Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Food Labeling Regulations, 79461-79465 [2013-31215]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 250 / Monday, December 30, 2013 / Notices
National Heart, Lung, and Blood
Institute (NHLBI), NIH, and currently at
the Institute of Infectious Diseases,
Southwest Hospital, Third Military
Medical University, Chonqing, China,
engaged in research misconduct in
research supported by intramural
research at NHLBI, NIH.
The questioned research involves a
Western blot analysis of IgM and IgG
antibodies from Chinese subjects in
patients with non-A–E hepatitis and
control subjects to test reactivity
towards a newly discovered virus.
Analysis of Figure 6 of the published
paper and Figure S4 of the online
supplemental information identified
thirteen pairs of Western blot bands
which had a common origin yet were
labeled as from different subjects and
usually as detecting a different class of
immunoglobulin. Specifically the
following pairs were shown to match
using forensically useful tools in
Photoshop. Each represent a
falsification in one or both of the figures
as indicated in the table:
Located in:
A1 IgM/F1 IgG ...........
B6 IgM/E1 IgM ..........
D7 IgM/A11 IgG ........
G3 IgM/H4 IgG ..........
H9 IgM/F4 IgG ...........
A4 IgM/E2 IgG ...........
A5 IgM/B9 IgM ..........
C9 IgG/C6 IgM ..........
D11 IgM/H11 IgG ......
D5 IgM/A1 IgG ..........
A10 1gM/F7 IgG ........
C11 1gM/E9 IgG .......
F3 IgG/E9 IgM ...........
maindgalligan on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Identity of strips
Fig. 6 & Fig. S4.
Fig. 6 & Fig. S4.
Fig. 6 & Fig. S4.
Fig. S4.
Fig. S4.
Fig. S4.
Fig. S4.
Fig. S4.
Fig. S4.
Fig. S4.
Fig. S4.
Fig. 6.
F3 in S4/E9 in Fig. 6.
The Respondent agreed to correction
of Figures 6 and S4 of the PNAS paper.
Dr. Xu has entered into a Voluntary
Settlement Agreement and has
voluntarily agreed for a period of three
(3) years, beginning on December 6,
2013:
(1) That prior to the submission of an
application for U.S. Public Health
Service (PHS) support (including NIH
support) for a research project on which
the Respondent’s participation is
proposed, and prior to Respondent’s
participation in any capacity on PHSsupported research, Respondent shall
ensure that a plan for supervision of her
duties is submitted to ORI for approval;
the supervision plan must be designed
to ensure the scientific integrity of
Respondent’s research contribution;
Respondent agrees that she shall not
participate in any PHS-supported
research until such a supervision plan is
submitted to and approved by ORI;
Respondent agrees to maintain
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:15 Dec 27, 2013
Jkt 232001
responsibility for compliance with the
agreed-upon supervision plan;
(2) That any institution employing her
shall submit, in conjunction with each
application for PHS funds, or report,
manuscript, or abstract involving PHSsupported research in which
Respondent is involved, a certification
to ORI that the data provided by
Respondent are based on actual
experiments or are otherwise
legitimately derived, that the data
procedures, and methodology are
accurately reported in the application,
report, manuscript, or abstract, and that
the text in such submission is her own
or properly cites the source of copied
language and ideas; and
(3) To exclude herself voluntarily
from serving in any advisory capacity to
PHS including, but not limited to,
service on any PHS advisory committee,
board, and/or peer review committee, or
as a consultant.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Director, Office of Research Integrity,
1101 Wootton Parkway, Suite 750,
Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 453–8800.
David E. Wright,
Director, Office of Research Integrity.
[FR Doc. 2013–31160 Filed 12–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–N–1155]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Food Labeling
Regulations
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the
collection of information by January 29,
2014.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX:
202–395–7285, or emailed to oira_
submission@omb.eop.gov. All
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
79461
comments should be identified with the
OMB control number 0910–0381. Also
include the FDA docket number found
in brackets in the heading of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA
PRA Staff, Office of Operations, Food
and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard
Dr., PI50–400B, Rockville, MD 20850,
PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Food Labeling Regulations—21 CFR
Parts 101, 102, 104, and 105 (OMB
Control Number 0910–0381)—Revision
to Include Collections Previously
Approved By OMB, But Currently in
Use Without Approval
Our food labeling regulations require
food producers to disclose to consumers
and others specific information about
themselves or their products on the
label or labeling of their products.
Related regulations require that food
producers retain records establishing
the basis for the information contained
in the label or labeling of their products
and provide those records to regulatory
officials. Finally, certain regulations
provide for the submission of food
labeling petitions to us. We issued our
food labeling regulations under parts
101, 102, 104, and 105 (21 CFR parts
101, 102, 104, and 105) under the
authority of sections 4, 5, and 6 of the
Fair Packaging and Labeling Act (FPLA)
(15 U.S.C. 1453, 1454, and 1455) and
sections 201, 301, 402, 403, 409, 411,
701, and 721 of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C.
321, 331, 342, 343, 348, 350, 371, and
379e). Most of these regulations derive
from section 403 of the FD&C Act,
which provides that a food product
shall be deemed to be misbranded if,
among other things, its label or labeling
fails to bear certain required information
concerning the food product, is false or
misleading in any particular, or bears
certain types of unauthorized claims.
The disclosure requirements and other
collections of information in the
regulations in parts 101, 102, 104, and
105 are necessary to ensure that food
products produced or sold in the United
States are in compliance with the
labeling provisions of the FD&C Act and
FPLA.
