Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Dyke Marsh Restoration and Long-term Management Plan, George Washington Memorial Parkway, Virginia, 2690-2691 [2014-00633]
Download as PDF
2690
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2014 / Notices
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, please be aware your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
The responsible official for this Draft
EIS is the Regional Director, NPS
Southeast Region, 100 Alabama Street
SW., 1924 Building, Atlanta, Georgia
30303.
Dated: January 8, 2014.
Stan Austin,
Regional Director, Southeast Region.
[FR Doc. 2014–00634 Filed 1–14–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–JD–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–NCR–GWMP–13704;
PX.XGWMP0400.00.1]
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
for the Dyke Marsh Restoration and
Long-term Management Plan, George
Washington Memorial Parkway,
Virginia
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Park Service
(NPS) announces the availability of a
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(DEIS) for the Dyke Marsh Restoration
and Long-term Management Plan at
George Washington Memorial Parkway,
Virginia. The DEIS provides a
systematic analysis of alternatives for
the restoration and long-term
management of the tidal freshwater
marsh and other associated wetland
habitats lost or impacted in Dyke Marsh
Preserve on the Potomac River.
DATES: The NPS will accept comments
on the DEIS from the public for 60 days
after the date that the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes the notice
of availability of the DEIS in its regular
Friday Federal Register listing. A public
meeting will be held during the review
period to facilitate the submission of
public comment. Once scheduled, the
meeting date will be announced via the
George Washington Memorial Parkway
Web site
(https://www.nps.gov/gwmp/), the NPS’s
Planning Environment and Public
Comment (PEPC) Web site (https://
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:04 Jan 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
parkplanning.nps.gov/gwmp), and a
press release to area media.
ADDRESSES: The DEIS for the Dyke
Marsh Restoration and Long-term
Management Plan will be available for
public review online at the NPS’s PEPC
Web site (https://parkplanning.nps.gov/
GWMP). You may submit your
comments by any one of several
methods. The preferred method of
commenting is via the Internet at
(https://parkplanning.nps.gov/GWMP).
You may also mail comments to Dyke
Marsh Restoration Plan, 700 George
Washington Memorial Parkway, Turkey
Run Park Headquarters, McLean, VA
22101. Or, you may hand-deliver
comments to 700 George Washington
Memorial Parkway, Turkey Run Park
Headquarters, McLean, VA 22101.
Written comments will also be accepted
at the public meeting. We will not
accept comments by fax, email, or in
any other way than those specified
above. We will not accept bulk
comments in any format (hard copy or
electronic) submitted on behalf of
others. Before including your address,
phone number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alex
Romero, Superintendent, 700 George
Washington Memorial Parkway, Turkey
Run Park Headquarters, McLean, VA
22101; telephone (703) 289–2500.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
purpose of this DEIS is to develop a
plan for the restoration and long-term
management of the tidal freshwater
marsh and other associated wetland
habitats lost or impacted in Dyke Marsh
Preserve on the Potomac River.
Dyke Marsh Preserve is one of the last
large tracts of tidal freshwater marsh
along the Potomac River in the
Washington, DC, area and has existed
for at least 2,200 years.
Located just south of Alexandria,
Virginia, Dyke Marsh Preserve is viewed
as a national treasure because of its
proximity to the Nation’s Capital and a
large urban/suburban population, its
history, and its current potential for
providing ecosystem services,
recreational values and educational
opportunities. Despite continual
degradation of the existing marsh, it
provides numerous natural benefits and
services, including resident and
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
migratory wildlife habitat, refuge for
state species of concern, attenuation of
tidal energy, shoreline stabilization,
flood control, and water quality
enhancement.
The goal of the actions described in
the DEIS is to restore areas of Dyke
Marsh that were previously impacted by
dredging and erosion. The park will reestablish soil elevations to sustain
marsh plant communities while
preventing damage to vegetation in the
existing wetland. In the long-term, the
project will provide additional wetlands
to the Potomac River watershed
ecosystems, preserve the aesthetic and
natural values of Dyke Marsh and the
George Washington Memorial Parkway,
and continue to offer recreational
opportunities currently available.
