Safety Standard for Bedside Sleepers, 2581-2589 [2014-00597]
Download as PDF
2581
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 79, No. 10
Wednesday, January 15, 2014
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
16 CFR Parts 1112 and 1222
[Docket No. CPSC–2012–0067]
Safety Standard for Bedside Sleepers
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Danny Keysar Child
Product Safety Notification Act, Section
104 of the Consumer Product Safety
Improvement Act of 2008 (CPSIA),
requires the United States Consumer
Product Safety Commission
(Commission or CPSC) to promulgate
consumer product safety standards for
durable infant or toddler products.
These standards are to be ‘‘substantially
the same as’’ applicable voluntary
standards or more stringent than the
voluntary standard if the Commission
concludes that more stringent
requirements would further reduce the
risk of injury associated with the
product. The Commission is issuing a
safety standard for bedside sleepers in
response to the direction under Section
104(b) of the CPSIA.
DATES: The rule is effective on July 15,
2014. The incorporation by reference of
the publication listed in this rule is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of July 15, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel Dunlap, Compliance Officer,
Consumer Product Safety Commission,
4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD
20814; telephone: 301–504–7733; email:
ddunlap@cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
A. Background and Statutory Authority
The Consumer Product Safety
Improvement Act of 2008, (CPSIA, Pub.
L. 110–314), was enacted on August 14,
2008. Section 104(b) of the CPSIA, part
VerDate Mar<15>2010
11:25 Jan 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
of the Danny Keysar Child Product
Safety Notification Act, requires the
Commission to: (1) Examine and assess
the effectiveness of voluntary consumer
product safety standards for durable
infant or toddler products, in
consultation with representatives of
consumer groups, juvenile product
manufacturers, and independent child
product engineers and experts, and (2)
promulgate consumer product safety
standards for durable infant and toddler
products. These standards are to be
‘‘substantially the same as’’ applicable
voluntary standards or more stringent
than the voluntary standard if the
Commission concludes that more
stringent requirements would further
reduce the risk of injury associated with
the product.
The term ‘‘durable infant or toddler
product’’ is defined in section 104(f)(1)
of the CPSIA as a durable product
intended for use, or that may be
reasonably expected to be used, by
children under the age of 5 years.
Bassinets and cradles are specifically
identified in section 104(f)(2)(L) as
durable infant or toddler products.
Bedside sleepers are similar to
bassinets, and many bedside sleepers
also function as bassinets. In addition,
some bedside sleepers are accessories to
play yards, which are explicitly
identified in section 104(f)(2)(F).
On December 10, 2012, the
Commission issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for bedside sleepers
(77 FR 73345). The NPR proposed to
incorporate by reference the voluntary
standard, ASTM F2906–12, ‘‘Standard
Consumer Safety Specification for
Bedside Sleepers,’’ with certain changes
to provisions in the voluntary standard
to strengthen the ASTM standard.
In this document, the Commission is
issuing a safety standard for bedside
sleepers. Pursuant to Section
104(b)(1)(A), the Commission consulted
with manufacturers, retailers, trade
organizations, laboratories, consumer
advocacy groups, consultants, and
members of the public in the
development of this proposed standard,
largely through the ASTM process. The
rule incorporates the voluntary standard
developed by ASTM International
(formerly the American Society for
Testing and Materials), ASTM F2906–
13, ‘‘Standard Consumer Safety
Specification for Bedside Sleepers’’
(ASTM F2906–13), by reference, and
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
requires bedside sleepers to be tested to
16 CFR part 1218, the Safety Standard
for Bassinets and Cradles (bassinet
standard).
B. The Product
ASTM F2906–13 defines ‘‘bedside
sleeper’’ as ‘‘a rigid frame assembly that
may be combined with a fabric or mesh
assembly, or both, used to function as
sides, ends, or floor or a combination
thereof, and that is intended to provide
a sleeping environment for infants and
is secured to an adult bed.’’ A ‘‘multimode product’’ is ‘‘a unit that is
designed and intended to be used in
more than one mode (for example, a
play yard, bassinet, changing table,
hand held carrier, or bedside sleeper).’’
A bedside sleeper is intended to be
secured to an adult bed to permit
newborns and infants to sleep close by
an adult without being in the adult bed.
Bedside sleepers currently on the
market have a horizontal sleep surface
that typically is 1 inch to 4 inches below
the level of the adult bed’s mattress. The
side of the bedside sleeper that is
adjacent to the adult bed can usually be
adjusted to a lower position, a feature
that differentiates bedside sleepers from
bassinets, where all four sides of a
bassinet are the same height. Current
bedside sleepers range in size from
about 35″ x 20″ to 40″ x 30.″ Bedside
sleepers may have rigid sides, but they
are most commonly constructed with a
tube frame covered by mesh or fabric.
Bedside sleepers are intended for use
with children up to the developmental
stage where they can push up on hands
and knees (about 5 months). This is the
same developmental range for the
intended users of bassinets.
Several manufacturers produce
multiuse (or multimode) bedside sleeper
products that can convert into bassinets
and/or play yards. Most bedside sleeper
products can be converted into a
bassinet by raising the lowered side to
create four equal-height sides, and a few
also convert into both a bassinet and
play yard. Some play yards include
bedside sleeper accessories, which
when attached, convert the play yard
into a bedside sleeper; and some
bassinets convert into bedside sleepers.
All of the tube-framed products that
CPSC staff has evaluated may be
collapsed for storage and transport. A
bedside sleeper that can be used in
additional modes would need to meet
E:\FR\FM\15JAR1.SGM
15JAR1
2582
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
each applicable standard. For example,
a bedside sleeper that converts to a
bassinet must meet the bedside sleeper
standard and the bassinet standard.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
C. Incident Data
The preamble to the NPR summarized
the incident data involving bedside
sleepers reported to the Commission
from January 2001 through December
2011. 77 FR 73345 (December 10, 2012).
The data was extracted on January 24,
2012. CPSC’s Directorate for
Epidemiology staff identified 40 cases of
bedside sleeper-related incidents from
2001 to 2011, including four fatalities
and 36 nonfatal incidents (with and
without injuries). Since the NPR, the
incident data have been updated to
include bedside sleeper-related incident
data reported to the Commission
between January 24, 2012 and May 15,
2013.
Since the extraction of the data
presented in the NPR, CPSC staff has
received four new reports involving
bedside sleepers. One of the reports was
a consumer query regarding a recalled
product and did not involve an actual
incident. The rest of the reports
involved no fatalities or injuries. The
infants identified in the incident reports
ranged in age from 1 to 6 months.
The hazards reported in the new
incidents were consistent with the
hazard patterns identified among the 40
incidents presented in the NPR briefing
package. The hazard scenarios reported
in 24 of the 40 incidents (60 percent)
were attributed to some sort of failure/
defect or a potential design flaw in the
product.
Among the four new reports, two
incidents were classified under
miscellaneous product-related issues
concerning the poor design and a
broken/detached component of the
product. In the incident reporting poor
design, the consumer expressed concern
that the fabric side could create a
suffocation hazard when the child’s face
is against the fabric; the consumer
reportedly stopped using the product.
The second incident involved a sixmonth-old who fell onto the floor from
a recalled, multimode product when the
horizontal bar that converts the product
from a bedside sleeper to a bassinet,
broke off or detached. No injury was
reported, and it is unclear whether the
consumer was aware of the recalled
status of the product. The third incident
is categorized as an assembly instruction
issue, where it appears that the
consumer did not properly follow the
assembly instructions. The last report
was a CPSC recall-related consumer
query; no actual incident was involved.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
11:25 Jan 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
D. Overview of ASTM F2906
ASTM first published a voluntary
standard for bedside sleepers, ASTM
F2906–11, in December 2011. ASTM
F2906 specifically addressed hazards
associated with bedside sleepers,
including incidents involving the
creation of a hazardous gap between the
product and an adult mattress, by
requiring the successful completion of
three disengagement tests. The tests
help ensure that the securing
components can withstand forces that
may be exerted on the product by either
the child or an adult, while sleeping.
The gap must be no more than 0.5 in.
when the product is installed onto the
adult bed, per each manufacturer’s
directions. When a 25-lb. horizontal
force is applied near the attachment
system or corners, the gap may not
exceed 1.0 in. To simulate an adult
rolling into a bedside sleeper while
sleeping, a gap greater than 1.0 in. may
not be created after the application and
release of a 50-lb. horizontal force to the
bedside sleeper’s corners. The inclusion
of these anti-gap requirements serve to
mitigate the foreseeable head and neck
entrapment hazards posed by bedside
sleepers. In addition, bedside sleepers
must also satisfy the minimum sideheight requirement for bassinets (the
upper surface of the non-compressed
mattress of a bassinet/cradle must be at
least 7.5 inches lower than the upper
surface of the lowest side in all intended
bassinet/cradle use positions), with the
exception of the lowered side rail (the
height of the side rail in the lowest
position shall be no less than 4 inches
when measured from the top of the
uncompressed bedside sleeper mattress
to the top of the lowered side rail, when
the mattress support is in its highest
position).
Bedside sleepers and bassinets share
a significant number of hazard patterns
because both products are intended to
be used by children with the same
developmental abilities and for the same
purpose. Many bedside sleepers also
function as bassinets. Accordingly, the
bedside sleepers voluntary standard
requires beside sleepers to be tested to
the bassinet standard (ASTM F2194).
1. Proposed Rule
In the NPR, CPSC identified 24
incidents attributed to defect or
potential design flaws in bedside
sleepers. The hazards associated with
these incidents included: Issues with
the adjustable fabric cover over the
metal bars on the side that lowered in
the bedside sleeper mode (9 incidents);
poor assembly instruction (6 incidents);
and miscellaneous other product-related
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
issues (9 incidents). To address these
incidents, the Commission proposed in
the NPR to adopt by reference, ASTM
International’s voluntary standard,
ASTM F2906–12, Standard Consumer
Safety Specification for Bedside
Sleepers, with a few additions to
strengthen the standard. ASTM F2906–
12 also required that, in addition to the
tests provided in ASTM F2906–12, the
bedside sleeper must be tested to the
bassinet standard (ASTM F2194).
Additionally, multimode products must
also be tested to each applicable
standard associated with the product’s
use modes.
In the NPR, the Commission proposed
adding clarifying language to ASTM
F2906–12 so that the hazards associated
with play yard bassinet misassembly
and fabric-sided enclosed openings
would also be addressed in bedside
sleepers for bedside sleeper accessories.
As discussed in the preamble to the
NPR, for bassinets/cradles with fabric
sides, a fully bounded opening may not
be created that allows the complete
passage of the torso probe (based on a
torso diameter of a 5th percentile, 0 to
2-month-old infant) when tested in
accordance with the fabric release test
methods for enclosed openings.
However, the test does not apply to play
yard bassinet accessories. Bassinet
accessories to play yards (that cannot be
converted to bedside sleepers) are
usually held in place by fasteners that
clip to the top of the play yard’s railing.
If the fasteners were left unclipped, the
bassinet would fall, rendering the
product untestable, due to the complete
collapse of the bassinet attachment.
Unlike bassinet play yard accessories, a
bedside sleeper play yard accessory
could have fasteners left unclipped
(through the detachment of snaps/
Velcro®) where the bedside sleeper with
the lowered side does not completely
collapse and appears functional. As a
result, the Commission determined that
all bedside sleeper play yard accessories
should be subject to the requirements of
the bassinet standard’s fabric-sided
enclosed openings test (without the
exemption for bassinet play yard
accessories), given the entrapment and
suffocation hazards presented when a
bedside sleeper’s removable cover (liner
or shell) is either not used or not
secured properly.
To address this hazard, the
Commission proposed to add a new
definition for ‘‘bedside sleeper
accessory’’ and eliminate the fabricsided, bounded-opening performance
requirement exemption currently
granted to play yard bassinet
accessories. The definition proposed
was: ‘‘bedside sleeper accessory, n—an
E:\FR\FM\15JAR1.SGM
15JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
elevated sleep surface that attaches to a
non-full-size crib or play yard, designed
to convert the product into a bedside
sleeper intended to have a horizontal
sleep surface while in a rest (nonrocking) position.’’ In addition, the
Commission proposed to add a new
section: ‘‘Bedside Sleeper Accessory
Fabric-Sided Enclosed Openings—A
bedside sleeper accessory shall meet the
F2194 performance requirement
‘‘Fabric-Sided Enclosed Openings.’’
However, a bedside sleeper would be
exempt from this requirement if the
bedside sleeper collapsed under its own
weight or the sleep surface tilts by more
than 30 degrees.
The Commission also proposed
additional language to address play yard
bedside accessory misassembly. The
Commission had already proposed a
requirement to address consumer
misassembly of key structural elements
for bassinet accessories to play yards in
the play yard standard, ASTM F406.
