Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana; Volatile Organic Compound Emission Control Measures for Industrial Solvent Cleaning for Northwest Indiana, 78726-78727 [2013-30543]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
78726
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 249 / Friday, December 27, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2012–0453; FRL–9904–35–
Region 5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana;
Volatile Organic Compound Emission
Control Measures for Industrial
Solvent Cleaning for Northwest Indiana
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a request
from the Indiana Department of
Environmental Management to revise its
volatile organic compound state
implementation plan (SIP) for industrial
solvent cleaning rule for manufacturers
of coatings, inks, adhesives, and resins.
These revisions are approvable because
they are consistent with EPA’s
Industrial Solvent Cleaning Control
Technique Guidelines document and
therefore satisfy the reasonable available
control technology requirements of the
Clean Air Act. EPA proposed to approve
these revisions on September 10, 2013,
and did not receive any comments.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
January 27, 2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R05–OAR–2012–0453. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We
recommend that you telephone Anthony
Maietta, Environmental Protection
Specialist, at (312) 353–8777 before
visiting the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anthony Maietta, Environmental
Protection Specialist, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:49 Dec 26, 2013
Jkt 232001
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604, (312) 252–8777,
maietta.anthony@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is the background for the action?
II. What action is EPA taking?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is the background for the
action?
On September 10, 2013, EPA
proposed to approve rule revisions
contained in a May 29, 2012, submittal
from IDEM into the Federal Register (78
FR 55234). The submittal requested that
EPA approve a revision to the Indiana
SIP regarding the industrial solvent
cleaning rule for manufacturers of
coatings, inks, adhesives, and resins.
EPA received no comments on the
proposed action.
II. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving revisions to Title
326, Article 8, Rule 17 of the Indiana
Administrative Code (IAC) as submitted
to EPA on May 29, 2012. Specifically,
EPA is approving revisions to 326 IAC
8–17–2, 326 IAC 8–17–4, and 326 IAC
8–17–7.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Clean Air Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42
U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus,
in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by February 25,
2014. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM
27DER1
78727
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 249 / Friday, December 27, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: December 6, 2013.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. In § 52.770 the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by adding a new entry
in ‘‘Article 8. Volatile Organic
Compound Rules’’ for ‘‘Rule 17.
Industrial Solvent Cleaning Operations’’
in numerical order to read as follows:
■
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
§ 52.770
*
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED INDIANA REGULATIONS
Indiana citation
Indiana
effective date
Subject
*
*
*
EPA approval date
*
Notes
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Article 8. Volatile Organic Compound Rules
*
*
Rule 17. Industrial Solvent Cleaning Operations
*
*
*
8–17–1 .........
8–17–2 .........
Applicability .....................................
Exemptions .....................................
1/2/2010
5/3/2012
8–17–3 .........
1/2/2010
8–17–4 .........
‘‘Composite partial vapor pressure’’
defined.
VOC emissions control requirements.
8–17–5 .........
8–17–6 .........
8–17–7 .........
Compliance dates ...........................
Compliance test methods ...............
Monitoring and recordkeeping ........
1/2/2010
1/2/2010
5/3/2012
8–17–8 .........
Reporting requirements for monitoring and recordkeeping information.
Requirements on compliance certification.
Recordkeeping requirements for
exempt sources.
1/2/2010
12/27/2013, [INSERT PAGE NUMBER WHERE THE DOCUMENT
BEGINS].
2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 ...................
2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 ...................
12/27/2013, [INSERT PAGE NUMBER WHERE THE DOCUMENT
BEGINS].
2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 ...................
1/2/2010
2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 ...................
1/2/2010
2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 ...................
8–17–9 .........
8–17–10 .......
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–30543 Filed 12–26–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–0286; FRL–9904–30]
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Copper Sulfate Pentahydrate;
Exemption From the Requirement of a
Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of copper sulfate
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:49 Dec 26, 2013
5/3/2012
Jkt 232001
2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 ...................
12/27/2013, [INSERT PAGE NUMBER WHERE THE DOCUMENT
BEGINS].
