New Postal Product, 4184-4185 [2014-01378]
Download as PDF
4184
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 16 / Friday, January 24, 2014 / Notices
December 27, 2013, the Postal Service
filed the FY 2013 Performance Report
and FY 2014 Performance Plan with the
Commission along with its FY 2013
Annual Compliance Report. See library
reference USPS–FY13–17.1
The Commission is required to
evaluate whether the Postal Service has
met the goals established in its FY 2013
Performance Report and FY 2014
Performance Plan. See 39 U.S.C.
3653(d). It may also provide
recommendations to the Postal Service
‘‘related to the protection or promotion
of public policy objectives set out in’’
title 39. Id. In past years, the
Commission’s analysis of Performance
Plans and Performance Reports have
been included its Annual Compliance
Determination (ACD).2 Since the
Commission’s obligations under section
3653(d) are distinguishable from its
annual compliance determination
obligations under section 3653(b), the
Commission has determined that,
beginning with FY 2013, it will issue a
separate report on the Postal Service’s
Performance Report and Performance
Plan. The Commission anticipates
issuing that report early in May 2014.
To accommodate that schedule, the
Commission is establishing a separate
comment period for the FY 2013
Performance Report and FY 2014
Performance Plan. Comments by
interested persons are due no later than
by March 10, 2014. Reply comments are
due no later than March 20, 2014.
Kenneth E. Richardson, previously
designated to serve as the Public
Representative in this proceeding, will
continue in that capacity.
It is ordered:
1. Comments on the Postal Service’s
FY 2013 Performance Report and FY
2014 Performance Plan are due no later
than March 10, 2014.
2. Reply comments are due no later
than March 20, 2014.
3. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
By the Commission.
Ruth Ann Abrams,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–01381 Filed 1–23–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
1 The FY 2013 Performance Report and FY 2014
Performance Plan are included in the Postal
Service’s 2013 Annual Report to Congress.
2 See, e.g., Docket No. ACR2012, Annual
Compliance Determination Report Fiscal Year 2012
at 35–46.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Jan 23, 2014
Jkt 232001
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. MC2014–16 and CP2014–25;
Order No. 1970]
New Postal Product
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recent Postal Service filing requesting
the addition of Priority Mail Contract 75
to the competitive product list. This
notice informs the public of the filing,
invites public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: January 24,
2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Corcoran, Acting General Counsel,
at 202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filings
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
In accordance with 39 U.S.C. 3642
and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq., the Postal
Service filed a request and associated
supporting information to add Priority
Mail Contract 75 to the competitive
product list.1 The Postal Service asserts
that Priority Mail Contract 75 is a
competitive product ‘‘not of general
applicability’’ within the meaning of 39
U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). Request at 1. The
Request has been assigned Docket No.
MC2014–16.
The Postal Service
contemporaneously filed a redacted
contract related to the proposed new
product. Id. Attachment B. The instant
contract has been assigned Docket No.
CP2014–25.
Request. To support its Request, the
Postal Service filed six attachments as
follows:
• Attachment A—a redacted copy of
Governors’ Decision No. 11–6,
authorizing the new product;
• Attachment B—a redacted copy of
the contract;
1 Request
of the United States Postal Service to
Add Priority Mail Contract 75 to Competitive
Product List and Notice of Filing (Under Seal) of
Unredacted Governors’ Decision, Contract, and
Supporting Data, January 16, 2014 (Request).
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Attachment C—proposed changes
to the Mail Classification Schedule
competitive product list with the
addition underlined;
• Attachment D—a Statement of
Supporting Justification as required by
39 CFR 3020.32;
• Attachment E—a certification of
compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a); and
• Attachment F—an application for
non-public treatment of materials to
maintain redacted portions of the
contract and related financial
information under seal.
In the Statement of Supporting
Justification, Dennis R. Nicoski,
Manager, Field Sales Strategy and
Contracts, asserts that the contract will
cover its attributable costs and increase
contribution toward the requisite 5.5
percent of the Postal Service’s total
institutional costs. Id. Attachment D at
1. Mr. Nicoski contends that there will
be no issue of market dominant
products subsidizing competitive
products as a result of this contract. Id.
Related contract. The Postal Service
included a redacted version of the
related contract with the Request. Id.
Attachment B. The contract is
scheduled to become effective one
business day following the day on
which the Commission issues all
necessary regulatory approval. Id. at 5.
The contract will expire three years
from the effective date unless, among
other things, either party terminates the
agreement upon 30 days’ written notice
to the other party or the contract is
renewed by mutual written agreement.
Id. The contract also allows two 90-day
extensions of the agreement if the
preparation of a successor agreement is
active and the Commission is notified
within at least seven days of the
contract’s expiration date. Id. at 6. The
Postal Service represents that the
contract is consistent with 39 U.S.C.
3633(a).2
The Postal Service filed much of the
supporting materials, including the
related contract, under seal. Id.
Attachment F. It maintains that the
redacted portions of the Governors’
Decision, contract, customer-identifying
information, and related financial
information should remain confidential.