However, the proposed play yard
standard did not include specific
language for a misassembled bedside
sleeper accessory. Accordingly, the
Commission proposed to add a new
section to include bedside sleepers:
‘‘Bedside Sleeper Play Yard Accessories
Missing Key Structural Elements: A
bedside sleeper accessory shall meet the
F406 general requirement ‘‘Bassinet/
Cradle Accessories Missing Key
Structural Elements.’’
2. Recent Developments in the Play
Yard Standard and Bassinet Standard
After the the Commission published
the NPR for bedside sleepers in the
Federal Register, the ASTM play yard
subcommittee worked closely with the
ASTM bassinet subcommittee to address
hazards related to bassinet accessory
misassembly. The subcommittees
decided to address the hazards
associated with bassinet accessory
misassembly in two different ASTM
standards: (1) The play yard standard,
ASTM F406–13, Standard Consumer
Safety Specification for Non-Full-Size
Baby Cribs/Play Yards, now addresses
safety issues related to bassinet
accessory attachment components (i.e.,
structures that attach the bassinet
accessory to the play yard); and (2) the
bassinet standard, ASTM F2194–13,
Standard Consumer Safety
Specification for Bassinets and Cradles,
addresses safety issues related to
mattress support rods (and all other
structures that ensure that the bassinet
accessory mattress is flat and stable)
through the segmented mattress-flatness
test contained in the bassinet standard.
These requirements are now part of the
current ASTM standards for play yards,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
11:25 Jan 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
ASTM F406–13, and for bassinets/
cradles, ASTM F2194–13.
On August 19, 2013, the Commission
issued an amendment to the Safety
Standard for Play Yards, to incorporate
by reference the most recent version of
ASTM’s play yard standard, ASTM
F406–13, to address the hazards
associated with misassembly of play
yard bassinet accessories. 78 FR 50328.
The play yard standard, ASTM F406–
13, now addresses safety issues related
to bassinet accessory attachment
components (i.e., structures that attach
the bassinet accessory to the play yard).
On October 23, 2013, the Commission
issued a final rule for bassinets, Safety
Standard for Bassinets and Cradles, to
incorporate by reference the most recent
version of ASTM’s bassinet standard,
ASTM F2194–13, to address safety
issues related to mattress support rods
(and all other structures that ensure that
the bassinet accessory mattress is flat
and stable) through the segmented
mattress-flatness test contained in the
bassinet standard. 78 FR 63019. In
addition, the Commission’s bassinet
rule required several modifications to
ASTM F2194–13. These modifications:
• Added new definitions, a test
requirement, and test procedure for a
new performance requirement
pertaining to the stability of bassinets
with removable bassinet beds;
• Revised the current stability test
procedure by specifying the use of a
newborn CAMI dummy, rather than the
six-month infant CAMI dummy;
• Revised the pass/fail criterion for
the segmented mattresses flatness test to
make it more stringent;
• Excluded segmented mattress
flatness test bassinets that are less than
15 inches wide along the width of the
mattress; and
• Revised the scope to clarify that a
multimode or combination product
must meet the requirements of all
standards associated with its use modes.
These additional requirements are
codified at 16 CFR part 1218, Safety
Standard for Bassinets and Cradles.
3. Current ASTM Bedside Sleeper
Standard (ASTM F2906–13)
The current version of the voluntary
standard for bedside sleepers adopts the
same performance requirement and test
method in ASTM’s play yard standard,
ASTM F406–13, which addresses the
hazards associated with misassembly of
play yard bassinet accessories, for
bedside sleeper accessories. To provide
clearer definitions of a ‘‘bedside sleeper
accessory,’’ ASTM F2906–13 now
provides definitions for ‘‘bedside
sleeper accessory’’ and ‘‘bedside sleeper
accessory attachment components.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2583
ASTM F2906–13 provides that a
bedside sleeper accessory is an elevated
sleep surface that attaches to a play yard
designed to convert the product into a
bedside sleeper and is intended to have
a horizontal sleep surface while in a rest
(non-rocking) position. Bedside sleeper
accessory attachment components are
defined as components that provide the
means of attachment for a bedside
sleeper accessory to a play yard.
ASTM F2906–13 also adds a
definition of a ‘‘bedside sleeper shell.’’
As explained in the NPR, there are
demonstrated hazards presented when a
bedside sleeper’s removable cover,
including a liner or shell, is either not
used or not secured properly. 77 FR
73348–49. Accordingly, ‘‘bedside
sleeper shell’’ is defined as a textile
cover for bedside sleeper accessory that
incorporates structural elements such as
tubing, permanently attached clips or
hooks, or other elements that allow it to
be suspended from the play yard frame.
In addition, ASTM F2906–13
addresses the hazards associated with
misassembly of play yard bedside
sleeper accessories. The standard adopts
the same requirements set forth in
ASTM F406–13 for bassinet/cradle
accessories missing accessory
attachment components, and an
associated test method for misassembly
failure under the bassinet/cradle
accessory sleep surface collapse/tilt test.
Under the current ASTM F2906–13
standard, bedside sleeper accessories
must have all accessory attachment
components permanently attached to
the bedside sleeper accessory. If bedside
sleeper accessories that require
consumer assembly of accessory
attachment components can be
assembled and attached to the product
with any accessory attachment
component missing, the accessory must
either: (1) Collapse such that any part of
the mattress pad contacts the bottom
floor of the play yard or is not able to
support 4.0 lbm test mass tested; or (2)
the bedside sleeper accessory sleep
surface must tilt by more than 30
degrees when tested to the bedside
sleeper accessory sleep surface collapse/
tilt test.
ASTM F2906–13 also continues to
require bedside sleepers to meet the
requirements of the bassinet standard,
ASTM F2194, with the exception of the
height of the lowered fourth side. Most
bedside sleepers also function as
bassinets. The intended users are
identical, and the majority of the
hazards are identical. Because bedside
sleepers are already required to be
tested to the bassinet standard, ASTM
F2194, all of the requirements and test
methods in ASTM 2194 are not restated
E:\FR\FM\15JAR1.SGM
15JAR1
2584
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
in the bedside sleeper standard ASTM
F2906–13. However, ASTM F2906–13
specifically adds a new section on fabric
release test methods for enclosed
openings for bedside sleeper
accessories. As stated above, although
the bassinet standard, ASTM F2194,
contains a requirement for fabric-sided
enclosed openings, the test does not
apply to play yard bassinet accessories.
Bassinet accessories to play yards (that
cannot be converted to bedside sleepers)
are usually held in place by fasteners
that clip to the top of the play yard’s
railing. If the fasteners were left
unclipped, the bassinet would fall,
rendering the product untestable,
resulting in test failure. However, the
unique hazard associated with bedside
sleepers requires testing for fabric-sided
enclosed openings because bedside
sleepers have a lowered fourth side that
can create a hazard when the removable
cover or shell is either not used or not
secured properly. ASTM F2906–13
addresses this hazard by making explicit
that the fabric release test methods for
enclosed openings apply to all bedside
sleepers and bedside sleeper
accessories.
In this rule, the CPSC incorporates by
reference ASTM F2906–13 because the
Commission’s proposed modifications
in the NPR have been adopted in ASTM
F2906–13, including the requirements
and test methods for bedside sleeper
accessories missing accessory
attachment components and bedside
sleeper accessory fabric-sided enclosed
openings. In addition, because bedside
sleepers are required to be tested to the
bassinet standard, and because the
Commission recently issued a
mandatory standard for bassinets
(incorporating the ASTM bassinet
standard with modifications), which
was codified at 16 CFR part 1218, the
Commission adopts ASTM F2906–13
with revisions to change the references
to the voluntary bassinet standard,
ASTM F2194, in the standard with
references to the mandatory bassinet
standard, 16 CFR part 1218.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
E. Response to Comments
The Commission received five
comments in response to the NPR from
consumers, industry, consumer
advocacy groups, and trade associations.
A summary of each comment topic and
response is provided.
1. General Comments
Comment: One commenter generally
supported the proposed rule. Another
commenter stated that the responsibility
for the safe use of products lies with the
parent of the young child.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
11:25 Jan 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
Response: Section 104 of the CPSIA
requires the Commission to examine
and assess the effectiveness of voluntary
consumer product safety standards for
durable infant or toddler products and
to promulgate mandatory standards. The
Commission has identified bedside
sleepers as a durable infant or toddler
product. Bedside sleepers are similar to
bassinets and function also, in many
instances, as bassinets. The Commission
has concluded that more stringent
requirements would further reduce the
risk of injury associated with the
product. Accordingly, the Commission
is issuing a safety standard for bedside
sleepers in response to the direction
under section 104 of the CPSIA.
2. Mandatory Standards Should Be
Finalized
Comment: Several commenters stated
that the standards for play yards and
bassinets should be finalized, including
the issues related to fabric-sided
enclosed openings and consumer
misassembly with missing components
before they are applied to bedside
sleepers. In addition, two commenters
stated that to avoid confusion, the
specific requirements of ASTM F406
and ASTM F2194 should be inserted
into ASTM F2906, rather than simply
referencing those standards.
Response: ASTM has finalized both
the play yard standard, ASTM F406–13,
and the bassinet standard, ASTM
F2914–13. The Commission has made
some additional modifications to ASTM
F2194–13. The requirements for fabricsided enclosed openings have been
adopted in ASTM F2906–13 for bedside
sleeper accessories. The requirements
for misassembly of play yard bassinet
accessories have also been adopted in
ASTM F2906–13 for bedside sleeper
accessories. Those provisions have been
included in ASTM F2906–13.
ASTM’s bedside sleeper standard,
ASTM F2906–13 did not include all the
modifications that the Commission
subsequently made to the CPSC bassinet
standard. Therefore, the final rule for
bedside sleepers requires reference to 16
CFR part 1218 to reflect those
modifications.
3. Redundant Product Safety Feature
Comment: One commenter stated that
the play yard bassinet accessory
misassembly requirement may compel
manufacturers to eliminate redundant
safety features that are already a
component of the product. The
commenter stated that removal of the
mattress pad support bars does not
replicate or address the misassembly
incident or result in a safer product.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Response: This comment has been
addressed in the Commission’s final
safety standards for play yards and for
bassinets and cradles. The play yard
standard, ASTM F406–13, addressed
safety issues related to bassinet
accessory attachment components (i.e.,
structures that attach the bassinet
accessory to the play yard). The bassinet
standard, ASTM F2194–13, addressed
the issue of mattress pad support rods
(and all other structures that keep the
bassinet accessory mattress flat and
stable) through the segmented mattress
flatness test. ASTM F2194–13 now
requires that bassinets with removable
mattress support rods be tested both
with and without the mattress support
rods. In addition, the Commission’s
modifications to ASTM F2194 in the
final rule for the safety standard for
bassinets included a change to the pass/
fail criterion for the mattress flatness
test and revisions to the stability test
procedures for bassinets. These safety
features are not redundant because each
product must meet the standards
associated with the product’s use mode.
78 FR 50332 and 63025.
4. Intellectual Property
Comment: One commenter stated that
there may be patents that restrict
options for manufacturers. For example,
the commenter stated that there is a
patent application pending, detailing 10
different methods to ‘‘stiffen a play yard
mattress pad before the mattress is used
in a play yard bassinet accessory.’’
Response: This comment has been
addressed in the final rule on the safety
standard for play yards. The
Commission stated that the concern
regarding the means of stiffening a
mattress pad is no longer an issue for
the play yard rule because the play yard
bassinet accessory misassembly
requirement no longer applies to
mattress support rods or any other
methods that might be used to stiffen a
mattress pad. Instead, the play yard rule
focuses only on accessory attachment
components that attach the bassinet
accessory to the play yard. Moreover,
the bassinet standard, which addresses
mattress flatness, does not require a
specific design to pass the standard, and
a bassinet can meet the mattress-flatness
test in a variety of ways without
necessarily implicating patented
technology. 78 FR 50333.
5. Requirements for Stability of
Removable Bassinet Beds
Comment: One commenter stated that
adding the removable bassinet bed
stability requirement is premature. The
commenter stated the belief that the
requirement should be removed from
E:\FR\FM\15JAR1.SGM
15JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
the regulation and that ASTM should be
allowed to continue work on this issue.
Response: This comment has already
been addressed in the Commission’s
final consumer product safety standard
for bassinets and cradles, which
likewise would apply to bedside
sleepers with a removable bed.
Specifcally, the Commission has
provided manufacturers with options to
meet the removable bassinet bed
requirements. The Commission stated
that any product containing a removable
bassinet bed with a latching or locking
device intended to secure the bassinet
bed to the base/standshall comply with
at least one of the following: (1) The
base/stand shall not support the
bassinet bed (i.e., the bassinet bed falls
from the stand and contacts the floor or
the base/stand collapses when the
bassinet bed is not locked on the base/
stand); (2) the lock/latch shall
automatically engage under the weight
of the bassinet bed (without any other
force or action) in all lateral positions;
(3) the sleep surface of the bassinet bed
shall be at an angle of at least 20 degrees
from a horizontal plane when the
bassinet bed is in an unlocked position;
(4) the bassinet/cradle shall provide a
false latch/lock visual indicator(s). At a
minimum, an indicator shall be visible
to a person standing near both of the
two longest sides of the product; or, (5)
the bassinet bed shall not tip over and
shall retain the CAMI newborn dummy.