Specific objectives of the plan are listed
below.
Natural Resources. Dyke Marsh
Restoration will protect and maintain
tidal freshwater wetlands and associated
ecosystems to provide habitat for fish,
wildlife, and other biota. The park will
ensure that management actions
promote native species while
minimizing invasive nonnative plants.
The marsh restoration will reduce or
eliminate erosion of the existing marsh
and, to the extent practicable, will
restore and maintain hydrologic
processes needed to sustain the marsh.
The restored marsh will protect
breeding populations of state species of
concern such as least bittern
(Ixobrychus exilis), state critically
imperiled swamp sparrow (Meloxpiza
georgiana ssp. georgiana, G5T5, S1B/
S4S5N), and state imperiled species
such as river bulrush (Bolboschoenus
fluviatilis, G5S2). Finally, the
restoration will increase the resiliency
of Dyke Marsh, provide a natural buffer
to storms, and help ameliorate flooding
in populated residential areas.
Cultural Resources. The restoration
will protect the historic resources and
cultural landscape features associated
with Dyke Marsh and the George
Washington Memorial Parkway.
Visitor Experience will be enhanced
through appropriate educational,
interpretation, and research
opportunities at Dyke Marsh and
enhance access by diverse audiences.
The DEIS analyzes two action
alternatives and the no action
alternative, as described below.
Alternative A: No Action—Under this
alternative, there would be no
restoration. Current management of the
marsh would continue, which includes
providing basic maintenance related to
the Haul Road, control of nonnative
invasive plant species, ongoing
interpretive and environmental
E:\FR\FM\15JAN1.SGM
15JAN1
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2014 / Notices
education activities, scientific research
projects, boundary marking, and
enforcement of existing regulations.
There would be no manipulation of the
marsh other than emergency, safetyrelated, or limited improvements or
maintenance actions. The destabilized
marsh would continue to erode at an
accelerated rate.
Alternative B: Hydrologic Restoration
and Minimal Wetland Restoration—
Under alternative B, the focus is on the
most essential actions to reestablish
hydrologic conditions that shield the
marsh from erosive currents and protect
the Hog Island Gut channel and channel
wall. A breakwater structure would be
constructed on the south end of the
marsh, in alignment with the
northernmost extent of the historic
promontory, and wetlands would be
restored to strategic areas where the
water is less than 4 feet deep. This
alternative also includes fill of some
deep channel areas near the breakwater.
The final element of this alternative is
the reestablishment of hydrologic
connections to the inland side of the
Haul Road to restore bottomland swamp
forest areas that were cut off when the
Haul Road was constructed.
Approximately 30 acres west of the
Haul Road could be influenced by tidal
flows as a result. These actions would
not necessarily happen in any particular
order, and may be dictated by available
funds. However, it is assumed that the
breakwater would be constructed first.
This alternative would create
approximately 70 acres of various new
wetland habitats and allow the
continued natural accretion of soils and
establishment of wetlands given the
new hydrologic conditions.
Alternative C: Hydrologic Restoration
and Fullest Possible Extent of Wetland
Restoration (NPS Preferred
Alternative)—Under alternative C, the
marsh would be restored in a phased
approach up to the historic boundary of
the marsh and other adjacent areas
within NPS jurisdictional boundaries.
Phased restoration would continue until
a sustainable marsh is achieved and the
overall goals of the project are met. The
historic boundaries lie between the
historic promontory and Dyke Island,
the triangular island off the end of the
Haul Road. The outer edges of the
containment cell structures would be
placed at the park boundary in the river.
The initial phase of this alternative
would first establish a breakwater
structure at the southern alignment of
the historic promontory to provide
immediate protection to Dyke Marsh
from erosion. After the breakwater is
established, the deep channel areas
north of the historic promontory would
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:04 Jan 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
be filled within the NPS boundary, and
the marsh would be restored to the 4foot contour at strategic locations to
further reduce the risk of erosion and
storm surges and promote
sedimentation within the existing
marsh. Afterwards, two cells would be
constructed along the northern edge of
the breakwater, restoring the original
extent of the promontory’s land mass.
