Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Modifications to Identification Markings on Fishing Gear Marker Buoys, 381-384 [2013-31416]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 2 / Friday, January 3, 2014 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
flexibility in defining the term
‘‘windward wall’’ when a total
enclosure is not impacted by ambient
wind. The regulatory text was unclear
where to place monitors when ambient
wind does not affect the total enclosure.
Petitioners requested clarification in
how to monitor irregularly shaped
enclosures or enclosures that are
divided into multiple areas all under
negative pressure. Petitioners also asked
the EPA to clarify that data from
differential pressure monitors should be
used to calculate 15-minute averages.
Petitioners also stated that the EPA
should clarify the meaning of
‘‘accuracy’’ in 40 CFR 63.548(k)(3).
II. Direct Final Rule
A direct final rule that would make
the same changes as those proposed in
this document appears in the Rules and
Regulations section of this Federal
Register. The EPA is taking direct final
action on these amendments because we
view the amendments as
noncontroversial and anticipate no
significant adverse comments. The EPA
has explained our reasons for the
amendments in the direct final rule. If
no significant adverse comments are
received, no further action will be taken
on the proposal, and the direct final rule
will become effective as provided in
that action.
If the EPA receives significant adverse
comments, we will withdraw only those
provisions on which we received those
comments. The EPA will publish a
timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register indicating which provisions
will become effective, and which
provisions are being withdrawn. If part
or the entire direct final rule in the
Rules and Regulations section of this
Federal Register is withdrawn, all
comments pertaining to those
provisions will be addressed in a
subsequent final rule based on these
proposed amendments. The EPA will
not institute a second comment period
on the subsequent final action. Any
parties interested in commenting must
do so at this time.
The changes to the regulatory text
proposed in this notice are identical to
those for the direct final rule published
in the Rules and Regulations section of
this Federal Register. For further
information, including the detailed
rationale for the proposal and the
regulatory revisions, see the direct final
rule published in a separate part of this
Federal Register.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
For a complete discussion of all of the
administrative requirements applicable
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Jan 02, 2014
Jkt 232001
to this action, see the direct final rule in
the ‘‘rules and Regulations’’ section of
this Federal Register.
Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,
(202) 646–4064, or (email)
Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov.
List of Subjects for 40 CFR Part 63
381
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedures,
Air pollution control, Hazardous
substances, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: December 20, 2013.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013–31266 Filed 1–2–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
On March
28, 2012, FEMA published a proposed
notice at 77 FR 18837, proposing flood
hazard determinations in Bullitt County,
Kentucky. FEMA is withdrawing the
proposed notice.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4104; 44 CFR 67.4.
Date: November 22, 2013.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for
Mitigation, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management
Agency.
[FR Doc. 2013–30946 Filed 1–2–14; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
BILLING CODE 9110–12–P
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
44 CFR Part 67
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[Docket ID FEMA–2012–0003; Internal
Agency Docket No. FEMA–B–1241]
50 CFR Part 679
Proposed Flood Hazard
Determinations for Bullitt County,
Kentucky and Incorporated Areas
RIN 0648–BD66
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Proposed notice; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
The Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) is
withdrawing its proposed notice
concerning proposed flood hazard
determinations, which may include the
addition or modification of any Base
Flood Elevation, base flood depth,
Special Flood Hazard Area boundary or
zone designation, or regulatory
floodway on the Flood Insurance Rate
Maps, and where applicable, in the
supporting Flood Insurance Study
reports for Bullitt County, Kentucky and
Incorporated Areas.
DATES: This withdrawal is effective
January 3, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. FEMA–B–
1241, to Luis Rodriguez, Chief,
Engineering Management Branch,
Federal Insurance and Mitigation
Administration, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4064,
or (email)
Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov.
SUMMARY:
Luis
Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, 500 C
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[Docket No. 130903776–3776–01]
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Modifications to
Identification Markings on Fishing
Gear Marker Buoys
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes to revise the
identification marking requirements for
fishing gear marker buoys (buoys) used
in Federal waters off Alaska. This
proposed rule would eliminate the
requirement that hook-and-line,
longline pot, and pot-and-line buoys be
marked with the vessel’s name. The
requirement to mark buoys with either
the vessel’s Federal fisheries permit
number or Alaska Department of Fish
and Game (ADF&G) number remains in
effect. This action is needed to remove
a regulatory requirement that is
unnecessary. This action is intended to
promote the goals and objectives of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act), the Fishery
Management Plan for Groundfish of the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Management Area (BSAI Groundfish
FMP), the Fishery Management Plan for
Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA
Groundfish FMP), and other applicable
laws.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
382
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 2 / Friday, January 3, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Comments must be received no
later than February 3, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by FDMS Docket Number
NOAA–NMFS–2013–0137, by any of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20130137, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Glenn Merrill, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region NMFS, Attn:
Ellen Sebastian. Mail comments to P.O.
Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802–1668.
• Fax: Address written comments to
Glenn Merrill, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region NMFS, Attn:
Ellen Sebastian. Fax comments to 907–
586–7557.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on https://www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter
N/A in the required fields if you wish
to remain anonymous). Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word or Excel or Adobe PDF
file formats only.
Electronic copies of the Categorical
Exclusion and the Regulatory Impact
Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (RIR/IRFA) prepared for this
action are available from https://
www.regulations.gov or from the NMFS
Alaska Region Web site at https://
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this rule may
be submitted to NMFS at the above
address and by email to
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax
to 202–395–7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Camacho, 907–586–7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS
Alaska Region manages the U.S.
groundfish fisheries in the Exclusive
Economic Zone off Alaska under the
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Jan 02, 2014
Jkt 232001
BSAI and GOA Groundfish FMPs. These
FMPS were prepared by the North
Pacific Fishery Management Council,
under the authority of the MagnusonStevens Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., and
other applicable laws, and approved by
the Secretary of Commerce. Regulations
implementing the FMPs appear at 50
CFR part 679. General regulations that
pertain to U.S. fisheries appear at
subpart H of 50 CFR part 600.
Background
Federal regulations pertaining to gear
markings for groundfish are set forth at
§ 679.24. These regulations apply to
operators of vessels required to carry a
Federal fisheries permit (FFP) while
fishing in the groundfish and halibut
fisheries in Federal waters off Alaska.
The proposed rule implementing these
requirements was published on August
16, 1989 (54 FR 33737), and the final
rule on January 2, 1990 (55 FR 31).
Buoys are used to indicate the positions
of hook-and-line, pot, and pot-and-line
gear in these fisheries. Section 679.24
requires buoys to be marked to make it
possible to identify the vessel from
which the gear was deployed. The
NMFS Office of Law Enforcement and
the United States Coast Guard use the
identification markings from buoys
when issuing violations, prosecutions,
and other enforcement actions.
Cooperating fishermen use the
identification markings to report the
placement or occurrence of gear in
unauthorized areas. Identification
markings are also necessary to facilitate
the return of lost or stolen gear.
Fishermen that correctly mark their gear
ultimately benefit because this deters
unauthorized and illegal fishing and
reduces the need for more burdensome
regulations.
Federal regulations at § 679.24(a)
require that buoys carried onboard or
used by any vessel subject to 50 CFR
part 679 that is using hook-and-line,
longline pot, or pot-and-line gear must
be marked with the vessel’s name and
either the vessel’s FFP number or the
vessel’s Alaska Department of Fish and
Game (ADF&G) vessel registration
number. In addition, the markings
‘‘shall be in characters at least 4 inches
(10.16 cm) in height and 0.5 inch (1.27
cm) in width in a contrasting color
visible above the water line and shall be
maintained so the markings are clearly
visible.’’
These regulations apply to ‘‘vessels
regulated under this part’’ which refers
to those vessels required to carry FFPs
under § 679.4(b). FFPs are required for
vessels fishing for groundfish (a legal
category that does not include halibut)
in the GOA or BSAI, or fishing for any
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
non-groundfish species when
incidentally caught groundfish must be
retained. Regulations at § 679.7(f)(8)
prohibit vessels with individual fishing
quota (IFQ) halibut or sablefish on board
from discarding rockfish or Pacific cod
under various conditions. Thus, vessels
used to fish for halibut IFQ are required
to have FFPs and comply with all
regulations in 50 CFR part 679 that
apply to vessels required to have FFPs,
including requirements for marking
buoys. Other non-groundfish fisheries
have no comparable discard
prohibitions.
