arrangement or whether it should
develop one rule on audit committees
that would apply to both the Banks and
the Enterprises. FHFA also requests
comment on how a single rule should be
structured, i.e., whether it should adopt
the approach of the current OFHEO
regulations, the approach of the Finance
Board regulations, or some other
approach.
2. If FHFA were to retain the
substance of the current Finance Board
rule for Bank audit committees (either
for the Banks or for the Banks and the
Enterprises), FHFA requests comments
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2014 / Proposed Rules
on how it could modify the provisions
of that rule (which would be located at
§ 1239.33 of this proposal) to make them
more streamlined while also providing
sufficient guidance to the regulated
entities to ensure that the audit
committees function in an independent
and efficient manner.
3. With respect to the independence
requirement of the current Finance
Board regulation, FHFA requests
comments on whether it should add a
new provision that would deem a
member director to not be
‘‘independent’’ for audit committee
purposes if the member institution at
which that director is employed were to
have more than a specified percentage
of the Bank’s outstanding capital stock
or the Bank’s total advances. FHFA also
requests comments regarding the level
at which a member’s Bank stock or
advances could be considered to be too
high for that member’s representative to
be deemed sufficiently independent to
serve on the Bank’s audit committee.4
4. With respect to the composition of
Bank audit committees, which must
include a balance of representatives
from community financial institutions
and other members, and of independent
and member directors, FHFA requests
comment on whether that provision
remains optimal or whether the
regulation should require any other
requirements relating to audit
committee composition, such as
requiring a majority of the committee
members to be independent directors.
5. With respect to the relationship
between the audit committee
regulations and the Prudential
Standards, FHFA requests comment on
how best to coordinate the audit
committee regulations with the
provisions of Standard 2, which also
addresses audit committees, whether
FHFA should address audit committee
requirements entirely within either the
regulations or the standards, and what
matters would be more appropriately
addressed in a regulation or in the
Prudential Standards.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Bank Dividends (1239.34)
The last regulation in Subpart E
would carry over with only modest
4 For example, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation prohibits ‘‘large customers’’ from
serving on the audit committee of a regulated
institution that has total assets of more than $3
billion at the beginning of the fiscal year. ‘‘Large
customer’’ is defined as ‘‘any individual or entity
(including a controlling person of any such entity)
which, in the determination of the board of
directors, has such significant direct or indirect
credit or other relationships with the institution,
the termination of which likely would materially
and adversely affect the institution’s financial
condition or results of operations . . .’’ See 12 CFR
§ 363.5(b) and Appendix A to 12 CFR 363.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Jan 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
revisions a Finance Board regulation
addressing Bank dividends. See 12 CFR
917.9. Among other things, that
provision prohibits a Bank’s board of
directors from declaring or paying a
dividend based on projected or
anticipated earnings or if the par value
of the Bank’s stock is impaired, or
would become impaired as a result of
paying the dividend. The proposed rule
would not carry over two provisions
from § 917.9 whose content either is
addressed in another regulation or
relates to statutory provisions that are
no longer in effect. FHFA is proposing
not to apply this provision to the
Enterprises, in part because it carries
out provisions of the Bank Act that
apply only to the Banks and in part
because Enterprise dividends during
conservatorship are governed by the
senior preferred stock purchase
agreements.
F. Provisions To Be Repealed
As noted above, there are several
portions of 12 CFR part 917 and 12 CFR
part 1710 that have become obsolete or
are no longer necessary, and FHFA is
proposing to repeal them as part of this
rulemaking. The repealed provisions
consist of: (1) Several OFHEO
regulations that impose requirements
substantively identical to those found in
the SOA; (2) an OFHEO regulation that
reserves the right of FHFA to amend its
regulations; (3) an OFHEO regulation
that states that FHFA has the authority
under the Safety and Soundness Act to
prohibit or restrict indemnification of
board members and executives of the
Enterprises; (4) portions of the OFHEO
regulation relating to the responsibilities
of boards of directors that address
matters that are covered by the
Prudential Standards; and (5) a Finance
Board regulation that requires Banks to
prepare annual budgets.
SOA Provisions
OFHEO regulations at § 1710.13(b),
§ 1710.16, § 1710.17, § 1710.18, and
§ 1710.19(c) are substantively identical
to requirements found in the SOA,
which apply to the Banks and
Enterprises as registered issuers under
the federal securities laws.5 These
regulations address reimbursement of
compensation paid to an Enterprise CEO
or CFO in cases of accounting
restatements due to material
noncompliance with financial reporting
requirements, prohibitions on
extensions of credit to Enterprise board
5 Section 1112 of HERA requires the Banks to
maintain registration of their common stock with
the SEC and states that equity securities of the
Enterprises are not exempt from SEC registration
requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4421
members and executives, certification of
quarterly and annual financial
statements by the CEO and CFO, audit
partner rotation, and registration and
deregistration of securities. Because the
Enterprises and the Banks are subject to
the corresponding SOA statutory
provisions, there is no need to repeat
those requirements in the FHFA
regulations.
Board of Directors
As noted previously, § 1710.15 of the
OFHEO regulations addresses the
conduct and responsibilities of
Enterprise directors, and FHFA is
proposing to carry over certain of those
provisions into § 1239.4 of the proposed
rule. FHFA also is proposing to repeal
the remaining portions of § 1710.15,
which include the introductory
language, language requiring directors to
refer to state law and OFHEO
pronouncements for additional
guidance, several provisions requiring
the board to have policies for overseeing
corporate strategy, hiring of qualified
senior executives, financial reporting,
and extensions of credit to board
members. FHFA believes that these
matters are adequately addressed in
other provisions of the proposed rule or
in the Prudential Standards, and need
not be adopted as FHFA regulations.
Budget Preparation
Finance Board regulation § 917.8
requires Banks to adopt an operating
and a capital expenditures budget
annually. FHFA believes that the
adoption of a budget is a basic duty
already encompassed in a director’s
duty to act in good faith and with care
in overseeing the affairs of a Bank.
Therefore, FHFA is not proposing to
carry this Finance Board provision over
into the FHFA regulations.
Part 1720
As noted previously, FHFA is
proposing to repeal 12 CFR part 1720 of
the OFHEO regulations, which
established certain safety and soundness
standards for the Enterprises, because
those matters are addressed by the
Prudential Standards and by certain
parts of this proposed rule.
IV. Prudential Standards
The introductory section of the
Prudential Standards, which appears
immediately before the enumerated 10
standards, recites general
responsibilities of the boards of
directors and senior management of the
regulated entities, as they relate to the
matters addressed by the individual
standards. FHFA is proposing to
explicitly state that this introductory
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
4422
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2014 / Proposed Rules
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
section is part of the standards, which
means that the introductory provisions
would have the same effect and could
be enforced in the same manner as the
10 enumerated standards. To do this,
FHFA is proposing to amend the
definition of the term ‘‘standards,’’
which appears in 12 CFR 1236.2, by
adding an explicit statement that the
Prudential Standards consist of both the
introductory section and the existing
enumerated standards. FHFA is also
proposing to revise the Prudential
Standards by relocating a sentence that
appears immediately after the
introductory language and immediately
before the 10 enumerated standards,
that reads as follows: ‘‘The following
provisions constitute the prudential
management and operations standards
established pursuant to 12 U.S.C.
4513b(a).’’ FHFA would relocate this
sentence to the beginning of the
Prudential Standards and immediately
before the existing introductory
language regarding director and senior
management responsibilities. FHFA is
proposing these amendments to ensure
that it can use the remedial provisions
of the Prudential Standards to address
corporate governance deficiencies at the
regulated entities, as they may relate to
the individual standards, should FHFA
believe that those provisions will be
more effective than its other
administrative enforcement authorities.
Harmonization of the Prudential
Standards and FHFA Regulations
The Prudential Standards address
certain topics that also are covered by
the existing regulations and would
continue to be covered by the proposed
regulations, which results in a degree of
regulatory overlap. Despite that overlap,
there are meaningful differences
between the two provisions, some of
which may be appropriate to preserve.
One key difference is that because the
Prudential Standards have been adopted
as guidance, they do not have the force
and effect of law, as do the regulations
addressing the same topics. For that
reason, the Prudential Standards may be
enforced only by the remedial
authorities in the Prudential Standards
statute, and not through the agency’s
administrative enforcement powers,
which can be used to enforce
regulations, unless a regulated entity’s
failure to meet a prudential standard
rises to the level of an unsafe or
unsound practice. FHFA is not
proposing to address in this regulation
all of the potential areas of overlap
between the Prudential Standards and
the regulations, but does intend to
initiate a separate project to identify any
regulations that address topics that are
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Jan 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
also covered by the Prudential
Standards, or would more appropriately
be covered by a Prudential Standard. To
aid it in that undertaking, FHFA is
requesting comments on how it may
best integrate and harmonize its
regulations and the Prudential
Standards, particularly with respect to
the seven topics described below.
General Duties of Boards of Directors.
To certain degrees, both the Prudential
Standards and the regulations address
the general responsibilities of the boards
of directors of the regulated entities.
Within the Standards, the first three
principles of the introductory section
address certain director responsibilities,
as they relate to the subject matter of
each of the Prudential Standards, such
as adopting business strategies and
policies, overseeing management, and
remaining informed about the
operations and condition of a regulated
entity. The proposed regulation, at
§ 1239.4, also would address the duties
and responsibilities of the boards of
directors, albeit in a more global sense,
i.e., not simply in relation to the subject
matter of the 10 prudential standards.
Board Briefings. Principles seven and
eight of the introductory section of the
Prudential Standards require
management to provide the board of
directors with periodic reports on the
entity’s condition and performance.
This is similar to proposed
§ 1239.20(b)(4), which would apply only
to the Enterprise and requires
management to provide boards with
information that is necessary to allow
the directors to fulfill their fiduciary
duties.
Audit Committee Responsibilities.
Several provisions of the Prudential
Standards, paragraphs 2.1, 2.3–2.7, and
2.9–2.10, address audit committee
responsibilities, including establishing
policies for and overseeing the internal
audit function, evaluating the
effectiveness of the internal audit
function, addressing internal audit
issues, and ensuring that audit
department personnel are competent
and properly trained. Section 1239.33 of
the proposed rule, which is based on a
Finance Board regulation and would
apply only to the Banks, also addresses
certain of these same topics.
Risk Management. Although the
Prudential Standards do not address
specific duties of the risk committee or
the CRO, Standards 8.2, 8.4–8.5, 8.7,
8.9–8.10, and principles nine and 10 of
the introductory section do require a
regulated entity to have a risk
management program that is capable of
addressing a number of the topics.
Certain of those topics are also
addressed in § 1239.11 of the proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
rule. In addition, both § 1239.11 and the
Prudential Standards provide that the
CRO should report to the CEO and the
risk committee.
Internal Controls. Prudential
Standards 1.1, 1.3–1.8, 1.10, and 1.14–
1.15 require regulated entities to have
an adequate and effective system of
internal controls, including a boardapproved organizational structure that
clearly assigns responsibilities and
reporting relationships. Under those
provisions, a regulated entity also must
establish and monitor appropriate
internal control policies. These same
topics and related concepts are also
addressed in § 1239.32, which is based
on an existing Finance Board regulation
and would apply only to the Banks.
Code of Conduct. Principle nine of the
introductory section of the Prudential
Standards states that board members
and senior management of a regulated
entity should conduct themselves in a
manner to promote high ethical
standards and establish a culture of
compliance throughout the
organization. Section 1239.10, which
would apply to all regulated entities,
also addresses the topic of codes of
conduct and ethics.
Compliance with Laws and
Regulations. Prudential Standards 1–5
and 8–10 each contain a paragraph that
states that, with respect to the subject
matter addressed by that standard, a
regulated entity should comply with all
applicable laws, regulations, and
supervisory guidance. The subject of
regulatory compliance is also addressed
in § 1239.12, which requires each entity
to have a compliance program.
With respect to each of those topics
described above, FHFA requests
comments on whether there are any
direct conflicts between the regulations
and the standards, i.e., situations in
which an entity cannot practicably
comply with both the regulation and the
standard. FHFA also requests comments
on how it should strike the balance for
each of those topics with respect to
what issues should be addressed by
regulation and what issues should be
addressed by the Prudential Standards.
FHFA further requests comments on the
content of the particular regulations and
standards, i.e., whether the current
content remains appropriate, as well as
the structure of the regulations or
standards, i.e., whether they should
address the underlying subject matter
through a principles-based approach or
through the more prescriptive approach
reflected in the current Finance Board
regulations.
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2014 / Proposed Rules
CHAPTER IX—FEDERAL HOUSING
FINANCE BOARD
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The proposed regulation does not
contain any information collection
requirement that requires the approval
of the Office of Management and Budget
under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Subchapter C—[Removed and Reserved]
1. Subchapter C, consisting of parts
914 and 917, is removed and reserved.
■
CHAPTER XII—FEDERAL HOUSING
FINANCE AGENCY
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Subchapter B—Entity Regulations
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires an agency to
analyze a proposed regulation’s impact
on small entities if the final rule is
expected to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. 5 U.S.C. 605(b). FHFA has
considered the impact of this regulation
and determined that it is not likely to
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
because it applies only to the regulated
entities, which are not small entities for
purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act.
PART 1236—PRUDENTIAL
MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS
STANDARDS
4423
Subpart C—Other Requirements Applicable
to All Regulated Entities
1239.10 Code of conduct and ethics.
1239.11 Risk management.
1239.12 Compliance program.
1239.13 Regulatory reports.
Subpart D—Enterprise Specific
Requirements
1239.20 Board of directors of the
Enterprises.
1239.21 Compensation of Enterprise board
members.
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 4511, 4513(a) and (f),
4513b, and 4526.
Subpart E—Bank Specific Requirements
1239.30 Bank member product policy.
1239.31 Strategic business plan.
1239.32 Internal control system.
1239.33 Audit committee.
1239.34 Dividends.
3. Amend § 1236.2 by revising the
definition of ‘‘Standards’’ to read as
follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1426, 1427, 1432(a),
1436(a), 1440, 4511(b), 4513(a), 4513(b), and
4526.
§ 1236.2
Subpart A—General
2. The authority citation for part 1236
continues to read as follows:
■
■
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
Standards means any one or more of
the prudential management and
operations standards established by the
Director pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 4513b(a),
as modified from time to time pursuant
to § 1236.3(b), including the
introductory statement of general
responsibilities of boards of directors
and senior management of the regulated
entities.
§ 1239.1
12 CFR Part 1236
Appendix to Part 1236 [Amended]
Administrative practice and
procedure, Federal Home Loan Banks,
Government-Sponsored Enterprises,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
■
As used in this part (or, as otherwise
noted):
Authorizing statutes mean the Federal
National Mortgage Association Charter
Act and the Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation Act, which are
codified at 12 U.S.C. 1716 through 1723i
and 12 U.S.C. 1451 through 1459,
respectively, or the Bank Act, as
applicable.
Board member means a member of the
board of directors of a regulated entity.
Board of directors means the board of
directors of a regulated entity.
Business risk means the risk of an
adverse impact on a regulated entity’s
profitability resulting from external
factors as may occur in both the short
and long run.
Community financial institution has
the meaning set forth in § 1263.1 of this
chapter.
Compensation means any payment of
money or the provision of any other
thing of current or potential value in
connection with employment or service
as a director.
Credit risk is the potential that a
borrower or counterparty will fail to
meet its financial obligations in
accordance with agreed terms.
Employee means an individual, other
than an executive officer, who works
List of Subjects
12 CFR Part 914
Federal Home Loan Banks, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
12 CFR Part 917
Federal Home Loan Banks.
12 CFR Part 1239
Administrative practice and
procedure, Federal Home Loan Banks,
Government-Sponsored Enterprises,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
12 CFR Part 1710
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
12 CFR Part 1720
Administrative practice and
procedure, Mortgages.
Accordingly, for reasons stated in the
Supplementary Information and under
the authority of 12 U.S.C. 1426, 1427,
1432(a), 1436(a), 1440, 4511(b), 4513(a),
4513(b), and 4526, FHFA hereby
proposes to amend subchapter C of
chapter IX, subchapter B of chapter XII,
and subchapter C of chapter XVII of title
12 of the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
13:35 Jan 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
4. Amend the appendix to part 1236
by removing the undesignated
paragraph ‘‘The following provisions
constitute the prudential management
and operations standards established
pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 4513b(a).’’
following paragraph 10 under
‘‘Responsibilities of the Board of
Directors and Senior Management’’ and
adding it as introductory text to the
appendix.
