Reissuance of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Offshore Oil and Gas Exploration, Development and Production Operations Off Southern California, 1643-1644 [2014-00156]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 6 / Thursday, January 9, 2014 / Notices
information, as appropriate. To protect
the privacy interests of the individual or
individuals involved, personally
identifiable information has been
redacted, as appropriate.
Part B—Assistance for Education of All
Children With Disabilities
Section 614—Evaluations, Eligibility
Determinations, Individualized
Education Programs, and Educational
Placements
Topic Addressed: Individualized
Education Programs
Æ Letter dated May 21, 2013, to New
England Juvenile Defender Center
President Christopher Northrop,
regarding parent participation at
individualized education program (IEP)
team meetings.
Æ Dear Colleague Letter dated June
19, 2013, regarding the requirements in
Part B of the IDEA to provide braille
instruction for children who are blind or
visually impaired.
Section 615—Procedural Safeguards
Topic Addressed: Discipline Procedures
Æ Letter dated April 2, 2013, to Utah
State Director of Special Education
Glenna Gallo, regarding the
requirements in Part B of the IDEA that
apply to functional behavioral
assessments.
Topic Addressed: Natural Environments
Æ Letter dated April 18, 2013, to Utah
Provider Consortium Chairperson
Marsha Johnson, regarding the meaning
of community settings for purposes of
meeting the natural environments
requirement in Part C of the IDEA.
PMANGRUM on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Section 639—Procedural Safeguards
Topic Addressed: Confidentiality of
Records
Æ Letter dated May 8, 2013, to North
Texas Rehabilitation Center Early
Childhood Intervention Program
Director Charlcie Flinn, regarding the
confidentiality requirements that apply
to early intervention records of infants
and toddlers with disabilities in Part C
of the IDEA and the Family Educational
Rights and Privacy Act.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
Jkt 232001
[FR Doc. 2014–00171 Filed 1–8–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
The final general permit
and other related documents in the
administrative record are on file and
may be inspected any time between 8:30
a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays, at the
following address: U.S. EPA, Region 9,
NPDES Permits Office (WTR–5), 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105–3901.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eugene Bromley, EPA, Region 9, NPDES
Permits Office (WTR–5), 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, California 94105–
3901, or telephone (415) 972–3510.
Copies of the final general permit,
Addendum to Fact Sheet and the
Response to Public Comments will be
provided upon request and are also
available at EPA, Region 9’s Web site at:
https://www.epa.gov/region9/water/
npdes/permits.html.
Public
notice of Region 9’s tentative decision to
issue the permit was published in the
Federal Register on December 20, 2012
(77 FR 75429), and in the Santa Barbara
News-Press on December 19, 2012. The
public comment period closed on
February 4, 2013. Region 9 received
written comments from eight parties
concerning the proposed permit. Region
9 prepared a separate document
(Response to Public Comments) which
discusses these comments in more
detail and Region 9’s responses to the
comments.
For the most part, the final permit is
very similar to the permit proposed in
December 2012. However, the
monitoring requirements for produced
water discharges were revised based on
public comments and also discussions
between Region 9 and California Coastal
Commission (CCC) staff concerning
Region 9’s consistency determination
for the permit pursuant to the Coastal
Zone Management Act (CZMA). Region
9 also added a requirement to maintain
an inventory of the chemicals used to
formulate well treatment, completion
and workover fluids, and if there is a
discharge of the fluids, to report the
chemical formulation with the quarterly
discharge monitoring report. This
requirement was added in response to
recent concerns regarding the potential
effects of discharges of fluids used for
offshore hydraulic fracturing operations.
The final permit also includes a
number of technical corrections and
other relatively minor revisions based
on public comment or other sources.
These revisions are discussed in more
detail in the Response to Public
Comments and the final Addendum to
Fact Sheet.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY, REGION 9
[FRL–9905–23–Region 9]
Reissuance of National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) General Permit for Offshore
Oil and Gas Exploration, Development
and Production Operations Off
Southern California
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of availability of final
NPDES general permit.
Section 636—Individulaized Family
Service Plan
14:08 Jan 08, 2014
Dated: January 6, 2014.
Michael K. Yudin,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Special
Education and Rehabilitative Services.
