General Administrative Regulations; Mutual Consent Cancellation; Food Security Act of 1985, Implementation; Denial of Benefits; and Ineligibility for Programs Under the Federal Crop Insurance Act, 2075-2084 [2013-31357]
Download as PDF
2075
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 79, No. 8
Monday, January 13, 2014
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
7 CFR Parts 400, 407 and 457
[Docket No. FCIC–11–0009]
RIN 0563–AC26
General Administrative Regulations;
Mutual Consent Cancellation; Food
Security Act of 1985, Implementation;
Denial of Benefits; and Ineligibility for
Programs Under the Federal Crop
Insurance Act
Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation (FCIC) finalizes the General
Administrative Regulations to revise
regulations addressing Ineligibility for
Programs under the Federal Crop
Insurance Act. The intended effect of
this action is to eliminate redundancies,
improve clarity, remove or update
obsolete references, and add references
to other provisions regarding
ineligibility for Federal crop insurance.
DATES: Effective date: This rule is
effective February 12, 2014.
Applicability date: The changes will
apply for the 2015 and succeeding crop
years for all crops with a contract
change date after February 12, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim
Hoffmann, Product Administration and
Standards Division, Risk Management
Agency, United States Department of
Agriculture, Beacon Facility, Stop 0812,
Room 421, P.O. Box 419205, Kansas
City, MO 64141–6205, telephone (816)
926–7730.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that this rule is
not-significant for the purpose of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:45 Jan 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, it
has not been reviewed by OMB.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
In accordance with section 3507(d) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information
collection or recordkeeping
requirements included in this final rule,
which were filed under 0563–0085,
have been submitted for approval to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). When OMB notifies us of its
decision, if approval is denied, we will
publish a document in the Federal
Register providing notice of what action
we plan to take.
E-Government Act Compliance
FCIC is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act of 2002, to
promote the use of the Internet and
other information technologies to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) establishes
requirements for Federal agencies to
assess the effects of their regulatory
actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector.
This rule contains no Federal mandates
(under the regulatory provisions of title
II of the UMRA) for State, local, and
tribal governments or the private sector.
Therefore, this rule is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of
UMRA.
Executive Order 13132
It has been determined under section
1(a) of Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, that this rule does not have
sufficient implications to warrant
consultation with the States. The
provisions contained in this rule will
not have a substantial direct effect on
States, or on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Governments. The review reveals that
this regulation will not have substantial
and direct effects on Tribal governments
and will not have significant Tribal
implications.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
FCIC certifies that this regulation will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. Program requirements for the
Federal crop insurance program are the
same for all producers regardless of the
size of their farming operation.
However, FCIC does waive certain
administrative fees for limited resource
farmers to help ensure that small
entities are given the same opportunities
as large entities to obtain crop
insurance. This regulation provides the
rules regarding ineligibility for crop
insurance under the Act based on
actions or inactions of the producer,
such as violations of the Controlled
Substance Act, debarment from Federal
government programs, and failure to pay
premiums and administrative fees when
due. As such, all producers are treated
equally under this regulation. A
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has not
been prepared since this regulation does
not have an unduly burdening impact
on small entities, and therefore, this
regulation is exempt from the provisions
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 605).
Federal Assistance Program
This program is listed in the Catalog
of Federal Domestic Assistance under
No. 10.450.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to the
provisions of Executive Order 12372,
which require intergovernmental
consultation with State and local
officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR
part 3015, subpart V, published at 48 FR
29115, June 24, 1983.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed in
accordance with Executive Order 12988
on civil justice reform. The provisions
of this rule will not have a retroactive
effect. The provisions of this rule will
preempt State and local laws to the
extent such State and local laws are
inconsistent herewith.
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
2076
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Environmental Evaluation
This action is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on the
quality of the human environment,
health, or safety. Therefore, neither an
Environmental Assessment nor an
Environmental Impact Statement is
needed.
Background
This rule finalizes changes to 7 CFR
part 400 by revising subpart U—
Ineligibility for Programs Under the
Federal Crop Insurance Act that were
published by FCIC on December 5,
2011, as a notice of proposed
rulemaking in the Federal Register at 76
FR 75799—75805. The public was
afforded 61 days to submit comments
after the regulation was published in the
Federal Register.
A total of 25 comments were received
from 4 commenters. The commenters
were insurance providers and an
insurance service organization.
The public comments received
regarding the proposed rule and FCIC’s
responses to the comments are as
follows:
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
General Comment
Comment: A commenter questioned
whether the provisions in the proposed
rule would apply only to convictions
that occur after the effective date of the
final rule.
Response: Yes. The laws and
regulations in effect at the time of a
conviction will apply.
Section 400.677 Definitions
Comment: A commenter stated the
definition of ‘‘conviction’’ is vague, will
lead to delays in determinations, and is
unclear what the effective date of the
conviction will be for purposes of
determining ineligibility.
Response: FCIC does not agree the
definition of ‘‘conviction’’ is vague or
will result in delays in determinations.
The definition only defines the term; it
does not include provisions regarding
the effective date or consequences of a
conviction. The effective date and
duration of ineligibility due to a
conviction is provided in section
400.683. No changes were made as a
result of this comment.
Comment: A commenter questioned
the phrase ‘‘functional equivalent of a
judgment’’ within the definition of
‘‘conviction,’’ and states the definition
of the term ‘‘conviction’’ should be
limited to ‘‘criminal judgments.’’
Response: FCIC agrees the reference to
other resolutions that are the functional
equivalent of a judgment is not
necessary because the definition already
includes the phrase ‘‘a judgment or any
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:45 Jan 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
other determination of guilt.’’ The
commenter did not define ‘‘criminal
judgment’’ or state how it would differ
from the proposed definition of
‘‘conviction’’ which includes ‘‘a
judgment or any other determination of
guilt of a criminal offense by any court
of competent jurisdiction.’’ Accordingly,
the reference to other resolutions that
are the functional equivalent of a
judgment were removed in the final
rule; however, no change was made to
limit the definition to ‘‘criminal
judgments.’’
Comment: A commenter questioned
what role the Excluded Parties List
System (EPLS) plays in the Ineligible
Tracking System (ITS) for the insurance
provider.
Response: The EPLS and ITS are
separate sources of data, each with a
separate function and purpose. ITS is a
list of persons who have been
determined to be ineligible for crop
insurance because of various reasons
related to the crop insurance program.
This list is created and maintained by
FCIC. The EPLS is a list of persons who
have met the criteria for inclusion and
whose names were submitted by all
government agencies to the General
Services Administration (GSA). GSA
creates and maintains the EPLS.
Therefore, to the extent that FCIC
reports to GSA ineligible persons who
meet the criteria for inclusion in the
EPLS, there is some overlap of the two
lists. However, there are persons on the
EPLS who may not appear on the ITS
because of violations related to other
government programs. Similarly, there
are persons included on the ITS who do
not appear on the ELPS because they do
not meet the criteria from inclusion.
There is no role for the insurance
provider regarding submitting data to
the EPLS. However, insurance providers
are precluded from insuring or doing
business with anyone on the ITS or the
EPLS. Therefore, the insurance provider
is required to check both the ITS and
EPLS to ensure that it is not insuring or
doing business with an ineligible
person.
Comment: A commenter questioned
whether the definition of the EPLS will
change how the insurance provider
transmits or receives information.
Response: The rule does not provide
instructions regarding how insurance
providers transmit or receive any
applicable information regarding the
EPLS. Since the ELPS is maintained by
GSA, GSA will provide information to
the public on how it can be accessed.
This rule is just intended to provide
notice to the insurance providers that
they do need to access to EPLS to ensure
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
that it is not insuring or doing business
with an ineligible person.
Comment: A commenter questioned
the timeframe for the ‘‘meaningful
opportunity to contest’’ and whether the
definition of ‘‘meaningful opportunity
to contest’’ is a change from the
notification process provided in the
2011 Ineligible Tracking System
Handbook that allows 30 days from the
date of Notice of Debt for the insured to
challenge the debt.
Response: Nothing in this rule is
intended to change the established time
frames for filing for mediation,
arbitration or judicial review contained
in existing regulations, policy
provisions, and procedures. To the
extent that any time frame will be
changed, such change will occur in the
applicable regulation, policy provision,
or procedure. Therefore, no changes
have been made as a result of this
comment.
Comment: A commenter questioned
whether the term ‘‘Livestock Price
Reinsurance Agreement’’ should be
defined and whether the provisions of
the rule apply to policies covered under
the Livestock Price Reinsurance
Agreement.
Response: The provisions contained
within 7 CFR, part 400, subpart U apply
to all policies insured under the Federal
Crop Insurance Act, including those
reinsured under the Livestock Price
Reinsurance Agreement. FCIC agrees the
term ‘‘Livestock Price Reinsurance
Agreement’’ should be defined in the
final rule. The definition was added and
the term was referenced where
applicable in the final rule.
Section 400.679 Criteria for
Ineligibility
Comment: A few commenters stated
the provisions in section 400.679(d)
should apply only to individuals and
not to all ‘‘persons’’ as defined in the
rule.
Response: FCIC agrees and has made
the changes in section 400.679 and
other applicable sections in the final
rule.
Comment: A commenter stated the
references to the regulations at 7 CFR
part 3017 are incorrect because those
regulations are obsolete and have been
replaced with 2 CFR part 180 and 2 CFR
part 417.
Response: FCIC agrees 7 CFR part
3017 is obsolete. All references to 7 CFR
part 3017 have been corrected in the
final rule to reference 2 CFR part 180
and 2 CFR part 417. Further, these are
no longer the only provisions related to
debarment since permanent debarment
has been added by the 2008 Farm Bill.
Therefore, FCIC has clarified the
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
provisions in section 400.679 to make
the distinction between suspensions
and debarments under 2 CFR part 180
and 2 CFR part 417 and debarments
under 7 U.S.C. 2209j.
Comment: A few commenters stated
sections 400.679(c) and (f) are vague,
ambiguous, and impose an unnecessary
administrative burden on insurance
providers and insured producers. They
state subsection (f) is ambiguous
because it is unclear whether the phrase
‘‘ineligible person,’’ refers to persons
made ineligible under 2 CFR part 417,
previously 7 CFR part 3017, or all
persons ineligible under section 400.679
of the proposed rule. They also state the
phrase ‘‘knowingly doing business’’ will
impose an unnecessary administrative
burden on the insurance providers if it
is applied to ineligible persons outside
of 2 CFR part 180 and 2 CFR part 417.
Response: The phrase ‘‘ineligible
person’’ in section 400.679(f) of the
proposed rule referred to persons found
ineligible under 2 CFR part 180 and 2
CFR part 417, previously 7 CFR part
3017, and 7 U.S.C. 2209j, as a result of
the 2008 Farm Bill. The language in the
final rule has been amended to refer to
persons debarred or suspended under 2
CFR part 180, 2 CFR part 417, and 7
U.S.C. 2209j to provide more clarity.
With respect to the burdens, both 2 CFR
parts 180 and 417 makes it clear that
knowingly doing business with an
ineligible person can subject a person to
debarment. This applies to all persons,
including insurance providers so FCIC
cannot change the requirement or
exempt insurance providers. As part of
normal business operations, insurance
providers must be in compliance with
USDA regulations, policies and
procedures regarding debarment,
suspension and eligibility. FCIC has
revised the provisions to clarify that it
only applies to knowingly doing
business with debarred persons as
required by the debarment regulations
and statutes.
Comment: A commenter stated
section 400.679(e) should be eliminated
or limit its application to those persons
who have been listed in the EPLS.
Response: FCIC understands that
there may be problems of identifying
persons who have committed crimes for
knowingly defrauding the United States.
Further, as drafted, the proposed rule
presumed that permanent debarment
was automatic after such a conviction
but there is still a process that must be
followed for the Secretary to debar a
person and once that process is
completed, the debarred person will be
reported to the EPLS. In addition, to
make clear that this applies to persons
listed on the EPLS, FCIC has referenced
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:45 Jan 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
debarments under 2 CFR part 180, 2
CFR part 417, and 7 U.S.C. 2209j.
Section 400.680 Controlled Substance
Comment: A commenter questioned
the logic of barring someone convicted
of a controlled substance violation from
obtaining Federal crop insurance. The
commenter stated there is no statutory
authority for barring someone convicted
of possession of or trafficking in a
controlled substance, and the references
to such in the rule should be deleted.
The commenter stated that Chapter 13
of Title 21 is not applicable to the
Federal crop insurance program because
eligibility for Federal crop insurance is
contingent upon various ‘‘payments’’
and the term ‘‘Federal benefit’’ does not
include any benefit for which payments
are required for eligibility.
Response: FCIC disagrees that there is
no statutory authority for barring
someone convicted of possession of or
trafficking in a controlled substance.
The statutory provisions of Chapter 13
of Title 21 regarding convictions for the
possession of or trafficking in a
controlled substance are applicable to
Federal crop insurance because
eligibility for Federal crop insurance is
not contingent upon any payment.
Therefore, no changes have been made
as a result of this comment.
Comment: A commenter stated that
convictions for possession of or
trafficking a controlled substance do not
result in automatic denial of Federal
benefits, or denial of such benefits for a
set amount of time, according to Title
21. The determination regarding the
denial of Federal benefits and for how
long is at the court’s discretion;
therefore, section 400.680 is incorrect.
Response: FCIC agrees the language in
the proposed rule was inaccurate
regarding automatic denial of benefits
under the Act for conviction of the
possession of or trafficking in controlled
substances. The final rule has been
amended to be consistent with the
provisions of Title 21 regarding such
convictions.
Section 400.682 Determination and
Notification
Comment: A commenter questioned
whether National Appeals Division
(NAD) appealable disputes are
changing.