■ 5. Part 1239 is added to read as
follows:
PART 1239—RESPONSIBILITIES OF
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS,
CORPORATE PRACTICES, AND
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Administrative practice and
procedure, Mortgages.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
*
Subpart A—General
Sec.
1239.1 Purpose.
1239.2 Definitions.
Subpart B—Corporate Practices and
Procedures Applicable to All Regulated
Entities
1239.3 Law applicable to corporate
governance and indemnification
practices.
1239.4 Duties and responsibilities of
directors.
1239.5 Board committees.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Purpose.
FHFA is responsible for supervising
and ensuring the safety and soundness
of the regulated entities. In furtherance
of those responsibilities, this part sets
forth minimum standards with respect
to responsibilities of boards of directors,
corporate practices, and corporate
governance matters of the regulated
entities.
§ 1239.2
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
Definitions.
28JAP1
4424
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2014 / Proposed Rules
part-time, full-time, or temporarily for a
regulated entity.
Executive officer means the
chairperson or vice chairperson of the
board of directors of an Enterprise; and,
with respect to any regulated entity, the
chief executive officer, chief financial
officer, chief operating officer,
president, any executive vice president,
any senior vice president, and any
individual with similar responsibilities,
without regard to title, who is in charge
of a principal business unit, division, or
function, or who reports directly to the
chairperson, vice chairperson, chief
operating officer, or chief executive
officer or president of a regulated entity.
Immediate family member means a
parent, sibling, spouse, child,
dependent, or any relative sharing the
same residence.
Internal auditor means the individual
responsible for the internal audit
function at a regulated entity.
Liquidity risk means the risk that a
regulated entity will be unable to meet
its financial obligations as they come
due or meet the credit needs of its
members and associates in a timely and
cost-efficient manner.
Market risk means the risk that the
market value, or estimated fair value if
market value is not available, of a
regulated entity’s portfolio will decline
as a result of changes in interest rates,
foreign exchange rates, or equity or
commodity prices.
NYSE means the New York Stock
Exchange.
Operational risk means the risk of loss
resulting from inadequate or failed
internal processes, people, or systems,
or from external events (including legal
risk but excluding strategic and
reputational risk).
Significant deficiency means a
deficiency, or a combination of
deficiencies, in internal control that is
less severe than a material weakness, yet
important enough to merit attention by
those charged with governance.
SOA means the Sarbanes Oxley Act,
Pub. L. 107–204 (2002).
Subpart B—Corporate Practices and
Procedures Applicable to All
Regulated Entities
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
§ 1239.3 Law applicable to corporate
governance and indemnification practices.
(a) General. The corporate governance
practices and procedures of each
regulated entity, and practices and
procedures relating to indemnification
(including advancement of expenses),
shall comply with and be subject to the
applicable authorizing statutes and
other Federal law, rules, and
regulations, and shall be consistent with
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Jan 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
the safe and sound operations of the
regulated entities.
(b) Election and designation of body
of law. (1) To the extent not inconsistent
with paragraph (a) of this section, each
regulated entity shall elect to follow the
corporate governance and
indemnification practices and
procedures set forth in one of the
following:
(i) The law of the jurisdiction in
which the principal office of the
regulated entity is located;
(ii) The Delaware General Corporation
Law (Del. Code Ann. Title 8); or
(iii) The Revised Model Business
Corporation Act.
(2) Each regulated entity shall
designate in its bylaws the body of law
elected for its corporate governance and
indemnification practices and
procedures pursuant to this paragraph.
(c) Indemnification. (1) Subject to
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, to
the extent applicable, a regulated entity
shall indemnify (and advance the
expenses of) its directors, officers, and
employees under such terms and
conditions as are determined by its
board of directors. The regulated entity
is authorized to maintain insurance for
its directors and any other officer or
employee.
(2) Each regulated entity shall have in
place policies and procedures consistent
with this section for indemnification of
its directors, officers, and employees.
Such policies and procedures shall
address how the board of directors is to
approve or deny requests for
indemnification from current and
former directors, officers, and
employees, and shall include standards
relating to indemnification,
investigations by the board of directors,
and review by independent counsel.
(3) Nothing in this paragraph shall
affect any rights to indemnification
(including the advancement of
expenses) that a director or any other
officer or employee had with respect to
any actions, omissions, transactions, or
facts occurring prior to the effective date
of this paragraph.
(4) FHFA has the authority under the
Safety and Soundness Act to review a
regulated entity’s indemnification
policies, procedures, and practices, and
may limit or prohibit indemnification
payments in furtherance of the safe and
sound operations of the regulated entity.
§ 1239.4 Duties and responsibilities of
directors.
(a) Management of a regulated entity.
The management of each regulated
entity shall be vested in its board of
directors. While boards of directors may
delegate the execution of operational
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
functions to officers and employees of
the regulated entity, the ultimate
responsibility of each entity’s board of
directors for that entity’s management is
non-delegable. The board of directors of
a regulated entity is responsible for
directing the conduct and affairs of the
entity in furtherance of the safe and
sound operation of the entity and shall
remain reasonably informed of the
condition, activities, and operations of
the entity.
(b) Duties of directors. Each director
of a regulated entity shall have the duty
to:
(1) Carry out his or her duties as
director in good faith, in a manner such
director believes to be in the best
interests of the regulated entity, and
with such care, including reasonable
inquiry, as an ordinarily prudent person
in a like position would use under
similar circumstances;
(2) Administer the affairs of the
regulated entity fairly and impartially
and, for Bank directors, without
discrimination in favor of or against any
member institution;
(3) At the time of election, or within
a reasonable time thereafter, have a
working familiarity with basic finance
and accounting practices, including the
ability to read and understand the
regulated entity’s balance sheet and
income statement and to ask substantive
questions of management and the
internal and external auditors;
(4) Direct the operations of the
regulated entity in conformity with the
requirements set forth in the authorizing
statutes, Safety and Soundness Act, and
this chapter; and
(5) Adopt and maintain in effect at all
times bylaws governing the manner in
which the regulated entity administers
its affairs. Such bylaws shall be
consistent with applicable laws and
regulations administered by FHFA, and
with the body of law designated for the
entity’s corporate governance practices
and procedures.
(c) Director responsibilities. The
responsibilities of the board of directors
include having in place adequate
policies and procedures to assure its
oversight of, among other matters, the
following:
(1) The risk management and
compensation programs of the regulated
entity;
(2) The processes for providing
accurate financial reporting and other
disclosures, and communications with
stockholders; and
(3) The responsiveness of executive
officers in providing accurate and
timely reports to FHFA and in
addressing all supervisory concerns of
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2014 / Proposed Rules
FHFA in a timely and appropriate
manner.
(d) Authority regarding staff and
outside consultants. (1) In carrying out
its duties and responsibilities under the
authorizing statutes, the Safety and
Soundness Act, and this chapter, each
regulated entity’s board of directors and
all committees thereof shall have
authority to retain staff and outside
counsel, independent accountants, or
other outside consultants at the expense
of the regulated entity.
(2) The board of directors and its
committees may require that staff of the
regulated entity that provides services to
the board or any committee under
paragraph (d)(1) of this section report
directly to the board or such committee,
as appropriate.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
§ 1239.5
Board committees.
(a) General. The board of directors
may rely, in directing a regulated entity,
on reports from committees of the board
of directors, provided, however, that no
committee of the board of directors shall
have the authority of the board of
directors to amend the bylaws and no
committee shall operate to relieve the
board of directors or any board member
of a responsibility imposed by
applicable law, rule, or regulation.
(b) Required committees. The board of
directors of each regulated entity shall
have committees, however styled, that
address each of the following areas of
responsibility: Risk management, audit,
compensation, and corporate
governance (in the case of the Banks,
including the nomination of
independent board of director
candidates, and, in the case of the
Enterprises, including the nomination of
all board of director candidates). The
risk management committee and the
audit committee shall not be combined
with any other committees. The board of
directors may establish any other
committees that it deems necessary or
useful to carrying out its
responsibilities, subject to the
provisions of this section. In the case of
the Enterprises, board committees shall
comply with the charter, independence,
composition, expertise, duties,
responsibilities, and other requirements
set forth under rules issued by the
NYSE, and the audit committees shall
also comply with the requirements set
forth under section 301 of the SOA.
(c) Charter. Each committee shall
adopt, and the board of directors of each
regulated entity shall approve, a formal
written charter that specifies the scope
of a committee’s powers and
responsibilities, as well as the
committee’s structure, processes, and
membership requirements.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Jan 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
(d) Frequency of meetings. Each
committee of the board of directors shall
meet regularly and with sufficient
frequency to carry out its obligations
and duties under applicable laws, rules,
regulations, and guidelines. Such a
committee shall also meet with
sufficient timeliness as necessary in
light of relevant conditions and
circumstances to fulfill its obligations
and duties.
Subpart C—Other Requirements
Applicable to All Regulated Entities
§ 1239.10
Code of conduct and ethics.
(a) General. A regulated entity shall
establish and administer a written code
of conduct and ethics that is reasonably
designed to assure the ability of board
members, executive officers, and
employees of the regulated entity to
discharge their duties and
responsibilities, on behalf of the
regulated entity, in an objective and
impartial manner, and that includes
standards required under section 406 of
the SOA, as amended from time to time,
and other applicable laws, rules, and
regulations.
(b) Review. Not less often than once
every three years, a regulated entity
shall review the adequacy of its code of
conduct and ethics for consistency with
practices appropriate to the entity and
make any appropriate revisions to such
code.
§ 1239.11
Risk management.
(a) Risk management program—(1)
Adoption. Each regulated entity’s board
of directors shall have in effect at all
times an enterprise-wide risk
management program that establishes
the regulated entity’s risk profile, aligns
the risk profile with the regulated
entity’s strategies and objectives, and
addresses the regulated entity’s
exposure to credit risk, market risk,
liquidity risk, business risk and
operational risks and complies with the
requirements of this part and with all
applicable FHFA regulations and
policies.
(2) Risk profile. The board of directors
and senior management shall ensure
that the risk management program
aligns the regulated entity’s overall risk
profile with its mission objectives.
(b) Risk committee. The board of each
regulated entity shall establish and
maintain a risk committee of the board
of directors that is responsible for
oversight of enterprise-wide risk
management practices of the regulated
entity.
(c) Risk committee structure and
requirements. (1) The risk management
program shall include:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4425
(i) Risk limitations appropriate to
each business line of the regulated
entity;
(ii) Appropriate policies and
procedures relating to risk management
governance, risk management practices,
and risk control infrastructure, and
processes and systems for identifying
and reporting risks, including emerging
risks;
(iii) Provisions for monitoring
compliance with the regulated entity’s
risk limit structure and policies and
procedures relating to risk management
governance, practices, risk controls, and
effective and timely implementation of
corrective actions; and
(iv) Provisions specifying
management’s authority and
independence to carry out risk
management responsibilities, and the
integration of risk management and
control objectives in management goals
and compensation structure.
(2) The risk committee shall:
(i) Be chaired by a director not serving
in a management capacity of the
regulated entity;
(ii) Have at least one member with
risk management expertise that is
commensurate with the regulated
entity’s capital structure, risk profile,
complexity, activities, size, and other
appropriate risk-related factors;
(iii) Have committee members with an
understanding of risk management
principles and practices relevant to the
regulated entity;
(iv) Have members with experience
developing and applying risk
management practices and procedures,
measuring and identifying risks, and
monitoring the testing risk controls with
respect to financial services
organizations;
(v) Fully document and maintain
records of its meetings, including its
risk management decisions and
recommendations; and
(vi) Report directly to the board and
not as part of, or combined with,
another committee.
(d) Risk committee responsibilities.
The risk committee shall:
(1) Be responsible for documenting
and overseeing the enterprise-wide risk
management policies and practices of
the regulated entity;
(2) Review and approve an
appropriate risk management program
that is commensurate with the regulated
entity’s capital structure, risk profile,
complexity, activities, size, and other
appropriate risk-related factors; and
(3) Receive and review regular reports
from the regulated entity’s chief risk
officer.
(e) Chief Risk Officer—(1)
Appointment of a chief risk officer
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
4426
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(CRO). Each regulated entity shall
appoint a CRO to implement and
maintain appropriate enterprise-wide
risk management practices for the
regulated entity.
(2) Organizational structure of the risk
management function. The CRO shall
oversee an independent risk
management function, or unit, and shall
report directly to the risk committee and
to the chief executive officer.
(3) Responsibilities of the CRO. The
CRO shall be responsible for oversight
of:
(i) Allocating delegated risk limits and
monitoring compliance with such
limits;
(ii) Establishing appropriate policies
and procedures relating to risk
management governance, practices, and
risk controls, and developing
appropriate processes and systems for
identifying and reporting risks,
including emerging risks;
(iii) Monitoring risk exposures and
risk controls, including testing risk
controls and verifying risk measures;
and
(iv) Reporting risk management issues
and emerging risks, and ensuring that
risk management issues are effectively
resolved in a timely manner.
(4) The CRO shall execute the
responsibilities enumerated in
paragraph (e)(3) of this section on an
enterprise-wide basis.
(5) The CRO should have risk
management expertise that is
commensurate with the regulated
entity’s capital structure, risk profile,
complexity, activities, size, and other
appropriate risk related factors.
(6) The CRO shall report regularly to
the risk committee and to the chief
executive officer on the entity’s
compliance with, and the adequacy of,
its current risk management policies
and procedures, and shall recommend
any adjustments to such policies and
procedures that he or she considers
necessary or appropriate.
(7) The compensation of a regulated
entity’s CRO shall be appropriately
structured to provide for an objective
and independent assessment of the risks
taken by the regulated entity.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
§ 1239.12
Compliance program.
A regulated entity shall establish and
maintain a compliance program that is
reasonably designed to assure that the
regulated entity complies with
applicable laws, rules, regulations, and
internal controls. The compliance
program shall be headed by a
compliance officer, however styled, who
reports directly to the chief executive
officer. The compliance officer also
shall report regularly to the board of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Jan 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
Subpart D—Enterprise Specific
Requirements
a director of the Enterprise that is
independent, as defined under the rules
set forth by the NYSE, as amended from
time to time.
(b) Meetings, quorum and proxies,
information, and annual review—(1)
Frequency of meetings. The board of
directors of an Enterprise shall meet at
least eight times a year and no less than
once a calendar quarter to carry out its
obligations and duties under applicable
laws, rules, regulations, and guidelines.
(2) Non-management board member
meetings. Non-management directors of
an Enterprise shall meet at regularly
scheduled executive sessions without
management participation.
(3) Quorum of board of directors;
proxies not permissible. For the
transaction of business, a quorum of the
board of directors of an Enterprise is at
least a majority of the seated board of
directors and a board member may not
vote by proxy.
(4) Information. Management of an
Enterprise shall provide a board
member of the Enterprise with such
adequate and appropriate information
that a reasonable board member would
find important to the fulfillment of his
or her fiduciary duties and obligations.
(5) Annual review. At least annually,
the board of directors of an Enterprise
shall review, with appropriate
professional assistance, the
requirements of laws, rules, regulations,
and guidelines that are applicable to its
activities and duties.
§ 1239.20 Board of directors of the
Enterprises.
(a) Membership—(1) Limits on service
of board members—(i) General
requirement. No board member of an
Enterprise may serve on the board of
directors for more than 10 years or past
the age of 72, whichever comes first;
provided, however, a board member
may serve his or her full term if he or
she has served less than 10 years or is
72 years on the date of his or her
election or appointment to the board;
and
(ii) Waiver. Upon written request of
an Enterprise, the Director may waive,
in his or her sole discretion and for good
cause, the limits on the service of a
board member under paragraph (a)(1)(i)
of this section.
(2) Independence of board members.
A majority of seated members of the
board of directors of an Enterprise shall
be independent board members, as
defined under rules set forth by the
NYSE, as amended from time to time.
(3) Segregation of duties. The position
of chairperson of the board of directors
shall be filled by a person other than the
chief executive officer, who shall also be
§ 1239.21 Compensation of Enterprise
board members.
Each Enterprise may pay its directors
reasonable and appropriate
compensation for the time required of
them, and their necessary and
reasonable expenses, in the performance
of their duties.
directors, or an appropriate committee
thereof, on the adequacy of the entity’s
compliance policies and procedures,
including the entity’s compliance with
them, and shall recommend any
revisions to such policies and
procedures that he or she considers
necessary or appropriate.
