Minimum Essential Coverage and Other Rules Regarding the Shared Responsibility Payment for Individuals, 4302-4308 [2014-01439]
Download as PDF
4302
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 17 / Monday, January 27, 2014 / Proposed Rules
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Amendment 39–11096 (64 FR
14820, March 29, 1999), and adding the
following new AD:
■
SOCATA: Docket No. FAA–2014–0031;
Directorate Identifier 2013–CE–054–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by March 13,
2014.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 99–07–11,
Amendment 39–11096 (64 FR 14820, March
29, 1999).
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to SOCATA TBM 700
airplanes, manufacturer serial numbers
(MSN) 1 through 98, 100 through 156, and
158 through 161, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association of America
(ATA) Code 55: Stabilizers.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI
describes the unsafe condition as cracks on
the outboard hinge fittings. We are issuing
this AD to require the use of new service
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:16 Jan 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
information issued by DAHER–SOCATA to
eliminate the stress on the outboard hinge
fittings, which is causing the cracks. If this
condition is not prevented, the outboard
hinge fittings could fail causing reduced
structural integrity of the horizontal
stabilizer, which could result in reduced
control.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on January
17, 2014.
Pat Mullen,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–01470 Filed 1–24–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
(f) Actions and Compliance
Unless already done, within the next 100
hours time-in-service after the effective date
of this AD or within the next 12 months after
the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first, install shims on the outboard
hinge fittings of the horizontal stabilizer. Do
the modification following the
Accomplishment Instructions in DAHER–
SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB 70–080, Amendment 2, dated
August 2012.
(g) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Albert Mercado, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4119; fax: (816) 329–
4090; email: alebert.mercado@faa.gov. Before
using any approved AMOC on any airplane
to which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(h) Related Information
Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) AD No. 2013–0035, dated
February 22, 2013, for related information.
You may examine the MCAI on the Internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating it in Docket No. FAA–2014–
0031. For service information related to this
AD, contact SOCATA, Direction des Services,
65921 Tarbes Cedex 9, France; telephone +33
(0) 5 62 41 73 00; fax +33 (0) 5 62 41 76 54,
or for North America: SOCATA NORTH
AMERICA, North Perry Airport, 7501 South
Airport Road, Pembroke Pines, Florida
33023; telephone: (954) 8–9893–1400; fax:
(954) 964–4141; email: mysocata@
socata.daher.com; Internet:
www.mysocata.com. You may review copies
of the referenced service information at the
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call (816) 329–4148.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–141036–13]
RIN 1545–BL91
Minimum Essential Coverage and
Other Rules Regarding the Shared
Responsibility Payment for Individuals
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
and notice of public hearing.
AGENCY:
This document contains
proposed regulations relating to the
requirement to maintain minimum
essential coverage enacted by the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act and the Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act of 2010, as amended
by the TRICARE Affirmation Act and
Public Law 111–173. These proposed
regulations affect individual taxpayers
who may be liable for the shared
responsibility payment for not
maintaining minimum essential
coverage. This document also provides
notice of a public hearing on these
proposed regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received by
April 28, 2014. Outlines of topics to be
discussed at the public hearing
scheduled for May 21, 2014, at 10 a.m.,
must be received by April 28, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–141036–13), room
5205, Internal Revenue Service, P.O.
Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions
may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and
4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–141036–
13), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC, or sent electronically
via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov (IRS REG–141036–
13). The public hearing will be held in
the IRS Auditorium, Internal Revenue
Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
Sue-Jean Kim or John B. Lovelace, (202)
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27JAP1.SGM
27JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 17 / Monday, January 27, 2014 / Proposed Rules
317–7006; concerning the submission of
comments, the public hearing, and to be
placed on the building access list to
attend the public hearing,
Oluwafunmilayo Taylor, (202) 317–6901
(not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information
contained in § 1.5000A–3(h)(3) and
§ 1.5000A–4(a)(1) of this notice of
proposed rulemaking has been reviewed
and approved by the Office of
Management and Budget in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) under control
number 1545–0074 in conjunction with
the final regulations under section
5000A (TD 9632). The information is
necessary to determine whether the
individual shared responsibility
provision applies to a taxpayer and, if
it applies, the amount of the payment.
Comments on the collection of
information should be sent to the Office
of Management and Budget, Attn: Desk
Officer for the Department of the
Treasury, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC
20503, with copies to the Internal
Revenue Service, Attn: IRS Reports
Clearance Officer,
SE:W:CAR:MP:T:T:SP, Washington, DC
20224.
Comments on the collection of
information should be received by
March 28, 2014.
Background
The Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act, Public Law 111–148 (124 Stat.
119 (2010)), and the Health Care and
Education Reconciliation Act of 2010,
Public Law 111–152 (124 Stat. 1029
(2010)) (collectively, the Affordable Care
Act), added section 5000A to the
Internal Revenue Code. Section 5000A
was subsequently amended by the
TRICARE Affirmation Act of 2010,
Public Law 111–159 (124 Stat. 1123)
and Public Law 111–173 (124 Stat.
1215). Section 5000A provides that, for
months beginning after December 31,
2013, a nonexempt individual must
maintain minimum essential coverage
or make a shared responsibility
payment.
Final regulations under section 5000A
(TD 9632) were published on August 30,
2013 (78 FR 53646). The preamble to the
final regulations indicates that
subsequent proposed regulations will
provide that coverage under certain
government-sponsored programs is not
government-sponsored minimum
essential coverage. The preamble to the
final regulations also describes rules to
be included in subsequent regulations
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:16 Jan 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
for determining, for purposes of the lack
of affordable coverage exemption, the
required contribution for individuals
eligible to enroll in an eligible
employer-sponsored plan that provides
employer contributions to health
reimbursement arrangements (HRAs) or
wellness program incentives. These
proposed regulations address these
issues, consistent with the rules
contemplated in the preamble to the
final regulations. In addition, these
proposed regulations provide or clarify
rules under section 5000A addressing
the definition of excepted benefits,
hardship exemptions that may be
claimed on a Federal income tax return,
and the computation of the monthly
penalty amount.
Minimum Essential Coverage
Section 5000A(f)(1) enumerates the
types of health care coverage that
qualify as minimum essential coverage.
They include, among others, coverage
under specified government-sponsored
programs and health benefits coverage
that the Secretary of Health and Human
Services (HHS), in coordination with
the Secretary of the Treasury, recognizes
as minimum essential coverage. Under
section 5000A(f)(1)(A), specified
government-sponsored programs
include, among other things, the
Medicaid program under title XIX of the
Social Security Act and medical
coverage under chapter 55 of title 10,
United States Code, including the
TRICARE program.
Section 1.5000A–2(b)(1)(ii) of the
final regulations provides that
government-sponsored programs that
are minimum essential coverage include
the Medicaid program under Title XIX
of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1396 and following sections) other than
certain Medicaid coverage that may
provide limited benefits: (1) Optional
coverage of family planning services
under section 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XXI) of
the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1396a(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XXI)); (2) optional
coverage of tuberculosis-related services
under section 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XII) of
the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1396a(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XI)); (3) coverage of
pregnancy-related services under
section 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(IX) of the
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1396a(a)(10)(A)(ii)(IX)); and (4) coverage
limited to the treatment of emergency
medical conditions in accordance with
8 U.S.C. 1611(b)(1)(A), as authorized by
section 1903(v) of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(v)).
Excepted Benefits
Under section 5000A(f)(3) and
§ 1.5000A–2(g) of the final regulations,
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4303
minimum essential coverage does not
include any health insurance coverage
that consists solely of excepted benefits
described in section 2791(c)(1), (c)(2),
(c)(3), or (c)(4) of the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg–91(c)), or
regulations issued under these
provisions (45 CFR 148.220) (excepted
benefits regulations). In general,
excepted benefits are benefits that are
limited in scope or are conditional.
Under 2791(b)(1) of the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg–91(b)(1)),
health insurance coverage means
benefits consisting of medical care
(provided directly, through insurance or
reimbursement, or otherwise and
including items and services paid for as
medical care) under any hospital or
medical service policy or certificate,
hospital or medical service plan
contract, or health maintenance
organization contract offered by a health
insurance issuer.
Lack of Affordable Coverage Exemption
Section 5000A(e)(1) and § 1.5000A–
3(e)(1) of the final regulations provide
that an individual is exempt for a month
when the individual cannot afford
minimum essential coverage. For this
purpose, an individual cannot afford
minimum essential coverage if the
individual’s required contribution
(determined on an annual basis) for
minimum essential coverage exceeds a
percentage (8 percent for 2014) of the
individual’s household income for the
most recent taxable year for which the
Secretary of HHS, in consultation with
the Secretary of the Treasury,
determines information is available.