Upon review of the information
collection requests supporting these
food labeling regulations, FDA found
that the third-party disclosure burdens
associated with the requirements found
in §§ 101.9(c)(2)(ii) and 101.36(b)(2) to
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
maindgalligan on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
79462
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 250 / Monday, December 30, 2013 / Notices
declare the amount of trans fatty acids
present in a food, and with the
voluntary declaration of the quantitative
amount and the percent of Daily Value
of a dietary ingredient on a ‘‘per day’’
basis in addition to the required ‘‘per
serving’’ basis are in use without current
OMB approval. These collections of
information were previously approved
by OMB under control numbers 0910–
0595 and 0910–0395 respectively;
however, the approval period for these
collections has expired. To remedy this
oversight, to most appropriately
streamline these information
collections, and to eliminate
redundancy in its information collection
requests, we seek to revise the instant
collection to include these third-party
disclosure elements and have included
them in the burden estimates and
discussion in this document in support
of our approval request for OMB control
number 0910–0381.
Section 101.3 of our food labeling
regulations requires that the label of a
food product in packaged form bear a
statement of identity (i.e., the name of
the product), including, as appropriate,
the form of the food or the name of the
food imitated. Section 101.4 prescribes
requirements for the declaration of
ingredients on the label or labeling of
food products in packaged form. Section
101.5 requires that the label of a food
product in packaged form specify the
name and place of business of the
manufacturer, packer, or distributor
and, if the food producer is not the
manufacturer of the food product, its
connection with the food product.
Section 101.9 requires that nutrition
information be provided for all food
products intended for human
consumption and offered for sale, unless
an exemption in § 101.9(j) applies to the
product. In particular, § 101.9(c)(2)(ii)
requires that the amount of trans fatty
acids present in a food must be declared
on the nutrition label on a separate line
immediately under the line for the
declaration of saturated fat. Section
101.9(g)(9) provides that interested
parties may submit to us requests for
alternative approaches to nutrition
labeling requirements. Finally,
§ 101.9(j)(18) provides that firms
claiming the small business exemption
from nutrition labeling must submit
notice to us supporting their claim
exemption. We developed Form FDA
3570 to assist small businesses in
claiming the small business exemption
from nutrition labeling. The form
contains all the elements required by
§ 101.9(j)(18).
Section 101.10 requires that
restaurants provide nutrition
information, upon request, for any food
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:15 Dec 27, 2013
Jkt 232001
or meal for which a nutrient content
claim or health claim is made. Section
101.12(b) provides the reference amount
that is used for determining the serving
sizes for specific products, including
baking powder, baking soda, and pectin.
Section 101.12(e) provides that a
manufacturer that adjusts the reference
amount customarily consumed (RACC)
of an aerated food for the difference in
density of the aerated food relative to
the density of the appropriate nonaerated reference food must be prepared
to show us detailed protocols and
records of all data that were used to
determine the density-adjusted RACC.
Section 101.12(g) requires that the label
or labeling of a food product disclose
the serving size that is the basis for a
claim made for the product if the
serving size on which the claim is based
differs from the RACC. Section
101.12(h) provides for the submission of
petitions requesting that we change the
reference amounts defined by
regulation.
Section 101.13 requires that nutrition
information be provided in accordance
with § 101.9 for any food product for
which a nutrient content claim is made.
Under some circumstances, § 101.13
also requires the disclosure of other
types of information as a condition for
the use of a nutrient content claim. For
example, under § 101.13(j), if the claim
compares the level of a nutrient in the
food with the level of the same nutrient
in another ‘‘reference’’ food, the claim
must also disclose the identity of the
reference food, the amount of the
nutrient in each food, and the
percentage or fractional amount by
which the amount of the nutrient in the
labeled food differs from the amount of
the nutrient in the reference food. It also
requires that when this comparison is
based on an average of food products,
this information must be provided to
consumers or regulatory officials upon
request. Section 101.13(q)(5) requires
that restaurants document and provide
to appropriate regulatory officials, upon
request, the basis for any nutrient
content claims they have made for the
foods they sell.
Section 101.14(d)(2) and (d)(3)
provides for the disclosure of nutrition
information in accordance with § 101.9
and, under some circumstances, certain
other information as a condition for
making a health claim for a food
product. Section 101.15 provides that, if
the label of a food product contains any
representation in a foreign language, all
words, statements, and other
information required by or under
authority of the FD&C Act to appear on
the label must appear in both the foreign
language and in English. Section 101.22
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
contains labeling requirements for the
disclosure of spices, flavorings,
colorings, and chemical preservatives in
food products. Section 101.22(i)(4) sets
forth disclosure and recordkeeping
requirements pertaining to certifications
for flavors designated as containing no
artificial flavors. Section 101.30
specifies the conditions under which a
beverage that purports to contain any
fruit or vegetable juice must declare the
percentage of juice present in the
beverage and the manner in which the
declaration is to be made.
Section 101.36 requires that nutrition
information be provided for dietary
supplements offered for sale, unless an
exemption in § 101.36(h) applies. In
particular, § 101.36(b)(2) requires that
the amount of trans fatty acids present
in dietary supplements must be
declared on the nutrition label on a
separate line immediately under the line
for the declaration of saturated fat.
Section 101.36(e) permits the voluntary
declaration of the quantitative amount
and the percent of Daily Value of a
dietary ingredient on a ‘‘per day’’ basis
in addition to the required ‘‘per serving’’
basis, if a dietary supplement label
recommends that the dietary
supplement be consumed more than
once per day. Section 101.36(f)(2) crossreferences the provisions in § 101.9(g)(9)
for the submission to us of requests for
alternative approaches to nutrition
labeling requirements. Also,
§ 101.36(h)(2) cross-references the
provisions in § 101.9(j)(18) for the
submission of small business exemption
notices. As noted previously, we
developed Form FDA 3570 to assist
small businesses in claiming the small
business exemption from nutrition
labeling. The form contains all the
elements required by § 101.36(h)(2).
Section 101.42 requests that food
retailers voluntarily provide nutrition
information for raw fruit, vegetables,
and fish at the point of purchase and
§ 101.45 contains guidelines for
providing such information. Also,
§ 101.45(c) provides for the submission
to us of nutrient databases and proposed
nutrition labeling values for raw fruit,
vegetables, and fish for review and
approval.