Response: Neither the proposed rule
or final rule change appealable disputes
under the NAD regulations.
Section 400.683 Period of Ineligibility
Comment: A commenter stated the
term ‘‘crop year’’ for determining when
ineligibility begins for a person
convicted of a controlled substance
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2077
violation is vague and needs to be
further defined or expanded.
Response: The proposed rule did not
define the term ‘‘crop year.’’ The term
‘‘crop year’’ is defined in the policy for
applicable commodities, and the public
was not provided the opportunity to
comment on those definitions under the
proposed rule. In addition, the
applicability of the term ‘‘crop year’’
regarding persons convicted under
Federal or State law of planting,
cultivation, growing, producing,
harvesting or storing a controlled
substance is statutory.
Comment: A commenter stated they
understood that they, as an insurance
provider, would deny coverage to an
applicant who is not a United States
citizen, United States non-citizen
national, or a qualified alien, but were
not aware of any obligation or
requirement to report such individuals
as part of the ITS process.
Response: Sections 400.682 and
400.684 of the proposed rule did
provide that insurance providers must
notify FCIC of applicants who are not a
United States citizen, United States noncitizen national, or a qualified alien and
that such individuals would be placed
on the ITS. FCIC agrees that insurance
providers are not required to report
individuals who are not a United States
citizen, United States non-citizen
national, or a qualified alien to FCIC.
FCIC also agrees that such individuals
are not placed on ITS if the sole reason
they are ineligible is because they are
not a United States citizen, United
States non-citizen national, or a
qualified alien. The final rule has been
amended to remove the reporting
requirement of such individuals and the
reference that such individuals would
be placed on the ITS.
Section 400.684 Effect of Ineligibility
Comment: A couple of commenters
stated the proposed rule had two
subsections labeled ‘‘b’’ under section
400.684.
Response: FCIC agrees and has made
the applicable changes in the final rule.
Comment: A commenter stated they
agree with the consolidation of the
provisions in 7 CFR, part 400, subpart
F, into 7 CFR, part 400, subpart U, to
eliminate redundancies. However, the
commenter also stated the provisions in
7 CFR, part 400, subpart F, that allowed
insurance providers to continue to
receive reinsurance if the insurance
provider follows all the regulations and
procedures were not retained and
consolidated in the proposed rule. The
commenter stated the elimination of
those provisions could result in an
insurance provider being penalized
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
2078
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
even though it had followed all of the
applicable regulations and procedures.
Response: FCIC agrees the provisions
of 7 CFR, part 400, subpart F, regarding
the continuation of reinsurance in cases
involving controlled substance
violations where the insurance provider
followed all FCIC procedures and
regulations should have been retained
and consolidated in the proposed rule.
The applicable provisions have been
added to the final rule.
Comment: A commenter stated that
subsections 400.684(b)(3) and (4), for
general and limited liability
partnerships and joint ventures,
respectively, are the same and could be
combined.
Response: FCIC agrees the provisions
for general partnerships, limited
liability partnerships and joint ventures
are repetitive and although legally there
may be distinctions between these
entities, they are being treated the same
for the purposes of this final rule.
Therefore, FCIC has combined the
provisions and renumbers the
subsequent provisions accordingly.
Comment: A few commenters stated
section 400.684(b)(5)(redesignated as
400.684(b)(4)) is ambiguous, denies
appeal rights and liability protections to
insured producers and insurance
providers, could adversely affect a
person’s eligibility for program benefits
even when that person is not a party to
a contract, and that FCIC should revise
or eliminate the subsection because it
creates a burden that outweighs the
potential benefits.
Response: FCIC does not agree the
subsection is ambiguous, denies any
appeal rights or liability protections or
could affect a person who is not a party
to the applicable policy. The provision
applies to different types of entities and
specifies that it applies to the persons
who are in control of the actions of such
entities or are responsible for the action
or inaction that resulted in the
ineligibility. Since entities have no
ability to take action except through the
persons conducting the business of the
entity, it is appropriate to hold such
individuals responsible for their actions
or inactions. Further, appeal rights will
be afforded such individuals the same
as they would for any other person
determined to be ineligible. While
certain state laws protect individuals
within certain entities, the crop
insurance program is funded with
taxpayer dollars and FCIC has the
responsibility to ensure those dollars are
properly spent. The provisions are
necessary to ensure the integrity of the
Federal crop insurance program and
prevent producers from circumventing
their ineligibility by hiding behind the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:45 Jan 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
facade of an entity. Therefore, no
¸
changes have been made as a result of
this comment.
Section 400.686 Administration and
Maintenance
Comment: A commenter stated that
subsection 400.686(d) should be
rewritten to read ‘‘AIPs must check to
ensure that the persons with whom they
are doing business are eligible to
participate in the programs authorized
under the Act. The ITS does not include
all persons ineligible to receive
government benefits, such as persons
debarred, disqualified or suspended
from receiving government benefits as a
result of being listed in EPLS.’’
Response: FCIC disagrees with the
commenters suggested changes. The
provision applies to all participants in
the program, and that includes not only
insurance providers but it also includes
partners, cooperators, and contractors,
to ensure that the persons with whom
they are doing business are eligible to
participate in the programs authorized
under the Act. The provision has been
clarified to specify that insurance
providers, partners, cooperators, and
contractors must check ITS and other
sources, such as the EPLS, to identify
ineligible persons. Further, there
appears to be some confusion regarding
the EPLS. The EPLS is a source of
information about certain persons who
are ineligible for certain benefits or
transactions. The government agency
that reported the person to EPLS
actually determined the person’s
ineligibility.
In addition to the changes described
above, FCIC has made minor editorial
changes, revisions to specific sections of
7 CFR, part 400, subpart U, and
revisions to 7 CFR, parts 407 and 457 as
follows:
Part 400, Subpart U
1. Revised the definition of ‘‘debt’’
and ‘‘delinquent debt’’ for consistency
with § 400.682 and § 400.684 regarding
debtors that file bankruptcy. The
definitions in the proposed rule were in
conflict with the existing provisions
regarding the eligibility of a person in
bankruptcy in section 400.683(b)(1). The
final rule clarifies that only discharge of
the debt in bankruptcy will restore
eligibility.
2. Revised § 400.682(a) because of the
inconsistency in the proposed rule
regarding bankruptcy. The intent of the
proposed rule was to specify that filing
for bankruptcy did not make a person
eligible for crop insurance. To be
eligible the debt must be discharged in
bankruptcy. However, nothing in this
rule was intended to abrogate any
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
existing bankruptcy laws regarding the
collection of a debt while the producer
is in bankruptcy. Therefore, FCIC has
clarified that a debtor who has filed for
bankruptcy may be notified of the
amount of debt owed and their
ineligibility for insurance; however, no
request for payment of the debt can be
made, unless approved in writing by the
Office of General Counsel. The clarified
language will ensure that insurance
providers do not request payment of a
debt when they are aware the debtor has
filed bankruptcy.
3. Revised § 400.683 to distinguish
between suspensions and debarments
under 2 CFR part 180 and 2 CFR part
417 and debarments under 7 U.S.C.
2209j because the effective date for each
is different and that was not clear in the
proposed rule.
4. Revised § 400.684(a)(1) to clarify
that filing bankruptcy does not make an
ineligible person eligible for crop
insurance or preclude the ineligible
person from being placed on the ITS.
There was an inconsistency in the
proposed rule and the intent was to not
allow debtors to be eligible for
insurance until their debt was
discharged in bankruptcy and FCIC had
revised the provisions to be consistent.
This does not change the law regarding
the collection of debts from persons in
bankruptcy so FCIC has clarified that
while insurance providers are precluded
from requesting payment of the debt
once a person files bankruptcy, such
filing does not make the person eligible
to obtain crop insurance.
5. Revised § 400.684(b)(3) to include
limited partnerships and limited
liability companies. The proposed rule
impacted partners and members of
limited partnerships and limited
liability companies differently than
members of limited liability
partnerships, which was not the intent
of FCIC. In addition, the proposed rule
created program vulnerability because it
would allow certain partners and
members to evade ineligibility
determinations. The revision will
address the program vulnerability and
ensure equal treatment of partners and
members of limited partnerships,
limited liability partnerships, and
limited liability companies. Also
revised § 400.684(b)(3) to include
references to joint ventures because
although they may be legally different,
they are treated the same as of limited
partnerships, limited liability
partnerships, and limited liability
companies for the purposes of this rule.
As a result, § 400.684(b)(4) has been
deleted and § 400.684(b)(5) has been
redesignated as § 400.684(b)(4).
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
6. Revised § 400.684(b)(5)
(redesignated § 400.684(b)(4)) to remove
limited partnerships and limited
liability companies. The proposed rule
impacted partners and members of
limited partnerships and limited
liability companies differently than
members of limited liability
partnerships, which was not the intent
of FCIC. In addition, the proposed rule
created program vulnerability because it
would allow certain partners and
members to evade ineligibility
determinations. The revision will
address the program vulnerability and
ensure equal treatment of partners and
members of limited partnerships,
limited liability partnerships, and
limited liability companies.
Part 407, Area Risk Insurance Policy
Basic Provisions
1. Revise sections 2(k) and (p) to be
consistent with the provisions in 7 CFR,
part 400, subpart U. After it had
published the proposed rule for 7 CFR,
part 400, subpart U, FCIC discovered the
Area Risk Insurance Policy Basic
Provisions regarding debt for persons in
bankruptcy were inconsistent with the
existing provisions.
Part 457, Common Crop Insurance
Policy Basic Provisions
1. Revise section 2(f) to be consistent
with the provisions in 7 CFR, part 400,
subpart U. After it had published the
proposed rule for 7 CFR, part 400,
subpart U, FCIC discovered the
Common Crop insurance Policy Basic
Provisions regarding debt for persons in
bankruptcy were inconsistent with the
existing provisions.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 400, 407
and 457
Administrative practice and
procedure, crop insurance, reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, as set forth in the
preamble, the Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation amends 7 CFR parts 400,
407 and 457 as follows:
PART 400—GENERAL
ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 400 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(1), 1506(o).
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Subpart C [Removed and Reserved]
■
2. Remove and reserve subpart C.
Subpart F [Removed and Reserved]
■
■
3. Remove and reserve subpart F.
4. Revise subpart U to read as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:45 Jan 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
Subpart U—Ineligibility for Programs Under
the Federal Crop Insurance Act
400.675 Purpose.
400.676 [Reserved]
400.677 Definitions.
400.678 Applicability.
400.679 Criteria for ineligibility.
400.680 Controlled substance.
400.681 Written payment agreement.
400.682 Determination and notification.
400.683 Period of ineligibility.
400.684 Effect of ineligibility.
400.685 Criteria for regaining eligibility.
400.686 Administration and maintenance.
Subpart U—Ineligibility for Programs
Under the Federal Crop Insurance Act
§ 400.675
Purpose.
This subpart prescribes conditions
under which a person may be
determined to be ineligible to
participate in any program administered
under the authority of the Federal Crop
Insurance Act. This subpart also
establishes the criteria for regaining
eligibility.
§ 400.676
[Reserved]
§ 400.677
Definitions.
As used in this subpart:
Act means the Federal Crop Insurance
Act (7 U.S.C. 1501–1524).
Applicant means a person who has
submitted an application for crop
insurance coverage under the Act.
Authorized person means any current
or past officer, employee, elected
official, managing general agent, agent,
or contractor of an insurance provider,
FCIC, or any other government agency
whose duties require access to the ITS
to administer the Act.
Controlled substance has the same
meaning provided in 7 CFR 3021.610.
Conviction means a judgment or any
other determination of guilt of a
criminal offense by any court of
competent jurisdiction, whether entered
upon a verdict or plea, including a plea
of no contest.
Date of delinquency means: The
termination date specified in the
applicable policy for administrative fees
and premiums owed for insurance
issued under the authority of the Act,
and any interest and penalties on those
amounts, if applicable; and the due date
specified in the notice to the person of
the amount due for any other amounts
due the insurance provider or FCIC for
insurance issued under the authority of
the Act. Other amounts due include, but
are not limited to, indemnities,
prevented planting payments, or replant
payments found not to have been earned
or that were overpaid, premium billed
with a due date after the termination
date for the crop year in which premium
is earned, and any interest,
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2079
administrative fees, and penalties on
such amounts, if applicable. Payments
postmarked or received before the date
of delinquency by the insurance
provider or its agent for debts owed to
the insurance provider, or by FCIC for
debts owed to FCIC, are not delinquent.
Debt means an amount of money that
has been determined to be owed by any
person to FCIC or an insurance
provider, excluding money owed to an
insurance provider’s agent, under any
program administered under the Act.
The debt may have arisen from
nonpayment of interest, penalties,
premium, or administrative fee;
overpayment of indemnity, prevented
planting or replant payment; cost of
collection; or other causes. A debt does
not include debts discharged in
bankruptcy.
Debtor means a person who owes a
debt and that debt is delinquent.
Delinquent debt means a debt that is
not satisfied on or before the date of
delinquency. To avoid delinquency or
ineligibility due to a delinquent debt, a
debtor may enter into a written payment
agreement acceptable to the insurance
provider or FCIC to pay any such debt
as long as all payments are made by the
due dates specified in such written
payment agreement. A delinquent debt
does not include debts discharged in
bankruptcy or any debt to an insurance
provider’s agent.
Employer Identification Number (EIN)
means a Tax Identification Number
issued by the Internal Revenue Service
used to identify a business entity, and
may also be referred to as a Federal Tax
Identification Number.
Excluded Parties List System (EPLS)
means a list maintained by the General
Services Administration that provides a
source of current information about
persons who are excluded or
disqualified from covered transactions,
including the date the person was
determined ineligible and the date the
period of ineligibility ends.