For individuals ineligible for coverage
under an eligible employer-sponsored
plan, the required contribution is the
annual premium for the applicable plan
reduced by the premium tax credit
allowable under section 36B for the
taxable year (determined as if the
individual enrolled in a plan through an
Exchange for the entire taxable year).
The applicable plan is the lowest cost
bronze plan available in the Exchange
serving the rating area where the
individual resides that would cover all
members of the individual’s nonexempt
family taking into account the rating
factors that an Exchange would use to
determine the cost of coverage. If the
Exchange serving the rating area where
the individual resides does not offer a
single bronze plan that would cover all
members of the individual’s nonexempt
family, the premium for the applicable
plan is the sum of the premiums for the
lowest cost bronze plans available in the
Exchange that provide coverage for all
members of the nonexempt family.
E:\FR\FM\27JAP1.SGM
27JAP1
4304
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 17 / Monday, January 27, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Hardship Exemptions
Section 5000A(e)(5) and § 1.5000A–
3(h)(1) of the final regulations provide
that, in general, an individual is exempt
for a month that includes a day on
which the individual has in effect a
hardship exemption certification. A
hardship exemption certification is
issued by an Exchange under section
1311(d)(4)(H) of the Affordable Care Act
(42 U.S.C. 18031(d)(4)(H)) certifying that
the individual has suffered a hardship
(as that term is defined in 45 CFR
155.605(g)) with respect to the
individual’s ability to obtain coverage
under a qualified health plan. Section
1.5000A–3(h)(3) of the final regulations
provides that a taxpayer who meets the
requirements of 45 CFR 155.605(g)(3) or
45 CFR 155.605(g)(5) may claim a
hardship exemption for a calendar year
on a Federal income tax return.
Pursuant to the authority under 45
CFR 155.605(g), the Secretary of HHS
has established an additional hardship
exemption that applies to individuals
enrolling in a qualified health plan
through an Exchange prior to the close
of the initial open enrollment period.
Specifically, an individual may claim a
hardship exemption for the months
prior to the effective date of the
individual’s coverage on a Federal
income tax return for 2014 without the
need to request an exemption from the
Exchange. See HHS Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services,
Shared Responsibility Provision
Question and Answer (Oct. 28, 2013).
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Monthly Penalty Amount
Under section 5000A(c)(1), the
amount of the shared responsibility
payment imposed on any taxpayer for
any taxable year is equal to the lesser of
(A) the sum of monthly penalty amounts
for months when one or more failures to
maintain minimum essential coverage
occurred, or (B) an amount equal to the
national average premium for qualified
health plans that satisfy requirements
enumerated in section 5000A(c).
Under section 5000A(c)(2), the
monthly penalty amount, for any
month, is 1⁄12 of the greater of (A) the
flat dollar amount, or (B) a specified
percentage of the taxpayer’s household
income over the taxpayer’s applicable
return filing threshold (as defined in
section 6012(a)(1)).
The flat dollar amount is the lesser of
(A) the sum of the defined applicable
dollar amounts for all individuals in the
shared responsibility family who did
not have minimum essential coverage in
a particular month, or (B) 300 percent of
the applicable dollar amount. Under
section 5000A(c)(3), the applicable
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:16 Jan 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
dollar amount is $95 in 2014, $325 in
2015, and $695 in 2016. After 2016, the
applicable dollar amount will be
indexed by a cost-of-living adjustment.
The specified percentage is 1.0
percent for taxable years beginning in
2014, 2.0 percent for taxable years
beginning in 2015, and 2.5 percent for
taxable years beginning after 2015.
The final regulations incorporate
these provisions.
Explanation of Provisions
I. Minimum Essential Coverage
A. Medicaid-related programs
1. Coverage for the Medically Needy
The Social Security Act provides
states with flexibility to extend
Medicaid eligibility to individuals with
high medical expenses who would be
eligible for Medicaid but for their
income level (medically needy
individuals). See section 1902(a)(10)(C)
of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1396a(a)(10)(C)) and 42 CFR 435.300
and following sections. In general,
individuals whose income is in excess
of the maximum allowed for Medicaid
eligibility but who are otherwise eligible
for Medicaid may ‘‘spend down’’ their
income, based on incurred medical
expenses, and thereby become eligible
for the benefits provided for medically
needy individuals in the state. States
providing coverage to medically needy
individuals must establish a ‘‘budget
period’’ lasting from one to six months.
Eligibility for coverage as a medically
needy individual, which must be
determined each budget period, is
provided only after an individual incurs
sufficient medical expenses to spend
down to the qualifying income level.
Thus, depending on an individual’s
medical needs and the options exercised
by the state program, eligibility may be
assessed as frequently as every month,
and an individual may move in and out
of coverage for medically needy
individuals multiple times in a year.
States are permitted, and some states
have adopted the option, to offer
benefits to the medically needy that are
more limited than the benefits generally
provided to Medicaid beneficiaries.
Because the benefits provided to
medically needy individuals are not
required to be comprehensive, the
coverage is analogous to coverage
consisting of excepted benefits that is
not minimum essential coverage under
section 5000A(f)(3). Other types of
coverage under government-sponsored
programs that potentially provide
limited benefits are not minimum
essential coverage under the final
regulations (for example, the optional
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
coverage of family planning services
under section 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XXI) of
the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1396a(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XXI)), and the
optional coverage of tuberculosis-related
services under section
1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XII) of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1396a(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XII)). Accordingly,
the proposed regulations provide that
coverage for medically needy
individuals generally is not governmentsponsored minimum essential coverage.
To the extent such coverage in a
particular state is comprehensive
coverage, such coverage may be
recognized as minimum essential
coverage by the Secretary of HHS, in
coordination with the Secretary of the
Treasury, under section 5000A(f)(1)(E).
Because individuals receiving
medically needy coverage may not
know at the time of open enrollment for
the 2014 plan year that coverage under
the program is not minimum essential
coverage, Notice 2014–10 (available at
www.irs.gov), (see § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b)
of this chapter), released concurrently
with these proposed regulations,
provides that a taxpayer is not liable for
the shared responsibility payment for a
month in 2014 with respect to
individuals in the taxpayer’s shared
responsibility family who are enrolled
in medically needy coverage.
2. Section 1115 Demonstration Projects
Section 1115 of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 1315) authorizes the
Secretary of HHS to approve
experimental, pilot, or demonstration
projects that promote the objectives of
the Medicaid program (‘‘Section 1115
demonstration projects’’). Some Section
1115 demonstration projects involve
waivers of Medicaid requirements that
affect individuals eligible under the
approved Medicaid state plan (for
instance, waivers to permit changes in
manners of delivering Medicaid
services), but do not change the basic
requirement to provide comprehensive
Medicaid coverage. Other Section 1115
demonstration projects, authorized
under section 1115(a)(2) of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1315(a)(2)),
allow a state to extend benefits to
additional populations (expansion
populations). Because the expansion
populations are not described in
approved Medicaid state plans, the
coverage authorized under those Section
1115 demonstration projects is not
required to be comprehensive and may
be limited. Accordingly, the proposed
regulations provide that coverage under
Section 1115 demonstration projects
authorized under section 1115(a)(2) of
the Social Security Act generally is not
E:\FR\FM\27JAP1.SGM
27JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 17 / Monday, January 27, 2014 / Proposed Rules
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
government-sponsored minimum
essential coverage. However,
comprehensive coverage for expansion
populations under certain Section 1115
demonstration programs may be
recognized as minimum essential
coverage by the Secretary of HHS, in
coordination with the Secretary of the
Treasury, under section 5000A(f)(1)(E).
The Treasury Department and IRS
understand that individuals receiving
benefits as part of an expansion
population under a demonstration
project authorized under section
1115(a)(2) may not know at open
enrollment for the 2014 plan year that
the coverage they receive under a
Section 1115 demonstration project is
not minimum essential coverage.
Accordingly, Notice 2014–10 (available
at www.irs.gov), (see
§ 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter),
released concurrently with these
proposed regulations, provides that a
taxpayer will not be liable for the shared
responsibility payment for a month in
2014 with respect to individuals in the
taxpayer’s shared responsibility family
receiving benefits as part of an
expansion population authorized under
section 1115(a)(2).
B. Limited-Benefit Coverage Under
Chapter 55 of Title 10, U.S.C.
Similar to Medicaid programs that
provide a limited scope of benefits, two
types of coverage provided under
chapter 55 of Title 10, U.S.C., do not
provide a scope of benefits comparable
to the full TRICARE program under the
same chapter. Under sections 1079(a),
1086(c)(1), and 1086(d)(1) of Title 10,
U.S.C., the first type of limited-benefit
coverage is provided for certain
individuals who are excluded from
TRICARE coverage for health care
services from private sector providers
and only eligible for space available care
in a facility of the uniformed services
(space available care). There is no
guarantee of care and any care received
is subject to the availability of space and
facilities, as well as the capabilities of
the medical and dental staff. Coverage
potentially available to an affected
individual may not be accessible if there
is no space available at the facility
where the individual seeks care or
treatment. These affected individuals
are not entitled to comprehensive health
care coverage under chapter 55 of Title
10, U.S.C., and the Department of
Defense has no statutory authority to
pay claims for any outside care
provided to these individuals.