§ 1239.13
Regulatory reports.
(a) Reports. Each regulated entity
shall file Regulatory Reports with FHFA
in accordance with the forms,
instructions, and schedules issued by
FHFA from time to time. If no regularly
scheduled reporting dates are
established, Regulatory Reports shall be
filed as requested by FHFA.
(b) Definition. For purposes of this
section, the term Regulatory Report
means any report to FHFA of
information or raw or summary data
needed to evaluate the safe and sound
condition or operations of a regulated
entity, or to determine compliance with
any:
(1) Provision in the Bank Act, Safety
and Soundness Act, or other law, order,
rule, or regulation;
(2) Condition imposed in writing by
FHFA in connection with the granting
of any application or other request by a
regulated entity; or
(3) Written agreement entered into
between FHFA and a regulated entity.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Subpart E—Bank Specific
Requirements
§ 1239.30
Bank member products policy.
(a) Adoption and review of member
products policy—(1) Adoption. Each
Bank’s board of directors shall have in
effect at all times a policy that addresses
the Bank’s management of products
offered by the Bank to members and
housing associates, including but not
limited to advances, standby letters of
credit, and acquired member assets,
consistent with the requirements of the
Bank Act, paragraph (b) of this section,
and all applicable FHFA regulations and
policies.
(2) Review and compliance. Each
Bank’s board of directors shall:
(i) Review the Bank’s member
products policy annually;
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(ii) Amend the member products
policy as appropriate; and
(iii) Re-adopt the member products
policy, including interim amendments,
not less often than every three years.
(b) Member products policy
requirements. In addition to meeting
any other requirements set forth in this
chapter, each Bank’s member products
policy shall:
(1) Address credit underwriting
criteria to be applied in evaluating
applications for advances, standby
letters of credit, and renewals;
(2) Address appropriate levels of
collateralization, valuation of collateral
and discounts applied to collateral
values for advances, and standby letters
of credit;
(3) Address advances-related fees to
be charged by each Bank, including any
schedules or formulas pertaining to
such fees;
(4) Address standards and criteria for
pricing member products, including
differential pricing of advances
pursuant to § 1266.5(b)(2) of this
chapter, and criteria regarding the
pricing of standby letters of credit,
including any special pricing provisions
for standby letters of credit that
facilitate the financing of projects that
are eligible for any of the Banks’ CICA
programs under part 1292 of this
chapter;
(5) Provide that, for any draw made by
a beneficiary under a standby letter of
credit, the member will be charged a
processing fee calculated in accordance
with the requirements of § 1271.6(b) of
this chapter;
(6) Address the maintenance of
appropriate systems, procedures and
internal controls; and
(7) Address the maintenance of
appropriate operational and personnel
capacity.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
§ 1239.31
Strategic business plan.
(a) Adoption of strategic business
plan. Each Bank’s board of directors
shall have in effect at all times a
strategic business plan that describes
how the business activities of the Bank
will achieve the mission of the Bank
consistent with part 1265 of this
chapter. Specifically, each Bank’s
strategic business plan shall:
(1) Enumerate operating goals and
objectives for each major business
activity and for all new business
activities, which must include plans for
maximizing activities that further the
Bank’s housing finance and community
lending mission, consistent with part
1265 of this chapter;
(2) Discuss how the Bank will address
credit needs and market opportunities
identified through ongoing market
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Jan 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
research and consultations with
members, associates, and public and
private organizations;
(3) Establish quantitative performance
goals for Bank products related to multifamily housing, small business, small
farm and small agri-business lending;
(4) Describe any proposed new
business activities or enhancements of
existing activities; and
(5) Be supported by appropriate and
timely research and analysis of relevant
market developments and member and
associate demand for Bank products and
services.
(b) Review and monitoring. Each
Bank’s board of directors shall:
(1) Review the Bank’s strategic
business plan at least annually;
(2) Re-adopt the Bank’s strategic
business plan, including interim
amendments, not less often than every
three years; and
(3) Establish management reporting
requirements and monitor
implementation of the strategic business
plan and the operating goals and
objectives contained therein.
(c) Report to FHFA. Each Bank shall
submit to FHFA annually a report
analyzing and describing the Bank’s
performance in achieving the goals
described in paragraph (a)(3) of this
section.
§ 1239.32
Internal control system.
(a) Establishment and maintenance.
(1) Each Bank shall establish and
maintain an effective internal control
system that addresses:
(i) The efficiency and effectiveness of
Bank activities;
(ii) The safeguarding of Bank assets;
(iii) The reliability, completeness, and
timely reporting of financial and
management information, and
transparency of such information to the
Bank’s board of directors and to FHFA;
and
(iv) Compliance with applicable laws,
regulations, policies, supervisory
determinations, and directives of the
Bank’s board of directors and senior
management.
(2) Ongoing internal control activities
necessary to maintain the internal
control system required under
paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall
include, but are not limited to:
(i) Top level reviews by the Bank’s
board of directors and senior
management, including review of
financial presentations and performance
reports;
(ii) Activity controls, including
review of standard performance and
exception reports by department-level
management on an appropriate periodic
basis;
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4427
(iii) Physical and procedural controls
to safeguard, and prevent the
unauthorized use of, assets;
(iv) Monitoring for compliance with
the risk tolerance limits set forth in the
Bank’s risk management policy;
(v) Any required approvals and
authorizations for specific activities;
and
(vi) Any required verifications and
reconciliations for specific activities.
(b) Internal control responsibilities of
Banks’ boards of directors. Each Bank’s
board of directors shall ensure that the
internal control system required under
paragraph (a)(1) of this section is
established and maintained, and shall
oversee senior management’s
implementation of such a system on an
ongoing basis, by:
(1) Conducting periodic discussions
with senior management regarding the
effectiveness of the internal control
system;
(2) Ensuring that an internal audit of
the internal control system is performed
annually and that such annual audit is
reasonably designed to be effective and
comprehensive;
(3) Requiring that internal control
deficiencies be reported to the Bank’s
board of directors in a timely manner
and that such deficiencies are addressed
promptly;
(4) Conducting a timely review of
evaluations of the effectiveness of the
internal control system made by internal
auditors, external auditors, and FHFA
examiners;
(5) Directing senior management to
address promptly and effectively
recommendations and concerns
expressed by internal auditors, external
auditors, and FHFA examiners
regarding weaknesses in the internal
control system;
(6) Reporting any internal control
deficiencies found, and the corrective
action taken, to FHFA in a timely
manner;
(7) Establishing, documenting, and
communicating an organizational
structure that clearly shows lines of
authority within the Bank, provides for
effective communication throughout the
Bank, and ensures that there are no gaps
in the lines of authority;
(8) Reviewing all delegations of
authority to specific personnel or
committees and requiring that such
delegations state the extent of the
authority and responsibilities delegated;
and
(9) Establishing reporting
requirements, including specifying the
nature and frequency of reports it
receives.
(c) Internal control responsibilities of
Banks’ senior management. Each Bank’s
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
4428
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2014 / Proposed Rules
senior management shall be responsible
for carrying out the directives of the
Bank’s board of directors, including the
establishment, implementation, and
maintenance of the internal control
system required under paragraph (a)(1)
of this section, by:
(1) Establishing, implementing, and
effectively communicating to Bank
personnel policies and procedures that
are adequate to ensure that internal
control activities necessary to maintain
an effective internal control system,
including the activities enumerated in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, are an
integral part of the daily functions of all
Bank personnel;
(2) Ensuring that all Bank personnel
fully understand and comply with all
policies, procedures, and legal
requirements applicable to their
positions and responsibilities;
(3) Ensuring that there is appropriate
segregation of duties among Bank
personnel and that personnel are not
assigned conflicting responsibilities;
(4) Establishing effective paths of
communication upward, downward,
and across the organization in order to
ensure that Bank personnel receive
necessary and appropriate information,
including:
(i) Information relating to the
operational policies and procedures of
the Bank;
(ii) Information relating to the actual
operational performance of the Bank;
(iii) Adequate and comprehensive
internal financial, operational, and
compliance data; and
(iv) External market information about
events and conditions that are relevant
to decision making;
(5) Developing and implementing
procedures that translate the major
business strategies and policies
established by the Bank’s board of
directors into operating standards;
(6) Ensuring adherence to the lines of
authority and responsibility established
by the Bank’s board of directors;
(7) Overseeing the implementation
and maintenance of management
information and other systems;
(8) Establishing and implementing an
effective system to track internal control
weaknesses and the actions taken to
correct them; and
(9) Monitoring and reporting to the
Bank’s board of directors the
effectiveness of the internal control
system on an ongoing basis.
§ 1239.33
Audit committee.
(a) Establishment. The audit
committee of each Bank established as
required by § 1239.5(b) of this chapter,
shall be consistent with the
requirements set forth in this section.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Jan 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
(b) Composition. (1) The audit
committee shall comprise five or more
persons drawn from the Bank’s board of
directors, each of whom shall meet the
criteria of independence set forth in
paragraph (c) of this section.
(2) The audit committee shall include
a balance of representatives of:
(i) Community financial institutions
and other members; and
(ii) Independent and member
directors of the Bank.
(3) The terms of audit committee
members shall be appropriately
staggered so as to provide for continuity
of service.
(4) At least one member of the audit
committee shall have extensive
accounting or related financial
management experience.
(c) Independence. Any member of the
Bank’s board of directors shall be
considered to be sufficiently
independent to serve as a member of the
audit committee if that director does not
have a disqualifying relationship with
the Bank or its management that would
interfere with the exercise of that
director’s independent judgment. Such
disqualifying relationships include, but
are not limited to:
(1) Being employed by the Bank in the
current year or any of the past five
years;
(2) Accepting any compensation from
the Bank other than compensation for
service as a board director;
(3) Serving or having served in any of
the past five years as a consultant,
advisor, promoter, underwriter, or legal
counsel of or to the Bank; or
(4) Being an immediate family
member of an individual who is, or has
been in any of the past five years,
employed by the Bank as an executive
officer.
(d) Charter. (1) The audit committee
and the board of directors of each Bank
shall:
(i) Review, and assess the adequacy
of, the Bank’s audit committee charter
on an annual basis;
(ii) Amend the audit committee
charter as appropriate; and
(iii) Re-adopt and re-approve,
respectively, the Bank’s audit committee
charter not less often than every three
years.
(2) Each Bank’s audit committee
charter shall:
(i) Provide that the audit committee
has the responsibility to select, evaluate
and, where appropriate, replace the
internal auditor and that the internal
auditor may be removed only with the
approval of the audit committee;
(ii) Provide that the internal auditor
shall report directly to the audit
committee on substantive matters and
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
that the internal auditor is ultimately
accountable to the audit committee and
board of directors; and
(iii) Provide that both the internal
auditor and the external auditor shall
have unrestricted access to the audit
committee without the need for any
prior management knowledge or
approval.
(e) Duties. Each Bank’s audit
committee shall have the duty to:
(1) Direct senior management to
maintain the reliability and integrity of
the accounting policies and financial
reporting and disclosure practices of the
Bank;
(2) Review the basis for the Bank’s
financial statements and the external
auditor’s opinion rendered with respect
to such financial statements (including
the nature and extent of any significant
changes in accounting principles or the
application therein) and ensure that
policies are in place that are reasonably
designed to achieve disclosure and
transparency regarding the Bank’s true
financial performance and governance
practices;
(3) Oversee the internal audit function
by:
(i) Reviewing the scope of audit
services required, significant accounting
policies, significant risks and exposures,
audit activities, and audit findings;
(ii) Assessing the performance and
determining the compensation of the
internal auditor; and
(iii) Reviewing and approving the
internal auditor’s work plan.
(4) Oversee the external audit
function by:
(i) Approving the external auditor’s
annual engagement letter;
(ii) Reviewing the performance of the
external auditor; and
(iii) Making recommendations to the
Bank’s board of directors regarding the
appointment, renewal, or termination of
the external auditor;
(5) Provide an independent, direct
channel of communication between the
Bank’s board of directors and the
internal and external auditors;
(6) Conduct or authorize
investigations into any matters within
the audit committee’s scope of
responsibilities;
(7) Ensure that senior management
has established and is maintaining an
adequate internal control system within
the Bank by:
(i) Reviewing the Bank’s internal
control system and the resolution of
identified material weaknesses and
significant deficiencies in the internal
control system, including the
prevention or detection of management
override or compromise of the internal
control system; and
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(ii) Reviewing the programs and
policies of the Bank designed to ensure
compliance with applicable laws,
regulations and policies, and monitoring
the results of these compliance efforts;
(8) Review the policies and
procedures established by senior
management to assess and monitor
implementation of the Bank’s strategic
business plan and the operating goals
and objectives contained therein; and
(9) Report periodically its findings to
the Bank’s board of directors.
(f) Meetings. The audit committee
shall prepare written minutes of each
audit committee meeting.
§ 1239.34
Dividends.
A Bank’s board of directors may not
declare or pay a dividend based on
projected or anticipated earnings and
may not declare or pay a dividend if the
par value of the Bank’s stock is impaired
or is projected to become impaired after
paying such dividend.
CHAPTER XVII—OFFICE OF FEDERAL
HOUSING ENTERPRISE OVERSIGHT,
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN
DEVELOPMENT
Subchapter C—Safety and Soundness
PART 1710—[REMOVED]
■
6. Remove part 1710.
PART 1720—[REMOVED]
■
7. Remove part 1720.
Dated: January 15, 2014.
Melvin L. Watt,
Director, Federal Housing Finance Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014–01173 Filed 1–27–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8070–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA–386]
Schedules of Controlled Substances:
Temporary Placement of 10 Synthetic
Cathinones into Schedule I
Drug Enforcement
Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Notice of Intent.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
AGENCY:
The Deputy Administrator of
the Drug Enforcement Administration
(DEA) is issuing this notice of intent to
temporarily schedule 10 synthetic
cathinones into schedule I pursuant to
the temporary scheduling provisions of
the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).
The 10 substances are: (1) 4-methyl-Nethylcathinone (‘‘4-MEC’’); (2) 4-methyl-
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Jan 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
alpha-pyrrolidinopropiophenone (‘‘4MePPP’’); (3) alphapyrrolidinopentiophenone (‘‘a-PVP’’);
(4) 1-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2(methylamino)butan-1-one (‘‘butylone’’);
(5) 2-(methylamino)-1-phenylpentan-1one (‘‘pentedrone’’); (6) 1-(1,3benzodioxol-5-yl)-2(methylamino)pentan-1-one
(‘‘pentylone’’); (7) 4-fluoro-Nmethylcathinone (‘‘4-FMC’’); (8) 3fluoro-N-methylcathinone (‘‘3-FMC’’);
(9) 1-(naphthalen-2-yl)-2-(pyrrolidin-1yl)pentan-1-one (‘‘naphyrone’’); and (10)
alpha-pyrrolidinobutiophenone (‘‘aPBP’’). This action is based on a finding
by the Deputy Administrator that the
placement of these synthetic cathinones
into schedule I of the CSA is necessary
to avoid an imminent hazard to the
public safety. Any final order will be
published in the Federal Register and
may not be effective prior to February
27, 2014. Any final order will impose
the administrative, civil, and criminal
sanctions and regulatory controls
applicable to schedule I substances
under the CSA on the manufacture,
distribution, possession, importation,
exportation, research, and conduct of
instructional activities of these synthetic
cathinones.
DATES: January 28, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ruth A. Carter, Acting Chief, Policy
Evaluation and Analysis Section, Office
of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration; Mailing Address: 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152, Telephone (202) 598–6812.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 201 of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 811,
provides the Attorney General with the
authority to temporarily place a
substance into schedule I of the CSA for
two years without regard to the
requirements of 21 U.S.C. 811(b) if he
finds that such action is necessary to
avoid imminent hazard to the public
safety. 21 U.S.C. 811(h). In addition, if
proceedings to control a substance are
initiated under 21 U.S.C. 811(a)(1), the
Attorney General may extend the
temporary scheduling for up to one
year. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(2).
Where the necessary findings are
made, a substance may be temporarily
scheduled if it is not listed in any other
schedule under section 202 of the CSA,
21 U.S.C. 812, or if there is no
exemption or approval in effect for the
substance under section 505 of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FDCA), 21 U.S.C. 355. 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(1); 21 CFR part 1308. The
Attorney General has delegated his
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4429
authority under 21 U.S.C. 811 to the
Administrator of the DEA, who in turn
has delegated her authority to the
Deputy Administrator of the DEA. 28
CFR 0.100, 0.104, Appendix to Subpart
R of Part 0, Sec. 12.
