Intent To Prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Route 460 Location Study From Prince George County to the City of Suffolk, VA, 78948-78950 [2013-30695]

Download as PDF 78948 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 249 / Friday, December 27, 2013 / Notices for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and title, by the following method: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information. DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings. Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD Information Management Division, 4800 Mark Center Drive, East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350–3100. Dated: December 23, 2013. Aaron Siegel, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. BILLING CODE 5001–06–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Army [Docket ID: USA–2013–0047] Proposed Collection; Comment Request United States Army, DoD. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. AGENCY: In compliance with Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, and as part of an effort to streamline the process to seek feedback from the public on service delivery, the Department of Defense announces a proposed generic information collection and seeks public comment on the provisions thereof. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the information collection on tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES VerDate Mar<15>2010 23:48 Dec 26, 2013 Jkt 232001 You may submit comments, identified by docket number and title, by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 4800 Mark Center Drive, East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350–3100. Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information. ADDRESSES: To request more information on this proposed information collection or to obtain a copy of the proposal and associated collection instruments, please write to the Information Management Division, ATTN: Public Collections Team, 4800 Mark Center Drive, East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350–3100. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title; Associated Form; and OMB Number: United States Army Generic Clearance; OMB Control Number 0702– TBD. Needs and Uses: The proposed information collection activity provides a means to garner qualitative customer and stakeholder feedback in an efficient, timely manner, in accordance with the Administration’s commitment to improving service delivery. By qualitative feedback we mean information that provides useful insights on perceptions and opinions, but are not statistical surveys that yield quantitative results that can be generalized to the population of study. This feedback will provide insights into customer or stakeholder perceptions, experiences and expectations, provide an early warning of issues with service, or focus attention on areas where communication, training or changes in operations might improve delivery of products or services. These collections will allow for ongoing, collaborative and actionable communications between the Agency and its customers and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: [FR Doc. 2013–31007 Filed 12–26–13; 8:45 am] SUMMARY: respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by February 25, 2014. PO 00000 Frm 00139 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 stakeholders. It will also allow feedback to contribute directly to the improvement of program management. Responses will be assessed to plan and inform efforts to improve or maintain the quality of service offered to the public. If this information is not collected, vital feedback from customers and stakeholders on the Agency’s services will be unavailable. Affected Public: Individuals or households; business or other for-profit; not-for-profit institutions; farms; Federal Government; State, Local, or Tribal Government. Number of Respondents: 100,000. Average Annual Burden Average Expected Annual Number of Activities: 10. Average Number of Respondents per Activity: 3,332. Annual Responses: 33,320. Responses per Respondent: 1. Average Time per Response: 15 minutes. Annual Burden Hours: 8,330 Hours. Three Year Burden Average Expected Number of Activities: 30. Total Respondents: 100,000. Total Responses: 100,000. Responses per Respondent: 1. Average Time per Response: 15 minutes. Total Burden Hours: 25,000 Hours. Frequency: On occasion. Dated: December 20, 2013. Aaron Siegel, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. [FR Doc. 2013–30927 Filed 12–26–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001–06–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers Intent To Prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Route 460 Location Study From Prince George County to the City of Suffolk, VA Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD. ACTION: Notice of Intent. AGENCY: The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Norfolk District, as joint lead federal agencies, and in cooperation with the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), will prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM 27DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 249 / Friday, December 27, 2013 / Notices notice and continue processing the permit application. An FEIS for the Route 460 Location Study was approved by FHWA in June 2008 and a ROD was issued by FHWA in September 2008. U.S. Route 460 Mobility Partners has entered into a contract with VDOT to obtain permits and construct the Preferred Alternative identified in the 2008 FEIS/ROD. In November 2012, based upon the information before them at the time, FHWA completed a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Reevaluation of the FEIS concluding that an SEIS was not needed. Based on new information bearing on the environmental impacts, including the aquatic impacts, it was later decided that an SEIS is required. This SEIS will review information from the Route 460 Location Study FEIS/ROD, incorporate new information, update the alternatives and impacts analyses, and assess impacts not previously evaluated in the FEIS/ ROD. To streamline federal processes, the SEIS will also include the USACE’s NEPA evaluation. 