Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Judgment Under The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 1886-1887 [2014-00182]

Download as PDF 1886 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 7 / Friday, January 10, 2014 / Notices mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES conducting a full review.1 Accordingly, the Commission determined that it would conduct an expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act. Staff report. A staff report containing information concerning the subject matter of the review will be placed in the nonpublic record on January 17, 2014, and made available to persons on the Administrative Protective Order service list for this review. A public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules. Written submissions. As provided in section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s rules, interested parties that are parties to the review and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of institution,2 and any party other than an interested party to the review may file written comments with the Secretary on what determination the Commission should reach in the review. Comments are due on or before January 23, 2014 and may not contain new factual information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year review nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement (which shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the review by January 23, 2014. However, should the Department of Commerce extend the time limit for its completion of the final results of its review, the deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual information) on Commerce’s final results is three business days after the issuance of Commerce’s results. If comments contain business proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. Please be aware that the Commission’s rules with respect to electronic filing have been amended. The amendments took effect on November 7, 2011. See 76 FR 61937 (Oct. 6, 2011) and the newly revised Commission’s Handbook on E-Filing, available on the Commission’s Web site at https://edis.usitc.gov. In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each document filed by a party to the review must be served on all other parties to the review (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service 1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. 2 The Commission has found the responses submitted by Innovative Fabrication LLP/Indy Hanger, M&B Metal Products Company, Inc., and US Hanger Co., LLC to be individually adequate. Comments from other interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)). VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:40 Jan 09, 2014 Jkt 232001 must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. Dated: January 6, 2014. By order of the Commission. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2014–00209 Filed 1–9–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–871] Investigations: Terminations, Modifications and Rulings: Certain Wireless Communications Base Stations and Components Thereof U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 35) by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) terminating the investigation in its entirety based on withdrawal of the complaint. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clark S. Cheney, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 205–2661. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on March 1, 2013, based on a complaint filed by Adaptix, Inc., of Carrollton, Texas (‘‘Adaptix’’). 78 FR 13895 (March 1, 2013). The complaint alleged SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain wireless communications base stations and components thereof by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,870,808. The notice of investigation named Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, of Stockholm, Sweden, and Ericsson Inc., of Plano, Texas (collectively, ‘‘Ericsson’’), as respondents. On December 3, 2013, Adaptix filed a motion to terminate the investigation in its entirety based on withdrawal of the complaint. Ericsson did not oppose the motion, and the Commission investigative attorney supported the motion. On December 12, 2013, the ALJ issued an initial determination (Order No. 35) granting the motion. The ALJ noted that Adaptix certified that there are no agreements between the parties concerning the subject matter of the investigation and found that there are no extraordinary circumstances that should prevent Adaptix from withdrawing the complaint. The ALJ also found that terminating the investigation would conserve public and private resources. No petitions for review of the ID have been filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Dated: January 6, 2014. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2014–00208 Filed 1–9–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Judgment Under The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act On December 18, 2013, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed Consent Judgment with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York in the lawsuit entitled United States v. County of Suffolk, Civil Action No. CV–13–7183. Defendant County of Suffolk (‘‘Suffolk’’) has owned and/or operated E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM 10JAN1 1887 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 7 / Friday, January 10, 2014 / Notices at least 68 underground storage tanks (‘‘USTs’’) containing gasoline and waste oil throughout Suffolk County. The complaint seeks civil penalties and injunctive relief for Suffolk’s violations of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act regulations governing USTs, set forth at 40 CFR Part 280. The complaint also alleges violation of federally enforceable New York State hazardous waste regulations set forth at 6 N.Y.C.R.R. § 372.2(a)(2) governing disposal of spent fluorescent lamps. The Consent Judgment requires Suffolk: (a) to pay a civil penalty of $500,000; (b) to fund a Supplemental Environmental Project in the amount of $1,500,000 to acquire an interest in land, and to manage such land and any associated ecological resources, into perpetuity, to protect and/or enhance groundwater; (c) to maintain compliance with RCRA requirements for all of its underground storage tanks and with NYS regulations in its handling of spent fluorescent lamps; and (d) to submit regular reports to EPA for four years to demonstrate that they are in compliance. The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the Consent Judgment. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to United States v. County of Suffolk, D.J. Ref. No. 90–7–1–09883. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail: To submit comments: Send them to: By e-mail ...... pubcomment-ees.enrd@ usdoj.gov. Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES By mail ......... During the public comment period, the Consent Judgment may be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department Web site: https:// www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_ Decrees.html. We will provide a paper copy of the Consent Judgment upon written request and payment of reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ–ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611. Please enclose a check or money order for $15.75 (25 cents per page VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:40 Jan 09, 2014 Jkt 232001 reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Maureen Katz, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division. Importer of Controlled Substances, Notice of Application, Myoderm [FR Doc. 2014–00182 Filed 1–9–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–15–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application; Siegfried USA, LLC. Pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.34 (a), this is notice that on November 19, 2013, Siegfried USA, LLC., 33 Industrial Park Road, Pennsville, New Jersey 08070, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as an importer of the basic classes of controlled substances: Drug Schedule Opium, raw (9600) ....................... Poppy Straw Concentrate (9670) II II The company plans to import the listed controlled substances to bulk manufacture API’S for distribution to its customer. Comments and requests for hearings on applications to import narcotic raw material are not appropriate. 72 FR 3417 (2007) As noted in a previous notice published in the Federal Register on September 23, 1975, 40 FR 43745, all applicants for registration to import a basic classes of any controlled substances in schedule I or II are, and will continue to be, required to demonstrate to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, that the requirements for such registration pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(a); 21 U.S.C. 823(a); and 21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) are satisfied. Dated: December 23, 2013. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration. [FR Doc. 2014–00201 Filed 1–9–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–09–P PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Drug Enforcement Administration Pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.34 (a), this is notice that on October 28, 2013, Myoderm, 48 East Main Street, Norristown, Pennsylvania 19401, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) for registration as an importer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Drug Amphetamine (1100) .................... Lisdexamfetamine (1205) ............. Methylphenidate (1724) ................ Pentobarbital (2270) ..................... Nabilone (7379) ............................ Codeine (9050) ............................. Oxycodone (9143) ........................ Hydromorphone (9150) ................ Hydrocodone (9193) ..................... Levomethorphan (9210) ............... Meperidine (9230) ........................ Methadone (9250) ........................ Methadone intermediate (9254) ... Morphine (9300) ........................... Oxymorphone (9652) ................... Fentanyl (9801) ............................ Schedule II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II The company plans to import the listed controlled substances in finished dosage form for clinical trials, and research. The import of the above listed basic classes of controlled substances will be granted only for analytical testing and clinical trials. This authorization does not extend to the import of a finished FDA approved or non-approved dosage form for commercial distribution in the United States. Any bulk manufacturer who is presently, or is applying to be, registered with DEA to manufacture such basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedules I or II, which fall under the authority of section 1002(a)(2)(B) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 952 (a)(2)(B)) may, in the circumstances set forth in 21 U.S.C. 958(i), file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration and may, at the same time, file a written request for a hearing on such application pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.43, and in such form as prescribed by 21 CFR 1316.47. Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODW), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than February 10, 2014. E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM 10JAN1