Section 201(h)(4) of the CSA (21
U.S.C. 811(h)(4)) requires the Deputy
Administrator to notify the Secretary of
the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) of his intention to
temporarily place a substance into
schedule I of the CSA.1 As 4-MEC, 4MePPP, a-PVP, butylone, pentedrone,
pentylone, 4-FMC, 3-FMC, naphyrone,
and a-PBP are not currently listed in
any schedule under the CSA, the DEA
believes that the conditions of 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(1) have been satisfied. Any
comments submitted by the Assistant
Secretary in response to the notice
transmitted to the Assistant Secretary on
November 7, 2013, shall be taken into
consideration before a final order is
published. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(4).
To make a finding that placing a
substance temporarily into schedule I of
the CSA is necessary to avoid an
imminent hazard to the public safety,
the Deputy Administrator is required to
consider three of the eight factors set
forth in section 201(c) of the CSA, 21
U.S.C. 811(c): the substance’s history
and current pattern of abuse; the scope,
duration, and significance of abuse; and
what, if any, risk there is to the public
health. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(3).
Consideration of these factors includes
actual abuse, diversion from legitimate
channels, and clandestine importation,
manufacture, or distribution. 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(3).
A substance meeting the statutory
requirements for temporary scheduling
may only be placed in schedule I. 21
U.S.C. 811(h)(1). Substances in schedule
I are those that have a high potential for
abuse, no currently accepted medical
use in treatment in the United States,
and a lack of accepted safety for use
under medical supervision. 21 U.S.C.
812(b)(1). Available data and
information for 4-MEC, 4-MePPP, aPVP, butylone, pentedrone, pentylone,
4-FMC, 3-FMC, naphyrone, and a-PBP
indicate that these 10 synthetic
1 Because the Secretary of the HHS has delegated
to the Assistant Secretary for Health of the HHS the
authority to make domestic drug scheduling
recommendations, for purposes of this Notice of
Intent, all subsequent references to ‘‘Secretary’’
have been replaced with ‘‘Assistant Secretary.’’ As
set forth in a memorandum of understanding
entered into by HHS, the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), and the National Institute on
Drug Abuse (NIDA), FDA acts as the lead agency
within HHS in carrying out the Assistant
Secretary’s scheduling responsibilities under the
CSA, with the concurrence of NIDA. 50 FR 9518,
Mar. 8, 1985.
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 18 (Tuesday, January 28, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 4414-4429]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01173]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD
12 CFR Parts 914 and 917
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY
12 CFR Parts 1236 and 1239
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight
12 CFR Parts 1710 and 1720
RIN 2590-AA59
Responsibilities of Boards of Directors, Corporate Practices and
Corporate Governance Matters
AGENCIES: Federal Housing Finance Board; Federal Housing Finance
Agency; Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight.
ACTION: Proposed rule; with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) is proposing to
amend its regulations by relocating and consolidating certain Federal
Housing Finance Board (Finance Board) and Office of Federal Housing
Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) regulations that pertain to the
responsibilities of boards of directors, corporate practices, and
corporate governance matters. The OFHEO regulations address corporate
governance matters at the Federal National Mortgage Association and the
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Enterprises), while the Finance
Board regulations address the powers and responsibilities of the boards
of directors and management of the Federal Home Loan Banks (Banks). The
proposed rule would consolidate most of those existing regulations into
a new FHFA regulation, parts of which would apply to both the Banks and
the Enterprises (together, regulated entities), and parts of which
would apply only to the Banks or only to the Enterprises. Most of the
content of the new regulation has been derived from the existing
regulations, with such modifications as are necessary to apply certain
provisions to all regulated entities. The proposal also would include a
new provision on risk management and a new definition of ``credit
risk,'' which is a term that is used only within the proposed risk
management provision. Those provisions would apply to both the Banks
and the Enterprises. FHFA also is proposing to amend a definition
within
[[Page 4415]]
its Prudential Management and Operations Standards (Prudential
Standards) regulations and the introductory language to the standards
themselves. Together, those amendments would explicitly include certain
introductory language--pertaining to the general responsibilities of
senior management and boards of directors--as part of the standards.
The proposed rule also would repeal a separate provision of the OFHEO
regulations that relate to minimum safety and soundness requirements.
DATES: Written comments on the proposed rule must be received on or
before March 31, 2014. For additional information, see SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your comments on the proposed rule,
identified by regulatory information number ``RIN 2590-AA59,'' by any
of the following methods:
Email: Comments to Alfred M. Pollard, General Counsel, may
be sent by email to RegComments@FHFA.gov. Please include ``RIN 2590-
AA59'' in the subject line of the message.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. If you submit your
comment to the Federal eRulemaking Portal, please also send it by email
to FHFA at RegComments@FHFA.gov to ensure timely receipt by the agency.
Include the following information in the subject line of your
submission: Comments/RIN 2590-AA59.
U.S. Mail, United Parcel Post, Federal Express, or Other
Mail Service: The mailing address for comments is: Alfred M. Pollard,
General Counsel, Attention: Comments/RIN 2590-AA59, Federal Housing
Finance Agency, Constitution Center, Eighth Floor (OGC), 400 7th Street
SW., Washington, DC 20024.
Hand Delivered/Courier: The hand delivery address is:
Alfred M. Pollard, General Counsel; Attention: Comments/RIN 2590-AA59,
Federal Housing Finance Agency, Constitution Center, Eighth Floor
(OGC), 400 7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20024. The package should be
logged at the Guard Desk, First Floor, on business days between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Bogdon, Amy.Bogdon@fhfa.gov, (202)
649-3320, Associate Director, Division of Federal Home Loan Bank
Regulation; or Michou Nguyen, Michou.Nguyen@fhfa.gov, (202) 649-3081
(not toll-free numbers), Assistant General Counsel, Office of General
Counsel, Federal Housing Finance Agency, Constitution Center, Eighth
Floor (OGC), 400 7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20024. The telephone
number for the Telecommunications Device for the Hearing Impaired is
(800) 877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Comments
FHFA invites comments on all aspects of the proposed rule in
addition to requesting comments in response to specific questions that
appear throughout this document. FHFA will take all comments into
consideration before issuing a final regulation. All comments received
will be posted without change on the FHFA Web site at https://www.fhfa.gov, and will include any personal information you provide,
such as your name, address (mailing and email), and telephone numbers.
In addition, copies of all comments received will be available for
examination by the public on business days between the hours of 10 a.m.
and 3 p.m., at the Federal Housing Finance Agency, Eighth Floor, 400
7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20024. To make an appointment to inspect
comments, please call the Office of General Counsel at (202) 649-3804.
II. Background
A. Purpose of the Proposed Rule
This proposed rule is the next phase in FHFA's effort to repeal or
relocate all remaining OFHEO and Finance Board regulations. Both of the
predecessor agencies had adopted regulations addressing director
responsibilities, corporate practices, and corporate governance
matters. Pursuant to the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008
(HERA), Public Law 110-289, 122 Stat. 2654, those regulations remain in
effect until they are superseded by regulations issued by FHFA. See id.
at sections 1301, 1302, 1311, 1312, 122 Stat. 2794-95, 2797-98. The
intent of this proposed rule is to consolidate or relocate certain of
the existing regulations into a new set of FHFA regulations that would
address those same matters. FHFA would expand the scope of certain of
the existing regulations to both the Enterprises and the Banks. Those
provisions address matters of general corporate governance or corporate
practices that are common to all the regulated entities. For certain
other provisions of the existing regulations, FHFA would continue to
apply them only to the Banks or only to the Enterprises, as they
address topics that are unique to the particular entity, as permitted
by statute. The proposed rule would carry over most of those provisions
without change. The proposed rule is not intended to address
conservatorship matters. Rather, the proposal addresses matters of
corporate practice and governance, as well as compliance and risk
management practices, nearly all of which currently apply to the
Enterprises through the OFHEO regulations and all of which remain
relevant to their safe and sound operation.
The regulations of the predecessor agencies that would be relocated
by this rulemaking are located at parts 914, 917, and 1710 of title 12
of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The Finance Board regulations
at part 914 address regulatory reporting for the Banks. FHFA is
proposing to relocate that provision without substantive change and
apply it to all of the regulated entities. All of the relocated
regulations would be adopted as a new part, 12 CFR 1239 (part 1239), in
the FHFA section of title 12 of the CFR. Any regulations of the
predecessor agencies that are not being adopted as FHFA regulations
would be repealed.
As part of this rulemaking, FHFA is also proposing to amend one of
the definitions within its Prudential Standards regulations, as well as
one aspect of the Prudential Standards themselves. Together, those
amendments would explicitly provide that the introductory language
within the Prudential Standards, which appears immediately before the
enumerated 10 standards, is considered a part of the standards and is
to be treated in the same manner as the 10 enumerated standards. The
introductory section of the Prudential Standards recites general
concepts of corporate governance and responsibilities, as they relate
to the subject matter of the individual standards, that are a part of
the typical responsibilities of the board of directors and senior
management of any financial institution. FHFA believes that it would be
more appropriate to include those paragraphs as explicitly part of the
standards, and having the same substantive effect under the Prudential
Standards regime. Lastly, FHFA is proposing to repeal in its entirety
part 1720 of the OFHEO regulations, which established certain safety
and soundness standards for the Enterprises. Because many of the
matters addressed by part 1720 are also addressed by the Prudential
Standards and by parts of this proposed rule, FHFA has determined that
the repeal of part 1720 will not change the standards applicable to the
Enterprises. The following sections briefly describe each of the
provisions in proposed part 1239 and its origin.
[[Page 4416]]
Also with respect to the Prudential Standards, FHFA acknowledges
that there is substantial overlap between some of these proposed
regulations and the Prudential Standards, and requests comment on
appropriate modifications to the regulations to harmonize them with the
Prudential Standards to create a unified set of corporate governance
requirements with appropriate levels of specificity and appropriate
enforcement mechanisms.
B. Overview of Part 1239
Part 1239 of the proposed rule would be structured into a subpart
(A) for definitions and four substantive subparts (B through E).
Subpart B would consist of regulations relating to core corporate
governance principles, which would apply to both the Banks and the
Enterprises. Subpart C would include regulations addressing codes of
conduct, risk management, compliance programs, and regulatory reports,
which also would apply to all regulated entities. Subparts D and E
would consist of regulations that address matters specific to the Banks
(such as those relating to a Bank's member product policy) and to the
Enterprises (such as those relating to the Enterprise boards),
respectively.
Much of the content of part 1239, with the exception of the
provision on risk management, has been derived from the current Finance
Board and OFHEO regulations, with modifications as necessary to apply
certain of the provisions to all regulated entities and to clarify,
update, or supplement the existing regulations, as appropriate. FHFA
believes that the current Finance Board risk management regulation
would benefit from updates. Accordingly, FHFA has rewritten this
provision in its entirety and is proposing to apply the revised
provision to the Enterprises as well as to the Banks. FHFA believes
that the Finance Board regulations dealing with audit committees and
internal controls could be similarly updated and extended to the
Enterprises, but is soliciting comment on how best to do that, rather
than proposing revised language for those provisions, as discussed in
more detail in part III.E. (Bank Specific Requirements).
C. Considerations of Differences Between the Banks and the Enterprises
When promulgating regulations or taking other actions that relate
to the Banks, section 1313(f) of the Federal Housing Enterprises
Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (Safety and Soundness Act),
as amended by section 1201 of HERA, requires the Director to consider
the differences between the Banks and the Enterprises with respect to
the Banks' cooperative ownership structure; mission of providing
liquidity to members; affordable housing and community development
mission; capital structure; and joint and several liability. 12 U.S.C.
4513(f). In preparing the proposed rule, the Director has considered
the differences between the Banks and the Enterprises as they relate to
the above factors and has determined that none of the statutory factors
would be adversely affected by the proposed rule. The Director is
requesting comments from the public about whether differences related
to these factors should result in a revision of the proposed rule as it
relates to the Banks.
III. Part 1239
A. Subpart A--General
Definitions (1239.2)
The definitions section of the proposed rule consists of
definitions from parts 914, 917, and 1710, most of which are being
relocated without any substantive change, apart from conforming changes
that are necessary to make certain of the defined terms applicable to
both the Banks and the Enterprises. The proposed rule would
substantively amend certain of the existing definitions, as described
below. First, the proposed rule would replace the term ``reportable
conditions'' (which currently appears only in the Finance Board
regulation on audit committees) with the term ``significant
deficiency.'' That revision would better align the concept with current
accounting and financial reporting standards. Second, the proposed rule
would amend the definition of ``credit risk,'' which currently appears
only in the Finance Board provision pertaining to risk management. The
proposed definition would define credit risk as the potential that a
borrower or counterparty will fail to meet its financial obligations in
accordance with the agreed terms. FHFA believes that is a better
definition than the current provision, which focuses on the decline in
value of an obligation as a result of a deterioration in
creditworthiness. Third, the proposal would revise the definition of
``operational risk'' to follow the definition used by the other federal
banking regulators in their risk-based capital regulations, which also
is consistent with the definition of the term from the Basel Committee
on Banking Supervision.\1\ Fourth, the proposed rule would delete the
definition of ``senior executive officer'' but add the substance of
that definition into the definition of ``executive officer.'' The term
``senior executive officer'' is not used in any of the substantive
provisions of the proposed regulations, and appears only within the
definition of ``executive officer.'' Rather than retain a definition of
a term that appears only within another defined term, FHFA believes it
is more appropriate to relocate the operative language from the
definition of ``senior executive officer'' into the definition of
``executive officer.'' A number of terms that will no longer be used in
the proposed regulations will not be carried forward into the proposed
rule, nor will any terms that FHFA has defined in the general
definitions section of its regulations, 12 CFR part 1201.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, International
Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised
Framework--Comprehensive Version, Section V (Operational Risk),
paragraph 644, Basel, June 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Subpart B--Corporate Practices and Procedures Applicable to All
Regulated Entities
Subpart B includes three provisions that address certain core
principles of corporate practices or governance that FHFA believes
should be applied to both the Enterprises and the Banks. The topics
addressed by this part of the proposed rule are choice of law, duties
of directors, and committees of the boards of directors, and nearly all
of those provisions are derived from the Finance Board or OFHEO
regulations.
Choice of Law (1239.3)
Section 1239.3 of the proposed rule would require each regulated
entity to designate a body of law to follow with respect to its
corporate governance and indemnification practices. This requirement
already applies to the Enterprises and the Office of Finance, pursuant
to 12 CFR 1710.10 of the OFHEO regulations and 12 CFR 1273.7(i)(2) of
the FHFA regulations, respectively, but would be new for the Banks.
Under this provision, a regulated entity would be required to designate
in its bylaws one of the following for its corporate governance
practices and procedures: (1) The law of the jurisdiction in which the
entity maintains its principal office; (2) the Delaware General
Corporation Law; or (3) the Revised Model Business Corporation Act.
Technically, those laws would not apply to, nor be binding on, the
Banks or Enterprises, because they are not state-chartered
corporations. Rather, FHFA intends that the entities would look to
their chosen body of law to address any governance or indemnification
issues that may arise and for which no federal laws control.
[[Page 4417]]
The proposed regulation also includes a provision dealing with
indemnification, which is derived from FHFA's regulations governing the
Office of Finance, 12 CFR 1273.7(i)(3), and from the OFHEO
indemnification provisions at 12 CFR 1710.20. The proposed provision
would state that a regulated entity shall indemnify its directors,
officers, and employees under terms and conditions to be determined by
the board, subject to any limitations in federal law or the law of the
jurisdiction designated for an entity's corporate governance practices.
The proposal further requires each entity to have policies and
procedures regarding the indemnification of its directors, officers,
and employees, which must address how the board of directors is to
decide on requests for indemnification, and must include standards
relating to indemnification, investigations by the board of directors,
and review by independent counsel. The proposal also authorizes FHFA to
review an entity's indemnification policies, procedures, and practices,
and carries over a provision of the OFHEO regulation that authorized it
to limit or prohibit indemnification payments for reasons of safety and
soundness. Under that latter provision, FHFA could limit or prohibit
indemnification payments to any person found to have violated any law
or regulation, breached any material elements of the entity's bylaws or
code of conduct, or engaged in grossly negligent actions.
