Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee Engine Endurance Testing Requirements-New Task, 3659-3660 [2014-01125]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 14 / Wednesday, January 22, 2014 / Notices
—Development of requirements for
onboard lifting appliances and
winches
—Considerations related to the double
sheathed low-pressure fuel pipes for
fuel injection systems in engines on
crude oil tankers
—Development of amendments to the
provisions of SOLAS chapter II–2
relating to secondary means of
venting cargo tanks
—Development of amendments to the
requirements for foam-type fireextinguishers in SOLAS regulation II–
2/10.5
—Consideration of IACS unified
interpretations
—Biennial agenda and provisional
agenda for SSE 2
—Any other business
Members of the public may attend
this meeting up to the seating capacity
of the room. To facilitate the building
security process, and to request
reasonable accommodation, those who
plan to attend should contact the
meeting coordinator, Mr. Randall
Eberly, by email at randall.eberly@
uscg.mil, by phone at (202) 372–1393,
by fax at (202) 372–8379, or in writing
at Commandant (CG–ENG–4), U.S. Coast
Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr Ave.
SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593–
7509 not later than February 18, 2014,
7 days prior to the meeting. Requests
made after February 18, 2014, might not
be able to be accommodated. RTCM
Headquarters is adjacent to the Rosslyn
Metro station. For further directions and
lodging information, please see: https://
www.rtcm.org/visit.php. Additional
information regarding this and other
IMO SHC public meetings may be found
at: www.uscg.mil/imo.
Dated: January 13, 2014.
Marc Zlomek,
Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating
Committee, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014–01162 Filed 1–21–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Aviation Rulemaking Advisory
Committee Engine Endurance Testing
Requirements—New Task
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of new task assignment
for the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory
Committee (ARAC).
AGENCY:
The FAA assigned ARAC a
new task to review existing engine
endurance test requirements, assess its
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:00 Jan 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
suitability for all engines, and consider
an alternate endurance test and
associated methods of compliance. The
current regulations may not adequately
address the technological advances
found in modern engines, as related to
the current engine endurance test. This
notice informs the public of the new
ARAC activity and solicits membership
for the Engine Harmonization Working
Group (EHWG).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dorina Mihail, Rulemaking and Policy
Branch, ANE–111, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, FAA, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington,
Massachusetts, 01803, telephone (781)
238–7153, facsimile (781) 238–7199;
email dorina.mihail@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ARAC Task Acceptance
ARAC accepted the task and assigned
the task to the EHWG, under the
Transport Airplane and Engine (TAE)
Subcommittee. The working group will
serve as staff to ARAC and assist ARAC
by providing advice and
recommendations of the assigned tasks.
ARAC must review and approve the
working group’s recommendation report
before it will forward it to the FAA.
Background
The FAA established ARAC to
provide advice and recommendations to
the FAA Administrator, through the
Associate Administrator for Aviation
Safety, on the FAA’s rulemaking
activities. This includes obtaining
advice and recommendations on the
FAA’s commitments to harmonize Title
14 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR) with appropriate foreign
authorities’ regulations. ARAC’s
objectives are to improve the
development of the FAA’s regulations
by providing information, advice, and
recommendations related to aviation
issues.
The EHWG will provide advice and
recommendations to ARAC on existing
and alternate endurance tests and
associated methods of compliance.
The engine endurance test is an
accelerated severity test intended to
demonstrate a minimum level of engine
operability and durability within the
approved engine ratings and operating
limitations. The test running conditions
cover the declared engine rating and
operating limitations, but are not
intended to simulate the expected inservice operation. To run the test at
simultaneous speed and temperature
limits, applicants may need to modify
the test engine configuration and the
required test sequence.
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3659
The current practice and accepted
methods of compliance allow
modifications to the test engine
configuration and test sequence,
provided certain conditions are met.
Specifically, that the engine, as
modified, still represents the durability
and operating characteristics of the
intended type design and complies with
§ 33.87 requirements. However,
experience with past engine
certifications shows that for some
engines, those modifications are
substantial enough that the engine is not
conforming to its type design, thus
affecting the test outcome. These
difficulties occur because the required
test in § 33.87 has not been updated to
account for technological advances in
gas turbine engines and in-service
operational characteristics.
The endurance test requirements
originated with the reciprocating engine
and were later revised for single-shaft
turbine engines with mechanical
controls. The test running conditions
were designed to match the engine
design and operational characteristics
during that time and have remained the
same for the past 60 years. Today’s
engines have evolved by up to 10 times
increased compression ratio and 40
times increased airflow. They
incorporate advanced technologies that
include three-shaft designs, high-bypass
turbofans, sophisticated full authority
digital electronic controls, and complex
turbine cooling. Other technological
advances provide in-service engine
health monitoring, thus improving
engine reliability and increased mean
time on wing. Modern engine
technologies allow up to 50% lower
specific-fuel consumption and
significant emissions and noise
improvements.