78 FR 63022.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
6. Ambiguity in Catastrophic Failure
Evaluation
Comment: One commenter objected to
the 30°-tilt requirement in the
catastrophic failure test. The commenter
stated that the requirement is not
adequately supported by scientific data
and expressed the belief that this test is
counterintuitive to the typical design
approach by manufacturers of building
in redundancies that prevent
catastrophic failure.
Response: This comment has been
addressed in the Commission’s final
rule on the safety standard for play
yards. Bedside sleepers that are used in
the play yard mode must also meet the
play yard requirements. In the play yard
context, the Commission explained that
the catastrophic failure test is an
alternative to the permanent affixture
test. The Commission stated that the
angle of 30 degrees represents a safety
factor of three times the 10 degrees
maximum safe sleep surface angle of
incline. The Commission noted that
CPSC staff, as well as ASTM members,
can reconsider the tilt angle requirement
during future revisions should evidence
VerDate Mar<15>2010
11:25 Jan 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
be presented indicating that the angle is
too small or large. 78 FR 50332.
In addition any built in redundancies
in testing have been resolved because
bassinet accessory attachment
components are addressed in the play
yard standard, and because bassinet
accessory mattress support rods are
addressed in the bassinet standard. The
play yard bassinet accessory
misassembly requirement in F406–13
now applies to accessory attachment
components. Misassembly issues related
to mattress support rods are now
addressed in the standard for bassinets
and cradles. Bassinets with removable
mattress support rods are required to be
tested both with and without the
mattress support rods. The bassinet also
must pass the segmented mattress
flatness test, with and without the
mattress support rods. Accordingly, all
known misassembly issues are
addressed in either the play yard or the
bassinet final standards.
6. Proposed Segmented Mattress
Flatness
Comment: One commenter urged the
CPSC to adopt the ASTM pass/fail
criteria for the surface mattress flatness
requirement proposed in the Bassinet
NPR. The commenter further asserted
that the repeated testing to ASTM F2194
surface flatness requirements has shown
a tendency toward a lack of repeatability
and that an established principle of
looking at the mean of several trials
should be used.
Response: This comment has been
addressed in the final rule on the safety
standard for bassinets. The Commission
determined that mattress flatness
requirement is primarily aimed at
incidents involving bassinet/play yard
combination products that tend to use
segmented mattresses, where seams
could pose a suffocation and positional
asphyxiation hazard. Under the
Commission’s pass/fail criteria, a
bassinet attachment with a segmented
mattress will fail if any tested seam
creates an angle greater than 10 degrees.
ASTM F2194–13 allowed measured
angles between 10 degrees and 14
degrees to pass, as long as the mean of
three measurements on that seam is less
than 10 degrees. The 14-degree angle
was based on an extrapolation of angles
formed by dimensions of average infant
faces. However, the Commission
declined to use the average infant facial
dimension as the basis for this
requirement. Instead, in the final rule on
bassinets, the Commission adopted the
smallest users’ anthropometrics to set
the test requirement of 10 degrees
maximum for each measurement taken.
In addition, the bassinet final rule
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2585
exempts from the mattress flatness
requirement bassinets that are less than
15 inches across. The Commission
found that these products do not pose
the hazard the requirement is intended
to address, and they are also not wide
enough to test using the required
procedures and equipment. 78 FR
63023.
7. Assembly and Instructions
Comment: One commenter requested
that consistency be maintained with
previously adopted mandatory
regulations regarding assembly
instructions and visual indicators as are
demonstrated, for example, in the fullsize crib requirement (16 CFR part
1219).
Response: Although the language in
the full-size crib standard (16 CFR part
1219) and the ASTM F2906–13 and
ASTM F2194–13 standards is not
identical, the Commission finds that the
content is sufficiently consistent among
the standards regarding assembly
instructions and visual indicators to
convey the necessary information.
8. Attachment Mechanism
Comment: One commenter stated that
a gap between the bedside sleeper and
an adult bed creates a risk of injury to
an infant in both the bedside sleeper
and the adult bed. The commenter
recommended that CPSC include an
attachment mechanism to be composed
of only one part that is then attached to
the bedside sleeper, as required in the
portable children’s bed rail standard,
ASTM F2085–12. The commenter stated
that the attachment mechanism would
not need to be permanently attached to
bedside sleepers that are also used in
other modes without the attachment,
but all necessary parts for attachment
should be connected to each other,
reducing the chance that caregivers will
leave key elements out of the
attachment process.
Response: The CPSC is not aware of
any incidents in which an infant
became entrapped in a gap between a
bedside sleeper and an adult bed with
or without missing key elements of the
attachment mechanism. There are very
few single-mode bedside sleeper
products. Most bedside sleepers are
multiuse with other modes, such as
bassinets and play yards. Although the
commenter indicated the attachment
would not need to be connected
permanently when used in other modes
that do not require the attachment,
CPSC staff is concerned that the
attachment could present a risk of
injury, such as strangulation or
entrapment with the attachment cord or
strap, when not in use. The addition of
E:\FR\FM\15JAR1.SGM
15JAR1
2586
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
requirements to prevent entrapment in a
gap between the bedside sleeper and the
adult bed on very few single-mode
bedside sleeper products at the expense
of adding potential strangulation or
entrapment risks does not appear
warranted. At this time, the Commission
does not support the inclusion of a
requirement for a one-piece attachment
device that would need to be installed
permanently on single-mode bedside
sleepers and also would need to be
removable on bedside sleepers with free
standing bassinet or play yard use
modes.
Response: On Feburary 13, 2013, a
final rule implementing Testing and
Labeling Pertaining to Product
Certification, 16 CFR part 1107 (the
1107 rule), became effective. Under the
1107 rule, a manufacturer or importer
may label a certified compliant product
as ‘‘Meets CPSC Safety Requirements.’’
Because producers are already allowed
to label compliant products as such
under the 1107 rule, including this
option in the bedside sleeper standard
would be redundant. Accordingly, the
Commission will not require additional
markings at this time.
9. Pictograms and Warnings
F. Final Rule
The CPSC is incorporating by
reference ASTM F2906–13 because the
Commission’s proposed modifications
in the NPR have been adopted in ASTM
F2906–13, including the requirements
and test methods for bedside sleeper
accessories missing accessory
attachment components and bedside
sleeper accessory fabric-sided enclosed
openings. In addition, because bedside
sleepers are required to be tested to the
bassinet standard, and because the
Commission recently issued a final rule
incorporating the ASTM standard for
bassinets with some modifications,
codified at 16 CFR part 1218, the
references to the voluntary bassinet
standard (ASTM F2194) are revised to
reflect the current mandatory bassinet
standard, 16 CFR part 1218.
Specifically, ASTM F2194 is
referenced in sections 5.1, 5.1.1, 7.1 and
8.1. All of the references to ASTM
F2194 are replaced with 16 CFR part
1218 as follows:
• 5.1 Prior to or immediately after
testing to this consumer safety
specification, the bedside sleeper must
be tested to 16 CFR part 1218.
Multimode products must also be tested
to each applicable standard. When
testing to 16 CFR part 1218, the unit
shall be freestanding, and not be
secured to the test platform, as dictated
elsewhere in this standard.
• 5.1.1 The bassinet minimum side
height shall be as required in 16 CFR
part 1218, with the exception of a
lowered side rail as permitted in 5.4.
• 7.1 All bedside sleeper products
shall comply with the marking and
labeling requirements of 16 CFR part
1218.
• 8.1 All bedside sleeper products
shall comply with the instructional
literature requirements of 16 CFR part
1218.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Comment: One commenter suggested
that adding pictograms to the warnings
would effectively convey the hazard and
avoid language barriers that minimize
comprehension of these warning labels.
The commenter also stated that the
CPSC should add a warning that would
advise the caregiver of the danger adult
bedding can pose if bedding is allowed
to fall into the bedside sleeper.
Response: Currently, all bedside
sleeper products are required to comply
with the marking and labeling
requirements of the bassinet standard.
Although a well-developed and tested
pictogram could increase
comprehension, designing effective,
well-understood graphics can be
difficult. Poor understanding of graphics
may cause consumer confusion, the
most severe of which is a critical
confusion, where the graphic is
interpreted to mean the opposite of the
intention. Therefore, any warning
pictogram should be developed with
empirical study and well tested on the
target audience. In addition, there are a
number of products for which a soft
bedding pictogram could be useful, such
as bedside sleepers, bassinets, cribs,
play yards, inclined sleep products, and
others. Because of the increasing
number of multimode products, the
Commission believes a cross-product ad
hoc working group may be the best
place to develop such a pictogram and
would allow testing and validation of
the pictogram. Subject to budgetary and
staff resources, CPSC staff would
support participation in any such group,
and should the need arise, staff will
consider future action once such a
graphic is developed.
10. Effective Date Marking
Comment: One commenter stated that
the CPSC should add a marking on
products that are manufactured after the
effective date so that consumers can
clearly identify products that meet the
mandatory standard.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
11:25 Jan 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
G. Effective Date
The Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) generally requires that the
effective date of the rule be at least 30
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
days after publication of the final rule.
5 U.S.C. 553(d). Only one commenter
addressed the effective date and
supported the 6-month effective date
proposed in the NPR. To allow time for
bedside sleepers to come into
compliance with the standard, the
bedside sleeper standard will become
effective 6 months after publication of a
final rule in the Federal Register.
H. Regulatory Flexibility Act
1. Introduction
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
5 U.S.C. 601–612, requires agencies to
consider the impact of proposed and
final rules on small entities, including
small businesses. Section 604 of the
RFA requires that the Commission
prepare a final regulatory flexibility
analysis when promulgating final rules,
unless the head of the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The final regulatory flexibility
analysis must describe the impact of the
proposed rule on small entities and
identify any alternatives that may
reduce the impact. Specifically, the final
regulatory flexibility analysis must
contain:
• A succinct statement of the
objectives of, and legal basis for, the
rule;
• A summary of the significant issues
raised by public comments in response
to the initial regulatory flexibility
analysis, a summary of the assessment
of the agency of such issues, and a
statement of any changes made in the
proposed rule as a result of such
comments;
• A description of, and, where
feasible, an estimate of, the number of
small entities to which the rule will
apply;
• A description of the projected
reporting, recordkeeping, and other
compliance requirements of the rule,
including an estimate of the classes of
small entities subject to the
requirements and the type of
professional skills necessary for the
preparation of reports or records; and
• A description of the steps the
agency has taken to reduce the
significant economic impact on small
entities, consistent with the stated
objectives of applicable statutes,
including a statement of the factual,
policy, and legal reasons for selecting
the alternative adopted in the rule, and
why each one of the other significant
alternatives to the rule considered by
the agency, which affect the impact on
small entities, was rejected.
E:\FR\FM\15JAR1.SGM
15JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
2. The Market
Bedside sleepers are typically
produced and/or marketed by juvenile
product manufacturers and distributors.
Currently, there are at least five known
manufacturers supplying bedside
sleepers to the U.S. market. Four are
domestic manufacturers, including one
manufacturer that dominates the
market. The fifth is a foreign
manufacturer who ships products
directly to the United States. There may
be additional unknown small
manufacturers and importers operating
in the U.S. market as well.
The Juvenile Products Manufacturers
Association (JPMA), the major U.S.
trade association that represents
juvenile product manufacturers and
importers, runs a voluntary Certification
Program for several juvenile products.
Under this program, products
voluntarily submitted by manufacturers
are tested against the appropriate ASTM
standard, and only passing products are
allowed to display JPMA’s Certification
Seal.
Currently, JPMA does not have a
Certification Program for bedside
sleepers, and no firm claims to meet the
ASTM voluntary standard. However,
three firms supply multimode products,
which in one mode, are compliant with
the associated ASTM voluntary
standard. Two firms claim compliance
with the ASTM standard for bassinets;
one firm is JPMA-certified as compliant,
and the other claims compliance with
the ASTM bassinet standard. A third
firm supplies play yards that are JPMAcertified as compliant with the ASTM
play yard/non-full-size crib standard.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
3. Other Federal or State Rules
There are two federal rules that
impact the bedside sleeper standard: (1)
Testing and Labeling Pertaining to
Product Certification (16 CFR part
1107); and (2) Requirements Pertaining
to Third Party Conformity Assessment
Bodies (16 CFR part 1112).