FHFA is proposing to make these provisions applicable to the Banks
because there are benefits to having all regulated entities follow the
same regulatory standard with respect to their corporate governance and
indemnification practices, and because there currently is no definitive
guidance for the Banks on this matter. The indemnification provision
explicitly states that it is subject to the other provisions of the
regulation, one of which provides that the corporate governance and
indemnification practices must comply with the authorizing statutes and
any other applicable federal statutes or regulations. That means that a
regulated entity's ability to indemnify its directors, officers, and
employees will be subject to any limitations that FHFA imposes through
its separate indemnification regulations or through this provision,
regardless of what the chosen state law may provide.
Duties and Responsibilities of Board Members (1239.4)
Section 1293.4 of the proposed rule would set forth certain basic
duties and responsibilities of directors of a regulated entity. This
provision states that the ultimate responsibility for managing a
regulated entity lies with the board of directors. It also requires
directors to, among other things: (1) Act in good faith and with due
care, in the best interest of the regulated entity, and in a fair and
impartial manner; (2) direct the affairs of an entity in a manner
consistent with applicable statutes and regulations; (3) have a working
familiarity with basic finance and accounting practices; and (4) adopt
bylaws governing the manner in which the regulated entity administers
its affairs. Directors must also put in place policies relating to the
board's oversight of risk management, compensation, financial
reporting, and responsiveness to FHFA supervisory concerns.
The text of the proposed regulation consists mostly of provisions
carried over from Finance Board regulation (Sec. 917.2) and, to a
lesser extent, OFHEO regulation (Sec. 1710.15). The proposed rule
would carry over nearly all of the provisions of (Sec. 917.2) of the
Finance Board regulations, and the substance of the existing OFHEO
regulations located at 12 CFR 1710.15(b)(3), (5), and (7). Those OFHEO
provisions require the boards of directors to have policies in place to
assure their oversight of compensation programs, disclosures to
shareholders and investors, and responsiveness to regulatory inquiries.
The proposed rule would add a provision requiring the boards to have
policies in place to assure their oversight of risk management, in
light of the importance of risk management policies and controls to the
safe and sound operation of the entities. FHFA is proposing not to
carry over certain other OFHEO regulations that require the boards to
have in place policies to assure their oversight of corporate strategy,
hiring and retention of qualified senior executive officers, integrity
of financial reporting, and extensions of credit to board members. See
12 CFR 1710.15(b)(1)-(2), (4), and (6). FHFA believes that these topics
are covered adequately elsewhere. The proposed rule also would repeal
1710.15(a) and (c), which state the purpose of those OFHEO regulations
and direct Enterprise board members to their chosen body of corporate
law, as well as to OFHEO pronouncements, for additional guidance on
these topics. FHFA believes that these matters need not be explicitly
stated in the regulation.
Board Committees (1239.5)
The last section in subpart B deals with committees of the board of
directors, and is derived principally from Sec. 1710.12 of the OFHEO
regulations. The proposed regulation would require each regulated
entity to have certain specified committees of the board of directors
and would authorize the entities to establish any other committees they
deem appropriate. Each entity would be required to have committees of
the board of directors that are responsible for each of the following
matters: (1) Risk management; (2) audit; (3) compensation; and (4)
corporate governance. The rule would not require the entities to
establish committees with those specific names, only that they
establish committees that are responsible for overseeing those matters.
The proposed rule also would provide that the risk management committee
and the audit committee cannot be combined with any of the other
committees. The proposal would further require that each committee have
a formal written charter and that it meet with sufficient frequency to
carry out its responsibilities. The regulation retains, for the
Enterprises only, an OFHEO provision requiring Enterprise audit
committees to comply with certain provisions of section 301 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOA), which relates to audit committees of public
companies, and that the audit committee and other Enterprise committees
also comply with applicable provisions of the rules of the New York
Stock Exchange (NYSE). That is the only provision in this proposed
regulation that would not apply to the Banks. Because the Federal Home
Loan Bank Act (Bank Act) mandates that a majority of a Bank's board of
directors be officers or directors of the Bank's members, these
directors may not meet the independence criteria in both of the
relevant SOA and NYSE provisions for audit committee members. Indeed,
nine of the Banks have disclosed in their federal securities law
filings that the member directors who serve on the Banks' audit
committees did not meet the NYSE independence requirement because the
member had a ``material relationship'' with the Bank or failed the
NYSE's revenue test.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Under NYSE rules, an employee of a Bank member would not be
considered independent for purposes of serving on the audit
committee if: (1) The member has made interest payments to the Bank
exceeding the greater of $1 million or 2 percent of the Bank's gross
annual revenue in any of the past three fiscal years; or (2) if the
Bank has purchased loans from the member in an amount exceeding the
greater of $1 million or 2 percent of the member's gross annual
revenue in any of the past three fiscal years. In addition, an
officer of a Bank member is not considered independent if the member
has a ``material relationship'' with the Bank. The rules list a
banking relationship as an example of a type of relationship that
can constitute a material relationship. The board of directors of
the Bank is responsible for determining whether a relationship is
``material'' after ``broadly'' considering all relevant facts and
circumstances. See NYSE Listed Company Manual Sect. 303A.02 and
303A.07(a).
Under SOA section 301, an audit committee director is not
considered independent if the director is an ``affiliated person''
of the Bank. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 defines
``affiliated person'' as a person who owns, directly or indirectly,
or controls 5% of the voting securities of the Bank. A member
director does not directly own voting securities of a Bank but may
be deemed to indirectly own or control the securities under certain
scenarios (e.g., if the member director owns 25% of the voting
securities of the member). See 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(19) and 78j-1. Under
SEC rule 10A-3, promulgated pursuant to SOA section 301, an audit
committee director is considered ``affiliated'' if the director
directly or indirectly ``controls'' the Bank. Under rule 10A-3, a
person will be deemed not to have ``control'' if the person,
directly or indirectly, owns 10% or less of the voting securities of
the Bank. See 17 CFR 240.10A-3. Nine of the Banks have stated in
their federal securities laws filings that all members of their
audit committees have satisfied the independence requirements under
SEC rule 10A-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 4418]]
The substance of the proposed rule differs slightly from OFHEO
regulation Sec. 1710.12 in that it requires each board to have a
committee dealing with risk management. The OFHEO rule mandates that
the Enterprises have the other three committees mentioned above. There
is no equivalent Finance Board regulation. FHFA believes that,
consistent with current best practices, it is appropriate to add the
risk management committee to the list of required committees and to
make this regulation applicable to the Banks as these four areas are
crucial to the safe and sound operation of all regulated entities.
FHFA also has considered whether the proposed rule should require
the board of directors of each regulated entity to have an executive
committee, in addition to the other four committees that would be
required by the proposed rule. FHFA requests comments on whether it
would be appropriate for the regulations to require the establishment
of executive committees as a matter of course and, if so, what powers
should be delegated to those committees. An executive committee that is
authorized to exercise the powers of the full board of directors could
enhance the efficiency of the board's operations, particularly at Banks
that have large boards of directors. FHFA also requests comment on
whether the need for an executive committee, or the benefits from
having such a committee, would be any greater in the case of a Bank
that results from the merger of two other Banks. In such cases,
statutory provisions that cause the resulting Bank to have a very large
board of directors also may make board operations more cumbersome and
thus less efficient. To the extent that an executive committee may
address matters that otherwise would have been addressed by the full
board, FHFA requests comments on what limitations might be appropriate
to ensure that the ability of those directors who are not on the
executive committee to exercise their own fiduciary duties is not
compromised.
C. Subpart C--Other Requirements Applicable to All Regulated Entities
Subpart C includes four provisions that relate to certain other
matters that FHFA believes should apply to all of the regulated
entities, but are not the type of governance provisions that are
included in Subpart B. These provisions address: (1) Code of conduct;
(2) risk management; (3) compliance programs; and (4) regulatory
reports. The substance of these provisions is derived from parts 914,
917, and 1710 of the Finance Board and OFHEO regulations, respectively,
except for the risk management provision, which has been rewritten in
its entirety to better align it with supervisory expectations for sound
risk management.
Code of Conduct (1239.10)
The first regulation in Subpart C requires each regulated entity to
establish a written code of conduct for directors, executive officers,
and employees that is designed to ensure that they discharge their
duties in an objective and impartial manner. The code of conduct must
include standards set forth in section 406 of the SOA, which address
promoting: (1) Honest and ethical conduct, including the handling of
conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;
(2) full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosures in
periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC); and (3) compliance with applicable rules and regulations. In
addition, each regulated entity must review the code at least once
every three years and make any necessary revisions. The requirements of
proposed Sec. 1239.10 are being relocated from OFHEO regulation Sec.
1710.14 without any substantive changes, and are being made applicable
to the Banks as well as the Enterprises. FHFA believes that a code of
conduct is an important tool to ensure the safe and sound operation of
a regulated entity and therefore is proposing to extend the
requirements of this provision to the Banks.
Risk Management (1239.11)
Both the Finance Board and OFHEO regulations include provisions
dealing with the issue of risk management responsibilities of the
boards of directors. See 12 CFR 917.3 and Sec. 1710.19(b). In
reviewing both of those provisions, FHFA determined that they may no
longer reflect the current best risk management practices and concepts.
Based in part on more recent proposals of the Federal Reserve Board,\3\
FHFA is proposing to adopt a new risk management regulation for all of
the regulated entities, which would supplant the existing Finance Board
and OFHEO regulations. The proposed risk management provision would
require a regulated entity to adopt an enterprise-wide risk management
program that aligns the entity's overall risk profile with its
strategic plan and mission objectives. The regulation also would
require that the risk management program address the regulated entity's
risk profile and risk exposure. The program also would have to include
appropriate risk limitations, risk management practices, and compliance
monitoring provisions, while specifying management's authority and
independence to carry out its risk management responsibilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Enhanced Prudential Standards and Early Remediation
Requirements for Covered Companies, Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, 77 FR 594 (Jan. 5, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule would require each regulated entity to have a
risk committee and that it be established pursuant to a written charter
approved by the full board of directors. The risk committee also would
have to be chaired by a director that does not serve in a management
capacity. That provision would effectively apply only to the
Enterprises because the boards of the Banks do not have any management
representatives. The committee must have at least one member with risk
management expertise and all members must have an understanding of risk
management principles and experience developing and applying risk
management practices, identifying risks, and monitoring risk controls
for financial services organizations. The proposal would require the
committee to meet regularly and report directly to the board of
directors, and would provide that the committee is responsible for
documenting and overseeing the risk management policies and practices,
reviewing and approving the risk management program, and reviewing
regular reports from the chief risk officer (CRO).
The proposed rule would require each regulated entity to appoint a
CRO, who would be responsible for the risk management function. The
proposed
[[Page 4419]]
rule would specify certain responsibilities of the CRO, which would
include: (1) Allocating delegated risk limits; (2) establishing
appropriate policies, processes, and systems to identify and report
risks; (3) managing risk exposures and controls; and (4) reporting risk
management issues directly and regularly to the risk committee and the
chief executive officer. The CRO also must have risk management
expertise commensurate with the regulated entity's capital structure,
risk profile, complexity, activities, and size. The board would be
required to structure the CRO's compensation in such a manner as to
provide for an objective and independent assessment of the risks taken
by the regulated entity.
Compliance Program (1239.12)
This provision of the proposed rule would require the regulated
entities to establish a compliance program headed by a compliance
officer and would set forth criteria for the program. These provisions
would be carried over, with modest conforming changes, from OFHEO
regulation Sec. 1710.19, and thus would be new only for the Banks. The
compliance program to be established under this provision must be
reasonably designed to ensure that the regulated entity complies with
applicable laws, rules, regulations, and internal controls. In addition
to reporting directly to the chief executive officer, the compliance
officer must report regularly to the entity's board of directors (or a
committee thereof) on the adequacy of the entity's compliance policies
and procedures, and must recommend any appropriate adjustments to those
policies or procedures. Other provisions of the OFHEO regulation, at
Sec. 1710.19(b) and (c), which deal with risk management and
registration of Enterprise stock under the federal securities laws,
would be repealed as either being addressed elsewhere or no longer
being relevant.
Regulatory Reports (1239.13)
The last section of Subpart C would require each regulated entity
to provide FHFA with such regulatory reports as are necessary for it to
evaluate the condition of a regulated entity, or compliance with
applicable law, and to do so in accordance with the forms and
instructions issued by FHFA from time to time. This provision would be
relocated, with only minor non-substantive changes, from the Finance
Board regulations at 12 CFR 914.1 and 914.2. FHFA has the statutory
authority to compel all regulated entities to submit the reports
described in Sec. 1239.13. 12 U.S.C. 4514. Therefore, applying this
provision to all regulated entities would not impose any new burdens on
the Enterprises, but would serve to highlight the importance of timely
and accurate data reporting.
D. Enterprise-Specific Requirements (Subpart D)
Subpart D of the proposed rule would carry over two OFHEO
regulations relating to: (1) Eligibility requirements for the board of
directors of the Enterprises and conduct of their board meetings; and
(2) compensation for Enterprise directors. The first provision is
substantively identical to the current OFHEO regulation Sec. 1710.11,
while the second provision is based on Sec. 1710.13, with minor
changes that eliminate portions relating to compensation of executive
officers and employees, which are no longer necessary. Neither of these
two provisions would be applied to the Banks because section 7 of the
Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. 1427, already establishes eligibility requirements
and mandates a specific composition of Bank boards between member
directors and independent directors, and because section 7 and 12 CFR
part 1261 of the FHFA regulations already include provisions governing
compensation for directors of the Banks.
Enterprise Board of Director Requirements (1239.20)
The first provision of Subpart D addresses age and term limits for
individual Enterprise board members and requires that a majority of the
directors be independent, as defined under the rules of the NYSE. It
also addresses the frequency of Enterprise board meetings, quorum
requirements, and voting by directors. These provisions are being
carried over from Sec. 1710.11 without substantive change and would
apply only to the Enterprises. In addition, proposed Sec. 1239.20
includes a new provision that would prohibit the chief executive
officer (CEO) of an Enterprise from also serving as the chairman of the
board of directors. FHFA is proposing to add this requirement in order
to promote the board of directors' oversight of senior management. By
separating the two positions, FHFA intends to preclude the possibility
that a CEO would have an opportunity to unduly influence the full board
of directors by virtue of holding the chairman's position.
Compensation of Enterprise Board Members (1239.21)
The second provision of Subpart D states that Enterprise director
compensation must be reasonable and appropriate for the time required
for the performance of their duties. This provision is based on Sec.
1710.13 of the OFHEO regulations, which addresses compensation of
Enterprise board members, as well as Enterprise officers and employees.
The proposed rule would differ from the OFHEO rule in that it would
apply only to compensation paid to the directors of an Enterprise.
Because FHFA has recently adopted an interim rule addressing executive
compensation matters for the Banks and the Enterprises, there is no
longer any need to address the matter of executive compensation in
these provisions. As for non-executive employees, FHFA believes that a
separate regulation is not necessary as those salaries will be set by
an entity's executives, whose compensation is subject to FHFA review.
E. Subpart E--Bank-Specific Requirements
Subpart E of the proposed rule would carry over from the Finance
Board regulations five provisions that address a Bank's: (1) Member
products policy; (2) strategic business plan; (3) internal control
system; (4) audit committee; and (5) dividends. The proposed provisions
derive from current Finance Board regulations on these topics, which
will be relocated to subpart E with only minor and conforming changes.
As discussed in more detail below, FHFA believes that three of these
provisions--regarding the member products policy, business plan, and
dividends--are unique to the Banks and thus should not be applied to
the Enterprises. Although FHFA is proposing to include the Finance
Board provisions on internal controls and audit committees in the
``Bank specific'' portion of the rule, it also is requesting comment on
whether it would be appropriate to revise those provisions so that they
could be applied to both the Banks and the Enterprises.
Bank Member Product Policy (1239.30)
Finance Board regulations require each Bank to have a member
products policy that addresses the Bank's management of products
offered to members and housing associates. See 12 CFR 917.4. Under that
provision, a Bank's board of directors must review the policy annually,
amend it as appropriate, and readopt it at least every three years. The
policy must address certain specified topics, which are: (1) Credit
underwriting criteria; (2) levels of collateralization; (3) fees and
product pricing; (4) maintenance of appropriate systems, procedures,
and internal controls; and (5) maintenance of appropriate operational
and personnel
[[Page 4420]]
capacity. The proposed rule would simply relocate the existing Finance
Board regulations without substantive change.