Agencies

Department of Justice

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 7 (Friday, January 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1886-1887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00182]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Judgment Under The Resource 
Conservation and Recovery Act

    On December 18, 2013, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed 
Consent Judgment with the United States District Court for the Eastern 
District of New York in the lawsuit entitled United States v. County of 
Suffolk, Civil Action No. CV-13-7183.
    Defendant County of Suffolk (``Suffolk'') has owned and/or operated

[[Page 1887]]

at least 68 underground storage tanks (``USTs'') containing gasoline 
and waste oil throughout Suffolk County. The complaint seeks civil 
penalties and injunctive relief for Suffolk's violations of Resource 
Conservation and Recovery Act regulations governing USTs, set forth at 
40 CFR Part 280. The complaint also alleges violation of federally 
enforceable New York State hazardous waste regulations set forth at 6 
N.Y.C.R.R. Sec.  372.2(a)(2) governing disposal of spent fluorescent 
lamps. The Consent Judgment requires Suffolk: (a) to pay a civil 
penalty of $500,000; (b) to fund a Supplemental Environmental Project 
in the amount of $1,500,000 to acquire an interest in land, and to 
manage such land and any associated ecological resources, into 
perpetuity, to protect and/or enhance groundwater; (c) to maintain 
compliance with RCRA requirements for all of its underground storage 
tanks and with NYS regulations in its handling of spent fluorescent 
lamps; and (d) to submit regular reports to EPA for four years to 
demonstrate that they are in compliance.
    The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on 
the Consent Judgment. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and 
should refer to United States v. County of Suffolk, D.J. Ref. No. 90-7-
1-09883. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days 
after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted 
either by email or by mail:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
         To submit comments:                     Send them to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By e-mail...........................  pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov.
By mail.............................  Assistant Attorney General, U.S.
                                       DOJ--ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,
                                       Washington, DC 20044-7611.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    During the public comment period, the Consent Judgment may be 
examined and downloaded at this Justice Department Web site: https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html. We will provide a paper copy 
of the Consent Judgment upon written request and payment of 
reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent 
Decree Library, U.S. DOJ-ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-
7611.
    Please enclose a check or money order for $15.75 (25 cents per page 
reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury.

Maureen Katz,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment 
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-00182 Filed 1-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.