Order Temporarily Denying Export Privileges, 1823-1824 [2014-00229]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 7 / Friday, January 10, 2014 / Notices
To file a written complaint of
discrimination, write USDA, Office of
the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights,
1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–9410 or call
(202) 720–5964 (voice and TTY). USDA
is an equal opportunity provider and
employer.
Dated: January 3, 2014.
Alfred V. Almanza,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014–00372 Filed 1–8–14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
Agency: National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Title: Mandatory Shrimp Vessel and
Gear Characterization Survey.
OMB Control Number: 0648–0542.
Form Number(s): NA.
Type of Request: Regular submission
(extension of a current information
collection).
Number of Respondents: 1,529.
Average Hours Per Response: 20
minutes.
Burden Hours: 510.
Needs and Uses: This request is for
extension of a current information
collection.
The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) authorizes the
Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management
Council (Council) to prepare and amend
fishery management plans for any
fishery in waters under its jurisdiction.
National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) manages the shrimp fishery in
the waters of the Gulf of Mexico under
the Shrimp Fishery Management Plan
(FMP). The regulations for the Gulf
Shrimp Vessel and Gear
Characterization Form may be found at
50 CFR 622.51(a)(3).
Owners or operators of vessels
applying for or renewing a commercial
vessel moratorium permit for Gulf
shrimp must complete an annual Gulf
Shrimp Vessel and Gear
Characterization Form. The form will be
provided by NMFS at the time of permit
application and renewal. Compliance
with this reporting requirement is
required for permit issuance and
renewal.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 Jan 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
Through this form, NMFS is
collecting census-level information on
fishing vessel and gear characteristics in
the Gulf of Mexico Exclusive Economic
Zone (EEZ) shrimp fishery to conduct
analyses that will improve fishery
management decision-making in this
fishery; ensure that national goals,
objectives, and requirements of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA),
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
Endangered Species Act (ESA), and
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 are met;
and quantify achievement of the
performance measures in the NMFS’
Operating Plans. This information is
vital in assessing the economic, social,
and environmental effects of fishery
management decisions and regulations
on individual shrimp fishing
enterprises, fishing communities, and
the nation as a whole.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.
Frequency: Annually.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
OMB Desk Officer: OIRA_
Submission@omb.eop.gov.
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Jennifer Jessup,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482–0336, Department of
Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at JJessup@
doc.gov).
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov.
Dated: January 7, 2014.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–00233 Filed 1–9–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Order Temporarily Denying Export
Privileges
3K Aviation Consulting & Logistics, a/k/a 3K
Havacilik Ve Danismanlik SAN. TIC. LTD.
ST., Biniciler Apt. Savas Cad. No. 18/5,
Sirinyali Mah. 07160, Antalya, Turkey
and
Sonmez Apt. No. 4/5 1523 Sokak, Sirinyali
Mah. 07160, Antalya, Turkey
Huseyin Engin Borluca, Biniciler Apt. Savas
Cad. No. 18/5, Sirinyali Mah. 07160,
Antalya, Turkey
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1823
and
Sonmez Apt. No. 4/5 1523 Sokak, Sirinyali
Mah. 07160, Antalya, Turkey)
Adaero International Trade, LLC, 2326 17th
Avenue, Rockford, IL 61104
and
IDTM B 1 Blok, Kat 14 No: 439, Yesilkoy,
Istanbul, Turkey
Recep Sadettin Ilgin, 2326 17th Avenue,
Rockford, IL 61104
and
IDTM B 1 Blok, Kat 14 No: 439, Yesilkoy,
Istanbul, Turkey
Pouya Airline, a/k/a Pouya Air, Mehrebad
Airport, Tehran, Iran
Respondents.
Pursuant to Section 766.24 of the
Export Administration Regulations (the
‘‘Regulations’’ or ‘‘EAR’’),1 the Bureau of
Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’), U.S.