2. Alternatives: Alternatives to be considered for the proposed project are the No-Build Alternative, the FHWA/ VDOT preferred alternative (Preferred DATES: Submit comments on or before Alternative from the 2008 FEIS/ROD) January 27, 2014. and the FHWA/VDOT preferred ADDRESSES: Alice Allen-Grimes, U.S. alternative revised to include one or Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory more of the following proposed changes: Branch, 803 Front Street, Norfolk, VA changes to the termini, the proposed 23510 or Ed Sundra, Division interchange at Route 620, and alignment Administrator, Federal Highway shifts to avoid and minimize impacts. Administration, 400 North 8th Street, Additionally, so that the USACE may Suite 750, Richmond, VA 23219. fulfill its required alternatives analysis FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: responsibilities, consideration will also Alice Allen-Grimes, email: alice.w.allen- be given to the alternative from the DEIS arimes@usace.army.mil; (757) 201– to improve the existing Route 460 7219. Ed Sundra, email: ed.sundra@ corridor (CBA–2), an alternative to dot.gov; (804) 775–3357. provide a limited access tolled facility SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: along the existing Route 460 corridor 1. Description of the Proposed Action (CBA–2 Tolled), and potentially, other and Background: U.S. Route 460 alternatives identified during the SEIS Mobility Partners proposes to construct process. a limited access principle arterial tolled The SEIS will also document the facility on new location for alternatives previously eliminated from approximately 55 miles which would be consideration by FHWA. Actions located to the south and roughly parallel available to the USACE for the proposed to the existing Route 460 corridor project are to issue the IP, issue the IP between Interstate 295 in Prince George with special conditions, or deny the IP. 3. Scoping and Public Review Process: County and Route 58 in the City of Throughout the development of the Suffolk, Virginia. The typical section consists of a four-lane, divided highway project, a variety of scoping and public with two 12-foot lanes in each direction, involvement opportunities were provided to alert the public about the a 40-foot median, and paved shoulders. project, provide information and Seven interchanges are proposed along updates, and solicit feedback. These the project at the secondary roads. The opportunities included but were not Applicant has entered into a designbuild contract with VDOT to design and limited to a series of public hearings in construct the Project. Upon determining the corridor when the DEIS was issued that the submitted permit application is in 2005 and a series of public meetings complete, the USACE will issue a public in 2007 under Virginia’s PPTA to tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Statement (SEIS) for the Route 460 Location Study Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS). The purpose of this SEIS is to evaluate new information regarding the aquatic resource impacts and alternatives described in the June 2008 FEIS and the September 2008 Record of Decision (ROD). In addition, FHWA is evaluating proposed changes to the termini of the selected alternative and the proposed interchange at Route 620, and proposed changes to the selected alignment to avoid and minimize aquatic resource impacts. The USACE is preparing the document to produce a supplemented FEIS that fully evaluates the new information and to gather information that informs and supports the USACE’s evaluation of the Department of the Army Individual Permit (IP) application submitted by U.S. Route 460 Mobility Partners (the Applicant) for the discharge of fill material into waters of the United States in conjunction with the construction of the Route 460 Corridor Improvements Project (Project). The USACE was a cooperating agency in the preparation of the June 2008 FEIS and will adopt that document as appropriate. VerDate Mar<15>2010 23:48 Dec 26, 2013 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00140 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 78949 evaluate conceptual proposals received from the private sector in response to the solicitation of proposals. Most recently, VDOT hosted public meetings in 2012 to update the public on the project and respond to public input. To ensure that a full range of issues related to the Project are addressed and all significant issues identified, comments and suggestions are invited from all interested parties. Comments and suggestions concerning the range of issues to be evaluated under the SEIS should be submitted to FHWA and the Corps at (see ADDRESSES) within 30 days of the issuance of this notice to ensure timely consideration. Based on the extensive public involvement to date on the proposed Project, no public input on the scope of the SEIS will be requested beyond the solicitation by this notice for comments on the range of issues to be evaluated. No formal scoping meetings will be held. Notification of the availability of the draft SEIS for public and agency review will be made in the Federal Register and using other methods to be jointly determined by FHWA, USACE and VDOT. Those methods will identify where interested parties can go to review a copy of the draft SEIS. For the draft SEIS, public meetings will be held and a minimum 45-day comment period will be provided. The public meetings will be conducted by VDOT and announced a minimum of 15 days in advance of the meetings. VDOT will provide information for the public meetings, including date, time and location through a variety of means including their Web site (http:// www.virginiadot.org/default_ noflash.asp) and by newspaper advertisement. In addition to the draft SEIS public involvement opportunities, the USACE will issue a public notice for a minimum 30-day comment period following receipt of a complete application. 