Request for Comments Regarding Prior Art Resources for Use in the Examination of Software-Related Patent Applications, 644-645 [2013-31492]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
644
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 3 / Monday, January 6, 2014 / Notices
placed in the examination queue based
on the actual filing date of the
nonprovisional application.
For a detailed discussion regarding
treatment of applications that are not in
condition for publication, processing of
improper requests to participate in the
program, and treatment of
authorizations to charge fees, see Pilot
Program for Extended Time Period To
Reply to a Notice to File Missing Parts
of Nonprovisional Application, 75 FR
76401, 76403–04 (Dec. 8, 2010), 1362
Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 44, 47–49 (Jan. 4,
2011).
III. Important Reminders: Applicants
are reminded that the disclosure of an
invention in a provisional application
should be as complete as possible
because the claimed subject matter in
the later-filed nonprovisional
application must have support in the
provisional application in order for the
applicant to obtain the benefit of the
filing date of the provisional
application.
Furthermore, the nonprovisional
application as originally filed must have
a complete disclosure that complies
with 35 U.S.C. 112(a) which is sufficient
to support the claims submitted on
filing and any claims submitted later
during prosecution. New matter cannot
be added to an application after the
filing date of the application. See 35
U.S.C. 132(a). In the rulemaking to
implement the PLT and title II of the
PLTIA, the Office provided that in order
to be accorded a filing date, a
nonprovisional application (other than
an application for a design patent) must
include a specification with or without
claims. See Changes To Implement the
Patent Law Treaty, 78 FR 62367, 62369
(Oct. 21, 2013) (final rule). This change
is effective December 18, 2013, and
applies to any application filed under
35 U.S.C. 111 on or after December 18,
2013. Although a claim is not required
in a nonprovisional application (other
than an application for a design patent)
for filing date purposes and applicant
may file an amendment adding
additional claims as prescribed by 35
U.S.C. 112 and drawings as prescribed
by 35 U.S.C. 113 later during
prosecution, applicant should consider
the benefits of submitting a complete set
of claims and any necessary drawings
on filing of the nonprovisional
application. This would reduce the
likelihood that any claims and/or
drawings added later during
prosecution might be found to contain
new matter. Also, if a patent is granted
and the patentee is successful in
litigation against an infringer,
provisional rights to a reasonable
royalty under 35 U.S.C. 154(d) may be
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Jan 03, 2014
Jkt 232001
available only if the claims that are
published in the patent application
publication are substantially identical to
the patented claims that are infringed,
assuming timely actual notice is
provided. Thus, the importance of the
claims that are included in the patent
application publication should not be
overlooked.
Applicants are also advised that the
extended missing parts period does not
affect the twelve-month priority period
provided by the Paris Convention for
the Protection of Industrial Property
(Paris Convention). Accordingly, any
foreign filings must still be made within
twelve months of the filing date of the
provisional application if applicant
wishes to rely on the provisional
application in the foreign-filed
application or if protection is desired in
a country requiring filing within twelve
months of the earliest application for
which rights are left outstanding in
order to be entitled to priority.
For additional reminders, see Pilot
Program for Extended Time Period To
Reply to a Notice to File Missing Parts
of Nonprovisional Application, 75 FR
76401, 76405 (Dec. 8, 2010), 1362 Off.
Gaz. Pat. Office 44, 50 (Jan. 4, 2011).
Dated: December 31, 2013.
Margaret A. Focarino,
Commissioner for Patents, Performing the
functions and duties of the Under Secretary
of Commerce for Intellectual Property and
Director of the United States Patent and
Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2013–31574 Filed 1–3–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark
Office
[Docket No.: PTO–P–2013–0064]
Request for Comments Regarding
Prior Art Resources for Use in the
Examination of Software-Related
Patent Applications
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO) has formed
a partnership with the software
community to enhance the quality of
software-related patents (Software
Partnership). The Software Partnership
is an opportunity to bring stakeholders
together through a series of roundtable
discussions to share ideas, feedback,
experiences, and insights on softwarerelated patents. On December 5, 2013, as
part of the Software Partnership, the
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
USPTO hosted a roundtable discussion
on the USPTO’s prior art searching
techniques and tools. At the roundtable,
the USPTO spoke on the prior art
resources currently utilized by
examiners and listened to external
speakers and the public on additional
prior art resources and improved search
techniques. In order to receive further
feedback from stakeholders, the USPTO
is requesting comments on the questions
regarding prior art resources and search
techniques set forth below.
DATES: Comment Deadline: To be
ensured of consideration, written
comments must be received on or before
March 14, 2014. No public hearing will
be held.
Addresses for Comments: Written
comments should be sent by electronic
mail addressed to
SoftwareRoundtable2013@uspto.gov.
Comments may also be submitted by
mail addressed to: Mail Stop
Comments—Patents, Commissioner for
Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA
22313–1450, marked to the attention of
Seema Rao, Director, Technology Center
2100. Although comments may be
submitted by mail, the USPTO prefers to
receive comments via the Internet.