Under sections 1074a and 1074b of
Title 10, U.S.C., the second type of
limited-benefit coverage is provided for
certain individuals who are not on
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:16 Jan 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
active duty and are entitled to episodic
care for an injury, illness, or disease
incurred or aggravated in the line of
duty (line-of-duty care). Line-of-duty
care is limited to care appropriate for
treating the covered injury, illness, or
disease. This type of limited-benefit
coverage is similar to coverage
consisting of excepted benefits,
including workers’ compensation, that
is not minimum essential coverage
under section 5000A(f)(3).
Neither of these types of limitedbenefit coverage offers beneficiaries
coverage for comprehensive medical
care. Accordingly, the proposed
regulations provide that Military Health
System eligibility limited only to space
available care and line-of-duty care are
not government-sponsored programs
providing minimum essential coverage.
Because individuals enrolled in space
available care or line-of-duty care may
not know at open enrollment for the
2014 plan year that space available care
and line-of-duty care are not minimum
essential coverage, Notice 2014–10
(available at www.irs.gov), (see
§ 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter),
released concurrently with these
proposed regulations, provides that a
taxpayer is not liable for the shared
responsibility payment for a month in
2014 with respect to individuals in the
taxpayer’s shared responsibility family
who are enrolled in either space
available care or line-of-duty care.
C. Excepted Benefits
Section 5000A(f)(3) and § 1.5000A–
2(g) of the final regulations provide that
minimum essential coverage does not
include health insurance coverage that
consists solely of excepted benefits. In
the rulemaking process under section
5000A, the Treasury Department and
the IRS have provided that minimum
essential coverage does not include
plans or programs that do not provide
a comprehensive scope of benefits. See,
for example, § 1.5000A–2(b)(1)(ii)(A)
describing the Medicaid program for
family planning services and § 1.5000A–
2(b)(1)(v) excluding from the definition
of minimum essential coverage medical
care for veterans that does not provide
comprehensive health care benefits.
Consistent with this treatment, the
proposed regulations clarify that
minimum essential coverage excludes
any coverage, whether insurance or
otherwise, that consists solely of
excepted benefits.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4305
II. Exemption for Individuals Who
Cannot Afford Coverage
A. Health Reimbursement Arrangements
The preamble to the final regulations
provides that guidance on how
employer contributions to HRAs are
counted in determining an employee’s
or a related individual’s required
contribution will be consistent with
final rulemaking under section 36B. The
regulations proposed under section 36B
addressing the treatment of employer
contributions to HRAs were published
on May 3, 2013 (78 FR 25909) (the
section 36B proposed regulations). The
section 36B proposed regulations
provide that amounts newly made
available for the current plan year under
an HRA that is integrated with an
eligible employer-sponsored plan are
counted toward the employee’s required
contribution in determining the
affordability of the coverage if the
employee may use the amounts only for
premiums or may choose to use the
amounts for either premiums or cost
sharing. An HRA generally must be
integrated with an eligible employersponsored plan to satisfy the market
reform provisions imposed by Title I of
the Affordable Care Act. See Notice
2013–54 (2013–40 IRB 287 (September
30, 2013)), (see § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of
this chapter), which is available at
www.irs.gov.
Similar to the 36B proposed
regulations, under these proposed
regulations, an employer’s new
contributions to an HRA are taken into
account in determining (in other words,
they reduce) an employee’s required
contribution if the HRA is integrated
with an employer-sponsored plan and
the employee may use the amounts to
pay premiums. Amounts in an HRA that
may be used only for cost-sharing are
not taken into account when
determining affordability because they
cannot affect the employee’s out-ofpocket cost of acquiring minimum
essential coverage.
B. Contributions to a Cafeteria Plan
Many employers maintain section 125
cafeteria plans under which employees
are given the option of making salary
reduction contributions toward the cost
of non-taxable benefits or receiving an
equivalent amount in taxable cash. The
nontaxable benefit choices may include
both health and non-health benefits. If
an employee elects to make salary
reduction contributions and to have
those amounts applied towards the cost
of premiums, those contributions are
treated as employee contributions, and
the employee’s household income is
increased by the amount of the
E:\FR\FM\27JAP1.SGM
27JAP1
4306
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 17 / Monday, January 27, 2014 / Proposed Rules
contributions for purposes of the
affordability determination under
section 5000A(e)(1)(A).
Alternatively, employers may make
contributions that can be received only
in the form of nontaxable benefits under
the plan (sometimes referred to as flex
contributions). In addition, some
employers subsidize benefits available
under the section 125 cafeteria plan so
that an employee can elect a benefit
while making salary reduction
contributions in an amount less than the
value of the benefit. Some employers
will provide contributions even if the
employee declines the subsidized
benefit. For example, an employer might
offer a benefit with a value of $10,000
for an employee salary reduction of
$4,000, but provide other benefits with
a value of $3,000 if the employee
declines the $10,000 benefit.
Comments are requested on the
treatment of employer contributions
under a section 125 cafeteria plan for
purposes of section 5000A to the extent
employees may not opt to receive the
employer contributions as a taxable
benefit, such as cash. Specifically,
comments are requested regarding how
these contributions should be taken into
account for purposes of determining the
affordability of coverage.
III. Wellness Program Incentives
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
A. Individuals Eligible for Employersponsored Coverage
The preamble to the final section
5000A regulations provides that
guidance on how wellness program
incentives are counted in determining
the affordability of coverage under
section 5000A will be consistent with
final rulemaking under section 36B. The
proposed section 36B regulations
address the treatment of wellness
incentives by providing that, for
purposes of determining an individual’s
required contribution for employersponsored coverage under section
36B(c)(2)(C)(i), wellness program
incentives are treated as earned only if
the incentives relate to tobacco use. This
rule is consistent with other Affordable
Care Act provisions (such as one
allowing insurers to charge higher
premiums based on tobacco use).
Accordingly, these proposed regulations
provide that, for purposes of
determining for section 5000A an
individual’s required contribution for
coverage under an employer-sponsored
plan, wellness program incentives are
treated as earned only if the incentives
relate to tobacco use.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:16 Jan 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
B. Individuals Ineligible for Employersponsored Coverage
In general, for individuals ineligible
for coverage under employer-sponsored
plans, the required contribution is the
premium for the applicable plan
reduced by the maximum amount of any
premium tax credit allowable under
section 36B for the taxable year. In
general, the applicable plan is the
lowest cost bronze plan available in the
individual market through the Exchange
serving the rating area in which the
individual resides that would cover all
members of the individual’s nonexempt
family. Pursuant to section 36B(b)(3)(C),
the premium tax credit allowable under
section 36B is calculated by reference to
the adjusted monthly premium for the
applicable second lowest cost silver
plan without regard to any premium
discounts or rebates in a state
participating in the wellness discount
demonstration project described in
section 2705(l) of the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg–4(l)).
A comment received on previously
issued proposed regulations under
section 5000A asked that, for purposes
of computing the required contribution
for an individual not eligible for
coverage under an eligible employersponsored plan, the applicable plan for
an individual residing in a rating area in
a state participating in the individual
market wellness program demonstration
project disregard any premium-based
wellness incentive requirements,
including incentives relating to tobacco
use. Standards and processes
implementing the individual market
wellness program demonstration project
have not yet been established. After the
individual market wellness program
demonstration project is implemented,
additional guidance will be provided on
whether and how individuals residing
in a rating area participating in the
project will take wellness incentives
into account in determining the
affordability of their coverage for
purposes of section 5000A.
C. Simplified Method
Proposed regulations previously
issued under section 5000A (78 FR
7314) included an alternative method of
identifying the premium for the
applicable plan when a single bronze
plan is not offered that would cover all
members of the nonexempt family.
During the comment period to the
proposed regulations, questions arose
concerning the efficacy of the proposed
simplified method, as well as whether
an election to use the simplified method
should be revocable. The final
regulations removed the proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
alternative method, and the Treasury
Department and the IRS continue to
consider this issue.
A taxpayer may be unable to find a
single bronze plan that would cover all
members of the taxpayer’s nonexempt
family. The final regulations provide the
general rule that, if the Exchange
serving the rating area where the
individual resides does not offer a single
bronze plan that would cover all
members of the taxpayer’s nonexempt
family, the premium for the applicable
plan is the sum of the premiums for the
lowest cost bronze plans available in the
Exchange that provide coverage for all
members of the nonexempt family. The
Treasury Department and the IRS
request comments on alternative
methods for identifying the premium for
the applicable plan when a single
bronze plan would not cover all
members of the taxpayer’s nonexempt
family.