Strategic Business Plan (1239.31)
Finance Board regulations also require each Bank's board of
directors to adopt a strategic business plan that describes how each
Bank will achieve its housing finance mission, and how each Bank
establishes goals and objectives for each of its business activities.
See 12 CFR Sec. 917.5. The plan must also: (1) Discuss how a Bank will
address credit needs and market opportunities; (2) establish
quantitative performance goals for Bank products related to multi-
family housing, small business, small farm, and small agri-business
lending; (3) describe proposed new business activities; and (4) be
supported by appropriate research and analysis of market developments
and member demand for products. Each Bank's board of directors must
review the plan at least annually, readopt it at least every three
years, and establish management reporting requirements and monitor
implementation. The proposed rule would simply relocate this regulation
without substantive change to the FHFA regulations. FHFA is not
proposing to extend it to the Enterprises because their strategic
objectives are subject to FHFA control as a result of the
conservatorships.
Internal Control System (1239.32)
The proposed rule would carry over, without substantive change, the
Finance Board regulation dealing with internal control systems at the
Banks. See 12 CFR 917.6. The current Finance Board regulation requires
each Bank to establish and maintain an effective internal control
system that addresses: (1) The efficiency and effectiveness of Bank
activities; (2) the safeguarding of Bank assets; (3) the reliability,
completeness, and timely reporting of financial and management
information; and (4) compliance with applicable laws, regulations,
policies, and management and board directives. The regulation sets
forth detailed responsibilities of senior management and the board of
directors with respect to internal controls. This regulation would not
apply to the Enterprises, as many of the detailed requirements in the
provision are specific to the Banks and reflect their unique structure.
Nonetheless, the topic of internal controls is one that is relevant
to both the Banks and the Enterprises, and FHFA is considering whether
it should adopt a regulation on internal controls that would apply to
all of the regulated entities. Accordingly, FHFA specifically requests
public comment on the following questions:
1. In what manner should FHFA revise the content of Sec. 917.6 so
that it could be applied to all regulated entities, and what specific
revisions to the regulatory text would be needed to accomplish that
objective?
2. What regulatory approach would be best suited for addressing the
topic of internal controls at the Banks and Enterprises, one based on
general principles, or one that includes detailed requirements that
prescribe particular steps that an entity should take in creating and
operating a system of internal controls?
3. If FHFA were to adopt a more prescriptive approach to a
regulation on internal controls, is the current approach, which
separately addresses the requirements of an internal control system,
the responsibilities of the board, and the responsibilities of
management, appropriate?
4. If FHFA were to adopt a more principles-based approach to
internal controls, what principles would be necessary to assure that
regulated entities would establish and maintain an effective system of
internal controls?
5. What amendments to the regulation or the Prudential Standards
would be most appropriate to ensure that they complement each other
with respect to the entities' internal control systems?
6. Should the proposed Sec. 1239.32(a)(iv) retain the requirement
that the internal control system must ensure that the entity complies
with all applicable laws and regulations if the proposed rule will
separately require that the entities establish a compliance program to
address that same topic?
7. Are there any types of internal control requirements that would
be unique to either the Banks or the Enterprises and could not readily
be applied to the other entities?
Audit Committee (1239.33)
The proposed rule also would carry over without substantive change
the provisions of the Finance Board regulations dealing with Bank audit
committees. See 12 CFR 917.7. Those provisions would set forth
requirements relating to the composition of the audit committee and the
content of the audit committee charter. They would also require that
the audit committee members be independent and establish certain
independence criteria. The proposal would retain the provision
requiring the audit committee to include a balance of representatives
of community financial institutions and other members, as well as
independent directors and member directors. The audit committee would
be required to have a charter that covers the selection and retention
of the internal auditor and reporting channels for the auditor. The
regulation also lists numerous duties of the audit committee,
including: (1) Directing senior management to maintain the reliability
and integrity of the accounting policies; (2) reviewing the basis for
the Bank's financial statements and the external auditor's opinion; (3)
overseeing the audit function; and (4) conducting or authorizing
investigations.
The Finance Board regulation on Bank audit committees reflects the
unique structure of the Banks as member-owned cooperatives whose boards
of directors include a majority of member directors that also serve as
officers or directors of their member institutions. Because the board
structure of the Banks is unique and differs so much from that of the
Enterprises, FHFA believes that it is appropriate to retain the Bank-
specific regulations for the Banks' audit committees. FHFA is not
proposing to impose these requirements on the Enterprises because of
those differences and because the Enterprises are separately required
(by the OFHEO regulations and by this proposed rule) to comply with the
audit committee requirements of section 301 of the SOA and the rules of
the NYSE.
Nonetheless, the topic of audit committees is one that is relevant
to both the Banks and the Enterprises, and FHFA requests comments on
the following questions:
1. By carrying over the existing Finance Board and OFHEO
regulations, the proposed rule would effectively retain the two
distinct regulatory approaches embodied in the current rules, i.e.,
OFHEO's approach of using a cross-reference to the SOA audit committee
provisions and the Finance Board's approach of using the considerably
more detailed regulatory provisions to address audit committee
responsibilities. FHFA requests comment on whether it should continue
this arrangement or whether it should develop one rule on audit
committees that would apply to both the Banks and the Enterprises. FHFA
also requests comment on how a single rule should be structured, i.e.,
whether it should adopt the approach of the current OFHEO regulations,
the approach of the Finance Board regulations, or some other approach.
2. If FHFA were to retain the substance of the current Finance
Board rule for Bank audit committees (either for the Banks or for the
Banks and the Enterprises), FHFA requests comments
[[Page 4421]]
on how it could modify the provisions of that rule (which would be
located at Sec. 1239.33 of this proposal) to make them more
streamlined while also providing sufficient guidance to the regulated
entities to ensure that the audit committees function in an independent
and efficient manner.
3. With respect to the independence requirement of the current
Finance Board regulation, FHFA requests comments on whether it should
add a new provision that would deem a member director to not be
``independent'' for audit committee purposes if the member institution
at which that director is employed were to have more than a specified
percentage of the Bank's outstanding capital stock or the Bank's total
advances. FHFA also requests comments regarding the level at which a
member's Bank stock or advances could be considered to be too high for
that member's representative to be deemed sufficiently independent to
serve on the Bank's audit committee.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ For example, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
prohibits ``large customers'' from serving on the audit committee of
a regulated institution that has total assets of more than $3
billion at the beginning of the fiscal year. ``Large customer'' is
defined as ``any individual or entity (including a controlling
person of any such entity) which, in the determination of the board
of directors, has such significant direct or indirect credit or
other relationships with the institution, the termination of which
likely would materially and adversely affect the institution's
financial condition or results of operations . . .'' See 12 CFR
Sec. 363.5(b) and Appendix A to 12 CFR 363.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. With respect to the composition of Bank audit committees, which
must include a balance of representatives from community financial
institutions and other members, and of independent and member
directors, FHFA requests comment on whether that provision remains
optimal or whether the regulation should require any other requirements
relating to audit committee composition, such as requiring a majority
of the committee members to be independent directors.
5. With respect to the relationship between the audit committee
regulations and the Prudential Standards, FHFA requests comment on how
best to coordinate the audit committee regulations with the provisions
of Standard 2, which also addresses audit committees, whether FHFA
should address audit committee requirements entirely within either the
regulations or the standards, and what matters would be more
appropriately addressed in a regulation or in the Prudential Standards.
Bank Dividends (1239.34)
The last regulation in Subpart E would carry over with only modest
revisions a Finance Board regulation addressing Bank dividends. See 12
CFR 917.9. Among other things, that provision prohibits a Bank's board
of directors from declaring or paying a dividend based on projected or
anticipated earnings or if the par value of the Bank's stock is
impaired, or would become impaired as a result of paying the dividend.
The proposed rule would not carry over two provisions from Sec. 917.9
whose content either is addressed in another regulation or relates to
statutory provisions that are no longer in effect. FHFA is proposing
not to apply this provision to the Enterprises, in part because it
carries out provisions of the Bank Act that apply only to the Banks and
in part because Enterprise dividends during conservatorship are
governed by the senior preferred stock purchase agreements.
F. Provisions To Be Repealed
As noted above, there are several portions of 12 CFR part 917 and
12 CFR part 1710 that have become obsolete or are no longer necessary,
and FHFA is proposing to repeal them as part of this rulemaking. The
repealed provisions consist of: (1) Several OFHEO regulations that
impose requirements substantively identical to those found in the SOA;
(2) an OFHEO regulation that reserves the right of FHFA to amend its
regulations; (3) an OFHEO regulation that states that FHFA has the
authority under the Safety and Soundness Act to prohibit or restrict
indemnification of board members and executives of the Enterprises; (4)
portions of the OFHEO regulation relating to the responsibilities of
boards of directors that address matters that are covered by the
Prudential Standards; and (5) a Finance Board regulation that requires
Banks to prepare annual budgets.
SOA Provisions
OFHEO regulations at Sec. 1710.13(b), Sec. 1710.16, Sec.
1710.17, Sec. 1710.18, and Sec. 1710.19(c) are substantively
identical to requirements found in the SOA, which apply to the Banks
and Enterprises as registered issuers under the federal securities
laws.\5\ These regulations address reimbursement of compensation paid
to an Enterprise CEO or CFO in cases of accounting restatements due to
material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements,
prohibitions on extensions of credit to Enterprise board members and
executives, certification of quarterly and annual financial statements
by the CEO and CFO, audit partner rotation, and registration and
deregistration of securities. Because the Enterprises and the Banks are
subject to the corresponding SOA statutory provisions, there is no need
to repeat those requirements in the FHFA regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Section 1112 of HERA requires the Banks to maintain
registration of their common stock with the SEC and states that
equity securities of the Enterprises are not exempt from SEC
registration requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Board of Directors
As noted previously, Sec. 1710.15 of the OFHEO regulations
addresses the conduct and responsibilities of Enterprise directors, and
FHFA is proposing to carry over certain of those provisions into Sec.
1239.4 of the proposed rule. FHFA also is proposing to repeal the
remaining portions of Sec. 1710.15, which include the introductory
language, language requiring directors to refer to state law and OFHEO
pronouncements for additional guidance, several provisions requiring
the board to have policies for overseeing corporate strategy, hiring of
qualified senior executives, financial reporting, and extensions of
credit to board members. FHFA believes that these matters are
adequately addressed in other provisions of the proposed rule or in the
Prudential Standards, and need not be adopted as FHFA regulations.
Budget Preparation
Finance Board regulation Sec. 917.8 requires Banks to adopt an
operating and a capital expenditures budget annually. FHFA believes
that the adoption of a budget is a basic duty already encompassed in a
director's duty to act in good faith and with care in overseeing the
affairs of a Bank. Therefore, FHFA is not proposing to carry this
Finance Board provision over into the FHFA regulations.
Part 1720
As noted previously, FHFA is proposing to repeal 12 CFR part 1720
of the OFHEO regulations, which established certain safety and
soundness standards for the Enterprises, because those matters are
addressed by the Prudential Standards and by certain parts of this
proposed rule.
IV. Prudential Standards
The introductory section of the Prudential Standards, which appears
immediately before the enumerated 10 standards, recites general
responsibilities of the boards of directors and senior management of
the regulated entities, as they relate to the matters addressed by the
individual standards. FHFA is proposing to explicitly state that this
introductory
[[Page 4422]]
section is part of the standards, which means that the introductory
provisions would have the same effect and could be enforced in the same
manner as the 10 enumerated standards. To do this, FHFA is proposing to
amend the definition of the term ``standards,'' which appears in 12 CFR
1236.2, by adding an explicit statement that the Prudential Standards
consist of both the introductory section and the existing enumerated
standards. FHFA is also proposing to revise the Prudential Standards by
relocating a sentence that appears immediately after the introductory
language and immediately before the 10 enumerated standards, that reads
as follows: ``The following provisions constitute the prudential
management and operations standards established pursuant to 12 U.S.C.
4513b(a).'' FHFA would relocate this sentence to the beginning of the
Prudential Standards and immediately before the existing introductory
language regarding director and senior management responsibilities.
FHFA is proposing these amendments to ensure that it can use the
remedial provisions of the Prudential Standards to address corporate
governance deficiencies at the regulated entities, as they may relate
to the individual standards, should FHFA believe that those provisions
will be more effective than its other administrative enforcement
authorities.
Harmonization of the Prudential Standards and FHFA Regulations
The Prudential Standards address certain topics that also are
covered by the existing regulations and would continue to be covered by
the proposed regulations, which results in a degree of regulatory
overlap. Despite that overlap, there are meaningful differences between
the two provisions, some of which may be appropriate to preserve. One
key difference is that because the Prudential Standards have been
adopted as guidance, they do not have the force and effect of law, as
do the regulations addressing the same topics. For that reason, the
Prudential Standards may be enforced only by the remedial authorities
in the Prudential Standards statute, and not through the agency's
administrative enforcement powers, which can be used to enforce
regulations, unless a regulated entity's failure to meet a prudential
standard rises to the level of an unsafe or unsound practice. FHFA is
not proposing to address in this regulation all of the potential areas
of overlap between the Prudential Standards and the regulations, but
does intend to initiate a separate project to identify any regulations
that address topics that are also covered by the Prudential Standards,
or would more appropriately be covered by a Prudential Standard. To aid
it in that undertaking, FHFA is requesting comments on how it may best
integrate and harmonize its regulations and the Prudential Standards,
particularly with respect to the seven topics described below.
General Duties of Boards of Directors. To certain degrees, both the
Prudential Standards and the regulations address the general
responsibilities of the boards of directors of the regulated entities.
Within the Standards, the first three principles of the introductory
section address certain director responsibilities, as they relate to
the subject matter of each of the Prudential Standards, such as
adopting business strategies and policies, overseeing management, and
remaining informed about the operations and condition of a regulated
entity. The proposed regulation, at Sec. 1239.4, also would address
the duties and responsibilities of the boards of directors, albeit in a
more global sense, i.e., not simply in relation to the subject matter
of the 10 prudential standards.
Board Briefings. Principles seven and eight of the introductory
section of the Prudential Standards require management to provide the
board of directors with periodic reports on the entity's condition and
performance. This is similar to proposed Sec. 1239.20(b)(4), which
would apply only to the Enterprise and requires management to provide
boards with information that is necessary to allow the directors to
fulfill their fiduciary duties.
Audit Committee Responsibilities. Several provisions of the
Prudential Standards, paragraphs 2.1, 2.3-2.7, and 2.9-2.10, address
audit committee responsibilities, including establishing policies for
and overseeing the internal audit function, evaluating the
effectiveness of the internal audit function, addressing internal audit
issues, and ensuring that audit department personnel are competent and
properly trained. Section 1239.33 of the proposed rule, which is based
on a Finance Board regulation and would apply only to the Banks, also
addresses certain of these same topics.
Risk Management. Although the Prudential Standards do not address
specific duties of the risk committee or the CRO, Standards 8.2, 8.4-
8.5, 8.7, 8.9-8.10, and principles nine and 10 of the introductory
section do require a regulated entity to have a risk management program
that is capable of addressing a number of the topics. Certain of those
topics are also addressed in Sec. 1239.11 of the proposed rule. In
addition, both Sec. 1239.11 and the Prudential Standards provide that
the CRO should report to the CEO and the risk committee.
Internal Controls. Prudential Standards 1.1, 1.3-1.8, 1.10, and
1.14-1.15 require regulated entities to have an adequate and effective
system of internal controls, including a board-approved organizational
structure that clearly assigns responsibilities and reporting
relationships. Under those provisions, a regulated entity also must
establish and monitor appropriate internal control policies. These same
topics and related concepts are also addressed in Sec. 1239.32, which
is based on an existing Finance Board regulation and would apply only
to the Banks.
Code of Conduct. Principle nine of the introductory section of the
Prudential Standards states that board members and senior management of
a regulated entity should conduct themselves in a manner to promote
high ethical standards and establish a culture of compliance throughout
the organization. Section 1239.10, which would apply to all regulated
entities, also addresses the topic of codes of conduct and ethics.
Compliance with Laws and Regulations. Prudential Standards 1-5 and
8-10 each contain a paragraph that states that, with respect to the
subject matter addressed by that standard, a regulated entity should
comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and supervisory guidance.
The subject of regulatory compliance is also addressed in Sec.
1239.12, which requires each entity to have a compliance program.