Under 16 CFR part 1107, every
manufacturer of a children’s product
that is subject to a children’s product
safety rule is required to certify, based
on third party testing by a CPSCaccepted conformity assessment body
(or laboratory), that the product
complies with all applicable safety
rules. Because bedside sleepers will be
subject to a mandatory children’s
product safety rule, the product will
also be subject to the third party testing
requirements of section 14(a)(2) of the
CPSA.
Under 16 CFR part 1112, the
Commission established requirements
for the accreditation of third party
VerDate Mar<15>2010
11:25 Jan 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
conformity assessment bodies to test for
conformance with a children’s product
safety rule in accordance with section
14(a)(2) of the CPSA. This rule amends
16 CFR part 1112 to establish the
requirements for accepting the
accreditation of a conformity assessment
body to test for compliance with the
bedside sleeper standard.
4. Impact on Small Businesses
There are four domestic firms known
to be marketing bedside sleepers in the
United States. Under U.S. Small
Business Administration (SBA)
guidelines, a manufacturer of bedside
sleepers is small if it has 500 or fewer
employees. Based on these guidelines,
all four domestic manufacturers are
small. The economic impact on small
domestic manufacturers depends on two
factors: (1) Whether their products are
multiuse products and are already in
compliance with one or more existing
standards; and (2) the proportion of
their total sales or revenue that bedside
sleepers constitute.
Three of the four domestic
manufacturers produce a multiuse
product or a product that may be used
as a bedside sleeper as well as a bassinet
or play yard. These three multiuse
products are required to comply with
other existing standards, and there is
significant overlap between standards.
For example, firms that produce
multimode bedside sleeper/play yards
are already required to comply with the
mandatory play yard standard. In
addition, these three multiuse products
also function as bassinets and will need
to comply with the bassinet standard
prior to the effective date for the bedside
sleeper final rule. If the products
comply with applicable standards
pertaining to other use modes, these
products will require only slight,
incremental modifications. Thus,
assuming that these multiuse bedside
sleeper products comply or will comply
with the standards applicable to other
use modes, the three producers of
multiuse products are unlikely to
experience an economically significant
impact due to the bedside sleeper draft
final rule.
Two of the domestic manufactures
rely almost solely on the sales of
bedside sleepers, including a bedside
sleeper accessory, as their revenue
source. This includes one of the firms
mentioned above which produces a
multiuse product that will need to
comply with an existing standard prior
to any effective date for the bedside
sleeper draft final rule. Again, based on
the assumption that this firm’s products
will comply with other existing
standards, the bedside sleeper rule
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2587
should not result in a significant
economic impact on this firm. The
second firm, however, produces a
product that serves as a standalone
bedside sleeper. Staff believes that this
firm’s standalone bedside sleeper would
need several modifications to meet the
requirements in the bedside sleeper
standard. The firm will need at least two
modifications (adding a lowered fourth
side and complying with new stability
requirements). However, the firm’s
plans for modifying the product and
costs of compliance are unknown. Even
if the cost of each modification taken
individually is small, total costs of
compliance could be modest or high.
Because the majority of this firm’s
revenues is tied to bedside sleepers and
assuming that several modifications
may be needed to comply with the
bedside sleeper standard, this firm is
more likely experience an economically
significant impact as a result of the
bedside sleeper mandatory standard.
Under section 14 of the CPSA,
bedside sleepers are also subject to third
party testing and certification. Once the
new requirements become effective, all
manufacturers will be subject to the
additional costs associated with the
third party testing and certification
requirements under the testing rule,
Testing and Labeling Pertaining to
Product Certification (16 CFR part
1107). Third party testing will pertain to
any physical and mechanical test
requirements specified in the bedside
sleeper final rule; lead and phthalates
testing is already required. Third party
testing costs are in addition to the direct
costs of meeting the bedside sleeper
standard.
Based on information from the
durable nursery product industry and
confidential business information
supplied for the development of the
third-party testing rule, testing to a
single ASTM voluntary standard could
cost around $500–$600 per model
sample. On average, each small
domestic manufacturer supplies two
different models of bedside sleepers to
the U.S. market annually. Therefore, if
third-party testing to the requirements
in the bedside sleeper standard were
conducted every year on a single sample
for each model, third-party testing costs
associated for each manufacturer would
be about $1,000–$1,200 annually. Based
on an examination of estimates of firms’
revenues from recent Dun & Bradstreet
reports, the impact of third-party testing
to ASTM F2906–13 is not likely to be
economically significant if only one
bedside sleeper sample per model is
required. However, if more than one
sample would be needed to meet the
testing requirements, third-party testing
E:\FR\FM\15JAR1.SGM
15JAR1
2588
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
costs could have an economically
significant impact on two of the small
manufacturers (i.e., based on SBA
guidelines, staff typically uses 1 percent
of gross revenue as the threshold for
determining economic significance and
testing costs could be 1 percent or more
of gross revenue). The exact number of
samples needed to meet the ‘‘high
degree of assurance’’ criterion as
required in 16 CFR part 1107 is
unknown.
5. Alternatives
An alternative to the rule would be to
set an effective date later than 6 months,
which is generally considered sufficient
time for suppliers to come into
compliance with a rule. Setting a later
effective date would allow suppliers
additional time to develop compliant
bedside sleepers and spread the
associated costs over a longer period of
time. The Commission finds that a 6-
month effective date is adequate for
manufacturers to comply with the
bedside sleeper standard because the
changes necessary to comply with the
standard are not substantial given that
most bedside sleepers are also multimode products.
I. Environmental Considerations
The Commission’s regulations address
whether we are required to prepare an
environmental assessment or an
environmental impact statement. These
regulations provide a categorical
exclusion for certain CPSC actions that
normally have ‘‘little or no potential for
affecting the human environment.’’
Among those actions are rules or safety
standards for consumer products. 16
CFR 1021.5(c)(1). The rule falls within
the categorical exclusion.
J. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains information
collection requirements that are subject
to public comment and review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521). The
preamble to the proposed rule (77 FR at
73352 through 73353) discussed the
information collection burden of the
proposed rule and specifically requested
comments on the accuracy of our
estimates. Sections 7 and 8 of ASTM
F2906–13 contain requirements for
marking, labeling, and instructional
literature. These requirements fall
within the definition of ‘‘collection of
information,’’ as defined in 44 U.S.C.
3502(3).
OMB has assigned control number
3041–0160 to this information
collection. The Commission did not
receive any comments regarding the
information collection burden of this
proposal. Accordingly, we estimate the
burden of this collection of information
as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN
16 CFR
section
Number of
respondents
Frequency of
responses
Total
annual
responses
Hours per
response
Total
burden hours
1222 .....................................................................................
5
2
10
1
10
K. Preemption
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Section 26(a) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2075(a), provides that where a consumer
product safety standard is in effect and
applies to a product, no state or political
subdivision of a state may either
establish or continue in effect a
requirement dealing with the same risk
of injury unless the state requirement is
identical to the federal standard. Section
26(c) of the CPSA also provides that
states or political subdivisions of states
may apply to the Commission for an
exemption from this preemption under
certain circumstances. Section 104(b) of
the CPSIA refers to the rules to be
issued under that section as ‘‘consumer
product safety rules,’’ thus, implying
that the preemptive effect of section
26(a) of the CPSA would apply.
Therefore, a rule issued under section
104 of the CPSIA will invoke the
preemptive effect of section 26(a) of the
CPSA when it becomes effective.
L. Certification and Notice of
Requirements (NOR)
Section 14(a) of the CPSA imposes the
requirement that products subject to a
consumer product safety rule under the
CPSA, or to a similar rule, ban, standard
or regulation under any other act
enforced by the Commission, must be
certified as complying with all
VerDate Mar<15>2010
11:25 Jan 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
applicable CPSC-enforced requirements.
15 U.S.C. 2063(a). Section 14(a)(2) of the
CPSA requires that certification of
children’s products subject to a
children’s product safety rule be based
on testing conducted by a CPSCaccepted third party conformity
assessment body. Section 14(a)(3) of the
CPSA requires the Commission to
publish a notice of requirements (NOR)
for the accreditation of third party
conformity assessment bodies (or
laboratories) to assess conformity with a
children’s product safety rule to which
a children’s product is subject. The
‘‘Safety Standard for Bedside Sleepers,’’
to be codified at 16 CFR part 1222, is a
children’s product safety rule that
requires the issuance of an NOR.
The Commission published a final
rule, Requirements Pertaining to Third
Party Conformity Assessment Bodies, 78
FR 15836 (March 12, 2013), which is
codified at 16 CFR Part 1112 (referred to
here as part 1112). This rule became
effective on June 10, 2013. Part 1112
establishes requirements for
accreditation of third party conformity
assessment bodies (or laboratories) to
test for conformance with a children’s
product safety rule in accordance with
Section 14(a)(2) of the CPSA. Part 1112
also codifies a list of all of the NORs
that the CPSC had published at the time
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
part 1112 was issued. All NORs issued
after the Commission published part
1112, such as the bedside sleeper
standard, require the Commission to
amend part 1112. Accordingly, this rule
amends part 1112 to include the bedside
sleeper standard in the list with the
other children’s product safety rules for
which the CPSC has issued NORs.
Laboratories applying for acceptance
as a CPSC-accepted third party
conformity assessment body to test to
the new standard for bedside sleepers
would be required to meet the third
party conformity assessment body
accreditation requirements in 16 CFR
Part 1112, Requirements Pertaining to
Third Party Conformity Assessment
Bodies. When a laboratory meets the
requirements as a CPSC-accepted third
party conformity assessment body, the
laboratory can apply to the CPSC to
have 16 CFR Part 1222, Safety Standard
for Bedside Sleepers, included in its
scope of accreditation of CPSC safety
rules listed for the laboratory on the
CPSC Web site at: www.cpsc.gov/
labsearch.
CPSC staff conducted an analysis of
the potential impacts on small entities
of the proposed rule establishing
accreditation requirements, as required
by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, and
the agency prepared an Initial
E:\FR\FM\15JAR1.SGM
15JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA).
Requirements Pertaining to Third Party
Conformity Assessment Bodies. 77 FR
31086, 31123–26. Specifically, the NOR
for the bedside sleeper standard would
not have a significant adverse impact on
small laboratories. Based upon the
number of laboratories in the United
States that have applied for CPSC
acceptance of the accreditation to test
for conformance to other juvenile
product standards, we expect that only
a few laboratories will seek CPSC
acceptance of their accreditation to test
for conformance with the bedside
sleeper standard. Most of these
laboratories already will have been
accredited to test for conformance to
other juvenile product standards, and
the only cost to them would be the cost
of adding the bedside sleeper standard
to their scope of accreditation. As a
consequence, the Commission certifies
that the NOR for the bedside sleeper
standard will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
List of Subjects
16 CFR Part 1112
Administrative practice and
procedure, Audit, Consumer protection,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Third party conformity
assessment body.
16 CFR Part 1222
Consumer protection, Imports,
Incorporation by reference, Infants and
Children, Labeling, Law Enforcement,
and Toys.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Commission amends 16
CFR chapter II as follows:
PART 1112—REQUIREMENTS
PERTAINING TO THIRD PARTY
CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES
1. The authority citation for part 1112
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2063; Pub. L. 110–
314, section 3, 122 Stat. 3016, 3017 (2008).
2. Amend § 1112.15 by adding
paragraph (b)(35) to read as follows:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
§ 1112.15 When can a third party
conformity assessment body apply for
CPSC acceptance for a particular CPSC rule
or test method?
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(35) 16 CFR Part 1222, Safety
Standard for Bedside Sleepers.
*
*
*
*
*
■
3. Add part 1222 to read as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Jan 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
PART 1222–SAFETY STANDARD FOR
BEDSIDE SLEEPERS
Sec.
1222.1
1222.2
Scope.
Requirements for bedside sleepers.
Authority: The Consumer Product Safety
Improvement Act of 2008, Pub. L. 110–314,
§ 104, 122 Stat. 3016 (August 14, 2008); Pub.
L. 112–28, 125 Stat. 273 (August 12, 2011).
§ 1222.1
Scope.
This part establishes a consumer
product safety standard for bedside
sleepers.
§ 1222.2 Requirements for bedside
sleepers.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph
(b) of this section, each bedside sleeper
must comply with all applicable
provisions of ASTM F2906–13,
Standard Consumer Safety Specification
for Bedside Sleepers, approved on July
1, 2013. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by
reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR Part 51. You may
obtain a copy from ASTM International,
100 Bar Harbor Drive, P.O. Box 0700,
West Conshohocken, PA 19428; https://
www.astm.org/cpsc.htm. You may
inspect a copy at the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product
Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330
East West Highway, Bethesda, MD
20814, telephone 301–504–7923, or at
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal
regulations/ibr_locations.html.