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
(FCIC) means a wholly owned
government corporation within the
USDA.
Ineligible person means a person who
is denied participation in any program
administered under the authority of the
Act.
Ineligible Tracking System (ITS)
means an electronic system to identify
persons who are ineligible to participate
in any program pursuant to this subpart.
Insurance Provider means a legal
entity which has entered into a
Standard Reinsurance Agreement,
Livestock Price Reinsurance Agreement,
or other reinsurance agreement, as
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
2080
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
applicable, with FCIC for the applicable
reinsurance year.
Livestock Price Reinsurance
Agreement means a cooperative
financial assistance agreement between
FCIC and an insurance provider to
deliver eligible livestock price insurance
contracts under the authority of the Act
and establishes the terms and
conditions under which FCIC will
provide subsidy and reinsurance on
eligible livestock price insurance
policies sold.
Meaningful opportunity to contest
means the opportunity for the insured to
resolve disagreements with a decision
by the insurance provider through
requesting a review of the decision by
the insurance provider, mediation,
arbitration, or judicial review, as
applicable.
Person means an individual,
partnership, association, corporation,
estate, trust, or other legal entity, and
wherever applicable, a State or political
subdivision or agency of a State.
‘‘Person’’ does not include the United
States Government or any agency
thereof.
Qualified alien has the same meaning
provided in the Personal Responsibility
and Work Opportunity Reconciliation
Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1641).
Social Security Number (SSN) means
an individual’s Social Security Number
as issued under the authority of the
Social Security Act.
Standard Reinsurance Agreement
(SRA) means a cooperative financial
assistance agreement between FCIC and
an insurance provider to deliver eligible
crop insurance contracts under the
authority of the Act and establishes the
terms and conditions under which FCIC
will provide subsidy and reinsurance on
eligible crop insurance policies sold.
Substantial beneficial interest has the
same meaning as contained in the
applicable policy.
USDA means the United States
Department of Agriculture.
United States non-citizen national has
the same meaning provided in the
Personal Responsibility and Work
Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996
(8 U.S.C. § 1408).
Written payment agreement means a
written document between a debtor and
the insurance provider, or FCIC, that is
signed and dated by all applicable
parties to satisfy financial obligations of
the debtor with scheduled installment
payments under conditions that modify
the terms of the original debt in
accordance with § 400.681.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:45 Jan 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
§ 400.678
Applicability.
This subpart applies to any program
administered under the authority of the
Act, including but not limited to:
(a) The catastrophic risk protection
plan of insurance;
(b) The additional coverage plans of
insurance as authorized under section
508(c) of the Act;
(c) Private insurance products
authorized under section 508(h) or
523(d) of the Act and reinsured by FCIC;
and
(d) Persons entering contracts or
cooperative agreements under sections
506(l), 522(c), 522(d), or 524(a) of the
Act.
§ 400.679
Criteria for ineligibility.
Except as otherwise provided, a
person is ineligible to participate in any
program administered under the
authority of the Act if the person meets
one or more of the following criteria:
(a) Has a delinquent debt:
(1) The existence and delinquency of
the debt must be verifiable.
(2) The person has to be provided a
meaningful opportunity to contest the
debt.
(3) If the person contests the debt,
such action does not delay or preclude:
(i) Effect of the determination of
ineligibility;
(ii) Determination or notification of
ineligibility in accordance with
§ 400.682;
(iii) Termination of the applicable
crop insurance policies; or
(iv) Ineligible persons being reported
in accordance with § 400.682 or the
ineligible persons being recorded in the
ITS.
(4) If the person is determined not to
owe the debt, eligibility is reinstated
retroactive to the date of the
determination of ineligibility, any
applicable policies will be reinstated,
and any applicable indemnity,
prevented planting or replant payment
earned may be paid provided the person
has continued to comply with the terms
of the policy;
(b) Is an individual and has been
convicted of a controlled substance
violation according to § 400.680;
(c) Has been disqualified under
section 515(h) of the Act.;
(d) Is an individual and is not a
United States citizen, United States noncitizen national, or a qualified alien.
Such individuals may not be recorded
in the ITS; however, such individuals
are ineligible under the provisions of
the Personal Responsibility and Work
Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996,
8 U.S.C. 1611;
(e) Has been suspended or debarred
for committing a crime specified in 2
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
CFR part 180 or 2 CFR part 417, or 7
U.S.C. 2209j (Ineligibility
determinations will not be stayed
pending review. However, reversal of
the determination of ineligibility will
reinstate eligibility retroactive to the
date of the determination of
ineligibility, and any applicable policies
will be reinstated); or
(f) Has been debarred for knowingly
doing business with a person debarred
or suspended under 2 CFR part 180 or
2 CFR part 417 or 7 U.S.C. 2209j.
§ 400.680
Controlled substance.
(a) This section implements section
1764 of the Food Security Act of 1985
(Pub. L. 99–198) and Chapter 13 of Title
21 requiring the denial of Federal
Benefits, including crop insurance, to
individuals convicted of controlled
substance violations in accordance with
paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
(b) Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, an individual will be
ineligible to participate in any program
authorized under the Act, as provided
in § 400.683, if the individual is
convicted under Federal or State law of
planting, cultivating, growing,
producing, harvesting, or storing a
controlled substance in any crop year.
(c) Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, an individual may, as
determined by the court, be ineligible to
participate in any program authorized
under the Act, as provided in § 400.683,
if the person is convicted under Federal
or State law of possession of or
trafficking in a controlled substance.
§ 400.681
Written payment agreement.
(a) Written payment agreements shall:
(1) Require scheduled installment
payments that will allow for full
repayment of the debt within the time
frame allotted in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section;
(2) Not exceed two years in duration;
and
(3) Not be modified, replaced, or
consolidated after it has been executed
in accordance with paragraph (b) of this
section.
(b) To avoid being determined to be
ineligible through the execution of a
written payment agreement:
(1) For a debt arising from any unpaid
premium, administrative fees, or
catastrophic risk protection fees:
(i) Only one written payment
agreement is permitted per termination
date. A written payment agreement may
cover multiple crops provided they all
have the same termination date; and
(ii) The written payment agreement
must be signed by both parties, the
debtor and the insurance provider or
FCIC, as applicable, on or before the
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
termination date specified in the
applicable policy to prevent an
ineligible determination for a
delinquent debt.
(2) For all other debts, the written
payment agreement must be signed by
both parties, the debtor and the
insurance provider or FCIC, as
applicable, on or before the due date
specified in the notice to the person of
the amount due to prevent an ineligible
determination for a delinquent debt.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 400.682
Determination and notification.
(a) The insurance provider must send
a written notice of the debt to the
person, including the time frame in
which the debt must be paid, and
provide the person with a meaningful
opportunity to contest the amount or
existence of the debt. Once a debtor has
filed bankruptcy and the insurance
provider is formally informed of such
through the court or the debtor, no
request for payment of the debt can be
made, unless approved in writing by the
Office of General Counsel. The debtor
may be notified of the amount of debt
and ineligibility for crop insurance.
(1) The insurance provider shall
evaluate the person’s response, if any,
and determine if the debt is owed and
delinquent.
(2) Upon request by FCIC, the
insurance provider shall submit all
documentation related to the debt to
FCIC.
(b) If an insurance provider or any
other person has evidence that a person
meets criteria set forth in § 400.679(a),
(b), (c), (e) or (f), they must immediately
notify FCIC.
(c) After the insurance provider
determines a person has met one or
more of the criteria in § 400.679 and
notifies FCIC, FCIC will issue and mail
a Notice of Ineligibility to the person’s
last known address and to the insurance
provider. Notices sent to such address
will be conclusively presumed to have
been received by that person.
(d) The Notice of Ineligibility will
state the criteria upon which the
determination of ineligibility has been
based, a brief statement of the facts to
support the determination, the time
period of ineligibility, and the right to
appeal the determination to be placed
on the ITS in accordance with
paragraph (e) of this section.
(e) Within 30 days of receiving the
Notice of Ineligibility, the ineligible
person may appeal FCIC’s
determination to be placed on ITS to the
National Appeals Division in
accordance with 7 CFR part 11. The
existence and amount of the debt is
determined by the insurance provider,
not FCIC; therefore, those
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:45 Jan 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
determinations are not appealable to the
National Appeals Division.
(f) If the person appeals FCIC’s
determination to be placed on ITS to the
National Appeals Division, the
insurance provider will be notified and
provided with an opportunity to
participate in the proceeding, if
permitted by 7 CFR part 11.
§ 400.683
Period of ineligibility.
(a) The beginning of the period of
ineligibility will be:
(1) For ineligibility as a result of a
delinquent debt, beginning on the date
stated in the applicable policy;
(2) For ineligibility as a result of a
conviction under Federal or State law
of:
(i) Planting, cultivating, growing,
producing, harvesting, or storing a
controlled substance, the beginning of
the crop year in which the individual is
convicted; or
(ii) Possession of or trafficking in a
controlled substance, the beginning of
the crop year in which the individual is
convicted, unless determined otherwise
by the court.
(3) For ineligibility as a result of a
disqualification, debarment, or
suspension under 515(h) of the Act, 2
CFR part 180, 2 CFR part 417, the date
the person was disqualified, debarred,
or suspended by debarring official,
Administrative Law Judge, or such other
person authorized to take such action;
and
(4) For debarment under 7 U.S.C.
2209j, the beginning of the crop year in
which the person is convicted.
(b) The duration of the period of
ineligibility will be:
(1) For ineligibility as a result of a
delinquent debt, until the debt has been
paid in full discharged in bankruptcy, or
the person has executed a written
payment agreement.
(2) For ineligibility as a result of a
conviction under Federal or State law
of:
(i) Planting, cultivating, growing,
producing, harvesting, or storing a
controlled substance, four crop years
succeeding the crop year in which the
person was convicted; and
(ii) Possession of a controlled
substance or trafficking in a controlled
substance, in addition to the time of
ineligibility imposed in paragraph
(b)(2)(i) of this section, until the period
of time imposed by a court has expired.
(3) For ineligibility as a result of a
disqualification, debarment, or
suspension under section 515(h) of the
Act, or 2 CFR part 180 and 2 CFR part
417 until the period of time of
disqualification, debarment, or
suspension, as applicable, has expired.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2081
(4) For ineligibility as a result of not
being a United States citizen, United
States non-citizen national, or a
qualified alien, until the date such
individual becomes a United States
citizen, United States non-citizen
national, or a qualified alien.
(5) For ineligibility as a result of a
conviction falling under 7 U.S.C. 2209j,
permanent unless otherwise determined
by the Secretary of Agriculture for a
period of not less than 10 years.
§ 400.684
Effect of ineligibility.
(a) The effect of ineligibility depends
on the basis for the determination.
(1) Persons who are ineligible as a
result of a delinquent debt are ineligible
for crop insurance authorized under the
Act for a certain time period in
accordance with § 400.683. Filing for
bankruptcy does not make the person
eligible for crop insurance or preclude
the ineligible person from being placed
on the ITS in accordance with
§ 400.684(b)(1).
(2) Persons who are ineligible as a
result of a suspension or debarment are
precluded from:
(i) Participating in all programs
authorized under the Act, including but
not limited to:
(A) Obtaining crop insurance;
(B) Acting as an agent, loss adjuster,
insurance provider, or affiliate, as
defined in the Standard Reinsurance
Agreement or Livestock Price
Reinsurance Agreement, or successor
agreements;
(C) Entering into any contracts with
FCIC under sections 506(l) and section
522(c) of the Act; and
(D) Entering into any cooperative
agreements or partnerships under
sections 506(l), 522(d) and 524(a) of the
Act; and
(ii) Participating in any other covered
transaction as specified in 2 CFR part
180 and 2 CFR part 417.
(3) Persons who are ineligible because
of disqualification under section 515(h)
of the Act are precluded from
participating in all programs authorized
under the Act indicated in paragraph
(a)(2)(i) of this section, and those listed
in section 515(h)(3)(B) and (C) of the
Act.
(4) Individuals who are ineligible
because of a conviction of a violation of
the controlled substance provisions or
are not a United States citizen, United
States non-citizen national, or a
qualified alien are precluded from
participating in any program authorized
under the Act indicated in paragraph
(a)(2)(i) of this section.
(5) Persons who are ineligible as a
result of a conviction falling under 7
U.S.C. 2209j, are precluded from
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
2082
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
participating in any program offered by
USDA.
(b) Once a person has been
determined to be ineligible:
(1) The ineligible person will be
placed on the ITS and may be reported
to other government agencies, unless the
ineligible person is an individual and
the sole reason for ineligibility is
because the individual is not a United
States citizen, United States non-citizen
national, or qualified alien.
(2) If the ineligible person is an
individual:
(i) All crop insurance policies in
which the ineligible person is the sole
insured will terminate if the person is
ineligible for any reason other than a
controlled substance violation, or be
void if the person is ineligible due to
conviction of a controlled substance
violation according to § 400.680, and the
person will remain ineligible for crop
insurance for the applicable period
specified in § 400.683; and
(ii) The ineligible person must be
reported on all policies in which the
ineligible person has a substantial
beneficial interest in the applicant or
insured, and the insured share under
such policy will be reduced
commensurate with the ineligible
person’s substantial beneficial interest
in the applicant or insured for as long
as the ineligible person remains
ineligible in accordance with § 400.683.