Sections 101.54, 101.56, 101.60,
101.61, and 101.62 specify information
that must be disclosed as a condition for
making particular nutrient content
claims. Section 101.67 provides for the
use of nutrient content claims for butter,
and cross-references requirements in
other regulations for information
declaration (§ 101.4) and disclosure of
information concerning performance
characteristics (§ 101.13(d)). Section
101.69 provides for the submission of a
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
79463
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 250 / Monday, December 30, 2013 / Notices
petition requesting that we authorize a
particular nutrient content claim by
regulation. Section 101.70 provides for
the submission of a petition requesting
that we authorize a particular health
claim by regulation. Section
101.77(c)(2)(ii)(D) requires the
disclosure of soluble fiber per serving in
the nutrition labeling of a food bearing
a health claim about the relationship
between soluble fiber and a reduced risk
of coronary heart disease. Section
101.79(c)(2)(iv) requires the disclosure
of the amount of folate in the nutrition
label of a food bearing a health claim
about the relationship between folate
and a reduced risk of neural tube
defects.
Section 101.100(d) provides that any
agreement that forms the basis for an
exemption from the labeling
requirements of section 403(c), (e), (g),
(h), (i), (k), and (q) of the FD&C Act be
in writing and that a copy of the
agreement be made available to us upon
request. Section 101.100 also contains
reporting and disclosure requirements
as conditions for claiming certain
labeling exemptions (e.g., 101.100(h)).
Section 101.105 specifies
requirements for the declaration of the
net quantity of contents on the label of
a food in packaged form and prescribes
conditions under which a food whose
label does not accurately reflect the
actual quantity of contents may be sold,
with appropriate disclosures, to an
institution operated by a Federal, State
or local government. Section 101.108
provides for the submission to us of a
written proposal requesting a temporary
exemption from certain requirements of
§§ 101.9 and 105.66 for the purpose of
conducting food labeling experiments
with our authorization.
Regulations in part 102 define the
information that must be included as
part of the statement of identity for
particular foods and prescribe related
labeling requirements for some of these
foods. For example, § 102.22 requires
that the name of a protein hydrolysate
will include the identity of the food
source from which the protein was
derived.
Part 104, which pertains to nutritional
quality guidelines for foods, crossreferences several labeling provisions in
part 101 but contains no separate
information collection requirements.
Part 105 contains special labeling
requirements for hypoallergenic foods,
infant foods, and certain foods
represented as useful in reducing or
maintaining body weight.
The purpose of our food labeling
requirements is to allow consumers to
be knowledgeable about the foods they
purchase. Nutrition labeling provides
information for use by consumers in
selecting a nutritious diet. Other
information enables a consumer to
comparison shop. Ingredient
information also enables consumers to
avoid substances to which they may be
sensitive. Petitions or other requests
submitted to us provide the basis for us
to permit new labeling statements or to
grant exemptions from certain labeling
requirements. Recordkeeping
requirements enable us to monitor the
basis upon which certain label
statements are made for food products
and whether those statements are in
compliance with the requirements of the
FD&C Act or FPLA.
Description of Respondents:
Respondents to this information
collection are manufacturers, packers,
and distributors of food products.
Because of the existence of exemptions
and exceptions, not all of the
requirements apply to all food
producers or to all of their products.
Some of the regulations affect food
retailers, such as supermarkets and
restaurants.
In the Federal Register of November
1, 2013 (78 FR 65663), FDA published
a 60-day notice requesting public
comment on the proposed collection of
information. Several comments were
received in response to the notice. Many
were generally supportive of the
necessity of our food labeling
regulations. Other comments were
beyond the scope of the four collections
of information topics on which the
notice solicits comments and will
therefore not be discussed in this
document.
A number of comments referenced
our Federal Register notice published
on November 8, 2013 (78 FR 67169)
(‘‘the November 8, 2013, notice’’),
announcing the tentative determination
that partially hydrogenated oils (PHOs)
are no longer ‘‘generally recognized as
safe’’ (GRAS). Some comments
supported this determination while
others opposed it. Supportive comments
suggested that labels should be placed
on food packaging warning consumers
of the negative health effects of the trans
fatty acid component of PHOs. FDA
notes that it does not require warning
labels on food containing trans fatty
acid, but we agree that trans fatty acid
content should be provided in the
nutrition labeling of food. In the Federal
Register of July 11, 2003 (68 FR 41434),
we issued a final rule (‘‘the July 2003
final rule’’) amending our nutrition
labeling regulations to require
declaration of the trans fatty acid
content of food in the nutrition label of
conventional foods and dietary
supplements (§ 101.9(c)(2)(ii)). This
requirement was effective January 1,
2006. The November 8, 2013, notice
seeks comments on our preliminary
determination that PHOs are not GRAS
and we have submitted comments
relevant to this topic to that docket as
well. If FDA makes a final
determination that PHOs are not GRAS,
the food industry would be required to
phase out the use of PHOs in food over
time, not place warning labels on their
food products.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL THIRD-PARTY DISCLOSURE BURDEN 1
Number of
respondents
maindgalligan on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
21 CFR section
101.3, 101.22, 102, and 104; statement of identity labeling requirements ...........................................................
101.4, 101.22, 101.100, 102, 104, and 105; ingredient
labeling requirements ...................................................
101.5; requirement to specify the name and place of
business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor
and, if the food producer is not the manufacturer of
the food product, its connection with the food product
101.9, 101.13(n), 101.14(d)(3), 101.62, and 104; labeling requirements for disclosure of nutrition information
101.9(g)(9) and 101.36(f)(2); alternative means of compliance permitted ..........................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:15 Dec 27, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Number of
disclosures per
respondent
Total
annual
disclosures
Average
burden per
disclosure
Total hours
25,000
1.03
25,750
0.5
12,875
25,000
1.03
25,750
1
25,750
25,000
1.03
25,750
0.25
25,000
1.03
25,750
4
103,000
12
4
48
12
Fmt 4703
1
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
6,438
79464
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 250 / Monday, December 30, 2013 / Notices
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL THIRD-PARTY DISCLOSURE BURDEN 1—Continued
101.10; requirements for nutrition labeling of restaurant
foods .............................................................................
