Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Missouri; Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for the 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS), 580-582 [2013-31566]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
580
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 3 / Monday, January 6, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
EPA APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE TEXAS SIP—Continued
State
approval/
submittal
date
State citation
Title/subject
Section 116.787 ............
Amendments and Alterations of Permits Issued
Under this Division.
5/22/02
Section 116.788 ............
Renewal of Permits Issued Under this Division
5/22/02
Section 116.790 ............
Delegation ..........................................................
5/22/02
*
*
*
*
EPA approval date
Explanation
1/6/14 ...........................
[Insert FR page number where document
begins].
1/6/14 ...........................
[Insert FR page number where document
begins].
1/6/14 ...........................
[Insert FR page number where document
begins].
*
*
*
*
*
1/6/14 ...........................
[Insert FR page number where document
begins].
*
Subchapter I—Electric Generating Facility Permits
*
Section 116.919 ............
*
*
*
Additional Requirements for Grandfathered
Electric Generating Facility Permit Applications.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–31560 Filed 1–3–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2012–0767; FRL–9905–03–
Region 7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Missouri; Reasonably Available
Control Technology (RACT) for the 8Hour Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve a State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revision submitted by the State of
Missouri to EPA in a letter dated May
4, 2012. The purpose of the SIP revision
is to amend Missouri’s regulation for the
control of Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOC) and meet the requirement to
adopt reasonably available control
technology (RACT) for sources covered
by EPA’s Control Technique Guidelines
(CTG) for Industrial Cleaning Solvents.
We are taking final action to approve
this revision because it satisfies the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Jan 03, 2014
Jkt 232001
8/21/02
*
*
applicable requirements of the Clean Air
Act (CAA) with respect to RACT for the
Missouri portion of the St. Louis
Metropolitan 1997 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area.
DATES: This final rule is effective
February 5, 2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R07–OAR–
2012–0767. All documents in the docket
are listed on the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Planning and Development
Branch, Air and Waste Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region 7, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
The interested persons wanting to
examine these documents should make
an appointment with the office at least
24 hours in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Lachala Kemp, Air Planning and
Development Branch, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
Region 7, 11201 Renner Boulevard,
Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone
number (913) 551–7214; email address:
kemp.lachala@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section
provides additional information by
addressing the following:
I. What action is EPA taking in this final
rule?
II. What is the background for the approvals
by EPA in this final rule?
III. EPA’s Final Action
I. What action is EPA taking in this
final rule?
EPA is taking final action to approve
a SIP revision submitted by the State of
Missouri to EPA on May 4, 2012. The
purpose of this revision is to control the
emissions of VOCs, consistent with
Control Techniques Guidelines (CTGs)
issued by EPA, and to satisfy the RACT
requirements of the CAA for the
Missouri portion of the St. Louis
metropolitan 1997 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area. Specifically, the
revision incorporates an amendment to
E:\FR\FM\06JAR1.SGM
06JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 3 / Monday, January 6, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
an existing SIP-approved Missouri
regulation 10 Code of State Regulations
10–5.455 to control emissions from
Industrial Solvent Cleaning Operations
in the St. Louis metropolitan area. The
revision includes lowering the
allowable emissions threshold for VOCs
released per day from the use, storage
and disposal of industrial cleaning
solvents, and adds requirements for
facilities that exceed the applicability
threshold. EPA is taking final action to
approve this revision because the
adoption by Missouri of this regulation
represents RACT control levels for CTGs
issued by EPA after 2006. In addition,
EPA is taking final action to approve
this revision because it meets the
requirements of the conditional
approval EPA issued on January 10,
2012. See 77 FR 3144 (January 23,
2012).
II. What is the background for the
approvals by EPA in this final rule?
This section briefly summarizes the
background for today’s final action.
More detailed discussion of the
statutory and regulatory background can
be found in the preamble to the
proposal for this rulemaking. See 78 FR
at 45112–45114 (July 26, 2013). No
comments were received on the
proposed rulemaking.
The St. Louis metropolitan area—
which includes the counties of Franklin,
Jefferson, St. Charles and St. Louis, and
the City of St. Louis in Missouri (as well
as four counties in Illinois), is currently
designated as a moderate nonattainment
area under the 1997 8-hour ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS).1 For areas in moderate
nonattainment with the ozone NAAQS,
section 182(b)(2) of the CAA requires
states to submit SIP revisions to EPA
that require sources of VOCs in the
nonattainment area that are subject to a
CTG issued by EPA, and all other major
stationary sources,2 to implement
RACT.
EPA has defined RACT as the lowest
emissions limitation that a particular
source is capable of meeting by the
application of control technology that is
reasonably available, considering
technological and economic feasibility.