All subsequent phases would
establish containment cells out no
further than the historic marsh
boundary. The location of these cells
would be prioritized based on the most
benefits the specific locations could
provide to the existing marsh. The
timing of these subsequent phases and
the size and number of cells built during
these phases would be dependent upon
available funds and materials.
In addition to the construction of
containment cells, tidal guts would be
cut into the restored marsh area that
would be similar to the historical flow
channels of the original marsh.
This alternative, like Alternative B,
would also introduce breaks in the Haul
Road, returning tidal flows to
approximately 30 acres west of the Haul
Road, which would help to re-establish
the historic swamp forest originally
found on the site.
Additional wetland may be restored
south of the new breakwater to fill out
the southernmost historic extent of the
marsh. This area would not be protected
from storms, and would be one of the
last features implemented. In addition,
the marsh restoration would extend
north of Dyke Island, and tidal guts
would be created. This alternative
contains an optional restoration cell in
the area currently serving as a mooring
area for the marina. Such an option
would only be implemented should the
marina concession no longer be
economically viable for the current
concessioner, and then only if no other
concessioner expresses interest in taking
over the business, which would
eliminate the need for the mooring field.
In total, under this alternative,
approximately 245 acres of various
wetland habitats could be created.
Dated: October 21, 2013.
Stephen E. Whitesell,
Regional Director, National Park Service,
National Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 2014–00633 Filed 1–14–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–DL–P
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2691
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
[14XR0680A1, RX.00236101.0021000,
RR04313000]
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement and
Announcement of Public Scoping
Meetings for Continued
Implementation of the 2008 Operating
Agreement for the Rio Grande Project,
New Mexico and Texas
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Reclamation is
issuing this notice to advise the public
that an environmental impact statement
(EIS) will be prepared for the proposed
continued implementation of the 2008
Operating Agreement over its entire
remaining term (through 2050) for the
Rio Grande Project in New Mexico and
Texas. The Operating Agreement is a
written detailed description of how
Reclamation allocates, releases from
storage, and delivers Rio Grande Project
water to users within the Elephant Butte
Irrigation District (EBID) in New
Mexico, the El Paso County Water
Improvement District No. 1 (EPCWID) in
Texas, and to users covered by the 1906
international treaty with Mexico. In
addition, this EIS proposes to evaluate
the environmental effects of renewing
San Juan Chama Project storage
contracts under authority of the Act of
December 29, 1981, Pub. L. 97–140, 95
Stat. 1717, providing for storage in
Elephant Butte Reservoir.
DATES: Comments on the scope of the
EIS must be received by February 14,
2014.
Three public scoping meetings will be
held to solicit public input on the scope
of the EIS, potential alternatives, and
issues to be addressed in the EIS. See
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for meeting dates.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
regarding the scope and content of the
EIS should be sent to Ms. Rhea Graham,
Bureau of Reclamation, Albuquerque
Area Office, 555 Broadway NE., Suite
100, Mail Stop ALB–103, Albuquerque,
New Mexico 87102, or provided via
email at rgraham@usbr.gov.
Those not desiring to submit
comments or suggestions at this time,
but who would like to receive a copy of
the EIS, should contact Ms. Graham
using the information cited above. See
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for locations of public scoping meetings.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Rhea Graham, Bureau of Reclamation;
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15JAN1.SGM
15JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2690-2691]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00633]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS-NCR-GWMP-13704; PX.XGWMP0400.00.1]
Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Dyke Marsh
Restoration and Long-term Management Plan, George Washington Memorial
Parkway, Virginia
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Park Service (NPS) announces the availability of
a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Dyke Marsh
Restoration and Long-term Management Plan at George Washington Memorial
Parkway, Virginia. The DEIS provides a systematic analysis of
alternatives for the restoration and long-term management of the tidal
freshwater marsh and other associated wetland habitats lost or impacted
in Dyke Marsh Preserve on the Potomac River.