101.12(b); RACC for baking powder, baking soda, and
pectin ............................................................................
101.12(e); adjustment to the RACC of an aerated food
permitted .......................................................................
101.12(g); requirement to disclose the serving size that
is the basis for a claim made for the product if the
serving size on which the claim is based differs from
the RACC .....................................................................
101.13(d)(1) and 101.67; requirements to disclose nutrition information for any food product for which a nutrient content claim is made ............................................
101.13(j)(2), 101.13(k), 101.54, 101.56, 101.60, 101.61,
and 101.62; additional disclosure required if the nutrient content claim compares the level of a nutrient in
one food with the level of the same nutrient in another food .....................................................................
101.13(q)(5); requirement that restaurants disclose the
basis for nutrient content claims made for their food ..
101.14(d)(2); general requirements for disclosure of nutrition information related to health claims for food
products ........................................................................
101.15; requirements pertaining to prominence of required statements and use of foreign language ..........
101.22(i)(4); supplier certifications for flavors designated
as containing no artificial flavors ..................................
101.30 and 102.33; labeling requirements for fruit or
vegetable juice beverages ...........................................
101.36; nutrition labeling of dietary supplements ............
101.42 and 101.45; nutrition labeling of raw fruits, vegetables, and fish .............................................................
101.45(c); databases of nutrient values for raw fruits,
vegetables, and fish .....................................................
101.79(c)(2)(i)(D); disclosure requirements for food labels that contain a folate/neural tube defect health
claim .............................................................................
101.79(c)(2)(iv); disclosure of amount of folate for food
labels that contain a folate/neural tube defect health
claim .............................................................................
101.100(d); disclosure of agreements that form the
basis for exemption from the labeling requirements of
section 403(c), (e), (g), (h), (i), (k), and (q) of the
FD&C Act .....................................................................
101.105 and 101.100(h); disclosure requirements for
food not accurately labeled for quantity of contents
and for claiming certain labeling exemptions ...............
Total ..........................................................................
1 There
Number of
disclosures per
respondent
Number of
respondents
21 CFR section
Total
annual
disclosures
Average
burden per
disclosure
0.25
Total hours
300,000
1.5
450,000
112,500
29
2.3
67
1
67
25
1
25
1
25
5,000
1
5,000
1
5,000
200
1
200
1
200
5,000
1
5,000
1
5,000
300,000
1.5
450,000
0.75
337,500
300,000
1.5
450,000
0.75
337,500
160
10
1,600
8
12,800
25
1
25
1
25
1,500
300
5
40
7,500
12,000
1,000
1
1,000
5
4
20
1,000
1
1,000
0.25
250
100
1
100
0.25
25
1,000
1
1,000
25,000
1.03
1
4.025
0.5
4
500
80
1
25,750
7,500
48,300
1,000
0.5
12,875
1,029,258
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 1
Number of
recordkeepers
maindgalligan on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
21 CFR section
Number of
records per
recordkeeper
25
1
101.12(e); recordkeeping to document the basis for
density-adjusted RACC ................................................
101.13(q)(5); recordkeeping to document the basis for
nutrient content claims .................................................
101.14(d)(2); recordkeeping to document nutrition information related to health claims for food products .......
101.22(i)(4); recordkeeping to document supplier certifications for flavors designated as containing no artificial flavors ....................................................................
101.100(d)(2); recordkeeping pertaining to agreements
that form the basis for an exemption from the labeling
requirements of section 403(c), (e), (g), (h), (i), (k),
and (q) of the FD&C Act ..............................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:15 Dec 27, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Total annual
records
Average
burden per
recordkeeping
25
1
Total hours
25
300,000
1.5
450,000
0.75
337,500
300,000
1.5
450,000
0.75
337,500
25
1
25
1
25
1,000
1
1,000
1
1,000
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
79465
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 250 / Monday, December 30, 2013 / Notices
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 1—Continued
Number of
recordkeepers
21 CFR section
Number of
records per
recordkeeper
100
1
101.105(t); recordkeeping pertaining to disclosure requirements for food not accurately labeled for quantity
of contents ....................................................................
Total ..........................................................................
1 There
Average
burden per
recordkeeping
Total annual
records
100
Total hours
1
100
676,150
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
TABLE 3—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Number of
responses per
respondent
Number of
respondents
21 CFR Section/Form No.
101.9(j)(18) and 101.36(h)(2); procedure for small business nutrition labeling exemption notice using Form
FDA 3570 .........................................................................
101.12(h); petitions to establish or amend a RACC ...........
101.69; petitions for nutrient content claims ........................
101.70; petitions for health claims .......................................
101.108; written proposal for requesting temporary exemptions from certain regulations for the purpose of conducting food labeling experiments ...................................
Average
burden per
response
Total annual
responses
Total hours
10,000
5
3
5
1
1
1
1
10,000
5
3
5
8
80
25
80
80,000
400
75
400
1
1
1
40
40
Total ..............................................................................
maindgalligan on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1 There
80,915
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
The estimated annual third-party
disclosure, recordkeeping, and reporting
burdens are based on our
communications with industry and our
knowledge of and experience with food
labeling and the submission of petitions
and requests to us.