2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246 ...................
*
*
pentahydrate when applied to all food
contact surfaces in public eating places,
dairy-processing equipment, and foodprocessing equipment at a maximum
level in the end use concentration of 80
parts per million (ppm). Toxcel on
behalf of OhSo Clean, Inc., submitted a
petition to EPA under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA),
requesting establishment of an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance. This regulation eliminates the
need to establish a maximum
permissible level for residues of copper
sulfate pentahydrate.
DATES: This regulation is effective
December 27, 2013. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before February 25, 2014, and
must be filed in accordance with the
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–0286, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West
Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–
0001. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM
27DER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 249 (Friday, December 27, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 78726-78727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30543]
[[Page 78726]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2012-0453; FRL-9904-35-Region 5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Indiana; Volatile Organic Compound Emission Control Measures for
Industrial Solvent Cleaning for Northwest Indiana
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a
request from the Indiana Department of Environmental Management to
revise its volatile organic compound state implementation plan (SIP)
for industrial solvent cleaning rule for manufacturers of coatings,
inks, adhesives, and resins. These revisions are approvable because
they are consistent with EPA's Industrial Solvent Cleaning Control
Technique Guidelines document and therefore satisfy the reasonable
available control technology requirements of the Clean Air Act. EPA
proposed to approve these revisions on September 10, 2013, and did not
receive any comments.
DATES: This final rule is effective on January 27, 2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2012-0453. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays. We recommend that you telephone Anthony Maietta,
Environmental Protection Specialist, at (312) 353-8777 before visiting
the Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Maietta, Environmental
Protection Specialist, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604, (312) 252-8777, maietta.anthony@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is the background for the action?
II. What action is EPA taking?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is the background for the action?
On September 10, 2013, EPA proposed to approve rule revisions
contained in a May 29, 2012, submittal from IDEM into the Federal
Register (78 FR 55234). The submittal requested that EPA approve a
revision to the Indiana SIP regarding the industrial solvent cleaning
rule for manufacturers of coatings, inks, adhesives, and resins. EPA
received no comments on the proposed action.
II. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving revisions to Title 326, Article 8, Rule 17 of the
Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) as submitted to EPA on May 29, 2012.
Specifically, EPA is approving revisions to 326 IAC 8-17-2, 326 IAC 8-
17-4, and 326 IAC 8-17-7.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by February 25, 2014. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule
[[Page 78727]]
or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: December 6, 2013.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 52.770 the table in paragraph (c) is amended by adding a
new entry in ``Article 8. Volatile Organic Compound Rules'' for ``Rule
17. Industrial Solvent Cleaning Operations'' in numerical order to read
as follows:
Sec. 52.770 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Indiana Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indiana
Indiana citation Subject effective date EPA approval date Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Article 8. Volatile Organic Compound Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Rule 17. Industrial Solvent Cleaning Operations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8-17-1.................. Applicability......... 1/2/2010 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246.
8-17-2.................. Exemptions............ 5/3/2012 12/27/2013, [INSERT
PAGE NUMBER WHERE THE
DOCUMENT BEGINS].
8-17-3.................. ``Composite partial 1/2/2010 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246.
vapor pressure''
defined.
8-17-4.................. VOC emissions control 5/3/2012 12/27/2013, [INSERT
requirements. PAGE NUMBER WHERE THE
DOCUMENT BEGINS].
8-17-5.................. Compliance dates...... 1/2/2010 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246.
8-17-6.................. Compliance test 1/2/2010 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246.
methods.
8-17-7.................. Monitoring and 5/3/2012 12/27/2013, [INSERT
recordkeeping. PAGE NUMBER WHERE THE
DOCUMENT BEGINS].
8-17-8.................. Reporting requirements 1/2/2010 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246.
for monitoring and
recordkeeping
information.
8-17-9.................. Requirements on 1/2/2010 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246.
compliance
certification.
8-17-10................. Recordkeeping 1/2/2010 2/24/2010, 75 FR 8246.
requirements for
exempt sources.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2013-30543 Filed 12-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