Department of Commerce, through its
Office of Export Enforcement (‘‘OEE’’),
has requested that I issue an Order
temporarily denying, for a period of 180
days, the export privileges under the
EAR of: 3K Aviation Consulting &
Logistics, also known as 3K Havacilik
Ve Danismanlik SAN. TIC. LTD. ST.;
Huseyin Engin Boluca (3K Aviation
Consulting & Leasing’s founder and
director); Adaero International Trade,
LLC; Recep Sadettin Ilgin (Adaero
International Trade’s managing
director); and Pouya Airline, also
known as Pouya Air.
Pursuant to Section 766.24, BIS may
issue an order temporarily denying a
respondent’s export privileges upon a
showing that the order is necessary in
the public interest to prevent an
‘‘imminent violation’’ of the
Regulations. 15 CFR 766.24(b)(1) and
776.24(d). ‘‘A violation may be
‘imminent’ either in time or degree of
likelihood.’’ 15 CFR 766.24(b)(3). BIS
may show ‘‘either that a violation is
about to occur, or that the general
circumstances of the matter under
investigation or case under criminal or
administrative charges demonstrate a
likelihood of future violations.’’ Id. As
to the likelihood of future violations,
BIS may show that the violation under
investigation or charge ‘‘is significant,
deliberate, covert and/or likely to
occur again, rather than technical or
negligent[.]’’ Id. A ‘‘lack of information
1 The EAR is currently codified at 15 CFR Parts
730–774 (2013). The EAR are issued under the
Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50
U.S.C. app. 2401–2420 (2000)) (‘‘EAA’’). Since
August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse and the
President, through Executive Order 13222 of August
17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which
has been extended by successive Presidential
Notices, the most recent being that of August 8,
2013 (78 FR 49107 (Aug. 12, 2013)), has continued
the Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701,
et seq.) (2006 & Supp. IV 2010).
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1824
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 7 / Friday, January 10, 2014 / Notices
establishing the precise time a violation
may occur does not preclude a finding
that a violation is imminent, so long as
there is sufficient reason to believe the
likelihood of a violation.’’ Id.
In its request, BIS has presented
evidence that, in December 2013, two
U.S.-origin General Electric CF6 aircraft
engines 2 bearing manufacturer’s serial
numbers (‘‘MSN’’) 695244 and 705112
were transported on behalf of Adaero
International Trade, LLC to 3K Aviation
Consulting & Logistics (‘‘3K Aviation’’),
which is located in Turkey.
Additionally, BIS has been notified that
3K Aviation is preparing to immediately
re-export the engines to Iran without the
U.S. Government authorization required
by Section 746.7 of the EAR. BIS was
further notified that Pouya Airline, an
Iranian cargo airline, is scheduled to
transport both engines from Turkey to
Iran on January 7, 2014.
I find that the evidence presented by
BIS demonstrates that a violation of the
Regulations is imminent in both time
and degree of likelihood. As such, a
TDO is needed to give notice to persons
and companies in the United States and
abroad that they should cease dealing
with the Respondents in export
transactions involving items subject to
the EAR. Such a TDO is consistent with
the public interest to preclude future
violations of the EAR.
Accordingly, I find that a TDO
naming 3K Aviation Consulting &
Logistics, Huseyin Engin Borluca,
Adaero International Trade, Recep
Sadettin Ilgin, and Pouya Airline is
necessary, in the public interest, to
prevent an imminent violation of the
EAR.
This Order is being issued on an ex
parte basis without a hearing based
upon BIS’s showing of an imminent
violation in accordance with Section
766.24 of the Regulations.
It is therefore ordered:
First, that 3K AVIATION
CONSULTING & LOGISTICS, A/K/A 3K
HAVACILIK VE DANISMANLIK SAN.
TIC. LTD. ST., Biniciler Apt. Savas Cad.