(3) If the ineligible person is a general
partnership, limited partnership,
limited liability partnership, limited
liability company, or joint venture and
is ineligible as a result of:
(i) A delinquent debt:
(A) All partners or members of the
ineligible general partnership, limited
partnership, limited liability
partnership, limited liability company,
or joint venture will be ineligible;
(B) The ineligible general partnership,
limited partnership, limited liability
partnership, limited liability company,
or joint venture and all partners and
members of the ineligible general
partnership, limited partnership,
limited liability partnership, limited
liability company, or joint venture will
remain ineligible for crop insurance for
the applicable period specified in
§ 400.683;
(C) All crop insurance policies in
which the ineligible general
partnership, limited partnership,
limited liability partnership, limited
liability company, or joint venture is the
sole insured will terminate;
(D) All crop insurance policies in
which the ineligible partner or member
is the sole insured will terminate; and
(E) The ineligible general partnership,
limited partnership, limited liability
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:45 Jan 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
partnership, limited liability company,
or joint venture and all ineligible
partners or members must be reported
on any other policy in which they have
a substantial beneficial interest in the
applicant or insured, and the insured
share under such policies will be
reduced commensurate with the
ineligible general partnership, limited
partnership, limited liability
partnership, limited liability company,
or joint venture or the ineligible
partners’ or members’ substantial
beneficial interest in the applicant or
insured for as long as they remain
ineligible in accordance with § 400.683;
or
(ii) Meeting the criteria specified in
§ 400.679(c), (e) or (f):
(A) All crop insurance policies in
which the ineligible general
partnership, limited partnership,
limited liability partnership, limited
liability company, or joint venture is the
sole insured will terminate, and the
ineligible general partnership, limited
partnership, limited liability
partnership, limited liability company,
or joint venture will remain ineligible
for crop insurance for the applicable
period specified in § 400.683; and
(B) The ineligible general partnership,
limited partnership, limited liability
partnership, limited liability company,
or joint venture must be reported on any
other policy in which it has a
substantial beneficial interest in the
applicant or insured, and the insured
share under such policies will be
reduced commensurate with the
ineligible general partnership’s, limited
partnership’s, limited liability
partnership’s, limited liability
company’s, or joint venture’s substantial
beneficial interest in the applicant or
insured for as long as it remains
ineligible in accordance with § 400.683.
(4) If the ineligible person is an
association, estate, trust, corporation, or
other similar entity, and is ineligible as
a result of:
(i) A delinquent debt:
(A) Any partners, members,
shareholders, administrators, executors,
trustees, or grantors may be individually
ineligible if the delinquent debt
occurred as a result of their actions or
inactions, as determined by the
insurance provider or FCIC;
(B) All policies in which the ineligible
association, estate, trust, corporation, or
other similar entity is the sole insured
will terminate, and it will remain
ineligible for crop insurance for the
applicable period specified in § 400.683.
(C) The ineligible association, estate,
trust, corporation, or other similar entity
must be reported on any other policy in
which it has a substantial beneficial
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
interest in the applicant or insured, and
the insured share under such policies
will be reduced commensurate with the
ineligible entity’s substantial beneficial
interest in the applicant or insured for
as long as the person remains ineligible
in accordance with § 400.683;
(D) All policies in which a partner,
member, shareholder, administrator,
executor, trustee, or grantor determined
ineligible according to
§ 400.684(b)(4)(i)(A) is the sole insured
will terminate, and the person will
remain ineligible for crop insurance for
the applicable period specified in
§ 400.683; and
(E) The ineligible partner, member,
shareholder, administrator, executor,
trustee, or grantor must be reported on
any other policy in which they have a
substantial beneficial interest in the
applicant or insured, and the insured
share under such policies will be
reduced commensurate with the
ineligible person’s substantial beneficial
interest in the applicant or insured for
as long as the person remains ineligible
in accordance with § 400.683; or
(ii) Meeting the criteria specified in
§ 400.679(c), (e) or (f):
(A) All crop insurance policies in
which the ineligible association, estate,
trust, corporation, or other similar entity
is the sole insured will terminate, and
the ineligible association, estate, trust,
corporation, or other similar entity will
remain ineligible for crop insurance for
the applicable period specified in
§ 400.683; and
(B) The ineligible association, estate,
trust, corporation, or other similar entity
must be reported on any other policy in
which it has a substantial beneficial
interest in the applicant or insured, and
the insured share under such policies
will be reduced commensurate with the
ineligible association, estate, trust,
corporation, or other similar entity’s
substantial beneficial interest in the
applicant or insured for as long as it
remains ineligible in accordance with
§ 400.683.
(5) If an applicant or insured is a
corporation, partnership, joint venture,
trust, corporation, limited liability
company, limited liability partnership,
limited partnership, or other similar
entity that was created to conceal the
interest of an ineligible person or to
evade the ineligibility determination of
a person with a substantial beneficial
interest in the applicant or insured, the
policy will be void.
(6) All crop insurance policies in
which the ineligible person is insured as
landlord/tenant will terminate on the
next termination date. The other
person(s) on such policy may submit a
new application for crop insurance
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
coverage on or before the applicable
sales closing date to obtain insurance
coverage for the crop, if they are
otherwise eligible for such coverage.
(c) The spouse and minor child of an
individual insured is considered to be
the same as the individual for purposes
of this subpart and subject to the same
ineligibility, except when:
(1) The individual is ineligible due to
a conviction of a controlled substance
violation in accordance with § 400.680;
(2) The individual is ineligible as a
result of a felony conviction for
knowingly defrauding the United States
in connection with any program
administered by USDA;
(3) The individual is ineligible
because they are not a United States
citizen, United States non-citizen
national, or a qualified alien;
(4) The individual is ineligible as a
result of a disqualification, debarment,
or suspension;
(5) The spouse can prove they are
legally separated or otherwise legally
separate under the applicable State
dissolution of marriage laws; or
(6) The minor child has a separate
legal interest in such person or is
engaged in a separate farming operation
from the individual.
(d) Notwithstanding § 400.684(f),
when a policy is voided in accordance
with this subpart:
(1) No indemnities or payments will
be paid for the voided policy;
(2) Any indemnities or payments
already made for the voided policy will
be declared overpayments and must be
repaid in full; and
(3) No premiums will be due and any
premium paid will be refunded except
when the policy is void due to a
conviction of a controlled substance
violation according to § 400.680, in
which case the insured will still be
required to pay 20 percent of the
premium the insured would otherwise
be required to pay to offset costs in the
servicing of the policy.
(e) When the insured share of a policy
is reduced in accordance with this
subpart:
(1) Any indemnities or payments
commensurate with the share reduced
already made will be declared
overpayments and must be repaid in
full; and
(2) Any premiums paid by the insured
commensurate with the share reduced
will be refunded.
(f) Any insurance written by an
insurance provider to any person who is
ineligible under the provisions of this
subpart is not eligible for reinsurance by
FCIC. All premium subsidies, expenses,
or other payments made by FCIC for
insurance written for any person who is
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:45 Jan 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
ineligible under the provisions of this
subpart must be immediately refunded
to FCIC. However, with regard to
policies that would be void due to a
conviction of a controlled substance
violation according to § 400.680, if the
insurance provider follows the
procedures of FCIC and the
requirements of the regulations,
reinsurance will continue to be
provided under the reinsurance
agreement on the policy unless it is
shown that the agent or insurance
provider had knowledge of the facts
which would indicate ineligibility on
the part of the insured and failed to act
on that knowledge.
§ 400.685
Criteria for regaining eligibility.
After the period of ineligibility as
specified in § 400.683 has ended, the
ineligible person is eligible to
participate in programs authorized
under the Act, provided the person
meets all eligibility requirements.
(a) After a person regains eligibility
for crop insurance when their policy
was terminated or voided, the person
must submit a new application for crop
insurance coverage on or before the
applicable sales closing date to obtain
insurance coverage for the crop. If the
date of regaining eligibility occurs after
the applicable sales closing date for the
crop, the person may not participate
until the following year unless that crop
policy allows for applications to be
accepted after the sales closing date.
(b) If a person who was determined
ineligible according to this subpart is
subsequently determined to be an
eligible person for crop insurance
through mediation, arbitration, appeal,
or judicial review, such person’s
policies will be reinstated effective at
the beginning of the crop year for which
the producer was determined ineligible,
and such person will be entitled to all
applicable benefits under such policies,
provided the person meets all eligibility
requirements and complies with the
terms of the policy.
§ 400.686 Administration and
maintenance.
(a) Ineligible producer data will be
maintained in a system of records
established and maintained by the Risk
Management Agency in accordance with
the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a).
(1) The ITS contains identifying
information of the ineligible person,
including but not limited to, name,
address, telephone number, SSN or EIN,
reason for ineligibility, and time period
of ineligibility.
(2) Information in the ITS may be
used by an authorized person. The
information may be furnished to other
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2083
users as may be appropriate or required
by law or regulation, including but not
limited to, FCIC contracted agencies,
other government agencies, credit
reporting agencies, and collection
agencies, and in response to judicial
orders in the course of litigation. The
individual information may be made
available in the form of various reports
and notices.
(3) Supporting documentation
regarding the determination of
ineligibility and reinstatement or
regaining of eligibility will be
maintained by FCIC, or its contractors,
insurance providers, Federal agencies,
and State agencies. This documentation
will be maintained and retained
consistent with the electronic
information contained within the ITS.
(b) Information may be entered into
the ITS by FCIC employees or
contractors, or insurance providers.
(c) All persons applying for crop
insurance policies or with an existing
policy, issued or reinsured by FCIC, will
be subject to validation of their
eligibility status against the ITS.
Applications, transfers, or benefits
approved and accepted are considered
approved or accepted subject to review
of eligibility status in accordance with
this subpart.
(d) Insurance providers, partners,
cooperators, and contractors must check
to ensure that the persons with whom
they are doing business are eligible to
participate in the programs authorized
under the Act. Insurance providers,
partners, cooperators, and contractors
must check the ITS but the ITS may not
include all persons ineligible to receive
government benefits, such as persons
debarred, disqualified or suspended
from receiving government benefits by
an agency other than FCIC. Insurance
providers, partners, cooperators, and
contractors must check other sources
that contain ineligible persons,
including but not limited to EPLS, or
successor list, provide data on persons
ineligible to participate in programs
authorized under the Act.
PART 407—AREA RISK PROTECTION
INSURANCE REGULATIONS
5. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 407 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(l), 1506(o).
6. Amend § 407.9 as follows:
a. Amend section 2(k)(1)(i)(B) by
adding the word ‘‘or’’ after the
semicolon at the end;
■ b. Amend section 2(k)(1)(i)(C) by
removing the phrase ‘‘; or’’ and adding
a period in its place;
■ c. Remove section 2(k)(1)(i)(D);
■
■
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
2084
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
d. Amend section 2(k)(1)(ii) by
removing the phrase ‘‘2(k)(2)(i)(A), (B),
(D) or (E)’’ and adding the phrase
‘‘2(k)(2)(i)(A), (B) or (D)’’ in its place;
■ e. Amend section 2(k)(2)(i)(C) by
adding the word ‘‘or’’ after the
semicolon at the end;
■ f. Amend section 2(k)(2)(i)(D) by
removing the phrase ‘‘; or’’ and adding
a period in its place;
■ g. Remove section 2(k)(2)(i)(E);
■ h. Amend section 2(k)(2)(ii) by
removing the phrase ‘‘2(k)(2)(i)(A), (B),
(D) or (E)’’ and adding the phrase
‘‘2(k)(2)(i)(A), (B) or (D)’’ in its place;
■ i. Revise section 2(k)(3)(iii); and
■ j. Amend section 2(p)(2) by removing
the phrase ‘‘or you file a petition to
discharge the debt in bankruptcy’’ in the
last sentence and adding the phrase ‘‘or
you have your debts discharged in
bankruptcy’’ in its place.
The revised text reads as follows:
■
§ 407.9
policy.
discharge the debt in bankruptcy’’ in the
last sentence and adding the phrase ‘‘or
you have your debts discharged in
bankruptcy’’ in its place.
The revised text reads as follows:
§ 457.8
The application and policy.
*
*
*
*
*
2. Life of Policy, Cancellation, and
Termination.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Have your debts discharged in
bankruptcy.
*
*
*
*
*
Signed in Washington, DC, on December
20, 2013.
Brandon Willis,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2013–31357 Filed 1–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–08–P
Area risk protection insurance
*
*
*
*
2. Life of Policy, Cancellation, and
Termination.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Have your debts discharged in
bankruptcy.
*
*
*
*
*
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
PART 457—COMMON CROP
INSURANCE REGULATIONS
SUMMARY:
*
13 CFR Part 115
RIN 3245–AG56
Surety Bond Guarantee Program
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
7. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 457 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(l), 1506(p).
8. Amend § 457.8 as follows:
a. Amend section 2(f)(1)(i)(B) by
adding the word ‘‘or’’ after the
semicolon at the end;
■ b. Amend section 2(f)(1)(i)(C) by
removing the phrase ‘‘; or’’ and adding
a period in its place;
■ c. Remove section 2(f)(1)(i)(D);
■ d. Amend section 2(f)(1)(ii) by
removing the phrase ‘‘2(f)(2)(i)(A), (B),
(D) or (E)’’ and adding the phrase
‘‘2(f)(2)(i)(A), (B) or (D)’’ in its place;
■ e. Amend section 2(f)(2)(i)(C) by
adding the word ‘‘or’’ after the
semicolon at the end;
■ f. Amend section 2(f)(2)(i)(D) by
removing the phrase ‘‘; or’’ and adding
a period in its place;
■ g. Remove section 2(f)(2)(i)(E);
■ h. Amend section 2(f)(2)(ii) by
removing the phrase ‘‘2(f)(2)(i)(A), (B),
(D) or (E)’’ and adding the phrase
‘‘2(f)(2)(i)(A), (B) or (D)’’ in its place;
■ i. Revise section 2(f)(3)(iii); and
■ j. Amend section 2(f)(5) by removing
the phrase ‘‘or you file a petition to
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:45 Jan 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
The Small Business
Administration (SBA) is issuing this
final rule to conform the regulations
governing the Surety Bond Guarantee
Program to certain provisions of the
National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 (NDAA), including the
provisions that increase the contract
amounts for which SBA is authorized to
guarantee bonds, grant SBA the
authority to partially deny liability
under its bond guarantee, and prohibit
SBA from denying liability based on
material information that was provided
as part of the guarantee application in
the Prior Approval Program. This rule
also makes changes to the Quick Bond
Guarantee Application and Agreement,
the timeframes for taking certain actions
related to claims, and the dollar
threshold for determining when a
change in the Contract or bond amounts
meets certain criteria or requires certain
action. Finally, the final rule eliminates
references to the provisions of the
American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) that have
expired.