IV. Hardship Exemptions
The final regulations specify that an
individual who meets the requirements
of 45 CFR 155.605(g)(3) (relating to
individuals with gross income below
the applicable return filing threshold
who filed a return) or 45 CFR
155.605(g)(5) (relating to the
affordability of coverage under an
eligible employer-sponsored plan for
family members) may claim a hardship
exemption for a calendar year on a
Federal income tax return. Consistent
with guidance released by the Secretary
of HHS on October, 28, 2013, the
proposed regulations provide that an
individual who enrolls in a plan
through an Exchange during the open
enrollment period for coverage for 2014
may claim a hardship exemption for
months in 2014 prior to the effective
date of the individual’s coverage
without obtaining a hardship exemption
certification from an Exchange.
If additional situations are identified
where an individual should be allowed
to claim a hardship exemption without
obtaining a hardship exemption
certification from an Exchange, the
Secretary of HHS and the Secretary of
the Treasury will continue to coordinate
guidance. To facilitate issuing guidance
in this situation, the proposed
regulations provide that a taxpayer may
claim a hardship exemption on a return
if the Secretary of HHS issues published
guidance of general applicability
describing the hardship and indicating
that the hardship can be claimed on a
Federal income tax return pursuant to
guidance published by the Secretary of
the Treasury, and the Secretary of the
Treasury issues published guidance of
general applicability allowing an
E:\FR\FM\27JAP1.SGM
27JAP1
4307
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 17 / Monday, January 27, 2014 / Proposed Rules
individual to claim such hardship
exemption on a Federal income tax
return without obtaining a hardship
exemption from an Exchange.
Monthly Penalty Amounts
The final regulations provide that, for
each taxable year, the shared
responsibility payment is the lesser of
the sum of monthly penalty amounts for
each individual in the shared
responsibility family or the sum of the
monthly national average bronze plan
premiums for the shared responsibility
family. The monthly penalty amount is
computed for the taxpayer, not for each
individual in the shared responsibility
family. To avoid any confusion about
this treatment, the proposed regulations
remove from § 1.5000A–4(a) the clause
‘‘for each individual in the shared
responsibility family’’ and add a
reference to the taxpayer on whom the
shared responsibility payment is
imposed under § 1.5000A–1(c).
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Applicability Date
These regulations are proposed to
apply for months beginning after
December 31, 2013.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice
of proposed rulemaking is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
in Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563. Therefore, a regulatory
assessment is not required. It also has
been determined that section 553(b) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to the
proposed regulations. Pursuant to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. chapter 6), it is hereby certified
that the proposed regulations will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The applicability of the proposed
regulations is limited to individuals,
who are not small entities as defined by
the RFA (5 U.S.C. 601). Accordingly, the
RFA does not apply. Therefore, a
regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of
the Code, the proposed regulations have
been submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before the proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any
comments that are submitted timely to
the IRS as prescribed in this preamble
under the ‘‘Addresses’’ heading. The
Treasury Department and the IRS
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:16 Jan 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
request comments on all aspects of the
proposed rules. All comments will be
available at www.regulations.gov or
upon request.
A public hearing has been scheduled
for May 21, 2014, beginning at 10 a.m.,
in the Auditorium, Internal Revenue
Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC. Due to building
security procedures, visitors must enter
at the Constitution Avenue entrance. In
addition, all visitors must present photo
identification to enter the building.
Because of access restrictions, visitors
will not be admitted beyond the
immediate entrance area more than 30
minutes before the hearing starts. For
information about having your name
placed on the building access list to
attend the hearing, see the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble.
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3)
apply to the hearing. Persons who wish
to present oral comments at the hearing
must submit electronic or written
comments, and an outline of the topics
to be discussed and the time to be
devoted to each topic (signed original
and eight (8) copies) by April 28, 2014.
A period of 10 minutes will be allotted
to each person for making comments.
An agenda showing the scheduling of
the speakers will be prepared after the
deadline for receiving outlines has
passed. Copies of the agenda will be
available free of charge at the hearing.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of the proposed
regulations are Sue-Jean Kim and John
B. Lovelace, Office of the Associate
Chief Counsel (Income Tax &
Accounting). Other personnel from the
Treasury Department and the IRS
participated in the development of the
regulations.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par 2. An undesignated center
heading is added immediately following
§ 1.1563–4 to read as follows:
Individual Shared Responsibility
Payment for Not Maintaining Minimum
Essential Coverage
■
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Par. 3. Section 1.5000A–0 is amended
by:
■ 1. Revising the entry for § 1.5000A–
2(b)(2).
■ 2. Removing the entries for
§ 1.5000A–2(b)(2)(i), (b)(2)(ii), and
(b)(2)(iii).
■ 3. Revising the entries for § 1.5000A–
3(e)(4)(ii)(C) and (e)(4)(ii)(D).
■ 4. Adding a new entry for § 1.5000A–
3(e)(4)(ii)(E).
■ 5. Revising the entry for § 1.5000A–
3(h)(3).
The revisions and addition read as
follows.
■
§ 1.5000A–0
*
*
Table of contents.
*
§ 1.5000A–2
*
*
Minimum essential coverage.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) Certain health care coverage not
minimum essential coverage under a
government-sponsored program.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 1.5000A–3
Exempt individuals.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) * * *
(C) Wellness program incentives.
(D) Credit allowable under section
36B.
(E) Required contribution for part-year
period.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(3) Hardship exemption without
hardship exemption certification.
*
*
*
*
*
■ Par. 4. Section 1.5000A–2 is amended
by:
■ 1. Revising paragraphs (b)(1)(ii) and
(b)(2).
■ 2. Removing the language ‘‘health
insurance’’ in paragraph (g).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 1.5000A–2
*
Minimum essential coverage.
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Medicaid. The Medicaid program
under Title XIX of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 and following
sections);
*
*
*
*
*
(2) Certain health care coverage not
minimum essential coverage under a
government-sponsored program.
Government-sponsored program does
not mean any of the following:
(i) Optional coverage of family
planning services under section
1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XXI) of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1396a(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XXI));
E:\FR\FM\27JAP1.SGM
27JAP1
4308
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 17 / Monday, January 27, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(ii) Optional coverage of tuberculosisrelated services under section
1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XII) of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1396a(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XII));
(iii) Coverage of pregnancy-related
services under section
1902(a)(10)(A)(i)(IV) and
(a)(10)(A)(ii)(IX) of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)(10)(A)(i)(IV),
(a)(10)(A)(ii)(IX));
(iv) Coverage limited to treatment of
emergency medical conditions in
accordance with 8 U.S.C. 1611(b)(1)(A),
as authorized by section 1903(v) of the
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(v));
(v) Coverage for medically needy
individuals under section 1902(a)(10)(C)
of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1396a(a)(10)(C)) and 42 CFR 435.300
and following sections; or
(vi) Coverage authorized under
section 1115(a)(2) of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 1315(a)(2));
(vii) Coverage under section 1079(a),
1086(c)(1), or 1086(d)(1) of title 10,
U.S.C., that is solely limited to space
available care in a facility of the
uniformed services for individuals
excluded from TRICARE coverage for
care from private sector providers; and
(viii) Coverage under sections 1074a
and 1074b of title 10, U.S.C. for an
injury, illness, or disease incurred or
aggravated in the line of duty for
individuals who are not on active duty.
*
*
*
*
*
■ Par. 5. Section 1.5000A–3 is amended
by:
■ 1. Revising paragraphs (e)(3)(ii)(D)
and (e)(3)(ii)(E).
■ 2. Redesignating paragraphs
(e)(4)(ii)(C) and (e)(4)(ii)(D) as
(e)(4)(ii)(D) and (e)(4)(ii)(E),
respectively, and adding and reserving a
new paragraph (e)(4)(ii)(C).
■ 3. Revising paragraphs (h)(1) and
(h)(3).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 1.5000A–3
Exempt individuals.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) * * *
(D) Employer contributions to health
reimbursement arrangements. Amounts
newly made available for the current
plan year under a health reimbursement
arrangement that is integrated with an
eligible employer-sponsored plan and
that an employee may use to pay
premiums are taken into account in
determining the employee’s or a related
individual’s required contribution.
(E) Wellness program incentives.
Nondiscriminatory wellness program
incentives offered by an eligible
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:16 Jan 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
employer-sponsored plan that affect
premiums are treated as earned in
determining an employee’s or a related
individual’s required contribution to the
extent the incentives relate to tobacco
use. Wellness program incentives that
do not relate to tobacco use are treated
as not earned for this purpose.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) * * *
(ii) * * *
(C) Wellness programs incentives.
[Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
(h) Individuals with hardship
exemption certification—(1) In general.