No. 18/5, Sirinyali Mah. 07160, Antalya,
Turkey, and Sonmez Apt. No. 4/5 1523
Sokak, Sirinyali Mah. 07160, Antalya,
Turkey; HUSEYIN ENGIN BORLUCA,
Biniciler Apt. Savas Cad. No. 18/5,
Sirinyali Mah. 07160, Antalya, Turkey,
and Sonmez Apt. No. 4/5 1523 Sokak,
Sirinyali Mah. 07160, Antalya, Turkey;
ADAERO INTERNATIONAL TRADE,
LLC, 2326 17th Avenue, Rockford, IL
61104, and IDTM B1 Blok, KAT 14 No.
2 The engines are items subject to the Regulations,
classified under Export Control Classification
Number 9A991.d, and controlled for anti-terrorism
reasons.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 Jan 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
439, Ysilkoy, Istanbul, Turkey; RECEP
SADETTIN ILGIN, 2326 17th Avenue,
Rockford, IL 61104, and IDTM B1 Blok,
KAT 14 No. 439, Ysilkoy, Istanbul,
Turkey; and POUYA AIRLINE, a/k/a
POUYA AIR, Mehrebad Airport, Tehran,
Iran; and when acting for or on their
behalf, any successors or assigns, agents,
or employees (each a ‘‘Denied Person’’
and collectively the ‘‘Denied Persons’’)
may not, directly or indirectly,
participate in any way in any
transaction involving any commodity,
software or technology (hereinafter
collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’)
exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the
Export Administration Regulations
(‘‘EAR’’), or in any other activity subject
to the EAR including, but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the EAR, or in any other
activity subject to the EAR; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the EAR, or in any
other activity subject to the EAR.
Second, that no person may, directly
or indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of a Denied Person any item subject to
the EAR;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
a Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the EAR that has been or will
be exported from the United States,
including financing or other support
activities related to a transaction
whereby a Denied Person acquires or
attempts to acquire such ownership,
possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from a Denied Person of any
item subject to the EAR that has been
exported from the United States;
D. Obtain from a Denied Person in the
United States any item subject to the
EAR with knowledge or reason to know
that the item will be, or is intended to
be, exported from the United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the EAR that has
been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by a Denied
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by a Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the EAR that has been or will
be exported from the United States. For
purposes of this paragraph, servicing
means installation, maintenance, repair,
modification or testing.
Third, that, after notice and
opportunity for comment as provided in
section 766.23 of the EAR, any other
person, firm, corporation, or business
organization related to a Denied Person
by affiliation, ownership, control, or
position of responsibility in the conduct
of trade or related services may also be
made subject to the provisions of this
Order.
In accordance with the provisions of
Section 766.24(e) of the EAR, the
Respondents may, at any time, appeal
this Order by filing a full written
statement in support of the appeal with
the Office of the Administrative Law
Judge, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Docketing
Center, 40 South Gay Street, Baltimore,
Maryland 21202–4022.
In accordance with the provisions of
Section 766.24(d) of the EAR, BIS may
seek renewal of this Order by filing a
written request not later than 20 days
before the expiration date. The
Respondents may oppose a request to
renew this Order by filing a written
submission with the Assistant Secretary
for Export Enforcement, which must be
received not later than seven days
before the expiration date of the Order.
A copy of this Order shall be served
on the Respondents and shall be
published in the Federal Register.
This Order is effective upon issuance
and shall remain in effect for 180 days.
Dated: January 3, 2014.
David W. Mills,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2014–00229 Filed 1–9–14; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–552–802]
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
From the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam: Initiation and Preliminary
Results of Changed Circumstances
Review
Enforcement and Compliance,
formerly Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to a request for a
changed circumstances review (‘‘CCR’’)
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 7 (Friday, January 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1823-1824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00229]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Order Temporarily Denying Export Privileges
3K Aviation Consulting & Logistics, a/k/a 3K Havacilik Ve
Danismanlik SAN. TIC. LTD. ST., Biniciler Apt. Savas Cad. No. 18/5,
Sirinyali Mah. 07160, Antalya, Turkey
and
Sonmez Apt. No. 4/5 1523 Sokak, Sirinyali Mah. 07160, Antalya,
Turkey
Huseyin Engin Borluca, Biniciler Apt. Savas Cad. No. 18/5, Sirinyali
Mah. 07160, Antalya, Turkey
and
Sonmez Apt. No. 4/5 1523 Sokak, Sirinyali Mah. 07160, Antalya,
Turkey)
Adaero International Trade, LLC, 2326 17th Avenue, Rockford, IL
61104
and
IDTM B 1 Blok, Kat 14 No: 439, Yesilkoy, Istanbul, Turkey
Recep Sadettin Ilgin, 2326 17th Avenue, Rockford, IL 61104
and
IDTM B 1 Blok, Kat 14 No: 439, Yesilkoy, Istanbul, Turkey
Pouya Airline, a/k/a Pouya Air, Mehrebad Airport, Tehran, Iran
Respondents.