DATES: This rule is effective February
12, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barbara J. Brannan, Office of Surety
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Guarantees, 202–205–6545, email:
Barbara.brannan@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background Information
The U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA) guarantees bid,
payment and performance bonds for
small and emerging contractors who
cannot obtain surety bonds through
regular commercial channels. SBA’s
guarantee gives Sureties an incentive to
provide bonding for small businesses
and thereby assists small businesses in
obtaining greater access to contracting
opportunities. SBA’s guarantee is an
agreement between a Surety and SBA
that SBA will assume a certain
percentage of the Surety’s loss should a
contractor default on the underlying
contract.
On August 1, 2013, SBA published a
notice of proposed rulemaking with a
request for comments in the Federal
Register. The rule proposed to: (1)
Conform SBA’s Surety Bond Guarantee
Program (‘‘SBG Program’’) to certain
provisions of the National Defense
Authorization Act of 2013 (NDAA); (2)
clarify the extent to which a Principal
may subcontract work performed under
the Contract; (3) make changes to the
Quick Bond Guarantee Application and
Agreement; (4) increase the dollar
threshold for determining when a
change in the Contract or bond amounts
may result in denial of liability or
require certain actions; (5) reduce the
timeframes for taking certain actions
related to claims; and (6) eliminate
references to the provisions of the
American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) that have
expired. See 78 FR 46528.
The comment period was open until
September 30, 2013. SBA received two
comments, both from trade associations,
that expressed their support for the
proposed rule and indicated that the
changes are favorable to small
businesses. With respect to the
proposed increases in the dollar
thresholds, one commenter noted that a
Surety may not be in a position to notify
SBA or seek SBA’s approval when a
change order exceeds the specified
dollar threshold because a Surety may
be required contractually to waive
notice of contract amount changes.
Under section 115.32(d), a Prior
Approval Surety is required to notify
SBA of any required changes in the
Contract or bond amount that aggregate
25% or $50,000 (to be increased to
$100,000 under this final rule) ‘‘as soon
as the Surety acquires knowledge of the
change’’. Thus, the Surety is required to
provide notice to SBA under this
provision upon acquiring knowledge of
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 8 (Monday, January 13, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2075-2084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-31357]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 8 / Monday, January 13, 2014 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 2075]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
7 CFR Parts 400, 407 and 457
[Docket No. FCIC-11-0009]
RIN 0563-AC26
General Administrative Regulations; Mutual Consent Cancellation;
Food Security Act of 1985, Implementation; Denial of Benefits; and
Ineligibility for Programs Under the Federal Crop Insurance Act
AGENCY: Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) finalizes the
General Administrative Regulations to revise regulations addressing
Ineligibility for Programs under the Federal Crop Insurance Act. The
intended effect of this action is to eliminate redundancies, improve
clarity, remove or update obsolete references, and add references to
other provisions regarding ineligibility for Federal crop insurance.
DATES: Effective date: This rule is effective February 12, 2014.
Applicability date: The changes will apply for the 2015 and
succeeding crop years for all crops with a contract change date after
February 12, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Hoffmann, Product Administration
and Standards Division, Risk Management Agency, United States
Department of Agriculture, Beacon Facility, Stop 0812, Room 421, P.O.
Box 419205, Kansas City, MO 64141-6205, telephone (816) 926-7730.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this
rule is not-significant for the purpose of Executive Order 12866 and,
therefore, it has not been reviewed by OMB.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
In accordance with section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information collection or
recordkeeping requirements included in this final rule, which were
filed under 0563-0085, have been submitted for approval to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB). When OMB notifies us of its decision,
if approval is denied, we will publish a document in the Federal
Register providing notice of what action we plan to take.
E-Government Act Compliance
FCIC is committed to complying with the E-Government Act of 2002,
to promote the use of the Internet and other information technologies
to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other purposes.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments and
the private sector. This rule contains no Federal mandates (under the
regulatory provisions of title II of the UMRA) for State, local, and
tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore, this rule is not
subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of UMRA.
Executive Order 13132
It has been determined under section 1(a) of Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, that this rule does not have sufficient implications to
warrant consultation with the States. The provisions contained in this
rule will not have a substantial direct effect on States, or on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments. The review reveals that this regulation will not have
substantial and direct effects on Tribal governments and will not have
significant Tribal implications.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
FCIC certifies that this regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Program
requirements for the Federal crop insurance program are the same for
all producers regardless of the size of their farming operation.
However, FCIC does waive certain administrative fees for limited
resource farmers to help ensure that small entities are given the same
opportunities as large entities to obtain crop insurance. This
regulation provides the rules regarding ineligibility for crop
insurance under the Act based on actions or inactions of the producer,
such as violations of the Controlled Substance Act, debarment from
Federal government programs, and failure to pay premiums and
administrative fees when due. As such, all producers are treated
equally under this regulation. A Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has
not been prepared since this regulation does not have an unduly
burdening impact on small entities, and therefore, this regulation is
exempt from the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
605).
Federal Assistance Program
This program is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under No. 10.450.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to the provisions of Executive Order
12372, which require intergovernmental consultation with State and
local officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V,
published at 48 FR 29115, June 24, 1983.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive Order
12988 on civil justice reform. The provisions of this rule will not
have a retroactive effect. The provisions of this rule will preempt
State and local laws to the extent such State and local laws are
inconsistent herewith.
[[Page 2076]]
Environmental Evaluation
This action is not expected to have a significant economic impact
on the quality of the human environment, health, or safety. Therefore,
neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact
Statement is needed.
Background
This rule finalizes changes to 7 CFR part 400 by revising subpart
U--Ineligibility for Programs Under the Federal Crop Insurance Act that
were published by FCIC on December 5, 2011, as a notice of proposed
rulemaking in the Federal Register at 76 FR 75799--75805. The public
was afforded 61 days to submit comments after the regulation was
published in the Federal Register.
A total of 25 comments were received from 4 commenters. The
commenters were insurance providers and an insurance service
organization.
The public comments received regarding the proposed rule and FCIC's
responses to the comments are as follows:
General Comment
Comment: A commenter questioned whether the provisions in the
proposed rule would apply only to convictions that occur after the
effective date of the final rule.
Response: Yes. The laws and regulations in effect at the time of a
conviction will apply.
Section 400.677 Definitions
Comment: A commenter stated the definition of ``conviction'' is
vague, will lead to delays in determinations, and is unclear what the
effective date of the conviction will be for purposes of determining
ineligibility.
Response: FCIC does not agree the definition of ``conviction'' is
vague or will result in delays in determinations. The definition only
defines the term; it does not include provisions regarding the
effective date or consequences of a conviction. The effective date and
duration of ineligibility due to a conviction is provided in section
400.683. No changes were made as a result of this comment.
Comment: A commenter questioned the phrase ``functional equivalent
of a judgment'' within the definition of ``conviction,'' and states the
definition of the term ``conviction'' should be limited to ``criminal
judgments.''
Response: FCIC agrees the reference to other resolutions that are
the functional equivalent of a judgment is not necessary because the
definition already includes the phrase ``a judgment or any other
determination of guilt.'' The commenter did not define ``criminal
judgment'' or state how it would differ from the proposed definition of
``conviction'' which includes ``a judgment or any other determination
of guilt of a criminal offense by any court of competent
jurisdiction.'' Accordingly, the reference to other resolutions that
are the functional equivalent of a judgment were removed in the final
rule; however, no change was made to limit the definition to ``criminal
judgments.''
Comment: A commenter questioned what role the Excluded Parties List
System (EPLS) plays in the Ineligible Tracking System (ITS) for the
insurance provider.
Response: The EPLS and ITS are separate sources of data, each with
a separate function and purpose. ITS is a list of persons who have been
determined to be ineligible for crop insurance because of various
reasons related to the crop insurance program. This list is created and
maintained by FCIC. The EPLS is a list of persons who have met the
criteria for inclusion and whose names were submitted by all government
agencies to the General Services Administration (GSA). GSA creates and
maintains the EPLS. Therefore, to the extent that FCIC reports to GSA
ineligible persons who meet the criteria for inclusion in the EPLS,
there is some overlap of the two lists. However, there are persons on
the EPLS who may not appear on the ITS because of violations related to
other government programs. Similarly, there are persons included on the
ITS who do not appear on the ELPS because they do not meet the criteria
from inclusion. There is no role for the insurance provider regarding
submitting data to the EPLS. However, insurance providers are precluded
from insuring or doing business with anyone on the ITS or the EPLS.
Therefore, the insurance provider is required to check both the ITS and
EPLS to ensure that it is not insuring or doing business with an
ineligible person.
Comment: A commenter questioned whether the definition of the EPLS
will change how the insurance provider transmits or receives
information.
Response: The rule does not provide instructions regarding how
insurance providers transmit or receive any applicable information
regarding the EPLS. Since the ELPS is maintained by GSA, GSA will
provide information to the public on how it can be accessed. This rule
is just intended to provide notice to the insurance providers that they
do need to access to EPLS to ensure that it is not insuring or doing
business with an ineligible person.
Comment: A commenter questioned the timeframe for the ``meaningful
opportunity to contest'' and whether the definition of ``meaningful
opportunity to contest'' is a change from the notification process
provided in the 2011 Ineligible Tracking System Handbook that allows 30
days from the date of Notice of Debt for the insured to challenge the
debt.
Response: Nothing in this rule is intended to change the
established time frames for filing for mediation, arbitration or
judicial review contained in existing regulations, policy provisions,
and procedures. To the extent that any time frame will be changed, such
change will occur in the applicable regulation, policy provision, or
procedure. Therefore, no changes have been made as a result of this
comment.
Comment: A commenter questioned whether the term ``Livestock Price
Reinsurance Agreement'' should be defined and whether the provisions of
the rule apply to policies covered under the Livestock Price
Reinsurance Agreement.
Response: The provisions contained within 7 CFR, part 400, subpart
U apply to all policies insured under the Federal Crop Insurance Act,
including those reinsured under the Livestock Price Reinsurance
Agreement. FCIC agrees the term ``Livestock Price Reinsurance
Agreement'' should be defined in the final rule. The definition was
added and the term was referenced where applicable in the final rule.
Section 400.679 Criteria for Ineligibility
Comment: A few commenters stated the provisions in section
400.679(d) should apply only to individuals and not to all ``persons''
as defined in the rule.
Response: FCIC agrees and has made the changes in section 400.679
and other applicable sections in the final rule.
Comment: A commenter stated the references to the regulations at 7
CFR part 3017 are incorrect because those regulations are obsolete and
have been replaced with 2 CFR part 180 and 2 CFR part 417.
Response: FCIC agrees 7 CFR part 3017 is obsolete. All references
to 7 CFR part 3017 have been corrected in the final rule to reference 2
CFR part 180 and 2 CFR part 417. Further, these are no longer the only
provisions related to debarment since permanent debarment has been
added by the 2008 Farm Bill. Therefore, FCIC has clarified the
[[Page 2077]]
provisions in section 400.679 to make the distinction between
suspensions and debarments under 2 CFR part 180 and 2 CFR part 417 and
debarments under 7 U.S.C. 2209j.
Comment: A few commenters stated sections 400.679(c) and (f) are
vague, ambiguous, and impose an unnecessary administrative burden on
insurance providers and insured producers. They state subsection (f) is
ambiguous because it is unclear whether the phrase ``ineligible
person,'' refers to persons made ineligible under 2 CFR part 417,
previously 7 CFR part 3017, or all persons ineligible under section
400.679 of the proposed rule. They also state the phrase ``knowingly
doing business'' will impose an unnecessary administrative burden on
the insurance providers if it is applied to ineligible persons outside
of 2 CFR part 180 and 2 CFR part 417.
Response: The phrase ``ineligible person'' in section 400.679(f) of
the proposed rule referred to persons found ineligible under 2 CFR part
180 and 2 CFR part 417, previously 7 CFR part 3017, and 7 U.S.C. 2209j,
as a result of the 2008 Farm Bill. The language in the final rule has
been amended to refer to persons debarred or suspended under 2 CFR part
180, 2 CFR part 417, and 7 U.S.C. 2209j to provide more clarity. With
respect to the burdens, both 2 CFR parts 180 and 417 makes it clear
that knowingly doing business with an ineligible person can subject a
person to debarment. This applies to all persons, including insurance
providers so FCIC cannot change the requirement or exempt insurance
providers. As part of normal business operations, insurance providers
must be in compliance with USDA regulations, policies and procedures
regarding debarment, suspension and eligibility. FCIC has revised the
provisions to clarify that it only applies to knowingly doing business
with debarred persons as required by the debarment regulations and
statutes.
Comment: A commenter stated section 400.679(e) should be eliminated
or limit its application to those persons who have been listed in the
EPLS.
Response: FCIC understands that there may be problems of
identifying persons who have committed crimes for knowingly defrauding
the United States. Further, as drafted, the proposed rule presumed that
permanent debarment was automatic after such a conviction but there is
still a process that must be followed for the Secretary to debar a
person and once that process is completed, the debarred person will be
reported to the EPLS. In addition, to make clear that this applies to
persons listed on the EPLS, FCIC has referenced debarments under 2 CFR
part 180, 2 CFR part 417, and 7 U.S.C. 2209j.