AGENCY:
Part C—Infants and Toddlers With
Disabilities
VerDate Mar<15>2010
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF). To use PDF you must
have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
EPA Region 9 is today
publishing this notice of availability of
its final general NPDES permit (permit
No. CAG280000) for discharges from
offshore oil and gas exploration,
development and production facilities
located in Federal waters off the coast
of Southern California. The general
permit establishes effluent limitations,
prohibitions, and other conditions for
discharges from facilities that engage in
such operations within the geographic
coverage area of the general permit. The
general permit applies to 23 existing
development and production platforms
as well as to any new exploratory
drilling operations located in and
discharging to the specified lease blocks
on the Pacific Outer Continental Shelf
covered by the permit. The new general
permit replaces the previous general
permit issued on September 22, 2004
(69 FR 56761).
DATES: For purposes of judicial review
the permit is considered issued on
January 23, 2014. The final permit was
signed on December 20, 2013 and is
effective on March 1, 2014.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1643
E:\FR\FM\09JAN1.SGM
09JAN1
PMANGRUM on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1644
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 6 / Thursday, January 9, 2014 / Notices
B. Endangered Species Act (ESA). The
ESA and its implementing regulations
(50 CFR Part 402) require EPA to ensure,
in consultation with the Secretary of the
Interior or Commerce, that any action
authorized, funded or carried out by
EPA is not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of any threatened
or endangered species or adversely
affect its critical habitat.
For the 2004 permit, Region 9
concluded that the authorized
discharges would not affect listed
species or critical habitat for the species.
For the general permit reissuance,
Region 9 reconsidered this matter, but
again concluded that the discharges
would not affect such species. Region 9
also forwarded the draft permit and fact
sheet to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) and the National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) for
review and comment on Region 9’s
conclusion, but no comments were
received.
C. Coastal Zone Management Act
(CZMA). The CZMA provides that a
Federal license or permit for activities
affecting the coastal zone of a state may
not be granted until a state with an
approved Coastal Management Plan
(CMP) concurs that the activities
authorized by the permit are consistent
with the CMP. In California, the CZMA
authority is the CCC.
In accordance with the requirements
of the CZMA and its implementing
regulations at 15 CFR Part 930, Region
9 submitted a consistency determination
for the draft permit to the CCC in a letter
dated December 20, 2012. Region 9 and
CCC staff also met in spring 2013 to
discuss the permit and conditions
necessary to ensure consistency with
the CMP. Based on those discussions,
Region 9 submitted an amended
consistency determination in a letter
dated May 2, 2013. At a public meeting
held on June 12, 2013, the CCC
concurred with Region 9’s consistency
determination.
D. Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act. The
1996 amendments to the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act set forth a number of
new mandates for NMFS, regional
fishery management councils, and
Federal agencies to identify and protect
important marine and anadromous fish
habitat. Regional fishery management
councils, with assistance from NMFS,
are required to delineate essential fish
habitat (EFH).
The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires
that Federal agencies consult with
NMFS on all actions undertaken by the
agency which may adversely affect EFH.
For the 2004 general permit, EPA
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:08 Jan 08, 2014
Jkt 232001
concluded that the discharges would
not have a significant adverse effect on
EFH. After a consultation was held
regarding the 2004 permit, NMFS
concurred with Region 9’s conclusion.
For the general permit reissuance,
Region 9 reconsidered the effects of the
discharges on EFH, but again concluded
that the discharges would not have a
significant adverse effect on EFH. The
draft permit and fact sheet were
forwarded to NMFS for review and
comment on Region 9’s conclusion, but
no comments were received.
E. Permit Appeal Procedures. Within
120 days following the date the permit
is considered issued for purposes of
judicial review, any interested person
may appeal the permit decision in the
Federal Court of Appeals in accordance
with Section 509(b)(1) of the CWA.
Persons affected by a general permit
may not challenge the conditions of a
general permit as a right in further
Agency proceedings. They may instead
either challenge the general permit in
court, or apply for an individual permit
as specified at 40 CFR 122.21 (and
authorized at 40 CFR 122.28), and then
petition the Environmental Appeals
Board to review any condition of the
individual permit (40 CFR 124.19).