The comments will be available for
public inspection at the Office of the
Commissioner for Patents, located in
Madison East, Tenth Floor, 600 Dulany
Street, Alexandria, Virginia, and will be
available via the USPTO Internet Web
site at https://www.uspto.gov. Because
comments will be available for public
inspection, information that is not
desired to be made public, such as an
address or phone number, should not be
included in the comments. Parties who
would like to rely on confidential
information to illustrate a point are
requested to summarize or otherwise
submit the information in a way that
will permit its public disclosure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Seema Rao, Director, Technology Center
2100, by telephone at 571–272–0800, or
by electronic mail message at
seema.rao@uspto.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
USPTO conducted a Software
Partnership meeting on December 5,
2013, in Alexandria, Virginia, focused
on the topic of prior art resources for
use during the examination of softwarerelated applications. The meeting
featured both internal and external
stakeholders’ presentations, along with
an open discussion session aimed to
collect input on how the agency can
enhance prior art searching through the
use of search strategies, tools, and
databases. Details of the meeting along
with all presentation materials can be
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 3 / Monday, January 6, 2014 / Notices
found on the Prior Art Search micro-site
available at https://www.uspto.gov/
patents/init_events/prior_art_search.jsp.
Currently, the Office has access to a
variety of internal and external
resources for searching and accessing
prior art. Internally, the Office utilizes
the Examiner’s Automated Search Tool
(EAST), Web Examiner Search Tool
(WEST), and a variety of vendor
databases to provide examiners with
access to U.S. and foreign patents and
patent application publications using
both classification and textual
searching. Externally, the Scientific and
Technical Information Center (STIC)
provides examiners with access to nonpatent literature in several art-specific
print collections and electronic
resources totaling over 500 databases,
59,000 electronic journals and 175,000
e-books. A listing of the Office’s prior
art resources may be found at https://
www.uspto.gov/patents/resources/
priorart.jsp.
As a follow-up to the Prior Art
Software Partnership Meeting, the
Office is asking stakeholders for further
ideas to improve the quality and
efficiency of searching software-related
inventions. In particular, the Office
seeks comments on the following
questions:
1. What specific databases, Web sites,
tools and other resources do you find
useful in searching for software-related
inventions? Please indicate strengths
and limitations of each resource.
2. What are your concerns regarding
the manner in which USPTO examiners
formulate and implement search
strategies to identify prior art for
software related inventions? How
should these concerns be addressed?
Date: December 30, 2013.
Margaret A. Focarino,
Commissioner for Patents, Performing the
functions and duties of the Under Secretary
of Commerce for Intellectual Property and
Director of the United States Patent and
Trademark Office.
that will be furnished by nonprofit
agency employing persons who are
blind or have other severe disabilities.
DATES: Comments Must Be Received On
Or Before: 2/6/2014.
ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase
From People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite
10800, Arlington, Virginia 22202–4149.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR TO SUBMIT
COMMENTS CONTACT: Barry S. Lineback,
Telephone: (703) 603–7740, Fax: (703)
603–0655, or email CMTEFedReg@
AbilityOne.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice is published pursuant to 41 USC
8503 (a)(2) and 41 CFR 51–2.3. Its
purpose is to provide interested persons
an opportunity to submit comments on
the proposed action.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Committee for Purchase From
People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled.
ACTION: Proposed Addition to the
Procurement List.
AGENCY:
The Committee is proposing
to add a product to the Procurement List
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:08 Jan 03, 2014
Jkt 232001
Effective Date: 2/6/2014.
Committee for Purchase
From People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite
10800, Arlington, Virginia, 22202–4149.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barry S. Lineback, Telephone: (703)
603–7740, Fax: (703) 603–0655, or email
CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
ADDRESSES:
Additions
Addition
If the Committee approves the
proposed addition, the entities of the
Federal Government identified in this
notice will be required to procure the
product listed below from the nonprofit
agency employing persons who are
blind or have other severe disabilities.
The following product is proposed for
addition to the Procurement List for
production by the nonprofit agency
listed:
Product:
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
CD–R Silver w/Jewel Case, 10pk
NSN: 7045–01–482–7540.
NPA: North Central Sight Services, Inc.,
Williamsport, PA.
Contracting Activity: DEFENSE LOGISTICS
AGENCY TROOP SUPPORT,
PHILADELPHIA, PA.
Coverage: B-List for the Broad Government
Requirement as aggregated by Defense
Logistics Agency Troop Support,
Philadelphia, PA.
I certify that the following action will
not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The major factors considered for this
certification were:
1. The action will not result in any
additional reporting, recordkeeping or
other compliance requirements for small
entities other than the small
organizations that will furnish the
products to the Government.
2. The action will result in
authorizing small entities to furnish the
products to the Government.
3. There are no known regulatory
alternatives which would accomplish
the objectives of the Javits-WagnerO’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 8501–8506) in
connection with the products proposed
for addition to the Procurement List.
Barry S. Lineback,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2013–31529 Filed 1–3–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353–01–P
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
Procurement List; Proposed Addition
employing persons who are blind or
have other severe disabilities, and
deletes services from the Procurement
List previously provided by such
agencies.