With respect to each of those topics described above, FHFA requests
comments on whether there are any direct conflicts between the
regulations and the standards, i.e., situations in which an entity
cannot practicably comply with both the regulation and the standard.
FHFA also requests comments on how it should strike the balance for
each of those topics with respect to what issues should be addressed by
regulation and what issues should be addressed by the Prudential
Standards. FHFA further requests comments on the content of the
particular regulations and standards, i.e., whether the current content
remains appropriate, as well as the structure of the regulations or
standards, i.e., whether they should address the underlying subject
matter through a principles-based approach or through the more
prescriptive approach reflected in the current Finance Board
regulations.
[[Page 4423]]
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The proposed regulation does not contain any information collection
requirement that requires the approval of the Office of Management and
Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires an
agency to analyze a proposed regulation's impact on small entities if
the final rule is expected to have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. 5 U.S.C. 605(b). FHFA has
considered the impact of this regulation and determined that it is not
likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities because it applies only to the regulated entities, which
are not small entities for purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects
12 CFR Part 914
Federal Home Loan Banks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
12 CFR Part 917
Federal Home Loan Banks.
12 CFR Part 1236
Administrative practice and procedure, Federal Home Loan Banks,
Government-Sponsored Enterprises, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
12 CFR Part 1239
Administrative practice and procedure, Federal Home Loan Banks,
Government-Sponsored Enterprises, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
12 CFR Part 1710
Administrative practice and procedure, Mortgages.
12 CFR Part 1720
Administrative practice and procedure, Mortgages.
Accordingly, for reasons stated in the Supplementary Information
and under the authority of 12 U.S.C. 1426, 1427, 1432(a), 1436(a),
1440, 4511(b), 4513(a), 4513(b), and 4526, FHFA hereby proposes to
amend subchapter C of chapter IX, subchapter B of chapter XII, and
subchapter C of chapter XVII of title 12 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
CHAPTER IX--FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD
Subchapter C--[Removed and Reserved]
0
1. Subchapter C, consisting of parts 914 and 917, is removed and
reserved.
CHAPTER XII--FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY
Subchapter B--Entity Regulations
PART 1236--PRUDENTIAL MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS STANDARDS
0
2. The authority citation for part 1236 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 4511, 4513(a) and (f), 4513b, and 4526.
0
3. Amend Sec. 1236.2 by revising the definition of ``Standards'' to
read as follows:
Sec. 1236.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Standards means any one or more of the prudential management and
operations standards established by the Director pursuant to 12 U.S.C.
4513b(a), as modified from time to time pursuant to Sec. 1236.3(b),
including the introductory statement of general responsibilities of
boards of directors and senior management of the regulated entities.
Appendix to Part 1236 [Amended]
0
4. Amend the appendix to part 1236 by removing the undesignated
paragraph ``The following provisions constitute the prudential
management and operations standards established pursuant to 12 U.S.C.
4513b(a).'' following paragraph 10 under ``Responsibilities of the
Board of Directors and Senior Management'' and adding it as
introductory text to the appendix.
0
5. Part 1239 is added to read as follows:
PART 1239--RESPONSIBILITIES OF BOARDS OF DIRECTORS, CORPORATE
PRACTICES, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Subpart A--General
Sec.
1239.1 Purpose.
1239.2 Definitions.
Subpart B--Corporate Practices and Procedures Applicable to All
Regulated Entities
1239.3 Law applicable to corporate governance and indemnification
practices.
1239.4 Duties and responsibilities of directors.
1239.5 Board committees.
Subpart C--Other Requirements Applicable to All Regulated Entities
1239.10 Code of conduct and ethics.
1239.11 Risk management.
1239.12 Compliance program.
1239.13 Regulatory reports.
Subpart D--Enterprise Specific Requirements
1239.20 Board of directors of the Enterprises.
1239.21 Compensation of Enterprise board members.
Subpart E--Bank Specific Requirements
1239.30 Bank member product policy.
1239.31 Strategic business plan.
1239.32 Internal control system.
1239.33 Audit committee.
1239.34 Dividends.
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1426, 1427, 1432(a), 1436(a), 1440,
4511(b), 4513(a), 4513(b), and 4526.
Subpart A--General
Sec. 1239.1 Purpose.
FHFA is responsible for supervising and ensuring the safety and
soundness of the regulated entities. In furtherance of those
responsibilities, this part sets forth minimum standards with respect
to responsibilities of boards of directors, corporate practices, and
corporate governance matters of the regulated entities.
Sec. 1239.2 Definitions.
As used in this part (or, as otherwise noted):
Authorizing statutes mean the Federal National Mortgage Association
Charter Act and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Act, which
are codified at 12 U.S.C. 1716 through 1723i and 12 U.S.C. 1451 through
1459, respectively, or the Bank Act, as applicable.
Board member means a member of the board of directors of a
regulated entity.
Board of directors means the board of directors of a regulated
entity.
Business risk means the risk of an adverse impact on a regulated
entity's profitability resulting from external factors as may occur in
both the short and long run.
Community financial institution has the meaning set forth in Sec.
1263.1 of this chapter.
Compensation means any payment of money or the provision of any
other thing of current or potential value in connection with employment
or service as a director.
Credit risk is the potential that a borrower or counterparty will
fail to meet its financial obligations in accordance with agreed terms.
Employee means an individual, other than an executive officer, who
works
[[Page 4424]]
part-time, full-time, or temporarily for a regulated entity.
Executive officer means the chairperson or vice chairperson of the
board of directors of an Enterprise; and, with respect to any regulated
entity, the chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief
operating officer, president, any executive vice president, any senior
vice president, and any individual with similar responsibilities,
without regard to title, who is in charge of a principal business unit,
division, or function, or who reports directly to the chairperson, vice
chairperson, chief operating officer, or chief executive officer or
president of a regulated entity.
Immediate family member means a parent, sibling, spouse, child,
dependent, or any relative sharing the same residence.
Internal auditor means the individual responsible for the internal
audit function at a regulated entity.
Liquidity risk means the risk that a regulated entity will be
unable to meet its financial obligations as they come due or meet the
credit needs of its members and associates in a timely and cost-
efficient manner.
Market risk means the risk that the market value, or estimated fair
value if market value is not available, of a regulated entity's
portfolio will decline as a result of changes in interest rates,
foreign exchange rates, or equity or commodity prices.
NYSE means the New York Stock Exchange.
Operational risk means the risk of loss resulting from inadequate
or failed internal processes, people, or systems, or from external
events (including legal risk but excluding strategic and reputational
risk).
Significant deficiency means a deficiency, or a combination of
deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material
weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with
governance.
SOA means the Sarbanes Oxley Act, Pub. L. 107-204 (2002).
Subpart B--Corporate Practices and Procedures Applicable to All
Regulated Entities
Sec. 1239.3 Law applicable to corporate governance and
indemnification practices.
(a) General. The corporate governance practices and procedures of
each regulated entity, and practices and procedures relating to
indemnification (including advancement of expenses), shall comply with
and be subject to the applicable authorizing statutes and other Federal
law, rules, and regulations, and shall be consistent with the safe and
sound operations of the regulated entities.
(b) Election and designation of body of law. (1) To the extent not
inconsistent with paragraph (a) of this section, each regulated entity
shall elect to follow the corporate governance and indemnification
practices and procedures set forth in one of the following:
(i) The law of the jurisdiction in which the principal office of
the regulated entity is located;
(ii) The Delaware General Corporation Law (Del. Code Ann. Title 8);
or
(iii) The Revised Model Business Corporation Act.
(2) Each regulated entity shall designate in its bylaws the body of
law elected for its corporate governance and indemnification practices
and procedures pursuant to this paragraph.
(c) Indemnification. (1) Subject to paragraphs (a) and (b) of this
section, to the extent applicable, a regulated entity shall indemnify
(and advance the expenses of) its directors, officers, and employees
under such terms and conditions as are determined by its board of
directors. The regulated entity is authorized to maintain insurance for
its directors and any other officer or employee.
(2) Each regulated entity shall have in place policies and
procedures consistent with this section for indemnification of its
directors, officers, and employees. Such policies and procedures shall
address how the board of directors is to approve or deny requests for
indemnification from current and former directors, officers, and
employees, and shall include standards relating to indemnification,
investigations by the board of directors, and review by independent
counsel.
(3) Nothing in this paragraph shall affect any rights to
indemnification (including the advancement of expenses) that a director
or any other officer or employee had with respect to any actions,
omissions, transactions, or facts occurring prior to the effective date
of this paragraph.
(4) FHFA has the authority under the Safety and Soundness Act to
review a regulated entity's indemnification policies, procedures, and
practices, and may limit or prohibit indemnification payments in
furtherance of the safe and sound operations of the regulated entity.
Sec. 1239.4 Duties and responsibilities of directors.
(a) Management of a regulated entity. The management of each
regulated entity shall be vested in its board of directors. While
boards of directors may delegate the execution of operational functions
to officers and employees of the regulated entity, the ultimate
responsibility of each entity's board of directors for that entity's
management is non-delegable. The board of directors of a regulated
entity is responsible for directing the conduct and affairs of the
entity in furtherance of the safe and sound operation of the entity and
shall remain reasonably informed of the condition, activities, and
operations of the entity.
(b) Duties of directors. Each director of a regulated entity shall
have the duty to:
(1) Carry out his or her duties as director in good faith, in a
manner such director believes to be in the best interests of the
regulated entity, and with such care, including reasonable inquiry, as
an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would use under similar
circumstances;
(2) Administer the affairs of the regulated entity fairly and
impartially and, for Bank directors, without discrimination in favor of
or against any member institution;
(3) At the time of election, or within a reasonable time
thereafter, have a working familiarity with basic finance and
accounting practices, including the ability to read and understand the
regulated entity's balance sheet and income statement and to ask
substantive questions of management and the internal and external
auditors;
(4) Direct the operations of the regulated entity in conformity
with the requirements set forth in the authorizing statutes, Safety and
Soundness Act, and this chapter; and
(5) Adopt and maintain in effect at all times bylaws governing the
manner in which the regulated entity administers its affairs. Such
bylaws shall be consistent with applicable laws and regulations
administered by FHFA, and with the body of law designated for the
entity's corporate governance practices and procedures.
(c) Director responsibilities. The responsibilities of the board of
directors include having in place adequate policies and procedures to
assure its oversight of, among other matters, the following:
(1) The risk management and compensation programs of the regulated
entity;
(2) The processes for providing accurate financial reporting and
other disclosures, and communications with stockholders; and
(3) The responsiveness of executive officers in providing accurate
and timely reports to FHFA and in addressing all supervisory concerns
of
[[Page 4425]]
FHFA in a timely and appropriate manner.
(d) Authority regarding staff and outside consultants. (1) In
carrying out its duties and responsibilities under the authorizing
statutes, the Safety and Soundness Act, and this chapter, each
regulated entity's board of directors and all committees thereof shall
have authority to retain staff and outside counsel, independent
accountants, or other outside consultants at the expense of the
regulated entity.
(2) The board of directors and its committees may require that
staff of the regulated entity that provides services to the board or
any committee under paragraph (d)(1) of this section report directly to
the board or such committee, as appropriate.
Sec. 1239.5 Board committees.
(a) General. The board of directors may rely, in directing a
regulated entity, on reports from committees of the board of directors,
provided, however, that no committee of the board of directors shall
have the authority of the board of directors to amend the bylaws and no
committee shall operate to relieve the board of directors or any board
member of a responsibility imposed by applicable law, rule, or
regulation.
(b) Required committees. The board of directors of each regulated
entity shall have committees, however styled, that address each of the
following areas of responsibility: Risk management, audit,
compensation, and corporate governance (in the case of the Banks,
including the nomination of independent board of director candidates,
and, in the case of the Enterprises, including the nomination of all
board of director candidates). The risk management committee and the
audit committee shall not be combined with any other committees. The
board of directors may establish any other committees that it deems
necessary or useful to carrying out its responsibilities, subject to
the provisions of this section. In the case of the Enterprises, board
committees shall comply with the charter, independence, composition,
expertise, duties, responsibilities, and other requirements set forth
under rules issued by the NYSE, and the audit committees shall also
comply with the requirements set forth under section 301 of the SOA.
(c) Charter. Each committee shall adopt, and the board of directors
of each regulated entity shall approve, a formal written charter that
specifies the scope of a committee's powers and responsibilities, as
well as the committee's structure, processes, and membership
requirements.
(d) Frequency of meetings. Each committee of the board of directors
shall meet regularly and with sufficient frequency to carry out its
obligations and duties under applicable laws, rules, regulations, and
guidelines. Such a committee shall also meet with sufficient timeliness
as necessary in light of relevant conditions and circumstances to
fulfill its obligations and duties.
Subpart C--Other Requirements Applicable to All Regulated Entities
Sec. 1239.10 Code of conduct and ethics.
(a) General. A regulated entity shall establish and administer a
written code of conduct and ethics that is reasonably designed to
assure the ability of board members, executive officers, and employees
of the regulated entity to discharge their duties and responsibilities,
on behalf of the regulated entity, in an objective and impartial
manner, and that includes standards required under section 406 of the
SOA, as amended from time to time, and other applicable laws, rules,
and regulations.
(b) Review. Not less often than once every three years, a regulated
entity shall review the adequacy of its code of conduct and ethics for
consistency with practices appropriate to the entity and make any
appropriate revisions to such code.
Sec. 1239.11 Risk management.
(a) Risk management program--(1) Adoption. Each regulated entity's
board of directors shall have in effect at all times an enterprise-wide
risk management program that establishes the regulated entity's risk
profile, aligns the risk profile with the regulated entity's strategies
and objectives, and addresses the regulated entity's exposure to credit
risk, market risk, liquidity risk, business risk and operational risks
and complies with the requirements of this part and with all applicable
FHFA regulations and policies.
(2) Risk profile. The board of directors and senior management
shall ensure that the risk management program aligns the regulated
entity's overall risk profile with its mission objectives.
(b) Risk committee. The board of each regulated entity shall
establish and maintain a risk committee of the board of directors that
is responsible for oversight of enterprise-wide risk management
practices of the regulated entity.
(c) Risk committee structure and requirements. (1) The risk
management program shall include:
(i) Risk limitations appropriate to each business line of the
regulated entity;
(ii) Appropriate policies and procedures relating to risk
management governance, risk management practices, and risk control
infrastructure, and processes and systems for identifying and reporting
risks, including emerging risks;
(iii) Provisions for monitoring compliance with the regulated
entity's risk limit structure and policies and procedures relating to
risk management governance, practices, risk controls, and effective and
timely implementation of corrective actions; and
(iv) Provisions specifying management's authority and independence
to carry out risk management responsibilities, and the integration of
risk management and control objectives in management goals and
compensation structure.
(2) The risk committee shall:
(i) Be chaired by a director not serving in a management capacity
of the regulated entity;
(ii) Have at least one member with risk management expertise that
is commensurate with the regulated entity's capital structure, risk
profile, complexity, activities, size, and other appropriate risk-
related factors;
(iii) Have committee members with an understanding of risk
management principles and practices relevant to the regulated entity;
(iv) Have members with experience developing and applying risk
management practices and procedures, measuring and identifying risks,
and monitoring the testing risk controls with respect to financial
services organizations;
(v) Fully document and maintain records of its meetings, including
its risk management decisions and recommendations; and
(vi) Report directly to the board and not as part of, or combined
with, another committee.
(d) Risk committee responsibilities. The risk committee shall:
(1) Be responsible for documenting and overseeing the enterprise-
wide risk management policies and practices of the regulated entity;
(2) Review and approve an appropriate risk management program that
is commensurate with the regulated entity's capital structure, risk
profile, complexity, activities, size, and other appropriate risk-
related factors; and
(3) Receive and review regular reports from the regulated entity's
chief risk officer.
(e) Chief Risk Officer--(1) Appointment of a chief risk officer
[[Page 4426]]
(CRO). Each regulated entity shall appoint a CRO to implement and
maintain appropriate enterprise-wide risk management practices for the
regulated entity.
(2) Organizational structure of the risk management function. The
CRO shall oversee an independent risk management function, or unit, and
shall report directly to the risk committee and to the chief executive
officer.
(3) Responsibilities of the CRO. The CRO shall be responsible for
oversight of:
(i) Allocating delegated risk limits and monitoring compliance with
such limits;
(ii) Establishing appropriate policies and procedures relating to
risk management governance, practices, and risk controls, and
developing appropriate processes and systems for identifying and
reporting risks, including emerging risks;
(iii) Monitoring risk exposures and risk controls, including
testing risk controls and verifying risk measures; and
(iv) Reporting risk management issues and emerging risks, and
ensuring that risk management issues are effectively resolved in a
timely manner.