Section 400.680 Controlled Substance
Comment: A commenter questioned the logic of barring someone
convicted of a controlled substance violation from obtaining Federal
crop insurance. The commenter stated there is no statutory authority
for barring someone convicted of possession of or trafficking in a
controlled substance, and the references to such in the rule should be
deleted. The commenter stated that Chapter 13 of Title 21 is not
applicable to the Federal crop insurance program because eligibility
for Federal crop insurance is contingent upon various ``payments'' and
the term ``Federal benefit'' does not include any benefit for which
payments are required for eligibility.
Response: FCIC disagrees that there is no statutory authority for
barring someone convicted of possession of or trafficking in a
controlled substance. The statutory provisions of Chapter 13 of Title
21 regarding convictions for the possession of or trafficking in a
controlled substance are applicable to Federal crop insurance because
eligibility for Federal crop insurance is not contingent upon any
payment. Therefore, no changes have been made as a result of this
comment.
Comment: A commenter stated that convictions for possession of or
trafficking a controlled substance do not result in automatic denial of
Federal benefits, or denial of such benefits for a set amount of time,
according to Title 21. The determination regarding the denial of
Federal benefits and for how long is at the court's discretion;
therefore, section 400.680 is incorrect.
Response: FCIC agrees the language in the proposed rule was
inaccurate regarding automatic denial of benefits under the Act for
conviction of the possession of or trafficking in controlled
substances. The final rule has been amended to be consistent with the
provisions of Title 21 regarding such convictions.
Section 400.682 Determination and Notification
Comment: A commenter questioned whether National Appeals Division
(NAD) appealable disputes are changing.
Response: Neither the proposed rule or final rule change appealable
disputes under the NAD regulations.
Section 400.683 Period of Ineligibility
Comment: A commenter stated the term ``crop year'' for determining
when ineligibility begins for a person convicted of a controlled
substance violation is vague and needs to be further defined or
expanded.
Response: The proposed rule did not define the term ``crop year.''
The term ``crop year'' is defined in the policy for applicable
commodities, and the public was not provided the opportunity to comment
on those definitions under the proposed rule. In addition, the
applicability of the term ``crop year'' regarding persons convicted
under Federal or State law of planting, cultivation, growing,
producing, harvesting or storing a controlled substance is statutory.
Comment: A commenter stated they understood that they, as an
insurance provider, would deny coverage to an applicant who is not a
United States citizen, United States non-citizen national, or a
qualified alien, but were not aware of any obligation or requirement to
report such individuals as part of the ITS process.
Response: Sections 400.682 and 400.684 of the proposed rule did
provide that insurance providers must notify FCIC of applicants who are
not a United States citizen, United States non-citizen national, or a
qualified alien and that such individuals would be placed on the ITS.
FCIC agrees that insurance providers are not required to report
individuals who are not a United States citizen, United States non-
citizen national, or a qualified alien to FCIC. FCIC also agrees that
such individuals are not placed on ITS if the sole reason they are
ineligible is because they are not a United States citizen, United
States non-citizen national, or a qualified alien. The final rule has
been amended to remove the reporting requirement of such individuals
and the reference that such individuals would be placed on the ITS.
Section 400.684 Effect of Ineligibility
Comment: A couple of commenters stated the proposed rule had two
subsections labeled ``b'' under section 400.684.
Response: FCIC agrees and has made the applicable changes in the
final rule.
Comment: A commenter stated they agree with the consolidation of
the provisions in 7 CFR, part 400, subpart F, into 7 CFR, part 400,
subpart U, to eliminate redundancies. However, the commenter also
stated the provisions in 7 CFR, part 400, subpart F, that allowed
insurance providers to continue to receive reinsurance if the insurance
provider follows all the regulations and procedures were not retained
and consolidated in the proposed rule. The commenter stated the
elimination of those provisions could result in an insurance provider
being penalized
[[Page 2078]]
even though it had followed all of the applicable regulations and
procedures.
Response: FCIC agrees the provisions of 7 CFR, part 400, subpart F,
regarding the continuation of reinsurance in cases involving controlled
substance violations where the insurance provider followed all FCIC
procedures and regulations should have been retained and consolidated
in the proposed rule. The applicable provisions have been added to the
final rule.
Comment: A commenter stated that subsections 400.684(b)(3) and (4),
for general and limited liability partnerships and joint ventures,
respectively, are the same and could be combined.
Response: FCIC agrees the provisions for general partnerships,
limited liability partnerships and joint ventures are repetitive and
although legally there may be distinctions between these entities, they
are being treated the same for the purposes of this final rule.
Therefore, FCIC has combined the provisions and renumbers the
subsequent provisions accordingly.
Comment: A few commenters stated section 400.684(b)(5)(redesignated
as 400.684(b)(4)) is ambiguous, denies appeal rights and liability
protections to insured producers and insurance providers, could
adversely affect a person's eligibility for program benefits even when
that person is not a party to a contract, and that FCIC should revise
or eliminate the subsection because it creates a burden that outweighs
the potential benefits.
Response: FCIC does not agree the subsection is ambiguous, denies
any appeal rights or liability protections or could affect a person who
is not a party to the applicable policy. The provision applies to
different types of entities and specifies that it applies to the
persons who are in control of the actions of such entities or are
responsible for the action or inaction that resulted in the
ineligibility. Since entities have no ability to take action except
through the persons conducting the business of the entity, it is
appropriate to hold such individuals responsible for their actions or
inactions. Further, appeal rights will be afforded such individuals the
same as they would for any other person determined to be ineligible.
While certain state laws protect individuals within certain entities,
the crop insurance program is funded with taxpayer dollars and FCIC has
the responsibility to ensure those dollars are properly spent. The
provisions are necessary to ensure the integrity of the Federal crop
insurance program and prevent producers from circumventing their
ineligibility by hiding behind the fa[ccedil]ade of an entity.
Therefore, no changes have been made as a result of this comment.
Section 400.686 Administration and Maintenance
Comment: A commenter stated that subsection 400.686(d) should be
rewritten to read ``AIPs must check to ensure that the persons with
whom they are doing business are eligible to participate in the
programs authorized under the Act. The ITS does not include all persons
ineligible to receive government benefits, such as persons debarred,
disqualified or suspended from receiving government benefits as a
result of being listed in EPLS.''
Response: FCIC disagrees with the commenters suggested changes. The
provision applies to all participants in the program, and that includes
not only insurance providers but it also includes partners,
cooperators, and contractors, to ensure that the persons with whom they
are doing business are eligible to participate in the programs
authorized under the Act. The provision has been clarified to specify
that insurance providers, partners, cooperators, and contractors must
check ITS and other sources, such as the EPLS, to identify ineligible
persons. Further, there appears to be some confusion regarding the
EPLS. The EPLS is a source of information about certain persons who are
ineligible for certain benefits or transactions. The government agency
that reported the person to EPLS actually determined the person's
ineligibility.
In addition to the changes described above, FCIC has made minor
editorial changes, revisions to specific sections of 7 CFR, part 400,
subpart U, and revisions to 7 CFR, parts 407 and 457 as follows:
Part 400, Subpart U
1. Revised the definition of ``debt'' and ``delinquent debt'' for
consistency with Sec. 400.682 and Sec. 400.684 regarding debtors that
file bankruptcy. The definitions in the proposed rule were in conflict
with the existing provisions regarding the eligibility of a person in
bankruptcy in section 400.683(b)(1). The final rule clarifies that only
discharge of the debt in bankruptcy will restore eligibility.
2. Revised Sec. 400.682(a) because of the inconsistency in the
proposed rule regarding bankruptcy. The intent of the proposed rule was
to specify that filing for bankruptcy did not make a person eligible
for crop insurance. To be eligible the debt must be discharged in
bankruptcy. However, nothing in this rule was intended to abrogate any
existing bankruptcy laws regarding the collection of a debt while the
producer is in bankruptcy. Therefore, FCIC has clarified that a debtor
who has filed for bankruptcy may be notified of the amount of debt owed
and their ineligibility for insurance; however, no request for payment
of the debt can be made, unless approved in writing by the Office of
General Counsel. The clarified language will ensure that insurance
providers do not request payment of a debt when they are aware the
debtor has filed bankruptcy.
3. Revised Sec. 400.683 to distinguish between suspensions and
debarments under 2 CFR part 180 and 2 CFR part 417 and debarments under
7 U.S.C. 2209j because the effective date for each is different and
that was not clear in the proposed rule.
4. Revised Sec. 400.684(a)(1) to clarify that filing bankruptcy
does not make an ineligible person eligible for crop insurance or
preclude the ineligible person from being placed on the ITS. There was
an inconsistency in the proposed rule and the intent was to not allow
debtors to be eligible for insurance until their debt was discharged in
bankruptcy and FCIC had revised the provisions to be consistent. This
does not change the law regarding the collection of debts from persons
in bankruptcy so FCIC has clarified that while insurance providers are
precluded from requesting payment of the debt once a person files
bankruptcy, such filing does not make the person eligible to obtain
crop insurance.
5. Revised Sec. 400.684(b)(3) to include limited partnerships and
limited liability companies. The proposed rule impacted partners and
members of limited partnerships and limited liability companies
differently than members of limited liability partnerships, which was
not the intent of FCIC. In addition, the proposed rule created program
vulnerability because it would allow certain partners and members to
evade ineligibility determinations. The revision will address the
program vulnerability and ensure equal treatment of partners and
members of limited partnerships, limited liability partnerships, and
limited liability companies. Also revised Sec. 400.684(b)(3) to
include references to joint ventures because although they may be
legally different, they are treated the same as of limited
partnerships, limited liability partnerships, and limited liability
companies for the purposes of this rule. As a result, Sec.
400.684(b)(4) has been deleted and Sec. 400.684(b)(5) has been
redesignated as Sec. 400.684(b)(4).
[[Page 2079]]
6. Revised Sec. 400.684(b)(5) (redesignated Sec. 400.684(b)(4))
to remove limited partnerships and limited liability companies. The
proposed rule impacted partners and members of limited partnerships and
limited liability companies differently than members of limited
liability partnerships, which was not the intent of FCIC. In addition,
the proposed rule created program vulnerability because it would allow
certain partners and members to evade ineligibility determinations. The
revision will address the program vulnerability and ensure equal
treatment of partners and members of limited partnerships, limited
liability partnerships, and limited liability companies.
Part 407, Area Risk Insurance Policy Basic Provisions
1. Revise sections 2(k) and (p) to be consistent with the
provisions in 7 CFR, part 400, subpart U. After it had published the
proposed rule for 7 CFR, part 400, subpart U, FCIC discovered the Area
Risk Insurance Policy Basic Provisions regarding debt for persons in
bankruptcy were inconsistent with the existing provisions.
Part 457, Common Crop Insurance Policy Basic Provisions
1. Revise section 2(f) to be consistent with the provisions in 7
CFR, part 400, subpart U. After it had published the proposed rule for
7 CFR, part 400, subpart U, FCIC discovered the Common Crop insurance
Policy Basic Provisions regarding debt for persons in bankruptcy were
inconsistent with the existing provisions.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 400, 407 and 457
Administrative practice and procedure, crop insurance, reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, as set forth in the preamble, the Federal Crop
Insurance Corporation amends 7 CFR parts 400, 407 and 457 as follows:
PART 400--GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 400 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(1), 1506(o).
Subpart C [Removed and Reserved]
0
2. Remove and reserve subpart C.
Subpart F [Removed and Reserved]
0
3. Remove and reserve subpart F.
0
4. Revise subpart U to read as follows:
Subpart U--Ineligibility for Programs Under the Federal Crop Insurance
Act
400.675 Purpose.
400.676 [Reserved]
400.677 Definitions.
400.678 Applicability.
400.679 Criteria for ineligibility.
400.680 Controlled substance.
400.681 Written payment agreement.
400.682 Determination and notification.
400.683 Period of ineligibility.
400.684 Effect of ineligibility.
400.685 Criteria for regaining eligibility.
400.686 Administration and maintenance.
Subpart U--Ineligibility for Programs Under the Federal Crop
Insurance Act
Sec. 400.675 Purpose.
This subpart prescribes conditions under which a person may be
determined to be ineligible to participate in any program administered
under the authority of the Federal Crop Insurance Act. This subpart
also establishes the criteria for regaining eligibility.
Sec. 400.676 [Reserved]
Sec. 400.677 Definitions.
As used in this subpart:
Act means the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1501-1524).
Applicant means a person who has submitted an application for crop
insurance coverage under the Act.
Authorized person means any current or past officer, employee,
elected official, managing general agent, agent, or contractor of an
insurance provider, FCIC, or any other government agency whose duties
require access to the ITS to administer the Act.
Controlled substance has the same meaning provided in 7 CFR
3021.610.
Conviction means a judgment or any other determination of guilt of
a criminal offense by any court of competent jurisdiction, whether
entered upon a verdict or plea, including a plea of no contest.
Date of delinquency means: The termination date specified in the
applicable policy for administrative fees and premiums owed for
insurance issued under the authority of the Act, and any interest and
penalties on those amounts, if applicable; and the due date specified
in the notice to the person of the amount due for any other amounts due
the insurance provider or FCIC for insurance issued under the authority
of the Act. Other amounts due include, but are not limited to,
indemnities, prevented planting payments, or replant payments found not
to have been earned or that were overpaid, premium billed with a due
date after the termination date for the crop year in which premium is
earned, and any interest, administrative fees, and penalties on such
amounts, if applicable. Payments postmarked or received before the date
of delinquency by the insurance provider or its agent for debts owed to
the insurance provider, or by FCIC for debts owed to FCIC, are not
delinquent.