DATES: The NPS will accept comments on the DEIS from the public for 60
days after the date that the Environmental Protection Agency publishes
the notice of availability of the DEIS in its regular Friday Federal
Register listing. A public meeting will be held during the review
period to facilitate the submission of public comment. Once scheduled,
the meeting date will be announced via the George Washington Memorial
Parkway Web site (https://www.nps.gov/gwmp/), the NPS's Planning
Environment and Public Comment (PEPC) Web site (https://parkplanning.nps.gov/gwmp), and a press release to area media.
ADDRESSES: The DEIS for the Dyke Marsh Restoration and Long-term
Management Plan will be available for public review online at the NPS's
PEPC Web site (https://parkplanning.nps.gov/GWMP). You may submit your
comments by any one of several methods. The preferred method of
commenting is via the Internet at (https://parkplanning.nps.gov/GWMP).
You may also mail comments to Dyke Marsh Restoration Plan, 700 George
Washington Memorial Parkway, Turkey Run Park Headquarters, McLean, VA
22101. Or, you may hand-deliver comments to 700 George Washington
Memorial Parkway, Turkey Run Park Headquarters, McLean, VA 22101.
Written comments will also be accepted at the public meeting. We will
not accept comments by fax, email, or in any other way than those
specified above. We will not accept bulk comments in any format (hard
copy or electronic) submitted on behalf of others. Before including
your address, phone number, email address, or other personal
identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your
entire comment--including your personal identifying information--may be
made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your
comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public
review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alex Romero, Superintendent, 700
George Washington Memorial Parkway, Turkey Run Park Headquarters,
McLean, VA 22101; telephone (703) 289-2500.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of this DEIS is to develop a
plan for the restoration and long-term management of the tidal
freshwater marsh and other associated wetland habitats lost or impacted
in Dyke Marsh Preserve on the Potomac River.
Dyke Marsh Preserve is one of the last large tracts of tidal
freshwater marsh along the Potomac River in the Washington, DC, area
and has existed for at least 2,200 years.
Located just south of Alexandria, Virginia, Dyke Marsh Preserve is
viewed as a national treasure because of its proximity to the Nation's
Capital and a large urban/suburban population, its history, and its
current potential for providing ecosystem services, recreational values
and educational opportunities. Despite continual degradation of the
existing marsh, it provides numerous natural benefits and services,
including resident and migratory wildlife habitat, refuge for state
species of concern, attenuation of tidal energy, shoreline
stabilization, flood control, and water quality enhancement.
The goal of the actions described in the DEIS is to restore areas
of Dyke Marsh that were previously impacted by dredging and erosion.
The park will re-establish soil elevations to sustain marsh plant
communities while preventing damage to vegetation in the existing
wetland. In the long-term, the project will provide additional wetlands
to the Potomac River watershed ecosystems, preserve the aesthetic and
natural values of Dyke Marsh and the George Washington Memorial
Parkway, and continue to offer recreational opportunities currently
available. Specific objectives of the plan are listed below.
Natural Resources. Dyke Marsh Restoration will protect and maintain
tidal freshwater wetlands and associated ecosystems to provide habitat
for fish, wildlife, and other biota. The park will ensure that
management actions promote native species while minimizing invasive
nonnative plants. The marsh restoration will reduce or eliminate
erosion of the existing marsh and, to the extent practicable, will
restore and maintain hydrologic processes needed to sustain the marsh.
The restored marsh will protect breeding populations of state species
of concern such as least bittern (Ixobrychus exilis), state critically
imperiled swamp sparrow (Meloxpiza georgiana ssp. georgiana, G5T5, S1B/
S4S5N), and state imperiled species such as river bulrush
(Bolboschoenus fluviatilis, G5S2). Finally, the restoration will
increase the resiliency of Dyke Marsh, provide a natural buffer to
storms, and help ameliorate flooding in populated residential areas.
Cultural Resources. The restoration will protect the historic
resources and cultural landscape features associated with Dyke Marsh
and the George Washington Memorial Parkway.
Visitor Experience will be enhanced through appropriate
educational, interpretation, and research opportunities at Dyke Marsh
and enhance access by diverse audiences.