Pursuant to Section 766.24 of the Export Administration Regulations
(the ``Regulations'' or ``EAR''),\1\ the Bureau of Industry and
Security (``BIS''), U.S. Department of Commerce, through its Office of
Export Enforcement (``OEE''), has requested that I issue an Order
temporarily denying, for a period of 180 days, the export privileges
under the EAR of: 3K Aviation Consulting & Logistics, also known as 3K
Havacilik Ve Danismanlik SAN. TIC. LTD. ST.; Huseyin Engin Boluca (3K
Aviation Consulting & Leasing's founder and director); Adaero
International Trade, LLC; Recep Sadettin Ilgin (Adaero International
Trade's managing director); and Pouya Airline, also known as Pouya Air.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The EAR is currently codified at 15 CFR Parts 730-774
(2013). The EAR are issued under the Export Administration Act of
1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. app. 2401-2420 (2000)) (``EAA''). Since
August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse and the President,
through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp.
783 (2002)), which has been extended by successive Presidential
Notices, the most recent being that of August 8, 2013 (78 FR 49107
(Aug. 12, 2013)), has continued the Regulations in effect under the
International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et
seq.) (2006 & Supp. IV 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Section 766.24, BIS may issue an order temporarily
denying a respondent's export privileges upon a showing that the order
is necessary in the public interest to prevent an ``imminent
violation'' of the Regulations. 15 CFR 766.24(b)(1) and 776.24(d). ``A
violation may be `imminent' either in time or degree of likelihood.''
15 CFR 766.24(b)(3). BIS may show ``either that a violation is about to
occur, or that the general circumstances of the matter under
investigation or case under criminal or administrative charges
demonstrate a likelihood of future violations.'' Id. As to the
likelihood of future violations, BIS may show that the violation under
investigation or charge ``is significant, deliberate, covert and/or
likely to occur again, rather than technical or negligent[.]'' Id. A
``lack of information
[[Page 1824]]
establishing the precise time a violation may occur does not preclude a
finding that a violation is imminent, so long as there is sufficient
reason to believe the likelihood of a violation.'' Id.
In its request, BIS has presented evidence that, in December 2013,
two U.S.-origin General Electric CF6 aircraft engines \2\ bearing
manufacturer's serial numbers (``MSN'') 695244 and 705112 were
transported on behalf of Adaero International Trade, LLC to 3K Aviation
Consulting & Logistics (``3K Aviation''), which is located in Turkey.
Additionally, BIS has been notified that 3K Aviation is preparing to
immediately re-export the engines to Iran without the U.S. Government
authorization required by Section 746.7 of the EAR. BIS was further
notified that Pouya Airline, an Iranian cargo airline, is scheduled to
transport both engines from Turkey to Iran on January 7, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The engines are items subject to the Regulations, classified
under Export Control Classification Number 9A991.d, and controlled
for anti-terrorism reasons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I find that the evidence presented by BIS demonstrates that a
violation of the Regulations is imminent in both time and degree of
likelihood. As such, a TDO is needed to give notice to persons and
companies in the United States and abroad that they should cease
dealing with the Respondents in export transactions involving items
subject to the EAR. Such a TDO is consistent with the public interest
to preclude future violations of the EAR.