(b) Comply with ASTM F2906–13
with the following changes:
(1) Instead of complying with section
5.1 of ASTM F2906–13, comply with
the following:
(i) Prior to or immediately after testing
to this consumer safety specification,
the bedside sleeper must be tested to 16
CFR Part 1218. Multimode products
must also be tested to each applicable
standard. When testing to 16 CFR Part
1218 the unit shall be freestanding, and
not be secured to the test platform as
dictated elsewhere in this standard.
(ii) 5.1.1 The bassinet minimum side
height shall be as required in 16 CFR
Part 1218, with the exception of a
lowered side rail as permitted in 5.4.
(2) Instead of complying with section
7.1 of ASTM F2906–13, comply with
the following:
(i) All bedside sleeper products shall
comply with the marking and labeling
requirements of 16 CFR Part 1218.
(ii) [Reserved]
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2589
(3) Instead of complying with section
8.1 of ASTM F2906–13, comply with
the following:
(i) All bedside sleeper products shall
comply with the instructional literature
requirements of 16 CFR Part 1218.
(ii) [Reserved]
Dated: January 10, 2014.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–00597 Filed 1–14–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9653]
RIN 1545–BL28
Bond Premium Carryforward
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
AGENCY:
This document contains final
regulations that provide guidance on the
tax treatment of a debt instrument with
a bond premium carryforward in the
holder’s final accrual period. The
regulations in this document provide
guidance to holders of Treasury
securities and other debt instruments
acquired at a premium.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations
are effective on January 15, 2014.
Applicability Date: For the date of
applicability, see § 1.171–2(a)(4)(i)(C)(2).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William E. Blanchard, (202) 317–3900
(not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
On January 4, 2013, the IRS and the
Treasury Department published
temporary regulations (TD 9609) in the
Federal Register (78 FR 666) relating to
the federal income tax treatment of a
debt instrument with a bond premium
carryforward in the holder’s final
accrual period, including a Treasury bill
acquired at a premium. See § 1.171–2T.
On the same day, the IRS and the
Treasury Department published a notice
of proposed rulemaking (REG–140437–
12) cross-referencing the temporary
regulations in the Federal Register (78
FR 687). No comments were received on
the notice of proposed rulemaking. No
public hearing was requested or held.
The proposed regulations are adopted
without substantive change by this
E:\FR\FM\15JAR1.SGM
15JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 15, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2581-2589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00597]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2014 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 2581]]
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
16 CFR Parts 1112 and 1222
[Docket No. CPSC-2012-0067]
Safety Standard for Bedside Sleepers
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Danny Keysar Child Product Safety Notification Act,
Section 104 of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008
(CPSIA), requires the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission
(Commission or CPSC) to promulgate consumer product safety standards
for durable infant or toddler products. These standards are to be
``substantially the same as'' applicable voluntary standards or more
stringent than the voluntary standard if the Commission concludes that
more stringent requirements would further reduce the risk of injury
associated with the product. The Commission is issuing a safety
standard for bedside sleepers in response to the direction under
Section 104(b) of the CPSIA.
DATES: The rule is effective on July 15, 2014. The incorporation by
reference of the publication listed in this rule is approved by the
Director of the Federal Register as of July 15, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Dunlap, Compliance Officer,
Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda,
MD 20814; telephone: 301-504-7733; email: ddunlap@cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background and Statutory Authority
The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008, (CPSIA, Pub.
L. 110-314), was enacted on August 14, 2008. Section 104(b) of the
CPSIA, part of the Danny Keysar Child Product Safety Notification Act,
requires the Commission to: (1) Examine and assess the effectiveness of
voluntary consumer product safety standards for durable infant or
toddler products, in consultation with representatives of consumer
groups, juvenile product manufacturers, and independent child product
engineers and experts, and (2) promulgate consumer product safety
standards for durable infant and toddler products. These standards are
to be ``substantially the same as'' applicable voluntary standards or
more stringent than the voluntary standard if the Commission concludes
that more stringent requirements would further reduce the risk of
injury associated with the product.
The term ``durable infant or toddler product'' is defined in
section 104(f)(1) of the CPSIA as a durable product intended for use,
or that may be reasonably expected to be used, by children under the
age of 5 years. Bassinets and cradles are specifically identified in
section 104(f)(2)(L) as durable infant or toddler products. Bedside
sleepers are similar to bassinets, and many bedside sleepers also
function as bassinets. In addition, some bedside sleepers are
accessories to play yards, which are explicitly identified in section
104(f)(2)(F).
On December 10, 2012, the Commission issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for bedside sleepers (77 FR 73345). The NPR proposed
to incorporate by reference the voluntary standard, ASTM F2906-12,
``Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Bedside Sleepers,'' with
certain changes to provisions in the voluntary standard to strengthen
the ASTM standard.
In this document, the Commission is issuing a safety standard for
bedside sleepers. Pursuant to Section 104(b)(1)(A), the Commission
consulted with manufacturers, retailers, trade organizations,
laboratories, consumer advocacy groups, consultants, and members of the
public in the development of this proposed standard, largely through
the ASTM process. The rule incorporates the voluntary standard
developed by ASTM International (formerly the American Society for
Testing and Materials), ASTM F2906-13, ``Standard Consumer Safety
Specification for Bedside Sleepers'' (ASTM F2906-13), by reference, and
requires bedside sleepers to be tested to 16 CFR part 1218, the Safety
Standard for Bassinets and Cradles (bassinet standard).
B. The Product
ASTM F2906-13 defines ``bedside sleeper'' as ``a rigid frame
assembly that may be combined with a fabric or mesh assembly, or both,
used to function as sides, ends, or floor or a combination thereof, and
that is intended to provide a sleeping environment for infants and is
secured to an adult bed.'' A ``multi-mode product'' is ``a unit that is
designed and intended to be used in more than one mode (for example, a
play yard, bassinet, changing table, hand held carrier, or bedside
sleeper).'' A bedside sleeper is intended to be secured to an adult bed
to permit newborns and infants to sleep close by an adult without being
in the adult bed. Bedside sleepers currently on the market have a
horizontal sleep surface that typically is 1 inch to 4 inches below the
level of the adult bed's mattress. The side of the bedside sleeper that
is adjacent to the adult bed can usually be adjusted to a lower
position, a feature that differentiates bedside sleepers from
bassinets, where all four sides of a bassinet are the same height.
Current bedside sleepers range in size from about 35'' x 20'' to 40'' x
30.'' Bedside sleepers may have rigid sides, but they are most commonly
constructed with a tube frame covered by mesh or fabric. Bedside
sleepers are intended for use with children up to the developmental
stage where they can push up on hands and knees (about 5 months). This
is the same developmental range for the intended users of bassinets.
Several manufacturers produce multiuse (or multimode) bedside
sleeper products that can convert into bassinets and/or play yards.
Most bedside sleeper products can be converted into a bassinet by
raising the lowered side to create four equal-height sides, and a few
also convert into both a bassinet and play yard. Some play yards
include bedside sleeper accessories, which when attached, convert the
play yard into a bedside sleeper; and some bassinets convert into
bedside sleepers. All of the tube-framed products that CPSC staff has
evaluated may be collapsed for storage and transport. A bedside sleeper
that can be used in additional modes would need to meet
[[Page 2582]]
each applicable standard. For example, a bedside sleeper that converts
to a bassinet must meet the bedside sleeper standard and the bassinet
standard.
C. Incident Data
The preamble to the NPR summarized the incident data involving
bedside sleepers reported to the Commission from January 2001 through
December 2011. 77 FR 73345 (December 10, 2012). The data was extracted
on January 24, 2012. CPSC's Directorate for Epidemiology staff
identified 40 cases of bedside sleeper-related incidents from 2001 to
2011, including four fatalities and 36 nonfatal incidents (with and
without injuries). Since the NPR, the incident data have been updated
to include bedside sleeper-related incident data reported to the
Commission between January 24, 2012 and May 15, 2013.
Since the extraction of the data presented in the NPR, CPSC staff
has received four new reports involving bedside sleepers. One of the
reports was a consumer query regarding a recalled product and did not
involve an actual incident. The rest of the reports involved no
fatalities or injuries. The infants identified in the incident reports
ranged in age from 1 to 6 months.
The hazards reported in the new incidents were consistent with the
hazard patterns identified among the 40 incidents presented in the NPR
briefing package. The hazard scenarios reported in 24 of the 40
incidents (60 percent) were attributed to some sort of failure/defect
or a potential design flaw in the product.
Among the four new reports, two incidents were classified under
miscellaneous product-related issues concerning the poor design and a
broken/detached component of the product. In the incident reporting
poor design, the consumer expressed concern that the fabric side could
create a suffocation hazard when the child's face is against the
fabric; the consumer reportedly stopped using the product. The second
incident involved a six-month-old who fell onto the floor from a
recalled, multimode product when the horizontal bar that converts the
product from a bedside sleeper to a bassinet, broke off or detached. No
injury was reported, and it is unclear whether the consumer was aware
of the recalled status of the product. The third incident is
categorized as an assembly instruction issue, where it appears that the
consumer did not properly follow the assembly instructions. The last
report was a CPSC recall-related consumer query; no actual incident was
involved.
D. Overview of ASTM F2906
ASTM first published a voluntary standard for bedside sleepers,
ASTM F2906-11, in December 2011. ASTM F2906 specifically addressed
hazards associated with bedside sleepers, including incidents involving
the creation of a hazardous gap between the product and an adult
mattress, by requiring the successful completion of three disengagement
tests. The tests help ensure that the securing components can withstand
forces that may be exerted on the product by either the child or an
adult, while sleeping. The gap must be no more than 0.5 in. when the
product is installed onto the adult bed, per each manufacturer's
directions. When a 25-lb. horizontal force is applied near the
attachment system or corners, the gap may not exceed 1.0 in. To
simulate an adult rolling into a bedside sleeper while sleeping, a gap
greater than 1.0 in. may not be created after the application and
release of a 50-lb. horizontal force to the bedside sleeper's corners.
The inclusion of these anti-gap requirements serve to mitigate the
foreseeable head and neck entrapment hazards posed by bedside sleepers.
In addition, bedside sleepers must also satisfy the minimum side-height
requirement for bassinets (the upper surface of the non-compressed
mattress of a bassinet/cradle must be at least 7.5 inches lower than
the upper surface of the lowest side in all intended bassinet/cradle
use positions), with the exception of the lowered side rail (the height
of the side rail in the lowest position shall be no less than 4 inches
when measured from the top of the uncompressed bedside sleeper mattress
to the top of the lowered side rail, when the mattress support is in
its highest position).
Bedside sleepers and bassinets share a significant number of hazard
patterns because both products are intended to be used by children with
the same developmental abilities and for the same purpose. Many bedside
sleepers also function as bassinets. Accordingly, the bedside sleepers
voluntary standard requires beside sleepers to be tested to the
bassinet standard (ASTM F2194).
1. Proposed Rule
In the NPR, CPSC identified 24 incidents attributed to defect or
potential design flaws in bedside sleepers. The hazards associated with
these incidents included: Issues with the adjustable fabric cover over
the metal bars on the side that lowered in the bedside sleeper mode (9
incidents); poor assembly instruction (6 incidents); and miscellaneous
other product-related issues (9 incidents). To address these incidents,
the Commission proposed in the NPR to adopt by reference, ASTM
International's voluntary standard, ASTM F2906-12, Standard Consumer
Safety Specification for Bedside Sleepers, with a few additions to
strengthen the standard. ASTM F2906-12 also required that, in addition
to the tests provided in ASTM F2906-12, the bedside sleeper must be
tested to the bassinet standard (ASTM F2194). Additionally, multimode
products must also be tested to each applicable standard associated
with the product's use modes.
In the NPR, the Commission proposed adding clarifying language to
ASTM F2906-12 so that the hazards associated with play yard bassinet
misassembly and fabric-sided enclosed openings would also be addressed
in bedside sleepers for bedside sleeper accessories. As discussed in
the preamble to the NPR, for bassinets/cradles with fabric sides, a
fully bounded opening may not be created that allows the complete
passage of the torso probe (based on a torso diameter of a 5th
percentile, 0 to 2-month-old infant) when tested in accordance with the
fabric release test methods for enclosed openings. However, the test
does not apply to play yard bassinet accessories. Bassinet accessories
to play yards (that cannot be converted to bedside sleepers) are
usually held in place by fasteners that clip to the top of the play
yard's railing. If the fasteners were left unclipped, the bassinet
would fall, rendering the product untestable, due to the complete
collapse of the bassinet attachment. Unlike bassinet play yard
accessories, a bedside sleeper play yard accessory could have fasteners
left unclipped (through the detachment of snaps/Velcro[supreg]) where
the bedside sleeper with the lowered side does not completely collapse
and appears functional. As a result, the Commission determined that all
bedside sleeper play yard accessories should be subject to the
requirements of the bassinet standard's fabric-sided enclosed openings
test (without the exemption for bassinet play yard accessories), given
the entrapment and suffocation hazards presented when a bedside
sleeper's removable cover (liner or shell) is either not used or not
secured properly.