As noted, we are revising this
collection to include previously
approved third-party disclosure burdens
associated with the requirement to
declare the amount of trans fatty acids
present in a food, including dietary
supplements. The third-party disclosure
burden hours formerly associated with
OMB control number 0910–0515
(collection entitled, ‘‘Food Labeling:
Trans Fatty Acids in Nutrition
Labeling’’) are represented by the
citation to § 101.9 on line 4 of table 1
and the citation to § 101.36 on line 17
of table 1. For this revision, we have not
added burden hours to line 4 or line 17
of table 1 because, based on our
experience with food labeling, the 4
hours estimated for meeting the labeling
requirements of § 101.9 and the 4 hours
estimated for meeting the labeling
requirements of § 101.36 are appropriate
estimates of the total time it takes a
respondent to meet our requirements for
nutrition labeling in §§ 101.9 and
101.36.
We are also revising this collection to
include previously approved third-party
disclosure burdens associated with the
voluntary declaration of the quantitative
amount and the percent of Daily Value
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:15 Dec 27, 2013
Jkt 232001
of a dietary ingredient on a ‘‘per day’’
basis in addition to the required ‘‘per
serving’’ basis. The third-party
disclosure burden hours formerly
associated with OMB control number
0910–0395 (collection entitled, ‘‘Food
Labeling: Nutrition Labeling of Dietary
Supplements on a ‘Per Day’ Basis’’) are
represented by the citation to § 101.36
on line 17 of Table 1 and the addition
of 300 hours to our previous estimate of
48,000 hours. For this revision, we
added 300 burden hours to line 17 of
table 1 because voluntary labeling on a
‘‘per day’’ basis is in addition to the
required ‘‘per serving’’ basis. We
estimate that ‘‘per day’’ information
would generally be placed on, at most,
10 percent of the estimated 12,000
disclosures, for a total of 1,200 annual
disclosures, and that a respondent will
spend 15 minutes (0.25 hours) per
disclosure, for a total of 300 hours.
Thus, the total estimated burden on line
17 of table 1 is 48,300 hours and average
burden per disclosure on line 17 of table
1 has been increased from 4.0 to 4.025
hours, to represent an averaging of the
burden hours across all of the estimated
12,000 disclosures.
We expect that the burden hours for
submissions under § 101.108 will be
insignificant. Section 101.108 was
originally issued to provide a procedure
whereby we could grant exemptions
from certain food labeling requirements.
Exemption petitions have infrequently
been submitted in the recent past; none
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
have been submitted since publication
on January 6, 1993, of the final
regulations implementing section 403(q)
and (r) of the FD&C Act. Thus, in order
to maintain OMB approval of § 101.108
to accommodate the possibility that a
food producer may propose to conduct
a labeling experiment on its own
initiative, we estimate that we will
receive one or fewer submissions under
§ 101.108 in the next 3 years.
Dated: December 23, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013–31215 Filed 12–27–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–N–1676]
International Drug Scheduling;
Convention on Psychotropic
Substances; Single Convention on
Narcotic Drugs; Tapentadol; Tramadol;
Ketamine; gamma-Butyrolactone; 22
Additional Substances; Request for
Comments
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is requesting
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 250 (Monday, December 30, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 79461-79465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-31215]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-1155]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Food Labeling
Regulations
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by January
29, 2014.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
FAX: 202-395-7285, or emailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0381.
Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400B, Rockville,
MD 20850, PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Food Labeling Regulations--21 CFR Parts 101, 102, 104, and 105 (OMB
Control Number 0910-0381)--Revision to Include Collections Previously
Approved By OMB, But Currently in Use Without Approval
Our food labeling regulations require food producers to disclose to
consumers and others specific information about themselves or their
products on the label or labeling of their products. Related
regulations require that food producers retain records establishing the
basis for the information contained in the label or labeling of their
products and provide those records to regulatory officials. Finally,
certain regulations provide for the submission of food labeling
petitions to us. We issued our food labeling regulations under parts
101, 102, 104, and 105 (21 CFR parts 101, 102, 104, and 105) under the
authority of sections 4, 5, and 6 of the Fair Packaging and Labeling
Act (FPLA) (15 U.S.C. 1453, 1454, and 1455) and sections 201, 301, 402,
403, 409, 411, 701, and 721 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 342, 343, 348, 350, 371, and 379e).
Most of these regulations derive from section 403 of the FD&C Act,
which provides that a food product shall be deemed to be misbranded if,
among other things, its label or labeling fails to bear certain
required information concerning the food product, is false or
misleading in any particular, or bears certain types of unauthorized
claims. The disclosure requirements and other collections of
information in the regulations in parts 101, 102, 104, and 105 are
necessary to ensure that food products produced or sold in the United
States are in compliance with the labeling provisions of the FD&C Act
and FPLA.
Upon review of the information collection requests supporting these
food labeling regulations, FDA found that the third-party disclosure
burdens associated with the requirements found in Sec. Sec.
101.9(c)(2)(ii) and 101.36(b)(2) to
[[Page 79462]]
declare the amount of trans fatty acids present in a food, and with the
voluntary declaration of the quantitative amount and the percent of
Daily Value of a dietary ingredient on a ``per day'' basis in addition
to the required ``per serving'' basis are in use without current OMB
approval. These collections of information were previously approved by
OMB under control numbers 0910-0595 and 0910-0395 respectively;
however, the approval period for these collections has expired. To
remedy this oversight, to most appropriately streamline these
information collections, and to eliminate redundancy in its information
collection requests, we seek to revise the instant collection to
include these third-party disclosure elements and have included them in
the burden estimates and discussion in this document in support of our
approval request for OMB control number 0910-0381.