Except as provided in paragraph (h)(3)
of this section, an individual is an
exempt individual for a month that
includes a day on which the individual
has in effect a hardship exemption
certification described in paragraph
(h)(2) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Hardship exemption without
hardship exemption certification. An
individual may claim an exemption
without obtaining a hardship exemption
certification described in paragraph
(h)(2) of this section—
(i) For any month that includes a day
on which the individual meets the
requirements of 45 CFR 155.605(g)(3) or
45 CFR 155.605(g)(5);
(ii) For the months in 2014 prior to
the individual’s effective date of
coverage, if the individual enrolls in a
plan through an Exchange prior to the
close of the open enrollment period for
coverage in 2014; or
(iii) For any month that includes a
day on which the individual meets the
requirements of any other hardship for
which:
(A) The Secretary of HHS issues
guidance of general applicability
describing the hardship and indicating
that an exemption for such hardship can
be claimed on a Federal income tax
return pursuant to guidance published
by the Secretary; and
(B) The Secretary issues published
guidance of general applicability, see
§ 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter, allowing
an individual to claim the hardship
exemption on a return without
obtaining a hardship exemption from an
Exchange.
*
*
*
*
*
■ Par. 6. Section 1.5000A–4 is amended
by revising paragraph (a) introductory
text and paragraph (a)(1) to read as
follows:
§ 1.5000A–4 Computation of shared
responsibility payment.
(a) In general. For each taxable year,
the shared responsibility payment
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
imposed on a taxpayer in accordance
with § 1.5000A–1(c) is the lesser of—
(1) The sum of the monthly penalty
amounts; or
*
*
*
*
*
John Dalyrmple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2014–01439 Filed 1–23–14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R01–OAR–2010–0121; A–1–FRL–
9905–79–Region 1]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Connecticut; Low Emission Vehicle
Program
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of
Connecticut. The regulations adopted by
Connecticut include the California Low
Emission Vehicle (LEV) II light-duty
motor vehicle emission standards
effective in model year 2008, the
California LEV II medium-duty vehicle
standards effective in model year 2009,
and greenhouse gas emission standards
for light-duty motor vehicles and
medium-duty vehicles effective with
model year 2009. The Connecticut LEV
regulation submitted also includes a
zero emission vehicle (ZEV) provision,
as well as emission control label and
environmental performance label
requirements. Connecticut has adopted
these revisions to reduce emissions of
volatile organic compounds (VOC) and
nitrogen oxides (NOX) in accordance
with the requirements of the Clean Air
Act (CAA), as well as to reduce
greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide,
methane, nitrous oxide, and
hydrofluorocarbons). In addition,
Connecticut has worked to ensure that
their program is identical to California’s,
as required by the CAA. The intended
effect of this action is to propose
approval of the Connecticut LEV II
program. In addition, EPA is proposing
to approve the removal of the definition
and regulation of ‘‘composite motor
vehicles’’ from the Connecticut’s SIPapproved vehicle inspection and
maintenance program. These actions are
being taken under the CAA.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27JAP1.SGM
27JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 17 (Monday, January 27, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 4302-4308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01439]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG-141036-13]
RIN 1545-BL91
Minimum Essential Coverage and Other Rules Regarding the Shared
Responsibility Payment for Individuals
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations relating to the
requirement to maintain minimum essential coverage enacted by the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and
Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, as amended by the TRICARE
Affirmation Act and Public Law 111-173. These proposed regulations
affect individual taxpayers who may be liable for the shared
responsibility payment for not maintaining minimum essential coverage.
This document also provides notice of a public hearing on these
proposed regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received by April 28, 2014. Outlines of topics
to be discussed at the public hearing scheduled for May 21, 2014, at 10
a.m., must be received by April 28, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-141036-13), room
5205, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-
141036-13), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC, or sent electronically via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov (IRS REG-141036-13). The
public hearing will be held in the IRS Auditorium, Internal Revenue
Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations,
Sue-Jean Kim or John B. Lovelace, (202)
[[Page 4303]]
317-7006; concerning the submission of comments, the public hearing,
and to be placed on the building access list to attend the public
hearing, Oluwafunmilayo Taylor, (202) 317-6901 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information contained in Sec. 1.5000A-3(h)(3)
and Sec. 1.5000A-4(a)(1) of this notice of proposed rulemaking has
been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d))
under control number 1545-0074 in conjunction with the final
regulations under section 5000A (TD 9632). The information is necessary
to determine whether the individual shared responsibility provision
applies to a taxpayer and, if it applies, the amount of the payment.
Comments on the collection of information should be sent to the Office
of Management and Budget, Attn: Desk Officer for the Department of the
Treasury, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC
20503, with copies to the Internal Revenue Service, Attn: IRS Reports
Clearance Officer, SE:W:CAR:MP:T:T:SP, Washington, DC 20224.
Comments on the collection of information should be received by
March 28, 2014.
Background
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Public Law 111-148
(124 Stat. 119 (2010)), and the Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act of 2010, Public Law 111-152 (124 Stat. 1029 (2010))
(collectively, the Affordable Care Act), added section 5000A to the
Internal Revenue Code. Section 5000A was subsequently amended by the
TRICARE Affirmation Act of 2010, Public Law 111-159 (124 Stat. 1123)
and Public Law 111-173 (124 Stat. 1215). Section 5000A provides that,
for months beginning after December 31, 2013, a nonexempt individual
must maintain minimum essential coverage or make a shared
responsibility payment.
Final regulations under section 5000A (TD 9632) were published on
August 30, 2013 (78 FR 53646). The preamble to the final regulations
indicates that subsequent proposed regulations will provide that
coverage under certain government-sponsored programs is not government-
sponsored minimum essential coverage. The preamble to the final
regulations also describes rules to be included in subsequent
regulations for determining, for purposes of the lack of affordable
coverage exemption, the required contribution for individuals eligible
to enroll in an eligible employer-sponsored plan that provides employer
contributions to health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs) or wellness
program incentives. These proposed regulations address these issues,
consistent with the rules contemplated in the preamble to the final
regulations. In addition, these proposed regulations provide or clarify
rules under section 5000A addressing the definition of excepted
benefits, hardship exemptions that may be claimed on a Federal income
tax return, and the computation of the monthly penalty amount.
Minimum Essential Coverage
Section 5000A(f)(1) enumerates the types of health care coverage
that qualify as minimum essential coverage. They include, among others,
coverage under specified government-sponsored programs and health
benefits coverage that the Secretary of Health and Human Services
(HHS), in coordination with the Secretary of the Treasury, recognizes
as minimum essential coverage. Under section 5000A(f)(1)(A), specified
government-sponsored programs include, among other things, the Medicaid
program under title XIX of the Social Security Act and medical coverage
under chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, including the TRICARE
program.
Section 1.5000A-2(b)(1)(ii) of the final regulations provides that
government-sponsored programs that are minimum essential coverage
include the Medicaid program under Title XIX of the Social Security Act
(42 U.S.C. 1396 and following sections) other than certain Medicaid
coverage that may provide limited benefits: (1) Optional coverage of
family planning services under section 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XXI) of the
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XXI)); (2) optional
coverage of tuberculosis-related services under section
1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XII) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1396a(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XI)); (3) coverage of pregnancy-related services
under section 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(IX) of the Social Security Act (42
U.S.C. 1396a(a)(10)(A)(ii)(IX)); and (4) coverage limited to the
treatment of emergency medical conditions in accordance with 8 U.S.C.
1611(b)(1)(A), as authorized by section 1903(v) of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(v)).
Excepted Benefits
Under section 5000A(f)(3) and Sec. 1.5000A-2(g) of the final
regulations, minimum essential coverage does not include any health
insurance coverage that consists solely of excepted benefits described
in section 2791(c)(1), (c)(2), (c)(3), or (c)(4) of the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg-91(c)), or regulations issued under these
provisions (45 CFR 148.220) (excepted benefits regulations). In
general, excepted benefits are benefits that are limited in scope or
are conditional. Under 2791(b)(1) of the Public Health Service Act (42
U.S.C. 300gg-91(b)(1)), health insurance coverage means benefits
consisting of medical care (provided directly, through insurance or
reimbursement, or otherwise and including items and services paid for
as medical care) under any hospital or medical service policy or
certificate, hospital or medical service plan contract, or health
maintenance organization contract offered by a health insurance issuer.
Lack of Affordable Coverage Exemption
Section 5000A(e)(1) and Sec. 1.5000A-3(e)(1) of the final
regulations provide that an individual is exempt for a month when the
individual cannot afford minimum essential coverage. For this purpose,
an individual cannot afford minimum essential coverage if the
individual's required contribution (determined on an annual basis) for
minimum essential coverage exceeds a percentage (8 percent for 2014) of
the individual's household income for the most recent taxable year for
which the Secretary of HHS, in consultation with the Secretary of the
Treasury, determines information is available.