44 FR 53761 (September 17, 1979). EPA
provides states with guidance
concerning what types of controls could
constitute RACT for certain source
categories through the issuance of CTGs.
1 The St. Louis metropolitan area was also
recently designated as a ‘‘marginal’’ nonattainment
area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
2 For a moderate nonattainment area, a major
stationary source is one which emits, or has the
potential to emit, one hundred tons per year or
more of VOCs. See CAA section 302(j).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Jan 03, 2014
Jkt 232001
See 71 FR 58745, 58747 (October 5,
2006).
Section 183(e) of the CAA provides
that EPA may issue a CTG in lieu of a
national regulation for categories of
consumer or commercial products
where the Administrator determines
that such guidance will be substantially
as effective as regulations in reducing
VOC emissions in ozone nonattainment
areas.
III. EPA’s Final Action
In this rulemaking, EPA is taking final
action to approve a revision to
Missouri’s VOC rule 10 CSR 10–5.455
into Missouri’s SIP, as EPA believes that
this rule satisfies RACT for the Missouri
portion of the St. Louis nonattainment
area for Industrial Cleaning Solvents.
EPA also believes that this rule satisfies
the requirements of the conditional
approval of Missouri’s VOC RACT SIP
referenced above. This final action
means that the Missouri SIP meets all of
the applicable VOC RACT requirements
for St. Louis under section 182(b)(2) of
the Act, as they relate to the 1997 ozone
NAAQS.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
581
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by March 7, 2014. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
E:\FR\FM\06JAR1.SGM
06JAR1
582
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 3 / Monday, January 6, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
Dated: December 12, 2013.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
■
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
a. Revising in paragraph (c) the entry
for ‘‘10–5.455’’;
■ b. Revising paragraph (e)(55).
The revisions read as follows:
Subpart AA—Missouri
■
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
§ 52.1320
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
■
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
2. Amend § 52.1320 by:
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
Missouri citation
Title
State
effective
date
EPA approval date
*
*
10–5.455 ..........................................
*
*
Control of Emissions from Industrial
Solvent Cleaning Operations.
*
*
1/6/2014 [insert Federal Register
page number where the document begins].
*
08/30/2011
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Explanation
(e) * * *
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI NONREGULATORY SIP PROVISIONS
Name of non-regulatory SIP revision
Applicable geographic or nonattainment area
*
*
(55) VOC RACT Requirements for
the 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
*
*
St. Louis ...........................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–31566 Filed 1–3–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0874; FRL–9904–57]
Dimethyl Esters of Glutaric Acid (i.e.,
Dimethyl Glutarate), Succinic Acid (i.e.,
Dimethyl Succinate), and Adipic Acid
(i.e., Dimethyl Adipate); Exemption
From the Requirement of a Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of dimethyl esters
of glutaric acid (i.e., dimethyl glutarate),
succinic acid (i.e., dimethyl succinate),
and adipic acid (i.e., dimethyl adipate),
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Jan 03, 2014
Jkt 232001
State submittal date
EPA approval date
*
*
*
1/23/2012, 77 FR 3144 1/6/2014
[insert Federal Register page
number where the document begins].
*
*
1/17/2007,
6/01/2011,
8/30/2011
*
herein referred to as DMEGSA, when
used as inert ingredients (as solvents/cosolvents) in pesticide formulations
applied to growing crops and raw
agricultural commodities after harvest.
SciReg, Inc., on behalf of Rhodia, Inc.,
submitted a petition to EPA under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA), requesting establishment of an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance. This regulation eliminates the
need to establish a maximum
permissible level for residues of
DMEGSA.
This regulation is effective
January 6, 2014. Objections and requests
for hearings must be received on or
before March 7, 2014, and must be filed
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR Part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
DATES:
The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0874, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Explanation
Sfmt 4700
*
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West
Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. The
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and
the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
Lois
Rossi, Registration Division (7505P),
Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 305–7090; email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\06JAR1.SGM
06JAR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 580-582]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-31566]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2012-0767; FRL-9905-03-Region 7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Missouri; Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for the 8-Hour
Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted
by the State of Missouri to EPA in a letter dated May 4, 2012. The
purpose of the SIP revision is to amend Missouri's regulation for the
control of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) and meet the requirement to
adopt reasonably available control technology (RACT) for sources
covered by EPA's Control Technique Guidelines (CTG) for Industrial
Cleaning Solvents. We are taking final action to approve this revision
because it satisfies the applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act
(CAA) with respect to RACT for the Missouri portion of the St. Louis
Metropolitan 1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment area.