4. Issues: Based on coordination between FHWA, USACE, and VDOT, the issues to be analyzed in the SEIS will include, but are not limited to, alternatives based on the updated effects to aquatic resources including wetland and stream impacts, threatened and endangered species, relocations, cultural resources, and cost. 5. Additional Review and Consultation: The SEIS will comply with other federal and state requirements including, but not limited to, the state water quality certification under Section 401 of the CWA; protection of water quality under the Virginia/National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System; consideration of E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM 27DEN1 78950 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 249 / Friday, December 27, 2013 / Notices minority and low income populations under Executive Order 12898; protection of endangered and threatened species under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act; and protection of cultural resources under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. 6. Availability of the Draft SEIS: The Draft SEIS is expected to be published and circulated during the Spring of 2014, and a public meeting will be held by VDOT after the publication of the Draft SEIS. Dated: December 13, 2013. Paul B. Olsen, Colonel, U.S. Army, Commanding. [FR Doc. 2013–30695 Filed 12–26–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3720–36–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Navy [Docket ID: USN–2013–0047] Proposed Collection; Comment Request United States Navy, DoD. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. AGENCY: In compliance with Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, and as part of an effort to streamline the process to seek feedback from the public on service delivery, the Department of Defense announces a proposed generic information collection and seeks public comment on the provisions thereof. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the information collection on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by February 25, 2014. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and title, by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 4800 Mark Center Drive, tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 23:48 Dec 26, 2013 Jkt 232001 East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350–3100. Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information on this proposed information collection or to obtain a copy of the proposal and associated collection instruments, please write to the Information Management Division, ATTN: Public Collections Team, 4800 Mark Center Drive, East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350–3100. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title; Associated Form; and OMB Number: United States Navy Generic Clearance; OMB Control Number 0703– TBD. Needs and Uses: The proposed information collection activity provides a means to garner qualitative customer and stakeholder feedback in an efficient, timely manner, in accordance with the Administration’s commitment to improving service delivery. By qualitative feedback we mean information that provides useful insights on perceptions and opinions, but are not statistical surveys that yield quantitative results that can be generalized to the population of study. This feedback will provide insights into customer or stakeholder perceptions, experiences and expectations, provide an early warning of issues with service, or focus attention on areas where communication, training or changes in operations might improve delivery of products or services. These collections will allow for ongoing, collaborative and actionable communications between the Agency and its customers and stakeholders. It will also allow feedback to contribute directly to the improvement of program management. Responses will be assessed to plan and inform efforts to improve or maintain the quality of service offered to the public. If this information is not collected, vital feedback from customers and stakeholders on the Agency’s services will be unavailable. Affected Public: Individuals or Households; Business or Other ForProfit; Not-For-Profit Institutions; Farms; Federal Government; State, Local, or Tribal Government. PO 00000 Frm 00141 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Number of Respondents: 50,000. Average Annual Burden Average Expected Annual Number of Activities: 4. Average Number of Respondents per Activity: 4,167. Annual Responses: 16,668. Responses per Respondent: 1. Average Time per Response: 15 minutes. Annual Burden Hours: 4,167. Three Year Burden Average Expected Number of Activities: 12. Total Respondents: 50,000. Total Responses: 50,000. Responses per Respondent: 1. Average Time per Response: 15 minutes. Total Burden Hours: 12,500. Frequency: On occasion. Dated: December 20, 2013. Aaron Siegel, Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. [FR Doc. 2013–30928 Filed 12–26–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001–06–P DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION [Docket No.: ED–2013–ICCD–0160] Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Application for Grants Under the Alaska Native and Native HawaiianServing Institutions Program Department of Education (ED), Office of Postsecondary Education (OPE). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 3501 et seq.), ED is proposing a reinstatement with change of a previously approved information collection. SUMMARY: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before January 27, 2014. ADDRESSES: Comments submitted in response to this notice should be submitted electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http:// www.regulations.gov by selecting Docket ID number ED–2013–ICCD–0160 or via postal mail, commercial delivery, or hand delivery. Please note that comments submitted by fax or email and those submitted after the comment period will not be accepted. Written requests for information or comments DATES: E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM 27DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 249 (Friday, December 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78948-78950]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30695]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers


Intent To Prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement 
for the Route 460 Location Study From Prince George County to the City 
of Suffolk, VA

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of Intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the United 
States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Norfolk District, as joint lead 
federal agencies, and in cooperation with the Virginia Department of 
Transportation (VDOT), will prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact

[[Page 78949]]

Statement (SEIS) for the Route 460 Location Study Final Environmental 
Impact Statement (FEIS). The purpose of this SEIS is to evaluate new 
information regarding the aquatic resource impacts and alternatives 
described in the June 2008 FEIS and the September 2008 Record of 
Decision (ROD). In addition, FHWA is evaluating proposed changes to the 
termini of the selected alternative and the proposed interchange at 
Route 620, and proposed changes to the selected alignment to avoid and 
minimize aquatic resource impacts.
    The USACE is preparing the document to produce a supplemented FEIS 
that fully evaluates the new information and to gather information that 
informs and supports the USACE's evaluation of the Department of the 
Army Individual Permit (IP) application submitted by U.S. Route 460 
Mobility Partners (the Applicant) for the discharge of fill material 
into waters of the United States in conjunction with the construction 
of the Route 460 Corridor Improvements Project (Project). The USACE was 
a cooperating agency in the preparation of the June 2008 FEIS and will 
adopt that document as appropriate.