Section 101.3 of our food labeling regulations requires that the
label of a food product in packaged form bear a statement of identity
(i.e., the name of the product), including, as appropriate, the form of
the food or the name of the food imitated. Section 101.4 prescribes
requirements for the declaration of ingredients on the label or
labeling of food products in packaged form. Section 101.5 requires that
the label of a food product in packaged form specify the name and place
of business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor and, if the
food producer is not the manufacturer of the food product, its
connection with the food product. Section 101.9 requires that nutrition
information be provided for all food products intended for human
consumption and offered for sale, unless an exemption in Sec. 101.9(j)
applies to the product. In particular, Sec. 101.9(c)(2)(ii) requires
that the amount of trans fatty acids present in a food must be declared
on the nutrition label on a separate line immediately under the line
for the declaration of saturated fat. Section 101.9(g)(9) provides that
interested parties may submit to us requests for alternative approaches
to nutrition labeling requirements. Finally, Sec. 101.9(j)(18)
provides that firms claiming the small business exemption from
nutrition labeling must submit notice to us supporting their claim
exemption. We developed Form FDA 3570 to assist small businesses in
claiming the small business exemption from nutrition labeling. The form
contains all the elements required by Sec. 101.9(j)(18).
Section 101.10 requires that restaurants provide nutrition
information, upon request, for any food or meal for which a nutrient
content claim or health claim is made. Section 101.12(b) provides the
reference amount that is used for determining the serving sizes for
specific products, including baking powder, baking soda, and pectin.
Section 101.12(e) provides that a manufacturer that adjusts the
reference amount customarily consumed (RACC) of an aerated food for the
difference in density of the aerated food relative to the density of
the appropriate non-aerated reference food must be prepared to show us
detailed protocols and records of all data that were used to determine
the density-adjusted RACC. Section 101.12(g) requires that the label or
labeling of a food product disclose the serving size that is the basis
for a claim made for the product if the serving size on which the claim
is based differs from the RACC. Section 101.12(h) provides for the
submission of petitions requesting that we change the reference amounts
defined by regulation.
Section 101.13 requires that nutrition information be provided in
accordance with Sec. 101.9 for any food product for which a nutrient
content claim is made. Under some circumstances, Sec. 101.13 also
requires the disclosure of other types of information as a condition
for the use of a nutrient content claim. For example, under Sec.
101.13(j), if the claim compares the level of a nutrient in the food
with the level of the same nutrient in another ``reference'' food, the
claim must also disclose the identity of the reference food, the amount
of the nutrient in each food, and the percentage or fractional amount
by which the amount of the nutrient in the labeled food differs from
the amount of the nutrient in the reference food. It also requires that
when this comparison is based on an average of food products, this
information must be provided to consumers or regulatory officials upon
request. Section 101.13(q)(5) requires that restaurants document and
provide to appropriate regulatory officials, upon request, the basis
for any nutrient content claims they have made for the foods they sell.
Section 101.14(d)(2) and (d)(3) provides for the disclosure of
nutrition information in accordance with Sec. 101.9 and, under some
circumstances, certain other information as a condition for making a
health claim for a food product. Section 101.15 provides that, if the
label of a food product contains any representation in a foreign
language, all words, statements, and other information required by or
under authority of the FD&C Act to appear on the label must appear in
both the foreign language and in English. Section 101.22 contains
labeling requirements for the disclosure of spices, flavorings,
colorings, and chemical preservatives in food products. Section
101.22(i)(4) sets forth disclosure and recordkeeping requirements
pertaining to certifications for flavors designated as containing no
artificial flavors. Section 101.30 specifies the conditions under which
a beverage that purports to contain any fruit or vegetable juice must
declare the percentage of juice present in the beverage and the manner
in which the declaration is to be made.
Section 101.36 requires that nutrition information be provided for
dietary supplements offered for sale, unless an exemption in Sec.
101.36(h) applies. In particular, Sec. 101.36(b)(2) requires that the
amount of trans fatty acids present in dietary supplements must be
declared on the nutrition label on a separate line immediately under
the line for the declaration of saturated fat. Section 101.36(e)
permits the voluntary declaration of the quantitative amount and the
percent of Daily Value of a dietary ingredient on a ``per day'' basis
in addition to the required ``per serving'' basis, if a dietary
supplement label recommends that the dietary supplement be consumed
more than once per day. Section 101.36(f)(2) cross-references the
provisions in Sec. 101.9(g)(9) for the submission to us of requests
for alternative approaches to nutrition labeling requirements. Also,
Sec. 101.36(h)(2) cross-references the provisions in Sec.
101.9(j)(18) for the submission of small business exemption notices. As
noted previously, we developed Form FDA 3570 to assist small businesses
in claiming the small business exemption from nutrition labeling. The
form contains all the elements required by Sec. 101.36(h)(2).
Section 101.42 requests that food retailers voluntarily provide
nutrition information for raw fruit, vegetables, and fish at the point
of purchase and Sec. 101.45 contains guidelines for providing such
information. Also, Sec. 101.45(c) provides for the submission to us of
nutrient databases and proposed nutrition labeling values for raw
fruit, vegetables, and fish for review and approval.
Sections 101.54, 101.56, 101.60, 101.61, and 101.62 specify
information that must be disclosed as a condition for making particular
nutrient content claims. Section 101.67 provides for the use of
nutrient content claims for butter, and cross-references requirements
in other regulations for information declaration (Sec. 101.4) and
disclosure of information concerning performance characteristics (Sec.
101.13(d)). Section 101.69 provides for the submission of a
[[Page 79463]]
petition requesting that we authorize a particular nutrient content
claim by regulation. Section 101.70 provides for the submission of a
petition requesting that we authorize a particular health claim by
regulation. Section 101.77(c)(2)(ii)(D) requires the disclosure of
soluble fiber per serving in the nutrition labeling of a food bearing a
health claim about the relationship between soluble fiber and a reduced
risk of coronary heart disease. Section 101.79(c)(2)(iv) requires the
disclosure of the amount of folate in the nutrition label of a food
bearing a health claim about the relationship between folate and a
reduced risk of neural tube defects.
Section 101.100(d) provides that any agreement that forms the basis
for an exemption from the labeling requirements of section 403(c), (e),
(g), (h), (i), (k), and (q) of the FD&C Act be in writing and that a
copy of the agreement be made available to us upon request. Section
101.100 also contains reporting and disclosure requirements as
conditions for claiming certain labeling exemptions (e.g., 101.100(h)).