To address this hazard, the Commission proposed to add a new
definition for ``bedside sleeper accessory'' and eliminate the fabric-
sided, bounded-opening performance requirement exemption currently
granted to play yard bassinet accessories. The definition proposed was:
``bedside sleeper accessory, n--an
[[Page 2583]]
elevated sleep surface that attaches to a non-full-size crib or play
yard, designed to convert the product into a bedside sleeper intended
to have a horizontal sleep surface while in a rest (non-rocking)
position.'' In addition, the Commission proposed to add a new section:
``Bedside Sleeper Accessory Fabric-Sided Enclosed Openings--A bedside
sleeper accessory shall meet the F2194 performance requirement
``Fabric-Sided Enclosed Openings.'' However, a bedside sleeper would be
exempt from this requirement if the bedside sleeper collapsed under its
own weight or the sleep surface tilts by more than 30 degrees.
The Commission also proposed additional language to address play
yard bedside accessory misassembly. The Commission had already proposed
a requirement to address consumer misassembly of key structural
elements for bassinet accessories to play yards in the play yard
standard, ASTM F406. However, the proposed play yard standard did not
include specific language for a misassembled bedside sleeper accessory.
Accordingly, the Commission proposed to add a new section to include
bedside sleepers: ``Bedside Sleeper Play Yard Accessories Missing Key
Structural Elements: A bedside sleeper accessory shall meet the F406
general requirement ``Bassinet/Cradle Accessories Missing Key
Structural Elements.''
2. Recent Developments in the Play Yard Standard and Bassinet Standard
After the the Commission published the NPR for bedside sleepers in
the Federal Register, the ASTM play yard subcommittee worked closely
with the ASTM bassinet subcommittee to address hazards related to
bassinet accessory misassembly. The subcommittees decided to address
the hazards associated with bassinet accessory misassembly in two
different ASTM standards: (1) The play yard standard, ASTM F406-13,
Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Non-Full-Size Baby Cribs/
Play Yards, now addresses safety issues related to bassinet accessory
attachment components (i.e., structures that attach the bassinet
accessory to the play yard); and (2) the bassinet standard, ASTM F2194-
13, Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Bassinets and Cradles,
addresses safety issues related to mattress support rods (and all other
structures that ensure that the bassinet accessory mattress is flat and
stable) through the segmented mattress-flatness test contained in the
bassinet standard. These requirements are now part of the current ASTM
standards for play yards, ASTM F406-13, and for bassinets/cradles, ASTM
F2194-13.
On August 19, 2013, the Commission issued an amendment to the
Safety Standard for Play Yards, to incorporate by reference the most
recent version of ASTM's play yard standard, ASTM F406-13, to address
the hazards associated with misassembly of play yard bassinet
accessories. 78 FR 50328. The play yard standard, ASTM F406-13, now
addresses safety issues related to bassinet accessory attachment
components (i.e., structures that attach the bassinet accessory to the
play yard).
On October 23, 2013, the Commission issued a final rule for
bassinets, Safety Standard for Bassinets and Cradles, to incorporate by
reference the most recent version of ASTM's bassinet standard, ASTM
F2194-13, to address safety issues related to mattress support rods
(and all other structures that ensure that the bassinet accessory
mattress is flat and stable) through the segmented mattress-flatness
test contained in the bassinet standard. 78 FR 63019. In addition, the
Commission's bassinet rule required several modifications to ASTM
F2194-13. These modifications:
Added new definitions, a test requirement, and test
procedure for a new performance requirement pertaining to the stability
of bassinets with removable bassinet beds;
Revised the current stability test procedure by specifying
the use of a newborn CAMI dummy, rather than the six-month infant CAMI
dummy;
Revised the pass/fail criterion for the segmented
mattresses flatness test to make it more stringent;
Excluded segmented mattress flatness test bassinets that
are less than 15 inches wide along the width of the mattress; and
Revised the scope to clarify that a multimode or
combination product must meet the requirements of all standards
associated with its use modes. These additional requirements are
codified at 16 CFR part 1218, Safety Standard for Bassinets and
Cradles.
3. Current ASTM Bedside Sleeper Standard (ASTM F2906-13)
The current version of the voluntary standard for bedside sleepers
adopts the same performance requirement and test method in ASTM's play
yard standard, ASTM F406-13, which addresses the hazards associated
with misassembly of play yard bassinet accessories, for bedside sleeper
accessories. To provide clearer definitions of a ``bedside sleeper
accessory,'' ASTM F2906-13 now provides definitions for ``bedside
sleeper accessory'' and ``bedside sleeper accessory attachment
components.'' ASTM F2906-13 provides that a bedside sleeper accessory
is an elevated sleep surface that attaches to a play yard designed to
convert the product into a bedside sleeper and is intended to have a
horizontal sleep surface while in a rest (non-rocking) position.
Bedside sleeper accessory attachment components are defined as
components that provide the means of attachment for a bedside sleeper
accessory to a play yard.
ASTM F2906-13 also adds a definition of a ``bedside sleeper
shell.'' As explained in the NPR, there are demonstrated hazards
presented when a bedside sleeper's removable cover, including a liner
or shell, is either not used or not secured properly. 77 FR 73348-49.
Accordingly, ``bedside sleeper shell'' is defined as a textile cover
for bedside sleeper accessory that incorporates structural elements
such as tubing, permanently attached clips or hooks, or other elements
that allow it to be suspended from the play yard frame.
In addition, ASTM F2906-13 addresses the hazards associated with
misassembly of play yard bedside sleeper accessories. The standard
adopts the same requirements set forth in ASTM F406-13 for bassinet/
cradle accessories missing accessory attachment components, and an
associated test method for misassembly failure under the bassinet/
cradle accessory sleep surface collapse/tilt test. Under the current
ASTM F2906-13 standard, bedside sleeper accessories must have all
accessory attachment components permanently attached to the bedside
sleeper accessory. If bedside sleeper accessories that require consumer
assembly of accessory attachment components can be assembled and
attached to the product with any accessory attachment component
missing, the accessory must either: (1) Collapse such that any part of
the mattress pad contacts the bottom floor of the play yard or is not
able to support 4.0 lbm test mass tested; or (2) the bedside sleeper
accessory sleep surface must tilt by more than 30 degrees when tested
to the bedside sleeper accessory sleep surface collapse/tilt test.
ASTM F2906-13 also continues to require bedside sleepers to meet
the requirements of the bassinet standard, ASTM F2194, with the
exception of the height of the lowered fourth side. Most bedside
sleepers also function as bassinets. The intended users are identical,
and the majority of the hazards are identical. Because bedside sleepers
are already required to be tested to the bassinet standard, ASTM F2194,
all of the requirements and test methods in ASTM 2194 are not restated
[[Page 2584]]
in the bedside sleeper standard ASTM F2906-13. However, ASTM F2906-13
specifically adds a new section on fabric release test methods for
enclosed openings for bedside sleeper accessories. As stated above,
although the bassinet standard, ASTM F2194, contains a requirement for
fabric-sided enclosed openings, the test does not apply to play yard
bassinet accessories. Bassinet accessories to play yards (that cannot
be converted to bedside sleepers) are usually held in place by
fasteners that clip to the top of the play yard's railing. If the
fasteners were left unclipped, the bassinet would fall, rendering the
product untestable, resulting in test failure. However, the unique
hazard associated with bedside sleepers requires testing for fabric-
sided enclosed openings because bedside sleepers have a lowered fourth
side that can create a hazard when the removable cover or shell is
either not used or not secured properly. ASTM F2906-13 addresses this
hazard by making explicit that the fabric release test methods for
enclosed openings apply to all bedside sleepers and bedside sleeper
accessories.
In this rule, the CPSC incorporates by reference ASTM F2906-13
because the Commission's proposed modifications in the NPR have been
adopted in ASTM F2906-13, including the requirements and test methods
for bedside sleeper accessories missing accessory attachment components
and bedside sleeper accessory fabric-sided enclosed openings. In
addition, because bedside sleepers are required to be tested to the
bassinet standard, and because the Commission recently issued a
mandatory standard for bassinets (incorporating the ASTM bassinet
standard with modifications), which was codified at 16 CFR part 1218,
the Commission adopts ASTM F2906-13 with revisions to change the
references to the voluntary bassinet standard, ASTM F2194, in the
standard with references to the mandatory bassinet standard, 16 CFR
part 1218.
E. Response to Comments
The Commission received five comments in response to the NPR from
consumers, industry, consumer advocacy groups, and trade associations.
A summary of each comment topic and response is provided.
1. General Comments
Comment: One commenter generally supported the proposed rule.
Another commenter stated that the responsibility for the safe use of
products lies with the parent of the young child.
Response: Section 104 of the CPSIA requires the Commission to
examine and assess the effectiveness of voluntary consumer product
safety standards for durable infant or toddler products and to
promulgate mandatory standards. The Commission has identified bedside
sleepers as a durable infant or toddler product. Bedside sleepers are
similar to bassinets and function also, in many instances, as
bassinets. The Commission has concluded that more stringent
requirements would further reduce the risk of injury associated with
the product. Accordingly, the Commission is issuing a safety standard
for bedside sleepers in response to the direction under section 104 of
the CPSIA.
2. Mandatory Standards Should Be Finalized
Comment: Several commenters stated that the standards for play
yards and bassinets should be finalized, including the issues related
to fabric-sided enclosed openings and consumer misassembly with missing
components before they are applied to bedside sleepers. In addition,
two commenters stated that to avoid confusion, the specific
requirements of ASTM F406 and ASTM F2194 should be inserted into ASTM
F2906, rather than simply referencing those standards.
Response: ASTM has finalized both the play yard standard, ASTM
F406-13, and the bassinet standard, ASTM F2914-13. The Commission has
made some additional modifications to ASTM F2194-13. The requirements
for fabric-sided enclosed openings have been adopted in ASTM F2906-13
for bedside sleeper accessories. The requirements for misassembly of
play yard bassinet accessories have also been adopted in ASTM F2906-13
for bedside sleeper accessories. Those provisions have been included in
ASTM F2906-13.
ASTM's bedside sleeper standard, ASTM F2906-13 did not include all
the modifications that the Commission subsequently made to the CPSC
bassinet standard. Therefore, the final rule for bedside sleepers
requires reference to 16 CFR part 1218 to reflect those modifications.
3. Redundant Product Safety Feature
Comment: One commenter stated that the play yard bassinet accessory
misassembly requirement may compel manufacturers to eliminate redundant
safety features that are already a component of the product. The
commenter stated that removal of the mattress pad support bars does not
replicate or address the misassembly incident or result in a safer
product.
Response: This comment has been addressed in the Commission's final
safety standards for play yards and for bassinets and cradles. The play
yard standard, ASTM F406-13, addressed safety issues related to
bassinet accessory attachment components (i.e., structures that attach
the bassinet accessory to the play yard). The bassinet standard, ASTM
F2194-13, addressed the issue of mattress pad support rods (and all
other structures that keep the bassinet accessory mattress flat and
stable) through the segmented mattress flatness test. ASTM F2194-13 now
requires that bassinets with removable mattress support rods be tested
both with and without the mattress support rods. In addition, the
Commission's modifications to ASTM F2194 in the final rule for the
safety standard for bassinets included a change to the pass/fail
criterion for the mattress flatness test and revisions to the stability
test procedures for bassinets. These safety features are not redundant
because each product must meet the standards associated with the
product's use mode. 78 FR 50332 and 63025.
4. Intellectual Property
Comment: One commenter stated that there may be patents that
restrict options for manufacturers. For example, the commenter stated
that there is a patent application pending, detailing 10 different
methods to ``stiffen a play yard mattress pad before the mattress is
used in a play yard bassinet accessory.''
Response: This comment has been addressed in the final rule on the
safety standard for play yards. The Commission stated that the concern
regarding the means of stiffening a mattress pad is no longer an issue
for the play yard rule because the play yard bassinet accessory
misassembly requirement no longer applies to mattress support rods or
any other methods that might be used to stiffen a mattress pad.
Instead, the play yard rule focuses only on accessory attachment
components that attach the bassinet accessory to the play yard.
Moreover, the bassinet standard, which addresses mattress flatness,
does not require a specific design to pass the standard, and a bassinet
can meet the mattress-flatness test in a variety of ways without
necessarily implicating patented technology. 78 FR 50333.
5. Requirements for Stability of Removable Bassinet Beds
Comment: One commenter stated that adding the removable bassinet
bed stability requirement is premature. The commenter stated the belief
that the requirement should be removed from
[[Page 2585]]
the regulation and that ASTM should be allowed to continue work on this
issue.
Response: This comment has already been addressed in the
Commission's final consumer product safety standard for bassinets and
cradles, which likewise would apply to bedside sleepers with a
removable bed.