Certification experience shows that,
due to the complexity of modern
engines, the modifications needed to
run the required endurance test are
substantial, greatly affecting the engine
operating cycle and causing reduced
airflow, less cooling, or increased
temperatures. To compensate for these
undesirable effects, applicants make
additional engine modifications, such as
modifying cooling circuits, grinding
blade tips, or adding thermal barrier
coating to blades. As a result of these
modifications, it becomes increasingly
difficult to show that the test engine
conforms to the type design. The
objective of the ARAC task is to evaluate
whether the requirements for engine
endurance testing should be revised by
adding requirements for an alternate
test.
E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM
22JAN1
3660
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 14 / Wednesday, January 22, 2014 / Notices
The Task
The EHWG is to review and assess the
standards and advisory material for 14
CFR 33.87, engine endurance test
requirements as follows:
1. Develop an alternate endurance test
that would allow an engine to be tested
in the configuration representative of its
type design, and
a. Maintain compliance with the
intent, as well as the basic elements
currently in § 33.87, including the
ratings, operating limitations, and
engine configuration.
b. The alternate test is to be
equivalent to the test currently in
§ 33.87 with regards to demonstrating
engine operability and durability, and is
validated with engine data. The engine
data must include experience,
certification, and additional component
and engine tests.
2. Develop and document
recommended:
a. Methods of compliance, and
b. Rule changes, if considered
necessary.
3. Review the current foreign
requirements for engine endurance test
and determine the need for harmonizing
any new methodologies.
4. Provide initial qualitative and
quantitative estimates of costs and
benefits for any new methodologies.
5. Develop a report containing the
recommendations for rulemaking or
guidance material, or both, and explain
the rationale and safety benefits for each
proposed change.
6. The working group may be
reinstated to assist the ARAC by
responding to the FAA’s questions or
concerns after the recommendation
report has been submitted.
The final ARAC recommendation
report should include a summary of the
overall work scope, conclusions, and
rationale for all recommendations
related to the above tasks. It should
document both majority and minority
positions on the findings, and the
rationale for each position and reasons
for any disagreement. Any
disagreements should be documented,
including the rationale for each position
and the reasons for the disagreement.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Schedule
The recommendation report must be
submitted to the FAA for review and
acceptance no later than December 31,
2015.
Working Group Activity
The EHWG must comply with the
procedures adopted by the ARAC. As
part of the procedures, the working
group must:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:00 Jan 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
1. Conduct a review and analysis of
the assigned tasks, including any related
materials or documents.
2. Draft and submit a work plan for
completion of the task, including the
rationale supporting such a plan for
TAE Subcommittee consideration.
3. Provide a status report at each TAE
Subcommittee public meeting.
4. Draft and submit the
recommendation report based on the
review and analysis of the assigned
tasks and any related materials or
documents.
5. Present the recommendation at a
TAE Subcommittee public meeting.
6. The TAE Subcommittee Chair will
provide a status report at each ARAC
public meeting and present the final
recommendation to ARAC for review
and approval. ARAC will forward the
recommendation to the FAA.
Participation in the Working Group
The EHWG will be composed of
technical experts having an interest in
the assigned task. A working group
member does not need to be a member
representative of the ARAC. The FAA
would like a wide range of members on
the working group to ensure all aspects
of the tasks are considered in
development of the recommendations.
However, the June 18, 2010
memorandum, ‘‘Lobbyists on Agency
Boards and Commissions,’’ states that a
member must not be a federally
registered lobbyist who is subject to the
registration and reporting requirements
of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995
(LDA) as amended, 2 U.S.C 1603, 1604,
and 1605, at the time of appointment or
reappointment to an advisory
committee, and has not served in such
a role for a two-year period prior to
appointment. Therefore, the FAA will
not select any person that is a registered
lobbyist. For further information see the
Office of Management and Budget final
guidance on appointment of lobbyists to
federal boards and commissions (76 FR
61756, October 5, 2011).
If you have expertise in the subject
matter and wish to become a member of
the working group, write to the person
listed under the caption FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT expressing that
desire. Describe your interest in the task
and state the expertise you would bring
to the working group. The FAA must
receive all requests by February 11,
2014. The ARAC and the FAA will
review the requests and advise you if
they approve or disapprove your
request.
If you are chosen as a member on the
working group, you must represent your
aviation community segment and
actively participate in the working
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
group by attending all meetings and
providing written comments when
requested to do so. You must devote the
resources necessary to support the
working group in meeting any assigned
deadlines. You must keep your
management, and those you may
represent, advised of the working group
activities and decisions to ensure that
the proposed technical solutions do not
conflict with the position of those you
represent when the proposed
recommendations are presented to the
subcommittee and ARAC for approval.