Section 101.105 specifies requirements for the declaration of the
net quantity of contents on the label of a food in packaged form and
prescribes conditions under which a food whose label does not
accurately reflect the actual quantity of contents may be sold, with
appropriate disclosures, to an institution operated by a Federal, State
or local government. Section 101.108 provides for the submission to us
of a written proposal requesting a temporary exemption from certain
requirements of Sec. Sec. 101.9 and 105.66 for the purpose of
conducting food labeling experiments with our authorization.
Regulations in part 102 define the information that must be
included as part of the statement of identity for particular foods and
prescribe related labeling requirements for some of these foods. For
example, Sec. 102.22 requires that the name of a protein hydrolysate
will include the identity of the food source from which the protein was
derived.
Part 104, which pertains to nutritional quality guidelines for
foods, cross-references several labeling provisions in part 101 but
contains no separate information collection requirements.
Part 105 contains special labeling requirements for hypoallergenic
foods, infant foods, and certain foods represented as useful in
reducing or maintaining body weight.
The purpose of our food labeling requirements is to allow consumers
to be knowledgeable about the foods they purchase. Nutrition labeling
provides information for use by consumers in selecting a nutritious
diet. Other information enables a consumer to comparison shop.
Ingredient information also enables consumers to avoid substances to
which they may be sensitive. Petitions or other requests submitted to
us provide the basis for us to permit new labeling statements or to
grant exemptions from certain labeling requirements. Recordkeeping
requirements enable us to monitor the basis upon which certain label
statements are made for food products and whether those statements are
in compliance with the requirements of the FD&C Act or FPLA.
Description of Respondents: Respondents to this information
collection are manufacturers, packers, and distributors of food
products. Because of the existence of exemptions and exceptions, not
all of the requirements apply to all food producers or to all of their
products. Some of the regulations affect food retailers, such as
supermarkets and restaurants.
In the Federal Register of November 1, 2013 (78 FR 65663), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed
collection of information. Several comments were received in response
to the notice. Many were generally supportive of the necessity of our
food labeling regulations. Other comments were beyond the scope of the
four collections of information topics on which the notice solicits
comments and will therefore not be discussed in this document.
A number of comments referenced our Federal Register notice
published on November 8, 2013 (78 FR 67169) (``the November 8, 2013,
notice''), announcing the tentative determination that partially
hydrogenated oils (PHOs) are no longer ``generally recognized as safe''
(GRAS). Some comments supported this determination while others opposed
it. Supportive comments suggested that labels should be placed on food
packaging warning consumers of the negative health effects of the trans
fatty acid component of PHOs. FDA notes that it does not require
warning labels on food containing trans fatty acid, but we agree that
trans fatty acid content should be provided in the nutrition labeling
of food. In the Federal Register of July 11, 2003 (68 FR 41434), we
issued a final rule (``the July 2003 final rule'') amending our
nutrition labeling regulations to require declaration of the trans
fatty acid content of food in the nutrition label of conventional foods
and dietary supplements (Sec. 101.9(c)(2)(ii)). This requirement was
effective January 1, 2006. The November 8, 2013, notice seeks comments
on our preliminary determination that PHOs are not GRAS and we have
submitted comments relevant to this topic to that docket as well. If
FDA makes a final determination that PHOs are not GRAS, the food
industry would be required to phase out the use of PHOs in food over
time, not place warning labels on their food products.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Table 1--Estimated Annual Third-Party Disclosure Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
21 CFR section Number of disclosures Total annual Average burden Total hours
respondents per respondent disclosures per disclosure
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
101.3, 101.22, 102, and 104; 25,000 1.03 25,750 0.5 12,875
statement of identity labeling
requirements...................
101.4, 101.22, 101.100, 102, 25,000 1.03 25,750 1 25,750
104, and 105; ingredient
labeling requirements..........
101.5; requirement to specify 25,000 1.03 25,750 0.25 6,438
the name and place of business
of the manufacturer, packer, or
distributor and, if the food
producer is not the
manufacturer of the food
product, its connection with
the food product...............
101.9, 101.13(n), 101.14(d)(3), 25,000 1.03 25,750 4 103,000
101.62, and 104; labeling
requirements for disclosure of
nutrition information..........
101.9(g)(9) and 101.36(f)(2); 12 1 12 4 48
alternative means of compliance
permitted......................
[[Page 79464]]
101.10; requirements for 300,000 1.5 450,000 0.25 112,500
nutrition labeling of
restaurant foods...............
101.12(b); RACC for baking 29 2.3 67 1 67
powder, baking soda, and pectin
101.12(e); adjustment to the 25 1 25 1 25
RACC of an aerated food
permitted......................
101.12(g); requirement to 5,000 1 5,000 1 5,000
disclose the serving size that
is the basis for a claim made
for the product if the serving
size on which the claim is
based differs from the RACC....
101.13(d)(1) and 101.67; 200 1 200 1 200
requirements to disclose
nutrition information for any
food product for which a
nutrient content claim is made.
101.13(j)(2), 101.13(k), 101.54, 5,000 1 5,000 1 5,000
101.56, 101.60, 101.61, and
101.62; additional disclosure
required if the nutrient
content claim compares the
level of a nutrient in one food
with the level of the same
nutrient in another food.......
101.13(q)(5); requirement that 300,000 1.5 450,000 0.75 337,500
restaurants disclose the basis
for nutrient content claims
made for their food............
101.14(d)(2); general 300,000 1.5 450,000 0.75 337,500
requirements for disclosure of
nutrition information related
to health claims for food
products.......................
101.15; requirements pertaining 160 10 1,600 8 12,800
to prominence of required
statements and use of foreign
language.......................
101.22(i)(4); supplier 25 1 25 1 25
certifications for flavors
designated as containing no
artificial flavors.............