Specifcally, the Commission has provided manufacturers with options
to meet the removable bassinet bed requirements. The Commission stated
that any product containing a removable bassinet bed with a latching or
locking device intended to secure the bassinet bed to the base/
standshall comply with at least one of the following: (1) The base/
stand shall not support the bassinet bed (i.e., the bassinet bed falls
from the stand and contacts the floor or the base/stand collapses when
the bassinet bed is not locked on the base/stand); (2) the lock/latch
shall automatically engage under the weight of the bassinet bed
(without any other force or action) in all lateral positions; (3) the
sleep surface of the bassinet bed shall be at an angle of at least 20
degrees from a horizontal plane when the bassinet bed is in an unlocked
position; (4) the bassinet/cradle shall provide a false latch/lock
visual indicator(s). At a minimum, an indicator shall be visible to a
person standing near both of the two longest sides of the product; or,
(5) the bassinet bed shall not tip over and shall retain the CAMI
newborn dummy. 78 FR 63022.
6. Ambiguity in Catastrophic Failure Evaluation
Comment: One commenter objected to the 30[deg]-tilt requirement in
the catastrophic failure test. The commenter stated that the
requirement is not adequately supported by scientific data and
expressed the belief that this test is counterintuitive to the typical
design approach by manufacturers of building in redundancies that
prevent catastrophic failure.
Response: This comment has been addressed in the Commission's final
rule on the safety standard for play yards. Bedside sleepers that are
used in the play yard mode must also meet the play yard requirements.
In the play yard context, the Commission explained that the
catastrophic failure test is an alternative to the permanent affixture
test. The Commission stated that the angle of 30 degrees represents a
safety factor of three times the 10 degrees maximum safe sleep surface
angle of incline. The Commission noted that CPSC staff, as well as ASTM
members, can reconsider the tilt angle requirement during future
revisions should evidence be presented indicating that the angle is too
small or large. 78 FR 50332.
In addition any built in redundancies in testing have been resolved
because bassinet accessory attachment components are addressed in the
play yard standard, and because bassinet accessory mattress support
rods are addressed in the bassinet standard. The play yard bassinet
accessory misassembly requirement in F406-13 now applies to accessory
attachment components. Misassembly issues related to mattress support
rods are now addressed in the standard for bassinets and cradles.
Bassinets with removable mattress support rods are required to be
tested both with and without the mattress support rods. The bassinet
also must pass the segmented mattress flatness test, with and without
the mattress support rods. Accordingly, all known misassembly issues
are addressed in either the play yard or the bassinet final standards.
6. Proposed Segmented Mattress Flatness
Comment: One commenter urged the CPSC to adopt the ASTM pass/fail
criteria for the surface mattress flatness requirement proposed in the
Bassinet NPR. The commenter further asserted that the repeated testing
to ASTM F2194 surface flatness requirements has shown a tendency toward
a lack of repeatability and that an established principle of looking at
the mean of several trials should be used.
Response: This comment has been addressed in the final rule on the
safety standard for bassinets. The Commission determined that mattress
flatness requirement is primarily aimed at incidents involving
bassinet/play yard combination products that tend to use segmented
mattresses, where seams could pose a suffocation and positional
asphyxiation hazard. Under the Commission's pass/fail criteria, a
bassinet attachment with a segmented mattress will fail if any tested
seam creates an angle greater than 10 degrees. ASTM F2194-13 allowed
measured angles between 10 degrees and 14 degrees to pass, as long as
the mean of three measurements on that seam is less than 10 degrees.
The 14-degree angle was based on an extrapolation of angles formed by
dimensions of average infant faces. However, the Commission declined to
use the average infant facial dimension as the basis for this
requirement. Instead, in the final rule on bassinets, the Commission
adopted the smallest users' anthropometrics to set the test requirement
of 10 degrees maximum for each measurement taken. In addition, the
bassinet final rule exempts from the mattress flatness requirement
bassinets that are less than 15 inches across. The Commission found
that these products do not pose the hazard the requirement is intended
to address, and they are also not wide enough to test using the
required procedures and equipment. 78 FR 63023.
7. Assembly and Instructions
Comment: One commenter requested that consistency be maintained
with previously adopted mandatory regulations regarding assembly
instructions and visual indicators as are demonstrated, for example, in
the full-size crib requirement (16 CFR part 1219).
Response: Although the language in the full-size crib standard (16
CFR part 1219) and the ASTM F2906-13 and ASTM F2194-13 standards is not
identical, the Commission finds that the content is sufficiently
consistent among the standards regarding assembly instructions and
visual indicators to convey the necessary information.
8. Attachment Mechanism
Comment: One commenter stated that a gap between the bedside
sleeper and an adult bed creates a risk of injury to an infant in both
the bedside sleeper and the adult bed. The commenter recommended that
CPSC include an attachment mechanism to be composed of only one part
that is then attached to the bedside sleeper, as required in the
portable children's bed rail standard, ASTM F2085-12. The commenter
stated that the attachment mechanism would not need to be permanently
attached to bedside sleepers that are also used in other modes without
the attachment, but all necessary parts for attachment should be
connected to each other, reducing the chance that caregivers will leave
key elements out of the attachment process.
Response: The CPSC is not aware of any incidents in which an infant
became entrapped in a gap between a bedside sleeper and an adult bed
with or without missing key elements of the attachment mechanism. There
are very few single-mode bedside sleeper products. Most bedside
sleepers are multiuse with other modes, such as bassinets and play
yards. Although the commenter indicated the attachment would not need
to be connected permanently when used in other modes that do not
require the attachment, CPSC staff is concerned that the attachment
could present a risk of injury, such as strangulation or entrapment
with the attachment cord or strap, when not in use. The addition of
[[Page 2586]]
requirements to prevent entrapment in a gap between the bedside sleeper
and the adult bed on very few single-mode bedside sleeper products at
the expense of adding potential strangulation or entrapment risks does
not appear warranted. At this time, the Commission does not support the
inclusion of a requirement for a one-piece attachment device that would
need to be installed permanently on single-mode bedside sleepers and
also would need to be removable on bedside sleepers with free standing
bassinet or play yard use modes.
9. Pictograms and Warnings
Comment: One commenter suggested that adding pictograms to the
warnings would effectively convey the hazard and avoid language
barriers that minimize comprehension of these warning labels. The
commenter also stated that the CPSC should add a warning that would
advise the caregiver of the danger adult bedding can pose if bedding is
allowed to fall into the bedside sleeper.
Response: Currently, all bedside sleeper products are required to
comply with the marking and labeling requirements of the bassinet
standard. Although a well-developed and tested pictogram could increase
comprehension, designing effective, well-understood graphics can be
difficult. Poor understanding of graphics may cause consumer confusion,
the most severe of which is a critical confusion, where the graphic is
interpreted to mean the opposite of the intention. Therefore, any
warning pictogram should be developed with empirical study and well
tested on the target audience. In addition, there are a number of
products for which a soft bedding pictogram could be useful, such as
bedside sleepers, bassinets, cribs, play yards, inclined sleep
products, and others. Because of the increasing number of multimode
products, the Commission believes a cross-product ad hoc working group
may be the best place to develop such a pictogram and would allow
testing and validation of the pictogram. Subject to budgetary and staff
resources, CPSC staff would support participation in any such group,
and should the need arise, staff will consider future action once such
a graphic is developed.
10. Effective Date Marking
Comment: One commenter stated that the CPSC should add a marking on
products that are manufactured after the effective date so that
consumers can clearly identify products that meet the mandatory
standard.
Response: On Feburary 13, 2013, a final rule implementing Testing
and Labeling Pertaining to Product Certification, 16 CFR part 1107 (the
1107 rule), became effective. Under the 1107 rule, a manufacturer or
importer may label a certified compliant product as ``Meets CPSC Safety
Requirements.'' Because producers are already allowed to label
compliant products as such under the 1107 rule, including this option
in the bedside sleeper standard would be redundant. Accordingly, the
Commission will not require additional markings at this time.
F. Final Rule
The CPSC is incorporating by reference ASTM F2906-13 because the
Commission's proposed modifications in the NPR have been adopted in
ASTM F2906-13, including the requirements and test methods for bedside
sleeper accessories missing accessory attachment components and bedside
sleeper accessory fabric-sided enclosed openings. In addition, because
bedside sleepers are required to be tested to the bassinet standard,
and because the Commission recently issued a final rule incorporating
the ASTM standard for bassinets with some modifications, codified at 16
CFR part 1218, the references to the voluntary bassinet standard (ASTM
F2194) are revised to reflect the current mandatory bassinet standard,
16 CFR part 1218.
Specifically, ASTM F2194 is referenced in sections 5.1, 5.1.1, 7.1
and 8.1. All of the references to ASTM F2194 are replaced with 16 CFR
part 1218 as follows:
5.1 Prior to or immediately after testing to this consumer
safety specification, the bedside sleeper must be tested to 16 CFR part
1218. Multimode products must also be tested to each applicable
standard. When testing to 16 CFR part 1218, the unit shall be
freestanding, and not be secured to the test platform, as dictated
elsewhere in this standard.
5.1.1 The bassinet minimum side height shall be as
required in 16 CFR part 1218, with the exception of a lowered side rail
as permitted in 5.4.
7.1 All bedside sleeper products shall comply with the
marking and labeling requirements of 16 CFR part 1218.
8.1 All bedside sleeper products shall comply with the
instructional literature requirements of 16 CFR part 1218.
G. Effective Date
The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) generally requires that the
effective date of the rule be at least 30 days after publication of the
final rule. 5 U.S.C. 553(d). Only one commenter addressed the effective
date and supported the 6-month effective date proposed in the NPR. To
allow time for bedside sleepers to come into compliance with the
standard, the bedside sleeper standard will become effective 6 months
after publication of a final rule in the Federal Register.
H. Regulatory Flexibility Act
1. Introduction
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, requires
agencies to consider the impact of proposed and final rules on small
entities, including small businesses. Section 604 of the RFA requires
that the Commission prepare a final regulatory flexibility analysis
when promulgating final rules, unless the head of the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The final regulatory flexibility analysis
must describe the impact of the proposed rule on small entities and
identify any alternatives that may reduce the impact. Specifically, the
final regulatory flexibility analysis must contain:
A succinct statement of the objectives of, and legal basis
for, the rule;
A summary of the significant issues raised by public
comments in response to the initial regulatory flexibility analysis, a
summary of the assessment of the agency of such issues, and a statement
of any changes made in the proposed rule as a result of such comments;
A description of, and, where feasible, an estimate of, the
number of small entities to which the rule will apply;
A description of the projected reporting, recordkeeping,
and other compliance requirements of the rule, including an estimate of
the classes of small entities subject to the requirements and the type
of professional skills necessary for the preparation of reports or
records; and
A description of the steps the agency has taken to reduce
the significant economic impact on small entities, consistent with the
stated objectives of applicable statutes, including a statement of the
factual, policy, and legal reasons for selecting the alternative
adopted in the rule, and why each one of the other significant
alternatives to the rule considered by the agency, which affect the
impact on small entities, was rejected.
[[Page 2587]]
2. The Market
Bedside sleepers are typically produced and/or marketed by juvenile
product manufacturers and distributors. Currently, there are at least
five known manufacturers supplying bedside sleepers to the U.S. market.
Four are domestic manufacturers, including one manufacturer that
dominates the market. The fifth is a foreign manufacturer who ships
products directly to the United States. There may be additional unknown
small manufacturers and importers operating in the U.S. market as well.
The Juvenile Products Manufacturers Association (JPMA), the major
U.S. trade association that represents juvenile product manufacturers
and importers, runs a voluntary Certification Program for several
juvenile products. Under this program, products voluntarily submitted
by manufacturers are tested against the appropriate ASTM standard, and
only passing products are allowed to display JPMA's Certification Seal.
Currently, JPMA does not have a Certification Program for bedside
sleepers, and no firm claims to meet the ASTM voluntary standard.
However, three firms supply multimode products, which in one mode, are
compliant with the associated ASTM voluntary standard. Two firms claim
compliance with the ASTM standard for bassinets; one firm is JPMA-
certified as compliant, and the other claims compliance with the ASTM
bassinet standard. A third firm supplies play yards that are JPMA-
certified as compliant with the ASTM play yard/non-full-size crib
standard.
3. Other Federal or State Rules
There are two federal rules that impact the bedside sleeper
standard: (1) Testing and Labeling Pertaining to Product Certification
(16 CFR part 1107); and (2) Requirements Pertaining to Third Party
Conformity Assessment Bodies (16 CFR part 1112).
Under 16 CFR part 1107, every manufacturer of a children's product
that is subject to a children's product safety rule is required to
certify, based on third party testing by a CPSC-accepted conformity
assessment body (or laboratory), that the product complies with all
applicable safety rules. Because bedside sleepers will be subject to a
mandatory children's product safety rule, the product will also be
subject to the third party testing requirements of section 14(a)(2) of
the CPSA.