The DEIS analyzes two action alternatives and the no action
alternative, as described below.
Alternative A: No Action--Under this alternative, there would be no
restoration. Current management of the marsh would continue, which
includes providing basic maintenance related to the Haul Road, control
of nonnative invasive plant species, ongoing interpretive and
environmental
[[Page 2691]]
education activities, scientific research projects, boundary marking,
and enforcement of existing regulations. There would be no manipulation
of the marsh other than emergency, safety-related, or limited
improvements or maintenance actions. The destabilized marsh would
continue to erode at an accelerated rate.
Alternative B: Hydrologic Restoration and Minimal Wetland
Restoration--Under alternative B, the focus is on the most essential
actions to reestablish hydrologic conditions that shield the marsh from
erosive currents and protect the Hog Island Gut channel and channel
wall. A breakwater structure would be constructed on the south end of
the marsh, in alignment with the northernmost extent of the historic
promontory, and wetlands would be restored to strategic areas where the
water is less than 4 feet deep. This alternative also includes fill of
some deep channel areas near the breakwater. The final element of this
alternative is the reestablishment of hydrologic connections to the
inland side of the Haul Road to restore bottomland swamp forest areas
that were cut off when the Haul Road was constructed. Approximately 30
acres west of the Haul Road could be influenced by tidal flows as a
result. These actions would not necessarily happen in any particular
order, and may be dictated by available funds. However, it is assumed
that the breakwater would be constructed first. This alternative would
create approximately 70 acres of various new wetland habitats and allow
the continued natural accretion of soils and establishment of wetlands
given the new hydrologic conditions.
Alternative C: Hydrologic Restoration and Fullest Possible Extent
of Wetland Restoration (NPS Preferred Alternative)--Under alternative
C, the marsh would be restored in a phased approach up to the historic
boundary of the marsh and other adjacent areas within NPS
jurisdictional boundaries. Phased restoration would continue until a
sustainable marsh is achieved and the overall goals of the project are
met. The historic boundaries lie between the historic promontory and
Dyke Island, the triangular island off the end of the Haul Road. The
outer edges of the containment cell structures would be placed at the
park boundary in the river.
The initial phase of this alternative would first establish a
breakwater structure at the southern alignment of the historic
promontory to provide immediate protection to Dyke Marsh from erosion.
After the breakwater is established, the deep channel areas north of
the historic promontory would be filled within the NPS boundary, and
the marsh would be restored to the 4-foot contour at strategic
locations to further reduce the risk of erosion and storm surges and
promote sedimentation within the existing marsh. Afterwards, two cells
would be constructed along the northern edge of the breakwater,
restoring the original extent of the promontory's land mass.
All subsequent phases would establish containment cells out no
further than the historic marsh boundary. The location of these cells
would be prioritized based on the most benefits the specific locations
could provide to the existing marsh. The timing of these subsequent
phases and the size and number of cells built during these phases would
be dependent upon available funds and materials.
In addition to the construction of containment cells, tidal guts
would be cut into the restored marsh area that would be similar to the
historical flow channels of the original marsh.
This alternative, like Alternative B, would also introduce breaks
in the Haul Road, returning tidal flows to approximately 30 acres west
of the Haul Road, which would help to re-establish the historic swamp
forest originally found on the site.
Additional wetland may be restored south of the new breakwater to
fill out the southernmost historic extent of the marsh. This area would
not be protected from storms, and would be one of the last features
implemented. In addition, the marsh restoration would extend north of
Dyke Island, and tidal guts would be created. This alternative contains
an optional restoration cell in the area currently serving as a mooring
area for the marina. Such an option would only be implemented should
the marina concession no longer be economically viable for the current
concessioner, and then only if no other concessioner expresses interest
in taking over the business, which would eliminate the need for the
mooring field. In total, under this alternative, approximately 245
acres of various wetland habitats could be created.
Dated: October 21, 2013.
Stephen E. Whitesell,
Regional Director, National Park Service, National Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 2014-00633 Filed 1-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DL-P