DATES: This final rule is effective February 5, 2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R07-OAR-2012-0767. All documents in the docket
are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Planning and Development
Branch, Air and Waste Management Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region 7, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas
66219. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your
inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. The
interested persons wanting to examine these documents should make an
appointment with the office at least 24 hours in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Lachala Kemp, Air Planning and
Development Branch, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 7,
11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number (913)
551-7214; email address: kemp.lachala@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,'' or
``our'' refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by
addressing the following:
I. What action is EPA taking in this final rule?
II. What is the background for the approvals by EPA in this final
rule?
III. EPA's Final Action
I. What action is EPA taking in this final rule?
EPA is taking final action to approve a SIP revision submitted by
the State of Missouri to EPA on May 4, 2012. The purpose of this
revision is to control the emissions of VOCs, consistent with Control
Techniques Guidelines (CTGs) issued by EPA, and to satisfy the RACT
requirements of the CAA for the Missouri portion of the St. Louis
metropolitan 1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment area. Specifically, the
revision incorporates an amendment to
[[Page 581]]
an existing SIP-approved Missouri regulation 10 Code of State
Regulations 10-5.455 to control emissions from Industrial Solvent
Cleaning Operations in the St. Louis metropolitan area. The revision
includes lowering the allowable emissions threshold for VOCs released
per day from the use, storage and disposal of industrial cleaning
solvents, and adds requirements for facilities that exceed the
applicability threshold. EPA is taking final action to approve this
revision because the adoption by Missouri of this regulation represents
RACT control levels for CTGs issued by EPA after 2006. In addition, EPA
is taking final action to approve this revision because it meets the
requirements of the conditional approval EPA issued on January 10,
2012. See 77 FR 3144 (January 23, 2012).
II. What is the background for the approvals by EPA in this final rule?
This section briefly summarizes the background for today's final
action. More detailed discussion of the statutory and regulatory
background can be found in the preamble to the proposal for this
rulemaking. See 78 FR at 45112-45114 (July 26, 2013). No comments were
received on the proposed rulemaking.
The St. Louis metropolitan area--which includes the counties of
Franklin, Jefferson, St. Charles and St. Louis, and the City of St.
Louis in Missouri (as well as four counties in Illinois), is currently
designated as a moderate nonattainment area under the 1997 8-hour ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS).\1\ For areas in moderate
nonattainment with the ozone NAAQS, section 182(b)(2) of the CAA
requires states to submit SIP revisions to EPA that require sources of
VOCs in the nonattainment area that are subject to a CTG issued by EPA,
and all other major stationary sources,\2\ to implement RACT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The St. Louis metropolitan area was also recently designated
as a ``marginal'' nonattainment area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
\2\ For a moderate nonattainment area, a major stationary source
is one which emits, or has the potential to emit, one hundred tons
per year or more of VOCs. See CAA section 302(j).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA has defined RACT as the lowest emissions limitation that a
particular source is capable of meeting by the application of control
technology that is reasonably available, considering technological and
economic feasibility. 44 FR 53761 (September 17, 1979). EPA provides
states with guidance concerning what types of controls could constitute
RACT for certain source categories through the issuance of CTGs. See 71
FR 58745, 58747 (October 5, 2006).
Section 183(e) of the CAA provides that EPA may issue a CTG in lieu
of a national regulation for categories of consumer or commercial
products where the Administrator determines that such guidance will be
substantially as effective as regulations in reducing VOC emissions in
ozone nonattainment areas.
III. EPA's Final Action
In this rulemaking, EPA is taking final action to approve a
revision to Missouri's VOC rule 10 CSR 10-5.455 into Missouri's SIP, as
EPA believes that this rule satisfies RACT for the Missouri portion of
the St. Louis nonattainment area for Industrial Cleaning Solvents. EPA
also believes that this rule satisfies the requirements of the
conditional approval of Missouri's VOC RACT SIP referenced above. This
final action means that the Missouri SIP meets all of the applicable
VOC RACT requirements for St. Louis under section 182(b)(2) of the Act,
as they relate to the 1997 ozone NAAQS.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by March 7, 2014. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
[[Page 582]]
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: December 12, 2013.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA--Missouri
0
2. Amend Sec. 52.1320 by:
0
a. Revising in paragraph (c) the entry for ``10-5.455'';
0
b. Revising paragraph (e)(55).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Missouri citation Title effective EPA approval date Explanation
date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
10-5.455......................... Control of Emissions 08/30/2011 1/6/2014 [insert ....................
from Industrial Federal Register
Solvent Cleaning page number where
Operations. the document
begins].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA-Approved Missouri Nonregulatory SIP Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable State
Name of non-regulatory SIP geographic or submittal EPA approval date Explanation
revision nonattainment area date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
(55) VOC RACT Requirements for St. Louis........... 1/17/2007, 1/23/2012, 77 FR ....................
the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 6/01/2011, 3144 1/6/2014
8/30/2011 [insert Federal
Register page
number where the
document begins].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-31566 Filed 1-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