Once the working group has begun
deliberations, they will not add or
substitute members without the
approval of the TAE Subcommittee
Chair, FAA Representatives, including
the Designated Federal Officer, and the
working group.
The Secretary of Transportation
determined that the ARAC formation
and use is necessary, and in the public
interest, in connection with the
performance of duties imposed on the
FAA by law.
ARAC meetings are open to the
public. Meetings held by the EHWG will
not be open to the public, except to
individuals selected to participate based
on interest and expertise. We will make
no public announcement of working
group meetings.
Issued in Washington, DC, on January 8,
2014.
Lirio Liu,
Designated Federal Officer, Aviation
Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2014–01125 Filed 1–21–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Thirteenth Meeting: RTCA Special
Committee 225, Rechargeable Lithium
Battery and Battery Systems—Small
and Medium Size
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special
Committee 225, Rechargeable Lithium
Battery and Battery Systems—Small and
Medium Size.
AGENCY:
The FAA is issuing this notice
to advise the public of the fourteenth
meeting of the RTCA Special Committee
225, Rechargeable Lithium Battery and
Battery Systems—Small and Medium
Size
SUMMARY:
The meeting will be held Feb 4–
6, 2014 from 9 a.m.–5 p.m.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM
22JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 14 (Wednesday, January 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3659-3660]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01125]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee Engine Endurance Testing
Requirements--New Task
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of new task assignment for the Aviation Rulemaking
Advisory Committee (ARAC).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA assigned ARAC a new task to review existing engine
endurance test requirements, assess its suitability for all engines,
and consider an alternate endurance test and associated methods of
compliance. The current regulations may not adequately address the
technological advances found in modern engines, as related to the
current engine endurance test. This notice informs the public of the
new ARAC activity and solicits membership for the Engine Harmonization
Working Group (EHWG).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dorina Mihail, Rulemaking and Policy
Branch, ANE-111, Engine and Propeller Directorate, FAA, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, Massachusetts, 01803, telephone (781) 238-
7153, facsimile (781) 238-7199; email dorina.mihail@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ARAC Task Acceptance
ARAC accepted the task and assigned the task to the EHWG, under the
Transport Airplane and Engine (TAE) Subcommittee. The working group
will serve as staff to ARAC and assist ARAC by providing advice and
recommendations of the assigned tasks. ARAC must review and approve the
working group's recommendation report before it will forward it to the
FAA.
Background
The FAA established ARAC to provide advice and recommendations to
the FAA Administrator, through the Associate Administrator for Aviation
Safety, on the FAA's rulemaking activities. This includes obtaining
advice and recommendations on the FAA's commitments to harmonize Title
14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) with appropriate foreign
authorities' regulations. ARAC's objectives are to improve the
development of the FAA's regulations by providing information, advice,
and recommendations related to aviation issues.
The EHWG will provide advice and recommendations to ARAC on
existing and alternate endurance tests and associated methods of
compliance.
The engine endurance test is an accelerated severity test intended
to demonstrate a minimum level of engine operability and durability
within the approved engine ratings and operating limitations. The test
running conditions cover the declared engine rating and operating
limitations, but are not intended to simulate the expected in-service
operation. To run the test at simultaneous speed and temperature
limits, applicants may need to modify the test engine configuration and
the required test sequence.
The current practice and accepted methods of compliance allow
modifications to the test engine configuration and test sequence,
provided certain conditions are met. Specifically, that the engine, as
modified, still represents the durability and operating characteristics
of the intended type design and complies with Sec. 33.87 requirements.
However, experience with past engine certifications shows that for some
engines, those modifications are substantial enough that the engine is
not conforming to its type design, thus affecting the test outcome.
These difficulties occur because the required test in Sec. 33.87 has
not been updated to account for technological advances in gas turbine
engines and in-service operational characteristics.
The endurance test requirements originated with the reciprocating
engine and were later revised for single-shaft turbine engines with
mechanical controls. The test running conditions were designed to match
the engine design and operational characteristics during that time and
have remained the same for the past 60 years. Today's engines have
evolved by up to 10 times increased compression ratio and 40 times
increased airflow. They incorporate advanced technologies that include
three-shaft designs, high-bypass turbofans, sophisticated full
authority digital electronic controls, and complex turbine cooling.
Other technological advances provide in-service engine health
monitoring, thus improving engine reliability and increased mean time
on wing. Modern engine technologies allow up to 50% lower specific-fuel
consumption and significant emissions and noise improvements.
Certification experience shows that, due to the complexity of
modern engines, the modifications needed to run the required endurance
test are substantial, greatly affecting the engine operating cycle and
causing reduced airflow, less cooling, or increased temperatures. To
compensate for these undesirable effects, applicants make additional
engine modifications, such as modifying cooling circuits, grinding
blade tips, or adding thermal barrier coating to blades. As a result of
these modifications, it becomes increasingly difficult to show that the
test engine conforms to the type design. The objective of the ARAC task
is to evaluate whether the requirements for engine endurance testing
should be revised by adding requirements for an alternate test.