Identification markings on buoys in
the Federal waters off Alaska also are
regulated by the State of Alaska (State)
and the International Pacific Halibut
Commission (IPHC). The State shares
management responsibilities with
NMFS for king crab and Tanner crab in
the Federal waters off Alaska, and
regulates the buoy identification
markings in these fisheries. The State
requires at least one buoy on each
commercial king or Tanner crab pot or
ring net to be legibly marked with the
permanent ADF&G license number of
the vessel using the gear (5 AAC 34.051;
5 AAC 35.051). Identification marking
requirements for halibut gear buoys are
set by the IPHC. The IPHC’s regulations
for 2013 require that all setline or skate
buoys carried onboard or used by any
U.S. vessel for commercial halibut
fishing shall be marked with the vessel’s
state license number or the vessel’s
registration number. Both State and
IPHC commercial identification
markings must be maintained in a
legible condition, in characters at least
four inches high (10.2 cm) and one-halfinch (1.3 cm) wide, in a contrasting
color, and visible above the water. The
principal difference between the State
and IPHC commercial regulations and
50 CFR part 679 is the requirement for
buoys to be marked with the vessel
name.
Information on the extent of
compliance with the existing
regulations is not available; however,
non-compliance has not been raised as
a concern by enforcement agencies.
Description of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would eliminate
the requirement that buoys carried
onboard or marking the location of
hook-and-line, longline pot, and potand-line gear deployed by vessels with
FFPs be marked with the vessel’s name.
This action is needed to remove a
regulatory requirement that experience
has shown is not necessary. While one
vessel may share the same name as
another vessel, vessel identification
numbers are exclusive and unique to the
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 2 / Friday, January 3, 2014 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
recipient vessel. Therefore, the
proposed rule would eliminate the
requirement in § 679.24(a) to mark
buoys with the vessel’s name, but
maintain the requirement for marking
buoys with either the vessel’s FFP
number or ADF&G number. The
proposed action should reduce costs to
vessel owners by reducing the labor and
materials needed to mark buoys. In
addition, the proposed action would
make buoy marking regulations at
§ 679.24(a) consistent with Alaska’s
State crab and IPHC regulations.
Classification
Pursuant to section 305(d) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has determined
that this proposed rule is consistent
with the BSAI and GOA Groundfish
FMPs, other provisions of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other
applicable law, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
This proposed rule has been
determined not to be significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
An RIR was prepared for this action
that assesses all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives. The
RIR describes the potential size,
distribution, and magnitude of the
economic impacts this action may be
expected to have. The RIR finds that this
action has a positive net economic
impact to commercial fishing operations
since it reduces the cost of compliance
with identification marking
requirements for buoys. This action
does not create additional
administrative costs and does not
impose new requirements on fishing
operations, or modify other existing
ones.
Section 610 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) requires ‘‘periodic
review of the rules issued by the agency
which have or will have a significant
economic impact upon a substantial
number of small entities. * * * The
purpose of the review shall be to
determine which such rules should be
continued without change, or should be
amended or rescinded, consistent with
the stated objectives of applicable
statues, to minimize any significant
economic impact of the rules upon a
substantial number of such small
entities.’’ Regulations requiring vessel
names on buoys was identified by
NMFS during a section 610 review of
past final rules as a requirement that
was not necessary and could be
removed from regulations.
An initial regulatory flexibility
analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as
required by section 603 of the RFA. The
IRFA describes the economic impact
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Jan 02, 2014
Jkt 232001
this proposed rule would have on small
entities, if adopted. A description of the
action, why it is being considered, and
the legal basis for this action are
contained in the Background and
Description of the Proposed Action
sections of this proposed rule. A
summary of the analysis follows. A copy
of this analysis is available from NMFS
(see ADDRESSES).
On June 20, 2013, the Small Business
Administration issued a final rule
revising the small business size
standards for several industries effective
July 22, 2013 (78 FR 37398; June 20,
2013). The rule increased the size
standard for Finfish Fishing from $4.0 to
$19.0 million, Shellfish Fishing from
$4.0 to $5.0 million, and Other Marine
Fishing from $4.0 to $7.0 million. The
new size standards were used to prepare
the IRFA for this action.
Vessels are directly regulated by this
action when required to carry an FFP
and using hook-and-line, pot, or potand-line gear in Federal groundfish or
halibut fisheries in the GOA or BSAI.
NMFS estimates that, in 2012, the most
recent year for which gross revenues
information is available, 761 entities
would have been directly regulated by
this action. NMFS estimates that 693
would have been small entities. Median
gross revenues for the small entities
would have been about $327,000, while
75 percent would have had gross
revenues under about $779,000, and 25
percent would have had gross revenues
under about $144,000. The 99th
percentile of gross revenues was about
$2,974,000.
An IRFA also requires a description of
any significant alternatives to the
preferred alternative that accomplish
the stated objectives, are consistent with
applicable statutes, and that would
minimize any significant economic
impact of the proposed rule on small
entities. The preferred alternative (the
action alternative removing the
requirement that vessel names be placed
on marker buoys) places somewhat
smaller obligations on directly regulated
small entities than the alternative of
retaining the status quo. Thus, there are
no alternatives that have a smaller
adverse economic impact on directly
regulated small entities.
This action will reduce, in a small
way, the reporting and recordkeeping
requirements of small entities
participating in the BSAI and GOA
groundfish fisheries.
The analysis revealed no Federal rules
that would conflict with, overlap, or be
duplicated by the alternatives under
consideration.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
383
Collection-of-Information Requirements
This rule contains collection-ofinformation requirements, subject to
review and approval by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
This requirement has been submitted to
the OMB for approval under OMB
control number 0648–0353. The public
reporting burden is estimated to average
per response 10 minutes or less to
collect the information and paint it on
a buoy.
This estimate includes the time for
reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the
collection-of-information.
Public comment is sought regarding:
whether this proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
the accuracy of the burden estimate;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden on the collection of information,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Send comments on these or any other
aspects of the collection of information
to NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and by email
to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov, or
fax to 202–395–7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 679
Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: December 26, 2013.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries,
performing the functions and duties of the
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 679 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 679—FISHERIES OF THE
EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF
ALASKA
1. The authority citation for part 679
continues to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
384
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 2 / Friday, January 3, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et
seq.; 3631 et seq.; Pub. L. 108–447.
§ 679.24
2. In § 679.24, revise paragraph (a)(1)
to read as follows:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:05 Jan 02, 2014
Jkt 232001
Gear limitations.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(1) All hook-and-line, longline pot,
and pot-and-line marker buoys carried
on board or used by any vessel regulated
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
under this part shall be marked with the
vessel’s Federal fisheries permit number
or ADF&G vessel registration number.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–31416 Filed 1–2–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM
03JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 2 (Friday, January 3, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 381-384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-31416]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 130903776-3776-01]
RIN 0648-BD66
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska;
Modifications to Identification Markings on Fishing Gear Marker Buoys
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes to revise the identification marking
requirements for fishing gear marker buoys (buoys) used in Federal
waters off Alaska. This proposed rule would eliminate the requirement
that hook-and-line, longline pot, and pot-and-line buoys be marked with
the vessel's name. The requirement to mark buoys with either the
vessel's Federal fisheries permit number or Alaska Department of Fish
and Game (ADF&G) number remains in effect. This action is needed to
remove a regulatory requirement that is unnecessary. This action is
intended to promote the goals and objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), the
Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian
Islands Management Area (BSAI Groundfish FMP), the Fishery Management
Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA Groundfish FMP), and
other applicable laws.
[[Page 382]]
DATES: Comments must be received no later than February 3, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by FDMS Docket Number
NOAA-NMFS-2013-0137, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2013-0137, click the ``Comment Now!'' icon,
complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to Glenn Merrill, Assistant
Regional Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region
NMFS, Attn: Ellen Sebastian. Mail comments to P.O. Box 21668, Juneau,
AK 99802-1668.
Fax: Address written comments to Glenn Merrill, Assistant
Regional Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region
NMFS, Attn: Ellen Sebastian. Fax comments to 907-586-7557.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on https://www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address), confidential business information,
or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender
will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter
N/A in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous).
Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word
or Excel or Adobe PDF file formats only.
Electronic copies of the Categorical Exclusion and the Regulatory
Impact Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (RIR/IRFA)
prepared for this action are available from https://www.regulations.gov
or from the NMFS Alaska Region Web site at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.
Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other
aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this
rule may be submitted to NMFS at the above address and by email to
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax to 202-395-7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Camacho, 907-586-7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS Alaska Region manages the U.S.
groundfish fisheries in the Exclusive Economic Zone off Alaska under
the BSAI and GOA Groundfish FMPs. These FMPS were prepared by the North
Pacific Fishery Management Council, under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., and other applicable
laws, and approved by the Secretary of Commerce. Regulations
implementing the FMPs appear at 50 CFR part 679. General regulations
that pertain to U.S. fisheries appear at subpart H of 50 CFR part 600.
Background
Federal regulations pertaining to gear markings for groundfish are
set forth at Sec. 679.24. These regulations apply to operators of
vessels required to carry a Federal fisheries permit (FFP) while
fishing in the groundfish and halibut fisheries in Federal waters off
Alaska. The proposed rule implementing these requirements was published
on August 16, 1989 (54 FR 33737), and the final rule on January 2, 1990
(55 FR 31). Buoys are used to indicate the positions of hook-and-line,
pot, and pot-and-line gear in these fisheries. Section 679.24 requires
buoys to be marked to make it possible to identify the vessel from
which the gear was deployed. The NMFS Office of Law Enforcement and the
United States Coast Guard use the identification markings from buoys
when issuing violations, prosecutions, and other enforcement actions.
Cooperating fishermen use the identification markings to report the
placement or occurrence of gear in unauthorized areas. Identification
markings are also necessary to facilitate the return of lost or stolen
gear. Fishermen that correctly mark their gear ultimately benefit
because this deters unauthorized and illegal fishing and reduces the
need for more burdensome regulations.
Federal regulations at Sec. 679.24(a) require that buoys carried
onboard or used by any vessel subject to 50 CFR part 679 that is using
hook-and-line, longline pot, or pot-and-line gear must be marked with
the vessel's name and either the vessel's FFP number or the vessel's
Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) vessel registration number.
In addition, the markings ``shall be in characters at least 4 inches
(10.16 cm) in height and 0.5 inch (1.27 cm) in width in a contrasting
color visible above the water line and shall be maintained so the
markings are clearly visible.''
These regulations apply to ``vessels regulated under this part''
which refers to those vessels required to carry FFPs under Sec.
679.4(b). FFPs are required for vessels fishing for groundfish (a legal
category that does not include halibut) in the GOA or BSAI, or fishing
for any non-groundfish species when incidentally caught groundfish must
be retained. Regulations at Sec. 679.7(f)(8) prohibit vessels with
individual fishing quota (IFQ) halibut or sablefish on board from
discarding rockfish or Pacific cod under various conditions. Thus,
vessels used to fish for halibut IFQ are required to have FFPs and
comply with all regulations in 50 CFR part 679 that apply to vessels
required to have FFPs, including requirements for marking buoys. Other
non-groundfish fisheries have no comparable discard prohibitions.
Identification markings on buoys in the Federal waters off Alaska
also are regulated by the State of Alaska (State) and the International
Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC). The State shares management
responsibilities with NMFS for king crab and Tanner crab in the Federal
waters off Alaska, and regulates the buoy identification markings in
these fisheries. The State requires at least one buoy on each
commercial king or Tanner crab pot or ring net to be legibly marked
with the permanent ADF&G license number of the vessel using the gear (5
AAC 34.051; 5 AAC 35.051). Identification marking requirements for
halibut gear buoys are set by the IPHC. The IPHC's regulations for 2013
require that all setline or skate buoys carried onboard or used by any
U.S. vessel for commercial halibut fishing shall be marked with the
vessel's state license number or the vessel's registration number. Both
State and IPHC commercial identification markings must be maintained in
a legible condition, in characters at least four inches high (10.2 cm)
and one-half-inch (1.3 cm) wide, in a contrasting color, and visible
above the water. The principal difference between the State and IPHC
commercial regulations and 50 CFR part 679 is the requirement for buoys
to be marked with the vessel name.
Information on the extent of compliance with the existing
regulations is not available; however, non-compliance has not been
raised as a concern by enforcement agencies.
Description of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would eliminate the requirement that buoys
carried onboard or marking the location of hook-and-line, longline pot,
and pot-and-line gear deployed by vessels with FFPs be marked with the
vessel's name. This action is needed to remove a regulatory requirement
that experience has shown is not necessary. While one vessel may share
the same name as another vessel, vessel identification numbers are
exclusive and unique to the
[[Page 383]]
recipient vessel. Therefore, the proposed rule would eliminate the
requirement in Sec. 679.24(a) to mark buoys with the vessel's name,
but maintain the requirement for marking buoys with either the vessel's
FFP number or ADF&G number. The proposed action should reduce costs to
vessel owners by reducing the labor and materials needed to mark buoys.
In addition, the proposed action would make buoy marking regulations at
Sec. 679.24(a) consistent with Alaska's State crab and IPHC
regulations.
Classification
Pursuant to section 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with the BSAI and GOA Groundfish FMPs, other provisions of
the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
This proposed rule has been determined not to be significant for
the purposes of Executive Order 12866.
An RIR was prepared for this action that assesses all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives. The RIR describes the
potential size, distribution, and magnitude of the economic impacts
this action may be expected to have. The RIR finds that this action has
a positive net economic impact to commercial fishing operations since
it reduces the cost of compliance with identification marking
requirements for buoys. This action does not create additional
administrative costs and does not impose new requirements on fishing
operations, or modify other existing ones.
Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires
``periodic review of the rules issued by the agency which have or will
have a significant economic impact upon a substantial number of small
entities. * * * The purpose of the review shall be to determine which
such rules should be continued without change, or should be amended or
rescinded, consistent with the stated objectives of applicable statues,
to minimize any significant economic impact of the rules upon a
substantial number of such small entities.'' Regulations requiring
vessel names on buoys was identified by NMFS during a section 610
review of past final rules as a requirement that was not necessary and
could be removed from regulations.
An initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as
required by section 603 of the RFA. The IRFA describes the economic
impact this proposed rule would have on small entities, if adopted. A
description of the action, why it is being considered, and the legal
basis for this action are contained in the Background and Description
of the Proposed Action sections of this proposed rule. A summary of the
analysis follows. A copy of this analysis is available from NMFS (see
ADDRESSES).
On June 20, 2013, the Small Business Administration issued a final
rule revising the small business size standards for several industries
effective July 22, 2013 (78 FR 37398; June 20, 2013). The rule
increased the size standard for Finfish Fishing from $4.0 to $19.0
million, Shellfish Fishing from $4.0 to $5.0 million, and Other Marine
Fishing from $4.0 to $7.0 million. The new size standards were used to
prepare the IRFA for this action.
Vessels are directly regulated by this action when required to
carry an FFP and using hook-and-line, pot, or pot-and-line gear in
Federal groundfish or halibut fisheries in the GOA or BSAI. NMFS
estimates that, in 2012, the most recent year for which gross revenues
information is available, 761 entities would have been directly
regulated by this action. NMFS estimates that 693 would have been small
entities. Median gross revenues for the small entities would have been
about $327,000, while 75 percent would have had gross revenues under
about $779,000, and 25 percent would have had gross revenues under
about $144,000. The 99th percentile of gross revenues was about
$2,974,000.
An IRFA also requires a description of any significant alternatives
to the preferred alternative that accomplish the stated objectives, are
consistent with applicable statutes, and that would minimize any
significant economic impact of the proposed rule on small entities. The
preferred alternative (the action alternative removing the requirement
that vessel names be placed on marker buoys) places somewhat smaller
obligations on directly regulated small entities than the alternative
of retaining the status quo. Thus, there are no alternatives that have
a smaller adverse economic impact on directly regulated small entities.
This action will reduce, in a small way, the reporting and
recordkeeping requirements of small entities participating in the BSAI
and GOA groundfish fisheries.
The analysis revealed no Federal rules that would conflict with,
overlap, or be duplicated by the alternatives under consideration.
Collection-of-Information Requirements
This rule contains collection-of-information requirements, subject
to review and approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). This requirement has been
submitted to the OMB for approval under OMB control number 0648-0353.
The public reporting burden is estimated to average per response 10
minutes or less to collect the information and paint it on a buoy.
This estimate includes the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing the collection-of-information.
Public comment is sought regarding: whether this proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall
have practical utility; the accuracy of the burden estimate; ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the burden on the collection of
information, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology.
Send comments on these or any other aspects of the collection of
information to NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and by email to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov, or fax to 202-395-7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 679
Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: December 26, 2013.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, performing the functions and
duties of the Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 679 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 679--FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF ALASKA
0
1. The authority citation for part 679 continues to read as follows:
[[Page 384]]
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et seq.; 3631 et seq.;
Pub. L. 108-447.
0
2. In Sec. 679.24, revise paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 679.24 Gear limitations.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(1) All hook-and-line, longline pot, and pot-and-line marker buoys
carried on board or used by any vessel regulated under this part shall
be marked with the vessel's Federal fisheries permit number or ADF&G
vessel registration number.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-31416 Filed 1-2-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P