F. Regulatory Flexibility Act. The
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601
et seq, requires that EPA prepare a
regulatory flexibility analysis for
regulations that have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The permit issued today is not
a ‘‘rule’’ subject to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. EPA prepared a
regulatory flexibility analysis, however,
on the promulgation of the Offshore
Subcategory guidelines on which many
of the permit’s effluent limitations are
based. That analysis has shown that
issuance of this permit would not have
a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
G. Paperwork Reduction Act. The
information collection required by this
final permit has been approved by
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et. seq., in submissions made for
the NPDES permit program and
assigned OMB control numbers 2040–
0086 (NPDES permit application) and
2040–0004 (discharge monitoring
reports).
Authority: Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251
et seq.
Dated: December 20, 2013.
Jane Diamond,
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 9.
[FR Doc. 2014–00156 Filed 1–8–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Change in Bank Control Notices;
Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank or
Bank Holding Company
The notificants listed below have
applied under the Change in Bank
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and
§ 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12
CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank
or bank holding company. The factors
that are considered in acting on the
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of
the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
The notices are available for
immediate inspection at the Federal
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices
also will be available for inspection at
the offices of the Board of Governors.
Interested persons may express their
views in writing to the Reserve Bank
indicated for that notice or to the offices
of the Board of Governors. Comments
must be received not later than January
24, 2014.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
(Adam M. Drimer, Assistant Vice
President) 701 East Byrd Street,
Richmond, Virginia 23261–4528:
1. Randolph Gillespie Rogers,
Hartsville, South Carolina; to acquire
voting shares of Regional Bankshares,
Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire
voting shares of Heritage Community
Bank, both in Hartsville, South Carolina.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, January 6, 2014.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014–00140 Filed 1–8–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part
225), and all other applicable statutes
and regulations to become a bank
holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The applications will also be
available for inspection at the offices of
E:\FR\FM\09JAN1.SGM
09JAN1
Agencies
- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, REGION 9
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 6 (Thursday, January 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1643-1644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00156]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, REGION 9
[FRL-9905-23-Region 9]
Reissuance of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) General Permit for Offshore Oil and Gas Exploration,
Development and Production Operations Off Southern California
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of availability of final NPDES general permit.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA Region 9 is today publishing this notice of availability
of its final general NPDES permit (permit No. CAG280000) for discharges
from offshore oil and gas exploration, development and production
facilities located in Federal waters off the coast of Southern
California. The general permit establishes effluent limitations,
prohibitions, and other conditions for discharges from facilities that
engage in such operations within the geographic coverage area of the
general permit. The general permit applies to 23 existing development
and production platforms as well as to any new exploratory drilling
operations located in and discharging to the specified lease blocks on
the Pacific Outer Continental Shelf covered by the permit. The new
general permit replaces the previous general permit issued on September
22, 2004 (69 FR 56761).
DATES: For purposes of judicial review the permit is considered issued
on January 23, 2014. The final permit was signed on December 20, 2013
and is effective on March 1, 2014.
ADDRESSES: The final general permit and other related documents in the
administrative record are on file and may be inspected any time between
8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays, at the following address: U.S. EPA, Region 9, NPDES Permits
Office (WTR-5), 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eugene Bromley, EPA, Region 9, NPDES
Permits Office (WTR-5), 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California
94105-3901, or telephone (415) 972-3510. Copies of the final general
permit, Addendum to Fact Sheet and the Response to Public Comments will
be provided upon request and are also available at EPA, Region 9's Web
site at: https://www.epa.gov/region9/water/npdes/permits.html.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public notice of Region 9's tentative
decision to issue the permit was published in the Federal Register on
December 20, 2012 (77 FR 75429), and in the Santa Barbara News-Press on
December 19, 2012. The public comment period closed on February 4,
2013. Region 9 received written comments from eight parties concerning
the proposed permit. Region 9 prepared a separate document (Response to
Public Comments) which discusses these comments in more detail and
Region 9's responses to the comments.