Id. at 3. This information includes the
price structure, underlying costs and
assumptions, pricing formulas,
information relevant to the customer’s
mailing profile, and cost coverage
projections. Id. The Postal Service asks
2 Although the Request appears to state that the
certification only pertains to paragraphs (1) and (3)
of 39 U.S.C. 3633(a), the certification itself contains
an assertion that the prices are in compliance with
39 U.S.C. 3633(a)(1), (2), and (3). See Request at 2;
Attachment E.
E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM
24JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 16 / Friday, January 24, 2014 / Notices
the Commission to protect customeridentifying information from public
disclosure indefinitely. Id. at 7.
II. Notice of Filings
The Commission establishes Docket
Nos. MC2014–16 and CP2014–25 to
consider the Request pertaining to the
proposed Priority Mail Contract 75
product and the related contract,
respectively.
Interested persons may submit
comments on whether the Postal
Service’s filings in the captioned
dockets are consistent with the policies
of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 3642, 39 CFR
3015.5, and 39 CFR part 3020, subpart
B. Comments are due no later than
January 24, 2014. The public portions of
these filings can be accessed via the
Commission’s Web site (https://
www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints Pamela A.
Thompson to serve as Public
Representative in these dockets.
III. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
Nos. MC2014–16 and CP2014–25 to
consider the matters raised in each
docket.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Pamela
A. Thompson is appointed to serve as
an officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in these
proceedings.
3. Comments by interested persons in
these proceedings are due no later than
January 24, 2014.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Ruth Ann Abrams,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–01378 Filed 1–23–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. MC2014–17 and CP2014–26;
Order No. 1971]
New Postal Product
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recent Postal Service filing requesting
the addition of Priority Mail Contract 76
to the competitive product list. This
notice informs the public of the filing,
invites public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: January 24,
2014.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Jan 23, 2014
Jkt 232001
Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Corcoran, Acting General Counsel,
at 202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filings
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
In accordance with 39 U.S.C. 3642
and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq., the Postal
Service filed a request and associated
supporting information to add Priority
Mail Contract 76 to the competitive
product list.1 The Postal Service asserts
that Priority Mail Contract 76 is a
competitive product ‘‘not of general
applicability’’ within the meaning of 39
U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). Request at 1. The
Request has been assigned Docket No.
MC2014–17.
The Postal Service
contemporaneously filed a redacted
contract related to the proposed new
product. Id. Attachment B. The instant
contract has been assigned Docket No.
CP2014–26.
Request. To support its Request, the
Postal Service filed six attachments as
follows:
• Attachment A—a redacted copy of
Governors’ Decision No. 11–6,
authorizing the new product;
• Attachment B—a redacted copy of
the contract;
• Attachment C—proposed changes
to the Mail Classification Schedule
competitive product list with the
addition underlined;
• Attachment D—a Statement of
Supporting Justification as required by
39 CFR 3020.32;
• Attachment E—a certification of
compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a); and
• Attachment F—an application for
non-public treatment of materials to
maintain redacted portions of the
contract and related financial
information under seal.
In the Statement of Supporting
Justification, Dennis R. Nicoski,
Manager, Field Sales Strategy and
1 Request
of the United States Postal Service to
Add Priority Mail Contract 76 to Competitive
Product List and Notice of Filing (Under Seal) of
Unredacted Governors’ Decision, Contract, and
Supporting Data, January 16, 2014 (Request).
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4185
Contracts, asserts that the contract will
cover its attributable costs and increase
contribution toward the requisite 5.5
percent of the Postal Service’s total
institutional costs. Id. Attachment D at
1. Mr. Nicoski contends that there will
be no issue of market dominant
products subsidizing competitive
products as a result of this contract. Id.
Related contract. The Postal Service
included a redacted version of the
related contract with the Request. Id.
Attachment B. The contract is
scheduled to become effective one
business day following the day on
which the Commission issues all
necessary regulatory approval. Id. at 3.
The contract will expire three years
from the effective date unless, among
other things, either party terminates the
agreement upon 30 days’ written notice
to the other party or the contract is
renewed by mutual written agreement.
Id. The contract also allows two 90-day
extensions of the agreement if the
preparation of a successor agreement is
active and the Commission is notified
within at least seven days of the
contract’s expiration date. Id. The Postal
Service represents that the contract is
consistent with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a).2
The Postal Service filed much of the
supporting materials, including the
related contract, under seal. Id.
Attachment F. It maintains that the
redacted portions of the Governors’
Decision, contract, customer-identifying
information, and related financial
information should remain confidential.
Id. at 3. This information includes the
price structure, underlying costs and
assumptions, pricing formulas,
information relevant to the customer’s
mailing profile, and cost coverage
projections. Id. The Postal Service asks
the Commission to protect customeridentifying information from public
disclosure indefinitely. Id. at 7.