Debt means an amount of money that has been determined to be owed
by any person to FCIC or an insurance provider, excluding money owed to
an insurance provider's agent, under any program administered under the
Act. The debt may have arisen from nonpayment of interest, penalties,
premium, or administrative fee; overpayment of indemnity, prevented
planting or replant payment; cost of collection; or other causes. A
debt does not include debts discharged in bankruptcy.
Debtor means a person who owes a debt and that debt is delinquent.
Delinquent debt means a debt that is not satisfied on or before the
date of delinquency. To avoid delinquency or ineligibility due to a
delinquent debt, a debtor may enter into a written payment agreement
acceptable to the insurance provider or FCIC to pay any such debt as
long as all payments are made by the due dates specified in such
written payment agreement. A delinquent debt does not include debts
discharged in bankruptcy or any debt to an insurance provider's agent.
Employer Identification Number (EIN) means a Tax Identification
Number issued by the Internal Revenue Service used to identify a
business entity, and may also be referred to as a Federal Tax
Identification Number.
Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) means a list maintained by the
General Services Administration that provides a source of current
information about persons who are excluded or disqualified from covered
transactions, including the date the person was determined ineligible
and the date the period of ineligibility ends.
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) means a wholly owned
government corporation within the USDA.
Ineligible person means a person who is denied participation in any
program administered under the authority of the Act.
Ineligible Tracking System (ITS) means an electronic system to
identify persons who are ineligible to participate in any program
pursuant to this subpart.
Insurance Provider means a legal entity which has entered into a
Standard Reinsurance Agreement, Livestock Price Reinsurance Agreement,
or other reinsurance agreement, as
[[Page 2080]]
applicable, with FCIC for the applicable reinsurance year.
Livestock Price Reinsurance Agreement means a cooperative financial
assistance agreement between FCIC and an insurance provider to deliver
eligible livestock price insurance contracts under the authority of the
Act and establishes the terms and conditions under which FCIC will
provide subsidy and reinsurance on eligible livestock price insurance
policies sold.
Meaningful opportunity to contest means the opportunity for the
insured to resolve disagreements with a decision by the insurance
provider through requesting a review of the decision by the insurance
provider, mediation, arbitration, or judicial review, as applicable.
Person means an individual, partnership, association, corporation,
estate, trust, or other legal entity, and wherever applicable, a State
or political subdivision or agency of a State. ``Person'' does not
include the United States Government or any agency thereof.
Qualified alien has the same meaning provided in the Personal
Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (8
U.S.C. 1641).
Social Security Number (SSN) means an individual's Social Security
Number as issued under the authority of the Social Security Act.
Standard Reinsurance Agreement (SRA) means a cooperative financial
assistance agreement between FCIC and an insurance provider to deliver
eligible crop insurance contracts under the authority of the Act and
establishes the terms and conditions under which FCIC will provide
subsidy and reinsurance on eligible crop insurance policies sold.
Substantial beneficial interest has the same meaning as contained
in the applicable policy.
USDA means the United States Department of Agriculture.
United States non-citizen national has the same meaning provided in
the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of
1996 (8 U.S.C. Sec. 1408).
Written payment agreement means a written document between a debtor
and the insurance provider, or FCIC, that is signed and dated by all
applicable parties to satisfy financial obligations of the debtor with
scheduled installment payments under conditions that modify the terms
of the original debt in accordance with Sec. 400.681.
Sec. 400.678 Applicability.
This subpart applies to any program administered under the
authority of the Act, including but not limited to:
(a) The catastrophic risk protection plan of insurance;
(b) The additional coverage plans of insurance as authorized under
section 508(c) of the Act;
(c) Private insurance products authorized under section 508(h) or
523(d) of the Act and reinsured by FCIC; and
(d) Persons entering contracts or cooperative agreements under
sections 506(l), 522(c), 522(d), or 524(a) of the Act.
Sec. 400.679 Criteria for ineligibility.
Except as otherwise provided, a person is ineligible to participate
in any program administered under the authority of the Act if the
person meets one or more of the following criteria:
(a) Has a delinquent debt:
(1) The existence and delinquency of the debt must be verifiable.
(2) The person has to be provided a meaningful opportunity to
contest the debt.
(3) If the person contests the debt, such action does not delay or
preclude:
(i) Effect of the determination of ineligibility;
(ii) Determination or notification of ineligibility in accordance
with Sec. 400.682;
(iii) Termination of the applicable crop insurance policies; or
(iv) Ineligible persons being reported in accordance with Sec.
400.682 or the ineligible persons being recorded in the ITS.
(4) If the person is determined not to owe the debt, eligibility is
reinstated retroactive to the date of the determination of
ineligibility, any applicable policies will be reinstated, and any
applicable indemnity, prevented planting or replant payment earned may
be paid provided the person has continued to comply with the terms of
the policy;
(b) Is an individual and has been convicted of a controlled
substance violation according to Sec. 400.680;
(c) Has been disqualified under section 515(h) of the Act.;
(d) Is an individual and is not a United States citizen, United
States non-citizen national, or a qualified alien. Such individuals may
not be recorded in the ITS; however, such individuals are ineligible
under the provisions of the Personal Responsibility and Work
Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, 8 U.S.C. 1611;
(e) Has been suspended or debarred for committing a crime specified
in 2 CFR part 180 or 2 CFR part 417, or 7 U.S.C. 2209j (Ineligibility
determinations will not be stayed pending review. However, reversal of
the determination of ineligibility will reinstate eligibility
retroactive to the date of the determination of ineligibility, and any
applicable policies will be reinstated); or
(f) Has been debarred for knowingly doing business with a person
debarred or suspended under 2 CFR part 180 or 2 CFR part 417 or 7
U.S.C. 2209j.
Sec. 400.680 Controlled substance.
(a) This section implements section 1764 of the Food Security Act
of 1985 (Pub. L. 99-198) and Chapter 13 of Title 21 requiring the
denial of Federal Benefits, including crop insurance, to individuals
convicted of controlled substance violations in accordance with
paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an individual will
be ineligible to participate in any program authorized under the Act,
as provided in Sec. 400.683, if the individual is convicted under
Federal or State law of planting, cultivating, growing, producing,
harvesting, or storing a controlled substance in any crop year.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an individual may,
as determined by the court, be ineligible to participate in any program
authorized under the Act, as provided in Sec. 400.683, if the person
is convicted under Federal or State law of possession of or trafficking
in a controlled substance.
Sec. 400.681 Written payment agreement.
(a) Written payment agreements shall:
(1) Require scheduled installment payments that will allow for full
repayment of the debt within the time frame allotted in paragraph
(a)(2) of this section;
(2) Not exceed two years in duration; and
(3) Not be modified, replaced, or consolidated after it has been
executed in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section.
(b) To avoid being determined to be ineligible through the
execution of a written payment agreement:
(1) For a debt arising from any unpaid premium, administrative
fees, or catastrophic risk protection fees:
(i) Only one written payment agreement is permitted per termination
date. A written payment agreement may cover multiple crops provided
they all have the same termination date; and
(ii) The written payment agreement must be signed by both parties,
the debtor and the insurance provider or FCIC, as applicable, on or
before the
[[Page 2081]]
termination date specified in the applicable policy to prevent an
ineligible determination for a delinquent debt.
(2) For all other debts, the written payment agreement must be
signed by both parties, the debtor and the insurance provider or FCIC,
as applicable, on or before the due date specified in the notice to the
person of the amount due to prevent an ineligible determination for a
delinquent debt.
Sec. 400.682 Determination and notification.
(a) The insurance provider must send a written notice of the debt
to the person, including the time frame in which the debt must be paid,
and provide the person with a meaningful opportunity to contest the
amount or existence of the debt. Once a debtor has filed bankruptcy and
the insurance provider is formally informed of such through the court
or the debtor, no request for payment of the debt can be made, unless
approved in writing by the Office of General Counsel. The debtor may be
notified of the amount of debt and ineligibility for crop insurance.
(1) The insurance provider shall evaluate the person's response, if
any, and determine if the debt is owed and delinquent.
(2) Upon request by FCIC, the insurance provider shall submit all
documentation related to the debt to FCIC.
(b) If an insurance provider or any other person has evidence that
a person meets criteria set forth in Sec. 400.679(a), (b), (c), (e) or
(f), they must immediately notify FCIC.
(c) After the insurance provider determines a person has met one or
more of the criteria in Sec. 400.679 and notifies FCIC, FCIC will
issue and mail a Notice of Ineligibility to the person's last known
address and to the insurance provider. Notices sent to such address
will be conclusively presumed to have been received by that person.
(d) The Notice of Ineligibility will state the criteria upon which
the determination of ineligibility has been based, a brief statement of
the facts to support the determination, the time period of
ineligibility, and the right to appeal the determination to be placed
on the ITS in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section.
(e) Within 30 days of receiving the Notice of Ineligibility, the
ineligible person may appeal FCIC's determination to be placed on ITS
to the National Appeals Division in accordance with 7 CFR part 11. The
existence and amount of the debt is determined by the insurance
provider, not FCIC; therefore, those determinations are not appealable
to the National Appeals Division.
(f) If the person appeals FCIC's determination to be placed on ITS
to the National Appeals Division, the insurance provider will be
notified and provided with an opportunity to participate in the
proceeding, if permitted by 7 CFR part 11.
Sec. 400.683 Period of ineligibility.
(a) The beginning of the period of ineligibility will be:
(1) For ineligibility as a result of a delinquent debt, beginning
on the date stated in the applicable policy;
(2) For ineligibility as a result of a conviction under Federal or
State law of:
(i) Planting, cultivating, growing, producing, harvesting, or
storing a controlled substance, the beginning of the crop year in which
the individual is convicted; or
(ii) Possession of or trafficking in a controlled substance, the
beginning of the crop year in which the individual is convicted, unless
determined otherwise by the court.
(3) For ineligibility as a result of a disqualification, debarment,
or suspension under 515(h) of the Act, 2 CFR part 180, 2 CFR part 417,
the date the person was disqualified, debarred, or suspended by
debarring official, Administrative Law Judge, or such other person
authorized to take such action; and
(4) For debarment under 7 U.S.C. 2209j, the beginning of the crop
year in which the person is convicted.
(b) The duration of the period of ineligibility will be:
(1) For ineligibility as a result of a delinquent debt, until the
debt has been paid in full discharged in bankruptcy, or the person has
executed a written payment agreement.
(2) For ineligibility as a result of a conviction under Federal or
State law of:
(i) Planting, cultivating, growing, producing, harvesting, or
storing a controlled substance, four crop years succeeding the crop
year in which the person was convicted; and
(ii) Possession of a controlled substance or trafficking in a
controlled substance, in addition to the time of ineligibility imposed
in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section, until the period of time
imposed by a court has expired.
(3) For ineligibility as a result of a disqualification, debarment,
or suspension under section 515(h) of the Act, or 2 CFR part 180 and 2
CFR part 417 until the period of time of disqualification, debarment,
or suspension, as applicable, has expired.
(4) For ineligibility as a result of not being a United States
citizen, United States non-citizen national, or a qualified alien,
until the date such individual becomes a United States citizen, United
States non-citizen national, or a qualified alien.
(5) For ineligibility as a result of a conviction falling under 7
U.S.C. 2209j, permanent unless otherwise determined by the Secretary of
Agriculture for a period of not less than 10 years.
Sec. 400.684 Effect of ineligibility.
(a) The effect of ineligibility depends on the basis for the
determination.
(1) Persons who are ineligible as a result of a delinquent debt are
ineligible for crop insurance authorized under the Act for a certain
time period in accordance with Sec. 400.683. Filing for bankruptcy
does not make the person eligible for crop insurance or preclude the
ineligible person from being placed on the ITS in accordance with Sec.
400.684(b)(1).
(2) Persons who are ineligible as a result of a suspension or
debarment are precluded from:
(i) Participating in all programs authorized under the Act,
including but not limited to:
(A) Obtaining crop insurance;
(B) Acting as an agent, loss adjuster, insurance provider, or
affiliate, as defined in the Standard Reinsurance Agreement or
Livestock Price Reinsurance Agreement, or successor agreements;
(C) Entering into any contracts with FCIC under sections 506(l) and
section 522(c) of the Act; and
(D) Entering into any cooperative agreements or partnerships under
sections 506(l), 522(d) and 524(a) of the Act; and
(ii) Participating in any other covered transaction as specified in
2 CFR part 180 and 2 CFR part 417.
(3) Persons who are ineligible because of disqualification under
section 515(h) of the Act are precluded from participating in all
programs authorized under the Act indicated in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of
this section, and those listed in section 515(h)(3)(B) and (C) of the
Act.
(4) Individuals who are ineligible because of a conviction of a
violation of the controlled substance provisions or are not a United
States citizen, United States non-citizen national, or a qualified
alien are precluded from participating in any program authorized under
the Act indicated in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section.
(5) Persons who are ineligible as a result of a conviction falling
under 7 U.S.C. 2209j, are precluded from
[[Page 2082]]
participating in any program offered by USDA.
(b) Once a person has been determined to be ineligible:
(1) The ineligible person will be placed on the ITS and may be
reported to other government agencies, unless the ineligible person is
an individual and the sole reason for ineligibility is because the
individual is not a United States citizen, United States non-citizen
national, or qualified alien.
(2) If the ineligible person is an individual:
(i) All crop insurance policies in which the ineligible person is
the sole insured will terminate if the person is ineligible for any
reason other than a controlled substance violation, or be void if the
person is ineligible due to conviction of a controlled substance
violation according to Sec. 400.680, and the person will remain
ineligible for crop insurance for the applicable period specified in
Sec. 400.683; and
(ii) The ineligible person must be reported on all policies in
which the ineligible person has a substantial beneficial interest in
the applicant or insured, and the insured share under such policy will
be reduced commensurate with the ineligible person's substantial
beneficial interest in the applicant or insured for as long as the
ineligible person remains ineligible in accordance with Sec. 400.683.