For individuals ineligible for coverage under an eligible employer-
sponsored plan, the required contribution is the annual premium for the
applicable plan reduced by the premium tax credit allowable under
section 36B for the taxable year (determined as if the individual
enrolled in a plan through an Exchange for the entire taxable year).
The applicable plan is the lowest cost bronze plan available in the
Exchange serving the rating area where the individual resides that
would cover all members of the individual's nonexempt family taking
into account the rating factors that an Exchange would use to determine
the cost of coverage. If the Exchange serving the rating area where the
individual resides does not offer a single bronze plan that would cover
all members of the individual's nonexempt family, the premium for the
applicable plan is the sum of the premiums for the lowest cost bronze
plans available in the Exchange that provide coverage for all members
of the nonexempt family.
[[Page 4304]]
Hardship Exemptions
Section 5000A(e)(5) and Sec. 1.5000A-3(h)(1) of the final
regulations provide that, in general, an individual is exempt for a
month that includes a day on which the individual has in effect a
hardship exemption certification. A hardship exemption certification is
issued by an Exchange under section 1311(d)(4)(H) of the Affordable
Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18031(d)(4)(H)) certifying that the individual has
suffered a hardship (as that term is defined in 45 CFR 155.605(g)) with
respect to the individual's ability to obtain coverage under a
qualified health plan. Section 1.5000A-3(h)(3) of the final regulations
provides that a taxpayer who meets the requirements of 45 CFR
155.605(g)(3) or 45 CFR 155.605(g)(5) may claim a hardship exemption
for a calendar year on a Federal income tax return.
Pursuant to the authority under 45 CFR 155.605(g), the Secretary of
HHS has established an additional hardship exemption that applies to
individuals enrolling in a qualified health plan through an Exchange
prior to the close of the initial open enrollment period. Specifically,
an individual may claim a hardship exemption for the months prior to
the effective date of the individual's coverage on a Federal income tax
return for 2014 without the need to request an exemption from the
Exchange. See HHS Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Shared
Responsibility Provision Question and Answer (Oct. 28, 2013).
Monthly Penalty Amount
Under section 5000A(c)(1), the amount of the shared responsibility
payment imposed on any taxpayer for any taxable year is equal to the
lesser of (A) the sum of monthly penalty amounts for months when one or
more failures to maintain minimum essential coverage occurred, or (B)
an amount equal to the national average premium for qualified health
plans that satisfy requirements enumerated in section 5000A(c).
Under section 5000A(c)(2), the monthly penalty amount, for any
month, is \1/12\ of the greater of (A) the flat dollar amount, or (B) a
specified percentage of the taxpayer's household income over the
taxpayer's applicable return filing threshold (as defined in section
6012(a)(1)).
The flat dollar amount is the lesser of (A) the sum of the defined
applicable dollar amounts for all individuals in the shared
responsibility family who did not have minimum essential coverage in a
particular month, or (B) 300 percent of the applicable dollar amount.
Under section 5000A(c)(3), the applicable dollar amount is $95 in 2014,
$325 in 2015, and $695 in 2016. After 2016, the applicable dollar
amount will be indexed by a cost-of-living adjustment.
The specified percentage is 1.0 percent for taxable years beginning
in 2014, 2.0 percent for taxable years beginning in 2015, and 2.5
percent for taxable years beginning after 2015.
The final regulations incorporate these provisions.
Explanation of Provisions
I. Minimum Essential Coverage
A. Medicaid-related programs
1. Coverage for the Medically Needy
The Social Security Act provides states with flexibility to extend
Medicaid eligibility to individuals with high medical expenses who
would be eligible for Medicaid but for their income level (medically
needy individuals). See section 1902(a)(10)(C) of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)(10)(C)) and 42 CFR 435.300 and following
sections. In general, individuals whose income is in excess of the
maximum allowed for Medicaid eligibility but who are otherwise eligible
for Medicaid may ``spend down'' their income, based on incurred medical
expenses, and thereby become eligible for the benefits provided for
medically needy individuals in the state. States providing coverage to
medically needy individuals must establish a ``budget period'' lasting
from one to six months. Eligibility for coverage as a medically needy
individual, which must be determined each budget period, is provided
only after an individual incurs sufficient medical expenses to spend
down to the qualifying income level. Thus, depending on an individual's
medical needs and the options exercised by the state program,
eligibility may be assessed as frequently as every month, and an
individual may move in and out of coverage for medically needy
individuals multiple times in a year. States are permitted, and some
states have adopted the option, to offer benefits to the medically
needy that are more limited than the benefits generally provided to
Medicaid beneficiaries.
Because the benefits provided to medically needy individuals are
not required to be comprehensive, the coverage is analogous to coverage
consisting of excepted benefits that is not minimum essential coverage
under section 5000A(f)(3). Other types of coverage under government-
sponsored programs that potentially provide limited benefits are not
minimum essential coverage under the final regulations (for example,
the optional coverage of family planning services under section
1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XXI) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1396a(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XXI)), and the optional coverage of tuberculosis-
related services under section 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XII) of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XII)). Accordingly, the
proposed regulations provide that coverage for medically needy
individuals generally is not government-sponsored minimum essential
coverage. To the extent such coverage in a particular state is
comprehensive coverage, such coverage may be recognized as minimum
essential coverage by the Secretary of HHS, in coordination with the
Secretary of the Treasury, under section 5000A(f)(1)(E).
Because individuals receiving medically needy coverage may not know
at the time of open enrollment for the 2014 plan year that coverage
under the program is not minimum essential coverage, Notice 2014-10
(available at www.irs.gov), (see Sec. 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this
chapter), released concurrently with these proposed regulations,
provides that a taxpayer is not liable for the shared responsibility
payment for a month in 2014 with respect to individuals in the
taxpayer's shared responsibility family who are enrolled in medically
needy coverage.
2. Section 1115 Demonstration Projects
Section 1115 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1315) authorizes
the Secretary of HHS to approve experimental, pilot, or demonstration
projects that promote the objectives of the Medicaid program (``Section
1115 demonstration projects''). Some Section 1115 demonstration
projects involve waivers of Medicaid requirements that affect
individuals eligible under the approved Medicaid state plan (for
instance, waivers to permit changes in manners of delivering Medicaid
services), but do not change the basic requirement to provide
comprehensive Medicaid coverage. Other Section 1115 demonstration
projects, authorized under section 1115(a)(2) of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 1315(a)(2)), allow a state to extend benefits to
additional populations (expansion populations). Because the expansion
populations are not described in approved Medicaid state plans, the
coverage authorized under those Section 1115 demonstration projects is
not required to be comprehensive and may be limited. Accordingly, the
proposed regulations provide that coverage under Section 1115
demonstration projects authorized under section 1115(a)(2) of the
Social Security Act generally is not
[[Page 4305]]
government-sponsored minimum essential coverage. However, comprehensive
coverage for expansion populations under certain Section 1115
demonstration programs may be recognized as minimum essential coverage
by the Secretary of HHS, in coordination with the Secretary of the
Treasury, under section 5000A(f)(1)(E).
The Treasury Department and IRS understand that individuals
receiving benefits as part of an expansion population under a
demonstration project authorized under section 1115(a)(2) may not know
at open enrollment for the 2014 plan year that the coverage they
receive under a Section 1115 demonstration project is not minimum
essential coverage. Accordingly, Notice 2014-10 (available at
www.irs.gov), (see Sec. 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter),
released concurrently with these proposed regulations, provides that a
taxpayer will not be liable for the shared responsibility payment for a
month in 2014 with respect to individuals in the taxpayer's shared
responsibility family receiving benefits as part of an expansion
population authorized under section 1115(a)(2).
B. Limited-Benefit Coverage Under Chapter 55 of Title 10, U.S.C.
Similar to Medicaid programs that provide a limited scope of
benefits, two types of coverage provided under chapter 55 of Title 10,
U.S.C., do not provide a scope of benefits comparable to the full
TRICARE program under the same chapter. Under sections 1079(a),
1086(c)(1), and 1086(d)(1) of Title 10, U.S.C., the first type of
limited-benefit coverage is provided for certain individuals who are
excluded from TRICARE coverage for health care services from private
sector providers and only eligible for space available care in a
facility of the uniformed services (space available care). There is no
guarantee of care and any care received is subject to the availability
of space and facilities, as well as the capabilities of the medical and
dental staff. Coverage potentially available to an affected individual
may not be accessible if there is no space available at the facility
where the individual seeks care or treatment. These affected
individuals are not entitled to comprehensive health care coverage
under chapter 55 of Title 10, U.S.C., and the Department of Defense has
no statutory authority to pay claims for any outside care provided to
these individuals.