101.30 and 102.33; labeling 1,500 5 7,500 1 7,500
requirements for fruit or
vegetable juice beverages......
101.36; nutrition labeling of 300 40 12,000 4.025 48,300
dietary supplements............
101.42 and 101.45; nutrition 1,000 1 1,000 0.5 500
labeling of raw fruits,
vegetables, and fish...........
101.45(c); databases of nutrient 5 4 20 4 80
values for raw fruits,
vegetables, and fish...........
101.79(c)(2)(i)(D); disclosure 1,000 1 1,000 0.25 250
requirements for food labels
that contain a folate/neural
tube defect health claim.......
101.79(c)(2)(iv); disclosure of 100 1 100 0.25 25
amount of folate for food
labels that contain a folate/
neural tube defect health claim
101.100(d); disclosure of 1,000 1 1,000 1 1,000
agreements that form the basis
for exemption from the labeling
requirements of section 403(c),
(e), (g), (h), (i), (k), and
(q) of the FD&C Act............
101.105 and 101.100(h); 25,000 1.03 25,750 0.5 12,875
disclosure requirements for
food not accurately labeled for
quantity of contents and for
claiming certain labeling
exemptions.....................
Total....................... 1,029,258
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
Table 2--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average burden
21 CFR section Number of records per Total annual per Total hours
recordkeepers recordkeeper records recordkeeping
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
101.12(e); recordkeeping to 25 1 25 1 25
document the basis for density-
adjusted RACC.................
101.13(q)(5); recordkeeping to 300,000 1.5 450,000 0.75 337,500
document the basis for
nutrient content claims.......
101.14(d)(2); recordkeeping to 300,000 1.5 450,000 0.75 337,500
document nutrition information
related to health claims for
food products.................
101.22(i)(4); recordkeeping to 25 1 25 1 25
document supplier
certifications for flavors
designated as containing no
artificial flavors............
101.100(d)(2); recordkeeping 1,000 1 1,000 1 1,000
pertaining to agreements that
form the basis for an
exemption from the labeling
requirements of section
403(c), (e), (g), (h), (i),
(k), and (q) of the FD&C Act..
[[Page 79465]]
101.105(t); recordkeeping 100 1 100 1 100
pertaining to disclosure
requirements for food not
accurately labeled for
quantity of contents..........
Total...................... 676,150
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
Table 3--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
21 CFR Section/Form No. Number of responses per Total annual Average burden Total hours
respondents respondent responses per response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
101.9(j)(18) and 101.36(h)(2); 10,000 1 10,000 8 80,000
procedure for small business
nutrition labeling exemption
notice using Form FDA 3570.....
101.12(h); petitions to 5 1 5 80 400
establish or amend a RACC......
101.69; petitions for nutrient 3 1 3 25 75
content claims.................
101.70; petitions for health 5 1 5 80 400
claims.........................
101.108; written proposal for 1 1 1 40 40
requesting temporary exemptions
from certain regulations for
the purpose of conducting food
labeling experiments...........
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... 80,915
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
The estimated annual third-party disclosure, recordkeeping, and
reporting burdens are based on our communications with industry and our
knowledge of and experience with food labeling and the submission of
petitions and requests to us.
As noted, we are revising this collection to include previously
approved third-party disclosure burdens associated with the requirement
to declare the amount of trans fatty acids present in a food, including
dietary supplements. The third-party disclosure burden hours formerly
associated with OMB control number 0910-0515 (collection entitled,
``Food Labeling: Trans Fatty Acids in Nutrition Labeling'') are
represented by the citation to Sec. 101.9 on line 4 of table 1 and the
citation to Sec. 101.36 on line 17 of table 1. For this revision, we
have not added burden hours to line 4 or line 17 of table 1 because,
based on our experience with food labeling, the 4 hours estimated for
meeting the labeling requirements of Sec. 101.9 and the 4 hours
estimated for meeting the labeling requirements of Sec. 101.36 are
appropriate estimates of the total time it takes a respondent to meet
our requirements for nutrition labeling in Sec. Sec. 101.9 and 101.36.
We are also revising this collection to include previously approved
third-party disclosure burdens associated with the voluntary
declaration of the quantitative amount and the percent of Daily Value
of a dietary ingredient on a ``per day'' basis in addition to the
required ``per serving'' basis. The third-party disclosure burden hours
formerly associated with OMB control number 0910-0395 (collection
entitled, ``Food Labeling: Nutrition Labeling of Dietary Supplements on
a `Per Day' Basis'') are represented by the citation to Sec. 101.36 on
line 17 of Table 1 and the addition of 300 hours to our previous
estimate of 48,000 hours. For this revision, we added 300 burden hours
to line 17 of table 1 because voluntary labeling on a ``per day'' basis
is in addition to the required ``per serving'' basis. We estimate that
``per day'' information would generally be placed on, at most, 10
percent of the estimated 12,000 disclosures, for a total of 1,200
annual disclosures, and that a respondent will spend 15 minutes (0.25
hours) per disclosure, for a total of 300 hours. Thus, the total
estimated burden on line 17 of table 1 is 48,300 hours and average
burden per disclosure on line 17 of table 1 has been increased from 4.0
to 4.025 hours, to represent an averaging of the burden hours across
all of the estimated 12,000 disclosures.
We expect that the burden hours for submissions under Sec. 101.108
will be insignificant. Section 101.108 was originally issued to provide
a procedure whereby we could grant exemptions from certain food
labeling requirements. Exemption petitions have infrequently been
submitted in the recent past; none have been submitted since
publication on January 6, 1993, of the final regulations implementing
section 403(q) and (r) of the FD&C Act. Thus, in order to maintain OMB
approval of Sec. 101.108 to accommodate the possibility that a food
producer may propose to conduct a labeling experiment on its own
initiative, we estimate that we will receive one or fewer submissions
under Sec. 101.108 in the next 3 years.
Dated: December 23, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-31215 Filed 12-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P