(3) If the ineligible person is a general partnership, limited
partnership, limited liability partnership, limited liability company,
or joint venture and is ineligible as a result of:
(i) A delinquent debt:
(A) All partners or members of the ineligible general partnership,
limited partnership, limited liability partnership, limited liability
company, or joint venture will be ineligible;
(B) The ineligible general partnership, limited partnership,
limited liability partnership, limited liability company, or joint
venture and all partners and members of the ineligible general
partnership, limited partnership, limited liability partnership,
limited liability company, or joint venture will remain ineligible for
crop insurance for the applicable period specified in Sec. 400.683;
(C) All crop insurance policies in which the ineligible general
partnership, limited partnership, limited liability partnership,
limited liability company, or joint venture is the sole insured will
terminate;
(D) All crop insurance policies in which the ineligible partner or
member is the sole insured will terminate; and
(E) The ineligible general partnership, limited partnership,
limited liability partnership, limited liability company, or joint
venture and all ineligible partners or members must be reported on any
other policy in which they have a substantial beneficial interest in
the applicant or insured, and the insured share under such policies
will be reduced commensurate with the ineligible general partnership,
limited partnership, limited liability partnership, limited liability
company, or joint venture or the ineligible partners' or members'
substantial beneficial interest in the applicant or insured for as long
as they remain ineligible in accordance with Sec. 400.683; or
(ii) Meeting the criteria specified in Sec. 400.679(c), (e) or
(f):
(A) All crop insurance policies in which the ineligible general
partnership, limited partnership, limited liability partnership,
limited liability company, or joint venture is the sole insured will
terminate, and the ineligible general partnership, limited partnership,
limited liability partnership, limited liability company, or joint
venture will remain ineligible for crop insurance for the applicable
period specified in Sec. 400.683; and
(B) The ineligible general partnership, limited partnership,
limited liability partnership, limited liability company, or joint
venture must be reported on any other policy in which it has a
substantial beneficial interest in the applicant or insured, and the
insured share under such policies will be reduced commensurate with the
ineligible general partnership's, limited partnership's, limited
liability partnership's, limited liability company's, or joint
venture's substantial beneficial interest in the applicant or insured
for as long as it remains ineligible in accordance with Sec. 400.683.
(4) If the ineligible person is an association, estate, trust,
corporation, or other similar entity, and is ineligible as a result of:
(i) A delinquent debt:
(A) Any partners, members, shareholders, administrators, executors,
trustees, or grantors may be individually ineligible if the delinquent
debt occurred as a result of their actions or inactions, as determined
by the insurance provider or FCIC;
(B) All policies in which the ineligible association, estate,
trust, corporation, or other similar entity is the sole insured will
terminate, and it will remain ineligible for crop insurance for the
applicable period specified in Sec. 400.683.
(C) The ineligible association, estate, trust, corporation, or
other similar entity must be reported on any other policy in which it
has a substantial beneficial interest in the applicant or insured, and
the insured share under such policies will be reduced commensurate with
the ineligible entity's substantial beneficial interest in the
applicant or insured for as long as the person remains ineligible in
accordance with Sec. 400.683;
(D) All policies in which a partner, member, shareholder,
administrator, executor, trustee, or grantor determined ineligible
according to Sec. 400.684(b)(4)(i)(A) is the sole insured will
terminate, and the person will remain ineligible for crop insurance for
the applicable period specified in Sec. 400.683; and
(E) The ineligible partner, member, shareholder, administrator,
executor, trustee, or grantor must be reported on any other policy in
which they have a substantial beneficial interest in the applicant or
insured, and the insured share under such policies will be reduced
commensurate with the ineligible person's substantial beneficial
interest in the applicant or insured for as long as the person remains
ineligible in accordance with Sec. 400.683; or
(ii) Meeting the criteria specified in Sec. 400.679(c), (e) or
(f):
(A) All crop insurance policies in which the ineligible
association, estate, trust, corporation, or other similar entity is the
sole insured will terminate, and the ineligible association, estate,
trust, corporation, or other similar entity will remain ineligible for
crop insurance for the applicable period specified in Sec. 400.683;
and
(B) The ineligible association, estate, trust, corporation, or
other similar entity must be reported on any other policy in which it
has a substantial beneficial interest in the applicant or insured, and
the insured share under such policies will be reduced commensurate with
the ineligible association, estate, trust, corporation, or other
similar entity's substantial beneficial interest in the applicant or
insured for as long as it remains ineligible in accordance with Sec.
400.683.
(5) If an applicant or insured is a corporation, partnership, joint
venture, trust, corporation, limited liability company, limited
liability partnership, limited partnership, or other similar entity
that was created to conceal the interest of an ineligible person or to
evade the ineligibility determination of a person with a substantial
beneficial interest in the applicant or insured, the policy will be
void.
(6) All crop insurance policies in which the ineligible person is
insured as landlord/tenant will terminate on the next termination date.
The other person(s) on such policy may submit a new application for
crop insurance
[[Page 2083]]
coverage on or before the applicable sales closing date to obtain
insurance coverage for the crop, if they are otherwise eligible for
such coverage.
(c) The spouse and minor child of an individual insured is
considered to be the same as the individual for purposes of this
subpart and subject to the same ineligibility, except when:
(1) The individual is ineligible due to a conviction of a
controlled substance violation in accordance with Sec. 400.680;
(2) The individual is ineligible as a result of a felony conviction
for knowingly defrauding the United States in connection with any
program administered by USDA;
(3) The individual is ineligible because they are not a United
States citizen, United States non-citizen national, or a qualified
alien;
(4) The individual is ineligible as a result of a disqualification,
debarment, or suspension;
(5) The spouse can prove they are legally separated or otherwise
legally separate under the applicable State dissolution of marriage
laws; or
(6) The minor child has a separate legal interest in such person or
is engaged in a separate farming operation from the individual.
(d) Notwithstanding Sec. 400.684(f), when a policy is voided in
accordance with this subpart:
(1) No indemnities or payments will be paid for the voided policy;
(2) Any indemnities or payments already made for the voided policy
will be declared overpayments and must be repaid in full; and
(3) No premiums will be due and any premium paid will be refunded
except when the policy is void due to a conviction of a controlled
substance violation according to Sec. 400.680, in which case the
insured will still be required to pay 20 percent of the premium the
insured would otherwise be required to pay to offset costs in the
servicing of the policy.
(e) When the insured share of a policy is reduced in accordance
with this subpart:
(1) Any indemnities or payments commensurate with the share reduced
already made will be declared overpayments and must be repaid in full;
and
(2) Any premiums paid by the insured commensurate with the share
reduced will be refunded.
(f) Any insurance written by an insurance provider to any person
who is ineligible under the provisions of this subpart is not eligible
for reinsurance by FCIC. All premium subsidies, expenses, or other
payments made by FCIC for insurance written for any person who is
ineligible under the provisions of this subpart must be immediately
refunded to FCIC. However, with regard to policies that would be void
due to a conviction of a controlled substance violation according to
Sec. 400.680, if the insurance provider follows the procedures of FCIC
and the requirements of the regulations, reinsurance will continue to
be provided under the reinsurance agreement on the policy unless it is
shown that the agent or insurance provider had knowledge of the facts
which would indicate ineligibility on the part of the insured and
failed to act on that knowledge.
Sec. 400.685 Criteria for regaining eligibility.
After the period of ineligibility as specified in Sec. 400.683 has
ended, the ineligible person is eligible to participate in programs
authorized under the Act, provided the person meets all eligibility
requirements.
(a) After a person regains eligibility for crop insurance when
their policy was terminated or voided, the person must submit a new
application for crop insurance coverage on or before the applicable
sales closing date to obtain insurance coverage for the crop. If the
date of regaining eligibility occurs after the applicable sales closing
date for the crop, the person may not participate until the following
year unless that crop policy allows for applications to be accepted
after the sales closing date.
(b) If a person who was determined ineligible according to this
subpart is subsequently determined to be an eligible person for crop
insurance through mediation, arbitration, appeal, or judicial review,
such person's policies will be reinstated effective at the beginning of
the crop year for which the producer was determined ineligible, and
such person will be entitled to all applicable benefits under such
policies, provided the person meets all eligibility requirements and
complies with the terms of the policy.
Sec. 400.686 Administration and maintenance.
(a) Ineligible producer data will be maintained in a system of
records established and maintained by the Risk Management Agency in
accordance with the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a).
(1) The ITS contains identifying information of the ineligible
person, including but not limited to, name, address, telephone number,
SSN or EIN, reason for ineligibility, and time period of ineligibility.
(2) Information in the ITS may be used by an authorized person. The
information may be furnished to other users as may be appropriate or
required by law or regulation, including but not limited to, FCIC
contracted agencies, other government agencies, credit reporting
agencies, and collection agencies, and in response to judicial orders
in the course of litigation. The individual information may be made
available in the form of various reports and notices.
(3) Supporting documentation regarding the determination of
ineligibility and reinstatement or regaining of eligibility will be
maintained by FCIC, or its contractors, insurance providers, Federal
agencies, and State agencies. This documentation will be maintained and
retained consistent with the electronic information contained within
the ITS.
(b) Information may be entered into the ITS by FCIC employees or
contractors, or insurance providers.
(c) All persons applying for crop insurance policies or with an
existing policy, issued or reinsured by FCIC, will be subject to
validation of their eligibility status against the ITS. Applications,
transfers, or benefits approved and accepted are considered approved or
accepted subject to review of eligibility status in accordance with
this subpart.
(d) Insurance providers, partners, cooperators, and contractors
must check to ensure that the persons with whom they are doing business
are eligible to participate in the programs authorized under the Act.
Insurance providers, partners, cooperators, and contractors must check
the ITS but the ITS may not include all persons ineligible to receive
government benefits, such as persons debarred, disqualified or
suspended from receiving government benefits by an agency other than
FCIC. Insurance providers, partners, cooperators, and contractors must
check other sources that contain ineligible persons, including but not
limited to EPLS, or successor list, provide data on persons ineligible
to participate in programs authorized under the Act.
PART 407--AREA RISK PROTECTION INSURANCE REGULATIONS
0
5. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 407 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(l), 1506(o).
0
6. Amend Sec. 407.9 as follows:
0
a. Amend section 2(k)(1)(i)(B) by adding the word ``or'' after the
semicolon at the end;
0
b. Amend section 2(k)(1)(i)(C) by removing the phrase ``; or'' and
adding a period in its place;
0
c. Remove section 2(k)(1)(i)(D);
[[Page 2084]]
0
d. Amend section 2(k)(1)(ii) by removing the phrase ``2(k)(2)(i)(A),
(B), (D) or (E)'' and adding the phrase ``2(k)(2)(i)(A), (B) or (D)''
in its place;
0
e. Amend section 2(k)(2)(i)(C) by adding the word ``or'' after the
semicolon at the end;
0
f. Amend section 2(k)(2)(i)(D) by removing the phrase ``; or'' and
adding a period in its place;
0
g. Remove section 2(k)(2)(i)(E);
0
h. Amend section 2(k)(2)(ii) by removing the phrase ``2(k)(2)(i)(A),
(B), (D) or (E)'' and adding the phrase ``2(k)(2)(i)(A), (B) or (D)''
in its place;
0
i. Revise section 2(k)(3)(iii); and
0
j. Amend section 2(p)(2) by removing the phrase ``or you file a
petition to discharge the debt in bankruptcy'' in the last sentence and
adding the phrase ``or you have your debts discharged in bankruptcy''
in its place.
The revised text reads as follows:
Sec. 407.9 Area risk protection insurance policy.
* * * * *
2. Life of Policy, Cancellation, and Termination.
* * * * *
(k) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Have your debts discharged in bankruptcy.
* * * * *
PART 457--COMMON CROP INSURANCE REGULATIONS
0
7. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 457 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(l), 1506(p).
0
8. Amend Sec. 457.8 as follows:
0
a. Amend section 2(f)(1)(i)(B) by adding the word ``or'' after the
semicolon at the end;
0
b. Amend section 2(f)(1)(i)(C) by removing the phrase ``; or'' and
adding a period in its place;
0
c. Remove section 2(f)(1)(i)(D);
0
d. Amend section 2(f)(1)(ii) by removing the phrase ``2(f)(2)(i)(A),
(B), (D) or (E)'' and adding the phrase ``2(f)(2)(i)(A), (B) or (D)''
in its place;
0
e. Amend section 2(f)(2)(i)(C) by adding the word ``or'' after the
semicolon at the end;
0
f. Amend section 2(f)(2)(i)(D) by removing the phrase ``; or'' and
adding a period in its place;
0
g. Remove section 2(f)(2)(i)(E);
0
h. Amend section 2(f)(2)(ii) by removing the phrase ``2(f)(2)(i)(A),
(B), (D) or (E)'' and adding the phrase ``2(f)(2)(i)(A), (B) or (D)''
in its place;
0
i. Revise section 2(f)(3)(iii); and
0
j. Amend section 2(f)(5) by removing the phrase ``or you file a
petition to discharge the debt in bankruptcy'' in the last sentence and
adding the phrase ``or you have your debts discharged in bankruptcy''
in its place.
The revised text reads as follows:
Sec. 457.8 The application and policy.
* * * * *
2. Life of Policy, Cancellation, and Termination.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(3) * * *
(iii) Have your debts discharged in bankruptcy.
* * * * *
Signed in Washington, DC, on December 20, 2013.
Brandon Willis,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2013-31357 Filed 1-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-08-P