Under 16 CFR part 1112, the Commission established requirements for
the accreditation of third party conformity assessment bodies to test
for conformance with a children's product safety rule in accordance
with section 14(a)(2) of the CPSA. This rule amends 16 CFR part 1112 to
establish the requirements for accepting the accreditation of a
conformity assessment body to test for compliance with the bedside
sleeper standard.
4. Impact on Small Businesses
There are four domestic firms known to be marketing bedside
sleepers in the United States. Under U.S. Small Business Administration
(SBA) guidelines, a manufacturer of bedside sleepers is small if it has
500 or fewer employees. Based on these guidelines, all four domestic
manufacturers are small. The economic impact on small domestic
manufacturers depends on two factors: (1) Whether their products are
multiuse products and are already in compliance with one or more
existing standards; and (2) the proportion of their total sales or
revenue that bedside sleepers constitute.
Three of the four domestic manufacturers produce a multiuse product
or a product that may be used as a bedside sleeper as well as a
bassinet or play yard. These three multiuse products are required to
comply with other existing standards, and there is significant overlap
between standards. For example, firms that produce multimode bedside
sleeper/play yards are already required to comply with the mandatory
play yard standard. In addition, these three multiuse products also
function as bassinets and will need to comply with the bassinet
standard prior to the effective date for the bedside sleeper final
rule. If the products comply with applicable standards pertaining to
other use modes, these products will require only slight, incremental
modifications. Thus, assuming that these multiuse bedside sleeper
products comply or will comply with the standards applicable to other
use modes, the three producers of multiuse products are unlikely to
experience an economically significant impact due to the bedside
sleeper draft final rule.
Two of the domestic manufactures rely almost solely on the sales of
bedside sleepers, including a bedside sleeper accessory, as their
revenue source. This includes one of the firms mentioned above which
produces a multiuse product that will need to comply with an existing
standard prior to any effective date for the bedside sleeper draft
final rule. Again, based on the assumption that this firm's products
will comply with other existing standards, the bedside sleeper rule
should not result in a significant economic impact on this firm. The
second firm, however, produces a product that serves as a standalone
bedside sleeper. Staff believes that this firm's standalone bedside
sleeper would need several modifications to meet the requirements in
the bedside sleeper standard. The firm will need at least two
modifications (adding a lowered fourth side and complying with new
stability requirements). However, the firm's plans for modifying the
product and costs of compliance are unknown. Even if the cost of each
modification taken individually is small, total costs of compliance
could be modest or high. Because the majority of this firm's revenues
is tied to bedside sleepers and assuming that several modifications may
be needed to comply with the bedside sleeper standard, this firm is
more likely experience an economically significant impact as a result
of the bedside sleeper mandatory standard.
Under section 14 of the CPSA, bedside sleepers are also subject to
third party testing and certification. Once the new requirements become
effective, all manufacturers will be subject to the additional costs
associated with the third party testing and certification requirements
under the testing rule, Testing and Labeling Pertaining to Product
Certification (16 CFR part 1107). Third party testing will pertain to
any physical and mechanical test requirements specified in the bedside
sleeper final rule; lead and phthalates testing is already required.
Third party testing costs are in addition to the direct costs of
meeting the bedside sleeper standard.
Based on information from the durable nursery product industry and
confidential business information supplied for the development of the
third-party testing rule, testing to a single ASTM voluntary standard
could cost around $500-$600 per model sample. On average, each small
domestic manufacturer supplies two different models of bedside sleepers
to the U.S. market annually. Therefore, if third-party testing to the
requirements in the bedside sleeper standard were conducted every year
on a single sample for each model, third-party testing costs associated
for each manufacturer would be about $1,000-$1,200 annually. Based on
an examination of estimates of firms' revenues from recent Dun &
Bradstreet reports, the impact of third-party testing to ASTM F2906-13
is not likely to be economically significant if only one bedside
sleeper sample per model is required. However, if more than one sample
would be needed to meet the testing requirements, third-party testing
[[Page 2588]]
costs could have an economically significant impact on two of the small
manufacturers (i.e., based on SBA guidelines, staff typically uses 1
percent of gross revenue as the threshold for determining economic
significance and testing costs could be 1 percent or more of gross
revenue). The exact number of samples needed to meet the ``high degree
of assurance'' criterion as required in 16 CFR part 1107 is unknown.
5. Alternatives
An alternative to the rule would be to set an effective date later
than 6 months, which is generally considered sufficient time for
suppliers to come into compliance with a rule. Setting a later
effective date would allow suppliers additional time to develop
compliant bedside sleepers and spread the associated costs over a
longer period of time. The Commission finds that a 6-month effective
date is adequate for manufacturers to comply with the bedside sleeper
standard because the changes necessary to comply with the standard are
not substantial given that most bedside sleepers are also multi-mode
products.
I. Environmental Considerations
The Commission's regulations address whether we are required to
prepare an environmental assessment or an environmental impact
statement. These regulations provide a categorical exclusion for
certain CPSC actions that normally have ``little or no potential for
affecting the human environment.'' Among those actions are rules or
safety standards for consumer products. 16 CFR 1021.5(c)(1). The rule
falls within the categorical exclusion.
J. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains information collection requirements that are
subject to public comment and review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3521). The preamble to the proposed rule (77 FR at 73352 through 73353)
discussed the information collection burden of the proposed rule and
specifically requested comments on the accuracy of our estimates.
Sections 7 and 8 of ASTM F2906-13 contain requirements for marking,
labeling, and instructional literature. These requirements fall within
the definition of ``collection of information,'' as defined in 44
U.S.C. 3502(3).
OMB has assigned control number 3041-0160 to this information
collection. The Commission did not receive any comments regarding the
information collection burden of this proposal. Accordingly, we
estimate the burden of this collection of information as follows:
Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Frequency of Total annual Hours per Total burden
16 CFR section respondents responses responses response hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1222............................................................... 5 2 10 1 10
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
K. Preemption
Section 26(a) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2075(a), provides that where a
consumer product safety standard is in effect and applies to a product,
no state or political subdivision of a state may either establish or
continue in effect a requirement dealing with the same risk of injury
unless the state requirement is identical to the federal standard.
Section 26(c) of the CPSA also provides that states or political
subdivisions of states may apply to the Commission for an exemption
from this preemption under certain circumstances. Section 104(b) of the
CPSIA refers to the rules to be issued under that section as ``consumer
product safety rules,'' thus, implying that the preemptive effect of
section 26(a) of the CPSA would apply. Therefore, a rule issued under
section 104 of the CPSIA will invoke the preemptive effect of section
26(a) of the CPSA when it becomes effective.
L. Certification and Notice of Requirements (NOR)
Section 14(a) of the CPSA imposes the requirement that products
subject to a consumer product safety rule under the CPSA, or to a
similar rule, ban, standard or regulation under any other act enforced
by the Commission, must be certified as complying with all applicable
CPSC-enforced requirements. 15 U.S.C. 2063(a). Section 14(a)(2) of the
CPSA requires that certification of children's products subject to a
children's product safety rule be based on testing conducted by a CPSC-
accepted third party conformity assessment body. Section 14(a)(3) of
the CPSA requires the Commission to publish a notice of requirements
(NOR) for the accreditation of third party conformity assessment bodies
(or laboratories) to assess conformity with a children's product safety
rule to which a children's product is subject. The ``Safety Standard
for Bedside Sleepers,'' to be codified at 16 CFR part 1222, is a
children's product safety rule that requires the issuance of an NOR.
The Commission published a final rule, Requirements Pertaining to
Third Party Conformity Assessment Bodies, 78 FR 15836 (March 12, 2013),
which is codified at 16 CFR Part 1112 (referred to here as part 1112).
This rule became effective on June 10, 2013. Part 1112 establishes
requirements for accreditation of third party conformity assessment
bodies (or laboratories) to test for conformance with a children's
product safety rule in accordance with Section 14(a)(2) of the CPSA.
Part 1112 also codifies a list of all of the NORs that the CPSC had
published at the time part 1112 was issued. All NORs issued after the
Commission published part 1112, such as the bedside sleeper standard,
require the Commission to amend part 1112. Accordingly, this rule
amends part 1112 to include the bedside sleeper standard in the list
with the other children's product safety rules for which the CPSC has
issued NORs.
Laboratories applying for acceptance as a CPSC-accepted third party
conformity assessment body to test to the new standard for bedside
sleepers would be required to meet the third party conformity
assessment body accreditation requirements in 16 CFR Part 1112,
Requirements Pertaining to Third Party Conformity Assessment Bodies.
When a laboratory meets the requirements as a CPSC-accepted third party
conformity assessment body, the laboratory can apply to the CPSC to
have 16 CFR Part 1222, Safety Standard for Bedside Sleepers, included
in its scope of accreditation of CPSC safety rules listed for the
laboratory on the CPSC Web site at: www.cpsc.gov/labsearch.
CPSC staff conducted an analysis of the potential impacts on small
entities of the proposed rule establishing accreditation requirements,
as required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, and the agency prepared
an Initial
[[Page 2589]]
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA). Requirements Pertaining to
Third Party Conformity Assessment Bodies. 77 FR 31086, 31123-26.
Specifically, the NOR for the bedside sleeper standard would not have a
significant adverse impact on small laboratories. Based upon the number
of laboratories in the United States that have applied for CPSC
acceptance of the accreditation to test for conformance to other
juvenile product standards, we expect that only a few laboratories will
seek CPSC acceptance of their accreditation to test for conformance
with the bedside sleeper standard. Most of these laboratories already
will have been accredited to test for conformance to other juvenile
product standards, and the only cost to them would be the cost of
adding the bedside sleeper standard to their scope of accreditation. As
a consequence, the Commission certifies that the NOR for the bedside
sleeper standard will not have a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
List of Subjects
16 CFR Part 1112
Administrative practice and procedure, Audit, Consumer protection,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Third party conformity
assessment body.
16 CFR Part 1222
Consumer protection, Imports, Incorporation by reference, Infants
and Children, Labeling, Law Enforcement, and Toys.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Commission amends 16
CFR chapter II as follows:
PART 1112--REQUIREMENTS PERTAINING TO THIRD PARTY CONFORMITY
ASSESSMENT BODIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 1112 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2063; Pub. L. 110-314, section 3, 122 Stat.
3016, 3017 (2008).
0
2. Amend Sec. 1112.15 by adding paragraph (b)(35) to read as follows:
Sec. 1112.15 When can a third party conformity assessment body apply
for CPSC acceptance for a particular CPSC rule or test method?
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(35) 16 CFR Part 1222, Safety Standard for Bedside Sleepers.
* * * * *
0
3. Add part 1222 to read as follows:
PART 1222-SAFETY STANDARD FOR BEDSIDE SLEEPERS
Sec.
1222.1 Scope.
1222.2 Requirements for bedside sleepers.
Authority: The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008,
Pub. L. 110-314, Sec. 104, 122 Stat. 3016 (August 14, 2008); Pub.
L. 112-28, 125 Stat. 273 (August 12, 2011).
Sec. 1222.1 Scope.
This part establishes a consumer product safety standard for
bedside sleepers.
Sec. 1222.2 Requirements for bedside sleepers.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each
bedside sleeper must comply with all applicable provisions of ASTM
F2906-13, Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Bedside Sleepers,
approved on July 1, 2013. The Director of the Federal Register approves
this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and
1 CFR Part 51. You may obtain a copy from ASTM International, 100 Bar
Harbor Drive, P.O. Box 0700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428; https://www.astm.org/cpsc.htm. You may inspect a copy at the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East
West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, telephone 301-504-7923, or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to:
https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal
regulations/ibr_locations.html.
(b) Comply with ASTM F2906-13 with the following changes:
(1) Instead of complying with section 5.1 of ASTM F2906-13, comply
with the following:
(i) Prior to or immediately after testing to this consumer safety
specification, the bedside sleeper must be tested to 16 CFR Part 1218.
Multimode products must also be tested to each applicable standard.
When testing to 16 CFR Part 1218 the unit shall be freestanding, and
not be secured to the test platform as dictated elsewhere in this
standard.
(ii) 5.1.1 The bassinet minimum side height shall be as required in
16 CFR Part 1218, with the exception of a lowered side rail as
permitted in 5.4.
(2) Instead of complying with section 7.1 of ASTM F2906-13, comply
with the following:
(i) All bedside sleeper products shall comply with the marking and
labeling requirements of 16 CFR Part 1218.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) Instead of complying with section 8.1 of ASTM F2906-13, comply
with the following:
(i) All bedside sleeper products shall comply with the
instructional literature requirements of 16 CFR Part 1218.
(ii) [Reserved]
Dated: January 10, 2014.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-00597 Filed 1-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P