For the most part, the final permit is very similar to the permit
proposed in December 2012. However, the monitoring requirements for
produced water discharges were revised based on public comments and
also discussions between Region 9 and California Coastal Commission
(CCC) staff concerning Region 9's consistency determination for the
permit pursuant to the Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA). Region 9
also added a requirement to maintain an inventory of the chemicals used
to formulate well treatment, completion and workover fluids, and if
there is a discharge of the fluids, to report the chemical formulation
with the quarterly discharge monitoring report. This requirement was
added in response to recent concerns regarding the potential effects of
discharges of fluids used for offshore hydraulic fracturing operations.
The final permit also includes a number of technical corrections
and other relatively minor revisions based on public comment or other
sources. These revisions are discussed in more detail in the Response
to Public Comments and the final Addendum to Fact Sheet.
[[Page 1644]]
B. Endangered Species Act (ESA). The ESA and its implementing
regulations (50 CFR Part 402) require EPA to ensure, in consultation
with the Secretary of the Interior or Commerce, that any action
authorized, funded or carried out by EPA is not likely to jeopardize
the continued existence of any threatened or endangered species or
adversely affect its critical habitat.
For the 2004 permit, Region 9 concluded that the authorized
discharges would not affect listed species or critical habitat for the
species. For the general permit reissuance, Region 9 reconsidered this
matter, but again concluded that the discharges would not affect such
species. Region 9 also forwarded the draft permit and fact sheet to the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) for review and comment on Region 9's
conclusion, but no comments were received.
C. Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA). The CZMA provides that a
Federal license or permit for activities affecting the coastal zone of
a state may not be granted until a state with an approved Coastal
Management Plan (CMP) concurs that the activities authorized by the
permit are consistent with the CMP. In California, the CZMA authority
is the CCC.
In accordance with the requirements of the CZMA and its
implementing regulations at 15 CFR Part 930, Region 9 submitted a
consistency determination for the draft permit to the CCC in a letter
dated December 20, 2012. Region 9 and CCC staff also met in spring 2013
to discuss the permit and conditions necessary to ensure consistency
with the CMP. Based on those discussions, Region 9 submitted an amended
consistency determination in a letter dated May 2, 2013. At a public
meeting held on June 12, 2013, the CCC concurred with Region 9's
consistency determination.
D. Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. The
1996 amendments to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act set forth a number of new mandates for NMFS, regional
fishery management councils, and Federal agencies to identify and
protect important marine and anadromous fish habitat. Regional fishery
management councils, with assistance from NMFS, are required to
delineate essential fish habitat (EFH).
The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires that Federal agencies consult
with NMFS on all actions undertaken by the agency which may adversely
affect EFH. For the 2004 general permit, EPA concluded that the
discharges would not have a significant adverse effect on EFH. After a
consultation was held regarding the 2004 permit, NMFS concurred with
Region 9's conclusion.
For the general permit reissuance, Region 9 reconsidered the
effects of the discharges on EFH, but again concluded that the
discharges would not have a significant adverse effect on EFH. The
draft permit and fact sheet were forwarded to NMFS for review and
comment on Region 9's conclusion, but no comments were received.
E. Permit Appeal Procedures. Within 120 days following the date the
permit is considered issued for purposes of judicial review, any
interested person may appeal the permit decision in the Federal Court
of Appeals in accordance with Section 509(b)(1) of the CWA. Persons
affected by a general permit may not challenge the conditions of a
general permit as a right in further Agency proceedings. They may
instead either challenge the general permit in court, or apply for an
individual permit as specified at 40 CFR 122.21 (and authorized at 40
CFR 122.28), and then petition the Environmental Appeals Board to
review any condition of the individual permit (40 CFR 124.19).
F. Regulatory Flexibility Act. The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq, requires that EPA prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis for regulations that have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities. The permit issued today is not a
``rule'' subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act. EPA prepared a
regulatory flexibility analysis, however, on the promulgation of the
Offshore Subcategory guidelines on which many of the permit's effluent
limitations are based. That analysis has shown that issuance of this
permit would not have a significant impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
G. Paperwork Reduction Act. The information collection required by
this final permit has been approved by Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et. seq., in submissions made for the NPDES permit program and
assigned OMB control numbers 2040-0086 (NPDES permit application) and
2040-0004 (discharge monitoring reports).
Authority: Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
Dated: December 20, 2013.
Jane Diamond,
Director, Water Division, EPA Region 9.
[FR Doc. 2014-00156 Filed 1-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P