DATES: Submit comments on or before January 27, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Alice Allen-Grimes, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulatory 
Branch, 803 Front Street, Norfolk, VA 23510 or Ed Sundra, Division 
Administrator, Federal Highway Administration, 400 North 8th Street, 
Suite 750, Richmond, VA 23219.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alice Allen-Grimes, email: 
alice.w.allen-arimes@usace.army.mil; (757) 201-7219. Ed Sundra, email: 
ed.sundra@dot.gov; (804) 775-3357.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    1. Description of the Proposed Action and Background: U.S. Route 
460 Mobility Partners proposes to construct a limited access principle 
arterial tolled facility on new location for approximately 55 miles 
which would be located to the south and roughly parallel to the 
existing Route 460 corridor between Interstate 295 in Prince George 
County and Route 58 in the City of Suffolk, Virginia. The typical 
section consists of a four-lane, divided highway with two 12-foot lanes 
in each direction, a 40-foot median, and paved shoulders. Seven 
interchanges are proposed along the project at the secondary roads. The 
Applicant has entered into a design-build contract with VDOT to design 
and construct the Project. Upon determining that the submitted permit 
application is complete, the USACE will issue a public notice and 
continue processing the permit application.
    An FEIS for the Route 460 Location Study was approved by FHWA in 
June 2008 and a ROD was issued by FHWA in September 2008. U.S. Route 
460 Mobility Partners has entered into a contract with VDOT to obtain 
permits and construct the Preferred Alternative identified in the 2008 
FEIS/ROD. In November 2012, based upon the information before them at 
the time, FHWA completed a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Re-
evaluation of the FEIS concluding that an SEIS was not needed. Based on 
new information bearing on the environmental impacts, including the 
aquatic impacts, it was later decided that an SEIS is required.
    This SEIS will review information from the Route 460 Location Study 
FEIS/ROD, incorporate new information, update the alternatives and 
impacts analyses, and assess impacts not previously evaluated in the 
FEIS/ROD. To streamline federal processes, the SEIS will also include 
the USACE's NEPA evaluation.
    2. Alternatives: Alternatives to be considered for the proposed 
project are the No-Build Alternative, the FHWA/VDOT preferred 
alternative (Preferred Alternative from the 2008 FEIS/ROD) and the 
FHWA/VDOT preferred alternative revised to include one or more of the 
following proposed changes: changes to the termini, the proposed 
interchange at Route 620, and alignment shifts to avoid and minimize 
impacts.
    Additionally, so that the USACE may fulfill its required 
alternatives analysis responsibilities, consideration will also be 
given to the alternative from the DEIS to improve the existing Route 
460 corridor (CBA-2), an alternative to provide a limited access tolled 
facility along the existing Route 460 corridor (CBA-2 Tolled), and 
potentially, other alternatives identified during the SEIS process.
    The SEIS will also document the alternatives previously eliminated 
from consideration by FHWA. Actions available to the USACE for the 
proposed project are to issue the IP, issue the IP with special 
conditions, or deny the IP.
    3. Scoping and Public Review Process: Throughout the development of 
the project, a variety of scoping and public involvement opportunities 
were provided to alert the public about the project, provide 
information and updates, and solicit feedback. These opportunities 
included but were not limited to a series of public hearings in the 
corridor when the DEIS was issued in 2005 and a series of public 
meetings in 2007 under Virginia's PPTA to evaluate conceptual proposals 
received from the private sector in response to the solicitation of 
proposals. Most recently, VDOT hosted public meetings in 2012 to update 
the public on the project and respond to public input.
    To ensure that a full range of issues related to the Project are 
addressed and all significant issues identified, comments and 
suggestions are invited from all interested parties. Comments and 
suggestions concerning the range of issues to be evaluated under the 
SEIS should be submitted to FHWA and the Corps at (see ADDRESSES) 
within 30 days of the issuance of this notice to ensure timely 
consideration.
    Based on the extensive public involvement to date on the proposed 
Project, no public input on the scope of the SEIS will be requested 
beyond the solicitation by this notice for comments on the range of 
issues to be evaluated. No formal scoping meetings will be held.
    Notification of the availability of the draft SEIS for public and 
agency review will be made in the Federal Register and using other 
methods to be jointly determined by FHWA, USACE and VDOT. Those methods 
will identify where interested parties can go to review a copy of the 
draft SEIS.
    For the draft SEIS, public meetings will be held and a minimum 45-
day comment period will be provided. The public meetings will be 
conducted by VDOT and announced a minimum of 15 days in advance of the 
meetings. VDOT will provide information for the public meetings, 
including date, time and location through a variety of means including 
their Web site (http://www.virginiadot.org/default_noflash.asp) and by 
newspaper advertisement. In addition to the draft SEIS public 
involvement opportunities, the USACE will issue a public notice for a 
minimum 30-day comment period following receipt of a complete 
application.
    4. Issues: Based on coordination between FHWA, USACE, and VDOT, the 
issues to be analyzed in the SEIS will include, but are not limited to, 
alternatives based on the updated effects to aquatic resources 
including wetland and stream impacts, threatened and endangered 
species, relocations, cultural resources, and cost.
    5. Additional Review and Consultation: The SEIS will comply with 
other federal and state requirements including, but not limited to, the 
state water quality certification under Section 401 of the CWA; 
protection of water quality under the Virginia/National Pollutant 
Discharge Elimination System; consideration of

[[Page 78950]]

minority and low income populations under Executive Order 12898; 
protection of endangered and threatened species under Section 7 of the 
Endangered Species Act; and protection of cultural resources under 
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.
    6. Availability of the Draft SEIS: The Draft SEIS is expected to be 
published and circulated during the Spring of 2014, and a public 
meeting will be held by VDOT after the publication of the Draft SEIS.

    Dated: December 13, 2013.
Paul B. Olsen,
Colonel, U.S. Army, Commanding.
[FR Doc. 2013-30695 Filed 12-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-36-P