[[Page 3660]]
The Task
The EHWG is to review and assess the standards and advisory
material for 14 CFR 33.87, engine endurance test requirements as
follows:
1. Develop an alternate endurance test that would allow an engine
to be tested in the configuration representative of its type design,
and
a. Maintain compliance with the intent, as well as the basic
elements currently in Sec. 33.87, including the ratings, operating
limitations, and engine configuration.
b. The alternate test is to be equivalent to the test currently in
Sec. 33.87 with regards to demonstrating engine operability and
durability, and is validated with engine data. The engine data must
include experience, certification, and additional component and engine
tests.
2. Develop and document recommended:
a. Methods of compliance, and
b. Rule changes, if considered necessary.
3. Review the current foreign requirements for engine endurance
test and determine the need for harmonizing any new methodologies.
4. Provide initial qualitative and quantitative estimates of costs
and benefits for any new methodologies.
5. Develop a report containing the recommendations for rulemaking
or guidance material, or both, and explain the rationale and safety
benefits for each proposed change.
6. The working group may be reinstated to assist the ARAC by
responding to the FAA's questions or concerns after the recommendation
report has been submitted.
The final ARAC recommendation report should include a summary of
the overall work scope, conclusions, and rationale for all
recommendations related to the above tasks. It should document both
majority and minority positions on the findings, and the rationale for
each position and reasons for any disagreement. Any disagreements
should be documented, including the rationale for each position and the
reasons for the disagreement.
Schedule
The recommendation report must be submitted to the FAA for review
and acceptance no later than December 31, 2015.
Working Group Activity
The EHWG must comply with the procedures adopted by the ARAC. As
part of the procedures, the working group must:
1. Conduct a review and analysis of the assigned tasks, including
any related materials or documents.
2. Draft and submit a work plan for completion of the task,
including the rationale supporting such a plan for TAE Subcommittee
consideration.
3. Provide a status report at each TAE Subcommittee public meeting.
4. Draft and submit the recommendation report based on the review
and analysis of the assigned tasks and any related materials or
documents.
5. Present the recommendation at a TAE Subcommittee public meeting.
6. The TAE Subcommittee Chair will provide a status report at each
ARAC public meeting and present the final recommendation to ARAC for
review and approval. ARAC will forward the recommendation to the FAA.
Participation in the Working Group
The EHWG will be composed of technical experts having an interest
in the assigned task. A working group member does not need to be a
member representative of the ARAC. The FAA would like a wide range of
members on the working group to ensure all aspects of the tasks are
considered in development of the recommendations. However, the June 18,
2010 memorandum, ``Lobbyists on Agency Boards and Commissions,'' states
that a member must not be a federally registered lobbyist who is
subject to the registration and reporting requirements of the Lobbying
Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) as amended, 2 U.S.C 1603, 1604, and 1605,
at the time of appointment or reappointment to an advisory committee,
and has not served in such a role for a two-year period prior to
appointment. Therefore, the FAA will not select any person that is a
registered lobbyist. For further information see the Office of
Management and Budget final guidance on appointment of lobbyists to
federal boards and commissions (76 FR 61756, October 5, 2011).
If you have expertise in the subject matter and wish to become a
member of the working group, write to the person listed under the
caption FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT expressing that desire.
Describe your interest in the task and state the expertise you would
bring to the working group. The FAA must receive all requests by
February 11, 2014. The ARAC and the FAA will review the requests and
advise you if they approve or disapprove your request.
If you are chosen as a member on the working group, you must
represent your aviation community segment and actively participate in
the working group by attending all meetings and providing written
comments when requested to do so. You must devote the resources
necessary to support the working group in meeting any assigned
deadlines. You must keep your management, and those you may represent,
advised of the working group activities and decisions to ensure that
the proposed technical solutions do not conflict with the position of
those you represent when the proposed recommendations are presented to
the subcommittee and ARAC for approval. Once the working group has
begun deliberations, they will not add or substitute members without
the approval of the TAE Subcommittee Chair, FAA Representatives,
including the Designated Federal Officer, and the working group.
The Secretary of Transportation determined that the ARAC formation
and use is necessary, and in the public interest, in connection with
the performance of duties imposed on the FAA by law.
ARAC meetings are open to the public. Meetings held by the EHWG
will not be open to the public, except to individuals selected to
participate based on interest and expertise. We will make no public
announcement of working group meetings.
Issued in Washington, DC, on January 8, 2014.
Lirio Liu,
Designated Federal Officer, Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2014-01125 Filed 1-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P