On 11/8/2013 (78 FR 67129–67130)
and 11/15/2013 (78 FR 68823–68824),
the Committee for Purchase From
People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled published notices of proposed
additions to the Procurement List.
After consideration of the material
presented to it concerning capability of
qualified nonprofit agencies to provide
the products and impact of the
additions on the current or most recent
contractors, the Committee has
determined that the products listed
below are suitable for procurement by
the Federal Government under 41 U.S.C.
8501–8506 and 41 CFR 51–2.4.
[FR Doc. 2013–31492 Filed 1–3–14; 8:45 am]
COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM
PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR
SEVERELY DISABLED
645
COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM
PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR
SEVERELY DISABLED
End of Certification
Procurement List; Additions And
Deletions
Committee for Purchase From
People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled.
ACTION: Additions to and Deletions from
the Procurement List.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This action adds products to
the Procurement List that will be
furnished by nonprofit agencies
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Accordingly, the following products
are added to the Procurement List:
Products:
Pen, Roller Ball, Liquid Ink, Retractable,
Needle Point, Airplane Safe
NSN: 7520–00–NIB–1932—0.5 mm,
Refillable, Black
NSN: 7520–00–NIB–1933—0.5 mm,
Refillable, Blue
NSN: 7520–00–NIB–1934—0.7 mm,
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 644-645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-31492]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark Office
[Docket No.: PTO-P-2013-0064]
Request for Comments Regarding Prior Art Resources for Use in the
Examination of Software-Related Patent Applications
AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has
formed a partnership with the software community to enhance the quality
of software-related patents (Software Partnership). The Software
Partnership is an opportunity to bring stakeholders together through a
series of roundtable discussions to share ideas, feedback, experiences,
and insights on software-related patents. On December 5, 2013, as part
of the Software Partnership, the USPTO hosted a roundtable discussion
on the USPTO's prior art searching techniques and tools. At the
roundtable, the USPTO spoke on the prior art resources currently
utilized by examiners and listened to external speakers and the public
on additional prior art resources and improved search techniques. In
order to receive further feedback from stakeholders, the USPTO is
requesting comments on the questions regarding prior art resources and
search techniques set forth below.
DATES: Comment Deadline: To be ensured of consideration, written
comments must be received on or before March 14, 2014. No public
hearing will be held.
Addresses for Comments: Written comments should be sent by
electronic mail addressed to SoftwareRoundtable2013@uspto.gov. Comments
may also be submitted by mail addressed to: Mail Stop Comments--
Patents, Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-
1450, marked to the attention of Seema Rao, Director, Technology Center
2100. Although comments may be submitted by mail, the USPTO prefers to
receive comments via the Internet.
The comments will be available for public inspection at the Office
of the Commissioner for Patents, located in Madison East, Tenth Floor,
600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia, and will be available via the
USPTO Internet Web site at https://www.uspto.gov. Because comments will
be available for public inspection, information that is not desired to
be made public, such as an address or phone number, should not be
included in the comments. Parties who would like to rely on
confidential information to illustrate a point are requested to
summarize or otherwise submit the information in a way that will permit
its public disclosure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Seema Rao, Director, Technology Center
2100, by telephone at 571-272-0800, or by electronic mail message at
seema.rao@uspto.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The USPTO conducted a Software Partnership
meeting on December 5, 2013, in Alexandria, Virginia, focused on the
topic of prior art resources for use during the examination of
software-related applications. The meeting featured both internal and
external stakeholders' presentations, along with an open discussion
session aimed to collect input on how the agency can enhance prior art
searching through the use of search strategies, tools, and databases.
Details of the meeting along with all presentation materials can be
[[Page 645]]
found on the Prior Art Search micro-site available at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/prior_art_search.jsp.
Currently, the Office has access to a variety of internal and
external resources for searching and accessing prior art. Internally,
the Office utilizes the Examiner's Automated Search Tool (EAST), Web
Examiner Search Tool (WEST), and a variety of vendor databases to
provide examiners with access to U.S. and foreign patents and patent
application publications using both classification and textual
searching. Externally, the Scientific and Technical Information Center
(STIC) provides examiners with access to non-patent literature in
several art-specific print collections and electronic resources
totaling over 500 databases, 59,000 electronic journals and 175,000 e-
books. A listing of the Office's prior art resources may be found at
https://www.uspto.gov/patents/resources/priorart.jsp.
As a follow-up to the Prior Art Software Partnership Meeting, the
Office is asking stakeholders for further ideas to improve the quality
and efficiency of searching software-related inventions. In particular,
the Office seeks comments on the following questions:
1. What specific databases, Web sites, tools and other resources do
you find useful in searching for software-related inventions? Please
indicate strengths and limitations of each resource.
2. What are your concerns regarding the manner in which USPTO
examiners formulate and implement search strategies to identify prior
art for software related inventions? How should these concerns be
addressed?
Date: December 30, 2013.
Margaret A. Focarino,
Commissioner for Patents, Performing the functions and duties of the
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of
the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2013-31492 Filed 1-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P