(4) The CRO shall execute the responsibilities enumerated in
paragraph (e)(3) of this section on an enterprise-wide basis.
(5) The CRO should have risk management expertise that is
commensurate with the regulated entity's capital structure, risk
profile, complexity, activities, size, and other appropriate risk
related factors.
(6) The CRO shall report regularly to the risk committee and to the
chief executive officer on the entity's compliance with, and the
adequacy of, its current risk management policies and procedures, and
shall recommend any adjustments to such policies and procedures that he
or she considers necessary or appropriate.
(7) The compensation of a regulated entity's CRO shall be
appropriately structured to provide for an objective and independent
assessment of the risks taken by the regulated entity.
Sec. 1239.12 Compliance program.
A regulated entity shall establish and maintain a compliance
program that is reasonably designed to assure that the regulated entity
complies with applicable laws, rules, regulations, and internal
controls. The compliance program shall be headed by a compliance
officer, however styled, who reports directly to the chief executive
officer. The compliance officer also shall report regularly to the
board of directors, or an appropriate committee thereof, on the
adequacy of the entity's compliance policies and procedures, including
the entity's compliance with them, and shall recommend any revisions to
such policies and procedures that he or she considers necessary or
appropriate.
Sec. 1239.13 Regulatory reports.
(a) Reports. Each regulated entity shall file Regulatory Reports
with FHFA in accordance with the forms, instructions, and schedules
issued by FHFA from time to time. If no regularly scheduled reporting
dates are established, Regulatory Reports shall be filed as requested
by FHFA.
(b) Definition. For purposes of this section, the term Regulatory
Report means any report to FHFA of information or raw or summary data
needed to evaluate the safe and sound condition or operations of a
regulated entity, or to determine compliance with any:
(1) Provision in the Bank Act, Safety and Soundness Act, or other
law, order, rule, or regulation;
(2) Condition imposed in writing by FHFA in connection with the
granting of any application or other request by a regulated entity; or
(3) Written agreement entered into between FHFA and a regulated
entity.
Subpart D--Enterprise Specific Requirements
Sec. 1239.20 Board of directors of the Enterprises.
(a) Membership--(1) Limits on service of board members--(i) General
requirement. No board member of an Enterprise may serve on the board of
directors for more than 10 years or past the age of 72, whichever comes
first; provided, however, a board member may serve his or her full term
if he or she has served less than 10 years or is 72 years on the date
of his or her election or appointment to the board; and
(ii) Waiver. Upon written request of an Enterprise, the Director
may waive, in his or her sole discretion and for good cause, the limits
on the service of a board member under paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this
section.
(2) Independence of board members. A majority of seated members of
the board of directors of an Enterprise shall be independent board
members, as defined under rules set forth by the NYSE, as amended from
time to time.
(3) Segregation of duties. The position of chairperson of the board
of directors shall be filled by a person other than the chief executive
officer, who shall also be a director of the Enterprise that is
independent, as defined under the rules set forth by the NYSE, as
amended from time to time.
(b) Meetings, quorum and proxies, information, and annual review--
(1) Frequency of meetings. The board of directors of an Enterprise
shall meet at least eight times a year and no less than once a calendar
quarter to carry out its obligations and duties under applicable laws,
rules, regulations, and guidelines.
(2) Non-management board member meetings. Non-management directors
of an Enterprise shall meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions
without management participation.
(3) Quorum of board of directors; proxies not permissible. For the
transaction of business, a quorum of the board of directors of an
Enterprise is at least a majority of the seated board of directors and
a board member may not vote by proxy.
(4) Information. Management of an Enterprise shall provide a board
member of the Enterprise with such adequate and appropriate information
that a reasonable board member would find important to the fulfillment
of his or her fiduciary duties and obligations.
(5) Annual review. At least annually, the board of directors of an
Enterprise shall review, with appropriate professional assistance, the
requirements of laws, rules, regulations, and guidelines that are
applicable to its activities and duties.
Sec. 1239.21 Compensation of Enterprise board members.
Each Enterprise may pay its directors reasonable and appropriate
compensation for the time required of them, and their necessary and
reasonable expenses, in the performance of their duties.
Subpart E--Bank Specific Requirements
Sec. 1239.30 Bank member products policy.
(a) Adoption and review of member products policy--(1) Adoption.
Each Bank's board of directors shall have in effect at all times a
policy that addresses the Bank's management of products offered by the
Bank to members and housing associates, including but not limited to
advances, standby letters of credit, and acquired member assets,
consistent with the requirements of the Bank Act, paragraph (b) of this
section, and all applicable FHFA regulations and policies.
(2) Review and compliance. Each Bank's board of directors shall:
(i) Review the Bank's member products policy annually;
[[Page 4427]]
(ii) Amend the member products policy as appropriate; and
(iii) Re-adopt the member products policy, including interim
amendments, not less often than every three years.
(b) Member products policy requirements. In addition to meeting any
other requirements set forth in this chapter, each Bank's member
products policy shall:
(1) Address credit underwriting criteria to be applied in
evaluating applications for advances, standby letters of credit, and
renewals;
(2) Address appropriate levels of collateralization, valuation of
collateral and discounts applied to collateral values for advances, and
standby letters of credit;
(3) Address advances-related fees to be charged by each Bank,
including any schedules or formulas pertaining to such fees;
(4) Address standards and criteria for pricing member products,
including differential pricing of advances pursuant to Sec.
1266.5(b)(2) of this chapter, and criteria regarding the pricing of
standby letters of credit, including any special pricing provisions for
standby letters of credit that facilitate the financing of projects
that are eligible for any of the Banks' CICA programs under part 1292
of this chapter;
(5) Provide that, for any draw made by a beneficiary under a
standby letter of credit, the member will be charged a processing fee
calculated in accordance with the requirements of Sec. 1271.6(b) of
this chapter;
(6) Address the maintenance of appropriate systems, procedures and
internal controls; and
(7) Address the maintenance of appropriate operational and
personnel capacity.
Sec. 1239.31 Strategic business plan.
(a) Adoption of strategic business plan. Each Bank's board of
directors shall have in effect at all times a strategic business plan
that describes how the business activities of the Bank will achieve the
mission of the Bank consistent with part 1265 of this chapter.
Specifically, each Bank's strategic business plan shall:
(1) Enumerate operating goals and objectives for each major
business activity and for all new business activities, which must
include plans for maximizing activities that further the Bank's housing
finance and community lending mission, consistent with part 1265 of
this chapter;
(2) Discuss how the Bank will address credit needs and market
opportunities identified through ongoing market research and
consultations with members, associates, and public and private
organizations;
(3) Establish quantitative performance goals for Bank products
related to multi-family housing, small business, small farm and small
agri-business lending;
(4) Describe any proposed new business activities or enhancements
of existing activities; and
(5) Be supported by appropriate and timely research and analysis of
relevant market developments and member and associate demand for Bank
products and services.
(b) Review and monitoring. Each Bank's board of directors shall:
(1) Review the Bank's strategic business plan at least annually;
(2) Re-adopt the Bank's strategic business plan, including interim
amendments, not less often than every three years; and
(3) Establish management reporting requirements and monitor
implementation of the strategic business plan and the operating goals
and objectives contained therein.
(c) Report to FHFA. Each Bank shall submit to FHFA annually a
report analyzing and describing the Bank's performance in achieving the
goals described in paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
Sec. 1239.32 Internal control system.
(a) Establishment and maintenance. (1) Each Bank shall establish
and maintain an effective internal control system that addresses:
(i) The efficiency and effectiveness of Bank activities;
(ii) The safeguarding of Bank assets;
(iii) The reliability, completeness, and timely reporting of
financial and management information, and transparency of such
information to the Bank's board of directors and to FHFA; and
(iv) Compliance with applicable laws, regulations, policies,
supervisory determinations, and directives of the Bank's board of
directors and senior management.
(2) Ongoing internal control activities necessary to maintain the
internal control system required under paragraph (a)(1) of this section
shall include, but are not limited to:
(i) Top level reviews by the Bank's board of directors and senior
management, including review of financial presentations and performance
reports;
(ii) Activity controls, including review of standard performance
and exception reports by department-level management on an appropriate
periodic basis;
(iii) Physical and procedural controls to safeguard, and prevent
the unauthorized use of, assets;
(iv) Monitoring for compliance with the risk tolerance limits set
forth in the Bank's risk management policy;
(v) Any required approvals and authorizations for specific
activities; and
(vi) Any required verifications and reconciliations for specific
activities.
(b) Internal control responsibilities of Banks' boards of
directors. Each Bank's board of directors shall ensure that the
internal control system required under paragraph (a)(1) of this section
is established and maintained, and shall oversee senior management's
implementation of such a system on an ongoing basis, by:
(1) Conducting periodic discussions with senior management
regarding the effectiveness of the internal control system;
(2) Ensuring that an internal audit of the internal control system
is performed annually and that such annual audit is reasonably designed
to be effective and comprehensive;
(3) Requiring that internal control deficiencies be reported to the
Bank's board of directors in a timely manner and that such deficiencies
are addressed promptly;
(4) Conducting a timely review of evaluations of the effectiveness
of the internal control system made by internal auditors, external
auditors, and FHFA examiners;
(5) Directing senior management to address promptly and effectively
recommendations and concerns expressed by internal auditors, external
auditors, and FHFA examiners regarding weaknesses in the internal
control system;
(6) Reporting any internal control deficiencies found, and the
corrective action taken, to FHFA in a timely manner;
(7) Establishing, documenting, and communicating an organizational
structure that clearly shows lines of authority within the Bank,
provides for effective communication throughout the Bank, and ensures
that there are no gaps in the lines of authority;
(8) Reviewing all delegations of authority to specific personnel or
committees and requiring that such delegations state the extent of the
authority and responsibilities delegated; and
(9) Establishing reporting requirements, including specifying the
nature and frequency of reports it receives.
(c) Internal control responsibilities of Banks' senior management.
Each Bank's
[[Page 4428]]
senior management shall be responsible for carrying out the directives
of the Bank's board of directors, including the establishment,
implementation, and maintenance of the internal control system required
under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, by:
(1) Establishing, implementing, and effectively communicating to
Bank personnel policies and procedures that are adequate to ensure that
internal control activities necessary to maintain an effective internal
control system, including the activities enumerated in paragraph (a)(2)
of this section, are an integral part of the daily functions of all
Bank personnel;
(2) Ensuring that all Bank personnel fully understand and comply
with all policies, procedures, and legal requirements applicable to
their positions and responsibilities;
(3) Ensuring that there is appropriate segregation of duties among
Bank personnel and that personnel are not assigned conflicting
responsibilities;
(4) Establishing effective paths of communication upward, downward,
and across the organization in order to ensure that Bank personnel
receive necessary and appropriate information, including:
(i) Information relating to the operational policies and procedures
of the Bank;
(ii) Information relating to the actual operational performance of
the Bank;
(iii) Adequate and comprehensive internal financial, operational,
and compliance data; and
(iv) External market information about events and conditions that
are relevant to decision making;
(5) Developing and implementing procedures that translate the major
business strategies and policies established by the Bank's board of
directors into operating standards;
(6) Ensuring adherence to the lines of authority and responsibility
established by the Bank's board of directors;
(7) Overseeing the implementation and maintenance of management
information and other systems;
(8) Establishing and implementing an effective system to track
internal control weaknesses and the actions taken to correct them; and
(9) Monitoring and reporting to the Bank's board of directors the
effectiveness of the internal control system on an ongoing basis.
Sec. 1239.33 Audit committee.
(a) Establishment. The audit committee of each Bank established as
required by Sec. 1239.5(b) of this chapter, shall be consistent with
the requirements set forth in this section.
(b) Composition. (1) The audit committee shall comprise five or
more persons drawn from the Bank's board of directors, each of whom
shall meet the criteria of independence set forth in paragraph (c) of
this section.
(2) The audit committee shall include a balance of representatives
of:
(i) Community financial institutions and other members; and
(ii) Independent and member directors of the Bank.
(3) The terms of audit committee members shall be appropriately
staggered so as to provide for continuity of service.
(4) At least one member of the audit committee shall have extensive
accounting or related financial management experience.
(c) Independence. Any member of the Bank's board of directors shall
be considered to be sufficiently independent to serve as a member of
the audit committee if that director does not have a disqualifying
relationship with the Bank or its management that would interfere with
the exercise of that director's independent judgment. Such
disqualifying relationships include, but are not limited to:
(1) Being employed by the Bank in the current year or any of the
past five years;
(2) Accepting any compensation from the Bank other than
compensation for service as a board director;
(3) Serving or having served in any of the past five years as a
consultant, advisor, promoter, underwriter, or legal counsel of or to
the Bank; or
(4) Being an immediate family member of an individual who is, or
has been in any of the past five years, employed by the Bank as an
executive officer.
(d) Charter. (1) The audit committee and the board of directors of
each Bank shall:
(i) Review, and assess the adequacy of, the Bank's audit committee
charter on an annual basis;
(ii) Amend the audit committee charter as appropriate; and
(iii) Re-adopt and re-approve, respectively, the Bank's audit
committee charter not less often than every three years.
(2) Each Bank's audit committee charter shall:
(i) Provide that the audit committee has the responsibility to
select, evaluate and, where appropriate, replace the internal auditor
and that the internal auditor may be removed only with the approval of
the audit committee;
(ii) Provide that the internal auditor shall report directly to the
audit committee on substantive matters and that the internal auditor is
ultimately accountable to the audit committee and board of directors;
and
(iii) Provide that both the internal auditor and the external
auditor shall have unrestricted access to the audit committee without
the need for any prior management knowledge or approval.
(e) Duties. Each Bank's audit committee shall have the duty to:
(1) Direct senior management to maintain the reliability and
integrity of the accounting policies and financial reporting and
disclosure practices of the Bank;
(2) Review the basis for the Bank's financial statements and the
external auditor's opinion rendered with respect to such financial
statements (including the nature and extent of any significant changes
in accounting principles or the application therein) and ensure that
policies are in place that are reasonably designed to achieve
disclosure and transparency regarding the Bank's true financial
performance and governance practices;
(3) Oversee the internal audit function by:
(i) Reviewing the scope of audit services required, significant
accounting policies, significant risks and exposures, audit activities,
and audit findings;
(ii) Assessing the performance and determining the compensation of
the internal auditor; and
(iii) Reviewing and approving the internal auditor's work plan.
(4) Oversee the external audit function by:
(i) Approving the external auditor's annual engagement letter;
(ii) Reviewing the performance of the external auditor; and
(iii) Making recommendations to the Bank's board of directors
regarding the appointment, renewal, or termination of the external
auditor;
(5) Provide an independent, direct channel of communication between
the Bank's board of directors and the internal and external auditors;
(6) Conduct or authorize investigations into any matters within the
audit committee's scope of responsibilities;
(7) Ensure that senior management has established and is
maintaining an adequate internal control system within the Bank by:
(i) Reviewing the Bank's internal control system and the resolution
of identified material weaknesses and significant deficiencies in the
internal control system, including the prevention or detection of
management override or compromise of the internal control system; and
[[Page 4429]]
(ii) Reviewing the programs and policies of the Bank designed to
ensure compliance with applicable laws, regulations and policies, and
monitoring the results of these compliance efforts;
(8) Review the policies and procedures established by senior
management to assess and monitor implementation of the Bank's strategic
business plan and the operating goals and objectives contained therein;
and
(9) Report periodically its findings to the Bank's board of
directors.
(f) Meetings. The audit committee shall prepare written minutes of
each audit committee meeting.
Sec. 1239.34 Dividends.
A Bank's board of directors may not declare or pay a dividend based
on projected or anticipated earnings and may not declare or pay a
dividend if the par value of the Bank's stock is impaired or is
projected to become impaired after paying such dividend.
CHAPTER XVII--OFFICE OF FEDERAL HOUSING ENTERPRISE OVERSIGHT,
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Subchapter C--Safety and Soundness
PART 1710--[REMOVED]
0
6. Remove part 1710.
PART 1720--[REMOVED]
0
7. Remove part 1720.
Dated: January 15, 2014.
Melvin L. Watt,
Director, Federal Housing Finance Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014-01173 Filed 1-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8070-01-P