Under sections 1074a and 1074b of Title 10, U.S.C., the second type
of limited-benefit coverage is provided for certain individuals who are
not on active duty and are entitled to episodic care for an injury,
illness, or disease incurred or aggravated in the line of duty (line-
of-duty care). Line-of-duty care is limited to care appropriate for
treating the covered injury, illness, or disease. This type of limited-
benefit coverage is similar to coverage consisting of excepted
benefits, including workers' compensation, that is not minimum
essential coverage under section 5000A(f)(3).
Neither of these types of limited-benefit coverage offers
beneficiaries coverage for comprehensive medical care. Accordingly, the
proposed regulations provide that Military Health System eligibility
limited only to space available care and line-of-duty care are not
government-sponsored programs providing minimum essential coverage.
Because individuals enrolled in space available care or line-of-duty
care may not know at open enrollment for the 2014 plan year that space
available care and line-of-duty care are not minimum essential
coverage, Notice 2014-10 (available at www.irs.gov), (see Sec.
601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter), released concurrently with these
proposed regulations, provides that a taxpayer is not liable for the
shared responsibility payment for a month in 2014 with respect to
individuals in the taxpayer's shared responsibility family who are
enrolled in either space available care or line-of-duty care.
C. Excepted Benefits
Section 5000A(f)(3) and Sec. 1.5000A-2(g) of the final regulations
provide that minimum essential coverage does not include health
insurance coverage that consists solely of excepted benefits. In the
rulemaking process under section 5000A, the Treasury Department and the
IRS have provided that minimum essential coverage does not include
plans or programs that do not provide a comprehensive scope of
benefits. See, for example, Sec. 1.5000A-2(b)(1)(ii)(A) describing the
Medicaid program for family planning services and Sec. 1.5000A-
2(b)(1)(v) excluding from the definition of minimum essential coverage
medical care for veterans that does not provide comprehensive health
care benefits. Consistent with this treatment, the proposed regulations
clarify that minimum essential coverage excludes any coverage, whether
insurance or otherwise, that consists solely of excepted benefits.
II. Exemption for Individuals Who Cannot Afford Coverage
A. Health Reimbursement Arrangements
The preamble to the final regulations provides that guidance on how
employer contributions to HRAs are counted in determining an employee's
or a related individual's required contribution will be consistent with
final rulemaking under section 36B. The regulations proposed under
section 36B addressing the treatment of employer contributions to HRAs
were published on May 3, 2013 (78 FR 25909) (the section 36B proposed
regulations). The section 36B proposed regulations provide that amounts
newly made available for the current plan year under an HRA that is
integrated with an eligible employer-sponsored plan are counted toward
the employee's required contribution in determining the affordability
of the coverage if the employee may use the amounts only for premiums
or may choose to use the amounts for either premiums or cost sharing.
An HRA generally must be integrated with an eligible employer-sponsored
plan to satisfy the market reform provisions imposed by Title I of the
Affordable Care Act. See Notice 2013-54 (2013-40 IRB 287 (September 30,
2013)), (see Sec. 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter), which is
available at www.irs.gov.
Similar to the 36B proposed regulations, under these proposed
regulations, an employer's new contributions to an HRA are taken into
account in determining (in other words, they reduce) an employee's
required contribution if the HRA is integrated with an employer-
sponsored plan and the employee may use the amounts to pay premiums.
Amounts in an HRA that may be used only for cost-sharing are not taken
into account when determining affordability because they cannot affect
the employee's out-of-pocket cost of acquiring minimum essential
coverage.
B. Contributions to a Cafeteria Plan
Many employers maintain section 125 cafeteria plans under which
employees are given the option of making salary reduction contributions
toward the cost of non-taxable benefits or receiving an equivalent
amount in taxable cash. The nontaxable benefit choices may include both
health and non-health benefits. If an employee elects to make salary
reduction contributions and to have those amounts applied towards the
cost of premiums, those contributions are treated as employee
contributions, and the employee's household income is increased by the
amount of the
[[Page 4306]]
contributions for purposes of the affordability determination under
section 5000A(e)(1)(A).
Alternatively, employers may make contributions that can be
received only in the form of nontaxable benefits under the plan
(sometimes referred to as flex contributions). In addition, some
employers subsidize benefits available under the section 125 cafeteria
plan so that an employee can elect a benefit while making salary
reduction contributions in an amount less than the value of the
benefit. Some employers will provide contributions even if the employee
declines the subsidized benefit. For example, an employer might offer a
benefit with a value of $10,000 for an employee salary reduction of
$4,000, but provide other benefits with a value of $3,000 if the
employee declines the $10,000 benefit.
Comments are requested on the treatment of employer contributions
under a section 125 cafeteria plan for purposes of section 5000A to the
extent employees may not opt to receive the employer contributions as a
taxable benefit, such as cash. Specifically, comments are requested
regarding how these contributions should be taken into account for
purposes of determining the affordability of coverage.
III. Wellness Program Incentives
A. Individuals Eligible for Employer-sponsored Coverage
The preamble to the final section 5000A regulations provides that
guidance on how wellness program incentives are counted in determining
the affordability of coverage under section 5000A will be consistent
with final rulemaking under section 36B. The proposed section 36B
regulations address the treatment of wellness incentives by providing
that, for purposes of determining an individual's required contribution
for employer-sponsored coverage under section 36B(c)(2)(C)(i), wellness
program incentives are treated as earned only if the incentives relate
to tobacco use. This rule is consistent with other Affordable Care Act
provisions (such as one allowing insurers to charge higher premiums
based on tobacco use). Accordingly, these proposed regulations provide
that, for purposes of determining for section 5000A an individual's
required contribution for coverage under an employer-sponsored plan,
wellness program incentives are treated as earned only if the
incentives relate to tobacco use.
B. Individuals Ineligible for Employer-sponsored Coverage
In general, for individuals ineligible for coverage under employer-
sponsored plans, the required contribution is the premium for the
applicable plan reduced by the maximum amount of any premium tax credit
allowable under section 36B for the taxable year. In general, the
applicable plan is the lowest cost bronze plan available in the
individual market through the Exchange serving the rating area in which
the individual resides that would cover all members of the individual's
nonexempt family. Pursuant to section 36B(b)(3)(C), the premium tax
credit allowable under section 36B is calculated by reference to the
adjusted monthly premium for the applicable second lowest cost silver
plan without regard to any premium discounts or rebates in a state
participating in the wellness discount demonstration project described
in section 2705(l) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg-
4(l)).
A comment received on previously issued proposed regulations under
section 5000A asked that, for purposes of computing the required
contribution for an individual not eligible for coverage under an
eligible employer-sponsored plan, the applicable plan for an individual
residing in a rating area in a state participating in the individual
market wellness program demonstration project disregard any premium-
based wellness incentive requirements, including incentives relating to
tobacco use. Standards and processes implementing the individual market
wellness program demonstration project have not yet been established.
After the individual market wellness program demonstration project is
implemented, additional guidance will be provided on whether and how
individuals residing in a rating area participating in the project will
take wellness incentives into account in determining the affordability
of their coverage for purposes of section 5000A.
C. Simplified Method
Proposed regulations previously issued under section 5000A (78 FR
7314) included an alternative method of identifying the premium for the
applicable plan when a single bronze plan is not offered that would
cover all members of the nonexempt family. During the comment period to
the proposed regulations, questions arose concerning the efficacy of
the proposed simplified method, as well as whether an election to use
the simplified method should be revocable. The final regulations
removed the proposed alternative method, and the Treasury Department
and the IRS continue to consider this issue.
A taxpayer may be unable to find a single bronze plan that would
cover all members of the taxpayer's nonexempt family. The final
regulations provide the general rule that, if the Exchange serving the
rating area where the individual resides does not offer a single bronze
plan that would cover all members of the taxpayer's nonexempt family,
the premium for the applicable plan is the sum of the premiums for the
lowest cost bronze plans available in the Exchange that provide
coverage for all members of the nonexempt family. The Treasury
Department and the IRS request comments on alternative methods for
identifying the premium for the applicable plan when a single bronze
plan would not cover all members of the taxpayer's nonexempt family.
IV. Hardship Exemptions
The final regulations specify that an individual who meets the
requirements of 45 CFR 155.605(g)(3) (relating to individuals with
gross income below the applicable return filing threshold who filed a
return) or 45 CFR 155.605(g)(5) (relating to the affordability of
coverage under an eligible employer-sponsored plan for family members)
may claim a hardship exemption for a calendar year on a Federal income
tax return. Consistent with guidance released by the Secretary of HHS
on October, 28, 2013, the proposed regulations provide that an
individual who enrolls in a plan through an Exchange during the open
enrollment period for coverage for 2014 may claim a hardship exemption
for months in 2014 prior to the effective date of the individual's
coverage without obtaining a hardship exemption certification from an
Exchange.
If additional situations are identified where an individual should
be allowed to claim a hardship exemption without obtaining a hardship
exemption certification from an Exchange, the Secretary of HHS and the
Secretary of the Treasury will continue to coordinate guidance. To
facilitate issuing guidance in this situation, the proposed regulations
provide that a taxpayer may claim a hardship exemption on a return if
the Secretary of HHS issues published guidance of general applicability
describing the hardship and indicating that the hardship can be claimed
on a Federal income tax return pursuant to guidance published by the
Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of the Treasury issues
published guidance of general applicability allowing an
[[Page 4307]]
individual to claim such hardship exemption on a Federal income tax
return without obtaining a hardship exemption from an Exchange.
Monthly Penalty Amounts
The final regulations provide that, for each taxable year, the
shared responsibility payment is the lesser of the sum of monthly
penalty amounts for each individual in the shared responsibility family
or the sum of the monthly national average bronze plan premiums for the
shared responsibility family. The monthly penalty amount is computed
for the taxpayer, not for each individual in the shared responsibility
family. To avoid any confusion about this treatment, the proposed
regulations remove from Sec. 1.5000A-4(a) the clause ``for each
individual in the shared responsibility family'' and add a reference to
the taxpayer on whom the shared responsibility payment is imposed under
Sec. 1.5000A-1(c).
Applicability Date
These regulations are proposed to apply for months beginning after
December 31, 2013.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice of proposed rulemaking is
not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order
12866, as supplemented by Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It also has been determined that
section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5)
does not apply to the proposed regulations. Pursuant to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. chapter 6), it is hereby certified that
the proposed regulations will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. The applicability of the
proposed regulations is limited to individuals, who are not small
entities as defined by the RFA (5 U.S.C. 601). Accordingly, the RFA
does not apply. Therefore, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, the proposed
regulations have been submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of
the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small
business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before the proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any comments that are submitted timely
to the IRS as prescribed in this preamble under the ``Addresses''
heading. The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on all
aspects of the proposed rules. All comments will be available at
www.regulations.gov or upon request.
A public hearing has been scheduled for May 21, 2014, beginning at
10 a.m., in the Auditorium, Internal Revenue Building, 1111
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. Due to building security
procedures, visitors must enter at the Constitution Avenue entrance. In
addition, all visitors must present photo identification to enter the
building. Because of access restrictions, visitors will not be admitted
beyond the immediate entrance area more than 30 minutes before the
hearing starts. For information about having your name placed on the
building access list to attend the hearing, see the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble.
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3) apply to the hearing. Persons who
wish to present oral comments at the hearing must submit electronic or
written comments, and an outline of the topics to be discussed and the
time to be devoted to each topic (signed original and eight (8) copies)
by April 28, 2014. A period of 10 minutes will be allotted to each
person for making comments. An agenda showing the scheduling of the
speakers will be prepared after the deadline for receiving outlines has
passed. Copies of the agenda will be available free of charge at the
hearing.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of the proposed regulations are Sue-Jean Kim
and John B. Lovelace, Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax
& Accounting). Other personnel from the Treasury Department and the IRS
participated in the development of the regulations.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
0
Par 2. An undesignated center heading is added immediately following
Sec. 1.1563-4 to read as follows:
Individual Shared Responsibility Payment for Not Maintaining
Minimum Essential Coverage
0
Par. 3. Section 1.5000A-0 is amended by:
0
1. Revising the entry for Sec. 1.5000A-2(b)(2).
0
2. Removing the entries for Sec. 1.5000A-2(b)(2)(i), (b)(2)(ii), and
(b)(2)(iii).
0
3. Revising the entries for Sec. 1.5000A-3(e)(4)(ii)(C) and
(e)(4)(ii)(D).
0
4. Adding a new entry for Sec. 1.5000A-3(e)(4)(ii)(E).
0
5. Revising the entry for Sec. 1.5000A-3(h)(3).
The revisions and addition read as follows.
Sec. 1.5000A-0 Table of contents.
* * * * *
Sec. 1.5000A-2 Minimum essential coverage.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Certain health care coverage not minimum essential coverage
under a government-sponsored program.
* * * * *
Sec. 1.5000A-3 Exempt individuals.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) * * *
(C) Wellness program incentives.
(D) Credit allowable under section 36B.
(E) Required contribution for part-year period.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(3) Hardship exemption without hardship exemption certification.
* * * * *
0
Par. 4. Section 1.5000A-2 is amended by:
0
1. Revising paragraphs (b)(1)(ii) and (b)(2).
0
2. Removing the language ``health insurance'' in paragraph (g).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 1.5000A-2 Minimum essential coverage.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Medicaid. The Medicaid program under Title XIX of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 and following sections);
* * * * *
(2) Certain health care coverage not minimum essential coverage
under a government-sponsored program. Government-sponsored program does
not mean any of the following:
(i) Optional coverage of family planning services under section
1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XXI) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1396a(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XXI));
[[Page 4308]]
(ii) Optional coverage of tuberculosis-related services under
section 1902(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XII) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1396a(a)(10)(A)(ii)(XII));
(iii) Coverage of pregnancy-related services under section
1902(a)(10)(A)(i)(IV) and (a)(10)(A)(ii)(IX) of the Social Security Act
(42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)(10)(A)(i)(IV), (a)(10)(A)(ii)(IX));
(iv) Coverage limited to treatment of emergency medical conditions
in accordance with 8 U.S.C. 1611(b)(1)(A), as authorized by section
1903(v) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(v));
(v) Coverage for medically needy individuals under section
1902(a)(10)(C) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)(10)(C))
and 42 CFR 435.300 and following sections; or
(vi) Coverage authorized under section 1115(a)(2) of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1315(a)(2));
(vii) Coverage under section 1079(a), 1086(c)(1), or 1086(d)(1) of
title 10, U.S.C., that is solely limited to space available care in a
facility of the uniformed services for individuals excluded from
TRICARE coverage for care from private sector providers; and
(viii) Coverage under sections 1074a and 1074b of title 10, U.S.C.
for an injury, illness, or disease incurred or aggravated in the line
of duty for individuals who are not on active duty.
* * * * *
0
Par. 5. Section 1.5000A-3 is amended by:
0
1. Revising paragraphs (e)(3)(ii)(D) and (e)(3)(ii)(E).
0
2. Redesignating paragraphs (e)(4)(ii)(C) and (e)(4)(ii)(D) as
(e)(4)(ii)(D) and (e)(4)(ii)(E), respectively, and adding and reserving
a new paragraph (e)(4)(ii)(C).
0
3. Revising paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(3).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 1.5000A-3 Exempt individuals.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) * * *
(D) Employer contributions to health reimbursement arrangements.
Amounts newly made available for the current plan year under a health
reimbursement arrangement that is integrated with an eligible employer-
sponsored plan and that an employee may use to pay premiums are taken
into account in determining the employee's or a related individual's
required contribution.
(E) Wellness program incentives. Nondiscriminatory wellness program
incentives offered by an eligible employer-sponsored plan that affect
premiums are treated as earned in determining an employee's or a
related individual's required contribution to the extent the incentives
relate to tobacco use. Wellness program incentives that do not relate
to tobacco use are treated as not earned for this purpose.
* * * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) * * *
(C) Wellness programs incentives. [Reserved]
* * * * *
(h) Individuals with hardship exemption certification--(1) In
general. Except as provided in paragraph (h)(3) of this section, an
individual is an exempt individual for a month that includes a day on
which the individual has in effect a hardship exemption certification
described in paragraph (h)(2) of this section.
* * * * *
(3) Hardship exemption without hardship exemption certification. An
individual may claim an exemption without obtaining a hardship
exemption certification described in paragraph (h)(2) of this section--
(i) For any month that includes a day on which the individual meets
the requirements of 45 CFR 155.605(g)(3) or 45 CFR 155.605(g)(5);
(ii) For the months in 2014 prior to the individual's effective
date of coverage, if the individual enrolls in a plan through an
Exchange prior to the close of the open enrollment period for coverage
in 2014; or
(iii) For any month that includes a day on which the individual
meets the requirements of any other hardship for which:
(A) The Secretary of HHS issues guidance of general applicability
describing the hardship and indicating that an exemption for such
hardship can be claimed on a Federal income tax return pursuant to
guidance published by the Secretary; and
(B) The Secretary issues published guidance of general
applicability, see Sec. 601.601(d)(2) of this chapter, allowing an
individual to claim the hardship exemption on a return without
obtaining a hardship exemption from an Exchange.
* * * * *
0
Par. 6. Section 1.5000A-4 is amended by revising paragraph (a)
introductory text and paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 1.5000A-4 Computation of shared responsibility payment.
(a) In general. For each taxable year, the shared responsibility
payment imposed on a taxpayer in accordance with Sec. 1.5000A-1(c) is
the lesser of--
(1) The sum of the monthly penalty amounts; or
* * * * *
John Dalyrmple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2014-01439 Filed 1-23-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P