II. Notice of Filings
The Commission establishes Docket
Nos. MC2014–17 and CP2014–26 to
consider the Request pertaining to the
proposed Priority Mail Contract 76
product and the related contract,
respectively.
Interested persons may submit
comments on whether the Postal
Service’s filings in the captioned
dockets are consistent with the policies
of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 3642, 39 CFR
3015.5, and 39 CFR part 3020, subpart
B. Comments are due no later than
2 Although the Request appears to state that the
certification only pertains to paragraphs (1) and (3)
of 39 U.S.C. 3633(a), the certification itself contains
an assertion that the prices are in compliance with
39 U.S.C. 3633(a)(1), (2), and (3). See Request at 2;
Attachment E.
E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM
24JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 16 (Friday, January 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4184-4185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01378]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. MC2014-16 and CP2014-25; Order No. 1970]
New Postal Product
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a recent Postal Service filing
requesting the addition of Priority Mail Contract 75 to the competitive
product list. This notice informs the public of the filing, invites
public comment, and takes other administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: January 24, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing
Online system at https://www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments
electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Corcoran, Acting General
Counsel, at 202-789-6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filings
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
In accordance with 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq., the
Postal Service filed a request and associated supporting information to
add Priority Mail Contract 75 to the competitive product list.\1\ The
Postal Service asserts that Priority Mail Contract 75 is a competitive
product ``not of general applicability'' within the meaning of 39
U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). Request at 1. The Request has been assigned Docket
No. MC2014-16.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority
Mail Contract 75 to Competitive Product List and Notice of Filing
(Under Seal) of Unredacted Governors' Decision, Contract, and
Supporting Data, January 16, 2014 (Request).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Postal Service contemporaneously filed a redacted contract
related to the proposed new product. Id. Attachment B. The instant
contract has been assigned Docket No. CP2014-25.
Request. To support its Request, the Postal Service filed six
attachments as follows:
Attachment A--a redacted copy of Governors' Decision No.
11-6, authorizing the new product;
Attachment B--a redacted copy of the contract;
Attachment C--proposed changes to the Mail Classification
Schedule competitive product list with the addition underlined;
Attachment D--a Statement of Supporting Justification as
required by 39 CFR 3020.32;
Attachment E--a certification of compliance with 39 U.S.C.
3633(a); and
Attachment F--an application for non-public treatment of
materials to maintain redacted portions of the contract and related
financial information under seal.
In the Statement of Supporting Justification, Dennis R. Nicoski,
Manager, Field Sales Strategy and Contracts, asserts that the contract
will cover its attributable costs and increase contribution toward the
requisite 5.5 percent of the Postal Service's total institutional
costs. Id. Attachment D at 1. Mr. Nicoski contends that there will be
no issue of market dominant products subsidizing competitive products
as a result of this contract. Id.
Related contract. The Postal Service included a redacted version of
the related contract with the Request. Id. Attachment B. The contract
is scheduled to become effective one business day following the day on
which the Commission issues all necessary regulatory approval. Id. at
5. The contract will expire three years from the effective date unless,
among other things, either party terminates the agreement upon 30 days'
written notice to the other party or the contract is renewed by mutual
written agreement. Id. The contract also allows two 90-day extensions
of the agreement if the preparation of a successor agreement is active
and the Commission is notified within at least seven days of the
contract's expiration date. Id. at 6. The Postal Service represents
that the contract is consistent with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Although the Request appears to state that the certification
only pertains to paragraphs (1) and (3) of 39 U.S.C. 3633(a), the
certification itself contains an assertion that the prices are in
compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a)(1), (2), and (3). See Request at
2; Attachment E.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Postal Service filed much of the supporting materials,
including the related contract, under seal. Id. Attachment F. It
maintains that the redacted portions of the Governors' Decision,
contract, customer-identifying information, and related financial
information should remain confidential. Id. at 3. This information
includes the price structure, underlying costs and assumptions, pricing
formulas, information relevant to the customer's mailing profile, and
cost coverage projections. Id. The Postal Service asks
[[Page 4185]]
the Commission to protect customer-identifying information from public
disclosure indefinitely. Id. at 7.
II. Notice of Filings
The Commission establishes Docket Nos. MC2014-16 and CP2014-25 to
consider the Request pertaining to the proposed Priority Mail Contract
75 product and the related contract, respectively.
Interested persons may submit comments on whether the Postal
Service's filings in the captioned dockets are consistent with the
policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 3642, 39 CFR 3015.5, and 39 CFR
part 3020, subpart B. Comments are due no later than January 24, 2014.
The public portions of these filings can be accessed via the
Commission's Web site (https://www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints Pamela A. Thompson to serve as Public
Representative in these dockets.
III. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket Nos. MC2014-16 and CP2014-25
to consider the matters raised in each docket.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Pamela A. Thompson is appointed to
serve as an officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to
represent the interests of the general public in these proceedings.
3. Comments by interested persons in these proceedings are due no
later than January 24, 2014.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the
Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Ruth Ann Abrams,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-01378 Filed 1-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P