Accordingly, I find that a TDO naming 3K Aviation Consulting &
Logistics, Huseyin Engin Borluca, Adaero International Trade, Recep
Sadettin Ilgin, and Pouya Airline is necessary, in the public interest,
to prevent an imminent violation of the EAR.
This Order is being issued on an ex parte basis without a hearing
based upon BIS's showing of an imminent violation in accordance with
Section 766.24 of the Regulations.
It is therefore ordered:
First, that 3K AVIATION CONSULTING & LOGISTICS, A/K/A 3K HAVACILIK
VE DANISMANLIK SAN. TIC. LTD. ST., Biniciler Apt. Savas Cad. No. 18/5,
Sirinyali Mah. 07160, Antalya, Turkey, and Sonmez Apt. No. 4/5 1523
Sokak, Sirinyali Mah. 07160, Antalya, Turkey; HUSEYIN ENGIN BORLUCA,
Biniciler Apt. Savas Cad. No. 18/5, Sirinyali Mah. 07160, Antalya,
Turkey, and Sonmez Apt. No. 4/5 1523 Sokak, Sirinyali Mah. 07160,
Antalya, Turkey; ADAERO INTERNATIONAL TRADE, LLC, 2326 17th Avenue,
Rockford, IL 61104, and IDTM B1 Blok, KAT 14 No. 439, Ysilkoy,
Istanbul, Turkey; RECEP SADETTIN ILGIN, 2326 17th Avenue, Rockford, IL
61104, and IDTM B1 Blok, KAT 14 No. 439, Ysilkoy, Istanbul, Turkey; and
POUYA AIRLINE, a/k/a POUYA AIR, Mehrebad Airport, Tehran, Iran; and
when acting for or on their behalf, any successors or assigns, agents,
or employees (each a ``Denied Person'' and collectively the ``Denied
Persons'') may not, directly or indirectly, participate in any way in
any transaction involving any commodity, software or technology
(hereinafter collectively referred to as ``item'') exported or to be
exported from the United States that is subject to the Export
Administration Regulations (``EAR''), or in any other activity subject
to the EAR including, but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License
Exception, or export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of,
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way,
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the EAR, or in any other activity
subject to the EAR; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to
the EAR, or in any other activity subject to the EAR.
Second, that no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the
following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of a Denied Person any item
subject to the EAR;
B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted
acquisition by a Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or control
of any item subject to the EAR that has been or will be exported from
the United States, including financing or other support activities
related to a transaction whereby a Denied Person acquires or attempts
to acquire such ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition
or attempted acquisition from a Denied Person of any item subject to
the EAR that has been exported from the United States;
D. Obtain from a Denied Person in the United States any item
subject to the EAR with knowledge or reason to know that the item will
be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the EAR
that has been or will be exported from the United States and which is
owned, possessed or controlled by a Denied Person, or service any item,
of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or controlled by a Denied
Person if such service involves the use of any item subject to the EAR
that has been or will be exported from the United States. For purposes
of this paragraph, servicing means installation, maintenance, repair,
modification or testing.
Third, that, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided
in section 766.23 of the EAR, any other person, firm, corporation, or
business organization related to a Denied Person by affiliation,
ownership, control, or position of responsibility in the conduct of
trade or related services may also be made subject to the provisions of
this Order.
In accordance with the provisions of Section 766.24(e) of the EAR,
the Respondents may, at any time, appeal this Order by filing a full
written statement in support of the appeal with the Office of the
Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Docketing Center, 40
South Gay Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202-4022.
In accordance with the provisions of Section 766.24(d) of the EAR,
BIS may seek renewal of this Order by filing a written request not
later than 20 days before the expiration date. The Respondents may
oppose a request to renew this Order by filing a written submission
with the Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement, which must be
received not later than seven days before the expiration date of the
Order.
A copy of this Order shall be served on the Respondents and shall
be published in the Federal Register.
This Order is effective upon issuance and shall remain in effect
for 180 days.
Dated: January 3, 2014.
David W. Mills,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2014-00229 Filed 1-9-14; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE P