Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Modifications to Identification Markings on Fishing Gear Marker Buoys, 381-384 [2013-31416]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 2 / Friday, January 3, 2014 / Proposed Rules tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS flexibility in defining the term ‘‘windward wall’’ when a total enclosure is not impacted by ambient wind. The regulatory text was unclear where to place monitors when ambient wind does not affect the total enclosure. Petitioners requested clarification in how to monitor irregularly shaped enclosures or enclosures that are divided into multiple areas all under negative pressure. Petitioners also asked the EPA to clarify that data from differential pressure monitors should be used to calculate 15-minute averages. Petitioners also stated that the EPA should clarify the meaning of ‘‘accuracy’’ in 40 CFR 63.548(k)(3). II. Direct Final Rule A direct final rule that would make the same changes as those proposed in this document appears in the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register. The EPA is taking direct final action on these amendments because we view the amendments as noncontroversial and anticipate no significant adverse comments. The EPA has explained our reasons for the amendments in the direct final rule. If no significant adverse comments are received, no further action will be taken on the proposal, and the direct final rule will become effective as provided in that action. If the EPA receives significant adverse comments, we will withdraw only those provisions on which we received those comments. The EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register indicating which provisions will become effective, and which provisions are being withdrawn. If part or the entire direct final rule in the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register is withdrawn, all comments pertaining to those provisions will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on these proposed amendments. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on the subsequent final action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. The changes to the regulatory text proposed in this notice are identical to those for the direct final rule published in the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register. For further information, including the detailed rationale for the proposal and the regulatory revisions, see the direct final rule published in a separate part of this Federal Register. III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews For a complete discussion of all of the administrative requirements applicable VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:05 Jan 02, 2014 Jkt 232001 to this action, see the direct final rule in the ‘‘rules and Regulations’’ section of this Federal Register. Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4064, or (email) Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov. List of Subjects for 40 CFR Part 63 381 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedures, Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: December 20, 2013. Gina McCarthy, Administrator. [FR Doc. 2013–31266 Filed 1–2–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P On March 28, 2012, FEMA published a proposed notice at 77 FR 18837, proposing flood hazard determinations in Bullitt County, Kentucky. FEMA is withdrawing the proposed notice. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4104; 44 CFR 67.4. Date: November 22, 2013. Roy E. Wright, Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency. [FR Doc. 2013–30946 Filed 1–2–14; 8:45 am] DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BILLING CODE 9110–12–P Federal Emergency Management Agency DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 44 CFR Part 67 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [Docket ID FEMA–2012–0003; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–B–1241] 50 CFR Part 679 Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations for Bullitt County, Kentucky and Incorporated Areas RIN 0648–BD66 Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. ACTION: Proposed notice; withdrawal. AGENCY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is withdrawing its proposed notice concerning proposed flood hazard determinations, which may include the addition or modification of any Base Flood Elevation, base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps, and where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study reports for Bullitt County, Kentucky and Incorporated Areas. DATES: This withdrawal is effective January 3, 2014. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA–B– 1241, to Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4064, or (email) Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov. SUMMARY: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 [Docket No. 130903776–3776–01] Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Modifications to Identification Markings on Fishing Gear Marker Buoys National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments. AGENCY: NMFS proposes to revise the identification marking requirements for fishing gear marker buoys (buoys) used in Federal waters off Alaska. This proposed rule would eliminate the requirement that hook-and-line, longline pot, and pot-and-line buoys be marked with the vessel’s name. The requirement to mark buoys with either the vessel’s Federal fisheries permit number or Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) number remains in effect. This action is needed to remove a regulatory requirement that is unnecessary. This action is intended to promote the goals and objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area (BSAI Groundfish FMP), the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA Groundfish FMP), and other applicable laws. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM 03JAP1 382 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 2 / Friday, January 3, 2014 / Proposed Rules Comments must be received no later than February 3, 2014. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by FDMS Docket Number NOAA–NMFS–2013–0137, by any of the following methods: • Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to www.regulations.gov/ #!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20130137, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments. • Mail: Submit written comments to Glenn Merrill, Assistant Regional Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region NMFS, Attn: Ellen Sebastian. Mail comments to P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802–1668. • Fax: Address written comments to Glenn Merrill, Assistant Regional Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region NMFS, Attn: Ellen Sebastian. Fax comments to 907– 586–7557. Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period, may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on https://www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying information (e.g., name, address), confidential business information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter N/A in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word or Excel or Adobe PDF file formats only. Electronic copies of the Categorical Exclusion and the Regulatory Impact Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (RIR/IRFA) prepared for this action are available from https:// www.regulations.gov or from the NMFS Alaska Region Web site at https:// alaskafisheries.noaa.gov. Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this rule may be submitted to NMFS at the above address and by email to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax to 202–395–7285. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Camacho, 907–586–7228. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS Alaska Region manages the U.S. groundfish fisheries in the Exclusive Economic Zone off Alaska under the tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS DATES: VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:05 Jan 02, 2014 Jkt 232001 BSAI and GOA Groundfish FMPs. These FMPS were prepared by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council, under the authority of the MagnusonStevens Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., and other applicable laws, and approved by the Secretary of Commerce. Regulations implementing the FMPs appear at 50 CFR part 679. General regulations that pertain to U.S. fisheries appear at subpart H of 50 CFR part 600. Background Federal regulations pertaining to gear markings for groundfish are set forth at § 679.24. These regulations apply to operators of vessels required to carry a Federal fisheries permit (FFP) while fishing in the groundfish and halibut fisheries in Federal waters off Alaska. The proposed rule implementing these requirements was published on August 16, 1989 (54 FR 33737), and the final rule on January 2, 1990 (55 FR 31). Buoys are used to indicate the positions of hook-and-line, pot, and pot-and-line gear in these fisheries. Section 679.24 requires buoys to be marked to make it possible to identify the vessel from which the gear was deployed. The NMFS Office of Law Enforcement and the United States Coast Guard use the identification markings from buoys when issuing violations, prosecutions, and other enforcement actions. Cooperating fishermen use the identification markings to report the placement or occurrence of gear in unauthorized areas. Identification markings are also necessary to facilitate the return of lost or stolen gear. Fishermen that correctly mark their gear ultimately benefit because this deters unauthorized and illegal fishing and reduces the need for more burdensome regulations. Federal regulations at § 679.24(a) require that buoys carried onboard or used by any vessel subject to 50 CFR part 679 that is using hook-and-line, longline pot, or pot-and-line gear must be marked with the vessel’s name and either the vessel’s FFP number or the vessel’s Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) vessel registration number. In addition, the markings ‘‘shall be in characters at least 4 inches (10.16 cm) in height and 0.5 inch (1.27 cm) in width in a contrasting color visible above the water line and shall be maintained so the markings are clearly visible.’’ These regulations apply to ‘‘vessels regulated under this part’’ which refers to those vessels required to carry FFPs under § 679.4(b). FFPs are required for vessels fishing for groundfish (a legal category that does not include halibut) in the GOA or BSAI, or fishing for any PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 non-groundfish species when incidentally caught groundfish must be retained. Regulations at § 679.7(f)(8) prohibit vessels with individual fishing quota (IFQ) halibut or sablefish on board from discarding rockfish or Pacific cod under various conditions. Thus, vessels used to fish for halibut IFQ are required to have FFPs and comply with all regulations in 50 CFR part 679 that apply to vessels required to have FFPs, including requirements for marking buoys. Other non-groundfish fisheries have no comparable discard prohibitions. Identification markings on buoys in the Federal waters off Alaska also are regulated by the State of Alaska (State) and the International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC). The State shares management responsibilities with NMFS for king crab and Tanner crab in the Federal waters off Alaska, and regulates the buoy identification markings in these fisheries. The State requires at least one buoy on each commercial king or Tanner crab pot or ring net to be legibly marked with the permanent ADF&G license number of the vessel using the gear (5 AAC 34.051; 5 AAC 35.051). Identification marking requirements for halibut gear buoys are set by the IPHC. The IPHC’s regulations for 2013 require that all setline or skate buoys carried onboard or used by any U.S. vessel for commercial halibut fishing shall be marked with the vessel’s state license number or the vessel’s registration number. Both State and IPHC commercial identification markings must be maintained in a legible condition, in characters at least four inches high (10.2 cm) and one-halfinch (1.3 cm) wide, in a contrasting color, and visible above the water. The principal difference between the State and IPHC commercial regulations and 50 CFR part 679 is the requirement for buoys to be marked with the vessel name. Information on the extent of compliance with the existing regulations is not available; however, non-compliance has not been raised as a concern by enforcement agencies. Description of the Proposed Action The proposed action would eliminate the requirement that buoys carried onboard or marking the location of hook-and-line, longline pot, and potand-line gear deployed by vessels with FFPs be marked with the vessel’s name. This action is needed to remove a regulatory requirement that experience has shown is not necessary. While one vessel may share the same name as another vessel, vessel identification numbers are exclusive and unique to the E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM 03JAP1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 2 / Friday, January 3, 2014 / Proposed Rules tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS recipient vessel. Therefore, the proposed rule would eliminate the requirement in § 679.24(a) to mark buoys with the vessel’s name, but maintain the requirement for marking buoys with either the vessel’s FFP number or ADF&G number. The proposed action should reduce costs to vessel owners by reducing the labor and materials needed to mark buoys. In addition, the proposed action would make buoy marking regulations at § 679.24(a) consistent with Alaska’s State crab and IPHC regulations. Classification Pursuant to section 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is consistent with the BSAI and GOA Groundfish FMPs, other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law, subject to further consideration after public comment. This proposed rule has been determined not to be significant for the purposes of Executive Order 12866. An RIR was prepared for this action that assesses all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives. The RIR describes the potential size, distribution, and magnitude of the economic impacts this action may be expected to have. The RIR finds that this action has a positive net economic impact to commercial fishing operations since it reduces the cost of compliance with identification marking requirements for buoys. This action does not create additional administrative costs and does not impose new requirements on fishing operations, or modify other existing ones. Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires ‘‘periodic review of the rules issued by the agency which have or will have a significant economic impact upon a substantial number of small entities. * * * The purpose of the review shall be to determine which such rules should be continued without change, or should be amended or rescinded, consistent with the stated objectives of applicable statues, to minimize any significant economic impact of the rules upon a substantial number of such small entities.’’ Regulations requiring vessel names on buoys was identified by NMFS during a section 610 review of past final rules as a requirement that was not necessary and could be removed from regulations. An initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as required by section 603 of the RFA. The IRFA describes the economic impact VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:05 Jan 02, 2014 Jkt 232001 this proposed rule would have on small entities, if adopted. A description of the action, why it is being considered, and the legal basis for this action are contained in the Background and Description of the Proposed Action sections of this proposed rule. A summary of the analysis follows. A copy of this analysis is available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES). On June 20, 2013, the Small Business Administration issued a final rule revising the small business size standards for several industries effective July 22, 2013 (78 FR 37398; June 20, 2013). The rule increased the size standard for Finfish Fishing from $4.0 to $19.0 million, Shellfish Fishing from $4.0 to $5.0 million, and Other Marine Fishing from $4.0 to $7.0 million. The new size standards were used to prepare the IRFA for this action. Vessels are directly regulated by this action when required to carry an FFP and using hook-and-line, pot, or potand-line gear in Federal groundfish or halibut fisheries in the GOA or BSAI. NMFS estimates that, in 2012, the most recent year for which gross revenues information is available, 761 entities would have been directly regulated by this action. NMFS estimates that 693 would have been small entities. Median gross revenues for the small entities would have been about $327,000, while 75 percent would have had gross revenues under about $779,000, and 25 percent would have had gross revenues under about $144,000. The 99th percentile of gross revenues was about $2,974,000. An IRFA also requires a description of any significant alternatives to the preferred alternative that accomplish the stated objectives, are consistent with applicable statutes, and that would minimize any significant economic impact of the proposed rule on small entities. The preferred alternative (the action alternative removing the requirement that vessel names be placed on marker buoys) places somewhat smaller obligations on directly regulated small entities than the alternative of retaining the status quo. Thus, there are no alternatives that have a smaller adverse economic impact on directly regulated small entities. This action will reduce, in a small way, the reporting and recordkeeping requirements of small entities participating in the BSAI and GOA groundfish fisheries. The analysis revealed no Federal rules that would conflict with, overlap, or be duplicated by the alternatives under consideration. PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 383 Collection-of-Information Requirements This rule contains collection-ofinformation requirements, subject to review and approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). This requirement has been submitted to the OMB for approval under OMB control number 0648–0353. The public reporting burden is estimated to average per response 10 minutes or less to collect the information and paint it on a buoy. This estimate includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection-of-information. Public comment is sought regarding: whether this proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize the burden on the collection of information, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Send comments on these or any other aspects of the collection of information to NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and by email to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov, or fax to 202–395–7285. Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB control number. List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 679 Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: December 26, 2013. Alan D. Risenhoover, Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, performing the functions and duties of the Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine Fisheries Service. For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 679 is proposed to be amended as follows: PART 679—FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF ALASKA 1. The authority citation for part 679 continues to read as follows: ■ E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM 03JAP1 384 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 2 / Friday, January 3, 2014 / Proposed Rules Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et seq.; 3631 et seq.; Pub. L. 108–447. § 679.24 2. In § 679.24, revise paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows: tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS ■ VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:05 Jan 02, 2014 Jkt 232001 Gear limitations. * * * * * (a) * * * (1) All hook-and-line, longline pot, and pot-and-line marker buoys carried on board or used by any vessel regulated PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 under this part shall be marked with the vessel’s Federal fisheries permit number or ADF&G vessel registration number. * * * * * [FR Doc. 2013–31416 Filed 1–2–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P E:\FR\FM\03JAP1.SGM 03JAP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 2 (Friday, January 3, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 381-384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-31416]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 679

[Docket No. 130903776-3776-01]
RIN 0648-BD66


Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; 
Modifications to Identification Markings on Fishing Gear Marker Buoys

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS proposes to revise the identification marking 
requirements for fishing gear marker buoys (buoys) used in Federal 
waters off Alaska. This proposed rule would eliminate the requirement 
that hook-and-line, longline pot, and pot-and-line buoys be marked with 
the vessel's name. The requirement to mark buoys with either the 
vessel's Federal fisheries permit number or Alaska Department of Fish 
and Game (ADF&G) number remains in effect. This action is needed to 
remove a regulatory requirement that is unnecessary. This action is 
intended to promote the goals and objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens 
Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), the 
Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian 
Islands Management Area (BSAI Groundfish FMP), the Fishery Management 
Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska (GOA Groundfish FMP), and 
other applicable laws.

[[Page 382]]


DATES: Comments must be received no later than February 3, 2014.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by FDMS Docket Number 
NOAA-NMFS-2013-0137, by any of the following methods:
     Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public 
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2013-0137, click the ``Comment Now!'' icon, 
complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments.
     Mail: Submit written comments to Glenn Merrill, Assistant 
Regional Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region 
NMFS, Attn: Ellen Sebastian. Mail comments to P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, 
AK 99802-1668.
     Fax: Address written comments to Glenn Merrill, Assistant 
Regional Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region 
NMFS, Attn: Ellen Sebastian. Fax comments to 907-586-7557.
    Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other 
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period, 
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the 
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on https://www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying 
information (e.g., name, address), confidential business information, 
or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender 
will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter 
N/A in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous). 
Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word 
or Excel or Adobe PDF file formats only.
    Electronic copies of the Categorical Exclusion and the Regulatory 
Impact Review/Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (RIR/IRFA) 
prepared for this action are available from https://www.regulations.gov 
or from the NMFS Alaska Region Web site at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.
    Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other 
aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this 
rule may be submitted to NMFS at the above address and by email to 
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax to 202-395-7285.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Camacho, 907-586-7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS Alaska Region manages the U.S. 
groundfish fisheries in the Exclusive Economic Zone off Alaska under 
the BSAI and GOA Groundfish FMPs. These FMPS were prepared by the North 
Pacific Fishery Management Council, under the authority of the 
Magnuson-Stevens Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., and other applicable 
laws, and approved by the Secretary of Commerce. Regulations 
implementing the FMPs appear at 50 CFR part 679. General regulations 
that pertain to U.S. fisheries appear at subpart H of 50 CFR part 600.

Background

    Federal regulations pertaining to gear markings for groundfish are 
set forth at Sec.  679.24. These regulations apply to operators of 
vessels required to carry a Federal fisheries permit (FFP) while 
fishing in the groundfish and halibut fisheries in Federal waters off 
Alaska. The proposed rule implementing these requirements was published 
on August 16, 1989 (54 FR 33737), and the final rule on January 2, 1990 
(55 FR 31). Buoys are used to indicate the positions of hook-and-line, 
pot, and pot-and-line gear in these fisheries. Section 679.24 requires 
buoys to be marked to make it possible to identify the vessel from 
which the gear was deployed. The NMFS Office of Law Enforcement and the 
United States Coast Guard use the identification markings from buoys 
when issuing violations, prosecutions, and other enforcement actions. 
Cooperating fishermen use the identification markings to report the 
placement or occurrence of gear in unauthorized areas. Identification 
markings are also necessary to facilitate the return of lost or stolen 
gear. Fishermen that correctly mark their gear ultimately benefit 
because this deters unauthorized and illegal fishing and reduces the 
need for more burdensome regulations.
    Federal regulations at Sec.  679.24(a) require that buoys carried 
onboard or used by any vessel subject to 50 CFR part 679 that is using 
hook-and-line, longline pot, or pot-and-line gear must be marked with 
the vessel's name and either the vessel's FFP number or the vessel's 
Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) vessel registration number. 
In addition, the markings ``shall be in characters at least 4 inches 
(10.16 cm) in height and 0.5 inch (1.27 cm) in width in a contrasting 
color visible above the water line and shall be maintained so the 
markings are clearly visible.''
    These regulations apply to ``vessels regulated under this part'' 
which refers to those vessels required to carry FFPs under Sec.  
679.4(b). FFPs are required for vessels fishing for groundfish (a legal 
category that does not include halibut) in the GOA or BSAI, or fishing 
for any non-groundfish species when incidentally caught groundfish must 
be retained. Regulations at Sec.  679.7(f)(8) prohibit vessels with 
individual fishing quota (IFQ) halibut or sablefish on board from 
discarding rockfish or Pacific cod under various conditions. Thus, 
vessels used to fish for halibut IFQ are required to have FFPs and 
comply with all regulations in 50 CFR part 679 that apply to vessels 
required to have FFPs, including requirements for marking buoys. Other 
non-groundfish fisheries have no comparable discard prohibitions.
    Identification markings on buoys in the Federal waters off Alaska 
also are regulated by the State of Alaska (State) and the International 
Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC). The State shares management 
responsibilities with NMFS for king crab and Tanner crab in the Federal 
waters off Alaska, and regulates the buoy identification markings in 
these fisheries. The State requires at least one buoy on each 
commercial king or Tanner crab pot or ring net to be legibly marked 
with the permanent ADF&G license number of the vessel using the gear (5 
AAC 34.051; 5 AAC 35.051). Identification marking requirements for 
halibut gear buoys are set by the IPHC. The IPHC's regulations for 2013 
require that all setline or skate buoys carried onboard or used by any 
U.S. vessel for commercial halibut fishing shall be marked with the 
vessel's state license number or the vessel's registration number. Both 
State and IPHC commercial identification markings must be maintained in 
a legible condition, in characters at least four inches high (10.2 cm) 
and one-half-inch (1.3 cm) wide, in a contrasting color, and visible 
above the water. The principal difference between the State and IPHC 
commercial regulations and 50 CFR part 679 is the requirement for buoys 
to be marked with the vessel name.
    Information on the extent of compliance with the existing 
regulations is not available; however, non-compliance has not been 
raised as a concern by enforcement agencies.

Description of the Proposed Action

    The proposed action would eliminate the requirement that buoys 
carried onboard or marking the location of hook-and-line, longline pot, 
and pot-and-line gear deployed by vessels with FFPs be marked with the 
vessel's name. This action is needed to remove a regulatory requirement 
that experience has shown is not necessary. While one vessel may share 
the same name as another vessel, vessel identification numbers are 
exclusive and unique to the

[[Page 383]]

recipient vessel. Therefore, the proposed rule would eliminate the 
requirement in Sec.  679.24(a) to mark buoys with the vessel's name, 
but maintain the requirement for marking buoys with either the vessel's 
FFP number or ADF&G number. The proposed action should reduce costs to 
vessel owners by reducing the labor and materials needed to mark buoys. 
In addition, the proposed action would make buoy marking regulations at 
Sec.  679.24(a) consistent with Alaska's State crab and IPHC 
regulations.

Classification

    Pursuant to section 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS 
Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is 
consistent with the BSAI and GOA Groundfish FMPs, other provisions of 
the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law, subject to further 
consideration after public comment.
    This proposed rule has been determined not to be significant for 
the purposes of Executive Order 12866.
    An RIR was prepared for this action that assesses all costs and 
benefits of available regulatory alternatives. The RIR describes the 
potential size, distribution, and magnitude of the economic impacts 
this action may be expected to have. The RIR finds that this action has 
a positive net economic impact to commercial fishing operations since 
it reduces the cost of compliance with identification marking 
requirements for buoys. This action does not create additional 
administrative costs and does not impose new requirements on fishing 
operations, or modify other existing ones.
    Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires 
``periodic review of the rules issued by the agency which have or will 
have a significant economic impact upon a substantial number of small 
entities. * * * The purpose of the review shall be to determine which 
such rules should be continued without change, or should be amended or 
rescinded, consistent with the stated objectives of applicable statues, 
to minimize any significant economic impact of the rules upon a 
substantial number of such small entities.'' Regulations requiring 
vessel names on buoys was identified by NMFS during a section 610 
review of past final rules as a requirement that was not necessary and 
could be removed from regulations.
    An initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as 
required by section 603 of the RFA. The IRFA describes the economic 
impact this proposed rule would have on small entities, if adopted. A 
description of the action, why it is being considered, and the legal 
basis for this action are contained in the Background and Description 
of the Proposed Action sections of this proposed rule. A summary of the 
analysis follows. A copy of this analysis is available from NMFS (see 
ADDRESSES).
    On June 20, 2013, the Small Business Administration issued a final 
rule revising the small business size standards for several industries 
effective July 22, 2013 (78 FR 37398; June 20, 2013). The rule 
increased the size standard for Finfish Fishing from $4.0 to $19.0 
million, Shellfish Fishing from $4.0 to $5.0 million, and Other Marine 
Fishing from $4.0 to $7.0 million. The new size standards were used to 
prepare the IRFA for this action.
    Vessels are directly regulated by this action when required to 
carry an FFP and using hook-and-line, pot, or pot-and-line gear in 
Federal groundfish or halibut fisheries in the GOA or BSAI. NMFS 
estimates that, in 2012, the most recent year for which gross revenues 
information is available, 761 entities would have been directly 
regulated by this action. NMFS estimates that 693 would have been small 
entities. Median gross revenues for the small entities would have been 
about $327,000, while 75 percent would have had gross revenues under 
about $779,000, and 25 percent would have had gross revenues under 
about $144,000. The 99th percentile of gross revenues was about 
$2,974,000.
    An IRFA also requires a description of any significant alternatives 
to the preferred alternative that accomplish the stated objectives, are 
consistent with applicable statutes, and that would minimize any 
significant economic impact of the proposed rule on small entities. The 
preferred alternative (the action alternative removing the requirement 
that vessel names be placed on marker buoys) places somewhat smaller 
obligations on directly regulated small entities than the alternative 
of retaining the status quo. Thus, there are no alternatives that have 
a smaller adverse economic impact on directly regulated small entities.
    This action will reduce, in a small way, the reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements of small entities participating in the BSAI 
and GOA groundfish fisheries.
    The analysis revealed no Federal rules that would conflict with, 
overlap, or be duplicated by the alternatives under consideration.

Collection-of-Information Requirements

    This rule contains collection-of-information requirements, subject 
to review and approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). This requirement has been 
submitted to the OMB for approval under OMB control number 0648-0353. 
The public reporting burden is estimated to average per response 10 
minutes or less to collect the information and paint it on a buoy.
    This estimate includes the time for reviewing instructions, 
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data 
needed, and completing and reviewing the collection-of-information.
    Public comment is sought regarding: whether this proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall 
have practical utility; the accuracy of the burden estimate; ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and ways to minimize the burden on the collection of 
information, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology.
    Send comments on these or any other aspects of the collection of 
information to NMFS (see ADDRESSES) and by email to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov, or fax to 202-395-7285.
    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is 
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty 
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the 
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays 
a currently valid OMB control number.

List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 679

    Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: December 26, 2013.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, performing the functions and 
duties of the Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.

    For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 679 is 
proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 679--FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF ALASKA

0
1. The authority citation for part 679 continues to read as follows:


[[Page 384]]


    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et seq.; 3631 et seq.; 
Pub. L. 108-447.

0
2. In Sec.  679.24, revise paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:


Sec.  679.24  Gear limitations.

* * * * *
    (a) * * *
    (1) All hook-and-line, longline pot, and pot-and-line marker buoys 
carried on board or used by any vessel regulated under this part shall 
be marked with the vessel's Federal fisheries permit number or ADF&G 
vessel registration number.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2013-31416 Filed 1-2-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.